HomeMy WebLinkAbout51716 Packet
NEW BUSINESS
C. 1124 Asbury Avenue (L/RHD) – Sebastian Koziura,
applicant. Tear down existing south side 12'x16'
addition. Build a 1-story 15' x 21' addition on same
location with wood landing and stairs on the rear west
elevation. Applicable standards: [Construction] 1- 8 and
10-16; [Demolition] 1-5.
City of Evanston, Illinois
CERTIFICATE
OF
ZONING COMPLIANCE
APPROVED
ZONING CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 16ZONA-0040
DATE ISSUED:
In accordance with Section 6-3-2 of the Zoning Ordinance, the building, structure, and/or use described below complies with the provisions of
the Zoning Ordinance governing the proposed use.
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
ZONING DISTRICT:
OVERLAY DISTRICT:
USE:
1124 ASBURY AVE
R1
remove old addition and construct new 1-story addition
CONDITIONS OR
COMMENTS:
Miscellaneous:
Related Application ID:
Plans Originating As:
Plat of Survey Dated:
Plans Prepared By:
Plans Dated:
Plans Prepared As:Preliminary
Zoning Analysis Application
CERTIFICATE BASED ON:
THIS ZONING
CERTIFICATE IS NOT A
BUILDING PERMIT.
ISSUED BY:
Zoning Officer
City of Evanston
ZONING ANALYSIS REVIEW SHEET
APPLICATION STATUS: Closed/Compliant March 02, 2016 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: Compliant
Address:
Applicant:Sebastian Koziura
Phone:
District:R1 Overlay:
Reviewer:
Purpose:Zoning Analysis without Bld Permit App
Preservation
District:
16ZONA-0040
Ridge
Z.A. Number:
1124 ASBURY AVE
THIS APPLICATION PROPOSES (select all that apply):
New Principal Structure
X
New Accessory Structure
Addition to Structure
Alteration to Structure
Retention of Structure
Change of Use
Retention of Use
Plat of Resubdiv./Consol.
Business License
Sidewalk Cafe
Home Occupation
Other
Proposal Description:
ANALYSIS BASED ON:
Plans Dated:
Prepared By:
Survey Dated:
Existing
Improvements:
SFR
remove old addition and construct new 1-story addition
ZONING ANALYSIS
PRINCIPAL USE AND STRUCTURE
Standard Existing Proposed Determination
USE:Dwelling - SF Detached Dwelling - SF Detached Compliant
Comments:
CompliantMinimum Lot Width (LF)
USE:
35 80 80
Single Family
Detached
Comments:
7,200 sqftMinimum Lot Area (SF)
USE:Single Family
Detached
14000 14000 Compliant
Comments:
Dwelling Units:1 1 1 Compliant
Comments:
Rooming Units:
Comments:
Building Lot Coverage
(SF) (defined, including
subtractions& additions):
Compliant
13.0%
1823.7
12.1%
16964200
Comments:
Impervious Surface
Coverage (SF, %)
Compliant
17.0%
23826300
16.6%
2326
Comments:
Accessory Structure
Rear Yard Coverage:
40% of rear yard
Comments:
Page 1
LF: Linear Feet SF: Square Feet FT: Feet
Standard Existing Proposed Determination
Gross Floor Area (SF)
Use:
Comments:
Height (FT)
Comments:
Front Yard(1) (FT)
Asbury
CompliantNC47.8
Street:
Direction:
Comments:
Front Yard(2) (FT)
Street:
Direction:
Comments:
Street Side Yard (FT)
Crain
CompliantNC23.515
Street:
Direction:
Comments:
Interior Side Yard(1) (FT)Compliant145
Direction:
Comments:
Direction:
Interior Side Yard(2) (FT)
Comments:
Rear Yard (FT)Compliant+3030
Direction:
Comments:
Analysis Comments
COMMENTS AND/OR NOTES
See attached comments and/or notes.
Site Plan & Appearance Review Committee approval is: Not Required
Results of Analysis: This Application is Compliant
RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
SIGNATURE DATE
Page 2
LF: Linear Feet SF: Square Feet FT: Feet
2 3/8” Wood Molding
Painted
1 3/8” Wood Painted Divider
Lime Stone Detail
Lime Stone Detail
Wood Storm Window
2 3/8”Wood Molding
NEW BUSINESS
B. 714 Forest Avenue (LSHD) – Michael Hauser,
applicant. Replace degrading rear porch and stair (not
original) with new wood porch, deck and stair.
Applicable standards: [Construction] 1, 3, 7, 8, 10, and
12-15; [Demolition] 1-5.
