HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1987Environmental Control Board
Minutes
January 15, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT: Floyd, Fous, Hoyer, Hriljac, Jacover, Klosterman, Lewis,
Wollin, Zelewski
MEMBERS ABSENT: Becharas
OTHERS PRESENT: Woods Bowman, Illinois State Representative
Joel Asprooth, City Manager
David Ream, Alderman and City Council Liaison
Dr. David Mintzer, Northwestern University
Marjorie Fisher, Interested Citizen
Charlotte Omohundro, League of Woman Voters
Minutes: A motion was made by Mr. Klosterman and seconded by Mrs. Wollin
to accept the minutes as submitted without reading. The motion passed.
GIRL Recommendations
Mr. Ceplecha advised the Board relative to the seven individuals contacted
for their comments to the Environmental Control Boards recommendations. Mr.
Asprooth, Mr. Bowman, and Dr. Mintzer were present and would make presenta-
tions to the Board. The Mayor indicated she would be awaiting the Board's
final recommendation, Dr. Mintzer would speak for Dr. Hefti, Mr. Stillerman
had provided his recommendations to the City Manager and Alderman Jon Nelson
sent in his remarks which were passed out to those in attendance at that time.
Chairman Hriljac turned the floor over to City Manager Asprooth for his
comments. He stated he was there to clarify things for the Board and answer
their questions. A tentative timetable of events was suggested by him so
the Board would have an indication on how to proceed.
Dr. Mintzer read a statement to the Board. The statement has been made a
part of the BIRL file and a copy would be provided to all members present.
In summary, the conclusion of Dr. Mintzer's comments being shared on behalf
with Dr. Hefti were that they agree with the essence of the Jacover memorandum;
the ECB is the appropriate body to oversee environmental matters for the City;
it should be augmented by additional members and, perhaps, staff, chosen for
their knowledge on environmental matters; and all parts of the City should
be subject to the same laws and regulations. Mr. Jacover asked for clarifica-
tion of the RPI Board status. Dr. Mintzer indicated that RPI shouldn't belong
to the ECB because of conflicts and he pointed out that the hospitals, North-
western University and other large laboratories don't have representation and
therefore RPI shouldn't be a member.
Page 2
State Representative Woods Bowman paraphrased his written statement to the
Board. The statement has been made a part of the BIRL File and a copy would
be provided to all members present. He supported the Jacover recommendation
and discussed the Federal Government Superfund reauthorization. He is
prepared to introduce State Legislation dealing with superfund and community
right -to -know for Illinois and he would appreciate comments or guidance those
present might have.
Mr. Lewis made some comments of his perspective of the Jacover report as a
member of the Mayor's Oversight Committee. That committee also favored the
idea of eliminating a second layer of government, creating no additional new
ordinances, and the belief that a professionally staffed research office
could function to assure safety within the Park.
Mr. Hoyer expressed concern on duplication of individuals as members of the
Environmental Control Board and the RPI Board and an obvious conflict that
would be created.
Mrs. Woliin indicated her concern that communication might not happen without
some formally structured organization.
Mr. Klosterman stated he favored controversial environmental issues to be
brought. to the ECB before they became an issue before the Citv Council. Dr.
Mintzer suggested an exchange of information betwE,,i chairman of various
groups, i.e. St. Francis Hospital, Evanston Hospital, RPI, etc. on a regular
basis.
Mr. Jacover commented on his belief that new laws are not needed, that information
gathering can at times be a problem, and that technical help in the form of
a consultant may be appropriate.
Mr. Hoyer inquired from City Manager Asprooth about the Cook County Environmental
Control Board and any agreements we have with them. Mr. Asprooth felt it was
an imperfect understanding and that the County doesn't cover those areas where
the City has ordinances requiring regulation. When there are conflicts where
they are called in and we don't agree with them we discuss it with them but we
don't always agree with them. Mr. Asprooth said our attorneys are general
Municipal attorneys and didn't know all of the environmental laws and can't
always assist us in such conflicts and it is at such times outside counsel is
used. Mr. Jacover interjected that such environmental attorneys should perhaps
look over all of our existing environmental laws.
Chairman Hriljac brought up the question about an emergency response plan. Mr.
Jacover cautioned that federal laws protect a firms confidentiality on many
matters which could present some problems in gathering data. City Manager
Asprooth discussed the existing City's disaster plan and how it is approved
and evaluated along with the need to conduct drills/exercises and the plan is
quite elaborate. The City does have Fireman who are trained in hazardous material
handling and training is ongoing. Mr. Asprooth further clarified his understanding
of an emergency response plan. Mr. Jacover wasn't aware of our Emergency Service/
Disaster Agency plan and felt it might be adequate but just wanted: to be sure
the City is properly protected.
Page 3
Mrs. Wollin presented some comments on the Mayor's remarks with regards to
costs. Mrs. Wollin pointed out that environmental issues are of serious con-
cern and money must be spent on such issues. She also mentioned the poor
compliance to the Employee Right -To -Know law and the lack of monitering and
made the point that we don't need laws that aren't going to be enforced.
Mr. Hoyer read a statement aloud regarding his comment to the Jacover recommen-
dation. The major points he made were that the Environmental Control Board
(ECB) shouldn't be a part of the RPI Board and vice versa, "Qualified Citizens"
as stated should be defined, the cost ofrronitorinq personnel should be the City's
responsibility, all testing laboratories within the City should be monitored
equally, and he isn't ready to accept the Mayor's Oversight Committees report
until the legality of the ECB October meeting has been determined. Mr. Kloster-
man requested a copy of his written comments and that they be made available
to all Board Members.
Mr. Hoyer made some comments pertaining to the incineration ordinance he is
working on with Ms. Sharon Eiseman from the Law Department and how some of the
proposed Jacover recommendations may completely negate the work he and Ms.
Eiseman have done to date. Mr. Hoyer didn't see how the entire Board could
agree to something this complex.
Mr. Lewis noted the problem the Oversight Committee had with three people
coming to agreement and wondered if the discussion isn't more important than
a formal written document.
Mr. Jacover stated that since Mr. Asprooth had asked for a recommendation
that the Board should provide such a response although we could chose to do
nothing. He felt we should agree as a Board to something.
Ms. Fous agreed with Mr. Lewis on the complexity of this issue and felt a
resolution in general terns is in order rather than specific critera for test,
observing, etc.
Mrs. Wollin suggested the Board come to a consensus, even if not a unanimous
decision so a recommendation could be made. Mr. Lewis and Mr. Klosterman
offered supporting statements to this thought. City Manager Asprooth commented
again on the timetable and Alderman Ream supported his remarks that this matter
shouldn't be delayed. Chairman Hriliac suggested that a document be presented
and Mr. Jacover offered his opinion that what he presented earlier be voted
either up, or down or modified and if there is a minority report that could be
presented but action should be taken. Mrs. Zelewski agreed with the intent of
the Jacover recomm-endation despite her being new to the Board and she grants to
move ahead.
Mr. Hoyer presented his thoughts on looking at a recommendation as a groundwork
for the basis of any ordinance for the City to carry on protection of the environ-
ment. Alderman Ream agreed with this concept. City Manager Asprooth indicated
he was looking for something narrower - a response to his questions - a recommenda-
tion.
Ms. Fous inquired how Mr. Asprooth would proceed with our recommendation to which
he replied he would send the entire recommendation to the Council.
Page 4
At this point the invited guests left.
Mr. Klosterman inquired if there was consensus among the Board members that
the ECB be the board or agency ultimately responsible for the office of
Environmental Safety. After considerable discussion and clarification by
Jacover, Lewis, Fous, and Wollin, Mr. Klosterman moved that "The
Environmental Control Board along with City staff and consultant personnel
is the Environmental Safety Advisory Board Advisory Board (ESAS) recommended by
the Oversigght Committee (CC) in its report dated September 22, 1986". Seconded
by Mrs. Zelewski. Discussion followed on definitions, structure, and proceedures.
Vote was seven yes, and one no (Fous) and one abstention (Lewis)
Mr. Klosterman moved that from the Jacover report that the sentence recorded to
read "Environmental laws, ordinances, and regulations should be applied universally
and should not be limited in intent or in application to the Research Park
exculusively" be adopted. Seconded by Mr. Jacover. Vote was eight yes and
one abstain (Lewis).
Mr. Klosterman moved adoption of the sentences reworded that read "Retain
Environmental Consultants as needed to provide technical expertise to the City
of Evanston for its potential environmental problems, including those that may
relate to the Research Park. These consultants would, when requested, attend
meetings of the ECB, undertake environmental audits, and analyses as needed,
and develope an environmental protection plant for the City". Seconded by
Mrs. Wollin. Vote was seven yes and two abstain (Lewis and Fous).
Mr. Klosterman moved adoption of the section that reads "assign a member of the
City's legal staff to work with the ECB and the Environmental Consultant in
formulating and implementing the environmental protection plan for the City,
and advise the ECB from time to time according to its needs. Dennis Ceplecha,
the present staff person assigned to the ECB, has performed an outstanding job
and should continue in the same capacity he now serves. Seconded by Mrs.
Zelewski. Vote was seven yes and two abstain (Lewis and Fous).
