Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1997 - 1998V/ SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 15, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, J. Glus, D. Jennings, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, K. Kelly, D. Marino. H. Friedman. C. Ruiz, D. Venegas, C. Wonders. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the summary of findings of January 8, 1997; D. Jennings seconded. Committee unanimously approved the -motion to anoroyg the summary of findings. SPAARC 97-0004 7" Sheridan Road Recommendation to ZBA A. Alterson, C. Ruiz, and D. Venegas joined the meeting at this time. Ms. Molly J. Schiff (homeowner) presented her plans for a one-story addition to the southeast side of her house. M. Schiff provided the Committee with photographs of the existing conditions. Further, M. Schiff stated that the addition Is necessary for her to complete larger works of art while avoiding stairs. Reading from the Zoning Analysis, C. Smith stated that the average setback along Sheridan Road is 45.10 feet, and the proposed setback is 28 feet. A. Alterson added that the average setback requirement controls in this instance, even thought the district setback is 27 feet. J. Tonkinson noted that many subdivisions have 40- to 50-foot setbacks recorded on the plat, and someone should check to ensure this is not the case. J. Tonkinson motioned to recommend approval to the ZBA; D. Jennings seconded SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 15. 1997 Page 1 or 4 P Discussion: C. Ruiz informed M. Schiff that the Historic Preservation Committee MU have concerns with the lorjtion of the addition. A. Alterson requested that M. Schiff provide floor plans prior to the ZBA meeting so staff may review the floor area of the proposed home occupation. •1111 1-- • • • a 1t p• •! a •l111'!a •a • a 1: :,;, a - •a •aaa as SPAARC 97-0005 2101 Dempster Street Recommendation to ZBA J. Woiinski joined the meeting at this time. Mr. Doug Pasma (architect) presented plans to convert a vacant, one-story industrial building into a church. Mr. Lyle Foster (pastor) was available to answer questions, regarding the proposed use. D. Pasma stated that the majority of the exterior would remain as Is, except a gabled roof would rise above the currently flat roof in the area of the proposed sanctuary to cover a balcony. Further, D. Pasma stated the project would be conducted in phases — first phase to include the sanctuary and office area; second phase to include the classrooms and multi -purpose rooms. J. Tonkinson informed D. Pasma that drainage (including a water reclamation district permit) will be required. D. Pasma indicated he would like to meet with J. Tonkinson to discuss when drainage is or is not required. C. Smith informed D. Pasma that certain building provisions may be required because of on -site child care, and sprinklers may be required. D. Pasma stated the elevator will conform with ADA requirements. D. Jennings Indicated handicap parking must be provided on site. D. Pasma explained that required parking not able to be provided on site will be handled though an off -site leasing arrangement. Parking will be reserved on Sunday only at the southwest comer of Dempster Street and Hartrey Street. L. Foster stated crosswalks are being considered. L. Black indicated the most vulnerable spot on site was at the rear of the building, and the applicant should properly reinforce the rear door and employ other measures to guard against burglaries. D. Pasma Indicated the two existing loading doors will be removed. The eastern door will be filled with a store -front window; the western door will be removed to create an angled pedestrian entryway with double doors. C. Smith suggested using landscaping to soften the look along Dempster Street. L. Foster believed the railroad tracks shown on the survey had been removed; however, the rear of the property is exceptionally overgrown, and vegetation may simply be hiding the tracks. D. Jennings motioned to recommend approval to the ZBA; H. Friedman seconded. Committee ap rp oved the motion to recommend approval to the ZBA; one member opposed. J. Glus abstained. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 15. 1997 Page 2 or 4 SPAARC 96-0038 316 Florence Avenue Preliminary and Final Mr. Steve Knutson (architect) presented plans to modify an existing greenhouse. Mr. Tim Clesen (co-owner) was available to answer any questions, regarding the proposed use, S. Knutson indicated the plans called for reglaz€ng the northwestern -mast greenhouse with a new plastic to conform with code. Further, the plans called for providing two gables on the south side of the greenhouse to create two entrances with 6'8" door; currently, the eave of the roof is below 68". Finally, S. Knutson Indicated the ventilation would not change. D. Jennings motioned to approve the preliminary and final site plan and appearance; J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee unanimously approved the motion to approve the preliminajy and final si a plan and appCilEance. SPAARC 97-0006 900 Grove Street C. WondersJoined the meeting at this time. Preliminary Mr. Aaron Wilson (architect) presented plans to convert one exlsting three -flat to three condominium units, convert one existing one-story building to an art studio (ownership arrangement unsure), and build eight new condominium units. A. Wilson provided the Committee with a model of the proposal and photographs of the existing conditions. Further, A. Wilson stated: 1. The Elmwood Street facade will be enameled steel panels, except for the existing three -flat which will be rehabilitated. 2. The Grove Street facade and main Interior wall will be rehabilitated brick. 3. The remaining interior wall finishes have not been determined. 4. The roof material has not been determined. 5. The windows will be casement windows. 6, Landscape planters will be provided in the interior courtyard wherever possible. These planters will contain low -light plants. 7. The pavement material In the interior courtyard will be pavers, possible consistent with those used for the adjacent public sidewalk projecL The alleys will remain gravel. 8. The dwelling units will range in size from 800 sq.ft. to 1,200 sq.fi. The site has been environmentally cleaned, and they are awaiting the final EPA report prior to closing on the property. 10. 12 parking spaces will be provided for the 11 units. Driveway curb cuts will be in the same general area as those existing curb cuts. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 15, 1997 Page 3 of 4 11. The project will need setback variances for all yards. M. Mylott motioned to approve the preliminary site plan and appearance; L. Black seconded. Discussion: C. Ruiz indicated A. Wilson should provide examples of the finished materials prior to final SPAARC approval. J. Tonkinson indicated all applicable permits (including water reclamation district) will be required. Committee approved the motion to approve thepreliminary she Ran and appearance two members opposed. H. Friedman abstained. SPAARC 94-0052 1332 Emerson Street Final Mr. Frank Kassen and Mr. AN Khatkhate presented five alternatives for the northwest -comer parking lot. L. Black stated that, when considering any alternative and future landscaping, view obstructions must be considered. J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the final site plan with alternative SK-1 (dated 11911997): a sign to be placed at the entrance to the northwest -comer parking lot, indicating handicap access only; and the rear parking arrangement to remain as shown. H. Friedman seconded. Committee unaglmQusly approved the motion to_approve The final site plan -with alternative SK-1 (dated 11911997)4a_sian tQ be placed at the entrance to the northwest -comer a>L9 lot. indicating handicap access only: and the rear ap rking arrangement to remain as shown, Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m. e . ectfully Submit ?PIann Marc Steven Mylott, Zoner Date SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 15, 1997 Page 4 of 4 ,w SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 8, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, L. Black, J. Glus, Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski Members Absent: J. Aiello, Design Professional Present: H. Friedman Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz, D. Venegas Introductions D. Marino introduced D. Venegas as the City's new Economic Development Planner. A. Alterson introduced M. Mylott as the City's new Zoning Planner and Committee member. Aaaroval of Summary of Findings The Committee approved the summary of findings of December 11, 1996. M. Mylott abstained. SPAARC 94-0052 1332 Emerson Street Final Mr. Frank Kassen, Mr. Ani Khatkhate, Mr. Samuel Hunter and Mr. Joseph A. DeSalvo, architect, presented plans for a new fire station. The Committee discussed at length the northeast corner and the south side surface parking areas. Mr. Kassen said that parking for the disabled was required within the property. Furthermore, reduction or elimination of the dedicated parking areas would create a shortage of parking spaces during a shift change. Mr. A. Alterson noted that the 1 % over the allowed lot coverage, and the less than 5' property line set back for parking, are minor pending zoning issues. Mr. Alterson was mostly concerned with the south parking area and its immediacy to residential properties. Mr. Kassen said that landscaping will be provided at the south property line and a 6' high fence will be installed at the east property line. D. Marino said that because the substantial capital investment for the construction of the fire station, careful consideration should be given to the impact on the neighborhood of the northwest parking area. Mr. H. Friedmann added that the appearance of a civic building and its site planning were very important. SPAARC Summary of Findings 1-8-97 Page 9 Regarding the building materials, Mr. Kassen provided samples of the red brick, the asphalt shingles in weathered wood color, the Trico dark green aluminum single hung windows, the rock face stone for the bands, and the white steel panel garage doors. The Committee passed a motion to approve the final appearance of the fire station. Vote: seven ayes, one nay. M. Mylott abstained. The Committee also passed a motion to deny the site plan as submitted. Vote: five ayes, three nays. M. Mylott abstained. SPAARC 96-0041 1020 Grove Street D. Marino Left the meeting at this time. Final Mr. David Benni presented final plans for the covering of a large car port to the south of the Presbyterian Home building, and the enclosure of the north east portion of the ground level parking garage for additional office space. New windows would match existing off-white casement windows and the gap between windows would be in -filled with brick to match existing brick. Ms. L. Black emphasized the importance of natural surveillance to minimize security risks. Mr. Benni said that lighting has been improved and there are four surveillance cameras. The Committee passed a motion recommending final approval of the project as submitted. M. Mylott abstained. SPAARC 97-0001 1830 Ridae Avenue J. Wolinski joined the meeting at this time. Preliminary Mr. Gary Porter, Mr. George Ardelean, Mr. Tom Forman, and Ms. Shalini Agrawal discussed plans for the conversion of a warehouse building into a 21 unit condominium. The project includes the addition of a penthouse above the existing four stories facing Ridge Avenue. Parking would be at the rear of the building. J. Tonkinson advised that appropriate water drainage should be provided for the parking area. A. Alterson listed the following unresolved zoning items: a) skewed angle of north/south walls of penthouse addition b) entrance canopy height and its location in relation to the lot line c) building height exceeding the 52' height restriction d) absence of loading area SPAARC Summary of Findings 1-8-97 Page 2 •r The Committee passed a motion recommending preliminary approval of the project. M. Mylott abstained. SPAARC 97-0002 1834-1840 Ridae Avenue Preliminary Mr. Ed Noonan, Mr. Tom Forman and Ms. Shalani Agrawal presented plans for the conversion of two warehouse buildings into a 39 unit condominium. Covered parking would be available for 31 cars, and 10 additional parking spaces would be at the rear of the buildings. The project includes a two-story addition on the frontage of the taller building. Access to the covered garage would be from Ridge Avenue. J. Tonkinson said that driveway and drainage permits are required. The Committee passed a motion, subject to the compliance of traffic regulations, recommending preliminary approval of the project. M. Mylott abstained. SPAARC 97-0003 800 Austin Street Preliminary Mr. Leon H. Floerchinger, Mr. John Fischer and Mr. Mike Przybylski discussed plans for the renovation and expansion of the east tower office building at St. Francis Hospital. The proposed work includes a one-story, 6,700 s.f. addition, to the existing five -story building. The new addition will serve for radiation and chemotherapy treatment. The entrance to the new facility is located on the south side of the building. According to St. Francis Hospital, 95% of the activity would be ambulatory. The exterior finishes of the addition will match the precast concrete material of the existing building. The proposed work follows the Hospital's Master Plan. St. Francis Hostipal will request a special use for the addition. The existing parking garage will remain. No plans for landscaping were available at this time. Finally, a water reclamation permit would be required for the new construction. The Committee passed a motion recommending approval of the project as submitted. M. Mylott abstained. Carlos D. Ruiz Senior PlanneriPreservati /• /3. 97 Date SPAARC Summary of Findings 1-8-97 Page 3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 22, 1997 Room 2402 Members Present: J. Aiello, A. Aiterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, D. Marino, M. Mylott, Carolyn Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: J. Glus, K. Kelly. Design Professional Absent: H. Friedman, Other Staff Present: C. Wonders. Commencement D. Marino motioned to appoint J. Wolinski acting chairperson; J. Tonkinson seconded. Somminee unanimously approved the motion to appoint J. WollnsW acting chalroerson. J. Wolinski began the meeting at 3:15 p.m. without a quorum, noting the necessary member would arrive shortly. SPAARC 96-0048 1501 Central Street Final A. Alterson and P. D'Agostino joined the meeting at this time, establishing a quorum. Mr. Craig Smith presented the revised plans for the Dyche Stadium renovation. The two major changes relate to: BollQr Soom. The original plans included a basement boiler room in the north end zone, near the locker rooms. Constraints require moving this room to the north end of the grandstand and placing it at grade. The exterior will be a painted masonry wall with louvers. 2. Press Box E;derior. The original plans depicted precast concrete to frame the press box, spanning the entire height of the west face of the existing stadium. Constraints require stopping the precast concrete at 13 feet above grade and using acrylic cement stucco on portland cement board to finish the facade. A waterproof membrane will be placed under the cement board. The color of the acrylic cement stucco will match the precast concrete; individuals will only notice a difference during or following rain as the precast concrete darkens when wet while the acrylic cement stucco does not. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 22, 1997 Page 1 or 4 J. Aiello asked about the durability of the acrylic cement stucco. Craig Smith stated that the acrylic cement stucco has a 10-year lifetime while precast concrete has a 25- to 50-year lifetime. However, Craig Smith added that the acrylic cement stucco can easily be recoated with a roller application. J. Tonkinson asked where the smokestack would be placed. Craig Smith indicated the flue would be In the northeast comer of and at least 10 feet higher than the grandstand. D. Jennings motioned to approve the final site plan and appearance; J. Wolinski seconded. Q Unanimomsly approved the motion toapproyg the,ffngl gilg plan and appearance. J. Aiello told Craig Smith that the respective ward alderman should be informed of these changes. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the summary of findings of January 15, 1997; L. Black seconded. Discussion: M. Mylott Informed the Committee that Carlos Ruiz had requested that the following fragment be added to the end of the first item under "Discussion" for SPAARC 97- 0004 (top of page 2): "... because the property is located within the boundaries of the Lakeshore Historic District." J. Tonkinson amended the motion to include the revision; L. Black amended the second to include the revision. Committee unanimously j1ppromad the motion to approve the summaiXof, findings. SPAARC 97-0007 1515 Payne Street Conference Carolyn Smith and C. Wonders joined the meeting at this time. J. Wolinski relinquished chairperson responsibilities to Carolyn Smith. Mr. Thomas Kenny stated he would like to build an addition to an existing garage (accessory to a single- family house). T. Kenny stated that the existing garage is located 3 feet from each interior side lot line. The C2 District minimum setback is 5 feet. Not changing the established side setbacks, the proposed addition would simply extend the garage 20 feet toward the rear of the property; the final dimensions would be 29 feet wide by 45 feet deep. The purpose of the proposed addition Is to park trucks and provide interior work space. A. Alterson indicated that the plat T. Kenny submitted (dated October 1984) showed 112 garage, implying that the garage was an entirely new structure. T. Kenny stated that he purchased the property within the last 6 months, and the garage existed at that time. Carolyn Smith stated that the next step is to acquire a more accurate plat, and T. Kenny should contact the lending institution. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 22. 1997 Page 2 of 4 A. Alterson indicated that SPAARC recommendation pU not be necessary, it the -use Is accessoEY to 3 residential use. However, if a zoning variation is required (if the proposed addition encroaches on the required side yards), SPAARC recommendation is required. A. Alterson indicated he would like to further investigate the proposed use of the garage because the use may be a commercial use. T. Kenny stated that he will obtain a plat of survey which accurately depicted existing conditions. SPAARC 96-0033 900 Dodge Avenue Final Mr. John McLinden updated the Committee on the process of taking the special use, map amendment, alley vacation, and plat of consolidation to the City Council. Also, Mr. Howard Hirsch and Mr. Sherwood 811tstein were available to the Committee. The petitioner is a contract buyer on the property, contingent upon the special use; the special use is contingent upon the map amendment which is contingent upon the alley vacation. In addition, J. McLinden stated the appraiser will have the appraisal to the City by Monday. Finally, J. McLinden asked to discuss revisions to the site plan. Process. J. Tonkinson and J. Aiello Informed J. McLinden that the petitioner must have ownership of the property adjacent to alley before the City would transfer ownership of the vacated alley to the petitioner. As a consideration, J. Tonkinson indicated J. McLinden May be able to work with the legal department to create a mechanism to circumvent this requirement. J. Wolinski informed J. McLinden that two City Council meeting are necessary for the special use permit, map amendment, and the vacation ordinance as each must first be introduced. The plat of consolidation may be handfed in one City Council meeting. After much discussion, J. McLinden agreed to introducing the special use permit, map amendment, vacation ordinance, and plat of consolidation at the February 10, 1997 City Council meeting. Further, J. McLinden indicated he would work with the legal department to arrange the order In which documents must be signed. 2. aft Plan Revisions, H. Hirsch presented a proposal to shift the parking lot along Main Street south to the property line and place a landscaped buffer just south of the property line on the Main Street right-of-way. H. Hirsch argued that this would provide more space for the northern property line buffer against the residential property. H. Hirsch indicated that the site plan differs from the site plan given preliminary SPAARC approval by two less parking spaces and striped at -grade islands rather than curbed islands. The number of parking spaces still meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. These changes allow large delivery trucks to enter and exit the site via Main Street rather than use the Dodge Street entrance. H. Hirsch stated that he did not have a landscape plan, photometric plan, or elevations to present to the Committee. J. Aiello stated that the City would like the petitioner to place a 10-foot wide "truck -turning easement" along the alley, north of the proposed fenced trash area (north of the jog in the proposed western SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 22. 1997 Page 3 of 4 property line). J. McLinden stated the petitioner is willing to record such an easement If the City so wishes. The Committee discussed the proposed alternative site plan and decided that a parking lot on the Main Street property line and landscaping In the Main Street right-of-way was not acceptable. The Committee further discussed that the site plan should provide the maximum landscape opportunities to the north of the fence. A. Alterson stated that one alternative that would permit providing a greater landscaped buffer(s) is to build a smaller building. D. Marino stated that the northern landscaped buffer should include some canopy trees. H. Hirsch stated 3.5" caliper canopy trees would be Installed across from windows in the town houses. Carolyn Smith stated the petitioner should provide more canopy trees along Main Street and Dodge Street. P. D'Agostino stated he would reference the master tree plan for this area, and the petitioner's landscape architect should work with him on this matter. J. Wolinski asked if the petitioner had discussed these changes with Alderman Drummer. S. Blitsteln stated he had schedule a meeting with the Alderman for tomorrow (1/23/1997). J. Tonkinson motioned to table SPAARC 96-0033 until January 29, 1997; J. Aiello seconded the motion. Discussion: Carolyn Smith requested the petitioner have a landscape plan, photometric plan, and elevations to present to the Committee. J. Tonkinson stated he must have the photometric plan 12doE to the meeting to allow enough time for review; submitting the photometric plan at the meeting was unacceptable. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:46 p.m. s ectfully submitt , Marc Steven Mylott, Zoni lanner SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 22. 1997 Page 4 of 4 ate SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 29, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: J. Aiello, D. Marino, J. Glus. Design Professional Present: IA. Friedman. Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz, D. Venegas, C. Wonders. Commencement C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:00 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the summary of findings of January 22, 1997; C. Smith seconded. CgMmigee Unanimously approved thmotion to approve tha Alimmally of findings, SPAARC 97-0009 NE Corner of Chicago Avenue and Main Street Concept A. Alterson, D. Venegas, and C. Wonders joined the meeting at this time. Mr. Bill Smith Introduced a concept plan to construct a mixed -use development on the northeast comer of Chicago Avenue and Main Street. Mr. Jim Zaring from Evanston Bank was available for questions. Mr. L. Duane Jackson and Mr. Thomas Welch presented the concept plan and noted: The plan includes underground parking, approximately 10,000 sq.ft. of bank and other commercial space on the first floor, and 60 residential units (condominiums) distributed through the second through eighth floors. Separate entrances are provided for the bank, other commercial tenants, and residents. The proposed building is 85 feet high. The concept plan conforms to the height and FAR requirements of the 83 Zoning District. The building will conform (if it does not now) to all applicable 1996 BOCA and accessibility requirements. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 29, 1997 Page 1 or 4 i 3. The number of parking spaces provided complies with the number of parking spaces required. The provided spaces are distributed among underground (62 spaces, primarily for residents) and surface parking (13 spaces, primarily for bank and commercial) so that some bank and/or commercial spaces are provided underground . 