HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket 31516
NEW BUSINESS
A. 1011 Hull Terrace (L) – George Kalantzis, applicant.
Replace 12 second floor double hung wood windows in
kind. Applicable standards: [Alteration] 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
and 9.
Application for
Preservation Review of
Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)
Section A. Required Information (Print) * Refer to the Supplemental Information for guidance [page (i) fifth below].
1) Property Address:
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Application Number:
2) Owner’s Name:
Address:
City:
State: Zip: Phone: Email:
3) Architect’s Name:
Address:
City:
State: Zip: Phone: Email:
4) Contractor’s Name:
Address:
City:
State: Zip: Phone: Email:
5) Landmark: F Yes F No * Refer to the Supplemental Information for guidance [page (i) fifth below].
6) Within Local Historic District: * F No;
APPLICATION FOR WINDOW REPLACEMENT
Thank you for submitting your COA application for window replacement. This application is required for exterior work
affecting Evanston landmarks and properties within local Evanston historic districts. To process your application, submit
one complete electronic copy (PDF) and one hard copy of the application and attachments; not to exceed 11″ x 17″
paper size by 5pm on the first Tuesday of the month. The electronic copy and hard copy must include the plat of survey
showing the location of the existing windows and photos or elevation drawings showing the location of windows. Refer to the
Supplemental Information section (page 4) for guidance.
Incomplete applications will not be accepted.
Applications can be submitted in person or by email (as a PDF) to the Preservation Coordinator, City of Evanston,
Community Development Department, Planning & Zoning Division, Lorraine H. Morton Civic Center, 2100 Ridge Avenue,
Room 3201, Evanston, Illinois 60201. Completed applications must be submitted at least 10 business days prior to the
scheduled meeting date.
The Preservation Commission meets on the third Tuesday of the month (check with staff for last minute changes).
Applicants are asked to present at the scheduled meeting a brief overview of the project and provide additional information
(e.g., photos, letters of support, a sample of the proposed window, samples of proposed materials seeking to replicate
existing materials, etc.).
For more information call: Carlos Ruiz at (847) 448-8687 or email: cruiz@cityofevanston.org
Adopted October 19, 2004 Page 1
F Yes Æ F Lakeshore F Ridge F Northeast Evanston WCTU F Apartment Thematic Resources
Adopted October 19, 2004 Page 2
Section B: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness
1) In addition to the required site plan, elevation drawings, and photos, briefly describe the proposed
activity and reason for obtaining a Certificate of Appropriateness. Attach a separate sheet if
necessary, and refer to the Supplemental Information for guidance (page 4). For window replacement,
state the reason(s) why the existing windows (if original) cannot be restored. Include statement from
window restoration contractor to substatiate your claim.
2) Checklist (Check all that apply and attach any additional information)
Type of Exterior Activity
Location / Details
Visible from Public
Way (e.g. Streets
and Alleys)?
F Construction F Residential F Other: F Yes F No
F Demolition F Partial F Total
F Yes F No
F Alteration F Restoration
F Addition F Landscaping
F Front F Side F Rear
F Yes F No
Garage: F Rehabilitation
F Replacement F New
F Front F Side F Rear F Yes F No
F Windows F Storm Windows
F Doors F Storm Doors
F Restoration F Replacement F New
Style/Materials:
F Yes F No
Roof: F Restoration F Re-roof F New
F Front F Side F Rear
Style/Material:
F Yes F No
Solar Panels: F
* Adhere to Illustrated Guideline (Attached)
F Front F Side F Rear
F Yes F No
Fence/Gate: F Restoration
F Replacement F New
F Front F Side F Rear
Style/Material:
F Yes F No
Siding: F Replacement F New F Front F Side F Rear
Style/Material:
Exposure in inches:
F Yes F No
F Sign F Awning F Plaque F Restoration F New F Replacement
Material:
F Yes F No
F Air Conditioning Unit F Replacement F New
Location:
F Yes F No
Relocation: F Principal Structure
F Secondary Structure
New Address for Relocation:
Adopted October 19, 2004 Page 3
3) Checklist for Exterior Materials—Check all that apply.
