Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES-1993-06-14-1993CITY COUNCEL /-�l June 14, 1993 1 E Standing committees meet prior to the official regular meeting. Current members are as follows: Administration and Public Works Alderman Newman Alderman Heydemann Alderman Engelman Alderman Drummer Alderman Kent Alderman Holsman Alderman Guthrie Alderman Moran Alderman Feldman Planning and Development Alderman Engelman Alderman Heydemann Alderman Kent Alderman New Human Services Alderman Feldman Alderman Drummer Alderman Moran Alderman Guthrie Alderman Holsman The OFFICIAL REGULAR MEETING of the City Council was held on Monday, June 14, 1993, at 8:38 P.M. in the City Council Chamber. ROLL CALL - PRESENT: Alderman Guthrie Alderman Heydemann Alderman Kent Alderman Moran Alderman Engelman Alderman Holsman Alderman Feldman Alderman Newman Alderman Drummer A Quorum being present. ABSENT: None PRESIDING: Mayor Lorraine H. Morton A tape recording of this meeting has been made part of the permanent record and is available in the City Clerk's office. 16-0 2 June 14,1993 TREE CITY USA PRESENTATION: Mayor Morton noted that this was the ninth consecutive year that the City of Evanston was recognized as a Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Foundation because of its commitment to the care and maintenance of the City's trees. Tree City USA flags fly at Ladd Arboretum and at Fountain Square. Evanston's Tree City designation is also marked by signs at major entry points to the City. The care of parkway trees is provided by the Forestry section of the Parks/Forestry Division. Mayor Morton presented the Tree City USA flag and a plaque to Forestry Leaders Dock Cannon, Doug Hardy, Eugene Holt and William Sales, who are in charge of the various field operations. ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor Morton announced there would be a CLOSED SESSION to discuss litigation and land acquisition. CITIZEN CONMIENT: Alderman Feldman moved to extend Citizen Comment by 15 minutes. Seconded by Alderman Guthrie. Motion carried. No nays. Leonard Solomon, said that his father developed the 1500 Chicago Avenue apartments and supported granting the variances requested for height and dwelling units for the John Buck project, but not for the parking variance; questioned the economic and tax projections for the project; opposed using tax revenue for the project. Dick Stillerman, 2330 Park Place, questioned the need to subsidize the John Buck project; suggested that taxpayers were being asked to reward someone for moving out of town; opposed using public funds when no jobs were being created and no low -to-moderate income apartments were being developed; questioned the cost estimates projected for demolition; questioned the economic provisions for the project; suggested that the City will put up the money but never realize any profit; did not believe that Washington National would allow the building to sit vacant for long and still have to pay taxes on it; urged Council to work with Washington National on reasonable zoning concessions and to forget any public subsidy. Janet Larson, 811 Brummel Street, questioned why the mayor had chosen not to put the Eighth Ward Alderman on the Housing and Community Development Committee and urged her to reconsider her decision because she felt that the needs of the Eighth Ward were being neglected without that participation and with the retirement of a police chief who lives in that ward. Jim Matvkiewicz. 606 Lake Street, called attention to the letter from the Evanston Property Owners Association that had been placed in the packet; said that the group was not against the project per se because it would bring additional tax revenue to the City, but opposed the financial subsidy as presently structured; questioned whether the sales taxes generated by 600 additional people would make up for the millions of dollars the City would give to the project; questioned why the City should pay to tear down the Washington National building without gaining an equity partnership in the project; said that the Washington National site was so desirable that it would not remain undeveloped long. Dr. Dick Fischl. President of the Rotary Club of Evanston, thanked the City and City staff for all the help and cooperation the Rotary Club had when they undertook the replacement of the Crabapple Trees in the Rotary Friendship Garden in the Ladd Arboretum; he explained that the old trees had deteriorated and needed to be replaced; he thanked the Council for their Resolution of Appreciation that was being approved this evening. Mayor Morton thanked Dr. Fischl and the Rotary Club for replacing the Crabapple Trees in the Arboretum and also thanked them for the contribution of $1000 from their Youth Day Committee. Madeleine Bennett, 1302 Hinman Avenue, spoke on behalf of her neighbors and said that they favored a residential development on the Washington National site, but were opposed to the City paying to demolish the building or providing a $4 million line of credit. She question whether Evanston property owners should subsidize a company June 14, 1993 leaving town or a developer; questioned whether the City would ever get its money out of the project if it failed to convert to condos; suggested this was not a good risk. Chuck Remen. 1316 Judson Avenue, noted that he had followed deliberations on this project very closely; suggested that Washington National's history did not demonstrate any hardship that would require a subsidy for this project; said that the Plan Commission minutes showed that the project met the general criteria of the Plan for Downtown, but it failed on 7 points - among them not developing retail and commercial use to lot line and building a high rise in the park (a concept that he said had failed in other areas); said that this is a non-traditional building in a very traditional area; the building is anti -pedestrian and the architect has not related it to its surroundings; questioned whether the figures provided by the developer had been carefully scrutinized; said that the community was not in favor of this project; suggested that if the financial subsidies are approved, Council will find other developers with their hands out for help; urged the developers to provide the amount of parking recommended by the Planning and Development Committee; said the project is not appropriate at this time; suggested that if the project is not built, then the City could be stuck for the $2.5 million they spent to tear down the building. Marsha Niazmand. 408 Greenwood Street, speaking for the Southeast Evanston Association raised five points, suggesting that the developer is asking the City to invest in something he is not willing to invest in; suggested that since Washington National was ready to invest $20 million in their new building, but were able to secure a mortgage, they should use some of the money they had planned to use for their new building to protect the investment they have in Evanston rather than asking Evanstonians to do so; they plead hardship without backing it up with documentation; suggested that this site is of unusual caliber that make it one of the finest sites in the country to redevelop and enumerated those characteristics highlighted by the prospectus for the project; and noted that demolition is a standard part of redeveloping any urban site. Jonathan Perman. Evanston Chamber of Commerce, noted that Washington National had moved to Lincolnshire, leaving a large antiquated building on a prime site; questioned how the City will make up the property tax lost when the property is reassessed as vacant land and how the City will make up the sales tax lost because the employees aren't there to shop in Evanston; suggested that leaving the land sit without development (if the City does not help) would be a very small cost to Washington National; suggested that from a pedestrian viewpoint, it does not matter how high a building is once it is over 200 feet; said that any company locating here pays a premium of $5 per square foot in property taxes; urged the City to subsidize the project and urged them to have low level of patience about allowing the land to sit vacant; and if it can be proven that the economic benefits clearly exceed the cost of public assistance, then the City should move ahead with this development. Mayor Morton said that the 30 minutes allotted for Citizen Comment were up and there were three more speakers to be heard and asked the pleasure of the Council. Alderman Engelman moved that the time for Citizen Comment be extended. Seconded by Alderman Heydemann. Motion carried. No nays. Jean Esch. 917 Elmwood Avenue, supported the perspectives presented by Mr. Stillerman, Mr. Remen and Mr. Matykiewicz; expressed concern about using Home Rule powers to subsidize a high rise luxury building; and express concern about the City's ability to use that power to raise taxes without consulting