Adopted October 19, 2004 Page 1 of 4
Section A. Required Information (Print) * Refer to the Supplemental Information for guidance [page (i) fifth below].
1) Property Address: FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Application Number:
2) Owner’s Name: Address:
City: State: Zip: Phone: Email:
3) Architect’s Name: Address:
City: State: Zip: Phone: Email:
4) Contractor’s Name: Address:
City: State: Zip: Phone: Email:
5) Landmark: c Yes c No * Refer to the Supplemental Information for guidance [page (i) fifth below].
6) Within Local Historic District: * c No;
c Yes c Lakeshore c Ridge c Northeast Evanston c Apartment Thematic Resources
7) Refer to the completed Zoning Analysis. If project does not require any Zoning Variation or Fence
Variation or Special Use or Planned Development Complete section B only. Check as applicable if
project requires: c Major Zoning Variation; c Minor Zoning Variation; c Fence Variation; c Special Use
If one or more is checked, then fill out sections B and C.
Check if your project requires: c Planned Development Then refer to Supplemental Information (i).
Binding Review of Certificate of Appropriateness (C of A) and
Advisory Review of Zoning/Fence Variations, Special Uses, and Planned Developments
Thank you for submitting your C of A application for Preservation Review. This application is required for exterior work
affecting Evanston landmarks and properties within local Evanston historic districts. To process your application, submit
one (1) complete hard copy of the application and attachments; not to exceed 11² x 17² paper size by 5pm on the first
Tuesday of the month, except on dates marked with (*) on the Schedule Meeting Dates provided under Frequently Asked
Questions. Also, submit six (6) hard copies of the plat of survey with the proposed improvements and existing and
proposed elevations with dimensions and existing and proposed materials.Incomplete applications will not be
processed. Refer to the Supplemental Information section for guidance.
Applications can be submitted in person or by mail to the Preservation Coordinator, City of Evanston, Community
Development Department, Planning & Zoning Division, Lorraine H. Morton Civic Center, 2100 Ridge Avenue, Room 3201,
Evanston, Illinois 60201. All applications must be received at least 10 business days prior to the scheduled meeting date.
The Preservation Commission meets on the third Tuesday of each month, except on date(s) marked with (*) on the
Schedule Meeting Dates. Applicants are asked to present at the scheduled meeting a brief overview of the project and
provide additional information (e.g., photos, letters of support, models, samples of proposed materials seeking to replicate
existing materials, etc.).
For new construction, major alterations and demolition, applicants must submit to this office (in Excel), ten (10)
business days or more prior to the Preservation Commission scheduled meeting date, a current and updated list of all
names and mailing addresses of property owners within 250 feet of the subject property. Staff can provide a preliminary list
to the applicant in Excel (see pages XII and XIII below). Zoning Analysis must be completed by the City of Evanston
Zoning staff before or by no later than the submission deadline for the C of A application.
For more information call:(847) 4488687 or email: cruiz@cityofevanston.org
Application for
Preservation Review of
Certificate of Appropriateness (C of A)
714 Forest Avenue
Kate Masur and Peter Slevin 714 Forest Avenue
Evanston Illinois 60202
(202) 494-2093 peter.d.slevin@gmail.com
Michael Hauser Hauser Architects 1715 Chancellor Street
Evanston Illinois 60201 (847) 707 - 5129 hauserarch@gmail.com
TBD
X
X X
kate.masur@northwestern.edu
Adopted October 19, 2004 Page 2 of 4
Section B: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness
1) In addition to the required site plans, drawings, and photos, briefly describe the proposed activity
and reason for obtaining a Certificate of Appropriateness. Attach a separate sheet if necessary, and
refer to the Supplemental Information for guidance.
2) Checklist (Check all that apply and attach any additional information)
Type of Exterior Activity Location / Details
Visible from Public
Way (e.g. Streets
and Alleys)?
c Construction c Residential c Other: c Yes c No
c Demolition c Partial c Total c Yes c No
c Alteration c Restoration
c Addition c Landscaping
c Front c Side c Rear c Yes c No
Garage: c Rehabilitation
c Replacement c New
c Front c Side c Rear c Yes c No
c Windows c Storm Windows
c Doors c Storm Doors
c Restoration c Replacement c New
Style/Materials:
c Yes c No
Roof: c Restoration c Reroof c New c Front c Side c Rear
Style/Material:
c Yes c No
Fence/Gate: c Restoration
c Replacement c New
c Front c Side c Rear
Style/Material:
c Yes c No
Siding: c Replacement c New c Front c Side c Rear
Style/Material:
Exposure in inches:
c Yes c No
c Sign c Awning c Restoration c New c Replacement
Material:
c Yes c No
c Air Conditioning Unit c Replacement c New
Location:
c Yes c No
Relocation: c Principal Structure
c Secondary Structure
New Address for Relocation:
Replace degrading, rear porch and stair (not original) with new wood porch and deck /
stair.
