Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1991COMMITTEE ACTION Site Plan Review Committee July 3, 1991 Committee Members Present; J . Aiello, C . Eo ry s . D. Cn p l ► "h s . D. Jennings, T. Linkowski, D. Rasmussen, J. Wolfen5perger. J. Wollank Committee Members Absent: n . Rudd. J . T onk ins-n . V Wa i . nak . A. zanileii SPR 91-021 120-44 Sib ca o Ave (Conference) Ai 1 -­ . . the Wommittee that the owners of Minasian Carpo,_s w'_ul! s� _ resc.leduled. SPR 89-077 1 afi Oakton St (Final ARRXQval) il'- • _ nw _--A_. v final Diann. Lhe 7immi�tnn unanxm- uEly v *oi u. a. _N, . 0 p p f, v , SPR 417-34 2.907 Hartzell St. (Prelirninnry Qproyal) - 70mmiLtan arautej rol;m r:h_y appr.v51. A4, COMMITTEE ACTION Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee July 17, 1991 Committee Members Present: C. Boryal D. Ceplecha, T. Linkowski, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensparger, J. Wolinski, J. Zendell Committee Members Absent: J. Aiello, D. Jennings, R. Walczak Other Staff Present: H. Sabin SRC 91-039 2541 Lawndale_Avenue (2XA1MinarvJ D. Rasmussen stated that the property owner is proposing a second -story addition to the single-family home. An alley is located on the north and east side of the property. The Committee voted to grant preliminary approval and approval of the staff report to the Zoning Board of Appeals. SPAARC 91-040 604 Dempster Street (Prejijninarv/Final) D. Rasmussen stated that the occupants had applied for permits to remodel the existing landmark storefront. H. Sabin, interim preservation coordinator stated that she had visited the site. Ms. Sabin continued by saying that the storefronts are in various conditions. C. Borys asked if the owners are asking for assistance from the City. H. Sabin responded that she did not know, C. Borys said she would check with Tim Clarke, Development Analyst. R. Rudd suggested that this project first be reviewed by The Preservation Commission. J. Zendell expressed concern regarding the time it may take the Preservation Commission to review the project. H. Sabin said that if the storefront is being replaced in kind, she could approve the plans. The Committee voted to recommend referral of this project to the Preservation Commission or Preservation Staff. SPAARC 91-041 1501 Central Street (Concert) Mr. James Perry and Lonnig Williams were present on behalf of Northwestern University. Mr. Perry explained that Northwestern is proposing to relocate some of their vehicle storage from the Research Park site to the east side of the stadium, underneath the seating. Mr. Perry stated that part of this area is currently used for storage of equipment. Northwestern is proposing to utilize the space for vehicle storage, light maintenance of vehicles and a small office for record keeping. D. Rasmussen asked if only cars would be stored on site. Mr. Perry responded that some trucks would be stored on site as well. Mr. Perry continued by saying that during game days the vehicles would be removed and stored on other University property. T. Linkowski asked if the building would be sprinklered. Mr. Perry responded in the affirmative. D. Rasmussen asked the hours of operation. Mr. Perry said the facility would be used from 8:30 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, with the exception of emergencies. C. Borys asked how many vehicloa would be stored on the site. Mr. Perry responed 25--30. Mr. Perry said that there would be no gas stored on the premises. J. Tonkinson asked how many vehicles would access the property. Mr. Williams responded that vehicles will enter an existing curb cut on Central Street, by the ticket booth, and use a service drive that is currently located on the east side of the stadium. Mr. Williams continued by saying that there is the service drive, a grassy island and then the parking lot. Evanston Hospital is located to the east of the parking lot and utilizes a portion of the stadium parking. Mr. Williams stated that there is a hedge along Central Street. J. Wolinski asked if any of the vehicles proposed to be stored on site would be diesel. Mr. Williams responded one or two. D. Rasmussen stated that a use variation will probably be necessary. R. Rudd suggested that Northwestern be able to prove that they will not be increasing the traffic on Central Street. The Committee granted conceptual approval with the conditions that no flammable material be stored on site, the number of vehicles stored on site be limited to 30 and compliance with all building and zoning codes. SP RC_91-006 540 Florence_ Avenue (Final) D. Rasmussen informed the Committee that the Zoning Board of Appeals had granted variations for the proposed dormers. The Committee granted final approval. ,FAARC 89-043 2962 Central Street (Final) D. Rasmussen said that City Council had granted final approval for the Mobil Gas station subject to numerous conditions, including a gabled roof. This project began prior to appearance review. R. Rudd stated that the proposed plans are in compliance with the plans approved by the City Council. The Committee unanimously granted final approval. SPAARC 89-078 1202 Hinman Avenue (Final) D. Rasmussen stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals had granted approval of the required variations for the dormer addition. The Committee granted final approval. SPAAHC 2.1-042 607 Lake street (Preliminary/Final} H. Sabin stated that the First Baptist Church has landmark status. She continued by saying that the proposed roof material had been approved by the Preservation Commission. The Committee granted preliminary and final approval, subject to the Preservation Commission's conditions of approval. / Janice Wolfensiberder Zoning Planner Date V COMMITTEE ACTION Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee July 24, 1991 Committee Members Present: O. Ceplecha, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, R, Walczak, J. Wolfensperger, ,-i . Zendell Committee Members Absent: K Aiello, C. Borys, D. Jennings, T. Linkowski. J. Tonkinson, 4. W-iinski i'. ninwur tiv that tails L roj,_.ct If:_.'l & r=p_.._WTS@%t of an 0XIOU!"g r"w -r h ana _ na rway _[_uc•g_ • . , . m W _!�-._iy larger yQrh and ta:rway structure. D. Fasmunsyncontinued by saying Lhat U project will W schcdultd before the Wing Board of Appeals ar. it requires variation:, _ W = . onspergur noted that tnt' porch jaW _airways are 1DcaL,d y* the r--ar Qf the building Wammitt►e _ --M0_.:jud 3ppr,_wal of the t to f rtpwr.. and granted preliminary r-wa_. SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTI0N July 31, 1991 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENTS T. Clarke (for C. Darya), D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, T. Linkowski, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinson, R. Walczak, J. Zendell COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Wolfensperger SkAA,RC 91,-044. 2324 Lkagainwood Drive. Review of Staff Renort to ZU for variations to allow installation of a new siiahtly larggrr flagstone front porch in TA Ace of the gxLgtJ a 2grch of a einale Lam lv dwelling. The Committee voted to grant approval of the staff report to the ZBA. SPAARC 91-045, 1027 Sherman Avenue. Reyiay of Staff Renort to ZBA for Variation to nermit a chanae of use of two vacant store fronts and a Dortion of the second floor of the sit property for vouth counseling offices. The Committee voted to grant approval of the staff report to the Zoning Board of Appeals. SPAARC 91-046. 