citizens. She noted that the City is spending a great deal of money on infrastructure - some of it paid for by increases in water and sewer rates - making it difficult for some people to remain in Evanston. She speculated that if the City subsidizes Washington National's redevelopment, there will be an expectation that it will do it for anyone else who wants to develop in Evanston. She noted that a similar project in Chicago, supported by money from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), ended up with a $159 million debt. She urged Council not to support such a risky proposal with tax money and questioned what was going to happen when it came time to develop Phase 11 of this project. She suggested that if the building becomes an eyesore that Council condemn it and force Washington National to tear it down at its own expense. She did not feel that they would let it remain vacant for long. Brian Bourke, said he supported high -quality residential development in downtown Evanston which would bring people associated commerce with it. He said that both the architect, Harry Weese & Associates and the John Buck Company were highly regarded and developed only high caliber projects. He made reference to Block 37 in Chicago June 14,1993 where the City of Chicago got the owners to tear it down and it now a vacant eyesore. He noted that the real estate environment has changed greatly in the last several years and there will not be a major development in downtown for five to ten years; and suggested that this is a creative solution to a problem and Evanston ought to support it. Norman Katz, a representative of the partnership that developed Evanston Place, noted that the focus of the competition to develop what became Evanston Place was what they could do for the City, not what the City could do for them. He did not feel that the times require the City subsidy as is being requested now. He said that the focus of Evanston Place development was to provide a 600 car parking garage and they built the project with not a penny of fees, as well as having to put up a letter of credit for $2 million guaranteeing the completion of the garage and had to demonstrate their net worth. They did not buy the land, just air rights for $1.6 million. He called attention to the substantial landscaping that buffers the development from the residential area to the east, which was expensive to do. He pointed out that they did not get any height variations, so had to build two buildings which required building two everything (such as elevator banks); and had to design the residential portion of the project to fit the column spacing in the garage, which added costs that had to be absorbed by Rescorp. He also pointed out that the property taxes are $2000 per unit instead of the $1300 projected and it has cost them an extra $2 million to cover that increase. He asked that they be allowed to compete on a level playing field and not allow the Buck project to have lower operating costs than Evanston Place (allowing them to charge lower rents) because of a City subsidy. EVMARK PRESENTATION: Terrence M. Jenkins, Evmark Executive Director, presented the Downtown Streetscape Revitalization Plan, which was developed as a joint project between the City and Evmark. He opened the presentation by explaining that Evmark was an organization developed to market downtown Evanston as a place to shop and invest, as well as being committed to physically maintaining and improving the appearance of the downtown area beyond the services normally provided by the City of Evanston. Funding is generated by a Special Service District Tax Levy. He reviewed the projects that were undertaken last summer and the projects that are planned for this summer. Mr. Jenkins explained that it was the poor condition of the street lights in the downtown area and the realization that it would be a major project to bring them up to standard, that was the impetus for this project. In 1990 a task force was set up to address this problem. The task force retained the services of five Evanston -based urban planning and design firms - A.M. Kinney, Land Design Collaborative, Teska Associates, Barton -Ashman and CH2M Hill - to develop a conceptual plan for downtown Evanston. The plan was reviewed by the Administration and Public Works Committee on two occasions. During its development the planners considered the history of the downtown area and the relation of the downtown area to the neighborhoods. Another focus of the planners was to try to keep costs down. He noted that a year ago 3745 % of the sidewalks in the downtown were found to be in poor condition and in need of replacement, but the past winter had been especially hard on them and the figure is now much higher. He directed the Council's attention to the document detailing plans for revitalizing the downtown area and noted that it lays out the plans for removal and site preparation, drainage and utility improvements, improvements to street lighting and electrical wiring, paving systems, street furniture, landscape materials and addresses some public art issues and treatment of viaducts. The plan will require the creation of another special service district, but also includes an annual maintenance budget to preserve the infrastructure. He highlighted the design and infrastructure recommendations for the seven districts identified within the area, including how the core downtown area can be used for major events and festivals. He noted that the next step will be to build a consensus for the plan by presenting it to business people, property owners and other groups and obtaining a commitment from the City to provide $5 million in Capital Improvement money for the project. It is expected that the private sector will pay 48 % of the cost, with public funds bearing 52 % of the cost. He emphasized that, while the plan is intended to enhance the attractiveness of the downtown area, 80-85 % of the cost is driven by the need to replace electric wiring, street lights, curbs, gutters and sidewalk treatments. Construction is expected to take two years, beginning in 1994 or 1995. He pointed out that much thought has gone into how the revitalization can be accomplished with the least amount of disruption to each area. He asked the Council to endorse the plan and to set aside the money required for it in the Capital Improvement 5 June 14, 1993 �� 3 Plan. The marketing programs are in place and there is a very strong public -private partnership with the City. He said that he receives anywhere from five to seven calls a week inquiring about space in the downtown area. So with that kind of interest in downtown Evanston, coupled with the problems with the infrastructure, it is time to make a decision. MINUTES: Alderman Engelman moved that the minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 24, and the Special Meeting of June 1, 1993, as submitted in writing to members of the City Council, be approved without reading. Seconded by Alderman Heydemann. Motion carried. No nays. CONSENT AGENDA: (Any Docket Item Marked with an Asterisk*) Alderman Drummer moved Council approval of the Consent Agenda with the following exceptions: Under Purchases, Architectural Services for Fire Station Construction and Renovation and Docket 120-SB-93: Ordinance 61-0-93 - Removal of Two Parking Spaces - Chicago Avenue. Seconded by Alderman Feldman. Roll Call. Voting aye - Guthrie, Heydemann, Kent, Moran, Engelman, Holsman, Feldman, Newman, Drummer. Voting nay - none. Motion carried. (9-0) ADMINISTRATION & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE: BELLS AND PAYROLL * Approval, as recommended, of City of Evanston bills for the period ending June 11, 1993; for City of Evanston payroll for the period ending May 30, 1993; for City Council payroll for the month of May 1993; and that their payment be authorized and charged to the proper accounts, summarized as follows: City. of Evanston bills $2,219,859.22 City of Evanston payroll 1,196,296.57 City Council payroll 8,752.53 APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) PURCHASES: * Approval of the low bid from Sunrise Tree Service for Contract Public Elm Tree Removal at a total cost of $22,500. BID SUMMARY: Bidder Total Cost Sunrise Tree Service $22,500.00 Long Grove, IL Nels J. Johnson Tree Experts 23,686.50 Evanston, IL Hendricksen, The Care of Trees 40,740.00 Wheeling, IL * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Approval of the proposal from Clarion Associates, Inc., for Consultant Services for Comprehensive Review and Revision of the Evanston Preservation Ordinance at a total cost of $14,500.00 (Non -Bid Item, Requires a 2/3 Majority Vote) * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) 6- June 14, 1993 * Approval of the low bid from Triad Electric for Water Division Motor Protection Devices at a total cost of $6,200.00 (Non -Bid Item, Requires a 2/3 Majority Vote) BID SUMMARY: Bidder Triad Electric Chicago, IL Total Cost $ 6,200.00 ESCO 6,600.00 Elmhurst, IL * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Approval of the low base bid from Simpson Construction Co. of $759,386.00 and the alternate (supplemental) bid items totalling $32,258.000 for Chlorine Storage and Handling Building Construction for the Water Department at a total cost of $791,644. BID SUMMARY: Bidder Item No.I Item No.2 Total Cost Simpson Construction $735,886. $23,500. $759,386. Bellwood, IL Jay Dee Contractors 756,000. 