Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1993Environmental Control Board Minutes January 21, 1993 ADDroved Minutes Members Present: Hartnett, Klosterman Rodriguez, TerMolen, Voss, Members Absent: Frank, Miller Staff Present: Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Bruce Zimmerman, Assistant City Manager Others Present: Marilyn Classens Sheila Davis, Chairman, Ladd Arboretum Committee Mr. Klosterman called the meeting to order in the absence of Chairman Frank. The Environmental Control Board (ECB) reviewed the minutes of the December 17, 1993 meeting. Several corrections were made and the ECB approved the minutes of December 17, 1993 in their corrected form. Proposal to consolidate the ECB and the Ladd Arboretum Committee (LAC) Mr. Klosterman noted that the first topic of discussion was the proposed consolidation of the ECB and the LAC into a single body that would assume the responsibilities and duties of both Boards. Mr. Klosterman introduced Sheila Davis, chairman of the LAC who discussed the current responsibilities of the LAC. Ms. Davis explained that over 30 years ago the Ladd Arboretum was conceived by the Kickers Club as a memorial to Evanston Review founder and publisher, Edward Ladd. Money was raised through private donations to fund the trees, shrubs, flowers, and the Ecology Center building. The land on which the Arboretum is located in owned by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District and leased by the City of Evanston. Ms. Davis noted that originally the School District and the City were going to share the expenses of running the Ecology Center. This did not happen and the Evanston Environmental Association (EEA), a private, not--for-profit organization was formed to provide financial support for the Ecology Center. Currently the Board of Directors of the EEA, as stated in the EEA by-laws, is composed of the members of the LAC. The LAC is charged with oversight responsibility of the Ecology Center, its programs, and budget. The EEA's primary function is to raise funds for the operation of the Ecology Center. Ms. Davis said that much of their efforts over the last few years has been spent on fundraising. Over the last several years, Ms. Davis said, City financial support has been reduced and it has been a priority to raise additional funds for Ecology Center operations. Ms. Davis explained that the EEA has approximately 500 members. Mr. Hartnett asked if there were any LAC concerns regarding the proposed consolidation. Ms. Davis noted that there would be fewer people to do the same tasks and said it raised real questions about the ability of the EEA to raise money. Mr. Voss asked about the motive behind combing the 2 Boards, noting that he could not see a cost savings to the proposal. Mr. 'Zimmerman responded that with the reduction In the size of the City Council, the mayor has appointed a committee to look at committees and boards in an effort to reduce the number of meetings that would be required of alderman. Initially there were enough functions to consider consolidation. Mr. Zimmerman noted that the ECB and the LAC, unlike other City Boards and Commissions, has no requirement that an alderman be part of the committee. Mr. Klosterman raised the issue of the ECB energy sub -committee which combined members of the Energy Alternatives Task Force and the ECB. He noted that the issues of the Task Force and the ECB are more consistent with what the ECB does. He concluded that he saw the overlap with the LAC as only in the education area. Mr. Zimmerman reminded the ECB that previously the ECB had a more operational focus when they oversaw the drop-off recycling center. The proposed consolidation combined operational and environmental issues. Mr. Zimmerman reminded the ECB that the proposed consolidation is a recommendation. There will be a public hearing in March. Right now the City Manager is looking for written responses to the proposed consolidation. The Board noted that the goals of the LAC and ECB were different and consolidation for the sake of consolidation may not be the most effective solution. The Board brought up the issue of serving as the Board of Directors of the EEA as stated in letter D of the proposed ordinance. Ms. Davis explained that currently the LAC ordinance says nothing about the EEA. The EEA by-laws say that the EEA Board is composed of the LAC members. Mr. Hartnett questioned the authority of the City to put people on a non-profit Board. He noted that while he was not versed in non-profit law, it would appear that the EEA would need to change its by-laws in order for the current proposal to be enacted. The Board added that non -profits need to be able to make decisions independent of the City. Ms. Davis said the LAC Board had reservations about their ability to raise money for the EEA with such definite ties to the City as suggested in the proposed ordinance. The Board resumed discussion of the issue of aldermanic liaison to the ECB. Mr. Klosterman noted that no alderman is a member of the ECB. Mr. Zimmerman said the reduction in the number of groups reporting to the Human Services Committee may be an efficiency issue with fewer aldermen. He added that they may be some compatibility of the ECB and LAC Boards with a potential to strengthen both Boards. Mr. Klosterman raised concerns regarding the number of people on the ECB stating that the ECB wanted to increase membership to 12 in order to get all their •. 11 Y ,WI Y AY . 1 y 1 committee work done. He added that if the proposed Environmental Plan is implemented the ECB would need several more subcommittees. He said the operational role of the ECB in the past was strictly a pro forma role and was never a major function of the ECB. The former budget of the ECB has been incorporated into the Ecology Center budget Ms. Lutz noted, with ECB expenses incorporated into Ecology Center operational funds. The Board discussed the number of members on the proposed Board combination. Seventeen was thought to be too large for a Board so it was reduced to 13. Mr. Klosterman indicated that most of the ECB work is done through sub -committees that report back to the ECB. He supposed that the LAC would be a sub -committee function. The Board discussed the proposed title; the Ladd Arboretum Environmental Board. The Board's reaction was that the title reflected a superficial combination of the two existing Boards. A title that reflected the all encompassing nature of the 2 Boards might be better. Mr. Zimmerman noted that the combination was an attempt to give equal focus. The Board agreed that "control board" was inappropriate and Evanston Environmental Board might be better. Section three of the proposed ordinance Mr. Zimmerman noted contained antiquated language that is still a part of the City Code. He said that the Building and Property Services Department of the City was reviewing section three to see what needed to be kept and where was the appropriate place to have the new language in the City Code. This section should not be considered as part of the proposed consolidation ordinance. Mr. Klosterman clarified that the intention of the City Manager's memorandum was to respond in writing by the end of the month. He asked that the Board go through the sections in detail and decide their response. Mr. Voss suggested focusing on the concept of consolidation first. After a short discussion, Mr. Rodriguez moved that the ECB communicate to the City Manager its opposition to the proposed merger of the LAC and the ECB. Mr. Voss seconded the motion. Mr. Hartnett discussed the responsibilities of organization management and the liability issues in Fundraising, indicating that these were not part of the ECB's current responsibilities. The Board indicated that there may be some kind of overlap, however each Board had very specific charges. After discussion the ECB unanimously approved the motion. The ECB discussed section 4-10-11 dealing with the term length of members. Two separate three year terms is the basic policy in the City. Mr. Zimmerman noted that by state statutes the Recreation Board has 5 year terms. The ECB is the other exception with its 4 year terms. Mr. Klosterman expressed the opinion that it takes several years to become familiar with specific environmental issues before one can become a well rounded ECB member. Mr. Zimmerman noted that the current ordinance is not consistent with the environmental plan and would need to be updated. Mr. Zimmerman asked for clarification of the sections on membership of the Board. The Board noted that as they dealt with specific issues they needed members with specific expertise. Expertise in the areas of science and public health has been an important component in the past. The skill needs of the Board have varied as particular issues have come up. Mr. Klosterman noted that an electrical engineer would be a great additional to the Board. The Board noted that in the past they consulted with the mayor about particular skills needed at the time of a vacancy. The Board noted that items B-F, dealing with the LAC functions did not need to be addressed at this time. Mr. Klosterman expressed his opinion that an ECB member had to make a commitment to become knowledgeable on particular environmental issues even though some Issues are not currently a consideration for Evanston. He noted that Mr. Miller kept updated on electro-magnetic fields even though the data is not conclusive at this point. The ECB decided that the language in section H was sufficient. The Board added to section G, indicating that environmental issues should be able to be raised by the ECB as well as the City, the public, and other agencies. The ECB addressed section L, which indicates providing assistance to the Energy Alternatives Task Force. The Board decided to delete section L, feeling that section K addressing the ECB as a resource for other City Council Committees, and Departments covered joint work done by the ECB without limitations. Environmental Ordinance Draft The Board reviewed a draft of an environmental ordinance as developed by Mr. Hartnett. Mr. Hartnett explained the basic components and sections. The ECB briefly discussed their ability to request documents and talk to people regarding environmental issues. The ECB clarified with Mr. Zimmerman that the ECB is an advocacy/education group that is not involved in enforcement. Mr. Zimmmerman cited a memo from the legal department regarding the authority to investigate. Mr. Rodriguez noted these are serious issues with constitutional implications that the ECB should investigate further. Mr. Hartnett noted that the mechanism to request documents would be up to the corporation counsel to decide. Mr. Zimmerman suggested that after the issue of consolidation is considered the City attorney could go over the proposed ordinance with the ECB. The ECB agreed that this would be appropriate. Energy Sub -Committee Mr. Klosterman said he had contacted the members of the Energy Alternatives Task Force to set up a meeting time. He reported that it does not look like they will be able to meet for some time. Mr. Klosterman would like to discuss what should be included in an energy policy. Mr. Voss added that some western states have very progressive ordinances regarding energy. National Environmental Law Center Resolution Ms. Lutz reported the changes that the Human Services Committee had made in the proposed resolution. The Human Services Committee will again consider the resolution on January 25th. Ms. Lutz will attend the meeting for the ECB. Lead Report Y A i Y u, , i U IilW.Y The Board noted the report from Mr. Figurelli on the lead content in Evanston's water supply. The figures were impressive and showed very low levels. The ECB asked Ms. Lutz to find out if the problem is gone?, Once fixed does it stay fixed?, Is phosphate a suppressant that needs to be reapplied?, and What procedures need to be done periodically? Ms. Lutz will report back to the ECb in February. Resolution for Peter Dauzvardis Mr. Hartnett presented a draft of a resolution for former ECB member Peter Dauzvardis. The ECB approved the resolution. Ms. Lutz will check with the City for the Mayor's signature, and if this is the type of resolution City Council approves. The ECB approved the resolution. Next Meeting The ECB discussed the next meeting date. It was agreed to keep the regular meeting date of Thursday, February 18, '1993. Respectfully