824-36 Dobson Street, Preliminary Review of a Proposal for a 21 Unit Buildina for ttp Physically Disabled. Paul Finnell from the Center and Fritz Biederman, architect, were present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. Committee member Zendell noted that he lives across the street from the property and, due to a possible conflict of interest, would be abstaining with respect to this proposal. Mr. Biederman noted that the subject property has a 6 foot slope from its western edge to its eastern edge, that Dobson Street has been set up as the front yard and that the project, which would be funded by HUD, would be limited to the physically disabled only, not to the developmentally disabled. He noted that the parking area, to the south of the building, would achieve ingress and egress via the immediately adjacent alley which is paved. He said that the building will be 3 stories in height, be red face brick on all four sides, that there would be a limestone base and limestone quoins at the four corners of the building. He stated that the roof color would be dark grey and that the windows would be aluminum frame, double hung windows with white to beige frames. Mr. Finnell of the Center noted that this project would be funded directly by the Federal Government and that, under that agreement, the property would have to be removed from the tax rolls, but that the Center was willing to enter into agreement with the City for payments in lieu of taxes. Mr. Biederman, in response to a question, noted that the roof color would be dark grey. A motion to approve the building design and appearance was then passed by the Committee (non -binding review). The Committee then reviewed the site design and noted that emergency exits to the east and west would not allow wheelchair bound tenants to transit away from the building in the cans of fire. The Committee suggested that walks be provided to connect to the parking area. The committee also noted that a landscaping plan should be provided for Committee review and approval, prior to submittal of this case to the ZBA and that since the propound building will be an R2 use classification under the Basic Building Code, sprinkelere will be required. The Committee also noted that, under the terms of the Zoning ordinance, 23 off-street parking spaces would be required and that only 12 spaces are proposed. This would necessitate the variation from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Hr. Finnell noted that of 40 units that he is aware of, in similar buildings, only 2 of the tenants of those units have cars. Following discussion, a motion was passed to grant preliminary approval to this project subject to Zoning Board of Appeals, approval of the parking deficiencies, review and approval of a landscape plan by the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee and installation of pedestrian walks from the emergency egress on the east and west to connect with the parking area on the south. SPAARC 91-047, 2800-28 Gfr?a„Avenue. Preli inary Review of a Proposed 12 foot hiqhL, 90 foot lon4 fence at the second tee of -the golf course. Vito Dicanio, Superintendent of Parks, was present to discuss this matter with the Committee. He stated that tee 2 of the golf course has a long tee box and that problems have been incurred with golf balls damaging the property on Girard and adjacent to Girard Avenue. He noted that the tee was placed an far as possible to the western edge of the golf course and that, in his opinion, the 12 foot height wan necessary to eliminate the problem and the 90 foot length was to accommodate the long tee box at this tee. He noted that there was already a similar fence at the llth tee. Following discussion, the C =ittee voted to grant preliminary approval to this proposal subject to a municipal exemption being obtained from the City Council. David N. Rasmussen Assistant Director of Zoning Date SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION August 7, 1991 Committee Members Present: Committee Members Absent: Other Staff Present: D. Ceplecha, T. Linkowski, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski, J. Zendell J. Aiello, C. Borys, D. Jennings, D. Rasmussen, R. Walczak T. Clarke, D. Marino, H. Sabin SPAARC 91-Q4p 400 Main Street. Preliminary apd Final Review of Permit Plan- Por Paranet Remodelina on a Multl-familv Condominium Auildina. William Hicks, the project architect, was present to discuss the proposal to replace the existing parapet on the condominium building. Mr. Hicks explained that despite complete tuckpointing of the building in 1982, the parapet is in disrepair. Mr. Hicks presented the Committee with the proposed plans, as well as photographs of the building and a building where similar work had been completed. Mr. Hicks informed the Committee that the slopping parapat wall o1a the roof would be changed to a straight line. The Committee reviewed the photographs and the proposed plans and granted preliminary and final approval. SPAARC 91-049 228 Greenwood Street. Review of. Staff Report to 7$A on Variation to Reduce Reoruired Rear Yard, J. Wolfensperger explained that applicant is proposing to subdivide the parcel into two parcels. The existing coach house would have an insufficient rear yard. R. Rudd asked which would come first, the subdivision request or the variation request. J. Wolinski stated that the variation requested would have to be approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals before the plat is scheduled on the Planning and Development Committee agenda. The Committee unanimously approved the staff report. SPAARC 91-008 1555 Oak Avenue, Final Review of Permit Plans for a Canoov at the Presbvterian Home. J. Wolfensperger explained that the Presbyterian Home is seeking final approval for a canopy over a sidewalk to their main entrance. The Zoning Board of Appeals granted a variation from the permitted yard obstructions for the project. The Committee reviewed the plans and granted final approval. J2ffiYce L. Wo 1 f enj(peror oning Planner / Date SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION August 14, 1991 Committee Members Present: C. Borys, D. Jennings, T. Linkowski, R. Rudd, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski Committee Members Absent: J. Aiello, D. Ceplecha, D. Rasmussen J. Tonkinson, R. Walczak, J. Zendell Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz lRovi J. Wolfensperger explained that the applicant is requesting variations to construct a second story addition and side entrance. The Committee unanimously approved the staff report. Plans fnr Three Att.AnhAd Single mi 1 v novel 7 j ng Units . Roger Paris, Eric Eriksson and Richard Crane were present to explain their proposed project. Mr. Ericksson said that they are proposing to construct three (3) single family attached townhomes. A five (5) car detached garage will also be constructed. Mr. Paris stated that the primary structure will be sided with either aluminum or vinyl, in a light color, preferably white or beige. Mr. Paris continued by saying that a