30,000. 786,800. Livonia, MI William A. Randolph 777,000. 25,000. 802,000. Morton Grove, IL * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) Alderman Feldman moved Council approval of the proposal from Moretta & Sheehy to perform a cost assessment for the renovation needs of Fire Stations #2, #3, and #5 at a cost of $10,000. Seconded by Alderman Engelman. Roll Call. Voting aye - Guthrie, Heydemann, Kent, Moran, Engelman, Holsman, Feldman, Newman, Drummer. Voting nay - none. Motion carried. (9-0) Alderman Feldman moved Council approval of the proposal from FGM Architects and Engineers to provide architectural design services for Fire Station #1 at a cost of $90,000. Seconded by Alderman Engelman. Alderman Newman opposed awarding this contract to an Oak Brook firm when an Evanston firm, A.M. Kinney, who had bid on the contract and had contributed work at a reduced rate to develop the Evmark Street Revitalization Plan. He felt strongly that the bid should have gone to a local firm that does business and pays taxes in Evanston and'one he did not want to move to Skokie. Alderman Feldman said that there has been much attention given to the idea of awarding bids to Evanston firms whenever possible. But in this case he had seen no documentation that A.M. Kinney was qualified to do this job and, lacking that, he could not support awarding the contract to them. He urged the City to come up with a policy that would allow awarding contracts to Evanston firms, while still saving the taxpayer money. 1 June14,1993 Alderman Drummer said that he could not support awarding the contract to a non -Evanston firm and urged staff to develop a policy that would allow Council to favor Evanston firms in awarding contracts. Roll Call. Voting aye - Guthrie, Heydemann, Moran, Engelman, and Feldman. Voting nay - Kent, Holsman, Newman and Drummer. Motion carried. (5-4) * Approval of Change Order No. 4, Area I, Phase II Relief Sewer Project in the amount of $13,399. for replacement of two drainage structures, the pipeline necessary to connect them to the relief sewer and restoration of the road surface to DiPaolo Company. * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Docket 130-013-93: Illinois Department of Transnortation Street Maintenance Program - Consideration of a recommendation that the City Council approve an Agreement between the Illinois Department of Transportation and the City of Evanston for the period from July 1, 1993 to June 30, 1994 wherein the City would maintain certain State routes within the City and would be reimbursed $77,112. * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Docket 131-613-93: Extension of Citv Manager's Emplovment Agreement - Consideration of a recommendation that the City Council extend the City Manager's Employment Agreement. * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Docket 132-613-93: Resolution 70-R-93 - Accenting Donation from Evanston Friends of the Park - Consideration of proposed Resolution 70-R-93, by which the City Council would authorize the acceptance of an estimated $20,000 donation from Evanston Friends of the Park for the dedicated purpose of capital - type maintenance at Penny Park. * ADOPTED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Docket 133-613-93: Resolution 71-R-93 - Rotary Contribution for Arboretum Trees - Consideration of proposed Resolution 71-R-93, by which the City Council would recognize the latest contribution by the Rotary Club of Evanston to the Rotary Friendship Garden in the Ladd Arboretum. * ADOPTED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Docket 134-613-93: Resolution 76-R-93 - League of Women Voters Lease of Civic Center Office Space - Consideration of proposed Resolution 76-R-93, by which the City Council would renew the lease of the League of Women Voters for Civic Center office space for one year. * ADOPTED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Docket 135-613-93: Resolution 78-R-93 - Fire Pension Funding - Consideration of proposed Resolution 78-R-93, by which the City Council would authorize the funding of the Firefighters' Pension Fund annually in the amount calculated by the City's private actuary. * ADOPTED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Docket 136-6B-93: Ordinance 66-0-93 - State License for Motor Vehicle Repair Shops - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 66-0-93, by which the City Council would amend Section 3-21-1 of the Code of the City of Evanston to require a State license for motor vehicle repair shops. * MARKED INTRODUCED - CONSENT AGENDA * Docket 137-613-93: Ordinance 71-0-93 -- Class D Liauor License - Cafe Luciano - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 71-0-93, by which the City 16-6 8 June14,1993 Council would amend Section 3-5-6 of the Code of the City of Evanston to increase the number of Class D Liquor Licenses by one to allow for the issuance of a License to Luciano Management, Inc., dba Cafe Luciano & Pizzeria, 2676 Green Bay Road. * MARKED INTRODUCED - CONSENT AGENDA Alderman Feldman moved to Suspend Council Rules in order to adopt an Ordinance introduced this evening. Seconded by Alderman Drummer. Motion carried. No nays. Alderman Feldman moved Council adoption of proposed Ordinance 71-0-93. Seconded by Alderman Drummer. Roll call. Voting aye - Guthrie, Heydemann, Kent, Moran, Engelman, Holsman, Feldman, Newman, Drummer. Voting nay - none. Motion carried. (9-0) * Docket 138-6B-93: Ordinance 72-0-93 - Use of Jet Skis at Lakefront - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 76-0-93, by which the City Council would amend Section 7-11-7 of the Code of the City of Evanston to permit launching and operation of Jet Skis on the Lakefront under the same rules and regulations required of power boats and power boat operators. * MARKED INTRODUCED - CONSENT AGENDA * Docket 139-6B-93: Ordinance 73-0-93 - Two-Wav Ston - Emerson/Orrineton - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 73-0-93, by which the City Council would amend Section 10-11-5, Schedule V(B), of the Code of the City of Evanston to establish a 2-way Stop at the intersection of Emerson Street and Orrington Avenue. * MARKED INTRODUCED - CONSENT AGENDA * Docket 140-6B-93: Ordinance 74-0-93 - No Parkine Zone - 1416 Sherman - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 74-0-93, by which the City Council would amend Section 10-11-8, Schedule VIII(A), of the Code of the City of Evanston to prohibit parking at 1416 Sherman Avenue. * MARKED INTRODUCED - CONSENT AGENDA * Docket 141-6B-93: Ordinance 75-0-93 - No Parkine Zone - Colfax East of Ridge - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 75-0-93, by which the City Council would amend Section 10-11-8, Schedule VIII(A), of the Code of the City of Evanston to prohibit parking on Colfax Street east of Ridge Avenue. MARKED INTRODUCED - CONSENT AGENDA * Docket 142-6B-93: Ordinance 69-0-93 - Series 1993-A Comorate Purpose Refunding Bonds - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 69-0-93, by which the City Council would authorize the issuance of not to exceed $38,000,000 in Series 1993-A Corporate Purpose Refunding Bonds to refund outstanding Series 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, and 1990 Corporate Purpose Bonds. * MARKED INTRODUCED - CONSENT AGENDA Alderman Feldman moved to Suspend Council Rules in order to adopt an Ordinance that was introduced this evening. Seconded by Alderman Drummer. Motion carried. No nays. Alderman Feldman moved Council adoption of proposed Ordinance 69-0-93. Seconded by Alderman Drummer. Roll call. Voting aye - Guthrie, Heydemann, Kent, Moran, Engelman, Holsman, Feldman, Newman, Drummer. Voting nay - none. Motion carried. (9-0) 9 June 14,1993 * Docket 119-SB-93: Ordinance 60-0-93 - Dedication of Land - McDaniel/Greenwood - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 60-0-93, introduced on May 24, 1993, by which the City Council would allow the dedication of a portion of McDaniel Avenue between Greenwood and Dempster Streets as a City right-of-way. * ADOPTED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) Docket 120-5B-93: Ordinance 61-0-93 - Removal of Two Parkine Snaces - Chicaeo Avenue - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 61-0-93, introduced on May 24, 1993, by which the City Council would amend Section 10-11-8, Schedule XIII(A), to prohibit parking within fifty feet of the entrance to Parking Lot #60, 1234 Chicago Avenue. Alderman Feldman moved Council adoption of proposed Ordinance 61-0-93. Seconded by Alderman Drummer. Alderman Guthrie moved to amend Ordinance 61-0-93, Section 1, to read "...Parking Prohibited at all times, the following: Chicago Avenue - West side, within 50 feet north of the entrance to Parking Lot 60, 1234 Chicago Avenue," thus eliminating only one parking space. Seconded by Alderman Engelman. Motion carried. No nays. Vote on the Ordinance as amended. Voting aye - Guthrie, Heydemann, Kent, Moran, Engelman, Holsman, Feldman, Newman, Drummer. Voting nay - none. Motion carried. (9-0) * Docket 121-5B-93: Ordinance 62-0-93 - Traffic Controls at Lawndale/Hartzell. Benson/Clark. and Davis/McDaniel - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 62-0-93, introduced on May 24, 1993, by which the City Council would amend Section 10-11-5, Schedules V(B) and V(D), to establish 4-way Stops at the intersections of Lawndale Avenue/Hartzell Street and Benson Avenue/Clark Street, and a 2-Way Stop at Davis Street and McDaniel Avenue. * ADOPTED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Docket 122-5B-93: Ordinance 63-0-93 - Establishine Residents Onlv Parkine District - 2200 Cleveland - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 63-0-93, introduced on May 24, 1993, by which the City Council would amend Section 10-11-8, Schedule XVIII, to create a residents only parking district on Cleveland Street between Pitner and Hartrey Avenues and on Hartrey Avenue south of Cleveland Street. Also included in this Ordinance is a revision to Section 10-11- 8, Schedule VIII(A), to prohibit parking on the south side of the 2200 block of Cleveland Street. * ADOPTED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) Docket 80-3B-93: Ordinance 39-0-93 - Definition . of Lowest Bidder - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 39-0-93, introduced on March 22, 1993, by which the City Council would amend Section 1-17-1 of the Code of the City of Evanston by defining lowest bidder for the purchase of goods and services. No Action HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE: * Docket 143-6B-93: Townshin Monthlv Bills - Consideration of a recommendation that the City Council approve Township bills, medical payments, and payroll for the month of May 1993 in the amount of $130,681.50. * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) 16-8, 10 June 14, 1993 Alderman Drummer reported that at their last meeting the Human Services Committee received a report from the Recreation Board that, in response to a suggestion made by Mayor Morton in her Inaugural Address, they had voted to establish a free beach day every week at the Clark Street Beach, beginning July 12. He also announced that the Farmer's Market would be permitting not -for -profit organizations to set up tables to recruit volunteers, in addition to allowing them to sell baked goods. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE:, * Docket 144-6B-93: Resolution 74-R-93 - HOME Investment Partnership Consortium Agreement - Consideration of proposed Resolution 74-R-93, by which the City Council would reject the continuation of the Cook County HOME Investment Partnership Consortium Agreement for fiscal years 1994-96. * ADOPTED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Docket 145-6B-93: Resolution 75-R-93 - Matchine Grant for Baker Park - Consideration of proposed Resolution 75-R-93, by which the City Council would authorize the City Manager to apply for a $35,000 matching grant from the Land and Water Conservation Fund for the redevelopment of Baker Park. * ADOPTED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) * Docket 146-6B-93: Ordinance 65-0-93 - ZBA 93-6-SU(R) - Special Use 2516 Green Bav Road - Consideration of the Zoning Board of Appeals' recommendation that the City Council grant the application of the 2516 Green Bay Limited Partnership, as beneficiaries under the Harris Bank Winnetka Trust #L-3580, and Pizza Hut of America, Inc., (lessee), for a special use to permit establishment of a Type 2 Restaurant without drive-in facilities, limited to carry- out and delivery only, on the property at 2516 Green Bay Road. The property is zoned C1 Commercial District. * MARKED INTRODUCED - CONSENT, AGENDA * Docket 147-6B-93: Ordinance 67-0-93 - ZBA 93-5-SU(R) - 951 Howard - Consideration of the Zoning Board of Appeals' recommendation that the City Council grant the application of Walter E. Ryan, Jr. and Dennis Ryan, as beneficiaries under the Northwest Bank of Chicago Trust #3612, and Pizza Hut of America, Inc. (lessee), for a special use to permit establishment of a Type 2 Restaurant without drive-in facilities, limited to carry -out and delivery only on the property at 951 Howard Street. The property is located in a C1 Commercial District. * MARKED INTRODUCED - CONSENT AGENDA, * Docket 148-6B-93: Ordinance 68-0-93 - ZBA 93-7-V&SU(R) - 3200 Grant - Consideration of the Zoning Board of Appeals' recommendation that the City Council grant the application of The Presbyterian Home for a special use for an institution for the aged, and for variations from the use and front yard regulations of the Zoning Ordinance to permit construction of a fitness center, relocation of six existing garages, and construction of three new garages on the property at 3200 Grant Street. * MARKED INTRODUCED - CONSENT AGENDA Alderman Engelman asked the Aldermen to turn to Items for Future Consideration at the back of the Council Agenda and, on behalf of the Planning and Development Committee, moved to take Docket 215-7B-91: Plat of Subdivision - 202 Greenwood Street - off the table and to refer it to the Preservation Commission. Seconded by Alderman Drummer. Motion carried. No nays. 11 June14,1993 Docket 104-4B-93: Ordinance 59-0-93 - ZBA 92-38-PD & V(R) - Planned Development and Variation - 1660 Chicago Avenue - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 59-0-93, introduced on April 26, 1993, by which the City Council, essentially in accordance with the Zoning Board of Appeals' recommendations would: 1. grant a planned development for proposed Phase I with allowances for floor area ratio, building height and number of dwelling units, to permit construction of a 221-foot high tower, a maximum of 304 dwelling units, an accessory parking structure, and an adjacent commercial structure not to exceed five stories, with a total commercial gross floor area, including square footage within the tower and garage of 70,000 square feet; 2. deny variations for proposed Phase I from the building height and relative dwelling unit density, which would have permitted a tower 295 feet in height and a relative dwelling unit density of 60.3Z%; 3. grant a planned development for Phase II, Alternative A, with allowances from the floor area ratio and number of dwelling units to permit construction of a second tower with a height of 110.5 feet, a maximum of 200 additional dwelling units, 20,000 square feet of gross commercial floor area, accessory off- street parking, and a maximum floor area ratio for this Phase together with proposed Phase 1 of 7.9; 4. deny the planned development and variation for Phase II, Alternative B, for allowances for floor area ratio and number of dwelling units, and a variation from building height to permit construction of 30 open, off-street parking spaces and a building 215 feet in height, which may contain a maximum of 200 additional dwelling units or a maximum of 220,000 square feet of gross commercial floor area or a combination of dwelling units and gross commercial floor area within said maximum amounts; and 5. deny a planned development for proposed Phase H, Alternative C, for allowances from the floor area ratio and number of dwelling units to permit construction of a 60-foot high building which may contain accessory off-street parking and a maximum of 200 dwelling units and 20,000 square feet of gross commercial floor area, all on the property at 1660 Chicago Avenue. The property is located in a B4 Business District. At the request of the developer. this matter was held for the Mav 24. 1993 meetine. At the Mav 24. 1993 Council meeting. Section 1. Conditions 1. 