Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1987EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION • MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING Thursday, January 15, 1987 City. Council Chambers - 8:00 P.M..''`'. CIVIC CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: Barbara Buchbinder-Green, William Coney, 'Howard, -Decker. Anne Earle. David Gurnlak, .Solomon Hirsh, Mary McWilliams, and Harry Wolin MEMBERS ABSENT: Phyllis Horton. Anne McGuire, Carolyn Ripley STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant , PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Mary McWilliams, Chair = ASSOCIATES PRESENT: Judy Fiske, Stephen Knutson OTHERS PRESENT: Jonathan Fiske. Shelia Richard, Jenny Gilbertson, Eloise Jones, Jerry Neighbors. Bob Lubotsky, Jim Yeaman, Janet Gurnlak, Phillip Lindsey, Larry O'Donnell, Dan Sullivan, Robert Hunter, Susan Moss. Phillip Haley, Neil Davis, Scott Green, Chairman McWilliams opened the meeting by welcoming members of Rotary International. representative of the architectural firm of O'Donnell. Wicklund, Pigozzi do Peterson (OWPP, project architects). the Dewey Community Conference, Preservation League of Evanston, and other members of the audience. She then stated the purpose of this special meeting: to consider plans for expansion of the Rotary International Headquarter, 1600 Ridge Avenue, Involving demolition of six buildings located within the Evanston Ridge National Register Historic District, two of which. 1622 and 1628 Ridge Avenue. are Individually designated Evanston Landmarks. She then explained that the latter buildings were significant by virtue of their location and style. She summarized the agenda for the evening and turned the meeting over to Stephen Knutson. acting Chairman of the Commission's Review and Technical Assistance Committee. Mr. Knutson presented Phillip Lindsey. General Secretary of Rotary International. Mr. Lindsey Introduced his Rotary colleagues Jim Yeaman. Associate Secretary for Membership Services. Neil Davis. Associate Secretary for Program Development, Jerry Neighbors, Third Associate Secretary for Administration. and Phillip Haley, Personnel and Office Services Manager. He also Introduced members of the architectural firm present: Larry O'Donnell, principal, Scott Green, from the law firm of Hopkins and Sutter which serves as general counsel for O.W.P.P.. Bob Hunter, principal. and Dan Sullivan. Mr. Lindsey briefly discussed the history of Rotary in Evanston. the organization's need for office expansion and made a strong case for the organization's commitment to its good neighbor policy. Mr. Lindsey closed by stating the organization's desire to remain in Evanston and by asking for the Preservation Commission and Preservation League's cooperation and assistance. Bob Hunter then presented the architectural plans for expansion. He explained that a needs assessment revealed Rotary's needs for an additional 62.000 square feet of space. The present headquarters building contains 70.000 square feet. He summarized the design criteria for the new addition - compatibility with existing headquarters building in geometry and materials, backdrop to neighborhood (i.e., not imposing architectural statement), no on -grade parking, more effective entry. and. in general. minimal impact on the neighborhood. He explained how each of the above criteria were met: by introducing angles at the addition's corners, by reorienting the main entrance to Asbury. by providing two levels of below -grade Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - January 13, 1987 Page 2 parking at the site's northwest corner and topping ft wth landscaping serving as a "front. yard", by successively stepping the building back at each floor level, and by building no higher than the existing headquarters building. Mr. Hunter illustrated his explanation of the project with slides of a first-floor/site plan, a section through the building, a ground perspective, an aerial perspective, and plans of each floor. He stated that the addition would be organized around a central skylit "circulation spine", that the existing entrance would be enclosed to provide additional space and that its steps would be replaced by a terrace, that all windows In the existing building would be replaced. that some of the lannonstone treatment of the existing building would be extended to the addition, that each new balcony would be equipped with a planter, and that the new front entrance on Asbury would Include a turnaround decorated with flagpoles. In response to questions from Commission members, Mr. Hunter responded that the addition could not be built behind the 1622 and 1628 Ridge landmarks because: a) the northwest corner of the site Is zoned R I and a variation would be needed, and b) because the parking garage could not be connected to the building at this location. He also stated that the setback of the addition along Ridge would be greater than that of the existing building. Using slides of models. Mr. Sullivan then explained the successive architectural schemes investigated and why only the present scheme Is feasible. The schemes and Mr. Sullivan's conclusions were: 1. Build three small additions onto the existing building, retain 1622 and 1629 Asbury, locate on -grade parking north of landmarks along Church Street. Mr. Sullivan explained Oct this scheme is unfeasible because it presents serious zoning problems and does not provide all the Additional space required by Rotary. He added that the City's Site Plan Review Committee advised against building on Asbury, In anticipation of strong neighborhood opposition. 2. Build detached addition with below -grade parking north of Evanston landmarks in northeast corner of site, demolish Asbury residences and construct below -grade parking under site of Asbury residence. The scheme does not fulfill square foot needs and is inefficient in that It provides no link to the existing building. 3. Build L-shaped addition along Church Street and Asbury Avenue. Retain Evanston landmarks. This scheme comes close to fulfilling the square foot requirements. It necessitates building in the R 1 single-family zone along Asbury. It is unacceptable functionally because of the long distances to traverse between unconnected points. 4. Incorporate front one-third of landmarks Into addition. This solution was considered visually unacceptable. The plan of this scheme is basically analogous to the plan of the addition originally proposed. Mr. Knutson stated he was greatly encouraged by this scheme commenting that It related better with the character of Ridge Avenue than the balconied design being proposed for the addition. Discussion ensued. In response to a question by Mr. Decker as to whether the possibility of moving the landmarks is being Investigated. Chairman McWilliams stated that Rotary International has offered to give the buildings away to anyone who will move them, and that interested parties exist. She further stated that because a demolition permit has not been applied for, the Commission will not vote on the issue of demolition tonight. She suggested Commission discussion focus on appropriate mitigating measures for the two Evanston landmarks. These measures, in order of priority, are: retain the buildings in situ by building around them or Incorporating them into the addition Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - January 15. 1987 Page 3 move them to another location on site move them off -site within the Historic District move them off -site outside the Historic District demolish the structures Mr. Hirsh asked for the position of the Dewey Community Conference on the Rotary expansion plans. Jenny Gilbertson, President, Dewey Community Conference, stated that only the Board has met with Rotary to date. Expansion plans will be presented to the DCC membership on Wednesday, January 21st. at Dewey School. The Board will take a formal position only after receiving neighborhood input. The initial DCC Board reaction was serious concern about the demolition of the landmarks, recognition that Rotary has been a good neighbor, concern that a new tenant may not be as good a neighbor should Rotary move, and underground parking was very well received. Ms. Buchbinder-Green questioned the architects as to whether the two landmarks could be moved on -site to the corner of Asbury and Church. Mr. O'Donnell replied that OWPP had been advised by the CIty's Site Plan Review Committee that the Dewey neighborhood wants the Asbury/Church corner open. Ms. Gilbertson stated that the DCC Board had been told by OWPP that the northeast underground parking structure could not support the two landmarks atop it. Chairman McWilliams stated her regret that no preservation input was available to the architects at the site plan review stage and stated her hope that productive dialogue among Rotary, the neighbors, Preservation Commission, and Preservation League could henceforth resolve neighborhood/preservation concerns. Commissioner Gurniak queried whether the landmark structures could be used by Rotary, as residences for visiting Rotary members for example. Mr. Hunter responded that the buildings could not be used effectively as office space. Mr. Lindsay responded that Rotary had considered using the buildings as residences. but because they could not accommodate large groups, were costly to maintain and would be costly to rehab to a level on par with local hotels. the Idea was dropped, Chairman McWilliams recommended that consideration of the Rotary expansion be concluded tonight with discussion and vote as to whether the Commission would pursue. with Rotary and Its architects. alternatives to demolition. She added that the Proposed addition raises a second preservation issue. compatibility of the addition within the Evanston Ridge National Register Historic District. Although the Preservation Commission's legal jurisdiction does not extend over the National Register Historic District, compatibility of new construction within such districts is nonetheless an important community preservation issue. The Chair added that the apartment buildings on the east side of Ridge, across from Rotary. are in yet another historic district. the National Register Thematic Apartment Building. She therefore recommended that the EPC also take a position on the compatibility issue. Mr. Decker stated that the landmarks' location was an Important component of their significance and that he was uneasy about relocation. Partial reuse Is totally unacceptable, however, because it destroys the integrity of the building. He stated his belief, however, that a middle path that meets the needs of Rotary and addresses the neighborhood and preservation concerns needs to be more fully explored and that once fully explored the issue of demolition should be quickly resolved by vote of the Preservation Commission. Mr. Knutson concurred, adding his observation that the two landmarks are isolated remnants and that compatibility of the new building with the district thus assumes highest priority. Ms. Buchbinder-Green stated that moving the two landmarks Is far preferable to demolition. She felt that the U-shaped proposal which preserves the two landmark structures In unacceptable because it infringes on the historic district boundaries and isolates the Evanston Landmarks from the rest of the historic district. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - January 15, 1987 Page 4 Ms. Buchbinder-Green summarized the significance of the buildings. They were built as rental �f buildings by William Blanchard and were never of the grand scale of the neighboring houses on Ridge Avenue. The buildings are significant because of their association with William Blanchard and because of their Italianate design. She stated that it Is preferable to move the landmarks within the historic district rather than to save them In situ via the U-shaped plan which further Isolates the building and which infringes on the boundary of the historic district. Mr. Lindsay reiterated Rotary's offer to give the buildings away. He expressed hope that word of Rotary's offer would be disseminated quickly and that the houses will be preserved. He further stated his hope that Rotary's expansion needs could be met In a way that would do justice to the neighborhood but doubted that the buildings could be preserved on site. In response to a Commission request for clarification of Rotary's offer, Mr. Lindsay responded that Rotary will give the houses away for $1. The move will be made at owners expense. Mr. O'Donnell stated that the houses need to be moved by early summer in order to begin construction. He stated that OW PP wants to oreserve the homes and feels It has explored all logical options. The firm will, with Rotary's approval, try to work with concerned neighbors and community groups to continue exploring possibilities. In his opinion. however. relocation of the landmarks to the Asbury/Church corner would not work from a utility or visual standpoint. In response to the Chair's query as to neighborhood reaction to the Church/Asbury move. Ms. Gilbertson stated this question should be raised at Wednesday's DCC membership meeting. Mr. Wolin queried whether the landmarks could be moved to the site's southeast corner (Ridge; Church), and the addition designed around them. Discussion ensued. Mr. Hunter pointed out that such a scheme would probably necessitate building in the R I zone along Asbury. Mr. Coney stated his opposition to moving the landmarks and urged the architects to explore alternative schemes which would preserve the landmarks In situ. Mr. O'Donnell reiterated his wish to address the concerns of all Interested parties and staled the only realistic option is to move the buildings off -site. Retaining the landmarks on -site would present serious functional difficulties. Discussion as to the Preservation Commission position on the Rotary expansion ensued. A motion, by Mr. Decker, to ask Rotary to direct their architects to try to find a development scheme which preserves the two Evanston landmark homes In total, on their existing site, even If It required further variations was approved by a vote of six ayes, zero nays, and one abstention. Father Gurnlak and Ms. Buchbinder-Green stated their displeasure that a move on -site was not included in the motion. Mr. Coney offered the motion that if Rotary shows good faith effort In carrying out the above motion and no solution can be reached, then the buildings should be moved off site. Discussion ensued. Mr. Knutson suggested that moving a building does not completely deprive It of historical significance particularly in Evanston, where the moving of buildings was profuse. Ms. Buchbinder-Green added that the historic district contains many buildings that have been moved. Ms. Earle further added that 800 buildings were moved in Evanston between 1892 and the 1950's. The motion died for lack of second. Ms. Buchbinder-Green moved that If Mr. Decker's motion is unfeasible, that schemes locating the landmarks elsewhere on the site be pursued, and that If the latter Is unfeasible, the landmarks be moved as close as possible within the historic district. The motion was unanimously approved. Judy Fiske, Preservation League of Evanston (PLE) Board member, stated that the PLE Board, representing an organization of 500 members. would vote on the Rotary expansion Issue at their next meeting and would present their position at any future public hearings. Staff reminded Commissioners that the expansion necessitates approval of a special use by the Zoning Board of Appeals and City Council. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - January 15. 1987 Page 5 The Chair recommended a follow-up meeting with Rotary to discuss the results of activity recommended by the Preservation Commission In Its motions tonight. She recommended that this meeting be held after Wednesday's Dewey Community Conference meeting at which the Preservation Commission would be represented. She thanked Rotary and OWPP for their presentation. Following a five -minutes recess. the Commission considered the case for demolition of 1228-30 Chicago Avenue. The building Is designated an Evanston landmark under criteria A7. Application for demolition of the property was made on January 14, 1987. Commissioner Earle moved that the building also be designated under Evanston Landmark criteria A4 (excellence of design) and AS (significant local architect. John T. Wilson Jennings). Discussion ensued. Mr. Knutson stated that at the time of original designation, the architect was unknown and that in light of this information. A4 and AS are appropriate criteria for the building. Chairman McWilliams explained that A4 and A3 are the highest Evanston Landmark architectural criteria and that designation under such criteria denotes a highly significant building. The motion carried by a vote of 7 aves, zero nay, and one abstention. Chairman McWilliams further explained that these additional criteria In no way Increases the authority of the Evanston Preservation Commission over this building. Mr. Gerald Murphy, President. Levy Venture Management Company, then.presented the case for demolition. Mr. Murphy's company owns and operates Toyota of Evanston. The company needs to expand. Expansion plans call for construction on this site and the lot Immediately to the south. 1228-30 Chicago Avenue Is now a boarding house. The present owners support Toyota's plans for expansion and do not want to operate the boarding house any longer. The tenants do not want to live In the house because of its location surrounded by commercial properties. Mr. Murphy stated that the owner was surprised to learn of the landmark status of the building and contends that the interior of the structure no longer retains Its Integrity. Since learning of the building's landmark status. Toyota has explored the possibility of moving it to 609 Davis. a property owned by the company. Such a move would necessitate cutting the house In half and would cost approximately 5110.000 In moving costs alone. Moving the structure is not attractive to the company. The company Is willing to offer the house for a token cost to anyone who would be interested In moving it. The terms of sale of 1228-30 Chicago do not permit a closing unless procuring a demolition permit Is assured. Mr. Murphy requested an early approval of the demolition permit by the Preservation Commission. and pledged to work with the Commission In any way to facilitate its decision. The Chair explained that the Preservation Commission does not hold up demolition pernilts arbitrarily. The Preservation Ordinance empowers the Commission to hold a permit 90-days in order to work with an owner toward finding a solution which will save the building if at all Possible. The Chair pledged that the Commission would work with the owner exploring possible solutions in a timely and efficient manner. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - January 13, 1987 PaRe fi Discussion ensued. In response to questions from Commissioners. Mr. Murphy responded that no construction plans have been drawn for the site, and It is anticipated that expansion onto the site will take place in 2-3 years. Mr. Knutson commented that he was uneasy that viable uses for the buiiding have been fully explored. Asked if Commission deferral of this case would delay Levey's construction plans. Mr. Murphy replied that it would not. Mr. Wolin asked if Mr. Murphy needed the CommIssion's final decision by any particular date. Mr. Murphy explained that the contract's closing date is March 31 and that the owner needs time to Rive notice and vacate the tenants. Mr. Murphy stated that the matter could wait "a couple of weeks". He added that Toyota will only proceed with the contract if the property at 1228-30 Chicago Avenue can be used for automotive purposes as specified by Toyota. A motion to defer consideration of the 1228-30 Chicago Avenue demolition case until the regular February Evanston Preservation Commission meeting was unanimously approved. The Commission pledged to try to resolve this issue by mid -February in response to the applicant's needs. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 P.M. Staff: /IL44 Date: lfa� 23Y34/39 r EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY, January 20t 1987. 8:00 P.M. - Room 4601 CIVIC CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: Barbara Buchbinder-Green, Anne Earle, Solomon Hirsh,.. Ann McGuire, Mary McWilliams, Harry Wolin MEMBERS ABSENT: William Coney, Howard Decker, David Gurnlak, Phyllls ,Horton, Carolyn Ripley STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant, Fred Gullen, and Jeanne Liridwall PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Mary McWilliams, Chair ASSOCIATES PRESENT: Stephen Knutson, Marilee Roberg, OTHER PRESENT: Phillip Peters, Amy Seidman, Drew Petterson; Chairman McWilliams welcomed guests. The agenda was •amended, presentations on the Landmark Merrick Rose Garden and Plan Commission's Downtown Plan becoming the first item of business. MERRICK ROSE GARDEN PRESENTATION City of Evanston Horticulturist Fred Gullen presented plans for improvement of the Merrick Rose Garden. Mr. Gullen summarized the Garden's history, the current problems that must be addressed, new plantings proposed, irrigation system improvements, and Improvement of built elements and street furniture. In response to Commissioners' suggestions that the backless benches be concentrated at the Garden's south end and new Victorian -style benches be concentrated be near the Victorian -Era Fountain, Mr. Cullen said this was a good idea and would be taken into serious consideration. The Commission congratulated Mr. Gullen on a job well done. A motion to approve the improvements presented was unanimously approved. PLAN COMMISSION PRESENTATION: DOWNTOWN PLAN The Plan Commission Chairman Phil Peters summarized the purpose of his Commission's Downtown Plan project and asked for the Preservation Commission's comments and cooperation. Plan Commission member Drew Petterson then presented a slide program illustrating the concerns outlined in the Plan Commission's position paper entitled "Toward a Plan for the Downtown". Preservation Commissioners responded to the presentation by questioning the effect of the Research Park on downtown planning, the need for planning for an Evanston Library expansion, the need to retain the downtown's existing bounds, the possibility of creating a new taxing district for the downtown, the need to reconsider sidewalk paving materials, the appropriate role of zoning to retain the present pedestrian scale and historic character of downtown while simultaneously encouraging new development, and the need for design review. Mr. Peters thanked the Commission for its comments and expressed his hope that interested Preservation Commission members would participate In a downtown task force. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - January 20, 1987 Page Two The Commission resumed the agenda order and the Chair welcomed new Evanston Preservation Commission member Anne McGuire. MINUTES Minutes of November 18, 1986 were unanimously approved as submitted. The minutes of November 19, 1986 were unanimously approved with the following corrections. page 1, Others Present, "Rudnick and Wolfe"; page 2, paragraph 2. "...new construction elevations. She also recommended that a uniform color scheme for all non -masonry components be added to the rest of the covenants". The minutes of December 16. 