darker color will be used on the trim. Mr. Eriksson pointed out that shutters will be installed on the front side of th- structure. J. Wolfensperger informed the Committee that a subdivision plat is required prior to zoning approval. Mr. Paris explained that there are currently three (3) lots that will be re -subdivide into two (2) lots. C. Borys asked what type of screening will be installed. Mr. Paris and Mr. Eriksson stated that they would supply a landscaping plan for final review. R. Rudd suggested that they obtain a copy of the Site Plan and Appearance Review ordinance. R. Rudd stated that a sample of the proposed exterior material would also be required as part of the final review. T. Linkowski asked what type of fire separation would be use between units. Mr. Ericksson replied a two (2) hour, fire rated chip board. The Committee granted preliminary approval. OTHER BUSINESS David Jennings stated that he had received a communication from Alderman Wollin regarding some traffic problems resulting from the Dominicks Food Store on Green Bay Road. D. Jennings informed the Committee that Dominicks Appearance Review Committee Xanice Wolfensperg� Zoning Planner Date may come before the Site Plan and in the near future. SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION August 21, 1991. Committee Members Presentr Committee Members Aboant: Other Staff Present: C. Borys, A. Ceplecha, T. Linkowski, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinoon, R. Walczak, J. Wolinski J. Aiello, D. Jennings, J. Wolfenaperger, J. Zendell D. Barber (Public Works Director) SPAARC 91-003 2222 Oakton Street, Final Review of Permit Plane for Citv Recvclino Center. D. Rasmussen noted that preliminary approval had been given to this project at the Site Plan meeting held on March 13, 1991 and that the permit plans were now available for inspection. D. Barber explained that the building will be a one-story sprinklered pre-engineered building and that the hours of operation will be approximately 7:00 A.H. to 5:00 F.M., with a 24 hour drop-off area. After review of the plans and further discussion, the Committee granted final approval to this project. David N. Rasmussen AssLatant Director of Zoning 9'1.2 b 1-7 1 Date SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION September 11, 1991 Committee Members Present: C. Borys, D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, D, Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinson, R. Walczak, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski Committee Members Absent: J. Aiello, T. Linkowski, J. Zendell for physically di_ led nersQns. Mr. Paul Finnell and Fritz Biederman were present to discuss the landscaping plan with the Committee. D. Rasmussen reminded the Committee that preliminary (approval had been granted by the Committee on July 31, 1991, subject to ZBA approval and Committee approval of a final landscaping plan. Mr. Biederman explained the difficulty in landscaping the subject site because of the drastic change in grade. Mr. Biederman reviewer( the proposed plant materials with the Committee giving a summary of the plant characteristics. Mr. Biederman continued by 5ayinp that Boston Ivy will also be installed along the building, for a softening affect. L. Ceplecha stated that he was pleased with the proposed plan. Mr. Finnell said that an attempt will be made to preserve any Existing trea5. C. Borys stated that this property had been chosen by the City Council as a possible site for a City entrance sign. C. Borys continued that she had been in contact with Mr. Finnell regarding this matter. Mr. Finnell and Mr. Biederman stated that they had no ObJect.ions to the proposed sign but have some legal questi=!s regarding an easement and maintenance of the sign. D. Jennings responded that the City would be responsible for maintenance of the sign. Mr. Finnell said that they would be willing to maintain landscaping around the proposed sign if it blends with their proposed landscaping plan and consists of plant materials that do not require n ! .t _ f maintenance, Nr Siojerma" regwesttd nha'. the City consider the 510 pe of the property before finaiizing any plans. C. Borys said that she would be in contact with Mr. Finnell and Mr. Biederman c neerning City mien specifics. The Committee unanimously granted final approval of the landscaping plan. Y1 W ce �iolfensng Flanner Dat SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION September 25, 1991 Committee Members Present: Committee Members Absent: Other Staff Present: J. Aiello, C. Borys, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinson, R. Walczak, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, T. Linkowski, J. Zendell A. Berkowsky Sit 89--60 1000-20 Central Street. Final Review of Modifications to Previously annroved Plans for a Medical office Buildina and Park,ina Deck. D. Rasmussen reminded the Committee that final approval for this project had been granted on May 29, 1991. D. Rasmussen explained that the proposal is again before the Committee because of architectural changes. Mr. Walt Eckenhoff, Len Wilson, Tim Vander Molen and Jeff Hillebrand were present to discuss the modifications. Mr. Eckenhoff outlined the following changes to the proposed structure: 1) the driveway curb cut has been moved 1.5 feet to the west, per IDOT's requirement; 2) a proposed tree has been relocated on the property, per IDOT's request; 3) two (2) ornamental towers on top of the elevator shafts have been removed, hence, reducing the overall building height; 4) brick and precast concrete has been added at the arcade level to soften the appearance of the building; 5) the elevator shaft width has been slightly increased to accommodate strechers. Mr. Eckenhoff stressed to the Committee that these changes to not decrease parking or structurally alter the previously approved plans. Mr. Eckenhoff stated that glass blocks will be installed on the parking floors, but 4 hinged panels will be installed on each floor for Fire Department access. J. Wolinski informed Mr. Eckenhoff that the Building Department will require openers calculations. Mr. Eckenhoff responded that he would supply this information. The Committee unanimously voted to grant final approval, subject to Building Department approval of the openess calculations. SPAARC 91-053 2145 Sheridan Road. Preliminary and Final Review of a Pronosa 2x Renovation and Mechanical Penthouse Additions to the TecWcal Building t►t Northwestern University,- Quentin Bruhn and Joe Roibel were present representing Northwestern University. D. Rasmussen reminded the Committee that this project is subject to appearance review, as well as site plan review. Mr. Reibel explained to the Committee that the tech building was constructed in 1941 and is substandard with regard to restrooms. Mr. Reibel stated that the proposed penthouses would be built to accommodate required mechanicals for the building. Mr. Reibel said that an attempt was made to incorporate the penthouses into the design of the original buildings. Mr. Bruhn and Mr. Reibel indicated the proposed ornamentation on the plans. Mr. Rasmussen handed out photographs of the tech building. Mr. Reibel also informed the Committee that the single pane windows are to be replaced with double panes for energy efficiency. Mr. Reibel distributed a sample of the subtle green aluminum window sash to be installed. Mr. Reibel stated that the original window sashes are grey in color and made of steel. The Committee agreed that the proposed changes and additions are necessary and sensitive to the existing architecture. The Committee granted preliminary and final approval. §AARC 91-054, Emerson Street, Preliminary Review of Prongsed Church Elevator Addition and Review o to f Report to the Zonina Board of ADoeals. D. Rasmussen stated that final approval had previously been granted and variations and the special use granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals had expired. D. Rasmussen explained that the handicapped ramps are proposed to be replaced with an elevator. No increase in seating capacity is proposed. The Committee granted preliminary approval, subject to ZBA approval and approval of the staff report. SPAARC 091-055. 