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Façades/Front Porch &
Rear Porch Material Flashing Material Fences
F F Wood Frame F F Copper F F Wood
F F Stone F F Sheet Metal F F Wrought Iron
F F Brick F F Other: _______________ F F Aluminum
F F Stucco F F Other:_______________
F F Synthetic Stucco Fascias, Soffits, Height:______________
F F Wood Siding Rakeboards, Trim Length:______________
F F Aluminum Siding F F Wood Terraces, Patios, Decks
F F Vinyl Siding F F Metal F F Wood
F F Shingle, Material: ______ F F Synthetic Material, Type: F F Stone
____________________ ____________________ F F Brick Pavers
F F Other: _______________ F F Other: _______________ F F Concrete Pavers
Roofing Material F F Poured Concrete
F F Wood Shingles Door Material F F Other: _______________
F F Wood Shakes F F Wood
F F Slate F F Metal Driveway Material
F F Clay Tile F F Clad F F Asphalt
F F Asphalt Shingles F F Other: F F Poured Concrete
F F Metal Sheet Style: F F Brick Pavers
F F Other: _______________ Window Type F F Concrete Pavers
F F Double Hung F F Crushed Stone
Chimney Material F F Casement F F Other: _______________
F F Brick F F Other: _______________
F F Stone
F F Stucco Window Material
F F Other: _______________ F F Wood
F F Aluminum
Gutters/Downspouts F F Steel
Add Other Materials/Alterations/
Fixtures/Not Listed Here (Explain
and Attach Information As
Needed):
F F Copper F F Other: _______________ F F Air Conditioning Unit
F F Aluminum F F Solar Panels
F F Galvanized Sheet Muntins F F
F F Other:_______________ F F Not existing F F
F F True divided lights F F
F F Simulated divided lights F F
4) Applicant’s Signature: ____________________________________
Print Name:
Date:
Proceed to Section C if you are requesting a zoning or fence variation and/or s special use. Refer to the
Supplemental Information for guidance [page (i) below]. For Planned Development refer to Supplemental
Information [page (i) below].
NEW BUSINESS
B. 1322 Lake Street (RHD) – David Roberts, applicant.
Restore 4 wood windows, replace 4 storm windows.
Demolish open wood porch; construct new roofed wood
porch. Demolish and replace basement hatch doors;
concrete areaway; concrete exterior stair to basement.
Demolish existing garage and construct new one-car
detached garage. Applicable standards: [Alteration] 1,
2, 3, 5 - 10; [Construction] 1 - 5, 7, 8, 10 - 15, and 16;
[Demolition] 1 – 5.
NEW BUSINESS
C. 704 Judson Avenue (LSHD) – Nathan Kipnis,
applicant. Two and a half story addition to the rear
(west) of house, replacement of six existing vinyl
windows with wood windows, replace existing 5' high
wood fence in kind. Addition of solar panels on south
side of house. Applicable standards: [Alteration] 1 – 7
and 9; [Construction] 1- 5, 7, 8, and 10 – 15.
Adopted October 19, 2004 Page 1 of 4
Section A. Required Information (Print) * Refer to the Supplemental Information for guidance [page (i) fifth below].
1) Property Address:
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Application Number:
2) Owner’s Name:
Address:
City:
State: Zip: Phone: Email/Fax:
3) Architect’s Name:
Address:
City:
State: Zip: Phone: Email/Fax:
4) Contractor’s Name:
Address:
City:
State: Zip: Phone: Email/Fax:
5) Landmark: Yes No * Refer to the Supplemental Information for guidance [page (i) fifth below].
6) Within Local Historic District: * No;
Yes Lakeshore Ridge Northeast Evanston Apartment Thematic Resources
7) Refer to the completed Zoning Analysis. If project does not require any Zoning Variance or Fence
Variance or Special Use Complete section B only. Check as applicable if project requires:
Major Zoning Variance; Minor Zoning Variance; Fence Variance; Special Use If one or more is
checked, then fill out sections B and C.
Check if your project requires: Planned Development Refer to Supplemental Information below (i).
Binding Review of Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) &
Advisory Review of Zoning/Fence Variations, Special Uses, and Planned Developments
Thank you for submitting your COA application for Preservation Review. This application is required for exterior work affecting Evanston
landmarks and properties within local Evanston historic districts. To process your application, submit one (1) completed hard copy of the
completed application and attachments including: plat of survey, site plan, floor plans, elevation drawings, 3D drawings of the proposed
alteration/addition/construction (not to exceed 11” x 17” paper size); and one (1) digital copy in PDF format of the same by 5pm on the first
Tuesday of the month. All required materials must be to scale with dimensions and in context with the principal structure and immediate/adjacent
surroundings. Incomplete applications will not be processed. Refer to the Supplemental Information, page (i) below.
Applications can be submitted in person, by mail, electronically via email or in a hard drive to the Preservation Coordinator, City of Evanston,
Community Development Department, Planning & Zoning Division, Lorraine H. Morton Civic Center, 2100 Ridge Avenue, Room 3201, Evanston,
Illinois 60201.
We strongly recommend submitting COA applications at least 15 business days prior to the next scheduled meeting date, to allow staff review
of the application and to receive staff feedback in the completeness of the COA application. This will give applicants additional time to complete or
amend their applications as need. Final deadline for completed application is the first Tuesday of the month or no less than 10 business days
prior to the next scheduled meeting.
For new construction, additions, major alterations, and demolition, applicants must submit to this office electronically via email or in a flash
drive a current and updated list of all names and mailing addresses of property owners within 250 feet of the subject property (in Excel format).
