HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1995 -1996July 10, 1995
Honorable Mayor
Mortcn and City Council Members
Re: Guidelines
for Public Art Proiects or Donations
The Public Art
Committee snould be included in the process ct
reviewing both sites and subject Tatter for works of public art in
Evanston, The
existing Public Art Ordinance 112-0-89 contains
language that requires the Public Art Committee to perform tn:s
role. Reference
the `_:.liowing sections:
' 7-16-1 A: Thus
the purpose cf this ordinance shall be as follows:
A. To provide a
process cy which the City of Evanston shall acquire
and maintain
Works ,f Art including but not limited =o
commissioning works
of Art
and
7-16-4 C Functions (of PAC, ...2) reviewing design, execution and
installation of Works cf Art for Public Projects
Publ_ Art cn ^_'"A cr Ncr-nwestern Fa:lrcac rcrert•.
The language o'_ the ordinance mandates a Process which requires
that PAC be included from one inception of any public art project.
This would include public art projects :.____zing space owned and/or
managed by the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad or the C:A.
:AC understands that _ :lair= art _ -erects are usually brought fast
to the CTA, for example, when - ne project -n voives zn_ pain -in; =.
viaducts. As part of .. ne prccess , PAC nusz have an agreement wi-n
any entity approached Or permission no paint viaducts. These
entities must state :tat permission would be granted zc do _ne
project only after AC :as teen _nvc-i •ed in _ne site select;,,. ,
artist selection, and review cf irawings.
When the community grcup, _ n6ivi uai , or crganiza_ion ; nereaizer
community group: desiring =reate cr :innate public art :s
informed of PAC's role, ;nen PAC would moose a selection panes, as
described in Policies and Procedures 7A . -his panel would review
the site selection and design.
After the select;cn pare: has acted, PAC will recommend a time line
to ne followed and advise n e community group regarding Evanston's
insurance requ_remenzs, _ke budget required for the project, and
the maintenance escrow ..r._o.. r.as be estao:ianea to keep any
a project in proper ynys__a! zcnd=..__... :A_ 'hi.._ 3iso recommend he
-
Surat' cn c= he pr c� e :! , _ . � .. now _ a mursi ::n a �the
snould
oe inplace bezcre be=.- removea.
As a final step in the process, a letter agreement should be signed
by the community group acknowledging the guidelines in writing and
�an
4rcluding the recommendati=ns regarding:
i. site selection and design
2. time line for comnieti--n
2. insurance requirements
4. budget
S. maintenance escrow/ ma:.ntenance res_consibilities
6. how long the work is expected to be' -Jr. place
A letter agreement with t^p group or individual ahould be part of
the process since personne1.
can change in :.he course of a project.
Donat_orzs of Exist-na Wor.
-r Commissions =or Public Ark.
:f an existing work. _s tc
ce donated t., :he city, then slides of
the work or the actual
work snould be shown :.o PAC. After
discussion with the donor anti/or
artist regarding :he work and its
placement, PAC will choosy
a selection panel. The selection panel
will determine whetner c,r .=t
^V accept worm.. _f :.he worn is to
be donated to the Gvanstcn
Public Library, the Library Board has
•
appointed a Cellect_cns _cmmittee
and sue.- donat+ons would ao
throuan the Library's apwrc:ai process.
:. Whc should be resocrsi'Cle
_`or over: eel .a escrow 4.,4 d?
:. should t"er= be a tina_
aaonr--val ices Opposed 4^ review)?
f
-
Nancv Kotler, Chair
Public Art Committee
3
jL yid
� —W
-
1
1.. �'14iF
La :'I-�' aa' ♦
- i .-'1` - - _ _
_
DRAFT - NOT APPROVED
Minutes of the 12 September 1995 Public Art Committee meeting.
MBMBRRB PRESENT: N. Kotler, J. Gamble, B. Hart, I. Johnson, D.
Mickenberg, R. Moeller, G. Struve, and
affiliate members R. Isaacson, G. Struve and F.
Nagelbach.
MEMBERS AHSM;T: S. Bernstein, R. Green, A. Niffeneggar.
STAFF: Jonathon Glus, administrative director
Achieving a quorum, the September meeting of the Public Art
Committee was called to order by chair Nancy Kotler at 7:15 in the
first floor meeting room of the Evanston Public Library.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Indira Johnson moved for and Nancy Kotler
seconded approval of the June and August meeting minutes. Approval
was unanimous.
CHAIR REPORT: Nancy Kotler welcomed everyone back after a summer of
travels, and introduced new member Robert Moeller.
In way of opening the season, Fancy Kotler invited David Mickenberg
to deliver an excerpt of his recent lecture on art in architecture
in the Chicago area. David discussed the history around a number
of sculptures at Northwestern and the development of the sculpture
collection at Block Gallery. David also discussed the history and
artistic merit of a number of murals in Chicago, including some
found in the Humboldt Park and Pilsen neighborhoods as well as some
in the Loop and Near North areas.
STAFF REPORT: Jonathon Glus explained that prior to the meeting he
was at the first artists' "gathering" sponsored the Arts Council.
The event, which was organized by Council member Pam Matiosian,
attracted approximately SQ artists.
PUBLIC ART PLAN REVIEW/ APPROVAL: Jonathon directed the Committee's
attention to the draft 1995/1997 public hrt program. The following
dialogue ensued:
Regarding the Library, Jonathon explained that a second phase of
the children's mural at the Library will be installed in spring
196, and he suggested now (after the Library being open for a year)
may be a better time to instigate the proposed "adopt -a-chair"
program. Beth Hart agreed, and offered to contact Library Board
president Andrew Heindel to discuss the project.