4. Two metered spaces on Main Street are proposed to be eliminated to accommodate one additional curb cut. 5. Drive-thru customers will access the alley from Main Street and exit to Chicago Avenue. The proposed plan provides stacking space for 15 cars. 6. The architecture will distinguish the first floor bank and commercial from the upper floors of residential. L. D. Jackson provided the Committee with a handout that describes the floor area ratio analysis, height requirements, parking, square That distribution, and unit distribution. A copy of this handout has been placed in the SPAARC file. J. Wollnski asked if the concept had been discussed with the ward alderman. B. Smith Indicated the alderman "... was very positive." J. Zaring indicated that the bank has been in Evanston since 1914 and at the current location since 1924 (when the building was built). However, the lease expires next year, and the building Is functionally obsolete. J. Zaring stated the bank must move. C. Ruiz asked L. D. Jackson to look closely at the proximity of the subject property to the Lakeshore Historic District, especially the east facade; the alley (eastern boundary of the subject property) is the western boundary of the historic district. Also, C. Ruiz stated the historic district does not discourage contemporary design, provided that design respects the district's intent. L. Black stated that a mixed -use development will bring activity to a currently "dead area". Also, L. Black encouraged L. D. Jackson to avoid areas that eliminate natural surveillance. J. Wolinski asked about the anticipated price range of the condominiums. B. Smith stated the proposed development was targeting the middle market. Residential units would range from $132,000 to $356,000 (penthouse). C. Smith stated that this was a positive move on this comer because the proposed design had a "comer presence" with the reduced floor area and set backs toward the top. C. Smith stated that the density was fine, provided the design was complimentary, and the architect should look toward the eastern building for additional design clues. L. D. Jackson stated he was considering precast concrete for the first floor and masonry for the remainder of the building (as opposed to an entirely brick building as depicted in the concept plans) to create a strong base, similar to many historic building's design. L. D. Jackson concluded that he and his firm viewed this project as a signature building. M. Mylott asked D. Jennings and J. Tonkinson if using the alley to this degree presents any problems. D. Jennings and J. Tonkinson stated that as proposed, this concept presented no problems. D. Jennings stated that the planter separating the alley and underground parking entrance should be kept low to ensure positive sight distance is maintained. L. D. Jackson added that the card reader would be set away from the property SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 29, 1997 Page 2 of 4 line to ensure stacked cars would not disrupt pedestrian traffic. Finally, D. Jennings stated the architect should minimize column encroachment In the underground parking. A. Alterson stated that a drive-thru requires a special use. J. Zaring stated that he is simply relocating and not expanding an existing drive-thru. A. Alterson stated he will investigate the legality of relocating an existing special use on site. J. Wolinski asked about eliminating the parking for the existing bank building. J. Zarinq stated that this building has no parking with it — he leases the building but owns the parking lots. A. Alterson stated the developer should submit the proposal for a zoning analysis as soon as possible. J. Tonkinson stated the developer must provide surface drainage structures and receive a water reclamation district permit. J. Tonkinson stated these documents require a civil engineer licensed in Illinois. Also, J. Tonkinson stated driveway permits will be required. B. Smith stated they would like to begin construction in June 1997 and be ready for occupancy in March 1998. J. Wolinski asked if the funding was secured. J, Zaring stated the funding is secured. J. Wolinski motioned to -approve the concept; J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee approved the_Motlon to approve the concept; one member opposed. SPAARC 96-0029 1640 Chicago Avenue Final Mr. Corey Zussman presented the final site plans for the Interior tenant build out and modifications to the previously approved elevations and roof -top parking for Whole Foods. The site plan includes second -floor parking (above the grocery store) and depicts six trees located within the parking lot. C. Zussman stated store employees will transfer the food carts to the second floor for customers and return the carts. C. Zussman stated that, due to the increased size of condenser units, three parking spaces were eliminated; as a result, the project was two parking spaces short (76 parking spaces provided, 78 parking spaces required). A. Alterson stated that Whole Foods must either apply for a variation or provide two additional spots. A. Alterson stated the additional spots could be secured off site. J. Tonkinson stated he had not received a photometric plan. J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the revised final site plan and appearance, provided that the applicant remove the southwestern -most tree to provide two parking spaces, submit a photometric plan to Engineering for review and approval, and meets all other applicable requirements. A. Alterson seconded. Discussion: D. Jennings stated Whole Foods employees could park in the parking structure across the street. A. Alterson asked whether the trees were required by the Committee or provided by the original developer. C. Zussman could not answer the question. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 29, 1997 Page 3 of 4 D. Jennings stated the ramp should be heated. C. Smith stated that the parking -level area for cart waiting appears too small. C. Smith questioned the actual ability for this system to work and recommended this area be further reviewed. M. Mylott asked if the grocery pick-up area was covered. C. Zussman stated that the grocery pick-up area was not covered. J. Tonkinson amended the motion as follows: approve the revised Final site plan and appearance, provided the applicant resolves the parking Issue with the original developer, provides a photometric plan to Engineering for review and approval, and meets all other applicable requirements. A. Alterson amended the second to reflect the amended motion. Committee approved the revisednallte_Dlan_and apoearance. [ ,. U-T,,• - - -, .i- .•. M.- W_T'T-r' T1Ml71l1 RM.W. --IM.-11 9- u , •••• Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m. k s ectfully subm tt", Marc Steven Mylott, SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE January 29, 1997 Page 4 or 4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 5, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: J. Aiello, A. Alterson, L. Black, J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement P. D'Agostino. H. Friedman. C. Ruiz, D. Venegas.. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings J. 7onkinson motioned to approve the summary of findings of January 29, 1997; K. Kelly seconded. Committee unanimously approved the motion to approve the summary of findinga. SPAARC 94-0052 1332 Emerson Street J. Aiello joined the meeting at this time. Conference J. Glus introduced Ms. Donna Zarbin-Byrne and informed the Committee that D. Zarbin-Byrne is one of three finalists to design the art work for the new fire station at 1332 Emerson Street. D. Zarbin-Byme requested the Committee consider moving the flag pole and sign from their approved locations to accommodate her design. D. Zarbin-Byrne presented her design which included: a maximum three-foot high berm designed in an arc configuration (open face of arc toward Emerson); 2. three maximum five-foot high bronze "wave shapes" rising vertically from the center of the berm; numerous smaller "wave shapes" and fire fighting implements mounted horizontally on the berm; SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 5, 1997 Page 1 of 4 4. a six-foot diameter colored concrete patio with Inset designs and text, located in the open face of the arc; 5. two benches on the east and west side of the patio; and 6. walkways linking the fire station entrance sidewalk to the Emerson Street sidewalk. L. Black stated the area In question is small and warned about trying to do too much in a limited space. C. Smith asked the Committee to consider if a sign was necessary, or if it could be placed on the building. A. Alterson stated the reference to "God" In the inset text may be viewed by some people as inappropriate. C. Smith stated such an issue may be better addressed by the Arts Council. J. Tonkinson motioned to consider moving the flag pole and sign if D. Zarbin-Byme's design is selected. H. Friedman seconded. Committee unanimously approved the motion to consider moving the flag Pole and sign SPAARC 96-0033 900 Dodge Avenue Revised Preliminary D. Venegas and D. Marino Joined and J. Wofinski left the meeting at this time. Mr. John McLinden presented the revised site plan, revised photometric plan, landscape plan, and elevations for the proposed Walgreens at 900 Dodge Avenue. The site plan Included: A five-foot fence, starting approximately six feet south of the northeast comer of the site and west of the sidewalk. Moving west, at the point where the fence is across from the first town house, the fence height increases to eight feet. The fence follows the curb line of the entrance road to the western property line where it turns south and decreases to six feet in height. From this point, the fence generally follows the western property line, except for an area in which the applicant has agreed to provide a "truck -turning" easement. The fence stops well short of the sidewalk along the southern property line. The fence is to be board -on -board. Whether the design is vertical boards on alternating sides of the horizontal supports or all finished boards on the neighr ors' side is up to the neighbors. L. Black stated that the transition from the eight -foot fence to the five-foot fence should be gradual and may be more desirable to step it down to an even lower height. A. Aiterson agreed. J. McLinden stated he will contact the neighbors and design the fence in accordance with their preference. 2. The landscaping area provided for the northern neighbors varies from five -feet wide (at the northwest corner of the site) to approximately six -feet wide (toward the northeastern corner of the site). The landscaping plan includes plantings around Ms Karen Bond's town house and evergreens and canopy trees along the fence. The canopy trees (10- to 12-foot Greenspire Lindens) are placed across from windows within the town houses. The ground cover will be a low -maintenance species, H. Friedman asked which party will maintain this landscaped area. J. McLinden indicated the applicant will either deed the property to the adjacent property owner(s) or have them only a]aintain the area (including plant material); this decision 1s up to the property owner(s). SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 5, 1997 Page 2 of 4 M. Mylott stated the Committee should consider requiring a 24- to 36-inch masonry wall along the Main and Dodge sides of the parking lot to better screen parked cars. M. Mylott stated that using the same masonry material as on the building will create a more unified site and disrupt the appearance of a solitary building surrounded by "a sea of asphalt". D. Jennings stated that such a wall will cause trouble for parking cars. J. Glus stated that such a wall encourages people to "hang out" on the wall, and that is not desirable. J. McLinden presented the elevations and stated that they have not changed since the earliest meetings. The building consists of brick on the lower portion and various shades of dryvit on the upper portion. C. Smith stated more attention should be paid to the building design and questioned whether other elevations were considered that better reflect a residential character. C. Smith stated that if no area buildings provide design clues, then this building should create the desired character. Finally, C. Smith stated that dryvit is not an acceptable building material. M. Mylott stated that this site plan and building is simply a response to the automobile, and the design, while accommodating automobile traffic, should not reflect it. J. McLlnden stated he will work with his architect. J. McLinden presented a revised photometric plan. J. Tonkinson stated he will review this plan and work with J. McLinden's lighting engineer toward an acceptable plan. C. Smith stated that the sign and its appearance is a separate issue not pertaining to this Committee at this time. D. Jennings motioned to approve the revised preliminary site plan. K. Kelly seconded. Discussion: J. Tonkinson asked if the respective ward alderman had been contacted. J. McLinden stated that the alderman's only concern was that the neighbors had input on the fence. A. Alterson stated that the landscape area adjacent to the town houses was too small because of the building size. •iliI q .•• - -• 1- ol• •1 • •• • i- •• • - tl 1-1 big" H. Friedman motioned to approve the preliminary appearance. J. Tonkinson seconded. Discussion: C. Ruiz stated he supported the previous comments regarding building design. Further, C. Ruiz encouraged the applicant to consider that the masonry on the lower portion of the building will be screened by the landscaping and parked cars while the upper portion of the building is what will be visible. SPAARC 97-0009 530 Dempster Street Preliminary Mr. Steve Bernstein presented plans to demolish a freestanding cottage located at the east end of the site and extend a commercial building to accommodate an additional store front (1,844 sq.ft.) at 530 Dempster Street. The design will mirror the current facade. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 5, t997 Page 3 of 4 C. Ruiz inquired about the structural integrity of the cottage and whether or not it could be moved. S. Bernstein stated he doubted whether his client had considered such an option. J. Aiello asked if the parking needs a variation. S. Bernstein stated his client will grade and pave the remaining area to provide a handicap -accessible parking spot and the most conforming parking spaces on site. S. Bernstein stated he is aware that his client will have to lease parking spaces to make up any difference. C. Smith stated that elevations are required for preliminary site plan and appearance approval. J. Aiello stated that a vintage facade exists under the renovated facade. C. Smith stated that creating a new facade that mimicked the renovated facade would foreclose the opportunity to restore the vintage facade, and she would have concerns approving such a project. M. Mylott motioned to approve concept. J. Glus seconded. Discussion: C. Ruiz asked S. Bernstein if he would work with him on exploring opportunities to move the cottage. S. Bernstein agreed.. M. Mylott amended the motion as follows: approve the concept, provided the applicant work with C. Ruiz to explore the opportunities to move the cottage. J. Glus amended the second to reflect the amended motion. Committee unanimously approved the motion to approve the_consent provided the applicant work with C. Ruiz to galore the opportunities_to move the cottaoe. SPAARC 97-0010 2522 Green Bay Road Preliminary C. Smith presented Kinko's Copiers plans for exterior modification to an existing building at 2522 Green Bay Road. At the request of the City Building Division, the applicant agreed to remove doors (that would no longer be used) and replace said doors with brick and store front windows that matched those currently found on the building. J. Aiello motioned to approve preliminary and final site plan and appearance. D. Marino seconded. Committee unanimously approved the motion to approve preliminary and final i�plan appearance. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m. dpectfully sub t Marc Steven Mylott, Z ni g Planner SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 517E PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February S. 1997 Page 4 of 4 Date SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 12, 1997 Room 2402 Members Present: A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. . Marino, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Absent: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, L. Black, J. Glus. H. Friedman. C. Ruiz. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:00 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Wolinski motioned to approve the summary of findings of February 5, 1997; D. Marino seconded. Discussion: M. Mylott Informed the Committee that C. Ruiz had requested that the second sentence of the second "Discussion" section on Page 3 be revised as such: "Further, C. Ruiz encouraged the applicant to consider using the masonry currently shown on the lower portion of the building on the upper portion of the building because that portion is what will be visible." J. Wolinski amended the motion to include the revision; D. Marino amended the second to include the revision. Committee unanimously_aporoved the motion to approve -the summer of findings. SPAARC 96-0107 811 Chicago Avenue Sign Recommendation A. Alterson and J. Tonkinson joined the meeting at this time. C. Smith presented a temporary sign package to be placed on a temporary sidewalk shed for a condominium development at 811 Chicago Avenue. The requested duration of the permit was 18 months. J. Wolinski motioned to approve the temporary sign package. D. Marino seconded. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 12, 1997 Page 1 of 3 14 Discussion: J. Tonklnson asked why "18 months" was requested and stated the permitted duration of the temporary sign package should correspond to the duration of the sidewalk shed, not to exceed 12 months. J. Wolinskl amended the motion as follows: approve the temporary sign package, provided the permitted time period is equal to that of the sidewalk shed and not to exceed 12 months. D. Marino amended the second to reflect the amended motion. Committee unanimouslylporoved the motion to approve the temporary sion package_. provided the permitted time period is equal to that of the sidewalk shed and not to exceed 12 SPAARC 96-0093 2289 Howard Street Sign Recommendation K. Kelly and C. Ruiz joined the meeting at this time. C. Smith presented the site plan (showing the proposed pole sign in the southwest comer of the site) and building elevations (showing three proposed "wall" signs on the west, north, and east elevations) for the proposed bank at 2289 Howard Street. Also, C. Smith presented site photographs and examples of the Intended styles of free-standing signs considered with the comprehensive sign package (CSP) for the Evanston Center. C. Smith noted that the only signage in the previously approved CSP for the outlots was that each outlot was permitted to erect a 67 free-standing sign. C. Smith reported that the proposed overall height of the pole sign Is 18% and the top of the "wall" signs is 18'. C. Smith stated that the bottom of the "wall" signs actually begin at the top of the roof parapet. J. Wollnskl stated the pole sign should not exceed 166" to conform with the sign ordinance. C. Smith stated the style of this sign should reflect that already established by Evanston Center to present a consistent appearance along Howard Street. D. Jennings motioned to approve one free-standing sign, provided said sign not exceed 166" and the style reflect the previously approved style of the two Evanston Center signs. J. Tonklnson seconded. Committee unanimously approved the motion to approve one free-standing sign. provided said sign not exceed ,1,5'§" and the -style reflect the prev_iguslyapproved_style of the two Evanstgn Center signs. M. Mylott stated that the proposed "wall" signs on the east and west sides of the building were excessive, given the free-standing sign announced the building's occupant. J. Wolinski agreed. C. Smith disagreed, stating additional identity may be required. D. Marino stated direction is required for people entering from the west. C. Ruiz stated the signs were simply too large in relation to the building. D. Marino motioned that no portion of the 'wall" signs shall extend above the roof line. J. Tonklnson seconded. Committee unanimously apmoved the motion that no portion of the 'wail" signs shall extend above the roof line. D. Marino motioned to permit "wall" signs on only the north and west sides of the proposed building. K. Kelly seconded. Committee failed to approve the motion to permit'Vall" signs on only fire north and west sides of the proposed building (4 aye, 5 nay). SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 12, 1997 Page 2 of 3 if M. Mylott motioned to permit "wain signs on only the north side of the proposed building. K. Kelly seconded, Committee approved the motiop tq permit "wain slans on gl3ly the north side of the gImposed_buildina (5 aye, 4 nay). Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 3:25 p.m. F%aectfully submi e , • •- ,.-r�-�^�•+,'J. �r{�.r' � v:y."....'-l�is,',r�'e-w-ra,,i,ra�iy..�++c.�rrw�j•�s y�-,V,r�;q. �, <•y',5 ��'+.��c=-• ' �• .��ir' ••.. \, = �[!s�77`s+.�'}+-h.^f-:.ib•14'�{ i�7:. �i. G'',.%Ar T '•y � '11`�'w`"'�'�'.S,^':` • � Marc Steven Mylott, Zo g Planner D to SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 12, 1997 Page 3 of 3 • • SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 26, 1997 Room 2402 Members Present: A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, K. Kelly, D. Jennings, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, L. Black, J. Glus, D. Marino, J. Wolinski. H. Friedman. None. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:00 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of February 19, 1997. P. O'Agostino seconded. Committee unanimously aoordved the motion to approve the Summary of Findings of Februagy 19, 1997. SPAARC 97-0014 1744 Ridge Avenue Plat of Subdivision. Preliminary and Final J. Tonkinson motioned to recommend approval of the plat of subdivision and that the plat must contain all applicant -provided signatures prior to that applicant requesting any City -provided signatures. D. Jennings seconded. Discussion: Mr. Jim Murray (attorney for the applicant) noted that neither of the two structures are within 10 feet of the proposed lot line. Further, Mr. Murray stated his client is maintaining the public access easement (south of the proposed lot line). K. Kelly asked about fire access. J. Murray stated that the current access provided to all sides of the building will not change. C. Smith stated this subdivision mU pose future conflict with standards that regulate the number of unprotected openings (without sprinkler or exterior shutter) within a certain distance of the property line. • SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMriTEE February 26, 1997 Pagel 02 SPAARC 97-0016 2500 Ridge Avenue Preliminary and Final Plat of Consolidation. J. Tonkinson motioned to recommend approval of the plat of consolidation and that the plat must contain all applicant -provided signatures prior to that applicant requesting any City -provided signatures. A. Alterson seconded. Committee unanimously approved the motion to approve the plat of consolidation and that the plat must contain all applicant -related signatures prior to the applicant reguegfing any City. City. pCQyided signatures. SPAARC 97-0016 1928 Noyes Street Preliminary and Final Single-family addition requiring variations, Off -agenda item. Ms. Ellen Galiand (architect) and Ms. Donna Zarbin-Byner (property owner) presented a single-family addition for 1928 Noyes Street requiring variations to the lot coverage and street setback requirements of the R1 Single-family Residential Zoning District. The variations would permit creating a larger kitchen, mud room, and family room. E. Galland inquired about the possibility of erecting a fence on City property (Brown Avenue right-of-way). Numerous City staff stated such a request would not be permitted. J. Tonkinson motioned to recommend approval to the ZBA. D. Jennings seconded. Commute$ unanimously approved the motion to recommend approval to the ZBA. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 3.30 p.m. Marc Steven Mylott, Planner SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 26, 1997 Page 2 of 2 • .. r arm ..:rt.n�... . 3.3• Date n LJ SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 19, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, S. Franz (for P. D'Agostino), J. Glus, D. Jennings, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, K. Kelly, D. Marino, J. Wolinski. H. Friedman. C. Ruiz. 