2 and 3 of proposed Ordinance 59-0- 93, concerning required residential and commercial parking. were referred back to the Planning & Develonment Committee. Alderman Engelman moved Council adoption of proposed Ordinance 59-0-93 as previously amended to incorporate nine additional conditions. Seconded by Alderman Drummer. In response to several questions from Alderman Newman, Alderman Engelman and City Manager Anderson clarified that Condition #9 required the developer to do whatever he was going to do to start construction within 24 months and that condition would be part of negotiations of the development agreement. All the time -limits on payouts would be part of the development agreement. Alderman Engelman requested the Council's indulgence to allow the developer to make a statement. Mr. John Iberle, a member of the development team, urged adoption of the Planned Development Ordinance and the Economic Development Resolution and noted that the project had been under discussion for 18 months and had undergone significant modifications in response to Council and community input. The density of the building has been reduced from 500 to 304; the height of the building has been reduced from 295 feet to 221 feet; a commitment /6d 12 June 14, 1993 has been made to provide retail space at the lot line, to the extent possible; twice as many parking spaces as required by code have been incorporated into the project; and a commitment to use specific materials at the pedestrian level has been made part of the project. He said that of the possible options for this site, including doing nothing, this is the best alternative. He noted that a capable team has been assembled for this project, including the Harry Weese Architectural firm, which has an international reputation. He said that the project meets the planning goals of the City to increase retail space and to bring residential downtown, which will help to add vitality to that area. It is recognized that the site needs remediation and the building currently there needs to be torn down. He noted that the developers have spent nearly two years on the project and if it is not approved, it will take a number of years to develop another project for that site. He pointed out that a one-story retail development there would generate fewer dollars for the City than leaving it alone, because of the cost of remediation. A project like Evanston Place would only generate about $8.8 million in tax revenue over the next 20 years, but the project as proposed will generate in excess of $21 million in tax revenue over the next 20 years, even after the economic development costs they have requested are paid back (if the project remains rental, and more if it converts to condos.) He said that the project needed the City's help if it was to get off the ground in today's real estate market. He noted that the developers shared the City's goals in wanting to enhance the vitality of the downtown area. He held up two pictures - one of the Washington National site as it exists and one a sketch of the proposed development. He suggested that the question was one of whether to leave a vacant building - that would become a blight in the downtown area - or commiting to something that will enhance the tax base and add vitality to downtown Evanston. Alderman Guthrie moved to amend Ordinance 59-0-93. Section One. Conditions 2. and 3. to require that off-street, varkine spaces for the residential use in Phase I and H shall be suvolied at the rate of not less than one space per dwelling unit and for retail or commercial at not less than one varkine space for each 800 square feet of such floor area in excess of 2.000 square feet. Seconded by Alderman Engelman. Motion carried. No nays. Alderman Kent said that he did not feel this project was essential to the downtown area and did not believe that the City should be spending $2.5 million to demolish it. He felt that it was a wonderful site that would attract other developers who would not require the City's help and that the money slated for demolition could be better used to end joblessness for teens and to fight gangs and drugs in the community. It did not address the needs of people who only wanted four walls and a roof over their head that did not leak. He felt that there had not been enough consideration of what the neighbors wanted and opposed approving the project. Alderman Heydemann said this ordinance dealt with a request for zoning variations and that is what the Council should be addressing at this point. She noted that the developer had reduced the height of the building and said that even at the reduced height, she found it exciting and dramatic. She felt that the building did meet the needs of the Fifth Ward residents because it would bring increases to the tax base that would support the kinds of programs to which Alderman Kent was referring. She said she supported the project because a luxury apartment would bring a mix to the community. She felt it would help maintain a good mix at Evanston Township High School and that the City would be poorer if it loses any segment of its diverse population. She felt that developing this site as proposed would help all the people of Evanston. Alderman Newman said that during his recent campaign for alderman he had spoken to all the residents of the First Ward who had a telephone or an address and that most of them opposed a 221 foot high building. He said that building such a tall building would change the character of the City over time and that the neighbors did not find that desirable. He made reference to the building at 1000 Central Street and noted that it had changed the character of that neighborhood, just as this building will change the character of this neighborhood. He felt that the Council had been too focused on the pedestrian bridge (which he voted against) that the developers of that building had requested, to be aware of the change that building would have on that neighborhood. He read a letter from the residents of the 522 Church building requesting that the green space on the corner of Church and Chicago be kept in perpetuity and expressed dismay that it had been eliminated in the final proposal. He said that he supported the parking amendment only because he did not feel there were enough votes to require what was really needed, which is to have 1.5 parking spaces, especially if the building is converted to condos. He noted that the City spent $6.4 million to create 240 additional parking spaces - some of which were to deal with the parking demands of Washington National - one of the efforts the City made to keep that business in town. He suggested that those spaces would be lost to residents and visitors to 1660 Chicago. He objected to the effect he perceived the building will have on the ambience of the City and said he would oppose anything that he felt would have a negative effect on that ambience. F_J 1 Ib/ 13 June 14,1993 Alderman Engelman said that he, too, had voted against the pedestrian bridge over Central Street, but that be had been aware that that building would change the character of the neighborhood. He reminded the Council that the building had not required any zoning variations and was built within the existing code. He noted that a market study had determined that this project was the highest and best use for this site at Church and Chicago and that a series of meeting and discussions by citizens appointed by the mayor and approved by the Council on the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission had determined that 295 feet was not an acceptable height for the building, but that 221 feet was appropriate for the site. The proposal was further modified by the elected officials who imposed nine additional conditions on the project, including a requirement that the lower portions of the building had to be made of certain materials that would be in harmony with its surroundings. He said that he is supporting this because all the review boards who have looked at it have said that the proposal before the Council tonight is appropriate. Alderman Heydemann said that she may agree with Alderman Newman that change is a bad thing, but change will come, and referred to the development of the Barnes and Noble Bookstore, which now brings a vitality to the downtown area until 11 P.M. each night. That was change and was not there two years ago. Council has to decide what kind of change it wants. She felt that whatever warts this proposal has, all the alternatives are worse. She noted that the words "level playing field" had been used over and over again. She reminded Council that there are no level playing fields anywhere, not even in parks. In the same family, birth order makes a difference and with the same business, location makes a difference. Market conditions are different and what Council needs to do is to make this decision at this time about this property. People have said "wait and they will come", but reminded the aldermen that this site had been offered to many developers and they weren't knocking down the door. The longer the City waits, the less money it will get from this property. If this project is rejected tonight, that rejection will affect how another developer may look at trying to develop this site. Alderman Kent said that what directly affects one, indirectly affects all and he did not see this project benefiting residents of the Fifth Ward. He said that in poor neighborhoods, economic development consisted of finding a vacant lot and perhaps building a beautiful $130,000 house. However, it makes the neighborhood too attractive and most of the neighbors who have lived there for many years cannot afford that