The updated list must be submitted before or no later than the submission of the COA deadline. Staff provides a preliminary list in Excel to the
applicant. Zoning Analysis must be completed by the City of Evanston’s Zoning staff before or by no later than the submission deadline of the
completed COA application.
Completed applications will be scheduled for review at the next available meeting, as long as space is available (six projects per meeting).
Applications submitted on time but not making the cut will be scheduled to the next available meeting, in the order they were received. The
Preservation Commission meets on the third Tuesday of each month. Meeting dates are subject to change as needed.
Applicants are asked to present at the scheduled meeting to the Preservation Commission a brief overview of the project.
For more information call: Carlos Ruiz at (847) 448-8687 or email: cruiz@cityofevanston.org
Application for
Preservation Review of
Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)
704 Judson Ave.
Tiffany Farris & George DeMet 704 Judson Ave.
Evanston IL 60202 847 864-9650
farriss@palantir.net and george@demet.org
Nathan Kipnis,
Kipnis Architecture + Planning
1642 Payne Street
Evanston IL 60201 847 864-9650
nkipnis@kipnisarch.com
X
X X
Adopted October 19, 2004 Page 2 of 4
Section B: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness
1) In addition to the required site plans, drawings, and photos, briefly describe the proposed activity
and reason for obtaining a Certificate of Appropriateness. Attach a separate sheet if necessary, and
refer to the Supplemental Information for guidance.
2) Checklist (Check all that apply and attach any additional information)
Type of Exterior Activity
Location / Details
Visible from Public
Way (e.g. Streets
and Alleys)?
Construction Residential Other: Yes No
Demolition Partial Total
Yes No
Alteration Restoration
Addition Landscaping
Front Side Rear
Yes No
Garage: New Replacement
Rehabilitation
Front Side Rear Yes No
Windows Storm Windows
Doors Storm Doors
New Replacement Restoration
Style/Materials:
Yes No
Roof: New Re-roof Front Side Rear Yes No
Fence / Gate: New
Replacement
Front Side Rear Yes No
Siding: New Replacement Front Side Rear
Material:
Yes No
Sign Awning New Replacement Restoration
Material:
Yes No
Air Conditioning Unit New Replacement Yes No
Relocation New Address for Relocation:
X
X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X X X
X X X
X X X
X
X
The work consists of a two and a half story addition to the rear (west side)of the existing
two and a half story single family house, a renovated dormer on the east side facing
Judson Ave., the addition of solar panels on the south face of the roof, replacement of
six existing vinyl window with wood windows, minor renovations to the first and second
floor, as well as a renovated basement. The existing house will also be resided and
painted colors that are appropriate per the period of the original house, and the existing
5' wood fence will be replaced with a new 5' wood fence. The minor interior renovation
of the first and second floors, and renovation of the basement would not affect the
exterior facade or existing windows.
Adopted October 19, 2004 Page 3 of 4
3) Checklist for Exterior Materials—Check all that apply.
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Façades/Front Porch &
Rear Porch Material Flashing Material Fences
Wood Frame Copper Wood
Stone Sheet Metal Wrought Iron
Brick Other: _______________ Aluminum
Stucco Other:_______________
Synthetic Stucco Fascias, Soffits, Height:______________
Wood Siding Rakeboards, Trim Length:______________
Aluminum Siding Wood Terraces, Patios, Decks
Vinyl Siding Metal Wood
Shingle, Material: ______ Synthetic Material, Type: Stone
____________________ ____________________ Brick Pavers
Other: _______________ Other: _______________ Concrete Pavers
Roofing Material Poured Concrete
Wood Shingles Door Material Other: _______________
Wood Shakes Wood
Slate Metal Driveway Material
Clay Tile Clad Asphalt
Asphalt Shingles Other: _______________ Poured Concrete
Metal Sheet Brick Pavers
Other: _______________ Window Type Concrete Pavers
Double Hung Crushed Stone
Chimney Material Casement Other: _______________
Brick Other: _______________
Stone
Add Other Materials/Alterations
Not Listed Here (Explain and
Attach Information As Needed):
Stucco Window Material
Other: _______________ Wood
Aluminum
Gutters/Downspouts Steel
Copper Other: _______________ Air Conditioning Unit
Aluminum
Galvanized Sheet Muntins
Other:_______________ Not existing
True divided lights
Simulated divided lights
4) Applicant’s Signature: ____________________________________
Print Name:
Date:
Length:_____________
Proceed to Section C if you are requesting a zoning or fence variation and/or s special use. Refer to the
Supplemental Information for guidance [page (i) below]. For Planned Development refer to Supplemental
Information [page (i) below].