'r C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. SPAARC 97-0012 2033 Dodge Avenue Recommendation to ZBA J. Gtus joined and D. Jennings left the meeting at this time. Mr. Eric Eriksson presented a proposal to resubdivide one zoning tot (consisting of two lots of record) Into two zoning lots, erecting a two-story two -flat on the new northern zoning lot and retaining the existing two - flat on the southern zoning lot. E. Eriksson stated minor and major variations are required. Reading from the Zoning Analysis, C. Smith reported that variations are required from the R3 Two-family Residential Zoning District standards for minimum lot size (existing and new zoning lots), minimum lot width (new zoning lot), minimum side yard setbacks (existing and new zoning lot), accessory use setbacks (existing zoning lot), and parking lot location (new zoning lot). E. Eriksson stated the parking lot location variation may not be necessary with a simple site plan modification. A. Alterson stated this property has an on -going property maintenance problem (automobile operations in the existing garage), and the proposal would place another two dwelling units in close proximity to this problem. A. Alterson continued that many variation requests were directly related to keeping the garage. E. Eriksson stated the client's priority is to build a new building, not keep the garage; in other words, the garage could be removed if necessary. A. Alterson stated that the densities adopted by the City Council in the Zoning Ordinance reflect a vision of how each area should develop, and the lot area of the new zoning lot would permit a single-family dwelling unit by right. E. Eriksson stated that the economics may not support a single-family dwelling unit and that SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 19, 1997 Page 1 of 3 the proposed building Is a popular housing type. E. Eriksson stated the proposal attempts to stay within 20 percent of the standards established within the Zoning Ordinance. C. Smith stated that the site plan takes away from the neighborhood feel and goes against the concepts of neighborhood planning. C. Smith stated the proposed density Is hard to overlook. H. Friedman questioned the use of side access, especially when located along an alley. C. Ruiz stated that the design of the proposed building (appearing similar to a three -flat) Is contrary to the character of the neighborhood. L. Black stated she is "very familiar' with 2033 Dodge Avenue and does not wish to create additional problems. L. Black stated that side access is more vulnerable than front access. J. Tonkinson motioned to recommend disapproval to the ZBA based on the lot configuration and proposed use of the land. M. Mylott seconded. Discussion: A. Alterson asked the motion to be amended to require preliminary and final SPAARC approval should the ZBA approve the requested variations. J. Tonkinson amended the motion as follows: recommend disapproval to the ZBA based on the lot configuration and proposed use of the land, and preliminary and final SPAARC approval is required if the ZBA approves the requested variations. M. Mylott amended the second to reflect the amended motion. Committee unanimously approved the motion tg recommend disapproval tot the ZBA based on the lot configuration and imposed use of the land. and oreft'nary and final SPAARC approval is required if the ZBA approes the requested -variation . SPAARC 97-0013 2427 Oakton Street Recommendation to ZBA Mr. Mark Stringer presented his request for a special use for an outdoor storage yard as a principal use in the 11 Industrial/Office Zoning District. M. Stringer stated that he intended to provide an eight -foot stockade fence on the east and south sides of the subject property and attach to an existing fence on the northwest side of the subject property to complete the required enclosure (as M. Stringer owns the outdoor storage yard to the northwest of the site). M. Stringer stated he intended to divide the interior of the outdoor storage yard into smaller areas that may be rented out; two site plans (labeled "A" and "B") depicted different internal configurations. Site plan "A" depicted three interior areas with gates fronting yet setback from Oakton Street by 25 feet. Site plan "B" depicted four interior areas connected to an interior common area, creating one main gate with access to and at the right-of-way of Oakton Street. M. Mylott stated that access to Oakton Street is a concern given the road's current capacity and potential problems with sight distance (from the bridge to the west), and the Committee should consider permitting only one access to Oakton Street. M. Mylott stated that the area west of the quarter section line is within the Village of Skokie, J. Tonkinson stated that within the Village of Skokie, Oakton Street is County controlled and under State influence due to the bridge. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 19, 1997 Page 2 of 3 C. Smith stated she is concerned about providing enough area for trucks to turn around. M. Mylott stated he appreciated the applicant's preservation of the existing hedgerow to provide additional screening between the eastern side of the subject property and an existing parking lot. M. Mylott motioned to recommend approval to the ZBA based on site plan "B". L. Black seconded. Discussion: C. Smith asked the motion to be amended to require adequate turning area for trucks. M. Mylott amended the motion as follows: recommend approval to the ZBA based on site plan "B" and consultation with the City of Evanston's Traffic Engineer to ensure adequate truck turn around is provided. L. Black amended the second to reflect the amended motion. Committee an roR ved the motion to recommend appEgyal to the ZBA based on site plan"S" and consultation with the -City of Eyanston's Traffic Engineer to ensurQ adenuata truck turn around is ron vided; one member opposed. Approval of Summary of Findings .f J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of February 12, 1997; L. Black seconded. Committee unanimously approved the motion to_apDrove the Summary of Findings of February 12. 1997. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:00 p.m. pectfuliy sub tt , UAA� Marc Steven Mylott,ffo gPlanner SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE February 19. 1997 Page 3 or 3 "A•fAl on Date SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 5, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: J. Aiello, A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, L. Black, D. Jennings, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement K. Kelly, J. Glus, D. Marino. H. Friedman. C. Ruiz, C. Wonderb. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p,m. Approval of Summary of Findings D. Jennings motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of February 26, 1997. H. Friedman seconded. Committee unanimously approved the motion to approve the Summary gf Findings of February 26, 1997. SPAARC 97-0017 2027 Orrington Avenue Preliminary and Final J. Aiello, C. Ruiz, and J. Tonkinson joined the meeting at this time. Variations to side and rear setback and accessory structure location requirements for singledamily addition. Mr. Shelly Orbach (agent to property owners) presented site plans, elevations, and photographs of existing conditions for the single-family addition at 2027 Orrington Avenue. S. Orbach stated variations to the side and rear setback and accessory structure location requirements of the R1 Single-family Zoning District are required. S. Orbach stated the addition fills in an existing "niche" at the rear of the house. C. Smith asked if the wall facing the garage will be a one -hour fire -rated wall. S. Orbach stated yes. D. Jennings motioned to approve the preliminary and final site plan and appearance. J. Aiello seconded. ComMittee unanimously approved the motion to approve the oreliminary and final site plan and appearance. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 5, 1997 Page 1 of 4 Off -agenda item 1640 Chicago Avenue Revised tratlic%irculation plan for Whole Foods. Conference J. Aiello presented a site plan for Whole Foods at 1640 Chicago Avenue, proposing a cut out on Church Street to facilitate parcel pick-up. The proposal includes removing two metered parking spots an Church Street; J. Aiello stated Whole Foods is evaluating an annual fee to the City to offset the lost revenue. D. Jennings stated that he does not approve of the proposal, because the entire lane (west to the alley) would serve as the pick-up lane. M. Mylott asked if this arrangement was in replacement of or in addition to the roof -top pick-up facility. J. Aiello stated this arrangement Is In addition to the roof -top facility. J. Aiello informed the Committee that the development agreement promised six trees on the roof top. SPAARC 97-0019 2822 Central Street Preliminary A. Alterson and J. Wolinski Joined the meeting at this time. Exterior and interior modifications to an existing commercial building, and a variation to the side yard parking setback requirements of the B-2 Business Zoning District to permit rive parking spaces instead of the required three parking spaces. Mr. Ron Johnstone presented exterior and interior modifications to the existing one-story building at 2822 Central Street. Specifically, R. Johnstone stated: 1. The existing 8,400 sq.ft. building is located on a 8,850 sq.ft. lot. The plans will reduce the building area to 7,650 sq.ft. If the building is designed for one tenant, the rentable space will be approximately 7,600 sq.ft. If the building is designed for two tenants, the two rentable spaces will be less than 4,000 sq.ft. each. Earlier plans to create four to six rentable spaces have been dropped. The anticipated users will be retail and/or office. 2. The front modifications include new thermal -pane windows and removing the overhead door and replacing it with a new entrance. The curb cut would be removed. 3. The rear modifications include removing approximately 10 feet of the building to providing parking spaces. Currently, one large parking space is provided. 4. According to the Zoning Ordinance, the building is required to provide three spaces; five spaces is preferable. However, a variation to the side yard parking setback requirements is required. 5. The land use to the west is the fire department. A slatted chain link fence is located on the property line to screen Commonwealth Edison generators, 6. The land use to the east is the rear parking lot for a retail store. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE Match 5, t997 Page 2 of 4 7. As a condition of sale, the seller is removing an interior gas tank last used in 1970. M. Mylott motioned to approve preliminary site plan and appearance with five rear parking spaces. J. Aiello seconded. Committee unanimously approved the motion to approve the preliminary Bite plan and appearance with five reaEoarking spaces. SPAARC 96-0091 1501 Central Street Preliminary and Final C. Smith relinquished the role of chairperson to A. Alterson and left the meeting at this time. Replace existing grass surface on football practice field with astroturf. Mr. Gabor Zsolnay of Northwestern University presented a proposal to regrade the University's existing grass football practice field and install the astroturf removed from Dyche Stadium to comply with the NCAA and Big 10 requirements that woman's field hockey have an artificial surface. G. Zsolnay stated the biggest impact is in terms of drainage. .f Mr. Tom Rowlett (Harza, consulting engineering firm) stated 12,500 cubic feet of detention was required. T. Rowlett stated that, instead of two three- to four -foot deep detention ponds (a safety concern), the preferred alternative is to store the water on the field. T. Rowlett stated one -foot earthem berms on the north, south, and west side and a concrete curb (and fence) or earthern berm (5:1 slope) with release structure on the east side would contain the water. T. Rowlett stated depth is expected to be seven Inches during a 100-year storm event. T. Rowlett stated that the water will release to the Jenks Street storm sewer. T. Rowlett stated drainage on the eastern residential properties would not change. J. Tonkinson stated a Metropolitan Water Reclamation District permit is required. A. Alterson recommended G. Zsolnay submit an application for zoning analysis (including location of all drainage structures) as soon as possible. L. Black asked if bleachers would be installed. G. Zsolnay stated no bleachers would be permanently installed; however, temporary bleachers may be used and then removed if needed. J. Wolinski asked how often the practice field was currently used. G. Zsolnay stated the field is used for practices whenever it is not raining. A. Alterson asked if the new field would have a scoreboard, because scoreboards are special uses. G. Zsolnay stated if yes, then the scoreboard would be portable. J. Wolinski motioned to approve preliminary and final site plan and appearance, provided the drainage be approved by the City Engineer, the applicant strive for an earthern berm on the eastern side of the field, and no permanent scoreboard be erected. J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee_ unanimously approved by the Citv Engineer, the agglicant strive for an eanhern b rm on the eastern side of the field. and no pe(marient scgreboard be erepted. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 5. 1997 Page 3 of 4 SPAARC 97-0020 2000 Maple Avenue Conference C. Smith rejoined the meeting and reassumed the role of chairperson at this time. C. Wonders also joined the meeting at this time. J. Tonkinson left the meeting at this time. Committee Input on condominium development at northwest comer of Maple Avenue and Foster Street. Mr. Daniel Le Noble (architect) presented two site plans and photographs of the site. D. Le Noble stated that the proposed zoning lot is approximately 136 feet by 178 feet (north/south) and within two zoning districts (Bi and 134). With B1 or R4, 10 dwelling units are permitted. D. Le Noble presented Sheet 1, demonstrating changing to R5 (proposing five stories and 27 dwelling units) and Sheet 3, demonstrating changing to B2 (proposing four stories and 30 dwelling units where 60 dwelling units would be permitted by -right). D. Le Noble presented Sheet 2 and Sheet 4 as typical floor plans for Sheet 1 and Sheet 3, respectively. M. Mylott stated that he was not comfortable with R5 or B2 in this area, because no other land In the immediate area has that high of a permitted density. A. Alterson stated that, if the City rezoned this property to R5, such an action would be ", .. quite a policy statement.". _ r C. Smith stated that she did not like the entire ground floor being devoted to parking, and these plans did not enhance the streetscape or residential character of the adjacent R4 properties. C. Smith stated she was concerned with the bulk, and more attention to detail Is required (including massing, height, and respect to the comer), C. Smith suggested lowering the parking below grade by five feet. C. Ruiz stated the applicant should be aware that 2030 Maple Avenue is a landmark building and ensure this building is not included in the proposed demolition. M. Mylott asked if the applicant had considered an R4 PUD. D. Le Noble stated that provision did not increase the permitted density enough to make the project economically feasible. A. Alterson stated he had trouble with the proposal given the surroundings, and he would rather see the applicant rezone the property to R4 and request variations. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:55 p.m. e ectfully submi Marc Steven Mylott, Z g Planner SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SiTE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE Match 5. 1997 Page 4 of 4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 12, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, L. Black, D. Jennings, D. Marino, M. Mylott, C. Smith, I Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. J. Aiello, K. Kelly, J. Glus. H. Friedman. L. Lyon, C. Ruiz, R. Schur, D. Venegas, C. Wonders, _r C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:00 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings D. Jennings motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of March 5, 1997. P. D'Agostino seconded. Committee api2mved the motion (fi-d)to approve the sty of Findings of March 5. 1997. SPAARC 97-0009 530 Dempster Street Building addition. Petitioner not present. Item tabled until Further notice. SPAARC 97-0022 2289 Howard Street Sign for Worfd Savings & Loan Bank. Preliminary Preliminary and Final C. Smith stated this item was inadvertently placed on the agenda as it has previously been presented to the Committee for consideration. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 12. 1997 Page 1 of 7 SPAARC 97-0015 2925 Central Street Preliminary and Final Sign for First Bank & Trust of Evanston. C. Smith presented a sign package for the First Bank & Trust of Evanston, Including existing conditions (site plan and photos) and a proposed site plan. The sign package proposes to: I . Recover the pole sign at the existing location. 2. Install a new wall sign beneath the existing Cyrus sign on the west facade of the building. 3. Replace the wall sign on the south facade (located on the canopy). 4. Install a wall sign on the new drive-thru facility. C. Smith stated variations are required for the west -facade wall sign, because the Cyrus sign is an existing nonconforming sign, and a bank sign in this location would not be coterminous to the use. Also, C. Smith stated a variation is required for the south -facade wall sign because such signs cannot be higher 166" from the ground. Finally, C. Smith stated variations are required for the pole sign, because said sign cannot exceed A' or be within 20' of a driving lane. J. Tonkinson motioned to disapprove the preliminary and final sign package, based on insufficient Information. A. Alterson seconded. Discussion: H. Friedman recommended combining the pole sign for Cyrus Homes and the pole sign requested by First Bank & Trust of Evanston Into one pole sign. C. Smith stated she had no problem with locating the south -facade wall sign In the center of the canopy. A. Alterson stated the proposed signage is more than necessary, and the two pole signs should be combined into one pole sign. Committed failed jo approve the motion (4-4) to disapprove the preliminary r, nod sign gackagg. basQd on insufficient information. L. Black abstained. D. Marino motioned to approve the preliminary and final site plan and appearance for the south -facade wall sign. D. Jennings seconded. Committee approved the motion (7-1) toagorov _ the preliminary and final 29te plan and appearance for the south -facade wall sign. L. Slack abstained. D. Marino motioned to approve the preliminary and final site plan and appearance for the west -facade wall sign. D. Jennings seconded. Committee failed to aonrove the motion (2-6) to a o ove thepreliminary and final site plan and appearance for the west -facade wall sigp. L. Black abstained. A. Alterson motioned to require all pole signs be reduced to one pole sign. J. Tonkinson seconded. Discussion: D. Marino recommended the motion be amended to permit the petitioner to increase the sign area of whichever pole sign would remain by 25 percent. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 12, 1997 Page 2 of 7 A. Alterson revised the motion as such: require all pole signs be reduced to one pole sign, permitting the petitioner to increase the sign area of whichever sign would remain by 25 percent. J. Tonkinson withdrew the second. D. Marino seconded. •1111 1•: ,rr r -• 1- Ilr i r1 r -• r■ - @5 r' -• -• • r1- •• - •1 •- tl l 1• 1= ra •1' • 1 1: •1 • i 1 1' •1 i • r p•. 1 r •- -1 • �• Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee further discussed this case with the petitioners at a later time during this meeting. SPAARC 96-0033 900 Dodge Avenue Preliminary Appearance Proposed Walgreens. Mr. Howard Hirsch presented revised elevations and building materials for the proposed Walgreens at 900 Dodge Avenue. Mr. John McLinden was also available. The elevations portrayed a one-story building with a higher section to hide the mechanicals. H. Hirsch stated that the proposed design was Intended to (1) reduce the scale of the building with datum lines, and (2) draw attention to the entrance. The design Included: The Dodge Avenue facade as the primary elevation. 2. A 2' renaissance stone (limestone) base to present stability. 3. A residential brick (more texture and color) up to 10'. 4. Dryvit from the brick to the top of the building. 5. Windows trimmed in renaissance stone. 6. Heavy -set pilasters at the entrance to support a jutting architectural element. The entrance is recessed underneath this overhang. A drive-thru canopy of the same treatment as the entrance/overhang. 8. Cornice trimming the top of the building to serve as finish and additional datum point. C. Smith stated limestone should be used instead of dryvit. H. Hirsch stated he "... did not have much faith in limestone as an exterior material." C. Smith stated limestone is used on many buildings successfully, even high-rise buildings. C. Smith stated the building needed the enhancement provided by quality materials. J. McLinden stated the intent of the dryvit is not to mimic other materials but be its own statement, and a strong consideration must be given to the labor costs for limestone. A. Alterson stated that, given the degree of deliberation of the ZBA and City Council, this development was approved largely because it was perceived to be a quality enhancement to the neighborhood. J. McLinden added that, given that perception, no one ever said dryvit was unacceptable. C. Smith stated that most people do not have the expertise to evaluate building materials in terms of the resulting impact on building quality. H. Friedman stated that, at a minimum, the architect should look at ways to eliminate as much dryvit as possible by using masonry on the entire south SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 12, 1997 Page 3 of 7 and east elevations. C. Smith stated cement plaster or precast concrete could be appropriate attematives. J. Tonkinson stated he doubted limestone could be used for this building, because limestone cut too thin is problematic. C. Smith stated she would prefer the 2' renaissance stone base be removed, because this height is not enough to create the strong base the design Intends. C. Smith stated a more pedestrian -size (smaller) brick should be used rather than the 4" x 12" utility brick proposed; a norman brick is more appropriate. C. Smith reiterated that this building must set a high standard for development in this area while respecting the residential neighbors. J. McLinden stated such standards must be "... applied universally.". To conclude, C. Smith stated the building needs a smaller -scale brick (norman size) and limestone panels. C. Ruiz proposed repeating the brick pilasters (used to "support" the entrance overhang) along the east and south facades to unify the design. M. Mylott agreed, adding that these pilasters will help support the idea bf a strong base supporting lighter upper levels. D, Marino asked whether or not vision -glass windows could be added. J. McLinden stated that Walgreens is very specific about backing products along the outer wAb of their buildings, not windows. C. Smith stated that windows would increase the pedestrian scale of the building and provide additional light. L. Black stated more vision glass decreases security risks and would create a more inviting appearance. J. McLinden stated the decision was not his to make, and he would propose these comments to his client. M. Mylott summarized that the developer and architect consider four main points: (1) eliminate dryvit on the south and east facades; (2) use smaller -scale brick; (3) add architectural elements on the south and east facades to further the appearance of a strong base; and (4) attempt to integrate more windows. A. Alterson motioned to table preliminary appearance. L. Black seconded. Committee approved the motion t8-0t to kpble preliminary appearance. SPAARC 96-0103 2925 Central Street Preliminary and Final Interior and exterior remodeling for First Bank & Trust of Evanston. J. Behles presented the interior and exterior remodeling for the First Bank & Trust of Evanston at 2925 Central Street. The proposed exterior includes four new limestone piers with new annonized windows along the south (street) facade. J. Behles stated that, white not part of the current plans, the Bank will explore removing the existing canopy and restoring the limestone facade supposedly existing underneath. The east (parking lot) facade will have three new annonized windows with limestone sills. D. Marino motioned to approve the preliminary and final site plan and appearance, provided the applicant return to Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee if the canopy is to be removed. D. Jennings seconded. Committee approved the motion (10-0) to approve the Dreliminacy and final site plan and pearilnce. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 12, 1997 Page 4 of 7 SPAARC 96-0088 2201 Oakton Street Outlot proposal for Nome Depot shopping center. Concept Mr. Scott Gendell and Douglas Bean presented a site plan and elevations for a proposed building, located on an outlot within the Home Depot shopping center at 2201 Oakton Street. The proposal Included approximately 12,000 sq.ft, of retail space on 1.214 acres; 77 parking spaces are included. C. Smith stated the applicant should submit for a zoning analysis to determine what are the permitted uses. C. Smith stated she was concerned about the number of small spaces, because many smaller spaces Increases the tenant turn over rate. D. Marino asked if Interior spaces could be combined to accommodate larger users. S. Gendell responded that once fully occupied, the building will probably accommodate three or four users. A. Alterson stated that this proposal is in a redevelopment overlay district, requiring planned unit development approval and a public hearing. A. Alterson stated that the property is currently one lot. S. Gendell stated he is aware he must subdivide the outlot from the larger parcel. L. Black stated she did not like the proposed back of the buildings. M. Mylott stated he did not like locating parking In the street yard, and the building should be designed such that the street face ap ep tired as the front of the building to provide necessary advertising with parking located behind It. D. Marino stated S. Gendell should consider designing two fronts. S. Gendell stated creating two fronts is prohibitively expensive, and his tenants must have the store fronts facing Oakton Street and parking in front of their doors. H. Friedman asked if the height had to be over 22 feet. S. Gendell stated the scale of the building could be reduced; however, the building Is higher than necessary to hide the mechanicals. C. Smith stated the amount of dryvit should be reduced. D. Marino stated he is concerned about the compatibility with the Home Depot facade. C. Smith stated a unified sign package is necessary and suggested using awnings instead of the parapet for signage. M. Mylott stated he will be looking for extensive landscaping in front of the parking lot to reduce its visual Impact from Oakton Street if no parking islands are provided. S. Gendell stated he has discussed this proposal with Alderman Feldman. D. Jennings motioned to approve the site plan and appearance concept. J. Wolinski seconded. Committee aaproved the motion (9-0) to approve the site elan and appearance -concept. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 12, 1997 Page 5 of 7 SPAARC 97-0015 2925 Central Street Sign for First Bank & Trust of Evanston. Conference Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee recalled this case to discuss the Committee's decisions from earlier in the meeting. Note that a quorum was not present Mr. Robert Yohanan and Mr. Joe Behles asked the Committee to discuss the previous motions. M. Mylott reread the motions and resulting Committee decisions. R. Yohanan stated he was concerned with combining the two pole signs, because of the potential for visitors to associate First Bank & Trust of Evanston with a future undesirable tenant. M. Mylott stated that visitors will associate the two uses with each other, regardless of tt a future tenant and First Bank share a sign, because the two uses will share a building. R. Yohanan stated he was concerned about the disapproval of the west -facade wall sign. C. Smith stated that the Committee may be amenable to the west side sign if the two pole signs were combined Into one pole sign and the canopy was removed. R. Yohanan stated he would discuss the Committee's decisions with Cyrus. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. R ectfully submi , r Marc Steven Mylott, Zo ' Planner %6178,! Date SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 12. t997 Page 7 of 7 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 19, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, B. Fahlstrom (for C. Smith), S. Franz (for P. D'Agostino), D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, M. Mylott, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, L. Black, J. Glus. H. Friedman. C. Ruiz, R. Schur, D. Venegas, C. Wonders. J. Wolinski (acting as chairperson) determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:10 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings A. Alterson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of March 5, 1997, D. Jennings seconded. Discussion: C. Ruiz asked that the following fragment be added to page 4, fourth complete paragraph, end of the second sentence: "... and scale down the blank facade." A. Alterson amended the motion to include the revision. D. Jennings amended the second to include the revision. Committee approved the -motion 110-01 to approve the SummaMgf-Findings of -March 12._1.997. PVC (Plastic) Fencing Conference Proposed amendment from Plan Commission Zoning Committee to include PVC as a permitted fence material. Ms. Doraine Anderson presented brochures depicting a variety of styles of PVC fences, the Zoning Committee has recommended the Zoning Ordinance be amended to include PVC as a permitted fence material in nonindustrial zoning districts. D. Anderson stated this proposal was not an attempt to preempt the review authority of the Evanston Preservation Commission, rather this proposal recognizes new technology and provides property owners with an additional choice. D. Anderson stated that a manufacture's representative had stated that a power washer will remove most graffiti. D. Anderson stated she is waiting for more SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 19, 1997 Pape 1 of 8 Information about more indelible paints and inks; however, preliminary discussions Indicate that an inexpensive "dip" Is available that creates a surface to which graffiti cannot adhere. D. Anderson stated that Property Standards should appreciate that the material comes with a 20-yearwarranty and maintenance Is limited to a hose with scrubber attachment. Finally, D. Anderson stated the proposed standards require a minimum wall thickness and solid wall extrusion. H. Friedman stated that, as an architect on the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee, he is trying to maintain honesty with materials in the City, and he believes introducing "make-believe" fences is dishonesL H. Friedman stated the Plan Commission should reconsider this amendment. D. Anderson stated the Plan Commission tries to offer acceptable alternatives to homeowners In terms of cost and maintenance, and she cannot see why PVC fences are undesirable. D. Jennings asked if actual installations had been evaluated. D. Anderson stated that the closest installations were in Wadsworth, and she had not visited those sites, because she does not have an automobile. J. Tonkinson stated D. Anderson may wish to consider the specifications of the materials. J. Tonkinson stated he believes maintaining fences is a Property Standards responsibility, and he would not like to see this material permitted, because it does not lend itself to the climate. J. Tonkinson stated that, because a PVC fence is lighter than most other fences, the weight of the fence does not decrease fence "heave" like a wood or wrought iron fence. D. Jennings stated he is concerned with the ability to keep the fences clean If a permanent marker is used. J. Tonkinson asked what are rodent habits in relation to this material. D. Anderson stated she will contact the manufacturers' representatives for answers to these concerns. C. Ruiz stated he is concerned with the impacts on the Historic Districts due to the "floating" boundaries of the districts; PVC fences in the unprotected (transition) areas adjacent to the Historic District may have an detrimental impact on the area's character. A. Alterson stated he believes this material is far more favorable, because it encourages a market for recycled plastic. A. Alterson stated this material is extremely expensive, more so than wood, and it behaves better in terms of maintenance Issues. A. Alterson stated he appreciated H. Friedman's concerns. J. Tonkinson motioned to table the discussion on PVC fencing. A. Alterson seconded. Committee approved the motion (10-0) to table the discussion on PVC fencing, SPAARC 97-0009 630 Dempster Street Addition to commercial building. Preliminary Mr. S. Bernstein presented site plans, elevations, and photographs for an addition to 530 Dempster Street S. Bernstein stated that his client would donate the existing cottage; the alternative to moving the cottage is to demolish the structure and recycle the brick. J. Wolinski read the Summary of Findings from February 5. 1997, regarding SPAARC 97-0009, SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 19. 1997 Page 2 of 6 C. Ruiz stated he had made the initial contact with the Evanston Park District and plans to meet with the landscape architect to discuss finding an appropriate site for the cottage. S. Bernstein stated his client has no place to which he can to move the cottage and cannot complete the expansion with the cottage at its current location. S. Bernstein stated his client plans to duplicate the existing facade. D. Jennings motioned to approve the preliminary site plan, provided the applicant continue discussions with C. Ruiz and the Park District about moving the cottage. J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee approved the motion f 10-0) to approve_the_preliminary_site plan, provided _the _applicant continue discussigna with C. Ruiz and the Park District about moving the cottage. H. Friedman motioned to table the preliminary appearance. J. Tankinson seconded. the motion (10-0) to table the preliminary appearance. SPAARC 96-0033 900 Dodge Avenue Preliminary Appearance Proposed Walgreens. Continued from March 12, 1997 SPAARC meeting. Mr. Howard Hirsch presented revised elevations for the proposed Walgreens at 900 Dodge Avenue. Mr. John Mcl-inden was also available. The revisions include: 1. Additional windows. The east elevation entrance contains two sections of vision glass adjacent to the doors, extending from 2 feet above grade to 10 feet above grade, and 3-foot high (approximate) windows starting north of the vision glass, extending the length of the protruding sign band. The south elevation contains 3-foot high (approximate) windows staring west of entrance, extending the length of the protruding sign band. 2. A masonry "band" accented by upper and lower renaissance stone sills, continuing the window lines on the east and south elevations. 3. A smaller -sized brick. The architect is Investigating standard brick versus norman brick. 4. Additional masonry on the east and south elevations. The masonry extends from 2 feet above grade to approximately 24 feet above grade, except for the protruding sign band. The masonry is separated from the dryvit by renaissance stone. 5. Additional masonry pilasters (three on the east elevation and four on the south elevation). 6. A lower sign band with cornice feature, matching the cornice on the building. J. McLinden stated Walgreens considered all the Committee's recommendations; however, Walgreens requires a light background for their sign. H. Friedman asked why the drive-thru canopy was so high above grade and so large. H. Hirsch stated that, at the current height, the canopy will provide protection for the automobile drivers using the window; the massing is for prominence. H. Friedman recommended considering a "... more cantilevered look." M. Mylott SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SiTE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 19, 1997 Page 3 of 6 stated he liked the current proportions, because they create an interesting north facade while unifying the building; if a simple roof projected from the facade, it may appear to have been an afterthought rather than part of the original plans. C. Ruiz stated the current design may be "overkill", and the building would work better with a smaller canopy. D. Marino motioned to approve the preliminary appearance, provided the drive-thru canopy Is revised. D. Jennings seconded. Discussion: H. Friedman complemented the architect, stating the proposed design Is a great Improvement. C. Ruiz stated the light fixtures and associated Improvements will be Important. . SPAARC 97-0024 2201 Howard Street Preliminary Appearance Dutlot proposal for Evanston Center shopping center. Appearance tabled from March 12, 1997 SPAARC meeting. M. Mylott read the Summary of Findings from March 12, 1997, regarding SPAARC 97-0024. Mr. David Mangurten presented revised elevations for a proposed building, located on lot 4 of the Evanston Center shopping center at 2201 Howard Street. The revisions include: 1. An all -masonry (copper -complimentary color) building, except a stucco with stone finish sign band on the south and east elevations. 2. Prairie stone base on each facade, the same color as the stucco sign band. 3. Flat facades versus the canopy originally proposed. 4. Green -black accent bands and diamond shapes on each facade. 5. Clear annonized windows on the north, south, and east facades to match the windows proposed for the World Savings & Loan Bank. M. Mylott stated the sign band appeared to be an afterthought and did not look appropriate. M. Mylott stated green -black awnings containing the signage may be a more unifying element. B. Fahlstrom stated the signage on the east facade will need a variation. D. Marino asked about the height of the building. D. Mangurten stated the building is 20 feet high, and the mechanicals will be screened on all sides. D. Jennings motioned to approve preliminary appearance. D. Marino seconded. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 19. 1997 Page 4 of 6 Discussion: D. Marino asked about " dressing up" the west elevation. D. Mangurten replied that the west facade was "utilitarian" and their landscaping plus World Savings & Loan BanWs landscaping will screen it. D. Mangurten stated that racks were placed along the Interior side of the wall, making wlndows'meaningless. Finally, D. Mangurten stated expansion joints would be place at least every 40 feet to provide additional relief. D. Marino stated that the landscaping will be critical when it comes to the back of the building. D. Marino stated the north side of the building should receive the same treatment as the south side. Also, D. Marino stated the door should be visually attractive, designed to look less like a "back door". A. Alterson agreed. J. Wolinski stated a Blockbuster representative may wish to attend the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee meeting at which final site plan and appearance is reviewed, because Blockbuster is not a generic store. A. Alterson agreed. D. Jennings amended the motion as such: approve preliminary appearance, provided the north facade is designed to reflect the south facade. D. Marino amended the second to reflect the amended motion. Committee approved the motion (8-1) to appf vie preliminary appearance, tLyided the north facade is designed to reflect the south facade. SPAARC 97-0026 1034 Chicago Avenue Temporary building for used car dealership. Preliminary Mr. Pat Wolmack presented a survey, site plan, and building design to erect a temporary building at 1034 Chicago Avenue. P. Wolmack stated that the proposed building (60.0 feet by 23.5 feet) will be placed in the same location as the current building and Is clad with white -painted wood. A handicap ramp will be placed on the south side of the front facade, and landscape planters made from railroad ties will be on the north side of the front facade. P. Wolmack stated railroad ties will also be used to prevent further erosion on the west side of the property. P. Wolmack stated R. Fisher intends to build a new building within two years. A. Alterson stated a site plan showing all structures attached to the building (deck, alc units, etc.) is required to complete the Zoning Analysis. D. Marino asked what were R. Fisher's long-term plans for the site. P. Wolmack stated R. Fisher intends to build a showroom and office space in the southwest corner of the site. H. Friedman stated the sliding gates may be on public property when stacked. A. Alterson stated the columns may also be on public property. D. Marino motioned to approve preliminary site plan and appearance, provided (1) the applicant complies with the Zoning Ordinance and all applicable regulations, (2) the temporary building is permitted for only two years, (3) the landscaping is enhanced beyond the planters to be located around the temporary building, and (4) the issues with the gale and columns is addressed via survey. M. Mylott seconded. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 19, 1997 Page 5 of 6 Discussion: P. Wolmack asked if a variation can be granted for the slope of the handicap ramp. B. Fahlstrom stated that that law Is mandated by the State of Illinois. J. Wolinski stated he doubted the State would grant a variation given the two-year life of the building. B. Fahistrom stated that the bathrooms (including stalls and fixtures) must also be handicap accessible. B. Fahlstrom recommended that the applicant provide the building department with drawings for review. Committee approved the motion (9-0) to approve preliminary site plan and appearance, provided (1) the applicant complies with the Zoning Ordinance and all applicable reo Ala io g,(2) the tem,narary building Is permitted for only two years. (3)_the landscaping Is enhancCd beyond the planters to be located around the tCIMpp,ray building, and (4) the Issues with the gate and columns is addressers via survey. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 5:05 p.m. pectfully su d, I �'r.Ss' �`- � .:'':gib" :' Z . .� i4`' n � f `7 _�yi�•h �'fii lii--•..L��.�AL.�'eLLf " 37 j�.;_S?..�JY±.. `w�1�.:L.°3.� - .��9 Lf' Marc Steven Mylott, o Ing Planner Date V SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE March 19, 1997 Page 6 of 6 ,! SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 2, 1997' Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, M. Mylott, J. Tonkinson, C. Smith, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, J. Glus. H. Friedman. S. Lufkin, C. Ruiz, F;L Schur, D. Venegas, C. Wonders. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. SPAARC 96-0067 1835 Grant Street Final Proposed addition to Evanston Day Nursery (landmark property). Ms. Ellen Galland presented plans and elevations for a proposed addition to the Evanston Day Nursery. E. Galland stated the plans include one standard parking space and one handicap parking space at the rear of the property. E. Galland stated the Evanston Preservation Commission has already approved the proposal. C. Smith read the Summary of Findings from June 26, 1996, regarding SPAARC 96-0067. A. Alterson stated that he determined that the expansion is a permitted continuation of an existing special use. J Wolinski motioned to approve final site plan and appearance. J. Tonkinson seconded. Discussion: C. Smith asked if lighting is proposed. E. Galland responded no. C. Smith asked if landscaping is proposed. E. Galland stated a new fence and trellis are proposed on the west side of the property. C. Ruiz stated the fence must be approved by the Evanston Preservation Commission. The March 26. 1997 Site Pfan and Appearance Review Committee meeting was canceled. SUMMARY of FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April2, 1997 Page 1 of 8 /i J. Tonkinson stated the property owner must provide drainage for the two proposed paved parking spaces; the drainage cannot be to the unpaved alley. J. Tonkinson stated a MWRD permit will be required. J. Tonkinson stated an alternative is to pitch the parking spaces such that the spaces drain to the subject property. Committee app[Qved the motion_(10-0) to aRorove the final site plan and appearance. J. Tonkinson abstained. SPAARC 95-0109 1307'/a Chicago Avenue Sidewalk Cafe Sidewalk Cafe for New World Bagel, Mr. Tom Woitinner presented a proposed sidewalk cafe for New World Bagel. T. Woitinner stated the plans include two or three tables with four or six seals. C. Smith read the sidewalk cafe requirements as established in the Type II Restaurant Sidewalk Cafe Review form: 1. No alcoholic liquor said on the sidewalk cafe. T. Woitinner stated the sidewalk cafe will comply. 2. Food shall be covered and/or refrigerated. T. Woitinner stated the sidewalk cafe will comply. 3. No food shall be served in disposable containers. T. Woitinner responded stated the sidewalk cafe will comply and displayed samples of the dishware. T. Woitinner stated no waiver to use disposable containers will be requested. 4. Sidewalk cafe shall provide bus service. T. Woitinner stated the sidewalk cafe will comply. 5. Sidewalk cafe tables and chairs shall not be attached to public property. T. Woitinner stated the sidewalk cafe will comply. 6. Sidewalk cafe shall only be open when primary business is open. T. Woitinner stated the sidewalk cafe will comply. 7. Sidewalk cafe shall be delineated by rope or chain. T. Woitinner stated the sidewalk cafe will comply. 8. Sidewalk cafe shall comply with the Evanston Health Department and Public Works Department, including removing litter regardless of its source. T. Woitinner stated the sidewalk cafe will comply. 9 No animals (except seeing -eye dogs) are permitted in the sidewalk cafe. T. Woitinner stated the sidewalk cafe will comply. 10. Sidewalk cafe will not cause a negative cumulative effect. T. Woitinner responded the sidewalk cafe will not as this sidewalk cafe is the first on this block this year. 11. Sidewalk cafe will not cause undue pedestrian or vehicular congestion. T. Woitinner responded the sidewalk cafe will not. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 2. 1997 Page 2 of 8 M. Mylott read the sidewalk regulations and noted that the sidewalk cafe must be 15' from any trees. 12. Sidewalk cafe will not substantially impact adjoining properties. T. Woitinner responded the sidewalk cafe will not. 13. Sidewalk cafe will not affect public health, welfare, or safety. T. Woitinner responded the sidewalk cafe will not. D. Marino motioned to recommended a positive recommendation to the City Council. L. Black seconded. Discussion: J. Tonkinson stated engineering has not reviewed this proposal, and the physical restriction cannot be waived. D. Marino asked P. D'Agostino if 15 feet of clearance from a tree is excessive. P. D'Agostino responded yes, but he was unaware of the City Councif's intent of this requirement. M. Mylott motioned to table this item, until more site information is provided and engineering can sign off on the project. J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee approved the motion (10.1 ) to table this item until more site information is provided and engineering can slgn off. SPAARC 97-0027 2300 Green Bay Road Conference Proposed playground renovations at Kingsley School. Ms. Sheila Lesniowski presented proposed renovations to the Kingsley School playground. The revisions include: Step-up bleachers in a berm, surrounding new baseball and/or soccer fields. Park benches around trees. 3. Prairie garden expansion. Pavilion and new fence. S. Lesniowski asked if the new berms could be configured to help better drain the site. M. Mylott stated she should work with the City Engineer S Lesniowski stated the School is considering sound barriers to reduce traffic noise to permit outdoor teaching, but the School was concerned about crime and graffiti. S. Lesniowski stated the School was considering glass block or Lexan. J. Wolinski stated Lexan has a tendency to yellow. C. Smith stated scratching is a long-term problem. L. Black stated any berms exceeding five feet prohibit good surveillance. A. Alterson stated the Zoning Ordinance restricts any fence height to six feet; however, the Ordinance has no height restriction on open mesh fences. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 2. 1997 Page 3 of 8 H. Friedman stated this site may be an appropriate location to move the cottage planned to be demolished at 530 Dempster Street. S. Lesniowski stated the Issue will be the cost to move the cottage. C. Smith stated the Committee will provide S. Lesnlowski with a contact regarding this issue. SPAARC 97-0026 1900-1980 Dempster Street Concept Renovate Evanston Center. Mr. John Weichart and Mr. David Harvey presented a concept to renovate Evanston Center, located at the southwest corner of Dempster Street and Dodge Avenue. J. Weichart stated the concept was to provide a better anchor and maintain the smaller tenants; more specifically, provide 65,000 sq.ft. for a Dominick's "fresh concept" grocery store, move and reduce the Toy's-R-Us from 45,000 to 30,000 sq.ft., and eliminate Office Max. J. Weichart stated Office Max may decide to stay if the Dominick's is constructed; Office Max could occupy several of the smaller stores on the west side of the shopping center. J. Weichart stated retaining Office Max could create a problem complying with the Zoning Ordinance regarding parking because Dominick's corporate requirements arp five parking spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. J. Weichart explained that demolition may include part of the Office Max; however, demolition plans definitely include Silo (previous tenant) and Toy's-R-Us. C. Smith asked about the condition of the outlots. J. Weichart stated they are attempting to purchase the lease of the Pizza Hut and would prefer to demolish the building; however, such action is not currently in their control. J. Weichart explained that Toy's-R-Us and Fretters (previous tenant) owned their own land. J. Weichart explained that they would consolidate the lots if the purchase is successful. C. Smith asked about site integration, especially architecture. J. Weichart stated they would require facade renovations consistent with the architecture of the new buildings. L. Black stated the northeast corner of the site is a problem; however, the priority is filling this shopping center. D. Marino agreed. D. Marino motioned to approve the concept. J. Wolinski seconded. Committee approved the motion (10- 0) to approve the concept. SPAARC 97-0028 1820 Chicago Avenue Preliminary Addition to Allison Hall (Northwestern University) to expand kitchen and dining area. Mr. Andrew McGonigal presented a proposal to expand the Allison Hall kitchen and dining area at Northwestern University A. McGonigal stated the proposal will increase the "servery" and internal circulation; also, other residence halls without individual dining areas will use a separate dining area in Allison Hall, A. McGonigal stated that the plans depict a handicap elevator; however, an alternative to that item may be a ramp, depending on cost. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 2.1997 Page 4 of 8 C. Smith stated this project had no zoning concems. C. Smith stated final site plan and appearance requires building material samples. M. Mylott stated final site plan and appearance requires a landscape plan. D. Marino motioned to approve the preliminary site plan and appearance. D. Jennings seconded. Committee approved the motion (10-0) to ap rod ve thQ preliminaryy site Ulan and appearance, SPAARC 97-0025 1500 Grant Street Preliminary Replace footbridge at Peter Jans Golf Course. Off -agenda item, originally scheduled for March 19, 1997. Mr. Marty Ross and Ms. Anna Dukes presented plans to replace the footbridge adjacent to the 16th hole of the Meter Jans Golf Course; the new footbridge is proposed to be northeast of the existing footbridge. M. Ross stated the current bridge is used mainly for golfers with carts. M. Ross stated the existing bridge is not wide enough for golf carts, and the existing bridge is old, deteriorated, and cannot be rehabilitated. M. Ross stated the bridge will be 170 feet long with two 15-footr.approaches. M. Ross stated the bridge cross section will be eight -feet high with a centered wood deck. M. Ross stated eight -foot Coreten truces would be anchored in concrete. C. Smith stated Coreten will stain the concrete. M. Ross stated the bridge interior will have rubber ribbing to protect against errant golf carts. M. Ross stated no lights are planned, M, Ross stated Mr, Max Rubin requested better fencing. C. Smith stated the plans should come back with appropriately scaled wood pickets, or investigate a form of mesh. H. Friedman suggested looking at the shop drawings for the location of the guardrail protection. M. Ross stated MWRD has already granted a permanent and temporary construction easement. D. Jennings motioned to approve preliminary site plan and appearance. M. Mylott seconded. Discussion: M. Ross stated the construction requires a 300-ton crane to lift the middle piece. C. Smith stated M. Ross can get a map of truck routes from D. Jennings and work with J. Tonkinson to determine loads. C. Smith stated no work may begin before 7 a.m. M. Ross asked from where utility plans may be acquired. C. Smith stated J. Tonkinson can provide that information. D. Jennings asked if all construction would be on -site and not on the street. M. Ross responded yes. SPAARC 97-0009 530 Dempster Street Addition to multi -tenant commercial building. Final Mr. Steve Bernstein presented information on the architectural history of the existing building at 530 Dempster Street. S. Bernstein stated that a 1988 survey labels the building as brick. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE Apnl 2, 1997 Page 5 of a C. Smith stated that, because the proposal is consistent with existing conditions, the Committee cannot hold up the proposal; matching an existing facade is appropriate. S. Bernstein stated the applicant will provide one parkway tree and one parking meter. C. Smith stated the proposed parkway tree species should match the existing species. A. Alterson Informed S. Bernstein that Kingsley School may be interested in the existing cottage, J. Wolinski motioned to approve the final site plan and preliminary and final appearance. L. Black seconded. Committee approved The motion (10-0) to approve the final site lawn and preliminary and final appearance. SPAARC 97-0029 1034 Chicago Avenue Temporary office forAuloBam (used car dealership). Applicant was not present. SPAARC 97-0013 2427-2523 Oakton Street Final Recommendation to City Council Consider object height within contractors' yards. Off -agenda item, originally heard February 19, 1997. J. Wolinski informed the Committee that Alderman Feldman asked the Committee to evaluate the proposed height of vehicles and materials to be stored within contractors' storage yards at 2427-2523 Oakton Street. Mr. Mark Stringer was available for comment. M. Mylott stated that M. Stringer agreed to plant grass and three trees along the Oakton Street fence. C. Smith stated that a ten -foot high fence was too high. M. Mylott agreed. C. Smith stated that she would prefer to see a fence facade with some relief. A. Alterson recommended a board -on -board ien.e constructed such that 100 percent opacity is retained. D. Marino motioned to recommend requiring a wood board -on -board fence and no vehicles and materials may be visible from the road. J. Wolinski seconded, Discussion: D. Jennings stated that "visible from the road' is too vague. M. Mylott stated that such language would make enforcement very difficult. D. Marino withdrew the motion. J Wolinski withdrew the second. M. Mylott motioned to recommend requiring an eight -foot wood board -on -board fence and no vehicles or materials may exceed a height of ten feet above grade. J Wolinski seconded. Discussion: M. Mylott informed M. Stringer that the special use ordinance will require final site plan approval for the landscaping. C. Smith stated M. Stringer should bring fence plans at that time. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 2. 1997 Page 6 of 8 SPAARC 97-0030 808 Judson Avenue Preliminary Rebuild of 21-unit condominium. Mr. Larry Basil, Mr. Rich Brissette, and Ms. Nancy Cutter presented plans and elevations of a proposed 21-unit condominium; the original 21-unit condominium was destroyed by fire. L. Basil presented photographs of the original building. The plans include matching the existing footprint, but providing; 1. A prairie -stone (buff colored) parking wall. 2. Pilasters around the center windows; the pilasters will be projected to provide shadow lines. 3. A red/brown brick. 4. A traditional cap of Frypon (plastic) material. L. Basil stated the insurance company desires that the plans match the previous building as closely as possible, allowing for changes due to new codes regarding health and safety issues. L, Basil stated the new plans must also comply with new regulations, such as the Fair Housing Act and other accessibility standards. L. Basil stated that all owners agreed on one Improvement -- a better facade. L. Basil stated the key to the project was to appease the insurance company and the owners. M. Mylott stated the applicant was permitted to rebuild any previous nonconformities, provided no new nonconformities were created. A. Alterson asked about the increase in floor area and building lot coverage indicated on the Application for Zoning Analysis. L. Basil staled that, in meeting all the new building codes, some items were made much larger. L. Basil stated the new bump out was the trash shoot; however, it was maintained under the existing canopy. J. Wolinski stated that rebuilding the building as it was previously is not a good idea. N. Cutter stated the insurance company will not pay for items it deems aesthetics J. Wolinski stated he did not intend to put any undue pressure on the condominium association; the point is to build a safe building in terms of current codes. C. Smith suggested grouping the windows. L. Basil stated so doing goes against the owners' expectations of where they have had and wish to maintain windows. L. Basil stated they are investigating architectural grates over the exterior individual air conditioning units; however, the only way to eliminate those units would be a central air conditioning system. L. Basil they are currently investigating whether or not the owners would sacrifice the necessary space for such a feature. C. Smith stated that, given all the design constraints, it may not be worth all the decorative elements if the building is truly a 1950s building. C. Smith stated the better approach may be to improve the original building within the same style. C Smith recommended replacing the colonial cap with a thin cap; using a blond brick; incorporating the brick in the window tnm; and working to eliminate the "punched look" of the air conditioning units H. Friedman agreed. L. Basil stated he and the owners do not want to go back to the blond brick; they SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 2. 1997 Page 7 of 8 prefer a red/brown brick. L. Basil stated he will consider utilizing architectural linear grills for the air conditioning units. M. Mylott recommended popping out the entire center window areas, instead of just the pilasters. A. Alterson stated this may present a new noncompliance. C. Ruiz suggested working with the proportions the pilasters create. L. Basil stated each unit does not have room for a trash room; however, recycling facilities could be place in the central trash room. J. Wolinskl motioned to approve the preliminary site plan and appearance, provided the plans incorporate the Committee's suggestions about the Judson Street facade and noting the Committee strongly disapproves of rebuilding a 1950s building. H. Friedman seconded. Discussion: H. Friedman asked J. Wolinski to remove the note from the recommendation. J. Wolinski amended the motion to state as such: approve the preliminary site plan and appearance, provided the plans incorporate the Committee's suggestions about the Judson Street facade. H. Friedman amended the second to be consistent with the amended motion. Committee approved the motion (7-1) to approve the preliminary site plan and apoearanc% provided -the plans incomorate the Committee's suggestions about the Judson Street facade. Approval of Summary of Findings H. Friedman motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of March 19, 1997. P. D'Agostino seconded. Discussion: P. D'Agostino asked that any reference to the "Evanston Park District" be changed to the "Evanston Parks and Forestry Division". H. Friedman amended the motion to include the revision. P. D'Agostino amended the second to reflect the revision. Committee approved the motion (6-0) IQ approve the_Summaly of Findings of March 19. 1997. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:00 p.m. f e p ctfully submitt Marc Steven Myiott, Zonin lanner SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 2, 1997 Page a of 8 Date SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 9, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: L. Black, B. Fahlstrom, J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, M. Mylott, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, D. Marino, C. Smith. H. Friedman. R. Schur. J. Wolinski (acting chair person) determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of April 2, 1997. H. Friedman seconded. Committee approved thQ Motion (7-01 to approve the Summary of -Findings of April 2. 1997. L. Black abstained. SPAARC 97-0012 2033 Dodge Avenue Preliminary and Final Proposed subdivision and construction of two-story two -flat house. Petitioner did not attend. SPAARC 96-0113 2925 Central Street Sign Recommendation Variation for west -facing wall sign for First Bank & Trust of Evanston. B. Fahlstrom presented a request for sign variation by First Bank & Trust of Evanston for a west -facing wall sign; the sign is proposed for the Cyrus Homes side of the building. B. Fahlstrom stated the sign needs two variations. Also. B. Fahlstrom reported that C. Smith believes the sign may overhang the property line because the proposed sign is a box sign, requiring an easement on the adjacent property. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE Apnl 9. 1997 Page 1 of 3 M. Mylott read the Summary of Findings from March 12, 1997, regarding 2925 Central Street. J. Tonkinson motioned to recommend the Sign Review and Appeals Board deny the west -facing wall sign. L. Black seconded. Committee approved the motion (8&1 to recommend the Sign Review and Aooeals Board deny the west -facing wail sign. SPAARC 97-0031 141 Asbury Avenue Concept Proposed 12-unit condominium, requiring access via an unopened alley. Mr. Michael Silver presented a site plan, survey, and front elevation for a 12-unit condominium. M. Silver stated the land is already zoned for five stories or 50 feet and 16 units; M. Silver is proposing three stories and 12 units with 16 parking spaces. M. Silver stated the condominiums would require access to the proposed parking lot via an unopened, unimproved alley. M. Silver stated he believes two options ars.available: (1) have the City vacate the alley, developer purchase the land, and developer improve and open the alley; or (2) have the City open the alley, developer pay to improve both sides of the alley, and have the City maintain the alley. J. Tonkinson stated he would prefer vacation because the City is no longer responsible for maintenance. D. Jennings stated that if M. Silver purchases the vacated alley, M. Silver would have to provide a 24-foot wide aisle. M. Mylott stated that zoning setbacks are required also. M. Silver stated he would not have enough room to provide the parking spaces, aisles, and setbacks if the City vacated the alley. J. Tonkinson stated the unopened, unimproved alley has no access to Barton Avenue, requiring garbage trucks to back in. M. Silver stated the survey do not depict the cul-de-sac at the end of Dobson Street. M. Mylott asked D. Jennings and J. Tonkinson if a "T" turn around should be provided to eliminate the need to back trucks into the alley. D. Jennings and J. Tonkinson stated such a turn around was not necessary. M. Silver stated he had contacted the alderman and a meeting with the neighbors is being arranged. M. Silver stated he had discussed the plans with (but not shown plans to) the neighbor to the south, and that person seemed favorable and helpful. L Black motioned to grant concept approval D Jennings seconded Discussion: M. Silver reiterated that he would pay to improve both sides of the easttwest alley. L. Black amended the motion as such: grant concept approval, provided adjacent homeowners support the proposal. D. Jennings amended the second to reflect the amended motion. Committgeapproved (he motion (UQ) to avant concept al2groval. provided adjacen homeowners support the proposal. SPAARC 97-0022 2289 Howard Street Proposed World Savings Bank for Evanston Center. Final Ms Carol Ross Barney presented the site plan and elevations of the World Savings Bank. proposed for an outlot of the Evanston Center shopping center C. Ross Barney stated the facade has changed from SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 9 1997 Page 2 of 3 copper to a combination of burnished concrete with graffiti coating (predominant material) and randomly placed rock -face concrete; each concrete piece will be an eight -by -eight Inch square. The columns are a galvanized steel and the facia Is metal panel, as originally proposed. C. Ross Barney stated the sign letters are not illuminated. C. Ross Barney stated the Sign Review and Appeals Board approved the north, east, and west "wall' signs and the free-standing sign (at 15 feet B inches); however, the free-standing sign did r& have to conform with other free-standing signs in the shopping center. J. Wolinski asked if the new material will create less of a contrast between the proposed adjacent blockbuster. C. Ross Barney stated she was unsure due to the varying plans she has seen over time. D. Jennings asked if the rock -face concrete can be graffiti coated as well. C. Ross Barney said no; however, this material will be the significantly lesser of the two. J. Tonkinson motioned to grant final site plan and appearance. L. Black seconded. Discussion: J. Wolinski asked if the landscaping plarlwas available. C. Ross Barney stated the landscaping shown on the site plan is the landscaping proposed. J. Tonkinson stated species and size labels are required. J. Tonkinson amended the motion as such: grant final site plan and appearance, subject to Committee review of the landscape plan. L. Black amended the second to reflect the amended motion. Committep,, a roved the motion (10-0) t!grant final site plan and apl2earance. subject to Committee review of the landscape plan. SPAARC 97-0029 1034 Chicago Avenue Final Temporary building for AutoSarn. Mr. Pat Wolmack stated he did not have the landscape plan to present, as required for final site plan and appearance review. M. Mylott motioned to table final site plan and appearance. J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee approved the motion (8-01 to table final site plan and appearance. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:15 p.m. �`ReLp"ctfully submitte l� Marc Steven Mylott, Zoninkanner Date SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 9, 1997 Page 3 of 3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 16, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Absent: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, J. Glus. H. Friedman C. Ruiz, R. Schur, D. Venegas. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:00 p.m. Off -agenda Item Amend Sidewalk Cafe Regulations. Amendment to City Ordinance D. Jennings presented copies of a proposed amendment to Section 7-2-6 (D) 4c of the City Code, regulating the setback of sidewalk cafes from trees and planters; the amendment would eliminate the required 15-foot setback from various fixed elements, such as trees. D. Jennings stated he discussed this Section with the Health Department, and eating under trees is not a concern of the Health Department. C. Smith stated that, for the three cases before the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee today, the Committee should consider motions that recognize poosible City Council action. SPAARC 97-0017 1743 Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Cafe Recommendation Sidewalk Cafe for Taco Bell, Mr. Barry Edelman from Taco Bell Express presented his application for sidewalk cafe. C. Smith stated the site plan was not drawn to scale, and the layout may cause conflicts with the building's ingress and egress. C. Smith stated the applicant should consider providing a more accurate drawing or SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 16, 1997 Page 1 of 6 eliminating the table and associated chairs nearest the door; at least 12 Inches of clearance should be provided. C. Smith asked the applicant about the anticipated dishware. B. Edelman asked if nondisposable dishware was required. C. Smith stated a waiver may be granted only for beverage containers at the City Council's discretion. B. Edelman stated that he cannot operate with nondisposable dishware being a fast food restaurant. B. Edelman withdrew the application for Type II Restaurant Sidewalk Cafe Review. SPAARC 96-0057 1745 Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Cafe Recommendation Sidewalk Cafe for Einstein Brothers' Sagels. Ms. Laura Fishwild and Mr. Fran Morel of Einstein Brothers' Bagels presented their application for a sidewalk cafe at Einstein Brothers' Bagels. L. Fishwild stated that the tables and chairs would be black - finished wrought iron and stored inside. C. Smith read the sidewalk cafe requirements as established In the Type II Restaurant Sidewalk Cafe Review form; the applicants responded that they would comply with all requirements but wish to appeal for the beverage container waiver. C. Smith informed L. Fishwild and F. Morel about the potential amendment to the sidewalk cafe regulations. A. Alterson motioned to recommend the City Council deny the sidewalk cafe application, unless the City Council eliminates the 15-foot setback requirement. M. Mylott seconded. Discussion: D. Marino stated the recommendation should be for approval rather than denial. M. Mylott stated the site plan did not provide sufficient detail to determine all setbacks would be met. C. Smith stated the issue is to maintain 5 feet clearance, and she was not concerned that clearance would be a problem; however, the drawings were not accurate. D. Marino motioned to recommend the City Council approve the sidewalk cafe application, provided the City Council eliminates the 15-foot setback requirement. D. Jennings seconded. Committee approved the motion (5-2) to recommend the ON Council approve the sidewalk cafe application, provided the Citv Cow eliminates the 15-foot setback requirement. F. Morel asked if the north side of the sidewalk cafe could be set up as no objects on that side will be affected by the 15-foot requirement. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE Apni 16, 1997 Page 2 of 6 D. Marino motioned to recommend the City Council approve the north side of the sidewalk cafe application. L. Black seconded. Committee approved the motion (6-1) to recommend the City Council approve the north side of the sidewalk cafe application. SPAARC 95-0109 1307% Chicago Avenue Sidewalk Cafe Recommendation Sidewalk Cale for New World Bagel. T. Waltinner presented his refined application for a sidewalk cafe at New World Bagel. L. Black motioned to recommend the City Council approve the sidewalk cafe application based on the April 2, 1997 Summary of Findings regarding this case, provided the City Council eliminates the 15-foot setback requirement. D. Marino seconded. Discussion: C. Smith informed T. Woitinner about the potential amendment to the sidewalk cafe regulations. based on the A 15-foot setbac! SPAARC 97-0012 2033-2036 Dodge Avenue Final Two -lot subdivision and construction of new residence. This case was Inadvertently placed on the agenda. Preliminary site plan and appearance approval has yet to be granted. SPAARC 96-0088 2201 Oakton Street (Speculative Building) Preliminary Speculative building for small outlot at 2201 Oakton Street. Mr. Doug Bean presented a survey, site plan, and elevations for a speculative building for the small outlot at Home Depot (2201 Oakton Street). A. Alterson informed D. Bean and the Committee that any development in the oRD District requires a planned development. A. Alterson stated a planned development requires an appearance before the Site Man and Appearance Review Committee with the respective alderman and Plan Commission chairperson. M. Mylott recommended D. Bean review the requirements for the planned development. M. Mylott stated the zoning limitations on Type 11 restaurants and the remedial options are a map or text amendment. D. Bean stated no freestanding Type II restaurants are proposed, rather his company is "talking with" Baskin Robbins and a deli. D. Bean stated these users are "driving the project economically". A. Alterson stated the property must be subdivided from the larger parcel. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 16. 1997 Page 3 of 6 C. Smith asked if the site plan has changed. D. Bean responded the site plan has not changed. A. Alterson stated any setback problems may be remedied in the planned development. C. Smith asked If the building elevation was lower. D. Bean responded the building elevation was lower to ensure the signage would meet the sign ordinance height requirement. D. Sean stated signage could also be placed on the awnings. C. Smith stated the development will require a Unified Business Center Sign Plan. C. Ruiz stated D. Bean should inform potential tenants about the limitations within the Sign Plan. D. Bean stated all such limitations are included in their standard agreement. A. Alterson stated D. Bean should anticipate that signage will be a required component of the planned development. M. Mylott stated any sign limitations will have more "weight" if included In the planned development rather than a Sign Plan because the requirements of the planned development cannot be varied without applying for an amendment to the planned development. D. Jennings asked about the anticipated landscaping. D. Bean stated additional landscaping beyond that on site will be provided. M. Mylott stated the Committee can review the landscaping during final approval. A. Alterson stated D. Bean should anticipate that landscaping will be a required component of the planned development. C. Smith stated she would like to see more face brick on the front but recognized the economics of the project. M. Mylott stated D. Bean will need to provide proof of ownership or a letter from the property owner granting permission to bring the application for planned development; if D. Bean is not the property owner, the application must also Include proof of ownership from the individual or group writing the permission letter. D. Bean stated the green diamonds shown on the elevations are back -lit lights. L. Black motioned to grant preliminary site plan and appearance. M. Mylott seconded. Discussion: C. Smith stated a landscape plan, a photometric plan, and building material samples are required for final site plan and appearance approval. Committee aoRroved the motion (0-0) to grant nreliminary site plan and appearance. SPAARC 97-0029 1034 Chicago Avenue Condition of Final Landscape plan for temporary building at AutoBarn. Mr. Pat Wolmack presented the landscape plan for the temporary building at 1034 Chicago Avenue; the plan included: 1. Railroad ties along the west property line (railroad embankment). 