Mr. Klosterman moved elimination from the Jacover reconrendation paragraphs
numbered three, four, and five on page six that read "3. Appoint to the ECB, at
least as Ad Hoc members, persons who are knowledgeable about the inner workings
of the Research Park, and who have special expertise in Scientific Research and
Public Safety. One ideal nominee is Elizabeth Hefti, an Evanston resident who
has outstanding credentials as a research scientist, and presently serves as
chainnan of the RPI Committee on Environment and Safety. Another such nominee
is David Mintzer, also an Evanston resident, who is accociated with Northwestern's
Office of Public Safety and serves as a member of the RPI Board. 4. Appoint a
member of the ECB to the RPI in order to provide the ECB with an independent
assessment of the environmental aspects the Research Park. .5. Reorganize the
meetings of the ECB so that Research Park matters are prioritized on the meeting
agenda. In this format, Ad Hoc members would participate in matters relating to
the Research Park, and then be excused. With such economies of time, I am
hopeful that Dr. Hefti and Dr. Mintzer would agree to serve as Ad Hoc members
of the ECB". Seconded by Mrs. Wollin. Vote was eight yes and one abstain (Lewis).
Page 5
Mr. Klosterman moved adoption of the last paragraph of page six corrected to
read "The ECB, with the help of the technical and legal staff to be provided
by the City, could carry out the essential functions recommended for the ESAB
by the CC. Further, the ECB would also provide the means for public partici-
pation and independent review that the OC recommends". Seconded by Ms. Fous.
Vote was seven yes, one no and one abstain (Lewis).
Mr. Klosterman moved adoption of the seventh page by omitting the first paragraph
that reads "The RPI, on the other hand, is an organization which, like other
City institutions such as hospitals, universities and corporations, must be
permitted to manage it's own affairs. This necessarily includes the OES
contemplayted by the OC. If the OES is under the purview of the RPI's
Environment and Safety Committee, and if the chairman of that Committee is an
Ad hoc member of the ECB, the concerns of the ECB and the public will be
directly communicated to the OES. Moreover, by placing a member of the ECB on
the RPI Board, independent confirmation of the activities of the OES can be
provided to the ECB, the City, and Public" , and rewording the last paragraph
to read "Finally, by retaining Environmental Consultants, the City will have,
for the first time, means for implementing a City-wide environmental plan
monitoring pollution throughout the City, and handling environmental episodes
wherever they may occur". Seconded by Mrs. Floyd. Vote was seven yes, zero
nds, and two abstain (Lewis and Fous).
Mrs. Wallin moved adoption of the sentence from the first page of the report
that reads "The Office of Environmental Safety (OES) contemplated by the OC
should be professionally competent individuals selected by the RPI Board, and
would desirably come under the purview of the RPI's Environment and Safety
Committee". Seconded by Jacover. Vote was six yes, zero no and three abstain
(Lewis, Fous and Hoyer).
Mrs. Wollin approved adoption of the guiding concept number one on page 3 that
reads "Appropriate means should be provided for direct citizen involvement in
the environmental affairs of the City of Evanston. Citizens should be able
to become informed about environmental matters in an efficient manner, qualified
citizens should be able to become members of the City's Environmental Boards
when vacancies occur, means for public input should.be provided, and the City's
environmental findings and analyses should be publicly available to the extent
practicable". Mrs. Floyd seconded. Vote was six yes, zero no, and three
abstained (Lewis, Fous, and Hoyer).
Mr. Hoyer moved guiding concept number two as corrected to read "The City of
Evanston needs technically trained and competent personnel to provide such findings
and analyses as may be necessary to reasonably assure the residents of Evanston of
a safe environment. This applies to environmental matters both within and without
the Research Park. The cost of such personnel should be borne by the City of
Evanston". Seconded by Mrs. Wollin. Vote was seven yes, zero no, and two abstained
(Lewis and Fous).
Mr. Klosterman moved guiding concept number four be accepted as presented and which
reads "Bureaucracy, redundant boards and committees, and unnecessary layers of
duplicative legislation should be minimized. This kind of "red tape" is in-
effectual, costly to taxpayers, and time-consuming; it also tends to discourage
individual and corporate persons from investing in Evanston". Seconded by Mr.
Jacover. Vote was seven yes, one no (Royer) and one abstain (Lewis).
Page 6
Mr. Hoyer moved guiding concept number five as corrected to read "Existing Boards
should be utilized. Existing Boards and committees are already staffed, in
operation, have a proven "track record", and can begin performing their new functions
immediately". Seconded by Mrs. Floyd. Vote was seven yes, zero no and two
abstained (Lewis and Fous).
Mr. Hoyer moved that guiding concept number six be eliminated. Seconded by
Mr. Kieiste rman. Vote was seven yes, one no (Fous) and one abstained (Lewis).
Mr. Jacover agreed to revise his recommendations in accordance with the Boards
actions of tonight. He would then submit the revised recommendations to all of
the Board members and if acceptable to the Board,Staff would provide the re-
commendations to City Manager Asprooth. Copies would also be provided to all
of the seven people identified in the first recommendation.
OthE r
Frs. Wollin announced receipt of the Keep America Beautiful grant for the Keep
Evanston Beautiful Program. The Board was very pleased to receive such news.
Mr. Klosterman shared some material he had received from the State of Maryland
regarding recycling, indicated he had learned more about the McHenry County
Recycling Program, and would be discussing this more with Mr. Ceplecha in the weeks
ahead and would be bringing some proposals to the Board in the future.
Ms. Fous advised the Board she is working closely with the Keep Evanston Beautiful
on recycling matters to avoid duplication of efforts.
The next meeting of the Environmental Control Board will be on February 19, 1987.
Mr. Lewis moved that the Environmental Control Board be adjourned. Seconded by
Mrs. Wollin. The meeting adjourned at 10:25 P.M.
Staff Representative
4ennisW. Cep ha
Environmental Control Board
Minutes
February 19, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT: Floyd, Fous, Hoyer, Hril,jac, Klosterman, Wollin
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jacover, Lewis, Zelewski
OTHERS PRESENT: David Ream, Alderman and City Council Liaison
Charlotte Omohundro, League of Woman Voters
Joan Price, Medill School of Journalism
Minutes: Ms. Fous questioned some of the votes taken on a number of the motions made
at the last meeting and didn't recall voting either no or abstain on some motions & also
she didn't recall being the person who seconded one of the motions. Mr. Klosterman moved
that the record shows that there were s0,7e questions regarding the no votes and exactly who
abstained on some of the votes but that the minutes stand as corrected. Seconded
by Ms. Fous. Mrs. Wollin wanted the duplicate wording of "Advisory Board"
on Page 4, first paragraph deletea and on page 6 under "Other" to change the "Keep
America Beautiful Grant" to the "Illinois Clean and beautiful Grant". The mir..;tes
were approved as corrected.
GIRL Discussion A general discussion followed and was centered on what the City
Manager might re.:orrrend to the City Council regarding the Research Park and when he
will make the recorrnendation. Staff was requested to inquire into this matter,
advise them accordingly and provide whatever information might become available.
Democratic Party of Evanston Proposal - Chairman Hriljac presented to the Board an
invitation from the Democratic Party of Evanston (DPOE) to participate in the
formation of a platform on environmental issues. Mr. Klosterman moved that this is
inappropriate for the Environmental Control Board to become involved in and that the
Board not respond to the DPOE letter. Seconded by Mr. Hoyer. During discussion on
the motion it was agreed that political bodies should make recommendations to
governmental bodies and not vice versa. Motion passed by 6 yes and zero no's.
Committee Reports
Recycling Committee - Ms. Fous: A report on the appreciation program given for
volunteers was presented. Plans are being made to publicize Recycling Week which
will be in April. Progress is being made toward achieving a re!rote ne-:tsprin_ bin
at the Unitarian Church with the final details to be worked out soon. A letter- has
been sent to the Ladd Arboretum Committee requesting consideration of a remote
recycling site in the Ecology Center parking lot. Although the Civic Center parking
lot has been considered as a remote recycling site, the need to make the bin or site
more aesthetically pleasing hasn't been resolved.
Keep Evanston Beautiful - Mrs. Wollin: Plans are being made to apply for a State
grant of $10,000 for a remote recycling rogram. Improved containers are to be a part
of the program grant along with goad publicity. The addition of high density
polyethlene (milk jugs) would also be included. Mrs. Wollin moved that the
Environmental Control Board prepare a grant proposal this spring for the Illinois
Department of Energy and Natural Resources to increase voluntary Drop -Off Recycling in
Evanston. Seconded by Mrs. Floyd. Considerable discussion followed regarding the amount
of the grant being $10,000, what constitutes matching funds, should ECB or KEB apply
for the grant, will this grant preclude future grants, what would manditory recycling do
to this program, and how much would volumes increase. Motion passed: 6 yes and zero
no's. Mr. Klosterman suggested a field trip to McHenry County to see their successful
program. Mrs. Wollin also reported on the successful year that KEB program was closing
out.
Mrs. Wollin read a letter from Chemlawn regarding their planned program of public
notification for the summer of 1987 where they are treating lawns. The Board appreciated
hearing this favorable news. A copy of the letter would be provided to each Board member.
Incineration - Mr. Hoyer: A draft incineration ordinance was received from the Law
Department and reviewed by Mr. Hoyer. A number of items needed clarification and
after a meeting with Ms. Eiseman from the Law Department, this agenda item will be
brought back to the ECB at a later date. The final recoarendations to be presented
to the City Council by the Research Park, Inc. (RPI) and the City Manager regarding
the Research Park may impact this ordinance and therefore it would be prudent to wait
before the ECB endorses a new incineration ordinance.