2200 Greenleaf Street, Preliminary!Final Review of an Addition to a Manufacturing Buildinq. D. Rasmussen supplied the Committee with plans for a proposed 394 square foot addition to a manufacturing building. The Committee granted final approval based on the fact that the proposed addition is not visible from the atreet and is located adjacent to other manufacturing uses. �Ja4nice Woifenspe er Zoning Planner ©ate SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION October 2, 1991 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Borys, T. Linkowski, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J, Tonkinson, R. Walczak, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski, J. Zendell COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: OTHER STAFF PRESENT: J. Aiello, D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings T. Clarke, C. Ruiz APAARC 91-052 117 Asbury Avenue. CQncentual Review of, DeEict Options for Storefront Imnrnvements to Milte's Drive -In,. T. Clarke explained that he has baen working with Rodger Ryu, owner of Mike's and Mr. Nick Bruno, architect, on design options for a facade rehabilitation. T. Clarke said that this project is eligible ,for the City'rs Storefront Improvement Program which financially assists commercial property owners with storefront improvements, T. Clarke introduced Mr. Bruno to the Committee. Mr. Bruno proceeded by explaining six (6) design options that he and Mr. Ryu had discussed. The Committee noted two (2) particular design options of interest: 1) installation of a back illuminated west and south faces awnings on the building, and; 2) a design which transforms the west and south facade into a hot dog scheme. J. Tonkinson asked the building setback on the west property line. Mr. Bruno stated that he has not seen a plat of survey for the property. J. Tonkinson stated that the building is currently located very close to the public right-of-way and cautioned Mr. Bruno to be aware of this fact, J. Wolinski stated that many of the design options would require sign variations. D. Rasmussen asked what type of material would be used for the hot dog scheme. Mr. Bruno responded that the material to be used is very durable when reinforced. Mr. Bruno stated that this material has been used on other buildings in the area. J. Wolinski stated that code dictates the allowable percentage of combustible material. Mr. Bruno responded that the combustible material used on the facade would be separated from the building with a non-combustible material. C. Borys said that she is concerned with the durability and maintenance of the material which would be used on the hot dog scheme. J. Zendell said that he also has concerns regarding maintenance and execution of the hot dog design. R. Rudd pointed out that this project is before the Committee for appearance review.The Committee discussed the urgent need for a committee architect as required in the Site Plan and Appearance Review Ordinance. The Committee took no action, pending appointment of an architect to the Committee. r yoniAng ce L. Wolfen/A-! rr Planner Date DRAFT SOT APPROVED SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION OCTOBER 16, 1991 Committee Members Present: Committee Members Absent: D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, T. Linkowski, D. Rasmussen, J. Tonkinson, R. Walczak, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski, J. Aiello, C. Borys R. Rudd, J. Zendell E.P-AARC 91-058-A 2169 Sheridan Road, Pxeliminary review of Plans for an addition to the Allen Center at Northwestern University. Mr. Jim Koolish from Northwestern University, along with Steve Johnson and Barbara McCarthy from the architectural firm of V.O.A. were on hand to make the presentation. The addition to the Allen Center will consist of 50 guest rooms, lecture rooms, small seminar rooms, and 2,000 sq. ft. of office area. The addition construction will consist of poured in place concrete with a limestone exterior to match the existing exterior. The addition would now house the building's main entrance, and utilize stainless steel to accent it. The building would be fully handicapped accessible. The addition would eliminate some parking. Rasmussen advised the parking requirement in the Zoning Ordinance be carefully reviewed by Northwestern. Landscaping would attempt to screen the lobby from the parking lot. Signage on the building would be minimal, with raised letters on the building and the address etched in glass windows. An existing bicycle path would be extended and widened around the building to 18 ft. for emergency vehicle access. The Committee voted unanimously to grant preliminary approval. SPAARC 91-059-1 2115 Sheridan Road, Conceptual Review of Plans for a New School of Education Buildinq at Northwestern University. Jim Koolish of Northwestern University and Jim Fraerman from Booth Hansen Architects were present to discuss the proposed School of Education Building. Mr. Fraerman presented plans to the Committee indicating a light stone building with an elevation of three (3) stories on the west elevation and four (4) stories on the east elevation. Mr. Fraerman continued by saying that this proposed building will house classrooms on the first floor and faculty offices on the remaining floors. J. Wolinski asked the location of the handicapped entrance. Mr. Fraerman responded that the building will be handicapped accessible from the east and west entrances. In addition, Mr. Fraerman stated that the entire building will be handicapped accessible. D. Rasmussen informed the representatives that a parking plan will be required which indicates the number of parking spaces available for each use located in that specific University District. Mr. Fraerman and Mr. Koolish stated that a landscaping plan had not been developed but will be in the near future. R. Walczak and T. Linkowski reminded the University to properly indicate the address of the building so it is easily visible for emergency vehicles. The Committee agreed that the standards listed in the Appearance Review Ordinance had been met. The Committee granted conceptual approval. Site Plan & Appearance Review October 16, 1991 Page 2 SPAARC 91-060-A 1577--83 Maple venue. Prrl. iminary and Final Review of a Proposed Facade Remodeling on a Comm rcial Building. The Committee reviewed a letter and plans submitted by Mr. Nick Bruno, architect for a store front improvement. Mr. Bruno indicated that the configuration of the store front will remain unchanged, but an aluminum storefront system with insulated glazing will be installed. In addition, Mr. Bruno indicated that the existing cement steps will be resurfaced. J. Wolinski stated that the building will be required to be handicapped accessible. The Committee granted final approval subject to compliance with all applicable building codes. SPAARC 89-9,29 21U2 Green Bav Road, Final Review of Plans for a Homes Walgreen's Building - Mr. Bryan Resch, architect for the project was present to answer questions. D. Rasmussen presented the final building plans and informed the Committee that no changes had occurred from the working plans previously approved by the Committee. D. Rasmussen reminded the Committee that preliminary approval was granted prior to the Appearance Review Ordinance requirements. The Committee unanimously granted final approval. 