Regarding temporary construction site art, Ron Isaacson suggested
that the Arts Council sponsor an "artists' paint -in" at the
�' Washington National/Buck barricade site.
u iIh J. • •Y .. YY.
LI
r `
Regarding the Transportation Center/TransAxis, Nancy explained that
the subcommittee had a very difficult time locating artwork
substantial enough to command the entire round -a -bout. Gail Struve
reminded the subcommittee that Nina Levy was still a possibility,
and suggested that the committee meet at the site to determine
realistic space/size parameters.
Regarding "discovery art," Jim Gamble explained that a number of
elements of the new downtown streetscape may include "discovery
art," including fencing, benches, kiosks and signage. Jim also
explained that the artist which the design team will contract will
be responsible for the over-all design direction for these
elements.
Regarding a downtown public art fund, Jonathon explained that a
number of cities and counties now have such a trust, which is
usually managed by an arts council for an independent 501M . Funds
are obtained through a variety of methods, including self -taxing,
foundation, and municipal support. The purpose of such trusts is
to allow for on -going, innovative arts programming which may be
more attractive to foundations and private citizens to support than
a municipally -sponsored project.
Regarding Patriot's Park, David Mickenberg offered to work with
Jonathon to develop a grant request to the NEA for restoration of
the monument. Nancy Kotler suggested that a "buy a brick" program
could fund the upgrading of the park land and gardens at the site.
Regarding the public art lecture series, the committee discussed
hosting one or two speakers of national acclaim each year, or the
earlier proposed five to six lectures per year. Also discussed was
the purpose of the series (advocacy for public art?, general
education?, education for those already aware of public art and
contemporary art theory and practices?) and the intended audience.
Regarding the public art map, Indira Johnson and Gail Struve
offered to develop a draft of the map.
Regarding "art at the viaduct," Jonathon reminded PAC that he had
been requested by City Council to research the use of brackets and
mural boards at the viaducts. Jonathon explained that this concept
had been brought to City Council by individual members a number of
times over the past years, and that the intention was to use art at
the viaducts to distract from the deteriorating condition of the
bridges and walla. Jonathon also explained that Constance Martell
at the CTA was not supportive of the idea because many of the
_�
structures are nearly unsafe. However, Jonathon was somewhat
confident that the CTA would support such a project if the details
of the program were made clear in advance. Jim Gamble voiced
concern that such a program would encourage the eventual use of the
viaducts for advertisement, similar to the use of viaducts in Hyde
Park. Beth Hart explained her belief that art at the viaducts
-
should utilize the entire space, instead of the limited parameters
of the proposed use.
3
Nancy Kotler explained that the finalization of the draft
guidelines for public art projects and donations, currently being
discussed by PAC, can not be completed until a decision is reached
by PAC regarding its stand on the use of brackets.
Because the meeting had to end with the closing of the library,
Nancy asked the membership to review the draft plan and come to the
October meeting with the items of the plan prioritized,
PROGRAM UPDATES: (1) FIRE STATION: no change,
(2) TRANSPORTATION CENTER: Nancy Kotler explained
the committee is having a difficult time
locating sculpture that is large enough for
the space, and the search would continue.
(3) DOWNTOWN: Jonathon explained that on the
following day five artists would be
interviewed for a design consultancy to the
project, which will last until approximately
1 January and result in a number of design
alternatives for various locations throughout
downtown, including a motif that may be used
throughout downtown in a variety of forms and
materials,
ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 pm.
�by Jonathon Glus, 2 October 1995
$sus �a yr
7
DRAFT - NOT APPROVED
Minutes of the 10 October 1995 Public Art Committee meeting.
MEMBERS PRESENT: N. Kotler, J. Gamble, B. Hart, R. Moeller,
and affiliate member R. Isaacson.
MEMBERS ABSENT: S. Bernstein, I. Johnson, R. Green, D.
Mickenberg, A. Niffeneggar. Affiliate member
Gail Struve.
STAFF: Jonathon Glus, administrative director
The October meeting of the Public Art Committee was called to order
by chair Nancy Kotler at 7:10 in the first floor meeting room of
the Evanston Public Library. Because a quorum was not present, the
meeting was conducted for information and discussion only.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regarding page 02, paragraph #5, sentence ##2,
Robert Moeller suggested that it should read, "Also discussed was,
the purpose of the series (advocacy, education, scholarly, etc.)
and the intended audience. It was suggested that another format
may be more appropriate for disseminating information and promoting
dialogue about public art. Co-sponr.orship with another agency was
considered." Due to a lack of quoruuI, approval and revisions will
a be held for the November meeting.
CSAIR REPORT: Nancy Kotler welcomed everyone and suggested that due
to the size of the agenda, she would deliver a chair's report only
if time permitted at the end of the meeting.
STAFF REPORT: Jonathon Glus also suggested that he also hold his
report until the end of the meeting.
MEMORIALS: Beth Hart reported that a subcommittee consisting of
Marilyn Price, Pam Matiosian, Jonathon Glus and herself met in May
to consider prospects for a memorial to 3oseph Zendell. That
committee discussed the construction of a contemplative garden at
the west side of the Noyes Center, that would have be designed so
that any Evanston artist could participate in the design and
implementation of the garden. For example, artists would be
J invited to design and fabricate individual paving bricks. Jim
Gamble suggested that a space study should be conducted to test the
3 space for adequate amounts of light. Nancy Kotler suggested that
the east facade may be more appropriate in that the building is
accessed through the east facade and that the garden would be seen
from the CTA line. Jim Gamble suggested that the area in front of
the rear wing, at the lobby entrance, would be good for a memorial
garden area. Jim suggested that Joseph believed in the evolution
of art, and that could be manifest in a garden that is host to
ephemeral artwork and plantings. The garden could completely
change in content over a period of time, while still retaining its
character as a contemplative space dedicated to the arts.