2. Planter boxes along each side of the stairs. 3. A planter box on the north side of the door. 4. A triangular planter box (perpendicular sides 16' each) at the northeast corner of the site. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 16, 1997 Page 4 of 6 P. Wolmack stated the previous owner also had four portable planter boxes. C. Smith stated these should be utilized and placed as close as possible to the public right-of-way. P. D'Agostino cautioned P. Wolmack about using railroad ties for planter boxes as the creasote is harmful to plants. C. Smith suggested wolminize instead. D. Marino motioned to approve the landscape plan in accordance with the conditionary final approval of March 19. 1997. P. D'Agostino seconded. Discussion: P. Wolmack stated "I will not put up flags on cars on my lots." SPAARC 92-0046 2169 Sheridan Road Preliminary Additions to Allen Center at Northwestern University. Mr. Jim Koolish and Mr. Steven Johnson presented a site plan and elevations for an addition to the Allen Center at 2169 Sheridan Road; the proposal included: 1. Infilling an old lobby at the southwest bend in the existing building. 2. Eliminating the existing driveway. 3. Providing a dining room (for approximately 100 people) on the first floor. 4. Providing two classrooms (approximately 110 total seats) and three group study rooms on the second floor. 5. Landscaping the two exterior courtyards. 6. Matching the existing exterior materials of Indiana limestone (buff colored) with punched windows. The first floor will be a glass curtain wail. D. Marino motioned to grant preliminary site plan and appearance approval. D. Jennings seconded. Discussion: C. Ruiz questioned the proposed spacing of windows in relation to the existing spacing. J. Koolish stated he will work to get back the vertical emphasis of the windows found in the original design. C. Smith stated a landscape plan, a photometric plan, and building material samples are required for final site plan and appearance approval. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 16. 1997 Page 5 of 6 SPAARC 97-0028 1820 Chicago Avenue Final Additions to Allison Hall at Northwestern University. The applicant did not attend. Approval of Summary of Findings K. Kelly stated he was did not attend the meeting, contrary to the list of "Members Present". D. Jennings motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of April 9, 1997 with correction. L. Black seconded. Committee approved the motion (7-01 to approve the Summary of Findings of April 2. 1997 with correction. Adjoumment The meeting adjourned at 4:40 p.m. Ron ectfuliy submitt, Marc Steven Mylott, Zo Planner ate SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 16, 1997 Pape 6 or 6 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 23, '1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, P. D`Agostino, B. Fahlstrom, D. Jennings, D. Marino, M. Mylott, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, L. Black, J. Glus, K. Kelly, C. Smith. H. Friedman. C. Bush, C. Ruiz, D. Venegas. A. Alterson (acting as chair person) determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. SPAARC 97-0032 2021 Lee Street Campus expansion for CE Niehoff & Co. Preliminary Mr. George Buhrfeind, Mr. Richard Abram, and Mr. Charles Adams presented site plans, elevations, and photographs of existing conditions for 2021 Lee Street. G. Buhrfeind stated CE Niehoff & Co is attempting to acquire the former Globe Poster property (to the west, across Grey Avenue) and approximately 15,000 sq.ft. from the parcel to the north of the former Globe poster property to expand the CE Niehoff & Co campus. G. Buhrfeind stated the only construction would be a link between the two buildings, a new loading dock at the former Globe Poster building, and site improvements, including new parking lots and driveways. G. Buhrfeind stated the project would require vacating a portion of Grey Avenue, and permitting some access across the unopened, unimproved Lee Street right-of-way. G. Buhrfeind stated the access across Lee Street would permit routing the majority of the company's truck traffic away from residences. G. Buhrfeind stated CE Niehoff & Co is committed to preventing cut -through traffic and close any link east along Lee Street if cut -through traffic became a problem, CE Niehoff & Co would be receptive to gating the eastern access to Lee Street to limit problems R Abram stated the proposed link would be curtain wails over a clear span between the two existing buildings. R Abram stated the clear span would be approximately 20'. R. Abram stated he could design an area in which the walls could be removed to permit easy access to utilities that would remain in the vacated portion of Grey Avenue. D. Jennings slated the first choice is to abandon those street tight cables; the second choice is to ensure access is provided to them via steel conduit. R. Abram stated no SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 23, 1997 Page 1 of 5 production would occur or equipment would be stored in the proposed link; its purpose is to provide weather - protected transportation area between the two existing buildings and possible an area to place luncheon tables. A. Alterson stated G. Buhrfeind should work with Mr. Frank Aguado to eliminate or reduce the zoning concerns. A. Alterson stated the Zoning Division must determine that the 15,000 sq.ft. from the parcel to the north is not providing (or available to provide) parking for the current user if that user Is deficient. D. Marino stated the City often receives complaints about illegal dumping along the former railroad right-of- way, and the proposed connection along Lee Street is a creative solution to Industriallnelghborhood conflicts. J. Tonkinson stated the City would like to see: 1. the north curb line of Lee Street (in the area south of the proposed link) extended, and the south portion of Grey Avenue turned Into a driveway, eliminating the wide turning radii; 2. a cul-de-sac on the southern end of the portion of Grey Avenue north of the proposed link; 3. that portion of Lee Street coinciding with the old railroad right-of-way vacated; and 4. a barrier keeping vehicles accessing the landscaping firm from traveling east on Lee Street maintained. R. Abram stated vacating Lee Street is acceptable. G. Buhrfelnd stated gating the parking lot access to Lee Street seems most appropriate. D. Marino motioned to grant preliminary site plan and appearance approval. J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee gR rl-ethe_motion_(9-0f to grant preliminary Site -clan and ap eo arance. SPAARC 97-0025 1500 Grant Street Final Replace footbridge at Peter Jans Golf Course. Mr. Max Rubin and Ms. Anna Dukes presented construction plans for the footbridge at Peter Jans Golf Course. M. Rubin stated the only change is the new picket design -- vertical pickets to discourage children from climbing over or upon the bridge wait. J. Tonkinson recommended M. Rubin and A. Dukes locate all utilities prior to bringing the crane on site. D. Jennings recommended M. Rubin and A. Dukes check viaduct clearances. J. Wolinski motioned to grant final approval. J. Tonkinson seconded. Discussion: M. Mylott asked the motion to be amended to include the provision that any trees destroyed or damaged during construction will be replaced. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE Apn1 23. 1997 Page 2 of 5 J. Wolinski amended the motion as such: grant final approval, provided any trees damaged or destroyed during construction shall be replaced by the applicant. J. Tonkinson amended the second to be consistent with the amended motion. Discussion: M. Rubin stated no lighting is proposed with this project, and the grade will be returned to the condition prior to construction. SPAARC 97-0028 1820 Chicago Avenue Final Addition to Allison Halt (Northwestern University) to expand kitchen and dining area. Mr. Andrew McGonigle presented the landscape plans and building samples for Allison Hail at 1820 Chicago Avenue. A. McGonigle stated that the samples includq low-e insulated glass curtain wall panel with natural anodized finish aluminum; at construction, the aluminum may be white rather than natural finish. A. Alterson read the April 2, 1997 Summary of Findings, regarding this case. M. Mylott stated the landscape plan must detail species and size of proposed materials). M. Mylott asked A. McGonigle to provide the file with a loose copy of the elevations and isometrics. A. McGonigle stated he would provide that document. J. Tonkinson stated he had not approved any exterior lighting plan. A. McGonigle stated, at this point, the client is unsure if accessibility will be provided via a lift or ramp; the ramp appears to be the more cost-effective option. M. Mylott motioned to grant final site plan and appearance approval, regardless of whether the final aluminum color is white or natural, regardless of whether the accessibility is accomplished via a lift or ramp, provided P. D'Agostino review and approve a final landscape plan that includes size and species of proposed plant material, and provided J. Tonkinson review and approve a photometic plan. J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee_ approved the motion (8-0) _to grant final site plan and appearance approval, regardless of whether the final aluminum color is white or natural. regardless of whether the accessibility is accom lip shed via a lift or ramp_orovided P. D'6goslino review and approve a final landscape plan that includes size and specic5 of propgsed plant material. and orovided J. Tonkinson review and aoQrave a photometric elan. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 23, 1997 Page 3 of 5 SPAARC 92-0023 2813 Central Street Preliminary Wood deck for Alorthshore Lawn Equipment, Inc. Mr. William Hemesath presented a site plan for a wood deck for Northshore Lawn Equipment, Inc. W. Hemesath stated the entire deck will not exceed T above grade. A. Alterson stated that, by definition, outdoor storage means leaving materials, supplies, etc. outdoors for more than 24 hours; the owner of this business could use this deck to display merchandise, provided the merchandise was taken indoors at the close of business. M. Mylott stated W. Hemesath should bring site photographs, plans and elevations for the intended signage, landscape plans (species and size specific), and photomertic plans at his next Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee meeting. H. Friedman asked W. Hemesath to bring elevations of the deck to the next Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee meeting. B. Fahlstrom recommended W. Hemesath review the sections of the Sign Code pertaining to free-standing signs. D. Marino and J. Tonkinson recommended W. Hemesath review the plans with the Fire Department. •r W. Hemesath asked if a gazebo would be permitted in the center of the deck. M. Mylott stated gazebos are only permitted in residential districts. B. Fahlstrom stated any change of material only permits a W change In height. D. Jennings motioned to grant preliminary approval, provided the applicant (1) provides all requested materials during final site plan and appearance review, (2) provides proof of review from the Fire Department, (3) meets all applicable City ordinances. M. Mylott seconded. Committee approved the motion (8-0) to gran preliminary approval. provided the an licant (1) provides all requested materials during final site plan and appearance review. (2) provides proof of review from the Fire Department, (Z1 meets a11aplip cable City ordinances. SPAARC 97-0033 2415 McDaniel Avenue Preliminary and Final Addition to single-family house requiring major variation. A. Alterson presented site plans and elevations for second -story addition to a single-family house at 241 McDaniel Avenue. D. Marino motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance approval. P. D'Agostino seconded. Discussion. J. Tonkinson asked if the neighbors had commented on the project. A. Alterson stated the neighbor to the south had some concerns, but no objections. A. Alterson stated that he had heard that the building division has a problem with the proposed fire -wall rating given the addition's proximity to a lot line. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 23, 1997 Page 4 of 5 Off -agenda Item Amend Sidewalk Cafe Regulations. Amendment to City Ordinance D. Jennings reported that the proposed amendments to the Sidewalk Cafe Regulations will be addressed by the City Council at the April 28,1997 meeting. Off -agenda Item 530 Dempster Street Provision of Previous Approval Addition to multi -tenant commercial building. C. Ruiz reported that the City could not rind a means to accommodate relocating the existing cottage within City property. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonklnson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of April 18, 1997. D. Marino seconded. QQmmittee apprgved the motion (8-O) to approve the _Summary of Findings of April 18 1997 with corrg gtion. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:25 p.m. er I.". ate SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE Apn123. 1997 Page 5 of 5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 30, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, L. Black, J. Glus. H. Friedman. C. Ruiz, R. Schur, D. Venegas, C. Wonders. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:10 p.m. PVC (Plastic) Fencing Recommendation to Plan Commission Proposed amendment from Plan Commission Zoning Committee to include PVC as a permitted fence material. Ms. Doraine Anderson presented answers to the outstanding questions of the March 19, 1997 Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee meeting. Also, Mr. Ed Levine of Tru-Link was available to answer questions about fence installations. D. Anderson stated fading was not an issue in Boca Raton, FL; however, the primary colors used there are white and almond D Anderson stated that winter "heaving" is overcome by sinking the footings below the frost line. D. Anderson stated that animals do not chew on or through PVC fences, and horses do not "crib" on PVC fences. E. Levine stated animals are more likely to chew on wood. D. Marino asked where PVC fences are being installed. E. Levine stated approximately 75 percent of PVC fences are being installed at single-family houses. E. Levine stated that the majority of PVC installations are rail fences; however, many installations are solid and picket. E. Levine stated his company is seeing an " increasing desire for this product." C. Smith asked about the cost as compared to standard materials. E. Levine stated that PVC fences are approximately 2 '/. times more expensive than traditional materials. T Wolinski asked why customers select PVC. E. Levine stated customers select PVC because of its low maintenance and longevity; wood has a life span of approximately 15 to 16 years, while PVC can last between 30 and 50 years. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE Aptd 30, 1997 Page 1 of 6 C. Smith stated she has seen so many fences around the City that are outdated and could benefit from this characteristics. H. Friedman and J. Tonkinson stated such an issue is one for property maintenance. D. Jennings stated he is no longer concerned about graffiti, considering an epoxy paint is available. J. Tonkinson asked about the difficulty in replacing a post or section after said item moves. E. Levine state the sections are jointed and easily reassembled, much like any other fence type. M. Myiott asked if PVC fences require any additional installation requirements, specifically depth of footings. E. Levine stated PVC fences are installed to the same specifications as any other fence type. C. Smith stated that some designs appearing in the brochures (on file in the Zoning Department) are quite attractive, and, if the homeowners desire PVC fences, she had no objections. E. Levine stated he has received very positive reactions to his company's installations. H. Friedman asked if D. Anderson intended to keep PVC fences out of the historic district. D. Anderson stated that this amendment was in no way an attempt to override the Preservation Commission. M. Mylott stated that the Preservation Commission has the authority to prohibit a fence material, even if the Zoning Ordinance permits that material. C. Ruiz stated that his concern was the irregular boundaries of the historic districts, and he is concerned with preserving the character of the entire City. C. Ruiz stated that the City has two other areas (along Lincoln Street and northeast Evanston) that have the characteristics of and could become districts, and PVC fences could impede that opportunity. C. Ruiz stated that, during his work with the Preservation Commission, no person has ever requested PVC as a fence material. C. Smith stated that, for the most part, the Zoning Ordinance prohibits fences in the required front and street yards. J. Wolinski stated that, as head of property maintenance, a majority of alley fences are not in very good condition. J. Wolinski stated that the cost of PVC fencing will be prohibitive to many applicants. J. Wolinski stated that he may consider requiring "long-term fences" in certain areas. J. Wolinski stated he did not believe PVC fences were appropriate in the historic districts. J. Wolinski motioned to recommend the Plan Commission include PVC as a permitted material in residential districts, provided such material is prohibited in the historic districts. A. Alterson seconded. Discussion: A. Alterson asked J. Wolinski if he wished to also include landmarks. J. Wolinski amended the motion as such: recommend the Plan Commission include PVC as a permitted material in residential districts, provided such material is prohibited in the historic districts and when associated with landmark buildings and properties. A. Alterson amended the second to be consistent with the amended motion. A. Alterson stated that an applicant could request a variation to the fence materials section, and, if granted, erect a PVC fence 0. Marino asked A. Alterson who had the review authority on fence variations. A. Alterson responded the Zoning Administrator is the final authority on fence variations outside of the historic districts and landmark buildings and properties. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 30, 1997 Page 2 or 6 J. Tonkinson stated he would not like to have a PVC fence next to his house, and he believes temperature "cycles" (extreme and quick changes in temperature) are dangerous to installations of PVC fences. SPAARC 96-0103 2925 Central Street Revision to Final Canopy revision to original rnal approval (March 12, 1997) for First Bank & Trust of Evanston. Mr. Joe Behles presented an update to his investigation Into the possibilities of removing the existing canopy and returning the front facade closer to its original condition, Mr. Robert Yohanan of the First Bank & Trust of Evanston was available for questions. J. Behles stated First Bank & Trust of Evanston would like to remove the existing canopy; his investigation revealed the facade under the canopy (from the limestone trim to the top of the parapet) is a red modular face brick with colored mortar, virtually identical to that found across the street (south). J. Behles stated that, on the east side, a limestone wrap extends around the corner approximately 12 feet; on the west side, a limestone wrap extends approximately eight to ten inches. J. Behles stated that any anchors for the existing canopy would be removed. C. Smith stated J. Behles must amend the current permit by either (1) providing demolition drawings, or (2) providing a letter that describes the scope of work. M. Mylott motioned to revise the original final site plan and appearance approval to include removing the existing canopy, provided appropriate documentation is filed with the Building Division. J. Wallnskl seconded. Committee approved the moSion 110-0) to revise the original final site nlan and appearance approval to include removing the existing canopy. pLQvided appropriate documentation is filed with the Blilding Division. SPAARC 97-0033 1201-1215 Dodge Avenue Proposal to construct 12 townhouses on a vacant lot. Concept Mr. Bob Horner, Mr. Ibrahim Shihadeh, and Mr. Marton Sass presented a site plan depicting 12 townhouses (single-family attached dwellings) at 1201-1215 Dodge Avenue. B. Homer stated the property was under contract, and the developers were evaluating feasibility. B. Horner stated he had met with a local community group and the ward alderman and received " . favorable input." B. Horner staled dwelling units will range between 1,600 and 1,800 sq.ft. and have a two -car garage. M. Sass presented the site plan components, including: Two rows of six units, aligned perpendicular to Dodge Avenue. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 30. 1997 Page 3 of 6 2. An interior court yard with private patios for each unit. 3. Crain Street access for all units within the southern building; alley access to all units within the northern building. The six curb cuts on Crain Street are single -car width, expanding in width as the distance to the two -car garage decreases. 4. A hedge row along the northern property line. 5. A fence at the western end of the courtyard (M. Sass stated that the variation required for the current location can be eliminated as the fence may be moved to conform with the Zoning Ordinance). A. Alterson stated the Zoning Ordinance requires each dwelling unit to have frontage along a public street, and the current proposal would need a variation from the Zoning Ordinance. B. Homer stated that he would "walk away" from the project if that standard was required, because he cannot sell units in an "L" building with frontage on Dodge Avenue and Crain Street. B. Horner stated he will discuss the situation with the seller. B. Homer stated that, if he decides to pursue the variation, he will ask the seller to reduce the purchase price and extend the contingency period. C. Smith stated she had no particular problems with the proposed rear yard setback; when C. Smith asked Committee members for any Concems, no one responded. C. Smith stated the frequency of curb cuts on Crain Street is controversial because of the pedestrian interruption. B. Horner stated the six driveways cannot be combined into three driveways without reducing the two -car garages to one -car garages. J. Tonkinson stated he does not like garages facing a residential street. C. Smith stated that interior parking with pavers is an attractive option; parking at the exterior (as proposed) is at the sacrifice of the neighbors. C. Smith stated that, because this design is very internal oriented, it appears to "... turn its back on the neighborhood." D. Marino stated he agreed; however, this site has unique characteristics, and tradeoffs such as an internal arrangement may be necessary. D. Marino stated he doubted whether an alternative that located parking underneath would be economically feasible. B. Horner stated underground parking would add approximately $25,000 to each unit. M. Sass stated internal parking would destroy any courtyard. M. Mylott stated he agreed with C. Smith's statements regarding neighborhood planning; however, a strong architectural statement and attention to detail may offset the site plan's deficiencies. M. Mylott stated he will be looking for the building design to alleviate the Committee's concerns with the site plan. C. Ruiz stated he agreed with M. Mylott; the developer may also employ additional landscaping to make the street pedestrian friendly. C. Smith stated she agreed with M. Mylott; the developer should use the architecture to address the street rather than appear as though the building is turning its back to the street. M. Sass stated single -car garage doors will help achieve these goals. M. Sass presented the original site plan which rotated the two buildings 90 degrees. M. Sass stated the two buildings were situated as presented in the revised plans at the ward alderman's request, due to concerns of traffic on Dodge Avenue D Jennings agreed with this request. B. Horner stated he would prefer to establish fee -simple ownership; however, he will do condominiums if he cannot make the individual lots work J Wolinski asked about the expected price. B. Horner stated the expected selling price is approximately $190,000. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 30. 