submitted Linda Lutz ul, N i 1 u VI ,hi iI11I1 Environmental Control Board Minutes February 1s, 1993 Draft — Not Approved Members Present: Frank, Hartnett, Klosterman Miller, TerMolen, Voss, Members Absent: Rodriguez Staff Present: Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Don Wirth, Director Parks/Forestry, and Recreation Dennis Ceplecha, Superintendent Parks/Forestry Others Present: Judy Elsass, League of Women Voters Marjorie Fisher, Judy Freitag, Prospective ECB Member Sharon Lieberman, Prospective ECB Member Lynn Lawson Anthony Drobnick, USDA Rebecca Keith, USDA Minutes Approval Mr. Klosterman moved, seconded by Mr. TerMolen to approve the minutes of January 21, 1993. The Environmental Control Board (ECS) approved their minutes of January 21, 1993. Gypsy Moth Information Presentation Dr. Frank introduced Don Wirth from the City Parks/Forestry Department. Mr. Wirth explained that the united States Department of Agriculture (USDA) had discovered 2 egg masses of the gypsy moth ,n the 1st and 3rd wards of the City. Mr. Wirth and Mr. Ceplecha had conferred with the Administration and Public Works (API Committee of the City Council to create a process to inform the public and deal with the infestation of gypsy moth. As part of the process the EC8 agreed to serve as host for educational information sessions on the gypsy moth. the EC$ will send a recommendation regarding the USDA proposed spraying program to the City Council in a time frame consistent with the proposed USDA schedule. Mr. Wirth introduced Mr. Anthony Drobnick, the Illinois Representative of the USDA. Mr. Drobnick said that the USDA has been trapping gypsy moths in Illinois since the 1970's. Mr. Drobnick said the gypsy moth came to the United States in 1869. It has been defoliating trees since then moving west at a rate of 6 miles per year. Currently the gypsy moth quarantine area is several counties inside Ohio. Michigan and the lake counties in Wisconsin are also in the quarantine area. Gypsy moths spread slowly on their own. The mobile human population has transported the moth faster. Residents moving carry the moth on personal items, wood, outdoor furniture, etc. In the 1970's the USDA started a trapping program alternating between southern and northern Illinois counties. The Chicago area is trapped every year because there is lots of in and out transportation. Traps contain a pheromone that attracts the male moth up to a mile away. Initially the traps are set out at the rate of 1 per square mile. Approximately 2 dozen traps in Evanston contained male moths, with about 34 moths discovered. After the season the traps are analyzed. When several male moths are found in a trap, two things happen: more traps (3 per acre) are set in order to pin point the moth infestation area, and a search is begun for egg masses. The adult female gypsy moth does not fly and is not found in traps. In addition to Evanston, Mr. Drobnick noted that the gypsy moth has been found in: Lake Forest, Kennilworth, Wilmette, Lake Bluff, Volo, Palatine, McHenry Township, and at a forest preserve in the Des Plaines/Rosemont area. The procedure recommended by the USDA is to aerial spray the infested area with a biological pesticide, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), with the trade name Dipel. The procedure involves spraying the areas 3 times, seven to ten days apart. The spraying is done by helicopter. One quart of Dipel is mixed with 3 quarts of water. The first application is done when tree leaves are 3/4 out, this correlates with the hatching of the gypsy moth eggs. Mr. Drobnick explained that spraying is done at dawn while the air movement is minimal. It would take about 10 minutes to spray the areas in Evanston. Mr. Drobnick noted that the primary food of gypsy moths is oak trees. The moth feeds on over 500 species of plants. Dr. Frank inquired about the stress level of Evanston trees. Mr. Ceplecha noted that the drought of 1988 and subsequent spring droughts have left the majority of trees stressed. In 1992 the spring rainfall was low, even though the summer and falls levels were fine. Mr. Ceplecha said explained that urban trees suffer from road salt exposure, pesticides from homeowner lawn use, soil compaction, and air quality present in an urban setting. Any one is not bad by itself but totaled can have an impact on the tree. Healthy trees can usually tolerate 1 - 2 years of defoliation. It is uncertain how an initial defoliation would effect Evanston's trees. Mr. Ceplecha noted that the current infestation is not to the point where total defoliation would occur this year. Mr. Dobnick said 9 million acres of trees were defoliated in the East at the peak of the infestation. Mr. Miller inquired whether Dipel is allergenic? Mr. Drobnick said they recommend that windows be closed and if people are sensitive he recommended they have their doctor call Abbott Laboratories (the manufacturer) to inquire. Mr. Klosterman asked about the bacteria in Dipel. Mr. Drobnick replied that the bacteria in Dipel occurs naturally in the soil. The bacteria causes the larvae to become paralyzed resulting in starvation. Dr. Frank noted that in order for the bacteria to live in the Dipel formulation a large percentage of the inert ingredients would have to be water. She added that Dipel is not selective to gypsy moths. it affects all butterflies and moths in the larvae stage at the time of spraying. In response to a question regarding the waste disposal of Dipel, Dr. Frank noted that the pesticide company that appl ies the chemical is responsible for disposal as i icensed under II I inois State regulations. Mr. TerMolen mentioned that there may be an endangered butterfly, the Blue Garner, residing in the spray area. Mr. Drobnick said as part of the USDA's responsibilities, they will confer with the Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the presence of endangered species in the designated spray zone. Mr. Drobnick said native species outside the spray area will come back into the spray area over time. Mr. Klosterman asked about the life expectancy of the bacteria Bt. Mr. Drobnick responded that the bacteria persists for 7 - 8 days. Bt does well under the sun and is more specific that other bactericides. Dr. Frank asked if the USDA had used Gypchek, a naturally occurring organism used as a microbial pesticide. Mr. Drobnick said Gypchek breaks down quickly. When Gypchek has not been effective spray 7, a harsher pesticide has been used. Dr. Frank opened the floor for questions. Marjorie Fisher expressed concern about the inert ingredients and wanted to know what they are. Ms. Fisher noted that the book, Common Sense Pest Control, cites many natural predators of the gypsy moth. There is usually a delay while the predator population catches up with the moth. Ms. Fisher suggested that egg masses could be removed from trees, trees could be girdled with jelly or burlap. Ms. Fisher said their are other alternatives that should be tried before embarking on a spraying program. She noted that the League of Women voters of Evanston has a position paper against aerial spraying. If spraying occurred, Ms. Fisher suggested that everyone should be thoroughly protected against contact with skin, eyes, and clothing. Mr. Drobnick replied that it is hard to organize a program to collect egg masses because some are found 40 feet high in the trees, and others under rocks. He explained that when spraying occurs large balloons delineate the spray area for the helicopter pilot, there is constant radio contact with the helicopter, car patrols will tell people near the area to stay away. Mr. Drobnick said spraying would be done only if the wind speed was under 6 mph. This ensures that the spray comes down in the designated area. Dr. Frank inquired about previous sprayings in Illinois. Mr. Drobnick replied that 12 sprayings have occurred in the last four years. He noted that there had been no problems with the ground personnel who were participating in the spray program. No protective clothing was worn. The spray has no odor or oily film. Ms. Lieberman said people have a right to know the inert ingredients. Ms. Lynn Lawson said she represented a group of chemically sensitive individuals. She indicated that additional sprays can effect their immune system. She stressed the need to know the inert ingredients of Dipel. Dr. Frank said she would inquire regarding the inert ingredients. Dr. Frank inquired what chemically sensitive people who lived near the spray area would need to know. Ms. Lawson replied that knowledge of the inerts so individuals could research the effects. Pre -notification is a must for the chemically sensitive. Mr. Voss asked when the proposed spray would occur. Mr. Drobnick replied that the spray coincides with the time that oak leaves are 3/4 out; generally the lst to 2nd week of May. Mr. Hartnett asked about the effectiveness of spraying in other communities. unities. Ms. Rebecca Keith, USDA, say the spray programs have always eradicated the gypsy moth. She noted that spraying does not protect against re -infestation. Last summer the following communities were sprayed: Burr Ridge, Hinsdale, Oakbrook, Chippewa Woods, unincorporated McHenry county, and a section of St. Charles township. Traps in the treatment area have been negative. Mr. Drobnick noted that Yellow Springs, Ohio had opted not to spray. They had been doing tree banding but found it necessary to spray as a supplement. Dr. Frank reviewed the toxicology profile sheet on Dipel and noted that the damage to other animals was very low. Although she did not know the inert ingredients, Dr. Frank assumed that the majority is water. She noted that the trade off is the amount of time it would take other butterfly species to recolonize the sprayed areas. These areas are small and will probably recolonized rapidly. Mr. Miller said that it is very scary to see the forests after defoliation has occurred. Several questions were raised regarding how often the spraying would have to be done and what is the long range possibility of having to spray every year. Mr. Klosterman questioned whether trees severely damaged may not be able to recover. Dr. Frank clarified the position of the USDA: * 3 applications of Dipel to the 2 designated areas £-- * 3 different spray days approximately 7 - 10 days apart + Sprayin to be done b helicopter by a licensed pesticide applicator`` 9 Y 4--- • State and Federal employees will delineate the spray area and help limit traffic in the spray area on spray days * Individuals who specifically request notification regarding exact spraying times will be notified. n= The USDA additionally asks that the City notify people in the designated spray areas and 400 feet beyond the spray area. Dr. Frank added that the ECB will host a publicized public meeting that will serve as an information session regarding the gypsy moth and proposed spray program. Ms. Fisher questioned whether the pheromone is specific to gypsy moths. Mr. Drobnick replied that the pheromone is specific and catches only gypsy moth males. Ms. Fisher noted that there are ground beetles that go after the male moths. Ms. Lawson suggested that there need to be a flight/safety plan especially for the disabled. Mr. Drobnick added that there has to be an emergency landing area for the helicopter. The USDA will be working with the FAA (Federal Aeronautics Administration) to determine the proper procedures. Someone from the FAA usually rides in the helicopter. Mr. TerMolen noted that the lake front should offer plenty of area for emergency procedures. When questioned about ground spraying, Mr. Drobnick said that the amount of chemicals required for ground spraying is greater than for aerial spraying. Ground spraying averages $200 per tree for the three applications. Dr. Frank added that the larvae feed in the tree tops; aerial spraying coats these areas more effectively. Mr. Wirth explained that the City Council was looking for a recommendation from the ECB regarding the spraying issue. The recommendation would need to be presented at the March 22nd, or April 12th (last possible date to fit USDA schedule) Council meeting. Mr. Wirth recommended that the public meeting hosted by the ECB should be completed by March 15th. Dr. Frank outlined the decision course for the ECB: * The ECB will hold a public information meeting * The ECB will decide on a recommendation regarding the USDA spray program and forward the