X X X
X X X
X
X X
X X X
Modified Bitumen
porch/deck
porch/deck
Adopted October 19, 2004 Page 3 of 4
3) Checklist for Exterior Materials—Check all that apply.
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
Façades/Front Porch &
Rear Porch Material Flashing Material Fences
c c Wood Frame c c Copper c c Wood
c c Stone c c Sheet Metal c c Wrought Iron
c c Brick c c Other: _______________ c c Aluminum
c c Stucco c c Other:_______________
c c Synthetic Stucco Fascias, Soffits, Height:______________
c c Wood Siding Rakeboards, Trim Length:______________
c c Aluminum Siding c c Wood Terraces, Patios, Decks
c c Vinyl Siding c c Metal c c Wood
c c Shingle, Material: ______ c c Synthetic Material, Type: c c Stone
____________________ ____________________ c c Brick Pavers
c c Other: _______________ c c Other: _______________ c c Concrete Pavers
Roofing Material c c Poured Concrete
c c Wood Shingles Door Material c c Other: _______________
c c Wood Shakes c c Wood
c c Slate c c Metal Driveway Material
c c Clay Tile c c Clad c c Asphalt
c c Asphalt Shingles c c Other: _______________ c c Poured Concrete
c c Metal Sheet c c Brick Pavers
c c Other: _______________ Window Type c c Concrete Pavers
c c Double Hung c c Crushed Stone
Chimney Material c c Casement c c Other: _______________
c c Brick c c Other: _______________
c c Stone
c c Stucco Window Material
c c Other: _______________ c c Wood
c c Aluminum
Gutters/Downspouts c c Steel
Add Other Materials/Alterations
Not Listed Here (Explain and
Attach Information As Needed):
c c Copper c c Other: _______________ c c Air Conditioning Unit
c c Aluminum c c
c c Galvanized Sheet Muntins c c
c c Other:_______________ c c Not existing c c
c c True divided lights c c
c c Simulated divided lights c c
4) Applicant’s Signature: ____________________________________
Print Name:
Date:
Proceed to Section C if you are requesting a zoning or fence variation and/or s special use. Refer to the
Supplemental Information for guidance [page (i) below]. For Planned Development refer to Supplemental
Information [page (i) below].
X
X
X X
XX
XX
XX
April 4 2016Michael Hauser
Asphalt Roll
X
X
X X
RE
S
I
D
E
N
C
E
71
4
F
o
r
e
s
t
A
v
e
Ev
a
n
s
t
o
n
,
I
L
6
0
2
0
2
847.707.5129
hauserarch@gmail.com
1715 Chancellor St.
Evanston, IL 60201
MA
S
U
R
S
L
E
V
I
N
SP / P
Site Plan
Photographs
A-1
1 Proposed Site Plan
2 South East Elevation (no work)
shown for context
3 North Elevation
shown for context
4 West Elevation
RE
S
I
D
E
N
C
E
71
4
F
o
r
e
s
t
A
v
e
Ev
a
n
s
t
o
n
,
I
L
6
0
2
0
2
847.707.5129
hauserarch@gmail.com
1715 Chancellor St.
Evanston, IL 60201
MA
S
U
R
S
L
E
V
I
N
A-2
FP / WE
Floor Plans
West Elevations
3 Existing West Elevation
4 Proposed West Elevation
1 Existing Floor Plan
2 Proposed Floor Plan
RE
S
I
D
E
N
C
E
71
4
F
o
r
e
s
t
A
v
e
Ev
a
n
s
t
o
n
,
I
L
6
0
2
0
2
847.707.5129
hauserarch@gmail.com
1715 Chancellor St.
Evanston, IL 60201
MA
S
U
R
S
L
E
V
I
N
A-3
NE
North Elevation
1 Existing North Elevation
2 Proposed North Elevation
RE
S
I
D
E
N
C
E
71
4
F
o
r
e
s
t
A
v
e
Ev
a
n
s
t
o
n
,
I
L
6
0
2
0
2
847.707.5129
hauserarch@gmail.com
1715 Chancellor St.
Evanston, IL 60201
MA
S
U
R
S
L
E
V
I
N
SE
South Elevation
A-4
2 Proposed South Elevation
1 Existing South Elevation
NEW BUSINESS
C. 917 Edgemere Court (LSHD) – Elliot Flaws,
applicant. Construction of a new single-family
residence with 1-car attached garage and a 2-car
garage in front of house and connected to house
via a loggia. Applicable standards: [Construction]
1- 13, and 16.