Noise - Mrs. Floyd: Consensus of the Board was that some type of noise ordinance
is needed. It was asked that Staff provide to all Board members a packet of the
various ordinances gathered. Noise such as air conditioners, auto alarms, loud speakers,
etc. need to be addressed by the City ordinance, Mrs. Floyd recommended that all Board
members review the ordinance material to be provided, consider the noise ordinance
proposed in 1983 to the City but never adopted, and discuss this at the next meeting.
The Board agreed to this recommendation.
Alderman Ream advised the Board about some test helicopter flights in south Evanston
in association with a helipad requested by St. Francis Hospital. He indicated thzt
safety was the primary issue in this matter but noise was also a legitimate concern.
Pesticides - Ms. Hriljac: Ms. Hriljac advised the Board about a phone call commplaint
that the Metropolitian Sanitary District's (MSD) intends to use 2.4-0 to control
dandelions. The Board wasn't aware of this material contains dioin and is a hazard.
Chairman Hriljac reported receipt of a complaint from a citizen regarding local grocery
stores using plastic grocery bags rather than paper. Considerable discussion followed
and the Board was unclear on the policy of the various stores in rea3rd to their
providing plastic or paper bags. '•'rs. Floyd roved that the Board d:-eft a letter to the
individual Jewel and Dc,rinicks store managers to determine their policy en plastic bags
and paper bags. Seconded by Ms. Fous. Motion carried six yes and zero no's. Ms. Fous
agreed to write the letter on behalf of the Board.
Chaim:an Hriljac presented to the Board the idea of assisting State Representative Woody
Boamran in drafting legislation pertaining to the new Superfund use in Illinois. Mr.
Bowman is faced with an April deadline. The Board discussed the concept of the
Superfund. Mr. Klosterman moved that State Representative Bowman be encouraged to
draft legislation on the State level dealing with the Superfund. Seconded by Mr.
Hoyer. Vote was five yes and one (Foul) abstain. Chairman Hriljac agreed to contact
Representative Bc,�iman to invite hirrr to attend our next meetinn at his discreation if he
is looking far- support and feels are can be of any assistance.
Mr. Hoyer brought up the special meeting held in October and the unresolved legal
status of that meeting. Chairman Hriljac stated that our response back from the Law
Department stated that proxy votes were not permitted and the vote total would have
to be corrected to reflect one less yes vote making the total seven yes and one no.
Staff was instructed to inquire from the City Clerk and the Law Department as to the
legality of that October meeting.
The next meeting of the Environmental Control Board will be on March 19, 1987.
Ms. Fous moved that the Environmental Control Board be adjourned. Seconded by Mrs.
Wollin. The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
l = Staff_ R_epresentative_i ��•�•�
Dennis W. C recha
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
MINUTES
March 19, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT: Floyd, Fous, Hoyer, HrilJac, Klosterman, Lewis, Zelewski
MEMBER ABSENT: Jacover, Wollin
OTHERS PRESENT: Marjorie Fisher, Interested Citizen
Minutes; Mr. Hoyer asked that on page two under the heading of Incineration
that the term "incineration ordinance" be changed to "environmental control
ordinance". Also on page two it was pointed out that under the section on
Pesticides that the word "dioxin" was mispelled and the word"discretion"in
the next to the last line on that page was mispelled. Mrs. Floyd moved and
Mrs. Zelewski seconded a motion that the minutes be approved as corrected. The
minutes were approved as corrected.
Noise Ordinance: Mrs. Floyd recapped the four key items that should be in a
noise ordinance. Discussion followed on how this ordinance pertaining to noise
should interface with the environmental control ordinance. Although it was agreed
that an interface would be desirable and the two ordinances might be incorporated
into one at a later date, the noise ordinance should be considered on its own
at this time. Mrs. Floyd suggested that ordinance 66-0-86 dealing with auto
alarm noise be incorporated with the proposed 1983 noise ordinance that was
never adopted and that that ordinance be the basis for the new proposed ordinance.
The Board agreed with the recommendation and Mrs. Floyd then further corrected on
how decibels would be utilized to determine specific noise levels for enforcement
of the ordinance. Discussion followed on ambient noise versus specific sound levels
and the lack of a sound data base to enforce a five or ten decibel noise level above
the ambient noise. An absolute level is easier to document and enforce and was
agreed upon. A lengthy review of the individual sections of the ordinance was con-
ducted with additions or deletions of various sections being made as was deemed
appropriate and then all of the revisions vere accepted by consensus. Mrs. Floyd
agreed to work with staff to get the revised ordinance retyped and distributed to
the Board, Dr. Wilber, Reed Carlson and Alderman Ream within a week so all would
have an opportunity to comment prior to the next Board Meeting.
Ccmmittee Reports
Keep Evanston Beautiful: Mr. Ceplecha advised the Board that the Recycling Grant
proposal had been received and Mr. Steve Sthauof the City Manager's office was
working on this proposal.
Incineration - Mr. Hoyer: A memorandum from Ms. Sharon Eiseman of the Law Department
was read that pertained to keeping the section on sand blasting within the new
proposed environmental control ordinance. Since this was acceptable to the Board
to retain this section it would be added to the proposed ordinance which has been
put on hold. Mr. Klosterman moved that this ordinance revision be tabled until such
time as the Board is prepared to present this ordinance with the noise ordinance and
the Jacover report can be incorporated into the ordinance if necessary. Seconded by
Mr. Hoyer. Motion passed by unanimous vote.
Mr. Klosterman presented an issue dealing with air pollution and asked for a
clarification on how complaints should be handled. Mr. Hoyer suggested the Cook
County Environmental Control is the proper organization to deal with this matter.
It was pointed out that getting complaints to the proper person (Reed Carlson)
needs to be corrected.
Another problem was presented by Mr. Klosterman that involved the Health Department
disclosing the name of a complainant to an employer. Mr. Ceplecha said he would
follow up on this matter with the Health Department.
Mr. Klosterman raised the question regarding the matter of solid waste disposal
and the ability of the Board or the Recycling Center to deal with this problem
or effect some change in how solid waste is disposed of or recycled. Considerable
discussion followed on this subject and it was agreed to let Mr. Klosterman and
Mr. Hoyer further discuss this item prior to the next meeting and it would be placed
on the April agenda.
Recycling - Ms. Fous: A report of the subcommittee meeting was presented. Concern
was expressed about the duties, actions and responsibilities of the Recycling
Committee and the Keep Evanston Beautiful group with regard to areas not covered
or overlapping. A joint committee meeting on recycling to define the individual
goals was suggested. After lengthy discussion it was agreed to meet with Keep
Evanston Beautiful, an orientation for new Board Members should be considered, and
the matter of solid waste needs to be attacked from a number of different approaches.
It was further agreed to ask Mr. Steve pudloski to attend a future meeting to discuss
this subject, but not April due to the limited attendance anticipated.
Ms. Fous read a letter clarifying the position of Dominick's with regard to the use
of paper bags and plastic bags.
Ms. Fous described the planned activities at the Recycling Center April 25, 1987
which is the culmination of Recycling Week and Evanston Clean and Beautiful Week
sponsored by Keep Evanston Beautiful.
Pesticides - Ms. Hriljac: A report was presented to the Board regarding the
Metropolitan Sanitary District (MSD) and their intent not to use 2,4-D broadleaf
weed killer on their lands to control dandelions. Ms. Hriljac questioned the use
of this material in the Parks and Mr. Ceplecha stated it was not their intent to
purchase any more of this material this year for dandelion control in the various
parks. More information on this matter would be appreciated.
The next meeting of the Environmental Control Board will be on April 16, 1987.
Mr. Lewis moved that the Environmental Control Board be adjourned. Seconded by
Ms. Fous. The meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
Staff Representative Dennis W. Ceplecha
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
MINUTES
April 16, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fous, Hoyer, Hriljac, Klosterman, Lewis, Wollin
ABSENT: Floyd, Jacover, Zelewski
OTHERS PRESENT: Charlotte Omohundro, League of Woman Voters
Minutes: Mr. Hoyer moved approval of the minutes of the previous minutes.
Ms. Fous seconded. Motion passed.
Solid Waste Disposal: Mr. Klosterman was not present at the meeting at this
time so this matter will be held for the next meeting.
Noise Ordinance: Mr. Ceplecha reported in Mrs. Floyd's absence that Dr. Wilber
would be willing to attend the May meeting to further discuss this item with
the Board. Dr. Wilber pointed out a number of apparent omissions that she
thought might be desirable to include in the ordinance. Mr. Hoyer presented
some remarks on this ordinance and suggested various corrections and or changes
he felt were needed. Comments from Reed Carlson have also been requested. A
revised draft ordinance will be provided prior to the next meeting.
Committee Reports:
Recycling - Ms. Fous: A proposal to change the hours of the Recycling Center
hours during the summer months was presented for discussion. Justification
for the new hours was provided. Mrs. Wollin noted that it is her observation
that the Center should be open seven days a week and that in the next round
of State grants that this should be submitted for funding. Additional discussion
followed on why the Center can't be open 24 hours a day, satellite bins,
desirability of more hours for recycling, and how the new hours might impact
on the long term recycling goal. Proposed publicity for the new hours and when
the new hours would end was presented. Ms. Fous moved approval of the proposed
hours of Tuesday and Thursday from 1:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M., Saturday from 9:00 A.M.
to 5:00 P.M. and on Sunday from 10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. Seconded by Mr. Hoyer.