recommendation to the City Council * The ECB will be involved in an education process to explain the gypsy moth, its implications, and recommendations for action. The Board expressed concern over the composition of the inert ingredients in Dipel and the chemically sensitive community. Mr. Miller moved to approve that the USDA spray for gypsy moths in Evanston on the condition that the ECB learns the inert ingredients of the spray, after which the ECB reserves the right to reopen the question. Mr. Voss seconded and the ECB Dassed the motion. Dr. Frank requested the formation of a sub -committee to prepare for the public information meeting. Mr. Voss and Mr. 7erMolen will meet with Dr. Frank to discuss the program. It was agreed that the public information session will be set for Thursday, March 4th, 1993 at Lincoln School. The meeting will begin at 8:00 PM. Mr. Wirth and Mr. Ceplecha will make the arrangements. Mr. Ceplecha will make a flyer regarding the meeting and ma�.e sure that it is delivered to people who live in the designated spray areas. Mr. Wirth said he had sent memo's to the aldermen in the designated spray areas. He additionally said the areas who receive a flyer about the public meeting and subsequently receive a flyer on the spraying schedule if spraying occurs. Dr. Frank noted that the 2nd flyer will contain any relevant information on the inert ingredients of Dipel. If no information can be found the suggestion will be to i contact Abbott through the individual's doctor. Household Hazardous Waste Mr. Voss reported that Evanston is included in the household hazardous waste program proposed by SWANCC. SWANCC will secure storage and collection at fire and/or police stations. It will be collected on a weekly basis. The cost will average $20,000 per year. Mr. Voss reported that it looked like a good opportunity. The hauler will assumes liability. When the program is in operation residents will probably be requested to show an ID. Mr. Voss will continue to monitor. Electro-Magnetic Fields Mr. Miller reported that there is inconclusive evidence on the controversy in electro-magnetic fields (EMF). Generally the current battle is in the legal community regarding cause/effect, not in the scientific community. Mr. Voss noted that Sweden recognizes the dangers of EMF's. Dr. Frank corroborated that life studies involving EMF's are not out; one is expected next year, Mr. Miller concluded that there is no consensus; the physiological effect is probably not large or we would have known about it by now. Proposed Board Consolidation The City Council will be reviewing the proposed consolidation of the ECB with the Ladd Arboretum Committee on March 1, 1993 at a public hearing. Mr. TerMolen, Mr. Klosterman and Dr. Frank will plan on attending the meeting. The ECB reviewed its position that they are not in favor of consolidation; no time, money, or staff savings can be determined, and the 2 boards have little mutual ground. Mr. Hartnett inquired about the status of the draft ordinance. Ms. Lutz will check with Assistant City Manager, Bruce Zimmerman. Energy Alternative Task Force Dr. Frank reviewed correspondence from Mr. Jim Suhr regarding the ,joint ECB/Task Force energy committee. No decisions were made on this matter. New ECB Members Dr. Frank noted that the names of two new board members, Judy Freitag and Sharon Lieberman, have been introduced at City Council. These nominations will be voted on at the February 22, 1993 meeting. Next Meetinq There being no further business, Mr. Klosterman moved, seconded by Mr. Voss to adjourn. The next meeting of the ECB will be Thursday, March 18th. 1993 at 7:30 PM. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz, Ecology Ce er Coordinator It it 1 16 i . Y . ��Ili � I Environmental Control Board Minutes March 18, 1993 QrAf t — 42t 6wroved Members Present: Frank, Hartnett, Klosterman, Lieberman Miller, Rodriguez, TerMolen Members Absent: Voss, Freitag Staff Present: Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Donald Wirth, Director Parks/Forestry & Recreation Bruce Zimmerman, Assistant City Manager Others Present: Judy Elsass, League of Women Voters Observer Marjorie Fisher Lynn Lawson Tom Klitzki, future's Perspective Diane Lloyd, President, Evanston League of Women voters Wynn Graham Camille Stauber Marilyn Claessens Emily Guthrie Environmental Ordinanc$ Bruce Zimmerman explained that the Environmental Control Board (ECB) had received a copy of the proposed ordinance regarding the ECB and the Environmental Plan. � He noted that suggestions made at the January 21, 1993 meeting were included in the proposed ordinance. Mr. Zimmerman explained that the ECS needed to make aFv-- decision regarding when the proposed ordinance would be submitted forconsideration by the City Council. The ECS decided to submit the appropriate documents to the Human Services Committee for consideration at their April 13, 1993 meeting. The ordinance would receive consideration by the full City Council on April 26, 1993. Mr. Zimmerman said that the parts of the ECS that dealt with regulation would be eliminated through restructuring by the legal department. Mr. Miller said that the language should be general to allow the ECS to take action on issues not enumerated. Mr. Zimmerman noted that the language should not differ radically from the Environmental Plan. Dr. Frank reminded the ECS that the Human Services Committee preferred to pass the ordinance and plan as a packac;u. Dr. Frank proposed a special meeting of the ECB to deal with the proposed document. This will give all members time to = review the proposal. The meeting was tentatively set for Monday, March 22, 1993. r Mr. Hartnett expressed concern over the language and a number of issues that need to be addressed. He cautioned against acting in haste and is prepared to take the time required to review the ordinance. Now ECB Member Dr. Frank formally recognized Sharon Lieberman as the newest raTber of the EC8. Pr000soo Gypsy Moth Aerial Spray ProgM_ Dr. Frank reviewed the meeting of February 18, 1993. The EC8 posed questions regarding 1.) inert ingredients in Dipel, 2.) what other cities are doing = regarding spraying, and 3.) revisit the plan to spray. - Dr. Frank referred to a memo regarding Gypchek noting that Gypchek is not available, used exclusively by the United States Forest Service (USFS) on an experimental basis, and is not registered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Dr. Frank explained that she did not know the inert ingredients of Dipel. Abbott Laboratories assured her that there are no sulfites in the formulation. She noted that physicians can get information for their patients with chemical sensitivities on a case by case basis. Regarding the inclusion of Dipel in a law suit in Hinsdale, Mr. Harnett reported that he had spoken with Clifford Weaver, the corporate counsel in Hinsdale who said Dipel is not cited in the litigation (which refers to herbicide use on public land). Mr. Hartnett cautioned that while Dipel is not involved, the situation does indicate the need to be aware of potential legal action through the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). He stressed that any spraying program needed to provide reasonable accommodation. Mr. Hartnett provided documents regarding the Hinsdale case. Marjorie Fisher took issue with Mr. Hartnett showing a year old newspaper article on the litigation, noting that Hinsdale had spent a considerable amount of money in legal costs. Quarantine The ECB discussed what would happen if no spray occurred. The USDA could Quarantine the area in an attempt to limit the spread of the Gypsy troth. Residents in the quarantine area would have to have particular items checked as they moved in and out of the area. All trees, shrubs, and landscape waste would have to be inspected. Don Wirth said that the Illinois Department of Agriculture would dc, the inspection. This could be a problem for the nursery industry and businesses that deal with landscape materials. Mr. Wirth noted that a memorandum from the Illinois Department of Agriculture cited the state statues that give the authority to quarantine. Pub 1 i c Cowdwnt Dr. Frank initiated a session of public oomnent with all those who wanted to speak on the proposed spray program. Tom Klit&ki, owner of Nature's Perspective in Evanston indicated that his business was landscaping. He said the gypsy math can be devastating and felt that his business would be severely impacted. He approved of the proposed spray program saying that you have to eradicate and control the gypsy moth if it is outside its natural boundaries. He noted that if a quarantine was imposed it would be a problem because he would have to have all the plant material he uses inspected; Nature's Perspective buys and sells plant material from and to many sources in and out of state that would have to inspected. Diane Lloyd, President of the League of Women Voters of Evanston indicated that the League does not have a position on the Gypsy Moth spraying. She noted that the League advocates the use of nontoxic alternatives. She looked to the ECB to provide a thorough discussion of all the alternatives available. Lynn Lawson, indicated that she was a chemically sensitive person who represented a group of 150 chemically sensitive persons, 17 of which live in Evanston. Ms. Lawson said she has a right to know what is being sprayed and particularly the inert ingredients of DiPel. She said she also has a right to access of her home, noting that it is difficult for chemically sensitive people to move to areas of safety. Emily Guthrie, Evanston resident indicated that she wanted to examine all alternatives to the proposed spray program for the Gypsy moths. Mariorie Fisher, Evanston resident, indicated her opposition to the spray program citing a lawsuit in Hinsdale regarding insecticide spraying. Ms. Fisher advocates using physical controls, such as beetles and removal of egg cusses. She is concerned about the inert ingredients in Dipel. Dr. Frank thanked people for their comments and queried the ECB for their comments. Environmental Control Board Comment Mr. TerMolen said he had beer, a Peace Carps volunteer in Honduras and worked with people in agriculture and beekeeping that used Dipel. He said he had never seen any adverse effects on people who were using Dipel. He noted that alternative methods of Gypsy moth removal are labor intensive; these methods would require lots of cooperation from residents. Resident would have to willingly watch for egg masses and refrain from using more toxic chemical. Alternatively, Mr. TerMolen, said that if the Gypsy moth populations increased unchecked that more spray, and possibly more toxic spray than Dipel might be required to check the moth. He noted that Dipel is a bacterial pesticide, or a light pesticide. If we don't spray now, we may have to spray more and larger areas. Mr. TerMolen advocated spraying now to control and endorsed a long term approach to the Gypsy moth that would include physical removal of egg masses and public education. Mr. TerMolen thought the USDA/IDA plan was good. He Noted that the application of Bt (active ingredient in DiPel) was used to control worms that attacked beans; its application did not require respirators. Mr. TerMolen did not experience any reactions to Bt in the 2 years that he used it. Mr. Klosterman thought the Gypsy moth is a very serious matter; he indicated that we have to act before the problem worsens. Mr. Klosterman speculated that an outbreak of Gypsy moth would also be a problem for the biologically sensitive; hairs and fuzz from the caterpillars could cause problems. Ms. Lieberman noted that Dipel is a major break through in the eradication of Gypsy moths. She noted that the moth's hair can cause swelling and itching. The frass, the excrement of caterpillars, can be allergenic. Ms. Lieberman questioned the cost of spraying. Mr. Wirth said the latest quote was $3500 for the 3 required applications. Ms. Lieberman indicated that she was disappointed that the flyers distributed to people in the spray area only encouraged 10 people to attend the public meeting. She said additional flyers should indicate that a method of control was being discussed. She was disappointed that the inert ingredients were still unknown. At the public meeting, Ms. Lieberman, noted that the Illinois Department of Agriculture representative said that if nothing was done now, a real infestation would not be noticed for 5 years. Ms. Lieberman added that she realized each egg mass has 800 - 1,000 eggs. She questioned the logic of the spray program. Dr. Frank added that the area defined for spraying was delineated through the moth count in pheromone traps. The boundaries of the spray area were set 400 feet outside the spray area to allow for drift. The USDA and IDA do not want to wait until the infestation reaches 80% to 90% before attempting to control it, which could be impossible then. Mr. Klosterman said finding the egg masses is very difficult. Mr. Miller wondered how long Dipel has been used and what has been the experience of the chemically sensitive. Mr. Klitzki said Dipel had been on the market for a least 15 years. Dr. Frank noted that safety data sheets are cx lied. (At this point Camille Stauber came in the meeting and was recognized by the Chair) Ms. Stauber indicated that she had investigated an alternative called Gypchok which is specific to Gypsy moths. She said it was available for use from Win McLain of the United States Forest Service (USFS). Ms. Stauber said all ingredients of Gypchek are known; the virus, sulfinite, orzane, molasses and a sticker called Bond which is a synthetic latex. Ms. Stauber indicated that Bill Currie, retired from the Environmental Protection Agency, indicated a willingness help with a training program that would teach people how to find moth egg masses as part of a long term management plan. Ms. Stauber noted that they were materials available that could be used for educational purposes. Ms. Stauber said that she thought is was more realistic to spray an individual tree that had the Gypsy moth than to use a non -selective spray. She said that she thought the level of Gypsy moths in Evanston was manageable. Dr. Frank clarified the difference between Gypchek, the formulation that is specific to Gypsy moths; and Dipel, which will kill any math or butterfly that is in the caterpillar stage that comes in contact with the DiPel. Ms. Stauber said Gypchek has been sprayed for 15 - 20 years. She noted that John Podgwaite, product manager for Gypchek, USFS, thought manual management was more realistic. Ms. Stauber said Appleton , Wisconsin did mass trapping and that was effective. Mrs Lawson asked what was in Gypchek. Ms. Stauber said lignosulfinate (orzone), the sticker Bond, and 18% virus which is insect body parts. Ms. Stauber concluded that Gypchek, treatment with fungus, and egg mass removal were alternatives to Dipel. Mr. Rodriguez indicated the need to examine in more detail the alternatives. He said that Dipel looks like a less toxic alternative. He also agreed that no control is not an option. Mr. Rodriguez thought that an integrated and systematic program is the best option. Ms. Lutz reviewed a letter received from the Ladd Arboretum Committee indicating its support for the proposed spray program; they thought that physical removal was not a viable option for the Arboretum due to its large number of trees. Ms. Lutz also noted correspondence from Dennis Ceplecha, Superintendent of the Parks/Forestry department. Mr. Ceplecha stated that urban trees are under many stresses; road salt, fertilizers and insecticide use by homeowners, exhaust congestion, etc. While none of these alone can be linked to a tree's death a combination of factors could reduce the lifespan of urban trees. Mr. Ceplecha said the Gypsy moth would be another stress. Mr. Ceplecha said that Dipel was a safe, reasonable approach to Gypsy moth control. Ms. Lieberman said that if there is not good public education, people with start spraying indiscriminately and that is not good. Ms. Lieberman did not think that the Gypsy moth population is an infestation; we have the option to look at low - tech solutions. Mr. Hartnett asked whether the City does anything now regarding infected trees. Mr. Wirth said nothing is done now. He cited the Elm tree program explaining the City Ordinance and City inspections monitor Elm tress. If a homeowner has a diseased Elm, they have 30 days to remove the tree. Tree removal costs are $1200 - $1500 for large trees and can be as low as $150 for smaller ones. Mr. Wirth noted there are 27,000 parkway trees in addition to the trees in the City parks. Mr. Wirth noted that tree removal and replacement could be a tremendous economic issue. Five hundred trees are replaced annually. Ms. Stauber brought up the wide implications of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). She thought the serious situation where people could be denied access to their hone (with spraying) would fall under ADA. Mr. Rodriguez and Mr. Hartnett (both attorneys) thought this was a unique application of the ADA that had not been tested in the courts. Mr. Hartnett wondered if the Illinois Human Rights Commission had jurisdiction. Ms. Guthrie said there was a history of litigation in the East. Ms. Stauber added that a new application of the Illinois law included wording regarding chemical sensitivities. ii II 11 11 . 1 ,. A y ill, 6 Mr. Hartnett analyzed the costs and benefits of spraying. He thought the potential risk was great enough to act. He noted that the literature and history of DiPel use indicated that it has been working. Mr. Hartnett was troubled about the impact of spray on people like Mrs. Lawson acknowledging that Is was a difficult situation. Mr. Hartnett stressed working out reasonable accommodations. Mr. Hartnett referred to a letter from the Mayor to Mrs. Lawson which listed these accommodations: 1)investigation of alternatives, 2) notification of spraying by flyer, telephone, and signs well in advance. Mr. Hartnett added that if the spraying does occur, we should check with the people identified as chemically sensitive. Mr. Hartnett also noted that Mrs. Lawson had asked for a per diem if spraying takes place. Mr. Rodriguez said he is not convinced that the issue is DiPel vs. Gypchek. Mr. Hartnett said he was willing to go ahead with the spray program provided the accommodations were met. He noted that an infestation of moths could present a situation where biologically sensitive people would have problems. Mr. Miller said it was incumbent to approve the program. He said he had heard of no negative reactions to DiPel, but he would like to find out if there were reactions to DiPel in other areas. He noted that Gypchek was not registered with the Environmental Protection Agency. Mr. Miller said he thought that most of the inerts in Dipel were water because bacteria (the active ingredient in DiPel) needs to live in an aqueous environment. Ms. Stauber said spraying is not the best option. She said Mr. McLain would release Gypchek to Evanston. Ms. Stauber said Mr. Bill Currie would aid training about manual methods. Mr. Miller thought limited spraying plus manual methods was a good system. Dr. Frank addressed several concerns: 1) If the USDA and the IDA indicate that the situation is serious enough to spray, then it is serious enough to develop a long term program, 2) It would not be in the best interest of the community to let the situation get away from us, 3) Appreciation for the citizen concerns and the resources suggested. Dr. Frank indicated a desire to start at ground zero by eliminating the breeding moths. In review, Dr. Frank determined that 6 of the 7 ECB members present had no objection to a spray program. In discussing Gypchek vs. DiPel, Dr. Frank noted that no one in the area has any experience with Gypchek. She pointed out that Gypchek is not EPA registered. Mr. TerMolen noted that Gypchek is more vulnerable to sunlight causing it to disintegrate faster, which is a drawback. Ms. Stauber said Gypchek can come with an ultraviolet screen to reduce disintegration. Ms. Stauber said Gypchek is not a commercial product. She said that Gypchek has been used by the USFS in urban and forested areas. Ms. Staube- said the USFS lab is in charge of distribution and decides where it will be used in the United States. Cost said Ms. Stauber is $3 per acre. Dr. Frank asked whether the USDA and the IDA would approve the use of Gypchek vs. DiPel. So far she can see no problem with DiPel. Ms. Fisher voiced that Dipel would effect endangered butterflies. Dr. Frank indicated that the endangered species in question has not been found in Gook County. Mr. Rodriguez indicated that there was conflicting information on the 2 products as presented here. He wanted to know the source of the information and is one product more effective than the other. Mr. Hartnett thought the perceived concern with Di Pal was with the fact that the exact formulation is unknown. He indicated there could be problems with Gypchek. Ms. Stauber said Dipel ingredients are unknown. Mr. Klosterman said that if there were serious problems with DiPel they would have surfaced. Dr. Frank questioned whether Gypchek would be better. She said there is no actual data that the ECB has right now to indicate the effectiveness of Gypchek. Mr. Wirth expressed concern that the individual in charge of the distribution be contacted. Issues such as effectiveness and availability would have to be considered. Dr. Frank noted that we are under a tight timeframe. Mr. Klosterman pointed out that there is a long history of experience with Dipel. Ms. Stauber pointed out that on the issue of pesticides, short term results may differ from long term results. Dr. Frank noted that Bt had never been implicated. Ms. Lieberman wondered whether the balloon holders (people holding delineating markers during the actual spraying) would be City workers and if the issue of chronic exposure would arise. Mr. Wirth responded that the USDA/IDA team was totally self-sufficient. Personnel from the Parks/Forestry department may supplement the team, but that would be our choice. Dr. Frank said that the spraying crew is the same for ail the USDA/IDA spraying sites. Ms. Lieberman said that the ECB has to indicate that real thought has gone into an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program and not just on paper. Dr. Frank asked Ms. Lieberman to chair the sub -committee on IPM and develop a long term program for Gypsy moth education. Ms. Guthrie expressed concern that legal action would be taken if the City went ahead with a program of aerial spraying. She suggested that a long term program be developed. Dr. Frank asked for a motion. Mr. Klosterman moved that the ECB endorse the aerial spray program for 1993 as outlined by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) provided that the following reasonable accommodations be made: t} Continued efforts be made to obtain the disclosure of the inert ingredients of Dipel 2) Commitment to an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program of trapping, scouting, manual removal of egg masses and spraying 3) Implementation of public education efforts in the future to inform citizens about control tactics other that spraying 4) Encouraging any chemically sensitive residents to contact Abbott Laboratories directly through their physician to determine safety issues associated with specific health concerns for Dipel B) Distribute flyers in the area to be sprayed not less than forty-eight hours prior to each of the three spray occasions and to conspicuously post signs advising of the spraying and exposure precautions not less than one week before the first spraying with such signs not to be removed earlier than one week after the last spraying 6) Establish a list of chemically sensitive people in the proposed spraying areas to be contacted at least twenty- four hours prior to each scheckiled spraying 7) Develop a detailed implementation plan with USDA and Illinois Department of Agriculture that will optimize safely considerations on the three occasions for spraying. In the spi rit of this endorsement the Envi rormental Control Board wi 11 design for implementation a program of Integrated Pest Management (IPM). Motion seconded by Mr. Miller. Ms. Lieberman asked if Gypchek was experimental. Ms. Stauber said that it is considered experimental. It is used by the USFS and the USDA* they do not make a lot of it. Ms. Stauber is confident with Gypchek because the ingredients are known and it is specific to Gypsy moths. Ms. Miller noted that the insect parts in Gypchek could be a problem for allergies. Ms. Fisher said Wauconda township had contracted to spray DiPel in a non- residential area. She noted the contracts stated that the village trustees would not be liable. Dr. Frank repeated that Lake Bluff, Lake Forest, and Palatine had voted to spray with DiPel. She noted that these were all residential areas. Ms. Stauber said if the spraying does occur, schools near the area should be notified. Ms. Lieberman pointed out that a true IPM program needs professionals and questioned whether Evanston could carry out the plan. Dr. Frank indicated that part of the IPM plan could be to learn how to use physical methods of control. She said the USDA will continue to trap the area with the pheromone traps. Dr. Frank added that the Ecology Center could be used for educational programs. Dr. Frank called for the vote. The ECS passed the motion with a 6 - 1 vote. Ms. Lieberman cast the dissenting vote. Mr. Wirth explained that the ECB will need to produce memoranda and documentation to forward to the City Council. Workshoos/Conferences Dr. Frank pointed out that funds Are available for Board related conferences. Ms. Lieberman may be interested in attending one on IPM flectro MagVAic Fields Mr. Miller reviewed where the data is at this point. He noted that it is a confusing situation that he will keep track of. Dr. Frank pointed out a situation in Round Lake Beach where 138,00 volts of electricity passed through a school playground. A citizens group was formed to provide a safe alternative. Mr. Klosterman reported that he had attended the open house at Evanston Township High School to view their co -generation facility. He will keep the information for the energy file. Mr. Klosterman also attended the Keep Evanston Beautiful annual greeting. with George Brabec. He noted that indications are that the Evanston Recycling Center will be making money. The Recycling Center is handling Winnetka's recyclables for a "tipping fee". Meeting Minutes The Board approved their minutes of February 18, 1993. Board Consolidation Dr. Frank reported that the City Council had voted not to consolidate the Ladd Arboretum Committee with the ECM. She noted that the ECB has a formal request to elaborate on information concerning joint responsibilities with the Energy Alternatives Task Force. Resolution Dr. Frank read into the record a thank -you from Marie Dauzvardis regarding the resolution the ECB passed in honor of Peter Dauzvardis. Next Meetin4 The next meeting of the EC8 will be Thursday April 15, 1993 at 7:30PM. There being no further business the EC8 adjourned. Respectfully submitted, bwdk Linda Lutz Environmental Control Board Minutes April 15, 1993 Members Present: Frank, Freitag, Hartnett, Klosterman, Lieberman, Miller, Rodriguez, TerMolen, Members Absent: Voss, Staff Present: Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Others Present: Judy Elsass, League of Warren Voters Marjorie Fisher Dr. Patricia Frank called the meeting to order. Mr. Iry Miller moved to approve the minutes of the meeting of March 18. 1993. Mr. Charles Klosterman seconded the motion and the Board approved the minutes. Gypsy Moth Dr. Frank summarized the Administration and Public Works Committee meeting of April 13, 1993. She explained that the Committee discussed the issue for 1 1/4 hours and passed the Environmental Control Board (ECB) recommendation to have the Illinois Department of Agriculture (IDA) and United States Department of Agriculture spray the bactericide Dipel for Gypsy moth larvae. The vote was 3-2. Dr. Frank explained that there was significant discussion regarding those residents who are chemically sensitive and hoar the spray program might effect them. Dr. Frank noted that Stan Smith from the IDA explained that Evanston would be quarantined if the spray program was not approved. Dr. Frank said the City Council requested that the ECB develop and Integrated Pest Management program and continue to request information regarding the inert ingredients of Dipel. Accommodations for chemically sensitive individuals will be integrated into the program. The Gypsy moth spray program will begin the 2nd-3rd week in May depending on the weather and the size of the tree leaves. Ms. Lieberman noted that the IDA can legally spray regardless of City action. Dr. Frank said in that case the paper work for the quarantine would most likely take a year to put in place and then the area would be sprayed. Dr. Frank added that this has not happened in Illinois; all areas where the moth has been detected have agreed to participate in the spray program. Plan Commission The Plan Commission had requested information from the ECS regarding environmental concerns facing Evanston and the quality of the environment in Evanston. Dr. Frank explained that she had attended the Plan Commission April meeting. She covered radon, integrated pest management, household hazardous waste, lead, noise, electro-magnetic fields, and the environmental plan. Dr. Frank mentioned that Nancy Burhop updated the group on recycling. The Plan Commission was particularly concerned about hazardous waste sites that have been identified in Evanston. Dr. Frank asked Ms. Lutz to file a freedom of information act request through the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency concerning hazardous waste sites in Evanston. Dr. Frank additionally mentioned that the Plan Commission could impact the zoning board regarding the process of giving variations and promote energy efficiency. If an energy audit was required for new development, buildings might have an incentive to become more energy efficient. Additionally an energy plan might be required. Dr. Frank noted that local hot water in the bathrooms at the new library vs. pumping hot water all over the building was an example of energy efficiency and cost savings. The Recycling Center is currently receiving $40 a ton for newsprint. The Center is working at 20% under capacity. Recyclables from Winnetka and from business collected through Active Service, are processed through the Recycling Center. Mr. Klosterman said this helps increase the volume that the Recycling Center can sell. Regarding plastics recycling, Dr. Frank mentioned a company that takes all plastics and makes them into "blue" palettes. Currently the process is in place but the company does not have sufficient funding. Environmental Ordinance Mr. Miller reported that he and Bill Hoyer had attended the April 13th Human Services Committee meeting where the environmental ordinance and plan were being discussed. The Committee recommended that an enabling clause be added and that some mention of the relationship with the proposed Energy Commission be stated. Mr. Miller explained that this would put energy before other environmental issues and was not sure that was appropriate. The Human Services Committee passed the plan. Mr. Bruce Zimmerman, assistant City Manager, will make the proposed changes. Highlights of the discussion were: The ECB would be the only appointed body Expansion of the Board to 13 members Concern that average concerned citizens able to serve on the Board that required specific skills with common sense would still be Energy Mr. Klosterman said that City Manager Anderson wanted to hire a staff person to track the energy program and commission. The Administration and Public Works Committee just passed a multi -year work plan and establishment of an Evanston Energy commission. Mr. Klosterman recalled that the Energy Alternatives Task Force and the ECB were supposed to submit a proposal regarding energy and an energy plan for Evanston. Mr. Klosterman noted that paragraph i8 of the Multi -year plan stresses that the proposed Energy Commission will work with the Environmental Control Board in developing the policy. Mr. Klosterman moved to support cooperation with the Energy Commission in developing an energy policy for Evanston. Mr. Miller seconded, and the ECB approved the motion. Mr. Klosterman said he could see the ECS becoming involved in energy policy but not franchise negotiations. Mr. Klosterman noted that Nuclear Energy Information Services is holding a meeting regarding reliability of electric service on Wednesday, April 28th. Integrated Pest Management Marjorie Fisher commented that the integrated pest management (IPM) programs at the Ecology center were informative. She noted that they were an important educational aspect. Ms. Fisher thought the response from big groups in the community was limited. Ms. Lieberman asked about generating an IPM plan. Dr. Frank gave some history of the previous IPM sub -committee. Ms. Lieberman, Mr. TerMolen, and Dr. Frank will have a sub -committee meeting to discuss the scope and focus of the IPM sub - co mmi ttee Staff Report Ms. Lutz showed the ECB a curriculum developed by the IL Natural History Survey that deals with the Gypsy Moth. Ms. Lieberman requested that a copy be purchased for the ECB. Ms. Lutz asked for ideas for the signs that will be placed on the parkways of the areas that will be sprayed with Dipei. The ECB added their suggestions. Ms. Lutz will pass these on to Don Wirth. Next Meeting The ECB had no further business. Mr. Miller moved to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Klosterman. The next meeting of the ECB will be Thursday, May 20, 1993 at 7:30 PM. Respectfully submitted, 1 Lh&t WY Linda Lutz %orIt,Citi, of Evanston Environmental Board Minutes May 20, 1993 Draft -- Not Approved 2100 Ridge Avenue Evamion. Illinois 61YM Telephone 312,328.2100 Members Present: Frank, Freitag, Hartnett, Klosterman, Lieberman, Miller, Rodriguez, TerMolen, Members Absent: Voss Staff Present: Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Don Wirth, Director Parks/Forestry, Recreation Others Present: Judy Elsass, League of Women Voters Marjorie Fisher, Minutes Approval Mr. Charles Klosterman moved, seconded by Mr. Matt TerMoien that the minutes of the April 15, 1993 meeting be approved. The Board voted to approve the minutes. COMMITTEE REPORTS Energy/Ordinance Mr. Klosterman reported that the work of the environmental ordinance committee was completed. The ordinance was passed by the City Council in April 1993. Mr. Klosterman distributed copies of the new ordinance. He noted that the new ordinance provides for the Environmental Board (EB) to work with the newly appointed Energy Commission to establish an energy plan for Evanston. The Energy Commission will be appointed over the next several months. Dr. Patricia Frank recalled that Mr. Dan Hartnett, Mr. Charles Klosterman, Ms. Judy Freitag, and Mr. Gabriel Rodriguez are members of the energy subcommittee. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Ms. Sharon Lieberman asked if the EB would support sending a letter to Governor Edgar's office regarding Senate Bill 85 in which local authorities are pre-empted from authority on pesticide use. She noted that Cook County would be excluded as it has a population of over one milliai. The EB discussed its role in legislation and decided that the EB could take an advocacy position for the City. Dr. Frank pointed out that in the past the EB has had a legislative sub -committee that monitored legislation pertinent to environmental issues indicating that there is precedence for legislative action. A letter will be sent to Governor Edgar with copies to State Representatives and Senators, as well as Mayor Morton. The letter will state the EB's position that local control of pesticide issues is necessary. Ms. Lieberman questioned where staffing, phone monitoring, and resident inspection visits, would come from in putting forth an IPM program. She indicated that an IPM program provides the least toxic approach to pest control. Dr. Frank added that information posted at places such as the Ecology Center and libraries will help people to identify the gypsy moth. Early detection is the key to the long term prevention of the need for more toxic chemical. Ms. Lieberman suggested preparing a flyer for distribution that had pictures and identifying characteristics of the gypsy moth. The issue of money to cover costs of a public relations program on the gypsy moth will be discussed with Don Wirth. Mr. Hartnett added that educational materials may already be available from such groups as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Ms. Lieberman will investigate the kind of materials already available for an intense community education program. The EB reviewed a memo to be sent to Don Wirth regarding the development of an IPM program for Evanston. Ms. Lieberman will set up a meeting. Dr. Frank noted that there was interest in reviving the IPM ad hoc committee that was looking at pest management in Evanston. This group comprises large users. Dr. Frank suggested setting up a meeting in June 1993. Ms. Lutz will take care of the meeting notices and details. Board Vacancies The EB discussed the 4 vacancies currently on the Board. Suggestions for skills needed to work on new subcommittees included energy efficient architectural heating and lighting, health, legislative, and engineer with energy conservation emphasis. Dr. Frank will meet with Mayor Morton to discuss the vacancies and upcoming issues for the ES. I r Clean Air Act The Board would like information on how Evanston will comply with the Clean Air Act of 1994. Ms. Lutz said that David Jenkins, from Traffic Engineering, is the person in the City who will be working with the State to comply. The EB is interested in issues addressed by the Clean Air Act that an energy policy might address. Environment Board Chairman Dr. Frank noted that the new ordinance states that the chairman of the EB is elected annually. Formerly the chairman was appointed by the Mayor. Dr. Frank asked that at the June 1993 meeting the EB propose a plan to elect the chairman of the EB. Leaf Blower Noise Ms. Lutz noted that several citizens are concerned about the noise pollution caused by leaf blowers. Jane Smith has done a computer search on relevant articles which was distributed to EB members. Dr. Frank suggested that the EB read the materials and discuss the issue at the June meeting. Gypsy Moth Mr. Donald Wirth, Director of Parks/forestry & Recreation updated the EB on the aerial spray program. Mr. Wirth said the helicopter made a practice flyover and at 2:00 AM officials will begin to assess the weather situation to see if spraying will be possible. The 3rd ward will be done, and then the 1st ward. Areas will be blocked off by police and parks/forestry personnel. Each spraying should take 7 - 8 minutes. Mr. Wirth said 40 people were called regarding the spraying; they will be notified before each of the 3 sprayings. Some chemically sensitive people have called Abbott laboratories regarding diPel. Regarding an educational program, Mr. Wirth said the Ecology Center would be involved. Mr. Wirth encouraged the EB to act quickly so the opportunity to look for stages of the gypsy moth can be done by residents this summer. Mr. Wirth discussed briefly recent findings regarding Abbott and Clarke Environmental, the organization doing the spraying. Clarke Environmental had been cited for date and initialing errors associated with spraying. Mr. Wirth did nrt think this will affect the aerial spraying in Evanston. Ms. Lieberman commented that the inerts of diPel are still unknown. Dr. Frank said that the inert ingredients can only be the substances found on the EPA schedule 4 list. There was no further business and the EB adjourned. i� dl VI ii YI a II��IL��q p1 I b,1, �fa City of Evanston r Environmental Control Board Minutes June 17, 1993 Draft -- Not Approved Members Present: Frank, Hartnett, Klosterman, Lieberman Miller, TerMolen, Members Absent: Rodriguez, Freitag, Voss, Staff Present: Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Others Present: Judy Elsass, League of Women Voters Walter Oleksy Jane Smith Minutes approval Civic Center 2100 Ridge Avenue Evanston. Illinois 60204 Telephone 312/328.2100 QRftFr Mr. Mt'ler noted he was not at the May meeting. Mr. Hartnett moved, seconded by M.. Teryolen that the minutes be approved with the correction in Mr. Miller's status. The Environment Board approved their meeting minutes from May 20. 1993. Chairman's Report Dr. Patricia Frank read a response from State Representative Jan SchakowsNv to the E,1�1-ozmenval Board's (ES) letter regarding SB85. Unfortunately SB85 passed allnw-,'9 the State to regulate loca' pesticide use with Cook County being an exceptio". Dr. Crank updated the EB on a meeting she had with Mayor Lorraine Morton regarding the 4 vacancies on the EB. Dr. Frank indicated that the Mayor had solicited interested volunteers and will be making appointments based on interest and qua Iifica`ions. The Mayor requested the EB review the statistics on recycling participation throughout the City. Ms. Lutz has requested the information from the Public Works Department. New Business i Mr. Walter Oleksy, President of the Stadium Neighbors group (residents living in the Dyche Stadium area). Mr. Oleksy had prepared a document for the EB on noise pollution in the area of Isabella, Green Bay, Central, and Evanston Hospital, Mr. Oleksy and his neighbors have experienced noise from Northwestern University (NWU) in various contexts: speakers from concerts, Dyche stadium non-NWU events, and, NWU band practice. The acoustics of the area, sound bouncing off Evanston Hospital, and amplification of sound have been distressing on neighbors. Mr. Oleksy has not been satisfied with the response of NWU to noise concerns. Mr. Oleksy would like to encourage NWU to be more considerate of the noise that they generate. In this way local residents would be able to enjoy their years and patios without excessive noise interruptions. Dr. Frank noted that the State of Illinois noise ordinance excludes organized sporting events such as NWU has. She thought the state regulations do not highlight loudspeaker systems. Mr. Hartnett said part of the current ordinance deals with operations of a IOuwSpeaKer 150 feet from a residentially owned property. Mr. Oleksy understood that NWu's own sporting events were exempt. Mr. Oleksy noted that when he called tn,e police department, there was no set policy except regarding excessive noise after '1:00 pm. Dr. :rank said that several years ago the EB bought a decibel meter. The EB d,sc,.ssed how noise depends on the neighborhood: some areas have trains, a.jtorative paging systems, or in the case of Dyche stadium, sporting events ~-o1_e. Some noise situations can be determined when choosing a neighborhood to lives .other noise you learn about after moving into the area. V Ole}.sy recalled a situation where he talked to the NWU band director reaa,ding oract;ce noise levels. Mr. Oleksy was told that the band could not z--';ze on campus "oecause it would disturb students and professors." '-eall 'ogre- '+cise 4 - - - _tatec nis concern over the increasing noise of landscaping services -ii_' -,'ew= of c to 5 people operating leaf blowers for a long period of time. a,rne c- the increasing number of people working at home, Mr. Oleksy finds the -ise u-sruat;ve. He noted some use of leaf blowers is unnecessary such as sweeo:ng toe sidewalk... Ms. Ja-+e Smith said some leaf blowers have mufflers and some do not work. Ms. S"t -'sc .roars at home and said that {ram spring to November the blowers are Yol -y. ms. S-otr compiled a handout for the ES based on a computer search that torte -crate of the noise pollution aspect of leaf blowers and other urban activities. Ms. Smith noted that there is little regulat,on of leaf blowers. Jver tre last few years leaf blowers have been misused: now it is an automatic ac)o'at.J_ that is "misused`• to blow dry walks and other non-sensical uses. One r)-=1eT,, said Ms. Smitn, is that neighbors can not band together against a single source because many different companies are using the equipment. Dr. Frank added that the regulations regarding compliance with the Clean Air Act may cover some noise situations. She noted that Evanston has had to face a number of "inconvenient behaviors" such as yard waste disposal, recycling, composting, and soon car pooling. Ms. Smith said there is a detailed process if you want to file a noise complaint in Evanston. It involves filing a legal suit, enlisting an attorney; both of which are unlikely to be done regarding the time and expense, Ms. Smith said Highland Park had a sensible ordinance which allows leaf blowers to be used for spring and fall clean up, but not from May to June. In this way residents enjoy a respite from daily noise through the warm months when people are outside more and have their windows open. Ms. Smith also noted that one manufacturer of leaf blowers has a full time lobbyist. Ms. Smith recommended that system similar to parking enforcement be set up with fines and penalties involving economic dis- incentives. In this was a "necessary" nuisance will be regulated. Ms. Smith said it would be useful to watch what is happening in places like California; they seem to deal with the issues before other parts of the country. Dr. FranF, thanked Ms. Smith and Mr. Oleksy for voicing their concerns with the EB. Dr. Frank noted that the function of the EB is to research and recommend bases on inquiry from the City Council. Several suggestions to consider are a seascnai leaf blower ban, sensitivity training for the police especially, to understand how annoying noise is, and create a system for dealing with the prop' e-r- Bonr-re Pegulations Dr. Fra-� reoorted that the issue of permitting for bonfires and their ecological impact was raised to the EB by the Fire Department. Fire Marshall Sam Bodie grants eerm,ts which are required by ordinance. Currently permit granting is arpitrar,. M,. Bodie wondered if air pollution issues could be involved with this issue. v-. r'cs_ermar, said he has not heard complaints regarding air quality, although otr,e•- EB memoers noted tie regulations in the West regarding fireplace use. Ms. Lute saia the current ordinance prohibits non -cooking fires. Dr. rra,' tr,ought the EB did not have expertise in this issue but felt it should be �rvestigated. The Board agreed to see what kind of information has been generated dealing with "recreational fires" ano their environmental impact. CO'MMITT�;� Rcp'JRTS Integratec Pest Management (IPM) The ad 1-oc pesticide comm-ttee will meet an Tuesday, .tune 29, 1993 at 4:00 PM. Infortr,a-ior will be gathered on issues since the last meeting in 1992. Ms. Lieoerman reported that on June 8th, she and Dr. Frank met with Dori Wirth, Denr•s "eoiecha, Martha Logan, and Linda Lutz. Ms. Lieberman said 340 traps for gypsy mo,�►is had been set out. Flyers on the gypsy moth were run off and sent to vario,js community centers, informational press releases were sent out along with i, I i � 6 , W IIII public service announcements to radio stations. Ms. Lieberman said it was very expensive to deliver or mail the flyers to every household in Evanston. There was some discussion on working with realtors to help them identify stages of the gypsy moth so the realtors would be knowledgeable with new Evanston residents. Mr. Wirth was going to check with the Co-operative Extension Service on having a master gardener program at the Ecology Center. Mr. Cepiecha also indicated that Parks/Forestry personnel should go through educational training regarding the gypsy moth. Ms. Lieberman has found at least 2 curriculums that concentrate on the gypsy moth. She would like to get more posters and post them around the City. Recycling While recycling is no longer a formal committee the EB discussed apartment building recycling. The recycling center is not "making a profit" although tioaing fees are being saved. The center is not running at capacity. Mr. Klosterman said that Winnetka/Wimette is going to privatize. Mr. Klosterman noted that an impressive amount of things are recycled. He would like to see more plastics recycled. Dr. Frank added that with the amount of things being recycled the size of the container should be looked at. Ms. Lieberman said newspapers could be placed in brown paper bags. Energy M, r. K- osterman said that the energy sub -committee has not met. At first they were wa-ting to see what would happen with the Energy Alternatives Task Force. Cr. FranF encouraged the grouts to meet. The new energy commission will be researc—ing a~d analyzing the energy franchise agreement and co -generation cass70117ties. The energy sub --committee will begin working soon. Ne't Mee--: The ne•.. meeting of the Environment Buard will be Thursday, July 15, 1993 at 7:30 DM in room 3650 of the Civic Center. ,, II. II . I II . in. . 0 61" In, ,h111�II number of "inconvenient behaviors" such as yard waste disposal, recycling, composting, and soon car pooling. Ms. Smith said there is a detailed process if you want to file a noise complaint in Evanston. It involves filing a legal suit, enlisting an attorney; both of which are unlikely to be done regarding the time and expense. Ms. Smith said Highland Park had a sensible ordinance which allows leaf blowers to be used for spring and fall clean up, but not from May to June. In this way residents enjoy a respite from daily noise through the warm months when people are outside more and have their windows open. Ms. Smith also noted that one manufacturer of leaf blowers has a full time lobbyist. _ Ms. Smith recommended that system similar to parking enforcement be set up with fines and penalties involving economic dis-incentives. In this was a "necessary" nuisance will be regulated. Ms. Smith said it would be useful to watch what is happening in places like California; they seem to deal with the issues before other parts of the country. Dr. Frank thanked Ms. Smith and Mr. Oieksy for voicing their concerns with the EB. Dr. Frank noted that the function of the EB is to research and recommend based on inauiry from the City Council. Several suggestions to consider are a seascnal leaf blower ban, sensitivity training for the police especially, to understand how annoying noise is, and create a system for dealing with the problem, Bonr"re P.equlations Dr. FranE reported that the issue of permitting for bonfires and their ecological impact was raised to the EB by the Fire Department. Fire Marshall Sam Bodie grarts cerr— s which are required by ordinance. Currently permit granting is aroitrarv: 4-. Bodie wondered if air pollution issues could be involved with this issue. M-. tilostermar. said he hao not heard complaints regarding air aualitv, although other ES members noted the regula'ions in the West regarding fireplace use. Ms. Lutz said the Current ordinance prohibits non -cooking fires. Dr. r a 'nought the EB did not have expertise in this issue but felt it shoula be zrvestlgated. The Board agreed to see what kind of information has been generated dealing with "recreational fires" anc their environmental impact. COMMITTEE REPORTS Integrated Pest Management (IPM) The ad hoc pesticide comm•ttee will meet on Tuesday, June 29, 1993 at 4:00 PM. :nformat7or will be gathered on issues since the last meeting in 1992. Ms. Lieberman reported that on June 8th, she and Dr. Frank met with Don Wirth,, Denr-s Cealecha, Martha Logan, anc Linda Lutz. Ms. Lieberman said 340 traps For gypsy moths had been set out. Flvers on the gypsy moth were run off and sent to varlois community centers. Informational press releases were sent out along with u .. I � �. 1 u "I Environment Board Minutes Ar July 15, 1993 Draft - Not Approved Members Present: Frank, Freitag, Hartnett, Klosterman, Lieberman Members Absent: Miller, Rodriguez, Ter Molen, Voss Staff Absent: Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Others Present: Judy Elsass, League of Women Voters Minutes Approval Mr. Klosterman pointed out that on the last page of the proposed June 17, 1993 minutes the portion dealing with recycling should omit the name of Wilmette. Dr. Frank requested that in the same paragraph the abbreviation "EB" be added before the word "formal". Mr. Klosterman moved, seconded by Ms. Lieberman, that the minutes be approved with the corrections noted above. The Environment Board approved its meeting minutes from June 17, 1993. Chairman's Report Dr. Patricia Frank noted an operability problem with the tape recorder used to assist in the preparation of the minutes. Dr. Frank requested that Ms. Lutz send to Mayor Morton a letter prepared by Dr. Frank together with a corrected copy of the June 17, 1993 EB meeting minutes. Dr. Frank read the letter, the subject of which was noise problems in Evanston. Committee_ Reports Energy Policy Joint Committee Mr. Klosterman noted his efforts to coordinate a meeting between certain members of the Energy Commission and the Environment Board to begin the work of creating a proposal for an energy policy for Evanston. Mr. Klosterman observed that he had not yet heard from the Energy Commission members. Mr. Klosterman pointed out that the Energy Commission had not been formally appointed yet. Mr. Klosterman predicted that not much was likely to happen before the end of August. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Ms. Lieberman reported on a June 29, 1993 meeting of the ad hoc pesticide committee. Ms. Lieberman noted that the meeting was poorly attended. The only persons present were: Marjorie Fischer, Pat Frank, Martin Germann, the owner of an IPM company, Ms. Lieberman and Linda Lutz. Ms. Lieberman explained that approximately ten institutions had been invited but failed to attend. Ms. Lieberman stated that she would attempt to convene another meeting find out the community's desires concerning an IPM program. She said she would again invite those persons or entities who had failed to attend the June meeting. Dr. Frank read a document from Don Wirth, Director of Parks/Forestry and Recreation, concerning Evanston's use of herbicides, fungicides and insecticides on properties maintained by the municipality. Dr. Frank expressed the sense of the Environment Board that the document described an impressive trend of reduction in the city's use of these substances. Ms. Lieberman volunteered to prepare a press release extolling the reduction. Dr. Frank reported on a Gypsy Moth education program for city employees. Linda Lutz wrote Dr. Frank advising that the Cooperative Extension Service will offer such a course no earlier than the spring of 1994. Accordingly, Dr. Frank said that gypsy moth education will have to be carried on in-house. Ms. Lieberman observed that the Gypsy Moth Flyer had been distributed to various sites, including libraries and the City Clerk's office. Ms. Lieberman reported that a 10-20 second radio spot had been prepared. Ms. Lieberman expressed frustration concerning who does what to distribute the flyer. She had hoped for a sense of urgency from municipal employees which has thus far not developed. Dr. Frank invited Ms. Lieberman to consider distributing the flyer at the Farmer's Market. Curbside Recycling Program Report Dr. Frank said she had never heard of the Recycle It Right Contest in either her personal or official capacity. Other EB members expressed similar sentiments. There followed discussion of several topics raised in the June 29, 1993 report of Nancy Burhop to Dave Barber including ideas to increase west side participation in the recycling program; the use of stickers by collection personnel providing feedback on the state of a particular recycling bin; anecdotal observations concerning how the location of the recycling bin pick-up affects compliance; encouraging people to use the bins, even if not entirely correctly; and encouraging the storage of newspapers in brown paper bags. e( l Dr. Frank stated that she wishes the EB to communicate with the Mayor on this issue. She requested that at the September meeting the Board generate a list of ideas to improve recycling performance. Dr. Frank requested Ms. Lutz send a note to Mayor Morton stating that the Board had read the report and would be communicating suggestions to her by the end of September. Other Business Dr. Frank requested EB volunteers to attend the 13th Annual Illinois Recycling Conference in LaGrange, IL August 4-6. Interested persons should contact Ms. Lutz. Dr. Frank noted that she wanted member(s) of the EB to attend the meetings of the City Council's Health and Human Services Committee meetings on a regular basis commencing in October. The purpose of attending is to provide a report of the EB's activities. Dr. Frank reported receiving word that the Mayor had proposed the names of three new EB members to the City Council. Final action on the nominations is expected on July 26, 1993. Next Meeting The £B will not meet in August. The next meeting of the Environment Board will be Thursday September 16, 1993 at 7:30 p.m., in Room 3650 of the Civic Center. ki Environment Board Minutes September 16, 1993 Members Present: Frank, Hartnett, Halderman, Klosterman Lieberman, Miller, Moss, Rodriguez, TerMolen, Wynne Members Absent: Staff Present: Others Present: Freitag, Voss Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Judy Elsass, League of Women Voters Marjorie Fisher Chairman Frank opened the meeting. Mr. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Klosterman that the minutes of the Environment Board of July 15. 1993, be approved. The Board approved the minutes. Board Orientation Dr. Frank welcomed three new members of the Environment Board: Sally Halderman, William Moss, and Melissa Wynne. Dr. Frank reviewed the history of the Environment Board, noted some of the skills on the Board, and asked each new member to introduce themselves. A short discussion of the major subcommittees and issues that had come before the Board were discussed. These include: radon, electro-magnetic radiation, legislation, lead, hazardous material, water quality, air pollution and quality, energy, asbestos, pesticide use, environmental education, and household hazardous waste. Early interests and efforts of the Board focused on recycling and the development of the recent environmental plan. Recycling Dr. Frank met with Mayor Morton and discussed the goal of running the recycling center at capacity. Dr. Frank indicated that the Board would discuss the issue I , . -. . .. 1 1 11 1 . , 1, `IiIl u and send preliminary ideas to the Mayor. Ms. Lieberman noted that District #65 has contracted with Active Service to pick up recyclables; most schools are not recycling. perhaps the school board should require schools to participate in recycling. Mr. Miller suggested that the schools should have red recycling bins for continuity with the rest of the community. Mr. Klosterman indicated that recycling can't be mandated unless the accompanying funds are provided. He said that if Active Service provides garbage pickup for a building you get reduced rates if you recycle. The Board discussed the KEB "Recycle it Right" contest. The general consensus was that the "report card" was too picky regarding messy bins. Negative comments can lead to reduced incentive to recycle. The object of the program should be more participate. Mr. Miller indicated that there is confusion regarding what can be recycled. Mr. Klosterman noted that people who recycle may not put their bin out every week which might be construed as they are not recycling. Less participation on the west side may be the result of several factors including: not as many newspaper subscriptions, less purchasing of recyclable products, aluminum can may be sold vs. recycled, environmental issues may not be a high priority. The Board agreed the recycling issue for the west side has not been studied or defined. Some suggestions for increased participation include: education in schools, churches, community organizations provide incentives for participation: discounts on lam bags, beach tokens • communicate why recycling is important and what's it's worth to the City curbside pickup has traditionally been more successful Mr. Klosterman noted that a rental building with over 4 units is considered commercial and the recycling decision would depend on the landlord. Thinking about recycling needs to change from "just garbage" to a valuable product that saves energy, money, and resources. Mr. Klosterman said Winnetka used to bring recyclabies to Evanston, but has now contracted for pickup. As a result Evanston does not receive their material. Mr. Rodriguez summarized that the recycling focus needs to increase participation, not penalize or give temporary incentives. He thinks that education in the schools can be aggressive, should teach the very young, and may require people going into schools with programs. Ms. Lieberman noted that she is the environmental chairman for the PTO Council. She suggested that the PTA's could work with the City to develop a program that has volunteers going into the schools. An environmental person, much like the picture lady, could do ongoing programs that covered a variety of environmental issues. du Y iu Y . . u i i i i III I 1 li .II I. Y ii Ii6i Mr. Miller and Mr. Klosterman discussed the cost of recycling, noting that a recycling charge is added to the water bills. Enforcement for recycling was indicated in the ordinance but has not been pushed yet. Dr. Frank said the good/bad sticker on "recyclable" material had positive and negative results. Mr. TerMolen questioned why should be recycle more; how much can participation be increased, and how much is not being recycled. Mr. Klosterman said the recycling center is only operating at 80% or less. He indicated that there have been problems with the markets purchasing recyclables. Mr. Miller added that office paper pick-up and pick up of more plastics could help. The plastic market is limited according to Mr. Klosterman. He added that the pressure for recycling should be on the marketing aspect. The Board thought that a well publicized contest, with incentives, and large support would make recycling more public. Mr. Klosterman noted that coordination of efforts with Keep Evanston Beautiful, City Departments, and the Ecology Center would foster a more comprehensive approach to the recycling issue. City departments and community centers should all participate in recycling. Dr. Frank and Ms. Lutz will integrate the discussion into a written format and forward to Mayor Morton. Electro-Magnetic Radiation Mr. Miller submitted a report for members to read. He indicated that there is not a lot of data, but studies on ongoing. Within a year he expects to see results of good studies. Energy Mr.Klosterman said that he had met with Ms. Freitag, Mr. Hartnett, Mr. Rodriguez, and David Kraft to begin discussion on energy. He recalled that the new environmental plan and ordinance stated that the Environment Board and the Energy Commission would be working together to draft an energy policy for Evanston. Mr. Kraft and Mr. Klosterman met with Mayor Morton. Integrated Pest Management Mr. Miller indicated that he thought some gypsy moths were caught in this year's trapping program. Reports are just being concluded by the Illinois Department of Agriculture. Ms. Lieberman said the informational brochure on the gypsy moth was distributed throughout the City. Isis. Lieberman reported that the IPM committee met in June with few people in attendance. Ms. Lieberman designed a questionnaire that was sent to all committee members in the community regarding pesticide use. She will compile the results and report back. I, Ms. Lieberman said the passage of SS 85 would limit Evanston's ability to ban Pesticides used locally. State regulations can not be over -ridden where the population is more than 2 million. Friendly persuasion, and a long process of education, will be needed to work on the issue. Mr. TerMolen and Ms. Lieberman invited more people to join their committee. One of Ms. Lieberman's goals for the IPM committee is to avoid having to spray for the gypsy moth again. A training program for moth identification will be designed with help from the Forestry Department. Noise Dr. Frank reviewed noise problems that had been reported to the Board. She said that many complaints were received regarding leaf blowers and anticipates more fall clean up season. Dr. Frank indicated that she had received a petition on car alarm noise. She will draft a response and forward to the Human Services Committee for their information. Committee Assignments Dr. Frank read a memorandum from the Mayor that indicated Boards and Commissions can appoint associate members to aid in their committee work, especially if the Board lacks the expertise necessary to complete research, activities or projects. Dr. Frank encourages new members to select an issue or committee to become involved with while they are on the Board. Hazardous Waste Dr. Frank reported that information was received from a Freedom of Information Act request regarding the Rustoleum site on Oakton. She is concerned about the possible liability for the City if extensive clean-up is required there. Questions such as the extent of any testing, soil testing depth, underground storage and possible seepage could all be potential problems. Mr. Moss and Ms. Wynne may become involved with investigation of this issue. There being no more business, Mr. Klosterman moved to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Rodriguez. The next meeting of the Environment Board will be Thursday, October 21, at 7:30 PM. Environmental Control Boar9 Minutes October 21, 1993 Draft -- Not Aanroved Members Present: Pat Frank, Judy Freitag, Sally Halderman, Sharon Lieberman, Iry Miller, Bill Moss, Gabe Rodriguez, Matt Ter Molen, Melissa Wynne Members Absent: Dan Hartnett, Charles Klosterman, Claus Voss Staff Present: Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Minutes Approval The Board reviewed minutes of the Seatember 16. 1993 meeting and made corrections. Ms. Lieberman moved, seconded by Mr. Ter Molen that the corrected minutes be accepted. The Board approved the minutes. Rustoleum Site Several citizens have contacted Environment Board members regarding the safety of the building on the Rustoleum site. Mr. Moss asked if an assessment of the Rustoleum site was available for review. Dr. Frank noted that the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) had monitored the site. When Rustoleum vacated the site, Rustoleum had met EPA standards for the site with its present use, which is an abandoned "field" site. Dr. Frank noted that Rustoleum has had a number of offers on the site, however it appears that the economic feasibility of cleaning the site up for a commercial use was very high. Rustoleum assumed no liability for the site, and any potential buyer would be liable for any clean up that was deemed necessary. According to an alderman Home Depot has agreed to take on liability for costs of clean up necessary to comply with commercial use of the site. The City believes they are indemnified. Home Depot will seal and asphalt as part of the clean up. Public record on the negotiations with Home Depot is available through City Council minutes and the Planning and Development Committee. Ms. Wynne noted that a cap (on various parts of the site with questionable materials or deposits) will work if nothing is moving. She brought up the point that Home Depot as an owner would not want to have major problems with the EPA over clean up. Ms. Wynne questioned whether the City is truly indemnified as recent legal opinions have traced responsibility to early owner/operators of questionable sites. If the City had operated a dump on the site, they might be considered an owner/operator even though they are not current owners. Dr. Frank added that on some properties it is less costly to let the property sit rather that sell and reopen the site clean up issue. Ms. Wynne thought that if the waste is contained and not migrating, it may be fine. She asked if current evaluations on the site were available. Dr. Frank added that the board had filed a freedom of information act request regarding super -fund sites in Evanston. The completed request had no sites listed in Evanston. Ms. Wynne and Mr. Moss will discuss environmental issues related to site and report back to the Board. Communications] Mr. Ter Molen reported that he will be updating the Human Services Committee on the activates and issues under consideration by the Environment Board at the Human Services meeting on November 1, 1993. Integrated Pest Management Committee Ms. Lieberman reviewed Don Wirth's report on the Gypsy Moth program for 1993. She had questions regarding the distribution of the gypsy moth flyer developed by the EB (Environment Board). Ms. Lieberman suggested sending information to the science chairman in the school districts regarding gypsy moth. Ms. Lutz reported that initial conversations with Stan Smith of the Illinois Department of Agriculture indicated that gypsy moths were found in traps in the areas that were sprayed with BT in May. Mr. Smith considered this unusual; he noted that this was the case in all other communities (except Kennilworth) where spraying occurred. Mr. Smith said the infestations in Wisconsin and Michigan are very large and believes that Evanston is seeing some "blow over" from Michigan. Illinois Department of Agriculture will be doing a search for egg masses. Ms. Lutz will find out when this will happen and notify EB members who are interested in seeing how the searches are done. Ms. Lieberman thought this would be important for spotting training that the ES would like to develop with volunteers. Ms. Wynne added that if people were as aware of the gypsy moth as they are of dutch elm disease, people would take what preventable measures they could do reduce the effect of gypsy moths. Dr. Frank agreed that public awareness needs to be elevated to a new level and the EB can move to a more active role. Perhaps a proclamation for gypsy moth awareness month could be issued. One part could urge homeowners to spend 1 hour surveying their property looking for egg masses; the EB could offer training. Since the gypsy moth spraying did not eradicate the moth we need to get people to take a more active role. Ms. Lieberman noted that there is a new coalition for alternative to pesticides. Ms. Lieberman will be attending the American Public Health Association conference and asked for input from the EB on sessions she might attend that would be valuable to the Board. Ms. Lieberman said she would like to promote more recycling in the schools. Through INVEST and PTA's, volunteers with expertise could teach sessions and publicize the importance of recycling. Ms. Lieberman suggested that various foundations and corporations would fund this type of program. She suggested bringing together the Environment Board, the Ecology Center, the City Recycling coordinator, and Keep Evanston Beautiful to work on the recycling issue. A larger scope of the issue and a combination of organizations will be a more fundable package according to Ms. Lieberman. Energy Ms. Freitag, Mr. Klosterman, and David Kraft met prior to the first official meeting of the Energy Commission. Direction is needed from the City Manager regarding the joint efforts of the Energy Commission and the EB to produce an energy policy for Evanston. The group will review the energy policy for the 1980's, the money available, and the standards that need to be met. Dr. Frank added that Mr. Klosterman and Mr. Kraft met with Eric Anderson on October 7th. They agreed to set up a joint meeting for November 4th. She noted that the EB will be fully involved except for the issues regarding municipalization. The EB had no further business to discuss. Mr. Ter Molen moved, seconded by Ms. Freitag. to adjourn. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Environment Board will be Thursday, November 18th, at 7:30 PM in room 3650 of the Evanston Civic Center. Dr. Frank agreed that public awareness needs to be elevated to a new level and the EB can move to a more active role. Perhaps a proclamation for gypsy moth awareness month could be issued. One part could urge homeowners to spend 1 hour surveying their property looking for egg masses; the EB could offer training. Since the gypsy moth spraying did not eradicate the moth we need to get people to take a more active role. Ms. Lieberman noted that there is a new coalition for alternative to pesticides. Ms. Lieberman will be attending the American Public Health Association conference and asked for input from the EB on sessions she might attend that would be valuable to the Board. Ms. Lieberman said she would like to promote more recycling in the schools. Through INVEST and PTA's, volunteers with expertise could teach sessions and publicize the importance of recycling. Ms. Lieberman suggested that various foundations and corporations would fund this type of program. She suggested bringing together the Environment Board, the Ecology Center, the City Recycling coordinator, and Keep Evanston Beautiful to work on the recycling issue. A larger scope of the issue and a combination of organizations will be a more fundable package according to Ms. Lieberman. Energy Ms. Freitag, Mr. Klosterman, and David Kraft met prior to the first official meeting of the Energy Commission. Direction is needed from the City Manager regarding the joint efforts of the Energy Commission and the EB to produce an energy policy for Evanston. The group will review the energy policy for the 1980's, the money available, and the standards that need to be met. Dr. Frank added that Mr. Klosterman and Mr. Kraft met with Eric Anderson on October 7th. They agreed to set up a joint meeting for November 4th. She noted that the EB will be fully involved except for the issues regarding municipalization. The EB had no further business to discuss. Mr. Ter Molen moved, seconded by Ms. Freitag, to adjourn. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Environment Board will be Thursday, November 18th, at 7:30 PM in room 3650 of the Evanston Civic Center.