MEMORANDUM
To: Members of the Preservation Commission
From: Mark Muenzer, Director of Community Development
Damir Latinovic, Planning and Zoning Administrator
Melissa Klotz, Zoning Planner
Subject: 917 Edgemere Court – ZA 16ZONA-0102
Date: May 9, 2016
At the request of the Preservation Commission Chair, staff provides the following summary
regarding the proposed new single family residence and its compliance with zoning
requirements and the intent of the zoning ordinance.
Proposal Summary
The applicant is proposing to construct a new single family residence with a one-car
attached garage and two-car garage attached via a loggia, on a vacant property on
privately-owned Edgemere Court.
Front Yard Setback:
The Zoning Ordinance requires a 27’ front yard setback on residential properties. On
blocks where more than 50% of homes have a front yard setback larger than 27’, the
required front yard setback is the average front setback on that block, with a maximum
required front yard setback of 50’. The average front yard setback to the existing houses
on the east side of Edgemere Court exceeds 50’, therefore the required front yard setback
on this property is 50’. The proposed front yard setback from the front property line at 917
Edgemere Court is 66’ and meets the zoning requirement.
The intent of the averaged front yard setback regulation is to create a unified building line
along the block where no single structure protrudes substantially closer to the street or
looks out of place. The proposed one-story two-car garage attached via loggia is located
in-line with the homes on the adjacent properties. However, the actual home is located
approximately 68’ behind the two-car garage. Therefore the proposed design and
placement of the home do not meet the intent of the Ordinance for a similar front yard
setback for all homes on the block.
Garage Attached via Loggia:
Detached garages are not permitted in front yards (in front of a principal structure/house).
A garage is considered attached, or part of the principal structure, if it is attached to the
house by a roof. The proposed construction features a two-car garage in the front that is
attached to the house by an approximately 68’ long loggia, which constitutes a roof and
therefor meets the requirement of the Zoning Ordinance.
However, the intent of the regulation is not to locate a garage in a front yard with a long
roofed walkway or loggia that connects to the house. The intent of the Zoning Ordinance
would be more closely met if the length of the loggia were reduced so that the two -car
garage would appear more as part of the house, rather than appearing as a detached
structure.
Rear Yard Setback:
A 30’ rear yard setback is required on this and other adjacent residential properties. The
applicant is proposing a 96’ rear yard setback and meets the zoning requirement. On
Edgemere Court, some rear property lines are located 40’ west of the water’s edge, while
other rear property lines are located east of the water’s edge into Lake Michigan. At 917
Edgemere Court, the rear property line is roughly located at the water’s edge which is
substantially different than the properties to the south. As such, when the 30’ rear yard
setback is applied, it creates a buildable area far greater than the properties to the south.
The intent of the rear yard setback regulation is to maintain a similar size of open rear
yards among all properties. The proposed 96’ rear yard setback of the home at 917
Edgemere Court is compliant, but substantially less than the setback of adjacent properties
on both north and south sides of the property. The intent of the Zoning Ordinance would
be more closely met if the east/rear portion of the house could be moved further to the
west to increase the open rear yard in a manner similar to the surrounding properties.
Conclusion
Although all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance are met, the design and placement of
the house with a two-car garage attached via the loggia approximately 68 feet in front of
the home and proposed rear yard setback shorter than that on adjacent properties do not
meet the intent of the zoning regulations.
Attachments
Area zoning map
My Map
U ser drawn points
Zoning Boundaries & Labels
Ta x Parc els
May 10, 2016 0 0.0 3 0.0 60.0 15 mi
0 0.0 55 0.110.0 275 km
1:2 ,0 0 0
This map is not a plat of surv ey. This map is provided "as is" without warranties of any kind. See www.c it yof evanst on.org/mapdisclaimers .htm l for m or e inform ation.Copy right 2015 City of Evans ton
EX-1
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
917 EDGEMERE COURT
EX-2ORIGINAL HOME (DEMOLISED 2005)
TWO STORY BRICK AND STUCCO WITH FLAT ROOFS AND LARGE LAKESIDE WINDOWS.
EX-32002 AERIAL OF ORIGINAL HOME WITH FLAT ROOFS (DEMOLISED 2005)
FRONT SETBACK NOT CONTIGUOUS
2015 AERIAL OF EXISTING VACANT LOT
FRONT SETBACK NOT CONTIGUOUS
EX-4PRE-DEMOLITION 2005 SITE PLAN
VOIDS
EX-5PROPOSED 2016 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
VOIDS
EX-6PROPOSED 2016 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN
CONTEXTUAL LAKE SIDE SETBACK LINE
EX-7
943 Edgemere Ct.929 Edgemere Ct.919 Edgemere Ct.911 Edgemere Ct.917 Edgemere Ct.907 Edgemere Ct. 901 Edgemere Ct.935 Edgemere Ct.925 Edgemere Ct.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
FACADE ELEVATIONS
EX-8
Edgemere Court Lot Sizes (per www.zillow.com)
Address Lot Size Building Sq. Ft. % House to Lot
930 7,875 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. 51%
917 (approved 2009) 18,372 sq. ft. 7,924 sq. ft. 43%
900 20,908 sq. ft. 8,919 sq. ft. 43%
925 22,215 sq. ft. 8,370 sq. ft. 38%
920 12,632 sq. ft. 4,552 sq. ft. 36%
938 13,068 sq. ft. 4,350 sq. ft. 33%
932 18,295 sq. ft. 5,906 sq. ft. 32%
926 7,875 sq. ft. 2,436 sq. ft. 31%
940 11,325 sq. ft. 3,447 sq. ft. 30%
935 14,374 sq. ft. 4,252 sq. ft. 30%
917 18,372 sq. ft. 5,394 sq. ft. 29%
929 17,424 sq. ft. 4,571 sq. ft. 26%
911 19,166 sq. ft. 4,584 sq. ft. 24%
943 22,215 sq. ft. 4,810 sq. ft. 22%
907 19,602 sq. ft. 4,194 sq. ft. 21%
919 19,166 sq. ft. 3,959 sq. ft. 21%
901 20,037 sq. ft. 2,604 sq. ft. 13%
EX-9
LAKESHORE HISTORIC DISTRIC
CONTEXT
CITY OF EVANSTON
EX-102002 AERIAL OF RES. BLOCK SOUTH OF CLARK SQUARE PARK
REAR SETBACK NOT CONTIGUOUS
NO BUILDING ON 713 SHERIDAN ROAD
2005 AERIAL OF RES. BLOCK SOUTH OF CLARK SQUARE PARK
REAR SETBACK NOT CONTIGUOUS
CONSTRUCTION STARTED ON 713 SHERIDAN ROAD
2015 AERIAL OF RES. BLOCK SOUTH OF CLARK SQUARE PARK
REAR SETBACK NOT CONTIGUOUS
LAKEWARD ADDITION TO 729 SHERIDAN ROAD
713 713 713
729 729 729
EX-11LAKESHORE HISTORIC DISTRICT CONTEXT
EX-12
729 SHERIDAN ROAD
1969 - RESIDENCE BUILT
2011 - CONSOLIDATED LOTS 1 & 2
PRESENT - LAKEWARD ADDITIONLOT 1
LOT 2
713 SHERIDAN ROAD
2005 - RESIDENCE BUILT
715 SHERIDAN ROAD (LANDMARK)
SUBDIVIDED LOT (713 CREATED)
727 SHERIDAN ROAD (LANDMARK)
SUBDIVIDED LOT (729 CREATED)
713
729
Chicago Suburban Preservation Alliance Meeting
Hosted by Landmarks Illinois
and the Plainfield Historic Preservation Commission
Masonic Block Building / 24050 W. Lockport St. / Plainfield, IL 60544
Saturday, May 21, 2015
AGENDA
9:00 am – registration and refreshments
9:30 am – Welcome – Jean Follet, LI Board Member Jean Follet, LI Board Member Jean Follet, LI Board Member Jean Follet, LI Board Member
Legislative Updates – Lisa DiChiera, LI Director of AdvocacyLisa DiChiera, LI Director of AdvocacyLisa DiChiera, LI Director of AdvocacyLisa DiChiera, LI Director of Advocacy
• Status of state historic tax credit legislation
• Status of Illinois Historic Preservation Caucus
10:00 am – Plainfield Historic Commission efforts – Michael BortelMichael BortelMichael BortelMichael Bortel, Chair, Chair, Chair, Chair
Michael and Commission members will discuss recent efforts including:
• Surveys and landmarking at local and National Register levels
• Conceptual plans for districts and architectural concepts for
historic buildings
• Outreach to residents and building owners
11:00 am – Walking Tour of downtown Plainfield – including a federal historic tax
credit project and buildings dating from 1850-1940
12:00 pm – local lunch places suggested – local recommendations will be provided