1986 were unanimously approved as submitted. The minutes of December 19, 1986 were unanimously approved as submitted. COMMUNICATIONS The Commission considered the January 7, 1987 memorandum from Booth/Hansen and Associates regarding the Evanston Preservation Commission's review of the Evanston Galleria project {1700 Sherman, Marshall FIeld and Company building}. As requested by the memo Commissioners noted the following errors and omissions: name mispellings. and no economic issue was tied to divided lites. Ms. Buchbinder-Green recommended that the Preservation Commission's minutes of the November 18, 1986 Evanston Galleria review be submitted as the EPC understanding of meeting content. A motion to apprise Booth/Hansen via letter, of the above errors and omissions, and to include the November 18th EPC minutes was unanimously approved. In response to Commissioners' queries as to the status of Centrum Property Inc. donating an historic preservation facade easement on the Marshall Field Building to the Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois, staff reported that she has made contact with the District 63 School Board of Education and that it Is hoped a presentation on the Issue can be made to the School Board in the near future. COMMITTEE REPORTS EVALUATION COMMITTEE Evaluation Committee Chair Buchbinder-Green reported that at the Committee's December Ist meeting it reviewed criteria for Evanston Register designation. The Committee recommends that the National Register criteria be used as Evanston Register designation criteria. The Committee also recommends that a side -by -side comparison of Evanston Landmark criteria and National Register criteria be made available for the next Legislation Committee meeting. She also reported that the Evaluation Committee reviewed the owner -initiated Evanston Landmark nomination for 1303 Maple. The owner recommends criteria A-5. The Committee voted (4-ayes, 0-n-ayes) not to recommend designation of 1505 Maple under criteria A-5 because the building is not a good representation of the work of local architect E. O. Blake, A motion not to accept 1305 Maple as an Evanston Landmark under criteria A-5 was unanimously approved NEW BUSINESS EVANSTON ART CENTER REHABILITATION The Chair reported on a meeting that she and staff attended with representatives of the Evanston Art Center Board of Directors. The Evanston Art Center building, 2603 Sheridan Road. Is badly in need of rehabilitation. FA • Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - January 20, 1987 Page Three The board has asked the Preservation Commission for technical assistance and funding source 'deas for the rehabilitation. The Chair and staff recommended various funding sources Including the new State Historic Preservation Office "Bricks and Motar Grant Program", through which up to S20,000 in matching funds can be obtained for rehabilitation of property, owned by a government or not -for -profit institution, which Is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The Art Center Is not now listed on the Historic Register of Historic Places. The Chair queried whether the Commission was interested in helping the Art Center with a National Register nomination for the property. Discussion ensued. A motion to assist the Evanston Art Center prepare a National Register nominatlon for 2603 .Sheridan Road was unanimously approved. PRESERVATION WEEK PLANNING Staff reported that the Preservation League of Evanston is Interested In cooperating with the Evanston Preservation Commission to promote awareness of Evanston's architectural heritage and preservation Issues during Preservation Week In May of this year. Proposed activities include designating the Certified Local Government survey area landmarks as close to Preservation Week as possible, architectural walks, holding the traditional party for Landmark owners during Preservation Week, celebrating the completion of the 10 year City-wide landmark survev with a presentation to City Council at the time of designation, and asking the Mayor to declare National Preservation Week (May t 0 through 17th) as Evanston Preservation Week. A motion approving the above activities passed unanimously. NOMINATING COMMITTEE REPORT Mr. Knutson reported that the Nominating Committee recommends the following Evannton Preservation Commission officers for 1987-98: Mary McWilliams, Chair and Howard Decker, Vlce-Chair. A motion to accept the recommendation of the Nominating Committee was approved with one abstention. STAFF REPORT Staff reviewed the Preservation Commission's fiscal year 1987-88 work plan. She presented slides showing the new fence at 2424 Lincoln Avenue, a recent Review and Technical Assistance Committee case. Mr. Knutson, freshly arrived from the Zoning Board of Appeals hearing held simultaneous with tonight's EPC meeting, reported that the 1100 Forest Avenue PUD, scheduled for consideration by the Zoning Board of Appeals tonight, has been rescheduled for February 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS Staff announced that Commissioners Phyllis Horton, Solomon Hirsh, and Mary McWilliams were reappointed to the Preservation Commission on December 22 and that Anne McGuire was appointed to the Preservation Commission on December 8, and Building Maintenance Director Max Rubin has requested the assistance of the Review and Technical Assistance Committee on retrofitting the Civic Center Observatory. The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 P.M. Staff: Date: EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, February 17, 1987 ....... 8:00 P.M. Room 2403 CIVIC CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT:, Barbara Buchbinder-Green, Anne Earle, David Gurnlak, Solomon Hirsh, Phyllis Horton, Ann McGuire, Mary McWilliams, Carolyn Ripley MEMBERS ABSENT: William Coney, Howard Decker, Harry Wolin, STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Mary McWilliams, Chair ASSOCIATES PRESENT: David Galloway OTHER PRESENT: Helen Roberti (Owner 1228-30 Chicago Avenue), Ruth Smalley (Evanston Chamber of Commerce), Gerald ,Murphy (Levy Venture Management), Richard Fitzgerald (Counsel, Levy Venture Management), Lee Randhava (League of Women Voters of Evanston), Sue Brady (Alderman Third Ward), Sid Ross (Chairman Housing Commission), Joan Price (Northwestern/Medill). 1 ' MINUTES The minutes of January 15, 1987 were unanimously approved with the following corrections: page 1, paragraph 2, note Bob Hunter as "principal"; page S, paragraph 2, change "Stephen H. Jennings" to "John T. Wilson Jennings". The minutes of January 20, 1987 were unanimously approved with one correction, that "Fred Gullen, Jeanne Lindwall" be listed under STAFF instead of ASSOCIATES PRESENT." The Chair welcomed guests and noted that tonight's agenda will be amended; Items Involving guests will be handled first. COMMITTEE REPORTS REVIEW AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE The Commission considered the demolition permit for 1228-30 Chicago Avenue. Chairman McWilliams opened by summarizing the Commission review procedure for demolition of Evanston landmarks, and she reiterated the limit of Commission's authority he hold a demolition permit up to 90 days while seeking viable alternatives to demolition of that landmark. She reported that since receipt of the demolition permit on January 14, 1987, she, R&TA Chair Ann McGuire and Preservation Coordinator Gwen Sommers Yant met with the owner Mrs. Roberti and purchaser representative Mr. Gerald Murphy to discuss alternatives to demolition. Because purchaser Levy Toyota is not in immediate need of the property for expansion, an Interim commercial lease for 1228-30 Chicago Avenue was found to be an acceptable so►ution. The Commission made inquiries, through the Evanston Chamber of Commerce and the City Manager's office, and private sources of parties interested in entering such an agreement. The Chair reported that, to date, no such parties have been identified. Given the lack of a suitable, proximal, alternative site moving the building does not appear to be a viable alternative. Preservation Commission Minutes February 17, 1987 Page Two Chairman McWilliams stated that the Housing Commission has expressed concern for the building. She Introduced Mr. Sid Ross, Housing Commission Chair. Mr. Ross summarized the Housing Commission's goal for affordable housing In Evanston. He explained that the Housing Commission has drafted an ordinance, currently under review by the City's Legal Department, allowing the Housing Commission to review demolition permits where dislocation of tenants Is Involved. He stated that the Housing Commission will be meeting next Thursday and asked that the Preservation Commission refer this case to the Housing Commission to review. Ms. Buchbinder-Green presented a late nineteenth century photograph of the house and noted that It was described as one of the outstanding houses of its day. She also noted that, subsequent to Evanston Landmark designation, the Integrity of the house had been compromised by the addition of aluminum siding. Staff questioned whether the Housing Commission could be Instrumental In Identifying alternatives to demolition of the building. Sue Brady, Alderman of the ward In which the building Is located and a member of the Housing Commission, stated the demolition of 1228-30 Chicago raises many issues related to housing, preservation, and economic development. She asked that further time be alloted to explore these Issues. Mr. Murphy summarized Levy Toyota's need to eventually expand its operation on to the site, the timetable for expansion, and the costs Involved in demolishing ($31,330) and moving W 10,000) the house. He stated that demolition was unlikely before April 30 and thus the Preservation Commission needn't hold the demolition permit In order for the Housing Commission to consider the case. The building owner, Mrs. Roberti, added that the building Is Inhabited by transients who would probably not move into the house If it were relocated, and that the house Is in poor condition. Chairman Mcwllliams stated her belief that the Preservation Commission needs to explore all reasonable alternatives to save the building. Ms. Buchbinder-Green moved to continue exploring demolition alternatives and seek the input and assistance of the Housing Commission In this endeavor. Second. Discussion ensued. Ms. Buchbinder-Green queried whether the building could be moved to the Church/Greenwood property owned by Mr. Levy. Mr. Murphy explained that this property was co -awned by four people and because of the site's valuable nature, relocation of 1228-30 Chicago Avenue to It was Inappropriate. In response to her question whether other Levy -owned sites existed, to which the building could be moved Mr. Murphy responded in the negative. Mrs. Horton stated her belief that if no reasonable alternative to demolition became apparent before the next regular Commission meeting, that the Commission should seriously consider concluding its review of the case at that meeting. The question was called and the motion was unanimously approved. COMMUNICATIONS Staff reviewed the January 27, 1997 Preservation Commission response to the January 7, 1997 Booth/Hansen and Associates memo regarding the Evanston Galleria project; there was no comment. Staff then reviewed the January 18, 1987 Preservation League of Evanston Position Statement regarding strengthening the Evanston Preservation Ordinance; discussion was deferred to the next Legislation Committee meeting. COMMITTEE REPORTS REVIEW AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COMMITTEE Staff reported that final plans for the Lagoon/Dempster Street bullldngs rehabilitation were presented January 26 to the Planning and Development Committee and were favorably received. Construction bids will be reviewed by the Administration and Public Works Committee and by City Council on February 23. As at the January 26 meeting, representatives from the Preservation Commission will be present to state the Preservation Commission's strong support for the project. OF Preservation Commission MInutes February 17, 1987 Page Three OLD BUSINESS REVIEW OF STRUCTURES IN CLG AREA TWO AND •THREE PROPOSED FOR EVANSTON LANDMARK DESIGNATION. The Commission reviewed slides and recommendations of the Evaluation Committee regarding structures In Certified Local Government (CLG) Survey Areas lI and III proposed for Evanston Landmark designation. The Indicated structures received the Commission's "Intent to nominate" (at least six affirmative) votes. Full records of votes and comments are filed In the Planning Department. CLG AREA 11 VOTE CRITERIA ADDRESS Y- N-A A7 2770 Garrison 4-0-0 A7 1234 Isabella 6-2.0 A8 1234 Isabella 7-1-0 A7 2302 Isabella 4-3-1 A7 2309 Isabella 5-3-0 A7 2322 Isabella 7-1-0 A7 2639 Eastwood 3-4-1 A7 2763 Eastwood 8-0-0 A7 2643 Broadway 4-4-0 A6 2673 Prairie 0-8-0 A7 2675 Prairie 6-2-0 A8 2770 Prairie 3-3-0 A7 2663 Stuart 4-4-0 A5 2727 Herd 3-4-1 A7 2303 Thayer 3-3-0 A7 2305 Thayer 4-4-0 A7 2319 Thayer 4-4-0 A7 2321 Thayer 4-4-0 A7 2326 Thayer 3-5-0 A8 2315 Park Place 2-5-1 AS 2324 Park Place 5-3-0 A7 2502 Park Place 6-2-0 A7 2719 Park Place 1-7-0 A5 3431 Clifford 6-1-1 A8 3431 Clifford 4-4-0 A7 2703 Hartzell 2-6-0 A4 2713 Hartzell 6-1-1 A7 2722 Hartzell 5-3-0 A4 2736 Hartzell 3-5-0 A5 2736 Hartzell 8-0-0 A7 3127 Hartzell 8-0-0 A4 3127 Hartzell 2-6-0 A4 2726 Park Place 5-3-0 A7 2726 Park Place 6-2-0 A7 2649 Highland Avenue 8-0-0 X R. X x X X X X X k Preservation Commission Minutes February 17, 1987 Page Four Ms. Buchbinder-Green noted that the following buildings were Identified as significant In the 1972 Illinois Historic Structure Survey and are thus already Evanston Landmarks under Criteria A9. Because these buildings are located in CLG Area 11, additional research has been conducted during the course of the survey, and the Evaluation Committee has recommended additional landmark criteria. VOTE CRITERIA ADDRESS Y-N-A INTENT TO NOMINATE A3 2400 Park Place 8-0-0 X A8 2418 Park Place 7-0-1 : ; X A7 2418 Park Place 6-2-0 X A3 2608 Park Place . 6-0-2 X1 A4 2608 Park Place .6-1-1 . X CLG AREA IV r A7 2527 Asbury -4-4-0 A7 1317 Rosalie 7-0-1 X A 7 2500 Jackson 3-3-0 A7 2310 Jackson 3-3-0 A7 1300 Lincoln 3-3-0 A4 Saint Athanaslus Complex (Lincoln/Ashland) 7-1-0 X'. A8 Saint Athanaslus Complex (Lincoln/Ashland) 7-1-0 X A4 1634 Lincoln 3-3-0 A4 1918-22 Harrison 0-8-0 A7 1918-22 Harrison 2-6-0 A7 1722 Central 6-2-0 X A7 1923 Colfax 4-4-0 A7 2407 Payne 4-4-0 A4 2031 Hawthrone Lane 8-0-0 X A7 2421 Simpson 3-3-0 A4 Central CTA Station 6-1-1 X The following buildings, located in CLG Area IV and already designated as Evanston Landmarks under Criteria A9, were considered by received no additional criteria designation recommendations: 2750 Broadway 2424 Thayer 2810 Thayer ROTARY INTERNATIONAL. EXPANSION Staff summarized developments to date. A special joint EPC/PLE meeting was held January 15, 1987, at which plans for expansion were presented. The same presentation was made to the Dewey Community Conference (DCC) January 21, 1987, at which meeting Ms. Buchbinder-Green presented the effected historic buildings' significance and Ms. McWilliams explained the Preservation Commission's position regarding the effect of the expansion on the Evanston Landmarks and National Register historic district involved. Following the DCC meeting, representatives of the EPC, Preservation League of Evanston (PLE), and DCC drew up a position paper representing a summary of the combined concerns of the groups. The Rotary International Board of Directors is meeting; in Tennessee this week and the next, and will consider what direction the expansion project will take. Staff explained that the position paper Is intended to communicate concerns and the desire :or collaboration to this international board. J • Preservation Commission Minutes February 17, 1987 Page Five y-. �.." The Position Statement has been reviewed and approved by each of the other boards at their most recent regular meeting. A cover letter has been sent by • each board, along with the Position Statement, to Rotary International after board approval of the Position Statement. The Position Statement Is now before the full EPC for Its revlew and comment. Discussion ensued. Commissioners expressed their concern that constructing around or Incorporated the Evanston Landmarks Into a new addition would destroy their Integrity, that the Statement Implied approval of demolition of the landmarks, and that the desirability of moving the landmark buildings was not strongly enough expressed. Staff stated that the preservation section of the Statement was based on the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, "Manual of Mitigating Measures". The Chair said that the statement is intended as a basis for dialogue among the affected parties. It is hoped that there will be subsequent opportunity for more detailed explanations of community concerns and for working together with Rotary to satisfy these concerns. A motion, to approve the Position Statement and to Incorporate the concerns specifically Identified at this meeting In a cover letter, was approved with one abstention. PRESERVATION WEEK PLANNING Staff reviewed a memo outlining Preservation Week (May 10 - 16, 1987) activities sponsored by the Evanston Preservation Commission, Preservation League of Evanston, and Evanston Historical Society. A motion approving the proposed schedule was unanimously approved. NEW BUSINESS SPRING LANDMARK DESIGNATION SCHEDULE Staff reviewed a proposed schedule for the designation of the Evanston-Landmark-ellgible structures located In the CLG survey area. A motion approving the proposed schedule was unanimously approved. Staff reiterated that, at the May 4 City Council meeting at which the CLG landmarks will be voted upon, the Preservation Commission will be doing a short presentation celebrating the completion of the 10-year, citywide landmarks survey and assessing Its Importance in the Commission's development. This event will mark the beginning of National Historic Preservation month activities in Evanston. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS Chairman McWilliams appointed EPC Standing Committee Chairmen as follows: Anne Earle - EPC Liaison Anne McGuire - Review and Technical Assistance Committee Barbara Buchbinder-Green - Evaluation Committee Phyllis Horton - Public Committee STAFF REPORT 1100 FOREST PLANNED UNIT UPDATE Staff reported that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the 1100 Forest Planned Unit Development on February 3, 1987. She explained that the site plan recommended for approval delineated both the maximum buildable area on each lot and a rough footprint within each buildable area. Although the conditions recommended by the zoning Board of Appeals simplify those recommended by the Preservation Commission, the substance of Preservation Commission concerns was addressed. The proposed 1100 Forest Planned Unit Ordinance is scheduled for consideration by the Planning and Development Committee and City Council on February 23, 1987. Preservation Commission Minutes February 17, 1987 Page Six 1319 MAPLE CONSERVATION GRANT Staff reported that the owners of 1319 Maple have applied to the Preservation Commission for a Conservation Grant to repair clapboards, shingles -and 'decorative trim only. Project complications caused the cancellation of an earlier Conservation Grant for this property (see EPC minutes 9/16/96, 8/19/86). Discussion ensued. Commissioners expressed concern about the method used to remove and dispose of the preexisting asbestos siding. The Commission resolved that this application constituted a new project and that the Commission would need to reassess the building's landmark eligibility and review a written work program. A motion to request that the owners submit, In writing, a new project work program and submit photo documentation of the building after removal of the front facade siding, was approved by a vote of 2-1-5. PERMITS Sommers Yant reported that the following permits received staff approval since the last EPC meeting: 1456 Ridge Avenue - reroof coach house, no change of materials 1023 Asbury - electrical service, not visible from street 720 Judson - electrical service, not visible from street 225 Greenwood - Install and upgrade alarm system, not visible from street . 1400-06 Central - electrical service, 935 Ridge Court - kitchen remodeling and rear deck, not visible from street 1509 Ridge - reroof, no change of materials 1217 Maple - reroof, no change of materials 1583 Ashland - deck side yard, not visible from street. ANNOUNCEMENTS Staff announced that the Preservation League of Evanston has printed 200 copies of the Cove School Feasibility Study; copies are available for $6.50 apiece, and the City of Evanston Preservation Program and the Cove School Revitalization project will be featured at the American Institute of Certified Planners, "Preservation as a Tool for Economic Revitalization" conference. The conference will be held in Savannah, Georgia; Austin, Texas; and Chicago, Illinois. The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m. Staff: Data: �I � • 25Y46/ 51 EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION dP MINUTES REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, March 17, 1987 8:00 P.M. - Room 2404 CIVIC CENTER _ MEMBERSPRESENTr Barbara Buchbinder-Green, Anne Earle, David Gurnlak, Phyllis Horton, Anne McGuire, Mary McWilliams, Carolyn Rlpley, `Harry . 'Wolin MEMBERS ABSENT William Coney, Howard Decker, Solomon Hirsh STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant PRESIDING OFFICER: Mary McWilliams, Chair ASSOCIATES PRESENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Andrew Locken (owner, 1319 Maple), David Hald (architect, 1043 3udson), Gerald Murphy '(Levy Management/1228-30 Chicago Avenue) r The Chair opened the meeting by welcoming guests. 1 COMMUNICATIONS Staff reviewed the February 19, 1987 EPC response to Rotary International presentation on plans for expansion of the 1600 RIdge Avenue headquarters; there was no comment. Staff reviewed Rotary International response to EPC February 19, 1987 communication; there was no comment. Staff reviewed memo to EPC from P&D requesting comment on new PUD legislation. A motion to form a subcommittee to respond to this request was unanimously approved, Mrs. Horton recommended that the Roanoke, Virginia Historic Preservation Zoning Plan be reviewed at this subcommittee meeting for its relevance to the PUD Issue. COMMITTEE REPORTS Review and Technical Assistance Committee Mr. David Haid, architect, reviewed plans for a proposed terrace, fence, and kitchen remodeling for 1045 3udson. Alterations visible from the street are confined to a new brick garden waif gate, and also the replacement of existing windows with historically appropriate fenestration. The Commission complimented Mr. Haid on the quality and sensitivity of his design. A motion to approve the permit for the presented work was unanimously approved. Ms. McGuire presented plans for a kitchen remodeling/addition at 2244 Orrington. She recommended approval of the new construction given its limited visibility and sensitivity to the original design. A motion to approve the construction permit for 2244 Orrington was unanimously approved. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes -March 17, 1987 Page 2 The Commission next considered the case for demolition of 1229-30 Chicago Avenue. Chairman McWilliams reported that the Housing Commission has not been able to offer an alternative to demolition of the building and no Interested tenants have been Identified. Discussion ensued, Ms. Buchbinder-Green queried whether Levy Management had made its offers a) of an Interim lease, and b) giving the building away for $I to any parties who would move the structure, known through the Evanston Review. Mr. Murphy replied In the negative. When asked for Levy's timetable for demolition of the building, Mr. Murphy stated that 1228-30 Chicago would probably be demolished the first week of April. Given no apparent alternatives to demolition, a motion to no longer hold the demolition permit was approved by a vote of 5 Yeas to 2 nays. Ms. Buchbinder-Green queried whether Levy Management would allow the building to be photo documented before demolition. Mr. Murphy responded In the affirmative. OLD BUSINESS 1319 Maple Conservation Grant The agenda was amended in order to consider the Conservation Grant case for 1319 Maple. Staff summarized the history of the project to date. Owner Andy Locken then explained .he method for removal and disposal of the building's asbestos siding. Removal followed procedures recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency. The asbestos shingles are being removed, In recommended containers, to a registered asbestos dump site. Mr. Locken then described the project for which he Is applying for the Conservation Grant: repair and/or replacement of clapboards, shingles, and decorative molding. He presented photographs of the project area, Le. the west facade. Mr.Locken noted that this facade constitutes most of the area of the house that is visible from the street. The owners Intends to complete restoration of the remainder of the house eventually. He submitted a written work program specifying costs for the the restoration of missing siding, shingles, and trim. Recalling the Concern raised at the February EPC meeting, that a landmark -eligible building existed under the artificial siding material, the Chair questioned whether the now -exposed building Is landmark eligible. A motion to declare the structure landmark eligible was unanimously approved. A subsequent motion to approve a $2,500 Conservation Grant to restore the clapboard shingles„and decorative moldings on the west facade of 1319 Maple was approved with 1 abstention. COMMITTEE REPORTS (CONTINUED) Review and Technical Assistance Committee Staff then reported on the Section 106 review of 1229-31 Emerson Street. She explained that pursuant to Federal environmental review procedures, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)-funded rehabilitation or demolition project must be examined to determine their effect upon any National Register or National Register -eligible properties. Under a Memorandum of Agreement with the State Historic Preservation Office and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the City of Evanston has been delegated the responsibility and authority to perform the necessary preservation assessments. Assessments are performed by the Preservation Coordinator. As a result of this review, it appears that 1229-31 Emerson Street may be National Register -eligible because of its significance to Evanston's black community. The property Is receiving a CDBG-funded grant under the Evanston Community Development Corporation's Dodge/Emerson Facade Improvement Program. R&TA Chair McGuire then reported she had met with the 1229-31 Emerson owner, Ms. Sommers Yant, and representatives from the CDBG program, and ECDC, to discuss the proposed facade Improvement's conformance with the "Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation". (CDBG-funded projects involving National Register or National Register -eligible structures must meet the "Secretary of the interior's Standards for Rehabilitation".) She stated that the work entailed cleaning the first floor and replacing badly -deteriorated second floor windows. A search will be made for historic photographs of the building. Ms. Buchbinder-Green stated that no such photographs exist at the Evanston Historical Society. Rn Evanston Preservation Commission ,MInutes -March 17, 1987 Page 3 / Staff recommended that If the building Is determined National Register -eligible, the l^ Commission pursue National Register listing In conjunction with the owner and interested community groups, possibly in time for next year's Black History Month. Ms. Buchbinder-Green stated that the significance of this building parallels that of the City of Chicago's new "Black Metropolis National Register Historic District". The Commission enthusiastically supported pursuing the project. Public Commlttee Project 65 Chairman Phyllis Horton reported that the Preservation Commission Is again offering the spring "Shapes and Materials" 2nd and 3rd grade architectural education lecture. All DIstrict 65 second and third grade teachers and PTA Presidents have been notified of the program. The training session for volunteers Is scheduled for March 23. OLD BUSINESS Evanston Art Center Restoration Chairman McWillIams reported that she and Ms. Sommers Yant met with the Evanston Arts Center Board on February 24 to apprise them of sources of restoration funds. Because National Register status Is a prerequisite of one major funding source, the benefits and responsibilities of such status was also explained. The Arts Center Board, however, has determined to postpone pursuing such funding and National Register nomination In the near future. 1100 Forest PUD Staff reported that the 1100 Forest Planned Unit Development Ordinance was unanimously passed by City Council February 23, 1987. Follow-up publicity on the project and its significance is being pursued. Merrick Rose Garden The Chair reported that she attended the March 9 Planning and Development Committee meeting at which Plans for the Evanston Landmark Merrick Rose Garden rehabilitation were reviewed. The project were unanimously approved. STAFF REPORT Rotary International Expansion Update Staff reported that the CIty of Evanston's Site Plan Review Committee met with Rotary International and its architects on March 2, 1987, at which time the joint EPC/PLEIDCC/Plan Commission Position Statement was discussed. Rotary asked for clarification on how the Secretary of the Interior's Standards would apply to this project, and It was agreed that design representatives from each of the four authoring groups would meet with Rotary and its architects next Wednesday to discuss this matter. Four design representatives, Steven Knutson (EPC), Bob Lubotsky (PLE), Bennett Johnson (DCC), Stephen Yas (Plan Commission) and EPC staff met last night and drew up site -specific design guidelines based on the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The guidelines have been submitted to Rotary and its architects and will form the basis of discussion at the March 25 meeting. Evanston Preservation Commission MInutes - March 17, 1987 Page 4 LPCI Fund Committee Report Staff reported that she and Chairman McWilliams gave a verbal presentation on the Cove School Feasibility Studv to the Landmarks Preservation Council of Illinois (LPCI) Fund Committee, the body which approved LPCI's $1,000 matching grant. The program was well received and the Preservation Commission and Preservation League were congratulated on the quality and success of the endeavor. Staff also reviewed the comprehensive closing reports submitted to each of the project's granting organizations. ANNOUNCEMENTS Staff announced: Representatives from the State Historic Preservation Office'. will monItor the. Commission's April meeting, the Commission will conduct a Certified Local Government (CLG) re view "of- the Roycemore School National Register Nomination, She will be delivering a lecture on "Evanston Landmarks"- to the North Evanston Senior Citizens Club at the Chandler Center on April 7tha She will participate as a panel speaker In the American Institute of Certified .Planners, "Preservation as a Tool for Economic Revitalization" Conference, March 20th; she will focus on the role of historic preservation In City of Evanston planning/services, In particular the Cove School Rehabilitation Project ands The following permits received staff approval since the last Preservation Commission meeting: 704 Judson - remove steps at rear of north side of house, no preservation Impact. 1023 Asbury - kitchen remodeling, not visible from street l 113-33 Maple - replace rear fence, no change In material or style 2937 Sheridan Place - rear addition, not visible from street 923 Noyes - Interior handicapped accessibility, not visible from street 923 Michigan - kitchen remodeling, not visible from street 721 Custer - reroof, not visible from street. The meeting was adjourned at 9:10 P.M. Staff: l Qate:20, -4;, /-6 10Y32/SS EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES LANDMARK DESIGNATION HEARING Tuesday, March 31 1987 8:00 P.M. - Room 2404 CIVIC CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: William Coney, Anne Earle, Phyllis Horton, Anne.`; McCuke, Mary McWilliams, Carolyn Ripley . MEMBERS ABSENT: Barbara Buchbinder-Green, Howard Decker, Da'VId Gurniak, Solomon Hirsh, Harry Wolin STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Mary McWilliams, Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. dt Mrs. Charles McDonald (owners, 2736 Hartzell), Mr. and: Mrs. Russell Wagner (owners, 1303 Washington), Garland Allen (owner, 2302 Park Place) The Chairman opened the meeting by welcoming guests. She summarized the history of the Preservation Commission survey efforts, delineated the area most recently surveyed, and explained that Evanston Landmark -ellglble buildings Identified In the latter area are the subject of tonight's hearing. She also announced that with the completion of the most recent survey project the Commission concludes its decade -long, city-wide landmarks survey. She concluded by explaining the Evanston Landmark designation process. Preservation Coordinator Gwen Sommers Yant then summarized the benefits and responsibilities of Evanston Landmark status. She also explained the permit review process through which the Commission advises landmark owners and thereby protects landmark buildings. Ms. Earle subsequently presented slides of each of the Identified landmark-ellglble buildings. The Chairman Invited comments and questions. Audience members questioned: a) the effect of landmark status on the sale of property, b) how the landmark review procedures apply to the building of a rear yard deck, and c) the effect any future binding review legislation would have on the construction of such a deck. In response to a), the Commission cited local realtors' observation that landmark status can have a positive effect. In response to b) and c), the Commission explained the review standards by which it assesses appropriateness; these standards are the Federal "Secretary of the Interiors's Standards for Rehabilitation". The availability of the Commision's architectural advisory service for landmarks was reiterated, as was the limits of the Commission's present advisory only review authority. Because binding review legislation has not yet been drafted for Evanston, Commissioners explained the process and theory behind other communities' binding review ordinances. The Chair questioned whether anyone present objected to landmark designation for any of the proposed buildings; no objections were offered. Staff reported that no verbal or written objections had been received in response to the special designation hearing notice/information packet mailed to the owner of each landmark -eligible building. She reported, however, that due to an addressing error, the notice for the St. Athanasius complex (corner Lincoln/Ashland) had been returned. She requested that final consideration of the St. Athanaslus complex be deferred until the next reguarly scheduled Preservation Commission meeting, in order to give the owner ample decision -making time. A motion to recommend Evanston Landmark designation of all proposed buildings, save the St. Athanasius complex, to the City Council, and to defer final consideration of the St. Athanasius complex until the next regular Preservation t-- Commission meeting, was unanimously approved. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 P.M. Staff: 23Y3 Date: �� MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF: PRESIDING OFFICER: ASSOCIATES PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Barbara Buchbinder-Green, David Gtirniak, Phyllis Horton, Mary McWilliams, Harry Wolin William Coney, Howard Decker, Anne Earle, Solomon Hirsh, Anne McGuire, Carolyn Ripley Gwen Sommers Yant Mary McWIlliams, Chair. Stephen Knutson Michael Ward (State Historic Preservation Office), 'Julia Hertenstein (SHPDX Kim and Gall Koehn (1041 Ridge), Michael Koenigsknecht (1423 Hinman) MINUTES A quorum of voting members was not present this meeting. Approval of minutes was deferred. COMMITTEE REPORTS Review and Technical Assistance Committee Owner Gall Koehn presented plans for a rear yard fence at 1041 Ridge Avenue. She explained that the five-foot high wooden fence would continue the setback of the existing retaining wall. Ms. Buchbinder-Green reported that the Review and Technical Assistance Committee found both the design and placement of the fence sensitive to the character of the prairie style main house and recommend approval of the permit. Ms. Buchbinder-Green then reported that the Koehn's also propose to glaze the front porch in order to garner additional useable space. They propose to glaze the porch with casement windows with snap -in muntins. The Review and Technical Assistance Committee offered the following hierarchy of recommendations, in decending order of preservation sensitivity: 1) reassess if sufficient useable space will be gained to justify the project, 2) consider screening the porch, 3) if glazing the porch is the only acceptable alternative, investigate procuring wooden casement windows with wooden muntins, and 4) In the case that wooden muntins are not feasible, use wooden casement windows without snap -in muntins. Mr and Mrs. Koehn elected to withdraw the permit for the time being. Mr. Michael Koenigsknecht, owner, 1423 Hinman, then described a proposed kitchen remodeling for the property Involving addition of an octagonal porch. Ms. Buchbinder-Green reported that the Review and Technical Assistance Committee recommended the permit be approved as submitted, given the fact that the alteration Is barely visible from the street, and does not adversely affect the character of the building. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - April 21, 1987 Page 2 Ms. Buchbinder-Green presented a proposed rear addition and 6-foot high fence for 2808 Sheridan Place. She noted that no permit has been applied for and that this case Is slated for consideration by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Review and Technical Assistance Committee found the design of the addition to be compatible with that of the original building. It recommended against approval of the fence, however, given the Preservation Commission's long history of opposition to front yard fences. Mrs. Horton recommended that in Its comment to the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), the Commission apprise ZBA of the negative Impact a front yard fence can have on a landmark property. Father Gurniak observed that the non -transparent nature of the proposed fence adversely Impacted both the 2808 Sheridan Place landmark and surrounding neighborhood, and further commented that transparency Is a feature which would be encouraged in cases where fences are permitted. Ms. Buchbinder-Green presented the permit for replacement of the rear yard fence at 1104 Michigan. The section of fence along Greenleaf will be replaced In kind; the section of picket fence along the rear yard alley will be removed and replace with fence matching that along Greenleaf.. The Review and Technical Assistance Committee recommended that the fence be set back at least 1-foot from the sidewalk to allow for plantings to soften the edge between fence and sidewalk. The Committee also suggested that a graying stain be used to hasten a weathered effect. R&TA recommended approval of the permit. The Chairman apologized that the Commission could not vote on the permits for lack of quorum. The Chair then reported on a meeting with City of Evanston Parks Department representatives regarding restoration of the Merrick Rose Garden Fountain. She explained that while the City of Evanston Is rehabilitating the Garden, insufficient funds are available to restore the Centennial Fountain located in the Merrick Rose Garden. The fountain Is In disrepair and has been recently vandalized. The Review and Technical Assistance Committee recommended various methods of restoring the fountain. At the meeting it was suggested that given the fountain's visibility, popularity, and significance to the City, perhaps private funds could be raised to restore the fountain. It was further suggested that perhaps a consortium of appropriate community groups could be Interested in donating to, or coordinating, a fund raising effort. The Chair asked for Commissioners' comments as to whether the Merrick Rose Garden Fountain restoration is an appropriate project for the Preservation Commission to facilitate. Discussion ensued. Mr. Violin stated that It was Important to first determine how much money would be needed to accomplish the project. ,Mrs. Horton then suggested inviting appropriate groups to a meeting to present the Idea to them and give them an opportunity to discuss the _ Issue and determine if they wish participate In the project. Father Gurnlak commented on the importance of identifying qualified professionals to undertake restoration of the fountain. Finally, staff reported on an April 6 Review and Technical Assistance Committee meeting requested by the First Baptist Church of Evanston. The church requested guidance on planning and carrying out a rehabilitation of the landmark church. R&TA provided an overview of the steps that would need to be undertaken. COMMUNICATIONS Staff reviewed the March 27, 1987 memo regarding 111100 Forest PUD Minor Changes". Plans and drawings were provided to illustrate the changes. Mr. Ward then explained that Mr. Chou Is In the process of applying for the 8-Year Property Tax Assessment Freeze Program for the property and that to qualify for the 8-year Freeze Program, the 1100 Forest PUD project must meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The State HIstoric Preservation Office has simultaneously been reviewing Mr. Chou's plans to monitor compliance with the Secretary of the Interior Standards. Mr. Ward stated that the project is a difficult and complex one to monitor and summarized SHPO concerns regarding the project. The Commission and SHPO representatives pledged to work more closely together to minimize conflict and confusion. , Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - April 21, 1987 Page 3 Discussion ensued. Some Commissioners expressed concern that the. full Preservation Commission should be more closely involved In the review of minor changes to the project; others felt that the existing review and decision making system Is both rfflclent and effective. OLD BUSINESS Final Landmark Vote = St: Athanaslus Complex The Commission discussed various ways Its final landmark recommendation vote could take place In time for St. Athanaslus to be included among the landmarks submitted to City Council for designation. It was determined to hold a special Preservation Comrr.ssion meeting.before the end of the week in order to vote on both the St. Athanasius Complex and the permits presented tonight. NEW BUSINESS Staff reported the need to hold a public hearing to review the National Register Nomination for Roycemore School (640 LIncoln Street). A May 6 meeting date was scheduled. STAFF REPORT Mr. Wolin queried as to the progress of distribution of the "Evanston Past and Present" maps. Staff reported that the maps are distributed through the City Clerk's Office, Evanston Chamber of Commerce, Evanston Historical Society, and Preservation Commission office. Ms. Buchbinder-Green suggested that printing of a revised version of the map be budgeted for next year. Mr. Wolin then queried as to the status of the Lakeshore Historic District signs. Staff reported that the signs have been made but because of more pressing Issues, the necessary memo specifying sign locations has had to assume low priority in the Commission staff work program. She promised to make the memo a high priority work Item. Staff reported Rotary International's plans to abandon expansion of Its Ridge Avenue headquarters and Instead purchase One American Plaza in downtown Evanston. Mr. Ward reported that his monitoring visit revealed a very thorough Section 106 historic preservation review process developed by the Preservation Commission and Community Development Block Grant staff. The SHPO recommended improvements, however, for updating the Preservation Commission's survey data. ANNOUNCEMENTS Staff announced: The Evanston Landmark at 1228-30 Chicago Avenue has been demolished. Spurred by the building's demolition, the Chicago/Dempster Merchants Association Is circulating a petition to strengthen Evanston's Preservation Ordinance. Ms. Sommers Yant also called to Commissioners' attention the Evanston Review article on the demolition and the editorial calling for a stronger landmark ordinance. The schedule of Evanston Historic Preservation Week (May 10-17) activities. The activities are: Sunday, May 10, Evanston Historical Society Housewalk; Wednesday, May 13 (A.M.) EPC/PLE "Historic Preservation for Realtors Program", (P.M.) EPC/PLE "When, Where, Why Wow!: Evanston Landmarks In Perspective" public program/reception; Sunday, May 170 PLE housewalk. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - April 21, 1987 Page 4 The Preservation Commission Is Invited to the ground breaking ceremonies at 1100 Forest on Thursday, April 23rd, The Preservation Commission will be making a special presentation to the Economic Development Committee regarding the benefits of the Cove School Project for Evanston. Former Alderman Ruth Thlel, whose company, Koenig & Strey, Is realtor for the 1100 Forest Avenue project, will comment on the economic benefits of the project, and Raymond Chou, 1100 Forest developer, will present project plans and answer questions. The Statewide Preservation Conference will be held June 4 through 6. At the conference, Chairman Mc Williams will be presenting the Preservation Commission's efforts to promote education and public awareness of historic preservation, and Ms. Sommers Yant will be presenting a case study of the 1100 Forest PUD project as well as speaking on identifying and protecting local landmarks. All Commissioners were urged to attend the conference. Financial Disclosure Statements are due May 1st, The Conservation Grant project at 1319 Maple is complete, and The following permits received staff approval since the last. Pre servatlon :j6DMmission meeting: 1201 Michigan (rebuild rear porch, not visible from the street), 1114 Hinman - restore front porch, repair garage (permits involve restoration of original building elements In original materials or no changes in material), 1403 Elmwood - front porch restoration (restore original design and original materials), 1239 Judson - electrical service (not visible from the street), 936 Sheridan Road - reroof (no change In materials), Meeting was adjourned at 9:43 P.M. Staff: L Da te: 2SY28 1 W# EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING Thursday, April 23, 1987 8:30 A.M. - Room 2403 CIVIC CENTER ' William Coney, David Gurniak, Phyllis' Horton,. Anne McGuire, Mary McWIIIIams, Carolyn Ripley STAFF: PRESIDING OFFICER: COMMITTEE REPORTS Review and Technical Assistance Committee Staff reviewed the permit for a proposed fence to be constructed around the rear yard at 1041 Ridge Avenue (see EPC Meeting Minutes, April 21, 1997). Members found the fence to be sympathetic in design and placement with the prairie style main house. A motion to approve the permit was unanimously approved. Staff reviewed the permit for a proposed fence for I104 Michigan Avenue (see EPC Meeting ?' Minutes, April 21, 1987). A motion to approve the permit and forward comments offered by the Review and Technical Assistance Committee at the April 21, 1987 meeting was unanimously approved. Staff reviewed plans for a kitchen remodeling and new porch for 1423 Hinman Avenue (see April 21, 1987 EPC Minutes). Commissioners found the limited visibility and design of the proposed alteration had no adverse preservation Impact. A motion to approve the permit was unanimously approved. Staff reviewed plans for a proposed addition and fence for 2808 Sheridan Road (see April 21 EPC Minutes). Commissioners found the addition to be sympathetic with the original design of the main house. Discussion regarding the compatibility of the fence ensued. Commissioners found the proposed fence sympathetic In Intent with the original design of the main house but strongly recommended the design be revised to Incorporation greater transparency. A motion to apprise the owner and architect of the above comments was unanimously approved. OLD BUSINESS Final Evanston Landmark Recommendation Vote - St. Athanasius Complex The Commission reviewed slides of the St. Athanasius complex. A motion to recommend Evanston Landmark designation for the St. Athanasius complex 'corner Lincoln Street and Ashland Avenue) to the City Council was unanimously approved. The meetft was a Staff: Da te: �1 23Y32 rned at 9:13 A.