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X
Nathan Kipnis 03.01.16
X X
X
X
X X
X
X X
X Awing
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X Solar Panels
Cement Fiberboard
170.93'
170.93'
50
.2
2
'
50
.2
2
'
Existing 2 1/2
Story + Bsmnt
Residence
Existing
Deck
Existing
Garage
Existing
Garage
30'-0"
Rear Yard Setback
5'
-
0
"
Fr
o
n
t
Y
a
r
d
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
5'
-
0
"
Fr
o
n
t
Y
a
r
d
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
J u
d
s
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
P u
b
l
i
c
A
l
l
e
y
27'-0"
Front Yard Setback
Exist.
Porch
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
Exist Site Plan
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Zoning District R1
Min. Lot Area 7,200.0 s.f.8,584.1 s.f.No Change
Min. Lot Width 35'0"50'2 5/8"No Change
Min. Front Yard Setback 27'0"30'1 1/2"No Change
Min. Side Yard Setback (North)5'0"4'4 1/2"No Change - Proposed Addtition at 5'-0" Setback
Min. Side Yard Setback (South)5'0"5'11"No Change
Min. Rear Yard Setback 30'0"105'4"80'8"
Min. Garage Side Yard Setback 3'0"4'8 3/8"No Change
Min. Garage Rear Yard Setback 3'0"4'3 3/8"No Change
Max. Mean Bldg. Hgt.lesser of 35' or 2 1/2 Stories 2 1/2 Story No Change
Max. Lot Coverage *30% of 8,584.1 sf = 2,575.2 s.f. max 1,569.6 sq ft 2,229.8 sq ft
Max. Impervious Surface Coverage **45% of 8,584.1 sf = 3,862.9 s.f. max 3,609.3 sq ft 3,864.4 sq ft
* See Zoning Code for Exemptions.
** See Zoning Code for Exclusions.
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"
Proposed Site Plan
March 01, 2016
27'-0"
Front Yard Setback
170.93'
170.93'
50
.2
2
'
50
.2
2
'
170.93'
Existing
Garage
5'
-
0
"
Fr
o
n
t
Y
a
r
d
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
5'
-
0
"
Fr
o
n
t
Y
a
r
d
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
J u
d
s
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
P u
b
l
i
c
A
l
l
e
y
Existing 2 1/2
Story + Bsmnt
Residence
Exist.
Porch
30'-0"
Rear Yard Setback
Existing Paving to be Removed
New Paving
New 2 Story
Addition
New
Deck
Existing Paving to be Removed
Replace Existing 5’ Wood Fence
with New 5’ Wood Fence
Replace Existing 5’ Wood Fence
with New 5’ Wood Fence
Replace Existing 5’ Wood Fence
with New 5’ Wood Fence
Replace Existing 5’ Wood Fence
with New 5’ Wood Fence
Zoning District R1
Min. Lot Area 7,200.0 s.f.8,584.1 s.f.No Change
Min. Lot Width 35'0"50'2 5/8"No Change
Min. Front Yard Setback 27'0"30'1 1/2"No Change
Min. Side Yard Setback (North)5'0"4'4 1/2"No Change - Proposed Addtition at 5'-0" Setback
Min. Side Yard Setback (South)5'0"5'11"No Change
Min. Rear Yard Setback 30'0"105'4"80'8"
Min. Garage Side Yard Setback 3'0"4'8 3/8"No Change
Min. Garage Rear Yard Setback 3'0"4'3 3/8"No Change
Max. Mean Bldg. Hgt.lesser of 35' or 2 1/2 Stories 2 1/2 Story No Change
Max. Lot Coverage *30% of 8,584.1 sf = 2,575.2 s.f. max 1,569.6 sq ft 2,229.8 sq ft
Max. Impervious Surface Coverage **45% of 8,584.1 sf = 3,862.9 s.f. max 3,609.3 sq ft 3,864.4 sq ft
* See Zoning Code for Exemptions.
** See Zoning Code for Exclusions.
Exist. Dining Room
14'2 1/4" x 14'2 3/4"
Exist. Living Room
24'3 1/2" x 13'5 7/8"
Exist. Foyer
6'4 7/8" x 3'10"
Exist. Kitchen
10'10 1/2" x 17'11"
Exist. Hallway
13'5 1/2" x 6'7 1/2"
DN
UP
Exist. Porch
9'6 3/8" x 18'10 3/8"Exist. Deck
20'11 1/8" x 18'2"
DN
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Exist 1st Flr Plan
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Exist. Dining Room
14'2 1/4" x 14'2 3/4"
Exist. Living Room
24'3 1/2" x 13'5 7/8"
Exist. Hallway
13'5 1/2" x 6'7 1/2"
6"
Exist. Porch
9'6 3/8" x 18'10 3/8"
Mudroom
5'11 1/2" x 17'4 1/8"
DN
New Deck
25'8 5/8" x 12'3"
Monitor Location
DN
DN
Exist. Foyer
6'4 7/8" x 3'10"
Back Porch
4'1 5/8" x 7'8 1/2"