Beth reported that she was still interested in implementing the
"adopt -a-chair" program at the Library and would explore the
possibility with the Library Board. Beth also reported that
upcoming projects will be more successful if efforts are
collaborative.
TRANSPORTATION: Jim Gamble said that he is aware of a possible
funding source for the permanent placement of an artwork at the
Transportation Center or possibly Fountain Square, and that he
would bring to this committee more definitive information on the
source.
Nancy directed the attention of the committee to the draft Public
Art Plan. Jonathon asked that the committee review the sections
and prioritize them. Ron Isaacson suggested that instead, a
statement be inserted at the top of the document which explains
that the list is not by priority. Nancy agreed, and suggested that
the list be titled, "On -Going Projects." Below are additional
adjustments to the document:
- include. "Books" in the Library collection
- fold 3C, 3D & 3E into #3.
- rename the Lecture Series, "Education Program"
- delete #7
- update text as necessary
CHAIR'S REPORT: Nancy asked if the committee would consider meeting
at 6.30 pm. The committee agreed to do so at the November meeting.
STAFF REPORT: Jonathon reported that Carla Kenney -Phillips at
District #65 is willing to do the next mural project in the
Children's Room at the Library but she has no budget. She
anticipated needing approximately $1,000. Beth suggested that
Carla contact Invest Museum Alliance for funding support.
Jonathon also reported that the search for the Arts Council
director would begin in early November, and the public art
coordinator position has been eliminated from the 196/197 budget.
The permanent director will continue to be responsible for the
public art program.
ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 9.15 pm.
Submitted by Jonathon Glus, 8 November 1995
.t �i�r ,���,i gin+ �.nsn� „j�I�r ��- ,n,. En • i• ""gdIA1� EM "Rrr ��m-'T�ICF�'�r�'P"r
gg.ai .. rY• ., u� w w �� .•YY w�„ rM � ��� r u� .� �Ji
�,. OWN,,,"
DRAFT - NOT APPROVED
Minutes of the 16 January 1996 Public Art Committee meeting,
MFMERS PRHSENT: J. Gamble, B. Hart, D. Mickenberg, R. Moeller,
and affiliate members R. Isaacson and G. Struve.
XMdBERS ABSENT: R. Green, I. Johnson, N. Kotler, E. Lyon.
GUESTS: Mary Van Haaf ten, Land Design Collaborative Planner
David Csicsko, downtown project artist
STAFF: Jonathon Glus, administrative director
The January meeting of the Public Art Committee was called to order by
guest chair Beth Hart at 5:10 am, in office #100 of the Noyes Cultural
Arts Center. At the time of this meeting, the Committee consisted of 8
members, thus a quorum was present.
APPROVAL OF MXNUTES: Jim Gamble moved for approval of the 16 November
minutes. Beth Hart seconded the motion, with unanimous approval,
CHAIR REPORT: Due to the limited meeting time, Beth stated t:haL• she
would not deliver a chair report, and asked Jim Gamble to update the
committee on the downtown renovation project and introduce project
artist David Csicsko.
DOWNTOWN PROJECT: Jim Gamble reminded the Committee that they saw a
preliminary set of images by David Csicsko at a meeting in December fat
which a quorum was not present) in late autumn, which the committee
approved and encouraged the artist to continue developing the imagery.
The images at this meeting were a selection of the many which David
Csicsko had developed and refined since that first meeting. Jim further
explained that the design team for the downtown project had made a great
deal of progress, and a selection of these images would be presented to
City Council in late winter as part of the entire downtown project. Jim
a was at this meeting interested in updating the Committee on the project
and getting their feed back on which images may be most appropriate to
go to City Council. Jim thus introduced David Csicsko.
David directed the attention of the Committee to approximately 35
images, and explained that these comprised a set of visual symbols, all
of which derived meaning from things that remind him of Evanston, -
thinking, ecology, nature, cultural diversity, the arts, the lake &
beach, steeples, the Lighthouse and birds and pets. David explained
that the feeling he was going for was a "hand -made,' feeling, similar to
a feeling he gets from Evanston's shops and old clapboard houses.
Mary Van Haaften drew the Committee's attention to a series of drawings
which picture how Ceicsko's designs may be used tree graters at any of 20
major traffic nodes throughout downtown - the two primary areas being
niL
�.rwekrrw ..
the McDonand's plaza area and the Citibank plaza area.
Mary also showed four scenarios for the design and construction of
banner and signage poles, and explained possible Bites for the poles,
David Mickenberg suggested that the signs be used also throughout the
catty to mark cultural sites. Jim Gamble explained that the plan will be
completed incrementally, and the additional of a network of cultural
signs may be very appropriate towards the end of the project.
Beth Hart raised concerns voiced at the December meeting: 1) one of the
bird images looked to be more of a Pacific Northwest design and (2)
other images of domestic housing would make the images more relevant to
Evanston.
Jim Gamble said that there will be a number of fund -raiding
opportunities with this imagery for the Arts Council as well as downtown
merchants. Ron Isaacson stated that this imagery will develop
continuity among downtown merchants as well as the arts community.
Gail Struve said that she believed the images to be too obtuse as a
collection, but specific images such as the lighthouse were good.
Robert Moeller said that he was quite fond of the "thinking" aspect of
the images, and that children will be able to relate to the bird and
animal images.
9 Jim asked for specific recommendations for selection of images
appropriate for City Council. The Committee discussed possible images
and recommended approximately 20 for inclusion. Beth Hart suggested
that the imagery may be used for a barricade project. Jonathon asked
the Committee to consider other uses for the images over the coming
month and contact nary, Jim or himself with recommendations.