house and the neighborhood changes and the old one dies out. Different aldermen have constituents with different needs and until members of the Council can get on the same level playing field, he did not feel that their citizens had much of a chance. Alderman Feldman said that change has come and he felt that it represented an opportunity that Council was not taking advantage of. He noted that Alderman Engelman said that the reviewing bodies had found the project appropriate, but he felt that there was a dramatic difference between appropriate and desirable and he did not find it to be desirable. He questioned whether "appropriate" is a value the City wants to attach to a building that is to occupy a space of such importance, whether "appropriate" is something we want to live with for many years. He said that a project should be more than appropriate, it should be desirable, essential and needed. We also can't allow fear to impell this development - being afraid to leave this site vacant. He asked what horrible thing would happen if it is left vacant for a time. He said that the Council that negotiated with Rescorp did not blink, but made them abide by the City's zoning ordinance. He said that the community was imploring the Council not to blink now, and felt that it did not want this project. The citizens will accept the responsibility for a vacant lot for as long as it takes to get something more than "appropriate." He felt that this was "settling" and "acquiescence" and does not exalt the community. He did not know anyone who was in love with this project and said that it was something the community would have to live with for a long time. He raised questions about the proportions and said that one of the strongest lobbying efforts in history had opposed this project. Mayor Morton reminded Alderman Feldman about the Council Rule which limits aldermen's comments to five minutes. Alderman Newman said he wanted to hear what Alderman Feldman had to say and said that the Rule had never been enforced in the two years he had been on the Council. He made a reference to the Rules Committee to consider eliminatine the Rule limitine aldermen's comments to five minutes. Alderman Feldman continued by pointing out that in the past the Council has voted to do something in spite of opposition, but in all cases they were convinced that what they are voting for was a higher and greater good for the community and said that he was convinced that while this was high, it was neither great or good. He asked Council to listen to the voice of the community and urged Council to leave it alone and promised that it they did, it would be developed within a year or a year and a half. 14 June 14,1993 In response to questions from Alderman Newman, Assistant City Manager Aiello clarified that this building will not be set back from the lot line and that was in response to the recommendations from the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission, who encouraged lot line to lot line development. At the sidewalk level what you will see is masonry construction that will blend in with the adjacent commercial areas. Alderman Newman again made reference to the 1000 Central Street Building, the change it effected on that neighborhood and reminded the Council of the dramatic change the height of this building will have on the character of Chicago Avenue. He noted that in the North Shore Hotel, the retail is at the lot line and the height is set back from the sidewalk. He felt that people will be shocked when they see what it looks like. He questioned whether this proposal had been under discussion for two years and said that the financial proposals did not come to the Economic Development Committee until last October or November. He said that the City should not be characterized as not being able to make up their minds when they really hadn't been considering the proposal for that long. He felt that the developers had not listened to the community and brought proposals that they knew would not be approved, which slowed down the process. He said that they chose to go through the more difficult process and he did not think other developers would consider Evanston hard to deal with. He objected to paying Washington National for leaving town. He said that people will come to Evanston if it is part of their target area and if it is in their interest to do so. Alderman Heydemann said that building to the lot line was a very high value that was brought to the developer by the community and they acquiesced. Alderman Drummer called for the question. Seconded by Alderman Heydemann. Roll call. Voting aye - Guthrie, Heydemann, Moran and Drummer. Voting nay - Kent, Engelman, Holsman, Feldman and Newman. Motion failed. (4-5) Alderman Holsman said that he had received a lot of telephone calls on this project and while most people he talked to favored a residential development on this site, most were opposed to the height, the parking allowances and the TIF. Therefore, he felt he could not support it. Roll call on Ordinance 59-0-93, as amended, voting aye - Guthrie, Heydemann, Moran, Engelman and Drummer. Voting nay - Kent, Holsman, Feldman and Newman. Motion carried (5-41 OTHER COMIdITI'EES: Docket 129-5B-93: Resolution 72-R-93 - Redeve000ment of Washington National Site - Consideration of proposed Resolution 72-R-93, by which the City Council would conceptually approve of the City's financial participation in the redevelopment of the Washington National Site as recommended by the Economic Development Committee on May 6, 1993. Alderman Engelman moved Council adoption of proposed Resolution 72-R-93. Seconded by Alderman Drummer. Alderman Engelman said he wanted to try to clear up a perceived misunderstanding in the community about what Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is. He first explained how property is assessed, using the story of the three little pigs and their houses of straw, twigs and bricks illustrate how properties with different characteristics are assessed differently. He then took the story 60 years into the future where the houses of straw and twigs had been blown away by the wolf and redeveloped. He explained how Grandfather Pig, who had lived in the brick house for 60 years, had been moved into a rest home in Lincolnshire and the assessed value on his house reduced because it was such a pig sty. Developers expressed interest in the property, but asked for help (by having it designated a TIF District as a blighted area) to redevelop it (because the brick house was so sturdy and was difficult to tear down.) He said that a TIF District uses the property itself to generate additional revenues to pay back the fuel that you had to inject to get the project started. Grandfather Pig's property was designated the property a TIF District and after the project was complete, the developers paid the newly reassessed value of the property, so (in this case) 80% of the taxes went to pay back the TIF and the rest went to pay the taxes required by the previously reduced assessment until the TIF was paid off. 1 A63 15 June 14, 1993 He said that, while those stories were fairy tales, what is happening at the Washington National site is not. Washington National has moved and left a vacant building that will leave the City with an $800,000 hole in its tax revenues and a big "pig sty" in Evanston's downtown area as well as an economic climate that is not conducive to the development of real estate. What we must decide is whether this is appropriate public policy and whether it is appropriate to enter into a public -private partnership to keep our downtown area a viable place to live. The City has said yes to a TIF for the Howard/Hartrey development and the Sam's Warehouse development. There are certain underlaying factors that contribute to the high cost of demolition at the Washington National site, among them are asbestos and tank removal and the mass of concrete composing the building. In order to undertake this project, the developers want to be assured that there is sufficient capitalization for the project. Lenders want to make sure that the developers won't default on the real estate taxes. This project needs an infusion of capital to keep the downtown vital and that is why the Economic Development Committee recommended a TIF, not a subsidy. He felt that, after giving it much thought, the proposed $6.5 million requested by the developer was too great an infusion of capital for the City to give them, so he moved to amend the Resolution as follows: 1. to increase the TIF from $2.5 million to $3.5 million: 2. to delete the $4 million line of credit: 3. to establish the following Davment nriorities in the event of sale. conversion. transfer or distribution of capital - a. conversion costs: b. return of new Drivate capital with 15 %: c. return to the Citv of $3.5 million: d. contribution of $250.000 to the Housing Fund: and e. solit of anv additional