New Pantry
P. Rm.
3'0" x 6'6 1/4"
Exist. Kitchen
10'10 1/2" x 17'11"
UPDN
New
Straight
Stair
New Half Wall
Existing
Laundry
Chute
New
Conduit
for Cat 6
Cables
Glass Door
Gr
i
l
l
Planter
Desk
6"
6"
Cubbies
Bench
SD
CO
SD
CO
2
3
1
Family Room
20'1 1/8" x 20'10 3/8"
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Proposed 1st Flr Plan
March 01, 2016
Exist. Bedroom
12'6 1/4" x 14'1 3/4"
Exist. M. Bedroom
13'5 1/2" x 14'1 3/4"
Exist. Bedroom
10'6 3/4" x 9'8 1/4"
Exist. Bedroom
9'7 3/4" x 9'8 1/4"
Exist. Bath
5'8 1/2" x 6'10 3/4"
Exist. M. Bath
10'5 1/2" x 6'7 1/2"
UP
DN
Exist. Deck
4'10 1/2" x 6'3 3/4"
Exist.Hallway
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Exist 2nd Flr Plan
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Proposed 2nd Flr Plan
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Exist. M. Bedroom
13'5 1/2" x 14'1 3/4"
Exist. Bedroom
12'6 1/4" x 14'1 3/4"
Exist. Bedroom
9'7 3/4" x 9'8 1/4"
Exist. Bath
5'8 1/2" x 6'10 3/4"
Be
n
c
h
Exist. Bedroom
10'6 3/4" x 9'8 1/4"
M. Bedroom
14'0" x 16'8"
M. Bath
17'8" x 10'7 1/4"
Walk-in Clo.
6'6" x 6'10 1/2"
Walk-in Clo.
6'11 3/4" x 7'3"
Bath
8'6 1/4" x 6'7 1/2"
Existing
Laundry
Chute
Exist. Deck
4'10 1/2" x 6'11 3/8"
UP
DN
New
Straight
Stair
Arched
Hallway
Arched
Opening
Shelving
SD
SD
CO
SD
Shelving
De
s
k
Option For a
Larger Closet
6
6
5
4
7
New Opening
& Wall in
Existing Wall
Remove Existing
Wall & Arch, and
Provide New Linen
Closet
Li
n
e
n
Exist. Bath
6'8 1/2" x 7'11 3/4"
Exist. Clo.
7'11 3/4" x 5'5 1/4"
Exist. Clo.
8'7" x 4'7"
Exist. Office
18'4 1/2" x 15'8"
Attic
24'3 1/2" x 13'3 3/8"
Attic
24'3 1/2" x 18'5 1/8"
DN
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Exist Attic Plan
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Exist. Bath
6'8 1/2" x 7'11 3/4"
Exist. Clo.
7'11 3/4" x 5'5 1/4"
Attic
24'3 1/2" x 18'5 1/8"
Attic
25'0 5/8" x 24'4 1/2"
New
Straight Stair
Office
20'1" x 20'6 1/2"
Remove
Existing
Closet
Remove Existing Dormer and
Provide New Dormer to Match
Existing West Dormer
New
Conduit
for Cat 6
Cables
Attic
24'3 1/2" x 13'3 3/8"
Existing
Access
Door to
Attic
Existing Flat
Ceiling
DN
New Access
Door to Attic
Existing
Access
Door to
Attic
Location to
be Verified
New
Access
Door to
Attic
New Skylight
Above
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Proposed Attic Flr Plan
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
W.H.
C.B
.
Exist. Office
7'2 1/4" x 11'11 1/8"
Exist. Storage
6'1 5/8" x 17'3 7/8"
Ex. Laundry Rm.
10'9" x 5'4"
Exist. Mech.
7'10 1/4" x 7'0 7/8"
Exist. Bathrm.
7'2 3/4" x 13'2 5/8"
Exist. Family Room
19'1 3/4" x 19'11 5/8"
UP
W/D
Boiler
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Exist Bsmnt Plan
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Proposed Bsmnt Flr Plan
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
C.B
.
Utility Rm.
11'8 1/2" x 8'6 1/4"
Bedroom
13'7 7/8" x 13'4 7/8"
Storage
11'7 7/8" x 5'1 1/2"
WH
Sump
Pump
Ejector
Pump
fd
C.B.PV Inverter
UP
DW
Bench
Bath
5'9 5/8" x 11'7 7/8"
Laundry Room
8'2" x 10'2"
Linen
6"
Media Room
22'8 1/4" x 12'8"
Play Area
12'1" x 12'4 1/8"
Storage
20'4 1/8" x 23'8 7/8"
New Straight
Stair
Existing
Laundry
Chute
Above
Remove Existing
Column & Provide
New Beam
Remove Existing
Column & Provide
New Beam
New
Conduit
for Cat 6
Cables
Counter
Clo.
3'-3"
Clg Hgt
New Window Well
Egress
Window
Egress
Window
Exist.