Motion passed.
Ms. Fous reported on the banner being; displayed at Grey Park and tite Super
Saturday activities that are planned, prizes to be given away that Saturday were
mentioned, and volunteers requested to assist at this activity. The Mayor has
proclaimed the week of April 20, 1986 as Recycling Week. Efforts are still being
made to get a bin at the Unitarian Church for a remote recycling facility.
Keep Evanston Beautiful - Mrs. Wallin: The progress on the remote recycling
grant proposal for the Ecology Center parking lot was presented. Plans for
the Trash Buster Day were presented, the area to be cleaned up identified,
and details of the day reviewed.
Mr. Klosterman arrived at 9:00 P.M.
Pesticides - Ms. Hriljac: Mr. Ceplecha discussed the Parks Departments
reserving the possible use of 2, 4-D, th,e posture of the University of
Illinois Extension Service with regard to the one cancer study done on this
material, and a typed statement was presented.
Othf r Items:
Mr. Ceplecha raised a concern about establishing a policy on which holidays
the Recycling Center would or would not be open. Mr. Klosterman suggested
that a list of the holidays on which the Recycling Center would be closed
be brought to the next meeting for approval.
Mr. Ceplecha presented material on a computer model for makinq decisions
on solid waste recycling. More on this would be presented as input from the
Sanitation is received and reports are produced by the computer.
Mr. Klosterman discussed the acute problem of solid waste, articles that
have appeared in the newspapers, and a resolution passed by the City Council
supporting the Northwest Municipal Conference solid waste management plan.
A bale plan was described and a hearing date mentioned that Mr. Klosterman
hoped he would be able to attend. Discussion followed regarding tipping
fees and how these are tied into future recycling of refuse. Recycling
programs in other communities were mentioned and will be closely watched.
The next meeting of the Environmental Control Board will be on May 21, 1987.
Ms. Fous moved that the Environmental Control Board be adjourned. Seconded
by Mrs. Wollin. The meeting adjourned at 9:35 P.M.
/
Staff Representative [�!
Dennis Ceplecha
Environmental Control Board
Minutes
May 21, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT: Floyd, Fous, Hauser, Hoyer, Hriljac, Klosterman, Wollin
MEMBERS ABSENT: Atkinson, Zelewski
OTHERS PRESENT: Marjorie Fisher, Interested Citizen
Charlotte Qhohundro, Leaoue of Woman Voters
Two Students - Northwestern University
Minutes: Mr. Klosterman moved approval of the previous meeting. Mrs. Wollin
seconded. +.?otion passed.
Noise Ordinance - Dr. Laura Wilbur was present to answer questions about the
draft noise ordinance, discuss clarifications needed and she offered cc .vents
on the proposed draft. She raised a question on the noise an automobile
engine would make but in discussing this item it was felt this is adequately
covered by the ordinance.
Noise from pile drivers was mentioned as probably exceeding the CO decitels
(db) level at all tires but construction hours are provided and such activities
need to be tollerated. The use of the sirens for snow emergencies would not
be a problem because this is a part of City government and is exempted.
Mrs. Floyd questioned the letters C, D, G, and H in the fourth line of Section
9-12-2:A. It was agreed after discussing that these should be deleted and
pertained to a reference in an earlier draft.
Mr. Hoyer cuestioned the portion of the ordinance dealina with motor vehicle
alarms and the question of towing fees. It was determined that since towing
is done by a private firm that these fees are fixed by the City Council and
are fees additional to a noise ordinance violation.
The memorandum from Reed Carlson, Director of Building and Zonina, listing
suggestions for the noise ordinance was discussed. Mr. Klosterman moved that
item number one (1) and two (2) of that memorandum by adopted and editicnal
changes as necessary be made to the draft noise ordinance. Seconded by "rs.
Wollin. Discussion followed regarding emergency work but which i; alreadv
exempted and clarification how section one differs from section 2. Substitute
motion mady by Mrs. Floyd to delete item number 2 from the motion was acceptable
to Mr. Klosterman. Motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Klosterman made a motion to adopt item two (2) of Reed Carlson's memorandum
and incorporate that into the proposed ordinance. Mr. Hauser seconded the motion.
Mr. Klosterman explained has reasoning for making this motion. Voting yes -
Klosterman. Voting Nay - Floyd, Fous, Hauser, Hoyer, and Wollin. Motion failed.
Mrs. Wollin questioned Reed Carlson's third point in his memorandum pertaining
to enforcement. Mrs. Floyd moved that the wording "the City Manager or his
duly authorized representative" be included into the ordinance wherever
appropriate when enforcement is mentioned. Seconded by Mr. Hoyer. Motion
passed unanimously.
A number of other typing and wording corrections were made for inclusion in the
next draft.
Mrs. Flovd moved elimination of the last sentence in Section 9-12-5: (B) that
says "Care shall be taken that the reading is not unduly influenced by traffic,
aircraft, and other noise sources". Mr. Klosterman seconded. Discussion
followed. Motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Hauser moved to change the wording in Section 9-12-3: (A) to read "......
except through a muffler or other similar device in good repair which will
effectively prevent loud . . . . . . . . . . .". Seconded by Mr. Kloster~nan.
Motion passed unanir..oisly.
Mr. Moyer inquired about the City Manager's recommendation to the City Council
on the Research Laboratory. Mr. Ceplecha advised the Board that the City Manager
plans on presenting his recommendations to the City Council in the near future.
Solid Waste - Mr Klosterman inquired about the Northwest Municipal Conference's
efforts to find an alternative disposal site. No one had any recent information.
Mr. Klosterman reported on his attendance at a couple of meetings on this subject
but wasn't aware of the outcome. Mr. Ceplecha mentioned the Recycling Conference
and his intent to attend and record the sessions. Mr. Hoyer questioned efforts
being spent on solid waste disposal and the establishment of new disposal sites.
Chairman Hriljac gave an overview of where this legislation was at in Springfield.
Committee Reports.
Recycling Committee - Ms. Fous. A report on the Recycling Saturday was given
and it was this Committee's feeling that this was a successful venture. A
suggestion was made to provide a mailbox outside of the gate with information
for recyclers about the hours. Mr. Ceplecha commented on the ne,,•r attendant, the
new hours, and so:7e negative comments received about the new hours. ''r-s. Wollin
indicated she also had had 1or;,e calls questioning the new hours.
An update on the bin at the Unitarian Church was given and the attempts made to
relocate the bin. The Board was glad to see we are moving ahead on this location.
A review of the proposed signs, proper location of the bin, etc. was presented.
Mrs. Wollin gave a status report on the grant that has been applied for by the
Environmental Control Board but no definite answer has been provided. All
indications were that we were still in the running and that receipt of the grant
looked favorable. She also commented on the Garden Fair and her activities of
passing out information on the new hours and her talking to individuals about
recycling.
Mr. Ceplecha submitted a memorandum to the Board dealing with the closing of
the Recycling Center on those legal holidays recognized and celebrated by
the City. Mr. Klosterman moved acceptance of the memorandum. Ctrs. Wollin
seconded. Discussion followed regarding specifics of the proposal. Motion
passed unanimously.
Keep Evanston Beautiful - Mrs. Wollin: A report on the Trash Buster day
activities was presented. The day was very successful and supported by local
businesses very well. There was no press coverage which was very disappointing.
Future projects were discussed and there may be a possibility of some sort of
involvement in the July 4 parade.
Chairman Hriljac took time to explain the committee structure to Mr. Hauser
and indicated a renewed Effort will be made in the fall to get everyone
actively involved as chairman of a committee or as a committee member. She
also indicated that she will attempt to have the Mayor attend the July IE, 1987
meeting to discuss her ideas of recycling.
The next meetinv of the Environmental Control Board will be on June 18, 1987.
Mr. Klosterman moved that the meeting be adjourned. Seconded by Mr. Hoyer.
The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m.
L
Staff Representative
ennis W. Cep ee a
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
MINUTES
June 18, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fous, Hoyer, Hriljac, Klosterman, Zelewski
MEMBERS ABSENT: Atkinson, Floyd, Hauser, Wollin
STAFF PRESENT: Dennis W. Ceplecha, Municipal Arborist
OTHERS PRESENT: Marjorie Fisher, Interested Citizen
Barbara Klosterman, Mr. Klosterman's Daughter
PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Ms. Hriljac, Chairman
Minutes: Mr. Hoyer made a motion to approve the minutes of the previous
meeting after the words Omohundro, tolerated, and the word additional were
correctly spelled. Mrs. Zelewski seconded. Motion passed.
Chairman Hriljac read a memorandum pertaining to capitol outlay items to be
considered for the 1988-89 budget year. Mr. Hoyer suggested some electrical
wiring for operation of additional lighting, operation of a plastic densifier
and the glass crushing unit.
Committee Reports:
Recycling Committee - Ms. Fous: Plans for participation in the July 4th parade
were presented and details as to who would participate discussed. Keep Evanston
Beautiful (KES) also plans on giving the Recycling Center Publicity. A renewed
effort at using the slide/tape educational program is needed. KEB it was reported
has plans to use this propram extensively in the fall in the school system.