1997 Page 4 of 6 D. Jennings stated the City requires 24 feet clear distance to back out of the garage (90 degree stall); In the southeastem comer, the developer is nine feet short. J. Wolinski stated elevations are necessary to evaluate this proposal. M. Mylott motioned to table this item. J. Tonkinson seconded. Discussion: C. Ruiz suggested the developer acquire a copy of the design guidelines as he prepares the elevations. C. Smith stated she will mail a copy of the design guidelines to the applicant tomorrow. D. Marino asked the motion to be amended so that it encouraged the developers to return with additional information. M. Mylott amended the motion as such: table this item and encourage the developer to return with additional information. J. Tonkinson amended the second to reflect the amended motion. SPAARC 95-0097 1700 Sherman Avenue Sidewalk cafe for St. Louis Bread Company. Sidewalk Cafe Mr. Jeff Nave of the St. Louis Bread Company presented a site plan and photographs for a sidewalk cafe (nine tables and 30 chairs maximum within approximately 280 sq.ft.) along Sherman Avenue. C. Smith read the sidewalk cafe requirements as established in the Type II Restaurant Sidewalk Cafe Review form; J. Nave responded that St. Louis Bread Company would comply with all requirements but wish to appeal for the beverage container waiver. J. Tonkinson motioned to recommend the City Council approve the sidewalk cafe application. P. D'Agostino seconded. Discussion: C. Smith informed J. Nave about the potential amendmt'nt to the sidewalk cafe regulations. J. Tonkinson amended the motion as such: recommend the City Council approve the sidewalk cafe application, provided the City Council eliminates the 15-foot setback requirement. P. D'Agostino amended the motion to be consistent with the amended motion. •Illl l-- ••�■ :Ti 1- 1 . •1 : 1 a - •1111"1■ 1- • 1 _■• . •-, .■• •1 ■ • • • •uncil eliminakg5-tbe 15-foot setback■ tl 1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 30, 1997 Page 5 of 6 Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of April 23, 1997. P. D'Agostino seconded. Committee approved the motion (8-0) to approve the qummaU of Findings of April 23, 1997. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m. e ectfully submitte Marc Steven Mylott, Zoning fanner SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE April 30, 1997 Page 6 of 6 _r Date F0 e SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 7, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, M. Myiott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, J. Glus. H. Friedman. C. Ruiz, R. Schur, D. Venegas, C. Wonders. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of April 30, 1997, H. Friedman seconded. Committee approved the motion (8-0) to approve the SuComary of Findings of April 23, 1997. L. Black abstained. SPAARC 96-0033 900 Dodge Avenue Proposed Walgreens' sign variations. Sign Recommendation C. Smith presented the sign variation application for Walgreens at 900 Dodge Avenue, C. Smith stated that the variations requested include (1) a height of 17'6" on the east and south elevations, and (2) an increase in sign area permitted on east elevation to permit the words, "DRIVE-THRU PHARMACY". C. Smith presented the free-standing sign for information purposes only as it is permitted by right. C. Smith stated illuminated channel letter on a masonry background would be more appropriate for the free- standing sign J Wolinskl motioned to recommend that the Sign Review and Appeals Board approve the height variation and permit the words "DRIVE-THRU PHARMACY", provided the applicant remove the words "PHARMACY" and "1-HOUR PHOTO" from the east and south elevations and the applicant remove the mortar and pestle graphic from the free-standing sign. J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee approved the motion 11-01 to recommend that the Sian Review and Appeals Board approve the heiahl variation and permit the wards "DRIVE-THRU PHARMACY". provided the applicant remove the words "PHARMACY" and "1- SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 7, 1997 Page 1 of 5 ■ O:��r 1 ■ Il l : . 1 • • 1 - • 1 - ! +�tl . . • • . 1 " 11 • 1 a tl • 1 . 1 • • - . • C • t [•11 l� ,1+ 1+ +1 A. Alterson motioned to not permit a free-standing sign at this site, given the Site Plan & Appearance Review Ordinance (Section 4-17-2 (A) 1) provides Committee review of all new structures, M. Mylott seconded. Committee failed to approve the motion f5-61 to not permit a free-standing. Sign at this site. given the Site Plan & Appearance Review Ordinance (Seglion 4-17-2 (A) 1) provides Committee review of.all new 5tructu es, SPAARC 93-0012 750 Chicago Avenue Preliminary and Final Outdoor canopy for patio at Salsa Borracha. Mr. Aurelio Juarez presented site plans, elevations, and photographs to support his request to erect a wood canopy In the southeast comer (within the walls) of his outdoor patio at Salsa Borracha. A. Juarez stated the area is approximately 16 feet by 16 feet and will be finished as natural wood. C. Smith stated the canopy should be painted, rather than introducing an additional material of exposed wood. D. Marino disagreed. J. Wolinski stated he believed this project has zoning issues, based on previous similar applications. J. Tonkinson motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance approval. H. Friedman seconded. Committee agoroved the motion (L) to grant rel2 imiagU and final site plan and appearance approval. J. Wolinski abstained. D. Marino stated A. Juarez should work with the public arts coordinator for a solution Involving a mural to the graffiti problems on the CTA embankment. SPAARC 96-0076 1603 Orrington Avenue Revision to Previous Final Approval First Chicago Bank south plaza. Mr. Steven Yas, Mr. Dave Brannigan, and Mr. Jeff Clark presented a site plan to revise the previously approved southern plaza of the First Chicago Building at 1603 Orrington Avenue. Also, S. Yas presented material samples (darker feature brick and lighter infill brick to match existing metal edging); the materials are the same as those proposed for the north plaza. S. Yas presented an alternative (Option A) to the base bid package that removed part of an existing wall in the southwest corner of the site " to create a more open feeling." S. Yas stated that this option would require moving the revolving door from the west side to the south side in alignment with the row of trees. C. Smith stated the base bid does not respond to the corner, and she prefers Option A. M. Mylott asked about the proposed fighting. S. Yas stated the plan includes the same lighting types as the northern plaza -- uplighting for the tree canopy and lights set in to the walls. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 7, 1997 Page 2 of 5 + A. Alterson motioned to approve the revision to the previous final approval, provided the plans Include the southwest corner stairs of Option A, the landscaping of either Option A or B, and J. Tonkinson reviews and approves a photometric plan. M. Mylott seconded. Committee approved the motion (11-0) to approve the revision to the previous final a rR royal.provided the plans include the southwest comer stairs of Qption A. the landscaping of either Option A or Q. and J. Tonkinson reviews and approves a photometric plan. Plans have been placed In the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee file, illustrating Option A and B. SPAARC 94-0106 2201 Oakton Street Proposed Petsmart in the Home Depot shopping center. Concept Mr. Carl Frontera and Mr. Ed Agustin discussed plans for a proposed Petsmart to the east of the existing Home Depot; plans and elevations were limited to 8 % x 11 reproductions. C. Frontera stated Petsmart has an agreement to purchase Lot 2 of the proposed subdivision from Home Depot. A. Alterson stated that original zoning analysis was based on Lot 2 aN Lot 3 of the proposed subdivision, and this Issue should be clarified by providing larger and more legible documentation. C. Frontera stated he was told that this development had received previous approvals from the City. D. Marino stated that that was not true; the redevelopment agreement for this site included an attached site plan noting a junior anchor, but the development is subject to compliance with the Zoning Ordinance, C. Smith stated she had concerns with the proposed height and could not determine what materials were proposed. C. Frontera stated the materials consist of a split -face block (painted) and an EFIS system or stucco. C. Smith stated the building should provide additional locations for windows, more masonry, less stucco, and better reflect the massing and scale of the building. M. Mylott agreed and stated the typical suburban -highway big -box use is not appropriate in this location due to its proximity to residential uses to the east, if the applicant has limits, extra architectural efforts should be targeted on the east and south facades. A. Alterson stated that a planned development application (required in this instance) requires an appearance before the Committee with the Plan Commission chairperson and ward alderman. C. Smith informed C. Frontera that he should provide a complete site plan, including trash storage location and all means of ingress and egress. D. Marino stated no trucks may enter via or exit to Hartrey Avenue. A. Alterson motioned to grant concept approval of the site plan only. D. Marino seconded. Committee approved the motion (11-0) to grant concept agproyal of the site plan only. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 7, 1997 Page 3 of 5 SPAARC 97-0034 1900 Sheridan Road Preliminary and Final Recreation field redevelopment at Northwestern University (Lakefront). Mr. Gabor Zsolnay, Mr. Ron Nayer, and Paul Wiese presented site plans and photographs of the existing conditions to support the University's request to add an astro-turf field hockey and Informal grassed recreation field at the lakefront near the existing soccer field. P. Wiese stated other components Include: 1. No change to the south -end landscaping or trails. 2. An increase of 60 to 65 parking spaces to approximately 230 total. 3. Small permanent pads for temporary bleachers. Approximately 6 light poles for the field hockey field, light poles for the new parking, and security lighting. 5. Brown four -foot cyclone fence around the field hockey and soccer fields; In areas near the field hockey goals, the fence may be ten feet. 6. Relocate smaller trees to south end of informal recreation field, also add new plantings; the area between the parking lot and field hockey and soccer fields will contain approximately three- to four - foot berms with landscaping. J. Tonkinson motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance approval, waiving the review of the landscaping plan and photometric plan. L. Black seconded. Committee approved the motion (10.0) to grant the preliminary and final site plan and appearance approval waiving the review of the land5ca2na Ulan and photometric plan. Off -agenda Item Free-standing Signs Discussion of whether to extend Committee review to include free-standing signs. A. Alterson stated he believed reviewing free-standing signs is fully appropriate with the Committee's charge. A. Alterson stated that, as a general rule, increasing the Committee's work load or slowing the development process is something he actively seeks to avoid; however, free-standing signs are a very important component of a development's impact. L. Black stated she did not want to add another layer to the development process. J Tonkinson stated that this action is what the Committee is about, no one else is reviewing these signs for appearance M. Mylott stated that the Committee spends many hours improving the quality of the site plans and building appearance, and this work is jeopardized by inappropriate signage (scale and appearance). M. Mylott stated that the Site Plan and Appearance Review Ordinance states the Committee should be reviewing any modification to the exterior of an existing structure (except single-family houses). SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 7, 1997 Page 4 of 5 H. Friedman, J. Tonkinson, C. Smith, A. Alterson, D. Jennings, and M. Mylott discussed whether or not the Committee should approve or deny free-standing signs as any other project, or serve as an advisory/recommending body to a decision -making body. D. Marino motioned to table this discussion. L. Black seconded. Committee approved the motion (11-0) to table this discussion. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m. ectfully sub 11097 Marc Steven Mylott, Zo Ing Planner Date SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 7, 1997 Page 5 of 5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 14, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: J. Aiello, J. Glus, K. Kelly, D. Marino, J. Tonkinson. Design Professional! Absent: H. Friedman. Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz. .j Commencement C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:00 p,m. Approval of Summary of Findings D. Jennings motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of May 7, 1997. J. Wolinski seconded. Committee �porove I thg motion f7-01to approve the Summary of Findings of May 7__1997. SPAARC 97-0013 2427-2523 Oakton Street Condition of Special Use Landscape and fence plan for contractor's storage yard. Mr. Mark Stringer presented a landscape plan and picture of the proposed fence type for the contractor's storage yard at 2427 to 2523 Oakton Street; the landscape plan proposes sod (covering at least all land within Evanston) and three trees to be planted along Oakton Street. M. Stringer stated that the fence type is a board/batten (solid top). The Committee determined that permitting the fence posts at 87' was within the intent of the special use ordinance and would provide additional asthetic value to the area. J Wolinski motioned to approve the landscape and fence plan, satisfying the conditions of the special use ordinance and recommendation to City Council (April 2, 1997 SPAARC meeting). D. Jennings seconded. Committee approved the motion (7-0) to approve the landscape and fence plan. satisfvjRg the conditions of the Special use ordinance and recommendation IQ City Council (April 2. 1997 SPAARC tinal. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 517E PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 14, 1997 Page 1 of 3 SPAARC 97-0035 1133 Maple Avenue Preliminary and Final Replace three porches. Mr. Peter Lewis (general contractor) presented plans to replace three wood porches In -kind on the rear of 1133 Maple Avenue. P. Lewis stated the condominium association completes one porch renovation per year, and this project Is the third such project. D. Jennings motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval. P. D'Agostino seconded. Committee approved the motion (7-0)tQgrant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval. SPAARC 96-0004 1601 Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Cafe Sidewalk Cafe for Le Madeleine French Bakery & Cafe. Mr, Tom Cross and Ms. Jeannie Cleveland presented the request for sidewalk cafe for La Madeleine French Bakery & Cafe at 1601 Sherman Avenue (1600 Orrington Avenue). J. Cleveland stated La Madeleine is no longer pursuing a Type I sidewalk cafe in conjunction with a Type II restaurant; the requested sidewalk cafe is a Type II sidewalk cafe. J. Cleveland stated La Madeleine is no longer pursuing the site plan in which chairs and tables would be placed in the plaza; the requested sidewalk cafe is for 41 seats. C. Smith read the sidewalk cafe requirements as established in the Type Il Restaurant Sidewalk Cafe Review form; T. Cross responded that St. Louis Bread Company would comply with ail requirements. T. Cross stated he would provide ropes and/or chains to ensure 5' of clear passage was maintained. T. Cross stated that he would turn chairs and/or remove tables and chairs to ensure this requirement was met. J. Cleveland amended the site plan to include the anticipated locations of ropes and/or chains. A. Alterson asked T. Cross if any tables and/or chairs were within 5' of parking meters, signs, and/or planters in accordance with Section 7-2-6 4.a. of the City Code. T. Cross stated his tables and/or chairs complied with this requirement. J. Wolinski motioned to recommend the City Council approve the sidewalk cafe application. A. Alterson seconded. Committee ap rovpd the motion (7-0) to recommend the City Council approve the sidewalk cafe application. SPAARC 96-0093 2289 Howard Street Condition of Final Landscape plan for World Savings Bank. Ms. Sally Schwartzkopf presented a landscape plan that incorporated the suggestions of P. D'Agostino and M. Mylott for the proposed World Savings Bank, S. Schwartzkopf stated that sod will be planted in areas not depicting planter beds. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 14. 1997 Page 2 of 3 P. D'Agostino stated that the proposed grasses on the west side of the parking lot will not provide the three- foot screen at the time of initial planting. S. Schwartrkopf stated the grasses will grow to the required hleght In a couple of months. C. Smith stated she thought this was an acceptable proposal because the adjacent land use Is an entrance way to a shopping center. P. D'Agostino motioned to approve the landscape plan, satisfying the previous final site plan and appearance review approval (April 9, 1997 SPAARC meeting). D. Jennings seconded. Committee approved the motion (6-0) to approve the landscapli plan. satisfying the previous final site ratan and apnea[ance review approval (April 9. 1997-SPAARC meeting). SPAARC 97-0036 339 Custer Avenue Replace three porches. Preliminary and Final Mr. Chuck Rozhon presented plans to replace three wood porches In -kind on the rear of 339 Custer Avenue. M. Mylott motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval, subject to compliance with a letter from the Building Division dated April 1, 1997, D. Jennings seconded. Com im ttee approved the motion (5--0) to grant pgjmi. nary and final site plan and appgarance review approval sublept to compliance with a letter from the Building Division dated_April 1. 1997. SPAARC 92-0023 2813 Central Street Wood deck for Northshore Lawn Equipment, inc. Applicant did not attend. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m. F e Tectfully sub I d, Marc Steven Mylott, Zoning Planner Final .-Pig .97 Date SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 14, 1997 Page 3 of 3 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 21, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, J. Glus, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: J. Aiello, P. D'Agostino, D. Marino. Design Professional Present: H. Friedman. Other Staff Present: C. Ruiz, R. Schur, D. Venegas. Commencement C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:10 p.m. SPAARC 97-0037 2113 Greenleaf Street Fiber-optic hub (building) for Media One. Concept Mr. Tom Arvidson and Mr. Tom Keenan presented a proposal to build a fiber-optic hub for Media One at 2113 Greenleaf Street. T. Arvidson explained the 12-foot x 12-foot building is a receiving site for a fiber- optic cable(s) from the Media One Hartrey site; within the hub, 60 transmitters send signals via fiber-optic cables to neighborhood nodes (each node servicing approximately 500 to 1,000 homes). T. Arvidson stated no over -air transmission occurs, and no tower is required. T. Arvidson stated the site will require a propane or natural gas storage tank to provide fuel for a back-up generator; the generator is cased with 'residential housing" and equipped with residential -grade mufflers. T. Arvidson stated the site will fenced on all sides with an 8-foot chain -link fence, landscaping could be provided if necessary. A. Alterson stated fence setbacks will probably not be an issue because the site does not front a public street. T Keenan stated Media One is investigating an easement in perpetuity or purchasing a portion of the existing lot. A Alterson stated purchasing a portion of the existing lot may require a subdivision; any application to the City should include an explanation of the holding of the property. C. Smith stated the applicant should provide a site plan showing the relationship of the proposal to the surrounding existing conditions, especially buildings and towers. J. Tonkinson stated this proposal is classified as a private utility. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 21, 1997 Page 1 of 3 K. Kelly asked about the need for emergency access. T. Arvidson stated no people will be in the building, except those providing infrequent service; the building will have an alarm and be monitored. M. Mylott stated the site should have some emergency access if a natural gas or propane tank was being located on site. D. Jennings motioned to grant concept approval of the site plan and appearance. D. Jennings seconded. Committee aooroved the motion (8-0) to grant concept approval of the site 21an and appearance. SPAARC 92-0023 2813 Central Street Wood deck for Northshore Lawn Equipment, Inc. Applicant did not attend. Final J. Tonkinson motioned to table final site plan and appearance review. L. Black seconded. Committee approved the motion (8-0) to table final site plan and 8poearance review. Approval of Summary of Findings M. Mylott stated that the wording "... St. Louis Bread Company ..." found In the second paragraph under SPAARC 98-0004 (page 2) should read "... La Madeleine. . .". J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of May 14, 1997 as corrected. H. Friedman seconded. Committee approved the motion (8-0) tp approve the Summary of Findings of May 14. 1997 as corrected. SPAARC 97-0038 2748 Green Bay Road Preliminary and Final Reconfiguration of Dominick's parking tot. Mr. Bob Mazur presented plans to reconfigure the existing parking lot of the Dominick's grocery store at 2748 Green Bay Road. B. Mazur stated the current eastem-most aisle is two-way and creates congestion due to its proximity with the Green Bay Road entrance. B. Mazur stated their traffic consultant recommended a mandatory right turn into a one-way aisle (eastern -most aisle) when entering from Green Bay Road; the site plan includes other modifications to the entrance and eastern two aisles to facilitate this change. B. Mazur stated the amount of parking spaces will be the same as before this project. B Mazur stated landscaping similar to the existing landscaping along Green Bay Road will be installed in all new islands, no landscaping along Green Bay Road will be removed. B. Mazur stated the existing trees in the northern end Island will be relocated within the reconfigured northern end island C Smith stated directional signage should be added at the Green Bay Road entrance, indicating the change to entrance only, and within the northern end island or northern mid -row island, indicating no entry by cars heading southeasterly C. Smith stated that directional signs are permitted by right; however, these signs cannot include store name(s) or other advertising devices. B. Mazur stated he will provide such directional signs in the locations recommended above. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 21 1997 Page 2 of 3 J. Tonkinson motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval. D. Jennings seconded. Discussion: C. Smith stated B. Mazur should verify whether the driving lane along the north side of the store is a fire lane. K. Kelly stated 18 feet of width is required for a fire lane. B. Mazur stated he will shave the Island to provide 18 feet to provide a fire lane. C. Smith stated B. Mazur will need a permit for restdping, Plans have been placed in the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee file; however, these plans do not Include the revisions agreed to by the applicant. SPAARC 97-0O39 1328 Sherman Avenue Preliminary and Final Exterior modification to Heaventree Candles. Mr. Dennis Clarkson and Ms. Frances Clarkson presented plans for exterior modifications to Heaventree Candles at 1328 Sherman Avenue, D. Clarkson stated exterior modifications include replacing a garage door with a store -front window and replacing a door; interior modifications include adding a small wall. D. Clarkson stated he brings supplies in by hand through a rear door from his pick-up truck. D. Clarkson stated the building has existing lights, sprinklers, an alarm, motion detectors, and sensors on the windows and doors. L. Black stated, if those measures are not adequate, the next step is security film on the front windows. K. Kelly and C. Smith stated the applicant needs to reevaluate the sprinkler system, especially in light of Interior modifications and a new use. D. Jennings motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance approval. A. Alterson seconded. Committee aRl2raygd the motion (8-0) to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance aporoyal. - Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:00 p.m. ler 7D'ate SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 21, 1997 Page 3 of 3 11 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 28, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, K. Kelly, D. Marino, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson. Members Absent: J. Aiello, L. Black, J. Glus, D. Jennings, J. Wolinski. Design Professional Present: H. Friedman. Other Staff Present: R. Schur. Commencement C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of May 21, 1997. P. D'Agostino seconded. Committee approved the motlon (6-0) to aonrove the Summary of Findings_of May 21. 