2MRC 91-061-A §18 Library Place, Concq,ptual Plans Review of a new Eprthwestern University Building to House ghe Family Institute. Lee Johler, a representative of'Plorthwestern University and Jim Fraerman were present to discuss plans for a new 80 ft. x 85 ft. building to house the University's Family Institute. The plans submitted to the Committee revealed a four (4) story red brick building with a slate roof. Mr. Fraerman pointed out that the north building facade will be a mix of brick and limestone. The main entrance will be located on Library Place. The architect indicated that the University has chosen this design because it is architec- tural sensitive to the other buildings located on this one block street. The representatives stated that a landscaping plan has not been developed but they intend to use plant materials to buffer along the east and west property lines. The committee noted that some current parking spaces will be eliminated. D. Rasmussen reminded Northwestern that a parking plan will be required for the U2 District uses. The Committee discussed existing uses and sizes of structures in the block. The Committee agreed that the design of the proposed building meets the spirit of the standards outlined in the Site Plan and Appearance Review Ordinance. The Committee granted conceptual approval. SPAARC 91-062 2416 Dempster Street, Review Sian Variance Recruest from Evanston Car Wash. The Committee reviewed the staff report and plans transmitted to the Sign Review and Appeals Board. J. Wolinski stated that this variation request would be discussed by the Sign Review and Appeals Board at their October 17, 1991 meeting. Site Plan & Appearance Review October 16, 1991 Page 3 D. Rasmussen reminded the Committee that they are acting in an advisory capacity only. J. Wolfensperger noted that the proposed three (3) signs are new and no hardship exists to warrant a recommendation of approval. The Committee unanimously recommended denial of the requested sign variations. SPAARC 91-063 Research Park, Review an amer_dWnt to the Unified siness Center Sian Plan. At the request of the applicants, this matter was held over. Site Plan and &ppeara ce Review Quarterly Report, The Committee approved the first quartly report to the City Manager. J. L. Wolfensperger! Zoning Planner Date ` SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION OCTOBER 23, 1991 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: 0. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkincon, R. Walczak, J. Wolinaki, J. Zendell COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, C. Borys, T. Linkowski, J. Wolfensporger SPAARC 91-064-A 1721 Brown Avenue, CgnOe ev ew Of the Proposes Conversion of a single-family Dwelling Into a Church and Aaproval o Q Staff Report to the Zoning BQ,ad of Apneale The Committee reviewed the site plan and noted the placement of the subject building near the roar lot line, the large front yard created thereby, and the placoment of the adjacent residential buildings on the properties to the north and south with setbacks from the front lot line approximating the more normal 27 feet. With respect to building appearance, the Committee discussed the mix of facade materials which would be in part brick, in part aluminum siding and in part, cinder block, the creation of a large parking area and three (3) parking spaces in the property's front yard with an access drive via Brown Avenue and a large terrace in front of the proposed church. Following further discussion, a motion was passed to disapprove this proposal at concept review. Due to the unusual placement of the building, the proposal to create a paved parking area and terrace in the front yard would have a negative impact on the residential dwellings to the north and south. A motion to approve the staff report to the Zoning Board of Appeals was also passed. David N. Rasmussen Assistant Zoning Director Building and Zoning Department a 1� y, DAT9 ( 348H) SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE r COMMITTEE ACTION November 6, 1991 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Coplecha, D. Jennings, T. Li.nkowski, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski, J. Zendell COMMITTEE MEMBERS ASSENT: J. Aiollo, C. Borys, R. Walczak OTHER STAFF PRESENT: T. Clarke SPAARC 91-065-A 1000 Foster Str-ee�Prelim tnaxv and Final ,Review of Proposed Facade Alte AlIgM on a Vacant Commercial Buildinq_. Mr. Russell Van Elk was present to discuss this facade rehabilitation proposal. D. Rasmussen told the Committee that a building permit had been applied for. Mr. Rasmussen stated that this proposal had been submitted to T. Clarke for the facade rehab program, but had been denied because of an incomplete application. D. Rasmussen handed out photographs of the building. T. Clarke said, to his knowledge, the building is vacant, and the Owner has not indicated the proposed use. Mr. Van Elk explained his proposal. Mr. Van Elk stated that he is proposing to reinforce the building with a concrete/sand mixture and vertical wood slats. Mr. Van Elk said that his i:: proposing to install leaded glass windows. He assured the Committee that his proposal would architecturally enhance the "tudor" style of the building. T. Clarke stated that an architect, Nick Bruno, had been hired by the City to review design options with the property owner. In addition, T. Clark stated that architect, Eric Erickson had contacted him and indicated that he may be working on the project for the owner. Mr. Van Elk said the property owner is ready to proceed with or without financial help from the City. T. Clarke said that the City has outstanding Code violations against said property. Mr. Van Elk stated that he wants a building permit. J. Tonkinson said that the Committee has no architect to review the project. R. Rudd made a motion to refer the project back to the City hired architect for review. J. Zendell stated that the Committee has two options: 1) either table it until an architect is appointed, or 2) approve the project. The Committee reviewed the standards and concluded that appearance review was the only applicable standards. Mr. Van Elk asked the Committee to make a design decision. R. Rudd explained that this decision should be made by an architect. He re-.ir.:ed the Committee and Mr. Van Elk that the Committee's review is non -binding. R. Rudd continued by saying that this area lends itself to redevelopment and this building may be a cornerstore in this re -development. T. Clarke said that the facade program encourages commercial buildings to be visually open. Mr, Clarke stated that this plan is contrary to that goal. The Committee approved R. Rudd's motion to deny and refer the project to T. Clarke and the City hired facade rehabilitation architect for review. 52AARC 91-066-A 15QI Central Street. greliminary Review of a Northwestern Uni.verBi y Proposal to Install a Pneumatic Dome Qver Three ExistJrIg_JDrmJs Court. Mr. James Perry was present on behalf of Northwestern University. D. Rasmussen informed the Committee that the zoning Office has determined that the proposed pneumatic domo is a permanent structure and will require as special use. J. Perry explained that the proposed dome will be erected over three (3) existing tennis courts located behind the Byron S. Coon Athletic Building. Mr. Perry stated that the dome will be used during the month as of October through May, so that the girls tennis team may practice. Mr. Perry said that the use will be limited to tennis practice only and no stands will be erected inside the dome. The dome will be approximately 40 feet in height and will not be visible from the east or south. Mr. Perry pointed out that a portion of the top may be visible from the north and the closest residences are located one and one half blocks to the west. Mr. Perry continued by saying that the dome is made of a nylon material, will not be air-conditioned , and the structure will not emit light. Mr. Perry said that the required air pressure will be hooked up via existing utilities. R. Rudd asked what color the dome would be. Mr. Perry responded that color had not been decided, but it would probably be a neutral tone. T. Linkowski stated that the dome will not limit access. D. Ceplecha said the Environmental Control Board is concerned about noise pollution. Mr. Ceplecha asked if the air compressor would emit a loud noise. J. Perry responded in the negative. The Committee reviewed the appearance standards and decided to grant preliminary approval, subject to ZBA approval. J. Perry informed the Committee that a neighborhood meeting regarding this project will be conducted on Sunday November 10, 1991. SPAARC 89-29-1 826 Ridae Avenue, Final Review of the Childrens' Home and Aid Societv Prolect Mr. Thomas Kerwin and Bob Nogan were present to represent the Childrens` Home and Aid Society. D. Rasmussen reminded the Committee that conceptual approval had been granted on June 14, 1989, and preliminary approval was granted on October 16, 1991. D. Rasmussen stated that this project was not subject to appearance review because the project had been before the Committee prior to the appearance review amendment. He explained that appearance review had been an issue with the Zoning Board of Appeals. D. Rasmussen informed the Committee that the Ward Alderman had approved the brick style and color. J. Wolfensperger asked D. Rasmussen if the plans before the Committee were in substantial compliance with ZBA's approval. He responded in the affirmative. D. Ceplecha reviewed the landscape plans and stated that this plan was also in agreement with ZBA's approval. .7. Wolinski reminded Mr. Keriwn and Mr. Nogan of the construction traffic routes established by ZBA. The Committee unanimously granted final approval. t J ice L. Wolfe perder Z ing Planner —hA%,ew•kA.r 11, Mil Date (348H) SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION November 13, 1991 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Borys, D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, T. Linkowski, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinson, R. Walczak, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski, J. Zendell COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz SPAARC 91-067-A 355 Ridge Avenue. Conceptual gnd Preliminary Review of a Child Care Institution at St. Frangig HUDital John Salisbury, Kevin Reilley and Scott Crumrine were present on behalf of St. Francis Hospital. Kevin Reilley explained that there is currently a request before the City Council for the same building located on a different parcel. Mr. Reilley continued by saying that the City Council has objected to another piece of property being removed from the tax rolls, so this child care facility has been relocated to the east parking lot. Mr. Crumrine explained that eighteen existing parking spaces would be eliminated. Mr. Crumrine continued by saying that the child care facility, which would have a maximum of 128 children, will be used by hospital employees. D. Rasmussen informed the Committee that a special use and variations are necessary For the project. D. Rasmussen read the list of standards. In response to the standards, Mr. Crumrine stated that a five (5) foot green strip will be installed between the building and the alley. The building was designed to look like a residential structure composed of masonry stone and stucco on all four (4) elevations. Mr. Crumrine stated that the building will be sprinklered and constructed with non-combustible materials. For security, a four (4) foot high fence, with extensive landscaping, will be installed around the outdoor play area, D. Rasmussen asked about signage and site illumination. Mr. Crumrine responded that there will be no exterior signage and some existing parking lot light standards will need to be relocated. Mr. Crumrine noted that the proposed structure will be fully handicap accessible. The Committee discussed circulation. Mr. Reilley stated that no access will be available from Sherman Avenue or the alley. Mr. Reilley stated that six (6) parking spaces will be provided for drop off. Mr. Reilley stated that the hospital intends for employees to park in their regular parking space then escort their children to the facility. D. Jennings questioned whether six (6) spaces would be adequate. Mr. Reilley stated that additional spaces could be designated for drop off if this becomes a problem. Mr. Reilley stated that St. Francis Hospital has met with the neighbors. The Committee unanimously granted conceptual and preliminary approval, subject to ZBA approval and submittal of a landscaping plan. R y�v.i BPAARC 91-041 150,E Centres Street, Review of Staff Renc?pt ZBA for a special Use Recruest from Northwestern University Pneumatic Dome. The staff report was approved without comment. 21-068-A 2535-?601 5heridap Road, Copcentua}. and Prelimingr Review of an Add tion and $ construction of the lighthouse )Keeaer's Dwelling, Don Terras, resident caretaker of the lighthouse, was present to discuss the proposal with the Committee. Mr. Terrace presented the Committee with a copy of the original 1872 blueprints that indicated that the proposed addition had existed. Mr. Terras stated that the Lighthouse Park District is proposing to reconstruct the original addition that was demolished in the 1920s. Mr. Terras indicated that the proposed addition will be used to present educational materials to lighthouse visitors. Mr. Terras informed the Committee that the Lighthouse Park District has been working with the Illinois Historic Preservation Commission to designate this site as a national historic landmark. Mr. Terras said that grants totaling $60,000 had been obtained for the project. Mr. Terras indicated that $10,000 must be spent by the end of the year. The Committee discussed building time tables. Mr. Ruiz offered to contact the State to request a time extension. J. Wolinski said that a preliminary review of the addition indicated that it would not be required to be sprinklered. Mr. Terras stated that this project was planned in the 1970s, but was abandoned because of financial hardship. The Committee unanimously granted conceptual and preliminary approval. Janice L. Wolfensperger Zoning Planner Date (348H) SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION November 20, 1991 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Borys, D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, T. Linkowski, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski, J. Zendell COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, R. Walczak OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz SY,AARC 91-070-A 1227--23 Howard Street. Conceptual and prel,imina v Review of a Proposal to Expand the McQonald's Parking Lot to the West. Ken Kubiesa, representing McDonald's Corporation, was present to discuss the parking lot expansion proposal. D. Rasmussen informed the Committee that a special use is required. Mr. Kubiesa explained that McDonald's is proposing to acquire and demolish the existing building to the west, located on the northeast corner of Howard Street and Barton Avenue. The site plan submitted indicated an extension of the fencing along the north property line and sodded areas along Howard Street. D. Rasmussen informed Mr. Kubiesa that a four (4) foot landscaping buffer is required around the parameter of the parking lot, except where the fence is proposed. D. Ceplecha offered to provide a list to Mr. Kubiesa of recommended landscaping materials. Mr. Kubiesa said that an entrance and exit sign are proposed for the Barton Avenue and Howard Street driveways. J. Wolinski reminded Mr. Kubiesa that the signs should be set back as far as they are tall. Mr. Kubiesa agreed. D. Jennings said that he could see no potential problems with internal and external circulation. J. Wolinski asked how many handicapped parking spaces are proposed. Mr. Kubiesa responded that two (2) are proposed. D. Jennings toad Mr. Kubiesa to make sure the handicapped parking spaces are striped according to current Code. The Committee suggested that internal landscaping also be added to the landscape plan. J. Tonkinson explained what would be necessary for drainage approval. The Committee voted to continue this item until a new landscaping plan is submitted for review. SPAARC 90-78- 2530-38 Green 0av Road. Final Review of Plans for Remodeling of Evanston Paint and Glass. D. Rasmussen presented the final working plans for the remodeling to the Committee. He explained that no zoning relief is necessary. The Committee noted that the final plans are in compliance with the plans which had previously received preliminary Committee approval. The Committee granted final approval. SPAARC 91-059 1414 Leonard Place, Rear. Review Staff Report to the Zoning Board of Appeals and a Letter to Mr. Henry Theobold. D. Rasmussen explained that the subject property is unique, in that it has no frontage on a public right-of-way. The Committee discussed that practical difficulties of improving this lot with a single-family dwelling. The Committee voted to approve the staff report and letter to Mr. Theobold with an amendment to the staff report which indicates that the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee cannot endorse this project because of the complexities involved with the configuration of the lot. The Committee concluded that the subject lot is nit suitable for residential development. ZAARC 91-07;-S 2400 Demnstnr Street. Proposed Amendment t2 the AVU oved unified i3Vq.i Center sign Plan -for the Evanston Ikuto Care Center, J. Wolinski informed the Committee that the above mentioned property owners have applied for a sign variation to replace the approved free-standing sign face which was limited to "Evanston Auto Care Center", to a listing of businesses located in the Center. The Committee recommended approval of this modification. SPAARC 91-072-S 1,1?9 Howard Street. Consider Variation Request to The Si.c{n RqyiP_w an Aoneals' Board from St. Paul Federal Savinas and loan to Egfoce an Existiia Roof Sian. J. Wolinski informed the Committee that roof signs are no longer permitted by the Sign Ordinance. The Committee recommended denial of the variation request and noted that the remaining roof sign structure should be removed. SPAARC 91-072-S 1325 Howard Street, consider Variation ,Recruest to the Sian Review and Appeals' Board by St. Paul Federal Savinas and Loan to Reface a Non -conforming Free-standina Sian. J. Wolinski explained that the proposed sign does not meet the requirements of the Sign Ordinance with regard to the items of information and sign height. The Committee recommended approval of the variations to allow nine (9) items of information and recommended disapproval of the requested sign height variation. SPAARC 91-063-S Research Park - Consider PLonosal to Amend thg Unified Business Center Sign Plan for the &ydnston Northwester Research Park. J. Wolinski stated that three (3) additional signs are proposed for the Research Park, Sign "A" and "B" are temporary signs which would be in place longer than permitted by Code. Signs "C" are two permanent signs to be installed at Clark Street and Benson Avenue. J. Wolinski stated that sign "A" and "B" contain 22 items of information. The Sign Code permits seven (7) items. in addition, sign "A"' would have a sign height of 16 feet, whereas the Sign Ordinance limits the height of a free-standing sign to 15.5 feet. Sign "A" is proposed to be erected in the public right-of-way facing the train tracks. Sign "B" is proposed to be installed at the southeast corner of Ridge Avenue and Emerson Street. J. Wolinski explained that sign "C" meets the requirements of the Sign Ordinance. The Committee reviewed the proposed signs and their respective locations. The Committee voted to recommend approval of the amendment to the Unified Business Center Sign Plan, with the condition that sign "A" be placed on private pr7erty. Janice'L. Wolf spirger Zoning Planner Date (348H) SITE PLAN AND.APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION December 11, 1991 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Borys, D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinson, R. Walczak, J. Wolfensperger COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Wolinski, J. Aiello, J. Zendell SPAARC 9?