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF: EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING Wednesday. May 6, 1987 8:00 P.M. - Room 2404 CIVIC CENTER Barbara Buchbinder-Green, William Coney, Anne Earle, Solomon Hirsh, Phyllis Horton, Anne McGuire, Mary McWilliams Howard Decker, David Guniiak, Carolyn Ripley, Harry Wolin Gwen Sommers Yant PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Mary McWilliams, Chairman OTHERS PRESENT: Rose Ann Dineen (936 Sheridan Road), Scott Nelson (936 Sheridan Road. William McGee (Northwestern University, Medill School of Journalism), Joseph Becker (Roycemore School), Mayor Joan W. Barr. Mr. Katz (2136 Wesley) BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW Owners Rose Ann Dineene and Scott Nelson described a proposed gear yard fence for 926 Sheridan Road. The fence is primarily visible along the east and south edges of the property. t Ms. Dineene explained that a 6-foot high fence is proposed along the south property boundary. The fence is solid wood boards to a height of four feet and is topped by two feet of wood lattice. A four foot high picket fence is proposed to join the south section of fence with the south facade of the house. The picket fence will be stepped down from a height of 6-feet at the Juncture of the two fences, gradually tapering to a height of 4-feet. The south fence will retain natural finish; the picket fence will be stained white. Discussion ensued. A motion to approve the perrait as presented was unanimously approved. Staff presented a proposed 4-foot wood fence for 2136 Wesley. The Review and Technical Assistance Committee met on site with the owner of the building. The proposed fence is comprised of smooth, round headed pickets. A motion to approve the permit for the fence was unanimously approved. CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW - ROYCEMORE SCHOOL NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION The Preservation Commission then conducted its Certified Local Government (CLG) review of the National Register of Historic Places nomination for Roycemore School, 640 Lincoln Street. Mr. Joseph Becker, Headmaster, Roycemore School, gave the economic, social and architectural reasons spurring Roycemore to nominate the school complex to the National Register of Historic Places. Ms. Sommers Yant presented slides of the Roycemore complex. She simultaneously summarized the descriptive and architectural/historical information contained in the National Register Nomination form for the complex. Mrs. hfcWilliams presented additional background information on the Arts and Crafts style, the style for which the Roycemore complex is significant. Discussion ensued. A motion to support, in concept, the nomination of Roycemore School to the National Register of Historic Places was unanimously approved. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - May 6, 1987 Page 2 While the Commission strongly supported the National Register Nomination in concept, .1 members pointed out the following omissions and minor errors of fact in the nomination form. that need to be corrected: Item #6, p. 1 The Roycemore complex is also listed in the Evanston Preservation Commission Historic Resources Survey. The survey was conducted 1976-1987. The City of Evanston Planning Department is the depository for survey records. Item V. P. 1, par. 2 STRIKE "public park", INSERT "athletic field owned by Northwestern University.* Item #1, p. 1, par. 2 STRIKE "one block east of Roycemore", INSERT "alley east of Roycemore." Item #8, p. 3, par. 2 The Faulkner School and Chicago Latin School continue to, exist - (their present titles sans 'for Girls'), like Roycemore, as co-educational institutions. Item #8, p. 3, par. 3 Several facts related to really female education in Evanston are in error. They are: The education of women in Evanston began in 1855 with the opening of Northwestern Female Seminary (no relation to Northwestern University); Frances Willard was only one of the founders of Evanston College for Ladies; and Evanston College for Ladies was absorbed by Northwestern University (not Northwestern's preparatory school). A motion to submit comment to the State Historic Preservation Officer expressing the Preservation Commission's strong support for the nomination of Roycemore School to the National Register of Historic Places based on its architectural significance and to include the above errors and omissions. was approved with one abstention. Mayor Joan Barr also expressed her strong support for the nomination. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 P.M. Staff: 14 � l U Date: ^7 l �' f 25Y33/3 I EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, May 20, 1987 8:00 P.M. - Room 2404 CIVIC CENTER MEMBERS PRESENrh William Coney, Anne Earle, David Gurniak, Solomon Hirsh, Phyllis Horton, Anne McGuire, Mary McWilliams MEMBERS ABSENTS Barbara Buchbinder-Green, Howard Decker, Carolyn Ripley, Harry Wolin STAFFS Gwen Sommers Yant PRESIDING OFFICER: Mary McWilliams, Chair OTHERS PRESENTS Emil Ferris, Barbara Herman MINUTES The minutes of February 17, 1987 were unanimously approved as submitted. The minutes of March 17, 1987 were unanimously approved as submitted. The minutes of March 31, 1987 were unanimously approved as submitted. COMMUNICATIONS Staff reviewed an April 30, 1987 letter from Centrum Properties, Inc., explaining why they would not be using true divided lite windows on the Evanston Galleria Project, an Evanston Landmark located at 1700 S'ierman Avenue. Discussion ensued. Commissioners found that the work proposed did not meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and was not in keeping with the sensitive restoration presented for 1700 Sherman to the Commission by the project architects. A motion to incorporate the above comments in a letter to Centrum Properties was unanimously approved. Staff reviewed the May b, 1987 memo from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) regarding: a) Section 106 preservation monitoring for Community Developement Block Grant (CDBG) projects, and b) the Evanston Preservation Commission's (EPC) architectural survey. The SHPO congratulated the Commission on the thoroughness of its CDBG monitoring process but recommended that the Preservation Commission update some of its survey information to bring the city-wide survey up to *current methodological standards". Discussion ensued. Mrs. Horton asked for clarification on what is entailed in bringing the EPC up to "current standards". Staff explained that the SHPO recommends that the CD target area, the three National Register Historic Districts and any other areas identified as potential historic districts be documented by a reconnaissance color coded survey and by survey forms. She added that the cost of additional survey activity is eligible for partial funding from grants available through the SHPO. Much of this survey work could be completed by an intern. Because the SHPO, in its memo, cited the Preservation Commission's Certified Local Government (CLG) Survey Process as representative of "current methodological standards", Mrs. Horton requested a presentation to the Commission of the methodology and materials generated by the CLG survey. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - May 20, 1987 Page 2 Staff reviewed the Preservation Commission's May 8, 1987 CLG comment regarding the nomination of Roycemore School (640 Lincoln Street) to the National Register of Historic Places. Commissioners commented favorably on the content and tenor of the document. Staff reviewed Mayor Joan Barr's May 8, 1987 comments to the State Historic Preservation Officer regarding the nomination of Roycemore School to the National Register of Historic Places. There were no further comments. COMMITTEE REPORTS Public Committee Mrs. Horton reported that the second/third grade component of the Project 65 Architectural Education Program, "Shapes and Materials* is in progress. Completion of recommended follow-up activities by students is being encouraged through the presentation of a special certificate to classrooms who complete one or more of the activities. Mrs. Horton shared with the Commission examples of students' follow-up activity submissions. Mrs. Horton also reported that a thank you luncheon for Project 65 volunteers will be held at her home on May 26th. She added that approximately 2/3 of the District 65 schools have been served this spring with the "Shapes and Materials". Staff showed slides of the April 23rd ground breaking ceremonies at 1100 Forr-aL The Preservation Commission's positive role in bringing the project to fruition was acknowledged, and Chairman McWilliams delivered a brief address at the ground breaking ceremony. Staff then reported on Evanston Historic Preservation Week activities (May 10-17) co -sponsored by the Preservation Commission and Preservation League of Evanston (PLE). Preservation Week was kicked off with a special May 4th presentation to City Council. The presentations celebrated the completion of the Commission's ten year city-wide survey efforts and presented to the Council slides of the twenty-five buildings recommended by the Preservation Commission for landmark designation by the Council that evening. The presentation also highlighted the importance of preservation in the municipal planning process, outlined the tax benefits available to the community through historic preservation, summarized the Commission's public service programs, acknowledged the most significant preservation achievements of the past year - the successful Cove School project, certified local government status, in addition to completion of the city-wide survey, and concluded by stating the Commission's future efforts will concentrate on conserving Evanston's distinctive physical character in the most effective way possible. As for Evanston Historic Preservation Week proper, the Preservation Commission co -sponsored a special "Historic Preservation for Realtors Program" the morning of May 13th. Over 50 raltors attended the program. in the evening of May 13th, the EPC and PLE co -sponsored a special program for homeowners. Bradford White, Esq., of Shlaes and Company, was guest speaker for both May 13th programs and spoke regarding preservation tax incentives. EPCIPLE programs and services as well as basic historic preservation information was presented at both May L 3th meetings. Approximately 100 homeowners attended the May 13th evening presentation. STAFF REPORT Staff reported: Two Preservation Commission projects were included in this year's Community Development Block Grant program bus tour (May llth). They were the conservation grant at 1501 Lake Street and the Mount Moriah Masonic Temple (1229-31 Emerson Street) facade improvements/National Register nomination. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes -May 20, 1987 Page 3 r She will be delivering a presentation on Evariston Landmark architecture for the Leisure Learning Program on June 10. The following permits received staff approval since the last Preservation Commission meeting: 1104 Michigan: fence (no change in style or materials) 2323 Lincolnwood: electrical service (not visible from the street) 1114 Hinman: reroof (no change in materials) 1500 Ashland: rear yard fence (no preservation impact) 1454 Asbury: restore front porch (restore original design and original materia 1413 Wesley; reroof (no change in materials) 1114 Judson: reroof (no change in materials) 913 Monroe: two -car garage in rear (not visible from the street) , 1102 Elmwood: interior remodeling involving enlargement of one window in rear of north facade (not visible from the street) 1424 Judson: interior remodeling (not visible from street) ANNOUNCEMENTS Staff announced: The 1100 Forest PUD project was featured on the front page of the Alliance Review (newsletter of the National Alliance of Preservation Commissions), and Highlights (news of Evanston City government). She added that the 1100 Forest project has also been featured in Preservation News (National Trust for Historic Preservation) for the past two months. The Statewide Preservation Conference will be held June 4-6, 1987 In Quincy, Illinois, All Commission members are encouraged to attend. Staff showed 'in progress" slides of the demolition of 1228-30 Chicago Avenue. Citizen Emil Ferris introduced herself, expressed her concern and dismay at the demolition of the building, and urged the Preservation Commission to strengthen Evanston's Landmark ordinance as quickly as possible. She reported that her sentiment is shared by 300 local residents who have signed a petition requesting stronger local landmark legislation. The Issues in Chicago Architecture lecture series, sponsored by the Art Institute of Chicago, begins June 9. NEW BUSINESS Review and Technical Assistance Committee Chair Ann McGuire presented a proposed deck for 1326 Davis. R&T finds no adverse preservation impact from the project. A motion to approve the permit was unanimously approved. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - May 20, 1987 Page 4 Staff reported that the Planning and Development Committee has been considering the appropriateness of current front yard fence regulation. P&D has referred the issue to the Plan Commission, which has solicited, in turn, the Preservation Commission's comments. Staff reviewed a May 19. 1986 memo to P& D from City Assistant Zoning Director David M. Rasmussen regarding history, current regulations and rationale of fences in required front yards. Mrs. Horton recommended that a subcommittee be formed to discuss the issue and bring a report to the June EPC meeting. A subcommittee consisting of Barbara Buchbinder—Green, Phyllis Horton, Arnie Earle, and Mary McWilliams was formed. Ms. Earle presented slides of a house on Wesley Avenuewhich was rejected for Evanston Landmark status under criteria A7 because of minor alterations. The house is currently being aluminum sided. She used this example to Illustrate the importance of the A7 Evanston Landmark criteria ("exemplifying an architectural style, construction technique of building type once common in the City" Such "A7" buildings are significant streetscape contributors and the Commission's advisory review mechanism is helpful in educating owners of the adverse economic and aesthetic effects of alterations such as aluminum siding. The meeting was adjourned at 8:55 P.M. Staff: C Date: j,3 �S�.� 25Y3b13 In EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING ' Tuesday' June 23; 1987 8%00 P.M. - Room 2401 ' - . CIVIC CENTER MEMBERS PRESENTS Barbara Bucbinder-Green; Howard Decker; .Anne ' Earle; David Gurnlak; Solomon Hirsh', Ann McGuire, Mary McW111Iams; Carolyn Ripley, and Harry Wolin MEMBERS ABSENT: William Coney; Phyllis Horton STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant; Robert Ahlberg PRESIDING OFFICER: Mary McWilliams; Chair ASSOCIATES PRESENT: Stephen Knutson OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Perodeau (2637 Ridge), Drew Petterson (Plan Commission) MINUTES The minutes of April 2l; 1997 were approved as submitted. ( The minutes of April 23; 1987 were approved as submitted. The minutes of May 6, 1987 were approved as submitted. The minutes of May 20, 1997 were approved as submitted. Ms. Buchbinder-Green offered the following correction to minutes approved at the May Preservation Commission meeting which she was unable to attend: February 18, 1997 = Page 3: Change vote count for 2770 Garrison from 4-0-0 to change Herd to Hurd; change Stuart to Stewart Page 4: Note that 1722 Central has already been designated an Evanston Landmark under criteria A9. Mary 17, 1987 - Page 1: Include Carolyn Ripley under MEMBERS ABSENT; Include Marilee Roberg under MEMBERS PRESENT. COMMITTEE REPORTS Review and Technical Assistance Committee (R&TA) Staff presented the permit for a proposed bay window to replace the existing kitchen window at 2637 Ridge Avenue. RECTA met with owner Mr. Perodeau on June I 1 th. They recommended that the roof of the new bay match the existing house roof, and that the bay's cantilevered sup orts De ttea into ine noose in a sympatnerac manner* i ne Wmmixice noicu tnat true divided window lights are an Important characteristic of the house and recommended a prioritized hierarchy of suggestions regarding the windows of the new bay: 1) Install windows with true divided lights similar to the existing windows; 2) If the former are unavailable, use unorna nted sin le -pane windows; snap In muntlns were discouraged. Discussion ensued. Commissioners commented that the window In question Is not highly visible and that snapZ muntins should be discouraged. A motion to accept the recommendations of the Review and Technical Assistance Committee and approve the permit was unanimously approved. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - June 23, 1987 Page 2 COMMUNICATIONS Staff reviewed the June 18, 1997 letter from the Evanston. Preservation Commission .to Centrum Properties regarding window alterations In the -Evanston Galleria -project (former Marshall Field store, 1700 Sherman Avenue): There was no comment: ' NEW BUSINESS Revision to Zoning Ordittence/Vacation Standards Affecting Preservation Zoning Planner Robert Ahlberg summarized developments to date surrounding contemplated revisions to the City of Evanston Zoning Variation Standards and the entire Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Ahlberg summarized problems Involved in administering the standards and ordinance, and also outlined relevant Zoning Amendment Committee (ZAC)/staff recommendations to date. -I've, City Council Planning and Development Committee (P&D) !s currently considering these recommendations. Items under consideration include authorizing a request for proposal (RFP) for a comprehensive amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. It Is hoped that If approved the RFP will eventually lead to a new zoning ordinance within two years. The Chairman thanked Mr. Ahlberg for his Input. Discussion ensued. Ms. Bucbinder-Green noted that the League of Women Voters also concluded an overhaul of Evanston's Zoning Ordinance was necessary. Chairman McWilliams commented that conserving Evanston's historic character should be encouraged through both the municipal planning process and through zoning regulation. A motion to Inform P&D that the Preservation Commission Is Interested In participating In the process of revising both the zoning variation standards and the City Zoning Ordinance was unanimously approved. Ms. Buchbinder-Green queried whether variation standards in any other communities address aesthetics. Mr. Ahlberg responded that such standards seek to resolve Inequities and he is unaware of variation standards In any other community which address aesthetics. He added that aesthetic considerations are sometimes addressed in special use standards. Drew Petterson, planner and Plan Commission member, agreed with Mr. Ahlberg that aesthetics is a new zoning consideration and that few, if any, communities have recently reviewed their variation standards. EPC COMMENT TO PLAN COMMISSION REGARDING FRONT YARD FENCES Ms. Sommers Yant reported that over the past year or so, P&D has reconsidered the appropriateness of current front yard fence regulations. P&D has referred the Issue to the Plan Commission which has solicited, In turn, the Preservation Commission's comments. Mr. Ahlberg then summarized the history of front yard fence regulations and explained P&D's renewed Interest in the subject. Discussion ensued. Members commented that a high degree of transparency Is an important consideration for any new fence regulation, that fences compatible In terms of materials and styles should be encouraged for homes especially in the historic districts, that blanket regulation Is difficult to author because the success of any fence depends on many variables Including siting, location, style and material, that historically the preservation Commission has strongly discouraged front yard fences because open streetscapes are a key aesthetic feature characteristic of Evanston, that fences break up the continuity of such open streetscapes, that the existing variation process serves the Preservation Commission's purposes well because It forces applicants to carefully think out their decision In terms of both aesthetics and economics. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - June 23, 1987 Page 3 Ms. Buchbinder-Green reported that the Fence Subcommittee appointed at the May Preservation Commission meeting had met and concluded the following: 1) that compatibility of fence with house is particularly Important In historic districts, 2) that transparency Is ddeslrable for approved front yard fences, 3) that the Preservation Commission has worked hard In Its ten years of existence to foster public interest In and commitment to preservation of Evanston's built environment, a built environment which Is characterized by open streetscapes which should be protected through the Zoning Ordinance, and 4) that the Preservation Commission should notify both the Plan Commission and P&D of Its interest In participating In the drafting of any future front yard fence regulation. Discussion ensued. A motion to communicate Committee recommendations numbers 3 and 4 to the Plan Commission and P&D was unanimously approved. Chairman McWilliams thanked both Mr. Petterson and Mr. Ahlberg for their assistance. HOSTING STATEWIDE PRESERVATION CONFERENCE IN 1999 Chairman McWilliams queried whether the Commission was interested In hosting, with other appropriate local groups, the Illlnols Statewide Historic Preservation Conference In 1989, Commissioners attending this year's conference in Quincy (June 4-6) found it highly worthwhile. The Chair furnished background on the history and purpose of the Illinois Statewide Preservation Conference. Staff stated that 1989 could be a particularly appropriate time for Evanston to host the conference because hopefully, the Commission's binding review effort will be concluded by that time and a conference theme could be strengthening local preservation ordinances. Discussion ensued. Father Gurnlak queried as to what the local host Is responsible for. The �.. Chair stated the host community Is responsible for planning most of the logistics of the conference. She added that she has begun to enquire as to accommodations for conference participants and potential meeting/reception sites. Staff recommended that If the Commission Is amenable to the Idea of hosting the statewide preservation conference In 1989 it approve the Idea In concept and defer final commitment until It has reviewed the final conference application materials. A motion to accept staff's recommendation was unanimously approved. RESEARCH PARK PLANNING AFFECTING TWO EVANSTON LANDMARKS Staff summarized the significance of the two Evanston landmarks located In the Research Park - 912 Clark Street, a 1907 substation designed by the prominent Prairie School architect Herman Von Hoist, and 1024 Emerson Street, the Henry Butler Building, built In I909 by one of Evanston's most prominent black citizens. She then summarized the most pertinent facts pertaining to development of a revised master plan for the Research Park and the timetable for acquisition and demolition of the two landmark structures. DIscussion ensued as to the appropriate course of preservation Intervention. Mr. Decker summarized the preservation and urban design recommendations for the Research Park arrived at through the June 16, 1987 charette sponsored by Design Evanston. Charette participants concluded that the Research Park should be an Integral part of the built fabric of Evanston and that integration of the landmark structures In the Research Park development presented a unique opportunity to endow this Research Park with a special Evanston Identity. _ Commissioners noted that many of the broad urban design recommendations offered at the June 16 charette were Incorporated by the developer (Charles Shaw Company)/master planner . (Perkins & Will) In their presentation to the Economic Development Committee on Wednesday, June 17. Specific reference to the two Evanston landmarks was not made at the June 17 presentation, however. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - June 23, 1987 Page 4 Discussion of the adaptive reuse potential of both landmark building ensued as did discussion of the design/declslon making structure for the Research Park complex. A Motion for the Evanston Preservation Commission to enter Into negotiation with the Shaw Company, Perkins & Will, and other appropriate public and private agencies to explore all feasible and prudent alternatives for preserving the two Evanston Landmarks was approved by a vote of 8 ayes to l nay. Ms. McGuire stated that her opposition was based on her belief that because the building was historically Instead of architecturally significant, a plaque on the site was an appropriate way to commemorate the historical signflcance of the building: Chairman McWilliams countered that preserving buildings associated with significant historical events was equally Important as preserving buildings of architectural distinction. STAFF REPORT Staff requested that the CLG survey process/documentation presentation requested at the May Preservation Commission meeting be postponed until the July meeting because the Commission member originally requesting the presentation could not attend tonight's meeting. The Commission approved the request. Ms. Sommers Yant reported that the Preservation Commission made a May 27 presentation to the Economic Development Committee on the 1100 Forest Planned Unit Development (former Cove School) project. Included was a presentation of site plans and elevations by developer Raymond Chou and a report on the economic benefits of the project to Evanston by project realtor Ruth Then. The presentation was very well received. Permits receiving staff approval since the last Preservation Commission meeting are: 1400-04 Judson - reroof, (no change in materials), 1001 Hull Terrace - electrical Installation (not visible from the street), 144 Greenwood - electrical Installation (not visible from the street), 2769 Sheridan Road - remove asphnit roof,' restore wood shingle roof to match original shingles (restore original feature In original materials) 1126 Main Street - reroof, asphalt (no change In materials) 1618 Ashland - replace Boller (not visible from the street) ANNOUNCEMENTS City of Evanston Volunteer Recognition Day will be held on 3uly 14th. Staff reviewed the FIrst English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale vs: County of Los Angeles land use case decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. Although the decision was initially feared to Inhibit strong landmark ordinances, staff reported that Brad White, Vice-president for Legislation, Landmarks Preservation Council of lllinols, Informed her that both he and Dick Roddewig are of the opinion that the decision is only applicable if all use of property Is curtailed and as long as economic hardship provisions are Included In historic preservation ordinances, legal validity should not be problem. Staff will continue to monitor the effect of the decision. The meetl was adjo d at 10:03 P.M. Staff: Date: . r'� EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES MEMBERS ABSENT: Howard Decker, Anne McGuire, Harry Wolin STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant PRESIDING OFFICER: Mary McWilliams, Chairman ASSOCIATES PRESENT: David Galloway OTHER PRESENT: Mr. Horn, Ms. Hom, (1734 Asbury); Mr. Lohmann (1232 Maple) MINUTES The minutes of 3une 23, 1987 were, unanimously approved, with one corrections page 3, paragraph 4, change "19i 2" Clark Street to "912" Clark Street. COMMITTEE REPORTS Review and Technical Assistance Committee (R&TA) The Commission reviewed the application to permit a new, free standing garage beside the existing coach house in the rear yard of 1734 Asbury. owner Mr. Horn summarized his need for parking near the coach house (now a residence) and his desire to construct a garage sympathetic with the coach house. Staff reported that Review and Technical Assistance met on site with Mr. Horn, and, given his functional and aesthetic goals, recommended that a) the new garage roof match that of the coach house in pitch and type, b) sheathing material consist of narrow gage wood siding matching that of the coach house, c) the rhythm of the double -hung windows harmonize with those of the coach house, and d) that desired decorative details such as cupola or brackets be sympathetic to the material, scale, and style of similar elements on the coach house. Discussion ensued regarding the functional and aesthetic merits of wood siding as opposed to aluminum or other artificial siding. The Horns decided to Incorporate all R&TA recommendations. A motion to approve the permit as presented was unanimously approved, with commendation to the owners for their sensitivity to the character of the historic coach house and main house. The Commission then reviewed a building permit for 123Z Maple. The application proposed replacement, In kind, of front steps and replacement of the south facade, first floor, casement windows with a pair of wood, double -hung windows, more appropriate to the style of the house. A motion to approve the permit as presented was unanimously approved. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - July 21, 1987 Page 2 Mr. Coney then reported on the June 23th R&TA meeting with First Baptist Church (607 Lake Street). He summarized the architectural history of the building, Its Importance within its setting, and Its construction. Ms. Buchbinder-Green added additional Information about the significance of the original architect. Mr. Coney reported that he had examined the building and that It Is basically sound. The Church desires to put together a restoration plan. R&TA gave an overview of the process of putting together and carrying out a restoration plan. The Church Building Committee will now take this information and, with the assistance of R&TA, put together a request for proposal for the restoration plan. Preservation Commission staff has furnished the First Baptist Church with information regarding qualified consultants and fund raising. R&TA will continue to work with First Baptist Church through the restoration process. COMMUNICATIONS Staff reviewed the EPC memo to the Plan Commission regarding front yard fences. The memo reflected discussion held on the subject at the June EPC meeting. Commissioners commented that the desire for front yard fences seems to reflect a prevailing turf definition/protection mentality, and that such fences are often negative contributors to a neighborhood. OLD BUSINESS Research Park Landmarks - Update Staff reported that two meetings had been held with representatives of the Shaw Company, developer of the Research Park. The first meeting consisted of a mutual airing of concerns, and the Preservation Commisslon/Preservation League registering their desire to work with the Shaw Company to meet the needs of all parties involved. The second meeting, a site meeting at the Butler Building, explored the building in an effort to gain physical facts about the building and get Ideas for development alternatives which would both preserve the building and meet the needs of the Research Park development. The Preservation Commission, Preservation League, and Plan Commission now need to Identify specific alternatives and present them to the Shaw Company. 1100 Forest PUD Update Staff reviewed the minor changes approved for the 1100 Forest Planned Unit Development (PUD). Changes to the new units primarily articulate the original elevations. The redesign for new Unit #2 was also reviewed. Staff noted that recently the existing structures have become a focus of activity and, consequently, the 1100 Forest PUD Committee has Instituted fortnightly site monitoring visits in order to keep in close touch with developments. Staff summarized the results of the most recent site monitoring visit which concentrated on proposed changes to the existing coach house. She concluded by remarking the Committee works closely with the developer and, where appropriate client, to best assure development will both meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and clients'awAs. NEW BUSINESS Preservation Awards "Summit" Report Ms. Buchbinder-Green reported on the July 13th Preservation Awards "Summit" meeting. Former Evanston Preservation Commission and Preservation League of Evanston Preservation Award jurors and committee members met to reevaluate the Preservation Award program in this, Its fifth anniversary year. Committee recommendations were as follows: 1 Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - July 21, 1987 Page 3 r Refine the program definition of "rehabilitation" from, "Returning a structure or a L significant part of It to a functional condition by using materials compatible In scale, color, texture and character with the original", to, "Modifying a structure. to a functional condition....." This refinement better Incorporates the concept of "additions" in the Rehabilitationcategory, ]hstitute a program of exterior plaques for award winners In order to better highlight good examples of sensitive restoration/rehabilitation and to more effectively inspire other homeowners to meet the same standards of quality. The Committee suggested -that the plaques be available at low cost to homeowners and that a standard design for the plaques be created to further this goal, and Permanently reschedule the awards presentation from the fall to the spring, and, ideally, schedule it in conjunction with Preservation Week activities. Although Preservation Award presentations have heretofore been included as part of the Arts Week Gala celebration, Preservation Week is a far more appropriate time to hold the event. In the experience of Committee members, the traditional August/September application period of the program proved problematic because many homeowners are still on vacation during this time and because projects are nearly, but not quite, completed. Discussion ensued regarding various aspects of a proposed plaque program. Mrs. Horton added that a plaque program for all Evanston Landmarks was an early goal of the Preservation Commission but was never realized. Commissioners determined that separate subcommittees should be formed to further explore, and work out, details of a plaque program for the Preservation Awards and Evanston Landmarks. The following motions were offered In response to the "Summit" Committee recommendations: A motion to approve, in concept, the Initiation of a plaque program for the Preservation Awards and to form a joint Preservation Commission/Preservation League subcommittee to develop a proposal for such a program, if the Preservation League Is also agreeable to the plaque program Idea, was approved with one dissenting vote, A motion to permanently move the Preservation Awards celebration to the Spring, preferably in conjunction with Preservation Week activities, was unanimously approved, and A motion to accept the redefinition of "Rehabllltation" proposed by the "Summit" Subcommittee was unanimously approved. Barbara Buchbinder-Green, Phyllis Horton, and David Galloway volunteered to be Preservation Commission representatives on the joint Preservation Award plaque committee. Preservation Awards Committee - Appointments Chairman McWilliams reported that she appointed Solomon Hirsh and Carolyn Ripley as the 1987 Preservation Commission representatives of the Preservation Award Committee. Development of District 65 Headquarters (1314 Ridge) - Ms. Buchbinder-Green brought to the Commission's attention neighborhood concern that the District 63 headquarters (1314 Ridge) is again the focus of potential development plans. She summarized the history of efforts to promote public awareness of the significance of the property, I.e., listing it on the National Register of Historic Places. Mrs. Horton them i summarized the history of the CommiSSlon'S efforts to preserve the property by producing a feasibility study. She recommended that a copy of this feasibility study be sent to all District 65 School Board members and the Superintendent as soon as possible. Members also recommended that copies be sent to the Preservation Commission and the Preservation League of Evanston Board. A motion to carry out the above recommendation was unanimously approved. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - July 21, 1987 ' Page 4 Potential Development of Large Estate at 1144 Asbury Ms. Bucbinder-Green then reported neighbors' concern regarding the purchase of 1144 Asbury by developer Raymond Chou, and the potential development of the parcel. Ms. Buchbinder-Green recommended that the Commission closely monitor both the District 63 and 1144 Asbury estates. Staff stated that she is aware of events surrounding both parcels and is monitoring the situation closely. Reschedule August EPC Meeting Chairman McWilliams noted that, historically, It has been difficult to gather a quorum for the regular August EPC meeting. She therefore recommended that the August meeting be moved from the l8th to the 1lth. Discussion ensued. A motion to change the meeting date as recommended, provided a quorum of members could attend the August l Ith meeting, was unanimously approved. CLG Grant Application Staff reported that applications for Certified Local Government (CLG) Grants are due the last day of August. She recommended that the Commission apply for staff support In the form of a summer intern to help standardize and update the records amassed as a result of the Commission's decade -long survey efforts. Such organization/additional documentation was recommended earlier this year by Illinois Historic Preservation Agency (IHPA) staff monitoring the City's Certified Local Government and Community Development Block Grant programs. Because the IHPA Is the granting organization for CLG funds, the recommended project may have a good chance for funding. Staff also commented that a summer Internship with the Preservation Commission would be a valuable experience for an undergraduate or graduate student because of the breadth of the Commission's program. A motion to approve staff recommendation was unanimously approved. Statewide Commissioner Training Workshop Recommendations Staff reported that the Illinois Association of Historic Preservation Commissions Board has proposed sponsoring an annual preservation commissioner training workshop. The organizational meeting for this project Is tomorrow, and will be attended by EPC staff and Commissioners. She requested that Commissioners identify issues and topics they feel need to be covered at such a workshop. The following recommendations were offered: explanation of the concept of "integrity", background on historic preservation law explaining, the legal foundation of preservation commission activities, preservation jargon, long range goal planning, case studies of ubiquitous commission problems, and training In the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. It was also recommended that the workshop be applicable to commissioners at all levels of experience. Statewide Preservation Conference Application Committee Chairman McWilliams asked for volunteers for a joint Preservation Commission and Preservation League committee to draft the application to hold the 1989 Statewide Historic Preservation Conference in Evanston. Mr. Coney and Mrs. McWilliams will constitute the Committee. STAFF REPORT Historic Preservation Courses Available Through Recreation Lecture Series Staff reported that she will be working wlth City of Evanston Recreation Director Jeanne Ann Schulse to Include historic preservation related courses In the spring lecture program offered by the Recreation Department. S i Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - July 21, 1987 Page 3 STAFF REPORT CLG Survey Documentation Presentation As requested, staff presented the methods employed and documentation generated by the recent CLG survey. Staff noted that the presentation illustrates the level of survey documentation the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency recommendation the Commission bring all previously surveyed areas up to. First English EvanRelical Lutheran Church Supreme Court Declslon Update Staff reviewed the Information contained In the packet memo and concluded that the decision will probably not have the adverse affect on historic preservation regulation that was, at first, feared. Permits The following permit received staff approval since the last Preservation Commission meeting: 334 Wesley - new rear porch (not visible from street) Marshall Field Signage Ms. Sommers Yant summarized signage recommendations for the Evanston Gallerla project (former Marshall Field store, 1700 Sherman Avenue); signage to be concentrated on street4evel awnings and windows (press type letter only). ANNOUNCEMENTS Staff announced: The CIty of Evanston had taken third place In the CIty LIvability awards at the Mayors$ conference in Nashville, Tennessee. The award recognizes the commitment of Evanston to the arts, planning, and historic preservation, The Mayor highlighted several historic preservation achievements in her "State of the City" address to the City Council on July 13, 1987, Including adaptive reuse of the Marshall Field store, the new planned unit development ordinance, and the redevelopment of the former Wilson Estate; She submitted a press release about Conservation Grants, most of the information for which appears In the most recent Highlights: News of the City of Evanston newsletter. The article generated 23 inquiries about the program in three days; A reporter for the ChlcaRo Catholic Is In the process of writing an article which Includes Information on the St. Athanasius Church, a recently declared Evanston Landmark; and she and Ms. Earle have completed the update and error search for the Evanston Landmark list. The meetio was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. Staff:ILL-4��74a— Date., ,V S 23Y22/26 11 r EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, September 8, 1987 8:00 P.M. - Room 2402 : CIVIC CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: Barbara Buchbinder-Green, Anne O. Earle, David Gurniak. Solomon Hirsh. Phyllis Horton, Mary McWilliams, and Harry Wolin MEMBERS ABSENT: Willlam Coney, Carolyn Ripley, And Anne McGuire STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant PRESIDING OFFICIAI. Mary McWilliams, Chair OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Horvitz (814 South Blvd.) and Mr. And_ Mrs. Clay' (1040 Lake Shore Blvd.) MINUTES : The minutes of July 21. 1987 were unanimously approved as submitted. ' COMMrrrEE REPORTS Review and Tecbnical Aa dstance Committee (R &TA) On behalf of R&TA Chair Anne McGuire, R&TA member Barbara Buchbinder-Green presented the permit for 1040 Lake Shore Boulevard: replacement of existing slate roof with fiberglass shingle roof. She explained that the existing slates of this significant 92-yearroid house, designed by architect John Ttnr+er Long, were brittle and broken. Over the years the owner has experienced persistent leaking problems, problems exacerbated by the recent rains. The cost of complete replacement with slate is prohibitive. The owner proposes to replace the slates with a slate look -alike product, GAF Timberline Shingle, Slate Blend. recommended by the State Historic Preservation Office. R&TA strongly recommended that the magnificent copper soffits and gutters be retained as well as the copper turret cap and ridge. Ms. Sommers Yant added that she and Ms. McGuire have been working closely with the owner. imparting the above recommendations, and had reviewed the specifications of the roofing contract. The above recommerdations have been incorporated into the specifications. She noted, in closing, that the owners, Mr. and Mrs. Clay, and their roofer, North Shore Contractors, had exhibited great sensitivity and commitment to an appropriate solution for this roofing problem. A motion to approve the permit, with commendation to the owners, was unanimously approved. Staff then presented the permit for 814 South Boulevard, addition of a rearporch/deck. Discussion ensued. A motion to approve the permit an presented given the appropriate style and material of the porch/deck and its limited visibility from the street, was unanimously approved. Staff then presented the permit for 1316 Church, construction of a second floor front deck. Staff edescribed the proposed 4-foot high unpainted, wolmonized wood deck atop the first floor pergola at the northeast corner of the building. The permit documents show the deck's privacy screen to be comprised of diagonally laid boards. Ms. Sommers Yant reported that the owners declined a site meeting with R&TA. She relayed to the owners R&TA's recommendation that the privacy screen be se:tened with a lattice overlay and that the screen be painted to match the trim of the house. Although receptive to these suggestions, the owner refused to present documentation as to how the finished deck would differ from that depicted in the permit documents. They likewise declined to come to this Preservation Commission meeting. Mon Preservation Commission Minutes -September 8, 1987 Page 2 ' Discussion ensued. Commissioners determined that the proposal: submitted was insensitive to the design of this significant house, designed by the important Chicago architect Charies Sumner .� Frost. A motion to hold the permit, if necessary, for the full 35-day discussion period, to allow time to explore an appropriate solution with the owner, was unanimously approved. OLD BUSINESS Centennial Fountain Restoration Update Chairman McWilliams summarised the efforts of the City of Evanston Parks Department in the rehabilitation of the Evanston Landmark Merrick Rose Garden, located at Lake Street and Oak Avenue. The scope of the present rehabilitation does not include restoration of the Centennial Fountain at the garden's south end. As reported to the Preservation Commission at its April 21, 1987 meeting, it was decided to pursue the idea of a public subscription to fund restoration of the Centennial Fountain. The City commissioned the firm of Wins, Janney, Elstner Associates - consultants expert in the analysis, investigation, repair and restoration of historic structures - to undertake a feasibility study outlining the extent of the Fountain's deterioration and recommending a restoration program for the Fountain. The study was completed at the end of August. It projected a cost of approximately $25,000 to undertake the restoration. Staff explained that an organizational meeting for the Centennial Fountain restoration was held September 2, 1987. A letter, over the signature of Chairman McWilliams, was sent inviting preservation groups, garden clubs, service clubs, and women's clubs to the meeting. The letter included an explanation of the Fountain's significance, the history of public subscription in support of the Fountain and the state of deterioration of the Fountain. A copy of the Wins. Janney, Elstner report was included in the invitation. The letter also suggested the formation of a coalition to undertake a fund raising drive for the restoration. A copy of the Wise, Janney, Elstner report was included in the invitation. Chairman McWilliams reported that at the September 2 meeting, the history of the Fountain and the prvgrass of rehabilitation of the Rose Garden project was presented, via slide presentation by Fred Cullen, City of Evanton Horticulturist, and Mikell Darting, Executive Driector of the Evantson Historical Society. Don Wirth. Director of Parks. Recreation and Forestry of the City of Evanston, presented the proposed scope of the Fountain rehabilitation. The meeting then moved to a discussion of a timetable for undertaking both the fund raising drive and the restoration project. It included identification of the goal of rededicating the Fountain on July 4, 1988, the 40th anniversary of the dedication of the: Merrick Rose Garden and the 112th anniversary of the dedication of the Centennial Fountain. Further discussion included fund raising organization, coalition members' responsibilities. potential donors, and recognition for such donors. Organizations will take the information presented at this meeting to their boards, Board representatives will then report at the next fund raiser meeting, scheduled for October 21. 