Window
Well
Sump
Pump
Ejector
Pump
New Window Well
New Column
New Column
SD
CO
SD
fd
12
10
T.O. 2nd Floor
13'-11"
T.O. Basement Floor
-4'-4 3/4"
Bldg. Hgt.
35'-6 1/4"
T.O. 1st Floor
3'-9"
Grade
0"
T.O. Attic Floor
23'-5 1/2"
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Exist. East Elevation
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Exist
New
Exist New
T.O. 2nd Floor
13'-11"
T.O. Basement Floor
-4'-8"
Proposed Bldg. Hgt.
35'-0 5/8"
T.O. 1st Floor
3'-9"
Grade
0"
T.O. Attic Floor
23'-5 1/2"
Existing Wood Siding
to be Replaced
with Siding with
Exposure to Match
Existing Typ.
Existing Asphalt
Shingles to be
Replaced with New
to Match Existing
Existing Stucco to
be Replaced with
New Stucco Typ
Existing Dormer with
New Hip Roof
Existing Wood Siding
to be Replaced
with Siding with
Exposure to Match
Existing Typ.
Existing Stucco to
be Replaced with
New Stucco Typ
Existing Asphalt
Shingles to be
Replaced with New
to Match Existing
Stucco to Match
Existing
Wood Marvin
Casement Windows
to Match Existing
Wood Windows
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Proposed East Elevation
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
12
10
T.O. 2nd Floor
13'-11"
T.O. Basement Floor
-4'-4 3/4"
Bldg. Hgt.
35'-6 1/4"
T.O. 1st Floor
3'-9"
Grade
0"
T.O. Attic Floor
23'-5 1/2"
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Exist. South Elevation
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
ExistNew
ExistNew
T.O. 2nd Floor
13'-11"
T.O. Basement Floor
-4'-8"
Proposed Bldg. Hgt.
35'-0 5/8"
T.O. 1st Floor
3'-9"
Grade
0"
T.O. Attic Floor
23'-5 1/2"
6'
-
8
"
Existing Vinyl Windows to be
Replaced with New Wood
Marvin Casement Windows
with Vertical Muntins to
Match Existing Wood
Windows
Existing Wood Windows
New Solar Panels
Existing Dormer with New Hip
Roof
Stucco to Match Existing
Wood Marvin Casement
Windows with Vertical
Muntins to Match Existing
Wood Windows
Wood Marvin Casement
Windows to Match Existing
Wood Windows
Wood Sliding Door
Asphalt Shingles to Match
Existing
Dormer with Asphalt Shingles
and Solar Panels
Wood Marvin Casement
Windows with Vertical
Muntins to Match Existing
Wood Windows
Stucco to Match Existing
Existing Stucco to be
Replaced with New Stucco
Existing Wood Siding to be
Replace with Siding with
Exposure to Match Existing
Existing Wood Siding to be
Replaced with Siding with
Exposure to Match Existing
Typ.
Siding with Exposure to
Match Existing
Siding on Planter with
Exposure to Match Existing
Existing Asphalt Shingles to
be Replaced with New to
Match Existing
New Skylight Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Proposed South Elevation
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
12
10
T.O. 2nd Floor
13'-11"
T.O. Basement Floor
-4'-4 3/4"
Bldg. Hgt.
35'-6 1/4"
T.O. 1st Floor
3'-9"
Grade
0"
T.O. Attic Floor
23'-5 1/2"
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Exist. West Elevation
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
7'
-
0
"
ExistNew
ExistNew
4'
-
8
"
6'
-
8
"
T.O. 2nd Floor
13'-11"
T.O. Basement Floor
-4'-8"
Proposed Bldg. Hgt.
35'-0 5/8"
T.O. 1st Floor
3'-9"
Grade
0"
T.O. Attic Floor
23'-5 1/2"
Existing Vinyl Window to be
Replaced with New Wood
Marvin Casement Windows
with Vertical Muntins to
Match Existing Wood
Windows
Dormer with Asphalt
Shingles and Stucco to
Match Existing
Existing Stucco to be
Replaced with New Stucco
Existing Asphalt Shingles to
be Replaced with New to
Match Existing
Wood Marvin Awing
Windows
Stucco to Match
Existing Stucco Typ.
Siding with Exposure
to Match Existing
Typ.
Wood Marvin Casement
Windows to Match Existing
Wood Windows Typ.
Siding on Planter with
Exposure to Match Existing
Siding with Exposure to
Match Existing Typ.
Asphalt Shingles to
Match Existing
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Proposed West Elevation
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
T.O. 2nd Floor
13'-11"
T.O. Basement Floor
-4'-4 3/4"
Bldg. Hgt.
35'-6 1/4"
T.O. 1st Floor
3'-9"
Grade
0"
T.O. Attic Floor
23'-5 1/2"
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Exist. North Elevation
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Exist New
Exist New
7'
-
0
"
7'
-
0
3
/
4
"
6'
-
9
"
12
10
Match Exist. - Typ.