Robert Moeller moved for approval of the project thus far and the
recommended images. Beth Hart seconded the motion, and approval was
unanimous.
OTHER BUSINESS: Beth reported that the proposed J. Zendell memorial at
Noyes was being developed into a larger "green" project, and the
subcommittee would soon submit an update. Jonathon explained that the
Richard Hunt contract was still being reviewed by Legal. Jim Gamble
explained that the donation of an artwork for the Transportation Center
was being considered and he anticipated installation of a work by
= November.
s ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 pm.
N Submitted by Jonathon Glus, 9 April 1996
DRAFT - NOT APPROVED
Minutes of the 9 April 1996 Public Art Committee meeting.
W MBERS PRESRNT: R. Green, B. Hart, I. Johnson, N. Kotler,
E. Lyon and R. Moeller.
MMMERS ABSENT- I. Johnson, N. Kotler, E. Lyon.
STAFF: Jonathon Glus, director
- The April meeting of the Public Art Committee was called to order by
chair Nancy Kotler at 8:05 am, in studio #106 of the Noyes Cultural Arts
Center. At the time of this meeting, the Committee consisted of 8
members, thus a quorum was present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTSS: Jim Gamble moved for approval of the 16 November
minutes. Beth Hart seconded the motion, with unanimous approval.
CHAIR REPORT: Nancy Kotler briefly introduced new member John Engman and
explained.
42
M
CULTURAL FUND MURAL PROPOSAL: Jonathon Glus distributed a proposal by
Jim Parks for a mural at the Davis Street viaduct. The proposal was
submitted to the Cultural Fund. Jonathon reminded the committee that,
new this year, Cultural Fund applications which propose public art
projects are reviewed and approved by the Public Art Committee prior to
being submitted for review by a panel. Jonathon further explained that
the goal for this review was for PAC to approve the work, approved it in
concept but mandate that the artist submit revised drawings, or deny the
work.
Ray Green suggested that using figurative imagery of two races is
dangerous, and that Evanston does include many more peoples than black
and white. Ray also questioned how the mural would dialogue with the
Csicsko imagery being developed for the remainder of downtown. John
Engman said that they were "DC" comic like, and he enjoyed their out -of -
scale proportions. Nancy Kotler suggested that the committee consider
putting a limited life on the work. Ray Green suggested that the
committee has discussed murals at the viaducts for years, and its time
to get a project going. Ray further said that maybe a controversial
mural would stir -up dialogue around viaduct murals. Eliot Lyon said
that using figures was not politically a good move. Beth Hart said that
she loved the idea of figurative murals, but these figures did not seem
appropriate for the space. Indira Johnson agreed, saying she liked the
idea of figurative work, but did not like the overall quality of this
design. Jonathon Glus suggested that the PAC should consider focusing
its energies on an overall viaduct plan. Nancy Kotler suggested that a
portion of the Cultural Fund next year be designated in advance for
public art projects. Beth Hart agreed, paying that the PAC could then
more pro -actively direct public art projects. Ray Green moved that the
mural proposal be rejected. Seconded by Eliot Lyon. Motion unanimously
approved,
Nancy Kotler moved that the Cultural Fund Advisory Committee consider
devoting a percentage of the program budget to a public art project (8).
Seconded by Beth Hart. Unanomous approval. John Cngman suggested that
the committee set aside time to consider in a thorough way the whole
viaduct system.
THE GREEN AT NOYES: Beth Hart directed the committee's attention to a
proposal to develop a master art plan for the Green at Noyes - the
campus of the Noyes Cultural Arts Center. Beth explained that the plan
calls for the hiring of an Evanston artist to be hired to design a
master plan for primarily the east portion of the campus, including the
playlot, viaduct wall, walkways and parking area. Beth explained that
this is an expanded version of the proposal the committee saw at a
recent meeting, now approved by the Arts Council. Beth said that,
specifically, she was requesting tha approval to use up to $5,000 from
the Public Art Fund to pay an artist a $2,000 design award and another
$3000 for contract work. The artist would work closely with the City
landscape designer to develop a plan which may be implemented by the
City staff and as outside funds become available. Jonathon Glus
explained that the fund is currently approximately $9,000, thus leaving
approximately $4,000. Ray Green moved to approve the project and
expenditure. Seconded by Eliot Lyon, Unanomous approval.
MINUTES: Indira Johnson moved for approval. Seconded by Beth Hart.
Unanomous approval.
OTHER BUSINESS: No other business.
ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 pm.
Submitted by Jonathon Glus, 4 April 1996
'�fH
A
�� 1 iLCI IfnY6�u'�i���+li���L'i�.�I�iwl�+i+5ii4iliu��A�.i'iiuid►I�V�iw.a.�� ,
DRAFT - NOT APPROVED
Minutes of the 14 May 1996 Public Art Committee meeting.
MMO$RS PRESENT: J. Gamble, R. Green, B. Hart, I. Johnson,
R. Inaacson (associate), N. Kotler,
G. Struve (associate).
MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Engman, E. Lyon, D. Mickenberg, R. Moeller.
GUESTS: Mary VanHaaften, Land Design Collaborative.
STAFF: Jonathon Glue, Arts Council Director.
The May meeting of the Public Art Committee was called to order by chair
Nancy Kotler at 7:10 pm, in the first floor meeting room of the Evanston
Public Library.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Gail Struve asked that staff correct the list of
the members present and absent at the April meeting. Jim Gamble and
John Engman were present at that meeting. David Mickenberg was absent.
With that change, Ray Green moved for approval of the 9 April minutes.