New summer hours in effect are being given greater publicity through posters
in store windows. Efforts to correct the bin location at the Unitarian Church
are still being made to get this site more established. Chairman Hriljac
requested additional copies of the green information cards shuwina both the
summer and winter hours that can be passed out at the Farmer's Market and other
locations. Staff will procure these cards. It was suggested that the cards
be white with green printing to help differentiate them from the older cards.
Mrs. Zelewski inquired about seeing the Recycling Center slide program. A
number of others who hadn't seen the program also expressed an interest in
seeing this program. It was agreed that this would be placed on next months
agenda.
Mr. Klosterman commented on the landfill status and probable legal battles
that can by expected. Mr. Hoyer commented on community -wide recycling programs,
how the State needs to be a part of the solution and whether recycling should
be voluntary or mandatory. Mr. Klosterman reviewed the idea of a transfer
station.
Mr. Hoyer raised the question about material of importance to the Board in the
hands of former members. Staff agreed that Mr. Jacover and Mr. Lewis would be
asked to provide any such material since they had been active on the Board after
specific committees had been developed.
Chairman Hriljac reported on her attendance at Northwestern University and the
classroom presentation by Dr. Barbara Lewis' class on an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Basic Industrial Research Laboratory (SIRL). The class
was very objective and did a nice job.
Noise - Ms. Floyd: Mr. Ceplecha reported that the revised noise ordinance had
been sent to the Legal Department for their review. It was questioned hoa the
Board would proceed when the noise ordinance was returned and the options discussed.
Depending on the chances proposed it would be either be returned to the Lecal
Department or to the appropriate City Council committee for action.
Mr. Hoyer inquired into the request for Annual Emissions Data for Evanston Firms
as developed by Cock County Environmental Control. Mr. Ceplecha indicated he
had provided a written request but that he never received this material. Mr.
Ceplecha indicated he would make another request.
Mr. Ceplecha advised the Board about three air pollution complaints that had
been received and action that was taken relative to these complaints.
The next meeting of the Environmental Control Board will be on July 16, 1987.
Mr. Klosterman moved that the meeting be adjourned. Seconded by Ms. Fous. The
meeting adjourned at 8:20 P.M.
4 l
Staff Representative: ,
R � ti�
ennis W. Cep cha
Environmental Control Board
Minutes
July 16, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT: Atkinson, Floyd, Fous, Hoyer, Hriljac,
Klosterman, Wollin, Zelerrski
MEMBERS ABSENT: Hauser
STAFF PRESENT: Dennis W. Ceplecha, Municipal Arborist
OTHERS PRESENT: Joan Barr, Mayor
Charlotte 0mohundro, League of Women Voters
Presiding Official:Ms. Hriljac, Chairman
Minutei: Mrs. WolIin pointed out the fact that the written Keep Evanston
Beautiful (rEB) Committee report submitted in her absence was not resorted
at the meeting or in the minutes. It was also noted the word "capital"
was mistoelled. Mr. Klosterman made a motion to approve the minutes as
corrected. Mfrs. Wollin seconded. Motion passed.
Rec clino: ?is. Hriljac welcomed Mayor Barr and turned the floor over to
1Qr for Fle"r com-ments. Mayor Barr reviewed the problem of refuse disposal,
discussed how this mat-er has been handled in the past, reviewed the multi-
facted problems of today with landfills, and expressed her concern about
the immediacy of this problem. She stated she is pleased with the current
recyclinq program but it is limited and doesn't reach enough people.
The Mayor expressed her opinion that a more comprehensive ci-_y-wide recycling
program is needed and she would like to see Evanston develop such a nron_ram.
Although t►n ti, � i sh rt t' 1�'ayor expr:_�,sed a desire to see some type of
program in next years budget. Such a prograrrr it is reconnized would not pay
for itself but mould save money in the long run and Would nrobably not
eliminate the need for a transfer station. At this tir.le the Board was in-
vited to join in for a question, answer, and co=,,entary ;es;inll on this
subject.
Mrs. Woilir CY7rf SE'i tf',-, C.it''S (ie-slrt', inte'rcit i}ld intent .: 1`' fpr
a State re,7yc1ini; gr•c,Flr. of t_-a,OU for curbside t icL-up. Thr, future of these
grants is uncertain due to a legal action. ?Favor Barr expressed the serious
financial prohleris in expanding the budget. airs. Wollin explained how such
a program would ,,-rork and described efforts in Champaitln /Urbana and grant
money used for this program.
Mr. Klosterman discussed the possibility of doing a curbside recycling
program contractually and the benefits to the City by doling it that bray.
fie passed out immaterial to the Board from Vontgomery County, t'',1ryllnd's
profirarmt irl which cur'b'.ido roc,/clin<l i" done. It is their belir�f t!l~lt they
make (save') rollr?v thl-Orlgh thll, Pl'(lrlr'a{1'. Th,ir t' liof 1''•
d net 1' c"1 •1(r',tc' 111 t;l',�mJ l'f C11,111OW1 tile Ct' lltiC['tiCo4 t of refuse
disposal by consldorinq recycl,lhle lilater ill1 , kind ollce-,I-week
garbage thus enabling the same people and/or same trucks to be used.
Education about such a program and publicity were high priority items
with the Mayor and Ms. Nriljac confirmed that by using the Farmer's
Market success as an example.
Amonq th" other ideas or comments made were: the importance of having
good data available for revenues/volume of material recycled; more
cooperative support from the Evanston Review in supporting recycling; capital
outlay for equipment and how the establishment of a transfer station would
impact such a program; how condos and apartments might be serviced under
such a program; and hoar balefill, litigation, salvage of water-ial, and
incineration all need to he a part of the solution.
The Mayor thanked the Board for their attention and participation and
expressed her desire to work with them in the months ahead on this problem.
The 'Board enaaned in a lengthy discussion on how they Should proceed on
this matter. Mrs. Wollin discussed the KEB Co,-:mittee meeting with Steve
Pudloski, Public Norks Director, signs for refuse trucks for publicity
and the use and cost of a consultant to sot up such a program. After
discussirq the ccndo!apartment concern it was agreed that star'tinq a program
With the 14,000 single family residents Y:jld be a large tusk but a logical
starting point.
Ms Nriljac suggested a series of meetings to get things started. The KEB
Committee "ouid meet on August 4 and she would tali: to various recyclors
regarding contractual curbside recycling. A special August 25, 1987
meeting of the Board would be scheduled to deal with this problem. Additional
-individuals to be involved in this meeting miqht be Mr. Cliff Washington,
Superintendent of Sanitation: Mr. Tom Olkowski, Superintendent of Street
and 'I. Steve Pudloski, Director of Public Works.
The agenda items of committee reports and viewing the slide program were
deferred due to the lateness of the hour. The slide program will be presented
at a future meeting.
The next 7eetinq of the Cnvironmental Control Board will be a special meeting
on August 25, 1987.
The meeting of the Environmental Control Board adjourned at 9:45 P.M.
Staff Representative
Dennis W. Ceplecha
Environmental Control Board
Minutes
August 25, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT: Floyd, Fous, Hriljac, Klosterman,
Miller, Wollin, Zelewsky, Hauser
MEMBERS ABSENT: Atkinson, Hoyer
STAFF PRESENT: Dennis W. Ceplecha, Municipal Arborist
Steve Pudloski, Director of Public Works
OTHERS PRESENT: Alderman Feldman, City Council Liaison
Bill Blakely, FSC Paper
Steve Lissner, Valley Scrap Corporation
Bobbi Nechtow, KE5 Education Committee
Ronna Jacobson, Interested Citizen
Marjorie Fisher, Interested Citizen
Andrew Fisher, N.U. Students for a Better Environment
Charlie Sellers, N.U. Students for a Better Environment
Steve Ocienberger, Graduate Journalism Student
Dale Alekel- Carlson, Uptown Recycling Center
Presiding Official: Ms. Hriljac, Chairman
Minutes: Mr. Klosterman moved that the minutes of the July 16, 1987 meeting
of the Environmental Control Board be accepted as submitted. Seconded by
Mrs. Wollin. Motion passed.
Ms. Hriljac advised the Board about a Recycling conference to be held at
the Wisconsin Dells and inquired if someone from the Board might be able
to attend. There are also two books available that might be of value to
the Board which we might consider purchasing. Material pertaining to these
books will be circulated during the meeting and the Board asked to decide
on this at the end of the meeting.
Mrs. Wollin was given the floor and circulated a stastical sheet and copies
of an article regarding recycling that appeared in the Evanston Review.
Despite a number of errors it was good to see some publicity on recycling in
the press.
Mr. Klosterman opened the evenings discussion on recycling with comments on
the problem of refuse and the Boards interest in recycling. He introduced
Mr. Bill Blakely from FSC Paper who's company is a major recycler of paper
and producer of recycled paper. Mr. Blakely stated FSC is very interested
in the refuse /landfill problems that have developed. This firm consumes
400 tons of paper per day of which 360 tons of recycled newsprint and other
paper products. The source of their paper comes from over 300 miles away
and would favor a good paper source (Evanston) within 45 miles of their mill.
He felt to be successful the material to be recycled needed to properly be
sorted, ie. newsprint would not contain other forms of paper, glass would
be sorted by color, etc.
Mr. Dale Alekel - Carlson commented on the Uptown Recycling Center that
she is in charge of. Some of the funding aspects were covered as well
as the scope of their program. She didn't see some mixing of certain
materials as a problem because it does also provide employment for people
to separate these ineterials.