6'
-
1
1
/
4
"
T.O. 2nd Floor
13'-11"
T.O. Basement Floor
-4'-8"
Proposed Bldg. Hgt.
35'-0 5/8"
T.O. 1st Floor
3'-9"
Grade
0"
T.O. Attic Floor
23'-5 1/2"
Wood Marvin Awing
Windows
Siding with Exposure
to Match Existing
Typ.
Stucco to Match
Existing Stucco Typ.
Asphalt Shingles to
Match Existing
Wood Marvin Casement
Windows to Match Existing
Wood Windows
Glass Block Window
Wood Marvin
Casement Windows
to Match Existing
Wood Windows
Wood Egress Marvin
Casement Windows
to Match Existing
Wood Windows
Existing Vinyl Windows to be
Replaced with New Wood
Marvin Casement Windows
with Vertical Muntins to
Match Existing Wood
Windows
Existing Vinyl Windows to be
Replaced with New Wood
Marvin Casement Windows
with Vertical Muntins to
Match Existing Wood
Windows
Existing Dormer with
New Hip Roof
Existing Wood Siding
to be Replaced
with Siding with
Exposure to Match
Existing Typ.
Existing Stucco to
be Replaced with
New Stucco Typ
Existing Stucco to
be Replaced with
New Stucco Typ
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0"
Proposed North Elevation
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Neighboring Photos
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Project
Address
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Perspective Views
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Proposed Solar
Exist.
Proposed Dormer
Exist.
Proposed Dormer
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Perspective Views
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Proposed Solar
Proposed Addition
Proposed Addition
Exist. Fence Shown
Transparent for Clarity
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Perspective View/ Roof Plan
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
Proposed Solar
Proposed Addition
Proposed Addition
Exist.
Exist.
Proposed Dormer
Evanston, IL
Renovation for
704 Judson
Farriss / DeMet
Details/ Proposed Exterior Colors
March 01, 2016
1642 payne street | evanston IL 60201
847 864 9650 | f847 864 0956
T.O. Fence
5'-0"1x10
1x2
Fence Detail
Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0"1
Siding Color
Benjamin Moore
1482 Sabre Gray
Stucco Color
Benjamin Moore
HC-173 Edgecomb Gray
Trim & Gutter Color
Benjamin Moore
2139-20 Dakota Woods Green
Porch Flooring Color
Benjamin Moore
2096-30 Grandfather Clock Brown
Marvin Wd. Ultimate
Casement Mfr. Detail - To
Match Exist. Refer to
Elevation - Typ.
Marvin Wd. Ultimate
Casement Mfr. Detail - To
Match Exist. Refer to
Elevation - Typ.
Window Section Detail
Scale: 1 1/2" = 1'-0"2 Exterior Palette3
PUBLIC COMMENT
A. Letter from Cathleen and John Hammerschlag
To: Mayor Tisdahl, Aldermen Fiske, Wynne, Wilson, Revelle, and Miller
City Manager Bobkiewicz
From: Cathleen and John Hammerschlag
Re: Reforming Evanstonʼs Preservation Review
Date: " March 7, 2016
We are disappointed with the decision of the February 16 meeting of the Preservation
Commission regarding 321 Lake --- and we feel duped by the preservation review
process that we encountered. We knew that it was not going to be easy or comfortable
to attempt to change the new ownersʼ building plans. We chose to go forward because
we thought this case presented important issues for us and the LakeShore Historic
District. And, we had faith in the Preservation Ordinanceʼs review process and the
Preservation Commission. Please see the Commission packets online for the
December 2015 and February 2016 meetings regarding the Applicantʼs plans and the
neighborsʼ comments.
We met the Applicant in October 2015, shortly after they took possession of the home at
321 Lake. We indicated we had concerns about rumors of plans to place a second-
story addition on the roof of a one-story 1987 addition which was “readily visible” from
the public way of the 300 block of Lake Street. We suggested they consider an
alternative design to obtain more square footage, as well as minimize the adverse
impact to close neighbors. We were told that they needed more time to explore various
options and that they would talk to us after they had done this.
The next conversation with the Applicant occurred on December 6 when we were told
that an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness had already been filed in
November and would be on the December 15, 2015 agenda of the Preservation
Commission. In a phone call December 9, the Applicant refused to show us the plans to
be presented at that meeting. By this time, the vacant house had been a topic of
discussion among neighbors for over two months.
At the December 15 meeting, the Preservation Commission Chair indicated that
neighbors had expressed concerns about the Applicantsʼ plan. After the Applicant
presented plans, we responded with an analysis of how the proposed addition would
affect our home at 311 Lake, the Lake Street public way and the LakeShore Historic
District. Another neighbor who attended the meeting expressed his concerns about the
proposed addition. After a few questions were asked, one Commissioner preempted
further discussion by saying that if a vote were taken, a Certificate of Appropriateness
would be denied, and the matter could be tabled. The Applicant requested that the
matter be tabled. We wrongly assumed Commissioners shared neighborsʼ concerns ---
and we also hoped that the Applicant might seriously consider other designs after
hearing the extent of the adverse impact of their proposal.