Jim Gamble seconded the motion, with unanimous approval.
DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE REVITALIZATION: Jim Gamble presented the current
imagery portfolio for the downtown renovation project. Jim discussed
the history of the artist approval process and the inclusion of and
artist (s)'s work in the overall design. Jim also explained the overall
program as including Evmark, the City, the Chamber of Commerce and the
PAC.
Beth Hart questioned the use of the banner poles. Jim explained that
banners were part of the original design intent to identify special
places and be easily adaptable to different festivals and special
events. Beth Hart said that the committee was not given the images to
vote on, only the project in concept at the January meeting.
Ron Isaacson said that one long-term objective for downtown is a uniform
image, which will be achieved, in part, by the use of a design package
developed by David Csicsko. Beth explained that she was not objecting
to the use of poles or the images, but the use of poles not made by an
artist. Ron responded that a design team met for five years to develop
a plan which does not call for individually -designed poles, and said
that the poles were, in fact, designed by an artist. Gail Struve agreed
that the poles and banners have been part of the plan, but stated that
she did not like the poles - she felt they were too "busy."
Ray Green asked Jim for what purpose are the banners. Jim explained,
for special events and to designate gateway locations. Ray asked if the
budget reflected a firm amount, or preliminary figures. Jim explained
that the figures are preliminary. Ray asked for an explanation of the
... . ..■. 44, w ..
kiosks in purpose, as well as the "scalloped" feature on the kiosks and
the poles. Mary VanHaaften explained that David Csicsko had introduced
the scallops to soften the material and add a "wave -like" quality. Ron
interjected that the kiosk and pole are both designed as a framework for
further imagery developed by other artistry in the future. Jim also
explained that the poles will be backlit.
Ray Green moved for approval of the project, save the kiosks and poles.
The motion was seconded by Nancy Kotler, and approval was unanimous.
Ray Green noted that he was sensitive to the design process and
committee approval, and believed that it is not possible for all
involved in any project to agree on aesthetic grounds, thus the process
must be sound.
Ray Green moved for approval of the total budget as currently standing.
THe motion was seconded by Jim Gamble. The motion was declined, 2 for
and 3 against.
Beth Hart moved for approval of the budget, with the reduction of one
pole. The $12,900 budgeted for that pole will be, instead, used to
contract an artist to design one piece of street furniture. Seconded by
Indira Johnson, the motion passed with 3 for and 1 against.
Beth Hart moved for approval of the budget, with the caveat that Indira
Johnson and Gail Struve meet with the artist to discuss the design
elements in question, and that the PAC have the opportunity to review
the designs after this meeting, and in accordance with the overall
project calendar. Indira Johnson seconded the motion, which was
approved unanimously.
Beth Hart also moved that $15,000 of the budget be earmarked for
streetscape furniture to resolve the issues of seating in an urban area.
Seconded by Indira Johnson, the motion was approved unanimously.
Indira Johnson moved that all previous motions, prior to B. Hart's final
two motions, be withdrawn. Beth Hart seconded the motion and approval
was unanimous.
Ray Green explained that he was frustrated with the amount of work the
committee had been able to accomplish. He suggested that the committee
consider committing to ideas and find the funding to meet the goal.
ADJOURN. The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 pm.
Submitted by Jonathon Glue, June 1996
.. n• .. ,�, - -� sir ,p �*pr III��Ar ,N SAn^„�iP - ,p .,. ,�.� •, „•+n ��� ,�p� i�'C�ad'I""i6M '4^►
IN IJIII , III 2 W&w' ILI al. k4� 11I044 A MI, d iJ., j iON . A r , Jill 10 MAI. ISO.. — iA,1&4 1, o A II, L06 u - Jn „ .rind 4W
Note: Indira Johnson and Gail Struve subsequently met with artist David
Csicsko to review the design of the pole and kiosk. On 9 June an ad hoc
meeting of the PAC met at the downtown revitalization site office to
review the design changes made by David Csicsko to the poles and kiosks
based on his earlier meeting with Indira and Gail. At that ad hoc
meeting, David Mickenberg moved that the revised drawings reflected the
concerns of the committee and were satisfactory. Recognizing the
meeting as ad hoc, approval was unanimous.
r it II r J. FP—
-
k.� •
45
DRAFT - NOT APPROVED
Minutes of the 10 September 1996 Public Art Committee meeting.
MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Curley, J. Engman, B. Hart (associate member),
I. Johnson, R. Isaacson (associate), N. Kotler,
D. Mickenberg, R. Moeller, E. Ockwell, M. Robinson,
G. Struve (associate).
MEMBERS ABSENT: E. Lyon.
GUESTS: Nancy Fell, League of Women Voters.
STAFF: Jonathon Glus, Arts Council Director.
The September meeting of the Public Art Committee was called to order by
chair Nancy Kotler at 7:10 pm, in the first floor meeting room of the
Evanston Public Library.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: John Engman moved for approval of the May minutes.
David Mickenberg seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.
CHAIR'S REPORT: Nancy Kotler opened the meeting with a thank you to the
three committee members whose time on the committee expired in August -
James Gamble, Ray Green and Beth Hart. Nancy explained that the three
of them were pivotal in the establishment of a public art program in
Evanston and the success of the program's efforts to date.
Nancy then welcomed the new members of the committee, and asked each
member to introduce himself. Beth Hart explained that she is now an
associate member, but will continue to participate on the committee
level. She is a past curator and chair of the program's first project,
"Leaf gate Garden." Beth is currently the coordinator of the Learning in
Retirement Program at Northwestern. Nancy Fell explained that she is a
member of the League of Women Voters, and will be observing the PAC and
Arts Council for the next few months. Elizabeth ockwell explained that
she is an artist tenant at Noyes and painting instructor at the Art
Institute of Chicago. Chie Curley is a sculptor and independent
curator. John Engman is past executive director of the Chicago
Architecture Foundation and currently consultant to that agency. David
Mickenberg is director of Block Gallery and lectures on public art.