Mr. Steve Lissner of Valley Scrap Corporation commented that he felt
municipalities should be the movement behind curbside recycling programs
and should set them up but that they shouldn't handle the collection.
Mr. Blakely indicated FSC was in a position and interested in helping
communities set up programs. He stressed that FSC doesn't do any actual
collection but only buys the collected paper. Their only product is a
30 pound newsprint.
Discussion turned to actual markets for newspaper and Mr. Blakely stated
they would like to get paper from Evanston but that their paper mill
is at capacity and someone would have to be cut out.if Evanston has to
become a source of newsprint. They would cut out a distant source probably
in another state. They are flexible in trucking arrangements and would be
in a position to sign a contract on a yearly basis.
Mr. Pudloski commented on time restraints in regard to presenting such a
program in time for the budget. He has no preccnceived idea of what kind
of a recycling program the City should have to be successful. Various
approaches used by ether communities were discussed by Mr. Purloski, Mr
Lissner, and Mrs. Wollin. The ,alue of public education, peer pressure,
and the use of volunteer block captains for program success was mentioned.
Mr. Klosterman questioned how three separate collection systems can be
accommodated, ie. single family residences, apartments, and condominiums.
Mrs. Alekel-Carlson explained how the Upton Recycling Center works with a
blend of different dwellings and their program is successful. She stressed
proper containers be used and people organizing people is essential. Mr.
Klosterman supported these statements and related his experience with con-
dominium buildings and janitors who take care of these units. It was
mentioned that New York City has worked successfully with multi -family
dwellings.
Mr. Klosterman inquired of Mr. Lissner as to the possibility of his firm
doing the recycling within the City. Mr. Lissner stated his firm would do
just hauling of recycled materials. Ms. Hriljac estimated costs of $.85
- S1.00 per stop to pick up materials for recycling. Current costs pre-
sently are about $13 per house per month within the City for refuse pick-up.
An average of 50 pounds of paper per house per month should be realized on a
city-wide paper recycling program. Present figures indicate that taking
materials to landfills is less expensive than recycling but won't be possible
in the future. _.
Ms. Hriljac questioned if volumes of materials recycled were a critical
factor and Mr. Blakely didn't see that as a problem for a community
entering into a new program He said there wili always be a market for
good "clean" material.
The Board agreed that even if a community -wide program were started that
the Recycling Center would still serve a purpose and should remain open
until such time as it was demonstrated that the facility wasn't needed.
Currently the center serves other than Evanston residents and acts as a
distribution point for the sale of firewood. Plastic recycling would
most likely be done at this facility if it wasn't a part of a curbside
program.
Mr. Klosterman inquired atout the Hyde Park; Recycling program as a possible
group that might be interested in bidding on this program. There was a
general feeling that they weren't of sufficient size and close enough
to Evanston to consider such a program at this time.
Additional discussion followed by the Board and audience regarding the
City's current agreements with waste haulers, other firms that might be
interested in considering this program/talking to the Board, obtaining
specifications from Champaigne for their program, considering getting a
consultant versus doing a lot of the work ourselves, ind possibly meeting
with individuals who will be in town for the American Public Works Association
meeting in September.
Chairman Hriljac inquired of the Board as to their wishes to purchase the
two books mentioned at the beginning of the meeting. Mr. Klosterman
moved that these two books be purchased. Seconded by Mr. Hauser. Discussion
followed. Vote was two yes and 5 no's. Motion failed. It was suggested
that this be put on the September agenda for further consideration.
Mr. Sellers from Northwestern University volunteered to try to get these
books and present a synopsis for the Board.
The next regularly scheduled meeting of the Environmental Control Board
will be on September 17, 1987.
The meeting of the Environmental Control Board adjourned at 9:25 P.M.
Staff Representative:
Dennis W. Ceplecha
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
Minutes
September 10, 1987
Members Present: Floyd, Fous, Hoyer, Hriljac, Klosterman, Miller
Members Absent: Atkinsor, Hauser, Woliin, Zelewski
Staff Present: Dennis W. Ceplecha, Municipal Arborist
Presiding Official: Ms. Hriljac, Chairman
This meeting had been called to review and discuss the proposed 1988-89
Environmental Control Board budget. Written notification was provided
to the Evanston Review, City Clerk, and all Board members regarding this
special meeting and the meeting was posted in the Civic Center. Provisions
of the Open Meeting Act have been met.
Chairman Hriljac opened the floor for discussion of the budget as presented
in draft form. A number of typographical errors were pointed out.
Mr. Ceplecha presented some comments about how the budget was put together,
the improved market picture at the present time, the increased volumes of
material that are being recycled, and inclusion of the Keep Evanston Beautiful
program again in this budget.
Mr. Ceplecha responded to questions from the Board regarding the listing of
the Attendant as a part time position; how the Illinois Municipal Retirement
Fund (IMRF) impacts this position; decreases as projected in the utility
costs for electricity and gas; and the fact that the $700 for Capital Outlay
is for electrical service to run the new plastic densifier that is anticipated
will be used as part of the plastic recycling program.
There was a review of the Budget Summary form and explanation provided as to
what some of the specific account expenditures were for, how end of the year
estimates were developed and a correction made as to the end -of -the year
projection for the Keep Evanston Beautiful program.
A review of the ongoing activity measures followed with questions about the
dollars saved by recycling, the level and extent of firewood sales, and the
low number of publicity. A change in the 1987-88 estimate and the 1988-89
publicity figures was made.
Mr. Hoyer moved to adopt the 1988-89 budget for the Recycling Center as
corrected. Seconded by Mr. Klosterman Vote to approve was unanimous.
The Environmental Control Board adjourned at 8:15 P.M.
The next meeting of the Environmental Control Board will be on September
17, 1987 to further consider a curbside recycling program.
t
Staff Representative
Dennis W
Ceple a
Environmental Control Board
Minutes
September 17, 1987
Members Present:
Floyd, Fous, Hoyer, Hriljac, Klosterman, Miller, Wollin
Members Absent:
Atkinson, Hauser, Zelewski
Staff Present:
Dennis Ceplecha, Municipal Arborist
Steve Pudloski, Director of Public works
Others Present:
Dale Alekel - Carlson - Uptown Recycling Center
Andrew Fisher, N.U. Students for a Better Environment
Kevin Greene, Citizens for Better Environment
Karen Heneghan,Students for a Better Environment
Walter Fisher, Interested Citizen
Marjorie Fisher, Interested Citizen
Donald Dennspaedt , Active Service Corporation
George Brabec, North Shore Ecology Center
Frank Bickmore, North Shore Ecology Center
Presiding Official:Ms. Hriljac, Chairman
Minutes: Due to the presence of guest speakers, a lot of material to cover, and
the fact that some of the minutes were passed out just prior to the meeting,
the minutes of the August 25, 1987 meeting and the special meeting of September
10, 1987 will be considered at the next meeting in October.
Mr. Klosterman submitted a written report on his attendance at the Recycling
in the Midwest Conference held September 14 A 15, 1987 at the Wisconsin Dells.
He gave a verbal report that covered markets, Illinois priorities for recycling
glass, plastics, curbside collections, yardwaste composting and essentials
for a successful recycling program.
Mr. Fudloski reviewed recycling program of possible interest that will be pre-
sented at the International Public Works Association program on Tuesday, September
22, 1987 at McCormick Place. Special discount coupons were distributed for those
who wanted to attend. Much of the day on Tuesday is Oedicated to recycling.
Chairman Hriljac welcomed Mr. Frank Bickmore and Mr. George Brabec from the
North Shore Ecology Center. Mr. Brabec described the scope of their program,
commented that plastics are a not recycled because of technical problems and
a lack of markets in this area. The recycling of high density polyethelene
(HOPE) is being done but these containers must be shredded or bundled. It
isn't any easier to bale HOPE and at this time the value of shredded HDPE is
greater. Shredder maintenance was discussed and the current value of HDPE is
currently $.10 per pound. Although more plastic containers are coming into use,
most of these plastics won't be recycled. HDPE is difficult to handle on a
curbside program because empty containers are bulky, hard to handle, and easily
blown by the wind.
Plastic bottles with aluminum tops were recently introduced by Coke Cola but
ultimately withdrawn due to protests by environmental groups - because
there is no way to recycle these containers. An increase in plastic
soda bottles is being observed in states with deposit laws.
Mr. Hoyer questioned the difficulty of trying to collect recycled items on
a community -wide basis. Mr. Brabec felt every town has to look at their
own situation and then set up a program of collecting materials using local
waste haulers or municipal crews. Whatever program is implimented it has
to be convenient to the residents and they can do a good job of separation
at the source. Paper would have to be kept separate but glass and metal
could be mixed together. Mr. Brabec felt yard wastes were overlooked and
needed to be addressed. These represent 40% of the total waste but glass
and cans is only 6-7A. A total service concept needs to be considered but
paper and yard wastes would be a good place to begin. Recycling won't always
be economical but there are other considerations. Other points made by Mr.
Brabec was that North Shore Ecology is strong on drop-off centers and apartment
building participation is low -probably due to storage space.
Ms. Fous questioned Mr. Brabec on their recycling program in Morton Grove.
He explained the program that covers 500 homes is strongly supported by the
schools, pick up is on a monthly basis, materials provided by residents in
whatever manner is convient to them, and the fact that holidays always cause
confusion as to when are the pick up days.