proceeds between the Citv (20 %) and the develoner (80 %): 4. agreement of a goal of 25 % Minoritv Business Enternrises (MBE's) and Women's Business Entemrises (WBE's) being involved in the Droiect: 5. a reauirement that the developer will nrovide a training comDonent during construction. Seconded by Alderman Drummer. He noted that the amendment would give the developer money to tear down the building and seed capital to jump-start the project. Alderman Heydemann raised a Point of Order and asked that, in light of Alderman Engelman's informative - but long - speech, that the filibuster rule be waived during the rest of this discussion. Alderman Newman said he would not support this because he had talked to a number of developers and they said that if they had known 18 months ago that a $6.5 million subsidy for this project was being offered by the City, or even $3.5 million subsidy, then there would have been a line of people wanting to develop this site. The City did not put out a Request for Proposal with the subsidy attached, Washington National only put out an RFP to redevelop its headquarters site. He said that the determination of when a TIFs is appropriate is a real question of public policy. (He recalled that certain aldermen on the Council had opposed giving the CTA $75,000 a year to keep an "L" stop open, because they believed that it was "poor public policy.") He felt that giving a company that was moving out of town a subsidy was poor public policy and said that it would cost Washington National a great deal in taxes, upkeep and insurance to maintain that vacant building and that by subsidizing the project, the City was saving them between $849 million by allowing the development to go ahead instead of letting it sit vacant. He felt that there were instances, such as the Howard/Hartrey Development when it has been demonstrated that the property cannot be redeveloped without help and reminded the aldermen that the Bell and Howell property had been on the market a long time before Dayton Hudson expressed interest in locating Target there. He said that the City had never given the private sector a chance at the Washington National property. He questioned subsidizing any development that does not create jobs or allow people to buy goods. With both the Howard/Hartrey Development and the Sam's Warehouse Development, you are getting retailers with a proven track record who will create jobs and increase the sales tax base. You should not allow companies that are leaving town to have TIF financing. He said that the City is not addressing the housing needs of senior citizens or residents of the west side and questioned whether it was appropriate to subsidize housing for wealthy people. He said that seniors who were having a hard time staying in Evanston because of the high real estate taxes are not receiving any subsidy. He did not want to use public funds for 2 % of the population, when the City is not addressing the needs of the whole community. He noted that the federal government had subsidized Presidential Towers, a similar development in downtown Chicago, that went bankrupt and suggested that the same thing might happen to this project. He questioned the developers' market survey and reminded aldermen that the City did not do their own. He expressed concern that the City's help with 1660 Chicago Avenue might cause problems renting Evanston Place and cause that apartment building to fail. He noted that the Evanston Place developers did not get any breaks or help from the City that these developers are requesting. He said that Evanston Place proved that even the best projections can be wrong and if the projections made for this project are wrong, then taxpayer money is at risk. He stated that this project is not appropriate for TIF financing and what the community wants is for Washington National to commit a large amount of cash for the project. He felt that to subsidize this project is poor public policy. 16 June14,1993 Alderman Heydemann said that with this project the City is doing something for the tax payers. She recalled that during 1991 budget hearings, many citizens spoke against high taxes, so the Council adopted a policy of not raising the City's portion of the taxes. Citizens sent Council a message, Council heard it and staff implemented it very well. We can't continue at the same level without raising taxes or cutting services, so something will need to be done. We are being asked to loan money to the developers and that money represents less than 10 % of the cost of the project. The rest of the cost is home by private capital investing in Evanston. We are becoming a partner in a project that will benefit all of Evanston and that is appropriate public policy. Alderman Feldman said that he had initially favored this project, but now he has come full circle as the project grew and developed. He felt that this was one of the most undocumented, un-validated, unverified, unsubstantiated economic development project that he has ever been involved in. He said that no one knows how much the building will cost or what the actual cost of demolition will be, or what the cost of conversion (to condos) will be. He said that the City has not done its homework as a lending institution would do before committing its money. He felt that the City was being irresponsible with the taxpayers' money by not having more information when they are being asked to conceptually approve this project. He felt that no decision he had ever been asked to make on the Council gave him more anxiety and the feeling he was not in control. He felt that no one had enough information to make a responsible decision and that the expected 5-4 decision on this Resolution would be unfortunate because there are so many risks involved in this project. He said that voting on this is precipitous. He felt more time was needed to obtain information and to build a stronger consensus. He noted that citizens had affected a number of changes to the project, changes that the developers originally had said they wouldn't accept. He commended the citizens for their input and participation. He wondered what the developers would want next and said that the City had no idea of where they were going on this project. Alderman Holsman said that he was just recently introduced to the concept of TIF financing and he felt that it can be a valuable economic development tool. He said that no one on Council could claim to be an expert on TIF financing and questioned whether the City had consulted any experts in TIF before setting the parameters for this deal. Alderman Moran said that there is something good happening here and the City is fortunate to be working with an excellent development company who has been willing to interface with City staff and the community. He saluted their diligence and said that such diligence speaks well as to how they will perform as this project goes forward. He noted that both the Buck Company and the Harry Weese firm are Chicago companies with excellent reputations. This building is an appropriate use for this site, is a vibrant development in keeping with the residential character of the community and will be distinguished over the course of time. He made reference to the prospectus for the poject and said that the amenities enumerated there are the reasons why the City will make money on this project. He suggested that the City is not paying anyone to leave - they are already gone. Some people on Council are trying to figure out how to punish Washington National for leaving Evanston. It's irrelevant, immaterial and over and what we need to focus on is who and what is here and how we can take advantage of this situation. He noted that Alderman Kent had raised questions about how this project could help the West Side and he reminded everyone that as taxes go down some of the first things that have to go are social service programs. The taxes generated by this building will help to maintain or increase the needed social services. He suggested that a tall building does not deny the heritage of Evanston and will not destroy it. Evanston has to adjust to change or die. He would rather see the City continue as a vibrant community than simply be passive and say that maybe tomorrow will be a better day. Significant changes have taken place to the project in response to the community, but credit should also be given to various members of the City Council who have had a great deal to do to the changes in the financial package. He said that he was not compelled by fear to approve this project, but a desire to see the community go forward in this century, to adjust to the things that we have to adjust to, and a desire to see this project work. In response to a question from Alderman Newman about engaging a financial consultant to analyze the Buck project, City Manager Anderson said that it would go through the normal RFP process and come back to Council