Nancy Kotler is supporter of the arts in a variety of disciplines,
including visual and theatre. Jonathon Glus is director of the Arts
Council and previous public art coordinator. Jonathon thanked the
committee for the past five years of work and welcomed the new members.
Robert Moeller explained that he is a corporate consultant and one-year
member of the PAC. Morris Robinson explained that he owns a graphic
arts agency in Evanston, is on the boards of the Chamber_ of Commerce and
Evanston Historical Society, and is involved with PITCH, an effort to
bring more attention to the 5th Ward. Gail Struve explained that she is
- --- - - ' - - r . ,. �. rn-K •�r'"9M'.' ^_a .]fs"�H-nl^n.1r A"'1"i}"'il i. r o M- I.
IIIAI11 _WA 1I.*JWI!Ili4
W ft
• � �yi'4��r-rT
an associate member and recently closed her gallery of 23 years. She
remains active in the arts in Evanston. Indira Johnson is a sculptor
and director of the Shanti Foundation for Peace. one of Indira's more
visible projects is the "peace bus" - a CTA bus painted by Shanti
artiste to promote peace, communication and respect. Ron Isaacson is till
associate member and continues as liaison to Evmark. Ron is owner of
Mindscape Gallery.
Nancy Kotler explained that the committee needed to appoint a chair, and
asked Jonathon to explain the process. Jonathon explained that a member
of the Arts Council must also sit on the committee, however s/he need
not also be the chair. Jonathon asked for nominations for chair. John
Engman moved to appoint Nancy Kotler to a second term. Indira Johnnori
seconded the motion, with unanimous approval.
Nancy thanked the committee for the support and asked Beth Hart to open
the new "season" with a slide presentation of public art across the Us.
To which Seth explained the goal of the elide presentation was to
encourage the committee members to think about the full breadth of
public art.
PROGRAM UPDATES: After the slide presentation, Nancy reported that the
Richard Hunt installation at the library is scheduled for installation
in March. Jonathon explained that the Fire Station #1 project is still
on schedule, as is the Green at Noyes project. A call for artists is
currently available for both projects. Beth Hart explained that the
Green at Noyes had expanded to include the entire south and east campus
at Noyes and will include walkways, parking, plantings, and possibly a
mural and outdoor meeting/entertainment space. Ron Isaacson explained
that the art component for downtown is scheduled for spring time.
Jonathon explained that he is currently working with representatives
from the Duck Company to encourage placement of public art around the
new building site, and he has met with the designers of the new plaza at
First Chicago to discuss public art at that site.
R. ZWXCA ESTATE: Nancy explained that a few pieces from the estate of
long-time Evanstonian Rosemary Zwick were offered as donation to the
City for placement in the Civic Center. Nancy said that the previous ad
hoc committee for gifts was defunct and a new one needs to be formed.
David Mickenberg and Gail Struve cautioned the committee to be sure
appropriate policies are in place prior to any acquisition. Jonathon
reminded the committee that all acquisitions will be recommendation only
to City Council. It was agreed that a committee will be formed after
Nancy and Jonathon thoroughly review the policy in the next month.
PROGRAM GOALS: Nancy directed the committee's attention to the 1995-1997
public art plan and asked all members to review the document for
discussion and prioritization at the October meeting. Nancy also
explained that each project is subcommittee driven, and many of these
subcommittees need new membership due to the change in PAC membership.
Specifically, the following subcommittees need membership: viaducts,
TransAxis, the Green at Noyes, and acquisitions. Nancy asked all
members to consider over the next month in which committee they are
interested.
4gr,Il .�aNr� i,'A 40, ot 111•0.141a4 d.14Ilki,J. i„0ITI10
S
IW„ n, IYa ., A.. JB., I .0 m ,I .w . .4.
AWOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 pm.
Submitted by Jonathon al.us, 11 September 1996
- .,... T,— ���, ..i�.. „ -.•�', .. �� . � t °rll 1. i I'.. 4 f 4�R�F.r �q t `g"p,'A"1" AMSi,Y����M.1i•I'11u:�1'{MeiKII�� Iiii�����MS�Ii�
DRAFT - NOT APPROVED
Minutes of the 8 October 1996 Public Art Committee meeting.
K3MBERS PRESENT: C. Curley, J. Engman, B. Hart (associate member),
I. Johnson, N. Kotler, E. Lyon, D. Mickenberg, R.
Moeller, E. Ockwell, M. Robinson, G. Struve
(associate).
MEMBERS ABSENT: B. Hart (associate), R. Isaacson (associate),
G. Struve (associate.)
STAFF: Jonathon Glus, Arts Council Director.
The October meeting of the Public Art Committee was called to order by
chair Nancy Kotler at 7:10 pm, in the first floor meeting zoom of the
Evanston Public Library.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: R. Moeller moved for approval of the September
minutes. Eliot Lyon seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.
CHAIR'S REPORT: Nancy Kotler held her discussion for the agenda.
STAFF REPORTS Jonathon Glus held his discussion for the agenda.
ACQUISITION POLICY: The committee reviewed the guidelines for public art
as developed and approved by the Public Art Committee in July 1995 and
elected to add a seventh guideline, which is a clause in each
acquisition agreement that the City will have right of de -acquisition
within a reasonable length of time. David Mickenberg offered the
acquisition policy for Block Gallery as a model for developing a
permanent acquisition policy for the Public Art Program. Eliot Lyon
agreed to review the Block model and make recommendations for refinement
to PAC. Eliot also recommended that a permanent acquisitions committee
be established after the policy is drafted.