Mrs. Alekel-Carlson commented that the Uptown Recycling Center program is able
to handle a wide varieties of materials and they sort out as necessary. They
ask participants not to put material out on holidays and they make it a point
not to schedule pick ups on Mondays.
Ms. Fous questioned how Mr. Brabec would envision and set up a curbside recycling
program in Evanston. He indicated he would look at successful programs
(Champaign, NaRerville, Elmhurst) and see what makes them successful. Providing
boxes or containers seems to be a common denominator of success. Private waste
haulers should be considered in such programs.
Mr. Hoyer questioned if yard wastes shouldn't be made a part of a recycling program
since this material makes up a large part of the refuse. Mrs. Wollin had concerns
about the political ramifications of cutting service back to once a week at the
beginning of a recycling program and might be considered a year or so after
recycling has been shown to be successful. Mr. Brabec and Mr. Miller agreed
that a recycling program should not be designed to make it look like the City
is cutting services. Mr. Klosterman questioned picking up yard wastes with City
trucks. Mr. Pudloski felt they could be used but additional vehicles would be
needed. Additional discussion followed on yard waste recycling and the problems
associated with providing such a program.
Mr. Pudloski suggested as a course of action that the City obtain "Requests for
Proposals" (RFP) and see what options might be available. Mr. Klosterman suggested
a work session of some of the Board to put together a recommendation prior to the
October 15, 1987 meeting. It was agreed that a work session would be held on
October 2, 1987 from noon until a proposal is worked out and that Mrs. Wollin,
Ms. Hriljac, Mr. Klosterman, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Pudloski and Mr. Ceplecha would serve
as that committee. A room would be reserved.
The Board discussed scheduling for the October 15, 1987 meeting and agreed to
hear Mrs. Dale Alekel-Carlson if she wished to present anything, have Mr.
Klosterman contact Eaglebrook Plastic about presenting a program, and consider
the proposal from the recycling committee. The noise ordinance will be
scheduled for November and a date needs to be established to discuss radon.
Additional discussion was held on composting as to how and where this would
be done. Problems of plastic bags, hauling, equipment, lack of sites and the
need to possibly use garden sites or park land was covered. Joint ventures
shouldn't be overlooked as a possibility.
Ms. Hriljac thanked those who came and presented material to the Board tonight.
Ms. Fous made a plea for volunteers to assist with the paper recycling container
at the Farmer's Market for the next five weeks (Saturdays).
Mrs. Alekel-Carlson presented a letter she sent to the Evanston Review correcting
statements she made in the September 3, 1987 article that were incorrectly
stated.
The Board was advised that the Human Services Committee would hold a budget
hearing on the Recycling Center budget on September 28, 1987. Those who can
make it are invited to attend this hearing. Mr. Ceplecha passed out the re-
vised budget that was being presented to the City Manager/Human Services Committee.
Mrs. Wollin passed out a recent article in the Sun Times about the Evanston
Recycling Center and our program. The Board appreciated her efforts at helping
to get the word out. She also invited members to an anniversary meeting of KEB on
September 29 and all Board members were invited to attend and passed out fliers
with more information. She discussed the Governor's veto of funding for the
Keep American Beautiful programs in the State and talked about upcoming
legislation that deals with this funding.
The next meeting of the Environmental Control Board is scheduled for October
15, 1987.
The meeting of the Environmental Control Board adjourned at 10:15 P.M.
i
/
Staff Representative L✓ .r
Dennis W. Ceplecha
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL BOARD
MINUTES
OCTOBER 15, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT: Hoyer, Hriljac, Floyd, Klosterman, Miller, Wollin
Zelewski
MEMBERS ABSENT: Atkinson, Fous
STAFF PRESENT: Dennis Ceplecha, Municipal Arborist
Steve Pudloski, Director of Public Works
OTHERS PRESENT: Andrew Fisher, N.U. Students for a Better Environment
Charlie Sellers, N. U . Students for a Better Environment
Marjorie Fisher, Interested Citizen
Charlotte Omohundro, League of Women Voters
Mr. & Mrs. Ron Freund, Interested Citizens
PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Ms. Hriljac, Chairman
Minutes: Mr. Klosterman moved that the minutes of the Auqust 25, 1987, September
10, 1987 and Seotember 17. 1987 meetings be accepted as submitted. Seconded by
Mr. Miller. Motion passed.
Solid Waste Policy Plan: The Board reviewed and discussed the proposed Solid
Waste Policy Plan to deal with recycling on a community -wide basis. Mr. Klosterman
spoke about composting and the space needed for such an activity. Mr. Hoyer and
Mr. Miller agreed that due to the many trees and larger lawns in Evanston as com-
pared to Hyde Park that Evanston's need for space would be much greater and that
five acres of land would be needed for composting. It was also pointed out that
curbside recycling programs and composting programs are compatible and actually
compliment the other recycling programs and it wouldn't be anticipated the=ecycling
Center would be abandoned.
Additional discussion followed pertaining to how a hauling recycling contractor
would be paid, including condominiums in a recycling program, and the need to
change the existing agreement with the current hauler of refuse from condcminiums.
Mr. Podlos�J ccr--ented on the report_ and suggested several minor e-?nces
and explained wh,, h. telieved they changes were needed.
Mr. Klosterman moved that the Environmental Control Board accept the report with the
appropriate suggested changes. Seconded by Mr. Miller. Vote was unanimous for the
motion. Mrs. Wollin would make the appropriate changes, a cover memorandum would
be attached to the report and both documents sent to the Mayor. The Board felt
strongly that the Administration and Public Works Committee would be the appropriate
committee to consider this report and act on it but would concur with the Mayor if
she wanted the Human Services Committee or both Committees to review and consider
this program.
Noise Ordinance: The Board was advised that the proposed noise ordinance was
returned by the Legal Department in early October with some minor changes. Mrs.
Floyd commented on these changes which were acceptable to the Board. The changed
ordinance was returned to the Legal Department. It is anticipated that the revised
ordinance will be returned to Mr. Ceplecha very soon and will then be distributed
to the Board members. This will be placed on the November agenda.
Ms. Hriijac acknowledged the presence of Mr. and Mrs. Ron Freund who were present
and indicated they were interested in the new noise ordinance. Mr. Freund regretted
it wouldn't be possible to be at next months meeting but he wanted to make a
statement about the ordinance. Chairman Hriijac gave Mr. Freund the floor. He
commented on the ten minute time period auto alarms are permitted to sound and
suggested a shorter period of time to be more appropriate, questioned the approprat-
ness of truck and bus drivers leaving their diesel engines running for long periods
of time, called attention to construction noise - especially older air compressors,
and stated he didn't feel the minimum fine of $25.00 was sufficient enough to dis-
courage someone from making noise. he called attention to the increased use of leaf
blowers that are excessively noisey, increased helicopter flights along the lake
front at early monrning hours and the early hours (7:00 A.M.) when refuse trucks
begin their routes. The Board reviewed and commented on all points made and agreed
where appropriate would be given further consideration next month during consideration
of the noise ordinance.
Mr. Ceplecha questioned the Board about their feelings of separating out newsprint
and recycling it at a higher market value with the end result that other parer of
lower value might not be recyclable, cost money to dispose of at a landfill, and be
perceived as inappropriate. The handling changes necessary at the Recycling Center
were identified and the value of Community Service Workers from the Cook County
Court system were explained. The Board agreed it would be desirable to try such a
program.
Mrs. Zelewski questioned staff about the status of Hecky's restaurant and the problem
of smoke emission as checked out by individuals from Cook County Environmental Control.
Mr. Ceplecha reported that he recently inquired of the City Manager as to how to
proceed in this matter and is awaiting a reply.
Chairman Hriljac brought up the issue of a no smoking ordinance and involvement
on behalf of the Environmental Control Board. Due to the lack of knowledge of what
this ordinance was intended to accomplish and how far it had progressed, Ms. Hriljac
will request from Alderman Feldman more information on this matter.
The next meeting of the Environmental Control Board is November 19, 1987.
The Environmental Control Board adjourned at 9:15 P.M.
LStaff Representative T
Bennis W. Cep c a
Environmental Control Board
Minutes
November 19, 1987
MEMBERS PRESENT: 'Floyd, Fous, Hoyer, Hriljac, Klosterman, Woilin, Zelewski
MEMBERS ABSENT: Atkinson, Miller
STAFF PRESENT: Dennis Ceolecha, Municipal Arborist
OTHERS PRESENT: Mary Rose Colburn, Medill School of Journalism
Dale Alekel - Carlson, Uptown Recycling Center
Bob Thompson, Eaglebrook Plastics
Charlotte Omohundro, League of Women Voters
PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Ms. Hriljac, Chairman
Minutes: Mr. Foyer roved that the minutes of the October 15, 1987 meeting
be accepted as submitted. Seconded by Mr. Klosterman. Motion passed.
Plastic Recycling Presentation: Mr. Klosterman introduced Mr. Robert Thompson
of Eaglebrook Plastics, Inc. in Chicago who presented a program on high density
polyethlene (FLD: E) recycling. Mr. Thompson gave the background of the company,
discussed how clastic recycling has been growing, and discussed the future of
plastic recycling. He explained how HOPE could be accomplished in Evanston and
mentioned the willingness on the part of Eaglebrook Plastics to enter into a
purchase agreement with the City. The current market price for ground up HDPE
is $300 per ton (S.15 per pound) and S220 per ton compressed and baled (S.il per
ton). Various recycled products made from recycled HDPE were passed around for
the Board to see. A general discussion followed on recycling plastic and Mr.
