Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10.26.20
AGENDA City Council Monday, October 26, 2020 Lorraine H. Morton Civic Center, James C. Lytle City Council Chambers, Room 2800 5:30 PM Administration & Public Works Committee begins at 4:30pm Planning & Development Committee begins at 5:00pm City Council convenes at 5:30pm or the conclusion of Planning & Development Committee Due to public health concerns, residents will not be able to provide public comment in-person at the meeting. Those wishing to make public comments at the Administrative & Public Works Committee, Planning & Development Committee or City Council meetings may submit written comments in advance or sign up to provide public comment by phone or video during the meeting by completing the City Clerk's Office's online form at www.cityofevanston.org/government/city-clerk/public-comment-sign-up or by calling/texting 847-448-4311. Community members may watch the City Council meeting online at www.cityofevanston.org/channel16 or on Cable Channel 16 Page (I) ROLL CALL - BEGIN WITH ALDERMAN RAINEY A. Suspension of the Rules Allowing for Remote Participation Due to an executive order issued by Governor J.B. Pritzker, staff recommends a suspension of the rules regarding in -person attendance requirements for public meetings, allowing for City Council members and City staff to participate in this meeting remotely. For Action (II) PUBLIC HEARING: FY 2021 PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EVANSTON Page 1 of 506 A. Public Hearing for 2021 Proposed Budget Staff recommends City Council conduct a public hearing to receive public comment regarding the FY 2021 Proposed Budget for the City of Evanston. For Discussion Public Hearing for 2021 Proposed Budget - Attachment - Pdf 12 - 13 (III) MAYOR PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PROCLAMATIONS (IV) CITY MANAGER PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS (V) COMMUNICATIONS: CITY CLERK (VI) PUBLIC COMMENT Members of the public are welcome to speak at City Council meetings. As part of the Council agenda, a period for public comments shall be offered at the commencement of each regular Council meeting. Public comments will be noted in the City Council Minutes and become part of the official record. Those wishing to speak should sign their name and the agenda item or non-agenda topic to be addressed on a designated participation sheet. If there are five or fewer speakers, fifteen minutes shall be provided for Public Comment. If there are more than five speakers, a period of forty-five minutes shall be provided for all comment, and no individual shall speak longer than three minutes. The Mayor will allocate time among the speakers to ensure that Public Comment does not exceed forty-five minutes. The business of the City Council shall commence forty-five minutes after the beginning of Public Comment. Aldermen do not respond during Public Comment. Public Comment is intended to foster dialogue in a respectful and civil manner. Public comments are requested to be made with these guidelines in mind. (VII) SPECIAL ORDERS OF BUSINESS SP1. 2021 Proposed Budget Discussion Staff requests discussion on the 2021 Proposed Budget. For Discussion 2021 Proposed Budget Discussion - Attachment - Pdf 14 - 15 Page 2 of 506 (VIII) CONSENT AGENDA - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES O1. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of October 12, 2020 The City Clerk recommends approval of the minutes of October 12, 2020. City Council Minutes for 10_12_2020 16 - 28 (IX) CONSENT AGENDA - ADMINISTRATION & PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE - ALDERMAN RUE SIMMONS A1. Approval of the City of Evanston Payroll and Bills Staff recommends City Council approval of the City of Evanston Payroll for the period of September 28, 2020, through October 11, 2020, in the amount of $2,869,051.84 and Bills List for October 27, 2020, in the amount of $2,586,917.51. For Action Approval of the City of Evanston Payroll and Bills - Pdf 29 - 54 A2. Change Order No. 1 with Great Lakes Plumbing and Heating for the Robert Crown Community Center and Library HVAC maintenance services Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to approve Change Order No. 1 for HVAC maintenance services for the Robert Crown Community Center and Library with Great Lakes Plumbing and Heating (4521 W. Diversey Avenue, Chicago, IL 60639) to increase the contract period by 159 calendar daysfrom December 23, 2020 to May 31, 2021. This change order will not increase the existing contract price. Funding is from the Crown Construction Fund (Account 416.40.4160.65515 – 616017). For Action Change Order No. 1 with Great Lakes Plumbing and Heating for the Robert Crown Community Center and Library HVAC maintenance services - Attachment - Pdf 55 - 57 Page 3 of 506 A3. Change Order No. 5 with Thieneman Construction, Inc. for Clearwell 9 Replacement Project Construction (Bid 18-30) Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 5 to the contract for the Clearwell 9 Replacement Project (Bid No. 18-30) with Thieneman Construction, Inc. (17219 Foundation Parkway, Westfield, IN) in the amount of $387,264.31. This will increase the total contract amount from the current contract price of $19,286,531.55 to $19,673,795.86. There is no time extension associated with this change order. The City has a loan agreement in place with the IEPA for funding from the State Revolving Fund in the amount of $20,556,256 for engineering and construction of this project. Staff will seek a final Loan Amendment to increase the loan amount to cover all eligible costs. The loan is currently set to be repaid over 20 years at 1.84% interest. IEPA loan funding for this work is being routed through the Water Fund, Capital Improvement (Account 513.71.7330.65515-733107). Northwestern University (NU) will reimburse Evanston $313,568.23 of this change order amount and the City's portion of the change order amount is $73,696.08. Further information is included in the packet below. For Action Change Order No. 5 with Thieneman Construction, Inc. for Clearwell 9 Replacement Project Construction (Bid 18-30) - Attachment - Pdf 58 - 188 A4. Change Order No.1 with Harris Computer Systems for a Six Month Extension of the Maintenance and Support Agreement on the NorthStar Utility Billing System Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Change Order No.1 with Harris Computer Systems (1 Antares Drive, Suite 400, Ottawa, Ontario) for the Harris NorthStar utility billing software maintenance and support agreement in the amount of $25,663.11. This support will be for six months, December 1, 2020 through May 31, 2021. Funding is provided by the Water Fund, Water Other Operations Business Unit (Account 510.40.4225.62340), which has an approved FY 2020 budget of $373,300 and a YTD balance of $273,300.91. For Action Change Order No.1 with Harris Computer Systems for a Six Month Extension of the Maintenance and Support Agreement on the NorthStar Utility Billing Sys - Pdf 189 - 190 Page 4 of 506 A5. Contracts with Alexander Chemical Corporation, Polydyne Incorporated and Carus Corporation for FY 2021 Water Treatment Chemicals Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with Alexander Chemical Corporation (7593 S. First Road, LaPorte, IN 46350) in the amount of $378,174.00, Polydyne Incorporated (One Chemical Plant Road, Riceboro, GA 31323) in the amount of $75,168.00 and Carus Corporation (315 Fifth Street, Peru IL 61354) in the amount of $152,006.40, for the period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 for the purchase of water treatment chemicals in the amount of $605,348.40. Funding is provided by the Water Production Bureau Filtration Business Unit (Accounts 510.40.4220.65015 & 510.40.4220.65030), which have a t otal FY 2021 budget request of $665,100.00. For Action Contracts with Alexander Chemical Corporation, Polydyne Incorporated and Carus Corporation for FY 2021 Water Treatment Chemicals - Attachment - Pdf 191 - 195 A6. Resolution 86-R-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Sign Notification of Grant Awards to Fund and Operate a Senior Congregate Meal Program Staff recommends City Council approval of Resolution 86-R-20 authorizing the City Manager to sign notification of grant awards to fund and operate a congregate senior meal program at the Levy Senior Center and Fleetwood-Jourdain Community Center. Funding for this program is budgeted in various line items in the Fleetwood -Jourdain Business Unit 100.30.3040 and Levy Center Business Unit 100.30.3055. Overall budgeted expenses for the 2020-2021 program including staff salaries, Social Security, Medicare, advertising, program supplies and food costs are projected at $87,696. For Action Resolution 86-R-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Sign Notification of Grant Awards to Fund and Operate a Senior Congregate Meal Program - Attachmen - Pdf 196 - 202 Page 5 of 506 A7. Resolution 89-R-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Grant an Easement for Steam Infrastructure Installation on Emerson Street Staff recommends City Council adoption of Resolution 89 -R-20, authorizing the City Manager to grant an easement for steam infrastructure installation on Emerson Street. The easement would be granted for a 20 year period. No City funding is required for these proposed utilities. Northwestern University will fund the project and will be assessed a one-time easement fee of $20,643.00. These funds will be deposited to the General Fund (Account 100.40.4105.52175). For Action Resolution 89-R-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Grant an Easement for Steam Infrastructure Installation on Emerson Street - Attachment - Pdf 203 - 211 (X) CONSENT AGENDA - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE - ALDERMAN WYNNE P1. Resolution 87-R-20, Approving a Plat of Resubdivision for 1605 - 1631 Chicago Avenue Plan Commission and Staff recommend City Council adoption of Resolution 87-R-20 for approval of a two-lot Subdivision at 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue. For Action Resolution 87-R-20 for a Two-Lot Subdivision and Ordinance 98-O-20 for a Major Adjustment to a Planned Development, 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue - Attach - Pdf 212 - 267 P2. Ordinance 98-O-20, Approving a Major Adjustment to a Planned Development at 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue Plan Commission and staff recommend City Council adoption of a Ordinance 98-O-20 granting a Major Adjustment to a Planned Developmentoriginally approved by Ordinance 86-O-13. The adjustment includes an increased Floor Area Ratio (FAR) from 3.15 to 4.2, increased number of parking spaces from 32 (23 on-site, 9 leased) to 38 (all leased off-site), and decrease the total number of units from 205 to 186 (including 65 dwelling units). No new site development allowance will be needed. For Introduction Ordinance 98-O-20, Approving a Major Adjustment to a Planned Development at 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue - Attachment - Pdf 268 - 291 Page 6 of 506 P3. Ordinance 97-O-20, Special Use for a Planned Development at 1621-1631 Chicago Avenue The Plan Commission and staff recommend denial of Ordinance 97 -O- 20 for approval of a Special Use for a Planned Development to construct a 17-story apartment building with 215 units, 85 subterranean parking spaces, and approximately 3,289 sq. ft. of ground -floor retail space in the D4 Downtown Transition District. The proposal includes the following Site Development Allowances: 1) A building height of 185 ft. where 105 ft. is allowed; 2) An FAR of 10.38 where a maximum of 5.4 is allowed; 3) 215 dwelling units where 54 is the maximum is allowed; and 4) 85 parking spaces where a minimum of 162 are required. For Introduction Ordinance 97-O-20, Special Use for a Planned Development at 1621- 1631 Chicago Avenue - Attachment - Pdf 292 - 347 P4. Ordinance 95-O-20, Amending Title 6 of the Evanston Code to Revise Regulations Regarding Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels Plan Commission recommends City Council adoption of Ordinance 95- O-20, Amending Title 6 of the Evanston Code to Revise Regulations Regarding Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels.The Ordinance allows for a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, Title 6 of the City Code, to amend Section 6-18-3 - Definitions to increase the permitted hours of operation for a Domestic Animal Daycare Center and amend Section 6-12-2-3 – Special Uses to add Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels as Special Uses in the RP Research Park District. For Action Ordinance 95-O-20, Amending Title 6 of the Evanston Code to Revise Regulations Regarding Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels - Attachment - Pdf 348 - 432 Page 7 of 506 P5. Ordinance 96-O-20, Authorization to grant a Special Use Permit for a Daycare - Domestic Animal, and Kennel, Located at 900 Clark Street in the RP Research Park District ("Dogtopia of Northshore LLC") The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), as well as City staff, recommend City Council adoption of, with conditions, Ordinance 96-O-20, allowing for a special use permit for a Daycare – Domestic Animal, and Kennel, in the RP Research Park District. The applicant has complied with all zoning requirements and meets all of the standards of a special use for this district contingent on the adoption of concurrent legislation for a proposed text amendment to add said uses to the list of authorized special uses in the RP Research Park District. For Action Ordinance 96-O-20, Authorization to grant a Special Use Permit for a Daycare - Domestic Animal, and Kennel, Located at 900 Clark Street in the RP Rese - Pdf 433 - 453 P6. Ordinance 94-O-20, Granting Major Zoning Variations to Construct an Upper Story Dwelling Unit atop a One-Part Commercial Building in the B1a Business District and oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District (1800 Central Street). The Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning and Zoning staff recommend adoption, with conditions, of Ordinance 90 -O-20, granting major zoning variations at 1800 Central Street to construct an upper story dwelling unit atop a one-part commercial building in the B1a Business District and oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District. For Action Ordinance 94-O-20, Granting Major Zoning Variations to Construct an Upper Story Dwelling Unit atop a One-Part Commercial Building in the B1a Business - Pdf 454 - 475 (XI) CONSENT AGENDA - RULES COMMITTEE - ALDERMAN RUE SIMMONS R1. Approval of the Proposed 2021 City Council Meeting Dates Staff recommends City Council approval of the 2021 proposed City Council meeting dates. For Action Approval of the Proposed 2021 City Council Meeting Dates - Pdf 476 - 477 Page 8 of 506 R2. Resolution 91-R-20, Dissolution of the Transportation and Parking Committee The Rules Committee and staff recommend that the City Council adopt Resolution 91-R-20 dissolving the Transportation and Parking Committee. For Action Resolution 91-R-20, Dissolution of the Transportation and Parking Committee - Attachment - Pdf 478 - 481 R3. Ordinance 100-O-20; Amending City Code Section 2-3-2 to Reduce the Number of Members on the Commission on Aging Staff recommends City Council adoption of Ordinance 100 -O-20, amending City Code Section 2-3-2 to reduce the number of members on the Commission of Aging from fifteen to nine. For Introduction Ordinance 100-O-20; Amending City Code Section 2-3-2 to Reduce the Number of Members on the Commission on Aging - Attachment - Pdf 482 - 484 R4. Ordinance 102-O-20; Amending Portions of the City Code Codifying the Reparations Committee Rules Committee recommends City Council adoption of Ordinance 102- O-20 amending portions of the City Code codifying the Reparations Committee. For Introduction Ordinance 102-O-20; Amending Portions of the City Code Codifying the Reparations Committee - Pdf 485 - 488 R5. Ordinance 104-O-20, Setting Compensation for the City Clerk Staff requests the City Council adopt Ordinance 104-O-20, setting the compensation for the City Clerk. For Introduction Ordinance 104-O-20, Setting Compensation for the City Clerk 489 R6. Ordinance 105-O-20, Setting Compensation for the Mayor Staff requests the City Council adopt Ordinance 105-O-20, setting the compensation for the Mayor. For Introduction Ordinance 105-O-20, Setting Compensation for the Mayor - Attachment - Pdf 492 - 494 Page 9 of 506 R7. Aldermanic Compensation At the Rules Committee's request, Staff has prepared Ordinances regarding the compensation for Aldermen (three Ordinances with three different models) along with one Resolution that would accompany o ne Ordinance. Staff requests the City Council discuss and adopt one of the following proposals: • Option 1: Ordinance 103-O-20 ($15,990 annual compensation with the City to cover insurance costs); or • Option 2: Ordinance 106-O-20 ($37,800 annual compensation with the Council covering the full cost of insurance); or • Option 3: Ordinance 108-O-20 ($15,990 annual compensation to be combined with a health insurance allowance with the Council covering the full cost of insurance) AND Resolution 94 -R-20 ($1,400 monthly allowance). For Introduction Aldermanic Compensation - Attachment - Pdf 495 - 505 (XII) APPOINTMENTS APP1. Approval of Appointments and Reappointments to Board, Commission and Committee The Mayor recommends City Council approval of the appointment of Angela Valavanis to the Alternative Emergency Response Subcommittee and the reappointment of Kristi Bachmann to the Animal Welfare Board. For Action Approval of Appointments and Reappointments to Board, Commission and Committee - Attachment - Pdf 506 (XIII) CALL OF THE WARDS (Aldermen shall be called upon by the Mayor to announce or provide information about any Ward or City matter which an Alderman desires to bring before the Council.) {Council Rule 2.1(10)} (XIV) EXECUTIVE SESSION (XV) ADJOURNMENT (XVI) UPCOMING ALDERMANIC COMMITTEE MEETINGS Page 10 of 506 DATE TIME BOARD/COMMITTEE/COMMISSION 10/28 6:00 PM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE 11/2 5:00 PM RULES COMMITTEE 11/2 7:00 PM HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Page 11 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Erika Storlie, Interim City Manager CC: Hitesh Desai, Chief Financial Officer; Kate Lewis-Lakin, Budget Coordinator Subject: Public Hearing for 2021 Proposed Budget Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council conduct a public hearing to receive public comment regarding the FY 2021 Proposed Budget for the City of Evanston. Council Action: For Discussion Summary: City Council will hold a public hearing on the 2021 Proposed Budget. This was properly noticed on October 15, 2020, which is at least 10 days before the hearing as required by state law. A copy of the notice published is attached. More information on the 2021 Proposed Budget, including full budget document and summaries, can be found at www.cityofevanston.org/budget. Attachments: 2021 Budget Hearing Notice A.Page 12 of 506 Product(s): SubTrib_Pioneer North , Publicnotices.com AdSize(s):1 Column Run Date(s):Thursday, October 15, 2020 Color Spec.B/W Preview Order ID:6786449 10/6/2020 4:16:14 PMPrinted: IL Govt Legal Pioneer NorthPACKAGE NAME: Page 2 of 2 A.Page 13 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Erika Storlie, Interim City Manager CC: Hitesh Desai, Chief Financial Officer; Kate Lewis-Lakin, Budget Coordinator Subject: 2021 Proposed Budget Discussion Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff requests discussion on the 2021 Proposed Budget. Council Action: For Discussion Summary: The 2021 Proposed Budget was released on October 9, 2020, and was presented to City Council on October 19, 2020. Last week's discussion also included a presentation on the 2021 Proposed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Links are posted below to the Budget Summary, Budget Document, and City Council meeting presentations. All budget documents are available on the City's website at cityofevanston.org/budget. • 2021 Proposed Budget Summary • 2021 Proposed Budget - Full Document • October 19 City Council Presentation - 2021 Proposed Budget • October 19 City Council Presentation - 2021 CIP City Council will hold the official public hearing on the 2021 Proposed Budget at the meeting on October 26, 2020. This hearing was noti ced in the Chicago Tribune on Thursday, October 15, 2020 in accordance with Illinois law. City Council will continue to receive public comment at all meetings where the budget is discussed. Budget memos are used to provide in-depth analysis on items included in the 2021 Budget and to answer questions posted by City Council members about the budget. They are posted to the City's website and available the public. The first round of budget memos was posted to the City's website on Friday, October 23. A second set of memos will be posted on Friday, October 30. SP1.Page 14 of 506 Staff intends to introduce the 2021 Budget Ordinance and 2020 Tax Levy Ordinances at the City Council meeting on Monday, November 9, with possible adoption on Monday, November 23. Staff requests Council direction on changes from the Proposed Budget to be included in the ordinance presented for introduction on Monday, November 9. The Council may of course make additional changes to the ordinance on the date of introduction. Page 2 of 2 SP1.Page 15 of 506 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EVANSTON, ILLINOIS LORRAINE H. MORTON CIVIC CENTER JAMES C. LYTLE COUNCIL CHAMBERS Monday, October 12th, 2020 Present: Alderman Fiske Alderman Rue Simmons Alderman Braithwaite Alderman Suffredin Alderman Wynne Alderman Revelle Alderman Wilson Alderman Rainey (8) Absent: Alderman Fleming (1) Presiding: Mayor Stephen Hagerty Devon Reid City Clerk O1.Page 16 of 506 Motion to suspend the rules and allow the meeting to be held virtually Passed 8-0 Motion: Ald. Wilson Second: Ald. Wynne Mayor’s Public Announcements Mayor Hagerty Announcements and Proclamation: ●Indigenous People’s Day ●Mental Health Awareness Week, October 4-10 ●World Polio Day - October 24, 2020 Watch City Manager’s Public Announcements City Manager Announcements: ●Update on properties facing problems Watch City Clerk’s Communications City Clerk provided information related to the upcoming November 3, 2020 Election. Watch O1.Page 17 of 506 Public Comment Lesley Williams Questioned the appropriateness of acknowledging Christopher Columbus Day. Voiced her concern over the hiring process for the next City Manager of Evanston. Questioned the validity of the public process and asked each City Council member to explain their vote for a candidate. Watch Karla R Thomas Provided her perspective on the finalists being considered for the City Manager position. Watch Kevin Brown Provided information regarding an ongoing racial discrimination investigation being conducted by the Illinois Department of Human Rights. Watch Carolyn Laughlin Voiced her concerns about residents not being able to participate proactively in the hiring process of the next City Manager. Encouraged the City Council to prolong the process so residents have the opportunity to provide input in the selection process. Watch Eric Paset Asked the City Council to support landlords and restaurants in Evanston. Watch Mike Vasilko Would like City Council members to acknowledge their vote for the candidate they selected as the next City Manager. Talked about the proposed city budget. Believes the City Manager and a few of the Alderman are jeopardizing safety and security by politicizing the police department. Watch Ray Friedman Stated there is a dialogue missing between residents and City Council to discuss the preferred qualities in a City Manager. He believes the same dialogue method should have been implemented during the city budget discussion. Watch Darlene Cannon Believes the selection and voting process of the City Manager was not transparent nor did it represent the residents who elected their public officials. She wanted more consideration given to Aretha Ferrell-Benavides, who she believes was qualified to serve as City Manager. Watch Cathleen McCann Expressed her disappointment in the decision by City Council to not hire a City Manager who the residents have confidence in. Watch Sean Peck-Collier Shared his remarks regarding the selection process of the City Manager. Watch Sharon Kushiner Stated that the City Council is pushing for a City Manager who is not responsive to the needs of the community and a budget that Watch O1.Page 18 of 506 increases taxes. Lionel Jean-Baptiste Asked City Council to support Resolution 77-R-20, designating Harbert Park as Harbert Payne Park Watch Delores Holmes Believes there was an open process for the City Manager hiring process. Asked people to listen and not believe there are ulterior motives behind the decisions being made. Watch Chris Kruger Stated the decision to select the next City Manager should be deferred to the residents and not left in the hands of the governing body. He stated his opposition for fracking and pipelines. He would like FOIA to treat recurrent requesters as the mainstream media. He also wants to close FOIA exemptions in order to have transparency in government. Watch Allie Harned Acknowledged the land covering Evanston was stolen from tribes native to the area. She shared her remarks regarding the selection process for the City Manager role. She reminded Evaston residents of the municipal elections happening in 2021. Watch Special Order of Business SP1. Approval of Evanston CARES Act Amendment to the PY 2019 Action Plan to include the Second Allocation of CDBG-CV Funding City Council adoption of Evanston CARES Act Amendment to the PY 2019 Action Plan to include the second allocation of CDBG-CV funding from the CARES Act to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus. Funding source is the City’s second allocation of CDBG-CV funding in the amount of $506,127 which combined with the first allocation of CDBG-CV in the amount of $1,080,243 totals $1,586,370. For Action Approved 8-0 Motion: Ald. Rainey Second: Ald. Wynne Watch SP2. 2020 Budget Update Staff will provide an update on the Fiscal Year 2020 Budget. For Discussion Motion: Ald. Rainey Second: Ald. Wynne Watch O1.Page 19 of 506 Consent Agenda CM1. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of September 21, 2020 City Council approved the minutes of September 21, 2020. For Action Approved 9-0 Watch CM2. Approval of the minutes of the special meeting of September 24, 2020 City Council approved the minutes of September 24, 2020. For Action Approved 9-0 CM3. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of September 29, 2020 City Council approved the minutes of September 29, 2020. Motion to amend the minutes to properly reflect the action taken for agenda item A5 Resolution 62-R-20. Approved 8-0 For Action Approved 8-0 as amended Motion: Ald. Rue Simmons Second: Ald. Revelle Motion: Ald. Revelle Second: Ald. Wynne Watch A1. Approval of the City of Evanston Payroll, Bills and Credit Card Activity City Council approved the City of Evanston Payroll for the period of September 14, 2020, through September 27, 2020, in the amount $2,180,658.54 Bills List for October 13, 2020, in the amount of $5,457,303.29 and credit card activity for the period ending July 26, 2020, in the amount of $179,219.44. For Action Approved on Consent Agenda O1.Page 20 of 506 A2. Approval of BMO Harris Amazon Credit Card Activity City Council approved the City of Evanston’s BMO Harris Amazon Credit Card Activity for the period ending July 26, 2020, in the amount of $28,136.29. For Action Approved 7-1-0 Ald. Suffredin abstained Motion: Ald. Rue Simmons Second: Ald. Rainey Watch A3. Approval of a Sole Source Purchase of Tallmadge Street Light Poles City Council authorized the City Manager to approve the purchase of 10 – Tallmadge street light poles and LED luminaire fixtures under the existing sole-source agreement with Spring City Electrical Manufacturing (One South Main Street, Spring City, PA, 19475) for a total cost of $43,750.00. Funding for this purchase will come from the Capital Improvement Program 2020 General Obligation Bonds (Account No. 415.40.4120.65515-420018), which has a FY 2020 budget of $128,000.00 for street light replacements. The remaining balance in the account is $61,023.00. For Action Approved on Consent Agenda A4. Resolution 84-R-20, Extending the Declared State of Emergency to November 9, 2020 City Council adopted Resolution 84-R-20, extending the declared state of emergency to November 9, 2020. For Action Approved 8-0 Motion: Ald. Rue Simmons Second: Ald. Rainey Watch A5. Resolution 77-R-20, Designating Harbert Park as Harbert Payne Park City Council adopted Resolution 77-R-20, designating Harbert Park as Harbert Payne Park. Funding for new signage comes from the Capital Improvement Fund (Account 415.40.4120.65515.519001). For Action Approved on Consent Agenda O1.Page 21 of 506 A6. Resolution 80-R-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Amendment to the Commercial, Business, Institutional, Multi-family Residential Buildings Waste Services Agreement with Groot to extend said Agreement City Council adopted Resolution 80-R-20 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract Amendment to the Commercial, Business, Institutional, Multi-family Residential Buildings Waste Services Agreement with Groot to extend said Agreement For Action Approved on Consent Agenda A7. Resolution 83-R-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Sign the Third Amendment to the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of 2222 Oakton Between the City of Evanston and Clark Street Real Estate, LLC Staff requests City Council review and provide direction on Resolution 83-R-20 approving a third amendment to the Purchase and Sales Agreement for the city owned property located at 2222 Oakton St, Evanston. For Action Failed in Committee A8. Ordinance 92-O-20, Amending the City Code to Establish a 3-Way Stop Control at the Intersection of Foster Street and Dewey Avenue City Council adopted Ordinance 92-O-20 amending Section 10-11-5(C), Schedule V(C) of the City Code to establish a 3-Way Stop Control at the intersection of Foster Street and Dewey Avenue. Funding will be through the General Fund-Traffic Control Supplies (100.40.4520.65115), with a FY 2020 budget of $58,000 and remaining balance of $8,455. Alderman Rue Simmons requests suspension of the rules for Introduction and Action at the October 12, 2020 City Council meeting. For Introduction and Action Approved on Consent Agenda O1.Page 22 of 506 A9. Ordinance 82-O-20, Amending City Code Section 5-1-3, 302.13 “Parking of Motor Vehicles”, Section 7-3-10-1 “Vehicles on Sidewalk, Parkway” and Section 10-4-1 “Stopping, Standing or Parking Prohibited in Specified Places” City Council adopted Ordinance 82-O-20, amending Section 5-1-3, 302.13 “Parking of Motor Vehicles,” Section 7- 3-10-1 “Vehicles on Sidewalk, Parkway” and Section 10-4-1 “Stopping, Standing or Parking Prohibited in Specified Places” to allow for parking of a vehicle on a parkway. The vehicle will be allowed to park on the parkway if there is an approved substrate/surface, the vehicle fits entirely between the sidewalk, street, and concrete curbing inner edges where it meets the parkway, is registered with the State of Illinois with a current license plate, and can be moved with proper notice if required. The Ordinance also adds a parking violation fee if the vehicle was not parked within the specifications and notes that the vehicle parked on the parkway is subject to all City Code enforcement. Motion to prohibit parking on parkways within 25 feet of an intersection. Passed 8-0 For Action Approved 7-1 as amended Ald. Fiske voted “No” Motion: Ald. Rue Simmons Second: Ald. Rainey Motion: Ald. Suffedin Second: Ald. Rue Simmons Watch A10. Ordinance 91-O-20, Authorizing the Sale of Aging Surplus Fleet Vehicles Owned by the City of Evanston City Council adopted Ordinance 91-O-20, directing the City Manager to offer the sale of vehicles owned by the City through public auction through GovDeals, an online auction system utilized by government agencies, on or around Wednesday, October 21, 2020, or any other subsequent America’s Auto Auction. These vehicles have been determined to be surplus due to new vehicle replacements being placed into service or vehicles that had to be taken out of service for safety reasons with the intention of eventual replacement. For Action Approved on Consent Agenda O1.Page 23 of 506 A11. Ordinance 57-O-20, Amending City Code Section 10-11-12 “Parking Zones Adding Section XII(J) – Electric Vehicle Charging Stations City Council adopted Ordinance 57-O-20, amending City Code Section 10-11-12 “Parking Zones” by adding Section J - Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. The Ordinance adds a fee of $1 an hour for vehicles parked in City owned parking lots at the Electric Vehicle Charging stations. In addition, the Ordinance adds a three (3) hour maximum ensuring better turnover. The fees will provide additional revenue to expand the City’s program in the future, while keeping the rate low to incentivize the use of electric vehicles as part of the City’s Climate Action Resilience Plan (CARP). For Action Approved on Consent Agenda A12. Ordinance 55-O-20, Amending the Amusement Tax City Council adopted Ordinance 55-O-20 amending the Amusement Tax to include online streaming services and to clarify that the tax applies to media that is capable of being streamed to mobile devices. Amusement Tax revenue is deposited to the City's General Fund. For Action Approved 6-1-1 Ald. Fiske voted “No” and Ald. Suffredin abstained Motion: Ald. Rue Simmons Second: Ald. Wynne Watch P1. 2020 Emergency Solutions Grant Recommendation Allocating Funds to Specific Activities to Assist Homeless and Housing Insecure Evanston Residents City Council approved the 2020 Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) allocations totaling $158,463: $146,579 to two social services agencies (Connections for the Homeless and the YWCA Evanston/North Shore) that provide housing and services for individuals and families who are homeless or at risk of homelessness, and $11,884 to the City of Evanston for grant administration. Funding source is the City’s 2020 Emergency Solutions Grant entitlement allocation in the amount of $158,463 from the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (Account 250.21.2128.XXXXX). Individual account numbers will be determined for external agencies and City administrative costs. For Action Approved on Consent Agenda O1.Page 24 of 506 P2. Approval of Vacation Rental License for a Coach House at an Owner-Occupied Property, 1131 Darrow Ave. City Council approved a Vacation Rental License for a coach house at an owner-occupied property at 1131 Darrow Ave. The Vacation Rental meets all of the Standards and Procedures for license approval. Additionally, staff seeks direction on future Vacation Rental Licensing of Accessory Dwelling Units. For Action Approved on Consent Agenda P3. Ordinance 95-O-20, Amending Title 6 of the Evanston Code to Revise Regulations Regarding Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels City Council adopted Ordinance 95- O-20, Amending Title 6 of the Evanston Code to Revise Regulations Regarding Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels.The Ordinance allows for a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, Title 6 of the City Code, to amend Section 6-18-3 - Definitions to increase the permitted hours of operation for a Domestic Animal Daycare Center and amend Section 6-12-2-3 – Special Uses to add Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels as Special Uses in the RP Research Park District. For Introduction Approved on Consent Agenda P4. Ordinance 96-O-20, Authorization to grant a Special Use Permit for a Daycare - Domestic Animal, and Kennel, Located at 900 Clark Street in the RP Research Park District ("Dogtopia of Northshore LLC") City Council adopted, with conditions, Ordinance 96-O-20, allowing for a special use permit for a Daycare – Domestic Animal, and Kennel, in the RP Research Park District. The applicant has complied with all zoning requirements and meets all of the standards of a special use for this district contingent on the adoption of concurrent legislation for a proposed text amendment to add said uses to the list of authorized special uses in the RP Research Park District. For Introduction Approved on Consent Agenda O1.Page 25 of 506 P5. Ordinance 94-O-20, Granting Major Zoning Variations to Construct an Upper Story Dwelling Unit atop a One-Part Commercial Building in the B1a Business District and oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District (1800 Central Street). City Council adopted, with conditions, Ordinance 90-O-20, granting major zoning variations at 1800 Central Street to construct an upper story dwelling unit atop a one-part commercial building in the B1a Business District and oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District. For Introduction Approved on Consent Agenda ED1. Resolution 82-R-20, Financial Assistance for Evanston Rebuilding Warehouse City Council adopted Resolution 82-R-20 providing financial assistance to Evanston Rebuilding Warehouse totaling $87,500 from the West Evanston TIF District. The Economic Development Committee supports staff's recommendation to support the funding. Staff recommends the West Evanston Tax Increment Financing District (Account 335.99.5870.65511). The account has a cash balance of approximately $1 million For Action Approved on Consent Agenda ED2. Resolution 81-R-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a Loan Agreement with Hecky Powell, Inc City Council adopted Resolution 81-R-20, authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Loan Agreement with Hecky Powell, Inc (1902 Green Bay Rd. Evanston IL 60201). The financial assistance to Hecky's Barbecue totaling $50,000 is proposed as a $25,000 loan and a $25,000 grant to support the renovation of the restaurant. Staff recommends a $50,000 loan, fifty-percent forgivable, from the General Fund/Economic Development Business District Improvement Fund (Account 100.15.5300.65522). Approximately $89,000 remains in this fund as of September 29, 2020. For Action Approved on Consent Agenda O1.Page 26 of 506 APP1. Approvals of Appointments and Reappointments on Boards, Commissions, and Committees City Council approved the following appointments: Jennifer Grist, Jon Jones and Anne Panek to the Animal Welfare Board; Alfonso Nieves and Melissa Raman Molitor to the Arts Council; Derik Ohanian to the Housing & Community Development Act Committee; Tracy Fulce to the Library Board; Gillian Robinson to the Minority, Women & Evanston Business Enterprise Development Committee; Robert Bush to the Parks, Recreation & Community Services Board; and Stuart Cohen and Ken Hazlett to the Preservation Commission and the reappointment of Tom Klitzkie and Wendy Pollock to the Environment Board. For Action Approved on Consent Agenda Call of the Wards Ward 1: The 1900 Sherman development will be presented at the Plan Commission meeting on Wednesday, October 14, 2020. Watch Ward 2: Thanked everyone who participated in “National Night Out”. Thanked Jean-Baptiste, the Law Department and neighbours who advocated at the two community meetings. Said he looks forward to celebrating the contributions made to the community by Ms. Payne. Watch Ward 3: Ward meeting on October 22, 2020 Watch Ward 4: Ward meeting on October 15, 2020 at 7 p.m. Watch Ward 5: Ward meeting on October 14, 2020. Thanked everyone who participated in “National Night Out” Watch Ward 6: Ward meeting on October 15, 2020 at 7 p.m. Watch Ward 7: No Report Watch Ward 8: Construction began on the 60 unit affordable housing senior project on Howard St. Watch O1.Page 27 of 506 Ward 9: No Report Watch Adjournment Mayor Hagerty called to adjourn the City Council meeting, Ald. Rainey made the motion with Ald. Wynne seconding the motion. A roll call vote was taken and by unanimous vote the meeting was adjourned. O1.Page 28 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of Administration and Public Works Committee From: Tera Davis, Accounts Payable Coordinator CC: Hitesh Desai, Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer Subject: Approval of the City of Evanston Payroll and Bills Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council approval of the City of Evanston Payroll for the period of September 28, 2020, through October 11, 2020, in the amount of $2,869,051.84 Bills List for October 27, 2020, in the amount of $2,586,917.51. Council Action: For Action Summary: Payroll – September 28, 2020, through October 11, 2020 $ 2,869,051.84 (Payroll includes employer portion of IMRF, FICA, and Medicare) Bills List – October 27, 2020, $ 2,586,917.51 General Fund Amount – Bills list $ 454,966.36 Advanced Check - $ 7,500.40 $ 462,466.76 TOTAL AMOUNT OF BILLS LIST & PAYROLL $ 5,455,969.35 *Advanced checks are issued prior to submission of the Bills List to the City Council for emergency purposes, to avoid a penalty, or to take advantage of early payment discounts. Attachments: 10.27.2020 BILLS LIST FY20 A1.Page 29 of 506 100 GENERAL FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 102520 - ILLINOIS PAPER DBA IMPACT NETWORKING LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,414.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,414.00 105394 - VERIZON WIRELESS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 18,645.64 Invoice Transactions 1 $18,645.64 101192 - CONSERV FS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,200.00 101192 - CONSERV FS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 717.00 101192 - CONSERV FS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 478.00 103639 - NATIONAL SEED 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,045.00 13427 - SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 164.38 105381 - VAN'S ENTERPRISES LTD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,571.00 Invoice Transactions 6 $6,175.38 12176 - EVANSTON REBUILDING WAREHOUSE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6,268.50 Invoice Transactions 1 $6,268.50 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 70.83 Invoice Transactions 1 $70.83 Invoice Transactions 1 $70.83 103917 - ON TRACK FULFILLMENT INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 260.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $260.00 272361 - Language Line Services 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6.34 Invoice Transactions 1 $6.34 Invoice Transactions 2 $266.34 17800 - ALLYSON HUNTER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 42.50 17801 - AMY WILSON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17818 - ANTHONY KIRCHMEIER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 275.00 17804 - BETTY MACKUNE-KARRER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 42.50 17805 - BETTY STEPHAN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 42.50 17838 - BOBBY WOODS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 42.50 17830 - DAN SCHMIDT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17817 - DAVID BRADEN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17829 - DIANE PETERSEN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 42.50 17823 - DORE BROWN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17821 - GEORGE GALLAND 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 40.00 17812 - GLEN CORNBLATH 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 4.00 17839 - JEAN DOLAN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 4.00 17802 - JOHN MICK 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 40.00 190852 - JUDITH MAENDEL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17845 - KEN ROBSON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 170.00 17814 - KIMBERLY SPRINGER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 10.00 284304 - LORI SCOTT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 98.75 17833 - LYNNE PUDLES 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 42.50 17806 - MARIE HARRIS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 42.50 17799 - MICHAEL SWIFT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17846 - MICHAEL WOLFE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17844 - MURIEL JOHNSON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17796 - MYRON STERNSTEIN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2.00 298013 - PETER JENTEL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 60.00 17803 - REBECCA BOULTON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2.00 17813 - ROBERT SPRINGER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 10.00 17820 - ROSE BARTLEBAUGH 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 42.50 17807 - ROSE FLEMING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 42.50 17840 - SCOTT MCMURRAY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17831 - SHANNA PRANAITIS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17819 - STEPHEN PFUNDSTEIN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 72.50 17836 - STEPHEN REINFRANCK 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 8.75 17837 - STUART KATZ 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 154001 - SUZANNE CALDER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 200.00 17828 - THANK MACH 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 115.00 17848 - THOMAS BUESS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.00 17811 - WILLIAM MEYERS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 50.00 Invoice Transactions 38 $2,564.50 17843 - REBECCA STEINBERG 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 10.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $10.00 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 47.22 Invoice Transactions 1 $47.22 17306 - DAVIS BANCORP, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,472.50 Invoice Transactions 1 $2,472.50 16914 - ALACRITI PAYMENTS LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 5,000.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $5,000.00 10643 - PASSPORT PARKING, INC`10/27/2020 10/27/2020 16,097.38 Invoice Transactions 1 $16,097.38 Invoice Transactions 43 $26,191.60 17849 - ROSA MARTINEZ 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 120.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $120.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $120.00 268935 - JEFFREY D. GREENSPAN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,950.00 137723 - SUSAN D BRUNNER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,800.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $4,750.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $4,750.00 Invoice Transactions 49 $31,398.77 COPIER PAPER Account 13040 - INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES Totals Account 22725 - CELL PHONE BILLS PAYABLE COMMUNICATION CHARGES SEPT 2020 Invoice Description Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND Account 13040 - INVENTORY OF SUPPLIES Account 41307 - RESERVE - L.E.P. VIOLATION FINES EVANSTON RESIDENT WORKFORCE TRAINEE PAYROLL Account 41307 - RESERVE - L.E.P. VIOLATION FINES Totals ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENACE SEED FOR ATHLETIC FIELDS LESCO SPREADER STICKER PAINT FOR ATHLETIC FIELDS Account 41223 - RSRV - FIELD USE FEES REC Totals Account 22725 - CELL PHONE BILLS PAYABLE Totals Account 41223 - RSRV - FIELD USE FEES REC HERBICIDE FOR OUTDOOR FIELDS ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Account 62210 - PRINTING Totals Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS TRANSLATION SERVICES Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Totals Business Unit 1505 - CITY MANAGER Totals Business Unit 1510 - PUBLIC INFORMATION Account 62210 - PRINTING BIKE THE RIDGE CARD PRINTING/MAILING Department 15 - CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Business Unit 1505 - CITY MANAGER Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals PAID WHEEL TAX TWICE OVERPAID WHEEL TAXES PAID WHEEL TAX BUT HAS A BENEFIT CARD PAID WHEEL TAX BUT HAS A BENEFIT CARD PAID WHEEL TAX BUT HAS A BENEFIT CARD Business Unit 1510 - PUBLIC INFORMATION Totals Business Unit 1560 - REVENUE & COLLECTIONS Account 52010 - WHEEL TAX PAID WHEEL TAX BUT HAS A BENEFIT CARD OVERPAID WHEEL TAX OVERPAID WHEEL TAX OVERPAID WHEEL TAX PURCHASED WHEEL TAX IN AUG AND SOLD VEHICLE IN SEPT PAID WHEEL TAX THREE TIMES PAID WHEEL TAX TWICE PAID TWICE FOR WHEEL TAX PAID WHEEL TAX BUT HAS A BENEFIT CARD PAID WHEEL TAX TWICE OVERPAID WHEEL TAX PAID DUPLICATE WHEEL TAX PAID WHEEL TAX ON A VEHICLE THAT WAS SOLD PREVIOUSLY OVERPAID WHEEL TAX OVERPAID WHEEL TAX OVERPAID WHEEL TAX OVERPAID WHEEL TAX DUPLICATE WT PAYMENT PAID WHEEL TAX BUT HAS A BENEFIT CARD PAID WHEEL TAX BUT HAS A BENEFIT CARD PAID WHEEL TAX TWICE PAID WHEEL TAX BUT HAS A BENEFIT CARD AND DOES NOT WANT A PERMIT OVERPAID WHEEL TAX PAID 2021 WHEEL TAX BUT SOLD VEHICLE AND WILL NOT REPLACE CITY DEPOSITED A CHECK MEANT FOR LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS PAID WHEEL TAX BUT SOLD VEHICLE BEFORE 10.01.2020 OVERPAID WHEEL TAX PAID WHEEL TAX BUT HAS A BENEFIT CARD PAID WHEEL TAX BUT HAS A BENEFIT CARD OVERPAID WHEEL TAX PAID WHEEL TAX TWICE Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Account 62431 - ARMORED CAR SERVICES ARMORED TRUCK SERVICES SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62431 - ARMORED CAR SERVICES Totals DUPLICATE PET LICENSE PURCHASE Account 52020 - PET LICENSES Totals Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES PAID WHEEL TAX TWICE OVERPAID WHEEL TAX Account 52010 - WHEEL TAX Totals Account 52020 - PET LICENSES Business Unit 1571 - TAX ASSESSMENT ADVOCACY Account 61055 - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES TEMPORARY TAX ASSESSOR CLERK Account 61055 - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES Totals ANNUAL ACTIVE PERMIT FEE-SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 65045 - LICENSING/REGULATORY SUPP Totals Business Unit 1560 - REVENUE & COLLECTIONS Totals Account 64545 - PERSONAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE MONTHLY CASHIERING SERVICES Account 64545 - PERSONAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE Totals Account 65045 - LICENSING/REGULATORY SUPP Department 15 - CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Totals Department 17 - LAW HEARING OFFICER Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS Totals Business Unit 1585 - ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS Totals Business Unit 1571 - TAX ASSESSMENT ADVOCACY Totals Business Unit 1585 - ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS HEARING OFFICER Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 2 of 26 A1.Page 30 of 506 100 GENERAL FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice AmountInvoice Description Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 47.22 Invoice Transactions 1 $47.22 122375 - LAW BULLETIN PUBLISHING COMPANY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 155.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $155.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $202.22 Invoice Transactions 2 $202.22 15876 - ACCURATE BIOMETRICS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,171.50 105201 - TRANS UNION CORP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 90.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,261.50 163373 - HEALTH ENDEAVORS, S.C.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 745.00 101665 - NORTH SHORE ENH OMEGA 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 4,244.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $4,989.00 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 23.61 Invoice Transactions 1 $23.61 Invoice Transactions 5 $6,274.11 17430 - DACRA AJUDICATION SYSTEMS LLC DBA DACRA TECH LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,000.00 17429 - CITYFRONT INNOVATIONS, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 370.80 Invoice Transactions 2 $2,370.80 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 56.00 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.61 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 62.00 Invoice Transactions 3 $203.61 154298 - CALL ONE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 21,473.91 154298 - CALL ONE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 20,317.53 Invoice Transactions 2 $41,791.44 Invoice Transactions 7 $44,365.85 17835 - MARY DENNIS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 55.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $55.00 17778 - EMMA RINGSTAD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 205.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $205.00 17789 - ANN BRESSLER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,100.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,100.00 10643 - PASSPORT PARKING, INC`10/27/2020 10/27/2020 28,443.75 Invoice Transactions 1 $28,443.75 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 132.65 Invoice Transactions 1 $132.65 10546 - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 209.02 Invoice Transactions 1 $209.02 Invoice Transactions 6 $30,145.42 16228 - ANDY FRAIN SERVICES, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11,489.53 Invoice Transactions 1 $11,489.53 Invoice Transactions 1 $11,489.53 100401 - COMCAST CABLE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 31.50 12792 - UNIFIRST CORPORATION 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 82.37 12792 - UNIFIRST CORPORATION 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 63.61 12792 - UNIFIRST CORPORATION 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 82.37 278136 - LAKESHORE RECYCLING SYSTEMS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 330.00 Invoice Transactions 5 $589.85 317013 - H-O-H WATER TECHNOLOGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,137.25 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 100.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,237.25 101143 - COMED 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 259.58 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,233.75 Invoice Transactions 2 $2,493.33 103744 - NICOR 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 92.58 Invoice Transactions 1 $92.58 Invoice Transactions 10 $4,413.01 Invoice Transactions 29 $96,687.92 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 118.05 Invoice Transactions 1 $118.05 Invoice Transactions 1 $118.05 12843 - ANGELIQUE SCHNUR 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 75.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $75.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $75.00 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 151.60 Invoice Transactions 1 $151.60 109096 - CLAUDE F. GARESCHE, JR.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 196.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $196.00 Business Unit 1705 - LEGAL ADMINISTRATION Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Department 19 - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Business Unit 1929 - HUMAN RESOURCE DIVISION Account 62160 - EMPLOYMENT TESTING SERVICES EMPLOYMENT TESTING-ACCURATE BIOMETRICS EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND CHECKS-TRANSUNION Account 65010 - BOOKS, PUBLICATIONS, MAPS Totals Business Unit 1705 - LEGAL ADMINISTRATION Totals Department 17 - LAW Totals COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Account 65010 - BOOKS, PUBLICATIONS, MAPS LAWYERPORT LEGAL RESEARCH PACKAGE Business Unit 1929 - HUMAN RESOURCE DIVISION Totals Business Unit 1932 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVI. Account 62340 - IT COMPUTER SOFTWARE SOFTWARE SERVICE Account 62270 - MEDICAL/HOSPITAL SERVICES Totals Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Account 62160 - EMPLOYMENT TESTING SERVICES Totals Account 62270 - MEDICAL/HOSPITAL SERVICES EMPLOYMENT TESTING-HEALTH ENDEAVORS EMPLOYEE TESTING-NORTHSHORE OMEGA COMMUNICATION CHARGES - SEPT 20 COMMUNICATION CHARGES OCT 2020 Account 64505 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS Totals Business Unit 1932 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIVI. Totals COPIER CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Account 64505 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS OVER THE PHONE INTERPRETATION SERVICES Account 62340 - IT COMPUTER SOFTWARE Totals Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES TOW REFUND Account 62451 - TOWING AND BOOTING CONTRACTS Totals Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS CITATION MANAGEMENT SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 52530 - BOOT RELEASE FEE TOW REFUND Account 52530 - BOOT RELEASE FEE Totals Account 62451 - TOWING AND BOOTING CONTRACTS Business Unit 1941 - PARKING ENFORCEMENT & TICKETS Account 52505 - TICKET FINES-PARKING OVERPAID CITATION 420811502 Account 52505 - TICKET FINES-PARKING Totals Business Unit 1942 - SCHOOL CROSSING GUARDS Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS CROSSING GUARD SERVICES - 2020 Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS Totals Account 65090 - SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISINFECTANT WIPES & GARBAGE CAN LINERS Account 65090 - SAFETY EQUIPMENT Totals Business Unit 1941 - PARKING ENFORCEMENT & TICKETS Totals Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS Totals Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS AVL TRACKERS Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS Totals MATS FOR SERVICE CENTER MATS FOR SERVICE CENTER MATS FOR SERVICE CENTER PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT LAKEFRONT Account 62225 - BLDG MAINTENANCE SERVICES Totals Business Unit 1942 - SCHOOL CROSSING GUARDS Totals Business Unit 1950 - FACILITIES Account 62225 - BLDG MAINTENANCE SERVICES COMMUNICATION CHARGES OCT 2020 Account 64015 - NATURAL GAS UTILITIES: NICOR Account 64015 - NATURAL GAS Totals Business Unit 1950 - FACILITIES Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES: COMED UTILITIES: DYNEGY ADD-ON Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS CHEMICAL WATER TREATMENT FOR HVAC IN MULTIPLE BUILDINGS AVL TRACKERS Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS Totals Business Unit 2115 - PROPERTY STANDARDS Account 62360 - MEMBERSHIP DUES AACE 2021 MEMBERSHIP Account 62360 - MEMBERSHIP DUES Totals COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Business Unit 2105 - PLANNING & ZONING Totals Department 19 - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Totals Department 21 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Business Unit 2105 - PLANNING & ZONING Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Account 62236 - SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE Totals Account 62295 - TRAINING & TRAVEL GARESCHE - ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR COURSES TO MEET CEU Account 62295 - TRAINING & TRAVEL Totals Business Unit 2115 - PROPERTY STANDARDS Totals Business Unit 2126 - BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES Account 62236 - SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AVL TRACKERS Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 3 of 26 A1.Page 31 of 506 100 GENERAL FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice AmountInvoice Description Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 316000 - SAFEBUILT ILLINOIS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 7,848.90 Invoice Transactions 1 $7,848.90 Invoice Transactions 3 $8,196.50 101187 - CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,055.62 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,055.62 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,055.62 Invoice Transactions 6 $9,445.17 103460 - MINUTEMAN PRESS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 843.16 12151 - MULTILINGUAL CONNECTIONS LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 184.50 291625 - THE PRINTED WORD, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 30.00 Invoice Transactions 3 $1,057.66 300517 - WILD CROW COMMUNICATION, INC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 440.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $440.00 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 283.32 Invoice Transactions 1 $283.32 103617 - NATIONAL AWARDS & FINE GIFTS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 159.00 103617 - NATIONAL AWARDS & FINE GIFTS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 191.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $350.00 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 269.72 Invoice Transactions 1 $269.72 Invoice Transactions 8 $2,400.70 101729 - EVANSTON FUNERAL & CREMATION 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,575.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,575.00 16782 - VELOCITY SYSTEMS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 735.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $735.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $2,310.00 167307 - NET TRANSCRIPTS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 45.77 Invoice Transactions 1 $45.77 Invoice Transactions 1 $45.77 101133 - COLLEGE OF LAKE COUNTY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 625.00 13815 - BEN HOLLIMAN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 75.00 17713 - JAMES VOLPE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 700.00 14910 - SUPERION, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,000.00 Invoice Transactions 4 $2,400.00 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 64.36 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 65.01 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 49.98 Invoice Transactions 3 $179.35 100922 - CDS OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11,540.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $11,540.00 Invoice Transactions 8 $14,119.35 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 59.88 Invoice Transactions 1 $59.88 Invoice Transactions 1 $59.88 101134 - COLLEY ELEVATOR CO.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 199.00 101134 - COLLEY ELEVATOR CO.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 207.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $406.00 10546 - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 207.39 10546 - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 51.08 Invoice Transactions 2 $258.47 Invoice Transactions 4 $664.47 Invoice Transactions 24 $19,600.17 137906 - STRYKER SALES CORPORATION 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 119.76 Invoice Transactions 1 $119.76 101749 - EVANSTON PHOTOGRAPHIC STUDIOS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,975.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $2,975.00 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 70.83 Invoice Transactions 1 $70.83 102277 - HASTINGS AIR-ENERGY CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,796.55 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,796.55 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 24.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 96.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 36.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 25.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 25.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 25.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 54.00 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 235.65 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 43.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 251.75 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 158.85 Account 62464 - PLUMB, ELEC, PLAN REVEIW SERV INSPECTION AND PLAN REVIEW CONSULTING SERVICES Account 62464 - PLUMB, ELEC, PLAN REVEIW SERV Totals Business Unit 2126 - BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES Totals Business Unit 2205 - POLICE ADMINISTRATION Account 62210 - PRINTING PRINTING SERVICES EPD PAMPHLET PRINTING SERVICES - BUSINESS CARDS Business Unit 2128 - EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT Totals Department 21 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Totals Department 22 - POLICE Business Unit 2128 - EMERGENCY SOLUTIONS GRANT Account 67110 - CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS ESG DISBURSEMENT FOR SEPTEMBER Account 67110 - CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS Totals RETIREMENT SHADOWBOX RETIREMENT PLAQUES Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Account 62210 - PRINTING Totals Account 62272 - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - SEPTEMBER Account 62272 - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Totals Account 65020 - CLOTHING UNIFORM - VEST Account 65020 - CLOTHING Totals Business Unit 2210 - PATROL OPERATIONS Totals Business Unit 2210 - PATROL OPERATIONS Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS BODY REMOVAL Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Totals UTILITIES: DYNEGY ADD-ON Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Business Unit 2205 - POLICE ADMINISTRATION Totals MEALS 40 HOUR FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR TRAINING - POLICE CITIZEN COMMISSION TRAINING - NIBRS Account 62295 - TRAINING & TRAVEL Totals Business Unit 2255 - OFFICE-PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS Totals Business Unit 2260 - OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION Account 62295 - TRAINING & TRAVEL TRAINING - EVIDENCE TECHNICIAN Business Unit 2255 - OFFICE-PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS Account 62770 - MISCELLANEOUS TRANSCRIPTS Account 62770 - MISCELLANEOUS Totals Business Unit 2280 - ANIMAL CONTROL Account 62225 - BLDG MAINTENANCE SERVICES PEST CONTROL - ANIMAL SHELTER (OCT 2020) Account 62225 - BLDG MAINTENANCE SERVICES Totals Account 65555 - IT COMPUTER HARDWARE IN-CAR LAPTOPS Account 65555 - IT COMPUTER HARDWARE Totals Business Unit 2260 - OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION Totals Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES - POLICE ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES - POLICE ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES - POLICE ADMIN Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Totals JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Account 65040 - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Totals Business Unit 2295 - BUILDING MANAGEMENT Totals ELEVATOR INSPECTION Account 62225 - BLDG MAINTENANCE SERVICES Totals Account 65040 - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Business Unit 2280 - ANIMAL CONTROL Totals Business Unit 2295 - BUILDING MANAGEMENT Account 62225 - BLDG MAINTENANCE SERVICES MAINTENANCE - FIRE TESTING Account 62360 - MEMBERSHIP DUES Totals Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals EPCR FEE Account 62335 - DATA PROCESSING SERVICES Totals Account 62360 - MEMBERSHIP DUES MEMBER PORTRAITS Department 22 - POLICE Totals Department 23 - FIRE MGMT & SUPPORT Business Unit 2305 - FIRE MGT & SUPPORT Account 62335 - DATA PROCESSING SERVICES UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS Account 62518 - SECURITY ALARM CONTRACTS EXHAUST REPAIR Account 62518 - SECURITY ALARM CONTRACTS Totals Account 65020 - CLOTHING UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 4 of 26 A1.Page 32 of 506 100 GENERAL FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice AmountInvoice Description Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 21.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 19.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 35.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 15.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 87.85 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 19.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 23.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 23.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 23.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 21.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 21.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 71.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 129.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 25.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 9.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 19.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 19.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 29.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 168.70 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 28.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 94.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 20.00 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 269.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 82.85 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 127.45 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 78.00 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 41.40 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 149.25 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 21.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 119.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 54.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 59.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 23.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 21.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 34.00 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 50.00 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 154.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 101.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 23.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 143.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 125.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 161.50 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 36.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 114.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 21.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 11.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 15.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 443.00 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 35.95 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 31.90 11435 - TODAY'S UNIFORMS INC. 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 15.95 Invoice Transactions 70 $4,589.60 102277 - HASTINGS AIR-ENERGY CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 174.95 102277 - HASTINGS AIR-ENERGY CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 496.81 Invoice Transactions 2 $671.76 Invoice Transactions 76 $10,223.50 100316 - ANDRES MEDICAL BILLING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 4,455.94 Invoice Transactions 1 $4,455.94 277574 - ALFREDO JAIMEZ 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 41.00 17822 - MARK BUCHANAN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 41.00 17827 - STEVE HUDDLESTON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 41.00 13114 - CARTERSON SAFETY COR. DBA FIRE TRAINING RESOURCES 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 250.00 Invoice Transactions 4 $373.00 100316 - ANDRES MEDICAL BILLING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 7,513.80 Invoice Transactions 1 $7,513.80 105943 - MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPOSITORY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 76.20 Invoice Transactions 1 $76.20 104171 - PRAXAIR DISTIBUTION INC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 787.53 Invoice Transactions 1 $787.53 16991 - AHA ECC DISTRIBUTION 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 7.20 Invoice Transactions 1 $7.20 Invoice Transactions 9 $13,213.67 Invoice Transactions 85 $23,437.17 12175 - NORTHERN ILLINOIS PUBLIC HEALTH CONSORTIUM 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,000.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,000.00 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 47.22 Invoice Transactions 1 $47.22 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,047.22 102530 - ILLINOIS STATE POLICE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 88.25 Invoice Transactions 1 $88.25 UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS Account 65050 - BLDG MAINTENANCE MATERIAL Totals Business Unit 2305 - FIRE MGT & SUPPORT Totals Business Unit 2315 - FIRE SUPPRESSION Account 65020 - CLOTHING Totals Account 65050 - BLDG MAINTENANCE MATERIAL EXHAUST REPAIR EXHAUST REPAIR UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNIFORMS Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS AMBULANCE CHARGES- SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS Totals PETTY CASH REFUND REQUEST PETTY CASH REFUND REQUEST PETTY CASH REFUND REQUEST FIRE TRAINING Account 62295 - TRAINING & TRAVEL Totals Account 53675 - AMBULANCE SERVICE AMBULANCE CHARGES- JULY 2020 Account 53675 - AMBULANCE SERVICE Totals Account 62295 - TRAINING & TRAVEL Account 65625 - FURNITURE & FIXTURES Totals Business Unit 2315 - FIRE SUPPRESSION Totals Department 23 - FIRE MGMT & SUPPORT Totals MEDICAL OXYGEN Account 65015 - CHEMICALS/ SALT Totals Account 65625 - FURNITURE & FIXTURES CITIZEN CPR Account 62522 - SCBA EQ MAINT AGREEMENTS SCBA PARTS Account 62522 - SCBA EQ MAINT AGREEMENTS Totals Account 65015 - CHEMICALS/ SALT Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Business Unit 2407 - HEALTH SERVICES ADMIN Totals Department 24 - HEALTH Business Unit 2407 - HEALTH SERVICES ADMIN Account 62360 - MEMBERSHIP DUES FY2200 MEMBERSHIP Account 62360 - MEMBERSHIP DUES Totals Business Unit 2435 - PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Account 62494 - HOME DAY CARE LICENSE EXPENDITURES FINGERPRINTING FOR HOMEDAYCARE Account 62494 - HOME DAY CARE LICENSE EXPENDITURES Totals Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 5 of 26 A1.Page 33 of 506 100 GENERAL FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice AmountInvoice Description Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 151.60 Invoice Transactions 1 $151.60 12458 - FINEST COURIER LOGISTICS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 35.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $35.00 Invoice Transactions 3 $274.85 15327 - ETHS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 4,849.04 15327 - ETHS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,342.08 Invoice Transactions 2 $7,191.12 Invoice Transactions 2 $7,191.12 244146 - CCMSI 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 23,375.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $23,375.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $23,375.00 Invoice Transactions 8 $31,888.19 17841 - MICHELLE BUSH 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 71.88 15879 - RYAN DOLLINS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 124.78 Invoice Transactions 2 $196.66 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 17.69 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 39.99 Invoice Transactions 2 $57.68 103360 - METROPOLITAN WATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,598.47 Invoice Transactions 1 $2,598.47 Invoice Transactions 5 $2,852.81 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 47.22 Invoice Transactions 1 $47.22 Invoice Transactions 1 $47.22 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 94.75 16589 - ADAM'S ACRES 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 141.00 10327 - DULCE CARAMEL CO.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 45.00 266331 - ED GAST 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 465.00 10765 - FROSTY PRODUCTION 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 454.00 16613 - GARLIC UNDERGROUND 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 164.00 270718 - GENEVA LAKES PRODUCE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 649.00 289422 - GREAT HARVEST BREAD CO.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 145.00 291352 - GREEN ACRES 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 118.00 15790 - GREEN FIRE FARM, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 189.00 266322 - HENRY'S FARM 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 471.00 268159 - J.W. MORLOCK AND GIRLS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 267.00 255093 - JON FIRST 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 739.00 266324 - K & K FARM'S 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 246.00 275512 - K.V. STOVER AND SON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 339.00 11913 - KATIC BREADS WHOLESALE, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 358.00 16855 - KOMBUCHA BRAVA LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 43.00 266320 - LAKE BREEZE ORGANICS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 291.00 266321 - LYON'S FARM 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 251.00 298625 - MARILYN'S BAKERY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 35.00 10317 - MINT CREEK FARM 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 64.00 17451 - NEWPORT COFFEE HOUSE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 52.00 270733 - NICHOLS FARM & ORCHARD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 534.00 270722 - OLD TOWN OIL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 79.00 270732 - P AND M FARM 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 352.00 300978 - RIVER VALLEY RANCH 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 248.00 288801 - SMITS FARMS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 153.00 11785 - THE CHEESE PEOPLE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 95.00 13243 - YAYA HOLDINGS LLC DBA CITY PRESS JUICE & BOTTLE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 36.00 Invoice Transactions 29 $7,117.75 Invoice Transactions 29 $7,117.75 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,068.69 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 3,439.05 Invoice Transactions 2 $4,507.74 104672 - SERVICE SANITATION INC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 324.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $324.00 Invoice Transactions 3 $4,831.74 102755 - JORSON & CARLSON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 35.76 Invoice Transactions 1 $35.76 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 756.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $756.00 15247 - VISION AND HEARING OUTREACH 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 230.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $230.00 15639 - DONALD HOWARD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,400.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $2,400.00 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6,799.16 Invoice Transactions 2 $6,799.16 10546 - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 492.12 10546 - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 850.44 10546 - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 90.64 10546 - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 577.94 Invoice Transactions 4 $2,011.14 COURIER TO IDPH Account 65075 - MEDICAL & LAB SUPPLIES Totals Business Unit 2435 - PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Totals Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS AVL TRACKERS Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS Totals Account 65075 - MEDICAL & LAB SUPPLIES Account 66048 - WORKERS COMP TPA PYMTS (NON SPECIFIC) Totals Business Unit 2499 - GENERAL ASSISTANCE Totals Department 24 - HEALTH Totals Business Unit 2455 - COMMUNITY HEALTH Totals Business Unit 2499 - GENERAL ASSISTANCE Account 66048 - WORKERS COMP TPA PYMTS (NON SPECIFIC) 4TH QUARTER CLAIMS & ADMINISTRATION FEES Business Unit 2455 - COMMUNITY HEALTH Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS PARTNER REIMBURSEMENT OF SUPPLIES PARTNERSHIP ETHS HEALTH CENTER Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Totals Account 62295 - TRAINING & TRAVEL Totals Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES Department 30 - PARKS, REC. AND COMMUNITY SERV. Business Unit 3005 - REC. MGMT. & GENERAL SUPPORT Account 62295 - TRAINING & TRAVEL PETTY CASH REFUND REQUEST PETTY CASH REFUND REQUEST Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Business Unit 3010 - REC. BUSINESS & FISCAL MGMT Totals Business Unit 3020 - REC GENERAL SUPPORT Business Unit 3005 - REC. MGMT. & GENERAL SUPPORT Totals Business Unit 3010 - REC. BUSINESS & FISCAL MGMT Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Totals Account 65125 - OTHER COMMODITIES LEASE 0000063 WITH MWRD Account 65125 - OTHER COMMODITIES Totals LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS AVL TRACKERS LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Totals Business Unit 3020 - REC GENERAL SUPPORT Totals Business Unit 3025 - PARK UTILITIES LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET LINK REIMBURSEMENT FARMERS MARKET Business Unit 3030 - CROWN COMMUNITY CENTER Account 62245 - OTHER EQMT MAINTENANCE Cleaned Scraper Knives Account 62245 - OTHER EQMT MAINTENANCE Totals Account 65085 - MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS PORTABLE RESTROOMS AT LAKEFRONT Account 65085 - MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS Totals Business Unit 3025 - PARK UTILITIES Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY UTILITIES: DYNEGY ADD-ON Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY VISION & HEARING PROVIDED FOR CHILDCARE STUDENTS Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Totals Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES LEARN TO SKATE HOCKEY CAMP & CLASS INSTRUCTOR Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Account 65040 - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Account 65040 - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 6 of 26 A1.Page 34 of 506 100 GENERAL FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice AmountInvoice Description Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 35.56 Invoice Transactions 1 $35.56 Invoice Transactions 11 $12,267.62 16722 - WE GOT GAME, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 441.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $441.00 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 807.39 Invoice Transactions 2 $807.39 Invoice Transactions 3 $1,248.39 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 43.50 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 78.86 Invoice Transactions 2 $122.36 15651 - NIBRA A. WHITE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,191.87 13568 - THOMAS SEXTON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 391.93 Invoice Transactions 2 $2,583.80 100401 - COMCAST CABLE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 201.10 Invoice Transactions 1 $201.10 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,572.02 Invoice Transactions 1 $2,572.02 Invoice Transactions 6 $5,479.28 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,044.00 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 23.61 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,067.61 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 55.06 Invoice Transactions 1 $55.06 17690 - AMANDA HART 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,515.60 17694 - BETSY MURPHY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,893.00 16733 - CARL ROSENTHAL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,521.00 17693 - CAROLYN MARTINEZ 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 586.00 17688 - EVELYN THOMPSON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 466.20 17699 - FRANCESCA SEGAL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 674.60 17793 - MARGARET EMILY GUTHRIE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 371.38 17692 - MARLA LAMPERT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 4,069.20 17792 - ROBIN STERLING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 320.00 17689 - SHAUNA BABCOCK 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 387.02 16022 - SUSAN LYNN TECKTIEL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 270.00 17691 - SUZANNE HOCK 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 992.40 Invoice Transactions 12 $13,066.40 313314 - 303 TAXI 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,880.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,880.00 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 4,624.97 Invoice Transactions 1 $4,624.97 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 7.60 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 14.25 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 34.96 Invoice Transactions 3 $56.81 Invoice Transactions 20 $20,750.85 100691 - BORDEN DECAL CO.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 557.50 100691 - BORDEN DECAL CO.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 619.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,176.50 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,176.50 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 37.90 Invoice Transactions 1 $37.90 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 57.69 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 57.69 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 46.59 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 46.59 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 57.69 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 46.59 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 .20 Invoice Transactions 7 $313.04 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 103.75 Invoice Transactions 1 $103.75 10546 - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 788.94 10546 - SUPERIOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 917.08 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,706.02 Invoice Transactions 11 $2,160.71 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 18.95 Invoice Transactions 1 $18.95 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 20,397.47 Invoice Transactions 2 $20,397.47 Invoice Transactions 3 $20,416.42 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 57.69 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 57.69 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 55.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Totals Business Unit 3030 - CROWN COMMUNITY CENTER Totals Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Business Unit 3035 - CHANDLER COMMUNITY CENTER Totals Business Unit 3040 - FLEETWOOD JOURDAIN COM CT Account 62495 - LICENSED PEST CONTROL SERVICES MASON PARK PEST CONTROL OCT. Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Business Unit 3035 - CHANDLER COMMUNITY CENTER Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES PLAY IN THE PARKS Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES Totals Account 62511 - ENTERTAIN/PERFORMER SERV Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals FJCC FALL KARATE INSTRUCTOR Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES Totals Account 62511 - ENTERTAIN/PERFORMER SERV COMMUNICATION CHARGES SEPT 2020 FJCC PEST CONTROL OCT. 2020 Account 62495 - LICENSED PEST CONTROL SERVICES Totals Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES FJCC FALL BASKETBALL SKILLS AND DRILLS Account 62495 - LICENSED PEST CONTROL SERVICES Totals Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES VIRTUAL FITNESS CLASSES VIRTUAL FITNESS CLASSES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Account 62495 - LICENSED PEST CONTROL SERVICES PEST CONTROL Business Unit 3040 - FLEETWOOD JOURDAIN COM CT Totals Business Unit 3055 - LEVY CENTER SENIOR SERVICES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES VIRTUAL FITNESS CLASSES VIRTUAL FITNESS CLASSES VIRTUAL FITNESS CLASSES ART INSTRUCTOR VIRTUAL FITNESS CLASSES PICKLE BALL CLINICS VIRTUAL FITNESS CLASSES VIRTUAL FITNESS CLASSES VIRTUAL FITNESS CLASSES VIRTUAL FITNESS CLASSES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES Totals Account 62695 - COUPON PMTS-CAB SUBSIDY SUBSIDIZED TAXI COUPON PROGRAM Account 62695 - COUPON PMTS-CAB SUBSIDY Totals Business Unit 3080 - BEACHES Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS AVL TRACKERS Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Totals DECALS FOR DEMPSTER ST BOAT LAUNCH Account 65045 - LICENSING/REGULATORY SUPP Totals Business Unit 3065 - BOAT RAMP OPERATIONS Totals Business Unit 3055 - LEVY CENTER SENIOR SERVICES Totals Business Unit 3065 - BOAT RAMP OPERATIONS Account 65045 - LICENSING/REGULATORY SUPP DEMPSTER ST BOAT LAUNCH PRINTED PASSES Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Account 65040 - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL Account 62495 - LICENSED PEST CONTROL SERVICES Totals Account 62495 - LICENSED PEST CONTROL SERVICES PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Business Unit 3095 - CROWN ICE RINK Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS AVL TRACKERS Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Totals JANITORIAL SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Account 65040 - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Totals Business Unit 3080 - BEACHES Totals PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL Business Unit 3095 - CROWN ICE RINK Totals Business Unit 3100 - SPORTS LEAGUES Account 62495 - LICENSED PEST CONTROL SERVICES PEST CONTROL Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 7 of 26 A1.Page 35 of 506 100 GENERAL FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice AmountInvoice Description Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 55.11 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 55.11 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 57.69 Invoice Transactions 6 $338.40 Invoice Transactions 6 $338.40 100177 - ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 49.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $49.00 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 56.85 Invoice Transactions 1 $56.85 Invoice Transactions 2 $105.85 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 19.55 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 64.86 100310 - ANDERSON PEST CONTROL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 64.86 Invoice Transactions 3 $149.27 17794 - SIANNA WATERS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 343.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $343.00 151986 - CINTAS CORPORATION #769 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 35.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $35.00 17268 - HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. DBA THE HOME DEPOT PRO 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 412.54 Invoice Transactions 1 $412.54 Invoice Transactions 6 $939.81 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 23.61 Invoice Transactions 1 $23.61 11642 - LILY CIGAN 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 460.80 Invoice Transactions 1 $460.80 100162 - ALARM DETECTION SYSTEMS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 464.17 Invoice Transactions 1 $464.17 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 370.74 Invoice Transactions 1 $370.74 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 73.98 Invoice Transactions 1 $73.98 Invoice Transactions 5 $1,393.30 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,375.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,375.00 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,159.64 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,159.64 Invoice Transactions 2 $2,534.64 254047 - DONALD KOLAKOWSKI 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,350.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,350.00 17791 - MARIACHI SIRENA 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,200.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,200.00 10352 - B&B PRODUCTIONS, INC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 425.00 104672 - SERVICE SANITATION INC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 665.00 104672 - SERVICE SANITATION INC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 470.00 Invoice Transactions 3 $1,560.00 Invoice Transactions 5 $4,110.00 Invoice Transactions 120 $87,771.29 17797 - ALBERT FISHER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 45.00 17842 - GAIL JOSEPH 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 34.00 17824 - KENNING ANDERSON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 72.00 17826 - MARVIN SCHWARZ 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6.00 17825 - NANCY BROCKSBANK-FOX 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 34.00 17832 - PERI JOHNSON 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 32.00 17834 - THOMAS KOPKO 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 36.00 Invoice Transactions 7 $259.00 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,020.00 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 47.22 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,067.22 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,000.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,000.00 292557 - SILK SCREEN EXPRESS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6,787.30 Invoice Transactions 1 $6,787.30 100359 - ARLINGTON POWER EQUIPMENT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,500.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,500.00 101063 - CINTAS FIRST AID & SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 129.58 Invoice Transactions 1 $129.58 130346 - ADAM THEIS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 30.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $30.00 Invoice Transactions 14 $10,773.10 138225 - RAINBOW TREECARE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,190.76 PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL AVL TRACKERS Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Totals Business Unit 3215 - YOUTH ENGAGEMENT DIVISION Totals Account 62210 - PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS - HERNANDEZ, GENARO Account 62210 - PRINTING Totals Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Account 62495 - LICENSED PEST CONTROL SERVICES Totals Business Unit 3100 - SPORTS LEAGUES Totals Business Unit 3215 - YOUTH ENGAGEMENT DIVISION Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS MONTHLY MAT SERVICE Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS Totals Account 65040 - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Account 62495 - LICENSED PEST CONTROL SERVICES Totals Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES YOGA INSTRUCTOR Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES Totals Business Unit 3225 - GIBBS-MORRISON CULTURAL CENTER Account 62495 - LICENSED PEST CONTROL SERVICES PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES YOGA PROGRAM INSTRUCTOR Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES Totals Account 62518 - SECURITY ALARM CONTRACTS Business Unit 3605 - ECOLOGY CENTER Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Account 65040 - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Totals Business Unit 3225 - GIBBS-MORRISON CULTURAL CENTER Totals Business Unit 3605 - ECOLOGY CENTER Totals Business Unit 3710 - NOYES CULTURAL ARTS CENTER Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Totals ANNUAL CHARGES NOV-OCT Account 62518 - SECURITY ALARM CONTRACTS Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES Totals Account 62511 - ENTERTAIN/PERFORMER SERV PERFORMER DAY OF DEAD Account 62511 - ENTERTAIN/PERFORMER SERV Totals Business Unit 3710 - NOYES CULTURAL ARTS CENTER Totals Business Unit 3720 - CULTURAL ARTS PROGRAMS Account 62505 - INSTRUCTOR SERVICES ECT DIRECTOR Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Business Unit 4105 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY ADMIN Account 52130 - RESIDENTS ANNUAL PARKING PERMITS PAID FOR A PARKING PERMIT BUT NOT PART OF A DISTRICT PAID FOR PERMIT AND PASSES BUT NOT PART OF A DISTRICT PAID FOR A PARKING PERMITS BUT NOT PART OF A DISTRICT Business Unit 3720 - CULTURAL ARTS PROGRAMS Totals Department 30 - PARKS, REC. AND COMMUNITY SERV. Totals Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Account 62515 - RENTAL SERVICES SOUND FOR DAY OF DEAD CONCERTS SANITATION AT NATIONAL NIGHT OUT SANITATION AT MOVIE IN PARK Account 62515 - RENTAL SERVICES Totals Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS AVL TRACKERS Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS Totals Account 65020 - CLOTHING Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals PAID FOR VISITOR PASSES BUT NOT PART OF A DISTRICT PAID FOR A PARKING PERMIT BUT NOT PART OF A DISTRICT PAID FOR A PARKING PERMIT BUT NOT PART OF A DISTRICT PAID FOR A PARKING PERMIT BUT NOT PART OF A DISTRICT Account 52130 - RESIDENTS ANNUAL PARKING PERMITS Totals Account 68205 - CONTINGENCIES PETTY CASH REFUND REQUEST Account 68205 - CONTINGENCIES Totals Business Unit 4105 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY ADMIN Totals Account 65085 - MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS Totals Account 65090 - SAFETY EQUIPMENT FIRST AID CABINET MAINTENANCE Account 65090 - SAFETY EQUIPMENT Totals FY2020 AFSCME UNIFORM PURCHASE Account 65020 - CLOTHING Totals Account 65085 - MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS FORESTRY EQUIPMENT/TOOLS Business Unit 4320 - FORESTRY Account 62496 - DED INOCULATION CAMBISTAT - FORESTRY Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 8 of 26 A1.Page 36 of 506 100 GENERAL FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice AmountInvoice Description Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,190.76 14884 - ROBERT KINNUCAN TREE EXPERTS & LANDSCAPING CO. INC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 106,553.33 Invoice Transactions 1 $106,553.33 100359 - ARLINGTON POWER EQUIPMENT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 427.70 Invoice Transactions 1 $427.70 Invoice Transactions 3 $108,171.79 13413 - EMERGENT SAFETY SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,416.01 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,416.01 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,416.01 100780 - OZINGA CHICAGO RMC, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,269.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,269.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,269.00 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 30.64 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 98.40 Invoice Transactions 2 $129.04 120248 - ELCAST LIGHTING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 273.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $273.00 Invoice Transactions 3 $402.04 Invoice Transactions 23 $122,031.94 Invoice Transactions 355 $454,966.36 Account 62497 - INOCULATION FUNDING- ANNUAL AMORTIZATION FY2020 DUTCH ELM TREE INJECTION PROGRAM Account 62497 - INOCULATION FUNDING- ANNUAL AMORTIZATION Totals Account 65055 - MATER. TO MAINT. IMP. Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Totals Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND Totals Account 62496 - DED INOCULATION Totals Account 65070 - OFFICE/OTHER EQT MTN MATL STREET LIGHT FIXTURE REPAIRS Account 65070 - OFFICE/OTHER EQT MTN MATL Totals Business Unit 4520 - TRAF. SIG.& ST LIGHT MAINT Totals Business Unit 4520 - TRAF. SIG.& ST LIGHT MAINT Account 64008 - FESTIVAL LIGHTING UTILITIES-DYNEGY UTILITIES: DYNEGY ADD-ON Account 64008 - FESTIVAL LIGHTING Totals Account 65055 - MATER. TO MAINT. IMP. FY2020 CONCRETE PURCHASE Account 65055 - MATER. TO MAINT. IMP. Totals Business Unit 4510 - STREET MAINTENANCE Totals Account 65090 - SAFETY EQUIPMENT Totals Business Unit 4500 - INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE Totals Business Unit 4510 - STREET MAINTENANCE Business Unit 4500 - INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE Account 65090 - SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT FORESTRY EQUIPMENT/TOOLS Account 65055 - MATER. TO MAINT. IMP. Totals Business Unit 4320 - FORESTRY Totals Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 9 of 26 A1.Page 37 of 506 200 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 101143 - COMED 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 32,651.71 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 64.54 Invoice Transactions 2 $32,716.25 Invoice Transactions 2 $32,716.25 Invoice Transactions 2 $32,716.25 Invoice Transactions 2 $32,716.25 Business Unit 5100 - MOTOR FUEL TAX - ADMINISTRATION Totals Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Totals Fund 200 - MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND Totals CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Business Unit 5100 - MOTOR FUEL TAX - ADMINISTRATION Account 64007 - TRAFFIC LIGHT ELECTRICITY UTILITIES: COMED UTILITIES: DYNEGY ADD-ON Account 64007 - TRAFFIC LIGHT ELECTRICITY Totals Invoice Description Fund 200 - MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 10 of 26 A1.Page 38 of 506 205 EMERGENCY (E911) FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 100987 - CHICAGO COMMUNICATIONS, LLC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 674.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $674.00 149416 - AT & T 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 342.28 Invoice Transactions 1 $342.28 103536 - MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 229.95 100199 - ALPHA PRIME WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 976.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,205.95 100987 - CHICAGO COMMUNICATIONS, LLC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 248.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $248.00 Invoice Transactions 5 $2,470.23 Invoice Transactions 5 $2,470.23 Invoice Transactions 5 $2,470.23 Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS MOBILE RADIO Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS Totals Invoice Description Fund 205 - EMERGENCY TELEPHONE (E911) FUND Department 22 - POLICE Department 22 - POLICE Totals Fund 205 - EMERGENCY TELEPHONE (E911) FUND Totals Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 MOBILE RADIO Account 65625 - FURNITURE & FIXTURES Totals Business Unit 5150 - EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SYSTM Totals COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT MOBILE RADIO Account 65085 - MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS Totals Account 65625 - FURNITURE & FIXTURES Account 64505 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATION CHARGES Account 64505 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS Totals Account 65085 - MINOR EQUIPMENT & TOOLS Business Unit 5150 - EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SYSTM Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 11 of 26 A1.Page 39 of 506 240 HOME FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 101187 - CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 15,981.85 Invoice Transactions 1 $15,981.85 Invoice Transactions 1 $15,981.85 Invoice Transactions 1 $15,981.85 Invoice Transactions 1 $15,981.85 Business Unit 5430 - HOME FUND Totals Department 21 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Totals Fund 240 - HOME FUND Totals CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Business Unit 5430 - HOME FUND Account 65535 - REHAB LOANS TBRA DISBURSEMENT FOR AUGUST Account 65535 - REHAB LOANS Totals Invoice Description Fund 240 - HOME FUND Department 21 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 12 of 26 A1.Page 40 of 506 250 AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 101187 - CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 14,328.29 Invoice Transactions 1 $14,328.29 Invoice Transactions 1 $14,328.29 Invoice Transactions 1 $14,328.29 Invoice Transactions 1 $14,328.29 Business Unit 2129 - ESG-CV Totals Department 21 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Totals Fund 250 - AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND Totals CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Business Unit 2129 - ESG-CV Account 67110 - CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS 1ST DISBURSEMENT ESG-CV FUNDS Account 67110 - CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS Totals Invoice Description Fund 250 - AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND Department 21 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 13 of 26 A1.Page 41 of 506 345 CHICAGO-MAIN TIF Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 16073 - PATRICK ENGINEERING, INC.*10/27/2020 10/27/2020 18,072.24 Invoice Transactions 1 $18,072.24 Invoice Transactions 1 $18,072.24 Invoice Transactions 1 $18,072.24 Invoice Transactions 1 $18,072.24 Business Unit 3400 - CHICAGO-MAIN TIF LETTER OF CREDI Totals Department 99 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL Totals Fund 345 - CHICAGO-MAIN TIF Totals CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Business Unit 3400 - CHICAGO-MAIN TIF LETTER OF CREDI Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS MAIN ST IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PHASE II ENGINEERING Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS Totals Invoice Description Fund 345 - CHICAGO-MAIN TIF Department 99 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 14 of 26 A1.Page 42 of 506 415 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 102196 - GRUMMAN/BUTKUS ASSOCIATES *10/27/2020 10/27/2020 384.50 Invoice Transactions 1 $384.50 172647 - IDEAL HEATING COMPANY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 32,801.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $32,801.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $33,185.50 104995 - B.H. SUHR & COMPANY, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,250.00 176428 - CIVILTECH ENGINEERING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6,981.31 Invoice Transactions 2 $8,231.31 100870 - CAPITOL CEMENT CO.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 41,850.00 153783 - INTERRA, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,945.13 16706 - SPRING CITY ELECTRICAL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 30,750.00 Invoice Transactions 3 $75,545.13 Invoice Transactions 5 $83,776.44 17367 - GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,156.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $2,156.00 100870 - CAPITOL CEMENT CO.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 121,366.86 17649 - ROBE INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 167,397.93 Invoice Transactions 2 $288,764.79 Invoice Transactions 3 $290,920.79 100870 - CAPITOL CEMENT CO.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 129,894.54 Invoice Transactions 1 $129,894.54 Invoice Transactions 1 $129,894.54 Invoice Transactions 11 $537,777.27 Invoice Transactions 11 $537,777.27 Invoice Description Fund 415 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS CIVIC CENTER BURNER REPLACEMENT Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS Totals Business Unit 4119 - 2019 GO BOND CAPITAL Totals Business Unit 4119 - 2019 GO BOND CAPITAL Account 62145 - ENGINEERING SERVICES CIVIC CENTER HVAC ARCHITECTURAL/ENGINEERING SRVCS Account 62145 - ENGINEERING SERVICES Totals Business Unit 4120 - 2020 GO BOND CAPITAL Account 62145 - ENGINEERING SERVICES CHURCH STREET SIDEWALK PLAT OF EASEMENT -1515 CHURCH CHURCH ST PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS Account 62145 - ENGINEERING SERVICES Totals Business Unit 4219 - NON-BOND CAPITAL Account 62145 - ENGINEERING SERVICES PUBLIC CANOE LAUNCH FEASIBILITY STUDY Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 2020 CDBG IMPROVEMENTS & WASTE TRANSFER STATION ALLEYS TASK ORDER 2 - TRAFFIC CALMING. SERVICE CNT, BUTLER PARK TALLMADGE STREET LIGHT POLE & LUMINAIRE FIXTURE Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS Totals Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Totals Fund 415 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND Totals Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 2020 CDBG IMPROVEMENTS & WASTE TRANSFER STATION ALLEYS Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS Totals Business Unit 4319 - CIP CDBG Funds Totals Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS Totals Business Unit 4219 - NON-BOND CAPITAL Totals Business Unit 4319 - CIP CDBG Funds Account 62145 - ENGINEERING SERVICES Totals Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 2020 CDBG IMPROVEMENTS & WASTE TRANSFER STATION ALLEYS EVANSTON SHORELINE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Business Unit 4120 - 2020 GO BOND CAPITAL Totals Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 15 of 26 A1.Page 43 of 506 416 CROWN CONSTRUCTION FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 285559 - BULLEY & ANDREWS, LLC *10/27/2020 10/27/2020 814,467.67 16678 - GREAT LAKES PLUMBING AND HEATING COMPANY *10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,568.75 317013 - H-O-H WATER TECHNOLOGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 450.00 317013 - H-O-H WATER TECHNOLOGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 450.00 Invoice Transactions 4 $817,936.42 Invoice Transactions 4 $817,936.42 Invoice Transactions 4 $817,936.42 Invoice Transactions 4 $817,936.42 Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Totals Fund 416 - CROWN CONSTRUCTION FUND Totals Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 ROBERT CROWN CENTER WATER TREATMENT SERVICE-SINGLE SOURCE Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS Totals Business Unit 4160 - CROWN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Totals Business Unit 4160 - CROWN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ROBERT CROWN CONSTRUCTION MANAGER SERVICES SOLE SOURCE HVAC MAINTENANCE SERVICES AT ROBERT CROWN ROBERT CROWN CENTER WATER TREATMENT SERVICE-SINGLE SOURCE Invoice Description Fund 416 - CROWN CONSTRUCTION FUND Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 16 of 26 A1.Page 44 of 506 505 PARKING SYSTEM FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 17306 - DAVIS BANCORP, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 3,277.50 Invoice Transactions 1 $3,277.50 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 170.58 Invoice Transactions 1 $170.58 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 18.95 Invoice Transactions 1 $18.95 15290 - BTR ENGINEERING, LLC *10/27/2020 10/27/2020 10,270.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $10,270.00 Invoice Transactions 4 $13,737.03 203703 - FASTSIGNS LINCOLNWOOD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 105.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $105.00 101215 - COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 475.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $475.00 101143 - COMED 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 25.26 101143 - COMED 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 25.26 101143 - COMED 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 184.67 101545 - DUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 3,756.25 101545 - DUNCAN PARKING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 350.00 10643 - PASSPORT PARKING, INC`10/27/2020 10/27/2020 528.00 Invoice Transactions 6 $4,869.44 10643 - PASSPORT PARKING, INC`10/27/2020 10/27/2020 10,648.66 Invoice Transactions 1 $10,648.66 101143 - COMED 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 56.57 Invoice Transactions 1 $56.57 Invoice Transactions 10 $16,154.67 17847 - IRMA DAVIS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 25.00 17808 - MAY FINE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 25.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $50.00 101215 - COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,199.71 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,199.71 13097 - SP PLUS PARKING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 8,559.20 Invoice Transactions 1 $8,559.20 13583 - 3C PAYMENT (USA) CORP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 143.43 120286 - JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE PROTECTION LP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,351.30 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,494.73 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,488.81 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,488.81 Invoice Transactions 7 $12,792.45 101215 - COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,690.02 Invoice Transactions 1 $2,690.02 13097 - SP PLUS PARKING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 15,562.50 Invoice Transactions 1 $15,562.50 13583 - 3C PAYMENT (USA) CORP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 307.09 Invoice Transactions 1 $307.09 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 3,845.98 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 85.93 Invoice Transactions 2 $3,931.91 Invoice Transactions 5 $22,491.52 101215 - COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 684.98 Invoice Transactions 1 $684.98 13097 - SP PLUS PARKING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 10,377.30 Invoice Transactions 1 $10,377.30 235507 - A & J SEWER SERVICE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 408.75 12366 - AUTOMATED PARKING TECHNOLOGIES 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,546.00 101960 - FOX VALLEY FIRE & SAFETY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,350.00 Invoice Transactions 3 $3,304.75 13583 - 3C PAYMENT (USA) CORP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 160.02 Invoice Transactions 1 $160.02 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 3,971.63 Invoice Transactions 1 $3,971.63 Invoice Transactions 7 $18,498.68 Invoice Transactions 33 $83,674.35 Invoice Transactions 33 $83,674.35 Invoice Description Fund 505 - PARKING SYSTEM FUND Department 19 - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES: DYNEGY ADD-ON Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS Business Unit 7005 - PARKING SYSTEM MGT Account 62431 - ARMORED CAR SERVICES ARMORED TRUCK SERVICES SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62431 - ARMORED CAR SERVICES Totals Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS Totals Business Unit 7005 - PARKING SYSTEM MGT Totals Business Unit 7015 - PARKING LOTS & METERS AVL TRACKERS Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS Totals Account 65515 - OTHER IMPROVEMENTS SECURITY CAMERA REPLACEMENT - SHERMAN PLAZA AND MAPLE AVE *PARKING TAX SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62347 - PARKING TAX PAYMENTS TO COUNTY Totals Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS UTILITIES: COMED Account 62230 - IMPROVEMENT MAINT SERVICE 14 PARKING SIGN OVERLAYS Account 62230 - IMPROVEMENT MAINT SERVICE Totals Account 62347 - PARKING TAX PAYMENTS TO COUNTY UTILITIES: COMED UTILITIES: COMED AUTOTRAX FEES OCTOBER 2020 API CHARGE-SMARKING-OCTOBER 2020 PERMIT SERVICE SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES: COMED Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Business Unit 7015 - PARKING LOTS & METERS Totals Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS Totals Account 62519 - PASSPORT MOBILE PARKING APP FEES MOBILE PAY SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62519 - PASSPORT MOBILE PARKING APP FEES Totals Business Unit 7025 - CHURCH STREET GARAGE Account 56075 - OVER AND SHORT - PARKING SYSTEMS GARAGE KEY CARD DEPOSIT REFUND GARAGE KEY CARD DEPOSIT REFUND Account 56075 - OVER AND SHORT - PARKING SYSTEMS Totals GARAGE MANAGEMENT-OCTOBER 2020 (REDUCED FEE) Account 62400 - CONTRACT SVC-PARKING GARAGE Totals Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS CREDIT & DEBIT CARD PROCESSING FEES-SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62347 - PARKING TAX PAYMENTS TO COUNTY *PARKING TAX SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62347 - PARKING TAX PAYMENTS TO COUNTY Totals Account 62400 - CONTRACT SVC-PARKING GARAGE Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Business Unit 7025 - CHURCH STREET GARAGE Totals Business Unit 7036 - SHERMAN GARAGE ANNUAL SERVICE CONTRACT-CHURCH GARAGE FIRE ALARM MAINTENANCE Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY GARAGE MANAGEMENT-OCTOBER 2020 (REDUCED FEE) Account 62400 - CONTRACT SVC-PARKING GARAGE Totals Account 62705 - BANK SERVICE CHARGES CREDIT & DEBIT CARD PROCESSING FEES-SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62347 - PARKING TAX PAYMENTS TO COUNTY *PARKING TAX SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62347 - PARKING TAX PAYMENTS TO COUNTY Totals Account 62400 - CONTRACT SVC-PARKING GARAGE Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Business Unit 7036 - SHERMAN GARAGE Totals Business Unit 7037 - MAPLE GARAGE Account 62705 - BANK SERVICE CHARGES Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY UTILITIES: DYNEGY ADD-ON Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS WASTE/STORM WATER BASIN PUMPING AND CLEANING-MAPLE GARAGE Account 62347 - PARKING TAX PAYMENTS TO COUNTY *PARKING TAX SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62347 - PARKING TAX PAYMENTS TO COUNTY Totals Account 62400 - CONTRACT SVC-PARKING GARAGE Fund 505 - PARKING SYSTEM FUND Totals Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals Business Unit 7037 - MAPLE GARAGE Totals Department 19 - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Totals CREDIT & DEBIT CARD PROCESSING FEES-SEPTEMBER 2020 Account 62705 - BANK SERVICE CHARGES Totals Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES-DYNEGY NEW PRINTER HEAD AND INSTALLATION-MAPLE GARAGE FIRE ALARM SERVICE & BATTERY REPLACEMENT-MAPLE GARAGE Account 62509 - SERVICE AGREEMENTS/ CONTRACTS Totals Account 62705 - BANK SERVICE CHARGES GARAGE MANAGEMENT-OCTOBER 2020 (REDUCED FEE) Account 62400 - CONTRACT SVC-PARKING GARAGE Totals Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 17 of 26 A1.Page 45 of 506 510 WATER FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 102499 - ILLINOIS DEPT OF REVENUE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 115.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $115.00 177879 - BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 10,000.00 177879 - BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 17,463.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $27,463.00 100177 - ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 39.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $39.00 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 94.44 Invoice Transactions 1 $94.44 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 37.90 Invoice Transactions 1 $37.90 103883 - OFFICE DEPOT 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 314.18 Invoice Transactions 1 $314.18 Invoice Transactions 7 $28,063.52 105394 - VERIZON WIRELESS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 114.03 Invoice Transactions 1 $114.03 Invoice Transactions 1 $114.03 101143 - COMED 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 20.05 15016 - DYNEGY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 86,243.10 Invoice Transactions 2 $86,263.15 Invoice Transactions 2 $86,263.15 106964 - EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 180.00 106964 - EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 180.00 106964 - EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 200.00 106964 - EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 200.00 106964 - EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 220.00 Invoice Transactions 5 $980.00 217862 - ALEXANDER CHEMICAL CORPORATION 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 3,440.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $3,440.00 Invoice Transactions 6 $4,420.00 17270 - BACKFLOW SOLUTIONS, INC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 5,800.85 Invoice Transactions 1 $5,800.85 17616 - TRUEPOINT SOLUTIONS, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 10,500.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $10,500.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $16,300.85 100177 - ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 96.00 100177 - ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 80.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $176.00 100177 - ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 48.90 100177 - ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 33.49 Invoice Transactions 2 $82.39 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 170.55 Invoice Transactions 1 $170.55 Invoice Transactions 5 $428.94 Invoice Transactions 23 $135,590.49 Invoice Transactions 23 $135,590.49 Business Unit 4200 - WATER PRODUCTION Account 56140 - FEES AND MERCHANDISE SALE *SALES TAX MAY 2020 Account 56140 - FEES AND MERCHANDISE SALE Totals Invoice Description Fund 510 - WATER FUND Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Account 62210 - PRINTING 1 LOT OF 500 BUSINESS CARDS FOR SHAWN PESTKA Account 62210 - PRINTING Totals Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Account 62180 - STUDIES VALUATION OF ASSETS FOR WATER RATE CALC FOR SKOKIE WATER WORKS COMPREHENSIVE VALUATION 2020 Account 62180 - STUDIES Totals Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS Totals Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES Account 65095 - OFFICE SUPPLIES Totals COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS AVL TRACKERS Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS Totals Business Unit 4208 - WATER BILLING Totals Business Unit 4210 - PUMPING Business Unit 4200 - WATER PRODUCTION Totals Business Unit 4208 - WATER BILLING Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS METER LAPTOPS Business Unit 4210 - PUMPING Totals Business Unit 4220 - FILTRATION Account 62465 - OUTSIDE LABARATORY COSTS FY2020 LABORATORY TESTING Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY UTILITIES: COMED UTILITIES-DYNEGY Account 64005 - ELECTRICITY Totals FY2020 LABORATORY TESTING FY2020 LABORATORY TESTING FY2020 LABORATORY TESTING FY2020 LABORATORY TESTING Account 62465 - OUTSIDE LABARATORY COSTS Totals Business Unit 4220 - FILTRATION Totals Business Unit 4225 - WATER OTHER OPERATIONS Account 62180 - STUDIES CROSS CONNECTION CONTROL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Account 65015 - CHEMICALS/ SALT LIQUID CHLORINE (PER SPEC) Account 65015 - CHEMICALS/ SALT Totals Account 62210 - PRINTING RPZ POSTCARDS Account 62180 - STUDIES Totals Account 62340 - IT COMPUTER SOFTWARE UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM YEAR 1 Account 62340 - IT COMPUTER SOFTWARE Totals Fund 510 - WATER FUND Totals Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS Totals Business Unit 4540 - DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE Totals Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Totals BACKFLOW POSTCARDS Account 62275 - POSTAGE CHARGEBACKS Totals Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS AVL TRACKERS BACKFLOW POSTCARDS Account 62210 - PRINTING Totals Account 62275 - POSTAGE CHARGEBACKS RPZ POSTCARDS Business Unit 4225 - WATER OTHER OPERATIONS Totals Business Unit 4540 - DISTRIBUTION MAINTENANCE Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 18 of 26 A1.Page 46 of 506 513 WATER DEPR IMPRV&EXT FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 106588 - CDM SMITH, INC.*10/27/2020 10/27/2020 42,088.13 Invoice Transactions 1 $42,088.13 Invoice Transactions 1 $42,088.13 Invoice Transactions 1 $42,088.13 Invoice Transactions 1 $42,088.13 Business Unit 7330 - WATER FUND DEP, IMP, EXT Totals Department 71 - UTILITIES Totals Fund 513 - WATER DEPR IMPRV &EXTENSION FUND Totals CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Business Unit 7330 - WATER FUND DEP, IMP, EXT Account 62145 - ENGINEERING SERVICES RFP 15-55 TREATED WATER STORAGE ENGINEERING Account 62145 - ENGINEERING SERVICES Totals Invoice Description Fund 513 - WATER DEPR IMPRV &EXTENSION FUND Department 71 - UTILITIES Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 19 of 26 A1.Page 47 of 506 515 SEWER FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 170.55 Invoice Transactions 1 $170.55 13666 - BUILDERS ASPHALT, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 34.72 13666 - BUILDERS ASPHALT, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 139.50 13666 - BUILDERS ASPHALT, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 155.62 13666 - BUILDERS ASPHALT, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 192.82 13666 - BUILDERS ASPHALT, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 90.52 Invoice Transactions 5 $613.18 Invoice Transactions 6 $783.73 307198 - HEY AND ASSOCIATES 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 27,076.99 Invoice Transactions 1 $27,076.99 Invoice Transactions 1 $27,076.99 17508 - GRANITE INLINER, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 97,270.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $97,270.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $97,270.00 Invoice Transactions 8 $125,130.72 Invoice Transactions 8 $125,130.72 Business Unit 4530 - SEWER MAINTENANCE Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS AVL TRACKERS Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS Totals Invoice Description Fund 515 - SEWER FUND Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Business Unit 4530 - SEWER MAINTENANCE Totals Account 65051 - MATERIALS - STREETS DIVISION FY2020 HOT MIX ASPHALT PURCHASE FY2020 HOT MIX ASPHALT PURCHASE FY2020 HOT MIX ASPHALT PURCHASE FY2020 HOT MIX ASPHALT PURCHASE Fund 515 - SEWER FUND Totals Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Account 62461 - SEWER MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS Totals Business Unit 4535 - SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Totals Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Totals Business Unit 4531 - SEWER OTHER OPERATIONS Totals Business Unit 4535 - SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Account 62461 - SEWER MAINTENANCE CONTRACTS 2019 CIPP SEWER REHABILITATION Business Unit 4531 - SEWER OTHER OPERATIONS Account 62180 - STUDIES STORMWATER MASTER PLAN Account 62180 - STUDIES Totals FY2020 HOT MIX ASPHALT PURCHASE Account 65051 - MATERIALS - STREETS DIVISION Totals Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 20 of 26 A1.Page 48 of 506 520 SOLID WASTE FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 102499 - ILLINOIS DEPT OF REVENUE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 7.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $7.00 102184 - GROOT RECYCLING & WASTE SERVICES 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 137,126.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $137,126.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $137,133.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $137,133.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $137,133.00 Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Totals Fund 520 - SOLID WASTE FUND Totals Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Account 62415 - RESIDENTIAL DEBRIS/REMOVAL CONTRACTUAL COSTS FY2020 RESIDENTIAL REFUSE COLLECTION Account 62415 - RESIDENTIAL DEBRIS/REMOVAL CONTRACTUAL COSTS Totals Business Unit 4310 - RECYCLING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MAIN Totals Business Unit 4310 - RECYCLING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MAIN Account 56155 - TRASH CART SALES *SALES TAX MAY 2020 Account 56155 - TRASH CART SALES Totals Invoice Description Fund 520 - SOLID WASTE FUND Department 40 - PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 21 of 26 A1.Page 49 of 506 600 FLEET SERVICES FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 149274 - CHICAGO OFFICE TECHNOLOGY GROUP 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 23.61 Invoice Transactions 1 $23.61 Invoice Transactions 1 $23.61 299298 - ADVANCED PROCLEAN INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 866.05 154890 - SPEX HAND WASH 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 917.00 Invoice Transactions 2 $1,783.05 14093 - VERIZON NETWORKFLEET, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 332.06 Invoice Transactions 1 $332.06 101081 - CITY WELDING SALES & SERVICE INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 88.74 Invoice Transactions 1 $88.74 101064 - CINTAS #22 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 201.13 101064 - CINTAS #22 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 201.13 Invoice Transactions 2 $402.26 17511 - AL WARREN OIL COMPANY, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6,544.22 17511 - AL WARREN OIL COMPANY, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6,644.95 17511 - AL WARREN OIL COMPANY, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6,684.37 17511 - AL WARREN OIL COMPANY, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6,580.50 Invoice Transactions 4 $26,454.04 284935 - ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE, VEHICLE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 151.00 284935 - ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE, VEHICLE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 151.00 284935 - ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE, VEHICLE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 151.00 284935 - ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE, VEHICLE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 151.00 Invoice Transactions 4 $604.00 15228 - ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 268.00 15228 - ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 4.89 15228 - ADVANCE AUTO PARTS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 (16.74) 322967 - APC STORES, INC., DBA BUMPER TO BUMPER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 219.58 322967 - APC STORES, INC., DBA BUMPER TO BUMPER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 190.71 322967 - APC STORES, INC., DBA BUMPER TO BUMPER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 146.76 322967 - APC STORES, INC., DBA BUMPER TO BUMPER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 140.16 322967 - APC STORES, INC., DBA BUMPER TO BUMPER 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 54.00 188151 - BILL'S AUTO & TRUCK REPAIR 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 3,721.34 16657 - CERTIFIED FLEET SERVICES, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,738.10 285052 - CHICAGO PARTS & SOUND, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 449.09 285052 - CHICAGO PARTS & SOUND, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 275.82 285052 - CHICAGO PARTS & SOUND, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 250.35 285052 - CHICAGO PARTS & SOUND, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 246.84 101511 - DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 140.84 107216 - DRIVE TRAIN SERVICE & COMPONENTS INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 150.20 106698 - GEIB INDUSTRIES, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 956.49 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 148.96 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 148.50 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 93.08 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,638.63 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 372.40 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 (75.00) 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 532.20 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 375.77 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 274.52 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 164.72 227800 - GOLF MILL FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 175.62 102281 - HAVEY COMMUNICATIONS INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,485.00 102281 - HAVEY COMMUNICATIONS INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 934.00 16406 - IMPERIAL SUPPLIES, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 113.50 16406 - IMPERIAL SUPPLIES, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 738.79 102614 - INTERSTATE BATTERY OF NORTHERN CHICAGO 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,236.27 102614 - INTERSTATE BATTERY OF NORTHERN CHICAGO 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 322.88 103250 - MCCANN INDUSTRIES, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 911.06 103534 - MOTION INDUSTRIES INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,323.45 103534 - MOTION INDUSTRIES INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,324.18 120836 - P & G KEENE ELECTRICAL 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 380.20 215687 - REINDERS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 167.34 215687 - REINDERS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 110.33 215687 - REINDERS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 46.25 215687 - REINDERS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 424.72 104918 - STANDARD EQUIPMENT COMPANY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 2,303.94 245587 - SUBURBAN ACCENTS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 350.00 245587 - SUBURBAN ACCENTS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 327.50 17308 - TIME MANUFACTURING COMPANY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 260.19 105395 - VERMEER MIDWEST 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 63.72 106333 - WEST SIDE EXCHANGE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 101.65 108472 - WILMETTE TRUCK & BUS SALES & SERVICE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 762.50 105688 - ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,350.06 Invoice Transactions 50 $28,823.36 245860 - WENTWORTH TIRE SERVICE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 807.50 245860 - WENTWORTH TIRE SERVICE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 242.00 245860 - WENTWORTH TIRE SERVICE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,765.42 245860 - WENTWORTH TIRE SERVICE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,038.01 245860 - WENTWORTH TIRE SERVICE 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 144.00 Invoice Transactions 5 $3,996.93 151986 - CINTAS CORPORATION #769 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 35.47 101063 - CINTAS FIRST AID & SUPPLY 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 14.18 Invoice Transactions 2 $49.65 Invoice Transactions 71 $62,534.09 Invoice Transactions 72 $62,557.70 Invoice Transactions 72 $62,557.70 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 Business Unit 7705 - GENERAL SUPPORT Totals Business Unit 7710 - FLEET MAINTENANCE Account 62245 - OTHER EQMT MAINTENANCE MULTIPLE CAR WASHES Business Unit 7705 - GENERAL SUPPORT Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES COPIER CHARGES Account 62380 - COPY MACHINE CHARGES Totals Invoice Description Fund 600 - FLEET SERVICES FUND Department 19 - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Account 65020 - CLOTHING UNIFORMS UNIFORMS Account 65020 - CLOTHING Totals Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS Totals Account 65015 - CHEMICALS/ SALT SHOP SUPPLIES Account 65015 - CHEMICALS/ SALT Totals CAR WASHES Account 62245 - OTHER EQMT MAINTENANCE Totals Account 64540 - TELECOMMUNICATIONS - WIRELESS AVL TRACKERS PLATE FOR VEHICLE 316 PLATE FOR VEHICLE 315R Account 65045 - LICENSING/REGULATORY SUPP Totals Account 65060 - MATER. TO MAINT. AUTOS Account 65035 - PETROLEUM PRODUCTS Totals Account 65045 - LICENSING/REGULATORY SUPP PLATE FOR VEHICLE 317 PLATE FOR VEHICLE 314 Account 65035 - PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FUEL PURCHASE FOR JULY 6 2020 - JULY 5 2021 FUEL PURCHASE FOR JULY 6 2020 - JULY 5 2021 FUEL PURCHASE FOR JULY 6 2020 - JULY 5 2021 FUEL PURCHASE FOR JULY 6 2020 - JULY 5 2021 MULTIPLE STOCK FILTERS MULTIPLE STOCK FILTERS SHOP SUPPLIES PRCS VEHICLE #449 REPAIRS TRAFFIC OPS VEHICLE #165 HYDRAULIC VEHICLE #511 WATT POWER INVERTER COMM DEVELOPMENT VEHICLE #418 REPAIRS CREDIT FOR SUPPLIES MULTIPLE STOCK FOR FILTERS STOCK FOR FLEET REM VEHICLE #701 FRONT END STOCK FOR FLEET FM VEHICLE #253 BRAKES STREET VEHICLE #635 DRIVER SIDE MIRROR FM VEHICLE #253 PARTS STOCK FOR FLEET REM VEHICLE #621 FRONT END BRAKES FOR REM VEHICLES PRCS VEHICLE #509 PARTS MULTIPLE LIGHTS FOR PLOW PRCS VEHICLE #421 FRONT END REM VEHICLE #701 FRONT END WATER VEHICLE #906 STARTER PD VEHICLE #30 LIGHTS/ WINDOWS PD VEHICLE #21 VAULT INSTALLATION PD VEHICLE #27 STEERING BOX TRAFFIC VEHICLE #170 OIL CHANGE/ TURBO REPLACEMENT CORE RETURN REBUILD KIT FOR VEHICLES FIRE VEHICLE #21 PARTS FM VEHICLE #267 GRAPHICS STOCK FOR FLEET REM VEHICLE PARTS PARTS FOR REM VEHICLES STOCK FOR FIRE TRUCK GREENWAYS VEHICLE #531 PARTS GREENWAYS VEHICLE #531 MISC PARTS STOCK FOR FLEET STOCK FOR FLEET MULTIPLE BATTERIES FOR STOCK MULTIPLE STOCK FOR BATTERIES WATER VEHICLE #956 STEERING COLUMN REPAIRS Business Unit 7710 - FLEET MAINTENANCE Totals Department 19 - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Totals Fund 600 - FLEET SERVICES FUND Totals CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Account 65090 - SAFETY EQUIPMENT FIRST AID KIT FIRST AID FOR FLEET Account 65090 - SAFETY EQUIPMENT Totals STOCK FOR FLEET STOCK FOR TIRES REM VEHICLE #716 DISCOUNT TIRES Account 65065 - TIRES & TUBES Totals Account 65060 - MATER. TO MAINT. AUTOS Totals Account 65065 - TIRES & TUBES STOCK FOR FLEET REM VEHICLE #722 TIRE SERVICE FORESTRY VEHICLE #875 BOOM CRADLE FORESTRY VEHICLE #825 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE FORESTRY VEHICLE #826 FUEL SYSTEM MULTIPLE SAFETY LANE INSPECTIONS STREETS VEHICLE #680/681/659 PARTS GREENWAYS VEHICLE #531 MISC. GREENWAYS VEHICLE #531 MISC. WATER VEHICLE #956 MISC PARTS Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 22 of 26 A1.Page 50 of 506 601 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 17158 - ROESCH FORD 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 27,475.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $27,475.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $27,475.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $27,475.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $27,475.00 Business Unit 7780 - VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS Totals Department 19 - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Totals Fund 601 - EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND Totals CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Business Unit 7780 - VEHICLE REPLACEMENTS Account 65550 - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT PURCHASE OF PD FLEET - F150 TRUCK 29, SEDANS 15, 26, 86, 35 Account 65550 - AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT Totals Invoice Description Fund 601 - EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND Department 19 - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 09:53:26 AM Page 23 of 26 A1.Page 51 of 506 605 INSURANCE FUND Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 10460 - ANCEL,GLINK,DIAMOND,BUSH,DICIANNI & KRAFTHEFER, P.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 45.00 10460 - ANCEL,GLINK,DIAMOND,BUSH,DICIANNI & KRAFTHEFER, P.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 602.00 10460 - ANCEL,GLINK,DIAMOND,BUSH,DICIANNI & KRAFTHEFER, P.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 5,504.00 17002 - ENGLER CALLAWAY BAASTEN & SRAGA, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 6,950.00 17051 - L.A. COURT REPORTERS, LLC 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 1,508.13 270106 - ROBBINS SCHWARTZ NICHOLAS LIFTON & TAYLO 10/27/2020 10/27/2020 107.50 279678 - TRIBLER ORPETT & MEYER, P. C.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 200.00 Invoice 7 $14,916.63 14118 - ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC.10/27/2020 10/27/2020 32,500.00 Invoice 1 $32,500.00 156020 - STATE TREASURER, ILLINOIS WORKERS'10/27/2020 10/27/2020 4,888.75 Invoice 1 $4,888.75 Invoice 9 $52,305.38 Invoice 9 $52,305.38 Invoice 9 $52,305.38 * = Prior Fiscal Year Activity Invoice 532 $2,560,379.60 Business Unit 7800 - RISK MANAGEMENT CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report G/L Date Range 10/27/20 - 10/27/20 Invoice Description Fund 605 - INSURANCE FUND Department 99 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL Account 62615 - INSURANCE PREMIUM Totals Account 62130 - LEGAL SERVICES-GENERAL SPECIAL COUNSEL ENGAGEMENT FOR ELECTION WORK ALLISON HARNED V EVANSTON MUNICIPAL OFFICERS ELECTORAL BOARD ALLISON HARNED V EVANSTON MUNICIPAL OFFICERS ELECTORAL BOARD LABOR GENERAL LABOR 150 COURT TRANSCRIPT LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES - WILSON Account 62130 - LEGAL SERVICES-GENERAL Totals Account 62615 - INSURANCE PREMIUM AFEE SERVICE FEE Account 66044 - WORKERS COMP INSURANCE PREMIUMS WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE-STATE TREASURER Account 66044 - WORKERS COMP INSURANCE PREMIUMS Totals Business Unit 7800 - RISK MANAGEMENT Totals Department 99 - NON-DEPARTMENTAL Totals Fund 605 - INSURANCE FUND Totals Run by Tera Davis on 10/20/2020 11:06:28 AM Page 24 of 26 A1.Page 52 of 506 Vendor G/L Date Payment Date Invoice Amount 17787 - EVANSTON LATINOS NFP 10/08/2020 10/08/2020 1,675.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,675.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $1,675.00 17784 - VINIC WINE CO.10/08/2020 10/08/2020 5,825.40 Invoice Transactions 1 $5,825.40 Invoice Transactions 1 $5,825.40 Invoice Transactions 2 $7,500.40 Invoice Transactions 2 $7,500.40 284935 - ILLINOIS SECRETARY OF STATE, VEHICLE 10/08/2020 10/08/2020 50.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $50.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $50.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $50.00 Invoice Transactions 1 $50.00 * = Prior Fiscal Year Activity Invoice Transactions 3 $7,550.40 Department 19 - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Totals Fund 600 - FLEET SERVICES FUND Totals Account 65045 - LICENSING/REGULATORY SUPP *REPLACEMENT TITLE: SURPLUS EQUIPMENT Account 65045 - LICENSING/REGULATORY SUPP Totals Business Unit 7710 - FLEET MAINTENANCE Totals Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND Totals Fund 600 - FLEET SERVICES FUND Department 19 - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Business Unit 7710 - FLEET MAINTENANCE Account 51595 - LIQUOR TAX Totals Business Unit 1560 - REVENUE & COLLECTIONS Totals Department 15 - CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Totals Business Unit 1505 - CITY MANAGER Totals Business Unit 1560 - REVENUE & COLLECTIONS Account 51595 - LIQUOR TAX *REFUND: DUPLICATE LIQUOR TAX PAYMENT Business Unit 1505 - CITY MANAGER Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS *HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH ACTIVITIES Account 62490 - OTHER PROGRAM COSTS Totals CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Invoice Description Fund 100 - GENERAL FUND Department 15 - CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Accounts Payable by G/L Distribution Report *ADVANCED CHECKS FOR PAY PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 Run by Tera Davis on 10/21/2020 10:44:14 AM Page 25 of 26 A1.Page 53 of 506 ACCOUNT NUMBER SUPPLIER NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT INSURANCE VARIOUS VARIOUS CASUALTY LOSS 3,231.75 VARIOUS VARIOUS WORKERS COMP 3,313.36 VARIOUS VARIOUS WORKERS COMP 6,553.80 13,098.91 VARIOUS VARIOUS TWIN EAGLE NATURAL GAS-SEPTEMBER, 2020 5,888.60 5,888.60 18,987.51 Grand Total $2,586,917.51 PREPARED BY DATE REVIEWED BY DATE APPROVED BY DATE CITY OF EVANSTON BILLS LIST PERIOD ENDING 10.27.2020 SUPPLEMENTAL LIST ACH AND WIRE TRANSFERS Page 26 of 26 A1.Page 54 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of Administration and Public Works Committee From: Stefanie Levine, Project Manager CC: David Stoneback - Public Works Agency Director; Lara Biggs - City Engineer Subject: Change Order No. 1 with Great Lakes Plumbing and Heating for the Robert Crown Community Center and Library HVAC maintenance services Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to a pprove Change Order No. 1 for HVAC maintenance services for the Robert Crown Community Center and Library with Great Lakes Plumbing and Heating (4521 W. Diversey Avenue, Chicago, IL 60639) to increase the contract period by 159 calendar daysfrom December 2 3, 2020 to May 31, 2021. This change order will not increase the existing contract price. Funding Source: Funding is from the Crown Construction Fund (Account 416.40.4160.65515 – 616017). Council Action: For Action Summary: On December 9, 2019, the City Council approved a sole-source contract with Great Lakes Plumbing and Heating (Great Lakes) to provide HVAC maintenance services at the new Robert Crown Community Center and Library. Great Lakes’ contract includes monthly services for the building’s rooftop units, boilers, pumps, humidifiers, exhaust fans, unit heaters, chiller, and variable frequency drives. Initially, it was anticipated that Great Lakes would begin their work immediately but as the building’s HVAC systems were not fully operational until the spring of 2020, Great Lakes’ services were not initiated until March of 2020 and were then skipped for the months of April and May. As a result, staff recommends extending this contract by 159 calendar days to May 31, 2021 , to allow for their originally contracted 12-month services to be performed. A2.Page 55 of 506 Legislative History: On December 9, 2019, Council approved the sole-source contract with Great Lakes Plumbing and Heating for the Robert Crown Community Center and Library HVAC maintenance services. Attachments: Change Order No. 1 Page 2 of 3 A2.Page 56 of 506 Page 3 of 3A2.Page 57 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of Administration and Public Works Committee From: Paul Moyano, Senior Project Manager CC: David Stoneback, Public Works Agency Director; Lara Biggs, Capital Planning & Engineering Bureau Chief / City Engineer Subject: Change Order No. 5 with Thieneman Construction, Inc. for Clearwell 9 Replacement Project Construction (Bid 18-30) Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Change Order No. 5 to the contract for the Clearwell 9 Replacement Project (Bid No. 18 -30) with Thieneman Construction, Inc. (17219 Foundation Parkway, Westfield, IN) in the amount of $387 ,264.31. This will increase the total contract amount from the current contract price of $19,286,531.55 to $19,673,795.86. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Funding Source: The City has a loan agreement in place with the IEPA for funding from the State Revolving Fund in the amount of $20,556,256 for engineering and construction of this project. Staff will seek a final Loan Amendment to increase the loan amount to cover all eligible costs. The loan is currently set to be repaid over 20 years at 1.84% interest. IEPA loan funding for this work (Account Improvement Capital Water Fund, through routed being is the 513.71.7330.65515-733107). Northwestern University (NU) will reimburse Evanston $313,568.23 of this change order amount and the City's portion of the change order amount is $73,696.08. Further information is included in the packet below. Council Action: For Action Summary: The City executed the Construction Services Agreement with Thieneman Construction, Inc. (TCI) on January 29, 2019. Work has been proceeding since the contractor mobilized on site on March 18, 2019, and is now 92% complete. Restoration of the site is in p rogress, and new facilities will be tested and put into service over the next months. The final completion date is January 28, 2021. A3.Page 58 of 506 Analysis: This Change Order is to authorize several items that need to be adjusted from the original contract documents and to add additional site restoration work (cost to be shared with NU). Specific information and costs for each item are detailed in the Proposed Change Orders (PCO’s) attached as part of the Change Order. Each PCO is the result of detailed reviews and negotiations between staff, the contractor, and the engineer. Each item is also summarized below. 1. Duct Bank Conduit – The contractor requested to replace all proposed rigid conduit to be encased in concrete duct banks with PVC conduit to provide a more reliable system as documented in PCO-18. The credit for this change is $39,415.50. 2. Backwash Basin – Due to underutilization of available staging area on the backwash basin within the water plant site, staff determined that sod restoration was not needed and that the existing stone surface could remain as documented in PCO -022. The credit for this change is $7,290.00. 3. VFD Warranty – An extended warranty for the medium voltage variable frequency drive was intended to be included with the original bid a s approved, but the associated cost was not included in the original contract amount, as referenced in PCO -019. The bid cost for this warranty is $4,000.00. 4. Ladders – Permanent ladders were added to the reservoir rather than requiring less- stable temporary ladders for access required for future maintenance, as documented in PCO-021. The cost of this work is $12,210.80. 5. Pipe Insulation – The high-lift pump 24” discharge pipe was installed slightly shallower than anticipated due to a conflict with existing utilities and as a result required the pipe be insulated to protect from freezing during winter months as documented in RFP -023. The cost of this work is $3,196.00. 6. Door Glass – The glass on the personnel door in the electrical room (formerly Gara ge 1) was tinted and needed to be replaced with transparent security glass for staff safety, as documented in RFP-027. The cost of this work is $1,616.27. 7. Deck Cracks – As an additional layer of protection for the water reservoir, minor cracks observed on the top concrete deck were sealed prior to installing the water proof membrane, as documented in the letter dated July 20, 2020. The cost of this work is $7,900.00. 8. Electric Room Conduit – Additional conduit was needed to properly route and terminate wires to the electric room as documented in PCO-030 dated September 4, 2020. The cost of this work is $1,629.67. 9. Restoration / Fence Removal – A fence owned by NU at the north end of Lincoln Street beach and adjacent to the Clearwell project site failed and NU requested that Evanston have TCI remove the fence at NU's cost, as documented in PCO -020 and the attached Memo of Understanding (MOU) between the City and NU dated May 4, 2020. The cost of this work is $4,800.00 and Evanston will be reimbursed by NU for this cost. 10. Restoration / Reservoir Turf and Irrigation – As agreed to by NU during design, the Clearwell project only included restoration of the site to rough grade, allowing NU to complete final restoration to their specification under a separate co ntract. During construction, NU recognized the value of incorporating part of the restoration work Page 2 of 131 A3.Page 59 of 506 under the existing construction contract, including turf restoration and the installation of an irrigation system. Because NU originally agreed to perform this work, they agreed to pay for it when it was added to the City’s construction contract. The work is documented in PCO-026 and the attached MOU between the City and NU dated September 11, 2020. The cost of this work to be reimbursed by NU is $129,122.86. 11. Restoration / Lincoln Street & North Campus Drive – On March 7, 2019, the City and NU entered into an MOU to widen North Campus Drive to alleviate traffic congestion during construction and share in the cost of this work. Costs are to be shared as 66.66% by NU and 33.34% by the City. The MOU initially anticipated that the widening and restoration work would be completed by NU. Recognizing that the work would be more efficiently completed by TCI under the existing contract, the restoration work is being added to the City’s construction contract with the same cost sharing agreement. The work is documented in PCO -025, the original attached MOU between the City and NU dated March 7, 2019, and its amendment. The total cost of this work is $269,495.01, of which $179,663.37 will be reimbursed by NU. Detailed Financial Summary: A summary of the costs and responsibility for each PCO included in Change Order 5 is below. NU will reimburse the City for costs that they are responsible for as documented in the attached MOU’s. Page 3 of 131 A3.Page 60 of 506 A summary of the project history and funding is below: Page 4 of 131 A3.Page 61 of 506 Legislative History: City Council approved award of the construction contract to Thieneman Construction, Inc. on November 12, 2018. The Public Works Director authorized Change Order 1 on March 1, 2019. City Council authorized the City Manager to execute Change Order 2 on July 8, 2019. City Council authorized the City Manager to execute Change Order 3 on September 9, 2019. City Council authorized the City Manager to execute Change Order 4 on January 13, 2020. Page 5 of 131 A3.Page 62 of 506 Attachments: Change Order No. 5 NU Agreements Page 6 of 131 A3.Page 63 of 506 Page 1 of 2 CITY OF EVANSTON CHANGE ORDER Order No. 005 Date: October 16, 2020 Agreement Date: January 29, 2019 PROJECT: Clearwell 9 Replacement Project OWNER: City of Evanston CONTRACTOR: Thieneman Construction, Inc. The following changes are hereby made to the AGREEMENT: 1) Modifications to the contract to address changes during construction summarized below and documented in the attached PCOs. Duct Bank Conduit / -$39,415.50: PCO-018 – Credit for Use of PVC Conduit in Lieu of Steel Conduit in Duct Banks – Rev.2 (April 15, 2020) / (WCD-016/RFQ-002-R2) Backwash Basin / -$7,290.00: PCO-022 – Backwash Basin Restoration (April 24, 2020) / (WCD- 018/RFP-007) VFD Warranty / $4,000.00: PCO-019 – Extended Warranties – Medium Voltage Adjustable Drives (March 9, 2020) / (WCD-014) Ladders / $12,210.80: PCO-021 – Additional Ladders (April 24, 2020) / (WCD-017/RFP-005) Pipe Insulation / $3,196.00: PCO-023 – Pipe Insulation (April 24, 2020) / (WCD-019/RFP-008) Door Glass / $1,616.27: PCO-027 – Maintenance Garage Door (July 28, 2020) / (WCD- 021/RFP-010) Deck Cracks / $7,900.00: Letter – Crack Remediation Deck Slab (July 20, 2020 Rev 1) / (WCD- 022) Electric Room Conduit / $1,629.67: PCO-030 – Additional Conduit Installation (September 4, 2020) / (WCD-023/RFI-059) Fence Removal / $4,800.00: PCO-020 – Removal of Damaged Section of Fence (March 23, 2020) / (WCD-015) Reservoir Turf and Irrigation / $129,122.86: PCO-026 – NU Site Restoration (June 24, 2020) / (WCD-024/RFP-009) North Campus Drive / $269,495.01: PCO-025 – Road Restoration (September 29, 2020) / (WCD-025/RFP-006) 2) Modification to Section 6.1 – Easement Completion Incentive of the Agreement to account for additional restoration work as requested in the attached letter from Thieneman Construction dated September 29, 2020. DELETE the second to last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 6.1 and REPLACE it in its entirety with the revised sentence as shown below: “The City will agree to pay an Incentive to the Contractor in the sum of $2,500 $5,000 per day for each full calendar day prior to that date that substantial completion of the work has been achieved, up to a maximum of $100,000.00.” Page 7 of 131 A3.Page 64 of 506 Clearwell 9 Replacement Project Change Order No. 005 October 16, 2020 Page 2 of 2 Change to CONTRACT PRICE: Original CONTRACT PRICE: $ 19,213,700.00 Current CONTRACT PRICE adjusted by previous CHANGE ORDERS $ 19,286,531.55 Total change in CONTRACT PRICE for this CHANGE ORDER 005 $ 387,264.31 The CONTRACT PRICE including this CHANGE ORDER will be $ 19,673,795.86 Original COMPLETION DATE January 28, 2021 Current COMPLETION DATE adjusted by previous CHANGE ORDERS n/a Total Change in CONTRACT TIME for this CHANGE ORDER None The COMPLETION DATE including this CHANGE ORDER will be January 28, 2021 Accepted by (Contractor): Thieneman Construction, Inc. Date Approved by (Owner): City of Evanston Date Page 8 of 131 A3.Page 65 of 506 Page 9 of 131 A3.Page 66 of 506 Page 10 of 131 A3.Page 67 of 506 PIEPER ELECTRIC, INC. KENOSHA BRANCH Pieper Electric, Inc. 4210 43rd Avenue Kenosha, WI 53144 Tel. (847) 599-1774 www.pieperpower.com n. RFQ #002 Rigid to PVC Conduit in Duct Banks Rev 2 April 14, 2020 Re: Evanston Clearwell Replacement Project Pieper Electric Inc. proposes to provide the following labor and material for the above referenced project per the e PVC conduit in lieu of rigid conduit in duct banks. Inclusions: Furnish & install PVC conduit in lieu of rigid per drawings. Provide coordination with other trades. CREDIT: <$36,623.76> Exclusions: Performance or any other bonds. Excavation. Removal/replacement/patching of any concrete or asphalt. Generators. Coordination drawings. Dumpsters. Painting of conduit. Premium time. Permit fees Review fees. Thank you for allowing me to quote on this project. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Andy Bean Department Supervisor Page 11 of 131 A3.Page 68 of 506 Evanston ClearwellRigid to PVC Conduit4/14/2020Pieper ElectricDescriptionQuantityTrade PriceUnitLaborUnitTotal MaterialTotal Hours11" CONDUIT - RMC - GALV-70275.00C6.20C-192.50-4.3422" CONDUIT - RMC - GALV-1,940560.00C10.50C-10,864.00-203.7033" CONDUIT - RMC - GALV-9301,190.00C17.00C-11,067.00-158.1042" COUPLING - RMC - GALV-2878.00C0.00C-12.29-0.0053" COUPLING - RMC - GALV-22,819.00C0.00C-39.47-0.0061" MEASURE CUT & THREAD LABOR - RMC - GALV-10.00C22.50C-0.00-0.2372" MEASURE CUT & THREAD LABOR - RMC - GALV-90.00C36.40C-0.00-3.2883" MEASURE CUT & THREAD LABOR - RMC - GALV-60.00C54.00C-0.00-3.2491" CONDUIT - PVC407064.06C4.00C29.152.80102" CONDUIT - PVC401,940123.68C6.00C1,559.57116.40113" CONDUIT - PVC40930242.60C10.00C1,466.5293.00121" COUPLING - PVC260.08C0.00C0.780.00132" COUPLING - PVC27145.41C0.00C25.520.00143" COUPLING - PVC8424.92C0.00C22.100.00151" ADAPTER MALE - PVC292.50C12.00C1.200.24162" ADAPTER MALE - PVC18203.44C18.00C23.803.24173" ADAPTER MALE - PVC8493.46C28.00C25.662.2418CONDUIT MEASURING TAPE2,87041.33M3.00M106.768.61Totals2,915-18,914.20-146.35Labor TypeCrewHoursFull RateSubTotalTotal1FOREMAN1.00-73.18124.00-9,074.32-9,074.322JOURNEYMAN1.00-73.18118.00-8,635.24-8,635.24Totals2.00-146.36121.00-17,709.56-17,709.56Final PricingCalculated (%)Calculated ($)Variance (%)Modified ($)Modified (%)% Final Price Database Material (Extension)-18,914.20-18,914.2051.645Material Total-18,914.20-18,914.2051.645 Direct Labor-17,709.56-17,709.5648.355Labor Total-17,709.56-17,709.5648.355Total Cost-36,623.76-36,623.76100.000Selling Price-36,623.76-36,623.76100.000Final Price-36,623.76-36,623.76Page 12 of 131 A3.Page 69 of 506 Page 13 of 131 A3.Page 70 of 506 Page 14 of 131 A3.Page 71 of 506 Page 15 of 131 A3.Page 72 of 506 Page 16 of 131 A3.Page 73 of 506 Page 17 of 131 A3.Page 74 of 506 Page 18 of 131 A3.Page 75 of 506 Page 19 of 131 A3.Page 76 of 506 Page 20 of 131 A3.Page 77 of 506 Page 21 of 131 A3.Page 78 of 506 Page 22 of 131 A3.Page 79 of 506 Page 23 of 131 A3.Page 80 of 506 Page 24 of 131 A3.Page 81 of 506 Page 25 of 131 A3.Page 82 of 506 Page 26 of 131 A3.Page 83 of 506 Page 27 of 131 A3.Page 84 of 506 Page 28 of 131 A3.Page 85 of 506 Page 29 of 131 A3.Page 86 of 506 Page 30 of 131 A3.Page 87 of 506 Page 31 of 131 A3.Page 88 of 506 Page 32 of 131 A3.Page 89 of 506 Page 33 of 131 A3.Page 90 of 506 INDUSTRIAL • MUNICIPAL CONTRACTOR 17219 Foundation Parkway • Westfield, IN 46074 • 317-867-3462 • Fax 317-867-3463 521 W. 84th Drive • Merrillville, IN 46410 • 219-947-4700 • Fax 219-947-4711 1400 Cecil Avenue • Louisville, KY 40211 • 317-867-3462 • Fax 317-867-3463 July 28th, 2020 Mr. Brandon Diffenderfer CDM Smith 125 S. Wacker Dr., Ste 700 Chicago, IL 60606 RE: Clearwell 9 Replacement Project RFP 010 – Maintenance Garage Door Subj: PCO -027 Dear Brandon: The below proposal is in accordance with RFP No. 10 issued July 9th, 2020. RFP 010 furnish and install replacement glass without tint or film to man door on East side of Maintenance Garage RFP 010 in the amount of One Thousand Six Hundred and Sixteen Dollars and Twenty- seven Cents ($1,616.27). Please contact me at 219-306-2159 if you have any questions. Respectfully, THIENEMAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. _______________ Vincent Rock Area Manager cc: P. Moyano (City of Evanston) encl: Daily Labor Tickets Material and Equipment Receipts /Packing slips Labor Rates Page 34 of 131 A3.Page 91 of 506 Contractor's / Subcontractor's Change Order Request Summary Date: 7/28/2020 PCO 27 General Contractor 521 W. 84th Drive Suite A, Merrillville, IN 46410, 219-947-4700 phone/ 219-947-4711 fax Engineer: CDM Smith Owner:City of Evanston Project:Clearwell 9 Replacement TCI Job #1818 I.DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE II.SUMMARY OF DETAILED BREAKDOWN Additions Deletions Net Total A.LABOR -$ -$ B.MATERIAL 722.00$ -$ 722.00$ C.EQUIPMENT -$ -$ D.OTHER COSTS 1.SAFETY (1% of LABOR)- Deletion -0--$ 2.EXPENDABLE TOOLS (3.0% of LABOR)- Deletion -0--$ E.NET TOTAL (A+B+C+D1+D2)722.00$ F.OVERHEAD AND PROFIT (Ex15%) - Deletion 5%108.30$ G.TOTAL WORK PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR (Lines E+F)830.30$ III. CONTRACTOR'S MARK-UP ON WORK OF SUBCONTRACTORS Detailed Breakdowns and summaries from each contractor must be attached. SUBCONTRACTOR: Firm Name CONTRACT WORK: Description INVOICE 1. 2.I.C. Glazing Window installation 711.00$ 3. 4. 5. H.SUBTOTAL of all work performed by contractor's subcontractors 711.00$ I.MARK-UP on work of subcontractors (Min. $_______.00)(Line H x 5%)35.55$ J.PROPOSAL (Lines G+H+I)1,576.85$ K.BONDS (1.5% of PROPOSAL)23.65$ L.BUILDER'S RISK INSURANCE (1% of PROPOASL)15.77$ M. IV.TOTAL PROPOSAL N.TOTAL PROPOSAL for subject COR increase in contract amount 1,616.27$ O.An extension time of 0 days to extend the Contract dates for Completion will be required commencing on the date when we are notified a Change Order will be issued for the price quoted herein. Approval needed in 2 days. CONTRACTOR Signature Title: Project Manager Date:7/28/2020Vince Rock Change of garage door window to a non-tinted option Page 35 of 131 A3.Page 92 of 506 Page 36 of 131 A3.Page 93 of 506 TOTAL SECURITY SOLUTIONS P: 517.223.7807 | info@tssbulletproof.com COMPONENTS OPTIONS Reflective Glass Tinted Glass (Gray, Bronze, Green, Blue) Translucent White Interlayer (Frosted Layer) Wire Glass One-Way Mirror Insulating Units – Low E More to choose from – Please inquire, as the size and thickness may not be available for every option. PROPERTIES & SPECIFICATIONS Protection .357 Mag Ballistic Data Velocity 1: 1250 ft/s Velocity 2: 1375 ft/s Light Transmission 76% Nominal Thickness 1" Weight 11.64 lbs/sqft Dimensional Tolerance ASTM C 1349 BALLISTIC AND FORCED ENTRY RATING U.L. 752 Level 2 H.P. White TP-0500.01 Level 1 –Forced Entry STANDARDS NSI Z971-1984 Safety Glazing Materials for Building ASTM C 1036 Standard Specifications for Flat Glass ASTM C 1172 Standard Specification for Laminated Architectural Flat Glass HANDLING INFORMATION It is imperative to clean the glazing unit during and after the construction period to maintain optimum performance and aesthetic properties. To clean, use a soft, clean cloth and a mild soap, detergent, or slightly acidic cleaning solution (such as vinegar). Wipe with a clean, lint-free cloth. WARRANTY Five years from date of manufacture Threat Layer 1: 1/4” Glass Layer 2: .025 Urethane Layer 3: 3/8” Glass Layer 4: .05 Urethane Layer 5: 1/8” Polycarbonate Layer 6: .05 Urethane Secure Layer 7: 3/16” Glass Page 37 of 131 A3.Page 94 of 506 Page 38 of 131 A3.Page 95 of 506 o o o o Page 39 of 131 A3.Page 96 of 506 \initial1\ Page 40 of 131 A3.Page 97 of 506 July 14, 2020 Includes: Submittal Drawings, Product Samples, Test Reports, Data and Product Sheets, Crate and Freight. \initial1\ Page 41 of 131 A3.Page 98 of 506 \signature1\ \date1\ Page 42 of 131 A3.Page 99 of 506 \signature1\ \date1\ Page 43 of 131 A3.Page 100 of 506 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DATE OF REQUEST: July 9, 2020 No. 010 OWNER: City of Evanston CONTRACTOR: Thieneman Construction Project: Clearwell 9 Replacement OWNER’s Contract No. 18-30 ENGINEER’s Project No. 112742 You are directed to provide a proposal to complete the proposed change(s) outlined below: Description: Provide and install replacement glass without a tint or film to the man door on the east side of the Maintenance Garage meeting the requirements of Specification 08 56 53. Attachments: (List documents supporting change) · N/A Proposed method of determining potential change in Contract Price: Unit Prices Lump Sum Cost of the Work Proposal Requested By: CDM Smith ENGINEER _______________________________ Brandon Diffenderfer, SE Page 44 of 131 A3.Page 101 of 506 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL DATE OF REQUEST: July 9, 2020 No. 010 OWNER: City of Evanston CONTRACTOR: Thieneman Construction Project: Clearwell 9 Replacement OWNER’s Contract No. 18-30 ENGINEER’s Project No. 112742 You are directed to provide a proposal to complete the proposed change(s) outlined below: Description: Provide and install replacement glass without a tint or film to the man door on the east side of the Maintenance Garage meeting the requirements of Specification 08 56 53. Attachments: (List documents supporting change) · N/A Proposed method of determining potential change in Contract Price: Unit Prices Lump Sum Cost of the Work Proposal Requested By: CDM Smith ENGINEER _______________________________ Brandon Diffenderfer, SE Page 45 of 131 A3.Page 102 of 506 WORK CHANGE DIRECTIVE No. 021 DATE OF ISSUANCE August 14, 2020 EFFECTIVE DATE August 14, 2020 OWNER: City of Evanston CONTRACTOR: Thieneman Construction Company. Project: Clearwell 9 Replacement OWNER’s Contract No. 18-18 ENGINEER’s Project No. 1667-112742 You are directed to proceed promptly with the following change(s): Description: Provide and install non-tinted and non-frosted bullet proof glass in the man door to the Maintenance Garage. Remove and dispose of the glass currently installed. Purpose of Work Change Directive: · Clear glass was requested by the Owner so that maintenance staff can see vehicles using the gated entrance off of Lincoln Street when existing through the door. Attachments: (List documents supporting change) · PCO-027 Maintenance Garage Glass RFP 010.pdf dated July 28, 2020 · RFP-010 Maintenance Garage Door Glass.pdf dated July 9, 2020 If OWNER or CONTRACTOR believe that the above change has affected Contract Price any Claim for a Change Order based thereon will involve one or more of the following methods as defined in the Contract Documents. Method of determining change in Contract Price: Unit Prices Lump Sum Cost of the Work Estimated increase (decrease) in Contract Price: Estimated increase (decrease) in $ 1,616.27 Contract Times: If the change involves an increase, the estimated Substantial Completion 0 days; amount is not to be exceeded without Ready for final payment 0 days. further authorization. RECOMMENDED: AUTHORIZED: CDM Smith City of Evanston ENGINEER OWNER By Project Manager: Page 46 of 131 A3.Page 103 of 506 Page 47 of 131 A3.Page 104 of 506 Page 48 of 131 A3.Page 105 of 506 Page 49 of 131 A3.Page 106 of 506 Page 50 of 131 A3.Page 107 of 506 Contractor's / Subcontractor's Change Order Request Summary Date: 9/1/2020 PCO 30 General Contractor 521 W. 84th Drive Suite A, Merrillville, IN 46410, 219-947-4700 phone/ 219-947-4711 fax Engineer: CDM Smith Owner:City of Evanston Project:Clearwell 9 Replacement TCI Job #1818 I.DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE II.SUMMARY OF DETAILED BREAKDOWN Additions Deletions Net Total A.LABOR -$ B.MATERIAL -$ -$ C.EQUIPMENT -$ D.OTHER COSTS 1.SAFETY (1% of LABOR)- Deletion -0--$ 2.EXPENDABLE TOOLS (3.0% of LABOR)- Deletion -0--$ E.NET TOTAL (A+B+C+D1+D2)-$ F.OVERHEAD AND PROFIT (Ex15%) - Deletion 5%-$ G.TOTAL WORK PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR (Lines E+F)-$ III. CONTRACTOR'S MARK-UP ON WORK OF SUBCONTRACTORS Detailed Breakdowns and summaries from each contractor must be attached. SUBCONTRACTOR: Firm Name CONTRACT WORK: Description PROPOSAL 1. 2.Pieper Electric Installation of Conduit 1,479.00$ 3. 4. 5. H.SUBTOTAL of all work performed by contractor's subcontractors 1,479.00$ I.MARK-UP on work of subcontractors (Min. $_______.00)(Line H x 7.5%)110.93$ PROPOSAL (Lines G+H+I+ J)1,589.93$ K.BONDS (1.5% of PROPOSAL)23.85$ L.BUILDER'S RISK INSURANCE (1% of PROPOASL)15.90$ M. IV.TOTAL PROPOSAL N.TOTAL PROPOSAL for subject COR increase in contract amount 1,629.67$ O.An extension time of 0 days to extend the Contract dates for Completion will be required commencing on the date when we are notified a Change Order will be issued for the price quoted herein. Approval needed in 2 days. CONTRACTOR Signature Title: Project Manager Date:9/1/2020Vince Rock Installation of Conduit for 16 #12 Wire as noted on RFI 059 Page 51 of 131 A3.Page 108 of 506 PIEPER ELECTRIC, INC. KENOSHA BRANCH Pieper Electric, Inc. 4210 43rd Avenue Kenosha, WI 53144 Tel. (847) 599-1774 www.pieperpower.com n. RFQ #003 VFD Conduit Install August 25, 2020 Re: Evanston Clearwell Replacement Project Pieper Electric Inc. proposes to provide the following labor and material for the above referenced project per the Inclusions: Furnish & install GRC conduit and #12 wire per engineer direction. Provide coordination with other trades. Proposed Price: $1,479.53 Exclusions: Performance or any other bonds. Excavation. Removal/replacement/patching of any concrete or asphalt. Generators. Coordination drawings. Dumpsters. Painting of conduit. Premium time. Permit fees Review fees. Thank you for allowing me to quote on this project. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Andy Bean Department Supervisor Page 52 of 131 A3.Page 109 of 506 Evanston ClearwellVFD Conduit Piping8/25/2020Pieper ElectricDescriptionQuantityTrade PriceUnitLaborUnitTotal MaterialTotal Hours1 3/4" CONDUIT - RMC - GALV40175.00C6.25C70.002.502 3/4" MEASURE CUT & THREAD LABOR - RMC - GALV10.00C25.00C0.000.253 3/4" 1-H STRAP - RMC - MALL5193.13C6.75C7.720.344#12 THHN BLACK704104.00M6.44M73.224.535WIRE CONN RED1619.36C7.50C2.481.206#8 TO #10x 7/8 PLAS ANCHOR (3/16)93.19C7.50C0.230.687#10x 1 P/H SELF-TAP SCREW910.28C3.75C0.740.34Totals784154.399.83Labor TypeCrewHoursFull RateSubTotalTotal1FOREMAN1.004.92124.00610.08610.082JOURNEYMAN1.004.92118.00580.56580.56Totals2.009.84121.001,190.641,190.64Final PricingCalculated (%)Calculated ($)Variance (%)Modified ($)Modified (%)% Final Price Database Material (Extension)154.39154.3910.435Material Total154.39154.3910.435 Direct Labor1,190.641,190.6480.474Labor Total1,190.641,190.6480.474Total Cost1,345.031,345.0390.909 Adjustment Markup10.000134.50134.5010.0009.091Total Markup10.000134.50134.5010.0009.091Selling Price1,479.531,479.53100.000Final Price1,479.531,479.53Page 53 of 131 A3.Page 110 of 506 On drawing e-9 it is showing #12 wiring coming into a PB (part 14). However, this #12 wiring is not called out after the PB on 4, 8 and 9 are called out. Please confirm where the 16 #12 wires terminate. Thank you. Brandon Diffenderfer The 16 #12 AWG wires are to be routed to the ASD for the shunt trip control per Dwg E-15. There are spare wires included in the wire count. Provide 1-2" conduit from pull box to ASD for the #12 wires. (Revised BJD, 8/26/2020) J. Mirabella 8/19/2020 Vince Rock Page 54 of 131 A3.Page 111 of 506 Page 55 of 131 A3.Page 112 of 506 Page 56 of 131 A3.Page 113 of 506 Page 57 of 131 A3.Page 114 of 506 Page 58 of 131 A3.Page 115 of 506 Page 59 of 131 A3.Page 116 of 506 Page 60 of 131 A3.Page 117 of 506 Page 61 of 131 A3.Page 118 of 506 Contractor's / Subcontractor's Change Order Request Summary Date: 9/2/2020 PCO 26 General Contractor 521 W. 84th Drive Suite A, Merrillville, IN 46410, 219-947-4700 phone/ 219-947-4711 fax Engineer: CDM Smith Owner:City of Evanston Project:Clearwell 9 Replacement TCI Job #1818 I.DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE II.SUMMARY OF DETAILED BREAKDOWN Additions Deletions Net Total A.LABOR 11,766.40$ -$ 11,766.40$ B.MATERIAL -$ -$ C.EQUIPMENT -$ -$ D.OTHER COSTS 1.SAFETY (1% of LABOR)- Deletion -0--$ 2.EXPENDABLE TOOLS (3.0% of LABOR)- Deletion -0--$ E.NET TOTAL (A+B+C+D1+D2)11,766.40$ F.OVERHEAD AND PROFIT (Ex 12.5%)1,470.80$ G.TOTAL WORK PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR (Lines E+F)13,237.20$ III. CONTRACTOR'S MARK-UP ON WORK OF SUBCONTRACTORS Detailed Breakdowns and summaries from each contractor must be attached. SUBCONTRACTOR: Firm Name CONTRACT WORK: Description PROPOSAL 1. 