While the application was tabled for two months, neither the Applicant nor any
representative of the City communicated with us. We called City staff before the
Commissionʼs January meeting to learn 321 Lake was not on that agenda. No other
information was given. During this time, we saw extensive interior construction
occurring and thought that perhaps the Applicant had decided against building an
addition. We called City staff before and after the February 2 submission deadline for
the February 16 meeting, and learned that the Applicant had “expressed the intention”
to file for a new COA, but had been given an extension. When directly asked, City staff
said that three commissioners had communicated “independently” with the Applicant ---
in order to give advice without having an actual meeting.
Upon learning this, we contacted our alderman, Judy Fiske, who suggested that we
consult with a respected architect who has lived and worked in the neighborhood for
over twenty-five years. In a very short time, this architect was able to offer a reasonable
alternative design for a rear addition that seemed to balance all neighborsʼ needs---as
well as avoid further disruption to the public way of Lake Street. It also would have
unified the disparate architectural elements that had accumulated over the years on the
rear facade of the property. In other words, options for avoiding major alteration to the
home were available to the applicants.
Alderman Fiske arranged our first meeting with the Applicant six and a half hours before
the February 16 evening meeting. She attended this meeting, along with the Director of
Planning and the Applicantʼs architect. The Applicant told us that they had already
completed their consideration of other designs, without providing any evidence of
sketches or specific, compelling reasons for rejecting these alternative designs.
Without that evidence, we cannot say whether a good faith attempt was made to make
“every reasonable effort” to adapt the home “in a manner that requires minimal
alteration of the property,” as required by the first Standard of Review. We also learned
at this meeting that the Applicant had been showing their desired plan to other
neighbors during the previous weeks.
The meeting held February 16 demonstrated that the Commissioners had already made
up their minds before they heard what we were going to say--- and what our counsel
and preservation expert were going to say. The Commissioners refused our request for
a continuance. When asked about the Commissionersʼ first-hand knowledge of the
property, the Chairman could not answer with certainty that the Commissioners present
had actually visited 321 Lake. And there was no attempt to set the record straight
regarding whether or not site visits had occurred.
Throughout our presentations, Commissioners grimaced, rolled their eyes, and resorted
to their digital devices. Their comments complimented the new design and never
mentioned the problematic issue of the proposed addition being “readily visible” from
two public ways (Lake Street and Judson Avenue). No Commissioner asked the
Applicant if every “reasonable effort” had been made to avoid a major alteration, an
alteration which would have a significant impact on neighbors and two public ways. No
effort was made by the Commissioners to establish facts for the record, even though
some discrepancies regarding existing additions were noted in neighbor comments.
Four of the 10 commissioners were not present and the vote to approve a COA was
unanimous with the numbers of the Standards for Review cited, but without discussion
to indicate how Commissioners were interpreting the cited standards. We were told by
both our counsel and preservation expert, who have many years of experience
appearing before boards and commissions in the entire metropolitan area, including
Evanston, that they found the meeting “highly irregular.”
Besides the conduct of the meeting, two other aspects of the Commissionʼs process
raise serious questions: the process for making information available to identifiable
interested parties and the process for giving “technical” advice to applicants.
In this case, the applicant missed the February 2 filing deadline, filed February 5, and
that information was not available to the public until late Friday afternoon, February 12
(Presidentʼs weekend) for the February 16 meeting. THIS IS NOT ADEQUATE
NOTICE. As of this date, the minutes from the December 15 meeting were still not
available to the public. Secondly, the communication that occurred between the
Commissioners and the Applicant during January and February excluded us, and
perhaps other interested parties, from participation. At the February 16 meeting, we
saw the results of excluding other viewpoints: Commissioners had become advocates
for the Applicant.
If the intent of the Preservation Ordinance is to provide a review process that examines
a proposed project from multiple points of view, seeking to balance property rights with
legitimate community interests by applying specific “standards of review” to reach
decisions, the current version of Evanstonʼs process does not achieve this goal. We
suggest the following reforms be made to Evanstonʼs historic preservation review:
1) Proper notice be given to all interested parties for re-submitted COA applications;
2)If communication occurs between Commissioners and an Applicant, other interested
parties be given the opportunity to follow and participate in that communication;
3)Parties who object to proposed plans be given the opportunity to request one
continuance;
4) All parties who disagree with a Commission decision be given the right to appeal that
decision to the Planning and Development Committee of the Council;
5)When making a decision regarding a Certificate of Appropriateness, Commissioners
provide a descriptive record of how they have applied the relevant Standards of
Review of the Preservation Ordinance.
Thank you for your consideration.