ZWICK DONATION: Nancy Kotler appointed to an ad hoc review committee
Morris Robinson, Chi Curley and associate member Gayle Struve. Nancy
asked Jonathon to invite a City emi)loyee to represent the site and
recommend one community member. The committee will meet on or near 6
November.
COM41TTER MEMBERSHIP: Nancy Kotler appointed the following to
The Green at Noyes: Beth Hart, chair
Elizabeth Ockwell
Pam Matiosian
Robert Moeller
n ei. 4 u,� :7 r.7 tFY': o.�r fA„F..3: �.' i ,. �" �• 4�. -
The committee chose to hold on appointment to TransAxis until a final
decision is reached by a prospective donor on the location of a
permanent artwork,
David Mickenberg suggested that Phillip Berman, a collector from
Pennsylvania, may be interested in donating an artwork by one of a
limited number of artists of whose work he collects and sponsors for
public placement. David offered to explore the possibility.
PROGRAM UPDATES: No new information reported.
PROGRAM GOALS: Elizabeth Ockwell suggested that the committee re-
consider the ways in which the viaducts may be addressed by artists.
Elizabeth suggested that for a very low fee, many artists could use the
viaduct space for temporary artwork or painting. John Engman described
a very successful mural project in Milwaukee which used JTPA funds to
pay youth to create murals. Nancy Kotler suggested that a joint project
between Artskills and Public Art may be a natural collaboration, and
Howard Street may be a goad location.
David Mickenberg suggested that the Andy Warhol Foundation in an ideal
funding source for such a project, and Northwestern U. may be an
appropriate partner as well. Nancy Koller asked Jonathon to invite Jon
Pound from Chicago Public Art Group to speak at the next meeting
regarding the various types of murals.
ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 8:30 pm.
Submitted by Jonathon Glus, 16 October 1996
,, ,.er a •.- r, �� cl'n`h•- .�f,: •HO r,� �.in s, .���..,N,�'7t'"�iN"'Y�Ia�Y�� IV -•'IA dot a, +r!r�
t{' \4
DRAFT - NOT APPROVED
Minutes of the 12 November 1996 Public Art Committee meeting.
MEMBERS PRESENT: C. Curley, B. Hart (associate member), R. Isaacson,
I. Johnson, N. Kotler, E. Lyon, D. Mickenberg, R.
Moeller, E. Ockwell, M. Robinson, G. Struve
(associate).
MEMBERS ABSENT: J. Engman, E. Lyon, G. Struve (associate).
STAFF: Jonathon Glue, Arts Council Director.
The evening was opened at 7:00 pm in the main gallery of Block Gallery
at Northwestern University. Chair Nancy Kotler introduced Jon Pounds
and Olivia Gude. Pounds, executive director of Chicago Public Art Group
and Gude, muralist and board member of that organization, presented a
slide presentation entitled "Contemporary Trends in Murals in the
Americas and Europe."
At the conclusion of the presentation (8:15 pm), Nancy Kotler introduced
guest Sherrill Frost Brown. Sherrill explained that she is a member of
the Clyde -Callan neighborhood, where Chicago Public Art Group artist
Kiela Smith led a mural project in 1994. Sherrill stated that the mural
is still in perfect condition, and encouraged anyone who has not seen
the mural to do so. With that, the November meeting of the Public Art
Committee was called to order by chair Nancy Kotler.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: R. Moeller moved for approval of the October
minutes. I. Johnson seconded the motion, and approval was unanimous.
CHAIR'S REPORT: Nancy Kotler held her discussion for the agenda.
STAFF REPORT: Jonathon Glue held his discussion for the agenda.
ACQUISITION POLICY/ZWXCK DONATION: Chie Curley reported that the ad hoc
committee earlier that day viewed the proposed artworks at the studio of
the late Rosemary Zwick. The ad hoc committee was comprised of Chie
Curley, Dino Morrison, Gail Struve and Sally Lufkin (City planner and
site representative). Chie explained that the ad hoc committee would
visit the Civic Center and determine possible sites prior to the January
PAC meeting.
Nancy Kotler thanked the ad hoc committee for their work, and explained
that a draft acquisition policy was currently being reviewed by herself,
Eliot Lyon, David Mickenberg and Jonathon Glue. She anticipated a final
draft to be presented at the January meeting.
L� -
.f
-
- < . ' .
���
_ .�. ... n
m, X r r ,r-�� rr�+n'iT'►r>�nM�T
.� � ' i��-. r .r n=, � r � F � ,. �� ^ q�jr y � "AID' a.�
�i pi
�. -n n ip
PROGRAM UPDATES: Beth Hart reported that only two artists submitted to
The Careen at Noyes project. Elizabeth ockwell asked if the range of
potential applicants could be expanded to include architects, thinking
that collaborative teams may find the project appealing. Beth suggested
that the inclusion of an artist at this early phase in intended to bring
alternative design solutions to the site. Nancy Kotler suggested a
limited invitational be designed. Jonathon Glue suggested that a site
visit be hosted, possibly including an historian to discuss they
relevance of the site and area. Beth Hart agreed, and added that a
short list of key artists in the community be invited, as well as
general announcement.