as a purchase. Alderman Newman moved to amend the Resolution to read that the Citv Council, with the assistance of the Citv Manager shall select the consultant to address the feasibilitv issue. Seconded by Alderman Feldman. Alderman Newman felt that it should be a Council decision. City Manager Anderson reiterated that it was always a Council decision when a contract is over $5000 (which he believed this would be) and promised that the Council would receive a memorandum with a recommendation and the alternatives. Alderman Feldman said that the whole question of a consultant was discussed in the Economic Development Committee and it was understood that 1 1 1 17 Junel4,1993 aldermen would have the opportunity to suggest consultants and to prepare questions for the consultant that they believed to be pertinent to their responsibilities as aldermen. City Manager Anderson said that he recalled the discussion and also said that he believed it had been agreed that the aldermen would review the RFP before it went out. In response to a question from Alderman Guthrie, it was clarified that the amendment would authorize something that was already part of the process. Vote on Alderman Newman's amendment. Voting ave - Kent. Holsman. Feldman and Newman. Voting nav - Guthrie. Hevdemann. Moran. Engelman and Drummer. Motion failed. (4-5) As a point of clarification, Alderman Engelman said that the Buck Company never agreed that the $3.5 million was acceptable to them. It was what he believed was an appropriate amount for the City offer as a subsidy for the project. He had informed the developer that day that he would be making the motion, but there was no deal struck. Roll call on Resolution 72-R-93. Voting aye - Guthrie, Heydemann, Moran, Engelman and Drummer. Voting nay - Kent, Holsman, Feldman and Newman. Motion carried. (5-4) * Docket 124-5A-93: Citv Council Meetings of the Whole - Consideration of a recommendation that all major issues of significance to the entire City be considered by the City Council, convening as a Committee of the Whole, rather than by a Standing Committee. * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL. (9-0) Docket 149-6B-93: Resolution 77-R-93 - Standing Committee Chairmanshins - Consideration of a recommendation that the City Council amend Council Rule 9.7 pertaining to Standing Committee Chairmanships. This docket is scheduled for consideration on June 28, 1993. NO ACTION. EV MODUCTIONS: Mayor Morton introduced the following names for appointment to the Housing Commission: Kay Fund, 906 Elmwood Avenue; Mary E. Lane, 800 Brummel Street; Penny Miller, 1310 Hinman Avenue; Colleen M. Murphy, 1608 Davis Street; Anthony Poole, 612 Mulford Street and Vivian P. Young, 731 Brummel Street. Mayor Morton introduced the name of Robert K. Costello, 2135 Sherman Avenue, for reappointment to the Police Pension Board. CALL OF THE WARDS: Alderman Feldman made a reference to the Rules Committee to clarify the inconsistency regarding appointments of aldermen to committees. Mayor Morton asked for clarification of his reference and asked why he had not brought this to her attention before now. He said that he could not do so at this time, but would be happy to do so at the Rules Committee meeting. He said that for some committees it is very clearly spelled out and for others it is not. Alderman Holsman said that his answering machine had not been working properly while he was out of town recently, so urged any of his constituents who had not received a return call to call him again. He said that he would be acquiring a new answering machine immediately. He reiterated the comments made by his constituent during Citizen Comment and said that there should be an Eighth Ward .alderman on the Housing and Community Development Committee. Alderman Holsman reported that he had recently met with members of the Southwest Area Neighbors and they continued to express concern about how the traffic generated by the Howard/Hartrey project would affect their neighborhoods. He said that he looked forward to working with the developers and City Manager Anderson to address those concerns. Alderman Engelman thanked John Iberle and Greg Merdinger of the John Buck Company and Tom Pontarelli of Washington National for their patience in dealing with the aldermen, mayor, former mayor and staff of the City l66 18 June 14,1993 concerning this project. He noted that it has been a long, involved, harrowing and tortuous experience. But it had been necessary to go through that process because the City has some very concerned and involved citizens and it takes that long to come to a right decision. Alderman Engelman also commended Terrence Jenkins for his presentation on the revitalization of the streetscape in downtown Evanston. He said that it was unfortunate that it was presented on a night when there was so much other important business on the agenda, that it was a very important issue, and he hoped that all the aldermen would take the time to study the proposal. It will have a tremendous impact on the future of downtown. He felt that it was a major step forward that Evmark had proposed to raise nearly 50% of the cost of the improvements. He congratulated the participants in Sportsfest last weekend and said there were well over 100 entrants running and roller blading. He said that is was exciting to see a 67 year old woman participating in the 10K roller blading event. He thanked the sponsors of the event for donating a portion of the proceeds to the Summer Youth Jobs program. Alderman Engelman made a reference to the Housing Commission that they investigate developing a credit enhancement program that would allow people who want to buy a house, but may have had credit problems previously because they were less responsible before they were married and settled down, or previously had paid their bills slowly. Seconded by Alderman Kent. Motion carried. Alderman Kent made a reference to the Planning and Development Committee to consider making specialty stores that sell beepers a special use in Business, Commercial, MU and MUE Districts. He felt that those stores carried a bad aura with them. He promised to provide a memo for the next committee meeting. Alderman Guthrie announced that the Warren Cherry Fund had awarded its first annual scholarship at an event at the YMCA the previous Sunday. It was awarded to a young man who graduated from ETHS in 1980, who will attend National College of Education and expects to get his degree from there. Alderman Guthrie also announced that District 65 Safety Town began that day. Alderman Drummer announced that the Unity Scholarships will be awarded at the Second Baptist Church on June 27. He said that there was a group called Design Mortgages that was addressing the same issue Alderman Engelman referred to in his reference to the Housing Committee, and he hoped that they would keep that group in mind when dealing with Alderman Engelman's reference. Alderman Drummer said that the question of who sits of the Housing and Community Development Committee is a dead issue and that no one ward has a right to sit on the committee. He noted that the committee only has four aldermanic members and that they are able to represent all segments of the community. The mayor has made her appointments. He said that if aldermen have issues they want the committee to address, they can ask one of the committee members bring it to the committee. The committee will consider all such requests equally. Alderman Newman reported that the City -School Liaison Committee had met the previous Saturday. The meeting was well attended and productive. He thanked Mayor Morton for her help with the meeting. He said that the committee had agreed to meet on a regular basis to deal with the tough issues facing Evanston. Alderman Newman thanked Alderman Engelman for all the work he had done and leadership he displayed on the Buck project. He said that he felt that, even though he disagreed with Alderman Engelman, he had set an example of leadership and hard work and had demonstrated an ability to listen to people on both sides of the issue objectively. He was not someone who was so opposed that he could not communicate with someone on the other side of the issue. He tried to communicate with those who didn't agree with him to try to reason and bargain with them. Alderman Newman said that even though he lost the vote, he appreciated Alderman Engelman's efforts. He also said that he knew that he could count on Alderman Engelman to be the fifth vote against the filibuster rule. Alderman Feldman moved that Council recess into CLOSED SESSION to consider pending litigation and land acquisition. Seconded by Alderman Heydemann. Voting aye - Drummer, Guthrie, Heydemann, Kent, Moran, Engelman, Holsman, Feldman, Newman. Voting nay - none. Motion carried. (9-0) The Council so recessed at 1:08 A.M. and adjourned at 2:45 A.M. from CLOSED SESSION. KIRSTEN F. DAVIS CITY CLERK