-073-A 820 Foster street, Congeptgai Review of a Plan to Remodlll and C2nstruct an Addition the Wagner Health Care enter (-oriner.ly The Kensington)_ Mr. Altman was present to discuss the project with the Committee. Mr. Altman explained that the former Kensington Nursing Home has a new owner and is being renovated. As part of this renovation, Mr. Altman explained that construction of a new entrance and group living area is proposed. Mr. Altman explained that the existing five -story (5) building is currently occupied on the top two (2) floors. Renovation will begin with the underground parking area to bring it into compliance with Code. The renovation will then proceed with the next three (3) floors. Mr. Altman explained that the current occupants will be relocated into other facilities and when renovation is completed, the facility will be licensed for 200 beds, instead of the 300 beds the facility was previously licensed for. He stated that this facility will serve the elderly that need skilled living care. The Committee reviewed the proposed building plans. Mr. Altman said that the proposed addition will be a brick, veneer with a metal roof and a skylight. He said the intent of this addition is to improve the appearance of the existing builidng and control traffic entering the building. Mr. Altman stated that no specific plant materials have been indicated, but plans to install six foot by six foot (6' x 61) planter boxes are proposed. Mr. Altman explained that it is necessary to control the weight of the top soil and plant materials so it does not adversely impact the underground garage. Mr. Altman said that a heavily landscaped buffer will be installed along the west property line. D. Rasmussen stated that there are some zoning problems with the project. He explained that the current facility was developed as a permitted use, but became a special use under the current Zoning Ordinance. As a result, the project, at minimum, will require a special use. In addition, D. Rasmussen said that the few proposed visitor parking spaces are located in a requied yard which is prohibited by the Zoning Ordinance. The Committee reviewed the standards and granted conceptual approval with the conditions that a landscaping plan be submitted and the project is in compliance with all other City Codes. SPAARg 91--074--A 2201 Howard Street, Conceptual and pre,liMinary #teview of Plans to �9a¢trM91 a Npw Sh2VD_!a Center'. Or Gary Enos, Craig Knoche and Jens Jensen were present to discuss the project. D. Rasmussen explained that the appearance review " portion of the Committee's examination is non --binding. Gary Enos began the discussion by informing the Committee that Target has a contract to purchase the former Bell and Howell property. Mr. Enos stated that, if the project is approved by the City, Target hopes to have an opening date sometime in the first quarter of 1993. The Committee examined the proposed site plan. Mr. Enos presented color photographs of the proposed Target store. He stated that the proposed 136,000 square foot store would be constructed of a light colored glazed brick with small contrasting stripes and green and blue vestibules to identify the entrances. Although the specifics were not known, Mr. Enos indicated that the remainder of the shopping center would be architecturally similar to the Target store. He stated that no specific plan has been considered for the proposed five (5) outlets. D. Rasmussen read the list of standards. He informed those present that the preliminary zoning analysis indicated that a landscaping plan is required. Any type 2 restaurant will require a special use. All other unspecified uses in the shopping center must be listed as a permitted use in the M3 Zoning District. A drainage plan is required, an additional loading berth is required for the food/drug store, and approval of a Unified Business Center Sign Plan will be required by the Sign Review and Appeals Board. In addition, D. Rasmussen advised the developers to discuss subdivision regulations with J. Wolinski. D. Jennings indicated that he has reviewed several traffic plans being negotiated by the neighbors, the City and the developers. Mr. Enos stated that the developers had submitted the proposed plan to the Captain of the Fire Station which will be serving this site. D. Ceplecha and C. Borys indicated that an effort should be made to attractively landscape the large parking lot. D. Rasmussen stated that a four foot (4) high landscape buffer is required between the parking lot and Howard Street. The developers were also notified that all site illumination must be designed so it does not project beyond the property lines. The Committee unanimously voted to grant conceptual and preliminary approval of the shopping center, contingent on approval of a drainage, landscaping and circulation plan and compliance with all other City Codes. Janice L. wolfenspergv Q ' Zoning Planner Date (348H) SITE' PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE COMMITTEE ACTION December is, 1991 COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: D. Jennings, J. Brewer, D. Rasmussen, R. Rudd, J. Tonkinson, R. Walczak. J. Wolinski, J. Zendell J. Aiello, C. Borys, D. Ceplecha, J. Wolfensperger OTHER STAFF PRESENT: T. Clarke and C. Ruiz S_PAARC Second Ouarter Report The Committee reviewed, revised and then approved the second quarter report. AEAARC 91--072-5 - 1325 Howard Street Recommendation to Sian Review and Appeals' Board on Sian variation reauest for St. Paul Federal Savinas. The Committee reviewed a proposal to install two wall signs on the east facade of the building. The signs which consists of a time and temperature sign and a wall sign directly below the time and temperature sign stating the name of the institution. The Committee was advised that the sign would be mounted 25 feet above grade, whereas the Sign Ordinance permits a maximum height of 15 feet, thereby necessitating the request for variation. The Committee was also advised that the previously reviewed roof sign had been disapproved by the Sign Review and Appeals Board and that the proposed signs represent a compromise with respect to the removal of the previously existing roof sign. After further discussion, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend approval of this sign variation request to the Sign Review and Appeals Board. SPAARC 91-075-5 - 1715 Chicaao Avenue Recommendation to the Sian Review and Appeals Board upon a Sian variation reauest. The Committee was advised that RESCORP Development was requesting a variation to permit installation of a free-standing sign on the Chicago Avenue frontage which would not conform to the Sign Ordinance in three aspects, Mr. Wolinski stated that it was not a listed exempt sign and, therefore, this type of sign could not be located in a residential district, that the building was not set back sufficiently to be entitled to a free-standing sign and that said free-standing sign would be within 20 feet of a circulation lane which provides access to a public right-of-way. The sign would contain the name Evanston Place, a statement, Luxury Apartments and then a phone number. it would be approximately 6 feet long by 44 inches high. The Committee discussed the fact that there were many other residential buildings that may want a sign if this one was approved. And, in this sense, this could be a precedent setting case and, that if granted, it could be viewed as granting preferential treatmont to this particular property. Following further discussion, the Committee voted unanimously to recommend denial of this request to the Sign Review and Appeals Board. David N. Rasmussen Assistant Zoning Director )q) /IfIFI Date (348H)