Indira Johnson reported that the number of submissions to the Fire
Station competition was likewise disappointing - not more than 20 total
submissions. The committee discussed the appropriateness and
effectiveness of a limited invitational or individual invitation of a
high visibility artist. David Mickenberg suggested that a very high
visibility artist may be interested given the unusual setting and
possibility of working in a different medium. Indira agreed to bring
these thoughts to the subcommittee. Nancy Kotler stated that the PAC
would agree with the decision of the subcommittee and a change of
process need not wait for approval by PAC in January. Because there
will be no December PAC meeting, Nancy asked Jonathon to inform the PAC
of updates, if necessary, during that month. Nancy wished each member a
good holiday season and stated that she will be back in March. However,
PAC will meet in January and February as scheduled.
ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 pm.
Submitted by Jonathon Glue, 13 November 1996
3
-,_ . - � - _- . , - _� -, - .- - - - -- - __ - •_ --' _- � . r ;p - ,, �.. nF � .�n 'n al ru'Sq " �r nTN -tli A�'.`—'pr"�y�"�4'inT+'Mf""'T1`
DRAFT - NOT APPROVED
Minutes of the 16 November 1996 Public Art Committee meeting.
LMCBERS PRESENT: N. Kotler, J. Gamble, R. Green, B. Hart, I.
Johnson, R. Moeller, and affiliate members R.
Isaacson and G. Struve.
MEMBERS ABSENT: S. Bernstein, D. Mickenberg, R. Moeller and A.
Niffeneggar.
STAFF: Jonathon Glus, administrative director
The November meeting of the Public Art Committee was called to order by
chair Nancy Kotler at 8:10 am, in the first Floor meeting room of the
Evanston public Library. A quorum was present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Ray Green moved for approval of the 12 September
and 10 October minutes with changes to the September minutes as
reflected in the October minutes. Jim Gamble seconded the motion, with
unanimous approval.
CnAIR REPORT: Nancy Kotler welcomed everyone and thanked them for making
an early morning meeting.
STAFF REPORT: Jonathon Glus suggested that he hold a report due to the
a
limited time the committee had to meet.
PUBLIC ART PLAN: Nancy turned the members` attention to the Public Art
Plan as revised from the October meriting. Ray Green moved for approval
of the Public Art Plan, seconded by Beth Hart. Unanimous approval.
Jonathon explained that the document will be submitted to Arts Council
and City Council for information in December.
PUBLIC ART REVIEW PROCESS: Nancy turned the members' attention to the
Public Art Review Process as revised from the September meeting. Jim
Gamble moved for approval, seconded by Beth Bart. Unanimous approval.
44
NINA LEVY SCULPTURE PROPOSAL: Beth Hart showed slides of three sculpture
series, "Heads,11 "Tongues," and "Fists," by Chicago artist Nina Levy.
Beth explained that "Tongues" is a group of three sculpture, each
+ approximately 72" high, each in the form of a tongue, and "Fists" is two
sculpture, each 57" high, and each in the form of a clenched fist. Both
series are of resin painted to look bronze. "Heads" is comprised three
units, all of which sit directly on the ground, and are hollowed -out
head forms painted in primary colors on the inside and gray on the
outside. These pieces are also of resin.
Beth further explained that the Transportation Center subcommittee for
months looked at work possibly appropriate to the Transportation Center,
'1
r�
.• •e.. .. h.. i_L li Gri a-i-. H. �—
• f �� Fi,()T..•� FIL _e1'�` i is J
of which very little was large enough to command the round -about pad.
However, the subcommittee chose to recommend a 6- to 8-month placement
of "Tongues" at the site. The intention is for Evanatonians to begin
using the space by considering it in conjunction with changing artwork.
Jonathon explained that the three pieces could be moved and installed
for less than $500. Ray Green voiced concern that adequate installation
might include anchoring the pieces in cement, including removal of a
portion of the pad, which could run installation upwards of $1100.
Jim Gamble explained that the estate of an Evanstonian of which his wife
is executor may fund the permanent installation of a sculpture at the
Transportation Center. Jim further explained that the work will be
created by a nationally -recognized artist and the budget will likely be
approximately $200,000. If a pre-existing piece is selected,
installation may be as soon as early summer, while a site -specific
acquisition may be installed within a year. Jim asked that the
Committee consider not placing sculpture at the Transportation Center at
this time, in anticipation of a permanent placement.
Indira Johnson suggested that "Tongues" be placed elsewhere in downtown.
Beth Hart stated that the subcommittee had discussed placement of
"Heads" at the Civic Center or Noyes, and "Fists" at the Civic Center.
Nancy reminded the Committee that at previous meetings discussion
included moving outdoor artworks to a number of places throughout
Evanston. Ray Green made a motion that the Committee not place
"Tongues" at the Transportation Center in anticipation of placement of
a permanent artwork, but discussion would continue on the placement of
"Tongues" or "Heads" elsewhere in Evanston. Jim Gamble seconded the
motion, with unanimous approval.
RICHARD HUNT PROPOSAL: Nancy Kotler moved the meeting to the 4th floor
of the Library to view the four final proposals for exterior artwork at
the Library. Nancy directed the members' attention to models by
Christine Rojek, Jose Cobo and Richard Hunt, and drawings by Ralph
Helmick. Nancy explained that the subcommittee, chaired by past PAC
member Fred Nagelbach, selected the Richard Hunt proposal due to the
abstract form, the "soaring" nature of the artwork, its dialogue with
the design of the building, and Richard's track record in the creation
of public artworks. Nancy further explained that Ralph Helmick's
proposal was well liked, but the subcommittee was concerned with long-
term maintenance as well as the visibility of the highly -detailed
sculptures from a distance. Ray Green inquired as to Mr. Hunt's
maintenance plans for the piece. Nancy explained that details would be
submitted prior to signing a contract. Ray Green moved for approval of
the Richard Hunt sculpture, seconded by Jim Gamble. Unanimous approval.
ADJOURN: The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 am.
Submitted by Jonathon Glus, 2 January 1996