1987, the Board decision whether to join the coalition and, perhaps, the organizationas level/type of commitment to the fund raising effort. the September 2 meeting concluded with a recommendation that the Preservation League of Evanston assume the leadership of the fund raising drive. An information slide presentation will be available, through the City of Evanston's Parks Department, to boards interested in becoming part of the coalition. Research Paris Landmarks Update Staff reported that on August 19th. EPC representatives (Mary McWilliams, Steve Knutson, Gwen Sommers Yant, and Howard Decker), Plan Commission member Steven Yas, and Aka. Drummer met with representatives of the Charles Shaw Company to present drawings of a compromise solution to preserve the Evanston Landmark Butler Building (1024 Emerson). A print of the proposed solution was presented to the Commission by staff. J Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes -September 8, 1987 Page 3 The proposed solution meets the building configuration and square foot requirements proposed by the Shaw Company in its master plan for the site. Specifically, the proposal calls for demolishing the stem (stable) of the existing L-shaped Butler Building and adjoining an addition to the north end of the building, resulting in the configuration desired by the Shaw Company and depicted in the Research Park Master PIan. The benefits of the compromise plan are as follows: it a) facilitates creation of the Master Plan's central court space for this block, b) because of the shallow setback of the Butler Building it offers the opportunity for mini parks or plazas flanking the building along Emerson Street, c) it harmonizes with the surrounding buildings proposed in the master plan in terms of height, scale, and materials, d) it preserves the most visually important elements of the Butler Building and thereby is a tangible commitment to this Evanston Landmark and the Black community for which it is significant. and e) because the Butler Building is amenable to a variety of other adaptive reuse possibilities - including commercial - the building offers a safety valve should 100 % research use of the park prove unattainable. The reaction of Shaw Company representatives to the plan was not encouraging. The chief objection to the plan was that the Butler Building did not fit in with the Research Park "front door" image for Emerson Street. The Shaw Company counter proposal is to demolish the Butler Building and erect a monument, on the site, appropriate to the significance of the Butler Building. Representatives at the meeting found this suggestion a token and unacceptable given the workable compromise offered which preserves the landmark. Staff concluded by noting that the Evanston NAACP has been apprised of the Issues/events surrounding the Butler Building and its input solicited. Discussion of tha potential political volatility of the issue ensued. Variation Standards/Zoning Ordinance Revision Update Staff reported that at the August 12, 1987 Punning and Development Committee (P&D) meeting, it was decided to terminate P& D pursuit of this issue and await pertinent recommendations of the consultant hired to revise the Evanston zoning ordinance. It is envisioned that the consultant will work in conjunction with a Blue Ribbon Committee. It is proposed that a representative of the Preservation Commission serve on this Blue Ribbon Committee. I100 Forest PUD Update Staff reported the following minor changes approved for the 1100 Forest PUD: Unit #7, conceptual approval of two lights for south bay windows of east facade; Unit #9, pair of glaaed wood'barn doors" in original stable door opening; Unit #7, cancel skylight on west facade. She also explained the circumstances surrounding City Manager approval of minor changes to Unit #8 comprising removal of two double -hung windows and the entrance door on the unit's first floor and their replacement with three pairs of french doors. The I100 Forest PUD Review Committee advised that these changes were contrary to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards. The changes were approved solely because of the purchaser's long-standing investment in the alteration and his erroneous understanding from the developer that this change could be initiated without being submitted to the minor change approval process stipulated in the City's Planed Unit Development ordinance. City Manager Asprooth strongly communicated to the R. H. Chou Company that he will approve no further changes to the 1100 Forest PUD unless they are recommended by the Committee and are clearly in conformance with all applicable guidelines aril ordinances. Ms. Buchbinder-Green and Mr. Hirsh expressed their dismay at the developer's breach of faith. Ms. Buchbinder-Green reported that Mr. Chou has purchased the property at 1144 Asbury and has called a neighborhood meeting for Thursday, September 10 at the Civic Center to present his proposed plans for the site. Ms. Buchbinder-Green then proceeded to explain the historic and architectural i. _.. significance of the 1144 Asbury parcel to the Ridge Historic District. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes -September 8, 1987 Page 4 r STAFF REPORT CLG Grant for EPC Summer intern Ms. Sommers Yant reported that she has prepared and submitted a Certified Local Government Grant application for a summer intern for the Evanston Preservation Commission. The intern will be primarily responsible for upgrading and organizing Eranston's City-wide significant structures survey data, in compliance with Illinois Historic Preservation Agency recommendations to undertake these activities to better facilitate Community Development Block Grant Environmental Review regulations and Certified Local Government historic resources monitoring responsibilities, Conservation Grant Status Report Staff reported that the Conservation Grant to repair roof/gutter problems on the John Van Bergen -designed 1026 MicWgan residence was declared ineligible because of ownership complicationz. She reported that the owners of 1419 Lake Street however, have been certified as income eligible. P. . .tion Awards - PLE Update Staff reported that the Preservation League of Evanston voted on the recommendations resulting from the *Preservation Awards Summit% held July 13, 1987 regarding rem of the Preservation Award competition from the fall to the spring, preferably culminating curing Preservation Week. The PLE wholeheartedly endorsed the schedullrg change. Permits Ms. Sommers Yant reported that the following permits received staff approval since the last Preservation Commission meeting. 1231 Asbury - rezoof garage, no change of materials 1316 Church - rear deck, not visible from street 2135 Orrington - rear stairs, replace in kind 1315 Davis - kitchen and bath remodeling involving 1 new exterior window on the west facade, not visible from street. 1022 Greenwood - stockade fence in the rear yard, no change in style or materials 2135 Orrington - rebuild rear porch, not. visible from the street ANNOUNCEMENTS Staff announced: - Howard Decker has resigned from the Preservation Commission due to pressing professional commitments. Mr. Decker has rendered valuable service to the Commission and will be missed. - A National Register training workshop has been scheduled, by the SHPO, for October 3, 1987 to acquaint Commissioners with revised National Register procedures. 0 Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes -September 8, 1987 • Page 5 She will be attending the National Trust for Historic Preservation Conference in ti•- Washington, D.C. October 7-1I and, because of a grant from the Kaplan Foundation, the Preservation Commission will receive a 1-year free subscription to the National Center for Historic Preservation Law's Preservation Law Update. Copies of these updates will be supplied to Commission members. The meeting was adjourned at 9r30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Barbara Buchbinder-Green, William Coney, Anne •Earle, Phyllis Horton, Anne McGuire, Mary McWilliams MEMBERS ABSENT: David Gurniak, Solomon Hirsh, Carolyn Ripley, Harry,,WaUn STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant, Judy Aiello PRESIDING: Mary McWilliams, Chair ASSOCIATES PRESENT: Steve Knutson, Hans Friedman OTHERS PRESENT: Arthur Stavin, William Weed (Centrum Properties, Inc.), William Ketchum, Rose Ann Knight (Booth/Hanson Associates), Steve Stegle (Daily Northwestern) Chairman McWilliams announced that this Is a special meeting of the Evanston Preservation Commission. The meeting Is held to review alterations to the Evanston Landmark at 1700 Sherman Avenue, formerly the Marshall Field store, now the "Evanston Galleria". Mr. Friedman reported that the Review and Technical Assistance Committee (R&TA) had met with Galleria project developer Centrum Properties Inc., on Wednesday, September 16th, and this morning, September 21. Mr. Friedman then summarized the issues before the Commission: a) without obtaining a building permit from the City of Evanston or complying with the landmark review provisions of the Preservation Ordinance, Centrum Properties had removed the plate glass window and marble bulkhead at the south end of the east (Sherman Avenue) facade and installed a new recessed entrance there; b)under Centrum's direction two of the small 'Jewel case" display windows an Church Street had been partially dismantled; c) lastly, the Preservation Commission seeks to preserve the building's original openings while helping the developer to find feasible entrance alternatives for tenants. Mr. Stavin explained that since the November, 1986 presentation to the Preservation Commission by Centrum and their architects, Booth -Hanson Assoc., of the Galleria concept with no exterior changes, Centrum has been forced to abandon the Galleria concept because of resistance on the part of retailers to It. Mr. Slavin submitted documentation of his efforts to contact a large number of retailers. Because of retailers' interest in the project only if they could be guaranteed direct street access, Booth -Hanson Associates drew up revised plans accommodating such entrances. Mr. Stavin apologized for bypassing the landmark review process, citing enormous commercial and time pressures. Mr. Stavin went on to explain the following: the new entrance at the south end of Sherman balances the new entrance at the north end of Sherman Avenue (this entrance was mandated as a fire exit by the City of Evanston), that Booth/Hanson was specifically requested by Centrum to design the mandatory fire exit In a sensitive manner and that Centrum's considerable efforts to donate a preservation easement (thwarted by Evanston School District 63) demonstrate Centrum's commitment to the integrity of this landmark. ��• Mr. Stavin stated that Centrum elected to do the Galleria project In Evanston because it believed Evanston to be a dynamic retail community. Centrum's full leasing target of fall; 1986, was Impossible to meet, however, because of the difficulty In attracting tenants to Evanston. The lack of available parking Is a major contributing factor to this problem. The Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - September 21, 1987 _ Page 2 company expected first class tenants but even after marketing the direct entrance plan, only the eastern half of the first floor has been leased and Centrum Is disappointed in the quality of the tenants. Mr. Stavin stated that approximately 1,000 retailers had been contacted and that the overwhelming response from these retailers was that they did not want to share an entrance or have their prospective clients forced to go through several doors to get into their store. He added that even with direct entrances onto the street, Church Street Is not easy to sell to retailers. He added that Centrum assumed the landmark Identity of the building would be an attraction to retailers and that Booth/Hanson Associates has been very conscientious in endorsing the most preservation sensitive rehabilitation of the building. In response to Commissioner Inquiries, Mr. Stavin responded that the west half of the building's first floor Is divided into three tenant spaces and that only the first floor can be used for retail purposes. He stated that the Church/Sherman Avenue corner will be leased by "Pure Sweat". Pure Sweat Is set on a new entrance with direct access to the street and Stavin fears this tenant will bank out If the Commission holds the building permit up as is Its option, for 33-days. He explained that retaining the existing entrance pattern requires very large tenants and that such tenants are not willing to rent or lease as part of this project. He also noted that sharing the residential entrance with retail space is out of the question because the upstairs apartments are luxury apartments for which no cost has been spared. Mr. Stavin stated that he needs the flexibility to Install new entrances to make the project economically feasible. The developers original thought was to subsidize the upper floors from the first floor space. This plan is In great jeopardy. He explained that the Church/Sherman space is the most important corner and that Centrum held out a long time, looking for a premiere lead tenant, but had to settle. for Pure Sweat, the best tenant they could get under the circumstances. Mr. Stavin stated his belief that the changes he proposes do not effect a large part of the overall facade. HIs entrance needs are as follows: Sherman entrance - remain functional, east Church entrance -close, west Church entrance -remain functional, and four new entrances. In response to a Commission inquiry why Centrum abandoned the Gallerla concept, Mr. Stavin stated that mini -malls have proved a failure all over the nation. He pointed out that If the space on the outside Is difficult to lease in Evanston, the Commission can Imagine how impossible It Is to lease space without direct entrances. Mr. Weed added that Evanston's recent history demonstrates that retailers are looking for very small spaces. Mrs. Horton noted that recent small tenants in Evanston have not been of high calibre. She advanced her belief that residential tenants In the Gallerla would not want low -quality stores in their luxury apartment building. Mr. Stavin responded that the upstairs apartments have leased up quickly but that this portion of the building is not a money-maker. Leasing of the first -floor space Is critical to the economic viability of the project. He explained that he has spoken to the high -quality tenants In nearby shopping malls including Northbrook Court, Plaza Del Lago, and Old Orchard, but that interested tenants were only interested In space east of the residential corridor. He noted however, that Benson Avenue has proved attractive to leasees. Chairman McWilliams thanked the representatives present from Centrum Properties and Booth/Hanson Associates. She stated that the Commission Is sensitive to their needs and the Commission encourages them to meet their needs within the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Mr. Friedman queried whether tenants have seen the building. Mr. Stavin responded that some had, others had not. Mr. Friedman then commented that two new entrances, particularly on the three -bay Sherman Avenue side of the building, are senseless. The new entrances unnecessarily destroy the historic fabric and the Sherman Avenue �r side already has a very prominent centrally -located entrance which Is well known to Evanstonlans. Mr. Stavin said he agreed with Mr. Friedman's logic but that his tenant, Pure Sweat, did not. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - September 21, 1987 Page 3 Mr. Stavin then lanched into a discussion of the limited desirability of Evanston as opposed to the recognized premiere markets of Shaumburg, Arlington Heights, Northbrook, Oakbrook, and -• Skokie (by virtue of Old Orchard). Mr. Friedman commented that Evanstonians are forced to shop at Old Orchard because they lack desirable shops In Evanston. Mr. Stavin Illustrated the difficulty of attracting flrst-quailty tenants to Evanston In the Galleria project by relating that the owner of Mallards store for men In downtown Chicago was about to sign a lease for the Sherman/Church corner space; but that after talking to other retailers on Sherman Avenue, the Mallards owner was convinced that Sherman Avenue does not have a healthy business climate; Mallards subsequently pulled out of the deal. Chairman McWilliams pointed out that because the building Is probably Evanston's most significant commercial building and an Evanston landmark, It Is Important that the Secretary of the interior's Standards be followed -for Its rehabilitation. She commented that Centrum's partially executed plan for new entrances changes the rhythm of the openings that characterizes this landmark building, and thus, does not meet the Standards. Ms. Buchbinder-Green commented that these changes are particularly destructive because people perceive the building at street level. Mr. Ketchum further commented that the recessed openings were inappropriate because they changed the character of the building from a taut facade to one with voids. Mr. Knutson expressed his concern that If the major entrances were not used, maintenance would probably suffer and subsequently jeopardize the existence of the doors and canopy. Mr. Stavin responded that the canopies would be maintained. ,Mr. Knutson responded that If they remained non-functional a risk remained. Mr. Stavin retorted that people can't be forced to use entrances: Mr. Knutson responded continued use could be insured through appropriate design. Ms. McGuire commented that the new openings recessed within the original "jewel case" display windows are Inappropriate because they occur in the load bearing portion of the design Instead of between structural bays. She likened the illog'c of the scheme to walking through a column. Thus, new entrances through the existing plate glass display windows are more appropriate because they would occur between structural bays and would minimize loss of historic fabric. Mr. Ketchum responded that installing openings In the plate glass windows presented a problem because doors them must swing out over the property line. Chairman McWilliams thanked the representatives of Centrum Properties and Booth/Hanson Associates present and called for discussion f rom the Commission. Mr. Stavin offered to restore the south Sherman. entry after the "Pure Sweat" lease ran out. The Commission found this unacceptable. Commissioners responded that the problem at hand exists because of Centrum's irresponsible conduct in not bringing contemplated alterations to the Preservation Commission as soon as possible when more time and alternatives were available. A motion for the R&TA Committee to meet with the developer, and representatives from the Department of Building and Zoning if necessary, to find an appropriate solution as expediently as possible was unanimously approved. The meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.M. Staff: ' Date: 23Y21 /23 F _ EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES `� SPECIAL MEETING �._ f _ Wednesday, September 30; 1987 _ 8:00 P.M. - Room 2403 CIVIC CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: Barbara BuchbInder-Green, William Coney, Anne. Earle, David Gurnlak, Solomon Hirsh, Anne McGuire, Mary McWilliams, Carolyn RIpley MEMBERS NOT PRESENT: Phyllis Horton STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Mary McWilliams, Chairman ASSOCIATES PRESENT: Hans Friedman, David Galloway, Steven Knutson, Jim McWilliams OTHERS PRESENTS William Weed, William Ketchem, Arthur Slavin, Roseann Knight Chairman McWilliams opened the meeting by summarizing events to date surrounding Illegal alteration of the Evanston Landmark at 1700 Sherman Avenue, the former Marshall Field store , now the "Evanston Gallerla". A special Committee meeting was called on Monday, September 21st to address the issue, the conclusion of which was to hold the building permit while the i Commission's Review & Technical Assistance Committee (R&TA) worked with the developer, Centrum Properties, Inc., and its architect, Booth/Hanson Associates, to find a sensitive solution to providing adequate tenant entrances. R&TA Committee Chairman Ann McGuire reported on the follow-up meeting of Wednesday, September 23, 1987 with Centrum and Booth/Hanson Associates. At the meeting, additional entrances on Church Street were explored, as well as the separate Issue of maintaining/restoring the exterior integrity of the Church/Sherman commercial space leased by "Pure Sweat". Pursuant to the latter, Chairman McWilliams, Mr. Knutson and Ms. Sommers Yant contacted the owner of Pure Sweat on Friday, September 25 to try to pursuade him of the aesthetic, economic and time benefits of a) restoring the illegally Installed south Sherman Avenue entrance, b) using the original entrances on Church and Sherman Street, and c) introducing no new entrances. The owner politely declined to yield. Mr. Knutson then reported that he, Ms. Sommers Yant and Mrs. McWilliams, In conjunction with Mayor Barr, again contacted Pure Sweat owner Jerry Michaels on Monday, September 28, at which time It was recommended to Mr. Michaels that a) he use solely the original Sherman and Church Street entrances for six months and b) if -he found this entrance pattern unacceptable at the end of this time, a new entrance through the south Sherman Avenue plate glass window could be installed. Mr. Michaels stated that over the weekend he had decided to pull out of the Galteria project. Returning to the summary of events past, Ms. McWilliams reiterated the recommendations made at the September 21 EPC meeting - that new entrances be Introduced through existing plate glass windows rather than recessed behind the small "jewel case" display windows located In the structural bays. Discussion ensued. Mr. Slavin stated that Mr. Michaels, owner of Pure Sweat, has agreed a) to restoration of the south Sherman entrance, b) to open his store for a period of j 45-days (starting today) using the two original entrances, and c) to reserve the right at the end of 45-days to have a new entrance Installed in the south Sherman Avenue display window if he (Mr. Michaels) determines, at the close of the 45-days, that a direct entrance onto Sherman Avenue Is necessary. I Evanston Preservation Commission , Minutes - September 30, 1987 Page 2 " Mr. Stavin stated that the agreement further provides that a) Mr. Michaels can leave the Galleria project at the end of 45-days if the City of Evanston falls to live up to its obligation to allow Installation of the Sherman Avenue direct entrance, and b) that Centrum will pay Mr. Michaels between $30,000 and $30,0000 In liquidated damages If the City falls to honor Its obligation. Mr. Knutson queried whether Mr. Michaels would agree to an in -swinging door for the potential new Sherman Avenue door. Such a door Is allowed by the building code only If Pure Sweat's Internal entrance off Sherman Avenue and the existing entrance on Church Street have out -swinging doors. Mr. Slavin responded in the affirmative. Ms. Buchbinder-Green asked whether Mr. Michaels agreed to this plan after the Monday, September 23 conversation with Mayor Barr et al. Again, Mr. Stavin agreed in the affirmative and added that as part of the deal Centrum would turn the space over to Pure Sweat by Monday, October 3, 1987. Mr. Knutson queried whether Centrum do Booth/Hanson had any description of the profile and materials of the hypothetical new door. Mr. Ketchem responded that the door would be wood with a wood frame and the wood would be painted. Mr. Stavin Invited the R&TA Committee to review specifications for the new entrances. He added that Centrum Properties had no Intention of cutting corners on the quality of the materials and sited the materials used to date on the exterior of the building as proof of his statement. At this point, Mr. Ketchem produced a sketch of a typical proposed new entrance within an existing plate glass window. Discussion returned to the 45-day trial period agreement between Centrum Properties and Pure Sweat. Mr. Knutson observed that if an entrance were eventually Installed In the south Sherman Avenue display window, It would be visually desirable that It be balanced by a new entrance In the north Sherman Avenue display window. Discussion of the north Sherman Avenue commercial space, occupied by tenant Babbage, ensued. Mr. Ketchem summarized the building code Issues surrounding the new exterior entrance to this space which are currently under consideration by the City of Evanston Department of Building and Zoning. Ms. McGuire suggested that Centrum be allowed to put new entrances in the Babbage and Pure Sweat Sherman Avenue display windows right now. Discussion of this proposal ensued, with Commissioners commenting that historic fabric may be unnecessarily lost If the proposed solution is executed. A motion was offered to accept Mr. Stavin's proposal that Pure Sweat occupy Its present space for a period of 43-days during which Pure Sweat will use the original Church and Sherman Avenue entrances; and that at the end of 45-days, If owner Jerry Michaels feels that business would be enhanced by a direct street entrance, Centrum will be allowed to Install an entrance, as shown on the drawing presented by Booth/Hanson tonight, In the south Sherman Avenue display window. The motion further stated that Centrum will restore the south Sherman Avenue bay, presently altered by the newly cut entrance, to Its original condition. The motion was unanimously approved. In response to Commissioners' query, Ms. Sommers Yant summarized the building code conditions under which an In -swinging door could be installed In the plate glass windows for the Babbage, Pure Sweat, and Footlocker tenants. Discussion then focused on the desirability of installing a new entrance in the Babbage display window (north Sherman Avenue bay) Identical to the new Sherman Avenue entrance proposed for the Pure Sweat space. Mr. Stavin clarified the proposed conditions under which a new entrance would be Installed for Babbage's: a) only if a new entrance were installed In the Sherman Avenue Pure Sweat display window, and b) If a new entrance were Installed In the Babbage's display window the existing retail entrance In the recessed Sherman Avenue fire exitway would be closed up. Discussion ensued. Mr. Friedman moved reconsideration of Ms. McGuire's suggestion that new entrances be Installed to the plate glass windows on Sherman Avenue for the Babbage and Pure Sweat spaces. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes -September 30, 1987 Page 3 Second. Discussion ensued. Ms. Sommers Yant strongly recommended against the present { proposal, arguing that the 45-day trial period agreement with Pure Sweat offers the posslbIllty that a new entrance will not be Installed in the south Sherman Avenue display window, thereby making a north Sherman Avenue entrance In the Babbage display window unnecessary. She added that If new entrances were allowed on the prominent Sherman Avenue facade, a negative precedent would be set and It be difficult to discourage Installation of other such entrances on the remaining building facades. Mr. Knutson concurred with Ms. Sommers Yant and strongly urged the Commission to pursue the 43-day trial period plan. Mr. Friedman withdrew his motion. Ms. Earle moved that if a new entrance Is Installed In Pure Sweat's Sherman Avenue display window at the end of the 43-�day trial period; an Identical entrance will be constructed In Babbage's Sherman Avenue display window and Babbage's existing exterior entrance shall he removed. Discussion then turned to the Church Street space leased by tenant "Footlocker". Mrs. McWilliams reiterated that Centrum has illegally begun Installation of an entrance to this space through the eastern "jewel" display case. The Footlocker tenant occupies the space behind the third large display window on Church Street west of Sherman Avenue. The space has no natural access. Ms. Buchbinder-Green restated the Commission's position that access through "jewel" windows Is Inappropriate. Ms. Earle moved that the.Commission reject the concept of "jewel" windows becoming doors anywhere on the building. Second by Ms. Buchbinder-Green. The motion was unanimously approved. A motion to approve an entrance for the Footlocker space identical to that of the proposed Pure Sweat or Babbage entrances was unanimously approved with the understanding that the installed door should swing Inward If an In -swinging door meets building code requirements. Discussion then turned to the yet unleased space in the original Marshall Field building west of the new residential entrance. Ms. Bucbinder-Green recommended the Commission pre -approve no entrance for this area until tenants have been secured. Ms. McGuire reported that R&TA has recommended that Centrum and Booth/Hanson developer, a "worse case scenario" master plan drawing depicting all proposed new entrances for each facade. The symmetry of the building necessitates consistent detail and placement among the entrances. Such a mutually agreeable worse case plan Is a useful vehicle for defining contextually appropriate alterations and for relaying such information to prospective tenants. The plan also ensured consistency In alterations over time as tenants, develop{or Commission members change. The plan should show what each new potential entrance will look like and where It will be placed. Mr. Wolin queried whether Centrum would revert a new entrance to Its original display window configuration If a tenant moved out and a new entrance were no longer needed. Mr. Slavin responded that once Installed, the new entrances would probably not be removed but that all original exterior fabric which must be removed to accommodate the new entrances will be stored. Mr. Ketchem stated he plans to propose an entrance in each showcase window. Mr. Ketchem will draw up the recommended master plan and present it to the Commission as soon as possible. Discussion them turned to proposed new entrances in the Marshall Field Annex. Messrs. Slavin and Ketchem stated their belief that the Annex Is not part of the Evanston Landmark designation. Chairman McWilliams and staff informed them that they were In error. Mrs. McWilliams presented historical documentation and explained how the Annex Is functionally, historically, and visually integral with the original Marshall Field store and, therefore, a part of the landmark designation. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes -September 30, 1997 Page 4 Mr. Stavin then stated that LePeep Restaurant, which will occupy the south half of the Benson Avenue facade, has designed its kitchen behind the existing Benson Avenue entrance and therefore desires to close off this entrance. Discussion as to how such closure could be most sensitively undertaken ensued. The Commission recommended that Le Peep's existing entry doors and transom remain and that Its Benson Avenue entrance be closed off from the Inside only, through a devise such as drywall. Because of the lateness of the hour and because the resolution of the LePeep entry Is not critical tonight, Mr. Stavin recommended that discussion focus on proposed exterior alterations for the "Wild Asparagus" space, located on the north half of Benson Avenue elevation. Mr. Weed explained that no natural entrance to the Wild Asparagus space currently exists. Centrum proposes to construct a door, Identical In profile and materials to the new Church and Sherman Avenue entrances, In the central display window of the Wild Asparagus space. Discussion ensued. A motion to approve the Centrum proposal to construct the described new Benson Avenge entrance into the Wild Asparagus restaurant was unanimously approved. The Preservation Commission, Centrum Properties, and Booth/Hanson representatives agreed to reconvene as soon as the "worse case" master plan drawings are ready for review. The meeting adjourned at 10:1 S P.M. Staff: Date:, 2SY24/27 ,A EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting Tuesday, October 20, 1987 8:00 P.M. Room 2403 ; t CIVIC CENTER MEMBERS PRESENT: Barbara Buchbinder-Green, William Coney, Anne Earle. Solomon Hirsh, Mary McWilliams, Anne McGuire, Carolyn Ripley. Harry :Wolin . MEMBERS ABSENT: David Gurnlak. Phyllis Horton STAFF PRESENT: Gwen Sommers Yant, Reed Carlson, Judy Aiello PRESIDING: Mary McWilliams, Chair ASSOCIATES PRESENT: MIchael Darling, Hans Freidman, David Galloway. Stephen Knutson OTHERS PRESENT: Arthur Slaven, William Weed (Centrum Properties Inc.) William Ketchum, Rose Ann Knight. (Booth/Hanson Associates); Bob Breltschneider (Evanston Review) OLD BUSINESS Marshall Fields Rehabilitation (Evanston Gallerla, 1700 Sherman Avenue) Chairman McWilliams welcomed guests and announced tonight's agenda would be amended to accommodate the Evanston Gaileria project as first order of business. She summarised events to date. concluding that the directive of the last Commission meeting was for Booth/Hanson Associates to develop a "worst case" master plan for proposed new first floor entrances for the entire Gallerla project. Mr. Ketchum then summarized the drawings (attached) dated October 21, 1987. Drawings reflect discussion/recommendations from the Seotember 30, 1987 Evanston Preservation Commission (EPC) meeting. Specifications for the new entrances are found on pages A6.2, A3.12, A3.3 of the Booth/Hanson. base building permit for the Galleria project Issued for permit October 14, 1987. Mr. Ketchum explained that the new entrance doors on the original portion of the Marshall Fields building are in the same plane as the surrounding glass and that the new entrance doors on the annex are recessed like the existing annex doors. Chairman McWilliams thanked Mr. Ketchum and reiterated that the plan presented is a master plan only; approval of the master plan tonight should not be construed as giving the developer or tenants permission to install proposed doors, in the future. without the review and approval of the Preservation Commission. Mr. Slaven stated he anticipates most of the proposed doors eventually being- installed because he envisions the Galleria being occupied by many small tenants. In response to a Commissioners' inquiries, Mr. Ketchum described the signage and awnings for the building. Ms. Buchbinder-Green complimented Mr. Ketchum on a job well done in terms of pattern and placement of the proposed new doors. She strongly discouraged Centrum from Installing a new entrance in the eastern most bay on Church Street. however. Mr. Slaven responded that the tenant for the Church/Sherman corner space (Pure Sweat) has dropped out of the project and that the likely new tenant is Victoria's Secret. Mr. Slaven will try hard to talk the new tenant out of a door in this opening. He also Invited the Commission to apprise the new tenant of It's concern for the integrity of this opening If/when the space Is leased. Mr. Slaven added that new doors cost him money and he has no interest in promoting unnecessary new entrances through any of the existing plate glass windows. W, Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - October 20, 1997 Page 2 Discussion then turned to the Sherman Avenue facade. Mr. Slaven said he will discourage Victoria's Secret from Installing a new entrance In the south display window. However, if a new entrance Is eventually installed In this entrance, he will balance it by installing an Identical entrance in the north Sherman Avenue display window. In response to a question by Mr. Knutson, Mr. Slaven identified the number of exterior bays belonging to each tenant and projected each tenant's need for new entrances. Mr. Knutson discouraged Mr. Slaven from installing new entrances in the displav windows on either side of an existing entrance. In this way existing entrances and their canopies are better safeguarded from disuse and deterioration. Discussion then turned to the existing Sherman Avenue entrance. Mr. Slaven stated that ground floor tenants would be competing with lower level tenants for customers if both levels used the existing central entrance on Sherman. Avenue. Mr. Knutson suggested that a set of entrance doors inside the Sherman Avenue vestibule be installed to separate the internal entrances to the first floor Sherman Avenue shops from the entrance to the lower level. Mr. Ketchum responded that this was impossible because a priority of Centrum Properties Inc. Is to preserve the Art Deco bronze grills In the vestibule: installing such interior doors would necessitate removing the (trills. The meeting returned to the subject of the new entrance master plan submitted tonight. Chairman McWilliams summarized master plan conditions and procedures: If Centrum Properties or a subsequent developer wants to install an entrance in one of the locations shown on the master plan, the developer will notify the Preservation Coordinator and a meeting of the Review and Technical Assistance Committee will be called within 24 hours. The Review and Technical Assistance Committee will work with the developer to try to Identify ways of meeting developer/tenant needs using original entrances. If a scheme using original entrances cannot be found, staff approval can be given to install the entrance in the master plan location originally requsted, on the condition that the entrance will be constructed In accordance with the specifications noted on the Booth Hanson building permit. A copy of the master plan and entrance specifications shall be retained in the files of the Department of Building and Zoning and Preservation Commission. Discussion moved to the purpose of the "worst case" master plats: It provides certainty and an efficient review/approval mechanism for the developer, while it provides the Commission with a consistent. preservation -sensitive rehabilitation plan and a timely opportunity to help identify appropriate preservation -sensitive alternatives. A motion to accept, as a reference document, the Booth/Hanson master plan for proposed new entrances to the "Evanston Galleria" and to furthermore provide that a) if one of the master plan doors is desired. a meeting of the Technical Assistance Committee will be called within 24 hours of notice by the developer, b) should the Review and Technical Assistance Committee fall to find an alternative to Installing the desired door, that staff approval instead of a full Commission vote can terminate Preservation Commission review of the door, and c) that the master plan document will consist of both the Sherman Avenue/Church Street/Benson Avenue elevations and the Booth/Hanson Base Building permit materials/dimensions/configuration specifications for the new entrances, was unanimously approved. Mr. Slavin asked for approval of an appropriate entrance for tenant "Babbage" (northernmost Sherman Avenue store). Discussion ensued. The following motion was then unanimously approved: a) to approve the master plan entrance for the Babbage space if the present entrance in the northernmost Sherman Avenue bay could not meet the building code, and b) if the master plan entrance were installed in the Babbage space, it will be balanced by Installation of the master plan Sherman Avenue door for the Victoria's Secret space. Ms. Buchbinder-Green queried and Mr. Slavin confirmed. that the new entrance cut into the southernmost bay of the Sherman Avenue entrance would be restored, as formerly agreed. Mr. Slavin requested approval for the second -farthest -west master plan door located on the Church Street facade of the original Marshall Field building. Discussion ensued. A motion to approved this doer was unanimously approved. Ms. McWilliams thanked the Centrum Properties Inc.. representatives for their attendance and cooperation. She thanked Mr. Carlson for his attendance and assistance. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - October 20, 1987 Page 3 The Commission then resumed its regular meeting agenda. P CORRESPONDENCE Staff reviewed correspondence sent to Mr. and Mrs. Leeds (owners of the Evanston Landmark at 1316 Church Street), as directed by the Commission at its last meeting. She further reported that shortly following expiration of the Commission's 35-day negotiating period with the Leeds, Mrs. Leeds requested that a member of the Review and Technical Assistance Committee come to a site meeting to advise mitigating measures for the second floor, front facade, deck In question. Review and Technical Assistance Committee member Ellen Galland subsequently met with Mrs. Leeds and recommended the following; that the privacy screen be the lesser of either 3-feet or the minimum height necessary for adequate privacy, that a lattice screen be affixed to the front of the wolmanized wood screen, that the scale of the lattice work be somewhat smaller than the scale of the lattice screening the first floor pergola below, and that the north screen be pulled back to the north edge of the existing planter. Mrs. Leeds also requested a Statement of Significance for her home. Discussion of the case ensued. The Commission resolved to continue monitoring the case. Adverse impact of the deck on the building's Integrity may trigger the landmark desisting process. COMMITTEE REPORTS Public Committee - Project 63 Staff reported that she has revised the Project 65 architectural education lecture for District 65 students In grades 4 and 5 "Geology, Early History and Evanston Architecture to the Civil War". To refresh Commissioners' memories, she explained that the Project 65 program consisted of slide lectures developed by Evanston Preservation Commissioners and staff, and that the Commission trained volunteers to deliver the program In the District 65 Schools, that the program consisted of preparatory exercises, a slide lecture, follow-up exercises, and a follow-up walk which reinforced concepts presented in the lecture to students In the vicinity of their school. She reported that the first training session was held last Friday and that this semester's program, would be delivered to District 65 4th and 3th grades whose teacher requested the program. Evaluation Committee Evaluation Committee Chairman Buchbinder-Green reported the Evaluation Committee had met to consider the architectural or historical significance of four potential conservation grant candidates. Three of the cases were deferred for additional Information. The fourth case, the building at 120 Dempster Street, was found by the Committee to fall short of meeting Evanston Landmark criteria. Following review of slides of 120 Dempster, a motion to accept the recommendation of the Evaluation Committee was unanimously approved. Staff noted that these conservation grant applications were generated by an article placed in the most recent issue of the City of Evanston's newsletter "Highlights". OLD BUSINESS 1100 Forest Planned Unit Development Update Staff reported that the l l00 Forest PUD Review Committee had been very busy In the last month and one-half and had experienced considerable trouble stemming from the developer's continued tax compliance with the planned unit development ordinance minor. ,change process. The following problems were encountered during the period: Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes -October 20, 4 987 Page 4 Units #6, #7 (mansion) - Pavers The Committee discovered that without notice the developer removed the pavers on the mansion's east and south terraces. The developer was reminded of his obligation under the 1100 Forest PUD ordinance to obtain minor change approval and to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. In order to comply with the latter, replacement pavers need to match the material being replaced as closely as possible In size, color. texture and other visual qualities. Timely submission of a sample was not forthcoming from the developer. resulting In considerable owner frustration. Several submissions were necessary before an acceptable replacement paver was found. New Light Fixtures Despite repeated reminders to comply with minor change procedures. conduit holes continue to be drilled and conduit continues to be Installed at the site In preparation to receive new light fixtures - all without the requisite notice or approval. The Committee has reocatedly requested timely submission of Information describing proposed new light fixtures and locations in order to facilitate responsible review and avoid delay. Appropriate product information was recently submitted and Mr. Knutson reported the location and type of fixtures approved for units #6, V, 1f8, and #9 (mansion and auxiliary building). It was further noted that the owner of Unit #7 (front of the mansion) desires to remove the large wrought iron fixture existing above the front door and install a brass fixture Immediately south of the entrance. The Review Committee recommended against this change. Unit #6 (south mansion), Depressed Garage The concept of a depressed garage/terrace for unit #6 was favorably reviewed by the 1100 Forest PUD Committee and approved by the City Manager early In the construction period. The garage has been dug and the walls poured. - The parapet above was also in the process of being constructed. No documentation of the parapet had been submitted for review or received approval, and the developer was requested to halt construction until documentation was submitted for minor change review /approva1. At the next site visit, it was found the construction on the parapet wall had continued and a second halt request was issued. The Committee awaits documentation and has requested that the developer explore designs which are as transparent as possible In order to a) provide an appropriate terminus for the central open space and b) following through on the approved terrace concept, to afford a vista to the coach house. The developer presently proposes a solid brick wall. partially obscured by a steep berm, to form the parapet. Landscape In anticipation of avoiding delay of landscaping being undertaken this year, the Committee has requested timely submission of the updated PUD landscape plan. No documentation has yet been received from the developer. The developer has facilitated delivery, to the Committee, of the revised landscape plan of one client who has hired an independent landscape architect, however. Unit #6 - Missing Door and Window. West Facade At one of Its September site visits, the Committee discovered that without notice, review, or approval, the developer had removed a door and window missing on the first floor of the west facade of unit #6 (south mansion) and was planning to reverse the size of the two openings. The developer was requested to discontinue construction on these Items until documentation was submitted and the minor change process completed. Evanston Preservation Commission • Minutes - October 20, 1987. Page 3 Unit fib - Reveal Despite a commitment to recess the Unit #8 addition behind the plane of the existing building, the developer failed to honor the commitment once construction was undertaken. Staff summarized a) the Review Committee's efforts to work with the developer to realize the intent of the original commitment In the most cost effective manner (by Installing a reveal) and the b) developer's lack of cooperation In carrying through site agreements. The issue remains unresolved. Unit #9 (east coach house) - Entrance Doors Without notice or approval, steel colonial -style entrance doors were Installed on Unit #9. Being Incompatible In materials and style with the existing Queen Anne coach house, and hence contrary to the 1100 PUD ordinance Secretary of the Interior's Standards, the Review Committee recommended against City Manager approval of the steel doors. The Committee recommended that the doors match as closely as possible the five -panel doors existing on the west coach house. The report concluded with a summary of positive developer contributions to the project: Unit #7 - Restoration of Limestone Balustrade (mansion, east facade) The highly visible and decorative limestone balustrade of the mansion's front terrace has been dismantled and completely restored, as promised. Missing or severely deteriorated balusters have been replaced by new stone replicas. The workmanship of the whole is excellent. �Unit #9 - (barn doors) West Coach House Through the cooperation of the developer and owner, the original stable door opening has been preserved and a modern Interpretation of stable doors have been installed In the opening. Unit 060 V, #8, #9 - Windows (mansion, auxiliary complex) One of the Committee's chief concerns has been the continued existence of the existing windows In the two historic buildings of the original estate. The developer Is retaining and reworking the windows of the existing buildings. Ms. Buchbinder-Green then followed with a summary of the neighborhood meeting held by the R. H. Chou Company on September 10, 1987 to discuss the proposed 1144 Asbury Planned Unit Development. Discussicr, ensued. Given the impending new PUD, It was determined that the Commission needs to identify areas where the planned unit development ordinance needs improvement and bring this Information to the Planning and Development Committee and City Council as soon as possible. STAFF REPORT National Trust for Historic Preservation Conference Report Ms. Sommers Yant presented preservation -sensitive product literature and publications acquired at the October 7-11 National Trust for HIstoric Preservation Conference In Washington, D.C. She deferred her report on the "Building Codes and Historic Preservation" mini -conference until the next Commission meeting when more time permits. r Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - October 20, 1987 Page 6 Illinois Heritage Grant Program us Staff announced that the application period has opened for Illinois Heritage Grants from. the State Historic Preservation Office. This "bricks and mortar" grant program Is .available to National -Register -listed buildings owned by municipalities and not -for -profit entities. She has sent Information and program applications to the Women's Christian Temperance Union, Evanston Historical Society, Roycemore School, and the Evanston Art Center. ANNOUNCEMENTS The Cradle, an Evanston Landmark, is being considered by the Evanston Commission on Aging as a potential site for well -elderly housing. A presentation by the Commission on Aging will be given at the next Preservation Commission meeting. At the Invitation of the Central Illinois Landmarks Foundation Board, Ms. Sommers Yant attended a meeting on September 21st with the Board and new Peoria City Manager to discuss Peoria's setting up a position analogous to Evanston's Preservation Coordinator position. The Illinois Association of Historic Preservation Commission's (IAHPC) training workshop for Illinois preservation commission members will be held on Saturday, October 24, 1987, at the Oak Park Village Halt. Staff and Chairman McWilliams urged all Commissioners to attend. The Evanston Preservation Commission has been notified that a group has been formed to try to preserve Chicago's Granada Theater. Individuals interested in participating in the effort should contact Mr. Sohn Hern at the Commission on Chicago Historical and Architectural Landmarks. The following building permits received staff approval since the last Preservation Commission meeting: 2135 Orrington - rebuild rear porch (not visible from street) 423 Grove - replace Ras burner (not visible from street) 2214 Ridge - asphalt roof (no change In materials) 2409 LIncolnwood - storage shed (not visible from street) 2233 Orrington - kitchen remodeling (not visible from street) 324 Sheridan Square - reroof (no change'ln materials) 732 Madison - reroof (no change In materials) 1743 Wesley - reroof (no change In materials) 2637 Ridge - reroof (no change in materials) The meeting Nvas adjourned at 10:13 P.M. Staff: Date: 23Y4/9 EVANSTON PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT:: •Barbara Buchbinder-Green, WIlliam Coney, Anne Earle, David Gurniak. Solomon Hirsh. Phyllis Horton, Anne-:, McGuire, .Mary McWilliams, Carolyn Ripley, Harry Wolin, MEMBERS -ABSENT: None _ STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Mary McWilliams, Chair ASSOCIATES PRESENT: David Galloway OTHERS PRESENT: Mark Brun (architect, 1452 Asbury), Nancy Brothers (Chair, Commission on Aging), B. J. Thomas (Chair, Commission. on Aging Housing Committee) The agenda was amended In order to hear first the guest presentation by the Commission on Aging. SENIOR HOUSING PROPOSAL FOR 'THE CRADLE" Commission on Aging Chairman and Housing Committee Chairman - Nancy Brothers and B. J. Thomas, respectively - summarized information available to date regarding Commission an Aging interest in converting "The Cradle" (Evanston Landmark located at 2049 Ridge) for senior housing purposes. The Commission on Aging does not envision the adaptive reuse to involve changes to the exterior of the landmark. Discussion ensued. Review 8c Technical Assistance Committee Chairman McGuire described some of the high quality building materials which contribute to the structure's landmark character, and noted that maintenance of such materials can be costly. Father Gurniak suggested that a search be made to find out if any endowments for the maintenance of "The Cradle" building exist and whether endowments would be transferable to a purpose/owner succeeding "The Cradle". Staff explained landmark permit review purpose/procedures and Invited potential or actual new owners of "The Cradle" building to avail themselves of the services of the Commission's Review do Technical Assistance Committee. R&TA advises landmark owners how to meet their needs in ways that are most sensitive to the historic character of their landmark buildings. The service is free. Chairman McWilliams thanked the Commission on Aging members for their presentation and expressed her pleasure that the Commission on Aging and the Preservation Commission would be working together on this proiect. The original agenda order was resumed thereafter. MINUTES The minutes were not duplicated in time to be Included In Commissioners' packets. They will be included In next month's packet. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - November 17, 1987 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE Thank you notes from Commissioners reviewed. COMMITTEE REPORTS Review be Technical Assistance Committee The Commission reviewed the proposal for construction of a new 3-car garage structure for the Evanston Landmark at 1462 Ridge Avenue. No permit has been applied for. The Review do Technical Assistance Committee found the design to be compatible, in general, with the main house in terms of massing and materials. The Committee recommended against the use of aluminum siding on the structure's west and north facades, however. encouraging face materials to be used in the round. The Committee found the height of the structure to be compatible with the main house but recommended that the architect consult the City's Zoning Department to ascertain whether the height was within allowable limits. Discussion ensued. Should a variation for height be necessary. the Commission felt its support would be appropriate. The architect will discuss the preceeding Commission/Committee recommendations with his client and present final plans to the- Commission at a later date. Staff will send the architect information regarding the adverse affects of aluminum siding on historic buildings and a CODY of the Sre _ecta_ry_ of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. -- Public Committee - Project 65 Project 65 Chairman Phyllis Horton announced that a training session was held November grid. OLD BUSINESS Evanston Galleria (Marshall Field Rehab) - Update Staff reported that the Booth/Hanson - designed master plan and door specification documentation submitted at the last EPC meeting has been reduced to legal sized format. She has written a memo summarizing the master plan purpose and procedure, attached to It the reduced master plan documentation and delivered copies to the developer and Building Department. Copies also are on file In the Preservation Coordinator's office. Staff further reported that she reviewed permit documentation for the first new master plan entrance (i.e. - entrance approved for the Foot Locker space). The entrance depicted on the submitted documentation was not the same as the master plan entrance specification. She contacted Foot Locker architect and developer, and the permit was held until corrected documentation was submitted. Discussion ensued. Commissioners expressed concern that the master plan agreement be shared with all new and prospective Galleria tenants. A motion to send a letter to Centrism advising them to apprise tenants of the master plan agreement, before or during lease negotiation, was unanimously approved. 1100 Forest Planned Unit Development Update Mr. Chou has submitted schematic elevations for Unit #1 and final elevations for Unit #2. Elevations for Unit #2 were found to include construction of front steps outside of the buildable area approved as part of the 1 100 Forest PUD ordinance by City Council. The developer was Informed that construction outside of the buildable area needs manor or minor change approval as appropriate. The developer has revised the Unit #2 elevation to contain front steps within the buildable area. The Committee recommends City Manager approval of schematic elevations for Unit #1 (conceptual approval) and final approval for elevations for Unit #2. It was also noted that the developer has gone ahead and poured a foundation for a patio outside of the Unit #2 buildable area without minor change approval. Discussion ensued. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - November 17, 1987 Paste 3 Commissioners expressed dismay at developer non-compliance with the minor change safeguard of the planned unit development ordinance. Further discussion ensued as to ways the ordinance Can be improved. Staff reminded the Commission that the City Council's Planning and Development Committee has requested such suggestions from the Preservation Commission. She reported that the 1100 Forest PUD Committee will be meeting tomorrow to draw up a list of recommended improvements to the planned unit development ordinance. It was further reported that the landscape phase of the project has begun. The developer has been requested to submit a revised landscape plan a) showing proposed changes to the approved PUD landscape plan and b) labeling plant species. Municipal horticulturist Fred Gullen has been very helpful In reviewing owners' landscape plans submitted to date, and In suggesting appropriate alternative species. Discussion ensued. Commissioners expressed concern that Wilson Estate owners have not been made fully aware of the significance of the PUD ordinance landscape plan. Further concern was expressed that owners had not been given sufficient Information about the purpose of the planned unit development ordinance, the minor change procedure, and the role of the 1100 Forest PUD Committee. It was suggested that an information packet be sent to owners or a meeting held with them. Ms. McGuire suggested that Commissioners' jot down their ideas for improving the planned unit development ordinance and bring there to the December Commission meeting. She suggested that the Review Committee's recommendations be brought and discussed at the same time. Centennial Fountain Restoration Update Chairman .McW 1liams listed the civic organizations which have joined together to raise funds to restore the Centennial Fountain in the Evanston Landmark Merrick Rose Garden. She summarized donations to date, amounting to approximately $10.000. Fundraising responsibilities have been divided among three committees: Major Gifts, Publicity, and Schools. - Conservation Grants R&TA Chair Ann McGuire and staff have conducted site visits at conservation grant structures located at 1419 Lake Street and 1501 Lake Street. Conservation Grant work programs were developed at the site for each building. I419 Lake Street has already received considerable rehabilitation at the hands of the owner, but much remains to be done. in both cases, the work Programs primarily are comprised of repair and replacement of wood clapboards and trim. It is hoped that owners of these structures will apply/qualify for other appropriate rehab programs (ex: paint program). Statewide Preservation Conference Application Evanston's application to hold the Statewide Historic Preservation Conference in 1989 is In the Process of being completed. Staff summarized local sponsor responsibilities and pledges of support to date. _ Zoning Ordinance Revision Update Staff reported selection of consultant Carnlros, Ltd., to revise Evanston's zoning ordinance and creation of a Blue Ribbon Citizens' Committee to work with the consultant. The latter includes a representative from the Preservation Commission, Chairman Wary McWilliams. Project Newsletter Chairman McWilliams reported that because of intervening crises this month, production of the Preservation Commission's Newsletter had to be postponed. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - November 17, 1987 Page 4 Appointment of Nominating Committee Chairman McWilliams appointed the following to. the. Nominating. COMM ltteet';.Anne.,McGulre,': Solomon Hirsh, and Harry Wolin STAFF REPORT Building Codes and Historic Preservation Report Staff shared information learned at the "Building Codes and Historic Preservation" Conference she attended during the National Trust for Historic Preservation Conference this year. This year's BOCA Building Code Introduces an "Existing Structures" chapter. This chapter fosters sensitive rehabilitation and reuse of historic buildings. It is anticipated that this Important . chapter will be adopted by the City of Evanston in February. "Preservation Primer" Workshop Report Chairman McWilliams' and staff summarized the highlights of the Preservation Primer Workshop held for Illinois historic preservation commission members In Oak Park In October. Staff urged Commissioners who could not attend the workshoo to read the handouts from the conference which are included in this month's Packet. PERMITS The following permits^ received staff approval since the last Preservation Commission meetings, 2320 Pioneer Road - Reroof (not visible from street) 1374 Ashland - Reroof (no change in material) 1630 Ashland - Rear addition (not visible from street) 1 Staff concluded with a report on the dismantling, strengthening, and reconstruction of a porch at 1502-04 Lee Street. Bricks will be salvaged as much as possible. Where salvage is impossible, custom bricks (to match the original) will be manufactured, and the new bricks will be integrated with the original brick to foster -in appearance as close to the original color mix as possible. All forms and decorative features will be exactly reconstructed. The permit will be held until R&TAlstaff approve a sample of the new bricks. ANNOUNCEMENTS. Ms. Buchbinder-Green announced that the City Council Planning and Development Committee will be considering a burglary prevention ordinance that may have an adverse impact on historic structures. Ms. Buchbinder-Green requested that Aid. John Rudy refer the ordinance to the Preservation Commission for comment. Staff announced: She delivered a Presentation about Evanston's Section 106 historic preservation review Procedures (for Federally funded projects) at the annual Section 106 conference sponsored by the Illinois HIstoric Preservation Agency in Springfield and held on October 28 and 29. Evanston has one of the best Section 106 review procedures in the state. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - November 17, 1997 Page 3 She will be delivering presentations about the Preservation Commission's program/services to both the King Home and Optimist Club within the next month. Commissioners are invited to a celebration of Roycemore School's (640 Lincoln Street) listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The celebration Is scheduled for December l st at 4:30 P.M. at the school. Rovicemore School `was listed ' on the National Register on August 3, 1987. The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 P.M. Staff: }f Date: I6$ jF y 25YI 113 F MEMBERS PRESENT:' ,William Coney. Anne Earle, David Gurniak, Solomon Hirsh. Phyllis •Horton. Anne McGuire, Mary McWilliams, James Yeaman MEMBERS ABSENT. Barbara Buchbinder-Green, Carolyn Ripley. Harry Wolin STAFF: Gwen Sommers Yant. Ellen Szymanski PRESIDING OFFICIAL: Mary McWilliams. Chair ASSOCIATES PRESENT: Stephen Knutson OTHERS PRESENT: Michael Peters (1459 Asbury). William Weed (Evanston Galleria). Judith Lavender (1108 Forest Avenue) Chairman McW-illiams opened the meeting by welcoming new Evanston Preservation Commission member Jim Yeaman. The agenda was amended .In order to consider guests' items first. COMMITTEE REPORTS Review & Technical Assistance Committee (R&TA) Staff presented slides and permit documentation describing Installation of skylights on the rear (east) facade of 1459 Asbury. R&TA member Ellen Galland and staff met with the owner on site yesterday; R&TA recommends approval of installing skylights on this rear facade In order to facilitate light and ventilation in third floor living spaces. During the course of presentation, owner Michael Peters mentioned that he Is contemplating reroofing with cedar shingles. The Commission commended his commitment to the restoration of the 'building's original historic roofing material. A motion to accept the recommendation of the Review do Technical Assistance Committee was unanimously approved. Centrum Properties Inc., representative William Weed then presented the need of Evanston Gallerla (1700 Sherman Avenue) tenant Le Peep (located corner Church/Benson) for an additional Benson Street entrance. Mr. Weed explained that the Le Peep kitchen is located behind the southernmost original Benson Street entrances and, per agreement with the Preservation Commission. this entrance will be retained but locked and the glass portions of the entrance painted from the inside. Mr. Weed seeks approval for installing a single -door entrance on Benson Street. The proposed entrance is located in the second existing show window north of Church Street. Mr. Weed presented drawings of the proposed entrance and stated that materials and profiles would be in keeping with those specified for other new entrances in the Booth/Hanson base building permit. The entrance would have a recessed vestibule. The proposed entrance is not shown in the master plan documents, but is needed for emergency exiting. Discussion ensued. R&TA Chair Anne McGuire reported the Committee's recommendation for approval given the clear need for an exit and the use of materials consistent with those specified in the Booth/Hanson base building permit for new entrances. A motion to accept the recommendation of the Review be Technical Assistance Committee was unanimously approved. The Commission understands that, contrary to the drawings presented, the new Le Peep door will abut the limestone on the entrance's north side. Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes - December 17, 1987 Page 2 The Commission next considered the appropriateness of barrel -shaped awnings for the annex portion of the Galleria. The awnings will be of the same fabric as the main building. will be illuminated. and will have translucent lettering. Mr. Weed added that on the original Marshall Field building. the old awnings were being repaired/replicated. Awnings like those of the main building could not be installed on the annex because of threats to passerbys'safety. ,Ms. McGuire further offered that the proportions of the proposed awnings better suited the annex. Ms. McGuire reported R&TA's recommendation: that the Le Peep barrel awning be accepted as the standard for the annex, that consistent materials be used for awnings of both the annex and main building, that installation of the barrell awning involve no change to the limestone lintels of the annex windows. and that a uniform location be adopted for awning placement. A motion to accept the recommendation of the Review & Technical Assistance Committee was unanimously approved. In response to Commissioners' queries, Mr. Weed responded that Centrum Properties Is discouraging Le Peep from Installing the neon box sign depicted on the Benson Street elevation of the documents presented tonight. Commissioners agreed that this type of signage is inappropriate and strongly supported Centrum in its efforts to discourage the erection of such signs. nAr. Weed further noted that the master plan and new entrance specifications have been incorporated as a part of the standard lease for Galleria tenants. Centrum properties is responsible for construction of these entrances to insure uniformity and quality. The Commission commended Mr. Weed and Centrum for their commitment to following through the master plan agreement. In closing, Mr. Weed informed the Committee that Centrum is considering requesting that the Benson elevation lighting fixtures'be changed. Mr. Weed will furnish documentation describing proposed new fixtures and their locations if Centrum pursues the idea. Chairman McWilliams thanked Mr. Weed for his continued cooperation. CORRESPONDENCE Staff reviewed correspondence to Mr. and Mrs. Harold Lavender regarding illegal light: fixture installation at 1108 Forest Avenue (Wilson Estates). Commissioner Horton commented that the letter fully outlined the preservation issues surrounding removal of the historic fixture. In response to Commission Yeaman's query whether a response had been received. staff distributed copies of Mr. and Mrs. Lavender's December 6th, response supporting their contention that the light fixture be removed. Chairman McWilliams asked Mrs. Lavender if she would like to make any comment or ask questions of the Commission. Mrs. Lavender declined. Staff stated that the Lavenders had been asked to meet informally with the 1100 Forest PUD Committee to discuss the light issue and that the Lavender's. declining. requested that Commission and Committee correspondence be directed solely to their attorney. The. Chair explained that because of threatened litigation. the Preservation Commission would now go into closed session to further discuss the issues contained in the Commission/Lavender correspondence here reviewed. Mr. Hirsh moved to adjourn to closed session; second, Mr. Yeaman. Voting aye - McWilliams, Horton, Hirsh, Gurnlak, Yeaman, McGuire. Earle. Coney; Voting nay - none. The Commission went into closed session at 8:40 P.M. The Commission reconvened in open session at 9:35 P.M. MINUTES The minutes of September 8, 1987, September 21, 1937, and October 30, 1987 were unanimously, approved as submitted. OLD BUSINESS Centennial Fountain Restoration Report Chairman McWilliams summarized the progress, to date, of fundralsing to restore the Centennial Fountain, Including a) the generous in -kind support from the Pioneer Press in the areas of editorial, advertising, circulation, and financial support, b) production of a fundraiser flyer, c) Evanston Preservation Commission Minutes December 17. 1987 + Page 3 production of fundraising progress signs to be installed In 'fountain Square and the Merrick Rose Garden, d) production of a Centennial Fountain video (by the Preservation League of Evanston), e) contributions to date, and f) a proposed press conference. NEW BUSINESS 1988 EPC Meeting Dates A motion to approve the 1938 EPC meeting dates listed In the packetmemo' was unanimously approved. SAH Presentation Commissioner Earle presented a slide presentation/poem developed for the Society cf Architectural Historians (SAH) dealing with recent tragic fines Involving two Evanston Landmarks. STAFF REPORT Staff reviewed slides sent to the Commission by the owner of the Evanston Landmark at 814 South Boulevard. Slides show the exterior restoration/rehabilitation work recently completed by the owner. including the deck reviewed and approved by the Preservation Commission. Staff will thank the owner In writing for the follow-up slides and the sensitivity of the work done. Staff further reported: Chairman McWilliams and Mayor Barr unveiled Roycemore School's National Register plaque during the National -Register -listing celebration held at Roycemoee School on December 1. Slides of the celebration were presented. Aid. Paden's concern for preservation of the Evanston Landmark Butter Building, voiced at the December 7. 1987 City Council meeting. COMMITTEE REPORTS Nominating Committee Report Nominating Committee member Solomon Hirsh reported the Committee's recommendations for EPC officers. for 1988: David Gurnlak, Chair and Mary McWilliams. Vice -Chair. A motion to accept the recommendation of the Nominating Committee was unanimously approved. The meeting was adjourned at 10:05 P.M. Staff: Date: 23Y16l18