2.Moore Landscaping Installing Mulch, Topsoil and Seeding 12,056.00$ 3.Deduct for RFP 006 (900.00)$ 4.Central Lawnsprinklers Inc Installation of Irrigation System 93,715.00$ 5. H.SUBTOTAL of all work performed by contractor's subcontractors 104,871.00$ I.MARK-UP on work of subcontractors (Min. $_______.00)(Line H x 7.5%)7,865.33$ J.PROPOSAL (Lines G+H+I)125,973.53$ K.BONDS (1.5% of PROPOSAL)1,889.60$ L.BUILDER'S RISK INSURANCE (1% of PROPOASL)1,259.74$ M. IV.TOTAL PROPOSAL N.TOTAL PROPOSAL for subject COR increase in contract amount 129,122.86$ O.An extension time of 0 days to extend the Contract dates for Completion will be required commencing on the date when we are notified a Change Order will be issued for the price quoted herein. Approval needed in 2 days. CONTRACTOR Signature Title: Project Manager Date:9/2/2020Vince Rock Installation of Mulch and Seeding Installation of Irrigation Sleeves underneath Sidewalk Page 62 of 131 A3.Page 119 of 506 Page 63 of 131 A3.Page 120 of 506 Labor Breakdown Estimated Hrs Unit Rate Total Scope Superintendent 40 95 3800 Subcontractor coordination & supervision Laborer 160 73.54 11766.4 Two Flaggers Labor total 15,566.40$ Page 64 of 131 A3.Page 121 of 506 Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. Page 1 of 2 August 6, 2020 Ann T Ziegelmaier Northwestern University a-ziegelmaier@northwestern.edu 2020 Ridge Avenue Phone: 847-491-4626 Evanston, IL 60208 Cell: 847-815-4269 Re: Irrigation NU Clearwell 9 We propose to install an irrigation system for the identified areas on the Clearwell Irrigation Overview plan that Northwestern provided us. The irrigation system will be installed according to Northwestern specification and standards. The proposed system will be connected to the existing Ryan Field House irrigation system. The system controller that we will be connecting to is a Baseline 3200 controller. We will connect to the two-wire control system by installing new wiring through the existing sleeve located on the East side of Campus Drive approximately 60 feet south of the southline of the Clearwater structure. The water source point-of- Drive, approximately 60 feet s Leemco isolation valve will be installed at the point of connection. The irrigation piping work that will take place on the top of the Clearwell structure will be coordinated to be installed prior to any topsoil being placed. No solenoid valves, mainline piping will be installed on top of the structure. The valves and mainline supplying the top of the structure will be installed in the turf area west of the structure. All mainline and lateral piping will have a trace wire, the locator connection points will be tagged in valve boxes. Using the HDPE pipe, the piping can be installed within the structural soil and equipment can also drive on it while placing the additional fill without damaging the piping. The system will be installed so that wiring and pipe sizing will be adequate for future expansion. If quick couplers are to be installed, at each quick coupler, a full sized mainline supply the quick coupler. Wiring will be coiled, labeled, and extended to each quick coupler valve box for future expansion. The two landscape beds on top of the Clearwell structure will be irrigated with individual zones with hi-popup sprinkler heads. 1.) CLEARWELL VICINITY IRRIGATION (LAWN AREA with LANDSCAPE BEDS) a. HDPE PIPE on TOP of CLEARWELL ONLY b. The landscape beds include irrigation modifications as-needed in the SPRING after Landscape material installation For the sum of $73,775.00 2.) REPLACE ORIGINAL IRRIGATION EAST OF CAMPUS DRIVE (north-south) ALONG BEACH FENCELINE For the sum of $10,870.00 (note if above #1 is not accepted add $5,225.00) 3.) ALTERNATE 1: ADD Quick Couplers NOTE: 4 LOCATIONS (as shown) For the sum of $5,220.00 Page 65 of 131 A3.Page 122 of 506 Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. Page 2 of 2 4.) ALTERNATE 2: ADD Irrigation SLEEVES under concrete walks and south asphalt fire lane NOTE: 6 LOCATIONS (as shown) a. 1 - b. 1 - c. . For the sum of $8,170.00 5.) ALTERNATE 3: ADD Irrigation SLEEVES under NORTH CAMPUS DRIVE NOTE: 1 LOCATIONS (as shown) a. 1 - b. 1 - c. For the sum of $9,490.00 Includes saw cutting, pavement removal, traffic control, road plating, spoil removal, backfilling of stone up to grade and normal working hours. Pavement restoration is not included. 6.) ALTERNATE 4: IRRIGATE LAWN AREA South of CLEARWELL For the sum of $6,550.00 Regards, John Castanoli Central Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. 239 King Street Elk Grove Village, IL 60007 (847) 364-6900 phone ext 304 (847) 364-9774 fax (847) 417-7881 cell john@clswater.com Page 66 of 131 A3.Page 123 of 506 Page 67 of 131 A3.Page 124 of 506 Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. Page 1 of 2 August 6, 2020 Ann T Ziegelmaier Northwestern University a-ziegelmaier@northwestern.edu 2020 Ridge Avenue Phone: 847-491-4626 Evanston, IL 60208 Cell: 847-815-4269 Re: Irrigation NU Clearwell 9 We propose to install an irrigation system for the identified areas on the Clearwell Irrigation Overview plan that Northwestern provided us. The irrigation system will be installed according to Northwestern specification and standards. The proposed system will be connected to the existing Ryan Field House irrigation system. The system controller that we will be connecting to is a Baseline 3200 controller. We will connect to the two-wire control system by installing new wiring through the existing sleeve located on the East side of Campus Drive approximately 60 feet south of the southline of the Clearwater structure. The water source point-of- Drive, approximately 60 feet s Leemco isolation valve will be installed at the point of connection. The irrigation piping work that will take place on the top of the Clearwell structure will be coordinated to be installed prior to any topsoil being placed. No solenoid valves, mainline piping will be installed on top of the structure. The valves and mainline supplying the top of the structure will be installed in the turf area west of the structure. All mainline and lateral piping will have a trace wire, the locator connection points will be tagged in valve boxes. Using the HDPE pipe, the piping can be installed within the structural soil and equipment can also drive on it while placing the additional fill without damaging the piping. The system will be installed so that wiring and pipe sizing will be adequate for future expansion. If quick couplers are to be installed, at each quick coupler, a full sized mainline supply the quick coupler. Wiring will be coiled, labeled, and extended to each quick coupler valve box for future expansion. The two landscape beds on top of the Clearwell structure will be irrigated with individual zones with hi-popup sprinkler heads. 1.) CLEARWELL VICINITY IRRIGATION (LAWN AREA with LANDSCAPE BEDS) a. HDPE PIPE on TOP of CLEARWELL ONLY b. The landscape beds include irrigation modifications as-needed in the SPRING after Landscape material installation For the sum of $73,775.00 2.) REPLACE ORIGINAL IRRIGATION EAST OF CAMPUS DRIVE (north-south) ALONG BEACH FENCELINE For the sum of $10,870.00 (note if above #1 is not accepted add $5,225.00) 3.) ALTERNATE 1: ADD Quick Couplers NOTE: 4 LOCATIONS (as shown) For the sum of $5,220.00 Page 68 of 131 A3.Page 125 of 506 Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. Page 2 of 2 4.) ALTERNATE 2: ADD Irrigation SLEEVES under concrete walks and south asphalt fire lane NOTE: 6 LOCATIONS (as shown) a. 1 - b. 1 - c. . For the sum of $8,170.00 5.) ALTERNATE 3: ADD Irrigation SLEEVES under NORTH CAMPUS DRIVE NOTE: 1 LOCATIONS (as shown) a. 1 - b. 1 - c. For the sum of $9,490.00 Includes saw cutting, pavement removal, traffic control, road plating, spoil removal, backfilling of stone up to grade and normal working hours. Pavement restoration is not included. 6.) ALTERNATE 4: IRRIGATE LAWN AREA South of CLEARWELL For the sum of $6,550.00 Regards, John Castanoli Central Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. 239 King Street Elk Grove Village, IL 60007 (847) 364-6900 phone ext 304 (847) 364-9774 fax (847) 417-7881 cell john@clswater.com Page 69 of 131 A3.Page 126 of 506 21.33'8.00'8.00'R30.00'6.00'© 201821.33'8.00'8.00'R30.006.00'6.00'6.00'6.00'6.00'6.00'6.00'6.00'6.00'6.00'6.00'0X X X X X XX X XXXXXXXXX XX XXXXX X X X XXXXXXPage 70 of 131 A3.Page 127 of 506 23.5023.5024.001.00%1.40%21.0022.006"MIN.© 2018X X XXX23.5023.5024.001.00%1.40%21.0022.00Page 71 of 131 A3.Page 128 of 506 Page 72 of 131 A3.Page 129 of 506 Page 73 of 131 A3.Page 130 of 506 Page 74 of 131 A3.Page 131 of 506 Page 75 of 131 A3.Page 132 of 506 Contractor's / Subcontractor's Change Order Request Summary Date: 6/8/2020 PCO 25 General Contractor 521 W. 84th Drive Suite A, Merrillville, IN 46410, 219-947-4700 phone/ 219-947-4711 fax Engineer: CDM Smith Owner:City of Evanston Project:Clearwell 9 Replacement TCI Job #1818 I.DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE II.SUMMARY OF DETAILED BREAKDOWN Additions Deletions Net Total A.LABOR 8,526.63$ -$ 8,526.63$ B.MATERIAL -$ -$ C.EQUIPMENT 4,200.00$ -$ 4,200.00$ D.OTHER COSTS 1.SAFETY (1% of LABOR)- Deletion -0--$ 2.EXPENDABLE TOOLS (3.0% of LABOR)- Deletion -0--$ E.NET TOTAL (A+B+C+D1+D2)12,726.63$ F.OVERHEAD AND PROFIT (Ex12.5%)1,590.83$ G.TOTAL WORK PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR (Lines E+F)14,317.46$ III. CONTRACTOR'S MARK-UP ON WORK OF SUBCONTRACTORS Detailed Breakdowns and summaries from each contractor must be attached. SUBCONTRACTOR: Firm Name CONTRACT WORK: Description PROPOSAL 1. 2.Moore Landscaping Installing Mulch, Topsoil and Seeding 900.00$ 3. Berger Construction Silt Fence & Flatwork 210,000.00$ 4.Central Replace Irrigation East of Campus Drive & Alternate 3 20,360.00$ 5. H.SUBTOTAL of all work performed by contractor's subcontractors 231,260.00$ I.MARK-UP on work of subcontractors (Min. $_______.00)(Line H x 7.5%)17,344.50$ J.PROPOSAL (Lines G+H+I)262,921.96$ K.BONDS (1.5% of PROPOSAL)3,943.83$ L.BUILDER'S RISK INSURANCE (1% of PROPOASL)2,629.22$ M. IV.TOTAL PROPOSAL N.TOTAL PROPOSAL for subject COR increase in contract amount 269,495.01$ O.An extension time of 0 days to extend the Contract dates for Completion will be required commencing on the date when we are notified a Change Order will be issued for the price quoted herein. Approval needed in 2 days. CONTRACTOR Signature Title: Project Manager Date:6/8/2020Vince Rock Demolition of Sidewalk, Fence, Lightpoles and Conduit, Guardrail, Manholes (2), Installation of Fence, East curb and Gutter, East Sidewalk Excavate Northern Manhole Equipment Costs include Signage for a weeklong road closure & Hauling of removed electrical materials Page 76 of 131 A3.Page 133 of 506 Page 77 of 131 A3.Page 134 of 506 Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. Page 1 of 2 August 6, 2020 Ann T Ziegelmaier Northwestern University a-ziegelmaier@northwestern.edu 2020 Ridge Avenue Phone: 847-491-4626 Evanston, IL 60208 Cell: 847-815-4269 Re: Irrigation NU Clearwell 9 We propose to install an irrigation system for the identified areas on the Clearwell Irrigation Overview plan that Northwestern provided us. The irrigation system will be installed according to Northwestern specification and standards. The proposed system will be connected to the existing Ryan Field House irrigation system. The system controller that we will be connecting to is a Baseline 3200 controller. We will connect to the two-wire control system by installing new wiring through the existing sleeve located on the East side of Campus Drive approximately 60 feet south of the southline of the Clearwater structure. The water source point-of- Drive, approximately 60 feet s Leemco isolation valve will be installed at the point of connection. The irrigation piping work that will take place on the top of the Clearwell structure will be coordinated to be installed prior to any topsoil being placed. No solenoid valves, mainline piping will be installed on top of the structure. The valves and mainline supplying the top of the structure will be installed in the turf area west of the structure. All mainline and lateral piping will have a trace wire, the locator connection points will be tagged in valve boxes. Using the HDPE pipe, the piping can be installed within the structural soil and equipment can also drive on it while placing the additional fill without damaging the piping. The system will be installed so that wiring and pipe sizing will be adequate for future expansion. If quick couplers are to be installed, at each quick coupler, a full sized mainline supply the quick coupler. Wiring will be coiled, labeled, and extended to each quick coupler valve box for future expansion. The two landscape beds on top of the Clearwell structure will be irrigated with individual zones with hi-popup sprinkler heads. 1.) CLEARWELL VICINITY IRRIGATION (LAWN AREA with LANDSCAPE BEDS) a. HDPE PIPE on TOP of CLEARWELL ONLY b. The landscape beds include irrigation modifications as-needed in the SPRING after Landscape material installation For the sum of $73,775.00 2.) REPLACE ORIGINAL IRRIGATION EAST OF CAMPUS DRIVE (north-south) ALONG BEACH FENCELINE For the sum of $10,870.00 (note if above #1 is not accepted add $5,225.00) 3.) ALTERNATE 1: ADD Quick Couplers NOTE: 4 LOCATIONS (as shown) For the sum of $5,220.00 Page 78 of 131 A3.Page 135 of 506 Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. Page 2 of 2 4.) ALTERNATE 2: ADD Irrigation SLEEVES under concrete walks and south asphalt fire lane NOTE: 6 LOCATIONS (as shown) a. 1 - b. 1 - c. . For the sum of $8,170.00 5.) ALTERNATE 3: ADD Irrigation SLEEVES under NORTH CAMPUS DRIVE NOTE: 1 LOCATIONS (as shown) a. 1 - b. 1 - c. For the sum of $9,490.00 Includes saw cutting, pavement removal, traffic control, road plating, spoil removal, backfilling of stone up to grade and normal working hours. Pavement restoration is not included. 6.) ALTERNATE 4: IRRIGATE LAWN AREA South of CLEARWELL For the sum of $6,550.00 Regards, John Castanoli Central Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. 239 King Street Elk Grove Village, IL 60007 (847) 364-6900 phone ext 304 (847) 364-9774 fax (847) 417-7881 cell john@clswater.com Page 79 of 131 A3.Page 136 of 506 Page 80 of 131 A3.Page 137 of 506 Page 81 of 131 A3.Page 138 of 506 Page 82 of 131 A3.Page 139 of 506 CONCRETE PAVEMENT ANDBASERIVER COBBLE OVERFLOW.5.0" D50 DIAMETER.ASPHALT SURFACECOURSE, 2.0" THICKNESSSTREET PAVEMENT AND BASEDWDRY WELL (DW)LVWATER VALVE VAULTCLEARWELL BELOW GRADECONCRETE CURB AND GUTTERCONCRETE BARRIER CURBSHEETPILE WALLScale: 1 inch = ft.020' 40'10'20'20NScale: 1 inch = ft.020' 40'10'20'20NPROJECT LIMITSDW6.00'EXISTING ADA DEPRESSED CURBAND DETECTABLE WARNING TILES.NEW 6.0' SIDEWALK TO PROVIDE ACCESS TOCROSS LINCOLN STREET AND ACCESS TOEAST SIDEWALK OF N CAMPUS DRIVE.STOP SIGN TO ALIGN WITHNEW PAVEMENT STRIPING.CONCRETE CURBAND GUTTERCONCRETE CURBAND GUTTERREINSTALL STREETLIGHT (TYP)REINSTALL SPEEDLIMIT SIGNREINSTALL NOPARKING SIGNREINSTALL LIGHTPOLE (TYP)REINSTALL NOPARKING SIGNREINSTALL LIGHTPOLE (TYP)REINSTALL LIGHTPOLE (TYP)REINSTALL LIGHTPOLE (TYP)PROVIDE MIN. 18" THICK RIVERCOBBLE OVERFLOW SPLASH PAD.RIVER COBBLE TO HAVING A MIN. D50DIAMETER OF 5-INCHES.CONNECT PROPOSED ACCESS PATHTO EXISTING BITUMINOUS PATH.STOP SIGNCHANGE TO "STOPAHEAD" SIGN. REUSEPOST.2.0' X 6.0' WHITE THERMOPLASTICCROSSWALK STRIPING2.0' WIDE WHITETHERMOPLASTICSTOP BAR (TYP)REINSTALL STREETLIGHT (TYP)3C-121C-123C-125C-12ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE,2.0" THICKNESS (TYP)STREET PAVEMENTAND BASE4C-12ACCESS HATCH (TYP)CONCRETEPAVEMENTAND BASE2C-1221.33'8.00'8.00'8.00'RAISEDCROSSWALK.6C-12EVERGREEN SHRUBS2C-1515.70'6.00'6.00'R20.00'R10.00'R5.00'R30.00'R15.00'R20.00'R30.00'R 3 6 .0 0 '6.00'R45.00'R29.54'11.00'6" MIN. FIBERREINFORCED TOPSOILPLACED OVER A 30"MIN. UN-REINFORCEDTOPSOIL BASE (TYP.OVER CLEARWELL)3C-156" MIN. REINFORCED FIBERTOPSOIL PLACED OVER 30"MIN. UN-REINFORCED TOPSOIL(TYP. OVER CLEARWELL)3C-15CIVIL SITE PLAN NOTES:1. PROPOSED STREET LIGHTS AND LIGHTPOLES SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING SHEETARE SHOWN FOR COORDINATION ONLY.REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOREXACT LOCATIONS AND DETAILS.2. LOCATION OF DUPLEX PUMP MANHOLESHOWN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFERTO MECHANICAL DRAWINGS FOR DUPLEXPUMP MANHOLE DETAILS.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE EROSIONCONTROL MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCEWITH SPECIFICATION 31 25 00IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION OFROUGH GRADING TO REMAIN IN PLACEUNTIL FINAL RESTORATION IS COMPLETEBY OTHERS.DUPLEX PUMP MANHOLESEED ON A MINIMUM 6-INCHTHICK TOPSOIL BASERIVER COBBLE AT PERIMETER.3.0" D50 DIAMETER.CONCRETE WALK AND BASELEGEND:EVERGREEN SHRUBSLANDSCAPE BYNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITYSOD BY NORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITYCITY OF EVANSTON ILLINOIS 555 LINCOLN STREET EVANSTON, IL 60201CLEARWELL 9 REPLACEMENTBID SET125 S WACKER DR, SUITE 700Chicago, IL 60606Tel: (312) 346-5000C-4CIVIL SITE PLANMATCH LINE B-B. SEE DRAWING SHEET C-5 FOR CONTINUATIONMATCH LINE A-A. SEE DRAWING SHEET C-5 FOR CONTINUATION110.02.2018DK110.18.2018DK210.23.2018DK210.23.2018DK210.23.2018DK210.23.2018DK310.25.2018DK1Page 83 of 131 A3.Page 140 of 506 SEED ON A MINIMUM 6-INCHTHICK TOPSOIL BASEASPHALT SURFACECOURSE, 2.0" THICKNESSScale: 1 inch = ft.020' 40'10'20'20NScale: 1 inch = ft.020' 40'10'20'20NPROJECT LIMITSLEGEND:X X X X XXXXX X XXXXXXXDWTPFTPFSOD BYNORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITYR20.00'R10.00'R5.00'R45.00'R29.54'X X XXASPHALT SURFACE COURSE,2.0" THICKNESS (TYP)6SOD BY NORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITYCIVIL SITE PLAN NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE EROSIONCONTROL MATERIAL IN ACCORDANCEWITH SPECIFICATION 31 25 00IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION OFROUGH GRADING TO REMAIN IN PLACEUNTIL FINAL RESTORATION IS COMPLETEBY OTHERS.CITY OF EVANSTON ILLINOIS 555 LINCOLN STREET EVANSTON, IL 60201CLEARWELL 9 REPLACEMENTBID SET125 S WACKER DR, SUITE 700Chicago, IL 60606Tel: (312) 346-5000C-5CIVIL SITE PLANNORTH OF CLEARWELL AND SOUTH OF CLEARWELLMATCH LINE B-B. SEE DRAWING SHEET C-4 FOR CONTINUATIONMATCH LINE A-A. SEE DRAWING SHEET C-4 FOR CONTINUATION210.23.2018DK210.23.2018DK210.23.2018DK310.25.2018DKPage 84 of 131 A3.Page 141 of 506 CAMPUS DRIVE ROAD WIDENINGEVANSTON, ILLINOISMARCH 07, 2019ISSUED FOR PRICING AND CONSTRUCTIONNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITYPrepared for:NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY500 LINCOLN STREETEVANSTON, ILLINOISSmithGroup Project Number: 11368.000Prepared by:35 EAST WACKERSUITE 900CHICAGO, IL 60601312.641.0770www.smithgroup.comSheet ListCover Cover SheetG-001 GENERAL NOTE & SPECCD100EXISTING CONDITIONS, SITE PREPARTION, & SECS PLANCS100 LAYOUT & MATERIALSCG100 DRAINAGE PLANCS500 SITE DETAILSCS501 SITE DETAILS Page 85 of 131 A3.Page 142 of 506 35 EAST WACKERSUITE 900CHICAGO, IL 60601312.641.0770www.smithgroup.comSEALS AND SIGNATURESKEY PLANDRAWING TITLEPROJECT NUMBERSCALEDRAWING NUMBERCAMPUS DRIVEROAD WIDENING500 LINCOLN STREETEVANSTON, ILLINOISNORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITYOwner:DATEREVISSUED FOR11368.0003/6/2019ISSUED FOR PRICING AND CONSTRUCTIONGENERAL NOTE & SPECPROJECT NORTHSCALE:G-001GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY BASEDON RECORD DOCUMENTS. TOPOGRAPHY AND STRUCTURE RIM ELEVATIONS AREBASED ON BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE CLEARWELL 9REPLACEMENT PROJECT DOCUMENTS, ISSUED SEPTEMBER 2018, PREPARED BYCDM SMITH FOR NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY. INVERT ELEVATION FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES LOCATED AT THEINTERSECTION OF LINCOLN STREET AND CAMPUS DRIVE ARE BASED ON DESIGNDOCUMENTS PREPARED BY SMITHGROUP FOR THE LINCOLN STREETRECONSTRUCTION, ISSUED ON JUNE 8, 2015. INVERT ELEVATION FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES LOCATED AT THE SOUTH ENDOF CAMPUS DRIVE ARE BASED ON DESIGN DOCUMENTS PREPARED BYSMITHGROUP FOR THE RYAN/WALTER ATHLETICS CENTER, ISSUED ONNOVEMBER 8, 2017. SHEET PILE LOCATIONS BASED ON RECORD DOCUMENTS FOR THE REINFORCEDCONCRETE RESERVOIR, DATED 1933.2. SUPPLEMENTAL UTILITY INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM UTILITYRECORDS PROVIDED BY NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY ON 11.24.2014.3. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE CITY OF CHICAGO DATUM (CCD).4. CALL J.U.L.I.E. @ 800.892.0123 A MINIMUM OF 48 BUSINESS HOURS TO PRIOR TOANY EXCAVATION ON THE SITE TO LOCATE ANY EXISTING UTILITIES ON THE SITE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE LOCATION AND DEPTH OFALL BURIED UTILITIES IN THE AREAS OF WORK BEFORE STARTING OPERATIONS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE COST OF REPAIRING ORREPLACING ANY BURIED CONDUIT, CABLES, OR PIPING DAMAGED DURING THEINSTALLATION OF THIS WORK.5. ALL ROADWAY, PAVEMENT, AND SUBGRADE CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLYWITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 2012 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR ROAD AND BRIDGECONSTRUCTION" OR LATEST EDITION, EXCEPT AS MAY BE MODIFIED BY THEPROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.6. ALL UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE 2014 "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER AND SEWER MAINCONSTRUCTION IN ILLINOIS", ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, LATEST EDITION,EXCEPT AS MAY BE MODIFIED BY PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.7. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONSFOR THE CITY OF EVANSTON.8. NOTIFY THE CITY OF EVANSTON BUILDING AND UTILITIES ENGINEERINGDEPARTMENTS AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO STARTCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING ALLJURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AND ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WITH FACILITIES THATMAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION, AND ENSURING THATALL UNDERGROUND LINES ARE LOCATED, PRIOR TO COMMENCINGCONSTRUCTION.9. ALL WORK TO MEET ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES.10. THE CONTRACTOR(S) SHALL INDEMNIFY THE OWNER, THE ENGINEER, AND THEMUNICIPALITY, THEIR AGENTS, ETC. FROM ALL LIABILITY INVOLVED WITH THECONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION AND TESTING OF THE WORK ON THIS PROJECT.11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL OFTHE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACTINCLUDING THOSE REQUIREMENTS FOR OPEN CUT TRENCHES AND SHEETINGAND BRACING AS REQUIRED. AT NO TIME WILL THE ENGINEER OR ANY OF HISEMPLOYEES BE HELD LIABLE, EITHER DIRECTLY OR AS THIRD PARTYPARTICIPANTS TO ANY LITIGATION CONCERNED WITH CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.12. COMMONWEALTH EDISON, NICOR GAS, AND OTHER UTILITY COMPANY CONDUITSARE NOT NECESSARILY SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MUST BE LOCATED INTHE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.13. VERIFY THE EXISTING CONDITIONS IN FIELD AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANYDISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.14. REPAIR ALL EXISTING PAVEMENT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION THAT ISNOT SPECIFIED.15. PROVIDE THE MUNICIPALITY AND THE ENGINEER WITH A COMPLETE SET OFRECORD DRAWINGS WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF THE WORK. DRAWINGSSHALL INCLUDE ELEVATIONS, LOCATION OF OTHER UTILITIES, SERVICES, FIELDTILES, ETC. PROVIDE DRAWINGS ELECTRONICALLY, 4 PAPER COPIES NOT TOEXCEED 24"x36", AND AN ELECTRONIC SHAPEFILE.16. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM CENTERLINE, BACK OF CURB, CENTER OF POST, OREDGE OF PAVEMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.17. VERIFY DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND INVERTS PRIOR TO STARTING WORKAND NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.18. NON-PAVED DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 6-INCHES OFTOPSOIL, TEMPORARY SEED, SEED AND MULCH.19. VERIFY WITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY OR CONTROLLING JURISDICTION AS TO THENECESSITY FOR AND REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO THE INSPECTION BY ANAPPROVED ON-SITE ENGINEER.TRAFFIC CONTROL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS1. THE CONTRACTOR, IN ACCORDANCE WITH I.D.O.T. STANDARDS, SHALL PROVIDEALL REQUIRED TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SIGNS.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TEMPORARY ACCESS TO ALL ROADWAYSAND DRIVEWAYS DURING CONSTRUCTION.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ONE LANE OF TRAFFIC DURING THE ENTIREDURATION OF THE PROJECT. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT PHASING ANDTEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TO ENGINEER FOR REVIEW PRIOR TOWORK COMMENCING.SITE PREPARATION NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS1. PROTECT AND MAINTAIN BENCHMARKS AND SURVEY CONTROL POINTS FROMDISTURBANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION.2. LOCATE AND CLEARLY IDENTIFY TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER VEGETATION TOREMAIN. FLAG EACH TREE TRUNK AT 54 INCHES ABOVE THE GROUND.3. PROTECT EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURINGCONSTRUCTION. RESTORE DAMAGED IMPROVEMENTS TO THEIR ORIGINALCONDITION, AS ACCEPTABLE TO OWNER.4. REPAIR OR REPLACE TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER VEGETATION INDICATED TOREMAIN OR BE RELOCATED THAT ARE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTIONOPERATIONS, IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ARCHITECT.5. LOCATE, IDENTIFY, DISCONNECT, AND SEAL OR CAP UTILITIES INDICATED TO BEREMOVED OR ABANDONED IN PLACE.6. ARRANGE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES TO SHUT OFF INDICATED UTILITIES. LOCATE,IDENTIFY, AND DISCONNECT UTILITIES INDICATED TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE.EXCAVATE FOR AND REMOVE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INDICATED TO BEREMOVED.7. DO NOT INTERRUPT UTILITIES SERVING FACILITIES OCCUPIED BY OWNER OROTHERS UNLESS PERMITTED BY THE APPROPRIATE PERMITTING AGENCY NOTLESS THAN TWO DAYS IN ADVANCE OF PROPOSED UTILITY INTERRUPTIONSAND THEN ONLY AFTER ARRANGING TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY UTILITY SERVICESACCORDING TO REQUIREMENTS INDICATED.8. ALL UTILITY STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINISH GRADEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. REMOVE OBSTRUCTIONS, TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER VEGETATION TO PERMITINSTALLATION OF NEW CONSTRUCTION. DO NOT REMOVE TREES, SHRUBS, ANDOTHER VEGETATION INDICATED TO REMAIN OR TO BE RELOCATED. GRIND DOWNSTUMPS AND REMOVE ROOTS, OBSTRUCTIONS, AND DEBRIS TO A DEPTH OF 18INCHES BELOW EXPOSED SUBGRADE. USE ONLY HAND METHODS FORGRUBBING WITHIN PROTECTION ZONES. CHIP REMOVED TREE BRANCHES ANDDISPOSE OF OFF-SITE.10. FILL DEPRESSIONS CAUSED BY CLEARING AND GRUBBING OPERATIONS WITHSATISFACTORY SOIL MATERIAL UNLESS FURTHER EXCAVATION OR EARTHWORKIS INDICATED. PLACE FILL MATERIAL IN HORIZONTAL LAYERS NOT EXCEEDING ALOOSE DEPTH OF 8 INCHES, AND COMPACT EACH LAYER TO A DENSITY EQUALTO ADJACENT ORIGINAL GROUND.11. REMOVE EXISTING ABOVE- AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS AS INDICATEDAND NECESSARY TO FACILITATE NEW CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE SLABS, PAVING,CURBS, GUTTERS, AND AGGREGATE BASE AS INDICATED.12. UNLESS EXISTING FULL-DEPTH JOINTS COINCIDE WITH LINE OF DEMOLITION,NEATLY SAW-CUT ALONG LINE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN BEFOREREMOVING ADJACENT EXISTING PAVEMENT. SAW-CUT FACES VERTICALLY.13. PAINT CUT ENDS OF STEEL REINFORCEMENT IN CONCRETE TO REMAIN WITHTWO COATS OF ANTIRUST COATING, FOLLOWING COATING MANUFACTURER'SWRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS. KEEP PAINT OFF SURFACES THAT WILL REMAINEXPOSED.14. REMOVE SURPLUS SOIL MATERIAL, UNSUITABLE TOPSOIL, OBSTRUCTIONS,DEMOLISHED MATERIALS, AND WASTE MATERIALS INCLUDING TRASH ANDDEBRIS, AND LEGALLY DISPOSE OF THEM OFF OWNER'S PROPERTY.EROSION CONTROL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS1. SEE SHEET C-1.03 FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL AND DEMOLITION NOTES.2. INSTALL ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION ANDEARTHWORK ACTIVITIES.3. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OFTHE PROJECT, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.4. INSTALL INLET FILTERS AT ALL EXISTING STORM SEWER INLETS AND NEWCATCH BASINS WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND AS NOTED ON THE PLAN.5. NO SUSPENDED SEDIMENT WILL BE PERMITTED TO LEAVE THE CONSTRUCTIONSITE. THE CONTRACTOR, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER, SHALLREMOVE ALL SEDIMENT INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CLEANING SEWERS,SEDIMENT REMOVAL AND RESEEDING, PAVEMENT SWEEPING, AND EROSIONCONTROL BARRIER REPAIRS.6. NO CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS, SOIL AGGREGATES, OR OTHER MATERIALS SHALLBE TRACKED ON TO CITY OR PRIVATE DRIVES OR STREETS. SWEEP / CLEANSTREETS WEEKLY AND AS REQUIRED BY OWNER AND/OR CIVIL ENGINEER.7. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL STRUCTURAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL PRACTICES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO MINIMUMSTANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS IN THE LATEST REVISION OF THE ILLINOISURBAN MANUAL PUBLISHED BY THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY (IEPA) AND THE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE(NRCS).8. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO INFORM ANYSUB-CONTRACTOR(S) WHO MAY PERFORM WORK ON THIS PROJECT, OF THEREQUIREMENTS IN IMPLEMENTING AND MAINTAINING THESE EROSION CONTROLPLANS.9. ANY APPLICABLE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) SHALLBE FOLLOWED ALONG WITH THE MINIMUM SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTCONTROL (SESC) MEASURES SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE SWPPP WILL BE KEPTONSITE DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR INSPECTION.10. PERMANENT SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYSAFTER COMPLETION OF FINAL GRADING OF THE SOIL.11. INSPECTION OF SESC MEASURES SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE CONTRACTOR'SCERTIFIED STORMWATER OPERATOR AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYSAND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A STORM 0.5 INCHES OR GREATER. SESC MEASURESWILL BE MAINTAINED TO PERFORM THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION UNTIL THE SITE ISPERMANENTLY STABILIZED.12. ALL PAVER AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED AND BE OF SUFFICIENT WIDTH ANDLENGTH TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM BEING TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC ORPRIVATE ROADWAYS. ANY SEDIMENT REACHING A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADSHALL BE REMOVED BY STREET CLEANING (NOT BY WATER FLUSHING) ASNECESSARY, OR BEFORE THE END OF EACH WORKDAY.13. TIRES AND WHEEL WELLS OF VEHICLES AND CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALLBE FREE OF DIRT AND/OR SEDIMENT BEFORE LEAVING A CONSTRUCTION AREATO PREVENT TRACKING ONTO A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PAVED ROAD OR SIDEWALK.14. TRUCKS LOADED WITH WASTE MATERIAL THAT MAY BE CARRIED OFF BY WINDOR RAIN SHALL BE COVERED PRIOR TO LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.15. ALL ONSITE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA ANDDOWN SLOPE WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE PROTECTED WITHSEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES.16. THE DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT INTO THE SEWER SYSTEM, AS PART OF SITEDEWATERING, MUST BE CONTROLLED AND MINIMIZED TO PREVENT CLOGGINGOF THE SEWER SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW CONDITIONS WITHOWNER AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTORSHALL CLEAN ONSITE AND DOWNSTREAM SYSTEMS AS REQUIRED BY OWNERAND CITY.17. THE USE, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL OF CHEMICALS, CEMENT, AND OTHERCOMPOUNDS AND BUILDING MATERIALS USED ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITESHALL BE MANAGED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD TO PREVENT THEIRENTRANCE INTO THE SEWER SYSTEM.18. ALL TEMPORARY SESC MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTERFINAL SITE STABILIZATION IS ACHIEVED OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.19. THE PROPOSED GRADING PLAN ASSUMES THE RETENTION OF TOPSOIL ONSITEFOR RESPREAD WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. TOPSOIL SHALL NOT BEMIXED WITH SUBSOIL AND SHALL BE FREE OF DEBRIS AND ROCKS.EARTH MOVING NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS1. PROVIDE PRODUCT DATA FOR GEOTEXTILES, CONTROLLED LOW-STRENGTHMATERIAL (INCLUDING DESIGN MIXTURE), AND WARNING TAPES.2. PROVIDE MATERIAL TEST REPORTS FOR EACH ON-SITE AND BORROW SOILMATERIAL PROPOSED FOR FILL AND BACKFILL CONFORMING TO ASTM D 2487AND ASTM D 1557.3. PROVIDE PREEXCAVATION PHOTOGRAPHS OR VIDEOTAPE. SHOW EXISTINGCONDITIONS OF ADJOINING CONSTRUCTION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS,INCLUDING FINISH SURFACES, THAT MIGHT BE MISCONSTRUED AS DAMAGECAUSED BY EARTH MOVING OPERATIONS. SUBMIT BEFORE EARTH MOVINGBEGINS.4. THE FOLLOWING PRACTICES ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN PROTECTION ZONES:STORAGE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, DEBRIS, OR EXCAVATED MATERIAL,PARKING VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT, FOOT TRAFFIC, ERECTION OF SHEDS ORSTRUCTURES, IMPOUNDMENT OF WATER, EXCAVATION OR OTHER DIGGINGUNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ATTACHMENT OF SIGNS TO OR WRAPPINGMATERIALS AROUND TREES OR PLANTS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.5. DO NOT DIRECT VEHICLE OR EQUIPMENT EXHAUST TOWARDS PROTECTIONZONES. PROHIBIT HEAT SOURCES, FLAMES, IGNITION SOURCES, AND SMOKINGWITHIN OR NEAR PROTECTION ZONES.6. PROVIDE BORROW SOIL MATERIALS WHEN SUFFICIENT SATISFACTORY SOILMATERIALS ARE NOT AVAILABLE FROM EXCAVATIONS.7. SATISFACTORY SOILS FOR SUBGRADE APPLICATIONS ARE DEFINED AS SOILCLASSIFICATION GROUPS GW, GP, GM, SW, SP, AND SM ACCORDING TO ASTM D2487, OR A COMBINATION OF THESE GROUPS; FREE OF ROCK OR GRAVELLARGER THAN 3 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION, DEBRIS, WASTE, FROZENMATERIALS, VEGETATION, AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATTER.8. PROVIDE WARNING TAPE ON INSTALLED UTILITIES. WARNING TAPE TO BE ACID-AND ALKALI-RESISTANT, POLYETHYLENE FILM WARNING TAPE MANUFACTUREDFOR MARKING AND IDENTIFYING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, 6 INCHES WIDE AND 4MILS THICK, CONTINUOUSLY INSCRIBED WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE UTILITY;COLORED AS FOLLOWS:RED: ELECTRIC.YELLOW: GAS, OIL, STEAM, AND DANGEROUS MATERIALS.ORANGE: TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATIONS.BLUE: WATER SYSTEMS.GREEN: SEWER SYSTEMS.9. PROTECT STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, SIDEWALKS, PAVEMENTS, AND OTHERFACILITIES FROM DAMAGE CAUSED BY SETTLEMENT, LATERAL MOVEMENT,UNDERMINING, WASHOUT, AND OTHER HAZARDS CREATED BY EARTH MOVINGOPERATIONS.10. PROTECT AND MAINTAIN EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS DURINGEARTH MOVING OPERATIONS.11. PROTECT SUBGRADES AND FOUNDATION SOILS FROM FREEZINGTEMPERATURES AND FROST. REMOVE TEMPORARY PROTECTION BEFOREPLACING SUBSEQUENT MATERIALS.12. PREVENT SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER FROM ENTERINGEXCAVATIONS, FROM PONDING ON PREPARED SUBGRADES, AND FROMFLOODING PROJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA.13. PROTECT SUBGRADES FROM SOFTENING, UNDERMINING, WASHOUT, ANDDAMAGE BY RAIN OR WATER ACCUMULATION. REROUTE SURFACE WATERRUNOFF AWAY FROM EXCAVATED AREAS. DO NOT ALLOW WATER TOACCUMULATE IN EXCAVATIONS. DO NOT USE EXCAVATED TRENCHES ASTEMPORARY DRAINAGE DITCHES.14. EXCAVATE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS REGARDLESS OF THE CHARACTER OFSURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED. UNCLASSIFIEDEXCAVATED MATERIALS MAY INCLUDE ROCK, SOIL MATERIALS, ANDOBSTRUCTIONS. NO CHANGES IN THE CONTRACT SUM OR THE CONTRACT TIMEWILL BE AUTHORIZED FOR ROCK EXCAVATION OR REMOVAL OF OBSTRUCTIONS.IF EXCAVATED MATERIALS INTENDED FOR FILL AND BACKFILL INCLUDEUNSATISFACTORY SOIL MATERIALS AND ROCK, REPLACE WITH SATISFACTORYSOIL MATERIALS.15. EXCAVATE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. MATERIAL TO BE EXCAVATED WILL BECLASSIFIED AS EARTH. EARTH EXCAVATION INCLUDES EXCAVATING PAVEMENTSAND OBSTRUCTIONS VISIBLE ON SURFACE; UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES,UTILITIES, AND OTHER ITEMS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED; TOGETHER WITH SOIL,BOULDERS, AND OTHER MATERIALS NOT CLASSIFIED AS ROCK ORUNAUTHORIZED EXCAVATION.16. EXCAVATE SURFACES UNDER PAVEMENTS TO INDICATED LINES, CROSSSECTIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND SUBGRADES. EXCAVATE TRENCHES TO INDICATEDGRADIENTS, LINES, DEPTHS, AND ELEVATIONS.17. EXCAVATE AND SHAPE TRENCH BOTTOMS TO PROVIDE UNIFORM BEARING ANDSUPPORT OF PIPES AND STRCTURES. SHAPE SUBGRADE TO PROVIDECONTINUOUS SUPPORT FOR BELLS, JOINTS, AND BARRELS OF PIPES AND FORJOINTS, FITTINGS, AND BODIES OF CONDUITS. REMOVE PROJECTING STONESAND SHARP OBJECTS ALONG TRENCH SUBGRADE. FOR PIPES AND CONDUITLESS THAN 6 INCHES IN NOMINAL DIAMETER, HAND-EXCAVATE TRENCHBOTTOMS AND SUPPORT PIPE ON AN UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE. FOR PIPES 6INCHES OR LARGER IN NOMINAL DIAMETER, SHAPE BOTTOM OF TRENCH TOSUPPORT BOTTOM 90 DEGREES OF PIPE CIRCUMFERENCE. FILL DEPRESSIONSWITH TAMPED SAND BACKFILL.18. ENGAGE A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING TESTING AGENCY TOPERFORM TESTS AND INSPECTIONS. NOTIFY ENGINEER AND TESTING AGENCYWHEN EXCAVATIONS HAVE REACHED REQUIRED SUBGRADE. ALLOW TESTINGAGENCY TO INSPECT AND TEST SUBGRADES AND EACH FILL OR BACKFILL LAYER.PROCEED WITH SUBSEQUENT EARTH MOVING ONLY AFTER TEST RESULTS FORPREVIOUSLY COMPLETED WORK COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS. IF THIRD PARTYTESTING AGENCY DETERMINES THAT UNSATISFACTORY SOIL IS PRESENT,CONTINUE EXCAVATION AND REPLACE WITH COMPACTED BACKFILL OR FILLMATERIAL AS DIRECTED.19. AUTHORIZED ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION AND REPLACEMENT MATERIAL WILL BEPAID FOR ACCORDING TO CONTRACT PROVISIONS FOR CHANGES IN THE WORK.20. RECONSTRUCT SUBGRADES DAMAGED BY FREEZING TEMPERATURES, FROST,RAIN, ACCUMULATED WATER, OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, AS DIRECTED BYARCHITECT, WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION.21. STOCKPILE BORROW SOIL MATERIALS AND EXCAVATED SATISFACTORY SOILMATERIALS WITHOUT INTERMIXING. PLACE, GRADE, AND SHAPE STOCKPILES TODRAIN SURFACE WATER. COVER TO PREVENT WINDBLOWN DUST. STOCKPILESOIL MATERIALS AWAY FROM EDGE OF EXCAVATIONS. DO NOT STORE WITHINDRIP LINE OF REMAINING TREES.22. ENSURE PROPER INSPECTION BY GOVERNING JURISDICTIONS HAS TAKEN PLACEPRIOR TO BACKFILLING OF UTILITIES.23. PLACE SOIL FILL, BACKFILL, AND SUBBASE COURSE ON SUBGRADES FREE OFMUD, FROST, SNOW, OR ICE. PLACE BACKFILL AND FILL SOIL MATERIALS EVENLYON ALL SIDES OF STRUCTURES TO REQUIRED ELEVATIONS, AND UNIFORMLYALONG THE FULL LENGTH OF EACH STRUCTURE.24. PLOW, SCARIFY, BENCH, OR BREAK UP SLOPED SURFACES STEEPER THAN 1VERTICAL TO 4 HORIZONTAL SO FILL MATERIAL WILL BOND WITH EXISTINGMATERIAL.25. UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS TO A SMOOTH SURFACE, FREE OF IRREGULARSURFACE CHANGES. COMPLY WITH COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS AND GRADETO CROSS SECTIONS, LINES, AND ELEVATIONS INDICATED. PROVIDE A SMOOTHTRANSITION BETWEEN ADJACENT EXISTING GRADES AND NEW GRADES. CUTOUT SOFT SPOTS, FILL LOW SPOTS, AND TRIM HIGH SPOTS TO COMPLY WITHREQUIRED SURFACE TOLERANCES.26. SLOPE GRADES TO DIRECT WATER AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AND TO PREVENTPONDING. FINISH SUBGRADES TO REQUIRED ELEVATIONS WITHIN PLUS ORINCH FOR PAVEMENTS.27. PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC, FREEZING, AND EROSION.KEEP FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.28. REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES WHERECOMPLETED OR PARTIALLY COMPLETED SURFACES BECOME ERODED, RUTTED,SETTLED, OR WHERE THEY LOSE COMPACTION DUE TO SUBSEQUENTCONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR WEATHER CONDITIONS. SCARIFY OR REMOVEAND REPLACE SOIL MATERIAL TO DEPTH AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER; RESHAPEAND RECOMPACT.29. WHERE SETTLING OCCURS BEFORE PROJECT CORRECTION PERIOD ELAPSES,REMOVE FINISHED PAVING, BACKFILL WITH ADDITIONAL STONE BASE MATERIAL,COMPACT, AND RECONSTRUCT SURFACING. RESTORE APPEARANCE, QUALITY,AND CONDITION OF FINISHED SURFACING TO MATCH ADJACENT WORK, ANDELIMINATE EVIDENCE OF RESTORATION TO GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE.30. REMOVE SURPLUS SATISFACTORY SOIL AND WASTE MATERIALS, INCLUDINGUNSATISFACTORY SOIL, TRASH, AND DEBRIS, AND LEGALLY DISPOSE OF THEMOFF OWNER'S PROPERTY.GENERAL UTILITY NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS1. PROVIDE PRODUCT DATA FOR ALL PRODUCTS USED IN UTILITY WORK.2. WATER AND SEWER LOCATIONS TAKEN FROM DRAWINGS BY OTHERS AND MUSTBE LOCATED IN THE FIELD BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,INCLUDING ALL ELEVATIONS OF RIMS AND INVERTS.3. ALL SEWER AND WATER MAINS TRENCHES UNDER, CROSSING UNDER OR WITHINTWO (2) FEET OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALK, ORPAVEMENT SHALL BE BACK FILLED WITH COMPACTED IDOT CA-7 BACKFILL.4. VALVE VAULTS AND MANHOLES FRAMES AND RINGS SHALL BE SET INWORKMANLIKE MANNER IN EASY-STICK (OR EQUAL) BED.5. ANY EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES REQUIRING MODIFICATIONS ARE TO BEADJUSTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AS PART OF THE CONTRACT. ANY ADJUSTMENTOF 2" OR LESS SHALL USE PREFORMED RUBBER ADJUSTING RINGS, WHICH ARE2" OR LESS IN THICKNESS.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH LOCAL MUNIPALITY OR CONTROLLINGJURISDICTION AS TO THE NECESSITY FOR AND REQUIREMENTS RELATING TOTHE INSPECTION BY AN APPROVED ON-SITE ENGINEER.STORM SEWER NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS1. PROVIDE PRODUCT DATA FOR STORM SEWER PIPE MATERIAL. PROVIDE SHOPDRAWINGS FOR STORM SEWER STRUCTURES.2. ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE MADE WITH PRECASTCONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS SET IN A FULL BED OF BUTYL ROPE JOINTSEALANT. NO MORE THAN 8" OF ADJUSTING RINGS WILL BE PERMITTED, SUBJECTTO THE APPROVAL OF THE AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. ANY ADJUSTMENT OF2" OR LESS SHALL USE PREFORMED RUBBER ADJUSTING RINGS, WHICH ARE 2"OR LESS IN THICKNESS.3. CONNECTION TO EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL BE DONE BYCORING THE CONCRETE BARREL SECTION.4. ALL STORM SEWER PIPES SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE CONFORMINGTO ASTM C-76 WITH JOINTS CONFORMING TO ASTM C-443.5. PRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONS FOR MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, INLETS SHALLMEET ASTM C 478.6. ALL FRAMES AND GRATES IN THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE EAST JORDANIRON WORKS 1050, TYPE M1 GRATE WITH 2.5-INCH NOMINAL PICK HOLES ORAPPROVED EQUAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. STORM SEWERS TO BE CLEANED OF DIRT AND SUPERFLUOUS MATERIALS AFTERTHE COMPLETION OF ONSITE PAVING. FLUSH WITH WATER.CALLJ.U.L.I.E.1-800-892-0123NOTE:ADDITIONAL PUBLIC UTILITIES EXIST UNDER THE ROADWAY AND WITHIN THERIGHT-OF-WAY. EXACT LOCATIONS OF THESE UTILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED TOTHE SELECTED CONTRACTOR(S) ONCE A CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT HASBEEN SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES IN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF EVANSTON.EXTREME CAUTION AND CARE SHALL BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO NOTALTER THE INTEGRITY OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES.NO VIBRATORY COMPACTION IS ALLOWED TO TAKE PLACE. CONTRACTOR TOUTILIZE ALTERNATE MEANS TO ACHIEVE REQUIRED COMPACTION FOR UTILITYINSTALLATION, ROADWAY SUBGRADE COMPACTION, ROADWAY AND SIDEWALKBASE COMPACTION, AND ROADWAY ASPHALT COMPACTION.1. THE MWRD SEWER PERMIT SECTION FIELD OFFICE MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEASTTWO (2) DAYS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK ( CALL 708-588-4055).2. ELEVATION DATUM IS EVANSTON CITY DATUM.3. NO FLOOR DRAINS.4. NO FOOTING DRAINS AND DOWNSPOUTS5. ALL SEWER PIPE AND JOINTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING:MATERIAL PIPE SPEC.JOINT SPEC.RCP ASTM C-76 ASTM C-4436. NOT REQUIRED FOR DIP7. "BAND SEAL" OR SIMILAR FLEXIBLE-TYPE COUPLINGS SHALL BE USED IN THECONNECTION OF SEWER PIPE OF DISSIMILAR MATERIALS.8. WHEN CONNECTING TO AN EXISTING SEWER MAIN BY MEANS OTHER THAN ANEXISTING WYE, TEE, OR AN EXISTING MANHOLE, ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODSSHALL BE USED.1. CIRCULAR SAW-CUT OF SEWER MAIN BY PROPER TOOLS ("SEWER-TAP"MACHINE OR SIMILAR) AND PROPER INSTALLATION OF HUB-WYE SADDLE ORHUB-TEE SADDLE.2. REMOVE AN ENTIRE SECTION OF PIPE (BREAKING ONLY THE TOP OF ONE BELL)AND REPLACE WITH A WYE OR TEE BRANCH SECTION.3. WITH PIPE CUTTER, NEATLY AND ACCURATELY CUT OUT DESIRED LENGTH OFPIPE FOR INSERTION OF PROPER FITTING, USING "BAND-SEAL" OR SIMILARCOUPLINGS TO HOLD IT FIRMLY IN PLACE.9. WHEREVER A SANITARY / COMBINED SEWER CROSSES UNDER A WATER MAIN, THEMINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE FROM THE TOP OF THE SEWER TO THE BOTTOM OFTHE WATER MAIN SHALL BE 18 INCHES. FURTHERMORE, A MINIMUM HORIZONTALDISTANCE OF 10 FEET BETWEENSANITARY / COMBINED SEWERS AND WATER MAINSSHALL BE MAINTAINED UNLESS: THE SEWER IS LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCH,KEEPING A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION; OR THE SEWER IS LAID IN THE SAMETRENCH WITH THE WATER MAIN LOCATED AT THE OPPOSITE SIDE ON A BENCH OFUNDISTURBED EARTH, KEEPING A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. IF EITHERTHE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL DISTANCES DESCRIBED ABOVE CANNOT BEMAINTAINED, OR THE SEWER CROSSES ABOVE THE WATER MAIN, THE SEWER SHALLBE CONSTRUCTED TO WATER MAIN STANDARDS.10. NONE11. ALL SANITARY MANHOLES, (AND STORM MANHOLES IN COMBINED SEWER AREAS),SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM INSIDE DIAMETER OF 48 INCHES, AND SHALL BE CAST INPLACE OR PRE-CAST REINFORCED CONCRETE.12. EXCEPT FOR FOUNDATION/FOOTING DRAINS PROVIDED TO PROTECT BUILDINGSAND FOR UNDERDRAINS SERVING GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, DRAIN TILES/FIELDTILES/UNDERDRAINS/PERFORATED PIPES ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BE CONNECTED TOOR TRIBUTARY TO COMBINED SEWERS, SANITARY SEWERS, OR STORM SEWERSTRIBUTARY TO COMBINED SEWERS IN COMBINED SEWER AREAS. CONSTRUCTION OFNEW FACILITIES OF THIS TYPE IS PROHIBITED; AND ALL EXISTING DRAIN TILES ANDPERFORATED PIPES, OTHER THAN THOSE SERVING GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE,ENCOUNTERED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA SHALL BE PLUGGED OR REMOVED, ANDSHALL NOT BE CONNECTED TO COMBINED SEWERS, SANITARY SEWERS, OR STORMSEWERS TRIBUTARY TO COMBINED SEWERS.MWRD GENERAL NOTESPage 86 of 131 A3.Page 143 of 506 CCSTST1 2" 8"18"8"DDDWWcoDDDDDDDDDLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONFULL DEPTH PAVEMENT REMOVALPROTECT ITEMCURB REMOVALSAWCUT PAVEMENTREMOVE ITEM561234SILT FENCEINLET FILTERCONSTRUCTION BARRIER (BY OTHERS)CONSTRUCTION FENCE (BY OTHERS)7891035 EAST WACKERSUITE 900CHICAGO, IL 60601312.641.0770www.smithgroup.comSEALS AND SIGNATURESKEY PLANDRAWING TITLEPROJECT NUMBERSCALEDRAWING NUMBERCAMPUS DRIVEROAD WIDENING500 LINCOLN STREETEVANSTON, ILLINOISNORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITYOwner:DATEREVISSUED FOR11368.0003/6/2019ISSUED FOR PRICING AND CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NOTESSITE PREPARATION LEGENDA. THIS SECTION IS FOR GENERAL SHEET NOTES TO BE ADDED.B. LENGTHEN THE HEIGHT OF THIS SECTION AS NEED TO FIT NOTES.C. DELETE SECTION IF NO SHEET NOTES ARE PROVIDED.NSIGN TO BE REMOVED UNDER CLEARWELL 9 REPLACEMENTPROJECT CONTRACT.EXISTING METAL SHEET PILE TO REMAIN.EXISTING WOOD SHEET PILE WITH TIES TO METAL SHEET PILE.PROTECT IN PLACE. APPROXIMATE TOP OF PILE ELEVATION IS 3.0EXISTING ORNAMENTAL METAL FENCE. REMOVE AND SALVAGEPANELS TO OWNER. PROTECT POSTS IN PLACE THROUGHOUTCONSTRUCTION.CONSTRUCTION BARRIER INSTALLED UNDER CLEARWELL 9REPLACEMENT PROJECT. PROTECT IN PLACE.CONSTRUCTION FENCE INSTALLED UNDER CLEARWELL 9REPLACEMENT PROJECT. PROTECT IN PLACE. COORDINATE ANYNECESSARY RELOCATIONS WITH OWNER AND CLEARWELLCONTRACTOR.EXISTING SHRUBS TO BE CLOSED AT GRUBBED ALONG THEENTRAILS FENCE.REMOVE PAVEMENT TO NEAREST JOINT.PROVIDE CHAIN LINK DOUBLE SWING GATE, 20' OPENING WIDTH FORFIRE LANE ACCESS.ADESCRIPTIVE KEYED NOTESBEXISTING CONDITIONS, SITEPREPARTION, & SECS PLANPROJECT NORTHSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"CD100EROSION CONTROL LEGEND1CS5002CS500CDEFA8883FEACB3742ATYP.TPY.TYP.TYP.TYP.GHI5TPY.5TPY.IHHG1096Page 87 of 131 A3.Page 144 of 506 CST12"8"18"8"DDWWcoDDDDDD1 5 .012.512.512.515.017.5D1.50' FROM OF EX. FENCE TOFACE OF NEW CURB, TYP.R50.00'R10.00'N 1965746.59E 1163194.79N 1965756.36E 1163184.86N 1965756.59E 1163194.86N 1965746.34E 1163228.02N 1965694.77E 1163277.62N 1965696.35E 1163227.641.50' FROM OF EX. FENCE TOFACE OF NEW CURB, TYP.CST12"8"18"8"DDWWcoDDDDDD1 5 .012.512.512.515.017.5DDDD1.50' FROM OF EX. FENCE TOFACE OF NEW CURB, TYP.R50.00'R10.00'N 1965746.59E 1163194.79N 1965756.36E 1163184.86N 1965756.59E 1163194.86N 1965746.34E 1163228.02N 1965694.77E 1163277.62N 1965696.35E 1163227.641.50' FROM OF EX. FENCE TOFACE OF NEW CURB, TYP.LIMITS OF DISTURBANCECONCRETE PAVEMENT TYPE 1CONCRETE PAVEMENT TYPE 2CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION TYPE 1CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION TYPE 2EXPANSION JOINTCONTROL JOINTCURB & GUTTERIDOT GUARDRAILINTEGRAL CURBFLOW LINECONSTRUCTION FENCESTORM STRUCTURECONSTRUCTION BARRIER (BY OTHERS)CONSTRUCTION FENCE (BY OTHERS)LANE MARKING - 4" YELLOW SOLID1231CS5002CS5004CS5005CS5003CS5004CS5014567891011121314D151635 EAST WACKERSUITE 900CHICAGO, IL 60601312.641.0770www.smithgroup.comSEALS AND SIGNATURESKEY PLANDRAWING TITLEPROJECT NUMBERSCALEDRAWING NUMBERCAMPUS DRIVEROAD WIDENING500 LINCOLN STREETEVANSTON, ILLINOISNORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITYOwner:DATEREVISSUED FOR11368.0003/6/2019ISSUED FOR PRICING AND CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NOTESKEYED NOTESA. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY NORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITY BASED ON RECORD DOCUMENTS.B. TOPOGRAPHY AND STRUCTURE RIM ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ONBACKGROUND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE CLEARWELL 9REPLACEMENT PROJECT DOCUMENTS, ISSUED SEPTEMBER 2018,PREPARED BY CDM SMITH FOR NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY.C. INVERT ELEVATION FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES LOCATED AT THEINTERSECTION OF LINCOLN STREET AND CAMPUS DRIVE ARE BASEDON DESIGN DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY SMITHGROUP FOR THELINCOLN STREET RECONSTRUCTION, ISSUED ON JUNE 8, 2015.D. INVERT ELEVATION FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES LOCATED AT THESOUTH END OF CAMPUS DRIVE ARE BASED ON DESIGN DOCUMENTSPREPARED BY SMITHGROUP FOR THE RYAN/WALTER ATHLETICSCENTER, ISSUED ON NOVEMBER 8, 2017.E. FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND INVERTS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEERIMMEDIATELY.F. SHEET PILE LOCATIONS BASED ON RECORD DOCUMENTS FOR THEREINFORCED CONCRETE RESERVOIR, DATED 1933.G. PAVEMENT MARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH MUTCD STANDARDS(CURRENT EDITION)H. SEE SHEET G-001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.I. SEE SHEET CG100 FOR NOTES REGARDING RESTORATION.NLAYOUT & MATERIALSPROJECT NORTHSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"CS100APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFEXISTING METAL SHEET PILEEXISTING WOOD PILE WITHTIEBACKS TO METAL SHEETPILESCALE: 1" = 20'-0"LAYOUT & MATERIALS (ALTERNATE)2EXISTING WOOD PILE WITHTIEBACKS TO METAL SHEETPILEIDOT GUARDRAIL, SEE DETAIL 8, FORPLACEMENT IN RELATION TOEXISTING FENCE AND NEW CURBCONSTRUCTION BARRIER, TO BEINSTALLED UNDER SCOPE OF THECLEARWELL 9 REPLACEMENTPROJECTCONSTRUCTION FENCE, TO BEINSTALLED UNDER SCOPE OF THECLEARWELL 9 REPLACEMENTPROJECTSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"LAYOUT & MATERIALS (BASE)183216714153BACK OF PROPOSED CURB ALIGNS WITHEDGE OF REMOVED CONCRETE WALK13TYP.12IDOT GUARDRAIL, SEE DETAIL 8, FORPLACEMENT IN RELATION TOEXISTING FENCE AND NEW CURBCONSTRUCTION BARRIER, TO BEINSTALLED UNDER SCOPE OF THECLEARWELL 9 REPLACEMENTPROJECTCONSTRUCTION FENCE, TO BEINSTALLED UNDER SCOPE OF THECLEARWELL 9 REPLACEMENTPROJECT10541671415BACK OF PROPOSED CURB ALIGNS WITHEDGE OF REMOVED CONCRETE WALK13TYP.12111.00', TYP.10.00' O.C. TYP.10.00' O.C. TYP.3APPROXIMATE LOCATION OFEXISTING METAL SHEET PILESEE SITE PREPARATION PLANSSEE SITE PREPARATION PLANS1616Page 88 of 131 A3.Page 145 of 506 CST12"8"18"8"DDWWcoDDDDDDD2%2%ADJUST RIM TOFINISH GRADE12.0212.51313.51414.51515.516121 6 CST12"8"18"8"DDWWcoDDDDDDDDDD2.5 LF 12" RCP, SLOPE @1%4' DIA. CATCH BASININV. EL. 11.64' SE1.5 LF 12" RCP, SLOPE @1%18 LF 12" RCP, SLOPE @1%4' DIA. CATCH BASININV. EL. 7.52' W4' DIA. CATCH BASININV. EL. 9.00'2%2%2%INV. EL. 11.46' NWADJUST INVERTS AS NECESSARY TO AVOIDCONFLICT WITH EXISTING SANITARY LINE.PROVIDE MINIMUM 1' CLEARANCE FROMEXISTING SANITART PIPE.INV. EL. 7.49 EINV. EL. 8.98' N12.5131213.51414.51515.5161212.22LIMITS OF DISTURBANCESTORM STRUCTURESTORM PIPEMAJOR CONTOURMINOR CONTOURBREAK LINESPOT ELEVATION1233CS501457D635 EAST WACKERSUITE 900CHICAGO, IL 60601312.641.0770www.smithgroup.comSEALS AND SIGNATURESKEY PLANDRAWING TITLEPROJECT NUMBERSCALEDRAWING NUMBERCAMPUS DRIVEROAD WIDENING500 LINCOLN STREETEVANSTON, ILLINOISNORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITYOwner:DATEREVISSUED FOR11368.0003/6/2019ISSUED FOR PRICING AND CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NOTESKEYED NOTESA. BACKGROUND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY NORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITY BASED ON RECORD DOCUMENTS.B. TOPOGRAPHY AND STRUCTURE RIM ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ONBACKGROUND INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THE CLEARWELL 9REPLACEMENT PROJECT DOCUMENTS, ISSUED SEPTEMBER 2018,PREPARED BY CDM SMITH FOR NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY.C. INVERT ELEVATION FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES LOCATED AT THEINTERSECTION OF LINCOLN STREET AND CAMPUS DRIVE ARE BASEDON DESIGN DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY SMITHGROUP FOR THELINCOLN STREET RECONSTRUCTION, ISSUED ON JUNE 8, 2015.D. INVERT ELEVATION FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES LOCATED AT THESOUTH END OF CAMPUS DRIVE ARE BASED ON DESIGN DOCUMENTSPREPARED BY SMITHGROUP FOR THE RYAN/WALTER ATHLETICSCENTER, ISSUED ON NOVEMBER 8, 2017.E. FIELD VERIFY DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, AND INVERTS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEERIMMEDIATELY.F. ALL PAVING SHALL SHALL SLOPE TO DRAIN TO CATCH BASINSINDICATED, BE FREE OF DEPRESSIONS OR OTHER IRREGULARITIESAFTER COMPACTION OF SOIL AND INSTALLATION OF PAVEMENT, ANDSHALL BE UNIFORM IN SLOPE BETWEEN THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED.G. RESTORE ALL DISTURBED LAWN AREAS WITH SEED AND BLANKETNON-WOVEN STRAW BLANKET.H. RESTORE AREA BETWEEN EXISTING FENCE AND BACK OF CURB WITHSHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH, 3" MIN. DEPTH.I. SPOT ELEVATIONS INDICATED ARE TO BOTTOM OF CURB, EDGES OFPAVEMENT, AND FLOWLINES.NDRAINAGE PLANPROJECT NORTHSCALE: 1" = 20'-0"CG100SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"LAYOUT & MATERIALS (ALTERNATE)2SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"LAYOUT & MATERIALS (BASE)153TYP.2TYP.1451466Page 89 of 131 A3.Page 146 of 506 CAPPING AGGREGATE (IDOT CA-6)COMPACTED SUBGRADEPOURED-IN-PLACE CONCRETEWITH MEDIUM BROOM FINISHAGGREGATE BASE (IDOT CS-02)GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER SECTION210 OF THE IDOT SPECIFICATIONS.6 X6 W 2.9 X W2.9 WWF @MIDPOINT OF CONCRETENOTES:1. CONCRETE MIX DESIGN SHALL BE REDI-MIX CONCRETE, IDOT PV MIX WITH TYPE III CEMENT FOR MINIMUM 3500PSI AT 3 DAYS.2. PREPARATION AND COMPACTION OF SUBGRADE AND AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IDOTSPECIFICATION SECTION 301.3. WHEN NEW CONCRETE ABATES EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENTS, INSTALL A DOWELED EXPANSION JOINT PERDETAIL 7 OF THIS SHEET.CAPPING AGGREGATE (IDOT CA-6)COMPACTED SUBGRADEPOURED-IN-PLACE CONCRETEWITH MEDIUM BROOM FINISHGEOTEXTILE FABRIC PER SECTION210 OF THE IDOT SPECIFICATIONS.6 X6 W 2.9 X W2.9 WWF @MIDPOINT OF CONCRETENOTES:1. CONCRETE MIX DESIGN SHALL BE REDI-MIX CONCRETE, IDOT PV MIX WITH TYPE III CEMENT FOR MINIMUM 3500PSI AT 3 DAYS.2. PREPARATION AND COMPACTION OF SUBGRADE AND AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IDOTSPECIFICATION SECTION 3013. WHEN NEW CONCRETE ABATES EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENTS, INSTALL A DOWELED EXPANSION JOINT PERDETAIL 7 OF THIS SHEET.AGGREGATE BASE, IDOT CA-6SLOPE 3/4" PER FOOTCOMPACTED SUBGRADE6"1"DEPRESS CURB ATDRIVEWAYS ANDRAMPSTC - SEE PLANSG - SEE PLANS2%SLOPE, TYP.R=1/4"NOTES:1. CONCRETE MIX DESIGN SHALL BE REDI-MIX CONCRETE, IDOT PV MIX WITH TYPE III CEMENT FOR MINIMUM 3500PSI AT 3 DAYS.2. PREPARATION AND COMPACTION OF SUBGRADE AND AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IDOTSPECIFICATION SECTION 301.3. WHEN NEW CONCRETE ABATES EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENTS, INSTALL A DOWELED EXPANSION JOINT PERDETAIL 7 OF THIS SHEET.4. EXPANSION JOINTS WITH PREFORMED 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED TO FULL DEPTH AT:a. 5 FT. ON EACH SIDE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURESb. MAX. OF 150 FT. INTERVALS5. TOOLED CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT 10 FT. INTERVALS. ALIGN WITH PAVEMENT SCORING.6. ASPHALT SHALL BE HELD 1/4" ABOVE GUTTER GRADE AT LOCATIONS WHERE ASPHALT PAVEMENT MEETS CURB& GUTTER UNLESS GUTTER IS REVERSE PITCH7. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION OF REVERSE PITCH GUTTER8. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL CONFORM TO IDOT STANDARD 606001-05.POURED-IN-PLACE CONCRETEWITH MEDIUM BROOM FINISHBI-AXIAL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PERSECTION 210 OF THE IDOTSPECIFICATIONS.AGGREGATE BASE, IDOT CS-02VARIES6 X6 W 2.9 X W2.9 WWF @MIDPOINT OF CONCRETEAGGREGATE BASE, IDOT CA-6SLOPE 3/4" PER FOOTCOMPACTED SUBGRADE6"1"DEPRESS CURB ATDRIVEWAYS ANDRAMPSTC - SEE PLANSG - SEE PLANS2%SLOPE, TYP.R=1/4"NOTES:1. CONCRETE MIX DESIGN SHALL BE REDI-MIX CONCRETE, IDOT PV MIX WITH TYPE III CEMENT FOR MINIMUM 3500PSI AT 3 DAYS.2. PREPARATION AND COMPACTION OF SUBGRADE AND AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IDOTSPECIFICATION SECTION 301.3. WHEN NEW CONCRETE ABATES EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENTS, INSTALL A DOWELED EXPANSION JOINT PERDETAIL 7 OF THIS SHEET.4. EXPANSION JOINTS WITH PREFORMED 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED TO FULL DEPTH AT:a. 5 FT. ON EACH SIDE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURESb. MAX. OF 150 FT. INTERVALS5. TOOLED CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT 10 FT. INTERVALS. ALIGN WITH PAVEMENT SCORING.6. ASPHALT SHALL BE HELD 1/4" ABOVE GUTTER GRADE AT LOCATIONS WHERE ASPHALT PAVEMENT MEETS CURB& GUTTER UNLESS GUTTER IS REVERSE PITCH7. SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION OF REVERSE PITCH GUTTER8. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL CONFORM TO IDOT STANDARD 606001-05.POURED-IN-PLACE CONCRETEWITH MEDIUM BROOM FINISHBI-AXIAL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PERSECTION 210 OF THE IDOTSPECIFICATIONS.6 X6 W 2.9 X W2.9 WWF @MIDPOINT OF CONCRETEAGGREGATE BASE, IDOT CA-6SLOPE 3/4" PER FOOTCOMPACTED SUBGRADE6"12"1"6"DEPRESS CURB ATDRIVEWAYS ANDRAMPS19"TC - SEE PLANSG - SEE PLANSSLOPEPAVEMENT, CONDITIONS VARY.SEE PLANSR=1/4"NOTES:1. CONCRETE MIX DESIGN SHALL BE REDI-MIX CONCRETE, IDOT PV MIX WITH TYPE III CEMENT FOR MINIMUM 3500PSI AT 3 DAYS.2. PREPARATION AND COMPACTION OF SUBGRADE AND AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH IDOTSPECIFICATION SECTION 301.3. WHEN NEW CONCRETE ABATES EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENTS, INSTALL A DOWELED EXPANSION JOINT PERDETAIL 7 OF THIS SHEET.3. EXPANSION JOINTS WITH PREFORMED 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED TO FULL DEPTH AT:a. 5 FT. ON EACH SIDE OF DRAINAGE STRUCTURESb. MAX. OF 150 FT. INTERVALS4. TOOLED CONTROL JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AT 10 FT. INTERVALS. ALIGN WITH PAVEMENT SCORING.5. ASPHALT SHALL BE HELD 1/4" ABOVE GUTTER GRADE AT LOCATIONS WHERE ASPHALT PAVEMENT MEETS CURB& GUTTER.6. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL CONFORM TO IDOT STANDARD 606001-05.EXISTING FENCE POST AND FOUNDATION,REMOVE AND SALVAGE FENCE PANELSTO OWNER. POSTS AND FOUNDATIONSTO REMAIN IN PLACE4'-0" O.C., TYP.IDOT GUARDRAIL4CS501CONCRETE CURB,SEE PLAN FOR TYPE2'-0"2'-0" TYP.CONCRETE PAVEMENT,SEE PLAN FOR TYPEPOST FOUNDATION BELOWJOINT SEALANTCONCRETE PAVEMENT3"12"14" RADIUS, TYP.BACKER RODEXPANSION JOINT MATERIALTO FULL DEPTHEPOXY-COATED, JOINTDOWEL BAR TYP. GRADE60, PLAIN-STEEL BARSCONCRETE PAVEMENTSAWCUT JOINT TO 15 DEPTH OFPAVEMENT, TYP.35 EAST WACKERSUITE 900CHICAGO, IL 60601312.641.0770www.smithgroup.comSEALS AND SIGNATURESKEY PLANDRAWING TITLEPROJECT NUMBERSCALEDRAWING NUMBERCAMPUS DRIVEROAD WIDENING500 LINCOLN STREETEVANSTON, ILLINOISNORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITYOwner:DATEREVISSUED FOR11368.0003/6/2019ISSUED FOR PRICING AND CONSTRUCTIONSITE DETAILSPROJECT NORTHSCALE:CS500SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"CONCRETE PAVEMENT TYPE 1 (BASE)1SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"CONCRETE PAVEMENT TYPE 2 (BASE)2SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION TYPE 1 (ALTERNATE)4SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION TYPE 2 (ALTERNATE)5SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"CURB & GUTTER3SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"EXPANSION JOINT7SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"GUARDRAIL INSTALLATION PLAN8SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"CONTROL JOINT6Page 90 of 131 A3.Page 147 of 506 POSTSFILTER FABRICPLACE THE END POST OF THE SECOND FENCE INSIDE THE END POST OF THE FIRST FENCE.ROTATE BOTH POSTS AT LEAST 180 DEGREES IN A CLOCKWISE DIRECTION TO CREATE A TIGHT SEAL WITH THEFABRIC MATERIAL.DRIVE BOTH POSTS A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES INTO THE GROUND AND BURY THE FLAP.NOTES:1.2.3.PLAN FOR ATTACHING TWO SILT FENCESSTEP 3STEP 2STEP 1FILTER FABRICNOTES:1. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING WORK. IN THE AREA TO BEPROTECTED. THEY SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD AND REMOVED INCONJUNCTION WITH THE FINAL GRADING AND SITE STABILIZATION.2.FILTER FABRIC SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF MATERIAL SPECIFICATION 592 GEOTEXTILE TABLE 1 OR 2,CLASS I WITH EQUIVALENT OPENING SIZE OF AT LEAST 30 FOR NONWOVEN AND 50 FOR WOVEN.3. FENCE POSTS SHALL BE EITHER STANDARD STEEL POST OR WOOD POST WITH A MINIMUM CROSS-SECTIONALAREA OF 3.0 SQ. IN.FABRIC ANCHOR SECTIONCOMPACTED BACKFILL6"MIN6"MINUNDISTURBED GROUND LINEDIRECTION OF FLOWFILTER FABRICELEVATION18"MIN(TYP)2'MIN5' MAX(TYP)FILTER FABRICFASTENER - MIN. NO. 10 GAGE WIRE4 PER POST REQUIRED. (TYP.)STAINLESS STEELLOCKING BANDGALVANIZED STEEL FRAMELIFT HANDLESOVERFLOW FEATUREGEOTEXTILE FILTER BAGWITH REINFORCED POLYESTEROUTER MESHGALVANIZED STEELFRAMELIFT HANDLESSTAINLESS STEELLOCKING BANDGEOTEXTILE FILTER BAGWITH REINFORCED POLYESTEROUTER MESHOVERFLOW FEATURE(REAR CURB GUARD FLAP INCLUDEDFOR CURB BOX INLET FILTERS)(REAR CURB GUARD FLAP INCLUDED FOR CURB BOX INLET FILTERS)NOTE:TEMPORARY INLET SEDIMENT FILTER TO BE INSTALLED ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND STORMINLETS. INLET FILTER TO BE ROUND IPP INLET FILTER AS MANUFACTURED BY INLET & PIPEPROTECTION, INC (847-722-0690) OR APPROVED OTHER. CLEAN FILTER AS NEEDED.NOTE:TEMPORARY INLET SEDIMENT FILTER TO BE INSTALLED ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND STORMINLETS. INLET FILTER TO BE RECTANGLE IPP INLET FILTER AS MANUFACTURED BY INLET & PIPEPROTECTION, INC (847-722-0690) OR APPROVED OTHER. CLEAN FILTER AS NEEDED. ROUND INLET FILTER RECTANGLE INLET FILTER24"DTT* FOR PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETESECTIONS, THIS DIMENSION MAY VARY FROM THEDIMENSION GIVEN TO PLUS 6".TOP OF MASONRYCONCRETE FILL,2% MAX. D C* T (MIN.)PRECAST REINFORCED 4'-0" 30" 4"GENERAL NOTES1. BOTTOM SLABS SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH A MINIMUM OF 0.31 SQ. IN /FT. IN BOTH DIRECTIONS WITHA MAXIMUM SPACING OF 12".2. BOTTOM SLABS MAY BE CONNECTED TO THE RISER DETERMINED BY THE FABRICATOR; HOWEVER,ONLY A SINGLE ROW OF REINFORCEMENT AROUND THE PERIMETER MAY BE UTILIZED.3. SEE IDOT STANDARD 602601 FOR OPTIONAL PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE FLAT SLAB TOP.4. ALL JOINTS BETWEEN BARREL SECTION, RISER & CASTING ARE TO BE SEALED WITH FLEXIBLE BUTYLGASKET MATERIAL 2-1/4" WIDE & 3/8" THICK, OR APPROVED EQUAL.2"PRECAST REINFORCEDCONCRETE SLABSAND CUSHIONCIRCULARTOP OF MASONRYADJUSTMENT RINGS (6" MAX)CAST IRON FRAME AND LIDFRAME: EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS 1050, TYPE M1 GRATE WITHLARGE (2.5" NOMINAL) PICK HOLES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED35 EAST WACKERSUITE 900CHICAGO, IL 60601312.641.0770www.smithgroup.comSEALS AND SIGNATURESKEY PLANDRAWING TITLEPROJECT NUMBERSCALEDRAWING NUMBERCAMPUS DRIVEROAD WIDENING500 LINCOLN STREETEVANSTON, ILLINOISNORTHWESTERNUNIVERSITYOwner:DATEREVISSUED FOR11368.0003/6/2019ISSUED FOR PRICING AND CONSTRUCTIONSITE DETAILSPROJECT NORTHSCALE:CS501SCALE: NOT TO SCALESILT FENCE1NOT TO SCALEINLET FILTER2NOT TO SCALEIDOT GUARDRAIL4NOT TO SCALEIDOT GUARDRAIL5SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"CATCH BASIN - TYPE A3Page 91 of 131 A3.Page 148 of 506 Page 92 of 131 A3.Page 149 of 506 Page 93 of 131 A3.Page 150 of 506 Clearwell 9 Replacement Project Construction (Bid 18-30) Change Order No. 5 Agreements with Northwestern University 1. Easement Agreement 2. Fence Removal 3. Reservoir Turf and Irrigation 4. Lincoln Street & North Campus Drive 5. Amendment to Lincoln Street & North Campus Drive Page 94 of 131 A3.Page 151 of 506 1. Easement Agreement Page 95 of 131 A3.Page 152 of 506 Page 96 of 131A3.Page 153 of 506 Page 97 of 131A3.Page 154 of 506 Page 98 of 131A3.Page 155 of 506 Page 99 of 131A3.Page 156 of 506 Page 100 of 131A3.Page 157 of 506 Page 101 of 131A3.Page 158 of 506 Page 102 of 131A3.Page 159 of 506 Page 103 of 131A3.Page 160 of 506 Page 104 of 131A3.Page 161 of 506 Page 105 of 131A3.Page 162 of 506 Page 106 of 131A3.Page 163 of 506 Page 107 of 131A3.Page 164 of 506 Page 108 of 131A3.Page 165 of 506 Page 109 of 131A3.Page 166 of 506 Page 110 of 131A3.Page 167 of 506 Page 111 of 131A3.Page 168 of 506 Page 112 of 131A3.Page 169 of 506 Page 113 of 131A3.Page 170 of 506 Page 114 of 131A3.Page 171 of 506 Page 115 of 131A3.Page 172 of 506 Page 116 of 131A3.Page 173 of 506 Page 117 of 131A3.Page 174 of 506 Page 118 of 131A3.Page 175 of 506 Page 119 of 131A3.Page 176 of 506 2. Fence Removal Page 120 of 131 A3.Page 177 of 506 Proposed Change Order Number 020: Removal of damaged section of fence City of Evanston CW9 Project Northwestern University (“University”) and the City of Evanston (“City”) entered into an Easement Agreement dated September 28, 2018 (“Easement Agreement”), allowing the City to reconstruct Clearwell 9 (“CW9“) on the University’s property. The Easement Agreement contemplated that unique circumstances might require the parties to enter into further agreements, such as this current agreement. Severe weather has collapsed the ornamental lakefront fencing adjacent to the City’s water treatment plant. The fence was originally placed by Northwestern. In light of this event, the University requested the City, through their consultants and contractor Thieneman Construction (“TCI”), provide the cost to remove and dispose the collapsed fence. TCI prepared Proposed Change Order Number 020 (“PCO-020”), dated March 23, 2020 and attached hereto, in response to that request. PCO-020 indicates that this effort will cost four thousand eight hundred dollars ($4, 800.00). The University respectfully asks that the City authorize PCO-020 and hereby agrees to reimburse the City upon presentation of properly documented PCO-020 expenses not to exceed the amount stated above, and in accordance with the Easement Agreement. The University acknowledges and appreciates the cooperation of the City and its consultants and contractors in responding to this request. This agreement shall be governed under and in accordance with the Easement Agreement. NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY Alexander J. Darragh, Vice President for Facilities Date: April 26, 2020 Northwestern University CITY OF EVANSTON 05 / 04 / 2020 Page 121 of 131 A3.Page 178 of 506 3. Reservoir Turf and Irrigation Page 122 of 131 A3.Page 179 of 506 Page 123 of 131 A3.Page 180 of 506 4. Lincoln Street & North Campus Drive Page 124 of 131 A3.Page 181 of 506 Page 125 of 131A3.Page 182 of 506 Page 126 of 131A3.Page 183 of 506 Page 127 of 131A3.Page 184 of 506 Page 128 of 131A3.Page 185 of 506 5. Amendment to Lincoln Street & North Campus Drive Page 129 of 131 A3.Page 186 of 506 Amendment Number One to Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Evanston and Northwestern University This Amendment Number 1 (“Amendment”) to the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is entered into between the City of Evanston (“the City”) and Northwestern University (“Northwestern”), to describe the cost-sharing responsibilities of the Parties regarding the Temporary Widening of Campus Drive and East End of Lincoln Street Project (“the Project”). The Parties previously executed a MOU for the Project on March 7, 2019. This Amendment articulates certain new cost-sharing terms agreed to by both Parties. The Parties agree as follows: The language of the first and second paragraph of the “Cost Sharing” section of the March 7, 2019 MOU will be replaced with the following language: “All costs of the Project, including temporary construction and subsequent restoration; including if over the current estimate or for any contingency, will be shared between by the City 33.34% and Northwestern 66.66%, subject to the below regarding cost savings. The Parties will hold contracts for professional services and construction, keeping each other reasonably informed of current and forecasted material increases in costs. Costs will not be marked-up, and neither party will charge project management or similar fees. The Parties will initially pay their properly documented invoices in full, to be later reimbursed by the other Party, and provide copies to the other Party. Upon completion of each of the initial demolition and construction (first phase) and the subsequent restoration and reconstruction (second phase), the Parties will invoice each other for all Project costs during each of those two phases. For the first phase, the City will reimburse Northwestern for its 33.34% share of all Project costs during the first phase. For the second phase, Northwestern will reimburse the City its 66.66% share of all Project costs during the second phase. The terms for all payments shall be Net 60 days from the date of invoice.” (SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE) Doc ID: 533675991af621fe8f310c0aa51c7904ba2575b5Page 130 of 131 A3.Page 187 of 506 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties agree to the above terms and have executed this Amendment Number One to the Memorandum of Understanding as follows: The date of this Amendment will be the date this Amendment is signed by the last party to sign it (as indicated by the date associated with that party’s signature). Each party is signing this Amendment on the date stated opposite that party’s signature. CITY OF EVANSTON NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY _________________________ __________________________ Erika Storlie, City Manager Approved as to Form: Kelley A. Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Doc ID: 533675991af621fe8f310c0aa51c7904ba2575b5Page 131 of 131 A3.Page 188 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of Administration and Public Works Committee From: Darrell King, Water Production Bureau Chief CC: David D. Stoneback, Public Works Agency Director Subject: Change Order No.1 with Harris Computer Systems for a Six Month Extension of the Maintenance and Support Agreement on the NorthStar Utility Billing System Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Change Order No.1 with Harris Computer Systems (1 Antares Drive, Suite 400, Ottawa, Ontario) for the Harris NorthStar utility billing software maintenance and support agreement in the amount of $25,663.11. This support will be for six months, December 1, 2020 through May 31, 2021. Funding Source: Funding is provided by the Water Fund, Water Other Operations Business Unit (Account 510.40.4225.62340), which has an approved FY 2020 budget of $373,300 and a YTD balance of $273,300.91. Council Action: For Action Summary: The Harris NorthStar utility billing software (known in Evanston as AQUAS) is a utility billing system that has been used by the Public Works Agency since 2009. The AQUAS system is used to bill customers for water, sewer and sanitation charges. Annual maintenance and support agreements are standard in the technology industry and are typically assessed by software companies to continuously improve software applications as well as to fund support centers with skilled employees for customers in order to resolve problems as quickly as possible. The City, as a customer with an active maintenance and support agreement, has access to all available fixes and enhancements to the software as well as access to online and telephone customer support. A4.Page 189 of 506 Background: On January 27, 2020, City Council approved a 9 month agreement with Harris to provide maintenance and support of the NorthStar utility billing system between March 1, 2020 and November 30, 2020. Staff recommended a 9 mon th agreement because staff was evaluating other utility billing software systems and did not want to pay for something that may not have been needed. On July 13, 2020, city Council approved staff's recommendation to implement a new utility billing software from True Point Solution based on proposals received from RFP 19 -65. The new billing software is being developed and will be fully operational in May 2021. Analysis: Staff will need to continue using the NorthStar utility billing software through May 2021 and therefore will require continued maintenance and support services. The cost for the initial 9 month period during 2020 totals $36,661.59. This equates to $4,073.56 per month. The additional six months totals $25,663.11. This equates to $4,277.17 per month. The cost increase when comparing the initial 9 months to the additional 6 months represents 5%. Legislative History: On January 27, 2020 City Council approved a 9 month agreement for maintenance and support through November 30, 2020. Page 2 of 2 A4.Page 190 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of Administration and Public Works Committee From: Darrell King, Water Production Bureau Chief CC: David D. Stoneback, Public Works Agency Director Subject: Contracts with Alexander Chemical Corporation, Polydyne Incorporated and Carus Corporation for FY 2021 Water Treatment Chemicals Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with Alexander Chemical Corporation (7593 S. First Road, LaPorte, IN 46350) in the amount of $378,174.00, Polydyne Incorporated (One Chemical Plant Road, Riceboro, GA 31323) in the amount of $75,168.00 and Carus Corporation (315 Fifth Street, Peru IL 61354) in the amount of $152,006.40, for the period of January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021 for the purchase of water treatment chemicals in the amount of $605,348.40. Funding Source: Funding is provided by the Water Production Bureau Filtration Business Unit (Accounts 510.40.4220.65015 & 510.40.4220.65030), which have a total FY 2021 budget request of $665,100.00. Council Action: For Action Summary: Five different chemicals are primarily used in the Evanston water treatment process. Chlorine is used as a disinfectant, alum and polymer are used as coagulants, fluoride (HFS acid) is added to help prevent tooth decay, and a blended polyphosphate is added to coat the interior of pipes to reduce the amount of lead and copper leaching into the water. Bid specifications 20-44 were prepared for the purchase of water treatment chemicals needed during FY2021. The bid for water treatment chemicals was advertised in the Chicago Tribune and on Demandstar. Bids were opened and publicly read on October 6, 2020. The bid specifications provide for a one year contract with selected vendors. A5.Page 191 of 506 Staff has reviewed the chemical bids received on October 6, 2020. Attache d is a tabulation of the bid responses. Staff recommends acceptance of all of the apparent low bids as responsive and responsible for alum, chlorine, fluoride, polymer and blended phosphate and award of the contracts as indicated. CHEMICAL: Alum Below is a summary of the bid results obtained on October 6, 2020 from Bid 20 -44 for supplying alum during FY 2021. CHEMICAL: Chlorine Below is a summary of the bid results obtained on October 6, 2020 from Bid 20 -44 for supplying chlorine during FY 2021. Please note that chlorine is supplied in both ton cylinders (in a price per ton) and in 150 pound cylinders (in a price per cylinder). CHEMICAL: Fluoride Below is a summary of the bid results obtained on October 6, 2020 from bid 20 -44 for supplying HFS acid (fluoride) during FY 2021. CHEMICAL: Polymer Below is a summary of the bid results obtained on October 6, 2020 from bid 20 -44 for supplying polymer during FY 2021. CHEMICAL: Blended polyphosphate Page 2 of 5 A5.Page 192 of 506 Below is a summary of the bid results obtained on October 6, 2020 from bid 20 -44 for supplying blended phosphate during FY 2021. The Water Fund, account 510.40.4220.65015 provides funding for the purchase of water treatment chemicals except for the blended phosphate. This account has a proposed budget allocation of $509,100 in FY 2021. The contracts to supply the estimated quantity of alum, chlorine, HFS acid and polymer will utilize $453,342.00 of this budget allocation as indicated below. Since a portion of the cost for blended phosphate is reimbursed by the Northwest Water Commission, a separate account in the Water Fund, 510.40.4220.65030, was established for purchasing this product. Account 510.40.4220.65030 has a proposed FY 2021 budget allocation of $156,000.00 and is augmented by revenues paid by the Northwest Water Commission, which is estimated at $43,000.00 for FY 2021. The table below summarizes the costs and the percent change from FY2020 to FY2021: Page 3 of 5 A5.Page 193 of 506 Legislative History: Water Treatment Chemicals was last approved by City Council on September 9, 2019. Attachments: Sprd Sheet Chem Bid tab 2021 Page 4 of 5 A5.Page 194 of 506 BID TABULATION BID # 20-44 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS Bid Opening: October 06, 2020 Group A - Aluminum Sulfate Vendor City/State Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Bid Total Cost Estimate Alexander Chemical Corp LaPorte, IN 624 ton $296.00 $184,704.00 USALCO LLC Baltimore, MD 624 ton $311.87 $194,606.88 Univar USA Inc.Kent, WA 624 ton $385.00 $240,240.00 Chemtrade Chemicals Parsippany,NJ 624 ton $460.00 $287,040.00 Group B - Liquid Chlorine Vendor City/State Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Bid Total Cost Estimate Alexander Chemical Corp LaPorte, IN 138 ton $439.00 $60,582.00 9 150#$57.00 $513.00 TOTAL $61,095.00 JCI Jones Chemicals Inc Beech Grove, IN 138 ton $450.00 $62,100.00 9 150#$59.00 $531.00 TOTAL $62,631.00 Vendor City/State Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Bid Total Cost Estimate Alexander Chemical Corp LaPorte, IN 375 ton $353.00 $132,375.00 Univar USA Kent, WA 375 ton $377.56 $141,585.00 Pencco Inc San Felipe, TX 375 ton $407.00 $152,625.00 Vendor City/State Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Bid Total Cost Estimate Polydyne, Inc.Riceboro GA 58 tons $1,296.00 $75,168.00 Vendor City/State Estimated Quantity Unit Unit Bid Total Cost Estimate Carus Corp Peru, IL 31,200 gallons $4.872 $152,006.40 Shannan Chemical Corporation Malvern, PA 31,200 gallons Group C - HFS Acid Group D - Polymer Group E - Blended Polyphosphate non-responsive Page 5 of 5 A5.Page 195 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of Administration and Public Works Committee From: Lawrence C. Hemingway, Director of Parks, Recreation, & Community Services CC: Karen Hawk, Assistant Director Parks, Recreation and Community Services Subject: Resolution 86-R-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Sign Notification of Grant Awards to Fund and Operate a Senior Congregate Meal Program Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council approval of Resolution 86 -R-20 authorizing the City Manager to sign notification of grant awards to fund and operate a congregate senior meal program at the Levy Senior Center and Fleetwood-Jourdain Community Center. Funding Source: Funding for this program is budgeted in various line items in the Fleetwood -Jourdain Business Unit 100.30.3040 and Levy Center Business Unit 100.30.3055. Overall budgeted expenses for the 2020-2021 program including staff salaries, Social Securit y, Medicare, advertising, program supplies and food costs are projected at $87,696. Council Action: For Action Summary: This is a reimbursement program in which the total amount of reimbursement the City will receive is solely dependent upon the number of lunches served and varies depending on the levels of participation. The City’s estimated reimbursement is calculated usi ng the highest daily participation level stated in our application. Levy Senior Center Fleetwood-Jourdain Center TOTAL Meal Program $71,128 $16,568 $87,696 A6.Page 196 of 506 Expenditure Budgeted Amount Maximum Grant Reimbursement to Revenue Account $33,363 $6,578 $39,941 Project Income (Donations) $7,000 $1,800 $8,800 Local In-Kind (i.e. Room usage, utilities, volunteers, etc) $13,840 $2,505 $16,345 Local Cash (City Supported) $16,925 $5,685 $22,610 Staff projects meal donations of $8,800. The City will provide a local cash match of $22,610 of the $87,696 if the projection for donations is met, and less if it is exceeded. This is the tenth year of this grant program, which has helped provide a senio r lunch program subsidy at Fleetwood-Jourdain one day per week and at Levy Senior Center five days per week. If donations the expected, than less be program meal the of attendees from received department will develop a plan to offset the revenue shortage. The City of Evanston reapplied to receive funding for a congregate senior meal program through Age Options. As part of the nationwide network, Age Options is authorized by the federal Older Americans Act and the Illinois Department on Aging as the Planni ng and Service Area for the 30 townships surrounding Chicago. The Older Americans Act Title III -C Nutrition Services grant funds congregate meals for older adults, aged 60 and over, a spouse, or child with disabilities under the age of 60. This grant covers food costs, administrative overhead and supplies for the program. The City received a maximum grant award of $33,363 to provide meals 5 days a week at the Levy Senior Center and $6,578 to provide meals one day a week at the Fleetwood -Jourdain Community Center. The time period of this grant is October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021. This grant for Congregate Meal Nutrition Services will offset the cost of each meal and no eligible senior shall be denied participation because of inability to contribute. The suggested contribution for each meal will be $6.50 – there has not been an increase from the prior agreement and meals will be provided regardless of the participant’s ability to pay. Attachments: 86-R-20 Authorizing CMO to Sign for Senior Meals AR 10-26-20 (1) NGA_FY2021_C1-19-1091_Evanston-Levy NGA_FY2021_C1-19-1100_Evanston-Fleetwood Page 2 of 7 A6.Page 197 of 506 10/8/2020 86-R-20 A RESOLUTION Authorizing the City Manager to Sign Notifications of Grant Awards To Fund and Operate a Congregate Senior Meal Program WHEREAS, the City of Evanston has made it a priority to focus on providing for a comfortable and high standard of living for seniors through activities and events ; and WHEREAS, the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department (the “Department”) strives to provide activities and opportunities to seniors; and WHEREAS, the Department applied to the Illinois Department on Aging for funding for a congregate senior meal program; and WHEREAS, the Department received two (2) grant awards, worth a combined total of thirty-nine thousand nine hundred forty one dollars ($39,941 .00) to operate meal programs for seniors; and WHEREAS, the grant award will allow seniors to receive meals at a suggested donation rate of six dollars and fifty cents ($6.50); and WHEREAS, the Department plans to operate a lunch program for seniors five (5) days a week at the Levy Senior Center; and WHEREAS, the Department plans to operate a lunch program for seniors one (1) day a week at the Fleetwood-Jourdain Community Center, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: Page 3 of 7 A6.Page 198 of 506 86-R-20 ~2~ SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are hereby found as fact and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2: The City Manager is hereby authorized to sign, and the City Clerk herby authorized to attest, on behalf of the City of Evanston, the Notifications of Grant Awards. SECTION 3: The City Manager is hereby authorized to sign, and the City Clerk herby authorized to attest, on behalf of the City of Evanston, the Notific ations of Grant Awards attached hereto as Exhibit A, incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4: This Resolution 86-R-20 shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Adopted: __________________, 2020 Approved as to form: _______________________________ Kelley Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 4 of 7 A6.Page 199 of 506 86-R-20 ~3~ EXHIBIT A Congregate Senior Meal Program Notification of Grants Awards Page 5 of 7 A6.Page 200 of 506 NOTIFICATION OF GRANT AWARD AgeOptions - (Illinois Department on Aging - PSA 13) Under Title III-B, Title III-C, Title III-D, Title III-E, & Title VII of the Older Americans Act and under the State of Illinois General Revenue Funds GRANTEE NAME, ADDRESS Project ID: C1-19-1091 City of Evanston - Levy Senior Center Date: September 21, 2020 2100 Ridge Avenue Evanston, IL 60201 Type of Grant: Nutrition Services (Title III-C1) Approved Costs for Project Period Project Period: October 01, 2020 a. Personnel/Fringe $40,820 To: September 30, 2021 b. Travel of Persons $0 c. Equipment & Supplies $500 Sub Areas (Townships except for C1 awards): Evanston d. Other $4,414 e. Food-Nutrition Only $25,394 f. Delivery-Nutrition Only $0 g. Total $71,128 Computation of Grant Award 1. Total Cost $71,128 8. Original Obligation: $33,363 2. Less Anticipated Project Income $7,000 Revision 1: $0 Revision 2: $0 3. Net Cost (estimated) $64,128 4. Nonfederal Share $30,765 9. Share of Net Cost a. Local Cash $16,925 a. NonFederal Share 47.97% b. Local Inkind $13,840 b. Local Cash Share 26.39% 5. Area Agency Share $33,363 c. Federal/State Share 52.03% 6. State Share $0 7. New Obligation Awarded $33,363 10. Application for Funds Date: June 19, 2020 The awarded obligation (8) includes the maximum Federal Share and State funds obligated to the Grantee provided all conditions are met. Grantee - I have read all the conditions of this award, and agree to fully comply with all such conditions. Name and Title Date Signature AgeOptions (also referred to as Area Agency on Aging) Signature: 09/28/2020 Diane Slezak, Chief Executive Officer Date NOTE: The attached Conditions of Award comply with Federal and State regulations and are an integral component of this Notification of Grant Award. Page 6 of 7 A6.Page 201 of 506 NOTIFICATION OF GRANT AWARD AgeOptions - (Illinois Department on Aging - PSA 13) Under Title III-B, Title III-C, Title III-D, Title III-E, & Title VII of the Older Americans Act and under the State of Illinois General Revenue Funds GRANTEE NAME, ADDRESS Project ID: C1-19-1100 City of Evanston - Fleetwood-Jourdain Community Center Date: September 21, 2020 2100 Ridge Avenue Evanston, IL 60201 Type of Grant: Nutrition Services (Title III-C1) Approved Costs for Project Period Project Period: October 01, 2020 a. Personnel/Fringe $7,050 To: September 30, 2021 b. Travel of Persons $0 c. Equipment & Supplies $300 Sub Areas (Townships except for C1 awards): Evanston d. Other $840 e. Food-Nutrition Only $8,378 f. Delivery-Nutrition Only $0 g. Total $16,568 Computation of Grant Award 1. Total Cost $16,568 8. Original Obligation: $6,578 2. Less Anticipated Project Income $1,800 Revision 1: $0 Revision 2: $0 3. Net Cost (estimated) $14,768 4. Nonfederal Share $8,190 9. Share of Net Cost a. Local Cash $5,685 a. NonFederal Share 55.46% b. Local Inkind $2,505 b. Local Cash Share 38.50% 5. Area Agency Share $6,578 c. Federal/State Share 44.54% 6. State Share $0 7. New Obligation Awarded $6,578 10. Application for Funds Date: June 19, 2020 The awarded obligation (8) includes the maximum Federal Share and State funds obligated to the Grantee provided all conditions are met. Grantee - I have read all the conditions of this award, and agree to fully comply with all such conditions. Name and Title Date Signature AgeOptions (also referred to as Area Agency on Aging) Signature: 09/28/2020 Diane Slezak, Chief Executive Officer Date NOTE: The attached Conditions of Award comply with Federal and State regulations and are an integral component of this Notification of Grant Award. Page 7 of 7 A6.Page 202 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of Administration and Public Works Committee From: David Stoneback, Public Works Agency Director Subject: Resolution 89-R-20, Authorizing the City Manager to Grant an Easement for Steam Infrastructure Installation on Emerson Street Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council adoption of Resolution 89-R-20, authorizing the City Manager to grant an easement for steam infrastructure installation on Emerson Street. The easement would be granted for a 20 year period. Funding Source: No City funding is required for these proposed utilities. Northwestern University will fund the project and will be assessed a one-time easement fee of $20,643.00. These funds will be deposited to the General Fund (Account 100.40.4105.52175). Council Action: For Action Summary: The purpose of this easement, located on Emerson Street between Orrin gton Avenue and Sheridan Road, is to install / upgrade the underground steam infrastructure that serves NU properties. The size of the easement area is 1,180 square feet. The cost of the easement on City right of way is proposed to be established at $0.720 per square foot in 2020 and increase 2% per year throughout the term of the easement. This easement fee structure is similar to that established by the Metropolitan Wate r Reclamation District and assessed to Evanston. NU will be assessed the total easement fee for the 20 - year period at the time the easement agreement is executed. Attachments: Resolution 89-R-20 , Easement with NU Easement fee calculation A7.Page 203 of 506 10/26/2020 89-R-20 A RESOLUTION Authorizing the City Manager to Grant an Easement for Steam Infrastructure Installation on Emerson Street NOW BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to sign an Easement Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and between the City and Northwestern University for the City to grant an easement for the installation of steam infrastructure below ground on Emerson Street, west of Sheridan Road and east of Orrington Avenue. The Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2: The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to negotiate any additional conditions of said Agreement that he deems to be in the best interests of the City. SECTION 3: This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval, in the manner provided by law. _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Adopted: __________________, 2020 Approved as to form: ______________________________ Kelley A. Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 2 of 9 A7.Page 204 of 506 89-R-20 - 2 - EXHIBIT 1 EASEMENT AGREEMENT Page 3 of 9 A7.Page 205 of 506 GRANT OF NON-EXCLUSIVE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT In consideration of the payment of the easement fee in the amount of Twenty Thousand Six Hundred Forty Three and 00/100 Dollars ($20,643) and other good and valuable consideration (“Easement Fee”), the receipt of which hereby is acknowledged, THE CITY OF EVANSTON, of the State of Illinois, County of Cook and its successors, assignees and transferees (all hereinafter referred to as "Grantor"), hereby grants to NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, of the State of Illinois, County of Cook and its successors, assignees and transferees (all hereinafter referred to as "Grantee") a non-exclusive permanent easement for the period between November 1, 2020 through October 31, 2040 for a total of twenty (20) years (“Easement Term”) for the purpose of the installation of utility conduits to accommodate steam infrastructure, and appurtenances in, over, upon, through, along, across and under the following described real estate, with an area of approximately 1,180 sq. ft. as described below: A Public Utility Easement, A 10.00 foot Utility Easement below ground level not to exceed a maximum depth of 15.00 feet (as measured from the existing centerline of Emerson Street) of that part of Emerson Street described as follows: Commencing at the Southwesterly corner of Emerson Street and Sheridan Road, being also the Northeast corner of Lot A in the Plat of Consolidation of Parts of Blocks 2, 5, 9 and 10 in the Village (now City) of Evanston Subdivision in fractional sections 7 and 18, Township 41 North, Range 14 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the Plat thereof recorded April 10, 1974 as Document No. 22680757; thence North 89º30'21" West on a assumed bearing along the Southerly line of said Emerson Street, being also the North line of said lot A for a distance of 87.05 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing North 89º30'21" West a distance of 118.00 feet; thence North 00º29'39" East a distance of 10.00 feet; thence South 89º30'21" East a distance of 118.00 feet; thence South 00º29'39" West a distance of 10.00 feet to the point of beginning, in Cook County, Illinois, situated in the County of Cook, State of Illinois and at Emerson Street west of Sheridan Road and hereby releases and waives all right under and by virtue of the Homestead Exemption Laws of the State of Illinois. The above-described real estate and improvements located thereon are herein referred to as the “Premises.” Attached as Exhibit A is the Plat of Easement depicting said Easement on the Premises and contains the legal description for said Easement. Grantor hereby grants, conveys, warrants and dedicates to the Grantee, its agents, servants, employees, its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive public utilities easement to survey, construct, reconstruct, use, operate, maintain, test, inspect, repair, or alter the steam infrastructure, and related appurtenances and to inspect and make alterations to the above describe system, both only in consultation with the City of Evanston’s Public Works Agency and any and all of parameters and restrictions on said use described, in, over, upon, thru, along, across and under the Premises together with related attachments, equipment and appurtenances thereto (collectively “Public Utilities”) in upon, under, along and across the Page 4 of 9 A7.Page 206 of 506 Premises, with the right of access thereto, including all reasonable rights of ingress and egress across any adjoining lands of Grantor necessary for the exercise of the rights herein granted. Grantor shall have and retain all rights to use and occupy the premises and access to Grantor’s remaining property, except as herein expressly granted; provided, however, Grantor’s use and occupation of the premises may not interfere with Grantee’s use of the premises for the purposes herein described. Grantor, without limiting the interest above granted and conveyed, acknowledges that upon payment of the agreed consideration, all claims arising out of the above acquisition have been settled, including without limitation, any diminution in value to any remaining property of the Grantor caused by opening, improving, and using the premises for highway purposes. This acknowledgment does not waive any claim for trespass or negligence against the Grantee or Grantee’s agents which may cause damage to Grantor’s remaining property. This grant shall constitute a covenant, which runs with the land, and shall be binding upon the legal representatives, successors and assigns of Grantor. Dated this day of ,2020. GRANTOR: By: Erika Storlie, City Manager CITY OF EVANSTON ATTEST: By: Devon Reid, City Clerk CITY OF EVANSTON STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF COOK ) I, , a Notary Public in and for said County and State aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that Erika Storlie, City Manager of the City of Evanston who is personally know to me to be the same person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as such, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that he signed and delivered the said instrument as his own free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth. Given under by hand and notarial seal this day of , 2020 Notary Public GRANTEE: Page 5 of 9 A7.Page 207 of 506 Northwestern University Facilities Management Operations By: Signature STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF COOK ) I, , a Notary Public in and for said County and State aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that, Gary R. Wojtowicz, Facilities Management Operations who is personally know to me to be the same person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument as such, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that he signed and delivered the said instrument as his own free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes therein set forth. Given under by hand and notarial seal this day of , 2020 Notary Public Page 6 of 9 A7.Page 208 of 506 89-R-20 - 3 - EXHIBIT A PLAT OF EASEMENT Page 7 of 9 A7.Page 209 of 506 625 Forest Edge Drive Vernon Hills, IL. 60061 TEL 847.478.9700 FAX 847.478.9701 Page 8 of 9 A7.Page 210 of 506 Emerson St easement year rate/SF SF Cost 2020 0.720 1180 849.60$ 2021 0.734 1180 866.59$ 2022 0.749 1180 883.92$ 2023 0.764 1180 901.60$ 2024 0.779 1180 919.63$ 2025 0.795 1180 938.03$ 2026 0.811 1180 956.79$ 2027 0.827 1180 975.92$ 2028 0.844 1180 995.44$ 2029 0.860 1180 1,015.35$ 2030 0.878 1180 1,035.66$ 2031 0.895 1180 1,056.37$ 2032 0.913 1180 1,077.50$ 2033 0.931 1180 1,099.05$ 2034 0.950 1180 1,121.03$ 2035 0.969 1180 1,143.45$ 2036 0.988 1180 1,166.32$ 2037 1.008 1180 1,189.65$ 2038 1.028 1180 1,213.44$ 2039 1.049 1180 1,237.71$ total cost 20,643.00$ avg annual cost 1,032.15$ Easement Calculaton for NU requested easement 15-Oct-20 Dave Stoneback Page 9 of 9 A7.Page 211 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Planning and Development Committee From: Meagan Jones, Neighborhood and Land Use Planner CC: Johanna Nyden, Community Development Director; Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Administrator Subject: Resolution 87-R-20, Approving a Plat of Resubdivision for 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Plan Commission and Staff recommend adoption of Resolution 87 -R-20 for approval of a two-lot Subdivision at 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue. Council Action: For Action Summary: Background In 2013, the existing Merion building on the northeast corner of Chicago Avenue and Davis Street, was approved for an 8-story addition to the north. The Planned Development for the addition was approved for up to 205 dwelling units, 32 parking spaces (23 o n-site, 9 leased), a FAR of 3.15 and established a special use for an Independent Living Facility. No site development allowances were needed and the development was to take place all on one 66,616.2-square foot parcel with 170.2 feet of frontage on Davis Street and 391.49 feet of frontage on Chicago Avenue. The development has since been constructed and is currently operating. Proposal No physical change is proposed for this portion of the existing property, however, the proposed subdivision of the parcel would create two parcels: a 21,644-square foot parcel with 127.1 feet of frontage on Chicago Avenue containing the existing one -story commercial building at 1621-31 Chicago Avenue (where new development is proposed); and a 44,972.2 - square foot parcel with 264.39 feet of frontage on Chicago Avenue containing the original Merion building and its addition. Each of the two new lots would meet minimum requirements for zoning lots in the D4 Zoning District. The change in zoning lot size does, however, trigger P1.Page 212 of 506 the need for a Major Adjustment to the 2013 planned development which is proposed for approval by Ordinance 98-O-20. By reducing the lot size the proposed adjustment would increase the FAR of the existing development. The applicant also proposes to increase the total number of parking spaces and reduce the total number of units. No new site development allowances would be needed. Per Section 4-11-1, “Subdivisions,” of the City Code, the Director of the Public Works Agency and the City Engineer have reviewed the proposed subdivision and determined that all required City infrastructure already exists in the neighborhood and no new public infrastructure (sidewalk, sewer, and water services) is needed unless new construction occurs on either lot. No new curb cut would be permitted on Lot 2. Staff and the Plan Commission find that the proposed subdivision and adjustment maintains the zoning standards for approval as there are no physical changes proposed to the existing structures. No impacts are expected with regards to utilities, environmental features or architectural resources due to the proposed adjustment. The proposal will not interfere with or diminish the value of other properties in the neighborhood and maintains compatibility with the surrounding area. Legislative History: September 30, 2020 – Plan Commission voted to recommend approval of the subdivision and adjustment to the planned development at 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue, 6-0. A vote to recommend approval of the associated planned developmen t failed with a 2-4 vote. Link to Plan Commission Packet for September 30, 2020 Meeting Page 2 of 56 P1.Page 213 of 506 May 13, 2020 – At the request of the applicant, the Commission voted to continue this item until such a time that a meeting could be held in-person to continue the review of the subdivision, major adjustment and associated planned development. February 26, 2020 – Plan Commission began a review of the subdivision and major adjustment and then continued the hearing for these items and related planned development at the applicant’s request in order to make changes to the planned development. 18,September 2019 – the of recommended unanimously Committee approval DAPR proposed subdivision and major adjustment to the existing planned development but voted unanimously to recommend denial of the proposed planned development. July 17, 2019 – DAPR Committee held the subdivision, major adjustment and proposed planned development in order to have the applicant make changes to their proposal Attachments: Resolution 87-R-20 Approving Plat of Resubdivision at 1605-1631 Chicago Ave 1605-31 Chicago Ave Subdivision and Major Adjustment Application Forms 9.30.20 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes 2.26.20 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Excerpt Public Works Agency Memorandum dated October 19, 2020 Page 3 of 56 P1.Page 214 of 506 10/12/2020 87-R-20 A RESOLUTION Approving a Plat of Resubdivision for 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 4-11-1-(B) of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended (the “City Code”), the City Council may approve of a plat by means of a resolution; and WHEREAS, the City intends to resubdivide the property located at 1605- 1631 Chicago Avenue, Evanston, Illinois (the “Subject Property”), legally described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the proposed plat complies with all applicable provisions of Title 4, Chapter 11 of the City Code, subject to certain conditions, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THAT: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are found as fact and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2: Pursuant to Title 4, Chapter 11 of the City Code, the City Council hereby approves the proposed Plat of Resubdivision, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference, subject to the following conditions: (A) The final plat of subdivision must substantially conform to the Preliminary Resubdivision plat prepared by B.H. Suhr & Company, Inc. dated May 7, 2019, except as such plat may be modified to conform to the City Code, Resolution, and Ordinance; Page 4 of 56 P1.Page 215 of 506 87-R-20 ~2~ SECTION 3: The City Manager and/or his designee(s) is/are hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk hereby authorized and directed to attest, any documents necessary to implement the terms of this resolution. SECTION 4: This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage and approval in the manner required by law. _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: ______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Adopted: __________________, 2020 Approved as to form: ______________________________ Kelley A. Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 5 of 56 P1.Page 216 of 506 87-R-20 ~3~ EXHIBIT A Legal Description LOT A IN PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION OF LOT 4 (EXCEPT THE NORTH 5 FEET THEREOF) AND ALL OF LOTS 5, 6, 7, 8 AND 9 IN BLOCK 20 IN EVANSTON, IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MER IDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PINS: 11-18-403-020-0000, 11-18-403-021-0000000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 521-533 Davis Street & 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue, Evanston, Illinois Page 6 of 56 P1.Page 217 of 506 87-R-20 ~4~ EXHIBIT B Plat of Resubdivision Page 7 of 56 P1.Page 218 of 506 Page 8 of 56 P1.Page 219 of 506 Page 9 of 56 P1.Page 220 of 506 Page 10 of 56 P1.Page 221 of 506 Page 11 of 56 P1.Page 222 of 506 Page 12 of 56 P1.Page 223 of 506 Page 13 of 56 P1.Page 224 of 506 Page 14 of 56 P1.Page 225 of 506 Page 15 of 56 P1.Page 226 of 506 Page 16 of 56 P1.Page 227 of 506 Page 17 of 56 P1.Page 228 of 506 Page 18 of 56 P1.Page 229 of 506 Page 19 of 56 P1.Page 230 of 506 Page 20 of 56 P1.Page 231 of 506 Page 21 of 56 P1.Page 232 of 506 Page 22 of 56 P1.Page 233 of 506 Page 23 of 56 P1.Page 234 of 506 Page 24 of 56 P1.Page 235 of 506 Page 25 of 56 P1.Page 236 of 506 Page 26 of 56 P1.Page 237 of 506 Page 27 of 56 P1.Page 238 of 506 Page 28 of 56P1.Page 239 of 506 Page 29 of 56 P1.Page 240 of 506 Page 30 of 56 P1.Page 241 of 506 Page 31 of 56 P1.Page 242 of 506 Zoning Analysis – Summary Page 1 Zoning Analysis Summary Case Number: Case Status/Determination: 19ZONA-0101 Compliant Proposal: Subdivision of existing parcel and subsequent Major Adjustment of a Planned Development for the Merion (Case 13PLND-0052 approved by Ordinance 86-O-13). No proposed changes to existing structures. Zoning Section: Comments: 6-11-5-6 6-16-2-1 6-11-5-4 FAR increase from 3.15 to 4.5 compliant, no site development allowance needed. 38 total parking spaces all leased off-site within 1,000 ft. of the property. 9 required to be leased per 86-O-13. 23 on-site parking spaces will be on different parcel with proposed subdivision and will possibly be removed with a new development. No site development allowance needed. Number of total units is 186 down from 205 as listed in 86-O-13. This includes 65 dwelling units with full kitchens. No site development allowance needed. Note: Page 32 of 56 P1.Page 243 of 506 City of Evanston ZONING ANALYSIS REVIEW SHEET APPLICATION STATUS: June 24, 2019 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS: Compliant Address: Applicant:Jeff Michael Phone:7735297200 District:D4 Overlay: Reviewer:Meagan Jones Purpose:Plat of Subdivision, Consolidation, etc. Preservation District: 19ZONA-0101Z.A. Number: 1619 Chicago AVE THIS APPLICATION PROPOSES (select all that apply): New Principal Structure New Accessory Structure Addition to Structure Alteration to Structure Retention of Structure X Change of Use Retention of Use Plat of Resubdiv./Consol. Business License Sidewalk Cafe Home Occupation Other Proposal Description: ANALYSIS BASED ON: Plans Dated: Prepared By: Survey Dated: Existing Improvements: B.H. Suhr Independent Living Facility Plat of Subdivision and Major Adjustment to existing PD approved by ordinance 86-O-13 ZONING ANALYSIS Does not apply to I1, I2, I3, OS, U3, or Excluded T1 & T2 Properties. See Section 6-8-1-10(D) for R's; Section 6-9-1-9(D) for B's; Section 6-10-1-9(D) for C's; Section 6-11-1-10(D) for D's; Section 6-12-1-7(D) for RP; Section 6-13-1-10(D) for MU & MUE; Section 6-15-1-9 for O1, T's, U's, oH, oRE, & oRD. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT THRESHOLDS 1. Is the request for construction of substantially new structures or a substantial rehabilitiation or substantial addition as defined by increasing floor area of principal struction by 35% or more? If not, skip to 2 & 4 below. Yes 2. Does the zoning lot area exceed 30,000 sqft?Yes 3. Does the proposal entail more that 24 new residential, commercial, business, retail or office units in any combination? Yes 4. Does the proposal entail the new construction of more than 20,000 sqft of true gross floor area at or above grade including areas otherwise excluded from defined gross floor area? No The following three sections applly to building lot coverage and impervious surface calculations in Residential Districts. Open Parking Debit (Add 200sqft/open space Addtn. to Bldg Lot Cov. # Open Required Spaces Paver Regulatory Area Pavers/Pervious Paver Exception (Subtract 20%) Total Paver AreaTotal Elibigle Front Front Porch Exception (Subtract 50%) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT CALCULATIONS Front Porch Regulatory Area PRINCIPAL USE AND STRUCTURE Standard Existing Proposed Determination USE:Independent Living Facility Indep Living Facility No Change Comments: CompliantMinimum Lot Width (LF) USE: No Requirement 393.2 266.1 Other Comments: Minimum Lot Area (SF) USE: 66616.2 44972.2 Compliant Comments: Dwelling Units: Comments: Page 1 LF: Linear Feet SF: Square Feet FT: Feet Page 33 of 56 P1.Page 244 of 506 Standard Existing Proposed Determination Rooming Units: Comments: Building Lot Coverage (SF) (defined, including subtractions& additions): None Comments: Impervious Surface Coverage (SF, %) Comments: Accessory Structure Rear Yard Coverage: 40% of rear yard Comments: Gross Floor Area (SF) All Uses Compliant 4.2 188457.2210088.2 3.15Use: Comments: Height (FT) Comments: Front Yard(1) (FT) Chicago Ave No Change00 Street: Direction: W Comments: Front Yard(2) (FT) Street: Direction: Comments: Street Side Yard (FT) Davis St No Change00 Street: Direction: S Comments: Interior Side Yard(1) (FT)No Change00 Direction: N Comments: Direction: Interior Side Yard(2) (FT) Comments: Rear Yard (FT)No Change00 Direction: W Comments: PARKING REQUIREMENTS Standard Existing Proposed Determination Use(1):23 off-street + 9 leased 38 (off-site, leased)Compliant Comments: 86-O-13 required 9 spaces to be leased to add to onsite open parking. Page 2 LF: Linear Feet SF: Square Feet FT: Feet Page 34 of 56 P1.Page 245 of 506 Standard Existing Proposed Determination Use(2): Comments: Use(3): Comments: TOTAL REQUIRED:3832 Compliant Comments: Handicap Parking Spaces Sec. 6-16-2-6 Comments: Access:Sec. 6-16-2-2 Comments: Vertical Clearance (LF)7' Comments: Surfacing:Sec. 6-16-2-8 (E) Comments: Location:Sec. 6-4-6-2 Comments: Angle(1): Comments: Width(W) (FT) Comments: Depth(D) (FT) Comments: Aisle(A) (FT) Comments: Module (FT) Comments: Angle(2): Comments: Width(W) (FT) Comments: Depth(D) (FT) Comments: Aisle(A) (FT) Comments: Module (FT) Comments: Garage Setback from Alley Access (FT) Comments: LOADING REQUIREMENTS DeterminationProposedExistingStandard Loading Use:11 No ChangeInstitutional Living 1 short 10K to 200K, 1 short each addtl. 100K. Comments: Page 3 LF: Linear Feet SF: Square Feet FT: Feet Page 35 of 56 P1.Page 246 of 506 Standard Existing Proposed Determination TOTAL (long): TOTAL (short): Long Berth Size (FT)12' wide x 50' deep Comments: Short Berth Size (FT)10' wide x 35' deep 10' X 35'No Change Comments: Vertical Clearance (FT)14' Comments: Sec. 6-16-4-1Location: Comments: MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS Standard Existing Proposed Determination Requirement (1): Comments: Requirement (2): Comments: Requirement (3): Comments: Analysis Comments COMMENTS AND/OR NOTES See attached comments and/or notes. Site Plan & Appearance Review Committee approval is: Required Results of Analysis: This Application is Compliant RESULTS OF ANALYSIS SIGNATURE DATE Page 4 LF: Linear Feet SF: Square Feet FT: Feet Page 36 of 56 P1.Page 247 of 506 APPROVED Page 1 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 MEETING MINUTES PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, September 30, 2020 7:00 P.M. Virtual Meeting through Zoom Platform Members Present: Peter Isaac (Chair), George Halik, John Hewko, Brian Johnson, Jeanne Lindwall, Kristine Westerberg Members Absent: Jennifer Draper Staff Present: Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Manager Meagan Jones, Neighborhood and Land Use Planner Brian George, Assistant City Attorney Presiding Member: Chair Isaac 1. CALL TO ORDER / DECLARATION OF QUORUM Chair Isaac called the meeting to order at 7:03 P.M. Ms. Jones called the roll and a quorum was established. 2. SUSPENSION OF THE RULES Members participating electronically or by telephone Commissioner Halik made a motion to suspend the rules to allow for electronic or telephone participation. Seconded by Commissioner Westerberg. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed, 6-0. 3. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: September 9, 2020. Commissioner Halik made a motion to approve the minutes from the September 9, 2020 meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Westerberg. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed, 5-0, with one abstention. 4. OLD BUSINESS A. Subdivision /Major Adjustment to a Planned Development - 1619 Chicago Avenue 19PLND-0059 The applicant, Horizon Realty Group, submits for a subdivision and Major Adjustment to a Planned Development in the D4 Downtown Transition District. The requested adjustment will increase FAR from 3.15 to 4.2, increase parking spaces from 32 (23 on -site, 9 leased) to 38 (all leased off -site), and a decrease in total Page 37 of 56 P1.Page 248 of 506 APPROVED Page 2 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 number of units from 205 to 186 (includes 65 dwelling units). No new site development allowance will be needed. B. Planned Development - 1621 Chicago Avenue 18PLND- 0112 The applica nt, Horizon Realty Group, submits a planned development application to construct a 17-story apartment building with 215 units, 85 subterranean parking spaces, and approximately 3,539 sq. ft. of ground floor retail space in the D4 Downtown Transition Distri ct. Site development allowances are being requested for: 1) a building height of 185 ft. where 105 ft. is allowed), 2) an FAR of 10.38 where a maximum of 5.4 is allowed, 3) 215 dwelling units where 54 is maximum is allowed, and 4) 85 parking spaces where a minimum 162 is required. In addition, the applicant may seek and the Plan Commission may consider additional Site Development Allowances Mr. Mangum provided a brief review of the subdivision, major adjustment to the existing planned development and a summary of revisions that have been made to the proposed planned development since the project was last before the Commission. Chair Isaac opened the hearing to question from the Commission. Commissioner Halik asked for clarification on the allowable building height as it relates to parking levels. Mr. Mangum clarified that up to 4-stories or 40 ft. (whichever is less) of levels that are at least 75% dedicated to parking do not count towards b uilding height in the D4 District. The proposed development is proposing two levels of below grade parking but if those levels were above grade, they would not count towards the building height. Commissioner Johnson asked how many existing curb cuts are o n the block. Mr. Mangum responded that the block-face has an existing circular drive which has two curb cuts. The proposed porte-cochere would add a third two-way curb cut. Mr. Permann then provided a summary and reasoning for the proposed development stating that it is a culmination of a vision for the Merion property. He explained that the team met with neighbors and stakeholders to find a common ground and in many cases was able to do so. He then referenced a policy article by Benjamin Schneider that pointed to the need for density in cities which would create a smaller carbon footprint and encourage more bicycling and walking and encouraged Evanston to embrace this idea. Mr. Permann pointed out that the project is self -financed. With regards to public benefits, he stated that no formalized formula is in place for determining public benefits and that no other project is providing the quantifiable amount of this project. Mr. Tim Kent provided a review of the site and proposed changes between the origin al submission and the current proposal, with concentration on the height. He explained that if four levels of parking were above ground the height could get up to 185 ft. but the proposed project is below ground enabling more activation of the façade. Chair Isaac opened the hearing to questions from the Commission. Page 38 of 56 P1.Page 249 of 506 APPROVED Page 3 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 Commissioner Lindwall inquired about the 12 in. residential window overhang, why they were necessary and if it could cause a hazard with falling ice. Mr. Kent replied that those bay windows are part of the articulation of the building façade and they are similar to the windows on the building to the north. There will likely not be issues with falling snow as the canopies on the ground floor would extend further than the bay windows. Commissioner Lindwall asked how the valet system would work. Mr. Kent stated there would be 18 hour per day access to valet but residents would also be able to self -park. Commissioner Lindwall then asked how the public would access the electric vehicle charging stations. Mr. Kent responded that the stations would be free and the valet would take the vehicle and plug it into the charging station. Commissioner Lindwall asked what conflicts are anticipated with the Whole Foods access and traffic turning in and out of that drive, also would there be any difference in peak hours given the difference in a residential use versus a grocery store with steady traffic throughout the day. Mr. Michael Werthmann with KLOA stated that the traffic count conducted showed that the majority of customers follow the “no left turn” that is at the Whole Foods parking lot exit. The Merion would be restricted to right -only exits; left- ins would be ok and would cross the existing bike lane. Mr. Permann added that the owner is willing to accept recommendations on restricting left turns into or out of the porte-cochere. Commissioner Lindwall then asked how construction will be handled with the protected bike lane and busy alley. Mr. Kent responded that a Construction Management Plan would need to be submitted that outlines specific plans. That is currently in the preliminary stages but will work with the City to minimize impact. Commissioner Lindwall then asked if the City will be compensated for the loss of parking spaces for the porte - cochere. Mr. Kent responded that the City will be compensated for the parking spaces. Commissioner Halik asked if there will be any additional safety measures installed at the entry to the porte-cochere. Mr. Kent confirmed that there will be and pointed to a prelim inary plan for them. There will be a site clearance triangle, raised bike lane and additional signage and lighting at the entry/exit. Mr. Permann added that a tour of the existing curb cuts along the existing bike lane was done and that there are 20 curb c uts, many lacking warning enhancements at conflict points. Commissioner Halik then asked if any assistance would be offered to the existing businesses in the one story building. Mr. Michael responded that there are currently only two viable businesses in that building due to the ongoing pandemic and other issues. Talks have been entertained with Found to locate in the new development. Commissioner Westerberg stated that the allowable height could go to 145 ft. and asked if the additional height mentioned could be from parking. Mr. Mangum confirmed that the building could be 145 feet with a site development allowance and if parking was above ground it would not count towards zoning height calculation. Page 39 of 56 P1.Page 250 of 506 APPROVED Page 4 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 Commissioner Halik asked if the deduction of height for parking levels was particular to downtown districts. Mr. Mangum confirmed that this was the case for the D2, D3 and D4 Downtown Districts and it is limited to 40 ft. or 4- stories, whichever is less. Chair Isaac clarified that the base height allowed is 105 ft. with a possible development allowance to get up to 145 ft. and if 4 levels of parking were above ground that would create a 185 ft. building height. The applicant is proposing 185 ft. in height with below grade parking. He then asked if an option with above ground parking was chosen, how that would change the unit count and FAR. Mr. Kent responded that the FAR would go down to approximately 6.7 with the loss of approximately 50 dwelling units. Chair Isaac then opened the hearing to questions from the public. Ms. Linda Del Bosque asked what the need is for senior housing and if any type of care will be provided. Mr. Permann responded that the proposed building would be all independent living and they intend to use the new building as a conduit into the existing Merion buildings as they age. He then referenced the Sawgrass study which showed an increasing demand for senior housing and that Evanston would need to meet the demand also taking into account the new senior living/care facilities. Ms. Del Bosque then inquired if the applicant would be willing to become a CCRC building instead of an active senior living building since that is a need. Mr. Permann responded that the owner and development team are not in the business of CCRC facilities. Mr. Bob Froetscher asked if the applicant had considered a zoning change as was discussed at the February 26th Plan Commission meeting and if citizen comments had been read. Mr. Permann responded that meetings had been arranged with those who made comments and discussions were held with some of those residents. Mr. Meek added that a rezoning had been considered and that the only district that w ould work would be the D3 District which the team felt would be similar to spot zoning and since the building has a lowered height it was within the reach of the current zoning district. Mr. Carl Klein asked if the development team had been in consultation with the Preservation Commission staff since the development is close to a designated historic district and may affect the view shed of those properties. Mr. Meek responded that the development team had not been asked to do that by staff and clarified th at the team has been in contact with the church which is within the historic district. Mr. Klein stated that the development is supposed to comply with the Comprehensive Plan and historic preservation is a part of that. Mr. Meek replied that the application does not address that directly since the proposal is not in the historic district but it does address general goals of the plan. Ms. Sue Loellbach, of Connections for the Homeless, stated that the project was introduced in 2017 and asked if there is a limit on how long the old inclusionary housing Page 40 of 56 P1.Page 251 of 506 APPROVED Page 5 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 ordinance would apply. Mr. Mangum responded that the application had been submitted prior to the activation of the current IHO regulations. If a project were to be under review for a longer time, the project would have to be analyzed to see what current requirements would be required and if there is a deficient application. Ms. Kiera Kelly asked if the new building would be age restricted. Mr. Kent replied that it would not be age restricted but marketed to a certain age. Ms. Kelly asked why it would not be designated as such. Mr. Michael responded that there are legal implications with a restriction. The current addition markets to a certain age with amenities that are offered including valet, dining facilities and programming so the senior restriction was not deemed necessary. Ms. Kelly stated that there is an overabundance of luxury residential high -rises and that it seems it would be possible to have another without the designation. Mr. Michael referred to the offerings provided in the buildings and that a good unit mix is being paid attention to keep the building geared towards seniors. Ms. Kelly stated that Covid-19 has been shaping senior living and asked if the applicant was concerned with this. Mr. Michael responded that that could probably be said for a variety of markets and that the team is optimistic that we will come out of the pandemic and the demand will be there. There will be design implemented to protect residents including modifying elevators to being touchless and having sanitation stations. Ms. Kelly then asked if the applicant had considered upping the current inclusionary housing ordinance (IHO) offering to comply with new IHO requirements. Mr. Michael responded no and that the project is offering the second largest contribution to the affordable housing fund in addition to providing 5% of the development’s construction costs. Ms. Kelly asked if there was a tenant for the ground floor building. Mr. Michael mentioned the current European Wax business in the existing building and added that there would be 2,800 sq. ft. of retail proposed in the new building. Chair Isaac then alerted the public of the ability to request a continuance. Hearing no request, he then opened the hearing to public testimony. Mr. Matt Feldman read a prepared statement that was submitted in the meeting packet. He mentioned living on the block and asked, given the project was submitted several years ago, when the project should be required to meet current IHO requi rements. He then quoted the staff memorandum regarding the lack of public benefits and asked that the Commission consider this and questions regarding the bike lane. Mr. Dennis Harder stated that he works in the field and understands the developer’s perspective. He added that his previously prepared statement still stands explaining that the proposed public benefits are grossly inadequate and the zoning allowances Page 41 of 56 P1.Page 252 of 506 APPROVED Page 6 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 requested are out of sync with the underlying zoning parameters. He urged denial of the project. Ms. Linda Del Bosque stated that she is running for Alderman and is thinking about her constituents. She is concerned about a domino effect of tall development and looking at aging in place. The City should look into organizations that offer more comprehensive care for seniors. She added that she appreciates what the applicant is doing but that she does not see the need in Evanston and that more CCRC offerings should be considered. Mr. William Brown, Chair of Board of Trustees of First Methodist Churc h, stated that there are 650 members in the church. He thanked Horizon Realty for sharing their plans and explained that the developer met with the Merion owners and development team over the summer and appreciated it. He expressed concerns about the build ing being overbearing on the adjacent historic district and being 20 ft. away from the church and it is troubling that it is on the east side of Chicago Avenue. He stated that the real reason for the building height is to maximize return on investment, not construction costs. He then stated that the alley is busy and church members can be locked into or out of the parking lot for up to 20 minutes when there are trucks blocking access. Another development would add to the congestion. Mr. Bob Froetscher stated that he purchased property to enliven the downtown and depends on the zoning to be upheld and protect their health and real estate investments. DAPR voted against the development and it does not meet standards or guidelines. He added that the parking s leight-of-hand should not be allowed to rule the day. Mr. Carl Klein stated that the development impedes on the church across the alley and asked the Commission please apply the standards to this project. He then provided a review of the applicable plans and historic district details and recommended that the proposed project be denied. Ms. Bonnie Wilson, who was on the Age Friendly Task Force and currently on the Joining Forces for Affordable Housing Committee of Connections for the Homeless, referenced the Sawgrass report on senior housing and the market demand for more affordable senior units. She expressed that the proposed development should provide 20% on-site affordable units. Ms. Loellbach stated that there is a projected gap for affordable units f or seniors and Jones Lang LaSalle shows 40% vacancy and slower absorption rate for market rate units. There is an opportunity to provide affordable housing for seniors with those available units. She then expressed that since the application submission, ne w information has been provided and the project should be denied or insist that affordable units be provided on-site Page 42 of 56 P1.Page 253 of 506 APPROVED Page 7 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 Ms. Kelly referred to the May memo review and stated that she does not want this project to be left to Council to decide as they do not fully review or know the code. She continued, saying that the zoning district is D4 a transition district, not D3, that the site development allowances are too high and that the public benefits are too limited. The intent of the D4 district is not met and the development is essentially extending the D3. She added that she uses the existing bike path with her children and th e development is not worth the damage and safety issues that could come from it. Developers should not guide downtown planning and Covid-19 has exposed vacancies and encouraged that existing businesses not be removed. Chair Isaac then closed the hearing and the Commission began deliberation. Chair Isaac asked for clarification on if IHO payments are considered a public benefit and if the applicant relying on the older version of the IHO would be germane to the Commission’s considerations. Mr. Mangum replied that meeting IHO requirements are not considered a public benefit and that it would not be under the purview of the Plan Commission. Chair Isaac then reminded the Commission that there are two items under consideration, the subdivision and Major Adjustment of the existing planned development and the proposed planned development. Commissioner Halik inquired about the height consideration and what development allowances exist that allow the height to go from 105 ft. to 145 ft. Mr. Mangum responded that the 40 ft. is the site development allowance that can be requested Commissioner Lindwall clarified if the adoption of the 2009 Downtown Plan included adoption of the recommended zoning regulations. Mr. Mangum replied that the Plan was adopted but the zoning regulations were not. Chair Isaac stated that he has no issues with the Subdivision and increased FAR within the proposed adjustment as it is below the maximum allowed. Other Commissioners agreed. Commissioner Halik stated that he has no strong feelings about the porte-cochere but that the height and FAR are a big ask and this is not enough of a step down in height. He acknowledged that if the parking were above ground, a higher building would be allowed. The proposed development does not follow the spi rit of the D4 District zoning. Chair Isaac stated that the building could go to 145 ft. but 40 ft. would have to be dedicated to parking. The building would probably be thinner and less imposing upon residential property to the east. Additional clarificat ion was provided regarding the calculation of building height. Commissioner Lindwall stated that she recalled the 1989 Downtown Plan and that one of the reasons for enacting the D4 District was for potential development sites and Page 43 of 56 P1.Page 254 of 506 APPROVED Page 8 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 enacting generous allowances to encourage development of these sites. There was some concern from residents but there was a conscious decision of the City Council. The Plan was to have 6 to 10 story buildings. She added that unless there are significant public benefits, the ask is not justified and should not be allowed. Commissioner Westerberg asked if allowances are allowed when do you actually have a non-abrupt transition. This seems larger and more massive than the public benefits would justify. Commissioner Hewko inquired about the process for site development allowances. Mr. Mangum responded that section 6-3-6-5 states the ability to request site development allowances but there are no criteria for the site development allowances themselves. Commissioner Halik stated that given the FAR the architect did a commendable job of arranging the massing and he wanted to compliment the architect on that effort. Chair Isaac agreed and added that if the building were 10 stories with 1 floor of parking he would feel better about the development. He added that he does not have much of an issue with the porte-cochere and is disappointed that the developer felt the proposed reduction of two floors would address his concerns. Commissioner Johnson expressed that he is inclined to support the project. It is not within the D3 District but is across the street from it with a similar height. He supports the buried parking with more active ground floor use and the transit oriented development is appropriate character for the site. There is a need for more traditional retail and residents in the downtown and this development could provide that on an underutilized property. He appreciates the changes made but would like to see greater public accommodation. Chair Isaac questioned the lack of transition. Commissioner Johnson responded that this is a traditional/transitional area must be somewhere and it is incongruent at this site as it is very close to residential zoning. He added that some residents live in those residential districts because they are close to that boundary line. Chair Isaac stated that he does not think there is an issue with the subdivision and that the one-story parcel is underutilized, a brief discussion of a step-down on the building heights followed. Commissioner Johnson stated that a step down would be better; however, inclined to say the proposal presented today is better even with the consideration of a stepdown. Chair Isaac stated that being asked to vote separately on the subdivision of the property shows there is a possibility to increase the use of the parcel. This is not an all or nothing decision. Commissioner Lindwall stated that the Commission should look not just look at the transition from D3 to D4 but also at what else is on the eas t side of Chicago Avenue as Page 44 of 56 P1.Page 255 of 506 APPROVED Page 9 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 there are already established heights and character on that block. The single -story building has been a redevelopment candidate for decades but does not think this development is the answer. Clarification was provided on which standards apply to each agenda item. The Commission then reviewed the standards for item 4A (Subdivision and Major Adjustment to a Planned Development and found that the applicable standards had been met, noting that parking had not substantially changed. Commissioner Halik made a motion to recommend approval of the subdivision and major adjustment to the existing planned development. Seconded by Commissioner Westerberg. A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved, 6-0. Ayes: Isaac, Halik, Hewko, Lindwall, Johnson, Westerberg Nays: The Commission then reviewed the standards for 4B. With regards to the Special Use standards, there was some disagreement on whether or not the proposal fully followed recommendations and guidelines within the Downtown Plan and the D4 district, if the proposal would cause a negative cumulative effect and create additional traffic congestion with regards to the alley. With regards to the Planned Development guidelines in the D4 the standards regarding the p roposal meeting bulk standards and being compatible with existing policies and plans were not met. Commissioner Lindwall made a motion to recommend denial. There was no second so she withdrew her motion. Commissioner Hewko stated he is inclined to support the project if conditions are added and suggested adding amendments . Commissioner Hewko then made a motion to approve the proposed planned development. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson. Commissioner Hewko then made a motion to add an amendment that the 9 conditions of approval as presented by staff be added as part of the original recommendation of approval in addition to complying with IHO regulations. A brief discussion followed regarding requiring conformance with the current IHO requirem ents. Mr. Mangum stated that in previous projects, the Legal Department has stated that IHO is not within the purview of the Plan Commission. Mr. George confirmed and stated that with regards to affordable housing he does not have a definitive answer but is leaning towards no. Page 45 of 56 P1.Page 256 of 506 APPROVED Page 10 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 Commissioner Hewko then withdrew language regarding the IHO requirements and made a motion to add an amendment that the 9 conditions of approval as presented by staff be added as part of the recommendation of approval. Seconded by Commissioner Lindwall. Ayes: Isaac, Halik, Hewko, Lindwall, Johnson, Westerberg Nays: Commissioner Lindwall made a motion to amend the previous motion to include a 10th condition for the applicant work with staff to resolve any issues related to left turns conflicting with the Whole Foods drive. Commissioner Hewko seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed, 5-1. Ayes: Isaac, Hewko, Lindwall, Johnson, Westerberg Nays: Halik A roll call vote was then taken on the original motion as amended and the vote failed, 2-4. Ayes: Hewko, Johnson Nays: Isaac, Halik, Lindwall, Westerberg 5. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. 6. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Westerberg made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Chair Isaac seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved by voice vote 6 -0. The meeting was adjourned at 10:02 pm. Respectfully Submitted, Meagan Jones Neighborhood and Land Use Planner Community Development Department Page 46 of 56 P1.Page 257 of 506 APPROVED Page 1 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 MEETING MINUTES PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, February 26, 2020 7:00 P.M. Evanston Civic Center, 2100 Ridge Avenue, James C. Lytle Council Chambers Members Present: Peter Isaac (Chair), Carol Goddard, George Halik, Brian Johnson, Andrew Pigozzi, Jane Sloss Members Absent: Jennifer Draper, John Hewko Staff Present: Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Manager Meagan Jones, Neighborhood and Land Use Planner Brian George, Assistant City Attorney Presiding Member: Chair Isaac 1. CALL TO ORDER / DECLARATION OF QUORUM Chair Isaac called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Ms. Jones called the roll and a quorum was established. 2. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: Minutes will be available at the next Plan Commission meeting. 3. NEW BUSINESS ….. B. Subdivision & Major Adjustment to a Planned Development 1619 Chicago Avenue 19PLND-0059 The applicant, Horizon Realty Group, submits for a subdivision and Major Adjustment to a Planned Development in the D4 Downtown Transition District. The requested adjustment will increase FAR from 3.15 to 4.2, increase parking spaces from 32 (23 on -site, 9 leased) to 38 (all leased off - site), and a decrease in total number of units from 205 to 186 (includes 65 dwelling units). No new site development allowance will be needed. C. Planned Development 1621 Chicago Avenue 18PLND-0112 The applicant, Horizon Realty Group, submits a planned development application to construct a 19-story apartment building with 240 units, 85 Page 47 of 56 P1.Page 258 of 506 APPROVED Page 2 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 subterranean parking spaces, and approximately 3,540 sq. ft. of ground floor retail space in the D4 Downtown Transition District. Site development allowances are being requested for: 1) a building height of 211 ft. 8 in. where 105 ft. is allowed), 2) an FAR of 11.62 where a maximum of 5.4 is allowed, 3) 240 dwelling units where 54 is maximum is allowed, 4) 85 parking spaces where a minimum 185 is required, and 5) 1 short loading berth where 2 short loading berths are required. In addition, the applicant may seek and the Plan Commission may consider additional Site Development Allowances as may be necessary or desirable for the proposed development. Mr. Scott Mangum provided an overview of the proposed subdivision, describing the existing Merion development, which includes a 2013 addition, and what zoning characteristics would change as a result of the subdivision. No physical changes would occur to the existing Merion residences. Mr. Mangum then gave an overview of the proposed planned development to be at the site currently consisting of a one-story commercial building. chair Isaac asked for questions from the Commission to staff. Hearing none, he asked the applicant to provide their presentation The applicant, Mr. Jeff Michael of Horizon Realty Group, then provided an introduction of the development team including Danny Michael who is the founder of Horizon Realty Group, Tim Kent of Pappageorge Haymes, Michael Werthmann of KLOA, David Meek of Becker Guerian and Jonathan Perman, the public affairs strategist for the project. Mr. Jeff Michael provided an overview of history Horizon Realty Group and of the existing development with the Northshore Hotel Residence celebrating its 100 year anniversary. Horizon Realty Group are long term owners of the site and choose to keep the site for seniors. The proposed development is intended to keep a “senior campus” feel with synergies between the new and existing buildings. The new development will have access to the amenities in the existing buildings. He added that the site is underutilized and there is a demand for additional housing for seniors. The development is expected to generate $1.6 million in recurring tax revenue and will provide a substantial amount of money for the affordable housing fund. Mr. Tim Kent then spoke about the development details. He described the existing site and its surroundings and stated that, once built out, the new building will act as a continuation of the existing buildings and their function. He stated that the design of the building is intended to be understated and complementary to existing development with the massing being broken up as the building height increases. He then described the building materials and façade. Mr. Kent then described the 1 st floor plan which includes retail space, ‘”back of house” uses and a porte-cochere which provides access to the lobby, the below-grade parking levels and a space for pick-ups/drop-offs off of Chicago Page 48 of 56 P1.Page 259 of 506 APPROVED Page 3 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 Avenue. He briefly reviewed the floor plans of the additional levels and described the parking which provides .35 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Mr. Jonathan Perman spoke providing some general demographic information including that Evanston’s population has been largely the same since the 1950’s and the proposed development will add .5% to the population. He explained that there is demand for senior housing. He added that available parking is 1.2 parking spaces per unit with a .9 parking space per unit demand. He then described the proposed porte - cochere, explaining that it is safer than the narrow shared alley and takes deliveries and pick-ups/drop-offs off of the s treet. He added that there are a number of existing curb cuts on the block and along the existing bike path and the City does not have a formal policy on curb-cuts. Mr. Perman then briefly reviewed the fiscal impact study and stated that the project fits the character of the block, and stands with Comprehensive Plan’s goals for increased housing for seniors. He finished stating that the public benefits proposed meet the site development allowances and the project is a fiscal win. Chair Isaac stated that there is the opportunity for residents living within 1,000 ft. of the site are able to submit a written request for continuance. None was submitted. He then opened the hearing to questions from the Commission. Commissioner Halik stated that he understands breaking down the massing and even though building across the street is taller, it looks lighter. He then asked if the applicant had considered a lighter colored base and darker color for the tower as this might give a different impression regarding the siz e. Mr. Kent replied that that option had been looked at and is being considered. He added that earlier iterations of the project had been taller and thinner. Mr. Halik stated that a lot of the concern is with the height of the building but not having a squat building. Commissioner Sloss stated that statements were made that the provided benefits are inherent to the development and asked if there had been any consideration of additional public benefits? Mr. Michael stated that the development team believes that they aligned and exceeded what has been done and are proportional to what is proposed. They are open to considering other public benefits. Commissioner Halik inquired about what the Mather parking ratio is. Mr. Michael responded that he was not certain of the ratio for that development. Mr. Danny Michael stated that transportation is provided at the existing Merion development and the same is intended for the new building. He added that most of the existing residents do not want to deal with cars so transportation is provided. Mr. Mangum stated that there are 169 units and 139 parking spaces at 1727 Oak which is limited to people 55 years of age and up. Mr. Perman stated that the development team would be open to renting additional spaces at the Church Street garage if they find additional parking is needed. Chair Isaac referred to the earlier statistic regarding 1.2 Page 49 of 56 P1.Page 260 of 506 APPROVED Page 4 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 parking spaces per unit provided and a point .9 space per unit demand. The proposed building proposed .35 per unit. Mr. Werthmann stated that the .9 parking space per unit demand statistic is for all of downtown versus for just a 55+ population which tends to not have the same demand. Chair Isaac then pointed out that the proposed building is not being restricted to 55 and over. Mr. Michael added that there is 50% vehicle ownership in all of the 28 buildings Horizon Realty Group owns. The building will target an older population through marketing. Commissioner Goddard expressed concerns regarding the height. She understands the need to have a certain number of units to justify the investment risk for a mixed-use development and wondered if the building were not for seniors would there be no need for the height? Mr. Michael replied no and revenue needed is based on the number of units and leasable spaces. The margin begins to get too tight. Mr. Meek added that the below grade parking added a significant cost and the porte -cochere creates a loss of leasable space. Commissioner Johnson inquired about the current alley conditions. Mr. Michael responded that the alley is largely commercial use and is both narrow, congested and in disrepair. Additionally, turning radii would be tight even before factoring in snow. He added that the Davis Street Fishmarket space is currently empty but added to congestion when it was open. Mr. Perman then pointed out the safety of the porte - cochere versus crossing existing bike lanes multiple times if the entry were off of the alley. Commissioner Johnson then asked if there would be more congestion created with one loading berth versus two which would enable delivery vehicles into a loading berth instead of stopping in the alley. Chair Isaac added to the question, revisiting the statement regarding tight turning radii and inquired how wide the proposed loading berth is and if turning studies had been conducted. Mr. Kent confirmed this had been done and delivery and trash vehicles are able to make that turn. He then stated that the dashed line in the diagram is the required size, the actual space is larger and a door can be chosen which enables easier entry. Commissioner Johsnon asked if there is anything suggesting senior building use of loading is more or less. Mr. Michael replied that tu rnover is typically less in senior buildings with a retention rate of 80%. They also typically have fewer items. Residents would be able to use the Merion’s loading. Commissioner Halik asked if the retail space would also need loading and if an additional dock would work. Mr. Michael replied that it can be looked at. Page 50 of 56 P1.Page 261 of 506 APPROVED Page 5 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 Chair Isaac stated that delivery and loading appears to be in a restricted part of the alley and asked what the plan would be for retail deliveries. Mr. Kent responded that a 2 nd loading dock may work and that there is a doorway south of the proposed loading dock that is an exit only door and not meant to be an access door that could be used for deliveries. He added that there are 4 to 5 commercial tenants in the existing building; the new building would only have one so delivery amounts would likely be lower. Chair Isaac asked how many existing spaces are behind the current commercial building. Mr. Michael responded that there are 18 spaces with additional spaces leased at the Church Street garage. Mr. Danny Michael stated that currently many of those spaces are used by the commercial tenants in the one-story building which would be removed should the proposed development be constructed. Chair Isaac then asked how many current tenants of The Merion have cars. Mr. Michael responded less than 10. Commissioner Pigozzi stated there are a number of high-rises dealing with deliveries. Mr. Michael stated that the porte-cochere will keep much of these deliveries on-site and off of the street. Mr. W erthmann responded that only smaller vehicles will use the porte - cochere. Larger vehicles will use the loading dock. Chair Isaac then opened the hearing to questions from the public. Mr. Bob Froetscher asked if a model was run that would meet the zoning requirements and if so what did it show and why was it not used. Mr. Michael replied that many models had been run but did not meet the rate of return in relation to the risk and fiscal needs. Mr. Froetscher then asked if the applicant knew the existing zo ning and if they assumed they could get the City to change the zoning. Mr. Michael responded yes they knew the zoning but did not assume the zoning could be changed. The development is part of a greater vision for the properties. Ms. Libby Hill stated that a letter was sent to the applicant with questions including if the building will comply with LEED 55 standards and asking for clarification on the balconies and if the lower level glass will reflect greenery. Mr. Kent responded that they intend to comply with LEED 55 standards, that balconies will be wrought iron and that the lower levels will comply with LEED 55 standards. Chair Isaac opened the hearing to public comment. Mr. William Brown, a member of First United Methodist Church which has been in existence since 1870, stated that only with this project has there been an issue and there is not one member of the church board that is comfortable with what is proposed; requests show no regard for zoning. The building will begin to create a canyon effect with the building across the street and the alley is bad now and will likely be worse with Page 51 of 56 P1.Page 262 of 506 APPROVED Page 6 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 the proposed development. He finished by saying that members of the adjacent Church will be vocal in opposition and encouraged the Commission to be thoughtful. Ms. Martha Rudy stated that Mr. Perman’s comment of no one disagreeing with the project is false and there are many who do not support the proposed development. She expressed that fear tactics are being used in order to get approval for the site development allowances. She added that the east alley was a de facto borderline for downtown with a promise of no taller buildings being built east of Chicago Avenue; if a zoning change is needed then that should be done. Mr. Bob Froetscher stated that the building height and number of dwelling units are his main concerns as both are well above maximum permitted amounts. Other buildings on the block are 8 or 9 stories with a transition established. He added that he and other residents expected the density to be adhered to and that the carbon footprint would not be an issue if there was not as much density. He then stated that developing housing to fill the City parking garages does not make sense. Chicago is losing residents but Evanston is ok. Do not be confused by “hand waving”. Ms. Ellen Feldman expressed that the zoning requests are a major issue and the east side of Chicago Avenue is not the Chicago lakefront. The building is not in scale or context with the rest of the neighborhood. The area is zoned to be a transition district. Ms. Feldman added that in her building at 522 Chicago Ave there are a number of older residents and most own vehicles. Her building has two garages with a 1 to 1 ratio of units to parking spaces. More density would make exiting her building garage difficult. She then recalled that the original plan was over 30 stories, then was reduced to 14 stories and is now 19 stories. Chair Isaac closed the public hearing and the Commission began deliberation. Commissioner Halik stated that there are positive things about the theme, planning, the porte-cochere and possible additional loading dock. He suggested that the applicant still consider shading and color of the building materials. He added that he considered both sides of Chicago Avenue for the massing, although the zoning district changes in the middle of the street. The zoning requests are an issue and a rezoning of the property should be considered as the proposed allowances are too large. Commissioner Johnson agreed with Commissioner Halik and stated that he likes the project. It is a transit oriented development that will bring potential shoppers but he cannot vote in favor of the project due to the zoning and the large ask for the site development allowances. Allowances should be granted for small variances. A zoning change should be sought. Commissioner Sloss stated that she generally agrees and that there is a lot being asked for in context of a variance. Page 52 of 56 P1.Page 263 of 506 APPROVED Page 7 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 Chair Isaac stated that there can be an argument made re garding the parking as the building will be geared towards older residents but he feels the parking is still inadequate. The amount of units is not appropriate. Commissioner Goddard stated that she has not seen such a large scale building proposed with such a small amount of return. The previous proposal was significantly smaller than this and proposed significantly more in public benefits. Commissioner Pigozzi stated that he felt the 1555 Ridge project was mediocre but was better than the existing parking lot. He then expressed that the design for the proposed Merion development is as good as he has seen but not as tall as the Park Evanston. He stated that it is expensive to construct below -grade parking and that the developer has made that effort. He rec alled other projects and mentioned that the building on Elgin Road started off with a good design and as the zoning issues got whittled away the design suffered. He stated that he hoped that the Commission could find a way to approve the project and that the staff report does not provide a rationale for denial. Mr. Mangum responded that rationale is provided within the staff report, relating to the building height, number of units, FAR, and lack of parking (though below grade parking is good) as well as the lack of public benefits in relation to the site development allowances being requested. It does not align with existing plans. Commissioner Pigozzi stated that recommendations have been inconsistent. Chair Isaac stated that the property is served by an alley. He would like to move access traffic to the alley but does like the idea of the porte-cochere and does not view it as a negative aspect of the project. Commissioner Halik stated that recommendations should be based on plans that are in place, giving the proposed Emerson Street rezoning as an example. Though he was in agreement, he did not think the rezoning should occur based on existing plans for the area. Chair Isaac asked if the applicant would like to move forward, withdraw the application from the meeting or come back at a later meeting date with changes to the design elements. A discussion then followed regarding possible options for the applicant. The applicant opted to look at making revisions and return to the Commission at a future meeting date. Due to the need to possibly revise zoning documents and provide notice, it was recommended that the applicant come back for the April Plan Commission meeting. The applicant requested to come back to the April 8th Plan Commission meeting. Page 53 of 56 P1.Page 264 of 506 APPROVED Page 8 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 Commissioner Goddard made a motion to continue this item to the April 8th Plan Commission meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Pigozzi. A voice vote was taken and the motion was approved, 6-0. Ayes: Isaac, Goddard, Halik, Johnson, Pigozzi, Sloss Nays: 5. PUBLIC COMMENT Chair Isaac acknowledged that this is the last meeting for Commissioners Goddard and PIgozzi and thanked them for their service. There was no public comment provided. 6. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Goddard made a motion to adjourn the meeting. C ommissioner Pigozzi seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion was approved by voice vote 6 -0. The meeting was adjourned at 10:58 pm. Respectfully Submitted, Meagan Jones Neighborhood and Land Use Planner Community Development Department Page 54 of 56 P1.Page 265 of 506 To: Johanna Leonard, Community Development Director From: David Stoneback, Public Works Agency Director Lara Biggs, P.E., Bureau Chief – Capital Planning / City Engineer Subject: Subdivision of 1605 – 1631 Chicago Avenue Public Works Director Report Date: October 19, 2020 Upon review of the proposed subdivision, and as required by Section 4-11-1 of the City Code, the Public Works Agency Director and the City Engineer submit the following report for the new subdivision located at 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue. Right-of-Way to be Dedicated to the City of Evanston None. Infrastructure Easements to be Granted to the City of Evanston None. Public Improvements to be Constructed on Behalf of the City of Evanston Sidewalk : Any new construction on either of the subdivided lots shall result in the public sidewalk adjacent to the lots being replaced in entirety with new sidewalk meeting the City standard for business districts which is concrete construction with a brick ribbon parallel to the curb line. Sewer: Lot 1 and Lot shall be served by separate sewer services. There is a 10” combined sewer located on Chicago Avenue and a 12-inch combined sewer located in the alley behind the proposed lot. Utilizing the sewer main on Chicago Avenue is preferred. If the existing sewer service for either lot is not reused, it will need to be capped at the sewer main. If there is any new construction, all s tormwater from the entire lot will need to be retained on site and released at a controlled rate of 0.15 cfs to the Chicago Avenue combined sewer in compliance with the City of Evanston Stormwater Control Ordinance. Water: For Lot 1, the existing building is served from a 24” water main located on Davis Street. For Lot 2, the existing building is served by a 4” tap off of the 8” water main Memorandum Page 55 of 56 P1.Page 266 of 506 located in Chicago Avenue. If Lot 2 is developed and this tap is not reused, it will need to be capped at the water main. In addition, a separate tap for the new fire service at Lot 2 will need to be installed off of the Chicago water main. Bond Requirements to Guarantee Future Infrastructure Improvements None. Other Requirements No curb cut off of Chicago Avenue will be allowed for Lot 2. Vehicular access shall be from the alley behind the building. Page 56 of 56 P1.Page 267 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Planning and Development Committee From: Meagan Jones, Neighborhood and Land Use Planner CC: Johanna Nyden, Community Development Director; Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Administrator Subject: Ordinance 98-O-20, Approving a Major Adjustment to a Planned Development at 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Plan Commission and staff recommend City Council adoption of a Ordinance 98 -O-20 granting a Major Adjustment to a Planned Development originally approved by Ordinance 86- O-13. The adjustment includes an increased Floor Area Ratio (FAR) from 3.15 to 4.2, increased number of parking spaces from 32 (23 on-site, 9 leased) to 38 (all leased off-site), and decrease the total number of units from 205 to 186 (including 65 dwelling units). No new site development allowance will be needed. Council Action: For Introduction Summary: Background In 2013, the existing Merion building on the northeast corner of Chicago Avenue and Davis Street, was approved for an 8-story addition to the north. The Planned Development for the addition was approved for up to 205 dwelling units, 32 parking spaces (23 o n-site, 9 leased), an FAR of 3.15 and established a special use for an Independent Living Facility. No site development allowances were needed and the development was to take place all on one 66,616.2-square foot parcel with 170.2 feet of frontage on Davis Street and 391.49 feet of frontage on Chicago Avenue. The development has since been constructed and is currently operating. No physical change is proposed for this portion of the existing property, however, the subdivision of the parcel, proposed for approval by Resolution 87-O-20, would create two parcels: a 21,644-square foot parcel with 127.1 feet of frontage on Chicago Avenue containing the existing one-story commercial building at 1621-31 Chicago Avenue (where a P2.Page 268 of 506 new development is proposed); and a 44,972.2-square foot parcel with 264.39 feet of frontage on Chicago Avenue containing the original Merion building and its addition. The change in zoning lot size triggers the need for a Major Adjustment to the 2013 planned development. By reducing the lot size the proposed adjustment would increase the FAR from 3.15 to 4.2. The applicant also proposes to increase the total number of parking spaces from 32 (23 on-site, 9 leased) to 38 (all leased off-site) and reduce the total number of units from the 205 that were originally approved to 186 (including 65 dwelling units) as constructed. No new site development allowance would be needed. As a result of the proposed change to the number of parking spaces, staff proposes that condition (B) in 86-O-13 be amended to increase the number of required leased spaces from 9 to 38 which would match the applicant’s request. This amendment would be stated in the ordinance for the proposed Major Adjustment. All other conditions as stated in ordinance 86 - O-13 will still apply should the Major Adjustment be approved. Standards of Approval The proposed development must follow the procedures for Adjustments to Development Plan in Section 6-3-6-12. It must also maintain the planned development’s satisfaction of the Standards for a Special Use (Section 6-3-5-10), the Standard for Planned Development (Section 6-3-6-9) and standards and guidelines established for Planned Developments in the D4 Downtown Transition District. (Section 6-11-1-10). Staff and the Plan Commission find that the proposed adjustment maintains the standards for approval as there are no physical changes proposed to the existing structures. No impacts are expected with regards to utilities, environmental features or architectural resources due to the proposed adjustment. The proposal will not interfere with or diminish the value of other properties in the neighborhood and maintains compatibi lity with the surrounding area. Legislative History: September 30, 2020 – Plan Commission voted to recommend approval of the subdivision and adjustment to the planned development at 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue, 6-0. A vote to recommend approval of the associated planned development failed with a 2-4 vote. Link to Plan Commission Packet for September 30, 2020 Meeting May 13, 2020 – At request of the applicant, the Commission voted to continue this item until such a time that a meeting could be held in person to continue review of the subdivision, major adjustment and associated planned development. February 26, 2020 – Plan Commission began review of the subdivision and major adjustment and then continued the hearing for these items and related planned development at the applicant’s request in order to make changes to the planned development. 18, 2019 September – DAPR unanimously recommended approval of the Committee proposed subdivision and major adjustment to the existing planned development but voted unanimously to recommend denial of the proposed planned development. Page 2 of 24 P2.Page 269 of 506 July 17, 2019 – DAPR Committee held the subdivision, major adjustment and proposed planned development in order to have the applicant make changes to their proposal. Attachments: Ordinance 98-O-20, Granting Major Adjustment to a Planned Development at 1605-1631 Chicago Ave Page 3 of 24 P2.Page 270 of 506 10/14/2020 98-O-20 AN ORDINANCE Granting A Major Adjustment to the Planned Development Located at 1605-1631 Chicago Avenue WHEREAS, the City of Evanston is a home-rule municipality pursuant to Article VII of the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and WHEREAS, as a home rule unit of government, the City has the authority to adopt ordinances and to promulgate rules and regulations that protect the public health, safety, and welfare of its residents; and WHEREAS, Article VII, Section (6)a of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, which states that the “powers and functions of home rule units shall be construed liberally,” was written “with the intention that home rule units be given the broadest powers possible” (Scadron v. City of Des Plaines , 153 Ill.2d 164); and WHEREAS, it is a well-established proposition under all applicable case law that the power to regulate land use through zoning regulations is a legitimate means of promoting the public health, safety, and welfare; and WHEREAS, Division 13 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-13-1, et seq.) grants each municipality the power to establish zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, pursuant to its home rule authority and the Illinois Municipal Code, the City has adopted a set of zoning regulations, set for th in Title 6 of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended, (“the Zoning Ordinance”); and Page 4 of 24 P2.Page 271 of 506 98-O-20 ~2~ WHEREAS, in August 2013, the City Council enacted Ordinance 86-O-13, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference, which granted a Special Use Permit for a Planned Development (the “Planned Development”) at 1611 - 1629 Chicago Avenue (the “Subject Property”), which is legally described in Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 86-O-13 approved the construction of an eight (8) story addition to the north of the existing Merion building with two hundred five (205) units, thirty-two (32) parking spaces (9 leased off-site), an FAR of 3.15, and established a special use for an Independent Living Facility, which is detailed at length in Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the Applicant, Horizon Realty Group (“the Applicant”) has proposed a subdivision of the parcel which would create two (2) parcels: one parcel containing an existing one-story commercial building and another parcel containing the existing Merion building and its addition; and WHEREAS, this change in zoning lot size triggers the need for a major adjustment to the 2013 planned development; and WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested a major adjustment that includes an increase in FAR to 4.2 from 3.15; an increase in parking spaces from thirty-two (32) to thirty-eight (38) (all leased off-site); and a reduction of units from two hundred five (205) to one hundred eighty-six (186) (including sixty-five (65) dwelling units); and Page 5 of 24 P2.Page 272 of 506 98-O-20 ~3~ WHEREAS, in order to approve the major adjustment requested, the Applicants request amendments to Ordinance 86-O-13 (the “Previously Approved Ordinance”); and WHEREAS, the Previously Approved Ordinance is a piece of legislation enacted by the City Council of the City of Evanston, subject to revision only by said City Council; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2020, May 13, 2020 and September 30, 2020, in compliance with the provisions of the Illinois Open Meetings Act (5 ILCS 120/1 et seq.) and the Zoning Ordinance, the Plan Commission held a public hearing on the application for a Major Adjustment to a Planned Development, case no. 19PLND-0059, heard extensive testimony and public comment, received other evidence, and made written minutes, findings, and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission recommended City Council approval of the application for a major adjustment; and WHEREAS, on October 26, 2020, the Planning and Development Committee (“P&D Committee”) held a meeting, in compliance with the provisions of the Illinois O pen Meetings Act (5 ILCS 120/1 et seq), during which it considered the Applicant’s request; and WHEREAS, during said meeting, the P&D Committee received input from the public, carefully deliberated on the major adjustment, and recommended approval thereof by the City Council; and Page 6 of 24 P2.Page 273 of 506 98-O-20 ~4~ WHEREAS, at its meetings on October 26, 2020 and November 9, 2020, held in compliance with the provisions of the Illinois Open Meetings Act, the City Council considered the P&D Committee’s recommendation, heard public comment, mad e findings, and adopted said recommendation; and WHEREAS, it is well-settled law in Illinois that the legislative judgment of the City Council must be considered presumptively valid (see Glenview State Bank v. Village of Deerfield, 213 Ill.App.3d 747) and is not subject to courtroom fact -finding (see National Paint & Coating Ass’n v. City of Chicago, 45 F.3d 1124), NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THAT: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are hereby found as fact and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2: Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this ordinance, the City Council hereby grants an amendment to the Special Use Permit previously authorized by Ordinance 86-O-13 to allow for the change in the zoning lot. SECTION 3: The conditions on the Special Use Permit imposed pursuant to Subsection 6-3-5-12 of the Zoning Ordinance by City Council in Ordinance 86 -O-13 remain applicable to the Planned Development, SECTION 4: Pursuant to Subsection 6-3-5-12 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council amends condition (B) of the Special Use Permit granted for the Planned Development in ordinance 86-O-13, as may be amended by future ordinance(s), and violation of any of which shall constitute grounds for penalties or Page 7 of 24 P2.Page 274 of 506 98-O-20 ~5~ revocation of said Special Use Permit pursuant to Subsection 6-3-10-5 and 6-3-10-6 of the Zoning Ordinance: (B) Parking: Pursuant to Subsection 6-16-2-1-(B)-1 of the Zoning Ordinance the Applicant shall license no less than thirty-eight (38) parking spaces, required for the Special Use Permit authorized by this ordinance, from the City in an off -street parking facility within one-thousand (1,000) feet of the Subject Property. For as long as the applicant operates said Special Use it shall maintain and keep current said licenses and shall comply with all terms thereof and any amendment thereto. SECTION 4: Except as otherwise provided for in this 98-O-20, all applicable regulations of the Ordinance 86-O-13, the Zoning Ordinance, and the entire City Code shall apply to the Subject Property and remain in full force and effect with respect to the use and development of the same. To the extent that the terms and/or provisions of any of said documents conflict with any of the terms herein, this Ordinance 98-O-20 shall govern and control. SECTION 5: When necessary to effectuate the terms, conditions, and purposes of this ordinance, “Applicant” shall be read as “Applicant and its agents, assigns, and successors in interest.” SECTION 6: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. SECTION 7: Except as otherwise provided for in this ordinance, all applicable regulations of the Zoning Ordinance and the entire City Code shall apply to Page 8 of 24 P2.Page 275 of 506 98-O-20 ~6~ the Subject Property and remain in full force and effect with respect to the use and development of the same. To the extent that the terms and provisions of any of said documents conflict with the terms herein, this ordinance shall govern and control. SECTION 8: All ordinances or parts of ordinances that are in conflict with the terms of this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 9: If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is ruled unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid application or provision, and each invalid provision or invalid application of this ordinance is severable. SECTION 10: The findings and recitals herein are hereby declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois. Introduced:_________________, 2020 Adopted:___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _____________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: _______________________________ Kelley A. Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 9 of 24 P2.Page 276 of 506 98-O-20 ~7~ EXHIBIT A Legal Description THAT PART OF LOT A DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE, 264.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AT APPROX. AT RIGHT ANGLE 170 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, 264.46 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE; 170 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION OF LOT 4 (EXCEPT THE NORTH 5 FEET THEREOF) AND ALL OF LOTS 5, 6, 7, 8 AND 9 IN BLOCK 20 IN EVANSTON, IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIP AL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PINs: 11-18-403-020-0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 521-533 Davis Street & 1605-1619 Chicago Avenue, Evanston, Illinois Page 10 of 24 P2.Page 277 of 506 98-O-20 ~8~ EXHIBIT B Ordinance 86-O-13 Page 11 of 24 P2.Page 278 of 506 Page 12 of 24 P2.Page 279 of 506 Page 13 of 24 P2.Page 280 of 506 Page 14 of 24 P2.Page 281 of 506 Page 15 of 24 P2.Page 282 of 506 Page 16 of 24 P2.Page 283 of 506 Page 17 of 24 P2.Page 284 of 506 Page 18 of 24 P2.Page 285 of 506 Page 19 of 24 P2.Page 286 of 506 Page 20 of 24 P2.Page 287 of 506 Page 21 of 24 P2.Page 288 of 506 Page 22 of 24 P2.Page 289 of 506 Page 23 of 24 P2.Page 290 of 506 Page 24 of 24 P2.Page 291 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Planning and Development Committee From: Meagan Jones, Neighborhood and Land Use Planner CC: Johanna Nyden, Community Development Director; Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Administrator Subject: Ordinance 97-O-20, Special Use for a Planned Development at 1621- 1631 Chicago Avenue Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: The Plan Commission and staff recommend denial of Ordinance 97 -O-20 for approval of a Special Use for a Planned Development to construct a 17 -story apartment building with 215 units, 85 subterranean parking spaces, and approximately 3,289 sq. ft. of ground -floor retail space in the D4 Downtown Transition District. The proposal includes the following Site Development Allowances: 1) A building height of 185 ft. where 105 ft. is allowed; 2) An FAR of 10.38 where a maximum of 5.4 is allowed; 3) 215 dwelling uni ts where 54 is the maximum is allowed; and 4) 85 parking spaces where a minimum of 162 are required. Council Action: For Introduction Summary: Site Layout The site for the proposed planned development is a slightly rectangular -shaped area with approximately 127 feet of street frontage along Chicago Avenue. The development consists of two below-grade parking levels and a ground floor with approximately 3,289 square feet of retail space, lobby area for the residences above and a porte-cochere which has an expanded internal turn-around area. The proposed building will be constructed lot line to lot line with a 12 in. overhang from residential windows beginning a t 28 ft. above grade level. A 10 ft. setback from the north property line is proposed beginning at the 2nd floor and an approximately 15 ft. setback from the south property line is proposed beginning at the 9th floor. P3.Page 292 of 506 The southwest corner of the ground floor will consist of retail space accessed from both the exterior (Chicago Ave.) and the interior of the building (the lobby for the residences). Just north of this area is lobby space for the residences, including a package room, and north of this area is the porte-cochere which is both the sole vehicular entry point to the below -grade parking and a covered area for valet, pick -ups and drop-offs for the building residents. There is also a pedestrian connection to the existing Merion development to the south. Loading and trash collection will take place within the two loading berths located off of the alley to the east of the property. Page 2 of 56 P3.Page 293 of 506 The first of the two below-grade parking levels will consist of 38 parking spaces, parking for 92 bicycles and resident storage space. The parking level below will have 47 parking spaces, parking for 11 bicycles and additional residential storage space. A total of 4 ADA accessible parking spaces will be provided. Building materials consist of brick and cast-in-place concrete on the ground floor, with the tower proposed to be painted concrete and metal. The concrete will have scored reliefs and possibly fluted to provide detail, with metal at the bay windows. Compliance with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO) The planned development application was submitted in December of 2018 and is not required to meet the current IHO requirements that went into effect on January 1, 2019. As such, the Applicant proposes to pay a fee-in-lieu of $2,400,000 which meets the previous IHO requirements. No on-site affordable units are proposed at this time. Compliance with the Zoning Ordinance The intent of the D4 General Residential District is “to provide for business infill development and redevelopment within downtown Evanston . The massing and scale of structures within the D4 district should be reflective of established uses and should provide suitable transition between downtown districts and those districts adjacent to the downtown. The district is also intended to encourage and sustain a mix of office, retail, and residential uses.” Page 3 of 56 P3.Page 294 of 506 The building will generally meet the setback requirements for the D4 Zoning District but will require an easement for the windows which extend over the public right -of-way. Additionally, the applicant requests four Site Development Allowances: Since the proposed FAR and building height are above the maximum site development allowances for planned developments, a favorable super-majority (two-thirds) vote from City Council is required unless the development were to comply with the current Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and provide 10 percent of the units on -site as affordable. Parking and Traffic The Applicant submitted a Traffic Impact Study conducted by KLOA which looked at the possible effects the proposed development may have on traffic in the area. The study noted that the site is considered a Transit Oriented Development that served by severa l nearby CTA bus lines and is within walking distance of CTA and Metra transit stations. Additionally, a two-way barrier protected bike lane runs in front of the site on the east side of Chicago Ave. Vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian counts were taken at pea k morning and evening times at several intersections and possible points of conflict, including points where Chicago Ave. intersects with various access points to other properties along that block. The study described the function of the proposed porte -cochere off of Chicago Ave, noting that it will function as both an on-site location for pick-ups/drop-offs and access to the parking garage minimizing on-street activity. It suggests that some benefits of the porte -cochere will be: easier circulation for valet service, all pick-up/drop off activity occurring in the interior of the site, controlled access in and out of the site onto northbound Chicago Avenue and less possible points of conflict between vehicles and bicyclists in the bike lane than if the ent ry were off of the alley. The total project traffic volumes included the existing traffic volume, an increase in background traffic due to ambient growth and traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development. The study concludes that given t he site’s location downtown and its proximity to transit, that the number of trips generated by the development will be minimized and that, given it will be replacing traffic generating commercial uses, the net increase in Page 4 of 56 P3.Page 295 of 506 parking generated will be reduced. The existing roadways around the development will be able to accommodate these trips and maintain a good level of service. The study did provide recommendations that would reduce impacts of the access drive to the porte -cochere on pedestrians and bicyclists including: ● Restricted outbound access to right-turn only. ● Provide signage within the bike lane and access drive to alert bicyclists and motorists of each other. ● Providing warning devices for pedestrians to alert them when vehicles are exiting. Public Benefits The applicant has committed to providing the following public benefits as part of the Planned Development proposal: 1. Contribution of 0.5% of Construction Budget to Public Projects – HRG proposes the establishment of a fund in an amount equal to the lesser of $300,000 or 0.5% of the Construction Budget that will be used to first pay for repairs to the public alley to the east of the Merion (between Davis St. and Church St.) for the purpose of improving alley use and access for its various users. The balance of the fund, if any, will be used to pay for safety enhancements to selected curb-cuts in bicycle lanes or routes that pose an elevated safety risk. 2. Promote Local Artists – Work with Evanston arts organizations to curate art from local Evanston artists to be displayed throughout the common areas of The Legacy. 3. Environmental Site Clean Up – The Merion Legacy will be developed on a site that is the subject of an NFR (former cleaner’s site). The development will enable us to remove contaminated soil and clean up a site in Evanston and eliminate potential harm to neighboring sites. 4. Electric Vehicle Charging Station – Provide one electric vehicle charging station that is available to the public for use. Additionally, provide 5% o f spaces to be EV charging stations along with an additional 15% of parking spaces to be EV ready in the case of increased demand. 5. Provide for Composting & Recycling of Waste - The Merion Legacy shall provide composting and recycling capabilities for its residents. are that items consists largely list of public proposed the that feels Staff benefits requirements, specifically benefit the development and not the general public, or are inherent to the proposed development itself. Given the extent of the fou r requested site development allowances, the requested public benefits are limited in scope. Should the City Council approve the planned development, staff recommends additional conditions as listed below and included in Ordinance 97-O-20: 1. The Applicant shall sign and agree to a Construction Management Plan (CMP) with the City of Evanston prior to issuance of the Building Permit. The CMP shall include but is not limited to the following: construction phasing/staging plans; construction hours; site access including traffic and pedestrian safety plans; contractor parking; project exhibits; construction monitoring; damage and control vibration communication and signage. 2. The proposed planned development shall substantially conform to the documents and testimony on record. Page 5 of 56 P3.Page 296 of 506 3. The Applicant shall lease a minimum of 20 additional parking spaces from the City of Evanston within the Church Street garage. 4. Building residents shall not be eligible for residential on-street parking permits. 5. Restrict outbound access from the porte-cochere to right-turn only. 6. The east adjacent alley is reconstructed to support additional traffic. 7. LEED 55 Bird-Friendly Standards will be incorporated into the proposed building. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit an easement shall be obtained for the twelve (12) inch overhang of windows into the Chicago Avenue right-of-way. 9. In compliance with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance in effect at the time of application, the applicant will pay a fee-in-lieu of $2,400,000. Such payment shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a Final Certificate of Occupancy. 10. The Applicant agrees to comply with the City of Evanston Green Building Ordinance and will obtain a LEED Silver Certification Rating for the Planned Development on the Subject Property. 11. Any material changes in the use of the building on the Subject Property must be approved as an amendment to this Planned Development in accordance with Subsection 6-3-6-12 of the Zoning Ordinance. 12. Pursuant to Subsection 6-3-6-10 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Applicant shall, at its cost, record a certified copy of this ordinance, including all exhibits attached hereto, with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, and provide proof of such recordation to the City, before the City may issue any permits pursuant to the Planned Development authorized by the terms of this ordinance. Standards of Approval The proposed development must satisfy the Standards for Special Use in Section 6 -3-5-10, the Standard for Planned Development in Section 6 -3-6-9, and the standards and guidelines established for Planned Developments in the D4 Downtown Transition District. (Section 6-11- 1-10). Staff finds that the proposed Planned Development does not meet all of the Standards for approval. Standards for Special Use (Section 6-3-5-10) A Planned Development is an eligible special use in the D4 Downtown Transition District. The proposal, while it generally follows the purposes and policies outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, contributing to a variety of housing types and the local economy , the height and density do not fit the context of adjacent properties within the same zoning district. Denser uses in close proximity are within the D3 zoning district which allows for more height and density. The proposed special use for the development will not cause a negative cumulative effect when considered in conjunction with other special uses in the area. Surrounding uses include a number of mixed-use residential buildings, retail, office, and high-density multiple- family residences. The extent of the proposed use, however, does greatly exceed what is permitted. The proposal can be adequately served by public facility infrastructure already available. Though due to the height of the building (greater than 70 feet), a dual water service will be needed. There are no significant historical and architectural resources or environmental Page 6 of 56 P3.Page 297 of 506 features present on the site. One of the public benefits of the project is the proposed remediation of the existing environmental contamination on site. The applicant submitted a traffic study that found the existing roadways will maintain a good level of service and, with recommended safety measures, the porte -cochere will aid in site circulation. As has been previously mentioned, staff is opposed to the proposed en try creating an additional conflict point along Chicago Avenue where there currently is not one. Finally, the proposal meets all zoning requirements except for the four site development allowances requested and outlined above. Standards and Guidelines for Planned Developments in R6 General Residential District (Sections 6-3-6-9 and 6-8-1-10) The proposed Planned Development use complies with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposal will greatly increase the bulk of structures on the east side of Chicago Avenue and be out of scale with other structures on that block which is within a zoning district meant to act as a transition to less intense uses on the edge of downtown and have smaller bulk. The proposal is largely consistent with th e vision and goals of the Comprehensive Plan for the redevelopment of underutilized properties with uses compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, however, the bulk of proposed development is out of scale with neighboring properties. As described above, the site layout does provide some concern to staff with the creation of a new entry off of Chicago Avenue. This creates additional conflict points between vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists, takes away on-street parking spaces and takes away from a walkable experience at the ground level. The proposed site development allowances for height, FAR and dwelling units greatly exceed the maximum site development allowances permitted without Supermajority City Council approval. Legislative History: September 30, 2020 – A motion to recommend approval of the revised planned development at 1621-1631 Chicago Avenue with conditions as listed by staff, and an added condition that the applicant work with staff resolve any issues related to left turns conflicting with the Whole Foods drive, failed with a 2-4 vote. Link to Plan Commission Packet for September 30, 2020 Meeting May 13, 2020 – At request of the applicant, The Commission voted to continue this item until such a time that a meeting could be held in person to continue review of the subdivision, major adjustment and associated planned development. February 26, 2020 – Plan Commission began review of the subdivision and major a djustment and then continued the hearing for these items and related planned development at the applicant’s request in order to make changes to the proposed planned development. Page 7 of 56 P3.Page 298 of 506 September 2019 18, – theof recommended unanimously approval DAPR Committee proposed subdivision and major adjustment to the existing planned development but voted unanimously to recommend denial of the proposed planned development. July 17, 2019 – DAPR Committee held the subdivision, major adjustment and proposed planned development in order to have the applicant make changes to their proposal. Attachments: Ordinance 97-O-20, Special Use Permit 1621 Chicago Avenue Planned Development 2.26.20 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Excerpt 9.30.20 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Page 8 of 56 P3.Page 299 of 506 10/13/2020 97-O -20 AN ORDINANCE Granting a Special Use Permit for a Planned Development Located at 1621- 1631 Chicago Avenue in the D4 Downtown Transition District WHEREAS, the City of Evanston is a home-rule municipality pursuant to Article VII of the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and WHEREAS, as a home rule unit of government, the City has the authority to adopt ordinances and to promulgate rules and regulations that protect the public health, safety, and welfare of its residents; and WHEREAS, Article VII, Section (6)a of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, which states that the “powers and functions of home rule units shall be construed liberally,” was written “with the intention that home rule units be given the broadest powers possible” (Scadron v. City of Des Plaines , 153 Ill.2d 164); and WHEREAS, it is a well-established proposition under all applicable case law that the power to regulate land use through zoning regulations is a legitimate means of promoting the public health, safety, and welfar e; and WHEREAS, Division 13 of the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/11-13-1, et seq.) grants each municipality the power to establish zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, pursuant to its home rule authority and the Illinois Municipal Code, the City has adopted a set of zoning regulations, set forth in Title 6 of the Evanston City Code of 1979, as amended, (“the Zoning Ordinance”); and Page 9 of 56 P3.Page 300 of 506 97-O-20 ~2~ WHEREAS, Horizon Realty Group (the “Applicant,”), developer of the property located at 1621-1631 Chicago Avenue, Evanston, Illinois (the “Subject Property”), legally described in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, applied, pursuant to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, specifically Section 6-3-5, “Special Uses”, Section 6-3-6, “Planned Developments”, and Subsection 6-11-1-10, “Planned Developments” in Downtown Zoning Districts, to permit the construction and operation of a Planned Development with accessory parking located at the Subject Property in the D4 Downtown Transition Zoning Dis trict (“D4 District”); and WHEREAS, the Applicant sought approval to construct a new nineteen (19) story two hundred eleven (211) foot eight (8) inch tall mixed use commercial and residential building consisting of two hundred forty (240) dwelling units, a pproximately 3,539 gross square feet of ground floor commercial space, with eighty-five (85) below grade parking spaces, and one short loading berth; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2020, in compliance with the provisions of the Illinois Open Meetings Act (5 ILCS 120/1 et seq.) and the Zoning Ordinance, the Plan Commission held a public hearing on the application for a Special Use Permit for a Planned Development, case no. 18PLND -0012, heard extensive testimony and public comment, and received other evidence before continuing the hearing to the April 8, 2020 Plan Commission meeting at the request of the Applicant; and WHEREAS, no Plan Commission meeting was convened in April of 2020 due to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic; and Page 10 of 56 P3.Page 301 of 506 97-O-20 ~3~ WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted a revised application for approval to construct a new seventeen (17) story one hundred eighty-five (185) tall mixed use commercial and residential building consisting of two hundred fifteen (215) dwelling units, approximately 3,289 gross square feet of ground floor commercial space, with eighty-five (85) below grade parking spaces and two short loading berths; and WHEREAS, at the May 13, 2020 Plan Commission meeting, the public hearing for this item was continued, with the Applicant requesting to hold review of the item to a time when the meeting could be held in person; and WHEREAS, the item was ultimately continued to a future in-person Plan Commission meeting to be determined, but due to the continuing COVID -19 pandemic, the Applicant opted to continue review of the proposal at the virtual September 30, 2020 Plan Commission meeting; and WHEREAS, the Applicant submitted minor revisions to the ground floor layout, which reconfigured the ground floor slightly, but did not lead to changes in the site development allowances; and WHEREAS, the Applicant sought approval to construct a new seventeen (17) story one hundred eighty-five (185) foot tall mixed-use building with three thousand two hundred eighty-nine (3,289) square feet of ground floor retail and two hundred fifteen (215) residential units targeting senior residents with eighty-five (85) below grade parking spaces and two short loading berths;; and WHEREAS, construction of the Planned Development, as proposed in the application, requires exception from the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance with Page 11 of 56 P3.Page 302 of 506 97-O-20 ~4~ regards to number of dwelling units per lot size, building height, flo or area ratio (“FAR”), and number of parking spaces; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 6-3-6-5 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council may grant Site Development Allowances to the normal district regulations established in the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on September 30, 2020, in compliance with the provisions of the Illinois Open Meetings Act (5 ILCS 120/1 et seq.) and the Zoning Ordinance, the Plan Commission held a public hearing on the application for a Special Use Permit for a Planned Development, case no. 18PLND-0012, heard extensive testimony and public comment, received other evidence, and made written minutes, findings, and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission’s written findings state that the application for the proposed Planned Development does not meet applicable standards set forth for Special Uses in Subsection 6-3-5-10 of the Zoning Ordinance and Planned Developments in the D4 Zoning District per Subsection 6 -11-1-10 of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission recommended City Council denial of the application with conditions; and WHEREAS, because the FAR and building height are above the maximum site development allowances for planned developments, a favorable supermajority (two-thirds) vote of the City Council is required; and WHEREAS, it is well-settled law that the legislative judgment of the City Council must be considered presumptively valid (see Glenview State Bank v. Village of Page 12 of 56 P3.Page 303 of 506 97-O-20 ~5~ Deerfield, 213 Ill.App.3d 747 (1991)) and is not subject to courtroom fact -finding (see National Paint & Coating Ass’n v. City of Chicago, 45 F.3d 1124 (7th Cir. 1995)), NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THAT: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are hereby found as facts and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2: Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this ordinance, the City Council hereby grants the Special Use Permit applied for in case no. 18PLND - 0012, to allow construction and operation of the Planned Development described herein. SECTION 3: The City Council hereby grants the following Site Development Allowances: (A) Number of Dwelling Units Per Lot Size: A Site Development Allowance is hereby granted for two hundred fifteen (215) dwelling units, whereas subsec tion 6-11-5-4 of the Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum of fifty-four (54) dwelling units for a lot sized at 21,644 sq. ft. in the D4 District. (B) Building Height: A Site Development Allowance is hereby granted for an approximately one hundred eighty-five (185) foot maximum building height, whereas subsection 6-11-5-8 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a maximum allowed building height of one hundred five (105) feet for structures containing residential units in the D4 District, with Subsection 6-11-1-10(C)(1) allowing for an additional forty (40) feet of height in the D4 District as a site development allowance. (C) Floor Area Ratio: A Site Development Allowance is hereby granted permitting a FAR of 10.38, whereas subsection 6-11-5-6 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a FAR of 5.4 for structures containing residential units in the D4 District, with Subsection 6-11-1-10(C)(2) allowing for an additional 0.6 FAR in the D4 District as a site development allowance. (D) Number of Parking Spaces: A Site Development Allowance is hereby granted permitting eighty-five (85) parking spaces on the Subject Property, whereas Table 16-B of Chapter 16 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of one Page 13 of 56 P3.Page 304 of 506 97-O-20 ~6~ hundred sixty-two (162) parking spaces on the Subject Property in the D4 District. SECTION 4: Pursuant to Subsection 6-3-5-12 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council imposes the following conditions on the Special Use Permit granted hereby, which may be amended by future ordinance(s), and violation of any of which shall constitute grounds for penalties or revocation of said Special Use Permit pursuant to Subsections 6-3-10-5 and 6-3-10-6 of the Zoning Ordinance: (A) Compliance with Applicable Requirements: The Applicant shall develop and operate the Planned Development authorized by the terms of this ordinance in substantial compliance with: the terms of this ordinance; the Site and Landscape Plans in Exhibits B and C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; all applicable legislation; the Applicant’s testimony and representations to the Design and Project Review Committee, the Plan Commission, the P&D Committee, and the City Council; and the approved documents on file in this case. (B) Construction Management Plan: The Applicant shall sign and agree to a Construction Management Plan (CMP) with the City of Evanston prior to issuance of the Building Permit. The CMP shall include but is not limited to the following: construction phasing/staging plans; construction hours; site access including traffic and pedestrian safety plans; contractor parking; damage control and vibration monitoring; construction exhibits; project communication and signage. (C) Contribution to Public Projects: The Applicant shall establish a fund in an amount equal to the lesser of $300,000 or 0.5% of the Construction Budget that will be used to first pay for repairs to or reconstruction of the public alley to the east of the Subject Property (between Davis St. and Church St.) for the purpose of improving alley use and access. The balance of the fund, if any, will be used to pay for safety enhancements to selected curb-cuts in bicycle lanes or routes that pose an elevated safety risk. (D) Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Station: The Applicant shall provide one electric vehicle charging station that is available to the public for use. Additionally, provide 5% of parking spaces to be EV charging stations along with an additional 15% of parking spaces to be EV ready in the case of increased demand. (E) Parking: The Applicant shall lease a minimum of twenty (20) additional parking spaces from the City of Evanston within the Church Street garage. Page 14 of 56 P3.Page 305 of 506 97-O-20 ~7~ (F) Building Resident Parking Permits: Building residents shall not be eligible for residential on-street parking permits. (G) Restricted Turn Movements: Outbound access from the porte cochere shall be restricted to right-turn only. (H) Harm Mitigation for Migratory Birds: LEED 55 Bird-Friendly standards will be incorporated into the proposed building. (I) Right of Way Easement: Prior to issuance of building permit an easement shall be obtained for the twelve (12) inch overhang of windows into the Chicago Avenue right-of-way. (J) Traffic Conflicts: Prior to issuance of the building permit the Applicant shall resolve any traffic conflicts relating to the access drive for the grocery store directly across the street to the satisfaction of the Director of the Public Works Agency. (K) LEED Silver Certification: The Applicant agrees to comply with the City of Evanston Green Building Ordinance and will obtain a LEED Silver Certification Rating for the Planned Development on the Subject Property. (L) Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO): The Applicant shall comply with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance in effect at the time of application, whereby ten percent (10%) of the units are affordable or pay a fee-in-lieu at the rate of one- hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per unit, with the applicant agreeing to to pay a fee-in-lieu of two million four hundred thousand dollars ($2,400,000). Such payment shall be submitted prior to issuance of a Final Certificate of Occupancy. (M) Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Approval: The Applicant shall submit an approval letter from the IEPA prior to issuance of a Final Certificate of Occupancy. Said letter must explicitly state that any and all environmental contamination has been remedied and/or removed. (N) Promote Local Artists: The Applicant shall work with Evanston arts organizations to curate art from local Evanston artists to be displayed throughout the common areas of the Subject Property. (O) Changes in Building Use: Any material changes in the use of the building on the Subject Property must be approved as an amendment to this Planned Development in accordance with Subsection 6-3-6-12 of the Zoning Ordinance. (P) Recordation: Pursuant to Subsection 6-3-6-10 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Applicant shall, at its cost, record a certified copy of this ordinance, including all exhibits attached hereto, with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, and provide proof of such recordation to the City, before the City may issue any permits pursuant to the Planned Development authorized by the terms of this ordinance. Page 15 of 56 P3.Page 306 of 506 97-O-20 ~8~ SECTION 5: When necessary to effectuate the terms, conditions, and purposes of this ordinance, “Applicant” shall be read as “Applicant’s tenants, agents, assigns, and successors in interest.” SECTION 6: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. SECTION 7: Except as otherwise provided for in this ordinance, all applicable regulations of the Zoning Ordinance and the entire City Code shall apply to the Subject Property and remain in full force and effect with respect to the use and development of the same. To the extent that the terms and provisions of any of said documents conflict with the terms herein, this ordinance shall govern and control. SECTION 8: All ordinances or parts of ordinances that are in conflict with the terms of this ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 9: If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is ruled unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applic ations of this ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid application or provision, and each invalid provision or invalid application of this ordinance is severable. SECTION 10: The findings and recitals herein are hereby declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois. Introduced:_________________, 2020 Adopted:___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Page 16 of 56 P3.Page 307 of 506 97-O-20 ~9~ Attest: _____________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: _______________________________ Kelley A. Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 17 of 56 P3.Page 308 of 506 97-O-20 ~10~ EXHIBIT A Legal Description LOT A EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY, BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE, 264.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY AT APPROX. AT RIGHT ANGLE 170 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, 264.46 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE; 170 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN PLAT OF CONSOLIDATION OF LOT 4 (EXCEPT THE NORTH 5 FEET THEREOF) AND ALL OF LOTS 5, 6, 7, 8 AND 9 IN BLOCK 20 IN EVANSTON, IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PINs: 11-18-403-021-0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 1621-1631 Chicago Avenue, Evanston, Illinois Page 18 of 56 P3.Page 309 of 506 97-O-20 ~11~ EXHIBIT B Development Plans Page 19 of 56 P3.Page 310 of 506 Northwest PerspectiveThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 179/30/20Page 20 of 56P3.Page 311 of 506 Ground Floor PlanThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 199/30/20 3,289 sq ft 1"127'-0"1"57'-13/4"27'-21/4"42'-8"Bay (Above) Projects 1'-0" Over Property Line (Typ.)24'-8"52'-35/8"37'-05/8"127'-2"-1'-10"R 20'-0"Access from MerionExit CorridorChicago AveDNUPDNUPRamp DN@4.5%Ramp DN@3.9% Retail Blend@8%Ramp DN@17.36%Loading Telephone /Data Room GeneratorRoom PumpRoom EmergencySwitchgearSwitchgear Package Mail Room Ramp DN@9.29% Ramp DN@9.29% Trash Staging Lobby Adjacent One-StoryBuilding Adjacent Eight-StoryBuilding Existing 20' AlleyPick-Up / Drop-OffArea RetailConnection UP 10'x35' Loading B a y 10'x35' Loading Bay Fire ControlRoom DL-23 Truck (UPS/Fedex)Auto EntranceBike LaneParallel ParkingComEd Vault WaterMeter Project Data Total Units: 215Avg Unit Size: 885sf Total Stories: 17- 1 Sky Amenity Level- 15 Residential Stories- 1 Ground Level Total Building Height: 185'-0" Typical Floor Eff.: 85.28%Total Building Eff.: 76.9% Total Cars: 85Parking Ratio: .40/DUParking Eff.: 466sf/Car Amenity Ratio: 25.0sf/DU SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Site Plan 0 5 10 20 40 NPage 21 of 56P3.Page 312 of 506 Second FloorThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 209/30/20 801 sq ft 744 sq ft 2,900 sq ft 873 sq ft 1,071 sq ft 621 sq ft 727 sq ft 786 sq ft 1,075 sq ft 795 sq ft 621 sq ft 727 sq ft 736 sq ft 1,340 sq ft 815 sq ft 801 sq ft 44'-2"22'-10" 67'-0"34'-0"67'-0" 22'-10"44'-2"24'-5"42'-8"41'-8"32'-8"117'-0"10'-0"42'-11/2"83'-87/8"42'-11/2" 168'-0" Access from MerionSecond Floor Amenity Comm.Elec.DNUPMech.Mech.DNUP2-Bed1-Bed Studio 2-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed Studio 1-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed Adjacent Eight-StoryBuilding WinterGarden 1-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed Project Data Total Units: 215Avg Unit Size: 885sf Total Stories: 17- 1 Sky Amenity Level- 15 Residential Stories- 1 Ground Level Total Building Height: 185'-0" Typical Floor Eff.: 85.28%Total Building Eff.: 76.9% Total Cars: 85Parking Ratio: .40/DUParking Eff.: 466sf/Car Amenity Ratio: 25.0sf/DU SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Second Floor 0 5 10 20 40 NPage 22 of 56P3.Page 313 of 506 Typical Tower (Tier 1 - 3rd-8th Floor)The Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 219/30/20 1,323 sq ft 825 sq ft 763 sq ft 1,098 sq ft 795 sq ft 621 sq ft 727 sq ft 736 sq ft 1,301 sq ft 825 sq ft 763 sq ft 1,075 sq ft 795 sq ft 621 sq ft 727 sq ft 736 sq ft 117'-0"42'-8"25'-8"24'-0"24'-8"67'-0"34'-0"67'-0" 44'-2"22'-10"22'-10"44'-2"24'-5"39'-5"67'-0"34'-0"67'-0" 33'-27/8"33'-91/8"33'-91/8"33'-27/8"38'-0"20'-0" 170'-0" Bay Projects 2'-0"From Exterior Wall Bay Projects 1'-0"Over Property Line Comm.DNUP2-Bed1-Bed Elec.DNUPStudio 2-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed 2-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed Studio Adjacent Eight-StoryBuilding Mech.Mech. 1-Bed 1-Bed 2-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed MinimumCourtyardDimensions Width = 20'(6' Min + 1' per StoryAbove Grade (14)) Length = 38'(10' Min + 2' per StoryAbove Grade (14)) Project Data Total Units: 215Avg Unit Size: 885sf Total Stories: 17- 1 Sky Amenity Level- 15 Residential Stories- 1 Ground Level Total Building Height: 185'-0" Typical Floor Eff.: 85.28%Total Building Eff.: 76.9% Total Cars: 85Parking Ratio: .40/DUParking Eff.: 466sf/Car Amenity Ratio: 25.0sf/DU SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Typical Tower Plan - Tier 1 (3rd-8th Floor)0 5 10 20 40 NPage 23 of 56P3.Page 314 of 506 Ninth FloorThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 229/30/20 1,075 sq ft 796 sq ft 621 sq ft 727 sq ft 736 sq ft 1,067 sq ft 1,062 sq ft 1,075 sq ft 796 sq ft 621 sq ft 727 sq ft 736 sq ft 1,067 sq ft1,062 sq ft 67'-0"34'-0"67'-0" 44'-2"22'-10"22'-10"44'-2"27'-0"25'-8"24'-0"24'-8"101'-4"24'-5"42'-7"24'-5" 67'-0"34'-0"67'-0" 24'-5"42'-7"23'-9"170'-0" Comm.DNUP2-Bed1-Bed 1-Bed 2-Bed Elec.DNUP2-Bed 1-BedStudio 2-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed Studio 2-Bed 2-Bed Mech.Mech. Project Data Total Units: 215Avg Unit Size: 885sf Total Stories: 17- 1 Sky Amenity Level- 15 Residential Stories- 1 Ground Level Total Building Height: 185'-0" Typical Floor Eff.: 85.28%Total Building Eff.: 76.9% Total Cars: 85Parking Ratio: .40/DUParking Eff.: 466sf/Car Amenity Ratio: 25.0sf/DU SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Ninth Floor 0 5 10 20 40 NPage 24 of 56P3.Page 315 of 506 Typical Tower (Tier 2 - 10th-15th Floor)The Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 239/30/20 1,075 sq ft 796 sq ft 621 sq ft 727 sq ft 736 sq ft 1,067 sq ft 1,062 sq ft 1,075 sq ft 796 sq ft 621 sq ft 727 sq ft 736 sq ft 1,067 sq ft1,062 sq ft23'-9"24'-5"42'-7" 67'-0"34'-0"67'-0" 42'-7"24'-5"27'-0"25'-8"24'-0"24'-8"101'-4"24'-5"22'-10"44'-2" 67'-0"34'-0"67'-0" 44'-2"22'-10" 170'-0" Comm.DNUP2-Bed1-Bed 1-Bed 2-Bed Elec.DNUP2-Bed 1-BedStudio 2-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed 1-Bed Studio 2-Bed 2-Bed Mech.Mech. Project Data Total Units: 215Avg Unit Size: 885sf Total Stories: 17- 1 Sky Amenity Level- 15 Residential Stories- 1 Ground Level Total Building Height: 185'-0" Typical Floor Eff.: 85.28%Total Building Eff.: 76.9% Total Cars: 85Parking Ratio: .40/DUParking Eff.: 466sf/Car Amenity Ratio: 25.0sf/DU SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Typical Tower Plan - Tier 2 (10th-15th Floor)0 5 10 20 40 NPage 25 of 56P3.Page 316 of 506 Penthouse Floor (16th Floor)The Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 249/30/20 1,683 sq ft 1,699 sq ft1,348 sq ft 2,125 sq ft 1,683 sq ft 1,699 sq ft 1,348 sq ft 68'-0"34'-0"68'-0" 22'-10"45'-2"45'-2"22'-10"24'-5"23'-9"68'-0"34'-0"68'-0" 43'-7"24'-5"24'-5"43'-7"102'-0"53'-4"48'-8"170'-0" Comm. 3-Bed2-Bed 3-Bed Elec.DNUP3-Bed 3-Bed 2-Bed 3-Bed Mech.Mech.DNUPProject Data Total Units: 215Avg Unit Size: 885sf Total Stories: 17- 1 Sky Amenity Level- 15 Residential Stories- 1 Ground Level Total Building Height: 185'-0" Typical Floor Eff.: 85.28%Total Building Eff.: 76.9% Total Cars: 85Parking Ratio: .40/DUParking Eff.: 466sf/Car Amenity Ratio: 25.0sf/DU SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Penthouse Floor (16th Floor)0 5 10 20 40 NPage 26 of 56P3.Page 317 of 506 Sky Amenity (17th Floor)The Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 259/30/20 1,262 sq ft 1,136 sq ft 910 sq ft834 sq ft 834 sq ft 33'-0"34'-0"33'-0" 100'-0"79'-4"33'-0"34'-0"33'-0"6'-8"24'-4"SwimmingPool Mechanical Lounge Dog Run StorageStorage DNDNOpen toSkyOpen toSky Mech.Mech. Project Data Total Units: 215Avg Unit Size: 885sf Total Stories: 17- 1 Sky Amenity Level- 15 Residential Stories- 1 Ground Level Total Building Height: 185'-0" Typical Floor Eff.: 85.28%Total Building Eff.: 76.9% Total Cars: 85Parking Ratio: .40/DUParking Eff.: 466sf/Car Amenity Ratio: 25.0sf/DU SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Sky Amenity (17th Floor)0 5 10 20 40 NPage 27 of 56P3.Page 318 of 506 Basement 01The Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 269/30/20 170'-0"127'-0"16'-0"Typ. HC Space 18'-0"Typ. HC Space-8'-10" -12'-8" -10'-2" -14'-8"-17'-0"-15'-10" Storage 55 Lockers(3x5x6) 16 21 9 9 Storage 10 Lockers(3x5x6) Bike Room 81 Bikes Ramp UP@4.98% Ramp UP@4.76%Ramp UP@4.87%Ramp DN@4.76%Blend@8%Ramp UP@8%Ramp DN@4.93%5 8 8 5 8 2 2 38 ParkingSpaces 9'-0" x 18'-0"U.N.O. 10 5 17 23 175 4 Storage 10 Lockers(3x5x6)DNUPDNUP11 Bikes BikeRoom Project Data Total Units: 215Avg Unit Size: 885sf Total Stories: 17- 1 Sky Amenity Level- 15 Residential Stories- 1 Ground Level Total Building Height: 185'-0" Typical Floor Eff.: 85.28%Total Building Eff.: 76.9% Total Cars: 85Parking Ratio: .40/DUParking Eff.: 466sf/Car Amenity Ratio: 25.0sf/DU SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Basement 01 0 5 10 20 40 NPage 28 of 56P3.Page 319 of 506 Basement 02The Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 279/30/20 170'-0"127'-0"16'-0"Typ. HC Space 18'-0"Typ. HC Space-25'-9"-23'-5" -21'-5" -18'-11" -24'-7" Storage 10 Lockers(3x5x6) Storage 10 Lockers(3x5x6) Storage 10 Lockers(3x5x6) Storage 10 Lockers(3x5x6) 10 8 6 12 2 4 2 3 Ramp UP@4.98% Ramp UP@4.76%Ramp UP@4.87%Ramp DN@4.76%Ramp UP@4.93%47 ParkingSpaces 9'-0" x 18'-0"U.N.O.UPUP11 Bikes BikeRoom Project Data Total Units: 215Avg Unit Size: 885sf Total Stories: 17- 1 Sky Amenity Level- 15 Residential Stories- 1 Ground Level Total Building Height: 185'-0" Typical Floor Eff.: 85.28%Total Building Eff.: 76.9% Total Cars: 85Parking Ratio: .40/DUParking Eff.: 466sf/Car Amenity Ratio: 25.0sf/DU SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" Basement 02 0 5 10 20 40 NPage 29 of 56P3.Page 320 of 506 Project DataThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 509/30/20 1621-31 Chicago Data Building Unit Mix Floor # Floors Height (ft) Height (in) Studio (581-621sf) 1 Bed (727-844sf) 2 Bed (1062-1348sf) 3 Bed (1683-2125sf) Total Units/FL Retail Resi SF Common SF Amenity SF Parking/ Load SF Vertical Service Mech SF Gross SF FAR SF Cars Sub- Grade Basement 02 1 8 9 0 0 1,890 0 18,925 568 0 21,383 0 47 Basement 01 1 15 10 0 0 3,594 0 17,428 568 0 21,590 0 38 Ground Floor 1 16 0 0 3,289 0 4,254 0 3,801 890 3,709 15,943 7,543 Second Floor 1 12 0 2 10 2 0 14 11,194 1,316 4,240 0 678 377 17,805 16,750 Tier 1 Third Floor 1 9 6 2 10 4 0 16 13,733 1,315 0 0 678 377 16,103 15,048 Fourth Floor 1 9 6 2 10 4 0 16 13,733 1,315 0 0 678 377 16,103 15,048 Fifth Floor 1 9 6 2 10 4 0 16 13,733 1,315 0 0 678 377 16,103 15,048 Sixth Floor 1 9 6 2 10 4 0 16 13,733 1,315 0 0 678 377 16,103 15,048 Seventh Floor 1 9 6 2 10 4 0 16 13,733 1,315 0 0 678 377 16,103 15,048 Eighth Floor 1 10 6 2 10 4 0 16 13,733 1,315 0 0 678 377 16,103 15,048 Tier 2 Ninth Floor 1 9 6 2 6 6 0 14 12,169 1,198 0 0 678 377 14,422 13,367 Tenth Floor 1 9 6 2 6 6 0 14 12,169 1,198 0 0 678 377 14,422 13,367 Eleventh Floor 1 9 6 2 6 6 0 14 12,169 1,198 0 0 678 377 14,422 13,367 Twelfth Floor 1 10 6 2 6 6 0 14 12,169 1,198 0 0 678 377 14,422 13,367 Thirteenth Floor 1 9 6 2 6 6 0 14 12,169 1,198 0 0 678 377 14,422 13,367 Fourteenth Floor 1 9 6 2 6 6 0 14 12,169 1,198 0 0 678 377 14,422 13,367 Fifteenth Floor 1 10 6 2 6 6 0 14 12,169 1,198 0 0 678 377 14,422 13,367 Penthouse Floor 1 14 0 0 0 2 5 7 11,585 1,064 0 0 678 377 13,704 12,649 Sky Amenity 1 16 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,997 1,136 0 662 3,079 6,874 3,133 Total 17 185.000 28 112 70 5 215 3,289 190,360 30,391 5,376 40,154 12,858 12,443 294,871 223,932 85 Percentage 13%52%33%2% Goal 20%60%20% 1621-31 Chicago - Evanston, IL 9/29/2020 Total Units 215 DU Avg Unit Size 885 SF Parking Ratio 0.40 /DU Parking Eff.472 /Space Typ. Floor Eff. - Tier 1 85.28% Typ. Floor Eff. - Tier 2 84.38% Total Eff.76.88% Amenity/Unit 25.00 SF Site Area 21,644 SF Total FAR Allowed (6.0)129,864 SF Proposed FAR Ratio 10.346 FAR Overage 94,068 SFPage 30 of 56P3.Page 321 of 506 Bike Lane and Curb Cut LayoutThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 519/30/20 20'-0"Minimum Parking Restriction 24'-8"Driveway Dimension 20'-0"Minimum Parking Restriction 15'-0"15'-0"15'-0"15'-0" 10'-9"3'-2"10'-9" 15' Minimum SpaceClear from VisualObstructions Signage WarningDrivers of Bike Lane Signage WarningDrivers of Bike Lane Existing Light Pole Chicago Ave "Bike Lane" Signage Auto Entrance Parallel Parking Driveway Design Guidelines perFederal Highway Administration's"Separated Bike Lane Planningand Design Guide" SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Bike Lane and Curb Cut Layout 0 5 10 20Page 31 of 56P3.Page 322 of 506 Chicago Ave. ElevationThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 529/30/20 Chicago Avenue Elevation Proposed Structure (+185'-0")Existing Structure (±93')Existing Structure (±80')Existing Structure (±80') DavisStreetChurchStreet EntryExit SCALE: 1" = 40' 0 10 20 40 80Page 32 of 56P3.Page 323 of 506 West ElevationThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 539/30/2016'-0"12'-0"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"14'-0"16'-6"Ground Level+0'-0" Second Floor+16'-0" Third Floor+28'-0" Fourth Floor+37'-6" Fifth Floor+47'-0" Sixth Floor+56'-6" Seventh Floor+66'-0" Ninth Floor+86'-0" Tenth Floor+95'-6" Eleventh Floor+105'-0" Twelfth Floor+114'-6" Thirteenth Floor+125'-0" Fourteenth Floor+134'-6" Fifteenth Floor+144'-0" Sixteenth Floor+154'-6" Seventeenth Floor+168'-6" T/Roof+185'-0" Eighth Floor+75'-6" SCALE: 1" = 30' West Elevation 05 06 07 08 04 03 02 01 05 03 06 01 - Brick Color A02 - Cast Stone03 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color A04 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color B05 - Aluminum Window06 - Prefinished Metal Panel07 - Prefinished Metal Railing08 - Aluminum Louver09 - Concrete Block10 - Colored Concrete Block 0 5 15 30 60Page 33 of 56P3.Page 324 of 506 North ElevationThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 549/30/2016'-0"12'-0"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"14'-0"16'-6"Ground Level+0'-0" Second Floor+16'-0" Third Floor+28'-0" Fourth Floor+37'-6" Fifth Floor+47'-0" Sixth Floor+56'-6" Seventh Floor+66'-0" Ninth Floor+86'-0" Tenth Floor+95'-6" Eleventh Floor+105'-0" Twelfth Floor+114'-6" Thirteenth Floor+125'-0" Fourteenth Floor+134'-6" Fifteenth Floor+144'-0" Sixteenth Floor+154'-6" Seventeenth Floor+168'-6" T/Roof+185'-0" Eighth Floor+75'-6" SCALE: 1" = 30' North Elevation 04 03 03 04 07 05 08 09 Line of Adjacent Building 05 06 0 5 15 30 60 01 - Brick Color A02 - Cast Stone03 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color A04 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color B05 - Aluminum Window06 - Prefinished Metal Panel07 - Prefinished Metal Railing08 - Aluminum Louver09 - Concrete Block10 - Colored Concrete BlockPage 34 of 56P3.Page 325 of 506 East ElevationThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 559/30/2016'-0"12'-0"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"14'-0"16'-6"Ground Level+0'-0" Second Floor+16'-0" Third Floor+28'-0" Fourth Floor+37'-6" Fifth Floor+47'-0" Sixth Floor+56'-6" Seventh Floor+66'-0" Ninth Floor+86'-0" Tenth Floor+95'-6" Eleventh Floor+105'-0" Twelfth Floor+114'-6" Thirteenth Floor+125'-0" Fourteenth Floor+134'-6" Fifteenth Floor+144'-0" Sixteenth Floor+154'-6" Seventeenth Floor+168'-6" T/Roof+185'-0" Eighth Floor+75'-6" SCALE: 1" = 30' East Elevation 08 05 06 07 04 03 10 05 06 03 0 5 15 30 60 01 - Brick Color A02 - Cast Stone03 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color A04 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color B05 - Aluminum Window06 - Prefinished Metal Panel07 - Prefinished Metal Railing08 - Aluminum Louver09 - Concrete Block10 - Colored Concrete BlockPage 35 of 56P3.Page 326 of 506 South ElevationThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 569/30/2016'-0"12'-0"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"14'-0"16'-6"Ground Level+0'-0" Second Floor+16'-0" Third Floor+28'-0" Fourth Floor+37'-6" Fifth Floor+47'-0" Sixth Floor+56'-6" Seventh Floor+66'-0" Ninth Floor+86'-0" Tenth Floor+95'-6" Eleventh Floor+105'-0" Twelfth Floor+114'-6" Thirteenth Floor+125'-0" Fourteenth Floor+134'-6" Fifteenth Floor+144'-0" Sixteenth Floor+154'-6" Seventeenth Floor+168'-6" T/Roof+185'-0" Eighth Floor+75'-6" SCALE: 1" = 30' South Elevation 04 10 06 03 04 09 07 Line of Adjacent Building 05 0 5 15 30 60 01 - Brick Color A02 - Cast Stone03 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color A04 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color B05 - Aluminum Window06 - Prefinished Metal Panel07 - Prefinished Metal Railing08 - Aluminum Louver09 - Concrete Block10 - Colored Concrete BlockPage 36 of 56P3.Page 327 of 506 Courtyard Elevation - EastThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 579/30/2016'-0"12'-0"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"14'-0"16'-6"Ground Level+0'-0" Second Floor+16'-0" Third Floor+28'-0" Fourth Floor+37'-6" Fifth Floor+47'-0" Sixth Floor+56'-6" Seventh Floor+66'-0" Ninth Floor+86'-0" Tenth Floor+95'-6" Eleventh Floor+105'-0" Twelfth Floor+114'-6" Thirteenth Floor+125'-0" Fourteenth Floor+134'-6" Fifteenth Floor+144'-0" Sixteenth Floor+154'-6" Seventeenth Floor+168'-6" T/Roof+185'-0" Eighth Floor+75'-6" SCALE: 1" = 30' Courtyard Elevation - East 05 06 07 08 03 03 05 03 0 5 15 30 60 01 - Brick Color A02 - Cast Stone03 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color A04 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color B05 - Aluminum Window06 - Prefinished Metal Panel07 - Prefinished Metal Railing08 - Aluminum Louver09 - Concrete Block10 - Colored Concrete BlockPage 37 of 56P3.Page 328 of 506 Courtyard Elevation - WestThe Merion Legacy - 1621-31 Chicago Ave. 589/30/2016'-0"12'-0"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"9'-6"9'-6"10'-6"14'-0"16'-6"Ground Level+0'-0" Second Floor+16'-0" Third Floor+28'-0" Fourth Floor+37'-6" Fifth Floor+47'-0" Sixth Floor+56'-6" Seventh Floor+66'-0" Ninth Floor+86'-0" Tenth Floor+95'-6" Eleventh Floor+105'-0" Twelfth Floor+114'-6" Thirteenth Floor+125'-0" Fourteenth Floor+134'-6" Fifteenth Floor+144'-0" Sixteenth Floor+154'-6" Seventeenth Floor+168'-6" T/Roof+185'-0" Eighth Floor+75'-6" SCALE: 1" = 30' Courtyard Elevation - West 05 06 07 08 03 03 05 03 0 5 15 30 60 01 - Brick Color A02 - Cast Stone03 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color A04 - Cast-In-Place Concrete Color B05 - Aluminum Window06 - Prefinished Metal Panel07 - Prefinished Metal Railing08 - Aluminum Louver09 - Concrete Block10 - Colored Concrete BlockPage 38 of 56P3.Page 329 of 506 APPROVED Page 1 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 MEETING MINUTES PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, February 26, 2020 7:00 P.M. Evanston Civic Center, 2100 Ridge Avenue, James C. Lytle Council Chambers Members Present: Peter Isaac (Chair), Carol Goddard, George Halik, Brian Johnson, Andrew Pigozzi, Jane Sloss Members Absent: Jennifer Draper, John Hewko Staff Present: Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Manager Meagan Jones, Neighborhood and Land Use Planner Brian George, Assistant City Attorney Presiding Member: Chair Isaac 1. CALL TO ORDER / DECLARATION OF QUORUM Chair Isaac called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. Ms. Jones called the roll and a quorum was established. 2. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: Minutes will be available at the next Plan Commission meeting. 3. NEW BUSINESS ….. B. Subdivision & Major Adjustment to a Planned Development 1619 Chicago Avenue 19PLND-0059 The applicant, Horizon Realty Group, submits for a subdivision and Major Adjustment to a Planned Development in the D4 Downtown Transition District. The requested adjustment will increase FAR from 3.15 to 4.2, increase parking spaces from 32 (23 on -site, 9 leased) to 38 (all leased off - site), and a decrease in total number of units from 205 to 186 (includes 65 dwelling units). No new site development allowance will be needed. C. Planned Development 1621 Chicago Avenue 18PLND-0112 The applicant, Horizon Realty Group, submits a planned development application to construct a 19-story apartment building with 240 units, 85 Page 39 of 56 P3.Page 330 of 506 APPROVED Page 2 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 subterranean parking spaces, and approximately 3,540 sq. ft. of ground floor retail space in the D4 Downtown Transition District. Site development allowances are being requested for: 1) a building height of 211 ft. 8 in. where 105 ft. is allowed), 2) an FAR of 11.62 where a maximum of 5.4 is allowed, 3) 240 dwelling units where 54 is maximum is allowed, 4) 85 parking spaces where a minimum 185 is required, and 5) 1 short loading berth where 2 short loading berths are required. In addition, the applicant may seek and the Plan Commission may consider additional Site Development Allowances as may be necessary or desirable for the proposed development. Mr. Scott Mangum provided an overview of the proposed subdivision, describing the existing Merion development, which includes a 2013 addition, and what zoning characteristics would change as a result of the subdivision. No physical changes would occur to the existing Merion residences. Mr. Mangum then gave an overview of the proposed planned development to be at the site currently consisting of a one-story commercial building. chair Isaac asked for questions from the Commission to staff. Hearing none, he asked the applicant to provide their presentation The applicant, Mr. Jeff Michael of Horizon Realty Group, then provided an introduction of the development team including Danny Michael who is the founder of Horizon Realty Group, Tim Kent of Pappageorge Haymes, Michael Werthmann of KLOA, David Meek of Becker Guerian and Jonathan Perman, the public affairs strategist for the project. Mr. Jeff Michael provided an overview of history Horizon Realty Group and of the existing development with the Northshore Hotel Residence celebrating its 100 year anniversary. Horizon Realty Group are long term owners of the site and choose to keep the site for seniors. The proposed development is intended to keep a “senior campus” feel with synergies between the new and existing buildings. The new development will have access to the amenities in the existing buildings. He added that the site is underutilized and there is a demand for additional housing for seniors. The development is expected to generate $1.6 million in recurring tax revenue and will provide a substantial amount of money for the affordable housing fund. Mr. Tim Kent then spoke about the development details. He described the existing site and its surroundings and stated that, once built out, the new building will act as a continuation of the existing buildings and their function. He stated that the design of the building is intended to be understated and complementary to existing development with the massing being broken up as the building height increases. He then described the building materials and façade. Mr. Kent then described the 1 st floor plan which includes retail space, ‘”back of house” uses and a porte-cochere which provides access to the lobby, the below-grade parking levels and a space for pick-ups/drop-offs off of Chicago Page 40 of 56 P3.Page 331 of 506 APPROVED Page 3 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 Avenue. He briefly reviewed the floor plans of the additional levels and described the parking which provides .35 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Mr. Jonathan Perman spoke providing some general demographic information including that Evanston’s population has been largely the same since the 1950’s and the proposed development will add .5% to the population. He explained that there is demand for senior housing. He added that available parking is 1.2 parking spaces per unit with a .9 parking space per unit demand. He then described the proposed porte - cochere, explaining that it is safer than the narrow shared alley and takes deliveries and pick-ups/drop-offs off of the s treet. He added that there are a number of existing curb cuts on the block and along the existing bike path and the City does not have a formal policy on curb-cuts. Mr. Perman then briefly reviewed the fiscal impact study and stated that the project fits the character of the block, and stands with Comprehensive Plan’s goals for increased housing for seniors. He finished stating that the public benefits proposed meet the site development allowances and the project is a fiscal win. Chair Isaac stated that there is the opportunity for residents living within 1,000 ft. of the site are able to submit a written request for continuance. None was submitted. He then opened the hearing to questions from the Commission. Commissioner Halik stated that he understands breaking down the massing and even though building across the street is taller, it looks lighter. He then asked if the applicant had considered a lighter colored base and darker color for the tower as this might give a different impression regarding the siz e. Mr. Kent replied that that option had been looked at and is being considered. He added that earlier iterations of the project had been taller and thinner. Mr. Halik stated that a lot of the concern is with the height of the building but not having a squat building. Commissioner Sloss stated that statements were made that the provided benefits are inherent to the development and asked if there had been any consideration of additional public benefits? Mr. Michael stated that the development team believes that they aligned and exceeded what has been done and are proportional to what is proposed. They are open to considering other public benefits. Commissioner Halik inquired about what the Mather parking ratio is. Mr. Michael responded that he was not certain of the ratio for that development. Mr. Danny Michael stated that transportation is provided at the existing Merion development and the same is intended for the new building. He added that most of the existing residents do not want to deal with cars so transportation is provided. Mr. Mangum stated that there are 169 units and 139 parking spaces at 1727 Oak which is limited to people 55 years of age and up. Mr. Perman stated that the development team would be open to renting additional spaces at the Church Street garage if they find additional parking is needed. Chair Isaac referred to the earlier statistic regarding 1.2 Page 41 of 56 P3.Page 332 of 506 APPROVED Page 4 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 parking spaces per unit provided and a point .9 space per unit demand. The proposed building proposed .35 per unit. Mr. Werthmann stated that the .9 parking space per unit demand statistic is for all of downtown versus for just a 55+ population which tends to not have the same demand. Chair Isaac then pointed out that the proposed building is not being restricted to 55 and over. Mr. Michael added that there is 50% vehicle ownership in all of the 28 buildings Horizon Realty Group owns. The building will target an older population through marketing. Commissioner Goddard expressed concerns regarding the height. She understands the need to have a certain number of units to justify the investment risk for a mixed-use development and wondered if the building were not for seniors would there be no need for the height? Mr. Michael replied no and revenue needed is based on the number of units and leasable spaces. The margin begins to get too tight. Mr. Meek added that the below grade parking added a significant cost and the porte -cochere creates a loss of leasable space. Commissioner Johnson inquired about the current alley conditions. Mr. Michael responded that the alley is largely commercial use and is both narrow, congested and in disrepair. Additionally, turning radii would be tight even before factoring in snow. He added that the Davis Street Fishmarket space is currently empty but added to congestion when it was open. Mr. Perman then pointed out the safety of the porte - cochere versus crossing existing bike lanes multiple times if the entry were off of the alley. Commissioner Johnson then asked if there would be more congestion created with one loading berth versus two which would enable delivery vehicles into a loading berth instead of stopping in the alley. Chair Isaac added to the question, revisiting the statement regarding tight turning radii and inquired how wide the proposed loading berth is and if turning studies had been conducted. Mr. Kent confirmed this had been done and delivery and trash vehicles are able to make that turn. He then stated that the dashed line in the diagram is the required size, the actual space is larger and a door can be chosen which enables easier entry. Commissioner Johsnon asked if there is anything suggesting senior building use of loading is more or less. Mr. Michael replied that tu rnover is typically less in senior buildings with a retention rate of 80%. They also typically have fewer items. Residents would be able to use the Merion’s loading. Commissioner Halik asked if the retail space would also need loading and if an additional dock would work. Mr. Michael replied that it can be looked at. Page 42 of 56 P3.Page 333 of 506 APPROVED Page 5 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 Chair Isaac stated that delivery and loading appears to be in a restricted part of the alley and asked what the plan would be for retail deliveries. Mr. Kent responded that a 2 nd loading dock may work and that there is a doorway south of the proposed loading dock that is an exit only door and not meant to be an access door that could be used for deliveries. He added that there are 4 to 5 commercial tenants in the existing building; the new building would only have one so delivery amounts would likely be lower. Chair Isaac asked how many existing spaces are behind the current commercial building. Mr. Michael responded that there are 18 spaces with additional spaces leased at the Church Street garage. Mr. Danny Michael stated that currently many of those spaces are used by the commercial tenants in the one-story building which would be removed should the proposed development be constructed. Chair Isaac then asked how many current tenants of The Merion have cars. Mr. Michael responded less than 10. Commissioner Pigozzi stated there are a number of high-rises dealing with deliveries. Mr. Michael stated that the porte-cochere will keep much of these deliveries on-site and off of the street. Mr. W erthmann responded that only smaller vehicles will use the porte - cochere. Larger vehicles will use the loading dock. Chair Isaac then opened the hearing to questions from the public. Mr. Bob Froetscher asked if a model was run that would meet the zoning requirements and if so what did it show and why was it not used. Mr. Michael replied that many models had been run but did not meet the rate of return in relation to the risk and fiscal needs. Mr. Froetscher then asked if the applicant knew the existing zo ning and if they assumed they could get the City to change the zoning. Mr. Michael responded yes they knew the zoning but did not assume the zoning could be changed. The development is part of a greater vision for the properties. Ms. Libby Hill stated that a letter was sent to the applicant with questions including if the building will comply with LEED 55 standards and asking for clarification on the balconies and if the lower level glass will reflect greenery. Mr. Kent responded that they intend to comply with LEED 55 standards, that balconies will be wrought iron and that the lower levels will comply with LEED 55 standards. Chair Isaac opened the hearing to public comment. Mr. William Brown, a member of First United Methodist Church which has been in existence since 1870, stated that only with this project has there been an issue and there is not one member of the church board that is comfortable with what is proposed; requests show no regard for zoning. The building will begin to create a canyon effect with the building across the street and the alley is bad now and will likely be worse with Page 43 of 56 P3.Page 334 of 506 APPROVED Page 6 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 the proposed development. He finished by saying that members of the adjacent Church will be vocal in opposition and encouraged the Commission to be thoughtful. Ms. Martha Rudy stated that Mr. Perman’s comment of no one disagreeing with the project is false and there are many who do not support the proposed development. She expressed that fear tactics are being used in order to get approval for the site development allowances. She added that the east alley was a de facto borderline for downtown with a promise of no taller buildings being built east of Chicago Avenue; if a zoning change is needed then that should be done. Mr. Bob Froetscher stated that the building height and number of dwelling units are his main concerns as both are well above maximum permitted amounts. Other buildings on the block are 8 or 9 stories with a transition established. He added that he and other residents expected the density to be adhered to and that the carbon footprint would not be an issue if there was not as much density. He then stated that developing housing to fill the City parking garages does not make sense. Chicago is losing residents but Evanston is ok. Do not be confused by “hand waving”. Ms. Ellen Feldman expressed that the zoning requests are a major issue and the east side of Chicago Avenue is not the Chicago lakefront. The building is not in scale or context with the rest of the neighborhood. The area is zoned to be a transition district. Ms. Feldman added that in her building at 522 Chicago Ave there are a number of older residents and most own vehicles. Her building has two garages with a 1 to 1 ratio of units to parking spaces. More density would make exiting her building garage difficult. She then recalled that the original plan was over 30 stories, then was reduced to 14 stories and is now 19 stories. Chair Isaac closed the public hearing and the Commission began deliberation. Commissioner Halik stated that there are positive things about the theme, planning, the porte-cochere and possible additional loading dock. He suggested that the applicant still consider shading and color of the building materials. He added that he considered both sides of Chicago Avenue for the massing, although the zoning district changes in the middle of the street. The zoning requests are an issue and a rezoning of the property should be considered as the proposed allowances are too large. Commissioner Johnson agreed with Commissioner Halik and stated that he likes the project. It is a transit oriented development that will bring potential shoppers but he cannot vote in favor of the project due to the zoning and the large ask for the site development allowances. Allowances should be granted for small variances. A zoning change should be sought. Commissioner Sloss stated that she generally agrees and that there is a lot being asked for in context of a variance. Page 44 of 56 P3.Page 335 of 506 APPROVED Page 7 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 Chair Isaac stated that there can be an argument made re garding the parking as the building will be geared towards older residents but he feels the parking is still inadequate. The amount of units is not appropriate. Commissioner Goddard stated that she has not seen such a large scale building proposed with such a small amount of return. The previous proposal was significantly smaller than this and proposed significantly more in public benefits. Commissioner Pigozzi stated that he felt the 1555 Ridge project was mediocre but was better than the existing parking lot. He then expressed that the design for the proposed Merion development is as good as he has seen but not as tall as the Park Evanston. He stated that it is expensive to construct below -grade parking and that the developer has made that effort. He rec alled other projects and mentioned that the building on Elgin Road started off with a good design and as the zoning issues got whittled away the design suffered. He stated that he hoped that the Commission could find a way to approve the project and that the staff report does not provide a rationale for denial. Mr. Mangum responded that rationale is provided within the staff report, relating to the building height, number of units, FAR, and lack of parking (though below grade parking is good) as well as the lack of public benefits in relation to the site development allowances being requested. It does not align with existing plans. Commissioner Pigozzi stated that recommendations have been inconsistent. Chair Isaac stated that the property is served by an alley. He would like to move access traffic to the alley but does like the idea of the porte-cochere and does not view it as a negative aspect of the project. Commissioner Halik stated that recommendations should be based on plans that are in place, giving the proposed Emerson Street rezoning as an example. Though he was in agreement, he did not think the rezoning should occur based on existing plans for the area. Chair Isaac asked if the applicant would like to move forward, withdraw the application from the meeting or come back at a later meeting date with changes to the design elements. A discussion then followed regarding possible options for the applicant. The applicant opted to look at making revisions and return to the Commission at a future meeting date. Due to the need to possibly revise zoning documents and provide notice, it was recommended that the applicant come back for the April Plan Commission meeting. The applicant requested to come back to the April 8th Plan Commission meeting. Page 45 of 56 P3.Page 336 of 506 APPROVED Page 8 of 8 Plan Commission Minutes 2/26/20 Commissioner Goddard made a motion to continue this item to the April 8th Plan Commission meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Pigozzi. A voice vote was taken and the motion was approved, 6-0. Ayes: Isaac, Goddard, Halik, Johnson, Pigozzi, Sloss Nays: 5. PUBLIC COMMENT Chair Isaac acknowledged that this is the last meeting for Commissioners Goddard and PIgozzi and thanked them for their service. There was no public comment provided. 6. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Goddard made a motion to adjourn the meeting. C ommissioner Pigozzi seconded the motion. A voice vote was taken and the motion was approved by voice vote 6 -0. The meeting was adjourned at 10:58 pm. Respectfully Submitted, Meagan Jones Neighborhood and Land Use Planner Community Development Department Page 46 of 56 P3.Page 337 of 506 APPROVED Page 1 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 MEETING MINUTES PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, September 30, 2020 7:00 P.M. Virtual Meeting through Zoom Platform Members Present: Peter Isaac (Chair), George Halik, John Hewko, Brian Johnson, Jeanne Lindwall, Kristine Westerberg Members Absent: Jennifer Draper Staff Present: Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Manager Meagan Jones, Neighborhood and Land Use Planner Brian George, Assistant City Attorney Presiding Member: Chair Isaac 1. CALL TO ORDER / DECLARATION OF QUORUM Chair Isaac called the meeting to order at 7:03 P.M. Ms. Jones called the roll and a quorum was established. 2. SUSPENSION OF THE RULES Members participating electronically or by telephone Commissioner Halik made a motion to suspend the rules to allow for electronic or telephone participation. Seconded by Commissioner Westerberg. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed, 6-0. 3. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: September 9, 2020. Commissioner Halik made a motion to approve the minutes from the September 9, 2020 meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Westerberg. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed, 5-0, with one abstention. 4. OLD BUSINESS A. Subdivision /Major Adjustment to a Planned Development - 1619 Chicago Avenue 19PLND-0059 The applicant, Horizon Realty Group, submits for a subdivision and Major Adjustment to a Planned Development in the D4 Downtown Transition District. The requested adjustment will increase FAR from 3.15 to 4.2, increase parking spaces from 32 (23 on -site, 9 leased) to 38 (all leased off -site), and a decrease in total Page 47 of 56 P3.Page 338 of 506 APPROVED Page 2 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 number of units from 205 to 186 (includes 65 dwelling units). No new site development allowance will be needed. B. Planned Development - 1621 Chicago Avenue 18PLND- 0112 The applica nt, Horizon Realty Group, submits a planned development application to construct a 17-story apartment building with 215 units, 85 subterranean parking spaces, and approximately 3,539 sq. ft. of ground floor retail space in the D4 Downtown Transition Distri ct. Site development allowances are being requested for: 1) a building height of 185 ft. where 105 ft. is allowed), 2) an FAR of 10.38 where a maximum of 5.4 is allowed, 3) 215 dwelling units where 54 is maximum is allowed, and 4) 85 parking spaces where a minimum 162 is required. In addition, the applicant may seek and the Plan Commission may consider additional Site Development Allowances Mr. Mangum provided a brief review of the subdivision, major adjustment to the existing planned development and a summary of revisions that have been made to the proposed planned development since the project was last before the Commission. Chair Isaac opened the hearing to question from the Commission. Commissioner Halik asked for clarification on the allowable building height as it relates to parking levels. Mr. Mangum clarified that up to 4-stories or 40 ft. (whichever is less) of levels that are at least 75% dedicated to parking do not count towards b uilding height in the D4 District. The proposed development is proposing two levels of below grade parking but if those levels were above grade, they would not count towards the building height. Commissioner Johnson asked how many existing curb cuts are o n the block. Mr. Mangum responded that the block-face has an existing circular drive which has two curb cuts. The proposed porte-cochere would add a third two-way curb cut. Mr. Permann then provided a summary and reasoning for the proposed development stating that it is a culmination of a vision for the Merion property. He explained that the team met with neighbors and stakeholders to find a common ground and in many cases was able to do so. He then referenced a policy article by Benjamin Schneider that pointed to the need for density in cities which would create a smaller carbon footprint and encourage more bicycling and walking and encouraged Evanston to embrace this idea. Mr. Permann pointed out that the project is self -financed. With regards to public benefits, he stated that no formalized formula is in place for determining public benefits and that no other project is providing the quantifiable amount of this project. Mr. Tim Kent provided a review of the site and proposed changes between the origin al submission and the current proposal, with concentration on the height. He explained that if four levels of parking were above ground the height could get up to 185 ft. but the proposed project is below ground enabling more activation of the façade. Chair Isaac opened the hearing to questions from the Commission. Page 48 of 56 P3.Page 339 of 506 APPROVED Page 3 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 Commissioner Lindwall inquired about the 12 in. residential window overhang, why they were necessary and if it could cause a hazard with falling ice. Mr. Kent replied that those bay windows are part of the articulation of the building façade and they are similar to the windows on the building to the north. There will likely not be issues with falling snow as the canopies on the ground floor would extend further than the bay windows. Commissioner Lindwall asked how the valet system would work. Mr. Kent stated there would be 18 hour per day access to valet but residents would also be able to self -park. Commissioner Lindwall then asked how the public would access the electric vehicle charging stations. Mr. Kent responded that the stations would be free and the valet would take the vehicle and plug it into the charging station. Commissioner Lindwall asked what conflicts are anticipated with the Whole Foods access and traffic turning in and out of that drive, also would there be any difference in peak hours given the difference in a residential use versus a grocery store with steady traffic throughout the day. Mr. Michael Werthmann with KLOA stated that the traffic count conducted showed that the majority of customers follow the “no left turn” that is at the Whole Foods parking lot exit. The Merion would be restricted to right -only exits; left- ins would be ok and would cross the existing bike lane. Mr. Permann added that the owner is willing to accept recommendations on restricting left turns into or out of the porte-cochere. Commissioner Lindwall then asked how construction will be handled with the protected bike lane and busy alley. Mr. Kent responded that a Construction Management Plan would need to be submitted that outlines specific plans. That is currently in the preliminary stages but will work with the City to minimize impact. Commissioner Lindwall then asked if the City will be compensated for the loss of parking spaces for the porte - cochere. Mr. Kent responded that the City will be compensated for the parking spaces. Commissioner Halik asked if there will be any additional safety measures installed at the entry to the porte-cochere. Mr. Kent confirmed that there will be and pointed to a prelim inary plan for them. There will be a site clearance triangle, raised bike lane and additional signage and lighting at the entry/exit. Mr. Permann added that a tour of the existing curb cuts along the existing bike lane was done and that there are 20 curb c uts, many lacking warning enhancements at conflict points. Commissioner Halik then asked if any assistance would be offered to the existing businesses in the one story building. Mr. Michael responded that there are currently only two viable businesses in that building due to the ongoing pandemic and other issues. Talks have been entertained with Found to locate in the new development. Commissioner Westerberg stated that the allowable height could go to 145 ft. and asked if the additional height mentioned could be from parking. Mr. Mangum confirmed that the building could be 145 feet with a site development allowance and if parking was above ground it would not count towards zoning height calculation. Page 49 of 56 P3.Page 340 of 506 APPROVED Page 4 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 Commissioner Halik asked if the deduction of height for parking levels was particular to downtown districts. Mr. Mangum confirmed that this was the case for the D2, D3 and D4 Downtown Districts and it is limited to 40 ft. or 4- stories, whichever is less. Chair Isaac clarified that the base height allowed is 105 ft. with a possible development allowance to get up to 145 ft. and if 4 levels of parking were above ground that would create a 185 ft. building height. The applicant is proposing 185 ft. in height with below grade parking. He then asked if an option with above ground parking was chosen, how that would change the unit count and FAR. Mr. Kent responded that the FAR would go down to approximately 6.7 with the loss of approximately 50 dwelling units. Chair Isaac then opened the hearing to questions from the public. Ms. Linda Del Bosque asked what the need is for senior housing and if any type of care will be provided. Mr. Permann responded that the proposed building would be all independent living and they intend to use the new building as a conduit into the existing Merion buildings as they age. He then referenced the Sawgrass study which showed an increasing demand for senior housing and that Evanston would need to meet the demand also taking into account the new senior living/care facilities. Ms. Del Bosque then inquired if the applicant would be willing to become a CCRC building instead of an active senior living building since that is a need. Mr. Permann responded that the owner and development team are not in the business of CCRC facilities. Mr. Bob Froetscher asked if the applicant had considered a zoning change as was discussed at the February 26th Plan Commission meeting and if citizen comments had been read. Mr. Permann responded that meetings had been arranged with those who made comments and discussions were held with some of those residents. Mr. Meek added that a rezoning had been considered and that the only district that w ould work would be the D3 District which the team felt would be similar to spot zoning and since the building has a lowered height it was within the reach of the current zoning district. Mr. Carl Klein asked if the development team had been in consultation with the Preservation Commission staff since the development is close to a designated historic district and may affect the view shed of those properties. Mr. Meek responded that the development team had not been asked to do that by staff and clarified th at the team has been in contact with the church which is within the historic district. Mr. Klein stated that the development is supposed to comply with the Comprehensive Plan and historic preservation is a part of that. Mr. Meek replied that the application does not address that directly since the proposal is not in the historic district but it does address general goals of the plan. Ms. Sue Loellbach, of Connections for the Homeless, stated that the project was introduced in 2017 and asked if there is a limit on how long the old inclusionary housing Page 50 of 56 P3.Page 341 of 506 APPROVED Page 5 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 ordinance would apply. Mr. Mangum responded that the application had been submitted prior to the activation of the current IHO regulations. If a project were to be under review for a longer time, the project would have to be analyzed to see what current requirements would be required and if there is a deficient application. Ms. Kiera Kelly asked if the new building would be age restricted. Mr. Kent replied that it would not be age restricted but marketed to a certain age. Ms. Kelly asked why it would not be designated as such. Mr. Michael responded that there are legal implications with a restriction. The current addition markets to a certain age with amenities that are offered including valet, dining facilities and programming so the senior restriction was not deemed necessary. Ms. Kelly stated that there is an overabundance of luxury residential high -rises and that it seems it would be possible to have another without the designation. Mr. Michael referred to the offerings provided in the buildings and that a good unit mix is being paid attention to keep the building geared towards seniors. Ms. Kelly stated that Covid-19 has been shaping senior living and asked if the applicant was concerned with this. Mr. Michael responded that that could probably be said for a variety of markets and that the team is optimistic that we will come out of the pandemic and the demand will be there. There will be design implemented to protect residents including modifying elevators to being touchless and having sanitation stations. Ms. Kelly then asked if the applicant had considered upping the current inclusionary housing ordinance (IHO) offering to comply with new IHO requirements. Mr. Michael responded no and that the project is offering the second largest contribution to the affordable housing fund in addition to providing 5% of the development’s construction costs. Ms. Kelly asked if there was a tenant for the ground floor building. Mr. Michael mentioned the current European Wax business in the existing building and added that there would be 2,800 sq. ft. of retail proposed in the new building. Chair Isaac then alerted the public of the ability to request a continuance. Hearing no request, he then opened the hearing to public testimony. Mr. Matt Feldman read a prepared statement that was submitted in the meeting packet. He mentioned living on the block and asked, given the project was submitted several years ago, when the project should be required to meet current IHO requi rements. He then quoted the staff memorandum regarding the lack of public benefits and asked that the Commission consider this and questions regarding the bike lane. Mr. Dennis Harder stated that he works in the field and understands the developer’s perspective. He added that his previously prepared statement still stands explaining that the proposed public benefits are grossly inadequate and the zoning allowances Page 51 of 56 P3.Page 342 of 506 APPROVED Page 6 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 requested are out of sync with the underlying zoning parameters. He urged denial of the project. Ms. Linda Del Bosque stated that she is running for Alderman and is thinking about her constituents. She is concerned about a domino effect of tall development and looking at aging in place. The City should look into organizations that offer more comprehensive care for seniors. She added that she appreciates what the applicant is doing but that she does not see the need in Evanston and that more CCRC offerings should be considered. Mr. William Brown, Chair of Board of Trustees of First Methodist Churc h, stated that there are 650 members in the church. He thanked Horizon Realty for sharing their plans and explained that the developer met with the Merion owners and development team over the summer and appreciated it. He expressed concerns about the build ing being overbearing on the adjacent historic district and being 20 ft. away from the church and it is troubling that it is on the east side of Chicago Avenue. He stated that the real reason for the building height is to maximize return on investment, not construction costs. He then stated that the alley is busy and church members can be locked into or out of the parking lot for up to 20 minutes when there are trucks blocking access. Another development would add to the congestion. Mr. Bob Froetscher stated that he purchased property to enliven the downtown and depends on the zoning to be upheld and protect their health and real estate investments. DAPR voted against the development and it does not meet standards or guidelines. He added that the parking s leight-of-hand should not be allowed to rule the day. Mr. Carl Klein stated that the development impedes on the church across the alley and asked the Commission please apply the standards to this project. He then provided a review of the applicable plans and historic district details and recommended that the proposed project be denied. Ms. Bonnie Wilson, who was on the Age Friendly Task Force and currently on the Joining Forces for Affordable Housing Committee of Connections for the Homeless, referenced the Sawgrass report on senior housing and the market demand for more affordable senior units. She expressed that the proposed development should provide 20% on-site affordable units. Ms. Loellbach stated that there is a projected gap for affordable units f or seniors and Jones Lang LaSalle shows 40% vacancy and slower absorption rate for market rate units. There is an opportunity to provide affordable housing for seniors with those available units. She then expressed that since the application submission, ne w information has been provided and the project should be denied or insist that affordable units be provided on-site Page 52 of 56 P3.Page 343 of 506 APPROVED Page 7 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 Ms. Kelly referred to the May memo review and stated that she does not want this project to be left to Council to decide as they do not fully review or know the code. She continued, saying that the zoning district is D4 a transition district, not D3, that the site development allowances are too high and that the public benefits are too limited. The intent of the D4 district is not met and the development is essentially extending the D3. She added that she uses the existing bike path with her children and th e development is not worth the damage and safety issues that could come from it. Developers should not guide downtown planning and Covid-19 has exposed vacancies and encouraged that existing businesses not be removed. Chair Isaac then closed the hearing and the Commission began deliberation. Chair Isaac asked for clarification on if IHO payments are considered a public benefit and if the applicant relying on the older version of the IHO would be germane to the Commission’s considerations. Mr. Mangum replied that meeting IHO requirements are not considered a public benefit and that it would not be under the purview of the Plan Commission. Chair Isaac then reminded the Commission that there are two items under consideration, the subdivision and Major Adjustment of the existing planned development and the proposed planned development. Commissioner Halik inquired about the height consideration and what development allowances exist that allow the height to go from 105 ft. to 145 ft. Mr. Mangum responded that the 40 ft. is the site development allowance that can be requested Commissioner Lindwall clarified if the adoption of the 2009 Downtown Plan included adoption of the recommended zoning regulations. Mr. Mangum replied that the Plan was adopted but the zoning regulations were not. Chair Isaac stated that he has no issues with the Subdivision and increased FAR within the proposed adjustment as it is below the maximum allowed. Other Commissioners agreed. Commissioner Halik stated that he has no strong feelings about the porte-cochere but that the height and FAR are a big ask and this is not enough of a step down in height. He acknowledged that if the parking were above ground, a higher building would be allowed. The proposed development does not follow the spi rit of the D4 District zoning. Chair Isaac stated that the building could go to 145 ft. but 40 ft. would have to be dedicated to parking. The building would probably be thinner and less imposing upon residential property to the east. Additional clarificat ion was provided regarding the calculation of building height. Commissioner Lindwall stated that she recalled the 1989 Downtown Plan and that one of the reasons for enacting the D4 District was for potential development sites and Page 53 of 56 P3.Page 344 of 506 APPROVED Page 8 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 enacting generous allowances to encourage development of these sites. There was some concern from residents but there was a conscious decision of the City Council. The Plan was to have 6 to 10 story buildings. She added that unless there are significant public benefits, the ask is not justified and should not be allowed. Commissioner Westerberg asked if allowances are allowed when do you actually have a non-abrupt transition. This seems larger and more massive than the public benefits would justify. Commissioner Hewko inquired about the process for site development allowances. Mr. Mangum responded that section 6-3-6-5 states the ability to request site development allowances but there are no criteria for the site development allowances themselves. Commissioner Halik stated that given the FAR the architect did a commendable job of arranging the massing and he wanted to compliment the architect on that effort. Chair Isaac agreed and added that if the building were 10 stories with 1 floor of parking he would feel better about the development. He added that he does not have much of an issue with the porte-cochere and is disappointed that the developer felt the proposed reduction of two floors would address his concerns. Commissioner Johnson expressed that he is inclined to support the project. It is not within the D3 District but is across the street from it with a similar height. He supports the buried parking with more active ground floor use and the transit oriented development is appropriate character for the site. There is a need for more traditional retail and residents in the downtown and this development could provide that on an underutilized property. He appreciates the changes made but would like to see greater public accommodation. Chair Isaac questioned the lack of transition. Commissioner Johnson responded that this is a traditional/transitional area must be somewhere and it is incongruent at this site as it is very close to residential zoning. He added that some residents live in those residential districts because they are close to that boundary line. Chair Isaac stated that he does not think there is an issue with the subdivision and that the one-story parcel is underutilized, a brief discussion of a step-down on the building heights followed. Commissioner Johnson stated that a step down would be better; however, inclined to say the proposal presented today is better even with the consideration of a stepdown. Chair Isaac stated that being asked to vote separately on the subdivision of the property shows there is a possibility to increase the use of the parcel. This is not an all or nothing decision. Commissioner Lindwall stated that the Commission should look not just look at the transition from D3 to D4 but also at what else is on the eas t side of Chicago Avenue as Page 54 of 56 P3.Page 345 of 506 APPROVED Page 9 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 there are already established heights and character on that block. The single -story building has been a redevelopment candidate for decades but does not think this development is the answer. Clarification was provided on which standards apply to each agenda item. The Commission then reviewed the standards for item 4A (Subdivision and Major Adjustment to a Planned Development and found that the applicable standards had been met, noting that parking had not substantially changed. Commissioner Halik made a motion to recommend approval of the subdivision and major adjustment to the existing planned development. Seconded by Commissioner Westerberg. A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved, 6-0. Ayes: Isaac, Halik, Hewko, Lindwall, Johnson, Westerberg Nays: The Commission then reviewed the standards for 4B. With regards to the Special Use standards, there was some disagreement on whether or not the proposal fully followed recommendations and guidelines within the Downtown Plan and the D4 district, if the proposal would cause a negative cumulative effect and create additional traffic congestion with regards to the alley. With regards to the Planned Development guidelines in the D4 the standards regarding the p roposal meeting bulk standards and being compatible with existing policies and plans were not met. Commissioner Lindwall made a motion to recommend denial. There was no second so she withdrew her motion. Commissioner Hewko stated he is inclined to support the project if conditions are added and suggested adding amendments . Commissioner Hewko then made a motion to approve the proposed planned development. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson. Commissioner Hewko then made a motion to add an amendment that the 9 conditions of approval as presented by staff be added as part of the original recommendation of approval in addition to complying with IHO regulations. A brief discussion followed regarding requiring conformance with the current IHO requirem ents. Mr. Mangum stated that in previous projects, the Legal Department has stated that IHO is not within the purview of the Plan Commission. Mr. George confirmed and stated that with regards to affordable housing he does not have a definitive answer but is leaning towards no. Page 55 of 56 P3.Page 346 of 506 APPROVED Page 10 of 10 Plan Commission Minutes 9/30/20 Commissioner Hewko then withdrew language regarding the IHO requirements and made a motion to add an amendment that the 9 conditions of approval as presented by staff be added as part of the recommendation of approval. Seconded by Commissioner Lindwall. Ayes: Isaac, Halik, Hewko, Lindwall, Johnson, Westerberg Nays: Commissioner Lindwall made a motion to amend the previous motion to include a 10th condition for the applicant work with staff to resolve any issues related to left turns conflicting with the Whole Foods drive. Commissioner Hewko seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed, 5-1. Ayes: Isaac, Hewko, Lindwall, Johnson, Westerberg Nays: Halik A roll call vote was then taken on the original motion as amended and the vote failed, 2-4. Ayes: Hewko, Johnson Nays: Isaac, Halik, Lindwall, Westerberg 5. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. 6. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Westerberg made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Chair Isaac seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved by voice vote 6 -0. The meeting was adjourned at 10:02 pm. Respectfully Submitted, Meagan Jones Neighborhood and Land Use Planner Community Development Department Page 56 of 56 P3.Page 347 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Planning and Development Committee From: Meagan Jones, Neighborhood and Land Use Planner CC: Johanna Nyden, Community Development Director; Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Manager Subject: Ordinance 95-O-20, Amending Title 6 of the Evanston Code to Revise Regulations andDaycareCenters Domestic Regarding Animal Kennels Date: October 12, 2020 Recommended Action: Plan Commission recommends City Council adoption of Ordinance 95-O-20, Amending Title 6 of the Evanston Code to Revise Regulations Regarding Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels.The Ordinance allows for a text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, Title 6 of the City Code, to amend Section 6-18-3 - Definitions to increase the permitted hours of operation for a Domestic Animal Daycare Center and amend Section 6-12-2-3 – Special Uses to add Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels as Special Uses in the RP Research Park District. Council Action: For Action Summary: Several dog daycare service providers have opened in the City’s commercial and mixed use districts. These businesses are larger in size, have multiple employees, service a large number of dogs and some include kenneling services. The applicant, Sarah Lewis, is seeking to open a domestic animal daycare center, Dogtopia, which will also include a kennel as an accessory use in the RP Research Park zoning district. The current definition of a Domestic Animal Daycare Center is: Any establishment for which the principal use or purpose is the housing of domestic animals for periods of time that shall neither exceed twelve (12) hours in any twenty-four (24) hour period, nor include overnight stays. Multiple animals shall be permitted outside on the premises when accompanied by staff and only between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on any day. Individual animals shall be permitted outside on the premises to relieve themselves at any time during the Center's hours of operation when accompanied by staff. P4.Page 348 of 506 Prior to beginning operation of any such Center, the operator shall submit to the Zoning Administrator a contingency plan for those times when an owner fails to claim his/her animal(s) before the Center closes for the day, and, thereafter, comply with said plan. The operator of any such Center shall comply with the applicable regulations of Title 8, Chapter 4, and Title 9, Chapter 4 of the City Code, as amended. The current definition of a Kennel is: Any establishment for which the principal use or purpose is the housing of domestic animals, including overnight stays. Multiple animals shall be permitted outside on the premises when accompanied by staff and only between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on any day. Individual animals shall be permitted outside on the premises to relieve themselves at any time during the Center's hours of operation when accompanied by staff. Prior to beginning operation of any such Kennel, the operator shall submit to the Zoning Administrator a contingency plan for those times when an owner fails to claim his/her animal(s), and, thereafter, comply with said plan. The operator of any such Kennel shall comply with the applicable regulations of Title 8, Chapter 4, and Title 9, Chapter 4 of the City Code, as amended. Both definitions were established as separate uses in 2011 and are considered Special Uses in the MXE, MUE, C1, C2 districts and all of the industrial districts (I1, I2, and I3) and business districts (B1, B1a, B2, and B3). The definitions are distinct in their ability to house animals overnight, with the Domestic Animal Daycare Center having a specific limit on the amount of time allotted for animals to be on the premises. Previously, Animal Daycare types of uses were approved as Retail Service Establishments which are permitted by right in a number of Business and Commercial Districts. Each use must also follow the Waste and Safety regulations within Title 8, Chapter 4 – Municipal Waste and Title 9, Chapter 4- Dogs, Cats, Animals and Fowl. The purpose of the RP, Research Park District is the following: The RP research park district is intended to provide a regulatory framework that will assist the development of applied research oriented and advanced technology activities in a high quality mixed use business park setting. The district also provides for a limited amount of light assembly, processing, and distribution uses along with their related support activities. There are a variety of uses currently permitted within the RP District, including but not limited to: research and development facilities, brewpubs, light manufacturing, and retail goods establishments (see attached district regulations). Current uses within the district consist of the Maple Avenue parking garage, The Century movie theater, Hilton Garden Inn , an administrative office building for Northwestern University, residential buildings and a variety of retail businesses and restaurants among other uses. Proposal Overview The applicant submitted an application with two possible alternatives for the text amendment: 1) amend Section 6-18-3 - Definitions to increase the permitted hours of operation for a Domestic Animal Daycare Center then amend Section 6 -12-2-3 – Special Uses to add Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels as Special Uses in the RP Research Park District; or 2) amend Section 6-18-3 - Definitions to include a Kennel and increase the permitted hours of operation in the definition of Domestic Animal Daycare Ce nter then add the amended definition as a Special Use to the RP Research Park District. Page 2 of 85 P4.Page 349 of 506 The Plan Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the first alterative, keeping the two definitions separate. Should City Council prefer to vote on the 2 nd alternative, the ordinance can be revised to reflect that change. If approved, the 1st alternative would amend the zoning ordinance as outlined below: Section 6-18-3. – DEFINITIONS. DAYCARE CENTER— DOMESTIC ANIMAL: Any establishment for which the principal use or purpose animals domestic of for the is housing periods of time that shall neither exceed twelve (12) fourteen (14) hours in any twenty-four (24) hour period, nor include overnight stays. Multiple animals shall be permitted outside on the premises when accompanied by staff and only between the hours of 8:30 any Individual day. on p.m. 4:30 and a.m. animals shall be permitted outside on the premises to relieve themselves at any time during the Center's hours of operation when accompanied by staff. Prior to Center, such any the operation beginning of operator shall submit to the Zoning Administrator a contingency plan for those times when an owner fails to claim his/her animal(s) before the Center closes for the day, and, thereafter, comply with said plan. The operator of any such Center shall comply with ofthe applicable regulations Title 8, Chapter 4, andTitle 9, Chapter 4 of the City Code, as amended. Section 6-12-2-3.- SPECIAL USES. The following special uses may be permitted in the RP district, subject to th e provisions set forth in Section 6-3-5 of this Title: Banquet hall. Business or vocational school. Cannabis dispensary (subject to the general requirements of Section 6 -4-11 of this Title). Craft alcohol production facility. Daycare Center- Domestic Animal. Kennel. Open sales lot. Outdoor storage. Performance entertainment venue. Planned developments (subject to the requirements of Section 6 -3-6 of this Title and Section 6-12-1-7 of this Chapter). Resale establishment. Restaurants—Type 2. Urban farm, rooftop. The proposal could be considered consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan to maintain the appealing character of Evanston’s neighborhoods while guiding their change; Page 3 of 85 P4.Page 350 of 506 promoting the growth and redevelopment of business, commercial and industrial a reas; as well as the objective to retain and attract business in Evanston in order to strengthen Evanston’s economic base. Though, the proposed amendments would provide for a new use to be established and ensure there is a process that would help to mitiga te potential nuisances, the more central downtown area may not be the best location for uses of this type. Care would need to be taken in evaluating a proposed business model and how it would fit in a particular site. Conversely, the proposed use may benefit a concentration of downtown resident dog owners and provide another convenience use within walking distance to further enable a car-free lifestyle. The 2009 Downtown Plan states that the RP District is out of date due to it being “so closely tied to a plan the city is no longer pursuing”, that plan being established in the 1980’s and intending to set aside an area of the downtown for a high-tech research park that would allow for light manufacturing and applied research and technology firms. The Downto wn Plan then recommends that the RP District be rezoned and incorporated into the core downtown district. RP Zoning District is within the Core Zone of the Downtown Plan which recommends that increased activity to occur there to take advantage of the proxi mity to transit options. Specifically, mixed-use development with ground floor retail is recommended or a location for a larger entertainment use. Permitting Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels within the RP District as Special Uses does not expressly meet the intent of the district; however, as mentioned above, the district itself has been described as needing to be incorporated into the adjacent downtown districts and adjusting its intent. Additionally, there are a variety of existing businesse s within the area that do not necessarily align with a business park setting. During the Special Use process, care would need to be taken to ensure that these uses do not become a nuisance through possible noise, odor or pick-up/drop-off traffic. Adequate public facilities and services currently exist in the area and could be adjusted as needed for any buildout that occurs. Legislative History: September 9, 2020 – The Plan Commission voted, 7-0, to recommend approval of the 1st alternative for the proposed text amendment as presented by staff. Plan Commission Packet from September 9, 2020 Attachments: Ordinance 95-O-20, Text Amendment Revising Regulations for Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Excerpt, September 9, 2020 Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Application Petitioner's Documents in Support of Text Amendment and Special Use Page 4 of 85 P4.Page 351 of 506 9/29/2020 95-O -20 AN ORDINANCE Amending Title 6 of the City Code to Revise Regulations Concerning Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels NOW BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: City Code Section 6-18-3 “Definitions” of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows : 6-18-3. – DEFINITIONS. DAYCARE CENTER— DOMESTIC ANIMAL: Any establishment for which the principal use or purpose is the housing of domestic animals for periods of time that shall neither exceed twelve (12) fourteen (14) hours in any twenty-four (24) hour period, nor include overnight stays. Multiple animals shall be permitted outside on the premises when accompanied by staff and onl y between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on any day. Individual animals shall be permitted outside on the premises to relieve themselves at any time during the Center's hours of operation when accompanied by staff. Prior to beginning operation of any such Center, the operator shall submit to the Zoning Administrator a contingency plan for those times when an owner fails to claim his/her animal(s) before the Center closes for the day, and, thereafter, comply with said plan. The operator of any such Center shall comply with the applicable regulations of Title 8, Chapter 4, and Title 9, Chapter 4 of the City Code, as amended. SECTION 2: City Code Section 6-12-2-3 “Special Uses” of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows : 6-12-2-3.- SPECIAL USES. The following special uses may be permitted in the RP district, subject to the provisions set forth in Section 6-3-5 of this Title: Banquet hall. Page 5 of 85 P4.Page 352 of 506 95-O-20 ~2~ Business or vocational school. Cannabis dispensary (subject to the general requirements of Section 6 -4- 11 of this Title). Craft alcohol production facility. Daycare Center- Domestic Animal. Kennel. Open sales lot. Outdoor storage. Performance entertainment venue. Planned developments (subject to the requirements of Section 6 -3-6 of this Title and Section 6-12-1-7 of this Chapter). Resale establishment. Restaurants —Type 2. Urban farm, rooftop. SECTION 3: That the findings and recitals contained herein are declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as provided by the Illinois Complied Statues and the courts of the State of Illinois. SECTION 3: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 4: This Ordinance 95-O-20 shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in the manner provided by law. SECTION 5: If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is ruled unconstitutional or otherwise Page 6 of 85 P4.Page 353 of 506 95-O-20 ~3~ invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid application or provision, and each invalid provision or invalid application of this Ordinance is severable. In troduced:_________________, 2020 Adopted:___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Kelley A. Gandurski Corporation Counsel Page 7 of 85 P4.Page 354 of 506 APPROVED Page 1 of 6 Plan Commission Minutes 9/9/20 MEETING MINUTES PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, September 9, 2020 7:00 P.M. Virtual Meeting through Zoom Platform Members Present: Peter Isaac (Chair), Jennifer Draper, George Halik, John Hewko, Brian Johnson, Jeanne Lindwall, Kristine Westerberg Members Absent: Staff Present: Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Manager Meagan Jones, Neighborhood and Land Use Planner Judy Frydland, City Attorney Presiding Member: Chair Isaac 1. CALL TO ORDER / DECLARATION OF QUORUM Chair Isaac called the meeting to order at 7:03 P.M. Ms. Jones called the roll and a quorum was established. 2. SUSPENSION OF THE RULES Members participating electronically or by telephone Commissioner Westerberg made a motion to suspend the rules to allow for electronic or telephone participation. Seconded by Commissioner Lindwall. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed, 7-0. 3. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: August 12, 2020. Commissioner Hewko suggested an edit to page 12 of the minutes. Commissioner Lindwall made a motion to approve the minutes from the July 8, 2020 meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Draper. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed, 7-0. 4. NEW BUSINESS A. Text Amendment – Domestic Animal Daycare Center 20PLND-0053 Sarah Lewis, applicant, submits for a Text Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, Title 6 of the City Code, to either 1) amend Section 6 -18 -3 - Definitions to increase the permitted hours of operation for a Domestic Animal Daycare Center then amend Section 6-12 -2-3 – Special Uses to add Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels as Special Use s in the RP Research Park District or 2) amend Section Page 8 of 85 P4.Page 355 of 506 APPROVED Page 2 of 6 Plan Commission Minutes 9/9/20 6-18-3 - Definitions to include a Kennel and increase the permitted hours of operation in the definition of Domestic Animal Daycare Center then add the amended definition as a Special Use to the RP Res earch Park District. Ms. Jones provided a brief summary of the proposed amendment and its two alternatives. She also provided existing locations of domestic animal daycare centers and kennels as well as the purpose of the RP District. Chair Isaac asked if there were any questions from Commissioners Commissioner Halik asked the main difference between the alternatives. Ms. Jones stated that the main difference between the two alternatives is the ability for Domestic Animal Daycare Centers to also have a K ennel as part of its operations without pursuing a separate Special Use. Commissioner Draper clarified that a Kennel could still be allowed as a Special Use. Ms. Jones confirmed that this would be the case. Alternative one would be adding 2 separate Special Uses to the RP District while the second alternative would only add one if the definition is amended. Chair Isaac asked if there are any zoning issues with combining the kennel and animal daycare definitions. Ms. Jones replied that there could be. Addin g Kennels to the definition of Domestic Animal Daycare Centers would be a bit redundant as there is already a separate definition for Kennels with its own set of regulations. Commissioner Draper asked if the text amendment is just for the RP District or for the whole zoning code. Ms. Jones responded that the changes would be in two parts: changing the definition for Domestic Animal Daycare Center, which could affect all zoning districts, and adding the definition(s) as Special Uses to the RP District whic h would only affect that district. Chair Isaac asked if the existing daycare centers have kennels as part of their operations. Ms. Jones responded that she believes they also have kennels. Ms. Jones responded that these are the larger existing daycare facilities. She checked in with the Economic Development Division who confirmed this and stated that there are some smaller home based operations which would serve a small number of dogs. Chair Isaac asked if Kennels and Domestic Animal Daycare Centers are permitted as Special Uses in all districts in which they are permitted and if the Applicant would need to go through the Special Use process. Ms. Jones responded that she believes that to be the case but would need to confirm that. The Applicant will still need to go through the Special Use process. Further discussion occurred regarding the differences between the two alternatives. Mr. Mangum interjected and referred back to the previous question, confirming that in the districts where the two uses are allowed, they are only allowed as Special Uses. Page 9 of 85 P4.Page 356 of 506 APPROVED Page 3 of 6 Plan Commission Minutes 9/9/20 Ms. Nicole Daniel, attorney for the applicant provided an introduction of the applicant and other members of the project team speaking on behalf of the applicant. She then explained that they are simultaneously pursuing a Special Use to open a Dogtopia location at 900 Clark St within the RP District and provided some considerations for that space. Ms. Sarah Lewis, the applicant, provided background on why she is pursuing opening a Dogtopia location in Evanston. She explained that she will be the primary operator and present onsite most days. She then added that she will be working with Have Dreams to pursue employing adults with autism. Mr. George Kisiel, architect and certified planner, provided his profess ional background then explained the site context and surrounding locations and stated that the use will help fill vacant space and be similar to other daycare uses. Mr. Kisiel reviewed the standards that must be met for the proposed text amendment to be approved explaining how he believed they had been met by the proposal. Commissioner Johnson asked if there would be any outdoor space as part of the business operations. Ms. Lewis responded that the site would be completely self - contained. Ms. Daniel added that the sire would have a number of rooms for dogs to use. Ms. Kathy Halter added that Dogtopia has 140 locations with about half having outdoor play space. An indoor environment is provided with rubber floors, ample running space, planned activities and an HVAC system that cycles in 90% outdoor air every 10 minutes. Commissioner Westerberg asked why the expanded hours would be needed and if being on a smaller street would work for parking with other sites being located on wider, busier streets. Ms. Lewis responded that she would like to cater to commuters and capture their true work hours, this led to the proposed longer hours of operation. With regards to parking, the Maple Avenue garage is very close and Evanston is agreeable to providing pick—up/drop-off spots in front of the space in addition to the two spaces the landlord will provide in the alley. Ms. Halter then explained that an app is currently used to streamline and provide touchless pick-ups and drop-offs. Commissioner Hewko asked if there is a limit on the duration of overnight stays a customer can have. Ms. Lewis responded that overnight stays are typically the length of a vacation, one to two weeks. Sometimes, essential workers may choose to leave their dog overnight. Boarding is 20% to 25% of the operation but dogs are also a part of the pack. For Dogtopia specifically, there is a “3-plays before you stay” rule. Mr. Mangum added that there is no limit on the number of overnight stays permitted within the zoning code. Chair Isaac opened the hearing to questions from the public. Mr. Mangum reminded the Commission and the public that, since this a text amendment, questions should be more general and not be specific to one site within the district. Since the applicant has Page 10 of 85 P4.Page 357 of 506 APPROVED Page 4 of 6 Plan Commission Minutes 9/9/20 concurrently applied for a special use permit the Zoning Board of Appeals would be the best venue for discussion of operations specific to this location. Ms. Tina Paden asked if dogs would be inside all day and how waste would be handled. Ms. Halter responded that the dogs would be inside and with designated areas for waste and a strict cleaning schedule with animal -safe cleansers that are also non-irritant to humans. Ms. Paden then inquired about the number of dogs and employees. Ms. Lewis stated that they would start at 40 and work up to 100 dogs. There would be 18 total employees with about 9 on-site at a time. Ms. Halter stated that there will be ancillary staff and roving staff in addition to canine coaches; dogs would be separated by size and temperament. Ms. Daniel stated that space determines the number of dogs with a range of 21sq. ft. required for small dogs and 42 sq. ft. for large dogs. Chair Isaac clarified that the Applicant would be going in front of the Zoning Board of Appeals and that questions that are more directed towards the specific site and its Special Use would be better suited at that meeting. Mr. Mangum confirmed this is the case and that the Zoning board meeting would be on September 15th. Ms. Paden asked how long build out would be and what operatin g procedures would be during Covid-19 pandemic. Ms. Halter responded that it will be 3 to 4 months and meet CDC regulations and procedures as they relate to operating during the pandemic. In response to Ms. Paden’s concern about the safety of dogs overnight, Ms. Lewis stated that employees would not be present after 10pm, however, the location would be monitored and that she lives nearby. Employees would then arrive prior to the center’s business hours at 5:30 AM. Chair Isaac opened the hearing to public testimony. Ms. Paden stated she is neither for nor against the amendment but is a bit alarmed at the possible amount of dogs on-site without all 18 employees on-site at the same time. Chair Isaac asked if there was any eligible resident who wish ed to request a continuance for this item. Hearing none, he closed the public hearing and the Commission began deliberation. Chair Isaac inquired if other research park uses have been researched? Ms. Jones stated that staff had not researched other municipalities but looked into the intention of the RP District and uses that currently operate within it, which are varied. Chair Isaac added that he could not think of specific research types of uses currently in the district. Ms. Jones responded that there are some office uses and medical office use within the district but uses are generally fairly varied. Commissioner Lindwall stated that RP district was enacted in the early 80’s but the notion behind that has changed over the years with additional uses. She believes the Page 11 of 85 P4.Page 358 of 506 APPROVED Page 5 of 6 Plan Commission Minutes 9/9/20 Commission should be considering if this is a use that is suited for the downtown instead of the Research Park District, given the Downtown Plan says the intent of the district is obsolete and it should be rezoned to Downtown districts. Chair Isaac agreed adding that the Church Street Plaza currently houses more entertainment uses. Commissioner Lindwall stated that the second alternative suggests that there is no need for a kennel definition and that the first alternative is the simplest option. Chair Isaac stated that he was leaning towards the first alternative as he had some worries regarding possible unintended consequences with including kennels in the definition of Domestic Animal Daycare Center. He then explained that there are several parts to the amendment: amending definition for hours of operation and/or kennel operations then adding one or both definitions as Special Uses within the RP District. In response to Commissioner Hewko, Ms. Daniel stated both Special Uses have been applied for. Neither existing definition fit what Dogtopia wants to do so modifications were proposed. There were some concerns about applying for a special use for a kennel, with potential connotations of other kennel operators, which is the reason for the second alternative. Chair Isaac clarified if alternative one is approved if the applicant would seek a Special Use for a kennel. Ms. Daniel confirmed that this is the case. A brief discussion followed regarding whether or not both Special Uses for a Kennel a nd Daycare Center would be necessary for this case. It was generally agreed that the first alternative would make the most sense. The Commission then reviewed the standards. There was discussion on each of the standards and there was general agreement t hat each had been met. With regards to adequate public facilities and services it was agreed that parking appears to be met but that this is more site specific and not necessarily the general district. Commissioner Johnson made a motion to recommend appro val of the first alternative for the text amendment. Commissioner Lindwall seconded. Commissioner Westerberg asked as a point of clarification if outside kennels would then be permitted. It was confirmed that they would be allowed as a Special Use and st ill need to go through that process for approval. A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed by a 7-0 vote. Ayes: Isaac, Draper, Halik, Hewko, Johnson, Lindwall, Westerberg Nays: Respectfully Submitted, Page 12 of 85 P4.Page 359 of 506 APPROVED Page 6 of 6 Plan Commission Minutes 9/9/20 Meagan Jones Neighborhood and Land Use Planner Community Development Department Page 13 of 85 P4.Page 360 of 506 Page 14 of 85 P4.Page 361 of 506 Page 15 of 85 P4.Page 362 of 506 Page 16 of 85 P4.Page 363 of 506 Page 17 of 85 P4.Page 364 of 506 Page 18 of 85 P4.Page 365 of 506 Page 19 of 85 P4.Page 366 of 506 Page 20 of 85 P4.Page 367 of 506 Page 21 of 85 P4.Page 368 of 506 1 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF VIEWPOINT CONSULTING, LLC d/b/a DOGTOPIA OF NORTHSHORE LLC’S APPLICATION FOR TEXT AMENDMENT I. SUMMARY Petitioner Viewpoint Consulting, LLC d/b/a Dogtopia of Northshore LLC (“Petitioner”) requests approval of its application for a text amendment under Section 6- 18-3 to amend the definition of Domestic Animal Daycare and to add the amended definition as a Special Use to the RP Research Park District, or in the alternative, add Kennels as a Special Use to the RP Research Park District. Petitioner seeks to amend the definition of the Domestic Animal Daycare to extend the time period to fourteen hours and to allow overnight stays. If the event the amended definition of Domestic Animal Daycare or Kennels are allowed as a Special Use in the RP Research Park District, Petitioner has simultaneously submitted an application for a special use permit at 900 Clark Street, Evanston, Illinois (the “Subject Property”) to allow for Domestic Animal Daycare (with amendment) or Kennels (the “Proposed Special Use”). The Subject Property is located in the RP Research Park District. For the reasons stated herein, the Text Amendment and subsequent Proposed Special Use will conform to the standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance and satisfies the standards for granting such relief under the Zoning Ordinance. Furthermore, approval of the Proposed Special Use is supported by residents of the City of Evanston. II. BACKGROUND Dogtopia, established in 2002, is the industry leader in dog daycare services with more than 140 highly sophisticated, safe and incomparably clean stores across the U.S. and Canada. Dogtopia sets itself apart from other establishments who offer similar services. The Subject Property is located in the RP Research Park District and is a part of the Church Street Plaza, a mixed use development. Petitioner proposes to occupy a first floor retail space consisting of over 5,000 square feet. See Ex. A, Site Plan. The site is bound by three public streets, accessible by two train lines and a short walk from a 1,400 space public parking garage with short term free parking. The Landlord has designated two short term parking spaces and the city parking manager is willing to change the spaces in front of 900 Clark Street to 30 minute parking to create more turnover for Dogtopia and others. Dogtopia has gone to great lengths to differentiate itself from its competitors. First, because pet parents have pet safety as their first priority, Dogtopia has taken great measures in design, maintenance and technology to meet safety expectations. Each playroom within the facility is soundproofed and the HVAC and air filtration system is industrial grade. Because of this design and requirement, no part of the facility smells of dogs and noise cannot be heard from the reception area, let alone the exterior of the building. Further, the air filtration system diminishes the spread of airborne illness and diseases between dogs. Page 22 of 85 P4.Page 369 of 506 2 Live streaming is also available throughout the facility. The following links will provide tours of a typical facility. https://www.dogtopia.com/webster/3d-tour/ https://www.dogtopia.com/stpeters-cottleville/3d-tour/ Second, Dogtopias are designed to be in neighborhood retail shopping centers and densely populated areas for community convenience, such as Evanston and within zoning districts such as the RP Research Park District. To further enhance the ease and experience for pet parents, Dogtopia has developed a smartphone application which allows for curbside drop-off and pick-up to reduce stress, amount of time and provide convenience for those who work and live in flourishing communities such as Evanston. Last, Dogtopia is unique because it focuses on daycare rather than overnight boarding. 74% of Dogtopia’s revenues are from daycare rather than overnight boarding and the Evanston location expects the same or higher percentage of daycare versus overnight boarding. The current text of the definition of Domestic Animal Daycare reads as follows: Any establishment for which the principal use or purpose is the housing of domestic animals for periods of time that shall neither exceed twelve (12) hours in any twenty-four (24) hour period, nor include overnight stays. Multiple animals shall be permitted outside on the premises when accompanied by staff and only between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on any day. Individual animals shall be permitted outside on the premises to relieve themselves at any time during the Center's hours of operation when accompanied by staff. Prior to beginning operation of any such Center, the operator shall submit to the Zoning Administrator a contingency plan for those times when an owner fails to claim his/her animal(s) before the Center closes for the day, and, thereafter, comply with said plan. The operator of any such Center shall comply with the applicable regulations of Title 8, Chapter 4, and Title 9, Chapter 4 of the City Code, as amended. (Ord. No. 67-O- 11, § 2, 9-12-2011) Under Evanston’s zoning ordinance, the closest definition and basis for this type of facility being allowed as a Special Use, is a “kennel” because Dogtopia offers overnight boarding as an ancillary part of its business. However, no outside access is required for the dogs. Accordingly, Applicant seeks to amend the definition of the Domestic Animal Daycare to extend the time period to fourteen hours and to allow overnight stays. The first sentence of the text would read as follows: "Any establishment for which the principal use or purpose is the housing of domestic animals for periods of time that shall not exceed fourteen (14) hours in any twenty-four (24) hour period, but the establishment may offer overnight stays for domestic animals." Page 23 of 85 P4.Page 370 of 506 3 In the event the request for the text amendment under Section 6-18-3 to amend the definition of Domestic Animal Daycare and to add the amended definition as a Special Use to the RP Research Park District is not granted, Applicant seeks to add Kennels as a Special Use to the RP Research Park District. III. STANDARDS FOR AMENDMENT Section 6-3-4-5 of the Zoning Ordinance states: The wisdom of amending the text of the Zoning Ordinance or the Zoning Map is a matter committed to the sound legislative discretion of the City Council and is not controlled by any one standard. In making their determination, however, the City Council should, in determining whether to adopt or deny, or to adopt some modification of the Plan Commission's recommendation consider, among other factors, the following: (A) Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive General Plan, as adopted and amended from time to time by the City Council. (B) Whether the proposed amendment is compatible with the overall character of existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. (C) Whether the proposed amendment will have an adverse effect on the value of adjacent properties. (D) The adequacy of public facilities and services. IV. APPLICATION OF THE STANDARDS FOR AMENDMENT TO THE FACTS In support of its application for the text amendment and with respect to the standards for amendment, Petitioner submits the following: Exhibit B: Report of George Kisiel, AIA, AICP of Okrent Kisiel Associates, Inc. Exhibit C: Report of Mary Linberger, MAI of Linberger & Company, LLC Mr. Kisiel concluded that the proposed amendments reinforce the stated goals, objective, and policies of the Evanston Comprehensive Plan by supporting efforts to improve the variety of retail businesses in Downtown Evanston to strengthen it as a regional shopping center and encouraging a compatible mix of land use in the Downtown. (See Exhibit B at p. 17 and Section 6-3-4-5(A)). He concluded that the proposed amendments to permit a Domestic Animal Day Care Center in the RP Research District is consistent with the goals of increasing housing and attracting Baby Boomers and Millennials to downtown multi-family housing as it provides an amenity and needed service close to their housing. (See Exhibit B at p. 12 and Section 6-3-4-5(A)). Mr. Kisiel Page 24 of 85 P4.Page 371 of 506 4 concluded that the text amendment which will allow the Proposed Special Use is compatible with the overall character of existing developments. (See Exhibit B at p. 12- 13 and Section 6-3-4-5 (B)). He stated that this proposed text amendment seeks to allow a particular use as a Special Use in an entire district rather than in a particular location with the end goal of establishing a Dogtopia at the Subject Property (See Exhibit B at p. 12). He further stated that the Domestic Animal Day Care is most similar to a day care center where patrons drop off and pick up their dogs at certain times and the dogs will be cared for by staff. Much like day cares, Dogtopia’s proposed hours of operation are similar to other daycares which would allow parents to drop off their dogs prior to work and pick up after work or for shorter term stays. See Ex. B, at p.13. Mr. Kisiel concluded that with respect to noise, vibration, odor, glare, threat of fire or explosion, the proposed use would be similar to other uses permitted in the RP Research District. However, a plan for noise and odor are present. Specifically, Dogtopia has designed an acoustically sealed sound barrier wall. See Group Ex. D. (Diagram of Wall type for adjacent and shared walls and Dogtopia Sound Control Specifications). In addition, Dogtopia mandates that there are separate HVAC systems with numerous controls and regulations and procedures for everyday operations. See Exhibit E (Requirements for Odor Reduction). Dogtopia also mandates a waste management plan with stringent protocols and procedures. See Exhibit F. Mr. Kiesel concurred with Mary Linberger that the land use will not have any negative impact on property values in the immediate vicinity due to the text amendment. See Exhibit B at p.13 and Section 6-3-4-5(C)). Mr. Kisiel concluded that the text amendment will have no additional demands on public facilities and services. See Exhibit B at p.13 and Section 6-3-4-5(D)). Further, there are numerous parking options in the near vicinity and Dogtopia developed a smartphone application which makes drop-off and pick- up efficient and accommodating to pet parents but also non-disruptive to non-pet parents. See Ex. G. Based on the aforementioned conclusions and analysis related thereto, Mr. Kisiel concluded that (1) the proposed text amendments satisfy the criteria for the zoning text amendments; (2) the proposed amendments reinforce the stated goals, objectives, and policies of the Evanston Comprehensive Plan; (3) the amendments allow for a use that is particularly attractive to Baby Boomers and Millennials thereby reinforcing the Comprehensive Plan; (4) the Proposed Special Use will have no negative impact on surrounding uses; and (5) the amendments allow for a use which will not create an undue burden on public facilities and services. (Exhibit B at p. 17). Ms. Linberger concluded that the text amendment will in no way diminish or impair the values of properties in the immediate vicinity. (See Exhibit C at p. 1 and Section 6-3- 4-5(C)). Ms. Linberger inspected the Subject Property as well as six other Dogtopia facilities. (Exhibit C at p. 3). Ms. Linberger stated that the bases for her conclusion are as follows: (1) The Dogtopia use is consistent with a retail environment that includes upscale service providers; (2) The Evanston market is not over-served with companies who provide dog daycare services; (3) the Domestic Animal Daycare can operate in a manner that is not Page 25 of 85 P4.Page 372 of 506 5 intrusive to surrounding businesses and property owners; and (4) there is no evidence that their presence has negatively impacted surrounding property values. (Exhibit C at p. 6). In addition to the above referenced evidence and expert opinions establishing that the text amendment satisfies the standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance, the text amendment is supported by the public, including residents of Evanston. (Group Exhibit H). V. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated herein, the text amendment will conform to the standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance and satisfies the standards for granting a text amendment under Section 6-3-4-5 of the Zoning Ordinance. Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Nicole H. Daniel Dinsmore & Shohl LLP One of the Attorneys for Petitioner Nicole H. Daniel Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 222 W. Adams Suite 3400 Chicago, IL 60606 Phone: 312-372-6060 Email: nicole.daniel@dinsmore.com Fax: 312-372-6085 Page 26 of 85 P4.Page 373 of 506 EXHIBIT LIST A. Floor Plan B. Report of George Kisiel, AIA, AICP of Okrent Kisiel Associates, Inc. C. Report of Mary Linberger, MAI of Linberger & Company, LLC D. Group Exhibit: Diagram of Wall type for adjacent and shared walls and Dogtopia Sound Control Specifications E. Requirements for Odor Reduction F. Waste Management Plan G. Parking Summary H. Group Exhibit: Letters of Support from: (1) The Landlord; (2) Yun Park; (3) Dan Cox; and (4) Laurel and David Hansen. Page 27 of 85 P4.Page 374 of 506 EX. A Page 28 of 85 P4.Page 375 of 506 Page 29 of 85 P4.Page 376 of 506 EX. B Page 30 of 85 P4.Page 377 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 1Page Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment and Special Use: Evanston IL Evaluation of proposed text amendment and special use with respect to Section 6-3-4-5 Standards for Amendments and Section 6-3-5-10 Standards for Special Uses contained in the Evanston Zoning Ordinance By: George V. Kisiel, AIA, AICP President Okrent Kisiel Associates, Inc. Date: September 2, 2020 Lincoln St.Lincoln St.Sheridan Rd.Sheridan Rd.Sheridan Rd .Sheridan Rd .Sherman Ave.Sherman Ave..evA yrubsA.evA yrubsAeniL elpruP ATCeniL elpruP ATCDodge Ave.Dodge Ave.Emerson St.Emerson St. Church St.Church St. Lake St.Lake St.Green B a y Rd .Gr e en B a y Rd .Union P a c i f i c No r thUnion Pac i f i c No r th Chicago Ave.Chicago Ave.Foster St.Foster St.Mayfair Railroad PropertyMayfair Railroad PropertyLake Michigan Lake MichiganRidge Ave.Ridge Ave.SITESITE N Subject Property in Context Page 31 of 85 P4.Page 378 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 2Page The proposed special use seeks to establish a Do- mestic Animal Day Care Center, as amended, in the RP Research Park District at the subject property located at 900 Clark Street. The sub- ject property is an existing, vacant 5,521 s.f. ten- ant space in the Church Street Plaza develop- ment with the address of 900 Clark Street. Opinion Based on my review and analysis of the data refer- enced in this report and contained in my file, and my professional experience and qualifications, it is my professional opinion that the proposed text amendments meet the standards contained in Section 6-3-4-5 Standards for Amendments of the Evan- ston Zoning Ordinance and the proposed spe- cial use for a Domestic Animal Day Care Center (or, alternatively, a Kennel) meets the standards for special uses contained in §6-3-5-10 Stan- dards for Special Uses of the Evanston Zoning Or- dinance. Introduction I am a licensed architect and a certified planner. I am a member of the American Institute of Architects, the American Planning Association, and the American Institute of Certified Plan- ners. I am the president and owner of Okrent Kisiel Associates, Inc., where I have been em- ployed for over 38 years. I have been accepted as an expert witness in planning and zoning in the courts of Cook, Lake, Will and DuPage Counties, Illinois and have appeared before numerous planning and administrative review boards throughout the Chicago metro area. I and my firm have extensive experience in Evan- ston, particularly in the context of downtown redevelopment including involvement in the de- velopment of Church St. Plaza, Optima Tow- ers, Optima Horizons, McDoughal Littell, and Mather Lifeways. Purpose I have been engaged by the applicant, View- point Consulting, LLC d/b/a Dogtopia of Northshore, LLC to evaluate a proposed zoning text amendment with regard to the standards for amendments contained in §6-3-4-5 of the Evanston Zoning Ordinance and to evaluate a proposed special use according to the standards for special uses contained in § 6-3-5-10 of the Evanston Zoning Ordinance. The proposed text amendments seek to add language to the definition of Day Care Center – Domestic Animal, contained in § 6-18-3, to allow stays of up to 14 hours (currently limited to 12 hours), to allow overnight stays (currently prohibited), and to allow Domestic Animal Day Care Centers in the RP Research Park District (§ 6-12-2-3). Page 32 of 85 P4.Page 379 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 3Page Property Description The subject property is a tenant space in the Church Street Plaza development. Church Street Plaza is the heart of Evanston’s Downtown En- tertainment District. Located in the triangular area between the METRA Union Pacific North Line and CTA Purple Line viaducts, Church Street Plaza was developed in the late 1990’s. The project included an 18 screen movie theater seating 3,400; a 180 room hotel; a new corpo- rate headquarters building (McDougal Littell and Company); a new Borders Books and Music; a 28 story 207 unit Optima Views building; and a city- constructed 1,450 space parking garage. The subject property address is 900 Clark Street. The ±5,521 s.f. tenant space occupies approxi- mately 60 feet of frontage on the south side of Clark Street just west of the CTA purple line track viaduct. According to the building owner (SCG Church Street Plaza, LLC) the space has been va- cant since 2013 when they acquired the building. Clark Street is a two-way local street that runs between Maple Avenue on the west and Sheri- dan Road on the east. It has one through traffic lane in each direction and street parking along the south (eastbound) lane. The subject prop- erty is located ±150 feet from Clark Street’s western terminus at Maple Avenue. ORRINGTON AVE.UNIVERSITY PL.OAK AVE.MAPLE AVE.BENSON AVE.SHERMAN AVE.CLARK ST. CHURCH ST. DAVIS ST. UNIVERSITY PL. E LG I N R D.OAK AVE.MAPLE AVE.BENSON AVE.SHERMAN AVE.ORRINGTON AVE.CLARK ST. CHURCH ST. DAVIS ST. SITESITE NN Subject Property Page 33 of 85 P4.Page 380 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 4Page Land Use Context The subject property is located in Downtown Evanston. Downtown Evanston is a moderate to high density mixed use area consisting of high-rise residential and office uses with commercial, retail, service and entertainment uses intermingled. It is well served by CTA and METRA rapid transit and has become one of the finer examples of transit oriented downtown re-development in the region. The subject property is located at the northern end of the Church Street Plaza building. The structure contains the Century 12/CineArts 6 Movie Theater along with a range of other ground floor commercial uses along Maple Ave- nue and Clark Street including restaurants (Terra & Vine Mediterranean Restaurant and Chili’s), retail (World Market, Blick Art Materials, Urban Outfitters), and personal services (Salon Lofts). NorthwesternCenter forPublic Safety OldbergPark NorthwesternUniversity St. JamesChurch AlleyGallery OptimaHorizonsCondos NorthwesternInformationTechnology CVS HiltonOrrington College ofOrientalMedicine ShermanPlazaCTA Purple LineChurch StreetStationCondos Church StreetPlaza OptimaViewsCondos SmylieBrewing Co. Wheel &Sprocket VintageVinyl Avidor 55+ Apartments HiltonGarden Inn NorthshoreResearchInstitute E2 ApartmentsE2 Apartments Avidor 55+ Apartments VintageVinyl Wheel &Sprocket SmylieBrewing Co. Church StreetStationCondos Church StreetPlaza ShermanPlaza CVS College ofOrientalMedicineCTA Purple LineOptimaViewsCondos OptimaHorizonsCondos St. JamesChurch AlleyGallery OldbergPark NorthshoreResearchInstitute HiltonGarden Inn HiltonOrrington NorthwesternInformationTechnology NorthwesternCenter forPublic Safety NorthwesternUniversity ORRINGTON AVE.UNIVERSITY PL.OAK AVE.MAPLE AVE.BENSON AVE.SHERMAN AVE.CLARK ST. CHURCH ST. DAVIS ST. UNIVERSITY PL. E LG I N R D.OAK AVE.MAPLE AVE.BENSON AVE.SHERMAN AVE.ORRINGTON AVE.CLARK ST. CHURCH ST. DAVIS ST. SITESITE NNLand Use Key CommercialInstitutionalOffice Open Space Residential Land Use Key Hotel Parking Land Use Context Page 34 of 85 P4.Page 381 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 5Page Immediately across Clark Street, to the north of the subject property, is the five-story Northwest- ern University Center for Public Safety (insti- tutional). To the west and north along Maple Avenue is the Hilton Garden Inn (hotel). Imme- diately to the west at the end of the intersection of Maple Avenue and Clark Street is a ±1,400 car public parking garage. Adjacent to the park- ing garage to the south is the Optima Views Condominium (207 unit high-rise residential). South of that is Northwestern Medicine Imme- diate Care (medical offices) with Furious Spoon (restaurant) and Cycle Bar (personal service/fit- ness) occupying ground floor tenant spaces. Across Church Street to the south is the six- story McDougal Littell (now Houghton Mif- flin Harcourt) office building that also houses North Shore University Healthcare (medical office) and Athletico (personal service/physical therapy) along with other office uses. Ground floor commercial tenants include Peeled Juice Bar and Noodles & Company (restaurant), Pure Barre (personal service/fitness) and Link, Inc. (service). Adjacent to the east and west of the McDougal Lit- tell building are the Davis Street Stations of both the METRA Union Pacific North Line and CTA Purple line providing excellent transit accessibility. Subject Property: 900 Clark Street Chili’s (right) and NU Public Safety Center (left) Parking Garage at Clark Street and Maple Avenue Northwestern Immediate Care with Optima View beyond World Market , Century Theatre and Terra & Vine Page 35 of 85 P4.Page 382 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 6Page Zoning Context The zoning pattern in Downtown Evanston is dominated by the D1 – D4 Downtown zoning districts. The exception is the RP Research Park District that occupies the triangle at the northwest corner of the Downtown area between the ME- TRA Union Pacific North Line viaduct and the CTA Purple Line viaduct. The core of the down- town (D and RP Districts) is surrounded, gener- ally by the higher density residential classifications including the R6 and R5 districts as well as the U-1 University District to the north and east. Evanston’s first zoning ordinance was drafted in 1921. The current zoning ordinance was enacted in 1993. The RP Research Park District was cre- ated subsequent to planning initiatives relating to the area designated as Downtown II in 1977. This was at a time where Evanston, in partner- ship with Northwestern University were at- tempting to establish a high-tech business park in this (at the time) underdeveloped portion of Evanston’s Downtown. The plan never came to fruition and current planning documents indi- cate the RP district is “out of date” R4 R4 R5 R5 R5 R5 R4 R4 R4a R4aR5 R6 R6 R4 R4 R6 R6 R6 R4 R5 R5 R5 D1 D1D2 D2 D4 D4 D2 D4 D2 D3 D3 RP D4 D4 R4 B1 B1 B2 B1 B1 B2 B1 WE1 WE1 MXE MXE WE1 I2 T1 T2 U1 U3 T1U1a R3 R3 R1 R1 R3 R2 OS OS OS OS C2 C2 C1 C2 C2 OS OS OS OS OS OS O1 O1 Sheridan Rd.Sheridan Rd.Sheridan Rd .Sheridan Rd .Sherman Ave.Sherman Ave.CTA Purple LineCTA Purple Line Emerson St.Emerson St. Church St.Church St. Lake St.Lake St.Gr e e n B a y R d .Gr e e n B a y R d .Un i o n P a c i f i c N o r t hUn i o n P a c i f i c N o r t h Chicago Ave.Chicago Ave.Foster St.Foster St. Lake Michigan Lake MichiganRidge Ave.Ridge Ave.SITESITE N Zoning Context Page 36 of 85 P4.Page 383 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 7Page The RP Research District currently allows the following permitted and special uses: 6-12-2-2. - PERMITTED USES. The following uses are permitted in the RP district: Brew pub. Commercial indoor recreation. Commercial parking garage. Conference facility (college/university). Conference facility (noncollege/university). Cultural facility. Day Care center—Adult (subject to the general requirements of Section 6-4-3, “Adult Day Care Homes,” of this Title). Day Care center—Child (subject to the general requirements of Section 6-4-2, “Child Day Care Homes,” of this Title). Dwellings—Multiple-family. Financial institution. Government institution. Hotel. Industrial service establishments. Light manufacturing. Neighborhood garden. Office. Pharmaceutical manufacturing. Public transportation center. Public utility. Research and development industries. Restaurant—Type 1. Retail goods establishment. Retail services establishment. Single-family attached dwelling unit. Warehouse establishment. Wholesale goods establishment. (Ord. No. 43-O-93; amd. Ord. 100-O95; Ord. No. 81-O- 14, § 41, 8-11-2014; Ord. No. 105-O-18 , § 31, 10-8-2018) 6-12-2-3. - SPECIAL USES. The following special uses may be permitted in the RP district, subject to the provisions set forth in Section 6-3-5 of this Title: Banquet hall. Business or vocational school. Cannabis dispensary (subject to the general require- ments of Section 6-4-11 of this Title). Craft alcohol production facility. Open sales lot. Outdoor storage. Performance entertainment venue. Planned developments (subject to the requirements of Section 6-3-6 of this Title and Section 6-12-1- 7 of this Chapter). Resale establishment. Restaurants—Type 2. Urban farm, rooftop. (Ord. No. 43-O-93; amd. Ord. 2-O-00; Ord. 114-O-02; Ord. 122-O-09; Ord. No. 129-O-12, § 14, 1-14-2013; Ord. No. 3-O-14, § 14, 2-10-2014; Ord. No. 57-O-14, § 14, 6-9-2014; Ord. No. 81-O-14, § 15, 8-11-2014; Ord. No. 8-O-17 , § 12, 4-24-2017; Ord. No. 105-O-18 , § 32, 10-8-2018; Ord. No. 126-O-19 , § 3, 10-28-2019) Both §6-12-2-2 (Permitted Uses) and §6-12-2- 3 (Special Uses) have been amended numerous times since the creation of the RP District. The vast majority of these amendments have been to allow compatible uses not contemplated by the original RP District. Some of those uses added include Cannabis Dispensaries (Ord. No. 126-O-19); Brew Pubs and Craft Alcohol Page 37 of 85 P4.Page 384 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 8Page Production Facilities (Ord. No. 105-O-18); and Rooftop Urban Farms (Ord. No. 81-O-14 ). The Permitted and Special Uses allowed in the RP Research Park District have evolved over the years to include a range of uses consistent with the mixed use commercial/retail/entertainment district that the area has emerged since the con- struction of Church Street Plaza. Planning Context. The City of Evanston’s Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 2000 and is now 20 years old. Nonetheless, the 2000 Comprehensive Plan con- tains relevant general goals and objectives pertain- ing to Evanston’s Downtown. The stated goal for the Downtown is to: • Promote a mixed-use central business district that is attractive, convenient and economically vibrant Objectives and policies relevant to the proposal include: • Support efforts to improve the variety of retail businesses in the Downtown to strengthen it as a regional shopping center; and • Encourage a compatible mix of land uses in the Downtown. In addition to the 2000 Comprehensive Plan, Evanston updated and adopted its revised plan for the Downtown in 2009. As this is the most recent, pertinent planning document, it is impor- tant to note its guidance regarding the location and proposed facility. As mentioned earlier the 2009 Downtown Plan recognizes that the RP Research Park District is out of date. The plan recom- mends converting the RP Research Park District into a new downtown “core” zoning classification . The plan states: • The existing RP district is compatible with the “core” classification in that it currently hosts bulky, high-traffic generating land uses. Relatively new uses within the RP district include a parking garage, ho- tel, and a movie theater that are also compatible and appropriate for a “core” zoning classification. • The construction of the new movie theaters within the RP district established this area as downtown’s central location for entertainment and night life. The Downtown Evanston 1993 Downtown Evanston 2019 Page 38 of 85 P4.Page 385 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 9Page new “core” zoning would continue to foster the de- velopment of this area as an entertainment district. Evanston’s most recent planning documents recognize the transformation that its Down- town has undergone over the last 20 years. Both the 2000 Comprehensive Plan and the 2009 Downtown Plan acknowledge and encourage continuing mixed use development with a vari- ety of commercial, retail, service and entertain- ment uses. Proposed Development The applicant, Viewpoint Consulting, LLC d/b/a Dogtopia of Northshore, LLC propos- es to establish a Day Care – Domestic Animal use in a tenant space in the Church Street Plaza building. The 5,521 s.f. ground floor space is located at the north end of the building facing Clark Street. The address of the tenant space is 900 Clark Street. Dogtopia, is the industry leader in dog day care and boarding with highly sophisticated, safe and incomparably clean stores across the U.S. and Canada. Dogtopia, created in 2002, has more than 140 units operating in the U.S. and Cana- da. Day Care services are the primary revenue source (74% of the revenue), followed by 18% from boarding and 8% from grooming/spa ser- vices. Dogtopia enjoys three differentiators from Subject Property Facility Layout Page 39 of 85 P4.Page 386 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 10Page ston area market, only two shared this impor- tant trait. 74% of Dogtopia’s revenues are from day care and it is considered the “hero” of our business. The proposed Dogtopia facility will provide day care for dogs for up to 14 hours in a 24 hour period. Additionally, the facility will provide overnight boarding and grooming/spa services. The hours of operation will be from Monday thru Friday 6:30 am – 7 pm and Saturday & Sunday 10:00 am – 5:00 pm. The facility will be monitored by security cameras 24/7. Total employment will be ±18 including 2 full time positions with a typical staff of 9 employ- ees on hand at all times during business hours. For overnight stays, staff remains present after closing, usually until 10:00PM with the facil- ity monitored by video after 10 PM. Less than 20% of stays are anticipated to be overnight boarders. The total operating capacity of the facility will be ramped up over a period of time as clientele is established. Initially average occupancy will be between 40 to 80 dogs per day for the first year. Up to 90 dogs per day is anticipated in year 2 with stabilization at ± 115 dogs per day after 5 years. Based on experience at other Dogtopia locations, peak drop-off time occurs between 6:30AM and 8:30AM with ±75% of average daily drop-offs occurring between those hours. Given the character of the Downtown Evan- ston it is anticipated that a significant amount of the clientele will walk to drop off their pets. Dogtopia of Evanston will partner with local restaurants and the neighboring movie theatre for periodic “Date Nights”, so that pet parents may enjoy an evening out while their dogs also competitors. First, pet parents have pet safety as their first priority and Dogtopia takes mea- sures to secure and maintain pet parent trust. Facilities are striking in design and maintenance. One experiences a modern professional office when entering Dogtopia. Each room is sound- proofed, and the HVAC/air filtration system is industrial grade. The end result is that no part of the facility smells of dog and no dog noise can be heard from the reception area. Addition- ally, airborne illnesses and diseases, like kennel cough, are greatly diminished through the air fil- tration system. A trained Canine Coach remains with the dogs in play areas at all times to pro- vide a safe,structured play environment and to work with the dogs on socialization, education and exercise. To provide the highest level of transparency in terms of pet care, live streaming of all play rooms and kennels is available to pet parents during operating hours via Nest cam- eras. This feature is very popular and on average Dogtopia pet parents watch the video feeds of their furry children 13 minutes a day. The second differentiating factor is Dogtopia’s convenience factor. Most day care and board- ing facilities are in rural, industrial or commer- cial areas. Dogtopias are in neighborhood retail shopping centers. The pet parent arrives in the morning at the store that is conveniently locat- ed in their community shopping center and is greeted at his/her car by a Dogtopian who takes their dog for curbside service. (Pet parents can also come into the lobby area for drop-off ser- vice.) On the way home from work or shopping, the pet parent comes to the store, curbside or lobby, to receive his/her dog and a report on the day’s activities. The third differentiator is Dogtopia’s focus on day care. Of the six competitors in the Evan- Page 40 of 85 P4.Page 387 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 11Page Evanston Zoning Ordinance Standards of Ap- proval for amendments Pursuant to Section 6-3-4-5 Standards for Amendments: The wisdom of amending the text of the Zoning Ordi- nance or the Zoning Map is a matter committed to the sound legislative discretion of the City Council and is not controlled by any one standard. In making their determi- nation, however, the City Council should, in determining whether to adopt or deny, or to adopt some modification of the Plan Commission’s recommendation consider, among other factors, the following: (A) Whether the proposed amendment is consis- tent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive General Plan, as ad- opted and amended from time to time by the City Council. Response: Evanston’s Comprehensive Plan is nearly twenty years old and is in the process of being updated. Nonetheless, the 2000 Comprehensive Plan con- tains relevant general goals and objectives pertain- ing to Evanston’s Downtown. The stated goal for the Downtown is to: • Promote a mixed-use central business district that is attractive, convenient and economically vibrant Objectives and policies relevant to the proposal include: • Support efforts to improve the variety of retail businesses in the Downtown to strengthen it as a regional shopping center; and • Encourage a compatible mix of land uses in the Downtown. The more recent 2009 Downtown Plan recogniz- es that the RP District and its planning objectives have special treats and photo opportunities. Dogtopia will hold raffles for gift cards and ob- tain discounts from restaurants for pet parents who participate in these special events. The store also plans to hold events in tandem with the city’s Oktoberfest, Art Walk, Farmer’s Mar- ket and Custer Street Fair. There will be VIP ticket raffles, giveaways and additional photo op- portunities during these events. Dogtopia looks forward to partnering with local bars downtown for football and March madness watch parties so that pet parents can attend these while dogs can come to play their own games. In order to permit the proposed use in the pro- posed location a text amendment to amend the definition of Day Care - Domestic Animal as indicated in §6-3-9 to allow a stay of up to 14 hours in 24 hour time period and to allow overnight boarding is proposed. In addition an amendment to the allowed special uses in the RP Research Park District to permit the Day Care Center– Domestic Animal use in §6-12-2- 3 is also requested. Alternatively, if it is decided that the definition of Day Care Center– Domes- tic Animal should not be amended as requested, and that the proposed Dogtopia use can be clas- sified as a “Kennel”as per the current definition in §6-18-3, the request would then be to amend §6-12-2-3 to allow Kennels as a special use in the RP Research Park District. Factor Analysis Based on the facts set forth in this report, and an analysis of the factors contained in the Evan- ston Zoning Ordinance Standards for evaluat- ing map and text amendments, it is my opinion that the proposed text and map amendment meet Evanston’s standards for zoning changes. Page 41 of 85 P4.Page 388 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 12Page choosing to live, is consistent with Comprehensive Plan objectives. The proposed use provides an in- demand service for a target demographic that ben- efits not only the residents of the downtown, but has the potential to benefit downtown businesses as well by providing a certain sense of “freedom” for dog owners to patronize entertainment uses such as theatres and restaurants where dogs are not allowed. Given the foregoing, the proposed text amend- ment allowing Domestic Animal Day Care Cen- ters in the RP research Park District is compat- ible with the goals, objectives and policies of both Evanston’s Comprehensive Plan and the more recent 2009 Downtown Plan. (B) Whether the proposed amendment is com- patible with the overall character of existing development in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. Response: This standard is more applicable to map amend- ments where a particular development requires a change in zoning to allow its construction, usually to the end of increasing bulk and/or density in a specific location. The proposed text amendment seeks to allow a particular use as a Special Use in an entire district rather than in a particular location even though the application for the text amend- ment is for the more specific purpose of establish- ing a special use in a particular location. The proposed use, Domestic Animal Day Care Center (as amended to allow a slightly longer stay and overnight boarding) is most similar in func- tion to other Day Care Center Uses. Patrons of the establishment drop off their wards at a cer- tain time, established in advance, and pick them up in a similar fashion. During their stay the wards are out of date and that the area has undergone a transformation: • The construction of the new movie theaters within the RP district established this area as downtown’s central location for entertainment and night life. The new “core” zoning would continue to foster the develop- ment of this area as an entertainment district. Permitting a Domestic Animal Day Care Center in the RP Research District as well as any new downtown “core” district is consistent with the general goals of the current Comprehensive Plan regarding land use. More specifically, the Com- prehensive Plan also targets aging Baby Boomers and Millennials as a target market for downtown multi-family housing. In the Housing Section of the 2000 Comprehensive Plan, New Housing De- velopment and its target market is addressed: Changes in population and the economy impact hous- ing demand. A strong economy in recent years has seen new single-family and multi-family housing construction throughout Evanston. In particular, there has been an increase in demand for “urban” housing styles, i.e., town- houses and condominiums. The approaching retirement of a large segment of the population known as the “baby boom” generation is anticipated to add to this demand as “empty nesters” seek to move from larger to smaller homes requiring less maintenance and located closer to urban amenities. Young professionals working in Chicago and commuting from Evanston via CTA and Metra are also seen as a strong market for multi-family housing. Devel- opments that fit this demand are therefore viewed generally as a healthy addition to Evanston’s housing stock. Given the rising number of dog owners in the two target demographic segments, (Baby Boomers and Millennials) allowing this service use to locate in the RP District (or any subsequent downtown “core” district) close to current and increasing housing density where these demographic segments are Page 42 of 85 P4.Page 389 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 13Page the Church Street Plaza building is a Chili’s restau- rant. The proposed use is compatible with these other commercial/institutional uses in terms of hours of operation, traffic generation and exter- nal impacts given adequate planning to mitigate any noise and/or odor. Given the foregoing, the proposed text amend- ment would allow a use that is compatible with the overall character of existing development in gen- eral, throughout the RP District and its specific lo- cation in the Church Street Plaza building. (C) Whether the proposed amendment will have an adverse effect on the value of adjacent prop- erties. Response: Given the foregoing analysis for Criteria B, there is nothing from a land use perspective that would indicate a negative effect on the value of adjacent properties. In addition, the analysis conducted by Linberger & Company LLC indicates no negative impact on property values in the immediate vicin- ity due to the proposed text amendment or special use. Given the foregoing, the proposed amendment will not have an adverse effect on the value of ad- jacent properties (D) The adequacy of public facilities and ser- vices. Response: The demands of Domestic Animal Day Care Centers on public facilities and services is mini- mal. The use generates no additional school age population thus there is no burden on the public school system. Demand for police and fire ser- vices are no different than other commercial uses permitted in the RP District with the same being participate in various activities, socialize with each other, are fed, and typically rest for a period of time before being picked up at the allotted time. Traffic generation and parking demands are simi- lar to other day care uses with peak hour drop-off occurring slightly before morning peak traffic and pick-up occurring around the peak afternoon/eve- ning traffic period and on a more distributed basis throughout the day. Hours of operation are simi- lar to other Day Care Center uses and are compat- ible with the other retail and entertainment uses in the surrounding areas. With respect to noise, vibration, odor, glare, threat of fire or explosion the proposed use would be similar to other uses permitted in the RP District with perhaps the ex- ception of noise and odor. A plan for managing noise and odor should be required as a condition for approval as a special use. From the broader perspective, the proposed amendment will allow a commercial/service use in a district that certainly permits other similar uses. The RP Research Park Districts lists both Adult Day Care Centers – Adult and Day Care Centers – Child, as permitted uses. Also permitted are Re- tail Uses and Retail Service Uses. The proposed amendment would allow a similar use, but only af- ter evaluation according to the standards for Spe- cial Uses contained in §6-12-2-3 of the Evanston Zoning Ordinance and only after consideration and recommendation by the Evanston Plan Com- mission and Evanston City Council. With respect to the specific proposed location of the Domestic Animal Day Care Center, it is pro- posed for a vacant tenant space in the Church Street Plaza building that houses movie theatres, restaurants, retail and service uses. The adjacent use to the north is the Northwestern University Center for Public Safety (institutional). Imme- diately to the west at the end of the intersection of Maple Avenue and Clark Street is a ±1,400 car public parking garage. The adjacent tenant in Page 43 of 85 P4.Page 390 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 14Page true for usage of public utilities. Clark Street is a minor street and is capable of handling the an- ticipated pick-up and drop-off traffic without any undue burden on the existing roadway network in Downtown Evanston. Given the foregoing, public facilities and services are adequate to handle the proposed use in the RP District and in the specific anticipated location of the proposed special use. Evanston Zoning Ordinance Standards of Ap- proval for Special Uses (A) It is one of the special uses specifically listed in the zoning ordinance; Response: The applicant has filed a petition for coordinated review of a text amendment along with the ap- plication for a special use pursuant to §6-3-4-8. - Coordinated Review and Approval of an Amendment and Special Use and/or Variation of the Evanston zoning Ordinance. The text amendment would add the proposed Day Care Center – Domestic Animal use to the list of special uses allowed in the RP Research Park District. Given the foregoing, and assuming that the text amendment is approved, this standard is met. (B) It is in keeping with purposes and policies of the adopted comprehensive general plan and the zoning ordinance as amended from time to time; Response: As indicated in the prior analysis the proposed special use reinforces the Comprehensive Plan goal for Downtown Evanston to develop as a mixed-use central business district that is attrac- tive, convenient and economically vibrant. The proposed use supports efforts to improve the variety of retail businesses in the Downtown to strengthen it as a regional shopping center; and encourages a compatible mix of land uses in the Downtown. Both of these concepts are listed as objectives and policies of Evanston’s Comprehen- sive Plan as it relates to Downtown Evanston. In addition the proposed special use supports the Comprehensive Plan’s housing objectives by of- fering a service that is specifically tailored to the needs of target populations intended to inhabit downtown multi-family residential developments. Finally the proposed special use makes it easier for Page 44 of 85 P4.Page 391 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 15Page Downtown residents who own dogs (an increas- ing characteristic of target demographic groups) to patronize the nearby retail and entertainment businesses on a more regular basis by providing a safe and secure place to board their pets while enjoying a movie or dinner out. Given the foregoing, the proposed special use is in keeping with purposes and policies of the ad- opted comprehensive general plan and the zoning ordinance. (C) It will not cause a negative cumulative effect, when its effect is considered in conjunction with the cumulative effect of various special uses of all types on the immediate neighbor- hood and the effect of the proposed type of special use upon the City as a whole; Response: As noted earlier the proposed special use is most similar to other permitted uses in the RP Research Park District such as Child and Adult Day Care Centers and Retail Service Establishments. Other special uses listed tend to have higher capacities (banquet halls, business/vocational schools, per- formance entertainment venues) that tend to ar- rive and depart during a compressed time frame (event start time, class start time, etc…) causing the potential for surges in both vehicular and pe- destrian traffic. The proposed use is much more modest in size with a peak traffic generation pe- riod that is greater in duration than the other listed more intense special uses mitigating any effect. Other special uses listed may have impacts on dust or particulate matter (outdoor storage facilities, open sales lots) or fire and explosion (Craft alcohol production facility). The proposed special use will have no impact regarding dust, particulate matter or danger of fire or explosion. With respect to other special uses in the immedi- ate vicinity of the proposed location the only use that generates any significant impact is the Cen- tury/CineArts movie theatres. Though not listed as a special use its impact and the impact of the proposed special use should be considered. The peak activity times for the existing movie theatre use and the proposed Domestic Animal Day Care center use do not coincide so no significant impact from that combination of uses can be anticipated. Given the foregoing, the proposed special use will not cause a negative cumulative effect, when its effect is considered in conjunction with the cu- mulative effect of various special uses of all types on the immediate neighborhood and the City as a whole. (D) It does not interfere with or diminish the value of property in the neighborhood; Response: As indicated in prior analysis of the standards for amendments, here is nothing from a land use per- spective that would indicate a negative effect on the value of adjacent properties. In addition, the analysis conducted by Linberger & Company LLC indicates no negative impact on property values in the immediate vicinity due to the proposed text amendment or special use. Given the foregoing, the proposed amendment will not have an adverse effect on the value of ad- jacent properties (E) It can be adequately served by public fa- cilities and services; Response: As indicated in the previous analysis, the demands of Domestic Animal Day Care Centers on public facilities and services is minimal. The use generates no additional school age population thus there is Page 45 of 85 P4.Page 392 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 16Page no burden on the public school system. Demand for police and fire services for a Domestic Animal Day Care Center are no different than other com- mercial uses permitted in the RP District with the same being true for usage of public utilities. Given the foregoing, the proposed special use can be adequately served by public facilities and ser- vices. (F) It does not cause undue traffic congestion; Response: The proposed use is modest in size and similar in operating characteristics and traffic generation to other permitted uses in the RP Research Park Dis- trict such as Adult and Child Day Care Centers, Type I Restaurants and Retail Service uses. The Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) estimates that Child Day Care Centers generate an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume of 80 trips per 1,000 s.f. For a ±5,000 s.f. facility that would translate to 400 trips daily. The proposed Dogtopia facility with a maximum capacity of 115 dogs can be expected to generate (conservatively) 2.5 trips per dog per day for a total estimated ADT of ±300 which is sig- nificantly less than the permitted Child Day Care Facility use. Dogtopia estimates that about 75% of their drop-off traffic occurs between the hours of 6:30AM and 8:30AM. With a maximum capac- ity of 115 dogs, a conservative peak traffic esti- mate is in the range of 90 trips over a roughly two hour period or 45 trips per hour. This number is likely to be reduced given the compact, urban, pe- destrian oriented nature of Downtown Evanston by as much as 33% dropping the peak generation to approximately 30 trips per hour. Clark Street is a two-lane thoroughfare that does not carry a significant volume of through traffic due to the fact that terminates at Sheridan Road on the east and Maple avenue on the west with a total length just over one half-mile. Street park- ing is available on the south side of Clark Street adjacent to the subject property with the opportu- nity to create a drop-off/pick-up zone during peak hours. Additional traffic mitigation measures for the proposed Domestic Animal Day Care Center include the use of a smart phone application to arrange and reserve specific drop-off and pick-up times allowing staff to have some level of control over traffic flow during peak drop-off and pick-up periods. It should be understood that any use of the vacant tenant space will generate some volume of traffic and that the volume of traffic generated by other permitted uses is likely to be similar to that of the proposed use. Given the foregoing, it is anticipated that the pro- posed special use will not cause any undue traffic congestion in the vicinity of the subject property, nor will it have any significant impact on the sur- rounding Downtown Evanston street system. (G) It preserves significant historical and archi- tectural resources; Response: No historic or architectural resources are present on-site therefore this standard is inapplicable. (H) It preserves significant natural and envi- ronmental features; and Response: No significant natural or environmental features are present on-site therefore this standard, also, is inapplicable. (I) It complies with all other applicable regula- tions of the district in which it is located and other applicable ordinances, except to the extent such regulations have been modified Page 46 of 85 P4.Page 393 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 17Page through the planned development process or the grant of a variation. Response: The proposed special use is located in a tenant space in an existing structure that complies with all applicable regulations of the RP Research Park District zoning classification. The applicant will also comply with any other state or local ordinanc- es required including the applicable regulations of Title 8, Chapter 4, and Title 9, Chapter 4 of the City Code, as amended. Conclusions Based on the foregoing analyses, the following conclusion are drawn: 1. The proposed text amendments meet the standards for zoning text amendments contained in §6-3-4-5. • The proposed amendments reinforce the stated goals, objectives, and policies of the Evanston Comprehensive Plan by supporting efforts to improve the variety of retail busi- nesses in the Downtown to strengthen it as a regional shopping center and encouraging a compatible mix of land uses in the Down- town. • The proposed amendments allow for a use that is particularly attractive to certain demo- graphic segments (Baby Boomers/Millennials), indirectly reinforcing the Comprehensive Plan housing policy objectives to attract those seg- ments to Downtown Evanston. • The proposed amendments allow a use that is compatible with the overall character of Downtown Evanston and is similar and complimentary to other permitted uses in the RP Research Park District. • The proposed amendments allow for a use that will not have a negative effect on land values in nearby properties as the use contemplated is similar in terms of operating characteristics, size, external impacts and traf- fic generation to other permitted uses in the RP Research Park District and is sufficiently separated from any more sensitive uses such as single-family residential uses. • The proposed amendments allow for a use that will not cause any undue burden on public facilities and services including schools, police, fire and emergency services, or public infrastructure such as roads, sewer and water services. 2. The proposed special use meets the stan- dards for approval of special uses contained in §6-12-2-3 of the Evanston Zoning Ordi- nance • The applicant has filed a petition for co- ordinated review of a text amendment along with the application for a special use pursuant to §6-3-4-8 adding the proposed Day Care Center – Domestic Animal use, as amended, to the list of special uses allowed in the RP Re- search Park District. • The proposed special use is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Evan- ston Comprehensive Plan as well as the 2009 Downtown Evanston Plan for the reasons stated above. • As the proposed special use is modest in size and less intense than many of the uses permitted by right and the listed special uses Page 47 of 85 P4.Page 394 of 506 EXPERT OPINION OKR E NT K I SIEL ASSOCIATES INC. 122 S o u t h M i c h i g a n a v e n u e • S u i t e 1200 C h i C ag o , i l l i n o i s 60603 • 312 • 427 • 3000 w w w .o k r e n t k i s i e l .C o m 18Page in the RP Research Park District there will be no negative cumulative effect caused by special uses in the vicinity of the proposed location or the City as a whole. • Nothing from a land use perspective would have a negative impact on land values in the vi- cinity of the subject property. In addition, the analysis conducted by Linberger & Company LLC indicates no negative impact on property values in the immediate vicinity due to the proposed text amendment or special use. • The proposed special use can be adequately served by public facilities and services without any burden on existing resources. • Due to the facility size, its location and na- ture of is operations, traffic generation will be modest and consistent with other commercial, retail, service, and entertainment uses in the area and will not cause undue congestion. • There are no historic, architectural, envi- ronmental or natural resources at the subject property to preserve, and • The proposed facility will comply with all zoning ordinance regulations and other state and local ordinances as required. Page 48 of 85 P4.Page 395 of 506 EX. C Page 49 of 85 P4.Page 396 of 506 LINBERGER & COMPANY, LLC REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL & CONSULTING SERVICES 1017 RIDGE AVENUE EVANSTON, ILLINOIS 60202 PHONE 312.968.1017 EMAIL mary@marylinberger.com September 3, 2020 Zoning Board of Appeals City of Evanston 2100 Ridge Avenue Evanston, Illinois 60201 Re: Proposed Dogtopia Business 900 Clark Street Evanston, Illinois Ladies and Gentlemen, Viewpoint Consulting, LLC d/b/a Dogtopia of Northshore, LLC, seeks approval to operate a service business at 900 Clark Street (“subject property”) providing dogs with daycare, grooming, spa treatments and overnight boarding. This business will be a franchisee of Dogtopia, a Phoenix-based company that was founded in 2002 and now has approximately 116 stores in the Unites States and 15 abroad. Page 50 of 85 P4.Page 397 of 506 Page | 2 This subject property is located in an area of downtown Evanston that is zoned RP Research Park District. The Applicant is seeking a Text Amendment that would recognize its services as a Special Use in this District. As part of this process, I have been asked to evaluate whether the operation of such a special use in the RP District would diminish or impair the values of surrounding properties. Based on the data and analyses contained in the following report, I have concluded that it will have no negative impact. CURRENT CONDITIONS Dogtopia proposes to occupy a first floor retail space of 5,230 square feet in the heart of downtown Evanston at 900 Clark Street. This space is part of Church Street Plaza, a mixed use planned development that includes residential and commercial components. Although it has an urban layout and is bounded by three public streets, Church Street Plaza's tenants are consistent with a lifestyle shopping center in that it is anchored by an 18-auditorium Century Theater and includes a range of restaurants as well as specialized retailers targeted to upscale shoppers. There is public parking on the streets surrounding this development, but there is also a 1,400 space public garage at the intersection of Maple and Clark, a very short walk from the subject. SITE PLAN – CHURCH STREET PLAZA Dogtopia Page 51 of 85 P4.Page 398 of 506 Page | 3 Dogtopia will be located at the northeast corner of Church Street Plaza and will face on to Clark Street. North across Clark is an office building occupied by Northwestern University. To the east is a strip of paved parking and elevated rail lines of the CTA. To the west is an adjacent storefront in Church Street Plaza occupied by a Chili's restaurant. Along the streetscape, these stores are separated by a glass-enclosed interior staircase. To the south is a service corridor which separates Dogtopia from the rear portion of Blick, an art materials store that faces on to Maple Avenue. About 340 feet southwest of Dogtopia is Optima Views, a 28 story condominium development constructed in 2003 that allows dogs and other small pets. A similar distance to the east is Optima Horizons, a 16-story building constructed in 2005 that has 248 units. It has the same pet policy as Optima Views. PROPOSED USE Dogtopia will serve an affluent dog-owning clientele which is seeking high quality care and services for their pets from a trained staff. While the focus will be on “day visitors”, overnight boarding will also be offered. The facility will allow owners to monitor their pet's stay via webcams and request special meals and care. In my judgment, the profile of the Dogtopia client is consistent with visitors to Church Street Plaza as well as downtown Evanston as a whole. COMPARABLE PROPERTIES The Dogtopia business model calls for a consistent and highly professional level of care provided within a specialized facility. In these regards, it is clearly distinguishable from most dog care businesses in Evanston and nearby communities, which are generally individually owned with lesser facilities and fewer services. For this reason, in evaluating the potential impact of the subject on surrounding properties, I have considered the six operating Dogtopias in the greater Chicago area which located are in the communities of Downers Grove, Countryside, Arlington Heights, Oakbrook Terrace, South Elgin, and Deer Park In selecting which of these properties were most relevant to the subject, I looked for the following characteristics: In operation for at least one year, Located in an established retail area, Occupying a modern retail space and Adjacent to other service businesses serving an affluent clientele – preferably not in pet- related activities. Applying these criteria, I concluded that the following three properties are not relevant to the subject: Page 52 of 85 P4.Page 399 of 506 Page | 4 DOWNERS GROVE – 909 WEST OGDEN AVENUE This was among the first Dogtopia to open in the Chicago area. It occupies an older-free standing office-warehouse of about 13,000 square feet in an area that I would characterize as commercial rather than retail. It appears that this business has been successful, as in early 2020, it was reported that the owners had secured $479,200 in new commercial financing for expansion. I believe the age and configuration of this building as well as its surrounding area make it irrelevant to the subject. COUNTRYSIDE -1416-18 WEST 55TH STREET This 5,466 square foot space is located at the western end of a small strip center constructed in 1950 which also includes a hair salon and another dog-oriented business providing a range of services that does not include overnight boarding. To the west of the strip is a gas station with a convenience store. The surrounding area appears stable and well-maintained, but is clearly less affluent than the environs of most of the other Dogtopias as well as the subject. The Planning Manager for Countryside reports that the City approved Dogtopia as a special use about seven years ago and about three years ago it granted an amendment to the special use to permit overnight boarding. The Manager reports that there have been no complaints about this business, and it underwent a thorough review by the City at the time of amendment. I consider this store irrelevant to the subject since it is in a 70-year old building where there is another pet-related tenant. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS – 676 EAST RAND ROAD This approximately 5,700 square foot store is part of Southpoint Shopping Center in the northeast quadrant of Palatine and Rand Roads. The center is currently anchored by Floor and Décor and has a 100,000 square foot vacant anchor space. The Dogtopia is in an area of the center where there are few other tenants. In July 2019, the Village approved a special use permit and two variances for Dogtopia and the store opened in July 2020. Due to the low occupancy of this center and the fact that this store has been open for such a short time, I do not believe is represents a meaningful indicator for the subject. The three properties I consider relevant to the subject are described below and plotted on the following map: Page 53 of 85 P4.Page 400 of 506 Page | 5 OAKBROOK TERRACE – 17W711 EAST ROOSEVELT ROAD This 7,753 square foot store occupies the western end of a modern strip center and includes a full-barrier fenced outdoor play area of 946 square feet along its western elevation. This space had previously been occupied by a restaurant. The nearest businesses are a free-standing Kiddie Academy daycare with an outdoor play area (50 feet from Dogtopia) and a chiropractic clinic (separated from Dogtopia by a vacant space). The other nearby tenants include a nail salon, hair salon, dental clinic, Pearle Vision and Office Depot. To the west of the center is a two-story memory care facility and to the south is a two- story townhome development. The nearest of these residential buildings to Dogtopia is about 200 feet away. At the eastern end of the strip is Pete's Fresh Market which is the shadow anchor. In January 2018, the City Council approved a text amendment that recognized Dogtopia as a special use in the B-3 District and also amended the PUD of which it is a part to allow daycare, boarding, spa and grooming services as well as an outdoor area. In September 2018, the store opened. I consider this store relevant to the subject property since it is located in a modern strip with neighboring uses offering personal care to an affluent clientele. It also has residential neighbors with more immediate exposure than any of the residential developments in the vicinity of the subject. The City's Building and Zoning Administrator reports that there have been no past or present complaints regarding Dogtopia. A representative of Kiddie Academy notes that Dogtopia is an “excellent” and “perfect” neighbor. SOUTH ELGIN – 580 SOUTH RANDALL ROAD This 7,900 square foot space has no outdoor area and is an anchor tenant in an L-shaped strip that totals 32,154 square feet and was constructed in 2005. The nearby tenants include a Page 54 of 85 P4.Page 401 of 506 Page | 6 chiropractic clinic, a nail salon and a pancake restaurant with outdoor seating. To the west of Dogtopia is a single-family subdivision where the nearest home is about 175 feet away. The Village Trustees approved this store in May 2018 by granting a special use in the MP- Master Planned Development District to permit overnight boarding (the other services Dogtopia planned to offer were already permitted by right under the zoning). The store opened in April 2019. I consider this store relevant to the subject since it is located in a modern strip with neighboring uses offering personal care to an affluent clientele. It also has residential neighbors with more immediate exposure than any of the residential developments in the vicinity of the subject. Katie Nails, the only tenant sharing a common wall with Dogtopia, reports no problems with their operation. In 2019, the South Elgin Economic Development Council voted Dogtopia the community’s “Rookie Business of the Year”. DEER PARK – 21540 WEST FIELD PARKWAY This 6,397 square foot space is in Deer Park Town Center, 406,304 square foot life style center in the southwest quadrant Rand Road and Deer Park Boulevard. The major tenants here include Century Theater, Crate and Barrel, Athleta and Barnes & Noble. There is also a full array of upscale national boutiques as well as many restaurants. Dogtopia is at the southern end of the center in a free-standing, three-tenant building that also includes Happki, a toy store, which is separated from Dogtopia by a small vacant space. Dogtopia is about 150 feet west of a free- standing Hacienda restaurant. In October 2018, the Village approved a special use permit and a fence variance for Dogtopia and it opened in June 2019. This is clearly an upscale shopping center, but since this Dogtopia's location is somewhat isolated with regards to almost all the other tenants, I consider it to be somewhat less relevant to the subject. A representative of the toy store reports that they have had no issues with Dogtopia. The Building, Zoning and Development Coordinator for Deer Park knows of no complaints regarding Dogtopia. CONCLUSIONS I conclude that this proposed special use will in no way diminish or impair the values of properties in the immediate vicinity. The bases for my opinion are as follows: Based on other Dogtopias I investigated, this use is consistent with a retail environment that includes upscale service providers. The Evanston market area is certainly not over-served with companies providing services and facilities equivalent to Dogtopia. Page 55 of 85 P4.Page 402 of 506 Page | 7 My review of the minutes of public hearings in other communities that have approved Dogtopia indicates that they have engaged in a thorough vetting process and have voted to grant special uses (and in one case a text amendment as well) to permit this business. It appears that Dogtopias can operate in a manner that is not intrusive to surrounding businesses and property owners. There is no evidence that the Dogtopias I investigated have diminished the values of surrounding properties. Respectfully submitted, LINBERGER & COMPANY, LLC Mary M. Linberger, MAI Page 56 of 85 P4.Page 403 of 506 Page | 8 CERTIFICATION I do hereby certify that, except as otherwise noted in this report: I have personally inspected the subject property. I have no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate that is the subject of this report. I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this report or the parties involved. The amount of the fee is not contingent upon reporting a predetermined opinion that favors the cause of the client, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. To the best of my knowledge and belief the statements of fact contained in this report, upon which the analysis, opinions, and conclusions expressed herein are based, are true and correct. I have not relied on any single item of information to the exclusion of other information and all data were analyzed within the framework of my judgment, knowledge, and experience. I have not withheld any pertinent information. This report sets forth all of the limiting conditions (imposed by the terms of the assignment or by me) affecting my analysis, opinions and conclusions. This report has been made in conformity with and is subject to the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct of the Appraisal Institute. No other person has prepared the analysis, conclusions, and opinions concerning real estate that are set forth in this report. As of the date of this report, I have completed the requirements of the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute and am certified by the state of Illinois. I will not be required to appear in Court or otherwise testify regarding this appraisal unless prior arrangements have been made. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. Mary M. Linberger, MAI Page 57 of 85 P4.Page 404 of 506 Page | 9 CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This Certification is expressly subject to the following stipulations: I obtained the information, estimates, and opinions contained in this report from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct; however, I can assume no responsibility for accuracy. I assume that the title for this property is marketable. I assume no responsibility for matters of a legal nature. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media, without my prior written consent and approval, particularly as to valuation conclusions, my identity, the firm with which I am connected, any reference to the Appraisal Institute, or any reference to the MAI designation. Page 58 of 85 P4.Page 405 of 506 Page | 10 QUALIFICATIONS EDUCATION Ms. Linberger was an undergraduate student at LeMoyne College in Syracuse, New York, and a graduate student at the University of Chicago. She holds the MAI designation from the Appraisal Institute and is a certified general appraiser in Illinois. She is a member of Lambda Alpha, a national land economics fraternity. EXPERIENCE Ms. Linberger has been engaged in providing real estate appraisal and consulting services for over 30 years. She was initially employed by the Marling Group, a Chicago-based firm that provided appraisal and consulting services to an institutional clientele on a national basis. In 1985, she formed her own firm. AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Ms. Linberger specializes in providing testimony and other litigation support in areas such as condemnation and zoning. She has extensive experience estimating the value impact of factors such as special uses, zoning changes, environmental contamination, encroachments, easements and parking losses. Some of her recent assignments have included: Evaluating the value impact on a large commercial property of a zoning ordinance that would substantially reduce the size of its exterior signage; Evaluating the impact of a proposed bed and breakfast on the values of surrounding historic homes in a lakefront neighborhood; Evaluating the value impact of a road widening which results in an irreplaceable parking loss for a funeral home; Evaluating the impact on downtown businesses of converting their privately owned and operated parking to free, municipally owned and operated parking; Estimating the value impact on a lakefront home of an easement that would grant its neighbors lake access across its front yard; and Evaluating the value impact of soil contamination from an adjoining property on a vacant commercial building being marketed for redevelopment by a major retailer. Page 59 of 85 P4.Page 406 of 506 Page | 11 CLIENTS The following is a representative list of clients with whom she has worked: Professional Firms Dinsmore & Shohl Dykema Gosset Fidelity National Law Group Helm & Wagner Holland & Knight Karaganis White & Magel McGladry Neal & Leroy Polsinelli Shughart RSM Swanson, Martin & Bell Taft Stettinius & Hollister Walker Wilcox Matousek, LLP Public Bodies Chicago Department of Aviation Chicago Public Building Commission Chicago Public Schools Chicago Transit Authority Illinois Department of Transportation University of Illinois Municipalities City of Berwyn City of Chicago City of Elmhurst City of West Chicago Lenders Bank of America Page 60 of 85 P4.Page 407 of 506 Group EX. D Page 61 of 85 P4.Page 408 of 506 Page 62 of 85 P4.Page 409 of 506 SoundControl • Special Wall Type at Demising Walls(s) that Extend to Roof Deck • Special Wall Type Around all Playrooms Spaces • Air Gap at the Demising Wall • Studs May Increase in Size if Roof Deck is Over 17'-6" Above Finished Floor (A.F.F.) • Type A: Typical Wall (See Exceptions Below) • Type A1: Plumbing Walls. • Type B: Walls Surrounding Playrooms • Type C: Demising Walls (Adjacent / Shared Walls with Neighboring Tenant(s)) Requirements for Sound Reduction A, A1BCPage 63 of 85P4.Page 410 of 506 EX. E Page 64 of 85 P4.Page 411 of 506 Page 65 of 85 P4.Page 412 of 506 EX. F Page 66 of 85 P4.Page 413 of 506 Better Together, LLC Real Estate Permitting Documentation © 2019 28 WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared By: Loraine Rhoads, Environmental Biologist April 2018 -NOTICE- Trusted Authority, LLC DBA Dogtopia, LLC hereby claims any and all Trademark rights under 15 U.S.C. 1125 of the Lanham Act to the following Waste Management Plan materials. Any of the disclosed Dogtopia franchise color schemes, design features, design layouts, and other non- functional aspects of the disclosed franchise materials that distinguish the Dogtopia franchise are further protected under relevant Trade Dress Law. Any unauthorized copying of the various Dogtopia franchise color schemes, design features, design layouts, and other non-functional aspects of the Dogtopia franchise is strictly prohibited. Trusted Authority, LLC DBA Dogtopia LLC further claims copyright to any and all original works of Authorship of the Waste Management Plan materials as defined by the Copyright Act of 1976 as amended. All copyright rights are reserved. Page 67 of 85 P4.Page 414 of 506 Better Together, LLC Real Estate Permitting Documentation © 2019 29 Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES 1. Introduction 2. Waste Types 2.1 Waste Categories 2.1.1 Re-Use 2.1.2 Recycling 2.1.3 Solid Garbage (Landfill) 2.1.4 Liquid (Wastewater) 3. Waste Collection and Disposal 3.1. Re-Use 3.2. Recycling 3.3. Solid Garbage (Landfill) 3.3.1. Like-business Research 3.4. Liquid (Wastewater) Sanitary, Grey and Black Water Wastes 4. Pet Safe Cleaning Program – Odor Control 5. Waste Minimization 6. Monitoring 7. Nonspecial Waste Certification 8. Consultation 9. References Page 68 of 85 P4.Page 415 of 506 Better Together, LLC Real Estate Permitting Documentation © 2019 30 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Waste types and waste management practices Waste Types Waste Form Waste Stream Waste Destination Paper waste Solid Landfill (soiled) or Recycling Waste transfer station Plastic waste Solid Re-use or Recycling Recycle depot Cardboard packaging Solid Recycling Recycle depot Towels or rags Solid Re-use (towels can be cut into rags) or Landfill Re-Use or Waste transfer station Organic waste (Dog waste or uneaten food) Solid Landfill Waste transfer station Grey and Black water Liquid Municipal Wastewater (non- point source) Water and Sewer Division of South Elgin Waste materials fall into four categories* for management, which include: 1. Re-Use 2. Recycle 3. Solid Garbage - Landfill 4. Liquid - Wastewater *The fifth category, Hazardous Waste, is not applicable at Dogtopia locations 1. Introduction The purpose of the Waste Management Plan is to describe the principles, procedures and management of the waste generated by a Dogtopia franchise location. Dogtopia has developed this plan to ensure wastes are reduced, reused, recycled and do not create offending odor. In accordance with EPA regulatory requirements, the Waste Management Plan outlines measures to manage and mitigate waste generation and resource consumption during the operation of the Dogtopia. The Plan includes details on the following: • The types and quantities of waste generated during operation • Procedures to collect and dispose of waste • Measures that Dogtopia implements to minimize waste generation • Monitoring protocol to ensure effectiveness of these measures The Waste Management Plan is designed to support an ecological based management approach with the focus on environmental best practices where Dogtopia is an asset to neighboring tenants. Surplus or waste materials arise from either the materials imported to our dog daycare center or from those generated on the site. Imported materials are those which are brought Page 69 of 85 P4.Page 416 of 506 Better Together, LLC Real Estate Permitting Documentation © 2019 31 to Dogtopia as part of operational practices. Generated materials are those that occur during the daily operations i.e. trash and wastewater. 2. Waste Types The operations of Dogtopia will generate wastes such as Re-Use, Recycle, Solid Garbage (Landfill) and Liquid (Wastewater). 2.1.1. Re-Use If surplus materials can be used in the future operations, they are classified as materials which can be re-used, i.e. older towels can be cut into cleaning rags. Materials that can be reused in their present form are surplus to operational needs and will be removed from site to a storage facility. The surplus supplies will be labelled and stored for future use. 2.1.2. Recycling If surplus materials cannot be reused in their present form but could be used in a different form, they will be sent to recycling through a waste management service provider. Current acceptable recyclable materials include: • Paper o Newspapers, including inserts o Magazines/Catalogs o Telephone Directories o Office/School Paper o Advertising/Junk Mail o Kraft Brown Paper Bags o Corrugated Cardboard (includes paper towel and toilet paper rolls) o Paperboard/Chipboard (cereal boxes, pasta boxes, tissue boxes etc.) Page 70 of 85 P4.Page 417 of 506 Better Together, LLC Real Estate Permitting Documentation © 2019 32 • Plastic beverage and food containers o Milk, water and juice bottles o Liquid detergent, fabric softener, bleach, shampoo, yogurt cups, vegetable oil bottles • Metal o Aluminum Cans o Steel or Tin Cans • Glass o Bottles and Jars only o Brown, Green and Clear Glass 2.1.3. Solid Garbage (Landfill) If solid waste cannot be classified as re-useable or recyclable, then the only alternative is to send surplus materials to the landfill through a waste management service provider. Under no circumstances will Dogtopia create any waste that is classified as Hazardous Waste according to Federal Regulations Title 40 (Protection of Environment) PART 261 Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste. Under no circumstances will Dogtopia create any waste that is classified as Special Waste according Illinois Environmental Protection Act and Title 35 of the Illinois Administrative Code of Regulations (See Section 7 Nonspecial Waste Certification.) 2.1.4. Liquid (Wastewater) Liquid waste is classified as either greywater or blackwater. Greywater is a product of washing food, dishes, laundry and cleaning duties such as mopping the floor or cleaning equipment. Blackwater is defined as the waste from flushing toilets. 3. Waste Collection and Disposal 3.1. Re-Use Re-useable materials that can be reused in their present form are surplus to operational needs and will be removed from site to a storage facility. The surplus supplies will be labelled and stored for future use. Dogtopia remains committed as an international brand to environmentally friendly practices to reduce waste where ever possible. Page 71 of 85 P4.Page 418 of 506 Better Together, LLC Real Estate Permitting Documentation © 2019 33 3.2. Recycle Weekly collection of recycle material will occur on the same schedule as solid garbage collection. All recycled materials will be collected and sent to a recycle depot or sorting center through a waste management service provider. 3.3. Solid Garbage (Landfill) All solid waste materials that are not re-useable or recyclable will be collected using trash receptacles lined with trash bags. Office and kitchen waste is normal and usual for any type of business and will be collected inside the store daily and removed to the covered dumpster. Dogtopia’s protocol for solid animal waste management is: • Pick up solid waste immediately using plastic bag • Securely tie the plastic bag • Place in a tightly lidded bin lined with plastic trash liner • Empty the trash bin at the end of each day, making sure to tie the double bagged waste • Place the double bagged animal waste in a small deep freezer that is labeled ‘Animal Waste’ • Once a week, on the day of dumpster collection, empty the animal waste freezer into the location’s dumpster • Quarterly, or more frequently if needed, the dumpster will be sanitized with a cleaning product called Super Citrus Dumpster Wash. The application of this product will clean and neutralize any odors and works well on all dumpster surfaces including the secure cover. This product also contains citronella to deter flying insects. Dumpster Wash is non-toxic, biodegradable and environmentally friendly. 3.3.1. Like-business Research Research was conducted at Chicagoland veterinary and boarding business to assess waste management practices. Animal Care Clinic of South Elgin uses standard dumpsters to dispose of all business and animal waste. In a review of their dumpster, there was no noticeable smell. They do have the dumpster area isolated behind a brick wall and gated, next to a small outdoor play area. They take their boarding dogs to an outdoor play area each day. Page 72 of 85 P4.Page 419 of 506 Better Together, LLC Real Estate Permitting Documentation © 2019 34 Gateway Veterinary Clinic in St. Charles offers boarding for dogs with medical needs. Sam Parker, office manager reports they use standard, lockable dumpsters. Their current practice is only to single-bag waste and place in the dumpster daily. Any biomedical waste from veterinary procedures, including sharps and surgery waste is removed weekly with a special biomedical waste disposal company. At Gateway Veterinary Clinic, their dumpsters are less than 50' from an apartment complex. When asked about resident concerns with dumpster smells, he indicated it has never happened and he frequently notices residents walking dogs and children playing in the green space behind and beside their parking lot/dumpsters without issue. 3.4. Liquid (Wastewater) All Sanitary, Grey and Blackwater wastes will be sent properly through the sanitary sewer system. Under no circumstances will Dogtopia crate liquid wastes that include forbidden material such as: • Cooking grease • Garbage Disposal byproducts • Feminine hygiene products • Disposable diapers • Other paper and plastic products Dogtopia’s protocol for liquid animal waste management is: • Fill one mop bucket with plain water and use a red mop wringer insert • Fill a different mop bucket with the approved cleaner (Eliminator for spot cleaning during open play) • Dip mop in approved cleaner and wring out thoroughly • Soak up liquid waste with the mop, ensuring not to spread around the floor • Rinse out contaminated mop in water bucket with red liner • Ready the mop for next use by returning it to the mop bucket with approved cleaner • When the mop water has become dirty or at the end of the shift, empty mop buckets and rinse out into mop sink. Mop heads are washed and traded out daily. • Twice daily perform a sanitation of the playroom floor using Triple Two • Midday – use Triple Two in the mop buckets • End of day – use Triple Two in the mop buckets Page 73 of 85 P4.Page 420 of 506 Better Together, LLC Real Estate Permitting Documentation © 2019 35 4. Pet Safe Cleaning Program – Odor Control Our Pet Safe Cleaning Program provides each location with detailed cleaning protocols for every job necessary in our stores in addition to details on which cleaners to use and when. Dogtopia is the first in the dog daycare business to address the need to clean using certified SAFE chemicals while at the same time effectively killing canine contagious germs. Extensive research has gone into creating our cleaning protocols that will guarantee dogs will not come into contact with a cleaning chemical that is not safe for contact, ingestion or inhalation. Dogtopia’s pet-safe cleaning program was exclusively designed by Health Technology Professional Products, specializing in the animal care industry since 1989. The program contains training videos, employee quizzes and regular inspections to ensure we are maintaining the cleanest environment both inside and outside our facilities. Odor Control begins with immediately removing the source of odor by physically removing solid waste with a double bag process and using a mop system to remove liquid waste. Our bio-enzymatic cleaner, Eliminator, is used when dogs are in open play and is a powerful tool for controlling odor. The great benefit in using a bio-enzymatic cleaner is the safety of this solution for people, dogs and the municipal sewer system. Eliminator is used on floor surfaces, crates, playground equipment and artificial turf to completely eliminate the odor causing bacteria. Daily cleaning happens twice a day with a disinfectant, Triple Two, when dogs are crated for rest. By using the disinfect chemical we are effectively killing germs but also recovering the dirty solution for safe disposal in the sanitary sewer system. Triple Two solution is strong enough to kill bacteria and viruses but safe for municipal sewer system. Triple Two is used extensively across the country in dog daycares, veterinary hospitals, animal rescue facilities and kennels. Artificial grass is cleaned properly in a similar fashion to the interior floors using a turf cleaning machine. This machine is designed for use with the Eliminator bio-enzymatic cleaner for odor control and effectively eliminates all waste. 5. Waste Minimization Wastes generated from Dogtopia do not have the potential to have a negative impact on the environment. The Waste Management Plan has been developed to communicate the principles, procedures and management of all types of waste generated during operations of Dogtopia. Figure 1. Eliminator is a safe bio-enzymatic cleaner formulated to consume odor-causing bacteria. Page 74 of 85 P4.Page 421 of 506 Better Together, LLC Real Estate Permitting Documentation © 2019 36 Dogtopia franchisees implement all possible waste minimization procedures and therefore will reduce the amount of waste to be removed each business location. All Dogtopian owners and staff will be encouraged to look at ways to minimize the amount of generated waste. Industry best practices include: • Waste materials will be reduced, re-used and recycled where possible • Leased items like dumpsters or delivery pallets will be kept in good usable quality and returned for processing when necessary • General solid waste will be double bagged to eliminate odor and placed in a covered and sealed dumpster • All liquid waste will be disposed properly in sanitary sewer system Dogtopia Owner and General Manager (or appointed delegate) will be responsible for ensuring the instruction of all staff members on implementation of our waste management policy and procedures. Regular staff meetings will include discussion of waste management procedures and updates on how to minimize waste. The monitoring of wastes generated will provide an opportunity to review the wastes being generated and ways in which they can be reduced (See Section 6 Monitoring.) 6. Monitoring Dogtopia is committed to minimizing the risks associated with the generation of wastes in daily operations. The monitoring of the quantity and the types of wastes being generated by Dogtopia operations will be tracked and monitored. All waste receptacles will be inspected weekly to ensure that they are maintained in a condition appropriate for their use and containment of specific waste. Page 75 of 85 P4.Page 422 of 506 Better Together, LLC Real Estate Permitting Documentation © 2019 37 The Waste Management Plan and its importance will be communicated to the whole team regularly. Business wide updates including improved recycling amounts will be communicated and discussed at staff meetings. Dogtopia Owner and staff will monitor and analyze waste management plan to produce best practice solutions throughout Dogtopia operations. 7. Nonspecial Waste Certification – copy this section into a separate document [Name] Owner/Operator telephone: [Number] [Date] I certify that cleaning chemicals and waste produced from my dog daycare, spa and boarding services are not hazardous, not liquid, do not contain PCBs or asbestos, are not formerly hazardous, are not shredded recyclable metals, and are not special wastes. I determined that my wastes are not special wastes by looking at my SDS. I also certify that double bagged dog waste and drainage from cleaning protocols are not classified as hazardous and do not pose contamination risk. SDS for cleaning chemicals used in our Pet Safe Cleaning Program are attached. [Name] Owner 8. References Batty, Stuart. “Do I Have a Special Waste?” Special-Waste, Illinois EPA, www.epa.illinois.gov/topics/small-business/publications/special-waste/index. Batty, Stuart. “Waste Management.” Waste Management, http://www.epa.illinois.gov/topics/waste-management/index. “EPA 40 CFR Part 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE.” LII / Legal Information Institute, http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/part-261. “Guide to Air Quality Assessment - Chapter 7 Appendix: Odor Reductions.” CEQA Guidance & Tools, 2017, http://www.airquality.org/businesses/ceqa-land-use-planning/ceqa-guidance- tools. Page 76 of 85 P4.Page 423 of 506 EX. G Page 77 of 85 P4.Page 424 of 506 On behalf of Dogtopia of Northshore, LLC, we are excited to propose the development at 900 Clark Street, Evanston, Illinois. The existing location will be redeveloped with a dog day care as a Special Use in the RP Research Park District. Dogtopia estimates the total capacity of the daycare to be 116 dogs with a total staff of 18. On any given day, approximately 9 staff will be on site. In the initial year, the daily dog total is expected to be 80 and each year thereafter this will increase by approximately 5-10 dogs until capacity is reached. Based on Dogtopia’s experience at other centers, approximately 5% of dogs are siblings, and consequently travel to and from the site in a single vehicle rather than each dog in a separate vehicle. Dogtopia’s hours plan to be 6:30am -7:00pm Monday - Friday in order to properly accommodate morning and evening commuters and individuals with varying work schedules, and 10:00am – 5:00pm on Saturday and Sunday. Dogs generally arrive between 6:30am and 9:00am and leave approximately 4:00pm – 7:00pm during weekdays. However, a portion of the dogs depart at the half day between noon and 2:00 pm. Arrivals and departures vary based upon pet parent and other schedules, such as spa services. The varied arrival and departure times minimize traffic congestion during high activity periods. On average a pet parent is at the property for a duration of approximately 30-60 seconds during pick-up and drop-off periods. This quick process is due to a smartphone application that is available for pet parents to schedule curbside drop-off and pick-up 10/15/20 minutes in advance of their arrival. See included screenshots. A store employee will meet the pet parent at their car to retrieve their dog or, in the event of a pick-up later in the day, bring their dog to their car. Pet parents are welcome to come into the lobby for drop-off and pick-up if they live nearby and are walking, or driving as well. The drop-off and pick-up process in the lobby takes 2- 5 minutes depending on the time of day. If walking, the pet parent is welcome to schedule a curbside drop- off/pick-up for expedience. When a new dog is brought to Dogtopia for a Meet and Greet evaluation appointment, the pet parent will be advised to park in the Maple Avenue parking garage, a brief 150-foot walk from 900 Clark St. The Meet and Greet consists of an evaluation of the dog as well as a thorough tour of the store for the pet parent which typically lasts half an hour. The garage permits the first hour of parking to be free on the first floor level, so this fits within the convenient time-frame for the evaluation appointment. Pet parents will use the paid parking in front of the store as well as surrounding paid parking, including the nearby Maple Avenue parking garage which provides for free parking for the first hour on the ground floor. There are two exclusive spaces provided by the landlord which are adjacent to the L tracks in the alley and will be clearly labeled for Dogtopia and monitored. Additionally, the site is in very close in proximity to significant public transportation and we estimate that approximately 20% of the pet parents dropping off dogs will be walking from nearby neighborhoods and/or parking in a garage so that they may take a train to downtown Chicago or northern suburb headquarters. It is less than 800 feet from the front door of the building to the entrance of the Davis Street Metra Station and less than 900 feet from the front door of the building to the entrance of the Davis Street Purple Line L Station. With the downtown location, we estimate there will also be pet parents walking to their work location from nearby neighborhoods who will drop their dog off prior to walking to work. Further, the Evanston parking manager is willing to change the spaces in front of 900 Clark Street to 30 minute parking to create more turnover for Dogtopia and other businesses in the area. Page 78 of 85 P4.Page 425 of 506 Page 79 of 85 P4.Page 426 of 506 Page 80 of 85 P4.Page 427 of 506 Group EX. H Page 81 of 85 P4.Page 428 of 506 June 15, 2020 Alderman Braithwaite 1227 Dodge Evanston, Illinois 60201 Re: Dogtopia at Church Street Plaza Dear Alderman Braithwaite: I am a representative of SCG Church Street Plaza, LLC, the landlord of the property located at Church Street Plaza and I am writing to you in support of Dogtopia, LLC which wishes to lease over 5,000 square feet in the plaza to operate a dog daycare. As you are likely aware, the space Dogtopia seeks to occupy has been vacant for years, never being leased since we acquired the property in 2013. Unlike other dog daycares or kennels, Dogtopia has taken numerous steps to set itself apart and take precautions in both build out and operations to ensure that it has a positive effect on neighbors and for the cities it is located in. During the lease discussions with Dogtopia’s operator and owner, Ms. Sarah Lewis, it was readily apparent that Ms. Lewis was passionate about adding this type of daycare and facility to Evanston. I believe that the citizens of Evanston will benefit from this addition to our businesses as it is unlike any business we currently have in Evanston, while also adding a unique element to the tenant mix at Church Street Plaza. I understand there were initial concerns regarding potential nuisance issues and complaints. However, in reviewing the Dogtopia materials, we determined procedures and protocols are required to address such concerns, such as filtration systems, separate HVAC systems and forced air cycling to eliminate odors, and walls are specially designed to eliminate sound. In addition, Dogtopia has agreed to reduce or eliminate potential sounds and odors pursuant to the terms of lease which we were adamant in having so as to not impact our surrounding tenants and neighbors. The lease also allows Dogtopia the exclusive use of two parking spaces designated for drop off and pick up in the alley behind the property. Further, given the location, car and pedestrian traffic is limited in this area so parking and access should not pose an issue to the citizens of Evanston, yet can provide a great convenience for those that will frequent Dogtopia, while also bringing additional consumers to the shopping center. We have reviewed the information provided by Dogtopia, and will also be reviewing schematics and build out plans shortly; but we believe the company is a great fit for the property and for Evanston. Accordingly, I would request your support of Dogtopia in Evanston and for its text amendment and special use applications. Sincerely, SCG Church Street Plaza, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: __________________________ Name: Sebastian Grisoni Title: Vice President Page 82 of 85 P4.Page 429 of 506 Yun Park 1231 Chicago Ave Evanston, IL 60202 847-475-8133 soapiescleaners@gmail.com August 17, 2020 Dear City of Evanston, I understand that Sarah Lewis, the owner of Dogtopia of Evanston, has applied for a text amendment and special use permit for her business so that it may operate at 900 Clark St. in the downtown area of Evanston. I own and operate Soapie’s on 1231 Chicago Ave as well as reside in Evanston. I have come to know Sarah as a customer at our local establishment and would love to have her be part of the Evanston local business merchants. I am also excited about the idea of a modern-style dog daycare and having the ability to check in on my dog via webcam, convenience of the location and clear attention to safety and cleanliness makes all the difference to me. I look forward to the business approvals and the grand opening of this business in the near future. I’m confident that Dogtopia of Evanston will be a significant benefit to our community. Thank you, Yun Park Page 83 of 85 P4.Page 430 of 506 8/19/20 Dear City of Evanston, My friend Sarah Lewis has applied for a text amendment and special use permit for her business, Dogtopia, so that it may operate at 900 Clark St. in the downtown area of Evanston. I am writing to voice my support for permitting this use so that Evanston pet owners can enjoy this new and compelling service offering. I’m asking your strong consideration for my one-year old cockapoo, but I’m also asking as a former coworker who worked closely with Sarah for nearly five years. She is the type of business owner who contributes to her community. She is a business owner who cares deeply about those she serves – human or canine. She is opening this business because she wholeheartedly believes it will operate at the intersection of her personal passion and our City’s deep need. She is a business owner who we want here in Evanston. After reviewing the portfolio of care and spa services, our family cannot wait for Dogtopia to open so that Nala (our aforementioned cockapoo) can enjoy the special care of Sarah’s team. We anxiously await Dogtopia’s opening, and appreciate the City’s support of this wonderful and differentiated new business. Thank you, Dan Cox 1207 Maple Ave. Evanston IL 60202 Page 84 of 85 P4.Page 431 of 506 PHONE 904.742.8078 HOME Evanston, Illinois E-MAIL laurelerusso@gmail.com Dear City of Evanston, We are writing on behalf of Sarah Lewis, the owner of Dogtopia of Evanston, who has applied for a text amendment and a special use permit for business so that it can operate at 900 Clark Street in Downtown Evanston. We have the great privilege of being Sarah’s friend and neighbor and have been anticipating the opening of Dogtopia since she shared her vision for her business with us. Our Evanston community needs Dogto- pia. We do not have a facility that offers such attention to safety, cleanliness and expert care for our family dog. It even offers a webcam that allows us to check on our dog during his visit which will bring us great peace of mind during the work week. We are confident that Dogtopia will not only be a great asset to us but also our community with it’s youth literacy programs, job initiatives for adults with autism and service dogs for veterans. We are looking forward to swift business approvals and watching this modern-style dog daycare thrive in our neighborhood. With gratitude, Laurel and David Hansen Page 85 of 85 P4.Page 432 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Planning and Development Committee From: Cade Sterling, Planner I CC: Johanna Nyden, Community Development Director; Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Manager Subject: Ordinance 96-O-20, Authorization to grant a Special Use Permit for a Daycare - Domestic Animal, and Kennel, Located at 900 Clark Street in the RP Research Park District ("Dogtopia of Northshore LLC") Date: October 12, 2020 Recommended Action: The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), as well as City staff, recommend City Council adoption of with conditions, Ordinance 96-O-20, allowing for a special use permit for a Daycare – Domestic Animal, and Kennel, in the RP Research Park District. The applicant has complied with all zoning requirements and meets all of the standards of a special use for this district contingent on the adoption of concurrent legislation for a proposed text amendment to add said uses to the list of authorized special uses in the RP Research Park District. Council Action: For Action Summary: 900 Clark Street is a single approximately 5,500 square foot storefront which is part of a large lot improved with a circa 1990s three-story, multi-tenant commercial/entertainment structure commonly known as the Church Street Plaza. The 900 Clark storefront has been vacant since 2013 and lacks ideal visibility and size (too large) for most retail uses. The storefront is adjacent to a restaurant located in the structures one-hundred percent corner. The subject property is located on the south side of Clark Street between the Clark Street viaduct and Benson Avenue to the east and Maple Avenue to the west. The closest major cross street is Maple Avenue one-half block to the west. The space is served by a public alley to the east. It is immediately surrounded by the following zoning districts: North: RP, Research Park District South: RP, Research Park District P5.Page 433 of 506 East: D2, Downtown Retail Core District West: RP, Research Park District Proposal The applicant proposes operating both a Daycare – Domestic Animal, and Kennel, at 900 Clark Street. The Zoning Ordinance currently defines these uses as: Domestic Animal Daycare Center: Any establishment for which the principal use or purpose is the housing of domestic animals for periods of time that shall neither exceed twelve (12) hours in any twenty- four (24) hour period, nor include overnight stays. Multiple animals shall be permitted outside on the premises when accompanied by staff and only between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on any day. Individual animals shall be permitted outside on the premises to relieve themselves at any time during the Center's hours of operation when accompanied by staff. Prior to beginning operation of any such Center, the operator shall submit to the Zoning Administrator a contingency plan for those times when an owner fails to claim his/her animal(s) before the Center closes for the day, and, thereafter, comply with said plan. The operator of any such Center shall comply with the applicable regulations of Title 8, Chapter 4, and Title 9, Chapter 4 of the City Code, as amended. Kennel: Any establishment for which the principal use or purpose is the housing of domestic animals, including overnight stays. Multiple animals shall be permitted outside on the premises when accompanied by staff and only between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on any day. Individual animals shall be permitted outside on the premises to relieve themselves at any time during the Center's hours of operation when accompanied by staff. Prior to beginning operation of any such Kennel, the operator shall submit to the Zoning Administrator a contingency plan for those times when an owner fails to claim his/her animal(s), and, thereafter, comply with said plan. The operator of any such Kennel shall comply with the applicable regulations of Title 8, Chapter 4, and Title 9, Chapter 4 of the City Code, as amended. The definitions for Domestic Animal Daycare and Kennel were established as separate uses and are distinct in their ability to house animals overnight with the Domestic Animal Daycare Center having a specific limit on the amount of time allotted for animals to be on the premises. Previously, Animal Daycare types of uses were approved as Retail Service Establishments which are permitted by right in a numbe r of Business and Commercial Districts. Each use must also follow the Waste and Safety regulations within Title 8, Chapter 4 – Municipal Waste and Title 9, Chapter 4- Dogs, Cats, Animals and Fowl. The applicant, Sarah Lewis, plans to open Dogtopia after a significant interior build -out of the space. Each room will be soundproofed, and the HVAC system will be modernized to provide industrial grade air filtration. These efforts are directed at reducin g nuisances typically associated with these uses. Additional interior design improvements are intended to present a clean and modern aesthetic. As a business model, Dogtopia locates in neighborhood and downtown business districts rather than industrial or commercial areas typical for this type of use. This creates convenience for urban residents who prefer independence from an Page 2 of 21 P5.Page 434 of 506 automobile lifestyle. Notably, this location is proximate to both the CTA Purple Line Davis Stop, as well as the Davis Street Metra Station and the space will be marketed toward residents public using who areas commute proximate in and downtown residential transportation. The facility will provide daycare services for up to 14 hours in a 24 hours period and will offer overnight boarding and grooming/spa services. Hours of operation are proposed to be Monday through Friday 6:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Total employment will be around eighteen including two full-time positions with a typical staff of nine employees on hand at all times. The site will not be staffed after 10 p.m. but will be monitored remotely by video surveillance. Total operating capacity will increase over a period of time as a steady client base is established with an initial capacity between 40 and 80 dogs per day in the first year, 90 in the second year, and 115 after five years. Peak drop-off time is anticipated between 6:30 a.m. and 8:30 a.m. with 75% of drop -offs occurring during this time. Peak pick-up times are anticipated between 4 p.m. and 7 p.m. with a portion of dogs departing at half-day between noon and 2 p.m. On average, a pick-up or drop-off will take 30-60 seconds, largely due to the use of a smartphone application that schedules curbside drop-off and pick-up. Those who choose to walk into the lobby to drop off or pick-up, spend on average between 2 and 5 minutes. The location is proximate to the Maple Avenue parking structure which provides parking for customers intending to spend more time at the facility, whether for grooming or spa services or for scheduled meet and greets for prospective clients. Parking Servic es has responded positively to the possibility of making the on -street parking spaces in front of the business 30- minute parking in order to increase turnover in this location and noted that parking on the first floor of the Maple Garage is free under one-hour. Comprehensive Plan: The of and vacant the utilization Plan encourages General Comprehensive Evanston underutilized businesses along existing commercial corridors that can add sales tax revenue and encourage economic vitality. The Comprehensive Plan specifically includes: Objective: Promote the growth and redevelopment of business, commercial, and industrial areas. Objective: Retain and attract businesses in order to strengthen Evanston’s economic base. Dogtopia will occupy a long-vacant storefront. The proposed use, although high in intensity, has demonstrated a willingness to minimize potential nuisances, benefit a concentration of downtown resident dog owners, and provide another convenience use within walking distance to further enable a car-free lifestyle. Careful consideration should be taken in evaluating the proposed business model, including the hours of operation and number of animals permitted on-site at one time in order to further minimize the potential for conflicts. Update Page 3 of 21 P5.Page 435 of 506 Following the Zoning Board meeting held on September 15, the applicant has had numerous consultations with Planning and Zoning staff regarding community outreach and design interventions. The applicant and the manager of Church Street Plaza have coordinated a time on Friday, October 2, 2020, to meet with all proximate stakeholders and leaseholders to further explain the proposed use, mitigation measures, share examples of similar successful locations, and share possibilities for shared marketing and promotional events. The applicant has also proposed seasonal flower arrangements in two large planting urns located at the storefront's entrance, as well as modified window displays to better activate the space. Planning and Zoning staff have significant conce rns that the proposed interventions do not adequately activate the street or provide identity and beautification as intended by the ZBA. The staff has further concerns with the proposed lack of window transparency and has encouraged the applicant to reduce the opaque window coverings to the maximum extent possible. Of particular contention is the use of opaque window coverings at the bottom of the windows, which effectively eliminate the view of dogs in the playroom as observed from the sidewalk due to the storefronts raised elevation. Staff agrees that there are limited options to activate the space outside of significant window transparency which would permit casual observation of the internal operations of the space including animal play. Outside of this staff has encouraged the applicant to consider a mural or similar artistic intervention on the blank brick façade above the storefront. It would be prudent to coordinate this effort with current branding and placemaking efforts the property management team is undertaking for the Church Street Plaza “campus”. Planning and Zoning staff will continue to have discussions and reach agreement on the necessary activation and beautification measures during the permitting process, and preliminary and final review by DAPR. Legislative History: Design and Project Review (DAPR) Discussion and Recommendation: On August 26, 2020, the Design and Project Review Committee found the proposal to be an appropriate use for the RP Research Park District and voted unanimousl y to recommend approval to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Plan Commission Discussion and Recommendation On September 9, the Plan Commission voted unanimously to provide a positive recommendation to amend Section 6-18-3 - Definitions to increase the permitted hours of operation for a Domestic Animal Daycare Center from 12 to 14 hours a day and amend Section 6-12-2-3 – Special Uses to add Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels as Special Uses in the RP Research Park District. Allowing Domestic Animal Daycare Centers and Kennels within the RP District as Special Uses does not expressly meet the intent of the district; however, the district itself has been described as needing to be incorporated into the adjacent downtown districts and adjusting its intent. Additionally, there are a variety of existing businesses within the area that do not necessarily align with a business park setting. The Plan Commission and staff noted that the Zoning Board of Appeals, during the Special Use process, would need to take care to ensure that these uses do not become a nuisance through possible noise, odor, or pick -up/drop-off traffic. Page 4 of 21 P5.Page 436 of 506 Zoning Board of Appeals Discussion and Recommendation On September 15, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 6 -1 to provide a positive recommendation for a special use permit for a Daycare - Domestic Animal, and Kennel at 900 Clark Street in the RP Research Park Zoning District. Board members were initially cautious about the proposed use, particularly the intensity of the use, and the likelihood of it to impact neighboring tenants. However, after hearing testimony, the majority of Board members noted the significant mitigation measures, detailed operations plan, similar successful urban locations, and substantial cooperate support as reasons for giving a positive recommendation. Notably Board members discussed that the long vacant location was not ideal for traditional retail due to a lack of visibility. The pr oposed use was considered to have a high likelihood of success in the location since it does not depend on spontaneous business and rather has an established client base. The proposed use was also seen as having the potential to support proximate retail an d residential uses and furthering a car-free lifestyle in Downtown. Members had initial concerns with traffic congestion, but were assuaged by the willingness of the Parking Manager to dedicate 30 minute parking in front of the space, the use of a scheduling app for pick-up and drop-off, the proximity to the Maple Parking Garage, as well as alternative transit options nearby. In an effort to activate this section of street, the Board conditioned approval on the applicants willingness to work with Planning and Zoning staff on strategic interventions for beautification and storefront activation. Additional conditions included reaching out to proximate stakeholders and tenants to gauge support and to create potential for collective marketing and promotion of Church Street Plaza. The dissenting member of the Board noted that the proposed use was not compatible with the intent of what was long ago branded as the Theatre District in Evanston. The member disagreed with colleagues and foresaw the use being a nuisa nce to the neighborhood and proximate tenants and was fearful that the positive recommendation was short-sighted and based on current unfavorable economic and market conditions. The dissenting member also had significant concerns regarding the lease period, noting that 10-20 years is a long time if the use is not compatible. Minutes excerpt attached. September 15, 2020 ZBA Packet Attachments: Ordinance 96-O-20, Special Use for Daycare - Domestic Animal, and; Kennel 900 Clark Street - Floor Plan Findings For Special Use for 900 Clark Street Draft ZBA Meeting Minutes Excerpt, September 15, 2020 Page 5 of 21 P5.Page 437 of 506 9/29/2020 96-O-20 AN ORDINANCE Granting a Special Use Permit for a Domestic Animal Daycare and Kennel Located at 900 Clark Street in the RP Research Park District (“Dogtopia of Northshore , LLC”) WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) met on September 15, 2020, pursuant to proper notice, to consider case no. 20ZMJV-0052, an application filed by Sarah Lewis (the “Applicant”), lessee of the property legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, commonly known as 900 Clark Street (the “Subject Property”) and located in the RP Research Park District, for a Special Use Permit to establish, pursuant to Subsection 6-12-2-3 of the Evanston City Code, 2012, as amended (“the Zoning Ordinance”), a Domestic Animal Daycare and Kennel business on the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the ZBA, after hearing testimony and receiving other evidence, made a written record and written findings that the application for a Special Use Permit for a Domestic Animal Daycare and Kennel business met the standards for Special Uses in Section 6-3-5 of the Zoning Ordinance and recommended City Council approval thereof; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of October 12, 2020, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council (“P&D Committee”) considered the ZBA’s record and findings and recommended the City Council accept the ZBA’s recommendation and approved the application in case no. 20ZMJV-0052; and Page 6 of 21 P5.Page 438 of 506 96-O-20 ~2~ WHEREAS, at its meetings of October 12 and October 26, 2020, the City Council considered and adopted the respective records, findings, and recommendations of the ZBA and P&D Committee, as amended, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THAT: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are found as fact and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby approves the Special Use Permit for a Domestic Animal Daycare and Kennel business on the Subject Property as applied for in case no. 20ZMJV-0052. SECTION 3: Pursuant to Subsection 6-3-5 of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council hereby imposes the following conditions on the Applicant’s Special Use Permit, noncompliance or violation of any of which shall constitute grounds for penalties or revocation of said Permit pursuant to Subsections 6-3-5 of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The applicant’s special use permit is contingent upon adoption of the Plan Commission recommendation to add Daycare – Domestic Animal, and Kennel, as listed special uses in the RP Research Park Zoning District. 2. The applicant shall communicate plans for the space with neighboring stakeholders and lessees. 3. The applicant shall continue to work with Planning & Zoning Division Staff to provide solutions for beautification and activation of the front -facing façade and streetscape. 4. Hours of operation to be consistent with Plan Commission recommendations. 5. The project be developed in substantial compliance with the documents and testimony on record for the case. Page 7 of 21 P5.Page 439 of 506 96-O-20 ~3~ 6. Before it may operate the Special Use authorized by the terms of this ordinance, the Applicant shall record, at its cost, a certified copy of this ordinance with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds. SECTION 4: When necessary to effectuate the terms, conditions, and purposes of this ordinance, “Applicant” shall be read as “Applicant’s agents, assigns, and successors in interest.” SECTION 5: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. SECTION 6: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 7: If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is ruled unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid application or provision, and each invalid provision or invalid application of this ordinance is severable. SECTION 8: The findings and recitals contained herein are declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois. Introduced: _________________, 2020 Adopted: ___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Kelley A. Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 8 of 21 P5.Page 440 of 506 96-O-20 ~4~ EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 1 IN DAVIS CHURCH SECOND RESUBDIVISION BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 IN DAVIS CHURCH RESUBDIVISION RECORDED OCTOBER 2, 2000 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 00766688, IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 14 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN IN CITY OF EVANSTON, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF DAVIS CHURCH SECOND RESUBDIVISION RECORDED APRIL 12, 2002 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 0020426116 IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. PIN: 11-18-125-014-0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 900 Clark Street, Evanston, Illinois. Page 9 of 21 P5.Page 441 of 506 Page 10 of 21 P5.Page 442 of 506 P LANNING AND Z ONING D IVISION 847 -448 -8230 zoning@cityofevanston.org Community Development Department www.cityofevanston.org/zoning 2100 Ridge Ave., Rm. 3202 Evanston, IL 60201 FF II NN DD II NN GG SS FOR STANDARDS OF SS PP EE CC II AA LL UU SS EE PP EE RR MM II TT SS In the case of After conducting a public hearing on September 15, 2020, the Zoning Board of Appeals makes the following findings of fact, reflected in the audio-visual recording of the hearings, based upon the standards for special uses specified in Section 6-3-5-10 of the Zoning Ordinance: Standard Finding (A) It is one of the special uses specifically listed in the zoning ordinance; ___X__Met _____Not Met Vote 7-0 (B) It is in keeping with purposes and policies of the adopted comprehensive general plan and the zoning ordinance as amended from time to time; ___X___Met _____Not Met Vote 7-0 (C) It will not cause a negative cumulative effect, when its effect is considered in conjunction with the cumulative effect of various special uses of all types on the immediate neighborhood and the effect of the proposed type of special use upon the city as a whole; ___X___Met _____Not Met Vote 6-1 (D) It does not interfere with or diminish the value of property in the neighborhood; ___X___Met _____Not Met Vote 7-0 Case Number: 20ZMJV-0052 Address or Location: 900 Clark Street Applicant: Sarah Lewis, Dogtopia of Northshore LLC Proposed Special Use: Daycare – Domestic Animal; and, Kennel Page 11 of 21 P5.Page 443 of 506 P LANNING AND Z ONING D IVISION 847 -448 -8230 zoning@cityofevanston.org Community Development Department www.cityofevanston.org/zoning 2100 Ridge Ave., Rm. 3202 Evanston, IL 60201 (E) It can be adequately served by public facilities and services ___X___Met _____Not Met Vote 7-0 (F) It does not cause undue traffic congestion; ___X___Met _____Not Met Vote 7-0 (G) It preserves significant historical and architectural resources; ___X___Met _____Not Met Vote 7-0 (H) It preserves significant natural and environmental features; and ___X___Met _____Not Met Vote 7-0 (I) It complies with all other applicable regulations of the district in which it is located and other applicable ordinances, except to the extent such regulations have been modified through the planned development process or the grant of a variation. ___X___Met _____Not Met Vote 7-0 and, based upon these findings, and upon a vote __6__ in favor & __1__ against Recommends to the City Council _____ approval without conditions _____ denial of the proposed special use __x__ approval with conditions specifically: 1. The applicant’s special use permit is contingent upon a doption of the Plan Commission recommendation to add Daycare – Domestic Animal, and Kennel, as listed special uses in the RP Research Park Zoning District. 2. The applicant shall communicate plans for the space with neighboring stakeholders and lessees. 3. The applicant shall continue to work with Planning & Zoning Division Staff to provide solutions for beautification and activation of the front -facing façade and streetscape. 4. Hours of operation to be consistent with Plan Commission recommendations. 5. The project be developed in substantial compliance with th e documents and testimony on record for the case. Page 12 of 21 P5.Page 444 of 506 P LANNING AND Z ONING D IVISION 847 -448 -8230 zoning@cityofevanston.org Community Development Department www.cityofevanston.org/zoning 2100 Ridge Ave., Rm. 3202 Evanston, IL 60201 Attending: Vote: Aye No ___X__ Max Puchtel __X__ ____ ___X___ Myrna Arevalo __X__ ____ ___X___ Jill Zordan __X__ ____ ___X___ Violetta Cullen __X__ ____ ___X___ Lisa Dziekan _____ _X__ ___X___ Mary McAuley __X__ ____ ___X___ Kiril Mirintchev __X__ ____ Page 13 of 21 P5.Page 445 of 506 Page 1 of 8 Zoning Board of Appeals NOT APPROVED MEETING MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Tuesday, September 15, 2020 7:00 PM Via Virtual Meeting Members Present: Violetta Cullen, Myrna Arevalo, Kiril Mirintchev, Jill Zordan, Lisa Dziekan , Max Puchtel, Mary McAuley Members Absent: Staff Present: M. Klotz, C.W. Sterling Presiding Member: Violetta Cullen _____________________________________________________________________ Declaration of Quorum With a quorum present, Chair Cullen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Suspension of Rules for digital meeting Ms. Dziekan motioned to suspend the rules to permit members to convene via virtual meeting. Second by Ms. Zordan and approved 7-0. Minutes Ms. Dziekan motioned to approve the meeting minutes of July 21, 2020. Second by Ms. Zordan and approved 7-0 with the change that member Putchel was not in attendance . 900 Clark Street ZBA 20ZMJV-0052 Sarah Lewis, proprietor, submits for a special use for a Daycare - Domestic Animal and Kennel, Dogtopia of Northshore LLC, in the RP Research Park District. The applicant requests the special use subsequent to a text amendment currently under consideration by the Plan Commission and City Council to add Daycare - Domestic Animal and Kennel as one eligible special use in the RP District. The Zoning Board of Appeals makes a recommendation to City Council, the determining body for this case. Mr. Sterling read the case into the record. Nicole Daniel, legal counsel, provided an overview of the proposal: Proposes use of a daycare – domestic animal and kennel, dependent on adoption of the proposed text amendment Use is proposed for 900 Clark Street which is a vacant storefront in the Church Street Plaza development Over 5000 square foot, self-contained facility to care for dogs Lease is initially for 10 years with two 5 year renewal options Cost of a full build-out is estimated at $750,000 – primarily due to the need to manage sound and odor appropriately Sarah Lewis, proprietor, provided further details on the proposal: Page 14 of 21 P5.Page 446 of 506 Page 2 of 8 Zoning Board of Appeals Explained her pleasant experience with Dogtopia in the past and how it led her to want to open an establishment in Evanston. Since moving back to Evanston she was unable to find a similar experience that provided the level of quality which she experienced at Dogtopia Explained that Dogtopia, unlike similar uses, is experienced in urban locations and is committed to sound and odor attenuation. Sees a downtown location as an ideal use to support proximate residential uses and retailers who would rather not drive to an industrial area and rather walk or use other means to drop off their pet before or after work Sarah will be the owner and operator, on site most days Reiterated that Dogtopia is a large chain, with immense support staff capable of making sure the use is appropriate in this location Referenced the Dogtopia foundation which is committed to employing adults with autism. Mr. Puchtel asked Mr. Sterling to provide information on the intent of the Research Park zoning district. Mr. Sterling stated that the Research Park was first envisioned in the 1980s as a joint effort between the City and Northwestern University to attract and retain high-tech and high-tech support uses. This was during a time where the industry was booming and it was not unreasonable to forsee an opportunity for Evanston to capture some of this market. It was well intentioned and visionary, but it was not implemented as envisioned for many reasons. Mr. Sterling further stated that the Downtown Plan for Evansto n, drafted by The Lakota Group, saw the Research Park as underutilized and outdated. The recommendation was to re-zone this section to be more congruent with the rest of the downtown. Ms. Dziekan asked for clarification on if this area would be re-zoned in the future to be consistent with other downtown zoning? Mr. Sterling stated that this would likely be an ideal solution, but no action has been taken to date Ms. McAuley discussed the intent of the Church Street Plaza when it was developed and was concerned that this use was such a divergence from the initial vision for this area, as the movie theatre district of downtown. Furthermore, Ms. McAuley stated concern that the majority of Dogtopia locations seem to be in strip malls and industrial areas. Areas more conducive to this kind of nuisance use. Ms. McAuley stated concern with the number of dogs proposed for this location and wasn’t sure if this could be outweighed by the positives of availability, primarily for the residential neighborhoods north of the subject property. Ms. McAuley stated her experience with this use and was very worried that it would be a nuisance for the neighborhood. This type of use is disruptive. Ms. McAuley asked if there was any outdoor space for the dogs Applicant responded that there was no outdoor space. Ms. Halter further stated that most locations do not have outdoor play areas. Page 15 of 21 P5.Page 447 of 506 Page 3 of 8 Zoning Board of Appeals Ms. McAuley stated that her concern is that this use will be permitted, only because we’re in an economic slump and the space has been vacant for some time Ms. Dziekan stated she understands and takes advantage of similar services like this. They are valuable to a community. However, she shares the views of Ms. McAuley and does not think it is an appropriate use in the core downtown area, particularly with a leasing period as long as is proposed (10 years with two 5 year options to extend). If this use is a nuisance, it will be difficult to remove. Ms. Dziekan stated concern with the number of animals and the intensity of the proposed use. Ms. Dziekan asked Mr. Sterling if the Economic Development Department had voiced an opinion on the proposed use. Mr. Sterling stated that the Economic Development Manager had been supportive of the proposed use, primarily due to the long vacancy of the subject property (~7 years). Mr. Sterling stated that there is a need to find new and unique uses in the downtowns traditional retail spaces. This use would certainly be a divergence from what has traditionally been supported, but the traditional land -use patterns in downtown and other merchant district areas has been changing rapidly although the signs of such shifts in land-use patterns have been evident for some time. Ms. Halter of Dogtopia stated that although not included in the packet, they have opened many downtown locations similar to the one proposed for Evanston. These include stores in Columbus Ohio, Redmond Washington, Washington, District of Columbia, Seattle Washington, Stamford Connecticut, etc… they are growing into more urban and densely populated areas Chair Cullen asked if someone from Dogtopia could clarify why an outdoor area was not needed Ms. Lewis responded that about half of the dogtopia locations don’t have any outdoor play. Ms. Halter stated that they work hard to “bring the outdoors in” with special design features which make the indoor playrooms comfortable and stimulating for the animals Ms. McAuley asked for clarification on the number of animals that the space will contain Ms. Lewis stated that the total capacity of the location would be 116 animals and at any given time, they would likely be at 60 -70% capacity Ms. Halter stated that for overnight boarding, 25% capacity would be typical Ms. McAuley asked Mr. Sterling if the City had received any communication from neighboring tenants Mr. Sterling stated that no correspondence for or against had been received but acknowledged that the notices are legally sent to the taxpayer on record, so the notices would have gone to the owner of the building, and not the individual tenants. Page 16 of 21 P5.Page 448 of 506 Page 4 of 8 Zoning Board of Appeals Ms. McAuley stated that she would have expected the applicant to reach out to the neighboring tenants. A larger discussion with a larger pool of stakeholders is needed and prudent. Ms. Dziekan stated that although the letters of support included were many, none were sent by proximate business owners. Ms. Halter stated that they do cross marketing with tenants who s hare walls and this has been successful in the past under the brand, “parents night out”. Ms. McAuley responded saying the had no doubts this could be successful, but for only a small pool of people who utilize the Dogtopia service. The wants of ~140 or so people should not be considered above the wants of neighboring businesses, many with long-term leases. Chair Cullen asked what the hours of operation would be. Ms. Lewis stated M-F 6:30am to 7pm and S-Su 10am to 5pm Ms. Dziekan asked about overnight boarding o Ms. Lewis stated this would occur 24/7 although much of this particular use would overlap with the normal daycare hours above. Typical overnight boarding would go to sleep around 9:30 and wake around 6am before the daycare opened Ms. Dziekan asked where the overnight dogs would go to the bathroom? o Ms. Lewis stated this would occur in the playroom, just as the daycare dogs would. She further explained a robust system of cleanliness and disposal o Ms. Dziekan followed-up asking if any staff would be present during overnight boarding Ms. Lewis stated that the facility would be un -staffed between 10:30pm and 5:30am although the owner and manager are on -call and the facility has temperature sensors to alert staff in case of extreme cold or heat which could impact the animals. Cameras are also included allowing for remote monitoring Chair Cullen asked how many staff would be on -site during the day Ms. Lewis stated that there would be 18 staff in total and no less than 9 on-site at any given time during daycare hours Chair Cullen responded that she would like the staff to be local o Ms. Lewis stated that she hoped so as well. Two of the staff members would be autistic Mr. Mirintchev stated concern with the aesthetic of the exterior of the building, noting that this section of the downtown is inactive and he would like to see the proposed use attempt to add life here. Mr. Mirintchev stated concern with the small waiting room and foyer and wondered if there would be lines outside during peak pick-up and drop-off Ms. Lewis stated that this has been rectified through use of a scheduling app where times are selected for pick-up and drop-off, specifically to reduce the potential for scheduling overlap and conflict between animals Page 17 of 21 P5.Page 449 of 506 Page 5 of 8 Zoning Board of Appeals Ms. Lewis further noted the proximity to the Maple Parking Garage and the willingness of the Parking Manager to designate spaces in front of the subject property as 30 minute parking in order to create more turnover. Chair Cullen asked if any regular deliveries would take place Ms. Halter stated that regular deliveries would be the cleaning solution as well as food. The cleaner would be delivered once a month or so and the food once per week Chair Cullen asked if Ms. Lewis had ever run a business before Ms. Lewis stated that she had not Ms. McAuley follow-up stating that the franchise seems to have very strict protocols. In the case of a failing franchise, has Dogtopia cooperate ever revoked a franchise o Ms. Halter stated that they have not although they have had a few acquisitions of franchises due to disagreements or a mutual understanding. Dogtopia has a second position on all lease agreements, meaning they are able to step in and continue service if an issue should arise. Mr. Puchtel stated that he appreciated earlier comments from his fellow Board members concerning the site and its context to downtown. However, he had to disagree and sees this unique location as less vibrant and almost more industria l than anywhere else in the downtown. It is a unique location tucked away next to the railroad and a large office building with little windows. It is a dead location and it needs something like the proposed use. Mr. Puchtel stated he was in favor of the proposal. Ms. Zordan asked what the use was above the proposed space Mr. Sterling stated that the use above the space was part of the movie theatre Mr. Kisiel reaffirmed this Ms. Zordan asked if soundproofing would also extend to the ceiling Ms. Halter stated that it would. The same application would occur on the ceiling as the vertical demising walls. Ms. Zordan asked if any accessory uses would be part of the proposal such as grooming, or retail sales of any kind Ms. Halter stated that grooming would be offered, but it is only used by those already utilizing the daycare or overnight services. No retail would be offered. Ms. Zordan asked Mr. Sterling if grooming would be a permitted use in this location o Mr. Sterling stated that grooming is permitted in this location and other downtown locations as retail service, although in this instance, it would be a use accessory to the principle use as a daycare and kennel o Ms. Klotz, affirmed this Page 18 of 21 P5.Page 450 of 506 Page 6 of 8 Zoning Board of Appeals Ms. Zordan asked how they anticipate customers accessing the site, by foot, by car, etc… Ms. Halter stated that most were anticipated to be customers who already lived there or were visiting downtown for some other reason. Most by foot or by car who would have driven regardless Ms. Zordan stated that the code allows for animals to be taken outside the premises to relieve themselves and asked if this would ever occur Ms. Daniel stated that this would never occur. It is policy to have the dogs self contained inside at all times. Ms. McAuley wanted the applicant to reiterate that under no circumstances the dogs would be outside the facility other than during pick-up or drop-off Ms. Daniel and Ms. Halter stated that this would never occur and is a serious violation of the franchises rules Deliberation: Ms. McAuley stated that the presentation and the policies in place for Dogtopia are very good. The letters of recommendation are meaningful. The employment of local Evanstonians and those with autism, is impactful and admirable. However, a conversation with neighboring tenants and stakeholders is essential. Although the use still gives pause and reservations for it exist, this location is difficult and the space has been long vacant as a result of it being a relative “dead zone”. For these reasons and for the obvious strong support by Dogtopia cooperate, she is supportive, provided of course that the text amendment is also adopted Ms. Zordan stated agreement and found the use complimentary to a resurge nce in downtown living and residential uses near and in downtown. Ms. Zordan also shares the concern with corresponding with neighboring stakeholders and encouraged the applicant to do so between this meeting and the Council meeting in October. Chair Cullen stated that the City and Board need to examine new and alternative uses for its traditional retail areas. Reviewing diverse proposals will be essential to keeping the downtown vibrant and populated. However, the lease agreement for an initial ten years could be problematic if the use is not a correct fit. Chair Cullen stated that a condition should be added to correspond with neighboring stakeholders. Mr. Mirintchev stated he was supportive but would like to add a condition to add vibrancy to the exterior of the space. This should include window transparency and placemaking efforts to activate the street. Mr. Puchtel stated he was supportive. The location is difficult and it takes creativity by the applicant and flexibility by the City to find success here. Ms. Dziekan stated she appreciated the thoughtful presentation, but disagreed that the use was appropriate in this location. The use is overtly intense and is better suited Page 19 of 21 P5.Page 451 of 506 Page 7 of 8 Zoning Board of Appeals outside of the core downtown area. The fear is that this use will interfer e with and diminish other proximate uses. For these reasons, she is not supportive. Standards: a) Yes b) Yes c) Yes; LD No d) Yes e) Yes f) Yes g) N/A h) N/A i) Yes Motion to recommend approval by Ms. McAuley, seconded by Ms. Arevalo Conditions Include: 1. Adoption of Plan Commission Recommendation to add Daycare – Domestic Animal, and Kennel, as listed special uses in the RP Research Park Zoning District. 2. The applicant communicate plans for the space with neighboring stakeholders and lessees. 3. The applicant continue to work with Planning & Zoning Division Staff to provide solutions for beautification and activation of the front-facing façade and streetscape. 4. Hours of operation to be consistent with Plan Commission recommendations. 5. The project be developed in substantial compliance with the documents and testimony on record for the case. Recommended for approval 6-1 Update to Board Rules of Procedure The Board shall consider updating its Rules of Procedure, particularly Article 2, Section 2, to indicate that the Board, rather than the appointing authority, shall elect the Chair and Vice-Chair. Mr. Sterling explained the potential rule change noting that City Council recently passed an ordinance changing the appointing authority for the Chair of the Board from the Mayor to the Board itself. Mr. Puchtel asked why City Council was interested in making this change Ms. Klotz stated that the Zoning Board had previously been the only land-use Board or Commission which had its chair elected. Rather than update the Plan Commission rules to also have its chair appointed, they elected to alter the Zoning Board rules to provide consistency. Ms. McAuley stated that the Board had always elected a chair in the past. Page 20 of 21 P5.Page 452 of 506 Page 8 of 8 Zoning Board of Appeals Ms. Zordan stated that the rules also state the chair would be elected annually, but this hasn’t occurred. Ms. Klotz stated that it has occurred in the past but more recently the Chair was selected and remained during their term. If you would like to elect someone annually, that’s an option. Motion to updated Article 2, Section 2 of its Rules of Procedure by Ms. McAuley, seconded by Ms. Dziekan Change adopted as presented 7-0 Adjourned 9:04pm Page 21 of 21 P5.Page 453 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Planning and Development Committee From: Cade Sterling, Planner I CC: Johanna Nyden, Community Development Director; Scott Mangum, Planning and Zoning Manager Subject: Ordinance 94-O-20, Granting Major Zoning Variations to Construct an Upper Story Dwelling Unit atop a One-Part Commercial Building in the B1a Overlay Corridor StreetCentral andDistrictBusiness oCSC District (1800 Central Street). Date: October 12, 2020 Recommended Action: The Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning and Zoning staff recommend adoption, with conditions, of Ordinance 90-O-20, granting major zoning variations at 1800 Central Street to construct an upper story dwelling unit atop a one-part commercial building in the B1a Business District and oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District. Council Action: For Action Summary: Site Background 1800 Central Street is currently improved with a small footprint one-part commercial structure in good condition and exhibiting good integrity. The subject property is located on the south side of Central Street between Poplar Avenue to the west and Eastwood Avenue to the east. The property is significantly smaller than most parcels and structures along the eastern portion of the Central Street Merchant District, representing ideal “smallness” and human scale development which contribute to the District’s sense of cohesion, place, and identity. The property is served by a public alley along the south lot line, and is just east of the Central Street Metra Station, and approximately one-half mile west of the Central Street CTA station. The surrounding development to the north and west of the block is more intact, smaller, and older, with two to three-story mixed use at the corners with adjacent traditional one-part retail. The block moving east has seen significant erosion of a cohesive pedestrian-oriented built P6.Page 454 of 506 environment including several surface parking lots, mid-century interventions, and a large footprint mixed-use development at the southwest corner of Central Street and Eastwood Avenue which occupies over half of the block’s southern frontage. The mixed-use structure on the northwest corner of Central and Eastwood retains significant integrity. Several single-family residences can be found immediately south of the subject property, although they are separated by a small alley-facing surface parking lot which does not directly serve the subject property. Zoning: B1a – Business District & oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District Surrounding zoning: North: B1a – Business District & oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District East: B1a – Business District & oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District South: B1a – Business District & oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District West: B1a – Business District & oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District Property size: ~1,800 square feet ~24’ wide Proposal The property owner proposes a modest second-floor residential addition to the extant first- floor commercial structure. The architect proposes the use of contextually appropriate brick and stone materials, as well as fenestration closely aligning with the adjacent structure. The proposal has high levels of detailing and appropriate massing and façade articulation with well-balanced components emphasizing the human scale. The two-story proposal embraces the established amenity zone and the pedestrian area along Central Street and contributes to the existing street wall more effectively than a single-story structure, or a second-story addition set back from the first floor. The applicant plans to continue his business in the first floor retail/office space and rent the above unit temporarily. The applicant has long -term plans to downsize and inhabit the second-floor residence where he and his partner can age in place without the need for a car. To construct the upper-story residential addition, the applicant requests a reduced rear yard setback (13’ where 15’ is required), a reduced front stepback above the first story (0’ where 7.25’ is required), and reduced off-street parking (0 where 1 is required). Other alternatives were considered, including meeting the required stepback on the front - facing upper-story façade with an open deck. However, the applicant and City staff believed this condition would erode the established street wall and be contextually inappropriate to the established development pattern on the west half of the block. Long -term lease of a parking space within 1500 feet of the development was considered. However, under direction from City staff, and due to close proximity to the Metra and CTA stations, a parking variation was preferred. Notably, if developed as a live-work space as the applicant intends to pursue in the future, the single parking space would not be required. The applicant currently has a parking Page 2 of 22 P6.Page 455 of 506 permit for the surface parking lot on the corner of Central Street and Stewart Avenue, west of Green Bay Road. City staff has not received correspondence from neighboring property owners. Ordinances Identified for Requested Relief 6-9-5-7 (H) - Yard Requirements The minimum rear-yard requirement when abutting a non -residential district is fifteen (15) feet. Rear-yard setbacks provide adequate separation between adjacent buildings, allowing air and light infiltration, as well as promoting adequate utility service, and a location for screened, open off-street parking, providing proper access management and eliminating conflict points between pedestrians and vehicles. It is the opinion of the staff that a 13’ setback compared to a 15’ setback is not detrimental to the health, safety , or well-being of adjacent users and uses. Notably, the subject property does not abut the alley and is bordered by a separate parcel containing a small surface parking lot. Although they haven’t done so, it would be reasonable for the applicant to propose a rear-yard setback aligning with the existing building footprint. 6-15-14-8 - Building Height A required stepback of 10% of the lot depth (7.25’) between the first and second floors as measured from the required pedestrian area is required per the Ce ntral Street Corridor Overlay. The purpose of a zoning overlay is to provide additional area -specific management that responds to unique existing conditions and/or intends to implement a new pattern of land-use. The Central Street Corridor Overlay is a rea ction to inappropriate, large, and unattractive interventions that occurred in the early 2000s. Examples include 2951 Central Street and 2935 Central Street. Both these developments lack appropriate modulation, fenestration, and articulation of materials. Additionally, they have a limited pedestrian area and limited storefront transparency, which deadens the streetscape and creates an uncomfortable and inactive pedestrian environment. The overlay stepback requirement in part attempts to address the need for modulation in large expanses of building massing to break-up the front-facing façade, create visual interest, permit additional light permeation, enhance pedestrian comfort, and activate the streetscape. An example of a building that meets this requirement is 1720 Central Street. The stepbacks seen in this development help reduce bulk and modulate the building into three parts rather than one mass. It is the opinion of the staff that the stepback regulations are more applicable to large interventions with a high degree of bulk and mass and that enforcing the stepback requirement for a building of such a small footprint would erode the established streetwall and be less sensitive to the adjacent mixed-use structure. It should be noted that the proposal has a high degree of material articulation, an established and comfortable pedestrian area, and would have less height than the adjacent building, preserving the visual separation between structures. Chapter 16, Table 16-B - Schedule of minimum off-street parking requirements One parking space is required for a two-bedroom unit located in a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) area. Required parking spaces are controversial and theoretically intended to reduce traffic congestion. Although there is a reduced req uirement since the subject property is located in a TOD area, a single parking space is still required. Best planning practices and research suggest that this number is high for a location with this level of density and transit availability. As such, staff believes a parking variation is appropriate for Page 3 of 22 P6.Page 456 of 506 this location due to its proximity to the Metra Station, Pace and CTA bus service, and CTA train service. The Center for Neighborhood Technology ’s All-Transit performance score for this location is 8.7 out of 10, suggesting an excellent combination of trips per week and number of jobs accessible within a half-mile. This condition enables numerous people to take transit to work. It should be noted again that if the space is used as a live -work space as intended, no parking space would be required. Comprehensive Plan Objectives from the Evanston Comprehensive General Plan that apply to this application include: Value: Evanston’s housing stock should continue to offer buyers and renters a desirable range of choice in terms of style and price Objective: Maintain and enhance property values and positive perceptions of housing in Evanston. Policy: Encourage both new housing construction and the conversion of underutilized non-residential buildings to housing in order to increase housing variety and to enhance the property tax base. Policy: Encourage creative adaptive use of properties available for redevelopment using zoning standards and the DAPR Review process to protect historic character. Policy: Support efforts aimed at improving Evanston’s housing stock. Policy: Monitor Central Street… in the appropriate locations, residential and residential/commercial mixed-use developments in order to enhance the existing character of the neighborhood. Policy: Protect and enhance the traditional character of neighborhood business districts; carefully examine proposed design changes using the Zoning and Sign Ordinances and design review. Affordability Due to the uniqueness of a single unit and therefore a 100% affordability requirement where 10% is standard, City staff determined that the traditional affordability requirements were not practical in this instance. As an alternative, City staff recommended that the Board consider the unit be rented as "missing middle" housing at 120% of AMI until such time that the unit becomes owner-occupied. The Zoning Board of Appeals found this to be an adequate compromise and one which would permit the standards for a variation to be met. Page 4 of 22 P6.Page 457 of 506 Legislative History: Design and Project Review Committee (DAPR) Discussion and Recommendation On July 22, DAPR members heard testimony from the property owner and the project architect. DAPR members found the proposal to be appropriate and sympathetic to the existing of structures adjacent and astreet established fabric, urban wall, rchitectural significance. A DAPR member acknowledged the work the project architect had put into significantly be improving the proposed materials, and façade articulation to more contextually appropriate. DAPR members did have some concern that it was possible to meet the stepback requirement by reversing the location of the deck, making the rear-deck, a front- facing deck on the Central Street frontage. The property owner and project architect showed a willingness to explore this option. However, a DAPR m ember noted that this solution, although it would reduce the degree of the variation request, had the potential to erode the existing fabric by unnecessarily modulating the mass of an already small-scale structure. Members debated the appropriateness of the stepback requirement ultimately determining that the project as proposed was the best design intervention for a second-floor addition to an existing one-story building on an established and well-preserved portion of the merchant district. Recommendation: DAPR members voted 11-0 to recommend approval of the proposal as presented to the Zoning Board. Zoning Board of Appeals Discussion and Recommendation On September 15, 2020 the Zoning Board of Appeals found the proposal to be appropriate and voted unanimously to recommend approval with the condition that the residential unit be rented to a household earning no more than 120% of the area median income until it becomes owner-occupied. Notably, Board members agreed that the proposed zoning relief, particularly relief from the stepback and district the for outcome merchant a enable would requirement, better neighborhood. Members applauded the sympathetic scale and contextual design of the second story addition and agreed that the location proximate to mul tiple alternative transit options supported the request for no off-street parking spaces. Board members agreed that traditional affordability requirements (80% of AMI) were too financially burdensome and would likely not permit viable financing of the proj ect. Members noted that the intent of the space was live-work and agreed that 120% of area median income was a compromise which would provide a public benefit until owner-occupation, while permitting a rent structure capable of supporting the costs of construction. No members of the public provided comment on the proposal. September 15, 2020, ZBA Meeting Packet. Attachments: Ordinance 94-O-20, Major Zoning Relief for Second Story Dwelling (1800 Central St) Architectural Plans, 1800 Central Street Draft ZBA Minutes Excerpt, September 15, 2020 ZBA Findings of Fact, 1800 Central Street Page 5 of 22 P6.Page 458 of 506 9/29/2020 94-O-20 AN ORDINANCE Granting Major Zoning Variations to Construct an Upper Story Dwelling Unit Atop A One -Part Commercial Building in the B1a Business District and oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District (1800 Central Street) WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) met on September 15, 2020, pursuant to proper notice, to consider case no. 20ZMJV-0045, an application filed by Matthew Kerouac, architect for the property legally described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, commonly known as 1800 Central Street (the “Subject Property”) and located in the B1a Business District and the oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District, seeking approval of major zoning variations from: (1) Section 6-9-5-7(H) of the Evanston City Code, 2012, as amended (“the Zoning Code”), to permit a thirteen (13) foot rear-yard setback where fifteen (15) feet is required on the Subject Property; (2) Section 6-15-14-8 of the Zoning Code, to permit a zero (0) foot stepback between the first and second floors where ten (10) percent of the lot depth from the required pedestrian area (7.25 feet) is required; and (3) Table 16 -B of Section 6-16 of the Zoning Code, to permit zero (0) off -street parking spaces where one (1) is required; and WHEREAS, the ZBA, after hearing testimony and receiving other evidence, made a written record and written findings that the application met the standards for Major Variations set forth in Subsection 6-3-8-12(E) of the Zoning Code and recommended City Council approval thereof; and Page 6 of 22 P6.Page 459 of 506 94-O-20 ~2~ WHEREAS, at its meeting of October 12, 2020, the Planning and Development Committee of the City Council (“P&D Committee”) received input from the public, carefully considered the ZBA’s record and findings and recommended the City Council approve the Major Variations, as requested; and WHEREAS, at its meetings of October 12, 2020 and October 26, 2020, the City Council considered the ZBA’s and P&D Committee’s records, findings, and recommendations, and adopted the recommendation of the P&D Committee, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THAT: SECTION 1: The foregoing recitals are found as fact and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby adopts the P&D Committee’s records, findings, and recommendations, and hereby approves, pursuant to the Zoning Code, the Major Variations on the Subject Property applied for in case no. 20ZMJV- 0045 and described hereinabove. SECTION 3: The Major Variations approved hereby are as follows: A. To permit a thirteen (13) foot rear-yard setback where fifteen (15) feet is required by Section 6-9-5-7(H) of the Zoning Code. B. To permit a zero (0) foot stepback between the first and second floors where ten (10) percent of the lot depth from the required pedestrian area (7.25 feet) is required by Section 6-15-14-8 of the Zoning Code. C. To permit zero (0) parking spaces where one (1) is required by Table 16-B of Section 6-16 of the Zoning Code. SECTION 4: Pursuant to Subsection 6-3-8-14 of the Code, the City Council hereby imposes the following conditions on the Major Variations granted hereby, Page 7 of 22 P6.Page 460 of 506 94-O-20 ~3~ violation of any of which shall constitute grounds for penalties or revocation thereof pursuant to Subsections 6-3-10-5 and 6-3-10-6 of the Zoning Code: (A) The residential unit shall be rented at a rate at or below 120% of the area median income for the period of time until said unit becomes owner occupied. (B) The Applicant shall develop and use the Subject Property in substantial compliance with all applicable legislation, with the testimony and representations of the Applicant to the ZBA, the P&D Committee, and the City Council, and the approved plans and documents on file in this case. (C) The Applicant shall, at its cost, record a certified copy of this ordinance, including all Exhibits attached hereto, with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, and provide proof of such recordation to the City. SECTION 5: When necessary to effectuate the terms, conditions, and purposes of this ordinance, “Applicant” shall be read as “Applicant’s agents, assigns, and successors in interest.” SECTION 5: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. SECTION 6: Except as otherwise provided for in this ordinance, all applicable regulations of the Zoning Code and the entire City Code shall apply to the Subject Property and remain in full force and effect with respect to the use and development of the same. SECTION 7: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. SECTION 8: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 9: If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is ruled unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this ordinance that can be given effect Page 8 of 22 P6.Page 461 of 506 94-O-20 ~4~ without the invalid application or provision, and each invalid provision or invalid application of this ordinance is severable. SECTION 10: The findings and recitals herein are declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois. Introduced:_________________, 2020 Adopted:___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: _______________________________ Kelley A. Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 9 of 22 P6.Page 462 of 506 94-O-20 ~5~ EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST 24 FEET OF THE NORTH 75 FEET OF LOT 1 (EXCEPT THAT PART THEREOF, IF ANY, FALLING WITHIN THE SOUTH 73 FEET OF SAID LOT 1) IN BLOCK 9, IN NORTH EVANSTON IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 13, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS PIN: 10-12-201-002-0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 1800 Central Street, Evanston, Illinois. Page 10 of 22 P6.Page 463 of 506 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN21/4" = 1'-0" UP NEW WD STAIR UP 4' 5" 2 A-3 LEGEND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION NEW CONSTRUCTION DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING FIRST FLOOR PLAN, 314 W. HAWTHORNE CT. LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044 708.254.7903 MJKEROUAC@YAHOO.COM A-1 FIRST FLOOR EXISTIN/DEMOLITION PLAN11/4" = 1'-0" SECOND STORY ADDITION: REV.DATE ISSUE EVANSTON, IL 1800 CENTRAL ST. 10.02.19 1988 REVIEW10.02.19 LEGEND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED REMOVE EXIST. CEILING CONSTRUCTION TO ACCOMMODATE NEW STAIRWAY REMOVE EXISTING STOREFRONT WINDOW TO ACCOMMODATE NEW ENTRY 2 A-6 2 A-4 2 A-5 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 A-3 1 A-6 1 A-4 1 A-5 MATTHEW K EROUAC ARCHITECT, LTD 06.30.20 ZONING VARIANCEPage 11 of 22P6.Page 464 of 506 DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 1/4" = 1'-0" ROOF EXISTING/DEMOLITION PLAN, 314 W. HAWTHORNE CT. LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044 708.254.7903 MJKEROUAC@YAHOO.COM A-2 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN21/4" = 1'-0" SECOND STORY ADDITION: REV.DATE ISSUE EVANSTON, IL 1800 CENTRAL ST. 10.02.19 1988 REVIEW10.02.1953'-2"DN BEDROOM 11'-3" X 11'-0" WIC 6'-0" X 5'-0" BEDROOM 11'-3" X 10'-0" BATHROOM 6'-0" X 12'-8" KITCHEN/GREAT RM 21'-8" X 22'-4" UTILITY RM 5'-7" X 8'-3" BATHROOM 5'-0" X 8'-4" REVIEW12.10.19 23'-6 1/2" LEGEND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION NEW CONSTRUCTION DECK 22'-3" X 7'-0" ROOF EXISTING/DEMOLITION PLAN11/4" = 1'-0" LEGEND EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO REMAIN EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE REMOVED REMOVE EXIST. ROOF CONSTRUCTION TO ACCOMMODATE NEW STAIRWAY PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLANREQ'D 2'-0" REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE15'-0" REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK13'-0"7'-3" REQ'D STEPBACK VARIANCE2 A-3 1 A-3 2 A-6 1 A-4 1 A-6 2 A-4 2 A-5 1 A-5 MATTHEW K EROUAC ARCHITECT, LTD 06.30.20 ZONING VARIANCEPage 12 of 22P6.Page 465 of 506 DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 1/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION 314 W. HAWTHORNE CT. LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044 708.254.7903 MJKEROUAC@YAHOO.COM A-3 SECOND STORY ADDITION: REV.DATE ISSUE EVANSTON, IL 1800 CENTRAL AVE. 10.02.19 1988 REVIEW10.02.19 REVIEW12.10.19 State Farm EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH11/4" = 1'-0" State Farm T/O PARAPET EL.: +33'-3" GRADE EL.: 0'-0" T/O SECOND FLOOR EL.: 18'-0"EXIST./MODIFIED CONST.NEW CONST.LINE OF ROOF BEYOND LIMESTONE COPING 18'-0"15'-3"PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH21/4" = 1'-0" 6" LIMESTONE TRIM 9" LIMESTONE SILL BRICK - TO MATCH EXISTING LIMESTONE TRIM - NORTH, PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH SECOND STORY ADDITION MATTHEW K EROUAC ARCHITECT, LTD 06.30.20 ZONING VARIANCEPage 13 of 22P6.Page 466 of 506 DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 1/4" = 1'-0" 314 W. HAWTHORNE CT. LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044 708.254.7903 MJKEROUAC@YAHOO.COM A-4 SECOND STORY ADDITION: REV.DATE ISSUE EVANSTON, IL 1800 CENTRAL AVE. 10.02.19 1988 REVIEW10.02.19 REVIEW12.10.19 EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST11/4" = 1'-0" T/O PARAPET EL.: +33'-3" GRADE EL.: 0'-0" T/O SECOND FLOOR EL.: 18'-0"15'-3"18'-0"LINE OF ROOF BEYOND PREFINISHED METAL COPING PREFINISHED METAL RAILING PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST21/4" = 1'-0" BRICK - TO MATCH EXISTING LIMESTONE TRIM LIMESTONE TRIM EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST, PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST REQ'D 2'-0" REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE 15'-0" REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK 13'-0" 7'-3" REQ'D STEPBACK VARIANCE MATTHEW K EROUAC ARCHITECT, LTD 06.30.20 ZONING VARIANCEPage 14 of 22P6.Page 467 of 506 DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 1/4" = 1'-0" 314 W. HAWTHORNE CT. LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044 708.254.7903 MJKEROUAC@YAHOO.COM A-5 SECOND STORY ADDITION: REV.DATE ISSUE EVANSTON, IL 1800 CENTRAL AVE. 10.02.19 1988 REVIEW10.02.19 REVIEW12.10.19EXIST./MODIFIED CONST.NEW CONST.T/O PARAPET EL.: +33'-3" GRADE EL.: 0'-0" T/O SECOND FLOOR EL.: 18'-0"15'-3"18'-0"PREFINISHED METAL COPING LINE OF METAL RAILING PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH21/4" = 1'-0" BRICK - TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH11/4" = 1'-0" EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH, PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH SECOND STORY ADDITION MATTHEW K EROUAC ARCHITECT, LTD 06.30.20 ZONING VARIANCEPage 15 of 22P6.Page 468 of 506 DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 1/4" = 1'-0" 314 W. HAWTHORNE CT. LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044 708.254.7903 MJKEROUAC@YAHOO.COM A-6 SECOND STORY ADDITION: REV.DATE ISSUE EVANSTON, IL 1800 CENTRAL AVE. 10.02.19 1988 REVIEW10.02.19 REVIEW12.10.19 EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST11/4" = 1'-0" LINE OF ROOF BEYOND PREFINISHED METAL COPING T/O PARAPET EL.: +33'-3" GRADE EL.: 0'-0" T/O SECOND FLOOR EL.: 18'-0"18'-0"15'-3"PREFINISHED METAL RAILING PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST21/4" = 1'-0" BRICK - TO MATCH EXISTING EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST, PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST REQ'D 2'-0" REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE 15'-0" REQUIRED REAR YARD SETBACK 13'-0" MATTHEW K EROUAC ARCHITECT, LTD 06.30.20 ZONING VARIANCEPage 16 of 22P6.Page 469 of 506 REV.DATE ISSUE MATTHEW K EROUAC ARCHITECT, LTD 314 W. HAWTHORNE CT. LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044 708.254.7903 MJKEROUAC@YAHOO.COM COVER SHEET, GENERAL NOTES & CONDITIONS, DRAWING LIST, SITE PLAN, ZONING DATA, SIGNED NOTE, SPECIAL SAFETY NOTE 12.17.19 ZONING ANALYSIS DRAWING LIST G-1 A-1 A-2 A-3 COVER SHEET, GENERAL NOTES &CONDITIONS, DRAWING LIST, SITE PLAN, ZONING DATA, SIGNED NOTE, SPECIAL SAFETY NOTE FIRST FLOOR EXISTING/DEMOLITION PLAN, PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH, PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH ZONING DATA ZONING DISTRICT: B1a DATE: SCALE: JOB NO.: 1/8" = 1'-0"G-1 SECOND STORY ADDITION: EVANSTON, IL 1800 CENTRAL ST. 10.02.19 1988 ROOF EXISTING/DEMOLITION PLAN, PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN LOT AREA: 1,758.24 S.F. SITE PLAN11/8" = 1'-0" A-3 EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST, PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST A-3 EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH, PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH A-3 EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST, PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST 13.00'15.00' REQ'D REAR YARD SETBACK2.00' REQ'D REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE7.25' REQ'D STEPBACK VARIANCE3 STORY BRICK AND STONE BUILDINGNO. 1804-1814EXIST. 1-STORY BRICK AND STONEW/SECOND FLOOR BRICK ADDITION1 STORY BRICK AND STONE BUILDINGNO. 17321 STORY BRICKBUILDING24.0' 24.0'73.26'73.26'LINE OF SECOND FLOOR ADDITION 24.0' 24.0' COVERED AREA CONCRETE CURB CONCRETE WALK CENTRAL STREET PARTY WALL53.17'7.02'53.17'7.02'24.0' BLACKTOP PARKING 06.30.20 ZONING VARIANCEPage 17 of 22P6.Page 470 of 506 Page 1 of 3 Zoning Board of Appeals NOT APPROVED MEETING MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Tuesday, September 15, 2020 7:00 PM Via Virtual Meeting Members Present: Violetta Cullen, Myrna Arevalo, Kiril Mirintchev, Jill Zordan, Lisa Dziekan , Max Puchtel, Mary McAuley Members Absent: Staff Present: M. Klotz, C.W. Sterling Presiding Member: Violetta Cullen _____________________________________________________________________ Declaration of Quorum With a quorum present, Chair Cullen called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Suspension of Rules for digital meeting Ms. Dziekan motioned to suspend the rules to permit members to convene via virtual meeting. Second by Ms. Zordan and approved 7-0. Minutes Ms. Dziekan motioned to approve the meeting minutes of July 21, 2020. Second by Ms. Zordan and approved 7-0 with the change that member Putchel was not in attendance . 1800 Central Street ZBA 20ZMJV-0045 Matthew Kerouac, architect, applies for major zoning relief to construct an upper story dwelling unit atop an existing one-part commercial building in the B1a Business District and oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District. The applicant requests a 13 foot rear-yard setback where 15 feet is required (Zoning Code Section 6 -9-5-7 (H)), a 0 foot stepback between the first and second floors where 10 percent of the lot depth from the required pedestrian area (7.25 feet) is required (Zoning Code Section 6 -15-14-8), and no off-street parking space where one is required (Zoning Code Section 6 -16, Table 16- B). The Zoning Board of Appeals makes a recommendation to City Council, the determining body for this case. Mr. Sterling read the case into the record. Matthew Kerouac explained the proposal: Proposes an upper story dwelling unit above an existing commercial space Requesting three variances to accomplish this Owner holds a lease on a parking space within 1500 feet, but it is renewed annually Property is close to CTA and Metra train service Rear yard variation is needed to accommodate a typical and marketable t wo- bedroom apartment Page 18 of 22 P6.Page 471 of 506 Page 2 of 3 Zoning Board of Appeals Building height and the setback as prescribed would erode the existing street wall which is not desirable Stepback from the pedestrian area is more appropriate for taller buildings with more mass Ms. McAuley stated that she supports the parking variation due to the properties location proximate to mass transit and because the applicant already rents a space at the Central surface lot Ms. Dziekan asked the applicant to clarify discussions they’ve had concerning affordability and when the unit would become owner occupied John Roman, property owner described the challenge of making his single unit affordable including the inability to pay the mortgage after construction costs if it is affordable under the traditional definition of 80% of AMI. 80% of AMI would be a net rent of about $1400 after utilities Plans to occupy the unit in two years or less once his youngest child graduates from high-school. Construction costs range between $250,000 and $300,000. Ms. McAuley stated that making 10% of units affordable in a traditional multi-family building is one thing, but asking for a single unit, 100% of the units, be affordable is cost prohibitive. Believes that 120% of AMI is a reasonable compromise. Mr. Mirintchev stated concern over the party walls and encouraged the architect to make sure improvements are taking place on the subject property and not the neighboring property. Undertake caution. Mr. Kerouac stated understanding Ms. Zordan asked if the compromise for rent structure was 80% or 120% Mr. Roman, stated the conversation had been for 120% and that it would certainly make the project more feasible although still financially difficult. The unit would be able to be rented for $2200 where most proximate two-bedroom units rent for $2900 to $3500 Mr. Putchel asked if the applicants have had any discussions with the property owner or tenants to the west as this building would be the most afflicted by construction Mr. Roman stated that he has not had conversations with any of the tenants but that he knows the owner of the building well and he is supportive Mr. Putchel asked if they intended to match the aesthetic of the building to the west Mr. Kerouac stated that they were taking significant cues from the building. The exact brick would vary to better match the brick extant on the first floor of the subject property, but that the fenestration, banding, and material selection would be similar to respect and preserve the integrity of the b lock. Deliberation: Ms. McAuley stated that it was a good proposal which maintains scale with the neighboring buildings, is cohesive in design aesthetic. Further, the thought of stepping back the second story of the addition would make no sense and would inhibit a cohesive street wall. There is nothing objectionable about this project. Page 19 of 22 P6.Page 472 of 506 Page 3 of 3 Zoning Board of Appeals Mr. Puchtel stated agreement and noted that the location can benefit from additional density. Believes the zoning relief requested is not only reasonable, but contributes to a better product. Ms. Dziekan agreed. Chair Cullen stated she was supportive and appreciated the added residential density on Central Street Ms. Zordan stated that it was a good project and agreed that the variations made for a better project which was more consistent with the existing built environment Ms. Arevalo stated she was supportive of the project and lauded Mr. Kerouac for his approach to integrating the upper residence with the existing built environment and adjacent building to the west. Mr. Mirintchev agreed. Standards: a. Yes b. Yes c. Yes d. Yes e. Yes f. Yes g. Yes Motion to recommend approval by Ms. McAuley, seconded by Ms. Dziekan Conditions Include: 1. The unit be rented at or below 120% of the area median income until said unit becomes owner-occupied. 2. Proposal be implemented in substantial compliance with the documents and testimony on record Recommended for approval 7-0 Adjourned 9:04pm Page 20 of 22 P6.Page 473 of 506 FF II NN DD II NN GG SS FOR STANDARDS OF VV AA RR II AA TT II OO NN SS In the case of After conducting a public hearing on September 15, 2020, the Zoning Board of Appeals makes the following findings of fact, based upon the standards for major variances specified in Section 6-3-8-12 of the City Code: Standard Finding (A) The requested variation will not have a substantial adverse impact on the use, enjoyment or property values of adjoining properties; ___X___Met _____Not Met 7-0 (B) The requested variation is in keeping with the intent of the zoning ordinance; ___X____Met _____Not Met 7-0 (C) The alleged hardship or practical difficulty is peculiar to the property; ___X____Met _____Not Met 7-0 (D) The property owner would suffer a particular hardship or practical difficulty as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out; ___X____Met _____Not Met 7-0 (E) The purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire to extract additional income from the property; or there is a public benefit; ____X___Met _____Not Met 7-0 Case Number: 20ZMJV-0045 Address or Location: 1800 Central Street Applicant: Matthew Kerouac, architect Proposed Zoning Relief: Major zoning relief to construct an upper story dwelling unit atop an existing one-part commercial building in the B1a Business District and oCSC Central Street Corridor Overlay District. The applicant requests a 13 foot rear-yard setback where 15 feet is required (Zoning Code Section 6-9-5-7 (H)), a 0 foot stepback between the first and second floors where 10 percent of the lot depth fr om the required pedestrian area (7.25 feet) is required (Zoning Code Section 6-15-14-8), and no off-street parking space where one is required (Zoning Code Section 6-16, Table 16-B). Page 21 of 22 P6.Page 474 of 506 (F) The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person having an interest in the property; __X___Met _____Not Met 7-0 (G) The requested variation is limited to the minimum change necessary to alleviate the particular hardship or practical difficulty which affects the property; ___X___Met _____Not Met 7-0 and, based upon these findings, and upon a vote of __7__ in favor and __0__ against recommends to the City Council: _____ approval __X__ approval with conditions _____ denial Condition: 1. The unit be rented at or below 120% of the area median income until said unit becomes owner-occupied and that the project be developed in substantial compliance with the documents and testimony on record for the case. Attending: Vote: Aye No __X__ Violetta Cullen _X_ ___ __X__ Jill Zordan _X_ ___ __X__ Lisa Dziekan _X_ ___ __X__ Kiril Mirintchev _X_ ___ __X__ Max Puchtel _X_ ___ __X__ Myrna Arevalo _X_ ___ __X__ Mary McAuley _X_ ___ Page 22 of 22 P6.Page 475 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Rules Committee From: Darlene Francellno, Mayoral/Aldermanic Assistant CC: Kimberly Richardson, Interim Assistant City Manager Subject: Approval of the Proposed 2021 City Council Meeting Dates Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council approval of the 2021 proposed City Council meeting dates. Council Action: For Action Summary: Proposed 2021 City Council meeting dates. The meetings were approved at the October 5 Rules Committee meeting. Attachments: Proposed 2021 City Council Meeting Schedule R1.Page 476 of 506 10/1/2020 PROPOSED City Council 2021 Meeting Schedule January 11 July 12 25 26 February 8 August 9 22 March 8 September 13 22 27 April 12 October 11 26 25 May 10 November 8 24 22 June 14 December 13 28 City Council meetings are held on the 2nd and 4th Mondays of each month, with the exception of August and December when only one meeting is scheduled for the 2nd Monday. City Council meetings are scheduled to begin immediately following the conclusion of the Planning & Development Committee meetings. Page 2 of 2 R1.Page 477 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Johanna Nyden, Director of Community Development CC: Luke Stowe, Interim Administrative Services Director Subject: Resolution 91-R-20, Dissolution of the Transportation and Parking Committee Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: The Rules Committee and staff recommend that the City Council adopt Resolution 91 -R-20 dissolving the Transportation and Parking Committee. Council Action: For Action Summary: This recommendation to dissolve this Committee is based on several factors that include 1) the evolution of the work of the Committee and potential that other Boards, Committees, or Commissions (BCCs) are doing similar work or are now better suited to do this work; 2) the idea that a formal committee might not be the most effective method to engage the Evanston community on transportation and mobility work in an equitable manner; and 3) effective resource management, in terms of staff, community, and elected official time. Evolution of the Parking & Transportation Committee The Transportation & Parking Committee was initially established as the Parking Committee in 1993 to address the issues of parking and the City’s parking garages. The work of addressing parking in Evanston today is very different than in the initial stages of establishing the Parking Committee. Based on this, staff recommends that Parking related issues (creation of parking districts, parking garage issues, expenditures of the Pa rking Fund, etc.) be directed to the Administration & Public Works Committee. It is noteworthy to highlight that the recommendations from the Transportation & Parking Committee regarding parking issues actually already travel to the Administration & Public Works Committee for discussion. This change would just eliminate the discussion at the Transportation & Parking Committee. Participation from the public at the Transportation & Parking Committee level has been minimal. Current participation does not often include members from interested stakeholders, including transit providers, Northwestern University, people with a disabilit y, people who bike, R2.Page 478 of 506 and people who rely on public transit. Staff will reconvene the Technical Advisory Committee in a new task force called Mobility Vision for Evanston (MoVE). Quarterly meetings of MoVE will prioritize the bicycle community, in order to bring engineering staff and bicycle advocates together to discuss upcoming projects. More Effective Way to Engage Public Beyond the engagement of stakeholders in an evening meeting, staff has started to research and develop in-person mobility engagement opportunities (pop-up events at the public library, grocery stores, and other places where users of our transportation systems might be found) to solicit feedback. The pandemic and move to online meetings has only further isolated the discussion of these issues to individuals who have the technology to participate in these meetings; staff is going to look at other safe opportunities to engage community members in mobility work. Effective Resource Management Finally, all BCCs come with a significant amount of time associated to prepare materials for meetings, check quorum, attend and staff a meeting, and complete follow -up from meetings. It is staff’s recommendation that the personnel resources devoted to the Transportation Parking Committee could be better utilized for other purposes for the City, both in activities and in policy development and implementation. Additionally, like many BCCs throughout the City, it is challenging to identify members interested in serving on the committee. The Committee was reduced from nine members to seven members in 2018. Legislative History: Members of the Transportation and Parking Committee discussed this dissolution at the August 2020 meeting. Members were supportive of the dissolution provided the development of a task force that focuses on bicycle and complete streets advocacy. The Rules Committee approved a recommendation to the City Council to dissolve the Transportation and Parking Committee at its October 5, 2020 meeting. Attachments: 91-R-20 Dissolution of Transportation and Parking Committee Page 2 of 4 R2.Page 479 of 506 10/19/2020 91-R-20 A RESOLUTION Dissolving the Transportation/Parking Committee WHEREAS, the City of Evanston currently has a Transportation/Parking Committee which was established pursuant to Resolution 42 -R-97 and subsequently amended by Resolution 13-R-15 and Resolution 38-R-18; WHEREAS, the Transportation/Parking Committee studies the intermediate and long term parking needs of the City and provide s recommendations to the City Council regarding parking problems ; WHEREAS, in October 2020, the Rules Committee directed staff to draft this Resolution for the dissolution of the Transportation/P arking Committee; and WHEREAS, it was determined that NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: All Resolutions or parts of resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 2: Resolution 91-R-20 shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. Page 3 of 4 R2.Page 480 of 506 91-R-20 ~2~ _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Adopted: __________________, 2020 Approved as to form: _______________________________ Kelley A. Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 4 of 4 R2.Page 481 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Rules Committee From: Kimberly Richardson, Interim Assistant City Manager Subject: Ordinance 100-O-20; Amending City Code Section 2-3-2 to Reduce the Number of Members on the Commission on Aging Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff recommends City Council adoption of Ordinance 100 -O-20, amending City Code Section 2-3-2 to reduce the number of members on the Commission of Aging from fifteen to nine. Council Action: For Introduction Summary: Currently, the Commission consists of ten members, with one member's term ending in January 2021. The Commission on Aging is the only commission with fifteen members. The majority of boards, commissions, and committees have nine or twelve members at the most. Legislative History: Rules Committee approved this item at its October 5, 2020 meeting. Attachments: 100-O-20 Amending Section 2-3-2 To Reduce Members on Commission On Aging R3.Page 482 of 506 10/16/2020 100-O-20 AN ORDINANCE Amending City Code Section 2-3-2 To Reduce The Number Of Members On The Commission On Aging NOW BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THAT: SECTION 1: City Code Section 2-3-2 of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: 2-3-2. - ESTABLISHMENT; APPOINTMENTS AND QUALIFICATIONS. The Commission shall consist of fifteen (15) nine (9) members appointed by the Mayor, with the advice and consent of the City Council. At least one-third (1/3) of the Commission on Aging shall be age sixty (60) or over. Eligible members include residents of the City and non- residents (not to exceed three (3) members) of the City that are employed within the City limits, except members cannot be a paid staff member of any City agency or organization serving seniors. Subject to the foregoing limitations, the appointed Commissioners shall possess, to the extent feasible, qualifications of leadership, desire and interest to work with and for seniors, compassion, knowledge of and experience with seniors and the ability to offer solutions to the difficulties encountered in the aging process. The Commission shall include representation of various socio-economic groups. It shall be the duty of the Human Services Committee of the City Council to submit to the Mayor, at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of terms, the names of one (1) or more qualified persons for each expected vacancy. SECTION 2: The findings and recitals contained herein are declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois. SECTION 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. Page 2 of 3 R3.Page 483 of 506 100-O-20 ~2~ SECTION 5: If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid application or provision, and each invalid application of this Ordinance is severable. Introduced: _________________, 2020 Adopted: ___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Kelley Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 3 of 3 R3.Page 484 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Rules Committee From: Kimberly Richardson, Interim Assistant City Manager Subject: Ordinance 102-O-20; Amending Portions of the City Code Codifying the Reparations Committee Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Rules Committee recommends City Council adoption of Ordinance 102 -O-20 amending portions of the City Code codifying the Reparations Committee. Council Action: For Introduction Summary: The Reparations Subcommittee of the City Council was established by Resolution 126 -R-19, establishing a reparations. local to source devoted Per the Evanston of City funding members. Council its of subcommittee formed Council City the Resolution, The a subcommittee is conducting a feasibility study determining the viability of recommendations for housing assistance and relief initiatives for African American residents in Evanston, and various Economic Development programs and opportunities for African Amer ican residents and entrepreneurs in Evanston. The new Reparations Committee expands the number of the members on the committee to include non -aldermanic members, along with updated roles and responsibilities that reflect the work being completed by the Reparations Subcommitte. Staff recommends the current Reparations Subcommittee continue through the end of the current City Council term. A specific Reparation Committee application will be created, and the application process will open for interested, non-aldermanic members beginning April 1, 2021. Individuals will be identified and appointed by May 1, 2021. Legislative History: This item was approved at the October 5, 2020 Rules Committee meeting. Attachments: 102-O-20 Amending the City Code to Create Reparations Committee R4.Page 485 of 506 10/19/2020 102-O-20 AN ORDINANCE Amending Portions of the City Code Codifying the Reparations Committee NOW BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THAT: SECTION 1: Title 2 of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended (“City Code”), is hereby amended to add Chapter 17 which shall read as follows: CHAPTER 17 – REPARATIONS COMMITTEE. 2-17-1. - PURPOSE. The City Council establishes a Reparations Committee to act in an advisory capacity to the City Council on matters relating to the Local Reparations Fund in order to determine the feasibility and viability of housing assistance and relief initiatives, as well as economic development programs and opportunities for African-American residents and entrepreneurs in Evanston. 2-17-2. - MEMBERSHIP. The Committee consists of seven (7) members who serve without compensation and are residents or business owners in the City of Evanston. The members must include the following: A. Three (3) members who are Aldermen; and B. Four (4) at-large members. A member may meet more than one qualification. No member may be a full-time or part-time employee of any agency, facility, or service that receives funds from the City. 2-17-3. - TERM. At-large committee members are appointed to three (3) year terms and Aldermen are appointed to four (4) year terms by the Mayor with the advice and consent of the City Council. Non-aldermanic members may serve for not more than two (2) full terms. Page 2 of 4 R4.Page 486 of 506 102-O-20 ~2~ 2-17-4. - POWERS AND DUTIES. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Committee must: A. Oversee the Reparations Fund B. Evaluate applications and recommended funding allocations to housing and economic development programs that address historical discrimination in the past by the City C. Monitor the progress of recipient impact and program impact in each ward to which funding is allocated. 2-17-5. - ADOPTION OF RULES; SELECTION OF A CHAIRPERSON. The Commission must annually elect a Chairperson from among its members. The Commission must also adopt rules and regulations necessary to exercise its responsibilities. SECTION 2: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on April 1, 2021. SECTION 4: If any provision of this ordinance or application thereof to any person or circumstance is held unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this ordinance that can be given effect without the invalid application or provision, and each invalid provision or invalid application of this ordinance is severable. Page 3 of 4 R4.Page 487 of 506 102-O-20 ~3~ Introduced:_________________, 2020 Adopted:___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: _______________________________ Kelley A. Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 4 of 4 R4.Page 488 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Rules Committee From: Jennifer Lin, Human Resources Division Manager Subject: Ordinance 104-O-20, Setting Compensation for the City Clerk Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff requests the City Council adopt Ordinance 104 -O-20, setting the compensation for the City Clerk. Council Action: For Introduction Summary: No changes are recommended to the City Clerk's compensation at this time. The pro posed Ordinances state the City Clerk's compensation will be $64,120 a year. Attachments: 104-O-20 City Clerk Compensation R5.Page 489 of 506 10/20/2020 104-O-20 AN ORDINANCE An Ordinance Setting Compensation for the City Clerk WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1-7-5 of the City Code all municipal officers’ salaries must be fixed by ordinance pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/3.1-50-5; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: That Section 1-7-5 of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended, is stricken and replaced in its entirety, and is to read as follows: 1-7-5: COMPENSATION: The compensation to be paid to the City Clerk elected April 2021 and taking office in May 2021 is as follows: (A)Effective May 1, 2021 and for the time period of May 1, 2021 through April 30, 2025, the Clerk will receive an annual salary of $64,120.00. The salary adjustment effective May 1, 2021 will be prospective only. The Clerk’s salary cannot be adjusted by Council action until the requirements of subsection C below are complied with. (B)The Clerk will receive medical benefits. (C) The Clerk’s compensation structure must be reviewed by a nonaldermanic committee every four (4) years. This committee must submit a report and recommendation to the City Council no later than two hundred forty (240) days prior to the next regularly scheduled municipal election. SECTION 2: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 3: The findings and recitals contained herein are declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois. Page 2 of 3 R5.Page 490 of 506 104-O-20 SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. Introduced: _________________, 2020 Adopted: ___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Kelley Gandurski, Corporation Counsel ~ 2 ~ Page 3 of 3 R5.Page 491 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Jennifer Lin, Human Resources Division Manager Subject: Ordinance 105-O-20, Setting Compensation for the Mayor Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: Staff requests the City Council adopt Ordinance 105 -O-20, setting the compensation for the Mayor. Council Action: For Introduction Summary: No changes are recommended to the Mayor's compensation at this time. The proposed Ordinances state the Mayor's compensation will be $25,317 a year. Attachments: 105-O-20 Mayor Compensation R6.Page 492 of 506 10/10/2020 105-O-20 AN ORDINANCE An Ordinance Setting Compensation for the Mayor WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1-6-10 of the City Code, all municipal officers’ salaries must be fixed by ordinance pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/3.1-50-5; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: That Section 1-6-10 of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended, is stricken and replaced in its entirety, and is to read as follows: 1-6-10: COMPENSATION: The compensation to be paid to the Mayor elected April 2021 and taking office in May 2021 for his/her services per annum is: (A) Effective May 1, 2021 – Twenty five thousand three hundred seventeen dollars ($25,317). The Mayor will receive medical benefits. (B) The Mayoral compensation structure must be reviewed by a nonaldermanic committee every four (4) years. This committee must submit a report and recommendation to the City Council no later than two hundred forty (240) days prior to the next regularly scheduled municipal election. SECTION 2: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 3: The findings and recitals contained herein are declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. Page 2 of 3 R6.Page 493 of 506 105-O-20 Introduced: _________________, 2020 Adopted: ___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Kelley Gandurski, Corporation Counsel ~ 2 ~ Page 3 of 3 R6.Page 494 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council CC: Members of the Rules Committee From: Jennifer Lin, Human Resources Division Manager Subject: Aldermanic Compensation Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: At the regarding Ordinances prepared has request, Committee's Rules the Staff compensation for Aldermen (three Ordinances with three different models) along with one Resolution that would accompany one Ordinance. Staff requests the City Council discuss and adopt one of the following proposals: • Option 1: Ordinance 103-O-20 ($15,990 annual compensation with the City to cover insurance costs); or • Option 2: Ordinance 106-O-20 ($37,800 annual compensation with the Council covering the full cost of insurance); or • Option 3: Ordinance 108-O-20 ($15,990 annual compensation to be combined with a health insurance allowance with the Council covering the full cost of insurance) AND Resolution 94-R-20 ($1,400 monthly allowance). Council Action: For Introduction Summary: Staff offers the following proposals for consideration and action: Option 1: Status Quo Proposal (Ordinance 103-O-20) This proposal leaves the current aldermanic compensation model in place. Annual salary would remain at $15,990/year, with the City contributing 85-90% of medical insurance costs for aldermen. The 2021 cost to the City for PPO family coverage is $2,133.95/month or $25,607.40/year. Assuming all nine aldermen elect PPO family coverage, each alderman would be contributing $320.10/month or $3,841.20/year (15%) towards medical insurance premiums, and the City would be contributing $1,813.85/month or $21,766.20/year for each alderman. Assuming all nine aldermen elect PPO family coverage, the City's total annual cost would be $339,805.80; this is the highest cost to the City. The total annual cost to the City for the current aldermen is $279,661 with current insurance elections. R7.Page 495 of 506 Option 2: Compensation With Aldermen Covering Insurance Costs Through Salary (Ordinance 106-O-20) This proposal provides aldermen with an annual salary of $37,800/year, allowing aldermen to elect medical insurance at their choosing, contributing 100% of medical insurance costs. Should aldermen choose to elect medical insurance through the City, a ny amounts for health insurance the reduce to would paycheck serve the from deducted being alderman’s alderman’s taxable income. Option 3: Compensation With Aldermen Covering Insurance Costs Through Allowance (Ordinance 108-O-20) This proposal provides aldermen with an annual salary of $15,990 and is meant to be combined with the allowance below. Adopting an allowance proposal would allow aldermen to elect medical insurance at their choosing, contributing 100% of medical insurance costs. This proposal would allow City Council to regularly modify the annual allowance amounts to capture medical insurance's rising costs. AND Allowance Proposal (Resolution 94-R-20) This proposal would entertain an annual allowance to be paid to aldermen to use towards medical insurance however they choose to use those funds. Aldermen could choose to opt into coverage under the City’s plan or purchase their own elsewhere. The Resolution sets an allowance each salary. alderman’s to addition $16,800/year or $1,400/month of in $1,400/month is equivalent to the cost of HMO family coverage. Using this proposal, the total annual cost to the City would be $295,110/year or $32,790/alderman . Should an alderman choose coverage under the City’s plan, s/he would be responsible for 100% of the cos ts, which would be directly deducted from the alderman’s paycheck. Any amounts for health insurance paycheck the reduce to serve would alderman’s the from deducted being alderman’s taxable income. Alternate allowance proposals include the following: • Alternate A: $1,800/month or $21,600/year in addition to each alderman’s salary. This is equivalent to the cost of PPO family coverage. Using this proposal, the total annual cost to the City would be $338,310 or $37,590/alderman. • Alternate B: $660/month or $7,920/year in addition to each alderman’s salary. This is equivalent to the cost of PPO single coverage. Using this proposal, the total annual cost to the City would be $215,190 or $23,910/alderman. In this proposal, aldermen who elected PPO family coverage would not have enough in their paycheck to cover all the costs and would effectively owe the City. A summary chart of all aldermanic proposals is attached. Attachments: Summary Chart 103-O-20, Compensation for Members of City Council 106-O-20, Compensation for Members of City Council Page 2 of 11 R7.Page 496 of 506 108-O-20 Compensation for Members of the City Council 94-R-20 City Council Rule Amendment - 1400 Allowance Page 3 of 11 R7.Page 497 of 506 Proposal Salary Insurance Allowance Annual Compensation Aldermanic Insurance Burden Max Total City Cost^Repercussions Option 1: Status Quo (Ordinance 103-O-20) $15,990 $15,990 10-15%$339,805*1) If the cost of insurance coverage is considered compensation, aldermen are paid differently based on insurance election. 2) Total City cost would fluctuate based on individual insurance elections made by each alderman. Option 2: Insurance Through Salary (Ordinance 104-O-20) $37,800 $37,800 100%$340,200 Option 3: Insurance Through Allowance (Ordinance 108-O-20) $15,990 $32,790 100%$295,190 Incentivizes enrollment in HMO. Alternate A:$15,990 $21,600 $37,590 100%$338,310 Alternate B:$15,990 $7,920 $23,910 100%$215,190 Aldermen who elect PPO family coverage under the City's plan would not have enough in their paychecks to cover all the costs and would owe the City. ^Assuming all aldermen elect PPO family coverage, which will cost $25,607/year in 2021. *Current City cost is $279,661, based on current individual elections. $16,800 (Resolution 94-R-20)Page 4 of 11R7.Page 498 of 506 10/20/2020 103-O-20 AN ORDINANCE An Ordinance Setting Compensation for the Members of the Evanston City Council Following the Report and Recommendations of the Compensation Committee WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1-5-9 of the City Code, the compensation of the members of the City Council was reviewed by a non-aldermanic compensation committee, and all municipal officers’ salaries must be fixed by ordinance pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/3.1-50-5; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: That Section 1-5-9 of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended, is stricken and replaced in its entirety, and is to read as follows: 1-5-9: COMPENSATION: The compensation to be paid to an Alderman elected April 2021 and taking office in May 2021 for his/her services per annum is: (A)Effective May 1, 2021 – Fifteen thousand nine hundred ninety dollars ($15,990). An Alderman may choose to receive medical benefits. (B)The aldermanic compensation structure must be reviewed by a nonaldermanic committee every four (4) years. This committee must submit a report and recommendation to the City Council no later than two hundred forty (240) days prior to the next regularly scheduled municipal election. SECTION 2: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 3: The findings and recitals contained herein are declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as Page 5 of 11 R7.Page 499 of 506 103-O-20 provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. Introduced: _________________, 2020 Adopted: ___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Kelley Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 6 of 11 R7.Page 500 of 506 10/20/2020 106-O-20 AN ORDINANCE An Ordinance Setting Compensation for the Members of the Evanston City Council Following the Report and Recommendations of the Compensation Committee WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1-5-9 of the City Code, the compensation of the members of the City Council was reviewed by a non-aldermanic compensation committee, and all municipal officers’ salaries must be fixed by ordinance pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/3.1-50-5. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: That Section 1-5-9 of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended, is stricken and replaced in its entirety, and is to read as follows: 1-5-9: COMPENSATION: The compensation to be paid to an Alderman elected April 2021 and taking office in May 2021 for his/her services per annum is: (A)Effective May 1, 2021 – Thirty-seven thousand eight hundred dollars ($37,800). An Alderman may choose to receive medical benefits from the City at full cost to the Alderman. (B)The aldermanic compensation structure must be reviewed by a nonaldermanic committee every four (4) years. This committee must submit a report and recommendation to the City Council no later than two hundred forty (240) days prior to the next regularly scheduled municipal election. SECTION 2: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 3: The findings and recitals contained herein are declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as Page 7 of 11 R7.Page 501 of 506 106-O-20 provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. Introduced: _________________, 2020 Adopted: ___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Kelley Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 8 of 11 R7.Page 502 of 506 10/20/2020 108-O-20 AN ORDINANCE An Ordinance Setting Compensation for the Members of the Evanston City Council Following the Report and Recommendations of the Compensation Committee WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1-5-9 of the City Code, the compensation of the members of the City Council was reviewed by a non-aldermanic compensation committee, and all municipal officers’ salaries must be fixed by ordinance pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/3.1-50-5. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1: That Section 1-5-9 of the Evanston City Code of 2012, as amended, is stricken and replaced in its entirety, and is to read as follows: 1-5-9: COMPENSATION: The compensation to be paid to an Alderman elected April 2021 and taking office in May 2021 for his/her services per annum is: (A)Effective May 1, 2021 – Fifteen thousand nine hundred ninety dollars ($15,990). (B)The aldermanic compensation structure must be reviewed by a nonaldermanic committee every four (4) years. This committee must submit a report and recommendation to the City Council no later than two hundred forty (240) days prior to the next regularly scheduled municipal election. SECTION 2: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 3: The findings and recitals contained herein are declared to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois. Page 9 of 11 R7.Page 503 of 506 108-O-20 SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in the manner provided by law. Introduced: _________________, 2020 Adopted: ___________________, 2020 Approved: __________________________, 2020 _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Approved as to form: ______________________________ Kelley Gandurski, Corporation Counsel Page 10 of 11 R7.Page 504 of 506 10/20/2020 94-R-20 A RESOLUTION Adding City Council Rule Section 29, “Healthcare Insurance Allowance” WHEREAS, The City Council amends the City Council Rules and Organization of the City Council of the City of Evanston from time to time; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION 1.That the City Council Rules are hereby amended to add Section 29, “Healthcare Insurance Allowance,” which shall read as follows: 29. HEALTHCARE INSURANCE ALLOWANCE 29.1 Each Alderman will receive a monthly healthcare insurance allowance in the amount of one thousand four hundred dollars ($1400.00) per month. Each alderman may use this amount to purchase health insurance through the City, if desired. 29.2 Any additional costs over and above the Healthcare Insurance Allowance will be the responsibility of the individual Alderman. SECTION 2: That this Resolution 94-R-20 shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. _______________________________ Stephen H. Hagerty, Mayor Attest: _______________________________ Devon Reid, City Clerk Adopted: __________________, 2020 Approved as to Form: ______________________________ Kelley A. Gandurski Page 11 of 11 R7.Page 505 of 506 Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Darlene Francellno, Mayoral/Aldermanic Assistant CC: Kimberly Richardson, Interim Assistant City Manager Subject: Approval of Appointments and Reappointments to Board, Commission and Committee Date: October 26, 2020 Recommended Action: The Mayor recommends City Council approval of the appointment of Angela Valavanis to the Alternative Emergency Response Subcommittee and the reappointment of Kristi Bachmann to the Animal Welfare Board. Council Action: For Action Summary: Appointment: Alternative Emergency Response Subcommittee Angela Valavanis is the owner and founder of Creative CoWorking located on Davis in downtown Evanston. She is Executive Board Member, Equ ity Council Member for the Evanston Chamber of Commerce, and former Board President of the Chamber. She currently volunteers her time as a board member of Downtown Evanston, Woman’s Club of Evanston, and Writer’s Council Co-Chair for Literature for All of Us. Reappointment: Animal Welfare Board Kristi Bachman APP1.Page 506 of 506