Thompson answered questions from the Board.
Mr. David Teske, Assistant City Engineer, introduced himself, advised the Board
he was representing Mr. Pudloski this evening, and explained his emerging involve-
ment in recycling. He described his previous recycling experience in Minnesota
and his recent attendance at a recycling conference in Madison, Wisconsin.
A review of the Administration and Public Works Committee (A&AW) special meeting
of November 16, 1987 was presented to the Board by those who attended that meeting.
The A&PW Committee apparently favored the idea of manditory recycling and believed
this should be done with existing City Sanitation Department crews once per week
(with the second pick-up to be for refuse). Mr. Pudloski has been asked to put
together a recycling program according to the ARPW Committee's concept and present
the program and its related costs to the Committee on December 7, 1987. Various
methods of enforcing a_ manditory recycling program were described and discussed
as to how these might work in Evanston. A number of interesting incentive programs
were described that could be utilized.
The Board asked staff to inquire about a purchase agreement with Midwest Plastics
in Wisconsin and compare it with the purchase agreement provided by Eaglebrook
Plastics, Inc. A status report will be presented next month. Mrs. Wollin stressed
the importance of keeping thorough and accurate records of any recycling programs
so analysis and comparisons can be performed. Chairman Hriljac presented
an idea used by others whereby bids are received for a project with the
City bidding on its own program out for bid to see how competitive the
City would be in handling the particular program -especially useful in
areas such as refuse collection.
Meeting Dates: Mr. Klosterman moved acceptance of Mr. Ceplecha's memorandum
as submitted cn meeting dates for the Environmental Control Board for 1988.
Mrs. Zelewski seconded. Motion carried.
Noise Ordinance: Chairman Hriljac asked for comments on the second draft
of the proposed noise ordinance. Mr. Hoyer commented on a recent problem
at the Basic Industiral Research Laboratory (BIRL) and the failure of the
proposed ordinance to deal with high frequency sounds that are objectional.
Mr. Ceplecha gave a status report on measures being taken to correct that
noise situation. It was agreed that appropriate language be included in
the ordinance in section 9-13-3 to cover high frequency sounds. A number
of typographical errors were noted and the Acoustical terminology, 1970
revision questioned as to if this was the most recent revision. Staff
agreed to check with Dr. Wilbur on this matter. Mrs. Floyd reviewed the
points made by Mr. Freund at the previous meeting regarding the proposed
ordinance. Each was discussed and it was agreed that the automobile alarm
time restriction should be reduced to four minutes; that running diesel
engines on busses, trucks and other vehicles while not particularly
desirable presents an enforcement problem and there are other considerations
such as heat and air brakes that require the enaines running; the problem
with construction noise (air compressions, etc.) would be adequately covered
under the general ordinance; and the fine is in line with other municipal
code violations of this nature. Mr. Hoyer moved adoption of the draft
ordinance with the changes as indicated. Seconded by Mrs. Floyd Motion
passed.
Committee Reports
Chairman Hriljac advised the Board that she had appointed Fir. Miller- as the
Board's representative to the Northwestern University Recombinant DNA Committee.
Mr, Hoyer advised the Board on his work to revise the Environmental Control Board
ordinance to make it more realistic and deal with current situations such as
BIRL. He felt we shouldn't wait any longer and recommended a task force to begin
working on this item. After a discussion of the various committees. who is
working cn which committee, who are the new members of the Board, and whit needs
to be accomplished, Chairman Hriljac agreed to work on this area. "emters
agreeing to work with Mr. Hoyer on the task force were Chairman Hriljac and Mr.
Klosterman.
Mrs. Wollin reported on her attendance at the regional League of Woman Voters
National Resource meeting and was pleased to realize how far we had come and
commented that we often lose sight of how far we have progressed in many different
areas. She also related to a meeting she attended at Oakton Community College
with former Chicago Mayor Jane Byrne and her perception and knowledge about
recyclinq. Mrs. Wollin sugqested that Mary McCann from Glenn Ellyn would
be a good resource person to have come talk to the Board and this will try
to be set up for February, 1988.
Chairman Hriljac reviewed her attendance at the Human Services Committee and
their dealing with a No Smoking ordinance. The Committee is still considering
the ordinance and technical questions will be answered on December 7, 1987,
Mrs. Zelewski indicated her interest and desire to attend that meeting and
she provided a summary of the provisions of the ordinance for the Board.
Ms. Fous reported on the paper bin at the Farmers Market and the fine support
received from the community during the summer and fall. It was her hope many
of those who recycled at this bin would use the Unitarian Church container for
their paper. A problem with the lack of a recycling attendant was pointed out.
Staff pointed out that we were aware of the situation and was working on correct-
ing this matter. Ms. Fous also inquired about publicizing the hours of the
Recycling Center and staff responded that articles had been put in the News
Source publication. There is an apparent problem with getting these publications
to some condo and aaartment residents.
The next meeting of the Environmental Control Board will be on December 19, 1987.
The Environmental Control Board adjourned at 9:35 P.M.
Staff Representative
Dennis W. Ceplecha
Environmental Control Board
Minutes
December 17, 1987
Members Present: Brown, Floyd, Fous, Hoyer, Hriljac, Klosterman, Miller
WolIin
Members Absent: Atkinson, Zelewski
Staff Present: Dennis Ceplecha, Municipal Arborist
David Teske, Assistant City Engineer
Others Present: Charlotte Omohundro, League of Women Voters
Marjorie Wilson, Interested Citizen
Presiding Official: Ms. Hriljac, Chairman
Minutes: It was pointed out that under the Plastic Recycling Presentation
that the word mandatory was incorrectly spelled twice and that the current
value of baled plastic is $.11 per pound and not per ton. The word Industrial
was misspelled on page two under the Noise Ordinance section and the date of
the December meeting should have been December 17, 1987 and not the 19th. Mr.
Hoyer moved approval of the minutes with these corrections. Mr. Klosterman
seconded. Motion passed.
Noise Ordinance: Mr. Ceplecha advised the Board of the status of the noise
ordinance and passed out copies of the ordinance as changed by the Board at
last months meeting and recently approved by the Law Department. It appears
likely that the Administration and Public Works Committee (A & PW) will consider
this ordinance in January, 1988. Staff will advise the Board of the exact
date when it has been determined. There was concern about the most recent up-
date of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Acoustical Terminology
as identified in the ordinance and asked staff to look into this item.
Curbside Recyclinq Program: Mr. Klosterman suggested and passed out a memorandum
supporting a curbside recycling program and identified the Mayor, City Manager,
Public Works Director, and A & PW Committee as those who should receive this
document. He made some comments about reactions and comments made by some
aldermen at the recent A & PW meeting held to discuss curbside recycling. Mr.
Klosterman made a motion to send the memorandum to those above to clarify the
Boards position on this matter. Mr. Miller seconded the motion. Mr. Klosterman
answered questions from various Board members and provided further explanation
about the specific items. A point of clarification was made in the second paragraph
of concern number 2 and a misspelled word (polyethylenes) in number 3 was noted.
The motion passed with these two corrections.
r
r�
Smoking Ordinance: In the absence of Mrs. Zelewski, Chairman Hriljac passed
out a memorandum from Mrs. Zelewski giving a progress report on this proposed
ordinance and action taken by the Human Services Committee. It has been
decided that this ordinance will now be directed at restaurants only and that
other public buildings will not be made a part of this ordinance at this time.
Copies of the revised ordinance would be made available to those that expressed
an interest.
Committee Reports: Chairman Hriljac reviewed the areas of responsibility, dis-
cussed each area, identified those working on a specific area at this time and
suggested the Board develope a consensus as to which committees should be
continued, added, or dropped. It was decided that the committees should be
I. Environmental Education, 2. Pesticide Use. 3. Asbestos Removal/Encap-
sulation, 4. City Environmental Ordinance, 5. Recycling, 6. Noise Pollution,
7. Legislation, 8. Hazardous Waste, 9. Water Issues, 10, Air Issues, and
11. Public Health. A list will be included with the mailing of the next agenda
and minutes of this meeting for members to review and consider which committee
or committees, on which they may wish to serve.
Recycling Committee: Ms. Eous commented on the receptivness of bussinesses at
putting posters in their store windows which give the hours of the Recycling
Center. Problems with the signs and bin placement at the unitarian Church were
raised and discussed.
City Environmental Ordinance: Mr. Hoyer expressed a desire for this committee
to meet to again work on a revised ordinance. Mr. Klosterman expressed his
Willingness to assist in this work. Chai man Hriljac saw the need for this new
ordinance in view of the recent recommendations by the City Manager and the
possible availability of $5,000 to be spent on contractual services. Mr. Miller
and Mr. Brown also agreed to serve on this committee. Chairman Hriljac will also
maintain an active role in this work. Staff agreed to send out supporting
material and arrange for a meeting room. A meeting date of January 5, 1988 at
7:30 p.m. was set. Mr. Hoyer commented that a lot of consultants are available
with expertise in this area and that Pollution Engineering magazine would be a
place to start looking.
Mr. Cepiecha advised the Board about action taken by Cook County Environmental
Control against Hecky's Bar-BQ for air pollution. Mr. Powell had to pay a $50
fine.
The next meeting of the Environmental Control Board will be on January 21, 1988.
The Environmental Control Board
Staff
adjourned at 9:20 p.
Representative: