Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1995 - 1996�� a t►�4•�-Fyt�> .����i-��'�'ti �.j; �.A.. "'�.'I�'.:i�;`�f�}.' �' ,*' _�i. ..�y ..w :;7,�� .ct;�' b�j`t, •-;'_� �.Q-'. h1I (= SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, JANUARY 19, 1995 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSF.Nr: STAFF PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, A. Spaeth, B. Greenberg, R. Qually► C. Abrams None C. Smith Chairman Stricker--Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:32 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of November 10, 1994. Spaeth motioned approval, which was seconded by Qually. The minutes were unanimously approved. (5-0) 3 residents of 1865 Sherman were present and one individual commented that the sign at 1745 Sherman never seemed to be a problem. The other 2 residents present made no comments. Mr. Venzor, owner of Santa Fe Chicken stated his position that he was under the impression that he could reface the existing sign panels. He was looking for something artistic and creative for a logo for his restaurant. Greenberg stated that tier problem with the signage is that there are too many items of information. Mr. Venzor responded that he never saw them as individual characters, let alone items of information. Greenberg questions why he should be penalized for having signage tint exceeds the ordinance, when other stores are non -compliant? Greenberg mentions that on the ':i'�?'�'1 ,! j•1F�. .k '. It;'���•'•� :%;•i.� icy `�i�,j;�`F .s ••f. •" �y l: M�'•K4. `JiN�..+ �3rt!:.,n ,.�.;. ..�, .1.. r. SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD MEETING NUNUTES -1 /19/95 PAGE 2 application for variation, Mr. V=or mentions the desire to have other stores "in the City" with the same. "logo". Greenberg wishes to clarify that if this stores' signage is approved, that does not give the applicant permission to install this same sign elsewhere without the Board approving it. Qually agrees that the application for variation has some ambiguous wording with regard to additional store locations and their signage. Qually reiterates that if the Board approves the signage, it would only be for this one store location. Mr. Venzor acknowledged his understanding of this clarification. Qually remarks illumination of the signage is an issue. Qually suggests that the illumination be reduced by at least Mr. third. Spaeth agrees that the. illumination is too bright, but suggests that the illumination be judged on the basis of the adjacent properties. Qually motions to accept the signage graphically, but to require a reduction in the light level to either be reduced by one third of the current illumination level, or to be no brighter that the adjacent illuminated signage. Abrams seconds this motion and it is unanimously approved. (5-0) C. Smith asked if the Board could be available for a special Board meeting on February 2, 1995. The purpose of the meeting would be to hear a case for the opening of a new business in town. "Cookin' with Jazz" opening in the Omni-Orrington Hotel in February. Stricker-Gay, Greenberg and Spaeth agreed that they could snake the meeting. C. Smith stated that this would provide the necessary quon=, and we could have that meeting. (Subsequent to the meeting, Chairman Strickeer-Gay and C. Smith agrced to allow any other petitioners to be heard, such that the normal February me -ling, scheduled for February 16, could be cancelled.) Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 8:00 p.m. The next meeting of the S.R.A.B. is scheduled for Thursday, February 29 1995. Carolyn Smi y Assi5tatii Director Community Development - Building Division cc: J. Wolinski, R. Fahistrom _i� Mr G M[WUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 21 199S EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: I Stricker-Gap, A. Spaeth, B. Greenberg MEMBERS A RSENi': R. Qually,C. Abrams STAFF PRESLN T: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Fredric Cnaolish - Doyle Signs; Nick Tywan - Onington Hotel; Dakshes Laxpati - Quick Stop Food Nfort; flick Bruno - Architect; Daniel Kelch - Lulu's Restaurant Chairman Stricker-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of January 19, 1995. Greenberg motioned approval, which was seconded by Spaeth. The minutes were unanimously approved. (3-0) None, PR i + UFIIN '4 ! 1 i rim 1:1 In, A"Llifilippr7a VI 11111TV-1427'11 1 1 Mr. Nick Tywan, manager of the Orrington Hotel presented the proposal to recover the existing awnings and canopy to use the new logo of the restaurant "Cookin' With Jars". The graphics will be painted on a heavy blue canvas (a sample was presented). Mr. Tywan stated that they felt this would have a dignified appeal. Mr. Tywan went on to say that the Hotel plans to do extensive remodeling (over S1,000,000) this year. The reason for the lighting, is that there is a problem with lack of light out the east side of the building. They would like to add lighting in an aesthetically pleasing manner. Greenberg stand that he would like to see strict compliance with the sign ordinance in this case, •i� Sign Review and Appeals Board MEETING 2i INTUTES - 2/2/95 Page 2 Certainly the commercial messages such as 'steaks and salads' and 'pizza and pasta' should not be allowed. He suggested that the applicant look to the signage on the "Roxy" restaurant, on Church Stmet for an example of signage that is attractive. The signage that the applicant is proposing has a 'monkey -conk' appearance. This signage should be bacidit, not externally illuminated as proposed. The Orrington Hotel has a prestigious facade and the signage should be compatible with that dignified appearance. Mr. Fredric Crumlish, of Doyle Signs, indicated that this is exactly why they decided to use a heavy fabric instead of vinyl for the awning material. This is a more attractive expression. Greenberg motioned that the signage should conform to the sign ordinance. This motion was not seconded. Chairman Stricker-Gay commented that if the motion is a blanket statement such as that made by Greenberg, then the existing canopy framing would need to be eliminated. Greenberg said that would be true, however, he would absolutely vote to eliminate the commercial messages. The music staff and notes might be allowed. With regard to the lighting, Stricker-Gay asked if the applicant considered the possibility of cut out letters, such that conformance with the ordinance would be possible with an internally illuminated awning. The applicant had not pursued this possibility . Greenberg noted that the applicant could still utilize the allowable window area for signage. Greenberg also suggested that the applicant apply for permit for temporary signage for their opening. Mr. Tywan indicated that they would like 2 banners. C. Smith stated that these could be applied for, provided they met the ordinance requirement. in the Building Division. Greenberg motions to keep the staff and notes only on the 3 recovered awnings, and leave the canopy as submitted in the application, without the neon. The gooseneck lighting would also not be allowed, but internally illuminated awnings would be allowed in keeping with the ordinance. This was seconded by Spaeth: and unanimously approved. (3-0) It was stated that this approval would only be valid until January 1, 2003, at which time all signage must come under compliance with the Evanston Sign Ordinance. Greenberg opens up the discussion by commenting that after driving by the property, he sympathizes with the difficulty of the location. The store is set back from Howard Street, but suggested that the replacement of the existing sign face would be a wasted effort, as the signage could only be seen for a short distance from the east or west, as other buildings and signage blocks it. Mr. Laxpati. the owner of the Quick Stop Food Mart states that the signage was hit by a truck and that he would just like to be able to repair the sign. as he is trying to sell the business and the building, and would like to have all repairs made. �' - .;+ , � }' .+,r•: .:.ems-f• );h.: - ,.6�- , Q .A c:�,F�.-•?Y ire ,, .. 1 ` Slgn Review and Appeals Board MATING lYANUTE S - 2/2/9S Page 3 At this time, Greenberg motioned to approve the signage as propowd. This was seconded by Spaeth, and unanimously approved. (3-0) It was stated that this approval is valid only until January 1, 2003, at which time all signage must come under compliance with the Evanston Sign • Ordinance. The owner of Lulu's Restaurant, Daniel Kelch, presented the proposal, stating that the building facade was in need of repair, so they removed the signage that had be up previously. The awning proposed is larger than they wished, due to the length of the facade. The graphics are Iarge to be proportionate with the length of the awning. Greenberg asks why he cannot comply with the required items of information? They proceed to count the items. Therc is some debate about which is counted as an item of information. Chairman Stricker-Gay suggests that the telephone numbers night not be considered as items of information, as addresses are allowed, so why shouldn't telephone numbers be allowed as addresses are, not being counted as an item of information? This still leaves the geometric shapes spelling out L-U-L-U'S, as well as the "bowl" logo, also saying Lulu's. Spaeth comments that it is confusing to have the name of the restaurant delineated using the two different "logos". Greenberg questions why the need for the telephone numbers? Mr. Kelch responds that they do slot of carry out business. Greenberg suggest, that the telephone number be put on the glass (windows). Mr. Kelch asks if that would really make a difference (i.e. where they were located)? Spaeth states that he is still uncomfortable with the items of information with regard to the 2 different logos. The strength of the graphic is in the strong geometric shapes on that black awning. Greenberg then motions to approve the submittal as submitted, except without the "bowl" logo. This was seconded by Spaeth, and unanimously approved. (3-0) Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 8:40 p.m. The ,.xt meetingLtheR.A.B. isscheduled for Thursday, February 16, 1995. Carolyn S th, t Director Community Development - Building Division MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, F'EBRUARY 16, 1"S EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. StAcker-Gay, A. Spaeth, B. Greenberg, R. Qually MEMBERS ABSENT: C. Abrams STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Cedlla Vitale - IHOP; Dan Olson - Grate Signs, Steven Hirsch - North Shore Mobile Werkg; Robert Jennings - Speedy Sign -A - Rama Chairman StrW=-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the; minutes from the meeting of February 2, 1995. Spaeth motioned approval, which was seconded by Greenberg. The minutes were unanimously approval. (4-0) None:. S.B.A Ms. Cecilia Vitale, owner of the International House of Pancakes pr*sented proposal to reface an existing free standing sign, and remove the bric-a-brac. Ms. Vitale stated that sbe had invested considerable money in remodeling the restaurant recently, and would Iike to up date her signage to reflect the changes inside. Greenberg asked if His. Vitale is aware of the requirement that the signage must conform to the ordinance by the year 2003. Ms. Vitale responded that although she was not aware of the resluirenmu, she is not concerned, as her lease on the property expires them. Qually gurestioned if this r.hnge to the signage is a corporate change of the IFIOP signage. Ms. Vitale answered yes, although many locations have not yet made the change, and are not required to do so. Greenberg motioned to approve the proposal as submitted, noting that in the year 2003, the slWwW mint conform to the requirements of the ordinance. This was seconded by Spaeth, and umanimously approved. (4-0) ��'�. r � .. � i� _-, � •. -� - � � �. s� .,�v�r� lr.z, j.r •.;.. .•r,i� _ .� 1�_.. Sip Review and Appeals Board MEETING MINEJ'TIES - February 16, 1993 Pgge 2 y yr lr '. MT, mrm w lagrop-07,tay� No one was present to present the proposal, but Chairman Stricker-Gay asked the Board if they would consider voting on the proposal as it Is a simple case and to save titne for the applicant, m they would t1= have to be postponed an additional month. The Board agreed. Qually motioned to approve the awning as proposed. This was seconded by Spaeth, and unanimously approved. (4-0) It was stated that this approval Is valid only until January 1, 2403, at which time all signage mast coarse under compliance with the Evanston Sign Ordhiance. Greg Olson of Grate Signs Inc. presented the proposal. Mr. Olson stated that the existing building architecture doen't allow for conformance with the ordinance since the building facade is a mer!s of arches. Greenberg gvrsdoned that since the building was there first, and had these strong feaata.res, why didn't Grate Sigm, Inc. respond to the architecture? Also, why wouldn't Grate Signs, Inc. =omnznd a free-standing sign? Mr. Olson responded that the site is problematic for any frerstanding signage. There is just a narrow strip of pavement between the building and Greedbay Read. Also, the ft=tion of the building being one of many drive-in bays, eliminates the passibility of any free-standing sign locations that would meet the ordinance. Gremiberg mentioned the possibility of I=dng a free-standing sign at the north end of the site, along the adjw.= cmb:nkor+m Pvir. Olson responded that this would only serve as signage for the north bound traffic, and thus not make serve for the investment. Also, they have proposed sigmage for die south wall of the building that meets the ordinance. Greenberg then suggests Iowering the signage so that it would span across the arches. Chairman Strickcr-Gay reminded Greenberg duet this too is rc►t allowed by the ordinance, as it obstructs the sipfficant architectural feaiurca of the building. Qually states that he does not find the submittal offensive, as the site is very difficult. The building facade complicates the issue of a strange site even further. Qually motions to approve as submitted. There is no second. Chairman Stricker-Gay inquires about the possibility of reducing the CellukuVm sign so that is fr. 'within the red arch, and leave the ,North Shore Mobile Werks sign as submitted. Greenberg agrees with this proposal, and makes a motion to approve based on the previously stated. Spaeth seconds and tine motion is approved by a vote of 3-1, with Qually voting against. Mr. Ohon stated that they would not be interested in locating the CellularOnc sign within the red arch, as that signage is proposed to be red, which would not work on the red background. Also, they would be penalized (by being required to have a smaller sign than they would normally be allowed) by the architecture. Would they allow the owner to move the signage down if they would remove the arch? At this point, Mr. Steve Hirsch the owner of North Shore Mobile Werks, states that he has already made a substantial financial .�I i',`�,1, •.r?` F-:-�. ""�����:�� v J,is' :ij �.'�'.:loin .tn".� Yt..�- s c k,. " +M ajt�:,�-• �.''�;. - � -. -. .�.. .s,,.: Ott � � � - .. ., � , commitment, and mbslht not have done so had he &mown he would not be able to have the sipage that he is proposing. He would like to be within the ordinance, but with this building elevation and site, he feels the ordinance requirements are not achievable. Again, Q=Uy motions to approve the proposal as submitted, and Greenberg seconds. The motion passes, 3-1 wlth Spaeth voting against. Airman Stricker-Gay announced that he will abstain from voting, as this business is a neighboring buainm to his. Greenberg states that this is signage that should be representative of the design professionals that this signage company is capable of. This storefront is quite small, so it should be a jewel box, where every aspect receives the utmost care and thought. This should not include trying to lit your signage into somebody else's sign box. Spaeth agrees, saying that as a sign company, they should conform to the ordinance. Mr. Robert Jennings, owner of Speedy Sign -A -Rama, said that he does not own the sign box and he will consult with the landlord with regard to removing the box. Greenberg motions to bring A the dgoagc, both the awning and wall siguage, into conformanee wM the sign ordinance. This is smnded by Spaeth, and approved 3-0, with Stri '-Gay abstaining. C. Smith informs the Board that, as discussed list summer, the proposed revision to the sign ordinance regarding the repeal process for residential district signage is going the Planning and Development Committee for approval next week. The Board recornmende i as additional revision to the ordinance bc proposed to allow recovering existing awnings {both retractable and fixed} that extend 'no more than 4'-0" beyond the face of a building, provided that the recoveries is exactly the same graphic and is being done for maintenance purposes only. C. Smith said that she will prepare some proposed language for the Board to review, 3 Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 8:40 p.m. NEXT BELLMbG_ The next meeting o SILA.B. is scheduled for Thursday. March 160 1995. Carolyn Srnith�`; assistant r Community Development cc: J. Woiinsld, R. Pa.hIstrom >7y �.�{; r's�rC.��e.'�.'c„i�. c:.t�N, �F..�{�G(^c'�'^'td :'l �tilf`v.r-.. ... tF; •;a MINUTES - SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, MARCH 16, 1995 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, C. Abrams, A. Spaeth, R. Qually MEMB , RS ABSENT: B. Greenberg STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: None Chairman Stricker-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of Febmaary 16, 1995. Spaeth motioned approval, which was seconded by Qually. The minutes were unanimously approved. (4-0) As nobody was present for the petitioner by 7:45 pm., Clmirman Stricker-Gay asked the Board members if they would consider voting on the issue. Spaeth commented that he had reservations about approval, as the freestanding signage is ineffective for southbound traffic. As there were concerns raised without representation by the petitioner, Chairman Strickcr-Gay announced that this matter will be held over until such time as there can be attendance by the appealing party. Chaimian Stricker-Gay commented that the wording of the proposed ammendment submitted was possibly too restrictive. He suggested that the wording be revised to allow changes to the existing awnings, provided that the changes in color or graphics meet the current regulations. Qually motions to approve the following wording: "6. Recovering of existing awnings, whether fixed or retractable, that extend no more t1fa:7 4'-0" beyond the face of a building, will be permitted provided that the recovering is otherwise in conformance with the ordinance and is bier done only for maintenance purposes." This aram6endent was seconded by Abram, and `�'` -' c. •.••r. .�• ^Y'b.c;iY..n,Ji�'sea.�wirl�ilun+�#'i,.�t,135.�v7���;,:it�, _ •� 't3: ��I��l��?�i'.i � i ,i;l a![r.CN�•.J��3:iY�` r+����.'�...i_..�.r• I y _I, ..`t.. f.- ", Sign Review and Appeals Hoard Meeting Minutes - March 16,1995 Page 2 unaminously approved (4-0). C. Smith stated that she will give this proposal the the Planning and Development Committee for their approval. ADj Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 7:50 p.m. NEXT M�'.ETIlriG The next meeting of the S.R.A.B, is scheduled for Thursday, April 20, 199S. Carolyn Smith, Assistant &ector Community Development cc: 1. Wolinski, R. Nahlstrom 1 i MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, APRIL 20, 1995 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: B. Greenberg, A. Spaeth, R. Qually MEMBERS ABSENT: C. Abrams, J. Stricker-Gay STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Ray LaMagna - Bean Counter Cafe, T. Doyle and William Henry - Discovery Zone, Dave DeVleeschouwer - White Way Sign, Greg McWilliams and Paul Boomsma - Koenig & Strey, Al Loeffler - Burger King, Jim Denmark - Sure Light Sign, Linda Kelley - Jimmy John's, Michael Weinstein - Speedy Arama, Norton O'Meara and Jack Weiss, Past Board Members U1Q yr . Acting Chairman Qually declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:40 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of March 16, 1995. Spaeth motioned approval, which was seconded by Greenberg. The minutes were unanimously approved. (3-0) Mr. Ray LaMagna was present to voice opinion on the proposed variation for S.R.A.B. #95-12 Jimmy John's. Acting Chairman Qually suggested deferring the comments until that time. . Mr. Dave DeVleeschouwer of White Way Signs presents the proposal to reface an existing free- standing sign. Mr. DeVleeschouwer explains that the new signage is identical to the temporary signage currently in place, as identified in the photos he presents to the Board. Qually suggests that this signage, if approved, would only be approved until the year 2003. when all signage must come into conformance with the current ordinance. Mr. McWilliams of Koenig & Strey responded that the real estate firm is interested in deferring all expense, as they have recently purchased the business, and it would cost an additional $1500 to reduce the existing pole. Greenberg motioned to approve the proposal as submitted, allowed until the year 2003. This 6.,. I. ., ,.._.ri J,i, n. wj.LL+.. si.^1f .-v Jk9ll1 Almon J;.i A.-d .. II .I.eJY,.Y:, , .ii� `` ��r wR+�_ ?�a�'4 '-9�r;,•�' .,+ � r �_• ST - rj� ��v �i 5.... i Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - 4/20/95 Page 2 motioned was seconded by Spaeth, and unanimously approved. (3-0) C UM] O M .�1-1§ VXV54,11 11•�i1y Mr. Doyle of Doyle Signs and Mr. Henry of Discovery Zone presented the proposal. They stated that the channel lettering and the refacing of the two circular wall signs are in the exact locationw of the existing "Leaps and Bounds" signage. Spaeth questioned if the height is the same. Mr. Henry confirmed that the height is the same. The length of the signage is approximately 1'-9" longer based on the amount of letters. Greenberg motioned to approve the proposal as submitted. This was seconded by Spaeth, and unanimously approved, (3-0) Mr. Loeffler of Burger King and Mr. Denmark of Sure Light Sign go through the proposal. In the process of presenting the proposal, several clarifications were made. The freestanding directional signage is exempted, as it will not contain any logo, only the words (enter, exit) and directional arrows. Also, the signage on the mansard portion of the "roof" was interpreted by the Board to be wall signage. As such, this signage is allowed within the ordinance. The only signage in question remained the free-standing corner sign. The Board and applicants discussed the issue for some time. Greenberg questioned why not comply? Is the applicant refacing an existing freestanding sign? The response was no, although they had hoped to reuse the existing foundation. Greenberg comments that this seems to be a nvnor reason as a consideration for a variation. The height of the corner freestanding sign is the problem. The only location within the ordinance is next to the building for an allowable height of 15'-6". The applicants were not willing to consider this location. The Board stated that they would not be willing to vary from the ordinance. The applicants proposed to lower the sign, but still keep the corner location. They proposed to use a 6' x 6' Burger King logo sign, at an overall height of 10'-0" on a 6' long brick base, diagonally located off of the corner, such that it is only 12" perpendicular to the inside curb. Greenberg motioned to approve this proposal, which was seconded by Spaeth, and unanimously approved. (3-0) l i t r' 11 FI TUVJPJVXWTTM. Pirmil The owner, Linda Kelley, and Michael Weinstein of Speedy Sign -A -Rama, presented the proposal. Ms. Kelley stated that the storefront is narrow, and they need the wording, as that is I ;� � = - ,_ i`� *,' �'-f,��.€,�',����+•s'�S+i'..'�. s'�s��� W*T'�k i �T'� i`+1+ ..=Cs-ji'd� T?'C+�,�;2""d+,'� i�+�t� ir�.� L�S r #u:��,R�r�. � � - A yjn,ti11�, Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - 4/20/95 Page 3 their logo. She submitted a document indicating the registered trademark. Qually asked Ms. Kelley how they answer the telephone. She responded "Jimmy John's". Acting Chairman Qually requested the citizen comment at this point. Mr. Ray LaMagna of the Bean Counter, commented that the other business owners had to comply with the ordinances, and so should Jimmy John's. The ordinance was created to provide a fair condition for all. Conformance should be uniform. The business is a catering business, so the primary identification is not necessary. Ms. Kelley responded that they need identification for their customers, Mr. LaMagna states that the wording is different on other printed messages and presents a copy of their menu. At this point, Ms. Kelley presents several photos of other locations indicating similar graphics to the proposal, and stating that they are trying to standardize all 12 of their company owned locations. Spaeth comments that the "World's Greatest Sandwiches" is a logo phrase, or tag phrase. Qually asks the owner if they would consider locating the phrase on the window or on the door at eye level. The owner said that defeats the purpose. They are trying to make all of their graphics similar. Spaeth questions why they can't locate the "Worlds Greatest Sandwiches" directly under the Jimmy John's logo? Again, the Board reviews the photos of the other locations. Spaeth continents that the other locations should not be a concern of this Board. Greenberg reviews the submitted proposal and motions to limit the size of the "World's Greatest Sandwiches" t ;ttering to 4" high, and reduce the logo by 20 q . Spaeth seconds the motion and it is unanimously approved. (3-0) 7. Mr. Norton O'Meara and Mr. Jack Weiss, past Board members, introduced themselves to the Board. They explained the reason for their appearance being the recent action by the Planning and Development Committee to temporally suspend the annual sign fee and to refund the current fees collected for this year. They requested that the Board appeal to the Planning and Development Committee to retain the annual sign fee. The past Board members were adamant that the Ordinance needed enforcement if the Board was going to contuiue to have meaning. The current Board did not know of these proceedings. The acting chairman Qually asked Carolyn Smith if in the future the S.R.A.B. would could receive copies of P & D meeting minutes when there are any issues pertaining to the Sign Review and Appeals Board. Qually stated that he did agree that adequate enforcement is essential if the Board is to exist at all. Qually asked O'Mera and Weiss how they would recommend proceeding with this issue to the P & D Committee. Weiss indicated that they should give notice that they would like to get the next agenda, and submit a memo to die committee. It was decided that Mr. Weiss would draft the Ing rli :d..M�ki1/1G4ilLMli r�1;Y �.� ,;r.. ;<. Jam'-•'L,.�y, ..{-.• >+ '4", Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - April 20, 1995 Page 4 memo, and work with Qually and the other Board members to finalize it. C. Smith stated that the next P & D Committee meeting is May 8, 1995. C. Smith agreed to fax to Qually the fax numbers of the Board members. Hearing no other business, Acting Chairman Qually motioned adjournment at 9:20 p.m. The next meeting of the S.R,A.B. is scheduled for Thursday, May 18, 1995. Q-1 Carolyn Smith, Assistant Director Community Development cc: J. Wolinski, R. Fahlstrom �,��:*'.r+.j.'..i—n*e�r+*,+' .. 3, .. - - -;, - ,�� �%�. .(. t -i, t } r ��r *ice r�nerey„ �'x �'•� l ;c,�4 r :: Uf � W10 I:10 SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, J[TrIE 15,1995 EVANSTON CCV1C CENTER, ROOM 2404 1l ERS PRESENT: B. Greenberg, A. Spaeth, C. Abrams, J. Sbricker-Gay MEMBERS ABSENT: R. Q alliy STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Norton O'Meara and Jack Weiss, Past Board Members Acting Chairman Qually declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:35 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of April 20,1995. Abrams motioned approval, which was seconded by Spaeth. The minutes were unanimously approved. (4-0) Jack Weiss, past Board member, commented that at the last meeting of the P&D Committee on May 22, 1995, sew somewhat supportive of the Sign Review and Appeals Board (S.R.A.B.) of reinstating the antntal sign fee, but suggested that the S.R.A.B. attend the meeting of 6126/95 prepared with a plan. Mr. Weiss commented that it was his impression from the discussion and the meeting minutes that the complaint of the business community was primarily one of not having had sufficient notification of the invoice. Some discussion ensued regarding the number and nature of the complaints. Norton O'Meara stated that basically, the S.R.A.B. should not engage in a discussion about how many signs and how many complaints constitute a problem, as everyone will have a different position on this matter. O'Meara recommended that the Board emphasize to the P&D Committee that there has been this fee all along in the Ordinance and that it had been neglected to be collected. Also, this fee had been intended to provide something quite important in the form of enforcement, which would create a equal footing for all businesses. It was suggested that the Board author a letter to the P&D Committee emphasizing their points and get it into the packet of information for the meeting of June 26, 1995. C. Smith stated that it should be into the City by Tuesday, June 20, 1995 to assure that it could be included with those packets. The Board discussed the contents and composed the memo at the meeting. Y- - - -- - �-#� � � „ . ,. wn-. f.-,,.F � �� ..,.--•K.�jan-m--nr�.�rr'T-ire,�,'y�rkrt.."1y'�"nprf3�ftT4Sfr°I�6S1'/°Si ,.-�r+,. .r a, .-,� i „ � �r i.�r� �„ •-°ae���"v.w,h x.: -. �. #-'k�'1�Si°ivn€�; .� ,a vS y - %p Review and Appals Board Meeting mutes - June AS, IM Page 2 Hsubg no other business, Chain= Stricker-Gay motioned far adjournment at 8:45 p.m. 1 �- 1 (�.�.1 �� f 11 � � mar .a a ►� �. I � i :! L----- Carolyn Smith, Assistant Director Community Development cc: J. QVofti i, R. Fahlsimm —/ r344�. � =„Y�Yl f�feR3 ii'fl/S •{ ... n 1 1 r� J. • i'F. ra�.,r, �,Y...ri r..allw r I IJLtY �.�rti•Il,�rWur.r�nliArLLuA�a uW�' .. '.:�"�a:;,��`i �;`... • h,•:,• . i : jar "�.. :s:ij-ft ��:I�ii MMS SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD MONDAY, JUNE 269 1995 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2403 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, A. Spaeth, B. Greenberg, R. QuaUy MEMBERS ABSENT: C. Abrams STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: H. Raln, R. Yohanan of First Bank and Trust of Evanston G. Woock of White 'Way Sign Company Chairman Str r-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:50 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes f om the meeting of June 15, 1995. Greenberg motioned approval, which was seconded by Qually. The minutes were unanimously approved. (4-0) No citizens were present. Mr. George Woock of White Way Sign Company presented the proposal. There are two variations requested, 1 for the high wall signage along the west elevation and the other for the freestanding sign at the corner of Benson and Church. Greenberg comments that the purpose.of the high sign location must be to attract people from the El platforms, and yet they already have signage that is along that elevation and visible from the platform that is allowed within the ordinance. Greenberg recommends to the other members of the Board that they reject the proposal for the high signage and for floc freestanding signage as well, commenting that they have too much signage. -+dam—�-...:+►w .. ., .,,i, ,f. ._ r,".,,i.._„kldJ-,_.IiNIF1/il1 °k' - 9 i 1�'������Y7, ♦fir' i .... � _ .._ .. 'J Sign Review and Appeals Board Meetng Minutes - 6/26195 Page 2 Spaeth states that he is in agreement with Greenberg. 'Qually also agrees, stating that there Is just too much signage in the proposal. Mr. Fain questions if there is any other location for the wall signage that would be acceptable? Groenberg's response is 15'-6". Mr. Kain states that this is impossible because of the trees along that elevation. Greenberg says that the trees could be cut down. Mr. Kain responds that they do not wish to cut down those mature trees. Mr. Yohanan reports that they had studied the proposal extensively with White Way Sign Company, and they feel that this is the tidiest solution. Chairman Stricker-Gay suggests that they discuss the corner signage. Strickcr-Gay suggests to the other members of the Board that to the drive -by customer, they do not have any signage visible on Church Stint. This could be perceived as a hardship. Greenberg states that he just doesn't see it. The Board discusses the corner signage and the location concerns. One of the comments made by the board indicates that the reason for the height restrictions relative to the lot line location is based on the safety issue of blocked sight lines for the vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Some discussion takes place with regard to the potential of locating the freestanding sigi?agc further south along Benson. Mr. Yohanan comments that this would not be what they are looking for. Also, there is low wall signage along Benson in the proposal. Spaeth suggests doing a low wall sign at the corner, on the north and west face of the wall. The response was that the lettering wotdd then be too small. They did mockup that passibility, but it is just too small. The discussion reverted back to the high wall signage. Mr. Woock described the wall signage as backlit individual bronze letters and added that this is a very sophisticated, understated appearance. The light level is very low. Chairman Stricker-Gay asked the Board if there were any other comments. Spaeth comments that he can't go for tbi high sign at all, but could live with a low corner wall sign. Qually states that he can understand the request of the applicants, but he could not approve the signage because he does not want to see others sprouting up all over town. Greenberg motions to reject the proposed variations of the wall and freestanding signage. Spaeth A seconds. The motion was passed by a vote of 3-1, with Stricker-Gay voting against. COMMEMCAIXONS The Board briefly discussed the P & D Committee Meeting just prior to this meeting. They would agree to meet with the Chamber of Commerce to discuss the anmtal sign fee, but only at == the next regular meeting. The SRAB Board is not unhappy with the fees as they now stand. So, if the Chamber would like to make any changes, they would not take a special meeting to do so. AN �$'"--YI.t�Y�/ '.a �,_, � u a�1,VFt � ,. ,.41 ,il•. �. I.I�.... ..., �.,, .i ..,JL: YY.f'!�_i11.lY�rt11 14N - - - � _ _ 1 Sip Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - 6126/95 Page 3 Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 8:40 p.m. The next meeting of the S.R.A.B. is scheduled for Thursday, July 20, 1995. Carolyn S t r Community Development - Building Division cc: J. Wolinski, R. Fahlstrom .. 1. ■ ✓. . +Yry W'.M iu r .. a rlay. Yr .Y. • . W...Y.. n . .. *0 - r A MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, JULY 20, 1995 EVANSTON CIMC CENTER, ROOM 2404 NtEMERS PRESENT: B. Greenberg, A. Spaeth, R. Qually, J. Shirker -Guy MEMBERS ABSENT: C. Abrams STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Yohanan and Howard Kaln of First Bank and Trust of Evanston, George Woork of 1M. U to Way Sign, Adam Rod and Jonathon Ferman of the Chamber of Commerce, Al Loeffler representing Burger King, Giovanni Garelli of Tapas Barcelona Chairman Stricker-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of June 26,1995. Greenberg motioned approval, which was seconded by Qually. The minutes were unanimously approved. (4-0) Mr. Robert Yohanan, of First Bards and Trust of Evanston, began his presentation by thanking the members of the Board for agreeing to hear this case again (See SRAB #95-13). He explained that after the last meeting, they went back and considered the Boards comments. The summary memo that went out to the members of the Board with this months meeting addresses some of the concerns. Mr. Yohanan stated that he would like to emphasize that a bank is not a typical retail operation. They are investing a great deal into the community. Mr. Yohanan and partners are investing over $1,000,000.00 into the renovation of this building. The position of this bank is extremely important in the marketplace. The signage is conservative. They have consulted with the executive director of Evmark to ensure that the signage is commiserate with the new downtown revitalization plan. They have looked at the west elevation and, in response to the Boards comments have lowered the signage approximately 4'. There are two reasons that this sign is important. The first is the traffic going down Church Street. The second is for the commuters. It is important because the commuters travel up the north shore, thus extending opportunity for business in the region. $� - 4ICs�th4` pp9� w `fit �ri5��iif�Yr 1. .16 A A. a 1 ... . . . 41 ALLY .11.., JL JA. I. JY. „—imil . Awl ,l&.�. rY iw Sign Review and ApPash Board Mfg Pr lnutm - July 20, 1995 Page 2 As fiat as the corner sign, Mr. Yohamn contimiled, it is critical for us to have parking adjacent to the site. Every space is a premium, both to us and the City. To use a parking space for this sign, when the reasons to move it back do not seem to apply in this location, seems unnecessary, Both he and W. Kaia have spent considerable time reviewing this location and have determined that the location originally proposed is the best and is not jeopardizing safety in any way. Because of the one way traffic on Church, we think there is no line of site that is blocked. Qually questioned why parking is critical, when the City Garage is right next door. Mr. Kain responded that they had checked with the City, and reserved spaces cannot be obtained. If any customer would try to use the garage, without reserved parking, they would most likely need to go up to the 4th floor before they could park, as during the week, most other spaces are taken up with the commuter parking. Mr. Perman of the Evanston Chamber of Commerce, commented that all of the other banks in the downtown area have parking lots adjacent to their banks. These institutions are the direct competition for this new bank. Qually questioned where the employees of the bank will park. Mr. Kain responded that they will all park in the public ,garage. Greenberg commented that he is not interested in changing his opinion in the least, as the applicants did not change their proposal at all. Qually suggested looking at the proposal for the 3 2 issues separately. Qually stated that he understood the rational for the wall signage, but he has a major problem with it based on the fact that what happens next is a domino effect, similar to what Las Vegas looks like, where one sign starts to out do the other. Now the freestanding sign, Qually continued, it should simply be moved back. Stricker-Gay said that one of the reasons that the Board is in existence is to rule on hardship. Quaky responded that if the signage doesn't read from 2 blocks away, that is not a hardship problem. Spaeth commented that he has visited the site and this is a difficult site. Qually stated that the wall sign is an eye sore, and proposed the following compromise: the Board should allow the freestanding sign, but not allow the wall sign to exceed the ordinance. Mr. Yohanan responded that from their standpoint, the wall sign is the most important sign. It doesn't need to set precedence. The ordinance allows us a wall sign. All we are requesting is to allow us to raise it such that it is higher than the trees. At this point, Qually motions to allow the free standing sign to be approved as submitted. This motion is seconded by Spaeth and approved, 3-1 with Greenberg voting against. Qually motions to deny the wall sign proposal, which is seconded by Greenberg. This motion is not approved, -w i.-'• - r �'b1' a 's_ - g�-� --1 � � '.t'�+?, R'"'�t.1�ia •t =?. +�rtili~ry ��i��•��` _ \. 'F ,. -+.._� ."rr is. "�,Cr, , � Zvi ..9tr +�� - ,.fr,� -'�}1i h�.'`, ., "� .:;�i; 1'f �.4rjz�}t� i:�r }.:,sf�3��ti''.+�i"�f,', !F���~ , - t r • ' _'i.'-? " Sigm Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - July 200 I995 Page 3 with a tie vote of 2-2, with Qually and Greenberg voting in favor of denial and Stricter -Gay aW Spaeth voting against. Mr. Yohanan comments that another reason the locate the sign at the height shown in this proposal, is to make use of the existing electrical outlet. 'This indiraus tht!t in the past, a sign had -,: -- been in that location. Qually responded that he doesn't see any hardship, as they now have their proposed corner signage. Stricter -Gay paraphrased Qually from the previous meeting, commenting that the "wall sign acts the same as billboard." Qually continues that there are no free billboards. The charm that is Evanston would not be well served to allow this "billboard" type signage. Stricter -Gay queries the Board to see if there is any acceptablc location for the wall sign? Spaeth would consider a 113 smaller sign and lower mounting height, such that the top of the lettering would align with the top of the building cornice. He added that the lower it is, the smaller it would need to be. Qually questioned how worthwhile of an investment that would be, as the signage would still be costly (Mr. Kain estimated that the wall sign alone would cost some where around $15,000 to install and operate for a year) and would not obtain the maximum benefit. With the motion at a tie of 2-2, the Board could not approve the proposal for wall signage. Mr. Kain and Mr. Yohanan thanked the committee for their time and their reconsideration. Mr. Al Loeffler presents the history of the light hand, and how it came to be installed. It was their presumption that this band was not a sign, thus they did not seek a sign permit. Mr. Loeffler goes on to explain the concept, that of a red band at the top of the building, as being something that Burger King is trying utilize consistently on all of their installations, to become a trademark of sorts. Mr. Loeffler presents some prototype brochures to the Board. Qually comments that during the day, it is only a red band and that is fine, but at night, it is acting as sign. Greenberg disagrees. He states that this is an architectural feature and the brochures over emphasize the light level. Burger King is trying to do the same thing that McDonald's does with the golden arches. Qually responds that this is his point. At night it is definitely advertising. Spaeth states that after driving by the site, it did not appear to be annoying, although it is illuminated rather brightly. Qually states that he does not want to see Evanston look like other strip mall areas and he doesn't view this request as a hardship. {wally motioned to leave the band in place, but require the electricity to be disconnected. This .�` . a- , r,.,,-.+��%a���,�.��C`1�"fr-+�'t��I��S"!.�'il� 1-F�'�i'€s'Ys"��.z'b.� S` -' ''F.:�,'-_ .'',..•,. M1..-y�-.;-%r.�r-•or+„'#!'1"" w ''y�,:fi' fi.:/•.\:i'.t at �s-I.'trl�''"�'�. kf�A,'�^ - .1 - '�.ys•�'il,.tyk Slga Review and Appel Board Meedng minutes - July 209 1995 Page 4 motion was not seconded. Qaally rhea modions to approve the proposal, but at a 50% lower light level. The rod portion and other spillage light must be reduced by 50%. Greenberg seconded and the motion was unanimously approved. (4-0) Mr. Giovanni Garelli, one of the restaurant owners was onhand to present the proposal. He proposed a change for consideration prior to the discussion, that being to revise the color of the lettering of the word "Barcelona" to be yellow to match the word "Tapas". Spaeth expressed concern for the support of the arch. C. Smith commented that the proposal indicated a brace to extend back to the wall of the building. Also, the installation would be inspected. Qually motioned that the modified proposal be approve, so long as the installation would be structurally sound. Spaeth seconded it and the motion was unanimously approved. (4-0) Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned for adjournment at 9:00 P.M. The next meeting of the S.R.A.B. is scheduled for Thursday, September 21, 1995. e--I� Carolyn Smith, Assistant Director Community Development cc: J. Wolinski, R. Fahlstrom M �'_ ,.- ,f�r "knit'+, i .. r'Fu -- � -%!' _._.. � �.- .-r�- - .- ��` - .. - �,.. .. .�..,... ,,� �.- nr.� ��pr�r•-�rT4^'��,h��v, n ... •fi�,'` )= 4-rjr, �004 DRAFT NQj APP 03MU MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 1995 E'VANSTON CMC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: B. Greenberg, A. Spaeth, R. (wally, J. Stacker -Gay MEMBERS AWjFNT: C. Abrams STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: John T. Andras, Andrus Realty Group, Inc. Helen Demir, Flashtric, Inc. Jonathan Sherman, Follett College Bookstore Chairman Stricker-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:33 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of July 20,1995. Greenberg comments that he would like to make amend the minutes. On page 3, the 2nd paragraph should be amended to ' reflect Greenberg's comment at that point (the location of the existing electrical outlet) being "this is not a justifiable reason to Locate a sign in that location". Spaeth motions to approve the minutes as amended, which is seconded by Greenberg. The minutes were unanimously approved. (4-0) a.xA.n, IM-1-1: Annr... KC2111 Group, 113Sa 950 Harvard TpE= Mr. John Andrus presents the proposal for freestanding temporary signage. Chairman Stricker- Gay asks if the Board has any questions. With no questions, Greenberg motions to approve the proposal as submitted. The motion is seconded by Qually and unanimously approved. (4-0) S. .A.B. #95-18: SBX Bookstore, 1733 Sherman Ave Chairman Stricker-Gay asks the applicants to explain their proposal. Ms. Demir reviews the proposal, indicating that SBX is expanding into the space to the north, and they would like to extend their awning to cover the new facade. The goal is to use the same material, and match the graphic by adding more "paw prints", but no new wording. The previous awning was is not an opaque fabric (it is vinyl) but it was approved by the City at the time. Qually questions if the entire awning is illuminated? Mr. Sherman responds that yes, the proposal is for an illuminated awning, and the existing awning is illuminated, The Board discusses their concern,which is to change materials on the awning for only the new portion, F Sign Review anti Appe& bard Meeting Minutes - August 179 199S Page 2 which would comply with the ordinance, but it would not give a uniform appearance. To change the entire awning would result in additional expense. Qually discumcs the recommendation by the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee. The Comn-ducc recommends that the portion of the awning which has the wording "SBX Student Book ]Exchange" be allowed to remain as currently illuminated, but that to either side, including the new portion of the awning, the light level would be reduced by 50%. Greenberg motions to approved the proposal with the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee's recommendation. The motion is seconded by Qually, and it is unanimously approved. (4-0) Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned for adjournment at 5:30 p.m. The next meeting of the S.R.A.B. is scheduled for Thursday, September 219 1995. C--L Carolyn Smith, Assistant Director Community Development cc: J. Wolinsld R. Fahistrom R- mx ,- � p-,Frr � .r �.4,k'sii��'+ti•��w~Mlf'f1"-4r`a* �i�r uA AliL -- AN-J Jimr.u.. „ — .. ..�... . -..—.1 . - , . .. (1'/ ' i •ar�ix"h"ty"(�I3�k�f'�,���1 1i ,t-i-.t'.;=''.: .1� i f SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 219 1995 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: B. Greenberg, A. Spaeth, J. Stricker-Gay MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: C. Abrams. R. Qually C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: George Roman and Jim Volpentesta- Spex Car Wash, Ted Paoulos - Mobile Hi Fi, Tim Anderson - Focus Development Inc., George Marinakis and Aurelio Jaurez - Salsa Borracha Chairman Stricker-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of August 17,1995. Spaeth motions to approve the mimrtes, which is seconded by Greenberg. The minutes Were nnanimpu8ly approved. (3-0) NEWBUSjNESS E S.R.A,B„#95a.9: Focus DevellIpmen1, 1300 Centro SUW Mr. Tun Anderson presented the proposal. C. Smith commented that this signage has been brought to this Board by staff, and there has not been any neighborhood comment. Chairman 3 Stricker-Gay asks if the Board has any questions. Spaeth comments that there should be a 12 month limit to this temporary signage. Greenberg agrees and motions to approve the proposal with a 12 month time limit. The motion is seconded by Spaeth and unanimously approved. (3-0) S R A B. #25-20: Salsa Borracha. 75Q teak^.AM A resident was present to comment that he was concerned that the sole purpose of this hearing was ro to require this restaurant to repaint with more subdued colors. He is in favor of the existing paint scheme. He likes the bright colors, and wishes that more buildings were so brightly colored. Mr. George Marinakis, representing the Salsa Borracha, explains the concept. These signs were dome by'a Mexican artist. There was not a formal plan. The interior also has similar graphics. t Greenberg comments that he is an admirer of Mexican art, and that this restaurant is just north _ of "auto row". These facts don't negate the fact that no permit was obtained. This proposal just lard y,x �� xt vt .. .. �?. r't. �.. •i- � .t��i. ����ar-.af � .n�, .��7t � xs �.{, �': �h� :�' i'.'. �''' � .. �,vf: '� i,� �S. ;^?'1 ,�• k �� .:fit•'. Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - September 21, 199S Page 2 has too many violations. Mr. Marutakis comments that the former owner also had numerous signs on the wails dating back to 1982. Mr. Marinakis indicated that the previous owner had to abate a great deal of graffiti, and it is our opinion that the signage is more pleasing to the eye than the graffiti. Graffiti artists aren't as interested in signage, but a blank wall is enticing. Also, across the street, there are many signs that they are competing with. The new owner is looking for some consideration. Chairman Stricker-Gay proposes that they could eliminate the "Buffet...." signage and the high south facing signage listing the carry -out services. Also, the north facing signage "Mexican Cuisine" and the phone number should be eliminated. Mr. Jaurez commented that this north facing signage is important. There are trees blocking any other potential location for that sign. Greenberg proposes that the south facing signage listing carry -out services be eliminated, and in its place, another logo, only smaller. This would put off any graffiti temptation. But the east facing signage stating "Buffet..." should be eliminated, along with the high north facing signage. The fim standing sign that was refaced could be allowed to stay, as well as the small illuminated north facing sign. The Board agreed that they should come back next month to confirm the agreed upon changes. This was agreed to by the applicant. Mr. George Roman and Mr. Jim Volpentesta of Spex Car Wash presented the proposal. They proposing to take down a large box sign along Dodge Ave. in order to put up these new individual letter signs. The signs are different colors but the same size and type. They are all individual letter type signs. The "Spex" sign will be red, the "Mobil Hi-Fi"sign will be blur and the "Hang Time" sign will be green with an orange ball. The Budget awing will remain the same. They have divided the space, and now have 4 businesses. They all need signage, that is why they have come before the Board. Greenberg comments that without scaled drawings, it is difficult to visualize your proposal. Also, comments Chairman Stricker-Gay, there is something in your proposal regarding south facing signage Mr. Roman clarified that this is not in their proposal at this time. They wish to focus their efforts along Dodge Ave. Chairman Stricker-Gay suggests that the Board define what would be allowed, so that they do not need to reappear before the Board. aJ ' � x .. r,.. ti � ''.I Mw .era ,4•iW h,: ie' wm,' w A luiw4 . i!'I• rt vie + lt3"I'"l: ' +.7, i+1 t'M'wyk"W"I•1-I rsi, Nr t NP'ITIi' C� �., k Ih SLY . 1 i��'1'aW���►7�� I I i r [f�1- ... u .., i��l" - 'L'fL.���pjrl-�1�7�gnt Ri �`Y: f�♦�Y j�J� Sign Review and Appeals Board Mee -dug Minutes - September 21, 1995 Page 3 Greenberg motions to approve the proposal for 1) only the West Elevation, 2) that no sign takes up more space than 113 of the elevation, vertically, and 3) that Mobil Hi-Fi and Hang Time stay as indicated dimensionally. The motion is seconded by Spaeth and unanimously approved. (3-0) [KIN751011INKNO MIN C. Smith discussed the current status of the Annual Sign Fees. Smith reported that at the last meeting of the Committee of the Whole, September 18, 1995, the Committee requested that an ordinance be drafted for City Council approval based on the Staff recommendation for the modifications. The memo from the Sign Review and Appeals Board, drafted by Qually, was received by the Committee of the Whole on the same evening (9118195), thus making it difficult for the Committee to respond. C. Smith stated that the memo will be again distributed to the Committee for the next meeting which will take place on Monday, October 9, 1995. Any Board member who is interested is welcome to attend. C. Smith stated that she will route the copy of the drafted memo to all Board members, including Jack Weiss, at his request, prior to the meeting. ADJO Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned for adjournment at 8:40 p.m. NF'hJr-r'i-kJ G The next meeting of the S.R.A.B. is scheduled for Thursday, October 19, 1995, at 7:30 pm. 1ViTN TES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS HOARD TfiURSDAY, OCTOBI R 19, 1995 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTEII, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, A. Spaeth, B. Greenberg NiENIBERS ABSENT: C. Abrams, R. Qually STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith, R. Fahlstrom OTHERS PRESENT: Aurelio Juurez - Salsa Borracha, Ben Kadlsh, Pat Cuunningltam, John Cunningham - Evanston Athletic Club, Toni Sinclair - Noyes Cultural Arts Center Chairman Stricker-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. and requested a Lotion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of September 21. 1995. Spaeth motioned q approval, which was seconded by Greenberg. The minutes were unanimously approved. (3-0) OLD BUSINESS S.R A. . #95-20: Salsa Borrachn,_750 Chi= Aye Mr. Juarez presents a revision to the south facing sign. The revision presented is not the logo. +- as was previously stated as the Board's recommendation. Mr Juarez explains that the artist is no longer in town. Greenberg comments that there is no shortage of artists around, and any good artist could proportionately reproduce the logo in the adjacent wall space. He suggests to the other Board members that they stick to the original agreement which was to reproduce the,logo. Mr. Juarez asks the Board's permission to keep the existing signage, until such time as he can contract with an artist in order to keep the graffiti off of an otherwise blank wall. Spaeth Tl suggested that would be possible, but only with a time limit. Spaeth suggested 90 days. Greenberg suggested that this is too long. Greenberg motions the graphic logo or a white wall should be in place within 60 days from now. Also, from the previous meeting, the north signage and "Buffet....." signage on the east elevation must be totally eliminated. This motion was seconded by Spaeth and was unanimously approved. (3-0) C. Smith informed the applicant that all the remaining signage must be permitted. <y_Mi lmjrlr6u 1{I�4-i��u4lic+ltl., I r I ' .•. p SIGN REVIEW AND APPEAIS BOARD NIEETLNG NMN1n7ES - 10/19/95 PAGE Z NEW BUSINESS Greenberg comments that after looking at,the proposal in the packet, he thinks that it needs to be redone. Mr. Ben Kadish, partner of the Evanston Athletic Club, responds that he would like the opportunity to at least present the proposal. The other Board members agree the proposal should be presented by the applicant prior to a decision bring reached. Mr. Kadish presents enlarged {Mans indicating the floor area that the building contains. If one were to take that area and spread it out into fist floor retail space in the downtown area, it would result in the equivalent of 15 businesses. The building has 50,000 SF, and including the tower, is 8 stories high. The Evanston Athletic Club (EAQ has land the entire building. Only 4 other buildings in Evanston have this much area. The Evanston Hospital sports medicine/physical therapy clinic is moving from the current first floor location to 3rd floor space, and need to display where they are. There are two other potential tenants, one on the 1st floor, and one on the '2nd floor. The Evanston Athletic Club, when completed will have a swimming pool, 3acuni, basketball court, child care facility, clunbing wall, etc.. All of this is not visible from the street. The architectural elements of the facade are such that they do not allow any opportunity for signage. The project investment is approximately $4.5 million. They are requesting consideration of their proposal in view of these facts. Greenberg comments that the purpose of the Sign Ordinance is to create a certain ambiance. If signage is allowed to be installed that does not conform to the ordinance, more signage that does not conform will proliferate. Spaeth comments that the Evanston Bank and Trust also had a similar request. They also wanted signage higher than the 15'-6" limit. They felt that they needed high identification signage. The Board denied them on the same basis, which is concern for proliferation of such signage. M. r. Kadish responded that based on the existing building elevation, the 15'-6" is not possible to achieve. Isn't the purpose of this Board to make such variations when a particular building cannot accommodate the requirements of the Ordinance? Chairman Stricker-Gay responds that the Board's task is to judge what is reasonable. The suggestion of the Board tonight is that other designs could be presented, such as a smaller sign mounted as close as possible to the Ordinance requirements for height and area. Some discussion took place with regard to the proposed awnings. The Board did indicate that the awnings could be accepted as a part of the Unified Business Center Plan, provided that they met the Ordinance for graphic area. C. Smith pointed out that as illuminated awnings, the white background must be made opaque. such that the graphic is the only portion that is lighted. Mr. Kadish indicated that this could be accomplished, and that they plan to comply with this A �s 1 SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD METING MIN UTES-10119195 PAGE 3 requirement. hriti F i5. S i �y..:T. Further discussion ensued, and the consensus of the Board was that the applicant needed to come back with a proposal that made a further attempt to comply with the Ordinance where possible. Mr. 1Kadish indicated that the EAC will o,pen within a couple of weeks, and would like to know if any decision could be reached prior to the next meeting. The Board agreed that they could meet either the next Thursday night, 10/26/95 or the following Thursday, 11/2/95. The Board suggested that the 2 members that are not present tonight be contacted to see if they could be in attendance for either of these 2 dates. C. Smith agreed that she would contact the others to see what date(s) they could make, and then contact the Boazd and applicant. This was agreeable to the applicant. S.R.A.B. #95-23e Unified Business Cater Jjan. 2M Grw EQintlaa The applicant was not present, but the Board decided to vote on the proposal, since there were no questions by the Board. Greenberg motioned approval of the freestanding sign, which was seconded by Spaeth, and unanimously approved. (3-0). Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 8:30 p.m. NEXT MEETING The next scheduled meeting of the S.R.A.B. is for Thursday, November 16, 1995. 3 Carolyn Smith, Assistant Director Community Development - Building Division cc: J. Wolinski 32 MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 169 1995 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, A. Spaeth, C. Abrams MEMBERS ABSENT: B. Greenberg, R. Qually STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Mary Koberstein, Lord, Bissell and Brook, representing the St. Louis Bread Company Chain= Stricker-Cray declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:35 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of October 19, 1995. Abrams motioned approval, which was seconded by Spaeth. The minutes were unanimously approved. (3-0) Ms. Koberstein presented the modification on behalf of the St. Louis Bread Company. She stated that the St. Louis Bread Company opened in Evanston in September and had planned to put up banners on the existing flag poles. They were surprised to learn that they could not, since the "Linen Store" on the lower level had banners on Sherman Ave.. The St. Louis Bread Company would like to obtain the modification for all the businesses to have an opportunity to use the existing 6 flagpoles. Ms. Koberstein continued that their position is not that they will be adding any additional signage. Since the request is for Manners, it should not be considered that this is the same thing as signage. Banners hang, and blow and furl, and consequently, the face is not often visible. The proposal is for the St. Louis Bread Company logo. If the Sign Board chooses to approve this modification to the Business Center Plan, they could control what is allowed to be put on the banners. The allowable colors for example could also be regulawd. The proposal is for a green fabric to match the existing awning material and color. St. Louis Bread Co. felt that this would be the most harmonious approach. The St. Louis Bread Co. is proposing a 25;6 coverage of the banner, and the use of only a graphic element. H dlh.l "i.y no r, m k A01095MANSLA pAil'i ciY1'y.,r_�visllm� � Alk SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD MEETING MINUTES-11/16/95 PAGE 2 As the current ordinance would allow, the buildutg ownership could decide to install 6 American flags tomorrow. Thus, the idea of flags as an element of this building could not be objectionable. In summary, we are trying to build on what is already there, and we are not adding anything new. The proposal calls for banners that are approximately 4 1/2' x 11 1/2'in size. The St. Louis Dread Co. would agree with whatever the Board would recommend. Chairman Stricker-Gay asked what the proposed distribution of the banners would be. Would the banners all have the St. Louis Bread Co. logo, or would just 2 be installed with that logo? Ms. Koberstein responded that this would entirely be under the control of the Board. Abrams commented that the banners would just be too much. Too commercial. Chairman Stricker-Gay questioned how he felt about the seeing the empty flagpoles? He responded that he really hasn't noticed them. Spaeth commented that Jewel/Osco installed some temporary banners and they fluttered and made noise. These could be a nuisance. Also, height is still a problem. Abrams continued that when there is no other opportunity for signage, such as the Linens store, it makes some sense. With this proposal, the businesses would be starting to invade the streetscape. Spaeth remarked that the height issue is still a problem. There were 2 other nearby businesses that recently had been turned down on a basis of height. Ms. Koberstein responded that she can understand the Boards concem for anything projecting into a public way. But banners are somewhat different. This is not a marquee. There are already 2 such banners. This building will always have the lower level tenant, and keeping the uniformity on existing flagpoles has validity. As for the height issue, we are not referring to a free standing or wail sign. Basically, it is a graphic element only. Chairman Stricker-Gay comments that he thinks that the banners would be an attractive addition. It is boiling down to a matter of taste. Spaeth comments that he has a problem with the logo issue. He states that he could see something not viewed as advertising, such as "Evanston Galleria" . Chairman Stricker-Gay questioned how The St. Louis Bread Co. might feel about providing banners that said "Evanston Galleria"? Ms. Koberstein responded that they do not view this proposal as signage, so she will inquire. Spaeth motioned that the banners could be permitted on all six existing flagpoles. if the graphic was the logo for the "Evanston Galleria", subject to the approval of the Preservation Commission. Abrams seconds this motion and the motion is approved unanimously (3-0) ar�'.cti'-..'='i�'a=- '�'1'.� ."-?4 .i t`1y�'-'�' ,�(:.:',.•,: 1.�,_.:.i,•.'y.,i.;�,•, 1:.�: (!.,..�.i:'.. . iC.'r'r ts•eiil .a . SIGN REVIEW 1NU�'I'F� � BOARD MEETING PAGE 3 AnMMOMM 5tricker-Gay motioned ad}ourament at 8:30 P.M. Hearing no other business, Chairman meeting of the S.R.A•B• is for Thursday, December• 21+ 1�$' The next Carolyn SmitV Assistant Director Community Development - Building Division cc; J. Wolinski i IT41 ri 41 W W i MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, JANUARY 18, 1996 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, A. Spaeth, B. Greenberg, C. Abrams, R. Qua11y None C. Smith Ben Kadish and Pat Cunningham - Evanston Athletic Club Chairman Strickcr-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:35 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of November 16, 1995. Abrams motioned approval, which was seconded by Spaeth. Greenberg abstained, as he did not attend that meeting. The minutes were approved, by a vote of 4-0, with Greenberg abstaining. No citizens were present for comment. Chairman Stricker-Gay opened the discussion by clarifying that everyone shall have the opportunity the express their opinion or present their position. This is true for both Board members and applicants. That being said, the Chair turned the discussion over to the applicant. Mr. Kadish presented the revised scheme to the Board. He stated that in response to the last meeting, they eliminated the north facing wall sign entirely and substantially reduced the size of the west facing wall sign. The wall sign is the same material as the awnings, and is not going to be backlit. It will be illuminated only by the exterior light fixtures, that have already been Ali �y 3i IZA -ZA ==1 �x:.i;r"=,�...w,,.• ;•�nrr+PC*7h�r"1A�tR*',�' t � .,. .., :.+�+�. � , , •.r ._ .,r •n.r „M="A4��,.��.i��i�a �y�, !� ��Fh'M.k!�rr?��1„g�S�vFwiy,r,�Ae��� Sign Review and Appeals Hoard Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 2 installed. Qually commented that the exterior lights of the building illuminate the entire building, making the entire building act like one big sign, like Wrigley Field. Greenberg stated that the exterior lighting scheme is accentuating the architectural features, not creating a sign at all. At this point the Chairman suggested breaking the discussion of the proposal into 2 elements, first the awnings, then the wall sign. This was agreed to by all parties. Mr. Kadish explained that the awnings would be as shown on the drawing submitted. All 6 awnings would be the same, white material depicting the business logos as indicated. The awnings are to be illuminated. The light will only shine through the image, not the remainder of the awning. He is aware of the City's requirement that tlic awning itself not be illuminated. The Chairman queried the Board to see if any member had any comment on the awnings portion of the proposal. Abrams and Spaeth stated that they did not see any problems with the awnings as submitted. Greenberg stated that he does have a problem with the images on the awnings which appear to be larger than the 15 % allowed in the ordinance. They should be required to conform to the ordinance. The awnings should not be allowed to become their signage. The Chairman suggested that if the wall signage approval became a problem, based on an issue of height, maybe the awnings could serve that function. Greenberg comments that their are other opportunities for them to have signage within the height restriction of 15.5'. They could utilize the brick frieze, gust above the awnings. Mr. Kadish responded that the logo will not fit into an area of the dimension. That space is too narrow. Qually stated that he would like to comment on the entire proposal. The wall signage proposed is absolutely unacceptable. It is repetitious. It is a building directory on the side of the building. In any other multi -story building, you go into the lobby and look at the directory to find the particular business. That's just how it works. That is what people expect. If the graphic area of the awnings are over the ordinance requirements, I don't have a problem with that, but the wall signage is unacceptable. Abrams questioned what the tenants in the building are requesting. Mr. Kadish responded that Evanston Hospital Physical Therapy Clinic used to have a 1st Floor location. They have many customers that come in specifically to that space. Also, Evanston Hospital's Cardiac Rehab is going to be located on the 3rd Floor and is expecting some identity. Qually asked Mr. Kadish to y explain the proposed tenants and their locations in the building. Mr. Kadish proceeded to explain the layout of the 6 business. Qually commented that with 6 business and 6 awnings, they should allow 1 awning per business. Mr. Cunningham said that would be impossible, as Merle's Ribs, the 1st Floor tenant on the north side, has a lease which allows them to use 3 of the 6 awnings. This was a lease that was in place when they bought the building. Qually motioned to deny the proposed wall sign, but allow wall signage. to be plated within the ;_,. —. . - _. __ i - n �. ,w�� �� .J m .� .. .. nn --�--h�'rlr m.,. .. mi .�.•nr ii� � it � n, � ON.., wi, Sign Review and Appe4ls Board Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 3 brick frieze above the awnings, and to allow the awnings to be installed as proposed. Abrams seconded the motion. The motion passed by a vote of 3-2, with Spaeth, Abrams and Qually in favor, and Greenberg and Stricker-Gay voting against the motion, Mr. Kadish questioned if they could suggest a counter proposal. This resulted in a lengthy conversation regarding many Evanston businesses and their signage, such as Fresh Fields and Best Buy. Mr. Cunningham questioned how those businesses obtained permission to exceed the ordinance. Abrams responded that it becomes a judgement call that the Board has to make. Qually commented that there are many highrise buildings in Evanston that do not have their buildings directories on the side of their buildings. Greenberg responded that Cunningham is correct in his argument and that he had voted against many of those decisions. Mostly for this very argument - that as soon as one business exceeds the ordinance, they will all want to. That is just what is happening. The other businesses have been allowed their variations for various reasons. Greenberg expressed this has been unfortunate. The Chairman stated that he personally did not find anything offensive about the sign's location, but the design was a problem for him. He did not think that the white sign, of that design, was 3 complementary to the dark building. He inquired if any Board member would consider the possibility of a wall sign of a different design, but in the same proximity. Three of the five members did indicate that they would consider another possibility. The general consensus of the entire Board was that the design should be considerably simpler and look less like a billboard. M The comment of the Board at that point was that the Evanston Athletic Club owners should consult with professional graphic/sign designers who understand their needs, the design aspects of their location, and the Evanston Ordinance. The applicants then thanked the members of the Board for their consideration and their suggestions. COMMUNICATION C. Smith asked the Board for their comments on the copy of the Banner Policy memo distributed y for their input to the Economic Development Committee (EDC). The consensus of the Board was that the "Suggested Banner Criteria" outlined in the memo of 9/26195 is fine. Although. in terms of the design considerations, the size of the banners should be larger, rather than smaller. Some of the banners that have been installed lose their effectiveness when they are too small and _A3 infrequent. This is one case where the Board felt that the more (size and frequency) the better. The Board suggested obtaining a copy the policy from the North Michigan Avenue Association in Chicago, as they felt that those banners did an excellent job of creating the type of "event" that banners are supposed to achieve. it was also mentioned that the banners should have a community based benefit message, as mentioned in the meeting minutes from the EDC meeting of 11/15/95. _ C. Smith stated that these comments will be transmitted to the Committee. . .,. i -nl.. nrrt"-�'nr+rR..Y�'+IAr' 4 •i _ _ fr"'— �• � � _ _ - _ ,Y. Y .t li.'. .Yuji .1.1•; ai .•; :M ` l5 Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - January 18, 1996 Page 4 Nearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 8:55 p.m. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the S.R.A.B. is for Thursday, February 15, 19%. Carolyn Smith, Assistant Director Community Development - Building Division cc: J. Wolinski etltc Ic MIN1X'ES SIGN REVIEW AND AP A/ S BOARD THURSDAY, ,f ARiF-*, 1996 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBER:; PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, A. Spaeth, C. Abrams MEMBERS ABSENT: R. Qually, B. Greenberg STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Bill Petroff, Ancient Mariner Awning Co. and Tim Prell of Papa John's Pizza Chairman Stricker-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:44 p.m. and requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of January 18, 1996. Abrams motioned approval, which was seconded by Spaeth. The minutes were approved, by a vote of 3-0. No citizens were present for comment. Mr. Bill Petroff presented the proposal for an illuminated awning. He explained that the panels are manufactured by 3M and then stretched over a frame. The 36 SF is the standard size for this logo. At this time, for clarification, C. Smith reviewed what has previously been allowed for this Unified Business Center. The original plan, approved in 1988, was for individual channel letters. The current Board commented that things have changed in signage since 1988, and that these awnings seem to be the popular solution. Probably because this is a less costly alternative. Mr. Petroff stated that the request is for the same awning on 2 sides. These awnings project only a minimum amount. One along Clark Street and the other facing Benson Ave.. Chairman y.., •.:�1 t. Y- -- �.s+ � `�. .k; �yf}art,] �'. •r1�f. .1�r. ►��. •���` �r ^ ik,ti; -i; ti�}��i,i l��,� ,+T'.L f� r its • �i - � � r • � % - Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - February 15, 1996 Page 2 Stricker-Gay commented that as he sees these "awnings", they are essentially wall signs made out of awning material. Spaeth commented that the size of the graphic bothers him. The location of this signage will be very prominent. The background material is white and it may be too bright. Abrams questioned what could be done to ensure that the signage would not be too bright? Chairman Stricker-Gay commented that we had this problem of brightness with the red strip around the top of Burger King at Dempster. The solution there was to reduce from 2 lamps to a single lamp. Mr. Petroff suggested that they reduce the lumen output from the 15,000 lumens per lamp proposed to 7,500 lumens per Iamp. Abrams questioned the logo phase included in the proposal. Mr. Petroff suggested that this could be removed. Abrams motions approval of the proposal with the reduced lumen output and the elimination of the logo phrase "delivering the perfect pizza". This motion is seconded by Spaeth and unanimously approved, (3-0) C. Smith distributed a memo from Jack Weiss, a past Board member. The memo calls attention to the City Ordinance regulating signs on the public right-of-way. He then indicated his concern for the proposed "Congratulations NU Wildcats" signs which are to be mounted at the entry points to the City. The Board briefly discussed this memo, although none of the Board members that were present had any comments about the signs in question. ►. 1a1;tli-VAI ►[%VI 101ZY� Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 8:15 p.m. NEXT MEEM& The next meeting of the S.R.A.B. is for Thursday, March 21, 19%. A6A� 3 Carolyn Smi ,Assistant Director = Community Development - Building Division cc: J. Wolinski B. Fahlstrom W iw, 4.n ,, w dAA 6,. . W � . . . d•,, W iI,. d.. I, - 'A WN 1, dVd vhi ... Wi JILI@ 4. MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, MARCH 21, 1996 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: R. Qually, B. Greenberg, A. Spaeth, C. Abrams MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Stxicker-Guy STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith iWA Y ljW'.'K IYI199 OTHERS PRESENT: Dave DeVleeschouwer - White Way Sign Co.(Koenig & Strey), Henon Carson (Lupita's Tacos), David Goetz (Oak Street Market/Whole Foods), David Blair, Vincent Pangle, Brad Winick (Border's Inc.), Chuck Zenn - Olympic Sign (Einstein) MINUTES Acting Chairman Abrams declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:35 p.m. Abrams requested a motion for approval of the minutes from the meeting of February 15, 1996. Spaeth motioned approval, which was seconded by Abrams and approved. No citizens were present for comment at the beginning of the meeting. Glen Hedman, a resident living near the new business "Lupita's Tacos", commented regarding the proposed signage after the vote had taken place regarding that sign. The Board listened and responded to his concerns. (See SRAB # 96-03) Mr. Dave DeVleeschouwer presented the proposal for refacing an existing sign. Qually questioned why Koenig & Strey wants their name below their logo, which also has their name on it? Mr. DeVleeschouwer stated that he didn't know that answer. Abrams stated that he preferred the new sign face, with the smaller version of the logo. Qually reminded the applicant that the white background must have a lower illumination level than the graphic portions of the sign. Mr. DeVleeschouwer stated that he was aware of that requirement, and that would be done. Abrams motioned approval until January 1, 2003, when all lion -conforming signage must come into conformance. Greenberg seconded and the motion was approved, 4-0. - • - - Y - 3-. '-" - �is's e4l "'..�.F' •rA �€ s y4 : i,66.11A9A �iir :l��lYII���I�w�!YKd16Yyl ilki ,. 'y 1+ 0ilk.tk M.. .r.&* , 4,i'w .., ,xi.,Y I. Ll.W�Y.W, .. �T' Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - March 21, 1936 Page 2 S.R A B 6-0 ., s niia's TAws,1122 HMarABIWA The tenant of the property, Mr. Henon Carson, presented the proposal to reface an existing sign. Greenberg began by discussing the wall sign. C. Smith interjected, commenting that the wall sign is not the subject of the appeal. Only the freestanding sign is being appealed. The wall sign was approved by staff, as it conformed with the ordinance. Greenberg claimed that it did not conform to the area allowed in the ordinance, as the gable portions of the roof should be excluded area, This is the area that must have been counted. C. Smith commented that she would look into thlo, but that the freestanding sign is what is being appealed. Greenberg then commented that the freestanding sign issue is the same issue as the previous applicant, who was given approval, Greenberg motioned approval until January 1, 2003, when all non -conforming signage must come Into conformance. Qually seconded and the motion was approved, 4-0. A neighbor in the audience, Glen Hedman, then spoke regarding the large sim of the existing freestanding sign. He stated that although he was glad that Lupita's had moved into that location, he is unhappy about the reuse of the large sign. Mr. Carson commented that the sign will be on a timer, and - turned off when Lupita's is closed. Mr. Hedman stated before Lupita's leased the site, a pawn shop was to have gone in that location. At that time, many of the neighbors turned out in protest of the pawn shop, and one of their issues was the freestanding sign being too large. The Boards 3 response was that the signage is only allowed thru 12/31/2.002, at which time the signage must come into compliance. Mr. Hedman said that this seems reasonable. &R.A.B. #9fi:N: Oahmeet Mar1mil Whole Foods, 1615 Q ve. Mr. Goetz, owner of the business, was present to discuss the proposal. The Board commented that the issue is once again the same as the previous two appeals. Spaeth motioned approval until January 1, 2W3, when all non -conforming signage must come into conformance. Quaky seconded and the motion was approved, 4-0. Greenberg began the discussion regarding the sign that is existing (previously approved) on the Off ington Ave. side of the building. He stated that this is a "Miesian design", and the placement of the signage. blocks an architectural feature of the building. The architectural feature is the window spandrel panel. In a Mies van der Rohe design, glass and steel are the design elements. C. Smith commented that this was approved by her, and as a licensed architect, she would disagree that this signage blocks a significant feature. C. Smith continued that the brick on either side of the elevation forms a mass, and in between that mass is inf]led with glass and panels. In between the mass of brick would be an acceptable location for signage. Greenberg commented that the signage extends above the glass and from the inside, the back of the lettering is visible. This should not have been allowed. He stated that he would like to have his protest recorded in the minutes, and that in the future, stall should baring such decisions to tine Board for approval. Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - March 21, 1996 Page 3 Quaky then asked that the discussion be moved to the signage that was the subject of the appeal. David Blair, the architect for the tenant work, stated that this is a building with 2 principal facades. As Orrington Ave. is a one way street going north, Border's needs some visual identity on the south side of their building. There are several other businesses along the street there, but this is the first commercial property. The commercial nature of that side of Orrington is unknown. Greenberg comments that if you kook to the north from the intersection of Davis and Orrington, you must be past the corner before you would even see their building, because of the location of the bank building to the south. At that point, you will be able to spot the previously approved sign on Orrington Ave. Mr. Pangle comments that the bank building is currently adding steps to the plaza to allow access at that point. The plaza is at a higher elevation that the surrounding sidewalk, necessitating the higher signage. Qually questioned how the steps could interfere with a sign. The response from the applicants was that with the adjacent public plaza being utilized as an outdoor seating area, it is possible that the tables with umbrellas could interfere with signage at the ordinance height. The Board disagreed, claiming that there would still be ample opportunity for compliance with the ordinance. Mr. Blair added that the architectural composition of the south elevation lends itself to the higher location, as the lower brick area is narrow. Greenberg mentioned that this is a a good point, but that is assuming that the signage must be as large as is currently shown. If you z modify the signage to be proportionate with the space that it would be occupying, it could be done in an architecturally pleasing manner. Qually added that if you bring the signage down to the ordinance required height, it must be reduced to fit in the brick area, or else bring up the topic that was previously raised regarding blocking an architectural feature. Qually stated that lie is familiar with and understands the needs of the retailer. The proposal for a sign at that location strikes him as being a billboard, leading to the possibility of what he terms the "Las Vegas Syndrome"(each sign being larger than the adjacent). This approach is inappropriate for Evanston, particularly in the downtown area. Spaeth commented that he had ' driven by the site just before the meeting, and Border's already the most commanding signage on - that street. Greenberg reiterated that their argument is not valid for a height variation, as one must be past the corner anyway. Greenberg motioned to deny the signage based on inadequate evidence of a hardship. The motion was seconded by Spaeth, and passed on a vote of 3-1. y Mr. Chuck Zenn, was available to answer questions regarding the appeal, representing Einstein Bros. Bagels. Greenberg opened the discussion by questioning if the graphic indicated for the awning is a logo. Mr. Zenn responded that although it has been installed on other locations in a ALMA, � A��,. 'F4" i.1%r!7 Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - March 21, 1996 Page 4 the area, it is not a logo for the company. On that basis, the Board decided that this graphic should be viewed as artwork, and not signage. Greenberg motioned that the graphic should be allowed as submitted, as it is artwork. Qually seconded, and the motioned was approved, 4-0. Hearing no other business, Acting Chairman Abrams motioned adjournment at 8:35 p.m. The next meeting of gal S.R.A.B. is for Thursday, April 18, 1995. -C Carolyn mlth, Assistant Director Community Development - Building Division cc: J. Wolinski B. Fahlstrom In ARWYM SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THMDAY, APRIL 189 1996 EVAN9TO1q CMC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, B. Greenberg, A. Spaeth, C. Abrams MEMBERS ABSENT: R. Qually STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas Wilson and Michael Rogers, McDonald's Corporation David Friedman, Stir Fire Grill Chairman Stricker-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m.. Spaeth motioned for approval of the minutes from the meeting of March 21, 1996. The motion was seconded by Abrams and unanimously approved. SIT 7KEN COMAWM No citizens were present for comment. S.R B # k:-0 - McDonWd's, 1219-25.Demp&t Street Mr. Thomas Wilson, representing McDonald's Corporation, began the presentation for variation by introducing the architect for the Playplace project, Mike Rogers, as well as the operations and store manager for the Dempster store. Mr. Wilson began by outlining all requested variations, as indicated on the application. Mr. Wilson pointed out the overall site signage amount indicated has changed from the original application based on the revision of the side wall arches signage, which reduced the overall number somewhat. Mr. Wilson emphases that with the existing free standing signage, the proposal will not change the streetscape. That signage is being relocated as it currently exists. Greenberg questioned why the proposal for the free standing sign relocates the signage to the east of the site, where the driveway visibility could be a problem, and another variation is required. Mr. Rogers responded that the west part of the site was looked at, but there is an existing tree that is on the neighbors property that could potentially block the visibility of the signage. Mr. LA q- W Yol• . ..1 Y. .i Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - April 18, 1996 Page 2 Greenberg responded that in the proposed location, the Kentucky Fried Chicken freestanding sign would prohibit visibility of the McDonald's sign. Also, Mr. Greenberg continued, with regard to the location of the "Playplace" signage, you have basically designed the problem into the building by placing the band of stucco material at a height which exceeds our ordinance. Abrams declared that he agrees with Greenberg. Mr. Rogers responded that all of the "Playplace" elevations have the band of stucco material at that height. It was not done with any intent to exceed Evanston's ordinance. Chairman Stricker-Gay comments that there are other McDonald's locations that have much smaller signage, such as the McDonald's at Willow Road and PCmgsten Road. 'thus, all McDonald's signage is not handled the same way. There is obviously some room for variation. Mr. Wilson responds to the issues that Greenberg raised. He stated that the stretch of Dempster is visually cluttered, but the free-standing sign rises up above die clutter. And that as far as designing the problem into the addition, the design of the Playplace is done from the interior out. The Playplace additions are 19 feet high to accommodate the play equipment inside. The Zoning Board of Appeals that approved the location of the addition did not see the signage on the addition. Greenberg motioned to move the existing freestanding sign to the west, and deny the rest of the variations requested. Spaeth seconded, but the motion did not pass, as the vote was 2-2. Spaeth commented that he has a problem with the proposed height. Some discussion ensued regarding the placement of the wall signage. Abrams motioned that the "Playplace" wall signage be lowered to the middle band of stucco material, and that the proposed side wall mounted arches be relocated to either side of the "Playplace" sign on the middle band of stucco. In addition, the existing freestanding sign be allowed to be relocated as is to the southwest corner of the site. The total lot area for these new signs and the other existing signs will be allowed. This approval Is until January 1, 20-03, when all non -conforming signage must come into conformance. This motion was seconded by Greenberg and unanimously passed, 4-0. Mr. David Friedman, owner of the Stir Fire Grill, was present to answer any questions with regard to the variation. The only variation requested is from the "Existing Unified Center Plan". Greenberg questions, as the rest of the Unified Plan has fallen apart, and this proposal meets the sign ordinance, does anyone have any objections to approving the proposal? As no objections were raised, Greenberg motioned approval, which was seconded by Abrams and approved, 4-0. """' S,!r �..� �, w cry`Yr7"FM+'ETC.''���1�'fr't*'r�•'R"t+crt"'4XlRf7�'• .+r• ,v T1fipnr-nr.*"�^'•'�erq+'�•tCrI.H••i...'.. ,� ..,, ,+r.., ••, DrT��„� . �t'a,*-r. +Y r ON y f ry e.ri Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - April 18, 1996 Page 3 As several of the businesses in this building have recently applied for a variation from the existing Unified Business Center plan, which was approved almost 10 years ago, the Board requested that staff provide the history of what has been approved for this site. The purpose of this synopsig would be to invzstigate the possibility of removing the requirement that this property have a Unified Business Center Plan. C. Smith stated that she will provide the Board with that information. Hearing no other business, Acting Chairman Abrams motioned adjournment at 8:35 p.m. The next meetin of the S.R.A,B. is for Thursday, May 160 1996. Carolyn Smith, Assistant 61rector Community Development - Building Division cc: J. Wolinski B. Fahlstrom d, .,W11 WOW W. n .+u W UI. uu W, .w w .G INI�YNIM itl. 001"W i6 . III&".1WuY Draft Not Approved • MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD THURSDAY JUNE 27,1996 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Stricker Gay, B. Greenberg, A.Spaeth MEMBERS ABSENT: R.Qually STAFF PRESENT: R. Fahlstrom OTHERS PRESENT: J. Robertson and Bob Clauss. (Park Evanston) Branson Edwards and Jencl Sulzberger(Hollywood Videos) Chris Maylone (Kaehler luggage) Acting Chairman J. Stricker-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:35 p.m. noting that there were no citizens present for citizen comment. NF.W BUSI 163.9 CHICAGQ AVEM E, Mr. Robinson of Trcacy Marketing and Mr. Clauss of The Buck Company presented their proposal for temporary signs for the construction canopies along Chicago Avenue and Church Street. The plan as presented, includes one 8' x 24' construction sign (3) 8"x 4" smaller leasing signs and five logo signs at approximately sq. Feet each. Mr. Robertson stated that the signs were carefully designed to be aesthetically pleasing. Greenberg noted that this proposal was similar to signs used by other developers in that there are way too many items of information, and that these items are too small to be seen by passing ' motorists or by most pedestrians. Greenberg proposes that all the items of information be allowed, but that the signs be reduced in size to meet the maximums established by the Sign ordinance. Greenberg notes that the Harry Wecse sign used at the corner is an effective sign which conforms to the sign ordinance. B. Clauss notes that these signs will utilize quality materials. Greenberg states that the Sign Ordinance does not regulate materials for a construction sign. Greenberg says the main issue is regarding these signs is 'size'. Greenberg motions to allow the proposed signs to keep all items of information but they must be reduced in size to meet the maximum sizes stipulated in the Sign Ordinance. A. Spaeth seconds the motion and a vote is taken. The motion fails 2 to l with Stricker Gay voting against it. iLLk.�.y✓,.. ... a� as S.R.A.B. Meeting blinu.ts June 271996 Page 2 Stricker-Gay notes that there is room for flexibility regarding these signs. Greenberg disagrees, states that these signs will be up for a year and that the signs will be a traffic distraction. J. Robertson states that his client could not accept such small construction signs. Greenberg notes that if the signs were reduced in size that he wouldn't object to there being more of them . Greenberg says the small logo signs are not the issue it is the size of the leasing and construction signs that makes them obnoxious. Greenberg suggests that the large construction sign be split into 2 signs. J, Robertson says that the only deletion or change his client would accept would be to omit the architectural rendering. A discussion follows on the pros and cons of splitting the sign. Stricker-Gay notes that the Sign Ordinance only stipulates a maximum size for construction signs for `unpermitted signs' if the signs were conventional wall signs, given the frontage of the canopies that these signs could be much larger. B. Fahlstrom notes that the maximum allowable sign size for a'Permitted" wall sign is 200 square, beet. A general discussion follows regarding the total amount of sign area being proposed for this project and staff s number of 296 Sq. ft. total area for the project is checked and confirmed. Greenberg states that if The Board could look at the proposed signs not as construction signs, but as wall signs, that he could accept the proposed signage as there seems to be latitude in the Ordinance for this interpretation. Greenberg motions for acceptance of the sign proposal as presented. The motion passes 3 to 0. B.Edwards from Hollywood Videos presents their proposal for "dryvit" sign band/canopy with illuminated channel letter signs proposed for he north, south and west facades of this new band. B. Edwards and B. Fahlstrom explain the history of this proposal and the issues surrounding the existing concrete ledge which overhangs the city sidewalk at the western facade of the building. The proposed canopy/fascia will cover this ledge. B. Edwards explains that Hollywood Video will seek a licensure agreement with the City for this new fascia if the Sign board proposal for the `dryvit' fascia and related signs. y Greenberg states that in his judgement, the fascia is clearly a canopy and he would accept the canopy, and proposed western and southern signs. He would not accept the northern sign. Greenberg cautions that Chicago Avenue is a signage mess and that the proposed northern sign isn't needed. B. Edwards explains Hollywood Video's need for signage that can compete with `Blockbuster Video to the north. Greenberg notes that he views the Board's allowing Blockbuster to receive a variance was a "mistake" and he doesn't want to repeat this mistake again. Spaeth stated that his problem was not with the proposed northern sign, but rather with the southern sign which would be clearly seen from the branch library and neighboring apartment buildings. . xi L. diJ.ti,dnfy,. -P ..dA, ,i.. uwl!ELI -A-t4l.9ilbE-osFri:rr - S.R.A.B. Meeting minutes June 27 Page 3 B. Edwards says that he is flexible and would like to propose a `deal'. B. Edwards would reduce the proposed southern sign (to which he is entitled by Code) to a freestanding 4' -0' High x 10'-0' long sign this would constitute a reduction in sign are of 50% as well as lowering the sign height to only 4' - 0" above ground. In return, the Sign Board would grant him the proposed northern wall sign. A general discussion ensues concerning this proposal. Stricker-Gay and Spaeth feel the proposal is worth accepting. Greenberg disagrees. Greenberg states that he will retract his acceptance of the proposed fascia as a'canopy' if Hollywood Video continues to demand the northern sign. Greenberg states that he wants to the record to show his opposition to the continued degradation of Chicago Avenue with excess signage. Stricker-Gay and Spaeth note that Hollywood Video's is entitled to the southern sign without compromising as they have offered to do, and that The Board was reaching an impasse with the applicant. I. Sulzberger (from Sarrfatty Architects) pointed out that Hollywood videos is going to provide many new site amenities including planting, potted plants, a metal railing separating the sidewalk from the parking area as well as new screening for the existing unsightly rooftop HVAC units These improvements are going to upgrade the appearance of the building from a car dealership into a more appealing general retail appearance . A brief discussion takes place concerning the single source of access to the parking lot from Chicago avenue. Greenberg states that if Hollywood Videos is truly going to provide all of these visual improvements, and given that Chicago Avenue is the sole source of site automobile access he will go along with a motion to approve the modified sign proposal with the 4'-0" high monument sign at the southern side and a wail sign for the northern facade. A. Spaeth moves to accept the modified compromise solution allowing the low monument sign at the southern side of the site and permitting the proposed wall sign for the north facade. The motion is seconded and passes 3 to 0. Chris Maylone of Mike Signs' makes his presentation for a non illuminated wall sign of individual letters for the newly renovated storefront of Kaehler Luggage at 1415 Sherman. Mr. Maylone states that the design of the letters is truly in keeping with the character of the I uilding's facade. Greenberg states that he likes the graphic quality of the sign but that he would prefer to see the design as lettering on the buildings canvas awnings. C. Maylone notes that canvas awnings with the lettering would appear to be somewhat less permanent and that although budget constraints will not allow the letters to be full 3 dimensional gold leaf on wood letters, every effort will be made to make the plastic letters selected for the project look this way. wa ,. ..�.0 ,.., ibJ.... '. •,.t:.,,., , . « � � • i� t r' • ,.7. y jT �. tic( {�� ! ati , �;; 1 �s ✓ �iL' .L -.��'M. 1`i sM�. �I 4 es:-.�. a � ��r r ti�`.'Es .'" i,4 1• S.RA.B.Meeting Minutes June 27,1996 Page A Spaeth notes that this particular building site is remote from major thoroughfares so the likelihood of public criticism is reduced. Striker -Gay states that the design of this sign would appear to be exactly what the framers of the Sign Ordinance would want with the exception of the sign's mounting height. Greenberg and Spaeth agree that the sign design is very appropriate for this building. Spaeth motion for acceptance of this variation proposal and the motion passes 3 to 0. There being no other business, the meeting adjourns at 9.00 P.M. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the S.R.A.B. is scheduled for Thursday, July 18,1996. obert Fahlstrom. - Coordinating Inspector I Wolinski, C. Smith V v': DRAFT - NOT APPROVED MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEAL BOARD THURSDAY JULY 18,1996 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Stricker Gay, B. Greenberg, A. Spaeth, R. Qually STAFF PRESENT; R. Fahlstrom OTHERS PRESENT: Judy Berg - Private Citizen Jack Freeman - Northwestern University George Woock - White Way Sign Company Acting Chairman Stricker Gay declared a quorum and called the meeting to order at 7:35P.M.. The Chairman asked for a vote of approval for the meeting minutes of June 27, 1996. The minutes were approved unanimously. Chairman Stricker Gay then asked if there was any citizen comment. Judy Berg replied that she was present only to observe the meeting not to make any comments. NEW BUSINESS Mr. George Woock of White Way Signs then began his presentation to the Board. Using a presentation board with color photographs, Mr. Woock explained that the intention of the proposal was to re -face the existing northeast scoreboard and to shift its location by one support pylon towards the east. Mr. Woock explained that this was required so that the scoreboard could be clearly seen away from the new I story building that Northwestern university was going to build in the end zone. Mr. Woock further explained that this scorcboard is only visible from one small location on Central Street and that shifting the scoreboard location would make the scoreboard even less visible. A.Spneth asked if it was McGaw flail that was being expanded. R. Fahistrom explained the Scope of proposed renovation work for Dyche Stadium and that the building in the end zone would be a l story locker room facility. B. Greenberg asked if there were any Zoning problems i with this proposal. R. Falilstrom stated that The Zoning Division did not see a problem with relocating the scoreboard by one support to the cast but, a Special Use Variance would most likely be required from The Zoning Board of Appeals for the proposed Wildcat sign box which would be placed on top of the scoreboard. 'v : 7'y�f;t�'7YhtlF,7 S.R.A.B. Meeting July 18,1996 Page 2 A general discussion followed concerning the proposed Wildcat Logo. G. Woock noted that the scoreboard itself would not change size, and that the Wildcat Logo Box Sign was the only proposed addition. G,Woock also added that the Logo Box Sign would only be illuminated and visible from the stadium side and that the scoreboard and logo would have blank backs. R. Qually asked about the movable copy portion of the scoreboard. G. Woock explained the Tri Vision portions of the scoreboard. At this time B. Greenberg made a motion to accept the proposal as shown. R. Fahlstrom asked G. Woock to explain the proposed box sign below the southwest scoreboard. G. Woock explained the proposed box sign below the southwest scoreboard and a brief general discussion followed in which G. Woock explained that this proposal for the scoreboard would be smaller than the first proposal shown on the submittal. B. Greenberg again motioned for acceptance of the proposal with the provision that Sign Board Approval of the proposed Wildcat sign box is =biect to the opproval of all anoiicable Zoning Boards. R. Qually seconds, and the motion passed unanimously. Chairman Stricker Gay discussed the proposal by Staff that a fax would be sent by City Staff to each member of the S.R.A.B. Board prior to the monthly meeting to determine if that member would be attending the meeting. The board members would sign the fax and re -fax it back to the city to indicate whether or not they could attend the meeting. B. Greenberg noted that if city Staff did not receive a fax in return, it would alert them that there might be a potential attendance problem which, B. Greenberg noted, would eliminate the rounds of `phone tag'. Chairman Stricker Gay motioned for approval and the motion passed unanimously. There being no other business before the Board Chairman Stricker Gay motioned for adjournment at 8:00 P.M. The next meeting of the Sign Review and Appeals Board is scheduled for: August l S1. 9 , r� t t Robert Fahlstrom - Coordinating Inspector Building division 1101 - - �fi•', x 5•,`�1n "'M'''1i ^•:{far105diaA##" ;t"-4-J!* AA-,k--A144 1, � �.J-w�:..."..b�..�l Y� °.� .rwwyi�i ��.YL�M. _ _ .4 �. W. .., ..rly wy•ri •Y JwY Y ,WI .Y • � ��4 Ya .mow .Y J.I, sYY.� _ u�.,.,�. MINUTES SIGN REVEEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, AUGUST 15, 1996 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER,, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, B. Greenberg, A. Spaeth, R. Qually MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Chuck Alden - Grate Signs,Inc. for 1st Chicago, Bill Benson - Kinko's, Jim Meyers - Meyers + Co., Andy Koglln - Koglin Wilson Architects for Crown Books, Tom Judd - La Madelelne, Ann Hunzinger - Evanston Awning Chairman Stricker-Gay declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m.. Greenberg motioned for approval of the minutes from the meeting of July 18, 1996. The motion was seconded by Qually and unanimously approved, 4-0. No citizens were present for comment. M-All i ZOIT Fl U 1 y 1 T'jI Mr. Alden presented the proposal to reface the existing freestanding monument sign. Qually confirmed with Mr. Alden that the size of the sign box will not change. Greenberg motioned approval as submitted, which was seconded by Qually, and unanimously approved, 4-0. Dill Benson and Jim Meyers were present to answer any questions regarding their proposal. They a 1 1_6 aA iLa n. W. .c.. I-L 11. H. .,A--I.,W.r Sign Review and Appeals Board August 15, 1995 Page Z stated that their current freestanding sign is basically invisible. Greenberg commented that the current sign is red, and as you can see by the photos that were submitted, It is visible. Qually asked why Kinko's is moving from their location in downtown Evanston. Mr, Benson responded that this space is larger. Qually commented that the type of signage that is being proposed is exactly why the ordinance is in effect. This is northwest Evanston, not Las Vegas, continued Qually. Mr. Benson inquired about the adjacent pole sign that is on the Koenig and Strey property. Greenberg responded that this was a variation to reface their existing sign box. Mr. Meyers commented that the current height, is not above the top of a car. He believes that the freestanding sign needs to be raised at least above the tops of cars. Spaeth commented that because of the traffic lights (at Lincoln Street and Central Street), frequently he has been stopped by traffic directly in front of the center and sign. Greenberg comments that it is almost visible above any car, and stated that this is evident in the submitted photos. Greenberg stated that nothing said by the applicants thus far has convinced him of a hardship. Greenberg suggested that the Board follow the recommendation of the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee, and deny the proposed pole sign, but allow the revisions necessary to modify the existing monument sign with the new tenant. With that comment, Greenberg motioned dental, but woWd recommend approval of the refacing of the existing monument sign to allow signage for the new tenant. This motion was seconded by Qually and unanimously approved, 4-0. Andy Koglin, or Koglin Wilson Architects, presented the proposal. Qually commented that both the wall sign and the logo are very tastefully done and motioned to approve both as submitted. This motion was seconded by Greenberg, and unanimously approved, 4-0. Ann Hunzinger of Evanston Awning and Tom Judd of La Madeleine, presented the proposal. Spaeth questioned the extension of the awning to Y-O". The response was to protect cafe customers. Greenberg stated that this extension would be further than the other storefront awnings on Sherman and Orrington. Ms. Hunzinger explained that the graphic logo size is the same on all of the awnings. Greenberg commented that the graphics are attractive. Greenberg motioned to approve all of the graphics, but not the extension of the awnings. This was seconded by Qually, and unanimously approved, 4-0. ADIOIJRN lillti.. i., .. •�:.�.• i.a •. I r/..w H.u.91 _ n.A.,, a•.:a.,wi.JiR I'h].Li�lmnerl.. ���'Ai'slsil�L►, l�7rx14i�i .idttllitfllliVNw� +7L/i4ti��i�l t` A Sign Review and Appeals Board August IS, 1996 Page 3 �.�[��.1�4�1'.j•4ti'��1 •' V� to{�},pJn'd!',�5.4�1-({' � .1� i1•: ILti'.iil?�i�" 4Z:^4t5-.I -si 1'iri 77. Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 8:20 p.m. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the S,R.A.B. is for Thursday, September 19, 1996 n � Carolyn Smith, Assistant Director Community Development - Building Division cc: J. Wolinski D. Fahlstrom 2:.7'•t:';s:}t t.Il=.. . .... Y/` 41 ...JA .. � �-R` fop--�'� ! �4 k -j �ii y, al�E�t- � a . • � •. . . .. •Y-+ `fit f. �,if�� Lr114` MINUTES 1 ES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 1996 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: B. Greenberg, A. Spaeth, R. Qually MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Stricker-Gay STAFF PRESENT: _ C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Stone - Flat Top Grill, Joe Cheney - North Shore Sign, Matt Doherty - St. Nicholas Church, Paul Boomsma - 817 Forest, Scott Kruger - Koenig/Strey (SBR), Richard Carter - 2212 Greenbay Road, Stuart Sabath - Evanston Subaru, Tim Anderson - Focus Development Acting Chairman Greenberg declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m.. Qually motioned for approval of the minutes from the meeting of August 15, 1996. The motion was seconded by Spaeth and unanimously approved, 3-0. No citizens were present for continent. Architect Robert Stone presented the proposal to add red "flames" to the top of the Flat Top's existing sign. They originally tried to fit the "flames" portion of the sign inside the sign panel on the building, but then the words would be too small. Greenberg commented that all the other signage fits within the sign panels, and the argument that Mr. Stone presents is not an overriding reason to change. Qually adds that this would upstage the other businesses. Also, Qually continues, you have your "logo" eight times across the windows. Qually questions if this is a • t .r ..rr. ��•a�rt',RY"rw '�zz • .�.rir, 'f�..�,nf.� wRzl Y`�r5: ..53� � Jr;•Wi:.s �F�, ttt may. � ti f'"•t7 i� i` ' ..� i !r`+C,..l.. !. �j. '='•.. frw..r� s.:.![vf :,i::. l ;..r_,�h.. �i`,��1.4..A x:z,a.3.1_u:.".:�3,. '.a -. �7 ,.ir44H :. i,. s_'�. .. r' � .if`. /fq. h i''?jf �"it f :`,;i r" ti. 3 .. a'a_,.:_� ..-.� z�.. _,z:�,::r':3Y i.l •'`fir F'{st,_..;�$k ;•e"�,.'.1 Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - September 19, 19% Page 2 franchise. Mr. Stone responds no, The Flat Top has another store in Chicago, and they are looking for recognition. Spaeth continents, in this location, the height restriction is critical and also mentions that the choice of color (blue) of the word "grill" is not legible. Greenberg motioned to deny the proposal, which was seconded by Qually, and unarrlmously approved, 3-0. Matt Doherty, a graphic designer representing St. Nicholas presented the proposal to -have 12' high temporary banners in front of St. Nicholas Church for a period of up . to . two years, throughout their capital campaign. The banners are proposed to be erected on an existing flag pole. Greenberg questioned the 12' height. Mr. Doherty responded that this is the height that he felt would look proportionate given the size and height of the church. Greenberg commented that the banners are too big. After a couple months, people will no longer notice, and these will be up for 2 years. Qually comments that he has no problem with thr proposal. Qually motioned approval of the proposal. This motion was seconded by Spaeth and unanimously approved, 3-0. Tim Anderson presented the proposal for a temporary freestanding real estate sign. Greenberg commented that we should allow the signage in order to help this project get underway. The other Board members commented that we have allowed similar temporary signage in the past. Greenberg motioned approval of the proposal, which was seconded by Qually and unanimously approved, 3-0. Paul Boomsma and Scott Kruger presented the proposal for a temporary free-standing sign for the condominium conversion of a 25 unit courtyard building. As the original proposal called for a double face sign, they are now proposing a single face sign, in light of the fact that the street is a one-way street. Greenberg questioned if the size could be reduced. Scott Kruger responded that they are proposing to use a 4' x 8' sheet of plywood. This is the minimum size to get all of the information necessary on the sign. Spaeth commented that there seems to be too many items of information on the sign. Greenberg stated that the Sign Ordinance does not sufficiently address real estate signs and the information being proposed is important. Mr. Boomsma commented that 68% of buyers surveyed buy based on signage. Qually stated that he doesn't have a problem with the size or the information. Qually motioned to approve the single sip proposal, with the sire r' a,,9• r'n 1• a., 4••�_9l Sign Review and Appe& Board Meeting Minutes - September 19, 19% Page 3 and information indicated. This motion was seconded by Spaeth, and unanimously approved, 3-0. Richard Carter, owner of the Car 'Nash, presented his proposal for wall signage on the north side of the property. Mr. Carter explained his treed for the signage is economic hardship, as he does not have viability of his operation due to the configuration of Greenbay Road, with the railroad embankment across the street. The submittal does not represent the exact signage (typeface, color, etc.), and the board discusses this. Greenberg motions to approve the concept, and. have - the City review the exact sipage color, etc. Spaeth seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved. Stuart Sabath of Evanston Subaru presented the proposal for the changes to the existing wall signs. Mr. Sabath stated that the reason for the change is that there has been a change in ownership of the dealership. Qually asked if Sims (previous owner) is out of business. Mr. Sabath responded yes. Evanston Subaru is proposing the same materials and colors be used in the name change. Greenberg motioned approval. This was seconded by Qually, and unanimously approved, 3-0. Paul Boomsma and Scott Kruger presented the proposal for a temporary free-standing sign for the condominium conversion of a 25 unit courtyard building. The Board discussed the same items as the previous (S.R.A.B. #96-23) proposal. Spaeth motions approval. This was seconded by Greenberg, and unanimously approved, 3-0. C. Smith cautioned that the applicant cannot erect any signage until all notification requirements have been satisfied. Hearing no other business, Acting Chairman Greenberg motioned adjournment at 8:20 p.m. .__j -- -- ' .'#` h - � .. nn . - - �—ni— t r��gnrin7-n'".-lAF� , .. n o, y� �• w� I f�� in �i7.rl� - d • L'dI W. YI •+4. 1 .1 W. +1, ih N. JU a J n Sign Review and A►ppeais Board Meeting Minutes - September 19, 1996 Page 4 m The next meeting of the S.R.A.B, is scheduled for Thursday. October 17, 1996. (The October meeting was suh tly cancelled. The next meeting is scheduled for Thursday, November 14r,�9�•) A Carolyn Smith, Assistant Director Community Development - Building Division cc: 1. Wolinski B. Fahlstrom g ��t:a- � if -1 r: �:;irt�i�i..iu`s+F:-,4 .-»-..,-,�..,�.�„s-.r...•,t,.F'"w?��,, n'. ,_.'._Ji- MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THURSUAY, NOVEMBER 14, 1996 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, C. Thomas, M. Larson MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: A. Spaeth, R. Qually C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Dave Pilz - Consolidated Sign (Osco Drug), Chris Maylone - Mike Signs, Tom Rosxak - Focus development, Dan Constance - Central Reese Service, Gordon Magill - Moffet Realty, Richard Alf - Architect for 1512-22 Sherman Chairman declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m.. The meeting minutes of September 19, 1996 were unanimously approved, 3-0. No citizens were present for comment, Chairman Stricker-Gay began by questioning if the proposed sign has already been installed. The response from Chris Maylone, of Mike's Signs, was yes, this sign has already been installed. Mr. Maylone stated that he has received some favorable comments. Larson added that he noticed another real estate sign on the property. Mr. Maylone confirmed that there was a smaller (2, x Y) sign that is a typical, exempt real estate sales sign. Larson motioned to approve the proposal only until August 1, 1997. This motion was seconded by Thomas, and unanimously approved, 3-0. ,S.R.A.B. #96-28:Jewel lOsco, 3333 Central Street, 3 Mr. Dave Pilz presented the proposed illuminated wall sign. The size, type face and color is the n •! �'� it • ; T "� • ,G '-r� ' ��:�f �J?i•�y j� y £: # iqfP �. �j:: yi •�'� z �`, S is *�fi_ .. Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - November 14, 1996 Page 2 same as the existing "Jewel/Oscu" signage, The proposed sign will also be individual channel letters, with a bronze return, to match the existing. The reason for the variation is based on the existing canopy that prevents the signage from being mounted within the ordinance height. Thomas commented that this does appear to be a hardship, and motions approval of the proposal. Larson seconded and the motion was unanimously approved, 3-0. Mr. Tom Rozsak presented the temporary sign and stated that it is already in place based on an error in communication with his sign company. When they (Focus Development) received their approval at the last meeting for the residential real estate, the sign company erected both signs. Chairman Stricker-Gay stated that although he had no problem with the need for a temporary sign, he would like to see the time duration limited to a maximum of 12 months. Thomas motioned to approve the temporary sign until November 1, 1997. This motion was seconded by Larson, and unanimously approved, 3-0. Mr. Dan Constance presented his proposal. Chairman Stricker-Gay commented that based on the configuration of the site, there is no location for a free standing sign within the ordinance. Thomas commented that the existing location does not appear to be a traffic problem. Stricker- Gay states that the height is not excessive. Larson questions if the words "Mobil Oil" are going to appear anywhere else on the sign or site. Mr. Constance responded no. Larson motioned approval until January 1, 2003. This motion was seconded by Thomas, and unanimously approved, 3-0. Mr. Maylone, of Mike's Signs presented a sample of the sign material, which is a painted wood. Chairman Stricker-Gay comments that it seems a tasteful solution. Kaehler has a definite disadvantage as there is no sidewalk across the street, thus limiting the opportunity for any visibility. As the proposed sign would face the Emmuel Lutheran Church parking lot, Thomas asks if the church has seen the proposal. Mr. Maylone responds that they have seen it. Chairman Stricker-Gay remarks that since the notice has been posted, and nobody has come to comment, we can assume that no one has any issue with the sign. Thomas motioned approval. This was seconded by Larson, and unanimously approved, 3-0. Y I JAY Ylo IY..I. i. . ui Ai - JYi. Ji IA IL .Y i Wi .ln A,, Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - November 14, 1996 Page 3 Mr. Gordon Magill and Mr. Richard Alf present the proposal for terra cotta colored canvas sign bands, with white I V silk screened uppercase letters. The sign above Peggy Robinson Jewelry is the only proposed illuminated (exterior illumination) sign. Chairman Stricker-Gay comments that the single illuminated sign does not allow for a "unified" look. Thomas commented that he doesn't think that any illumination is necessary. The display windows provide a nice amount of illumination, and focus the attention on the display, not the signage. Mr. Gordon responded that he didn't know how Peggy (Robinson) would respond. Illumination is a tradition with her. I think she feels that it is very important. The other storefronts are not open late, and if they were made to conform, would have light on their signs, but not be open. Stricker-Gay mentions that if this were not a Unified Plan, it would not come before this board, as it meets all aspects of the Ordinance, although there is a matter of consistency. Larson mentions that the background and the lettering will give the unified appearance. Larson motions approval of the plan as submitted. This was seconded by Thomas, and unanlmously approved, 3-0. Hearing, no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 8:33 p.m. The next meeting of the S.R.A.B. is for Thursday, December 12, 1996. Carolyn Smith, Assistant Director Community Development - Building Division cc: J. Wolinski B. Fahlstrom •Y ++�ui a yiu Jlli + u ..y i ,. ••�0 NO , F1't MINUTES SIGN REVIEW AND APPEALS BOARD THMDAY, DECEMBER 12, 1996 EVANSTON CIVIC CENTER, ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Stricker-Gay, C. Thomas, M. Larson, A. Spaeth MEMBERS ABSENT: R. Qually STAFF PRESENT: C. Smith OTHERS PRESENT: Ann M. Cunniff - Palliative Care Center (North Shore Hospice) James Meyers - Evanston North Plaza HIMUES Chairman declared a quorum and opened the meeting at 7:30 p.m.. The meeting minutes of November 14, 1996 were unanimously approved, 4-0. cTrMEN COMMENT No citizens were present for comment. NEW RUSMffM &R.A. 126-33: 1Hlospieg of the North Show,, 2821 Central Street Ms. Ann Cunniff, Director of Communications for the Palliative Care Center, explained the need for the proposed signage. She gave a brief history of how the Center came to be located in the building. The Center has been very sensitive to the appearance of the building and their landscaping. They would not propose something that was garish. The Center is a non for profit health care facility, which is unique in the health care industry. it is important, she continued, that the Community understand that they offer Home Care. The Center does not advertise and they must compete with hard core ad programs of large institutions, such as Advocate Health Care, to promote our home care program. Larson questioned if they will also change the signage on the front of the building. Ms. Cunniff responded no. The wording on that sign "...of the North Shore" has enormous equity for them, and they plan to retain it. Their intent is to indicate that they offer both, Hospice and Home Care programs. Spaeth comments that the signage looks attractive. Thomas motioned to approve the proposal as submitted. This motion was seconded by Larson, and unanimously approved, 4-0. �.f.u;1'�„= �•�.:. ���� ��• � � �h 7"���F � -C � 7-�i �. � x`.i`-��'� _ 1 a.�_t r� �_ _ "� ;S �_r''f �S -,,.� �, "Y'�-. �- r �R� f � r` _ srS Yw.W Yli 4w. .Yi JL ■.� JY. .wi n+ . IY a i�..1.0. Sign Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - December 12, 1996 Page 2 k-AXI"I f I%J 1 1 I. liti (. 1 L f1 Mr. Meyers presented the proposal to relocate an existing illuminated wall sign. Mr. Meyers explained that the last time he presented a proposal before the Sign Review and Appeals Board on behalf of Kinko's, the Board rejected the proposal. The previous proposal was extreme, but at the time, Mr. Meyers was in negotiations with Kinko's, and they felt strongly about the opportunity to bring traffic in from Greenbay Road. Since the original Unified Business Center plan was approved, traffic on Greenbay Road has increased its speed considerably. It has been difficult for a small retail center to survive. Thomas commented that he is surprised that they have managed at all. Mr. Meyers stated that recently, the haven't done vcry well. Chairman Stricker-Gay questioned if Mr. Meyers has had any discussion with the property to the south, Phoenix Design. Mr. Meyers said that this is the second time within four months that a notice regarding the sign appeal has been posted on the sitc. and the owner of that property has not made any contact with Mr. Meyers, nor has he come to the meetings. Mr. Meyers suggested at this time that he would be willing to lower the sign, such that it would be in conformance with the height requirement of 15.5'. The Board questioned if the sign would overhang the property line. Mr. Meyers responded that the wall is quite. close to the property line, and that he would agree to recess it, if reed b.. There was some conccrn regarding confusion with the existing freestanding "Phoenix Design" sign. The Board discussed the possibility of people being confused about which parking lot would belong to Kinko's. Mr. Meyers responded that the background color of the relocated sign will match the previously approved signage (blue background) that belongs with the center, this would minimize any confusion. After some discussion regarding this issue, Spaeth motions approval of the proposal, providing the height will not exceed 15'41, the signage will be Hersh (recessed In the wall), and the color/lettering will be as submitted, matching the previously approved monument sign face. Larson seconded and the motion was unanimously approved, 3-0. Hearing no other business, Chairman Stricker-Gay motioned adjournment at 8:00 p.m. SIgu Review and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes - December 12, 19% Page The next meeting of the S.R.A.B. is for Thursday, January 9, 1997. ('This, meeting was subsequently cancelled. IMe next Mewny h fgr Thursday. Mmaa 13, 1997.) a caarolgn Smith, want Director Community Development - Building Division cc: J. Wolinski B. Fahlstrom pis+ T ...,..ysy.� 2;4� � yr,,,� it ��rq��_ 4 :f ,'•?;_;��,,"��Al%`r � r `ifs .a ; fir= hr ir�'� �* rY'�ink :`ai"l+S \=1, r2 i ,1I? •f' ��•t N.% Z y�� ri-,.• st{ 5 .:;r �i�.,Fa •6�'Io .. - •.Jn .y t.,� -'� 1. .. .. �'�1'�3�',S.i r�r COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 11, 1995 ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, R. Walczak, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, D. Rasmussen OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz The staff report was approved without comment. R �11•tl 1 11 • 1' Mr. Strosberg, developer, was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. J. Wolfensperger stated that the Committee had previously approved the building materials and colors. C. Smith reiterated that she does not think the norman size brick is appropriate for this building at this location. D. Ceplecha reviewed the landscaping plan. C. Smith reminded Mr. Strosberg that a separate permit is required for the canopy. The Committee unanimously voted to grant final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes and regulations. Mr. Joe Heffelmire, contractor for Office Depot, was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. He explained the proposed facade changes. The Committee suggested that the proposed bolards located in the middle of the walk be relocated to the north edge of the walk. D. Jennings asked that the area indicated as customer loading be eliminated from the plans. After much discussion, the Committee suggested the following revisions: 1) Where brick in#ill is indicated, replace with spandrel glass (color to be approved by the Committee), 2) Infili the former east entry with split face CMU to match adjacent storefronts, 3) west of the new entry, cut in new spandrel glass store �a.,a-i �,-_•��.i������"�a��'rn't7�1-`.���C6�.�.'.i�r.�sil'�,L�rL��'r��'cmtlfi�c�,Elia�� is""C��,�'a�t.�xT�:'r_`'[r'�`ra* � 1 rs� _,= . �. .• r'-1�(�`�'�^'^r• Wd ' Soy �' c r; _ _ 7 t��i'F:�. - „� t -� yv~•�!J:f�t '-�5.:��} .t';; ° " t�� ''fir '' - � � - - - � - front to match east elevation and extend it to the western double doors, 4) use split face CMU for the western double doors, and 5) change parapet roof line to continue the rhythm of the existing recesses. The Committee also suggested that the interior security gates, which are visible from the exterior, be eliminated. C. Smith reminded Mr. Heffelmire that a separate permit is required for the signage and in this case, an amendment to the Unified Business Center Sign plan will be required. Mr. Heffelmire agreed to make the revisions suggested by the Committee. He continued by saying that color and material samples will be submitted at a later date. The Committee voted to grant final approval, subject to the recommended changes, compliance with all other codes and regulations and submittal and approval of the color and material samples. RnicWo fens ger .� Zonin Planner Da � :•= a*l f. �.�IuLARI.,i '1a�,4.w�.i�r3+u7Lk',iitCt,�4. - •'�i,..Lia....ar COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 19, 1995 ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski • MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz idan Preliminary and Final Review gf D. Rasmussen explained that ZBA had granted a side yard variation for the chimneys. The Committee unanimously voted to grant preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. 300 3 SPAARC_-94-0136 1816 Dempster Street Final Review Qf Colgr and Joe Heffelmire, contractor for Home Depot, was present to discuss the proposed color and material samples. He explained that the area behind the sign will be "manor white" dryvit with a bright white trim. The brick infill and split face concrete block will match the existing shopping material. Mr. Heffelmire explained that the spandrel glass will be bronze in color. The Committee voted to grant final approval, subject to compliance with all codes. a ; AARC 94-Q139 1745 Sherman Avenue Sign Variation Bequest for Santa fe Chicken C. Smith presented the Committee with plans for signage at Santa fe Chicken. She explained that the signage was installed without a permit and it exceeds .3: ���°l� ! � � .'a _ __ — _ it �A - - -_ `r �_��_.. - -s -,- r:r •'1_ 3f=.1 - ►,rs.�e�s�i�:�wrs r YY . _ Ili .r :AI .1 the maximum number of items of information and has a nontranslucent background. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to recommend the approval of the variation for the number of items of information. The Committee also recommended that the issue regarding the nontranslucent background and the brightness of the sign be addressed by the Sign Review and Appeals Board. I,CJ 5lanice Wolf nsperger ' Zoning Planner 'l/- e9 ate< A "rem, ay.. xl-�,3' - - sw•' SE ,�_ - �,� .k�' - ��� - , � { � t1 1 s �., --,� `� , ,G r=-4s�,�^., �� ,}t.^�,�h,._- a , ��;- 1 yi��yy �� x; t!•-'R^:,•a . I--v'ry. ,, .. ,.- ...- �5 �- -.-�:F �a .. . •.�i�M� .. COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 25, 1995 ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus SpAARQ 94-0141 2828 Harr son Street. Review Staff Reporter ZBA The staff report was unanimously approved. St. FranCia- Hospital Mr. Peter Oster was present on behalf of St. Francis Hospital. He presented the Committee with a site plan, aerial photographs and elevation drawing. Mr. Oster explained that the Hospital would like to inf ill a light well with a one-story addition at the second floor level. He stated that this addition would not be visible from Ridge Avenue. Mr. Oster continued by saying that the Hospital is also proposing construction of several exterior elevators and a small addition to the west side of the Professional Building, underneath the cantilevered portion of the building. D. Rasmussen stated that ZBA and Council approval for a special hospital use will be required. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. cpeeRC 93-0082 2500 idae Avenue Concept Review of Pr000sedRgxised Parkina Area -Design far The COS Building Mr. James Murray and Ms. Cooney were present on behalf of The COS owners. D. Rasmussen reminded the Committee that concept approval had previously been granted, but a revision has been made to the plan. Mr. Murray explained that the loading berth has been moved two parking spaces to the south, on the west side of the building to ensure adequate maneuvering area. Mr. Murray presented the Committee with a list of plant materials for the landscaping plan. J. Tonkinson reminded Mr. Murray and Ms. Cooney that a plat to vacate existing easements and a new plat to dedicate new easements is required D. Jennings reminded Mr. Murray that existing and proposed handicap parking stalls need to meet the requirements. Mr. Murray stated that the property owners are aware of the need to seek Zoning relief from previous conditions. AN h6 46 Ai He (continued by saying that they have met with the alderman of the ward and the neighbors. The Committee voted to grant revised concept approval. Mr. Jay Collier was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. He explained that he would like to construct a one-story "Butler" building to be used for storage. D. Rasmussen stated that the proposal complies with Zoning requirements. J. Tonkinson asked Mr. Collier to indicate on the plans where the proposed curb cuts will be located. D. Jennings asked *. Collier to include a loading berth in his next plans. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval. 0 e Wolf sperger PInIc oning Pla er Da e COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 1, 1995 ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, J. Olus D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello OTHER STAFF PRESENT: A. Halford C. Smith presented the Committee with plans for the proposed awnings and signage. She explained that numerous sections of the Sign Ordinance are in conflict with this proposal, including the allowable area for signage, projection of the awning from the building, number of items of information and advertising. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to recommend disapproval, based on a lack of hardship. C. Smith presented the Committee with plans for a proposed awning for Lulu's Restaurant. She explained that the awning contains too many items of information and the signage on the awning exceeds the allowable area. the Committee discussed the number of items of information and concluded that many of the items are design features. The Committee voted to recommend approval, subject to the telephone numbers being removed, C. Smith presented the Committee with plans to reface an existing nonconforming free-standing sign for Quick Stop Food Mart. She explained that the sign is nonconforming with regard to height and setback. In response to a question from a Committee member, C. Smith stated that the existing sign was damaged by a vehicle and is in need of repair. The Committee voted to recommend approval, subject to the sign being removed by the year 2003. q"r rn • - �"i r�Pr.�aIi�:'�ii#i�Iki�C,ff•�iifc�le�lmwir�ei�ra,:a: are%�..,ur..y:.._. .- - , � ..� ]'�.5. :'tJ,'/j � }a`�� ,ii��ivlia�•'�'ti•�,,�� Y:��'��-r{�I.e;:: f�! �' v � r - ,� �' ,e ti -•�' y i' '' °�+.t i � jCv�l�S�F`5'�tt S;t, v.;'•,1..,.• Avenue E L- �&w o T b ^ aa,cta far an �na�rtmant Midi ng p3s�i�ose ; �a�c9D� The Committee reviewed plans for a proposed location of the compactor and Committee had many questions regarding circulation in the alley. The Committee voted to hold this item over to February 8, 1995. anice o fensper r Zoning Planner WSAV Qate - _- - �. .. -,a..." Cdc1tF ���, `.i�iT ...4 JYs. �� �-��.y5 _.-..C.vt �7-- _-. ..�da.=�z.•�:.la L�:�'��i .Y� /i�_Ki_.�1,�.. yy,i J.. " :•� JI.' _ 15. 1'R' v i. :' I Lip ���, R�e�'�'3-�r.�,�yJt� yr. �F._ ;,�•. .�y,a } ,,7 �' e4 � 3f ; i r IY r COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 6, 1995 Third Floor Conference Room MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, K. Kelly, C. Smith, J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: R. Fahlstrom Fred Hoyt was present on behalf of Home Depot. D. Marino explained that, as part of the negotiations with the neighbors, Home Depot agreed to install a gate at the northeast drive to control truck traffic. Mr. Hoyt presented that Committee with plans for a six foot high, aluminum gate that would not be locked. The Committee reviewed the plans and suggested that the gate height be reduced to four to five feet and be constructed or painted in earth tone colors. The Committee also suggested that the gate be moved further back to the west so landscaping can be installed to screen the gate. The Committee voted unanimously to grant conceptual approval, subject to the suggestions noted above and compliance with all applicable codes. c4olsperger Zoning Planner Da e COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 15, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. CepEecha, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, J. Wolfensperger, OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz ' 1 i ■ Ill l ''1,71 11 1�* 1• Don Barry was present to discuss the location and operation of a proposed trash compactor with staff. He discussed the operation, safety features and scavenger service pick up with the Committee. Following discussion, a motion was passed to grant preliminary and final approval to this proposal without comment on the functionality of the installation. The Committee met with Tim Anderson of Focus Development Group and Gregory J. De Stefano of De Stefano Partners, regarding their proposal to demolish an existing N. U. dormitory building and erect, in its place, a 34 dwelling unit condominium building. Mr. Anderson explained that the building would have underground parking and that they will revise their request so the only variation that would be necessary would be that of lot area. Mr. Anderson advised that 34 dwelling units were necessary, since asbestos removal was figured at approximately $200,000 and demolition at approximately $150,000. Staff noted that, under the Zoning Ordinance, the number of dwelling units would be limited to a maximum of 24, unless a planned unit development was applied for, in which case, the total dwelling units would be limited to 30. Following further discussion, a motion was passed to approve the concept of demolishing the existing dormitory building and constructing, in its place, a condominium building. s'' � , J .. t� 1�, � � �i�i7 '1�� 1blT+rr Sjre,'F�hi•{fi Yi.f� 1 -' '�r �1��7't hip �I � �. ,.. •s,. r. �'kxi5x ,S,F.{,_°:' SPeARC 94-0142 900 Afthum Avenu low sign Variation D. Ceplecha recused himself from participation in this case, due to a possible conflict of interest. Following discussion, a motion was passed to recommend approval of the modifications to the existing sign to the Sign Review and Appeals Board. • t : 1 - -me C. Smith advised the Committee that the applicant was proposing to recover an existing awning ;which was nonconforming with respect to the Sign Ordinance. Following discussion, a motion was passed to recommend approval of this request to the Sign Review and Appeals Board. The Committee reviewed the proposal for a variation to permit two wall signs to exceed the height limitation. Following discussion, a motion was passed to recommend that the Sign Review and Appeals Board approve this request. The Committee reviewed the proposal to reface an existing, nonconforming wall sign and recover an existing awning. Following discussion, a motion was passed to recommend that the Sign Review and Appeals Board approve the refacing of the existing wall sign and permit the recovering of the awning, with the exception that the lettering on said awning be reduced to comply with the Sign Ordinance. David N. Rasmussen Assistant Zoning Director Date COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 22, 1995 Room 2404 i (MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, D. Marino, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinskl OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz C. Ruiz Stated that the proposed subdivision contains a landmark building. He stated that the Preservation Commission has approved the three lot subdivision and will have purview over any structures that are constructed on the lots. The Committee unanimously voted to grant conceptual, preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. a +� ►1 • 1 1 1 l E M!• 1 Mr. Daniel Hohmeier and Kurt Hezner, architects, were present on behalf of Northwestern University. D. Rasmussen stated that the ATM will be located on private property on a private street. Mr. Hezner explained that the graphics have not yet been picked. C. Smith reminded Mr. Hezner and Mr. Hohmeier that a separate sign permit will be required. Mr. Hohmeier stated that the prefabricated metal machine will probably be beige in color. The Committee voted to grant conceptual, preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. Reverend Michael Curry, Christine Neal and Cyril Power were present to discuss this project with the Committee. D. Rasmussen stated that the plans are in compliance with those approved by the ZBA and City Council. In response to questions from the Committee, Reverend Curry stated that the existing d COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 1, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Aiello, D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Glus The staff report was approved without comment. D. Rasmussen informed the Committee that the rehab had been completed without a building permit. The Committee reviewed the plans and determined that not enough information was provided. The Committee voted to hold this item over until additional information can be gathered. Wayne Swafford, Gil Ualfendy, Tom Hoieper and Clayton Weaver were present to discuss this project with the Committee. They explained the improvements to be made to the Matra Station including the following: Rehab of the existing structures, new canopies (style yet to be determined), new stairs, a handicap ramp, two new shelters, landscaping and new lighting. The Committee urged the representatives to work with the City to tie in the proposed landscaping and elevation improvements along Green Bay Road with the City's Green Bay Road improvement Plan. J. Tonkinson said that they have been meeting with the Director of Public Works. D. Rasmussen encouraged landscaping on the Poplar Street side. The Committee and Matra representatives discussed the location of the stairs at the corner of Green Bay Road and Central Street. Mr. Weaver :a�i_.d. f / ..� ski na�ea'rf.-ieu���*f7i�.=-=ar��r��'� .��..._.o.....,��..r ..:ate.. «......_�_��---_ —�_. .. - ..- ----•- .. _ � - '- - .., - .' - - t=, .ice sold that thay will try to located the stairs as far north as possible. J. ►, Tonklnson suggested a rail along a portion of Green Bay Road to discourage podectrians from crossing outside of the crosswalks. The Committee unanimously voted to grant conceptual approval. PI WMM- #I= - qr7 -AQ2110, Date . ;.i. 41 .�. x 't���t7_.� i.���s i• - •�. 'tf!';•�' '"` y:' K _ c;.�i �. COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March S, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz SPAARC 94-0155 2645 Asbury Avenue Review S1qff ggg Re The staff report was approved without comment. AARC 4-0156 2.609 Harrison Street ReviAw Staff Report on for Variation The staff report was unanimously approve without change. S A $C 93-005 2532 As urg Avenue Prpfflminary. Review of Proposed Multi-f mliy Dwel ipg and Review Qf Staff Report to 7RA D. Rasmussen explained that Mr. Anderson is unable to attend and asked that this item be held over to March 15, 1995. The Committee approve the staff report and voted to hold this item over to March 15, 1995. SPAR C 94-0154 309 Howard Street Goncelit.-Prelim nary -and Final Review of Proppged Facade RehahilftatjQn Ms. Lee, property owner, was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. She explained that a car accident had caused damage to the building facade, Ms. Lee stated that her contractor, Far East Construction, was hired and she was not aware that a building permit had not been issued, C. Smith stated that the repairs are consistent with the existing improvements. Ms. Lee stated that there is handicap access to the building. The Committee voted to grant conceptual, preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes and regulations. Ptn4iceltWlfens r err Date 2 Ai •�5.7 11� �H.r iIIDH7/1• ft t COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 15, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, n. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus OTHER STAFF PRESENT: E. Tresch The staff report was approved without comment. a l e • � 1 : l 1 i s j• � j C , • 1 - • 1 �• i i 1 ! • 1 R a: C. Smith presented the Committee with plans for Koenig and Strey to reface an existing free-standing, nonconforming sign. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to recommend approval, subject to the amortization provisions of the Sign Ordinance. 11 . r11 S M 1' Tim Anderson and Greg Destafano were present to discuss this project with the Committee. D. Rasmussen stated that a lot area variation is required. He also requested elevation drawings of the south and west faces of the building. Mr. Anderson said a landscaping plan is being developed. He continued by saying that the building is brick on all elevations and the banding will be either brick or limestone. The seals will be brick and they will use steel lentles above the windows. The lobby will be approximately a 1 /2 story below grade with parking below grade. Mr. Anderson said that he is meeting the alderman of the ward and the neighbors later this month. Mr. Destafano expalined that the surfaced parking area will be located in the rear yard. D. Jennings stated that the column locations in the garage need to be reviewed. He continued by saying that some of the turning radius' are tight. D. Jennings suggested that they be relocated further back in to the stall. Mr. Anderson advised that it `.,;.ra,.,e4,t,ruE€rrw�,.�il�wraSrw�N,i13•al�,%¢,ui,eiiiru;al3,�.11Y,�,�?YiY1,hi',F 'rr.fa.Mlhdl` . � Y.,,. ,, ,�i i .. r JIaLY�•�W�-=J�r� �_�i..n..Y.Y•-,` . �pI'�! +��� ' :•Y�i' •�� ti -_ � .6 iF4 � �43 'fir r 'T �`yY >, riri�y}' �• 'Ri i,t 'ii .::�-(FAr, 3- t l'__9Y, .i,wYulr 11.1 1111 .0 Y�i AY. LLr 'i r. rrrryu Y. Y 4% would be very expensive to reloacted the columns. In response to a question from K. Kelly, Mr. Anderson and Mr. Destefano said that the building will be sprinklered. D. Rasmussen suggested that this project be brought back to the Committee at the preliminary stage when more detail is available. The Committee voted to grant preliminary approval, subject to resubmittal of more detailed plans after the Zoning Board of Appeals` hearing. nice Wolfenspelger Date { LI �, „ -av r' �N��+s;Y i'P�, ���-�.'SS.•'�= '. y4ry... ,i f A'}�,�Cj`,f`,.� .�' • { � S ."?< COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 22, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Aiello, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. y Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiediin, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: D. Ceplecha, J. Glus OTHER STAFF PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, E.Tresch SPAARC 95:QQQ1 624 Clark street Concept/Preliminary and Final Review of Stair and Porrh Structure at NorthWgalgrn Univwhy D. Rasmussen stated that the proposed replacement structure is in compliance with Code. The Committee unanimously voted to grant conceptual, preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all codes and regulations. D. Rasmussen presented to Committee with the proposed subdivision and stated that major variations will be required. The Committee reviewed the proposal and voted 'to grant conceptual and preliminary approval, subject to ZBA approval of the required variations. SPAARC 95-0003 2201-2203 Eoster Street Cgoreptual Review of Proposed New Church Eric Eriksson, architect, was present on behalf of Friendship Baptist Church. He explained that the Church would like to demolish their existing structure and a two -flat owned by the Church, and construct a new building. The new building would be constructed with brick and would have a metal roof. A mezzanine level would be included in the sanctuary. D. Rasmussen stated that a special use for a church located in a Residential Zoning District is required. He suggested that a landscaping plan be developed for the ZBA hearing. E. Eriksson explained that parking would be sublet from the City on property owned by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District. J. Tonkinson stated that his parking area must be properly drained. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. ' lilii4dd � �!JMrYu a i iLlII Lk, q i . k i ., n LI w• , ' M' 1 SP� AARG 94-01 ;34 1203.31.5- Dodo Ave= CM - - - IndliRanden FMc11ity F k Larry Bullock, Larry Parkman, Pastor Wade and Marvin Walker were present to , discuss this proposal with the Committee. D. Rasmussen reminded the k Committee that this proposal was previously before the Committee in December. At that time, the use was approved, but the design was not. He continued by saying that, since that time, revisions to the plans have been made. Pastor Wade began by summarizing the need for this type of facility. Mr. Parkman explained that design revision had been made, based on comments received at a neighborhood meeting. He continued by stating that one story had been removed and the building spread out, The proposed building would contain 76 units which was originally proposed and would be five stories in height. The Committee reviewed the variations necessary to construct the proposed building. D. Rasmussen stated that a special use is also required. Mr. Parkman explained that the required parking, loading berth and dumpster are located along the alley. In response to the neighborhood meeting, an 8 foot high, wooden fence would be constructed along the alley and an a portion of the north property line to buffer the parking and refuse areas. D. Rasmussen stated that a fence variation would also be required. D. Jennings suggested that the radius on the loading berth be reviewed. Mr. Parkman stated that, in addition to the 76 units, a separate exercise room, arts and crafts room and community room are proposed. The average unit size is approximately 550 square feet. Mr. Parkman stated that the first floor would be constructed of split face block with earthtone brick on the remaining floors. The window sills would be stone. C. Smith suggested that the front facade along Dodge Avenue be broken up by alternating the facade design. Much discussion ensued regarding the scale, bulk and density of the proposal. Mr. Bullock and Pastor Wade explained that the number of units was suggested and approved by HUD. The Committee and representatives of Ebenezer African Methodist Episcopal Church discussed the density, bulk and design issues at length. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. nice Woifensp�rger Dllte COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 29, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Aiello, D. Ceplecha, J. Glus, , K. Grossman, D. Jennings, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: K. Kelly, B. Wiedlin OTHER STAFF PRESENT: M. Guttman The staff report was approved. 3jp Ag 95- 006 1701 Howard Street CQcept Review Of Pro osod TM - gory Adr� Minn to Automgbilg Repair Establishment D. Rasmussen explained that the architect phoned to say that he will be unable to attend this meeting. The Committee voted to remove this item from the agenda, pending scheduling by the architect or the property owner. RAMP 95-0004 630 Forest Avenue Reyieml Staff Report to ZBA go M1139t Madatign The Committee voted to approve the staff report. Patrick Fitzgerald, architect, was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. He explained that the proposed duplex would be built on a parcel of land located between a manufacturing use and residential use. The proposed building would have standard size brick on the first floor and siding on the remaining floors, Mr. Fitzgerald explained that the these materials will provide a transition between the existing uses. A four -car, detached garage would be located at the rear of the property. In response to a question from C. Smith, �a: :` f - w'.3 � awe, � ., . -r i,< ��..-� ,� � ��i�, ���-i.�i'r1 ., , ,- �fi t. ,} ,� F, `,� � ..:M .,.., t .- „+- : m�,r rfr�-.,�.,,ff . ,.,m+..:r,x-•'•i-n•----K»= r • • • • . W 1u ra ir. a T f Mr. Fitzgerald stated that limestone sills would be used on the windows. D. Rasmussen stated that this project will require major variations from the side yard, yard obstruction and floor area ratio provisions of the Zoning Ordinance/ The Committee voted unanimously to grant conceptual approval. f anice Wolfensper r Zoning Planner Date !y.`-,•; _ '„ i!'i i�3.' 'r+4... _a. i;��F' Ni: ..w.''��1�!,�i�'-1�1�F� ' COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 12, 1995 ' Room 2404 F MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, J. Glus, , D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. y Rasmussen, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin , J. ; ,• Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski 4 . MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, K. Grossman, D. Marino, C. Smith j : 1 Mr. Tony Booth, future owner and operator of the trroposed hand car wash and detail shop, was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. He explained that he would like to purchase this property and demolish the northernmost building. Two of the four existing curb cuts would be e�minated. J. Tonkinson stated that the curbs and sidewalks need to be restored to match existing improvements. D. Jennings suggested a right -turn -only onto Green Bay Road. Mr. Booth stated that the brick building would be sandblasted, cleared up and landscaping would be installed around the perimeter of the lot. D. Ceplecha suggested that ground cover be used in the landscaped areas around the trees. D. Rasmussen reminded Mr. Booth that the decorative walls cannot exceed 30 inches within 20 feet of the curb line. D. Rasmussen also stated that a special use and a plat of consolidation are required. Mr. Booth stated that the underground tanks were removed from the property in 1972. J. Wolinski suggested to Mr. Booth that he review the Sign Ordinance. J. Tonkinson explained that drainage structures are needed and a permit from the Metropolitan Reclamation District is required. The Committee briefly discussed lighting of the site and informed Mr. Booth that all fixtures should be directed downward and light should be full cut-off at the property line. The Committee unanimously voted to grant conceptual approval, 'fir .1 5 7 ol * a. �ZAZ , �,; JZ twv q Ut-Vi'At Ulf ^. .. h � .. ,'./ '.`"i.'. ;, `�:..� ... s �a d,i•i, 's �. "4 ..j�s � .�,�i���'�ia4-i •. .i. . �. 4`.� tti g .} r,r� .i .r.uy+ iry +:! '�!•!ly.,;fi'1.�:`_1 ']• cOMMITTEE ACTION - SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIFW CtMMITTEIC April 19, 1995 Room 2404 J. Glus, , C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. MEMBERS PRESENT: VNolfensperger J. Aiello, D. Ceplecha, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, MEMBERS ASSENT: D. Rasmussen, B. IlViedlin, J. K. Kelly, D. Marino, Wolinski The staff report was approved. aaeRr Fa-0414 t Revia j�ari tiQp The staff report was approved without comment. �n r►•,C 95� �1 70 Csisl9t..AY�1W� �The Committee approved the staff report to the Zoning Board of Appeals ,liitlFn ' C. Smith presented the Committee with plans for signage at Jimmy John's. She explained that 15 per cent of the canopy can be used for signage. Forty- five per cent is proposed. Also, the sign contains advertising which is prohibited by the Sign Ordinance. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to recommend denial, based on a lack of hardship. 1 4 }}..#�.... - - _ �- �t� � �4•i t - 3r��'9r�fi-a!gM'1�4� y.4 •� ry =Fg ,��• _, - t_- ..•, _ i .. . �viawer�sa.e�saKaAraaas,. �, •, , a. :i":i i;- ... ,.ri+ • .q;;e a ;gyp, , ..-•.,. ��?�i� ��li�f... �� a�►lr�H',Eor1 It�80ii fgr f�is��►e�r@ C. Smith presented the Committee with plans and explained that Discovery Zone is applying to reface existing signage that is part of a Unified Business Center Sign Plan. The Committee reviewed the signs and voted to recommend approval. RuEg.sLKiW C. Smith stated that Burger King is requesting variations for a free-standing sign, directional signs and wall signage. Because of a lack of information, the Committee voted to take no action on the free-standing sign. The Committee voted to approve the remaining signage with the condition that the logos be removed from the directional signs. ice Wol nsperger Zoning Planner Date 2 ab� "' Q4 �a �E. ai'Fl ��3_Y�t. •1-"`>-?..•.iir Fi•-r-:��.n in a•�glla��{•�.�r-t l4 �.. ,. ,.nT,'"'I�'In�ii r'�S. .W.a 1 ,. .o....JY COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 3, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Aiello, D. Ceplecha, J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Rasmussen, J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: L. Lutz, D. Stern, E. Tresch The staff report was approved. The staff report was unanimously approved. SPAARC 95M- 19 1201 Harvard Terrace Review Staf# Report to ZA The Committee unanimously approved the staff report. The Committee unanimously voted to approve the staff report. The staff report was approved. I Id e- Y�e..11.. i.iJ ..,.L... .. .e, i�. ��i Vs � iAi, .! 1, ,a tl.ec.. a, �.,_e ..� , .+. . ._. .... 11f3Ylill�C1. i-�, •n ., . . . ..,1./` : t rrats� �I�i 1 I.� �r► !1 �M !l 1��- �1� 711 J. Wolfensperger presented the Committee with plans for a two lot subdivision. The Committee reviewed the plans and raised concerns regarding curb cuts and easements. The Committee voted to hold this item over until further information can be obtained. .. t D. Tweedie, architect, was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. He explained that his client would like to add a two-story addition to the building located at the roar of the property that is a graphic arts studio. The owner and operator of the business lives in the house located at the front of the property. J. Wolfensperger explained that this property is zoned B-2 and has a build to the front property line requirement. She explained that a major variation would be required. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to grant conceptual approval subject to compliance with all codes. Presentation by PatriciaFrank Patricia Frank of the Environment Board and Linda Lutz, director of the Ecology Center, were present to discuss environmental issues with the Committee. Ms. Frank explained the work of the Environment Board and summarized methods for making development environmenially friendly. Ms. Frank suggested ways to reduce noise, conserve energy and improve air quality through good site and landscaping design. Ms. Frank concluded by saying that the Environment Board is a resource available to the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee. ®Wolf sperger oning Plan er bat 2 COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 10, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, J. Glus, K. Grossman, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, D. Jennings, J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman The Committee voted to grant conceptual, preliminary and final approval of the proposed subdivision, subject to compliance with all applicable codes, including review by the Preservation Commission. At the request of the applicant, the Committee voted to remove this matter from the agenda. Mark Segel, architect, was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. He explained that his client would like to add five repair bays and a second story addition to be used for auto parts storage. D. Rasmussen said that the zoning analysis revealed that the proposed parking spaces do not meet the minimum 8.5 foot width. Also, a five-foot setback along the east property line is required, whereas 2.83 feet is proposed. In addition, the construction violates the nonconforming use regulations and l -s .l JOUL, d'A _ .J 11 0 .wh .ii. ,! k J6.1roI,. Y..III' aiY�F�51ar:,1>dJillAl�� r�.x•1d�dd�d++iMale' .1. - '~ '•; '. •i, .•gip••. p:. •) � ,1 !;r•''NITM? S.•�P"!� �.i_" 1' •1 .c_- rLjh j.�W _r yti�t� srori • FJ. _ ��-�.; • .5�: '.,'lie off-street parking requirements. D. Rasmussen explained that 48 parking spaces are required and 17 are proposed. The Committee reviewed the plans and discussed landscaping, building materials, location of the addition with regard to the east property line, lighting and storage of automobiles and parts. The Committee suggested that a landscaping hedge be Installed along the south and east property lines, that the proposed windows on the north side of the addition be glass block or eliminated. J. Tonkinson informed Mr. Segal that lighting must be full cut off at the property line and directed downward. C Smith recommended that face brick be used an the east facade to make the building more compatible with the adjacent residential uses. Mr. Segal said they could use siding. D. Rasmussen suggested that the east side yard variation be eliminated by reducing the number or size of a bay. C. Smith advised Mr. Segel that a separate permit will be required for any signage. The Committee discussed storage and suggested that some screening be added to the rear of the property. In response to questions from Committee members, Mr. Segel stated that the proposed addition would be concrete block with the south elevation covered in light blue siding to match the existing building. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval, subject to the above mentioned comments. sparser Inic'ewolf ning Planner Date 2 �1R-�-=� -.;�.F `.• «:�_ :='�'-'ri° ..I:<ik. _ _w-.ram-_r=rx�:�.„ �T Y s� ,{ = _ `r - �•� -i - ' y�. :'- t- t ' I COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 17, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman j Lecia Daly, architect's representative, was present to discuss this matter - with the Committee. She stated that originally the street facade of the proposed addition was to be brick with a limestone cap. When estimates were made, it was found that this would add $3,000 to the cost of the project. Therefore, the applicant is proposing wood siding for this facade, instead. She noted that there were already three different styles of brick on the building. Carlos Ruiz suggested, if the Committee approves the wood siding, that the wood should be stained to minimize tht maintenance of the wood siding. Following further discussion, a motion was passed to approve the change in the street facade from brick to wood. SP ARC 95-0025 2120 Lincoln Street Review Staff Report the ZM The staff report was approved without comment. SPAARC 95-002,�,_.�Q Prospect Avenue Review Staff Re op rt to %he ZBA The staff report was approved without comment. JAN r. . - .+�:ti: t:; �i'F'4,`�T_ Ate'. ', f�;• i�� r 1 h"I The Committee reviewed the site plan of the proposal and questioned ownership of the driveway to the south serving two loading berths and, also the driveway to east with respect to the number of loading bays it may serve. Following further discussion, a motion was passed to table this matter until the architect and/or owner could be present to discuss this matter with the Committee. David N. Rasmussen Assistant Zoning Director Date 2 £{°•—w.-'tr.t�.'.,I,,,rF+�a•-'-4 +'#SfIcY'�,"'-M�4i'RE� TVs-u. k.1- Y. ao COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 24, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, K. Grossman, D. Marino, J. Wolinski PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman The staff report was unanimously approved. Jay Collier, property owner, was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. C. Smith explained that this item was previously held over because the Committee had questions relating to the locations of the driveways. J. Tonkinson explained that the civil drawings from the engineer do not match the architectural drawings in terms of the driveways. The Committee suggested that Mr. Collier's architect revise the site plan to match the civil drawings. The Committee also suggested that the water detention area that will also be used as a driveway, be paved. J. Tonkinson asked Mr. Collier to request an address for this building, in writing. He also suggested that the widening of the southernmost driveway be indicated on the plans. The Committee voted to hold this item over, pending receipt of revised plans. i Paul Price, John Tom, Ed DaPara and Steven Greenbaum were present on behalf of Me Donald's. They explained that Mc Donald's would like to 1 enclose the existing play lot so it can be used all year long. In response to a question from H. Friedman, Mr. Price explained that they need a 19 foot high ceiling height to accommodate a piece of play equipment. H. Friedman and C. Smith stated that the proposed addition makes no attempt to blend in with the existing building. They suggested ways to make the addition more compatible with the existing structure. C. Smith informed the representatives from Mc Donald's that signage will require a separate permit. The Committee discussed the close proximity of the proposed addition to the sidewalk. The Committee voted to hold this item over until Mc Donald's submits revised plans proposing an addition more compatible with the existing structure, Janice Wolfensperger Zoning Planner Date 2 ;��+_ v; ;.�! 4 � .. . i�.' :.kl tMr 1. •. :'. ��� �',. COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 31, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Marino, J, Wolinski PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman SPAARC 95M22 921 Asbury Avenue Review Staff Report to ZBa The staff report was unanimously approved. SPAARC 95-0030 850 Chicago Aygnue Concept Review of Proposed Parking Lot for Matra Kevin Kell and Gina Trimarco were present on behalf of METRA, Ms. Trimarco explained that METRA would like to construct 59 permitted parking spaces on land formerly owned and used by the CNW that is located between Main Street and Greenleaf Street. She continued by saying that the area will be resurfaced and new lighting will be installed. J. Tonkinson stated that he has not finished his review of the lighting plan. Ms. Tamarco stated that the lighting fixtures will be the 30 foot high, brown anodized, shoebox fixtures typically used by METRA. D. Rasmussen stated that all lighting shall be full cut off at the property line. Mr. Kell stated METRA would like to use the existing drainage basins. The Committee discussed the site and determined that no suitable location exists for landscaping. The Committee suggested that METRA install some type of warning to pedestrians that vehicular traffic may be entering or exiting. In response to a question, Ms. Trimarco explained that the parking lot will be designed with a one-way, 12 foot aisle with the entrance on Main Street and the exit on Greenleaf Street. The Committee voted to grant conceptual appr c Wolf sperger Zoning fanner Date COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 7, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, D. Marino, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolinski PROFESSIONAL. PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: T. Halford, C. Wonders SPAARC 9.5-0033 2610 Lincoln Street Review Staff Report to ZBA The staff report was unanimously approved. SPAARC 95-0034 1123 Howard-StEe t Review , taff Report to ZBA The staff report was approved. SEAAEtC 95-0031 2100 Dempster Street once IPrelitninary Final Peter Manno and an unidersn 'rdpresentative were present on behalf of Fisher Container. They explained that the Clean Air Act requires them to install a catalytic oxidizer that will remove the harmful chemicals from their exhausts, Mr. Manno explained how the oxidizer works. He stated that a fence will be installed around the equipment. The Committee reviewed the location of the oxidizer and the plans and voted to grant concept, preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. SPAARC 95-0032 800 Cree yyood Street Concept/Preliminary and Final Review of a Propgsed Facade Renovation 3 T. Halford explained that the property owner had applied for money available through the City's Facade Rebate Program. He continued by saying that the I ..-'�' �� �- � _ .ter== ,�� .Y,= '' �- - -- - "- ,' • - .'. _ COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 14, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: K. Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J, Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, D. Ceplecha, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Jennings. D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolinski PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: P. D'Agostino Matt Knupp and Jana Blackman were present on behalf of Mc Donalds. J. Wolfensperger reminded the Committee that they previously discussed ways to design the addition so it is compatible with the existing structure and the surrounding area. Mr. Knupp explained that the revised drawing include a masonry base around the addition. He continued by saying that the proposed plan is a corporate design that allows Mc Donalds to mass purchase the materials. Mr. Knupp stated that the proposed play area at this location has 30 per cent less space than their ideal size. In response to questions from the Committee, Mr. Krupp explained that the height is needed to accommodate play equipment than may change from time to time. H. Friedman and C. Smith asked why their suggestions regarding the mansard roof were not incorporated into the revised drawings. Mr. Krupp responded by saying that a mansard roof would require a sofet inside the structure and this would reduce the area. The Committee discussed the appearance of the proposed addition and voted to deny the proposal. Mr. 1 ,i:.. �;r. �; � , .. �r. t3.. �+ � ".;.>`i }:;.;,s'`�. � _`•=a '' + � � T,1+•, +'..1�'�-l�L��;rsf��J...� _ y 'J r r%i. ° + +af., �. t. - el.,_� . . r COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 7, 1995 Room 2404 F MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, D. Marino, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolinski PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: T. Halford, C. Wonders The staff report was unanimously approved. &AARC 95-0034 1123 Floward Steet The staff report was approved. • + i • 11 11 1 :u. Peter Manno and an unident li presentative were present on behalf: of Fisher Container. They explained that the Clean Air Act requires them to install a catalytic oxidizer that will remove the harmful chemicals from their exhausts. Mr. Manno explained how the oxidizer works. He stated that a fence will be installed around the equipment. The Committee reviewed the location of the oxidizer and the plans and voted to grant concept, preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. G.Li 11 :1i 1 i t�� 'if=11ill I lb I VAN1t IT T. Halford explained that the property owner had applied for money available through the City's Facade Rebate Program. He continued by saying that the 1 � 1 �t - I .i �_�si a;3r :laar Ssc,r-, � •<-,3:'�T.,,-� µe � - - - - - -- - -.- - ._i, i.?"a.'t`� '�""lrf. ."r �1� - s' 'o.,< _":i'a• :a'j,�:.,::. '�.5.:� �4i•�'0'r`�71��',� -'J� ',,i'a l_.�: �'.: .:;.• � �_ � S�!�K�.�r�'�.1, t�,� 4�-- ,. - �' ..•"i - --, �- a -��y ��.� r• EJ`^iii`%'�,.. .,t" =�i,.:=.'.. 4� h- proposed facade meets the criteria of the program and has preliminary approval. In response to questions from the Committee, Mr. Halford stated that the facade will be neutral color, the glass will be clear and the window frames will be clear anodized metal. C. Smith reminded T. Halford that a separate permit will be required for any signage. C. Smith suggested that the building joints be more defined to give the building more character. The Committee voted to grant concept, preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. Janice Wolfensperger Zoning Planner Date M- - � r W r. — . — - n...l ill . u .r rWe .. Il All' ...I - COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 14, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: K. Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, D. Ceplecha, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Jennings. D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolinski PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: P. D'Agostino Matt Knupp and Jana Blackman were present on behalf of Mc Donalds. J. Wolfensperger reminded the Committee that they previously discussed ways to design the addition so it is compatible with the existing structure and the surrounding area. Mr. Knupp explained that the revised drawing include a masonry base around the addition. He continued by saying that the proposed plan is a corporate design that allows Mc Donalds to mass purchase the materials. Mr. Knupp stated that the proposed play area at this location has 30 per cent less space than their ideal size. In response to questions from the Committee, Mr. Krupp explained that the height is needed to accommodate play equipment than may change from time to time. H. Friedman and C. Smith asked why their suggestions regarding the mansard roof were not incorporated into the revised drawings. Mr. Krupp responded by saying that a mansard roof would require a sofet inside the structure and this would reduce the area. The Committee discussed the appearance of the proposed addition and voted to deny the proposal. Mr. I T• .-• �. w.i ,fa il� �'\;lt,ptt�;;^� 'l}d'4 a "'�d3.}w'. }'d f`§�,� i��+��s Krupp said that Mc Donald's is flexible and he would work on a redesign. The Committee voted to grant concept approval of the proposal. •. i M.•• c a 1 1 ►. : 11 « 1 1 1 ll a r Cary Jacobson was present on behalf of Point One Motors. He explained that they would like to remove the mansard fixed awning and replace with an off-white and grey dryvit facia on the west and south elevations. Mr. Jacobson continued by saying that a small red metal band will be incorporated into the facia. He stated that the design and colors are determined by Toyota. The Committee voted to grant conceptual, preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. Religiou2 Instituti1 1 Ken Hazlett, architect, was present on behalf of Faith Temple Church. He explained that his clients have recently acquired some adjacent parcels and would like to dernolish the existing structure and construct a new building that would also house their gymnasium and grammar school. Mr. Hazlett stated that the church will be sprinklered and will conform with ADA requirements. J. Wolfensperger stated that a special use is required. Mr. Hazlett explained that the building will have concrete masonry walls in a warm grey color with a green roof and possibly green metal window frames. He stated that he would like to use some limestone accents at the heads of the windows. C. Smith suggested that Mr. Hazlett use ground face concrete for appearance and durability. Mr. Hazlett agreed, the Committee discussed the massing of the building and suggested articulation of the architectural elements on the east and west facades to reduce the mass. Mr. Hazlett said he would look at this possibility. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval. J. Wolfensperger informed Mr. Hazlett that a landscaping plan will be required. r4;,i.i•: ��:`,�:, c��"i� ��rSrt�`c.F,�i .�� ., W .. ..� SMARC 96.0037 2212-16_Gr_egnQaay Road Cent Rgytgw of Pronaaed Aland Car_W_aeh Mr. Robert Hammond was present and explained that he would like to purchase the subject property which includes two buildings. The southernmost building would be used for the car wash and the northern building would be leased to Jack's Muffler Man for 5 years. Mr. Hammond stated that two curb cuts would be eliminated. J. Tonkinson explained that the curbs and sidewalks would need to be replaced. Mr. Tonkinson also advised Mr. Hammond to review the drainage inside the building proposed to be used for the car wash. J. Tonkinson also expressed concern with the lack of stacking room available on Ashland. J. Wolfensperger stated that a special use will be required. The Committee voted to grant concept approval. Date 3 3 . _.�� - � - - '--w,.u.�rrr—Aar —__ __ rw �N%.✓.`w. �',�r„'.'UN _� �` N.�{.bl—�FVrh��.t 0 COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 21, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, J. Tonkinson, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Jennings. D. Marino, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski SPAARC 95-381391,9 Qa .1 Street Staff Report The staff report was unanimously approved without comment. SPAARC 620 Church -Street Sim Property is on the south east corner of Benson and Church, the former site of Scandinavian Design. The proposal has a multitude of signage which is not in accordance with the Sign Ordinance. No free-standing signs are permitted on the front of the property. C. Smith indicated that the proposed free-standing sign is not in keeping with the Sign Ordinance. J. Tonkinson indicated that the sign does not conform with the code and is in conflict with the streetscape and recommended disapproval to the Sign Board. The wall sign on the door on the Benson atrium and the low wall sign are acceptable according to the Ordinance. The location of the bank entrance sign on the interior indicating "FIRST BANK AND TRUST OF EVANSTON" should be clarified. The two wall signs ( one being located at 66' high and one at 17' high) on Church Street exceed the 15.5 foot allowable. The signs are individually illuminated letters and bronzed enamel in color. These two wall signs were recommended to be approved. Jo Ann Minear Clerk Typist III Date I 't \a� � P-. ,,�( "- :•��+�"'1�:.�.z.:�7�1'¢tSri';+; `.• {, r>, _ -A,).���. rt`�" ,.� � v`, ( 5'1j- •=�!•i� i A COMMITTEES ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARAIACE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 2E, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Rasmussen, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: M. Guttman PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman IS; :-.a ,1 The staff report was approved. Tim Anderson was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. J. Wolfensperger explained that this project previously had received concept approval, but the building contained more units. She continued by saying that a variation for the number of dwelling units was disapproved by the ZBA and Mr. Anderson is now considering a planned development that contains fewer units and fewer one -bedroom units. In response to a question from Mr. Anderson, D. Jennings stated that it is his preference to have access to the site off the alley. Mr. Jennings stated that a curb cut would be too close to the intersection. The Committee reviewed the plans and unanimously voted to grant conceptual approval. =711 1 � 1• 1 Tom Migon, business owner, was present on behalf of The Keg. He explained that he would like to add a small deck to the east side of the �: ...." .-15'•1���- ( I1 YI .4:.,A .. LEI i���. building. The Committee reviewed the plans and expressed concern over the bell shaped footings that appear to encroach on the adjacent property, the adjacent parking area to the east and the curb cut off of Grove Street. C. Smith also suggested that a ballard be installed on the southeast corner of the deck to protect it from any conflict with vehicular traffic. J. Tonkinson stated that he would like to inspect the curb cut and the use of the property to the east before voting on the project. The Committee voted to hold this item over to July 5, 1995. 0Wol nsperger Zoning Planner Date +fS 2 { f ram: - - ,. - -_-- • - - "- _ _ _ �` .l��il���.Y��9' sY� 1'•�i' 1 .: - yt�l. _ 1 � -�.. ��;. .a,'? ;Y S� ['�J r4 as 1 �� ��•yr.x�3}�S,'''�iC:?�•�:�;,n, �. =1,P n' ,i. �� • •r i ..^fy4yf,���k .. .. ;� �, t _ .. � '�" j. , .:rt%�;h dir;�f� s t COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE July 5, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, K. Grossman, C. Smith, J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: R. Falstrom DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman CentrI31 Stre t CoTcentvevkM4--1� Practice Fgcility for Northymentgrn ! Jim Koolish, Craig Smith and Rick Taylor were present on behalf of Northwestern. Mr. Smith explained that NU would like to construct an indoor football practice facility that would be located to the west of Welsh - Ryan Arena. The existing tennis courts would be relocated to the north. Mr. Smith continued by saying that their proposal would incorporate the existing football conference center into the practice facility. The proposed building would be 62.4 feet in height to the peak and would have a 20 foot setback from the property line along Ashland Avenue. In response to questions from Committee members, Mr. Smith stated that the roof would be metal and neutral in color. All ventilation and heating systems would be located inside the building. After reviewing the plans, the Committee voted to grant conceptual approval. George Woock, Kevin Flannery, Howard Kain and Bob Yohanan were present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. D. Rasmussen explained that the Committee is only reviewing the proposed free standing sign located at the northwest corner of the property. He continued by saying that a sign variation is necessary. Based on the additional information provided with i ;!'_ � ,��+,:-1... � '��r_.+.r��=>��. _:_ .�_�� `� . .5 �� 1 , ar_ ,���� a+rt�5��-��.i•� �" sis:ac*�E..1 , �a��,r ..»-� �n�s..,__ .� ac-.�.��F �...-.�i�n't�,r� -. _ .-r.- �3i4'=:.11ia-1 regard to the location, design of the sign and overall proposed signage, the Committee voted to recommend approval of the free standing sign. Tom Migon was present on behalf of The Keg. J. Wolfensperger explained that this project was previously held over. J. Tonkinson stated that he had inspected the site and noted that there are curb cuts leading into this parking area. He stated that it does not make sense to require The Keg to reduce the curb cut since this area will be revitalized as part of the Downtown Improvement Plan. The Committee expressed concern with the possibility of someone turning into the drive and hitting the deck. The Committee recommended that bollards be installed to protect the patrons. With this recommendation, the Committee voted to grant conceptual, preliminary and final approval, subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Traffic Engineer. 0" anice W fensperger Zoning P anner Date 2 1<' iiY's'lr �5., '� �� ���. �� M,, y..;: 4 'f R :a l !(�r•., v.. COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE July 12, 1995 Room 2402 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Woifensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Marino, J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman The staff report was unanimously approved. QUropQand StorefrQotias.• •l Mr. Kevin Hayes was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. He explained that the door currently doe not have a frame and, as a result, the store is drafty. Mr. Hayes explained that they are proposing to add an aluminum frame and construct and interior vestibule. He stated that the transom will remain to match the adjacent coffee house storefront. C. Smith pointed out some code issues and offered to meet with Mr. Hayes at the site. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to grant conceptual, preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. _ a T dice Wolnsperger � Zoning Pl ner 7 Da e f. _ -.e.�...�.r .... � -- -- �,M*n-.�-+n,-fr•M.rr.�4��,�„-�..^+wr'.irG++..-,-.::,...`y�.,�.y�,--�„-irkr.-r.-��✓nr�a-•K�r..,.•-rr=-rim�'*rn`irP� H�7 ��i� �-.r.nrms�:--5-*,�-��:,4.,.r�r��n,� . � �'_ A Y� r COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE July 19, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Marino DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman The staff report was approved. SPAAR 95.0046 2212-2216Green Bay Road Review Staff Re off, ZAA The staff report was unanimously approved. SPAARCC 95-0021 2248 Central Street Review Staff Report to ZBA The Committee approved the staff report. 3 SP ARC 95-0013 1829 Demmer Street Review Sign Variation ReRequest far Burger Kins� C. Smith presented the Committee with plans for a sign at Burger King. She stated that they have added an illuminated band around the roof of the building without a permit. The Committee reviewed the plans and noted that this element was not part of the building or sign plans previously reviewed and approved. The Committee voted to recommend denial because of a desire not to set a precedent for this type of signage. 1 {,-:- .. .. .. ,. ,. . •r,r� n � r, a � - r�S'*ri� 7n:r rri-."'�['�'�AT'ni^* _I�u •. iri diY WdWI kw err., C. Smith presented the Committee with plans for a canvas sign over the entrance to the restaurant. She explained that the proposed sign is not really a free-standing sign or an awning. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to recommend approval. ! 114i - . i R M-W-340 Jana Blackman and Mat Knupp were present on behalf of Mc Donalds' Mr. Knupp explained that they have made some design changes in response to the Committee's previous comments. He continued by saying that the brick size and spacing have been changed to reflect the existing building. The window sills and the mansard roof have also been extended to match the existing structure. Mr. Knupp stated that the glass in the roof of the addition will be slightly tinted a light blue. Mr. Knupp concluded by saying that the proposed location of the wall sign has been lowered. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to grant conceptual approval. The Committee also voted to approve the staff report to the ZBA. P., AARQ 85-0006 1201 Howard street Concept Re iew of Proof Addition toBEE-ZEE Auto 3-Qak Marc Kalman Segel, architect, was present on behalf of BEE ZEE. D. Rasmussen explained that a special use and variations would be necessary. Mr. Segel explained that the following revisions have been made to the plan: a six foot high chain link fence with a solid color infill would surround the property, landscaping would be installed on the outside of the fence along -` the south and east property lines, shutters have been added to the second floor, and tandem parking has been added. D. Jennings stated that the parking stall are marked 8.5 feet wide, but they scale to 8 feet. Mr. Segel said that if the numbers are added together they will match the width of the lot. D. Jennings also stated that service bays marked #1 and #2 would be blocked by the parking stalls. J. Tonkinson stated that a permit would be required to install landscaping on the public right-of-way, B. Wiedlin asked how the Police Department would gain access to the property. Mr. Segel stated that a lock box for the Police and Fire Departments could be installed. ha r Ir �I Ir a Y, W F Y I J. Wolinski asked that the back of the building be treated with an anti-graffi protectant. In response to a question from the Committee, Mr. Segel state that there will be a daily pick up of tiers and scrap materials. Mr. Segel reminded the Committee that the owner has agreed to reside the south and east elevations. C. Smith pointed out that a separate permit for signage will be required. She also noted that a second means of egress will be required from the second floor. The Committee suggested that the proposed shutters be eliminated. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval, subject to the following: removal of the shutters, installation of a lock box, inclusion of a second means of egress from the second floor, the addition of a second handicap parking space, elimination of the parking spaces in front of the 1 st and 2nd service bays, treating of the back wall of the building with an anti graffiti coating, and ZBA approval. Aanice*VY61fensperger Zoning anner ate 3 ••rr���� f I�■I� L'�I YI�„ICI J� wl a I� rM�ul6' aI�J�I IL4I. willW .�.�ri. u u Iw rlY .�a� iW i�. WL �. u u II�w � � r � .. ,'S- r. .: it�i ryi, Jw�i e�Z� ��71+�:..; ...�; � - - ;'4} p3••. :•�. ,. +'if :. a:� COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE July 26, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, B. Wiedlin DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz SPA_14 C 95-00 8 3015 'dyer Street Review Staff Report Millar Mari tion The staff report was approved. SPAARC 95-0049 2.300 Forestview Road Review Staff Report on Minor Vadati n The staff report was unanimously approved. aPAARC 95-Q050 1908 Sheridan Road Concept Review of Proceed QhaL ge of Use for Northvzestern University J. Wolfensperger explained that NU is proposing to convert a large home to offices. She continued by saying that a second stair case and a handicapped lift are proposed. C. Ruiz stated that this property contains a landmark structure. The proposed plans have received approval from the Preservation Commission. C. Smith stated that the code issue regarding the location of the interior staircases has been resolved. She pointed out that some landscaping is proposed to buffer the lift. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval. d�Td'e-Wolfen oning Plannd ualu rger %Ji:IALk: COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE August 2, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Rasmussen, B. Wiedlin DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz, R. Mackin The staff report was approved. The staff report was approved. SPAARC 95-0053 912 Caster Ayenue Conceet_Review of Proaosed a Storage Addition fgr Dard ProdUrts Steve Botes, architect, was present on behalf of Dard Products. He explained that the proposed plans were drafted in 1990, but the owners did not have the resources to construct the 9,70 square foot addition. J. Wolfensperger explained that a new Zoning Ordinance was adopted in 1993 and variations for the FAR, setbacks, and location of the parking area will be necessary. In response to questions from the Committee, Mr. Botes stated that the proposed addition will be used for storage and will be constructed of face brick to match the existing structure. J. Tonkinson stated that a driveway permit and a permit from the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District will be required. J. Tonkinson also suggested that Dard Products request a permit from the City to install planting materials on the right-of- -f i, ,. ., „ xr.-"'YRdhAn n�i n•..n.°-"�9^'n r.Tri y - 1 - - - -- P x �[�^,�^ w i, ,m.�•M,hr..�s "�'R to v� r,rxirY4'i^ w�n9 f�1^3ii�';'^i+^a 7 y' "'w��*I s.yMY�" CIA °4 way along Custer Street. Mr. Bates said that he would pass that suggestion on to the owners. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval. J. Wolfensperger explained that the Committee previously reviewed this project, but the developer has submitted revised plans for a 24 unit, four story building that complies with Zoning. The Committee asked that a landscaping plan and a material and color scheme be provided for final review. The Committee voted to grant preliminary approval, ar ~` vat; ' Lei r r.n.r .1" Clra.dLoll wth �.,J._iilAin.aa �I,LM - - - •- -•e-' -_- ►ILII�II�� AirlLMlltsbiaMY►�'i1�iL!aN141t111�' +Y�11�1'Jr'l� COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE August 10, 1994 ROOM 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Aiello, D. Ceplecha, D. Jennings, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. W olfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: R. Walczak, J. Wolinski, J. Zendell OTHER STAFF PRESENT: K. Kelly, D. Marino The staff report was approved without comment. Mr. Thomas Oberdieck was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. He explained that, in addition to the remodeling of the existing vacant building into condominium units, they are also constructing a garage. Mr. Oberdieck presented the Committee with brick samples for the garage and stated that it is a close match to the existing brick. He continued by saying that five trees currently located on the property will be relocated to the front of the building. D. Jennings stated that the proposed handicap parking stall does not meet code. The Committee voted to grant final approval subject to compliance with all applicable codes. Tel _communication Tovder Mr. Robert Cole was present to discuss this protect with the Committee. Mr. Rasmussen explained that the Committee had previously granted conceptual approval of the proposed tower but there was a question with Z regard to the setbacks. He continued by saying that the Zoning Ordinance permits the SPAARC Committee to determine the setbacks for antenna. Mr. Cole explained that this tower, which is approximately 250 feet high and the 10 x 20 x 10 prefabricated switching building would be located close to the 7i r I il�liw��dwf r i i !',iYtiY�Yli .r southeast corner of their propgrty. The Committee reviewed the plat and plans and voted to grant conceptual approval. Guy Carpenter was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. He explained that this design is basically the same as the proposal denied by the City Council except one curb cut on Green Bay Road has been eliminated. Mr. Carpenter stated that he has surveyed the neighbors and their concerns can be addressed by eliminating the curb cut and limiting the hours of operation. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval. Mr. Randolph Parks and Mr, Eric Eriksson were present to discuss this project with the Committee. D. Rasmussen reminded the Committee that at last review the Committee had concerns with the density and layout of the proposed townhomes. Mr. Eriksson stated that the density has been reduced to four units and the units have been divided into two buildings located parallel to each other. He continued by saying that the proposed Tudor style would be constructed with stucco board and dark brown wood bonding. C. Smith stated that she does not recommend stucco board, The Committee discussed the location of the second building and suggested that it be off -set from the side property line to reduce the gangway effect. Mr. Eriksson stated that they would like to maximize the rear yards. D. Rasmussen stated that a variation will be required since all units are required to have street frontage. D. Ceplecha suggest that the area adjacent to the parking area be landscaped. The Committee discussed the location of the proposed building in relation to the adjacent existing buildings and suggested that the next plan indicate this information. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval. �!♦ ","Klq ITWI1 D. Rasmussen presented the Committee with plans for a new church at Brown Avenue and Simpson Street. He stated that this project had received ZBA approval. The Committee reviewed the plans and noted that a detailed landscaping plan had not been submitted. D. Jennings stated that the proposed on -site parking area (nay not be workable. The Committee discussed the proposed plaza area and the need for it, The Committee voted to deny the proposal based on the lack of Information. , D. Rasmussen presented the Committee with plans for an S foot high chain link fence along the north property line. J. Aiello and D. Marino stated that the fence discussed with the neighbors was not to run the entire length of the property. The Committee noted that the survey presented was not the most recent, The Committee requested a copy of the most recent survey and site plan indicating the proposed fence. The Committee voted to hold this item over. •i ; ��: •1 r .1 ;: . . + • . _ . • 1 M 11 1 + 1 + i + tMR Mr. Darrell Daugherty and Glen Bober of Nextel Communications, were present to discuss this proposal Mr. Daugherty explained that they have been in negotiations with the property owner of 2533 Oakton Street and Mr. Cole, owner of the property located at 2527 Oakton Street. He continued by saying that the property located at this address is preferred. Mr. Daugherty assured the Committee that Nextel would build on only one of the sites. The Committee stated that this property is very close to the Skokie border and an updated survey of the area needs to be completed prior to further review of this site. The Committee suggested that the survey also include adjacent properties. The Committee voted to hold this item over until the survey is completed. 4aniceft. Wolf sp ge'r Zoning Planner g—/2 - vo Date COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE August 16, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, J. Wolinski DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman R C. Smith presented the Committee with plans for a temporary sign for an apartment building that is changing to condominiums. She explained that the 7 foot high sign is permitted for 30 days, but the applicant is proposing 12 months. C. Smith also explained that the sign contains more than seven (7) items of information. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to recommend approval. SPAARC_95-0059 17,3 Sherman_Amflnue Review Sjg,n Variation Request C. Smith explained that SBX Bookstore is expanding into the adjacent vacant storefront and is requesting a sign variation for an illuminated awning. The Committee reviewed the plans and recommended approval of the design, provided that the illumination be reduced approximately 5 feet on each side of the logo with only one row of bulbs. - 060 2319 Hastings Avenue Review -,Staff Report nn Pale Variation The staff report was approved. a nice Wolf sperger oe Zoning Pla er Date „-,,.��ea*�+'.n'... r �a •wk•n,�rin. tfia..4+a rally;. r `. ra COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE August 23, 1995 1 Room 2404 MBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino. B. Falstrom, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, J. Tonkinson, .AMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, H. Friedman, J. Glus, D. Marino, C. Smith, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski 9ESiGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: None The Committee reviewed and then approved the staff report to the Zoning. ` Board of Appeals. Now Variation The staff report was reviewed and approved by the Committee. •• 4 1 1 f f s j i * i• ` The Committee reviewed a revised concept plan reducing the proposed addition from two stories to a single story with five automotive bays and a storage area located behind said bays. Following review, the Committee gave conceptual approval to this proposal, subject to the following conditions: 3 Approval by the City Council of the Special Use for expansion of an automobile repair establishment and variation with respect to the number of off-street parking spaces and the fact that some of these off-street parking spaces are in tandem; Spacing for the proposed trees on the parkway should be a minimum of 35 feet on centers and the openings for the trees should be a minimum of 4 feet by 4 feet; t f y. . � . _ j`tt �;y'!••�-•,-= • _ '. ,£.`�'��f f:�_i {:: -'4:y. t lCt-i•L': ii t,'- •+ _ (- �3'.7ST.�''e'♦ t�� .,'i� „s, L-� t •y 4r f •''s='� - L .:a..'YCa' r.. - ., t' " - :�jv5:[. The landscaping which would be located on City property shall `= be subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works; .. ea and The new 6 foot high chain -link fence by the loading l edrsnd the scrap pick up area shall have a horizontal horizontalens and shall not new proposed light shall h beam directly on the City alley; The proposed addition shall have an anti -graffiti coating applied to the north or alley wall; A lock box shall be installed at a location suitable to the Fire Department; Drainage structures shall be installed to handle runoff from the parking area if none are now in existence. L2,a� X. Ax��� David N. Rasmussen Assistant Zoning Director Date fr -.5 tF - ,a- 'L,an'' ��i,�'W��r.�,�;i?y��v� .. j'F;�}: ` ��.�+!`=�`•. t' E. COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE September 6, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino. D. Jennings, K. Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, H. Friedman, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, J. Wolinski Mr. Phil Barr and Walter Hallen were present on behalf of Presbyterian Homes. Mr. Barr explained that they would like to replace a temporary wooden service ramp located at the rear of the building with a concrete ramp. The ramp is not for handicap accessibility, but is used for deliveries. Mr. Hallen stated that a hand rail and three steps will be added. Two steps currently exist. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to grant preliminary and final approval. Janice Wol nsperger Zoning PI ner 1 COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE September 20, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, B. Wiedlin, J. Woifensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, K. Kelly, D. Marino DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman SPAARC 95-9066 820 Brummel Street Review Staff ,Report to ZBA The staff report was unanimously approved, SPAARC 95-0057 1135 Cleveland Street Review staff ReaQrtonMinor MariatiQn The Committee unanimously approved the staff report. SPAA C 95-0060 1300 Central Street Review Sian Vadace for focus Develo n2 lent C. Smith presented the Committee with plans for a temporary real estate sign for a new condominium building currently under construction. She explained the sections of the Sign Ordinance that regulate such signs. The Committee reviewed the plan and voted to recommend approval to the Sign Review and Appeals Board. SPAARQ _95-0069 250 Chicago Avenue Review Sign Variation reauert for -Salsa Barracha C. Smith presented the Committee with plans and photographs of the site. She explained that the existing signage, which was installed without benefit of a permit, violates many sections of the Sign Ordinance. The Committee reviewed the photographs and voted to recommend denial of the requested variations. SPAARC 95-QQ70 1235 Dodge Review Sign Propoaal for Spex Car Wagh C. Smith stated that the property owners have applied for a unified business center sign plan. She presented the Committee with plans. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to recommend denial based on the lack of information and lack of any uniformity for the proposed signage. f nf. • i. .�i� n �f � it . �� iil I. • � i � � �� ,Mr.n liiin � .li Iql ' i. i n ..I � li i T SPAR Q 2SS2 Asbu _Avenue Final Review of Prononed Land roping Plan Tim Anderson, Developer, was present to discuss the proposed landscaping plan with the Committee. The Committee reviewed the landscaping plan and voted to grant final approval, subject to review and approval by P. D'Agostino. SPAARC 95-0065 1560 Sherman Avenue Preliminary and Final Review gf Proposed Pions for Rotary International Russell Sparacino and Matt Hichens were present on behalf of Rotary International. Mr. Sparacino explained that Rotary has plans for two projects: repair of the roof top terrace and repaving of the plaza area. The Committee reviewed the plans for the terrace repairs and voted to grant preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. Mr. Hichens explained the plans for the plaza paving. He stated that the plaza area is currently leaking into the basement of the building. Mr. Hichens stated that he had met with land Design Collaborative to make sure that Rotary's improvements are in compliance with the Downtown Improvement Plan. C. Smith advised Mr. Hichens to review the Code regarding detectable warnings at the steps. Mr. Hichens said he would review options for complying with Code. Mr. Sparacino and Mr. Hichens explained that the plans include two alternatives for dealing with the grade change along the south end of the property. One idea is to install a railing system which would be painted bronze to match the existing window frames. The other alternative is to install a planter. The Committee discussed these options and recommended the planter box. The Committee voted to grant preliminary and final approval of the plans specifying the planter, subject td review of any plant materials by the Forestry Department and compliance with all applicable codes. i GJ nice Wolf sperger Zoning Plan er 2o DI'a '`1lV JJn!,N. 14 U. i_if1�Y �i!-0II IMlJraIK'JYY:dYk6�uar �r.��.�WY.d.".--`dlultied.rake"�.,—�w�rfiY�lYsJt�rerwrl.rr,EtV.ir...la+irJ.i.ir.•Ir„a4w•'Ea �:Jm_.d�t„Y3i �mJ lirl�JrJl l.i v, o..•.l i_LYtl. r:+ 1.4 COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE September 27, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, D. Marino, J. Wolinski DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman 'rhe staff report was approved. �PAARC 95-0071 2141 Ilennett Avenue Review Staff Report on Fence Variation The staff report was unanimously approved. 31 SPAARC 95-005Q 190H Sheridan _Road Final Revil1w of Landscaj21ny Plan for Northwestern University Qffice The Committee reviewed the submitted landscaping plan and unanimously voted to grant final approval. z SPAARC 94-0120 3200 Grant Street Concept Review of Proposed New Parking Arean pt the Presbyterian Hope a Phil Barr was present on behalf of the Presbyterian Home, He explained that they are proposing to add 13 additional open, off-street parking spaces located on the east side of their campus. The existing parking area, located at the southeast corner would be expanded and two new areas created. Mr. Barr explained that they are trying to eliminate parking along the roadways. D. Rasmussen suggested that the proposed landscaping materials be replaced with evergreens which will buffer the parking space all year long. He reminded Mr. Barr that the landscape screening shall be a minimum of 4 AAWliMt NY MI+iJi auYiia M�Y�11l17IilRY� feet high and also must wrap around the stalls. P. D'Agostino svggeswo Hicks Yews. In response to a question from K. Grossman, Mr. Darr stated that there is adequate lighting of these parking areas. The Committee unanimously voted to grant conceptual approval with the condition that 4 foot high evergreens be installed to buffer the parking areas. Lfi nice Wolfensp ger Zoning Planner Date —'� 'liedf S�JikiY.�l, !a Ell��Ys.w... J4i.YY!da.C..11nI w..I I 4.E.. k.tul! ..�.u1411W1 .4. d•, rrY ,� „„ W �.a �oiYY. dYY �., /Li. elY YI YIYYdyWI 14 COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE October 12, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, H. Friedman, J. Glus, K. Grossman, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson The staff report was unanimously approved. Phil Barr was present on behalf of Presbyterian Homes. D. Rasmussen explained that the Committee had previously granted conceptual approval, subject to some revisions to the landscaping plan. Mr. Barr explained that the Committee had recommended the planting of Hicks Yews to be used as a buffer for the parking areas. He continued by saying that these Yews are very expensive and they would like to substitute Arbor Vitae. P'Dagostino said that this change is acceptable. The Committee voted to grant preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. nice Wolfe sperger Zoning Planner /f, - /�.� Date .I a ..Yam.. . "I ' we'. J� .1, r I"'.0 � InY YI +1 {il 1li MM COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN. AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE October 18, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, H. Friedman, D. Rasmussen C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, J. Wolfensperger SLO,AARC 95-012130 122.4 levelsnd Street Reylaw of Staff R2on rt on Fence Variation The staff report was approved. 6P.AIARG 9,%- LQ111 3723 BensanAvoue .Remiew of Sign Plan for Evanston Atbletic Club_ The Committee voted to disapprove the proposed wall sign because of the size. The awning sign was approved, subject to conformance with the Sign Ordinance and subject to removal of the logos which should be replaced with lettering of similar type face and not white. The Committee also voted to deny the projecting wail sign. !Qgnter Sign -Plan The Committee voted to approve the free-standing sign. i!: •1 The Committee voted to approve the staff report. David N. Rasmussen Assistant Zoning Director Date t.. IWu .I1. u. .. a •i i .� .. ui .li i. u � � - rt tit t.ii t< <lo,;z ,��p�'..r. al;"'yi ,rsr +_r���)•,'� . COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE October 25, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, J. Glus, D. Jennings, D. Rasmussen C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Woifensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, K. Grossman, K. Kelly, D. Marino, J. Wolinski DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: T. Halford, E. Tresche, C. Waite The staff report was approved. apAAR 95-0084 2500 Grant Street Ravi w Staff Report for Fgnce VatlatiQn The Committee approved the staff report. SPAABQ 93-0050 9 300 Qantral Street Fina� Appearan a Review_ of Prgposed New Condo Byjld!M i T. Anderson, developer, was present to discuss the proposed building materials and color scheme. He explained that, with the exception of the west elevation, the building will be all brick with limestone precast accents. The west elevation of the building, which is less than 8 feet from the next building, will be constructed with a colored split face concrete masonry unit (CMU). The adjacent building to the west is common brick, Mr. Anderson continued by saying that the balconies will be constructed with a dark green '- steel. The windows will be wood and aluminum clad in an off-white color. The roof is behind a parapet. In response to a question from C. Smith, Mr. AN Anderson stated that the brick size will be 2-3/4 inches by 7-5/8 inches. The Committee voted to grant final appearance approval. J �4 �w t 5PAARQ 95-0B41 1 QI Contra] Street Eigai Review of Lan $ naing Piave , for NU Indoor gQtbal Facility Jim Koolish was present on behalf of Northwestern University. P. D'Agostino reviewed the plan and stated that the proposed plant materials are appropriate for the site. The Committee voted to grant final approval of the landscaping plan. SPAARC 9S-008 1529 Orrinaton Avenue preliminary and Final Review Of Facade Rehab for order's Bookstore_ D. Rasmussen explained that a representative from Border's Bookstore could not be present, but he and J. Wolfensperger and C. Smith met with the architect, C. Smith explained that the proposed signage and second floor awing will require variations and a separate permit. She continued by saying that Borders' is proposing canvas awnings in a burgundy color, but, as an alternative, have used a metal awing at other locations. The Committee reviewed the proposed new windows on the south elevation and voted to grant preliminary and final approval, subject to all materials and colors matching the existing materials and colors and compliance with all other applicable codes. The Committee discussed the proposed awnings and recommended that no awnings be installed. The Committee felt that any awnings would be out of character with the building. 1111111142W.TM KIM. IUMIPWAII T. Halford presented the Committee with proposed plans and photographs of the existing storefronts. He explained that the store owner has applied for financial assistance from the City to restore the storefront. T. Halford stated that the glass block would be removed and the front windows lowered to match the adjacent storefronts. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to grant preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all codes. 1 anice WolKner erger Zoning Pla //%271•9.5-- Date 3 n.ui ,uiI h.Alwh6At1,1ai.1419L"ICYlLYIV1kle1.iAYviWITIRS� K''C:- COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE 1995 oom1, 404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, D. Marino, C. Smith DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman SPAARG 95-0087 1201 Chicago Avenue Prelimi gty and Fine! Review of New Gas Eumns for Shall Oil Company D. Rasmussen explained that the plans are for new pumps and nQ canopies are proposed at this time. The Committee reviewed the plans and survey and voted to grant preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. IA ice Wolfe perger Zoning Plan r Date �14�-"+r1tJ(IN�AMI�.A+fr+4r i.. ii r4Lylrnll,. .�,.� , i � . 1 ."���I♦R'��°L�R'XMS�Y'�'. r•'A'�r--w�K— r '.-' � * jy. .�n - - - ', � '��, �. ! � � =l .� - •titi..�i � `1 �` ��ii i� ��r• � ice' �!. . ir a rf F COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE November 8, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Jennings, D. Marino, J. Wolfensperger DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Waite SPAAR"5-0488,,' 112Ejinman Avenue The staff report was approved. SEMBC QQ89 2114 CmUA Sweet F . ` George Sarfatty, architect from Sarfatty, Assoc., and Allison Roess, Raymond and Associates, was present on behalf of Bruegger's Bagels to discuss the facade rehabilitation. The Committee unanimously approved concept and preliminary plans. r441 / • 1 ' F Wi • F i M.MIPM. I X; F a : Y11 The staff report was approved. 19x David N. Rasmussen Assistant Zoning Director Date �iJi$L � ((y�y��»:45: t}r •�F ,13 k'" ' � � COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE November 15, 1995 = Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: A. Berkowitz, J. Glus, D. Jennings, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: P. D'Agostino, J. Aiello, K. Grossman, K. Kelly, J. Wolfensperger DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz, E. Tresch MARC 95-0091 2420 Harrison Street Review Staff Reportto ZBA The staff report was approved and seconded, subject to review and approval by the Preservation Commission. SPAARC 95-0094 1701 Howard St eet Review Staff Report to Z13A The staff report was approved without comment. SPA►ABC 9.5-0093 _1000 Grove Street Conce+pt/prelirninarv/Final The Committee reviewed the floor plans for the proposed chiller on the roof of the YMCA. The question was raised with concerns of the noise issue. After deliberations, it was apparent that there would be no concern. The Committee approved the proposal. SPAARC 95-0090 810-816 Main Street Concern 1Preliminaw/Einal George Gauthier was present to review the plans and photographs of the building with the Committee. Mr. Rasmussen reminded the Committee that this meeting was for proposed exterior renovation to the exterior of the buildings. The project was before Site Plan previously to downgrade the property from 34 dwelling units to the original use of 6 dwelling units. Mr. Gauthier indicated that he proposes no buildout and proposed to paint the stone to match the brick exterior, remove the parapet and keep the wrought iron railing on the facade only, for beauty effect. The top mansard will also be covered up so as not to call attention to the upper portion of the building. The old windows will be replaced and the buildings will have 15 or 19 light doors with fixtures. The facade of the building has black fibre glass shingles. In answer to a Committee member question, Mr. Gauthier stated that there are staircases in the rear of the building and the rear walls are stucco which will be repaired and painted in matching Georgian brick. The landscaping will be low shrubs in front with grass. The back court yard will be converted, in m dJa w. UII iA u, U 061.011111 ll.. ,. t COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE November 22, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: R, Grodzke, D. Jennings, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, H. Friedman, J. Glus, K. Grossman, D. Morino, C. Smith, J. Wolfensperger OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz The Committee met with Bob Luclus to review a proposed vestibule enclosure at Tappas Barcelona. Following review, tho project was approved by motion made and seconded. SPAARC 25.0098 260Q„9=0130X Fina Cow The Committee met with Chris Onassis, who explained that he would rehab the residential building on the promises, and install a large garage for storage of commercial vehicles used in his business. Ho was advised by members that the gravel was not all weather dustless material upon which you could drive, and that it would have to be a hard surfaced area, and would also be subject to drainage, and an MSD permit. Following further discussion, a motion was made and passed to 3 hold this matter over until such time as a zoning review was completed. SPAARC 95-0029 ,2222 Lincoln Street Review Staff ftlort to ZBA The Staff Report was roviQwed by the Committee and then approved without comment. SPAARC _95.QOBQ 1245 Sherman Avenue Review % aff Report to ZBA The Staff Report was roviowod by the Committee and then approved without comment. ' A .� David N. Rasmussen Assistant Zoning Director Data r2M�4 r _ ,. =3 xb #.3 iat�•v^1�2��G-.=� �� ��� i LL -_ -1 S _ -- _ .-. . _. _- .. - - - COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE December B, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Woiinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, D. Marino DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz, K. Waite Because a copy of the staff report was not transmitted to the Committee, this item was hold over. Because a copy of the staff report was not transmitted to the Committee, this item was also held over. l John Mc Linden and Howard Hirsch were present on behalf of Walgreens. They explained that Walgreens is proposing to buy 4 lots beginning at the southeast corner of Dodge and Dempster, east to Bill's Grocery Store. The proposed 1$.154 square foot store will be two story; the first floor used for retail and the second floor will be used for storage. The parking lot will contain 43 parking spaces. Mr. Hirsch stated that Walgreens had met with the aldermen and neighbors of the Ward to discuss this proposal. He continued by saying that no liquor will be sold at this site and a traffic consultant had been hired to review the proposed curb cuts and traffic flow. Mr. Mc Linden explained that the existing curb cuts, located at the intersection, would be closed and reopened further to the east. He continued by saying that Walgreens will request the removal of approximately 6 on -street parking spaces to accommodate the new curb cuts. J. Wolfensperger stated that the drive- - thru pharmacy will require a special use, and a map amendment may be required for the Business zoned portion of the land. A plat of consolidation for all four properties will also be required. J. Tonkinson reminded Mr. Hirsch and Mr. Mc Linden that drainage for the parking area will be required and, because Dempster Street is a State roadway, the Illinois Department of Transportation will be involved a in the review and approval of this project. He continued by saying that all sidewalks must be replaced at an even grade. J. Wolinski asked about elgnage and i.1. i1JN y stated that changeable copy reader boards are not permitted. He stated that a soperate permit will be required for signage. With regard to the building design, Mr. Hirsch stated that the base of the building will be brick and the upper portion will be dryvit. The building will have three different heights: 30 ft, 27 ft and 24 ft. C, Smith suggested that they consider a porcelain or metal panel. She asked why the building has not been located at the corner. Mr. Mc Linden and Mr. Hirsch explained that a single-entry building is required for security purposes and the entrance needs to be located next to the parking area. In addition, the design of the loading area off the alley cannot conflict with the pharmacy drive-thru lane. The Committee reviewed the plans and voted to grant conceptual approval. Gill Walendy, Clayton Weaver and an unidentified person were present on behalf of Metra, Mr. Walendy explained that the canopy design had been selected and approved by the Preservation Commission. He presented the Committee with the plans for the canopy and landscaping. Mr. Walendy continued by saying that approximately $101,000 will be spent on these improvements. The Committee reviewed the plans. J. Tonkinson suggested that ivy be planted along the east wall. C. Smith recommended low shrubs or a low barrier along Green Bay Road, to prevent pedestrian traffic from entering or exiting before the intersection. The Committee discussed this idea. Mr. Walendy said that Metra would consider this recommendation. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval of the landscaping plan. t + 0 MMSPE911 ti LIA114111:12 C. Smith explained that a special use is required for the operation of a trade contractor's office in a commercial zoning district. She continued by saying that all parking and driveways are required by the Zoning Ordinance to be improved. Chris Onasis, property owner, stated that this house is his private residence which includes his home office. He continued by explaining that drivers who work for him only pick up their vehicles at this location. The facade improvements include white stucco portico and painting of the existing brick white. D. Jennings stated that the drive to the north and the east must be paved for 24 feet and drained. The Committee voted to grant preliminary approval. 3 Janice Wolfensperger Zoning Planner ate -r a Wti, ., {,,.' ,r a..• ..rnA-n.m.ry,*r+trT-rJ.ihr"'.i'...sn'. , --, •r-Y•"''rT�-yre ..r '�" ' COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE December 13, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, J. Glus, D. Jennings, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, K. Kelly, D. Marino DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: R. Grotsky, C. Ruiz, E. Tresch The staff report was approved. The staff report was unanimously approved. J. Blackman and M. Knupp were present on behalf of Mc Donalds. They explained = that the ZBA and City Council had approved their special use and the plans had not been revised since the Committee's last review. The Committee voted to grant preliminary and final approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes and regulations. SPAARC 95-0104 120 Dodge Avenue _Concept Review of Proposed Addition to a the Dobson Nu siQg Home Charlotte Kohn and Demetrios Criezis -,,sera present to discuss t. is pr:posa..�ith the Committee. Mr. Criezis explained that Via property which is located at 'I.e corner of Dodge and Dobson Street is currently three stories. He cor.:muec oy saying that they are proposing a two-story additicr, that will control access to the I *1,4ina f,)r CGf�`riri�y `t,rnnsoc anti wFj1 1gp adri office gram. ��1- Crate a S'a!ed S�3- •gyp �-i ,1:♦i .,n :II t-a panels will be removed and a small canopy added. The Committee discussed the mansard roof with Mr. Criezis. In response to questions from the Committee, Mr. Criezis stated that continuation of the mansard roof allows additional interior height i and will hide mechanicals on the roof. D. Rasmussen stated that this project will require ZETA and City Council approval. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval. .r.:..l.r.n I glrA Aarw 74,avDd{2'.0 a'mi+.lS,a 'F _ t..'fA Discusaion with Richard Crotsky The Committee and Mr. Grotsky discussed staffing issues related to the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee and the quorum requirements of the Site Plan Ordinance. —0Z ,nice Woifenspe er Zoning Planner _/.-X Date �!k^ - IFd:o.�,d �ri91.-�'i�t��W,kf�aiY �itil�ItSiM;�if1�I1d51ura�Jl�wk,Y��lr��aa�:�r C COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE December 20, 1995 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Kelly, D. Marino DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman SpARC 93-0004-A 1 524 Simnso� n Street Final Be -view of Change of Buildina_Materials Stephen Yas, Johnathan Fischel, Rev. Michael Curry and Cyril Powers were present to discuss the proposed changes with the Committee. Mr. Yas and Mr. Fischel presented the Committee with color renderings and explained that the previous architectural firm had proposed dryvit and a white roof for the addition. The existing brick portion of the church would have been painted white. They explained that they would like to construct the addition with two different tones of brick closley matching the existing brick. A lighter brick resembling limestone will be used for accents. Mr. Fischel explained that the roof would be black to match the existing roof. Mr. Fischel stated that for cost purposes, the south elevation would be painted dryvit to match the brick. Mr. Yas stated that the base will be concrete masonry. H. Friedman suggested using limestone for the coping. The Committee approved the plans and unanimously voted to approve the appearance changes. nice Wolfensper er Zoning Planner r ate 7 WMMI I I = AV 11UN SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 10, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, D. Marino DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PRESENT: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: D. Pettinger, E. Tresch, C. Waite 70A f_ar UnJag9ers The staff report and site plan were unanimously approved. SIMARC 95-0305 1938-42 Sherman_Avenue Concept Review of Pr os$1 to add Four Dwelling Units Greg Matic was present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. He explained that he would like to increase the number of dwelling units from 52 to 56 by dividing space currently used for storage into 4 dwelling units. D. Rasmussen stated that a variation from the lot area provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would be required. He also stated that a parking variation may also be required. C. Smith stated that the four new units would need to be sprinklered. The Committee voted to grant conceptual approval, subject to compliance with all codes. 14" nice WolfenVerger Zoning Planner a - Date S 4W COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 17, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, H. Friedman, J. Glus, K. Kelly OTHER STAFF PRESENT: T. Halford, E. Tresch The Committee reviewed the site plan which indicated no exterior modifications to the building and voted to approve the site plan and the staff report to the Zoning Board of Appeals. D. Rasmussen presented the Committee with the proposed site plan. The Committee voted to deny the site plan and suggested that the orientation of the garage be changed to front Harrison Street. The Committee voted to approve the staff report to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Rey'sed3ite Plan for Bee Zee Auto 13epair D. Rasmussen explained that the ZBA had heard this case and voted to recommend denial of the special use and parking variation. He continued by saying that, after the hearing, the applicant sent a revised site plan to the City Council that was referred back to the ZBA. D. Rasmussen explained that the revised site plan eliminates the storage area and creates 8 off-street parking spaces that are not accessible to patrons. The Committee reviewed the site plan and voted to 3 recommend the following changes and additions: 1) eliminate the proposed fencing, except that around the storage area on the north side of the building; 2) planting of a 30 inch high landscaping hedge along Howard Street and Dewey Avenue; 3) installation of the parkway trees as proposed, and 4) installation of a right -turn only _ sign for vehicles exiting the driveway located on Dewey Avenue. The Committee also voted to approve the revised staff report. .:'...'3.. +.- :x�r:: ri• ,JI^. w';n(.; �a'•"— •^^tea z. r,_: A. ..; r• �r MARC 95-0107 1310 Woolley AyenuQ Reviamt 61to Plan a ti Staff wit fatHmaldentiallAltatation D. Rasmussen presented the Committee with plans for construction of a canopy over the existing stoop. The Committee reviewed the site plan and staff report and voted to approve both. • 1 1: 1 1 ` 1 i- 1 1 1 1 e l 1 1 1 C. Smith presented the Committee with plans for a proposed wall sign and awnings for Evanston Athletic Club. She explained that the white awnings were installed without benefit of a permit. C. Smith also explained that the wall sign requires a variance. The Committee reviewed the wall sign and noted that they did not object to the location, but thought the proposed sign design was not compatible with the building and surrounding properties. The Committee stated that the white awnings are also not compatible with their surroundings. The Committee voted to recommend denial of the proposed sign plan. nice Wolfenspe er Zoning Planner / c Date COMMITTEE ACTION! SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 14, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Kelly, D. Marino, J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: K. Waite C. Smith presented the Committee with a color rendering of the proposed sign and explained that this storefront is part of a Unified Business Center Sigh Plan. The Committee reviewed the plan and voted to recommend approval of the sign, subject to removal of the advertising slogan "delivering the prefect pizza." Wo ensperger . Pnice ninner Date _ 4 .�w�nurrrr.vw COMMITTEE ACTI+DN,-.- f • SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 28, 1996 Room 2404 i MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, J. Wolfensperger DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: S. Lufkin, E. Tresch, K. Waite •��. q mrrmn a n I a i Ron Fleckman and Chris Thomas discussed the proposed 20 unit, 4 story condominium to be constructed at 1319-1323 Chicago Avenue. They presented a revised design for Committee review. The Committee discussed the appearance review and design guidelines. The Committee approved the preliminary design, subject to submission of a landscape plan prior to permit filing and submission of revised design to the Preservation Commission. Michael Silver presented the plans for a 6 unit, three-story condominium building to be constructed at 605 Oakton Street. Committee members discussed that this property was a corner lot and the side and back facade and landscaping should respond to that. Mr. Silver mentioned that they will keep as many existing trees as possible. The Committee approved the concept plan, subject to submission of a landscape plan, sprinkler drawings and a grading plan. Eli Ybeth Tresch Housing Planner reh, A,, MD Date 4. "1; a�41n•�.i7•i [„ ��4 ��p"�'°Wld-'�Y.:.. _"�`^/�?IjY'.�rr�.,a��'V�'��'Uwfi'�'.M..';.d•Y7�1 �IV���7Yd"n �iti lVl C'R.ivJ �..i�k'Ji�Y it •iq ' o�� COMMITTEE ACT10k, APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE SITE PLAN AND AP � March 6, 1995 Room 2404 ►, MEMBERS PRESENT: A. Alterson, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello, D.Marino, J.Glus D.MarinoJ. Wolfensperger DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: E. Tresch, C. Waite The Committee unanimously approved the staff report. •ffj; •. rrr: r t: - •1:# Larry Hillman and Joel Hillman discussed the proposed mixed use development of rehabilitation and addition to 630 Davis Street, the former Chandler's Building. The development would include ground floor commercial with 31 residential loft units on the upper floors. The development would also add a floor to the existing 6 story structure. The Committee suggested that, while the building is not a Historic Landmark, it is a significant building in Evanston's history and the Preservation Commission should be consulted. The Committee reviewed the concept according to the Appearance Review Design Guidelines. Committee members suggested maximizing the glass in the design, particularly the first floor, and maintaining as may of the existing building elements as possible. The Committee approved the concept design, with specific detail to come to the Committee later. - • •. rrr• :r ►►., M r _ - - _ James Rogers, Dana Holland and H. James Ferland discussed the proposal to erect six antennae in three directions on the roof of 1801 Maple Avenue. The antennae would be part of a digital personal communication system. The Committee approved the preliminary and final design. MARC 60-0006 605 Oakt n Si eet Final Michael Silver presented revised plans for a 6 unit, three-story condominium building to be constructed at 606 Oakton Street. The materials and design for X_ the front and east side were discussed with focus on the treatment of the east side window bays: Mr. Silver presented a landscape plan showing the mature trees currently on the site which would remain. The site plan was approved by the Committee, pursuant to conformance with City Codes and initiation of permits. The changes in appearance were approved by the Committee. trAUCA, Elizabeth Tresch Housing Planner r .,.;..,; COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 13, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: OTHER STAFF PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, A. Alterson, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski J. Aiello, J-Glus H. Friedman E. Tresch SPAAR 94-U152 1826-Central Street Fl=l The landscape plan for the Central Street Metra Station was unanimously approved with the following conditions: 1. A wrought iron guard rail of 42 inches along the southeast corner of the property going south along Green Bay Road on railroad property. 2. Use of Sumac as the planting along Green Bay Road, instead of the Juniper listed as an alternate. 3. Use of tree grates which were protected against rust, in materials such as baked enamel or aluminum. SPAR 6-00010 1000 Grey Avenue Staff Report The staff report was unanimously approved by the Committee. SMA®$C 96-0011 2525 Oakton Street Pre; mina !Final Plans to erect a new antenna for AT&T were reviewed by the committee. It was noted that the antenna was permitted under the Zoning Ordinance. The Committee unanimously approved the antenna. SPAARC 95-0085 1629 Orrinuton Avenue Recommend_Qf Ai2prove Apggaranco C. Smith discussed a new submission from Border's Books. This new submission includes picture decals, signs and awnings. She noted that only one sign needs a Sign Committee review, due to its height and that other building treatments can be erected as -of -right. She mentioned that the developer and architect were looking for comments on the overall concept. Discussion focused on the awnings. The Committee recommended approval of the new submission by a vote of 6 to 3. I � u a , _ . r IY 1. . . I'M .. , . . I.ur I I. I i. ram . I ,r COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 20, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, A. Alterson, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello, J. Glus, D. Marino DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz, E. Tresch Staff report was unanimously approved. Mr. Byron Gregory presented the proposed facade changes to 2425 Main Street, a recording studio. The Committee approved the changes. SPAARC 96-0014 1031 Michigan Avenue Preliminary Mr. Tom Hair presented the proposed subdivision of 1031 Michigan Avenue from one lot to two lots. The Committee noted that the property is in a Historic District and must be reviewed by the Preservation Commission. Discussion focused on the size of the two proposed lots in relation to the size of other lots in the area. The subdivision was approved with a vote of 8 to 1. EFM Mr. Irving Turner and Mr. Victor Friese presented the proposal for the subdivision of one lot containing four structures into four lots. One of the structures, a single-family residence, is a landmark property. The Committee discussed the difficulty in subdividing the property given the location of existing structures. Members discussed the size and configuration of the four proposed lots. The Committee voted by 6 to 3 to deny the subdivision. SPAARC 96-0006 605 Oaktog_Street Final 3 The Committee approved the permit plans for the construction of a six -unit, three-story, residential building. its .I •.... . cl 1 1 _ SI L1,141 4.1 A iu.' € - SpwAAC-26-091 W8 Green € ay sign The Committee reviewed the proposed refacing to an existing nonconforming, free-standing sign by Koenig and Strey. Committee approved the sign, noting that the white background should not be transparent. The Committee reviewed the proposed refacing to an existing nonconforming, free-standing sign by Lupita's Tacos. The Committee approved the sign, noting that the white background should not be transparent. The Committee approved the refacing of an existing nonconforming, free- standing sign by Oak Street Market, noting the white background should not be transparent. The Committee reviewed the proposed sign on the south facade of the building by Border's Books. The sign was approved. + ~ ' • I • I ' Committee reviewed the proposed illuminated awning and wall sign by Einstein's Bagels. Members noted that the logo on the awning covered 31 per cent of the awning, more than the 15 per cent allowed. 'rhe Committee voted unanimously to deny the awning and sign. `7 acL Eliza eth Tresch Housing Planner MOL4 �A .267, / q Wo bate i - �7. Y,7: ...Ira I:.: J11 Ytl-., ,<:�. Lk II.tiII.Y •+.I u. �aIG1­•.Yi.-,b II.b I. iU1. �iaallr oaY„litnli�'A.rS��,Ji�Y rti�r4iY�i.W{61�4 kVAI ru4:d6r �WIi.,JJ:L-s1�J11 liriak•- �Y,. r .4'` COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 27, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, A. Alterson, D. Marino, D. Rasmussen, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello, J. Glus, C. Smith, K. Kelly, J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: R. Falstrom, C. Ruiz, E. Tresch, C. Waite Jay Friese, Victor Friese and Ellen Galland discussed the revised subdivision of 1100-1106 Florence Avenue from one lot into 3 three lots. The Committee noted that there are still a number of zoning variations required. The Committee mentioned that the rezoning would not require a map change. The Committee unanimously approved the subdivision. Preliminary The Committee reviewed the proposal to subdivide one lot into two equal lots. The Committee unanimously approved tabling the proposal until the applicant describes their intention for the property. Elizabikh Tresch �Y1 Housing Planner V g-96 Date A NMI �1LWwY_UM11,u ilY.i u1,-A.L. IY- . ,. 1 ` ' COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 3, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino, A. Alterson, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello, J, Gius, K. Kelly OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz, E. Tresch fiPAARC 96-21 1940 Sherman Avenue -Staff ROUQ t to ZRA The Committee unanimously approved the staff report. SPAARC 95-O089 2114 Cent as 1 keet 1��( The Committee reviewed final plan for Bruegger's Bagels, including glass sliding doors and tables on their property. The Committee unanimously approved the plans. S AARC 96-0020 2747 Hurd anus Pry Mr. Ron Fleckman discussed his proposed subdivision of one lot into two lots. He mentioned that the current house would be demolished and two houses constructed on the two new lots. The Committee discussed the context of the adjacent neighborhood. The Committee noted that this would be a resubdivision since there had been previous subdivisions to the lot. The Committee unanimously approved the resubdivision. 3 SPAARC 96-QO22 101 Ridge -Avenue Preliminary/Final Mr. Ron Ambrose discussed the proposed renovation of the Shell Oil Service Station. He noted that the majority of the remodeling is interior, but some exterior remodeling is proposed. Committee requested additional information, including location on the plans of the trash enclosure, landscaping, signage and site illumination. Committee noted the location of the service station as a gateway to Evanston. The committee unanimously approved holding this proposal until Zoning review is complete and all information has been provided. � . T,', ��f,� S. � '-i" i � •> ` �::lh,' ELF :,:.: �' C�Y,ry'>: '. �' �ii.�.i ���':_�• `r�-�s��i. r'�'.'' �,,}r.f � : .- � .�.�• �t��r[ ",J' a YS. i:7 i-11, i •�' ' �5 'y r� t'4�c1;>+&:3Lrj`:c,.;.ti�} Mr, Raymond Schultz discussed the plans for a canopy, signs and landscaping at Alden Estates. The Committee discussed that this property has a special use. The Committee noted that zoning must review the canopy plans. The Committee unanimously approved tabling the proposal until staff conducts a review of the site conditions attached to the proposed special use designation, entrance markers and canopy and the plat of the property. Ms. Dana Holland and Mr. Jim Rogers discussed the new communication tower to be constructed at 2100 Lee Street to replace an existing AM Radio tower. They would replace the radio antenna, and locate antennas for personal communication services on the new tower. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. W. - ► t 11 11 i l J. Wolinski discussed the Sidewalk Cafe Committee meetings. They have resulted in a proposal to draft amendments to the City Code that would create a review process administrated by SPAARC. Under the proposal discussed, the City could approve sidewalk cafes for Type 2 restaurants, subject to applicants meeting four standards. H. Friedman discussed the abundance of illuminated awnings, particularly along the eastern side of Sherman Avenue downtown, The Committee discussed the different lighting patterns between fabric and vinyl awnings. The Committee discussed the continuous streetfronts with awnings. The Committee approved requesting that all proposed awning projects present photos to the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee of adjacent properties within at least a half block of the project. Elizabeth Tresch Housing Planner A f 99(0 Date f I s�S .■ .HL Vn .'� M. ills Y6. COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 10, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: A. Alterson, D. Jennings, D. Marino, C. Smith, K. Kelly, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, J. Clus, J. Tonkinson DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: L. Lyon, E. Tresch, C. Waite, S. Yazowski film t*11 MOM F1unj Messrs. Smith and Koolish discussed the plans for an indoor football practice facility at Northwestern University. They noted that the structure was precast concrete and no sign is currently being proposed. The Committee requested verification that a fire hook and ladder would have sufficient turning radius. The Committee approved the final plan. Ms. Smith abstained from the consideration of this matter. Mr. Ray Schultz discussed the landscape, canopy, fence and sidewalk plans for the Alden Estates. The Committee noted that the canopy is allowed by zoning. The Committee commented the landscaping was acceptable. The Committee discussed that the proposed solid masonry fences on either side of the entranceway could not be higher than 6 feet, by Ordinance. Mr. Alterson mentioned to Mr. Schultz that the lamps on top of the fence may be permitted as ornamental light standards. They noted than any signage on the fence would have to meet the Sign Ordinance and be reviewed separately. The Committee and Mr. Schultz discussed the external illumination of these signs by individual ground lamps. Mr. Schultz stated his desire to develop a gently horizontally undulating sidewalk, or not to build a sidewalk at all. The Committee unanimously approved the concept plan with an undulating sidewalk, if it is in conformance with the City Ordinance, and fence is not to exceed 4 feet 6 inches with signage light to cease at 11 p.m. Messrs. Bernstein and Parkman discussed the proposed 76 unit, 7 story independent living facility. They mentioned that the development would serve elderly and handicapped with 75 one -bedroom units. One two bedroom unit would be for the property manager. The project includes 32 parking spaces. -_ _ _. .. .- -- - -- -- - - - - , - -. - - .. -�,r .- A�„ _. :� , ... ..-�.-,.w�,,.r, r* - . °. r . „ 'w^-"'I,n,--�t•-r�t+r,r"..-^r(ir"'�f^ They mentioned that the neighborhood rei a;ddi tonsulxacf, The Committee noted that the surrounding neighborhood is smaller buildings and this development is massive for the neighborhood. The Committee suggested exploring some vertical lines to the north and south facades, placement of windows on the east and west facades, and possible massing changes to the building. The Committee noted the design should respond to the circumstances of this corner site location. It was noted that development is being subsidized by Federal Funds and would be tax-exempt. The Committee unanimously approved tabling the project until next week (April 17, 1996) during which time the Committee will review the project site. ElizeTresch Housing Planner 410A I I qqQ ©ate _ ����„a��,�4t.:�.4,�..,�.���.-.,. �,'�°+' M' - -��r �, ��� ^� !, ,., i .�a !�af'+�7!. '- . „ � , �,.,. „ ., �n nTi' �r . .w• � n -• M -. - � � - .__ YSi11iilY!IrYww Ir.+ a r�:�l.11.11lkxdn� IIY.,w�.i .. '. ^''. �'..�.'•:. d�� ''. � .-� },fir: �.,yi.:.i. -: . ;,:. (.1. r , •,i:r iy ¢ i3f'� F,'='�i t' "•:r .. .,".;.'�? J::t n='.;, cry i :!_.��,"'`•t� .ti §s.¢,�,y�i, t;•'�M.t'` c COMMITTEE ACTIoN r :xs SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 17, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino. A. Alterson, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello, H. Friedman, J. Glue, D. Marino, OTHER STAFF PRESENT: E. Tresch, C. Waite Messrs. Rogers and Wilson discussed the proposed signage on the new Play Place at the Mc Donald's at 1919 Dempster Street. Signage would include moving the existing nonconforming free-standing sign and adding new signage on the front and sides of the Play Place. The new building signs consist of the words "Play Place" on the front of the Play Place addition and logos in the form of "M" golden arches on the sides. The Committee adopted a motion to approve the proposed signage plan, subject to the condition that the signage on the property include either the free-standing sign or the new signage on the sides of the Play Place, but not both the free-standing sign and the side building signs, by a vote of 4 to 3. The Committee noted that all nonconforming signs must come into compliance by January 1, 2003. The Committee unanimously approved the staff report. SPAARC 96-0028 2002 Lincoln attest Review -Staff to ZBA J The Committee unanimously approved the staff report. IPAARC 96-0027 1729 Denim Avenuesio The Committee unanimously approved a proposal by Santa Fe Grill to recover an existing awning in a Unified Business Center Plan at 1729 Benson Avenue. _ SPAARC 96-0025 607-25 Emerson Street cane _t Messrs. Parkman and Bernstein discussed the proposed 7 story, 76 unit independent living facility. They noted that three residential structures, - - ,.-v"'.-. z _ x. _ = ti_ . ik i .S s -- � vy..� _ _ — _—�.i�.w - .- . ti•71eMNT1 .i _ ... - .. _ ii .. YYi --4t!A4 housing 5 families, snd'2 commercial buildings would be demolished. The Committee discussed the mass of the building, the siting of the building, and the relationship of the corner site and building to the neighborhood. The Committee suggested that the building and site should relate more to the existing neighborhood, The Committee suggested that possibly redesigning the building into an "L" shape, or moving the proposed foot print to the eastern edge of the property and moving parking spaces would accomplish this. In addition, a modified design could create a secure private space along Dewey Avenue that flowed into and related to the adjacent residential street and neighborhood. The Committee noted that there were currently more parking spaces than required by Code. Discussion tool: place regarding cost implications of various modifications. The Committee approved the concept of a 76 unit independent living facility on this site with the recommendation that the building be oriented toward Dewey and that open space on the property be so sited and designed to create a private yard which, while secure, serves- as a visual and functional link between the development and the residential neighborhood to the west and east. Vote was 4 to 2. &tTzwk Eiiz eth Tresch Housing Planner A pO Z2f 1?9& Date I �����•=it r, �,a�S.�Nr�c��+r�'�, j-���Etj, a� 1" :r�N l•�M; �.�.. 1, y'., i COMMITTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE 4 AM April 24, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: P. D'Agostino. A. Alterson, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello, J. Glus, D. Marino, DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: A. Berkowski, C. Bush, C. Ruiz, E. Tresch, C. Waite The Committee approved the staff report for the addition to the single-family home at 2328 Bryant Avenue. C. Smith abstained from discussion and vote. The Committee reviewed the proposed plans for buildout of a type 1 restaurant by Flat Top Grill at 707 Church Street. Committee noted that an inspection manhole and Metropolitan Water Reclamation District permit will be required. The Committee also noted that the exhaust system cannot encroach on the alley. The Committee unanimously approved the site design, subject to the proviso that the treatment of the curtain wall, window framing and glass will match the existing building design, materials, color and fenestration rhythm . Messrs. Jenkins, Geimer and Brubaker discussed the proposed development of a Whole Foods at 1640 Chicago Avenue, adjacent to the new residential tower. The Committee discussed the appearance review and design guidelines. The developer's representatives indicated that the smaller loading berth in the lower left quarter of Page A2-1, Grade Level Plan, of the building drawing was to be obstructed by a trash compactor and a dumpster. WF The Committee noted that this rendered the berth unusable far �►� di.l hr Jenkins also referred to a letter from the Corporation Counsel which _ Indicated that the design may comply with the loading requirements of the Zoning Ordinance if review staff consider the combined areas of the two berths, though it did not discuss the obstruction of one berth. The Committee further discussed anecdotally the volume of traffic in the alley to - the west of the development and specifically mentioned damage recently Incurred by the fire escape on the building to the west of this alley. The Committee indicated its concern regarding the development's sufficiency of loading capacity. E The Committee expressed concern about the parking arrangement on the second floor, specifically, the rationality of the striping, the size of some parking spaces, and the number of regulation sized spaces. The Committee noted that the lighting of the parking lot would be seen by occupants adjacent properties and requested photometrics be submitted. The Committee unanimously approved the site plan, subject to the loading berth and parking arrangement concerns, submission of all requested information and conformance to all applicable City codes. The Committee further approved the development for appearance review by a vote of 5 to 2. ' Eliz eth Tresch Housing Planner Date o . _ � r� tr#�n-''�•'ar`�,,.� iy��; ��-4 � - _ - '`c s � � < w + . 4 - �::i r_ - � , .... , A IN W f• co SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 1, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Smith, Chair; P. D'Agostino; A. Alterson; D. Jennings; K. Kelly; J. Tonkinson; J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; J. Gius; D. Marino DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: E. Tresch SPAARG 95-011 O 2504 Harrison Str _at Fjo�W Steven Knudson and Christina Tucci discussed the proposed new construction of a two -car garage at 2504 Harrison Street. The Committee discussed that they had reviewed this proposal on January 17, 1996, at which time they voted to disapprove the proposed site plan and suggested that the applicant change the garage's orientation to front Harrison Street. Committee Chair Carolyn Smith stated that the applicant had requested this opportunity to discuss with the Committee their project and the site constraints under which they are operating. The Committee discussed the safety and aesthetic concerns with the location and design of the garage. The Committee considered that this is a reversed corner lot where the side yard abuts the street and is substantially a continuation of the front yards beyond it. The applicant and the Committee discussed that this, the geometry of this almost square lot and the footprint of the principal structure results in particular difficulties in siting a standard sized garage upon this property. The Committee noted that the proposed garage location affects the views of the adjacent properties. The applicant stated that they will screen the view to the west with landscaping, and further indicated that the present arrangement of garage and driveway is objectionable to the neighbors to the west as the driveway is directly under the east side windows of that house. Mr. Alterson stated he is concerned with the placement of a building in what amounts to a continuation of the front yards along Harrison Street and the esthetic and economic impacts this may have upon the properties to the west. .. r .'nn+ar'T40..11MI-F2r01Wl'1i"�I11r-FRM1'1"1z Thy Corrirnt eye r,ofe1 tti# zoniriQ i~alies is required. The Committoe discussed that the site plan afforded cars forward ingress and egress from the driveway. The Committee voted to rescind the recommendation of January 17, 1996, by a vote of 5 to 3. A motion was made to approve the site plan with garage doors facing McDaniel Street and the driveway opening onto Harrison, with a recommendation that the applicant evaluate the possibility of creating a visual tie of the garage to the residence. This motion the Committee approved by a vote of 5 to 3. S±AMC 96-01 ZZ 101 Ridge Avenue Pre iminarvNinal Jim Fraser discussed the proposed landscaping, parking, trash and lighting plans for the Shell Gas Station at 101 Ridge Avenue. The Committee suggested that the planter on the southwest corner of the site be reduced in height a bit and the plantings within include evergreens as a center backdrop for flowers. The Committee noted that the trash enclosure should not be flush with the building, but be flush with the north property line. It was noted that the trash enclosure would be subject to zoning review. The Committee unanimously approved the site plan with the above concerns to be addressed. SPAARC 96-©032 1001 Chicaao Avenue Concept George Sarfatty, Janet Sulsberg, Branson Edwards and Richard Fisher discussed the proposed sign on the new Hollywood Video at 1001 Chicago Avenue. They discussed the existing structurally significant 3 foot projection of the building between the first and second floors. In order to provide signage, they propose to enclose the projection in a box which meets sign height requirements. The Committee noted that the existing projection and proposed box overhang the public right-of-way. The Committee suggested a review of the building permit to note if it contained any provisions for the existing projection, such as an easement agreement. The Committee mentioned that signage should be flush with the building on the west elevation. The Committee approved the concept of a box construction on the existing projection to provide signage, subject to research of past agreements. The vote was 4 to 1. Elisabeth Tresch Housing Planner Date 4-JA A SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 8, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Smith, Chair; P. D'Agostino; A. Alterson; A. Berkowsky; D. Jennings; D. Marino; J. Tonkinson; J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; J. Glus DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: L. Lyon; E. Tresch; C. Waite The Committee unanimously approved the Summary of Findings for May 1, 1996. � a i • 1 1 � a p t' 1 Messrs. Jim Stack and Scott Hartman discussed the concept plans for the demolition and reconstruction of portions of the St. Francis Hospital facilities. They elaborated on the community outreach process St. Francis Hospital is undertaking. Messrs. Stack and Hartman also discussed the recent changes in hospital uses and needs, which require fewer beds and small square feet of facility. They mentioned that St. Francis proposes to demolish one portion of the existing facility and build the new building on that open space. The services would then be transferred to the now building and the majority of the remaining portion of the facility would then be demolished. They added that the campus -like setting would remain the same. They mentioned that St. Francis may acquire some property on Mulford Street and Sherman Avenue. St Francis's representatives said that the present floor area of the facility is 688,706 sq. ft. with 396 beds, and that the proposed area after redevelopment would be about 355,400 sq. ft. with 150 to 225 beds. They showed a graphic indicating that the estimated cost to adapt the current facility is $80 million; to build a new hospital at the present location: $57 to 93 million; and to build on a new site (without consideration of land costs): $60 to 90 million. They further stated that St. Francis is looking to break ground on the new hospital in 1997; to occupy in 2000; and to begin demolition of the old hospital after 2000. The Committee noted that the main entrance would be off of Ridge Avenue. The Committee noted that the presentation and concept plans did not provide enough information for the Committee to vote on siting or appearance, but that St. Francis chould return when the plans are more developed. a- Q-1tiZ.LSLS z Don and Sue Conley discussed the proposed modification to the existing drive-thru facility at the Mc Donald's at 1117 Howard Street. They propose to install two new speaker stalls, in addition to thE: current one for the drive. thru. They mentioned that the cars in the drive-thru currently backup into Howard Street. The Committee noted that the existing handicapped stalls would have to be relocated. The Committee noted that the proposal must meet the parking space requirements. The Committee further noted that fast food restaurants are a special use at this location and that the modifications may trigger the requirement that the applicant petition for a new special use permit. The Committee stated that reference must be made to any ordinance which may have granted a special use for the operation of a type 2 restaurant here, in order to gauge if the proposed modifications exceed any past approved special use permit. The Committee noted that there was not enough information to take a vote. Messrs. Jim Rogers and Dan Pennise, of Primco Personal Communications, discussed the proposed new construction of an antennae at 2622 Green Bay Road. They mentioned that the tower would be approximately 124 feet in height. Mr. Alterson said that arguably 96-7-3 of the Zoning Ordinance exempts this structure and use from the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance subject to the conditions that the installation conforms to the rules of the FCC, FAA, and any other authority having jurisdiction; and for structures with a ground area exceeding 9 sq. ft. that the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee shall determine landscaping, screening and setbacks. The Committee expressed concern with the location given that the adjacent properties, especially the residential properties, were much lower than the tower. The Committee discussed that the proposed structure would be visible from most of the City. The Committee discussed with Primco's representatives exploring antennae locations on existing facilities, such as high buildings or poles. The Committee found that no acceptable landscaping, screening or setbacks can be determined to protect the surrounding properties and general area from adverse impacts stemming from the proposed development. The Committee voted unanimously to deny the proposed construction. /� Q,d, A- Eliz eth Tresch Housing Planner Date M ► , ��i,''''.� ; : SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMIttEC May 15, 1996 Room 2404 AEMBERS PRESENT; C. Smith, Chair; P. D'Agostino; A. Aiterson; K. Kelly; D. Jennings; J. Tonkinson; J. Wolinski AEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; J. Glus; D. Marino )ESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman The Committee unanimously approved the Summary of Findings for May S, 1996. After some discussion, it was moved and seconded to unanimously approve :he staff report to ZBA for a second story addition. Messrs. H. Hirsch, John Mc Linden and Evan Oliff represented Walgreen's For a proposed store at the above site. They presented a plat, site plan and elevation. The property is on the northwest corner of Dodge and Main. Messrs. Hirsch, Mc Linden and Oliff presented the Committee with elevation drawings. They noted that an alley splits the site; property to the north of this alley is R4, to the west of the tract property is R2. Mr. Mc Linden stated that they have spoken to the ward alderman who has responded positively. Walgreen's proposal is to consolidate the parcel at the Northwest corner of Dodge Avenue, the alley to the north of this and the residential parcel north of the alley; after having obtained alley vacation and purchase of this alley. Mr. Tonkinson indicated that many issues are touched by a proposed alley. He said all adjoining property owners and those utilizing the right of way must not object to the alley vacation. 100% ok from the neighborhood is necessary for alley vacation. He advised the representatives to send him a letter along with a plat of survey showing the vacation proposal and he would initiate the process. Alley vacations require 3/4 vote of Council. The proposed lot is and irregular polygon 95 by 135 feet with a two-story building of 12,285 square feet; retail sales, break room on first: floor and stock only on the second floor. C. Smith expressed concerns with ���Pa?xr;��''i�F"�"ti� � '�•:4-t.'r,r'.+'�'��. F �, . a. $ire*,-t"r�'+i?P'���•�T�?,. - - f . � � 1�,. �—, M "•1-.,.l.r.r<. -�t'. , '` ,{..: f,.y. .1-- -.a�' .,r'.,i,'°' - 1�;'•' �3;7yf.t�... .g' j�pp.� .i.,. y���':;7' �1 �tr1'h�l.tr.�-•'p1��;',E�.S�,`;�ti'i�c. -.5'- - .= the proposed gtfIWiUf N o i IMA Ith -Abk Me'. Hirsch Indle' ated that the' y will follow the Illinois Accessibility Code, as they are more stringent. No public bathroom facilities on the second floor, nor elevators would be provided. Their proposal is to relate the building back with the parking off the street and in a driveway around the building and place a drive -up window on the north side. Mr. Alterson indicated that according to the Zoning Ordinance, 4 stacking spaces are needed for a drive-thru window. Mr. Mc Linden indicated that past history shows that only 2 to 3 cars stack at a Walgreen's drive-thru; He said they sell only prescriptions thru the drive-thru facility. The desire is to have parking access to the building without flowing onto the street; portion of the parking will be on north and the southwest sides. Walgreen's proposes to have access for 41 stalls with sufficient F buffering landscaping. When autos exit the parking area, they turn left on Main and Dodge. Truck traffic will be one way to Main Street, only. Mr. Friedman asked if it would be feasible to site the building further on one side of the lot and have parking in one area only. The Walgreen's representative discussed that one -row parking or 60 feet would be more convenient for customers to the front of the store, rather than on just one side of the store. They said also drive-thru facilities need circulation. Mr. Mc Linden indicated that there would be less asphalt on the corners and more landscaping than is presently there. C. Smith expressed pedestrian traffic concerns; she felt that the proposal was very auto oriented; Mr. Mc Linden said that 80% auto and 20% pedestrian traffic is typical. Mr. Mc Linden indicated they have met with neighbors in the area who had no significant concern, other than that people will stay out of the alley, that an 8 foot fence will separate Walgreen's from residential lots; that there will be no liquor sales; and that the store will not be open 24 hours. Mr. Jennings indicated that the current alley continues to Dodge Avenue. The Walgreen's representatives said that neighbors indicated that this encourages "cut thru traffic." Walgreen's, they said is attempting to accommodate the neighbors in all respects. The possibility of area job opportunities was welcomed. They said that the neighbors made a request for Walgreen's to repave the alley which is disrepair, and this was agreed upon. Mr. Alterson indicated that north of the alley was Residential and it would be necessary to rezone the north portion of the site to C2 Commercial District. Walgreen's would also need to obtain a special use for the drive-thru facility. Discussion ensued regarding parking. 35 spaces are required for the first floor portion of the facility; 41 are proposed. All the aforementioned concerns will be addressed in zoning. Mr. Alterson advised that the first step is zoning analysis and Walgreen's should also include the parking concerns in the zoning analysis application. C. Smith reminded the representatives that there is a 15 feet, 6 Inch sign height limitation. Mr. Hirsch showed other examples of other Walgreen facades. Mr. Mc Linden inquired on the height limitation of fencing and was informed that S foot fencing is required when adjacent to residential. K. Kelly inquired as to the seating area for waiting for the bus, etc., and it was indicated that there was a planter which the passersby sat on. Mr. Alterson indicated that Walgreen's may not need variances, though they would need a map amendment and special use. He suggested that they apply for a zoning analysis and present it as if the area has been rezoned from R4 to C 1. Mr. Wolinski inquired of their time frame and Mr. Mc Linden stated they would like to begin construction as soon as possible; probably In late summer of 1996. The Committee discussed environmental issues. The Committee unanimously approved the development for concept. SPAARC 96-0038 316 Flgrence Avenue Prelimine IFingi Mr. Clasen presented his proposal to the Committee: 1) enclose space between two buildings and 2) close storage space on the outside to keep storage out of the elements. Mr. Alterson said that greenhouses are nonconforming in this location. He said that structural foot print on the greenhouse site cannot expand unless the applicant obtains a map amendment to rezone the property or obtain a text amendment to include greenhouses as a "special use" in the R District. Mr. Alterson suggested that the applicant seek legal advise as to the best strategy to follow. He said a special use may be more acceptable. Mr. Wolinski asked the applicant if he had spoken to the neighbors. Mr. Clesen replied that they had no complaints from the neighbors and they seem to have a good rapport with the "community" in the area. He said there is less traffic at their establishment, as they are not retail. Mr. Wolinski stated that if there are objectors, approval would probably be more apparent. C. Smith suggested that this matter be tabled so the applicant �_ could obtain more information and return to the Committee. It was unanimously agreed to table this matter. SPAA$C 96-05?39 707 Church Street F1m1 Mr. Stone and Ms. Wenger appeared before the Committee on behalf of Flat Top Grill. The Committee reviewed the revised elevation drawing and discussed matching the existing facades anc9 cc s� .. W; ..,,tb s that they would extend the ledge below the windows aloha k�e front of the 'S store. The storefront would be anodized aluminum of a chrome color with the business logo on the windows. Mr. Alterson indicated that he spoke to C. Ruiz, Preservation Coordinator, whose concern was that the ledge and window rhythm would match the adjacent stores, Mr. Store said it would. After some discussion, it was moved and seconded to approve the plans, as s presented. A Jc6Ann Minear Secretary " `� Date E 4 4 �#�f��� ����T7�C�SJC>•V bi<ai...f1 k y. � ,- k _ » SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 22, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Smith, Chair; P. D'Agostino; A. Alterson; K. Kelly; D. Jennings; J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; J. Glus; D. Marino, J. Tonkinson DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz, C. Waite, Approval of_SuIDmea afEndings of Previous_ Meeting of May 15, 1220 The Committee unanimously approved the Summary of Findings for May 15, 1996. ptflllmiam Steven Bernstein, attorney for owner, stated that the proposal was to subdivide property into two lots, each with 36 foot frontages so that two single-family dwellings could be constructed. Mr. Bernstein said that lot size is consistent with the neighborhood. One lot of 70 feet plus, he said, would be unmarketable in the area and the surrounding prpoerty valeus would increase with the proposal. The owner of the 50 foot front owns the other lots. Next to the subject property is a 2 flat building which has been plated forever. Wittington Trust owns this and much other property in Evanston. The landowner is a Trust and they pian to sell the property as vacant space. Hallmark and Johnson are the Developer. Mr. Alterson indicated that zoning review indicates the lots are deficient as to area and setbacks. He also said with the building on the proposed east lot is only 3.6 feet from the proposed lot line. Mr. Bernstein said he could redraw the plans to make the lots smaller, but an 8 112 foot separation would be bad. Mr. Alterson indicated that the increase of 5 feet would make the lots no more complying than before. Mr. Bernstein indicated he knew he was required to obtain two variations. Mr. Alterson stated that according to the Plat Act, a plat is not required for a one-time division of a lot in a recoreded subdivision. It was moved to approve preliminary plans, motion was seconded with Mr. Alterson abstaining because the prpoopsal does not conform to the Zoning Ordinance and C. Smith was opposed. 1 e 11 Messrs. W. Kihm from C rus Realt and Chris Thomas of Thm oas grad Y Y Thomas Architects were present and discussed the landscaping plans for a 20 unit building. Mr. Thomas said that they received demo permit, pending EPA approval and a foundation permit. Previously, the matter was approved at an appearance conference. Messrs. Kihm and Thomas proposed developing the site with front yard -planting area, ground cover, trees (evergreens, deciduous trees and hosta); side yard -privacy for adjoining units, deciduous trees, coniferous and hosta with berms; rear yard -ground cover with trees for screening of the property. C. Smith asked if the "brown area" on the plan was bark mulch and asked why not ground cover. Mr. D'Agostino indicated mulch would not stay put without a berm. Mr. Thomas indicated there would only be mulch and patios on that area. C. Smith expressed that there should be more ground cover. Mr. Thomas indicated that ground cover would be increased with crab or plum trees. Mr. Kilm indicated the security is at the front entrance and there are 3 trees to shade the walkway in front. C. Smith felt the north side was sparse of landscaping. Mr. Thomas replied by saying that there is no exposure and it is a fenestrated. C. Smith asked about terraces: the reply was there was terrace on the fourth level. Mr. Wolinski asked Mr. Alterson of the zoning issues. Mr. Alterson replied by stating that he would discuss the zoning analysis with the Zoning Officers and the landscape plans would be included in the permit for plan review. Mr. Ruiz, Preservation Coordinator, indicated that Preservation Committee has not seen the final landscaping plans, but the Preservation Committee had approved the concept drawings. it was indicated that they would be able to review them. Mr. Friedman indicated it would be good to know the result of the Preservation Committee's discussion on the matter. Mr. Alterson asked what the gross square foot for FAR was and it was answered 32,000 square feet. Mr. Thomas indicated they would increase the parking area from 10 ft. by 25 feet to 10 feet by 35 feet. Discussion ensued about the loading ramp. Motion was made to approve the Concept/Preliminary subject to the addition of ground cover on the north side of the building. The Committee approved the motion with Mr. Friedman abstaining. ' _45' '.�%r A,}...: ..• l ,�•:a. .,iyvl, �ii by [1' a.4{�-S`Yt.'..,`..i; t Sally Lufkin introduced Karen Fraser of Progressive Evanston Neighbors to discuss proposed streetscape improvements at Callan and Oakton and the lot at 606 Oakton. CDOG granted funds for improvements, and St. Francis Hospital donated $15,000 for the project. The improvement area is the Railroad embankment, South Blvd. to Schwartzhoff Cleaner building and Includes Custer Avenue. They propose the metal fence on the embankment with a masonry wall with trees and flowering plants at the base. The plan entails placing a higher wall under the viaduct and placing beautify stone at curbs and corners. Property adjoining Oakton Street contains multi -family dwellings. The Committee discussed that the first foot of walk was the public right of way. The Plan envisions a retaining wall along the front. The plan places decorative pavers at Oakton and Custer. The area is north of South Blvd. to Custer. Mr. D'Agostino inquired if the project will go to Linden. Ms, Frazer said this is not in their budget. C. Smith suggested that they reconsider the wall and use parkway planters and pavers and carry the project further; also that to the extent the walls are fences, the Zoning Ordinance prohibits them, C. Smith inquired of the "bluestone" K. Frazer said it is "biuestone paving on concrete base." C. Smith hoped that this project would tie in with design elements used in other areas, i.e., Main Street, etc. Mr. Friedman suggested that the property be graded and get rid of all the "junk" in the area. S. Lufkin indicated that Mr. Tonkinson has been contacted and that cooperative maintenance can do the work. C. Smith asked for summary of ideas for the Progressive Evanston Neighbors to work with; 1. Match pavement; 2. Grade the front of the property along Oakton, rather than retaining wall; 3. Discuss the wall and zoning issues and height with the Zoning Division, and 4. Carry the existing tree line to Linden. A motion was made to approve concept with consideration of the 4 above suggestions. Motion adopted. S,pAAR(e_ 6-0047 2703 Sheridan Road Preliminary Messrs. Thomas and Kihm represented the property owners, presented a proposal to demolish a house, and subdivide into a two lot. The property is on Ingleside and Sheridan, 2 blocks north of Central Street. The home is a 3 story yellow brick building and has been on market 2 years. Mr. Wolinski 72 inquired if the house was overpriced and he was told that there just is not the market for such a house. C. Ruiz inquired of the impact of the adjoining neighbors. Mr. Kihm replied that the other properties have been subdivided. The rehab cost for the house would be $500,000. Mr. Friedman indicated he felt it necessary to see photos of the house and property. The Committee voted to table the matter for the meeting of May 29, 1996. 3 - - - ,,.. .. iG � � L ,. Y.Y iY ����aM •ram_-.___ _� _.91� �RLCSl�7>�1. _ .1� . �.�_ h a Mr. Benni of Presbyterian Homes discussed a proposal to erect a carport attached to the south end of the building for the residents. He indicated that they are pending zoning analysis. The property is on Oak Avenue and Grove Street and is an independent living facility owned by the Presbyterian Homes. Mr. Benni showed renderings and presented photos of the area. The north elevation is on Grove Street. The new car port would be over the existing parking lot. Discussion ensued about the zoning analysis. It was Indicated that a space between the walkway and the carport would defeat the purpose of the carport. Mr. Benni indicated that the carport will be made of lightweight material and will be attached to the current building. The parapet wall will look like the existing building and the parking will remain the same. It was motioned to approve preliminary drawings subject to compatible color, and to work with Zoning on issues. Mr. Benni should bring landscape plans when he appears for final review. The project was approved with Mr. Alterson abstaining because of zoning nonconformities. Discusojon of SPAARC Review of Develgon�s Requir[pgZoning Elelief The Committee discussed its authority when reviewing Major and Minor Zoning Reports and requests. It was decided that the SPAARC authority should be reviewed and a legal opinion was suggested. More research is necessary regarding the authority of the Site Plan Review Committee. SPAARC 96 9042 722 Foster Street Rayiew alaff 13oport to ZBA The Committee reviewed the plat of survey for a 20 foot by 20 foot garage. The proposal is to tear down the existing garage. There are no elevations and no problem with lot coverage. The proposal was moved and approved to grant. SPAAR! 96-0043 1319 Lake St eet Report on _Minor Variation It was moved and seconded to approve a request for placing an air conditioning compressor less than 10 feet from the alley lot line, subject to screening the unit with planting materials. Motion adopted. SPAARC 96-0044 2401 Lawndale Avenue Report on Minor Venation Proposal is for a 6 foot privacy fence around a deck with relandscaping. The request is to expand the fence on the corner side of Garrison. Mr. Ruiz stated that Preservation Commission had reviewed fencing in Historic or Landmark areas and their preference was 1) open corners; 2) minimum height of 4 feet for fences, 3) Material should not be opaque. After some discussion it was moved and seconded for approval, with Mr. Alterson abstaining owning to Zoning nonconformities. 4 I NEW 3PA . _.��....�LE street t w; ,, 5 ItQ s . Min r V arse Init Raimod Fence variation for an 8 foot gate at a condo complex, to provide privacy for patios in rear of the complex. The property is landmark status and must be reviewed by Preservation. it was moved and seconded to defer this request to Preservation for their review. Q, .tit.- id/Ann Minear Secretary Date Ma �.jz'�^ ING$ SITE PLAN AND APl EARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 29, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Smith, Chair; P. D'Agostino; A. Alterson; K. Kelly; D. Jennings; D. Marino, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; J. Glus DESIGN PROFESSIONAL; H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz, E. Tresch, C. Waite, Approval of -Summary of Findings of Previous Meeting of May 221996 Minutes were amended to include "a discussion occurred on the possibility of adding a submittal of photos to the requirements of Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee submission." With this amendment, minutes were approved unanimously. PAARC 96-0048 1501—cantral Street Concept Messrs. Dan Pennisi and Jim Rogers discussed the proposal by Prime Co. to erect an antenna on the northeast corner entry tower of Northwestern University's Dyche Stadium. The noted that they do not have a lease with Northwestern as yet, but are optimistic enough to produce engineering drawings. They said they are coordinating this matter with the stadium renovation project. Mr. Pennisi and Rogers mentioned that the antenna would be roof mounted and the equipment would be inside the entry tower with 10 foot 5 inch projection from the top of the tower to the top of the antenna. They also noted that the entry tower is the furthest point on the stadium from residential areas. The Committee discussed that this proposal 3_ was made as a substitution for the antenna proposal previously made at 2626 Green Bay Road, which the Committee had denied. The Committee approved the proposal. C. Smith abstained. SPAARC 96-0047 2703 Sheridan Boa,d Pam Messrs Kihm, Thomas and Fleckman discussed the proposal to subdivide the exiting property into two equally conforming lots. They displayed photos of the existing single-family structure and some adjacent properties. They noted that the property has been for sale for 2 years and the adjacent properties are much smaller and newer. The Committee discussed the quality and character of the existing house and property. The Committee suggested that the developers consider moving the existing house to one of Summary of Findings of 5-29-96 1 l {� '' '• _ - - -. - - ._ - :. ., �. .., .a,. M . ..� •IiP Flip •i�cr'+Ir r . +�a�t^''!_��-F..1.. W¢_ul� Y}!.'.+, A���'a��'.�i•J.;_.�r?_� ..r. .� -.r .�w a - _ the proposed now subdivided lots. The Committee added that dembil n the house and subdividing the property adversely effects the character of the neighborhood and of the City. The Committee noted that the proposed lots will conform with the Zoning Ordinance. The Committee approved the subdivision with one abstention and one opposed vote. SPAARC 960050 SO Oak Awen 9 Pme iminaryl,j-inai Mr. Gorham discussed the proposal to pave and place 9 outdoor tables on a portion of Va Pensiero's garden property. He added that the bushes would be maintained as boundary and no new fencing would be added. The Committee noted that the restaurant is an existing nonconforming use in a residential district and that a zoning determination is necessary on whether the outdoor tables are an expansion of a nonconforming use. The Committee discussed that this proposal does not require a building permit and is not required to come before the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee. The Committee closed this matter. Discussion of Subdivisions The Committee discussed whether the Committee or the Council can deny a subdivision plat that meets all technical standards. The Committee expressed concern that it was not able to take community standards as well as prevailing and traditional land use patterns into consideration when reviewing subdivisions. The Committee noted that the Zoning Ordinance does have a Residential Estate Overlay District, however, no property is mapped within this overlay district. It was suggested that this overlay district could be used to protect estate sized lots developed with the mansion type houses in those parts of Evanston where such development is the historic pattern. The Committee also discussed the request of property owners to realize a reasonable economic return on their property, the impact of large lot zoning on the affordibility of housing, and implications on the City's tax base of splitting estate sized lots. The Committee noted that both the Plan Commission and Preservation Commission are proper forums in which to discuss a possible evaluation of community character and application of their standards in subdivision review. The Committee further noted that such standards should strongly relate to the Comprehensive Plan. Wk Eli ` eth Trssch Planner /} ate Summary of Findings of 5-29-96 2 _R __^ .., .. - -. .--• - - -, - - - ,.'' .r .. ,,. ... rrn .m+'.n—.."iY'r"Rt'+-}nF r'"-".'nAf*r .. .. n a n dill, 0 A:J W M W MY 61. all 4YIS16 . it ji ��.,ddi ...1Y ....1:. ,.,,.. .0lWM4AI. I, -. -'" n.I..u4 NW.. . dU_ ...w. �1W1 A .,. .., . 'i �. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 5, 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Smith, Chair; P. D'Agostino; A. Alterson; L. Black, K. Kelly; D. Jennings; D. Marino, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; J. Glus DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz, M. Travis, E. Tresch ApprovalQf Summamgf Findings of Previous _Meeting _of MAY 29. 1996 The Committee unanimously approved the summary of findings. Ms. Janel Sulsberg discussed the proposed parking plan for the Hollywood Video at 1001 Chicago Avenue. She noted the area is currently paved and the proposal is to stripe the area for 28 spaces. The Committee discussed that additional parking is not required by Zoning for the development: of the Hollywood Video Store, since the site footing will not be increased. The Committee reviewed the Site Plan and Appearance Review criteria. The Committee noted that the lot must be properly drained and they also noted that two handicapped spaces should be provided. The Committee requested that a site illumination plan be submitted, and noted that the entire lot should be properly lit to alleviate safety concerns. The Committee recommended planting on the entrance and along the back fence and requested submission of a landscape plan. The Committee noted that, while the proposal was only for the parking area, there were concerns about the site signage and screening of the air compressor. The Committee unanimously approved the parking proposal. •4.ARC 96-OQ52 2210 Aghlandn1f iT1 <FTik Messrs. Mark Powers and David Roberts discussed the proposal for the new construction of a car wash on the property. Mr. Powers discussed that the property is owned by the Water Reclamation District and he is negotiating to obtain a 39 year lease on the property. Mr. Roberts discussed the design for the mechanical car wash design which would likely be masonry with some 3 Summary of .Findings of 5-29-96 1 �3�-.t .F•_-� ..�^r,�= 1rs�+.��'ix:�.-;r-`'-x.�T�r,� _�—�='4-� .�--�- a ..- -',�� s-. ,� - -- .., - -. _ - - _ _ _- _ - _ - j si-_ 6 .. IWA rk. .-Y".. -66 . IOW glazed finish. He compared the anticipated design to a historic gas station of ' the 1920's and 1930's. The Committee recommended having an environmental review on the site done and noted I had previously been used as an emissions testing station. The Committee suggested that precautions be taken to provide security given that a bike path bounds the site on two sides. The Committee recommended landscaping around the building and along Ashland Avenue. It was noted that the City Parks Department has been maintaining this property and the development may be seen as a decrease in City open space, even though it is not City owned. The Committee approved the proposal by a vote of 5 to 3, with L. Black abstaining. 96-0051 1400-147 4 I AWla Street PreliMinary Mr. Marc K. Segel discussed the proposed 91 parking spaces behind 1400- 1414 Isabella Street. Mr. Segel noted that a plan for 102 parking spaces had previously been submitted to the ZBA, but was withdrawn based on citizen complaints. He mentioned that the new plan has been supported by the neighborhood and provides one space fore every unit in the building. The Committee noted that the plan requires a review by the Traffic Department. The Committee approved the parking plan, subject to all applicable codes and ordinances. L. Black abstainers. SPAARC 96-0053 2113 Colfax Street Minor Fengze Variation Mr. Philip Neff discussed the proposed front and side yard fence. The Committee noted that fences are not allowed in the front yard and there had been neighborhood complaints and expressed concern regarding the material. The Committee suggested that an alternative might be to eliminate a front yard fence and retain only the side yard fence. They noted that changes to the proposed fence will require a renotification of the neighborhood. The Committee denied the proposal. L. Black and H. Friedman abstained. 3 SPAARC, 96-0055 1800 Crain Street Minor Eno Variation Ms. Susan Enrich discussed the proposed fence. The Committee approved the fence. L. Black abstained. SPAARC 96-0054 300 Dewey Avenue Minor Fence V tiaf on Terry Mulcaire discussed his existing front yard fence. The Committee noted that zoning does not permit a front yard or side yard abutting a street fence. The Committee considered whether the applicant should propose a new design. The Committee denied the variation. L. Black abstained. Summary of Findings of 5-29-96 2 C. Ruiz provided a copy of the Preservation Commission's report and recommendations on the proposed fence at this landmark building. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal with the Preservation Commission's recommendations. 17 r : 1_ Mr. Anthony Amantegi discussed the proposed sidewalk cafe at Einstein's Bagels, a type li restaurant at 1745 Sherman Avenue. The Committee noted that not all the City departments had reviewed the proposal. The Committee discussed that the use of disposable beverage containers, flatware and dishware is proposed which is in violation of City's Sidewalk Cafe Regulations. The Committee noted that the use of disposable beverage containers may be allowed by City Council upon showing a good cause. The Committee unanimously voted to table the proposal until the next meeting of June 12, 1996, in order to complete the City Department review. Elizabi(th Tresch Planner �,1- gTG Date Summary of Findings of 5-29-96 _ 3 visa ..t•"?- k ,�-� � - � irr� SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 12„ 1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: A. Alterson; L. Black, D. Jennings; K. Kelly; D. Marino, J. Tonkinson MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; P. D'Agostino; J. Glus; C. Smith; J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: M. Cashman, E. Tresch Approval of Summary of Findings of Previous Menting of Jung S. 1996 The Committee unanimously approved the summary of findings. FM Messrs. Jim Rogers and Tom Poitras of Prime Co., Inc„ discussed the proposed antennae on a portion of Dyche Stadium, which was previously reviewed by the Committee. They noted that there are no changes from the previous proposal. They discussed that they do not have a signed lease with Northwestern, but anticipate one within the next two weeks. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. SPAARC 96-0057 1745 Sherman Avenue Final The Committee discussed that this proposal for a sidewalk cafe at a type II restaurant, Einstein's Bagels, was tabled at the last Committee meeting until all City departments had completed their reviews. At this time, all reviews, except for zoning, which is contingent on site review, are complete, The : Committee noted that the sidewalk cafe proposes to use disposable cutlery which is not allowed by Ordinance. The Committee voted unanimously to deny the proposed sidewalk cafe. SR AARC 96-0033 900 Dqdgi-Avenue Preli_ minary Messrs, Howard Hirsch and John Mc Linden discussed the proposed consolidation, map amendment and construction of a new Walgreen's on the corner of Dodge Avenue and Main Street. They discussed that they had revised the proposal a little, due to Committee and neighborhood comments. The proposal includes some more parking spaces, an increased buffer distance on the north edge, decreased canopy on the north side of the building, an easement for truck turning from the site into the alley, and a bus Summary of Findings of 6-12-96 1 ', rr'- �1T Tar:" r •�y; r' stop seating area with plantings and a monument sign. . E tha landscape along Main Street and Dodge Avenue will be shrubbery at about 3 feet high, so that the parking lot can be seen from the streets for security purposes. They noted that they have agreed to limit the hours of operation to 6 a.m. to 12 midnight, though the snore will likely be open from 9 a.m. to 10 p.m., with the drive-thru open during the same hours. They mentioned that they are negotiating with the neighborhood on whether to close the parking lot at night. The Committee discussed the proposed buffer to the north, including fencing and landscaping. The Committee discussed that the proposal contains only one loading berth, while two are required by Zoning. The Committee noted that a landscaping plan and a photometric; study is required for the entire proposal for final review. The Committee discussed the proposed parking set back of 5 feet from the property lines along Main Street and Dodge Avenue. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal, subject to all required regulations. The Committee unanimously voted to table this proposed consolidation until the City Engineer reviews the proposal, The Committee requested that a representative of the applicant be present at the next meeting to discuss this proposal. The Committee unanimously voted to table this proposed consolidation until a representative of the applicant was present to discuss the proposal. Messrs. Jim Leahy and Joe Bonfanti discussed the proposed antennae to be installed on the roof -top of 2601 Central Street. The discussed that there will be 9 antennae, three in each direction, each approximately 3 feet above the roof parapet wall. They noted that the parapet wall will screen the base and cabinets of the antennae. The Committee expressed concern with antennae in residential areas. The Committee approved the proposal, with one opposed. The Committee approved the staff report for the resubdivision of lots on Florence Avenue and Greenleaf Street. L. Black abstained. Summary of Findings of 6-12-96 2 �.�...,. .. .� ,_ � � •n�-.-..�.-n. ter--. nn -.r. �-�r��;... ..r ,. .. .. .,. . .M�yre •. ,,. ,-� . _ ,�. _-, �, n, r. •. .. ,. ,. •..��.. ,. +., �. .. =-`!.-, ;+' rV'��1. .�Y V..: ;,',: __.ice,... •. .,. _ ...r�yi.'_'��'`r;, .•J "- ��., � � eJi_.,, 1'..•]-...� h�a-'�1'='-�.�1',r .tt11�.. _-.. ,y'. .i. �:.::�. :,� �i°:�"r.VY�'!!y'S Mr. Daniel Faierstein discussed the proposed bad and breakfast to be developed in the existing single-family house at Forest Avenue and Hamilton. He discussed that the house is a landmark and no exterior renovation is proposed. He mentioned that there are three garage spaces. He discussed the screening of shrubbery, fencing and a brick kneewall along Hamilton. He mentioned that there are 5 bedrooms, and the owner will use one bedroom for private use and 4 bedroom for the bed and breakfast. The Committee noted that a bed and breakfast requires a special use permit and also must go through a licensing process. The Committee also discussed that any proposed exterior renovation must be reviewed by the Preservation Commission and suggested that the Preservation Commission be consulted for any interior renovation. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. Eliz&eth rench Planner Date Summary of Findings of 6-12-96 3 11; ,-, I. �r�.l ., _ Y�-, �.. �. I --ft. 1 Y LA -Le.�, Y.JrII L'Qf�f.'Ll3s Il l �i: � I_±� -- • Li.'f SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .• _ SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 19, 1996 ' Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: A. Aiterson; L. Black, J. Glus, D. Jennings (Chair); D. Marino, J. Tonkinson MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; P. D'Agostino; C. Smith; J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: B. Falstro m C. Ruiz E. Tresch C. Waite Apprgyal of Summary gf Funding, of -previous Meeftpg of June 12J 99B The Committee unanimously approved the summary of findings. r • 1 • 1 • w f y Fib Messrs. Ken Hazlett, Anthony Moody and Bishop Carlis Moody, discussed the proposed new construction of Faith Temple Church, elementary school and gymnasium. Mr. Hazlett discussed that the City Council approved a special use permit for the project in 1995, and the plat of consolidation was completed prior to the special use permit. He noted he has just prepared a revised parking plan with 33 spaces. He said that the cost of construction is 3 $1.8 million. Mr. Hazlett discussed that the existing church and vacant 3 house will be demolished. He discussed the construction materials of concrete masonry with drivet along the base and roof line, limestone window sills, and colored glass in the windows of the sanctuary. He noted that the existing trees will remain and low shrubbery will be added. The Committee suggested incorporating the entrance canopy, lettering and tower elements more fully in the entire building design. The Committee unanimously = approved the proposed new construction. S AARC 9 -Ofi62 1335 Howard Street FnW 3 Mr. Albert Adami discussed the proposed 24 hour automatic teller machine to be installed at the drive-thru island at 1335 Howard Street. The Committee raised concerns about the security of the location owing to its lack of visibility from off the site. Mr. Adami offered to increase the fighting of the ATM and mentioned that the proposed ATM site is observed from a camera to increase the sight line. The Committee approved the installation, L. Black from Police Department opposed. L. Black discussed with Mr. Adami other locations on the site with a higher visibility. Mr. Adami said that these were potential sizes for other ATMs and that proposed location is only for drive-thru customers. Summary of findings of 6-19-96 1 ' ,,.,. .. . , —,-,;rm-�^^,�.,�tr� . , a ,'il!I rrrq+ .s .r, i,•m ef'dt>-.a!p Y r"�1F'y..r'aA W u r a WWI �Y�u ...IIr IYWII .• �.Y i..l (,4 JMIi�_ SPA©RG 26-0062 1744 ■a rQmt Avenue Mr. George Austin discussed that the plans had been revised and mentioned zoning concerns regarding off -site parking. The Committee voted unanimously to table review of the proposal until the revised plans wore reviewed by Zoning. Ms. Janel Suslberger and Mr. Branson Edwards discussed the proposed parking, landscaping and lighting development adjacent to the Hollywood Video at 1001 Chicago Avenue on the revised plans dated 6/19/96. They noted that 2 handicapped spots have been developed, along with proposed painting and slats on the back fence adjacent to the alley. They also proposed construction of a three foot white tubular fence and planting of a tree on the right-of-way in the front of the parking lot. They pointed out that the new plan includes a bike rack and planters at the entrances. They mentioned that the site improvements were limited due to their desire to maximize parking spaces, of which there are 29 on the present plan. The Committee noted that access to some of these is difficult, and mentioned replacing the ones next to the alley fence with landscaping. Mr. Branson said they were concerned that cutting into the parking lot in order to provide landscaping would reduce the lot's future utility. They added that they would like the parking meters along Chicago Avenue to be limited to 15 minutes, or posted as a loading zone. The Committee mentioned that the screening of the air handling units on the southern edge of the store will be allowed by Zoning and plans reviewed during the permit process. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal, subject to approval of the screening and photometric analysis. ..I Mr, Edwards then discussed the two signage proposals for the Hollywood Video. The first alternative would enclose the structure "lip" of the building with a box upon which a sign meeting all Sign Ordinance requirements would be placed. Ms. Sulsberger noted that the box would provide drainage for roof water run-off. The second alternative would maintain the "lip" and band three sides of the building with neon and use small channel letters. The Committee approved the box alternative, with one opposed. SPAARC 9_ 5w0_114 1 ?0 Dodge Avenue REW Mr. Clifford Radatz of Criezis Architects discussed the proposed expansion of the extended care facility at 120 Dodge Avenue. He noted that the HVAC unit will now be located in a recessed area of the mansard roof and Summary of Findings of 6-19-96 2 1lMiSiirluLfllMsiy �UY'.Is�LPtyid�lwa'a�.:.'.ditnYErc�rsnyu+�.,cr,'eLi■:[Ua,.cxt�...�.,. .IrW�.;�'I�wa.�. - - - ---- -.-' ._..,••• 1--•,••-•i.� •will require a hand rail along the front of the recession. He mentioned that the existing landscaping will be maintained. The Committee approved the proposal with one abstention. t Mr. Gabor Zsolnay of Northwestern University discussed the proposed consolidation of lots, noting that the University had recently acquired a property to make a new contiguous lot. Mr. Zsolnay said that the University is not presently contemplating any construction on the property. The Committee unanimously approved the consolidation. ++ 1 1I* 1:5.,k1lallar.• ' _ t a EWMII Mr. bonnie Williams of Northwestern University discussed the proposed consolidation of the property, in order to provide a lot for the possible construction of a vehicle maintenance facility in the future. The Committee unanimously approved the consolidation. Messrs. Steve Bernstein and John Willison discussed variances for a 50 foot lot which may be considered to be substandard if determined that the lot was owned in common with the adjacent property. They indicated that the setbacks of the proposed house for this lot are well within the Zoning regulatory limits. The Committee unanimously approved the staff report. Zigns on t c fgllo + t . • • • prtiese 1630 Chicago Avenue The temporary signage for the John Buck building rental office. 1415 Sherman Avenue Signage on the facade of Kaehler Luggage, which needs to be placed higher than permitted by right because of the location of features on the existing facade. Ali beth Tresch Planner O0da'!199('P- Date Summary of Findings of 6-19-96 3 - r• SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE .r z.... June 26, 1996 r.... Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT; A. Alterson; P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings (Chair); K Kelly, D. Marino MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; H. Friedman, J. Glus, C. Smith; J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski OTHER STAFF PRESENT: B. Falstrom, C. Ruiz, E. Tresch, C. Waite, S. Walsh Approval of Summary of Findings of Previous Meeting of June 19. 1996 No vote from Committee was taken on the summary of findings. SPAARC 96-9057 1245 Sherman Avenue Fiaga Mr. Anthony Amunategui discussed the revised plans for the sidewalk cafe at Einstein's Bagels, a type 11 restaurant. He discussed that the proposal includes the use of non -disposable flatware and dishware, and the provision of a bus person for the outdoor seats, in conformance with the City Ordinance. He noted that he would request that City Council allow disposable beverage containers. He provided three options for tables to be configured. The Committee agreed that the option with two clusters of three tables on both the north and west sides of the entrance was the most preferred. The Committee noted that, while the proposed site plan does not provide the distance of the tables from the crosswalks, corner, fire hydrant, bus stops, trees or plantings, it appears that some tables are within 15 feet of the fire hydrant, which would make the tables nonconforming with the Ordinance. K. Kelly stated that he would not view the tables as an obstruction, since the hook up to the fire hydrant would be from the opposite side of the tables. The Committee requested that a site plan with all distances from the tables to articles noted above be submitted to City a Council. The Committee unanimously approved the sidewalk cafe with nondisposable flatware and dishware, with two clusters of three tables each and with a site plan noting distances, subject to the City Council granting a waiver to Section 7-2-604c, SP,AARQ 96-0005 1319-1323 Chicago Avenue Fiala Messrs. Chris Thomas and Walter Kihm presented the revised plans of June 16, 1996, and discussed the proposed new construction of a 20 unit condominium building. The Committee noted that the landscaping plan had been approved on May 22, 1996. Mr. Kihm discussed that the zoning issues Summary of Findings of 6-26-96 errs-' ni,v in-M11'' •gip+ nr��- ,n, -- .° - - .. " n •' had been addressed in the revised plans. The committee unanimously approved the plans. SMARC,9fi-062 1744 12arraW Avenue FIRW Mr. George Austin presented the revised }Mans of June 18, 1998 and discussed the proposed 26 space parking lot adjacent to the Bethel Church. The Committee indicated that further zoning analysis would be required to determine whether this parking area would be considered an expansion of the special use permit previously granted the church. The Committee requested a flip-flop in location of the one handicapped parking space and entrance ramp, as well as a 4 foot hedge along the length and front of the parking area. The Committee noted that a Water Reclamation District permit had been received and drainage will tie into the existing system. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal, subject to applicable zoning relief. award Street Mr. Dough Harmon of DRW Service discussed the proposal to remove five storage gas tanks and install three new gas tanks and five dispensers at 1201 Howard Street. He discussed that the proposal also includes a four column canopy over the dispensers. The Committee discussed that the. property currently is not a functioning gas station, but only conducts auto repair, and questioned whether the proposal would be considered a new or expanded use. The committee unanimously voted to table the discussion until a site plan, plat and photos of the site were provided. The Committee 3 also requested that a representative of the service station be present to discuss the explicit plans. $PAARC_96- 067 I!a35 Grant Street Pr [y Ms. Laura Tilly and Ellen Galland discussed the proposed expansion of the Evanston Day Nursery at 1835 Grant Street, an Evanston landmark. Ms. Tilly discussed that the two story addition would provide classroom and computer room areas for a new after -school care program, and office and conference room space. She noted that the new program is anticipated to ll t f 26 t 4fi children and the children will be irked "crease enro men rem o r p up at schools by a new nursery bus. She noted that the Nursery had received $60,000 in CDBG funds for the expansion. Ms. Galland noted that the neighborhood was primarily single-family residential and that the expansion is designed to have very little visibility from the street. The Committee noted that the Nursery has a special use permit and the proposed expansion may require an amendment to that permit. The Committee commented that the proposal mint be reviewed by the Preservation Commission. The Committee discussed the proposed handicapped parking space and agreed that its placement off the allay was preferable to a curb a == Summary of Findings of 6-26-96 2 14 ,+e� J.i G�: :S� t .. F.'' ,:..•l ;: ' cut and access from Grant Street, Tha.��ii�i O `hii, `th ti it would haV4" to be determined by Zoning if any parking was raquired because of the addition. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal, subject to appropriate zoning relief. $PAS CJ6-0068 2951 _Central Street F[UW Mr. Ray Manalang discussed the proposed development at the First Chicago Bank of two new ATM machines, to coincide with the closing of the interior of the bank. The proposal would remove the drive -up window and replace it with one ATM, and one ATM would be added to the walk up area for a total of 2 ATM walk ups. Mr. Manalang said the facility will be unstaffed. He discussed that, at this time, First Chicago-NBD does not have any plans for the bank building, but was considering possibly converting the entire site to an automated facility. The Committee expressed the desire to see the property used for some economic activity in keeping with the neighborhood context. The Committee unanimously approved the two proposed ATMs. SPAARC 9.rt.00�7 1 00 Sherman Avenue FM Mr. Jeff Nave and Ms. Mary Koberstein discussed the proposed sidewalk cafe at the St. Louis Bread Company, a type If restaurant. They discussed the reusable, nondisposable flatware and dishware to be used at the sidewalk cafe. The Committee discussed that the trays which the applicant used for carrying food are made from hard, non -disposable plastic. They discussed their initial desire to use wrought -iron tables and chairs, but noted 3 that Ordinance essentially requires plastic, since both tables and chairs must be brought into the store at closing. They will be using plastic dining sets. They mentioned that they will rope off the area, in conformance with the Ordinance, but would have preferred to erect a short, wrought -iron rail. The Committee noted than any future canopy or sign design should be unified, given the landmark status of the building. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal, subject to City Council, granting a waiver to Section 7-2-6-(D)(5)c to allow usage of reusable plastic trays. The Committee also recommends that the City Council consider a further waiver to Section 7-2- 6-(D)(5)f to lift the requirement that the applicant store tables within the restaurant so that they could use wrought iron rather than plastic. Flizabdifh Planner Da Summary of Findings of 6-26-96 3 lu rile ...4 F•.!-'��1L:'iy_:`r.l .).'.I WN M OF FINDINGS .^; SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REViEW COMMITTEE July 311996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: A. Alterson; L, Black, P. D'Agostlno, D. Jennings; K Kelly, D. Marino, C. Smith (Chair); J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; H. Friedman, J. Glus, C. Smith; J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz, C. Waite •• •. 1 i 1/ 1 AL • .11• 1• - • . �1 M,1• • 1 a - 1 f 1 The Committee unanimously approved the minutes of June 19, and June 26, 1996 minutes, without comment. Mr. Larry Conroy discussed his proposal for a car port at the above address. The carport would serve a 14 story condo building. Currently, there are 8 3 inside and 6 outside parking spaces. The proposal is for a 6 car capacity, 20 foot by 80 foot car port in the rear of the building. The carport is pre - manufactured, white with steel posts. Mr. Conroy shared photos of the site. Zoning requires a 10 foot separation; the proposal is for 30 feet (5 feet off alley and 5 feet from principal building. The lot required lot coverage is 45 feet and the proposal is for 52 feet. D. Marino asked what the purpose of the car port was and Mr. Conroy's reply was physical safety from harm, heat and rain. The ages of the residents ranges from 55 years to 100 years. Mr. Conroy indicated that the surrounding land use was of single-family residences on Harrison Street with off -set parking garages. Lights are proposed with shielded, indirect lighting. There are currently 3 outside lights with an "Edison Pole" for security. J. Tonkinson stated the car port must be 5 feet from the alley with overhang. Mr. Conroy stated the present parking area is concrete with no drains. Mr. Tonkinson stated there must be drainage off the carport roof to the grassy area with longer downspouts. It was moved and seconded, with one opposed, to recommend approval of the staff report, subject to flow of gutters to north In grassy areas and compliance with all other appropriate codes. Summary of Findings of 7-03-96 1 MW 1*717T RAI I pmk Messrs. Steven Bernstein, S. Malisoff, ahipkn and Heidrah, discussed the CCC. revitalization of the Chandler Building. Mr. (Bernstein provided photos and art updated rendering of the building for Committee's recollection. The proposal is for retail on first level with dwellings on upper floors. The top two floors of the corner building will be removed to build an atrium. Mr. Bernstein indicated that Preservation Commission gave favorable recommendation. Mr. Ruiz stated the building is not a landmark but it is an important part of the downtown. The materials used on th© renovation should reflect that of the higher, existing portions of the building and the renovation should be sensitive to scale, street block and the other current buildings. The Preservation Commission concurred that the submittal of the proposal was reasonable. At a later date, the Committee will be provided with more development plans, i.e., balconies, etc. The option to purchase the building is subject to zoning determination. Mr. Bernstein plans to bring the required zoning analysis to zoning on Monday, July 8, 1996. The subject property is a small parcel which would otherwise be hard to develop. The building has greatly deteriorated from being left empty and should be restored and has good potential. The development is meant to maintain retail quality of the downtown. The main reason the project is slated for zoning variation is the lack of parking. L. Black from Police Department inquired where receiving would be, it would be in rear with access via the lobby of the residence. Residents will have stairway access to their dwellings. K. Kelly from Fire Department asked what fire protection there would be; response was full life safety in building. After a question from C. Smith, it was indicated that there would be 3 commercial units on first floor; there would be 7,000 usable square feet; 1,750; 2,200 and 2,400 square feet. A. Alterson asked if the units would be rental or condo. The reply was there is a market study being done which will take about 30 days. Mr. Alterson indicated there are numerous zoning problems, including height. D. Jennings asked about parking and the Committee was informed that there would be adequate off -site parking for the 35 units. There is also access to the parking garage owned by the City to be used at night thru leasing the spots. C. Smith indicated the corner is a prominent focal point to the downtown and would be unwise to change the configuration of the building. The building needs more renovation than merely increasing the first floor corner parapet. Mr. Friedman strongly stated that the proposal is very Insensitive to the area. C. Smith added they should explore the street scape further to improve the downtown. Ms. Smith stated that proposed alteration .Summary of Findings • • :. i� =3'•-'lam ! 4Y+ f i f f tt Id ram, wlCLIY Ib lib y,l�.r ra Y�� Ir larii,. -I ., J, of the lower building Is too dramatlo a ange for the area, L. Bleck indlceted she liked the mixed use proposal. The architect indicated that, minus the two stories, it would be too much of an economic risk to put retail on upper floors. The proposal for the building is aimed at producing a light and airy result, D. Marino stated that single story retail would interact better with the area. C. Smith felt there should be more massing. Mr. Bernstein indicated a suggested alternative for the building was a museum but that the location is too valuable to remain empty. A. Alterson stated he plans to contact Mr. Bernstein regarding loading berths. Mr. Wolinski asked about the price of sale of each unit. The response was, depending on market study the price would be * 165,000 for one -bedroom. Mr. Ruiz requested that the steel windows be restored and to try to maintain the original structure. Keeping the building material as masonry would aid in the true meaning of restoration, drivit is not compatible with the existing building materials, Mr. Alterson inquired if it would be better to demolish building and build anew, the answer was no, rebuild, Mr. Marino asked if limestone would be used. Architect replied that the loading columns are steel work and drivit will be lighter and heavier material may not be supportive. It is impossible to increase the debt load for the building. The intent is to keep the same look as the original building. Architect stated that the windows will be thermally sound with twin glaze. Cr Smith felt that lofts would give the building the older, original look. The architect added that research on the aesthetics indicated there will be 50 per cent operational glass to comply with BOCA codes. J. Tonkinson moved for concept and preliminary approval. Motion passed with 6 approval and 4 disapprove. It was further noted that this project should come back for final discussion and they will need to provide landscape plan, materials with samples and working drawings. The owner of Onassis Construction consulted with Committee on the final review of paving of garage area. He had submitted new prints to zoning with revisions for special use. The area is mixed use and parking is necessary. The principal building will be used for the owner's residence with the rear aroa used as a "trade contractor" office. The expanded garage in the rear they will use for storage of ladders, equipment and supplies. Drivers will come to property for supplies for different locations. Parking will be only for employees; "trade contractor" in Zoning Ordinance allows for employee parking. Parking area will have 36 to 40 feet of paving, any thing less will cause 3 point turns to leave property. There Is a request to increase the Summary of Findings of 7-03-96 3 height of the garage (22 foot varletlon): 'The owner Indicated that he had good feedback from neighborhood on the proposal. A. Alterson suggested that the area be screened to the backyard. The owner indicated that the residence on the front of the lot is compatible with the other properties In the area. He plans on a new roof line for the building and feels that the proposed improvements will enhance the area of Green Bay Road, Mr. Tonkinson indicated that Water Reclamation permit must be acquired for the drainage. It was moved and seconded to recommend approval to ZBA with 2 abstinence. starhuck's Sid walk_Cafe on 2114 Central Street Sarah Johnson represented Sarbuck's in this matter. J. Wolinski stated that Legal Department advised denial of this sidewalk cafe owing to litigation regarding a recent accident. Ms. Johnson said that Starbuck's withdraw this application and that the matter should not go to the City Council. It was suggested that Starbuck's representative take the matter to the corporate office. Motion to deny was unanimously approved by a vote of 10-0. J. Wolinski stated the Health Department denied this proposal due to litter problems at rear of store. It was moved and seconded to table this discussion until the Starbuck's speak to Carla Bush in health department. Starbuck's Sidewalk Cafe of 628 Demmer Street The Sidewalk Cafe rules were reviewed and agreed to. All items were agreed upon with the exception of a concern with wax water cups for beverages instead of reusable glass. Thera were not health department ' issues apparent. It was determined that Starbucks will appeal to Council regarding use of paper products for beverages in the sidewalk cafe. It was suggested that they submit a fetter to Council to appeal the beverage container restriction. This should be submitted to go before City Council on July 22, 1996. fiPAARC 96-0076 Research Par PrOUMIUM Messrs. Galloway, De Woskin and Yas discussed the proposed townhouse development. They presented drawings for the townhouse 30 unit proposal. The proposal will be at the northeast corner of the Research Park. The courtyard area will have 30 single-family residences with garage at grade and court yard deck above. The archway with steps at the front entrance at the west corner of the site will coincide with other buildings in the area. The proposal complies with the Research Park Guidelines, The proposed Summary of Findings of 7-03-90 4 _9, �n cohittructlon Is an two levels with 1 grada having a family room built around parking with patios. The court yard provides visitors' entrance from Maple Avenue or University Place. The development is close to tho downtown. People are interested in fiber optic home offices. The developer presented visuals of sectional pictures and explained all the aspects of the proposal. L. Black inquired as to security. The reply was that there was none proposed other than security gates to court yards. L. Black stated there should be more extensive security, i.e., surveillance with garage and/or key cards for residents, or live security. The parking area should be reconsidered because of carbon monoxide fumes with parking too close to residences. The exterior will be panelized stone of 15 foot height and wrought iron fence with landscaping. The Courtyard would provide parking with a private door. The exterior will have bay windows and balconies. The brick work will be compatible with the existing structures. The traffic flow of pedestrians is greater because of the elevated station. The walkway will be user friendly with no curbcuts. The project will be cohesive to all the Research Park. Courtyard space will be 100 by 90 feet. D. Jennings inquired of the landscape embankments and C. Ruiz inquired of the elevation of University Place. Axonimetric view of the secondary entrance with curb cuts requires materials and designs to conform with the existing Research Park area. There are more offices than residences. Fenestration will change with carving out balconies and terraces. The discussion of the outside of the structures ensued stating there will be stick framing with brick veneer. K. Kelly inquired if the right of way on University will go thru and the answer was negative. Mr. Friedman questioned the use of the jumbo brick in the top band of the building. P. D'Agostino inquired if the courtyard would have containers for the trees. The answer provided minimal paving, bush garden and earth berming 3 1 /2 feet high. Few trees are proposed. For final review full landscape plans are required. It was moved and seconded for approval of preliminary and concept with recommendation to use normal brick. The proposal was unanimously approved. )hann Minear Secretary -7- cl-q4v Date Summary of Findings of 7-03-96 5 r,r'�.v •i.;,��'�.r- n x,r-w�.r.', ��--'•iA,'ki�.F�,1^.'�d"✓kFi"frl�'-, ND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE July 10, '1996 Room 2404 MEMBERS PRESENT: A. Alterson; L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings; K Kelly, D. Marino, C. Smith (Chair); J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski MEMBERS ABSENT J. Aiello; H. Friedman, J. Glus, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: H. Friedman OTHER STAFF PRESENT: C. Ruiz, C. Waite The Committee unanimously approved the minutes of July 10, 1996 minutes, without comment. • 1>111 1 W. T711 Mr. Anderson represented Starbuck's Cafe. This item was held over pending Health Department issues which have now been cleared and Health Department signed off. The Committee reviewed the plans and the proposal for the sidewalk cafe. C. Smith reviewed the Sidewalk Cafe Standards with the applicant. It was determined that Starbucks will petition City Council for usage of paper cups for beverages in the sidewalk cafe. This wi!I be discussed at City Council on July 22, 1996. Mr. Alterson inquired if the sidewalk cafe will be at least 5 feet from the curb; an affirmative response was given. Question regarding the close proximity of the tree on the property was resolved with a negative response. Mr. Anderson submitted written approval from the Health Department. It was moved and seconded for unanimous approval of the sidewalk cafe. �Z+ i '-- i1 • il• 73P11 1 James Owens, Reliable Builders, owner, presented photos and plans of property. This is the former location of Automatic Heating. New owner will use building for office warehouse and storage of equipment with no outdoor storage. The plans are to drop the ceiling and install new washrooms and tuckpoint exterior. The owner making only one office larger. The roof mounted air -conditioner will be improved. In the front there will be new Summary of Findings of 7.10-96 1 - - - - -_ � - � ' - _ - � r;... _ - i; � _ ; ' - - - �:., ✓ �- a r •, Flit +•.ti � a "t�,A.} `�J ..f .r,f�•'1b .1 �]�f•J7;���-7„J. 1rx "d: windows and same design as existing. In the rear, glass blocr3we new entry are proposed. There have been no modifications on the building since 1956. C. Smith suggested that yawner speak to our Forostry Department when considering the landscaping for the property. Messrs. Steven Yas, Mark Bastian, Glen Mulder and Chris Witherell were present to discuss preliminary rejuvenation of the plaza area. They propose lowering the vestibule is proposed with trees on the column grid with parking below. The project originated to address a leaking problem in basement. Plans include bringing sidewalk level diagonal to vestibule to make area more Inviting, including micro areas with low planting only 18 inches high or lower because of security at highest point. They plat not to put in street furniture; there will only be planters and more greenery, the paving and color scheme will blend with the center and coordinate with the city scape. Parking area will be more sunny. There will be bank tellers and ancillary retail on the lower level. The parking area will be buffered with trees; birches, multi - stemmed trees and planter beds. Two types of lighting are proposed including stairways and tree canopies; lighting will exude from lobby area with lights in planter walls. A. Alterson indicated that when building permit is submitted they must present detailed drawings of the vestibules. At final review, applicant must present material samples, finish samples, completed landscape plans. the architect indicated that the curtain wall is single pane glass because other type is not strong enough to be supportive and will be insulated with tinted glass. C. Ruiz suggested that the landscape plan coincide with Fountain Square street scape for the center. The Committee moved and seconded preliminary approve with one opposition. Jim Rogers and Dana Holland represented PCS Prime Co., and discussed the proposed PCS antenna for the water tower. He indicated that negotiations have been positive with the Water and Legal Departments. Mr. Figurelli has submitted all comments regarding the lease to Risk Management Department with no apparent questions regarding design. Mr. Wolinski reminded Mr. Rogers that final Site Plan Committee review does not mean release of permits. Discussion ensued regarding the plans presented at the meeting. Photos at various view points of the water tower relative to the antenna were presented to the Committee. The antenna controls were to be placed far enough from the residential areas. It was indicated that there would be no radiation type problems with the proposed or current materials for the Summary of Findings of 7-10-96 2 1� 1=.: ��e 'i!' .4 � .a. .3 .ISYn'. �i'rl:, `' �,t. ;,;�• ',i "1": is 4F �.,. , �, � . ;°s. ��' � -; :: f. ..'n• i.'•:..,r y„y '; r �r�t;yZ•�.... : .. I W.' . antenna. The Committee unanimously opp�'o approval of loose by City Council between PCS Flrirno Ca aria pity of Evanston. Discussion ensued regarding overhang, vestibule altellne, terracing and overgrown tree canopy. Passersby can ascend stairway at Davis and Orrington. James Campbell represented the owner of Phoenix Design. It was stated that the exterior remodeling work was begun without permit on this project. Building department gave approval to paint but we must review the exterior modifications. Representative submittod photos of before and after to the Committee. No apparent zoning violations. C. Smith indicated that the owner of the property must secure a permit for the tent which is frequently placed on property must secure a tent permit from Zoning Department. The parking Issue because of the walkway was discussed. Parking was reduce 4 feet. The walkway is raised with posts and cables for safety. It was moved and seconded to hold over this project for receipt of sufficient site plan showing all proposals to be presented at a later meeting. Applicant was advised to contact Zoning office to be schedule next meeting with Site Plan Review. John Dyer discussed his request for one concrete parking space on the property. He requested the parking space because there is no alley in rear of property. If he was to place it on adjacent lot he would be up at the front door of the coach house on the lot. There will be two driveway adjacent to on another on the east of the house. Mr. Dyer indicated that the neighbors are agreeable with his proposal. The Committee unanimously approved the staff report. Messrs. Alvin Stiglitz, Doug Harmon and Glen Mulder represented DRW Services and the owner of the property. This project was held over from July 3, 1996 meeting for unfinished business. The proposal is for 5 dispensing stations including 3 gasoline storage tanks with new piping. The Committee discussed the canopy at the Site Plan meeting of ( ) The canopy will be 40 foot by 50 feet with three columns lighting and Union 76 graphics. They propose to remove the concrete and resurface the asphalt on Howard Street to west and east on Barton Avenue. After a question from J. Summary of Findings of 7-10.96 3 �.Yw R'*"'ti+.'^^'".. � .r i �G'I�R+'Il Ft�3'"�"'7�'1FF5T�f,�iTlgt`��#'kt!"'arii..��.ii- ,. �. ^r i „ � id r'F aM.,+!r%,9'i«+�r�M'i�'1rM;�rFaif'�tK+lh rw�`�"�".,�y►k�"",je��°'���.s,ikes"r!� .�. i Jd �r-rV:'=•.,.. Wolinski regarding the main building, it was stated that they plan to remove the' panels and cement on the building and paint them grey and blue. They proposo a 24 hour, self -serve operation, including a mini mart seliing only bottle and can pop, candy bars and cigarettes. The doors will be locket at 10 p.m. with only prepay. The front window will be bullet proof glass. The representative showed photos of the proposal. Daily there will be auto repair on the property. The establishment stopped selling gas 2 years ago. The property is being redone to 1998 specifications of Union 011. L. Black discussed the complaints of cars being parked all over. The representative indicated that a contract will be enforced with lessee for no more than 3 cars in the area for service at one time. According to a contract to be drawn up between Landlord and Lessee, the Lessee may only do oil changes and tune-ups. No heavy repair will be permitted. The lighting issue was discussed. It is necessary that they use 16 canopy lights with halogen lighting under canopy. The Committee requested a landscape plan for the property. There is existing landscaping on Barton Avenue. The owner is resurfacing the asphalt for parking in rear. Dumpsters for trash have been placed in rear of building. D. Marino requested that the median in alley be cleaned up and install more greenery. The canopy height cannot be lower than 15 feet, 6 inches for refueling purposes. The canopy lighting is only banding and there will be light under canopy with 1 lite per 150 feet of canopy. A photometric plan is required. P. D'Agostino inquired about drainage. It is necessary for internal draining and MWRD permit is required. The Committee indicated owner should speak to J. Tonkinson. The handicapped parking requirements need to be checked. The west side of the property would be suitable for handicap parking space. C. Smith said that the Committee needs elevation drawings and a parking layout, a drainage plan and a landscape plan. The Sign Review and Appeals Board will review the signage. The Committee suggested that the owner continue the 5 foot strip all over the rear of the property. The owner should reconsider the paneling material on the building. Motion and second that the Committee hold this matter over to the next meeting for resolving outstanding issues. The owner was advised to contact Zoning when they plan to return with the required documents and items. a Affi Summary of Findings of 7-10-96 4 Iu+�'L k Mr. J. Rogers discussed the water tower and antenna In this location. He has discussed the matter with Water Department and has addressed tho zoning issues. This proposal would replace the proposal at 2100 Lee Street. This antenna would be some size as the antenna in north Evenaton. This would give a triangular effect with towers in north and south Evanston. This is the last phase of the project to allow Prima Co to have a mature system in Evanston. e motion was moved and seconded for approval. o Ann Minear Secretary Date Summary of Findings of 7-1 D-96 5 COXMZTTEE ACTION SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE RKVIEH COXY[I JULY 17, 1996 ROOD[ 2404 Members Present: P. D'Agostino, A. Alterson, L. Black, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Wolinski, J. Wolfensperger Members Absent: J. Aiello, H. Friedman, J. Glus, J. Tonkinson Other Staff Present: C. Hill, C. Ruiz, E. Tresch, C. Waite With minor corrections to the record of attendance, the summary of findings from the July 10, 1996 meeting were approved. ,JPAARC 96-0062 1335 Howa_rdStreet. Prel' ' final Review,,,,Qt Plans for an Automatic Teller Machine. Al Adami and Phil Nardulli were present on behalf of St. Paul Federal Bank. They explained that St. Paul would like to add a second ATM to the drive-thru lanes. The drive will be widened to accommodate the kiosk and new lighting will be installed for security purposes. In response to questions from the Committee Mr. Adami stated that two lanes will be ATM and two lanes will be for full service banking. The lanes are 8 feet wide. L. Black suggested that landscaping be kept low for surveillance and security purposes. The Committee unanimously voted to grant preliminary and final approval subject to compliance with all codes and regulations. SPAARC 96-0083 2201 Dewev A,1vQnue, Prel.minary and FiQal Review of Proposed Detached Garagg for Sinc:le -family _ i HgMeor_ated in an_MUE District. Robert Cornis was present on behalf of the property owner. A. Alterson explained that the house is a legal non- conforming use in the METE District. The Conanittee reviewed the plan and unanimously voted to grant preliminary and final approval subject to compliance with all codes and regulations. PAARC 96-0084 711 Church Srr�,_preliminI,v Review of 5deNA k Qfg for Bruaaelrs' BaaeU. Keith Johnston was present on behalfof Bruggers. In discussions with Mr. Johnston, it became apparent that Bruggers uses disposable utensils and as such, is not eligible for a sidewalk cafe permit. Mr. Johnston said that he would have to talk to the corporate management. The Committee voted to table this item. SPAARC 96-0081,_1501 Central Street_,__Review of Changes to the Existing-Scor,Qboards at Dvche Stadium. C. Smith presented the Committee with plans and explained that this item will be reviewed by the Sign Review and Appeals Board. She continued by saying that Northwestern is proposing to reface the two scoreboards and relocate one of the supports of the main scoreboard further to the r ��i;t.t - ,, 'i��A v'xi" �t��.:• .r l.'j1�j�1���[JJ`;M� -. .���ti f luT. t..I !' • �J i� a�ji� aw, w�f.�Y' YI� It'it IS -a .• f� T JI :... .�,A 4a '�C�f ���'E-�. 4a.y �; d',S:r,."c,,,t� -- .. south. A wildcat logo is proposed to be installed on the top of the main scoreboard and advertising is proposed to be installed to the bottom of the auxiliary scoreboard. The Committee reviewed the drawings and discussed the proposal. The Committee voted 5 to 3 to recommend approval to the Sign Hoard. C. Smith abstained. Nero Student Meetincr H411Hie . Rick Strusiner and Rick Katz were present on behalf of the Hillel organization. They presented the Committee with plans and stated that a text amendment and major variations are necessary. Mr. Strusiner continued by saying that Northwestern is selling the land to Hillel and they intend to tear down the existing house and construct the student meeting house. Mr. Strusiner explained that the proposed structure would be constructed with brick, have copper gutters, and a gabled shingle roof. The height would be less than the maximum building height of 35 feet permitted in the T1 District, but a front yard and. west side yard variance would be necessary, The Committee reviewed the plans and discussed the mass and bulk of the structure. Much concern was raised regarding the bulk and style of architecture which the Committee felt was more like a religious institution than a residential use. The Committee discussed the T1 District with and the intent to be a transitional district between university and residential uses. The Committee voted to disapprove the plan. ,2AARC 96-0062 1201 Howard Street . Review ReaUest for Chq gg&_KQ Non -conforming Sian. Doug Harmon and Alvin Stiglitz were present to discuss this proposal with the Committee. C. Smith stated that this item will be reviewed by the Sign Review and Appeals Hoard because the existing free-standing sign is non -conforming. She continued by saying that the proposed sign is 19 feet high and the Ordinance permits 15.5 feet. The sign is located within 20 feet of the circulation lane and has a changeable copy board which is not permitted. Mr. Harmon explained that they would like to reface the existing sign and use one of the existing footings. The Committee and the applicants discussed other signage that will be proposed at a later date. The Committee voted to recommend approval of the sign subject to the height conforming to the Sign Ordinance and elimination of the changeable copy board. The Committee also indicated that this recommendation in no way approves the use of the property as a gas and service station which is currently being reviewed by the Zoning Department. The Committee also discussed a proposed site plan with Mr. Harmon and Mr. Stiglitz and suggested that the location of the trash dumpster be indicated on the plan and that the dumpster be enclosed. The Committee also suggested that the site plan also be revised to indicate the type and size of all landscaping materials and the handicapped parking stall be striped. A 4 foot high landscaping buffer was suggested between the parking spaces and the residential area located to the north. 11 OW Bernstein and Mark Mobly were present on behalf of La Madeline Restaurant. Mr. Mobly explained that they are proposing to remove the existing exterior material and install a chicago common brick facade with burgundy colored canopies. The window frames are a treated red wood and the doors will be wooden. Gas light type fixtures will also be installed on the exterior of the building. In response to a question from the building department, Mr. Mobly stated that all improvements, except the canopies, will be constructed within the property lines. A few of the Committee members expressed concern that the proposed facade improvements conflict with the international style of architecture of the existing building. Mr. Mobly responded by saying that La Madeline has a distinct style that is very recognized by their clientele. The Committee voted six to three to grant final approval. I J abe Wolfefsperger oning Planner 174 to Aa ism AM .(,. T. it SMMUY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE RgVXEW CC MITTRE July 24, 1996 Room 2404 Members Presents A. Alterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski Members Absents J. Aiello, H. Friedman, J. Glus, K, Kelly Other Staff Presents C. Ruiz AWX0VA1 of Sumary of Findings from 9UIV 24, 1299 maet;iaa. The Committee requested that the summary of findings for 1201 Howard Street be amended to indicate that the applicants withdrew their request for a sign variation for the free-standing sign. They indicated that they would return with a sign package for all proposed signage. $PAARC 96-Q086 1.222-?,4 Chicacto AveAUD _PralJMiVi.ry Rev ggqJ Fropoaed Facade 99hab,_fiW3 Addition fQ,r Mixed Uge IMIldi.na. Gerald Murphy and Robert McGowan were present on behalf of the building owners. Mr. Murphy explained that they are proposing to demolish a portion of the existing building and construct a 7,885 square foot addition to the north side of the building. Twenty-one parking spaces are proposed, including roof top parking. A parapet wall will screen the rooftop parking. In response to a question from C. Smith, Mr. Murphy explained that this project is being proposed because the existing layout of the building is not conducive to retail business. Mr. McGowan explained that the facade will be renovated giving each of the tenants a distinctive entrance. Mr. McGowan agreed to investigate the cost of removal of the dryvit and replacement with another material. The Committee noted that any improvements to the facade need to occur within the property lines. Mr. Murphy stated that Duxler Tire, Enterprise Car Rental and Renew Car Care will occupy the spaces. The Committee and Mr. Murphy and Mr. McGowan discussed the location of the driveways. J. Tonkinson stated that a driveway permit will be required. The location of the drives will be reviewed by the Engineering Department at that time. The Committee suggested that the proposed fence be removed and A shrubbery be added along the south property line. The Committee also reviewed a proposed plat of consolidation. The Committee voted to grant preliminary approval of the plat and proposal. I SPAARC Min. 7/24/96 Kr;' - �� - '-T ,t .•. �.. •,4'� �..:I 1, �'ie�ky� "[-�I i'�'�1l{.i'. :.y. BPAARC 96-0067 50S 010590 AydnUe. Prellai a Of Progosed ROQftao DO. 8d Koppel, owner of the building was present. He explained that this building which recently was damaged by a fire, is occupied by business offices. He continued by saying that they would like to have a rooftop deck for employee use. The Committee reviewed the proposal and unanimously voted to grunt preliminary and final approval of the proposed deck, subject to compliance with all codes. SP8C 94-0152 1§2f cantral a rent. Rreliminary and rinal Reviem of Proposed P se II Z rov=MUte Gil Wallendy from Teng and Associates was present on behalf of Metra. J. Tonkinson stated that the Committee had already reviewed these plans. He continued by saying that the City did request that brighter lights be installed in the station for security purposes. The Committee voted to grant preliminary and final approval subject to compliance with all codes. onWice Wol nsperger ing Pl ter Xast SPAARC Min. 7/24/96 .. :!�-: .._�•,�'� ..._�;.� »>Q,:�... Fri f�My= summy or x+IND=as s SITE PLAI'i AND APPzARANCS RXVIEW COMXTTME July 31, 1996 Rooms 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolfensperger, J. Wolinski Members Absent: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K, Kelly Design professional Present: H. Friedman Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz, E. Tresch, C. Waite, C. Wonders Others Present: Alderman Engelman, V. Kretchmer AMMoval of gummry of F Xjgs jrgg July 24, 2996 Meeting. The Committee unanimously voted to approve the summary of findings. SPAKRC 93-0082 2400 Ridge Avenue. P for Redesi.aa of the Cos Buil.dincr PemkIMna.,--- James Murray waa 3 present on behalf of the building owner. C. Smith stated that the Committee had previously granted conceptual approval of a plan for - redesign of the parking area on January 25, 1995. J. Murray explained that with the exception of the kiosk, the plan has remained the same as previously approved by the Committee. The kiosk has been added as a means to control use of the parking spaces. He continued by saying that the proposed plat of consolidation will eliminate the existing easements and dedicate new easements. Mr. Murray explained that the new access easements will be installed and maintained by the building ownership up to the point of connection with the public alley. D. Jennings and J. Tonkinson stated that they will review the proposed easementa. Mr. Murray stated that relocation of the drive way further to the south will occupy most of the lot that is currently zoned R1. He A continued by saying that the lease with the CTA for parking spaces along the west side of the property is about to expire and will not 7n be renewed. In response to a question from J. Wolinski, Mr. Murray stated that a parking structure is not economically feasible. He stated that the idea of a parking structure had been abandoned by the owners. J. Murray continued by saying that the proposed redesign will add approximately 40 more parking spaces. Because of the grade change, a concrete retaining wall and fence will be installed along the east side of the parking are. P. D'Agostino _ reviewed the landscaping plan and stated that a detailed plan indicating plant materials and sizes will be required for final approval. Alderman Engelman asked about the reduction of the east side yard. J. Murray explained that a previous special use required a 38 foot east yard along Ridge Avenue. SPARC Min. 7/31/96 71 �rz -`�$I �L-"o-�:�' °'� �--•r�'��;s�'f�Ls.�'-*�,� `r-5dpt"���'�..t"i�+ �';�,1.=' - _. _', ,... _. a ' - - .-- N �- . -'- _ - - -- " - --1� flN A, Under the current proposal, this yard would be reduced to 27 tenet f^ which is permitted in the 01 District. The Committee unanimously voted to grant preliminary approval, subject to compliance with all applicable codes. nk' "%; YO-YURZ OAV roarer, a T'Vr1�ff pimm Raylew pl,imil for a new gtu t Mang Mume. Rick Strusiner, Philip Padawer and Richard Wexler were present on behalf of Hillel. Mr. Strusiner explained that based on the Committee's previous comments, he had gone back to the drawing board to make revisions to the plans. He continued by saying that he is trying to work within the setbacks of the existing house with regard to the front and side yards. The Committee reviewed the revised plans and again expressed concern regarding the mass and bulk of the structure. it. Friedman suggested that perhaps the bulk could be broken up in the middle of the structure. C. Smith suggested that certain materials and placement of windows could help the appearance. A. Alterson stated that neighbors are concerned with the parking. In repone to A. Alterson's comments, Mr. Wexler stated that Hillel is negotiating with the University to lease additional parking. L. Black expressed concerns relating to the lack of windows in the front of the building. She stated that additional windows would help natural. surveillance. The Cotmnittee took no action but suggested that drawings be revised to reduce the mass of the structure. SPfAUC 96-QO@$_ 229 ,,_Ca, ton Street, P-e1.i=inary_ Reviev� of ,g New Suildi.r)q� tq b+_, used bvra_ is_ T."tQ *us% Antz .tech. Scott Gendell and Douglas Dean were present to discuss this proposal with the Comittee. They explained that they are proposing to construct a one-story building on loc 3 of the Home Depot subdivision. Mr. Gendell continued by saying that the proposed building will have approximately 15,000 square feet and will be leased by Trak Tyuto and an Ameritech retail store. The Trak Auto store currently located on Main Street will be closed. The Committee reviewed the plan and suggested that the loading dock be located further to the west. Mr. Gendell explained that this cannot be done. The Committee suggested different ways to screen the loading dock. D. Marino said that he would have to review the redevelopment agreement to make sure there are no conflicts with the proposed plan. The Committee unanimously voted to table this item. SPAARC 96-0084 711 Church St Met. levy gf Si.deralkk Gate for Brueaaer's Aacrel. Keith Johnston and Suzzarniah Azizy were present on behalf of Bruegger's. They presented the Committee with samples of a wicker basket that will be lined with wax paper and used for sandwiches, non -disposable flat ware and a non -disposable plastic cup that will be used in the outdoor cafe area. Mr. Johnston stated that they will be asking for a waiver from the non -disposable cup requirement. C. Smith reminded them that they must have a bus person to service the outdoor area and they must pick up all trash located in front of their store. SPARC Min. 7/31/96 ' ` A4 t r � ' .'..��.,., Y a. , �L'r ;r:, _ �. ,- :..: • 1�y jtj�t ky^i�,��i'��'F:""� •:Y � . �.�fi,•Si�r� y I�f`" �fflF-' r i' ��t'-.43nriT.Yi»li�F C. Smith read the requirements for a sidewalk cafe* permit. Based on the responses from Mr. Johnston and Ms. Azizy, the Committee found that Brueggerle complies with the standards for an outdoor cafe permit. The Committee unanimously voted to recommend approval to the City Council. �7Xanlce wol nspeer Zoning P1 Zer F/2In Date SPAARC Min. 7/31/96 '�ti�'s�.`�1"�,F"Y�rr'�`�il'+1�r"1�'rkllr$t4E�i�- �.���,,� �,,..�, �. - .r ..-•-� �o' .t "rar+",R'4i r-,• ��r•aM � - � �•�� •`i � �i � ��,� SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE August 7, 1996 Room 2+404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black. P. D'Agostino, K. Kelly, D. Marino, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski Members Absent: J. Aiello, H. Friedman, J. Glus, D. Jennings, C. Smlth Other Staff Present: C. Waite, E. Tresch Approval oI<5...ldIIlQlary of Findlogo from August 7J996 Meolft The Committee unanimously voted to approve the summary of findings. SPAARC 98-0991 16Q1 Central % of Prollmina,f Mr. Jim Koolish and Mr. Craig Smith discussed the plans to renovate Dyche Stadium by Northwestern University. The plans include repairs to the stadium's concrete and waterproofing of the stands. A new high-rise press box facility is proposed. The press box will extend 3 floors, above the existing stadium height (for a total for 125 feet above grade) and include a stadium club for alumni, a media level, and a broadcast level. The architecture will match the existing facility. The renovation includes the lowering of the playing field to improve visibility. In addition, the seating will be upgraded with new bench seats and aisles widening to meet building code. New washrooms and concession stands will be developed under the stands, with new connecting passageways throughout the entire stadium. A new separate one-story training and men's locker room facility will be constructed at the north erid of the feid. The facility will open directly onto the playing field and contain a roof top terrace for viewing the playing field. The existing men's locker room will be renovated as a women's locker room. A separate one-story maintenance and storage building is also proposed, which would serve the entire facility, and will match the steel portion of the stadium. Mr. Darrel Christian of Turner Construction commented that the construction is anticipated to take 10 months, since work can occur at various places simultaneously. He added that work will start after the football season 1996 and be completed by the beginning of the 1997 season. However, construction of the women's locker room facility may continue past that time, depending on the completion date of the new men's locker room. Mr Gabor Zsolnay of Northwestern mentioned that Northwestern intends to have community meetings. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. SPAARC Findings 817196 •,�07j {"I =. r r ,} ";; ,,.*:�.•-F.s 4�'a w;:,{4'" �.�'ii Y����,ra �t�i'�l,Y`, .., FlQal Mr. Gerald Murphy and Mr. Robert McGowen discussed the proposed development of three commercial properties at 1224 Chicago Avenue. The preliminary plans had been approved by the SPAARC Committee on July 24, 1996. They discussed the materlalo proposed and indicated that photornetrics would be submitted for review. The Committee reviewed the proposal according to the Design and Appearance Review Guidelines. The Committee commented that the material colors are compatible with the adjacent Jewel property and that the project provides for better separation of parking and traffic flow than the current site. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal, with the condition that photometrics are submitted to and approved by the Engineering Department. aEAARC 96-0092 1933 Q IMo Avenue Pr2flmjaW Mr. Mark Pelini discussed the proposed development of a Super Crown bookstore at 1633 Chicago Avenue. He discussed that the development would include facade clean- up and the straightening of the window projections on each side of the entrance, in order to square off the building facade. The current canopy will be replaced with a now awning hung from the wall above. A new name sign and logo sign are proposed, both in brushed aluminum. The Committee noted that the signs will have to reviewed by the Sign Board. Additionally, the proposed awning will have to go through Sign Board if it exceeds the ordinance allowed projection. The Committee requested that the facade windows be clear glass through which pedestrians can see into the store, in order to provide the store with natural surveillance. The Committee noted that a landscape plan and photometrics will be required. The Committee approved the preliminary proposal, with J. Wolinski abstaining. Ms. Carol Ross Barney and Ms. Sallie Schwartzkoff discussed the proposed new construction of World Bank on an out lot of the Best Buy shopping center at 2301 Howard Street. Ms. Ross Barney discussed the proposed one-story building with lobby offices and a two station drive -through. A 24-hour walk-up ATM will be located on the wall of the building near the front door. Entrance to the bank would be from the existing store parking lots. There would be two new internal curb cuts and none on Howard Street. No new walls or fences are proposed along Howard St. She noted that the design attempts to make the transition from the commercial area to the adjacent residential area. The facade would include a colonnade of over -sized galvanized columns, with metal panels and glass walls between the columns. The service area of the bank would have a metal or brick facade, in similar proportions. Signage is proposed along the top of the three sides of the building and one free-standing sign of SPAARC Findings 8/7/96 _ ' - _ - _ - _ . , _ - � �,. ,. -n -T rr hr �, -w � r .. .. ^rr .t�'�-^"r1P'#1F'P' ♦ ~ _, i . , - - ... a M"1� ` 0��1 24 feet. Landscaping would Include low maintenance plants. The Committee discussed the security and safety concoms with the 24-hour walk-up ATM at that location. The Committee recommended that the ATM be Incorporated Into a drive -through. The Committee suggested that a brick facade be used for the service areas to prov.1do a strong tie with the nearby residential areas. The Committee noted that the both the free- standing sign and building signs exceed the height limit of 15'6". The Committee discussed whether there was a need for the free-standing sign and noted all signri would have to be reviewed by to the Sign Board. The Committee will review the site re- development agreement for any design or sign requirements. The Committee recommended that trees be Incorporated into the landscaping plan. The Committee approved the preliminary plans, excluding the pedestrian ATM, with one opposed, and one abstention. Elizabeth Tresch Housing Planner V91?& Date SPAARC Findings WIN X 11, SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE August 14,1996 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black. J. Gius, K Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski Members Absent: J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, H. Friedman, D. Jennings, D. Marino Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz, E. Tresch, C. Waite _$PAARC 95-0094 1928 Foster Street Preiiminarv, Mr, Peter Eric Siegol, Ms. Penny Miller and Ms. Erika Quinn presented plans for the construction of a single-family home. The construction of the house requires a zoning variance. J. Wolinski explained that this is the third house to be built by Habitat for Humanity. The Evanston Housing Commission (EHC) is the sponsor of this project. Cl\ The project needs relief from zoning side yard requirements from 5-feet on the east side to 3-feet, and from 15-feet on the west side to 5-feet. The house meets the EHC program and requirements, including its architecture which Is compatible with the neighborhood. The Committee suggested moving the front of the building to be in line with other two-story homes on the street and adding some landscaping. The Committee unanimously approved to recommend the project for approval to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Committee recommended moving the house forward and meeting the roof line of adjacent homes. SPAARC 96-0092 1633 Chicago Avenue Final, Mr. Andrew Koglin presented plans of the facade design and signage for Super Crown Books store. C. Smith said that the awning above the main entrance requires an awning variation to go beyond the maximum 3-feet allowed. Mr. Koglin said that the storefront windows would have clear glass and would be parallel to the street. The Committee discussed the building materials for the in fill portion of the facade which will have an aluminum fascia, and the same coping detail as the existing. The Committee unanimously approved the facade pending landscaping to be compatible with the landscaping plans for Chicago Avenue. SPAARC Findings 8114196 Page 1 - - -_ - -- � -� F, ".: ,.. � -. .. �..,.Tirr-mr�`�`w��„-„T«-+r-=��'h�li �l 'T—r`'rr, �-, .M�. "�•, -�—. .nr .• . ,.�(�'�..�,{�� .-.---�--�,"�,- - - ;-. E_ The Committeo also unanimously approved the proposed reduced aluminum crown signage. §RPAARC 96-0095.2601 Sherlggp Road Prellmi andEind Mr. Stephen Knutson presented plans for r6building two rear brick wood shed structures as were originally designed for the keeper of the lighthouse residence. Other work includes maintenance items, Installation of storm windows, and roofing. The north wing addition will enclosa an existing wheelchair lift, The Evanston Lighthouse complex is an Evanston Landmark. The Committee unanimously approved the project pending the Evanston Preservation Commission's approval. SPAARC 96-0096 1612 Sherman Avenue Preliminary Mr. Richard Alf and Mr. Gordon J. Magill presented plans for the storefront renovation at 1512 Sherman Avenue. The work includes cleaning the brick, removing the existing storefront, installing new awnings with signage, installing new doors, building new bulkheads and new light fixtures. Mr. Alf said that metal panels above the window openings, behind the awnings, will be Installed. He mentioned that there is the likelihood of covering metal lintels and rosettes with the metal panels. C. Ruiz suggested exploring the possibility of uncovering the metal lintels and rosettes and exposing them to enhance the facade. C. Smith informed the applicants that the awnings and signage will be reviewed as a unified signage center plan, which is a separate permit application to the Sign and Review Appeals Board. For final review the Committee requires a sample glass sample and awning material and color samples, The Committee unanimously approved the proposed renovation of the storefront. Aooroval of Summary of Findings from Auaust 7.1996 Meetina. The Committee unanimously voted to approve the summary of findings. SPAARC 96-0097 2951 Central Street Sian C. Smith said that this signage proposal is for the refacing of an illuminated monument sign. The refacing adds a skyline. The Committee approved the proposed signage refacing. Vote: five ayes. Mr. Wolinski voted nay. SPAARC Findings 6114196 Page 2 -�� - - - - ---- ,.e.. r ., . •fin E'•"Pl Rn IN 7��p'gN�.6i !`7�74A'�"� •nw��,❑n.. .,���i, �pp± ^r St 4 t' f, i j,", �R•,i 'S� S 'Ytoo �11 ARC 9"098 2, j C gjq.Pnv Road sto C. Smith said that the signage proposal is for a 13-feet by 15-feet, free standing sign at 30-feet high In the air. The Committee unanimously denied the proposed signage. The Committee approved a motion recommending to the applicant to reface the existing monument sign. . AARC 96-flg99 1600 Crrinaton.,&1nue sign C. Smith said that the signage proposal is for the installation of a non -illuminated fabric awning. The awning requires a variance from 3-feet extension over the public right of way to 5-feet. The Committee discussed whether the proposed awnings would Interfere with any of the monuments on Fountain Square. Some discussion revolved around the possible jurisdiction of the Public Works Department since the proposed signage would be 2-feet on the public right of way over what is allowed. The Committee approved the proposed awnings with the exception of the graphics on the awnings which should comply with the sign ordinance. Vote: four ayes, J. Tonkinson voted nay, J. Wolinski abstained. &ft 40�M. Carlos D. Ruiz J Senior Planner S • /� • �Cr Date SPAARC FindJngs 8114)96 Page 3 •�i�� 1 � wisl�inFd�4:.L►G�Jt�eefllWrlG.n:�}�a+�:�h�5t�' � � SUMMARY OF FINDINGS J. SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE August 21, 1996 Room 2403 embers Present: embers Absent: Design Profession Present: Other Staff Present: A. Alterson, L. Black. P. D'Agostino, J. Glue, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski J. Aiello, D. Marino H. Friedman D. Barber, C. Ruiz, C. Waite, E. Tresch A1212t4Yd14f Summary of Finding$ front August 14, SH Meefina The Committee unanimously approved the summary of findings from August 14, 1996, SPAARC 96-0J_G 1948 Ridge_Avonue PrglimiIIaly Mr. Lonnie Williams and Mr. Kevin Barker discussed the proposed new construction of a one-story maintenance facility in the back of 1948 Ridge Ave. They noted that the proposed development parcel is part of a newly consolidated lot which was approved by the City Council and the new plat of survey for the parcel is being drawn. The new building will be a concrete block and metal building with a ramp accessible by the parking spaces in the rear. A brick facade will face Ridge Ave. They noted that 1948 Ridge is currently unoccupied and no curb cuts on Ridge will be changed or added. The development would eliminate a total of 16 parking spaces in the rear. Mr. Alterson noted that this use is not a permitted or a special use in this district, however, a determination must be made as to whether this use is the primary use on the site, particularly with the new lot consolidation. The Committee requested that landscape screening be added along Ridge Ave. and a drainage plan be submitted. The Committee also requested revised parking calculations and parking plan for the lot adjacent to Ridge Ave. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. SPAARC 96-0101 815 Emorson Street Staff Renart to Z�A The Committee discussed that provisions had been imposed on the special use permit for the development approved at this location in 1989. J. Wolinski requested that the Committee review those past provisions in relation to this proposed development of Philly Cheese Steak Type 11 Restaurant. The Committee approved tabling this proposal until those provisions were reviewed and the applicant for this proposal was present, one opposed. SPAARC Finding 8121196 Page 1 A 93 man.p�v nub pmmaw Charlie Clarke discussed the proposed creation of 14 off-street parking spaces for 31 unit condominium conversion at 936 Hinman Ave. The parking spaces would be Wted in back of the building on current grass and gravel areas and accessed from the &y. In addition, the existing 3-car garage would be demolished for the parking, The Committee noted that the building is a landmark building and Is located in a landmark district, therefore the proposal would have to receive a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Preservation Commission. The Committee noted that there were two zoning issues that must be addressed and a Water Reclamation District Permit would be required. The Committee requested a site plan with measurements of the parking Spaces and the building, as well as photos of the existing site. The Committee unanimously approved tabling the proposal until a specific site plan and photos were available. VAAM 6� &070 1§03 Orrington Avenue FBI Mr. Stephen Yas and Mr. Nick Patera presented the plans for the plaza and lobby of 1603 Orrington Ave. The majority of the existing wall along the south and west edge of the plaza would be taken out. The plaza design includes planters and trees forming a canopy to the building entrance. In the southwest area, the plaza would have a small number of distantly spaced steps rising to the entrance. The design attempts to f harmonize with the City's sidewalk improvements. The trees would be placed in a grid pattern, with planters at the base. The north edge of the plaza along the Border's Book r. = Store would be terraced and contain a denser number of trees. The area in the northeast area of the plaza would be a garden with perennial plantings surrounded by short perimeter bushes and tall evergreens along the western edge to shield from the Buck housing development. The exterior of the first floor of 1603 Orrington, which houses the lobby, would be redeveloped with green tinted glass in horizontal champagne colored mullions with travertine marble panels. The interior would incorporate the green and champagne colors as well as the existing bronze colors. Mr. Dave Barber questioned the timing of the plaza development, in relation to that of the sidewalk improvements. Mr. Barber also discussed the lighting which Mr. Yas confirmed would be metal halide. Mr. Tonkinson suggested that plaza's design should include waterproofing the parking garage located underneath. Mr. Yas discussed the proposed plaza foundation design. The Committee discussed the desire for some unprogrammed space in the plaza, so that some public art and performance area would be available. Mr. Patera discussed that no art is currently proposed but that there would be space in the garden area in the north end of the plaza for art. He also noted that the entrance space between the steps could be used for performance space. The Committee discussed the proposed horizontal green glass on the first floor of the SPAARC Finding V21196 Page 2 Wilding, noting that this changed the base of the building significantly. The Committee noted that the adjacent Bordees Books is of the same design and has brown glass throughout the building. Mr. Yas discussed his design idea to incorporate the base of the building into the plaza design and provide a transition from the green plaza to the brown building. He also noted the desire for the lobby workers to see clearly outvlde, while at the same time providing some tinting to minimize the heat retention in the lobby. The Committee approved the si►e plan of the plaza and lobby by a vote of 7 to 1. The Committee approved the site appearance of the plaza and lobby design by a vote of 5to3. Eliza eth Tresch Housing Planner SPAARC Finding &29/96 y Page 3 "i: ., ': iii4 't ;:�:•' `�+ MST'' �,�, 4•f '•J'i:;!'=T�s sr.r. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE August 28, 1996 Room 2444 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black. P. D'Agostino, K Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski Members Absent: J. Aiello, Hans Friedman, J. Glus, D. Marino, D. Jennings Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz, E. Tresch, C. Waite Aonroval of Summary of Findinas from Atiaust 21.1996 Meetlnq. The Committee unanimously approved the summary of findings from August 21, 1996. SPAARC 96-0103 2636 Green Bev Road Prellminerv! Final, Mr. Joseph R. Colucci presented a proposed 8-foot by 20-fact metal storage shed for the Comer Store at 2636 Green Bay Road. A. Alterson noted that the proposed storage shed did not have any zoning Issues. Mr. Colucci said that parking will be reduced from 15 to 11 parking stalls. The Committee discussed the noncombustible nature of the metal shed, and the absence of utilities including heat, water and electricity. Additional discussion included whether the shed would remain permanently on the site and the option of requiring a time limit for its placement on the site. The Committee approve the proposed shed for one year from the time the permit is issued by a vote of 6 to 1. J. Tonkinson voted against. The applicant could reapply after one year. SPAARC 96-0101 816 Emerson Street Final, Mr. James T. Murray discussed the proposed use at 815 Emerson Street as Philly Cheese Steak Restaurant. He said that the only facade change is the signage. A. Alterson noted that the Committee's recommendation will go to the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA). Mr. Murray referred to 21 conditions stated in Ordinance 126-0-89 Granting a Special Use Permit at 817 Emerson Street for Little Caesar (the former tenant). He mentioned that his client is seeking relief of condition 3 (requiring electrical ovens), condition 16 (limiting hours of operation), and condition 18 (limiting deliveries). 3 Seating will be increased from 24 to 42 seats. The Committee discussed parking, circulation of vehicles, lighting and landscaping. The Committee unanimously approved the proposed site plan as presented with no comments on the conditions. §EMRC 96-0100 936 HinmanAvenue Mr. Charlie Clarke discussed a proposal for creating 14 off-street parking spaces at 936 Hinman Avenue. The property is an Evanston Landmark and is located within the Evanston Lakeshore Historic District. The Committee reviewed tho project for the first time on August 21, 1996. Mr. Clarke showed photographs depicting the existing condition of the proposed parking area and its surroundings. He said that the existing three car garage would be demolished. A. Alterson noted that the proposed off-street parking requires zoning variances. Mr. Clarke said that the parking spaces will be sold in a separate deed to condominium owners. The Committee requested plans for the lighting of the parking area. The Committee unanimously approved the proposed 14 off-street parking subject to compliance with the requirements as stated in the zoning report and the approval of the Evanston Preservation Commission. 1224 Chicano Avenue Plat of Consolidation The Committee unanimously approved a plat of consolidation for 1224 Chicago Avenue. f Carlos D. Ruiz` Senior Planner i Pre ion � , Date SPAARC Findings 8128198 Page 2 -A ' -` ��-� ' - fig. -. '' r s�'! - -_ • - - - - - - - ° -`� . -�t� uL� �° .��'° -_ �►.�'a ::3'ry�e:.,a,.-�rs�,�ia}Mree�i Y:ii�rlM�,iihiiaN�Siif�lRaL17�R11�i'�tYtttll�Sl�'i'�4� ,e��, i Ni.g. Mw - SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE September 4, 1996 Roam 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, Hans Friedman, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Wolinski Members Absent: J. Aiello, L. Black, J. Glus, J. Tonkinson. Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz, E. Tresch, C. Waite Aoorovai of Summary of Findings from Au ust . 1996 Meeting= The Committee unanimously approved the summary of findings from August 28,1 M. SPAARC 96-0062 629 Foster Street Recommendation to ZBA, Mr. Rick Strusiner, Mr. Robert Pugliese and Mr. Philip Padauer presented plans for the construction of a new two story building at 629 Foster Street. R. Strusiner said that the revised design incorporates architectural features such as overhang eaves that are compatible with the residential character of the neighborhood. In an effort to reduce the mass of the building, it was divided into three zones. These "zones" are emphasized on the exterior. R. Strusiner noted that the project requires zoning variations. The required front yard setback is 27 feet, they are asking for 26-feet. The projection on the front facade has a setback of 18-feet, same setback as the former porch. The side yard requirement for a T1 district is 15-feet and for the R1 district is 10-feet. They are asking side yard setbacks of 5-feet respectively. Finally, the site is approximately 9,000 s.f. The allowed buildable lot area is 40 percent or 3,600 s.f. , they are asking for 52 percent or 4,400 s.f.. To illustrate the compatibility of the proposed design, R. Strusiner showed pictures of adjacent structures in the neighborhood. C. Smith and H. Friedman were pleased with the revised design. C. Smith emphasized the overhangs are an important element of the overall design. Regarding the side yard setbacks, C. Smith noted that the plans still allow enough space on each side for landscaping. A. Alterson mentioned that the Committee's recommendation is to the ZBA. The ZBA's and the Plan Commission's recommendations go to Council since the proposed project falls in the category of special use. SPAARC Findings 914J96 Page 1 .._�.':��?�.`:i:.4'"�:=]�;�. 'Ar,d:.fF+t.:�� ,.�'�� ... :�t:i. •}•.,,'.i .. ,{il ..�.:�� �l�sr ?` G.i^�tt�r. �.� 'r. ;S}rk�4'j _ ,,{ r,s :.i. .e �I,.!yi'.r-�. _ Ir 1•.2 11 The Committee approved a motion recommending the ZEA approval of the project as submitted, emphasizing the importance of the overhang eaves to the overall design. The motion passed by a vote of 7 to 1. J. Woiinski voted against. SPAARC 96-0091 1501 Central Street Renovation of steel structure at Dyche Stadium. The applicant removed this item from the agenda. SPAARC 96-0104 602-606 Hinman Avenue Final The Committee unanimously approved plans for the repair and replacement of a rear porch at 602.606 Hinman Avenue. &�M Carlos D. Ruiz Senior Planner I Preservation "! - * .1 (r.' Date SPAARC Findings W4198 Page 2 ZM SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE September 19, 1996 Room 2404 Members Present: L. Black, K. Kelly, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski Members Absent: J. Aiello, A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, J. Glue, D. Jennings, D. Marino Design Profession Present: H. Freidman Other Staff Present: S. Franz, C. Ruiz, E. Tresch ARprovai of Summagr of Findings LMM September 41926 Meeting The Committee unanimously voted to approve the summary of findings from September 4,1996 meeting. SMAW 9s-Oi 05 1915_Maple Avenue PreJIMInary/Final Mr. Sloat discussed the proposed parking plan for the 1915 Maple Avenue, Englehart Hall of Northwestern University. The existing parking lot will be repaired and the parking spaces re -striped. The Committee noted that 4 handicapped parking spaces are required, and only 3 are indicated. The Committee unanimously approved the parking plan, subject to the addition of one handicapped parking space. SPAARC 95-0081 1723 Beason A epue > Withdrawn by applicant. SRC 96-0030 707 Qhurch Street -%0 The Flat Top Grill proposed to add three brushed aluminum neon illuminated flames to the building sign. The Committee voted to recommend disapproval, by 6 to 2. SPAARC 96-0106 606 8i 90 Avenue $n St. Nicholas Church proposes to attach a temporary banner, noting the Church's capital campaign, on an existing flag pole. The Committee voted to recommend approval, by 7 to 0, with one abstention. SPAARC Finding 9118196 Page 1 rf. f •� \ •:1 `Y-�{ir�Sj` ��•;yky Y�i�,�Na �•', `..,%.t'�,'�'.�t.'1+J4�_'�- ��.�3.,wY ;.''. 'i e'�.'�`rf :,= _'s i. i' h• 1"n£ yl:h I1y ll,iu` •(,3 ' SPj"Rr. 98-0197 $J1.,0191190 Ayenua Focus Davelopment proposed a free-standing temporary marketing sign on the lot of a new condominium construction. The Committee recommended approval of the sign for 12 months, with an option to return for an additional 6 months, If needed, by a vote of 7 to 1. SPAARQ 90108 822230 Mulford Stet WO The condominium conversion developer proposed to erect a temporary free-standing marketing sign. The Committee unanimously recommended disapproval, citing the size, height, amount of information and location of the sign within a residential area. SPAARC 9"037 2212 QMffi %U RQ" WO The owner of the car wash proposes to replace an existing sign with a new sign on the same location. The Committee recommended approval of the location of the sign, by a vote of 6 to 2. The Committee requested specific Information on the colors, fonts, and appearance of proposed sign. ,S RC 96-0109 71 a %W The new owner of the car dealership proposes to replace portions of two of the existing building signs. The Committee unanimously recommended approval of the proposal, subject to the removal of the free-standing sign directly across the street, on the west side of Chicago Avenue. 6EMRC 96-0110 817-Z31-orest Avenue 9D The condominium conversion developer proposed to rect a temporary free-standing marketing sign. 3 The Committee unanimously recommended disapproval, citing the size, height, amount of information and location of sign within a residential area. Elizabeth Tresch Housing Planner Date SPAARC Finding 9118196 „' � �...Y__�.,.__...._.��_. - r...�. m�/.Q:d M..:v++rrw`..ir.F`r'.x� 1.vw�asw..yw - -, -- � .. S;d,,,.ku✓�.r.,;.�w,;,f,�eva.yji..i`�r�vr,�!'� Page 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE October 2, 199+6 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black. P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinsk€ Members Absent: Design Profession Present: Other Staff Present: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Kelly, D. Marino H. Friedman C. Ruiz, E. Tresch IS, 1996 Meeting The Committee unanimously voted to approve the summary of findings. SP_-AARC 95-0g65 1560 ShermamAyiMe PralorninaWFIna Mr. Scott Ziessow discussed the proposed now chiller on top of the garage parking deck of One Rotary Center at 1560 Sherman Avenue. Installation of the chiller would eliminate two existing parking spaces. Two parking spaces would be added by re - striping the parking. The Committee suggested that work on the roof top units should be completed prior to Thanksgiving. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. SPAARC_96-0059 1948 Ridge Avon 9 Flual Messrs. Doug Pasma and Kevin Barker of GRB Architect and Lonnie R. Williams of Northwestern Physical Plant discussed the proposed new construction of a vehicle maintenance facility. They discussed the proposed landscaping plan which would shield the building from Ridge Ave. They mentioned that new asphalt drains would be constructed, but that the existing drainage lines would not be altered. They discussed the proposed lighting which would be mounted on the building's masonry. They provided samples of the materials proposed, with the back of the building proposed as a light color metal, and the Ridge Ave. side of the building would be a split faced and ground faced CMU with brick infill panels. They discussed the proposed parking plan. The Committee noted that the turning radius around the rear of the building appeared too tight and the parking lot on the east did not have sufficient width for the design. The Committee suggested that parking calculations be redone. The Committee expressed concern that many of the site's employees were not parking in the lot and any new SPAARO Finding 1012196 Page I An rrr. yl.-i�i1L��' 1J employees'would not park In the designated lots. The Committee also noted that a number of parking spaces are occupied by University service vehicles, The Committee recommended that the University outline how the pariting tem works and address whether there is sufficient pa to cover the P needs. g The Committee unanimousty approved the proposal, subject to recelpt of Metropolitan Chicago Water Declamation District permit l r it, arkingatlon and ie-drawing of parking, and receipt and acceptance of letterdfy g P Elizabeth Tresch Housing Planner / 96 Date �t Page 1 SPAARC Finding 1 aW6 M SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE October 09, 1996 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, D. Jennings, D. Marino, C. Smith, Linda Stewart, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski Members Absent: J. Aiello, L. Black, P. D'Agostinio,J. Glus, K Kelly, D. Marino Design Profession Present: M. Friedman Other Staff Present: Lisa Lyon, C. Ruiz, E. Tresch A2provai of SummA y of Findinas from October 2. 1996 Meetin% The Committee unanimously voted to approve the summary of findings. Se RC 9"111 1702 Chtcaco Avenue Preliunary Mr. Jerry Scherrer, architect, presented plans for the construction of a wheelchair ramp at 1702 Chicago Avenue. Evanston Preservation Commission had previously reviewed and approved the proposed ramp at this Evanston Landmark building. The ramp has a "l.i" shape with an entrance closest to the drop-off area, near the main entrance to the building. A parking space for the disabled at the adjacent public parking lot will be relocated closer to the ramp. A concrete path connects the parking area with the ramp. The open area surrounding the ramp would be landscaped. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. SPAARC 9"096 1612-22 Sherman Avenue Final Mr. Gordon J. Magill and Mr. Richard Alf discussed plans for the rehabilitation of the existing storefront at 1512-22 Sherman Avenue. Tile project is under consideration for City assistance under the Facade Improvement Program. The project consist of stripping off paint from the brick, installing new storefront windows and anodized aluminum frames, rebuilding the bulk heads with spectra glaze material, exposing metal lintels above windows, installing new vertical canvas awnings with signage, and installing new exterior light fixtures. SPAARC,FWng 11?I V6 Page I .« - �...,.,a w --- ...�RA...w..�n�rr w:u r;�..,,.....ttEr:-.i..yr..e.��irr.,•',.vwl.w•.vn w n7S.ni wh.�tww.+a+w.+.rr+.�w..+.rn- .fuVa..y�r The Committee discussedand when doors are allowed to swing over the public way In relation to levels of occupancy. The Committee suggested to the applicants exploring the use of more traditional designed light fixtures. The signage will have to be approved through a uniform sign plan. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. SPAAH9. 88-01a7 811 Chigggo Avenue PrellnVaW Mr. Tim Anderson presented plans for a new seven story condominium building at 811 Chicago Avenue. The building will have off street parking above and below the grade. The ground level facing Chicago Avenue will be commercial, except the lobby. The building has fifteen -feet of side yard setback to the north, and five -feet of side yard setback to the south. Gates will close both sides. The north setback area wip be landscaped. The building will have two elevators, a central corridor and nine units per floor. The units will be one bedroom and two bedroom. Larger units will be also available for up to three bedrooms. The construction of the building will be precast concrete and brick. The windows will be aluminum, The Committee suggested the use of limestone or precast stone at the ground level to break up the scale of the building. Also, the top floor could be treated In similar fashion. A canopy above the entrance to the lobby and projecting over the public way will require a special permit. The applicant will also have to file a water reclamation permit and other pertinent permits. The Committee unanimously gave preliminary approval to the proposal. SPAARC SS-0016 1100 Florence Avenue The Committee tabled this item to the next meeting. Carlos D. Ruiz Senior Planner/Prese ion lD• Jc{•• RJp Date SPAARC Finding 1019N6 P4V 2 Final �_ �,-._.�... �rj.;: -/.$•net:}.''�• c� ;«cl"_ �-�..r: ":'' y-, - -�F, r' `fi4t, . •H7: .s:FfZ V tiad�{ �•��k�� SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND AF)PEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE October 2391999 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, k Berkowsky, C. Bush, P. D'Agostinlo, D. Jennings, K Kelly, D. Marino. C. Smith, (present after SPAARC 96-0081) J. Wolinski Members Absent: J. Aiello, L. Black, I Glus, J. Tonkinson, Design Profession Present: H. Friedman Other Staff Present: B. Fahlstrom, L. Lyon, C. Ruiz, E. Tresch Aaoroval of Summary of Findinas from October 6. 1996 Meetin% The Committee unanimously voted to approve the summary of findings. SPAARC 98-0081 1501 Central Street Final, Carolyn Smith was not present during this presentation. Mr. Craig Smith, Mr. Jim Koolish, and Mr. Jeff Jozwiak discussed the plans for remodeling Dyche Stndium at 1501 Central Street. Mr. Smith said that the project consists of lowering the field five and a half feet, constructing a now one-story pmCast concrete building, adding a new press box with elevators, and improving the seating area. The west side of the site along Ashland Avenue is the most affected area. Wrought iron gates between the facade arches will be installed. A now ticket booth and other Improvements are inside below the concourse. Mr. Smith said that the walkway between McGaw Hall and the now one-story building vrill remain open. Mr. Smith discussed the new metal halide lighting which will only be seen through the arches. The lamps project the light down. He also said that the ramp tower windows are being replaced. SPAARC FirdEng 10123196 Par 1 —. n� - -a- �, •, - r� s-, s,r.}r 3 y., .� l t`-"-3g,iµ' r 3 Mr. Koolish said that the landscaping is along Ashland Avenue, where trees are being replaced. At Me comer of Ashland Avenue and Central Street the existing landscaping would be improvod. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. fiEAARG W015 1100 Florence Avenue Final Ms. Ellen Galland discussed the proposed three -lot subdivision 1100 Florence Avenue. She said that the difference between the preliminary and final proposal is that off-street surface parking is now provided along Greenleaf Street. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. _$PAARC 98-0112 1859-75 Maple Avenue Final Mr. Stephen Yas, Mr. David Galloway, Mr. Fidel Lopez, Mr. Paul Dewoskin and Mr. Ron Shipka, Jr. presented architectural drawings dated 10-23-96 for the construction on 30 attached, single family dwellings at 1859-75 Maple Avenue. Mr. Yas said that the final plans are virtually the same as the preliminary plans. Mr. Lopez said the plan shows two and three bedroom units, all accessible to a court yard. The main entrance is at Maple Avenue and Emerson Street. A secondary entrance is at University Avenue. The court yard is only accessible to the disabled through each unit. Bay windows and balconies face Maple Avenue, and kitchens face the court yard. Each unit has its own private patio. Underground parking is provided. Mr. Berkowsky asked about the accessibility to the court yard through a gate. Mr. Yas explained that the gate is a two -leaf and 6-feet wide leading to stairs and the court yard. The court yard landscaping includes a formal garden at the center, bermed lime stone planters and wood plarders. Other plantings include ivy, flowering plants and hedges. Some landscaping is also provided on the public right of way. The court yard pathways consist of 2-feet by 2-feet concrete pavers sitting on gravel. Ms. C. Smith said that the gravel may create problems such snow removal. Mr. Hans Friedman noted that the court yard was very formal and not suitable for large gatherings of people. Mr. Lopez said that their market studies determined the design of the court yard. Mr. -Yas described five lighting types: for trees, for pathways, for the gateway, for the patios, and for the entrance to th9 court yard. The finish building materials are: panelized stone or concrete block for the first 15-feet high and parting walls separations, a dark brick in the middle and a lighter brick on the fourth level, capped a F SPA RCFinding 10MIY6 �. P4W 2 `- =ram _rcii� Ada*#�t)a�k�n�eSr ►i r� , _ s...._ - - ep A with a fiber glass cornice and aluminum clad wood windows. Chloego common brick is proposed In the court yard side, where the windows may also change. Signege Is provided with front and back street name signs, and building Identification signs. Mr. Davis Jennings said that the sidewalk on University Avenue sids should be moved r . further away from the garage exits. The Committee unanimously approved the site plan for the proposal. The Committee approved the building appearance. Mr. Friedman voted nay. §PAARC 9"008 630 Davis Street FIMH Mr. Friedman left the meeting at this time. Mr. Steve Bernstein, Mr. Robert J. Heidrich, Mr. Selwyn Malisoff, and Mr. Jeffrey lCleifreid presented a proposal for alterations and three-story addition to Chandler Building at 630 Davis Street. Mr. Bemstein said that at ground level retail will not exceed three units, the rest would be marketed as condos. Mr. Heidrich explained that the project consists of adding three stories to the existing "L" shaped building while removing two stories from the three-story comer building. The new addition would be finished with Dryvit insulation material. an the -one story building, the finish material above the windows is also dryvit. Mr. Heidrich said that Dryvit would simulate the color and texture of the stone finish material of trhe "L" shaped building. New sliding aluminum windows would be installed, -With "snap -in" style divided lights. Ms. Smith expressed her concerns with the appearance of the new addition and alterations to the building. She said that important architectural elements such as articulation of control joints, expression of reveals, and the use of quality materials are missing in the design. Mr. Ruiz concurred with Ms. Smith. He added that the proposed project did not follow any of the recommendations from the Proservation Commission, which the applicants had requested voluntarily. The Committee discussed other aspects about the project such as lighting to the apartments entrance, the removal of the firescape and the rebuilding of existing stairs. Signage is still to be determined. Mr. Wolinski said that 20% of the units must be adaptable. Mr. Heidrich said that the project complies with that requirement. SPA.iRCFhft IOM196 Page Y -' - -�.' f � i [ �•t `s`t�� r ,�-`�'_�� + Y '�� - -�; zrs� 4 *-r` Sxr�+Y,#i`t� ,� ,�4�*}�. r „t - _ r 1 i:� n l; ��f � _� The Committee unanimously approved the site plan. in a separate motion, the Committee unanimously disapprovad the appearance of the addition and alterations to the building. 8PAARC 2i:9A0 2 1332 Emrg n Stmet Prnllminary Mr. Anil Khatkhate and Mr. Samuel Hunter discussed plans for a new fire Watson at 1332 Emerson Street. Mr. Hunter said that the main entrance to the fire station is on Emerson Street and it is accessible to the disabled. Eleven people would be in the building in each shift. The south side of the site would be landscaped and the exterior lighting will not affect the neighbors in the residential area. The building Is finished with a redissh color standard size brick, the window sills are currently buff color brick, but may change to precast stone, the doors are hollow metal, the windows glass is clear and the roofing material is asphalt shingle. A stone monument sign and a flag pole are located near the fnain entrance. Mr. Arthur Alterson said that zoning Issues such as parking and required yard setback needed to be addressed. The Committee discussed possibilities of moving some off street surface parking spaces from the front of the building to other less visible locations. Mr. David .Jennings suggested relocating some parking in the alley and the containment area. Mr. Hunter said that they would consult with their architect to comply with the recommendations suggested by tha Committee. The Committee unanimously voted for preliminary approval of the project. Carlos D. Ruiz Senior Planner/Pre tion % - --?- J1�._ Date SPAARCFlh&ng I0/23N6 Pass 4 .'ate• ''f ts; SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE November 6, 1996 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski Members Absent: J. Aiello, L. Black, J. Glus Design Profession Present: H. Friedman Other Staff Present: E. Tresch AoRfoval of Summary of.Findinas from October 23 1996 Meeting, The Committee unanimously approved the summary of findings. W AARC 93-0048 909 Foster Stre9t Canceled. Prejlm[136ry SPAARQ 96-01 3 79259entmi Stmot Canceflt Mr. Robert Yohanan, Ken Behles, and Howard Kain discussed the concept of a branch bank of the First Bank & Trust in Evanston to be developed at 2925 Central Street. The interior of the existing structure would be remodeled for the bank and the existing parking lot would be reconfigured to include two drive thru lanes. There would be ons ATM inside the vestibule and one on the side of the building. The existing signage would be modified. They noted that the parking lot would continue to be shared with the adjacent structure. The Committee commented that the proposed development will require a zoning analysis, a special use permit for the drive thru, and may need sign variances. The Committee noted that the drive thru as proposed meets the stacking requirements. It was suggested that some buffers be developed between the drive thru and the adjacent residence, particularly from car headlights. The Committee unanimously approved the development concept. 5PAARC 96.0114 1420 Maple Avenue PreliminarvlFinai Mr. Larry LaRoi presented the proposed handicap accessible ramp to the rear entry of the YMCA Child Care Center. He noted that the Preservation Commission had approved the ramp. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. SPAARC Finding 1116196 Page 1 ::. lu. :. .. a ar .. ..w ✓r j SPAARC N&ii§ 16Q1 Vlealay AVQDue PrgUMjftW Mr, Jim Fisher presented the proposed subdivision. He noted that the property was currently two lots with one tax identification number. His proposal la based on his conversation with a zoning officer who stated that since there is only one tax I.d. number, the lots must be subdivided In order to build on the undeveloped lot. The proposed subdivision modifies the existing lot lines. Mr. Alterson clarified that a subdivision Is not required, since tax i.d. and lots are exclusive entities. He noted that the currently undeveloped lot has sufficient area to be considered a buildable lot; therefore, any development on that lot must just meet zoning requirements for that district. Mr. Alterson added the proposed subdivision creates a non -conforming lot of the developed lot, as the lot coverage is greater than allowable and would require a zoning variance. The Committee noted that this property is a historic landmark in a historic district and any proposed development would have to be reviewed bythe Preservation Commission. - The Committee unanimously approved tabling the proposed subdivision, pending consultation with the zoning officer. SPAARC 96-0094 1928 Fostgr^treat Fin) Canceled. SPAARC 96-0116 UJ CjWch 5troet PrellminandE Mr. Mike Imlay presented the proposed porch re -construction on the YWCA. He discussed that the porch was part of the original house built in the 1880s and had recently collapsed. The proposed porch would have the same configuration as the previous porch, with new foundations for columns and a decorative stone base. The Roaring and the railings would be wood. The roof portion of the porch, which was not damaged in the collapse, is intended to remain as is due to budget constraints. He noted that the Preservation Commission had approved this proposed porch. The Committee suggested that the ventilation of the building foundation be studied closely, since the old porch sealed moisture from the building foundation and the proposed wood flooring would not provide as much sealing. The Committee unanimously approved the proposal. Elizabeth Tresch Housing Planner Date SPAARC Finding I116196 Page 2 _ . -. a , - - - • — _ _ �. - . �'7 ,n ..n M .. - i.'m.nr-4y^-�r yh„fir +� : �. I :rr n I ...1�.. C.rR iNLi;.`:. . ' i - .... i ' `r •-_° .: •.- ? ��,c e'v.]+Lr�-'7h SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 'E SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE November 13, 1996 Room 2404 Members Present: A Alterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K Kelly, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson Members Absent: J. Aiello, J. Glus, J. Wolinski Design Profession Present: H. Friedman Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz Aooroval of Summary of Findinas from November G.199B Meetinaz The Committee unanimously approved the summary of findings. SPAARC 93 0088 909 Foster Street Preliminary Mr. Eric Eriksson, architect discussed plans for a rear one-story addition at 909 Foster Street. Access to the proposed office space would be via an existing four -foot sidewalk. Required parking would be supplemented with a nearby off-street surface parking, in addition to the existing ten parking spaces. The building exterior finish would be two tone concrete block. C. Smith suggested matching the common brick finish of the existing main building. C. Smith highlighted the Fire Code requirements for office use such as: sprinkler systems, fire rated walls, and protected openings. Mr. Eriksson agreed to revise his plans to make the addition free standing, after security and fire safety issues were discussed. The Committee approved the preliminary plan, subject to the provision of providing adequate parking spaces, addressing security issues and compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances. Vote: five ayes, three nays. SPAARC 98-0094 1928 Foster Street Final, Mr. Peter Eric Siegal and Ms. Erika A. Quinn of Habitat for Humanity presented final drawings for a proposed single family house at 1928 Foster Street. Mr. Siegal said that a backyard fence was eliminated at the neighbors request. The two-story house with a gable roof aligns with the neighboring houses. The Committee unanimously approved the final plan with the provision that the landscaping plan be reviewed by P. D'agosUno. nr ■'q ar ■^�. r ■�n �u nrrr ,.�r.T `� .rr ,.. r'lllll'^i71"I n,�nr �r. •rl� ^A hN 7il" 6'�{R'1"`�^I 3Ai`6, JWRC 96-0117 1519 Hiq,Wn Avenue Prellml"noffinal Mr. Bennet Johnson, architect, discussed plans for a one-story penthouse addition at 1519 Hinman Avenue. The building is a condominium. Mr. Johnson said that the existing shed will be replaced by a penthouse with a metal roof. The penthouse Is part of an existing two -bedroom unit. The windows would be Pella aluminum -clad wood windows. A. Alterson said that the building height is a zoning Issue. The Zoning Ordinance allows up to 85-feet, the proposed height is 88-feet and six -inches. The Committee unanimously approved preliminary and final plans pending zoning approval. SPAARC 96-0100 936 Hinman Avenue %0 The Committeo unanimously approved a temporary free standing sign at 936 Hinman Avenue for a one-year period. The applicant has the option to come back after the expiration date. SPAARC 96-0118 3333 Central Street Sir The Committee unanimously approved a wail sign at 3333 Central Street. SPAARC 96-0107 811 Chicane Avenue Slgrn The Committee unanimously approved a temporary free standing commercial sign at 811 Chicago Avenue for a one-year period. The applicant has the option to come back after the expiraticn date. SPAARC 96-119 2829 Central Street Sian, The Committee approved the refacing of a free standing sign at 2829 Central Street. Vote: six yeas, one nay. SPAARC 96-120 1421 Sherman Avenue Sim The Committee unanimously disapproved a proposed wood, non illuminated wall sign at 1421 Sherman Avenue. SPAARC 96-0096 1512-22 Sherman Avenue Sian The Committee unanimously approved a Unified Center Sign Plan for 1512-22 Sherman Avenue. The Committee recommended that the flat canvas panels for signage either all be illuminated or none be illuminated. Carlos D. Ruiz Senior Planner �/. /S 0 �' Date iN - SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE November 20,1996 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black., J. Glus, D. Jennings, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski .a Members Absent: J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, K. Kelly Design Profession Present: H. Friedman Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz, E. Tresch The Committee unanimously voted to approve the summary of findings. SPAARC 96-0(}2,vL_ 'ill--2.5 Emerson S eet Pr lid mina�y Mr. Larry Parkman and Steve Bernstein discussed the proposed new construction of a 76 unit independent living facility. The plan presented was a revision to the plan previously discussed in concept. The 5 story gabled roof building would front Emerson Street, with a parking lot in back, accessed by Dewey St. An outdoor patio is proposed along the eastern side of the building and a loading berth would be located off of the alley on the northern edge of the site. The building is sited 28 feet off of Dewey on the western edge, which is a similar distance as the existing houses on the street. Face brick would be used on all four sides of the building, with cut stone or concrete above the windows. The eastern and western sides would have windows and glass block in front of the stairways. Mr. Bernstein commented that the developer is willing to make payments in lieu of taxes and that design has been discussed and modified through conversations with the Alderman. i The Committee appreciated the changes made in response to the Committee's previous comments. The Committee suggested a canopy at the front entrance, noting that zoning implications would have to be determined. It was noted that entrance did not face the parking lot, and a suggestion was made to consider some type of visual intercom system to the back door to allow access from the rear by visitors. The Committee suggested some landscaping or fencing buffer along the edges of the patio. It was noted that such a buffer would provide security, a sense of ownership, and some shade in the summer. The Committee discussed the possibility of added articulation of the gabled areas by adding a shadow line. The Committee noted that Water Reclamation District and driveway permits would be required. The Committee unanimously approved the site plan and appearance. SPAARC Summary of Findings page 1 tffi, RR"W'", An A Ad A APAAK $6421 1819-Ridge Aver W ftlimin ry Mr. Steve Bernstein and Eric Ericson discussed the proposed religious use in a MUE district at 1810 Ridge Avenue. The two existing structures would remain, however, the bridge between them would be demolished. The southern structure would remain an office use. The northern structure would be converted into a first floor sanctuary and second floor for church related administrative offices. The church would be used primarily on Sundays, with minimal meetings during the week. Parking would be provided in the existing lot and agreements to use adjacent lots. The church would make payments in lieu of taxes. The Committee expressed concern about the congregation crossing Ridge Avenue and suggested two crossing guards be present before and after services. The Committee also was concerned about the entrance and exit of cars from Ridge Avenue and suggested signage to strictly limited the locations of each. The Committee commented that the parking lot is very tight and that given the size of the congregation, there will be likely be parking outside of the lot. The Committee approved the religious use in the MUE district, subject to the Plan Commission approving such use as a special use in that district. The votes were 7 ayes, 1 nay, and 1 abstaining. fiMARC 96-4M 527 Davis Street prefiffjom Mr. Alterson presented the proposed Type 11 restaurant in this location. He noted that no exterior modifications are proposed. The Committee noted that the storefront is vacant and previous use was approved as a speciality food. It was noted that the previous use had problems with seating, toilet facilities, and dumpster overflow. The Committee approved the proposed use, subject to compliance with all building codes. The vote was 5 ayes and 2 nays. WAARC 96-Q 23 2111 Dewey Avenue Mr. John Wertymer discussed the proposed conversion of a one-story commercial property into two residential units. The existing building would be divided down the middle into two apartments with artist studio space. He noted that the adjacent properties are all residential. He mentioned that the design has not been fixed and that he would have to examine the site for possible environmental contamination, Mr. Alterson discussed that because this project needs zoning relief, it will be presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission. The Committee noted that if the zoning relief is approved, the design of the residential structure (because it will be a two -flat) will not come before the Committee. The Committee approved the proposal by a vote of 5 ayes and 2 abstentions, SAAARC Summery of Findings fte2 i; SRC 96- U4 100Ridge Avan a A @I1t Dl Mr. James Fraser discussed the proposed new canopy at the Shell Oil service station. The canopy would be located on the same supports at the same height and size of the existing canopy. The canopy would be grey and yellow. The Committee recommended that only the small shell be on the canopy. The Committee discussed that a trailer had been on the west side of the site, selling merchandise, and that the trailer must be removed since the remodeling of the store is complete. The Committee approved holding consideration of this issue until the trailer is removed, by a vote of 6 ayes and 1 nay. I'll, -,cluck Elizabeth Tresch Housing Planner Ias CIO Date 3 � . 3' SPAARC Summary of Findings Page 3 .W.,19• Pirtle 4.• Jr �. 45t SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE November 27,1996 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, D. Marino, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinskl Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: J. Aiello, L. Black., J. Glus, K Kelly H. Friedman C. Ruiz Pporoval of Summary of Findings from Novemb9120. 1996 Meetint. The Committee unanimously voted to approve the summaryof findings. SPAARC 96-0107 811 Chlcaao Avenue Final, Mr. Tim Anderson presented final plans for a mixed use multi family and commercial eight story building at 811 Chicago Avenue. The plans include a north side one way gate located towards th© rear of the building, a south side one way gate facing Chicago Avenue, and a south side ramp and railing located towards the rear of the building. Two types of exterior lighting fixtures will be used around the building. Four "geofonn" type fixtures will be on the main facade, two of which will be at each side of the main entrance canopy, and the other two fixtures will be symmetrically located to the south. The remaining three sides of the building will be illuminated with "bulkhead" type fixtures. The landscaping will be primarily along Chicago Avenue vAth trees and annual plantings and ground covering. The south side will be tree lined and the north side will have ivy covering. The rear of the building will have limited sodding on the ground and vines on the walls. Mr. D'Agostino will review the Chicago Avenue "sidewalW' trees for conformance with City standards for parkway trees. The finish materials of the building will be utility brick, the first and second floor will feature limestone banding. The windows will be off white aluminum clad. The railings will be dark green. The standard graphics and signage plan will be submitted later for review. Mr. Wolinski said that the east side of the building should be graffiti proof. The Committee unanimously approved the final plans as submitted, subject to approval of the landscape plan by Mr. D'Agostino. SPAARC Summary of Findings Pte f AN a Nl.ARC 96-01 Zs 20OZ Maple nuo PIM9 Mr. Ted Benson discussed plans for an open deck on the rear east side of 2007 Maple Avenue. The proposed deck is 9-feet above ground and held by 4" by N' posts. The construction material is cedar. The Committee unanimously approved the proposed deck, subject to the submission of letters of clearance or easement agreements with the local utility companies by the applicant to the City of Evanston. LOP - Carlos D. Ruiz Senior Planner/Prese /a • Date SPAARC Summary of Findings Page 2