1997. SPAARC 97-0043 2938 Central Street Mixed -use (retail or office and residential) building. Concept Mr. Doug Made) (architect) presented a proposal for a four-story mixed -use building at 2938 Central Street; the proposal included: 1. First -floor retail or office (number of tenants undetermined) and second-, third-, and fourth -floor residential (15 units, ownership undetermined); 2. 16 parking stalls for residential located underground and five parking stalls located at grade for nonresidential; 3. A ten -foot "offset' along the eastern property line above the first floor to provide relief against adjacent buildings; and SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 29, 1997 Page 1 of 4 4. A combination of renaissance stone and masonry for the first three floors and a different material (possible dryvit) for the fourth floor. The first floor may include some decorative the elements. The hip roof has a five-foot overhang. Made] stated that, while the proposal meets the height requirement of the 82 district, it will require a variation to the gross floor area ratio requirement; the lot is 70 feet by 140 feet. M. Mylott stated that D. Madel must ensure the residential does not exceed 20,000 sq.ft., otherwise the residential Is not a permitted use in the district. D. Madel asked if the same exceptions to gross floor area listed in the definition apply to the 20,000- sq.it. limitation; M. Mylott and A. Alterson responded yes. A. Alterson stated D. Made] should apply for a zoning analysis to allow the zoning officers time to evaluate this proposal. A. Alterson stated D. Madel should also include an explanation as to how the calculations were derived (i.e. what floor area was excluded). M. Mylott stated the parking, balconies, and eaves should be dimensioned in the site plans submitted for zoning analysis. A. Alterson explained the variation process to D. Madel, including an approximate time frame of three months, C. Smith stated a second means of Ingress/egress is needed for the basement. D. Madel asked If the automobile ingresslegress ramp could be used. C. Smith responded only if the width of the pedestrian ingress/egress was in addition to the width required for the ramp. C. Smith stated a handicapped parking space is required for the retail/office space. A. Alterson stated the roof eaves and balconies extend beyond the property line. D. Madel stated the balconies overhang approximately 42", and the roof eaves overhang approximately 5'. J. Tonkinson stated these overhangs will require a liscence agreement with the City; such agreements require City Council approval. J. Tonkinson stated that some liscence agreements also require insurance coverage or a bond. C. Smith stated semi -recessed balconies would help minimize the request and reduce the appearance that the balconies were "stuck on". D. Madel stated they would explore eliminating the balconies before recessing them due to drainage issues. C. Smith stated that the residential access of Hurd Avenue and the comer retaiVoffice is an asset to the neighborhood. H. Friedman stated that the Committee so rarely recieves such a well -designed building that the City should do everything possible to see this proposal built. J. Tonkinson motioned to grant concept approval of the site plan and appearance. H. Friedman seconded. Plans have been placed in the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee file SPAARC 97-0041 1102 Cleveland Street Preliminary and Final Sideyard setback and budding lot coverage variations for single-family house. Applicant did not attend. J. Tonkinson motioned to table preliminary and final site plan and appearance review. M. Mylott seconded. Committee_aooroved the motion (7-0) to table nreliminary and final site ninn and nnno-mmnra SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 28, 1997 Page 2 of 4 SPAARC 97-0018 2201 Oakton Street Preliminary and Final Subdivision of Home Depot shopping center. Mr. Irving Muldowney of Greenberg Farrow Architecture presented a plat of subdivision for the Home Depot Shopping Center at 2201 Oakton Street. f. Muldowney stated this request is a subdivision of the December 1, 1993 consolidation. 1. Muldowney stated the subdivision will create four lots -- lot 1 for Home Depot, lot 2 for the proposed Petsmart, lot 3 for a future Jr. anchor, and lot 4 for speculative commercial development. J. Tonkinson stated this subdivision must be reviewed with respect to the Home Depot redevelopment agreement for any applicable crass or access easements. D. Marino stated the original agreement anticipated one Jr. anchor versus the two now being proposed via the subdivision. D. Marino informed 1. Muldowney that no ingress/egress Is permitted to Hartrey Avenue and encroachment on the existing berm and landscaping is prohibited. M. Mylott stated the lot line proposed between lot 2 and lot 3 will create setback problems with the existing parking lot. D. Marino stated the Zoning Ordinance may not be responsive to "today's development trends". A. Allerson motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval, provided (1) the applicant(s) bring the plat of subdivision and the planned development application to City Council at the same time; (2) the plat of subdivision complies with the redevelopment agreement; (3) the plat of subdivision complies with any other existing easement agreements; (4) the plat of subdivision complies with all other City ordinances and codes; (5) this approval in no way permits ingresstegress to Hartrey Avenue; and (6) this approval in no way permits encroachment on the existing berm and landscaping. D. Marino seconded. Committee approved the motiog_(5-01 to grant relimina[y and final site plan and appearance review approval. provided_(1) the ap lip cantfsl bring the Mat of subdivision and the planned development application to City Council at the same lime: i21 the Dlat of subdivision comRllQ5 with the redevelo mp ent agreement: (3) the plat of subdivision complies with any ether exi5tipg easPmPnt agreements; (41 the plat of subdivision com lies_with all other Citv ordinaMs and codo: (5) this aDproyal in no wav qerMits ingresslearess to Hartrev Avenue: and (6) phis approval in no vy�y Hermits encroachment on She exi5ln-o berm and Iandsca2na. SPAARC 97-0040 1404 Greenleaf Street Preliminary and Final Exterior modification to first -floor studio and second -floor residence. Ms. Laura Litton (property owner) stated she is conducting interior and minor exterior modifications to the building at 1404 Greenleaf Street; exterior modifications include installing a new first -floor window and removing the western door L. Litton stated she will use the first floor as a documentary film studio and live upstairs. L. Littion stated her business will create no street traffic. L. Litton stated the house at the rear of the property is currently rented and she will continue to rent this dwelling unit. M. Mylott motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance approval. P. D'Agostino seconded. Committee apgroved the motion (6-0) to grant preliminary and final site plan and agoearance approval. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 28. 1997 Page 3 of 4 Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:10 p.m. pate SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE May 28. 1997 Page 4 of 4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 4, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement A. Alterson, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. J. Aiello, L. Black, J. Glus, D. Marino. H. Friedman. None. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of May 28, 1997. M. Mylott seconded. Committee approved the motion (8-0) to approve the Summary of Findings of May 28. 1997. SPAARC 974046 1958 Sheridan Road Preliminary and Final Proposed Transportation Center for Northwestern University. Applicant did not attend meeting. J. Tonkinson motioned to table SPAARC 97-0046. M. Mylott seconded. Committee approved the motion (8-Q to table SPAARC 97-004Q. SPAARC 97-0041 1102 Cleveland Street Preliminary and Final Side yard setback and building lot coverage variations for single-family house. M. Mylott presented the application for major variations for 1102 Cleveland Street; the requested building lot coverage and side yard variations would permit construction of the proposed two-story addition to an existing two-story house. M. Mylott stated the applicant wishes to extend the existing western side of the house further to the south (currently approximately one and one-half feet from the western lot line) and SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 4, 1997 Page 1 of 4 Increase the building lot coverage from approximately 34 percent to 44 percent (350 sq.ft.). Mr. Bob Ruschman and Ms. Martha Ruschman were present to answer any questions, M. Ruschman stated that, while the addition Is within the western required side yard, because of the large side yard immediately to the west, the addition is less of a disturbance than if it was placed five feet from the east lot line. J. Tonkinson asked A. Alterson If he had received any comments from the neighbors. A. Alterson responded no. J. Tonkinson motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval. D. Jennings seconded. Discussion: J. Wolinski recommended amending the motion to require the construction conform to the plans submitted In accordance with the variation application. J. Tonkinson amended the motion as such;. grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval, provided tKe construction conforms with the plans submitted in accordance with the variation application, D. Jennings amended the second to reflect the amended motion. A draft staff report for this zoning case has been placed in the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee file. SPAARC 96-0073 528 Dempster Street Sidewalk Cafe for Starbucks Coffee Company, Sidewalk Cafe Ms. Nicola Robbennolt presented the request for sidewalk cafe for Starbucks Coffee Company at 528 Dempster Street, including the anticipated nondisposable dishware. C. Smith read the sidewalk cafe requirements as established in the Type II Restaurant Sidewalk Cafe Review form; N. Robbennolt responded that Starbucks Coffee Company would comply with all requirements, and Starbucks Coffee Company will request the waiver to permit disposable beverage containers. Specifically, N. Robbennolt stated Starbucks will use dividing ropes as required, and Starbucks will keep animals out of all roped areas. J Wolinski advised N Robbennolt to attend the Planning & Development Committee meeting on June 9, 1997 at 7 00 p m. In Room 2403 of the Evanston Civic Center. A. Atterson motioned to recommend the City Council approve the sidewalk cafe application. J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee approved the motion f9-01 to recommend the City Council aporove the sidewalk cafe application. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 4, 1997 Page 2 of 4 SPAARC 96-0074 1724 Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Cafe for Starbucks Coffee Company. Sidewalk Cafe Ms. Nicola Robbennolt presented the request for sidewalk cafe for Starbucks Coffee Company at 1724 Sherman Avenue, including the anticipated nondisposable dishware. C. Smith read the sidewalk cafe requirements as established in the Type II Restaurant Sidewalk Cafe Review form; N. Robbennolt responded that Starbucks Coffee Company would comply with all requirements, and Starbucks Coffee Company will request the waiver to permit disposable beverage containers. Specifically, N. Robbennolt stated Starbucks will use dividing ropes as required, and Starbucks will keep animals out of all roped areas. J. Wolinski advised N. Robbennolt to attend the Planning & Development Committee meeling on June 9, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 2403 of the Evanston Civic Center. A. Alterson motioned to recommend the City Council approve the sidewalk cafe application. J. Tonkinson seconded. Committpe approved the mot(Q(9-0) to recommend ttie City Council apprQve the sidewalk cafe ,applicallo• SPAARC 97-0047 2650 Ridge Avenue Preliminary and Final Two temporary construction trailers for Evanston Hospital. Mr. Graeme Foster of Pepper Construction Company presented a site plan showing the location and photographs illustrating the appearance of two temporary construction trailers to be located at Evanston Hospital. G. Foster stated the trailers are necessary to house on -site offices that serve as field offices for numerous construction companies working for Evanston Hospital; Pepper Construction Company Is the general contractor on the current kitchen remodeling project. G. Foster stated that at the conclusion of the kitchen remodeling project, the field offices will be moved back inside and the trailers removed. G. Foster stated the trailers will be skirted once they are placed on site. P. D'Agostino noted that the site plan indicates one nine -inch tree will be removed; G. Foster was not able to indicate what species said tree was. M. Mylott suggested an equal caliper replacement of tree(s) once the trailers are removed. J. Wolinski stated a small tasteful sign should be placed on the trailers, illustrating that the trailers are construction trailers and not permanent fixtures. J. Tonkinson motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval, provided the applicant removes the two trailers by July 1, 1998 or upon completion of the kitchen remodeling project (as a condition of the Certificate of Occupancy) whichever comes first, and (2) Pepper Construction Company provides nine caliper inches of tree(s) to replace the one nine -inch caliper tree removed. M. Mylott seconded. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 4, 1997 Page 3 of 4 Discussion: W. Friedman asked about the power source for the two trailers. G. Foster responded that a utility pole was located In close proximity to the trailer location, and Commonwealth Edison has indicated the area transformer has adequate capacity. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 3:45 p.m. 1� sprctfully submi Marc Steven Mylott, Zo&d Planner I Date SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 4. 1997 Page 4 of 4 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June l 1, '1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, K. Kelly, D. Marino, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson, J. Wolinski. Members Absent: Design Professional Present: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Aiello, J. Glus. H. Friedman. None. •;. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. SPAARC 97-0046 1968 Sheridan Road Preliminary Proposed Transportation Center for Northwestern University. Mr. Lee Johler of Northwestern University and Mr. Hill Burgess of DLK Architecture presented a site plan and elevations for the proposed Transportation Center at 1958 Sheridan Road; also, the presentation included a plat of survey and existing site and neighborhood photographs. H. Burgess stated the proposed design: includes three stories (each with offices and clerical areas) plus a basement (wilts mechanical and "conference facilities"). 2. respects the residential character. will be constructed with a brick facade and asphalt shingles. The central architectural element (surrounding the windows) is green -painted wood. The tint of the windows has not been determined, 4. provides nine additional parking spaces to the amount currently existing. H. Burgess stated the current Transportation Center is approximately 9,000 to 11,000 square feet; the new Transportation Center will be approximately 19,600 square feet. H. Burgess added that the current Transportation Center is overcrowded; the number of persons moving to the new Transportation Center will not change. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 11, 1997 Page 1 of 6 A. Alterson stated that this project will need a special use because of the classrooms in the basement. H. Burgess stated that the Associate Provost of Northwestern University sent a letter to the Zoning Division explaining the use of that area to Mr. Martin Travis. H. Burgess stated that the area is better described as a "conference facility". A. Alterson stated that the building Is part of a university, and the space is used for education; therefore, the space Is a classroom. M. Mylott asked about the existing trees in the front yard and parkway. L. Johler pointed out that the site plan shows existing trees to remain. J. Tonkinson stated this building will have a Foster Street address because the principal entrance is on Foster Street. J. Tonkinson stated moving the existing parking lights will not warrant a photometric plan review. M. Mylott motioned to grant preliminary site plan and appearance review approval. J. Wolinski seconded. Discussion: A. Alterson stated the applicant will have -to provide more substantial evidence that the area In question within the basement is not a classroom, because he Is classifying that area as a classroom, requiring a special use permit. C. Smith stated building material samples are required for final site plan and appearance review approval. M. Mylott stated the landscape plan required for final site plan and appearance review approval must include the location, size, and species of all proposed material. SPAARC 97-0048 1201 Dodge Avenue Proposal to construct 12 town houses on a vacant lot. Preliminary Mr. Bob Horner, Mr. Ibrahim Shihadeh, and Mr. Martin Sass presented a revised site plan for and an elevation depicting the west side of 12 town houses (single-family attached dwellings) at 1201-1215 Dodge Avenue. M. Sass stated the revisions include: 1. Aligning (or paralleling) the western building line with Crain Street, using V8" setbacks (staggers) between units. 2 Two 8-Foot garage doors per dwelling unit. 3 "Extensive" landscaping between the driveways, and shrubbery along the eastern lot line (appropriate distance to be determined). 4. Siding as the building -cover material. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 11, 1997 Page 2 of 6 C. Smith stated the western elevation should have more distinction. C. Smith stated the "sameness" is not desirable. C. Smith stated the necessary change could occur with different facades or different window types or placement. H. Friedman suggested M. Sass consider changing the end unit. C. Smith suggested M. Sass consider using two groups of three like units. A. Alterson stated that this proposal has numerous zoning deficiencies, including rear yard setback and dwelling unit orientation. A. Alterson stated he believed these deficiencies could be overcome; however, the proposed solution was not too favorable. D. Jennings asked about the location for the garbage dumpster(s). M. Sass stated it (they) will be near the Intersection of the court yard and the alley. J. Tonkinson stated that requiring a resident to walk the length of this project through the court yard with garbage is undesirable. C. Smith stated M. Sass should consider the location of the garbage dumpster during this planning stage as its location could easily Influence the site plan. D, Marino motioned to grant concept approval. P. D'Agostlno seconded. Discussion: M. Mylott asked if the applicant had considered masonry as the building material. C. Smith stated masonry would add strength, even If the masonry was only concentrated on the western elevations due to cost constraints. M. Sass stated the houses on Crain Street are frame houses, and the market will not support a masonry product. H. Friedman suggested considering 16' garaged doors In selected locations as a method of including variety to the western elevation. C. Smith stated that the proposed elevation is not rhythm. M. Mylott agreed, stating rhythm is not stamping out a product over and over. D. Jennings stated M, Sass needs to provide 24' of clear backing distance for garages, as required in the City Code. A copy of the plan and elevation has been placed in the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee file. SPAARC 97-0049 805 Greenwood Street Preliminary and Final Tenant build -out including an overhead and entrance door. Mr. Peter Bordman presented plans to add an overhead door and a recessed entrance door to an existing one-story building at 805 Greenwood Street. P. Bordman stated the existing facade is non -painted brick with approximately 18 three-foot by three-foot windows spaced evenly within it. P. Bordman stated the business will be used for storage of construction materials; only pick-up trucks will use the overhead door (approximately ten feet wide). SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 11, 1997 Page 3 of 6 J. Tonkinson stated the unpaved area of Sherman Avenue (immediately adjacent to this building) is set to be paved as a CD project. J. Tonkinson stated that, provided the building owner is aware that a curb cut will eliminate on -street parking for other building tenants, he can see no reason to deny this proposal. J. Tonkinson stated P. Bordman should provide him with a plat of survey to present at a neighborhood meeting tomorrow night (June 12, 1997) so all parties are aware of the change. J. Tonkinson Informed P. Bordman that the meeting will be 8 p.m. in Room 2401 of the Evanston Civic Center, D. Marino motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval. J. Tonkinson seconded. Committee approved the motion (10-0) to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review ap rp oval. SPAARC 97-0050 1514 Elmwood Avenue Interior and exterior modifications to vacant building. Final SPAARC 97-0050 was granted preliminary approval on January-15, 1997 as part of SPAARC 97-0006. Mr. Aaron Wilson presented the plans and elevations for converting the first floor space (previously commercial space) to a residential unit and remodeling the upper two residential units; exterior modifications are limited to adding one new and replacing one old set of windows. A. Wilson stated the windows are H-type windows with a frosted portion in the middle for privacy. A. Alterson motioned to grant final site plan and appearance review approval. D. Jennings seconded. Committee approved the motion (10-0) to -grant final site plan and appggrance_reX ew approyw. SPAARC 97-0030 808 Judson Avenue Final Rebuild of 21-unit condominium. Mr. Rich Brissette, Mr. Tony A. Quinn, Mr. Larry Basil, and Ms. Nancy Cutter presented the site plan, revised elevations, and landscape plan for the 21-unit condominium located at 808 Judson Avenue. R. Brissette stated The building material will be red brick on all sides. 2. Accent material is a buff -colored renaissance stone, located at the base (two -foot pieces), sill, cap, and keystone. The window trim and architectural grill (some hiding air conditioning units) will be a close -colored match with the renaissance stone. The architectural grill will be anodized aluminum. The two center architectural elements or "eyebrows" (surrounding the center windows) will project 4" from the facade to provide relief. The banding surrounding the windows on either side of the "eyebrows" will project 3/4". SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 11, 1997 Page 4 of 6 5. The windows are "sliders" rather than casement, similar to the original windows, with the exception of the bathroom windows. T. Quinn presented the landscape plan, consisting of ornamental trees, low evergreens, and flowers in front of the building and low evergreens to provide a mowing edge on the west side of the building. T. Quinn stated the plan Includes and notes six columnar pear trees on the western edge that could be added if budget permits but are not part of this proposal. J. Tonkinson stated that the photometrics must indicate zero foot candle at the property line. J. Tonkinson recommended R. Brissette use horizontal housings with the proposed metal halite fixtures. M. Mylott motioned to grant final site plan and appearance review approval, provided J. Tonkinson reviews and approves a photometric plan. A. Alterson seconded, Discussion: C. Smith asked if the brick mortar would be a similar color to the renaissance stone. R. Brissette responded yes. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of June 4, 1997. P. D'Agostino seconded. Commifte approved -the motion (9-0) to agnrove the Summaly of Flpdings_of June 4. 1997. Off -agenda Item 1458 Sherman Avenue Preliminary and Final Special use permit for Olde Orleans Rib and Seafood House (Type 11 restaurant). A. Atterson presented the special use application by Mr. Charles Murray to permit the Olde Orleans Rib and Seafood House (a Type 11 restaurant) at 1458 Sherman Avenue. A. Alterson stated this use was previously a Type 1 restaurant. M. Mylott asked about proposed signage. A. Alterson stated no signage has been proposed. M. Mylott motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval. P. D'Agostino seconded. Discussion: L. Black stated that empty parking spaces are already very difficult to find In this area, and this proposal may cause double parking. A. Alterson stated this use does not need zoning relief from the parking requirements. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 11. 1997 Page 5 of 6 Off -agenda Item 2327 Brown Avenue Variation to permit existing air-conditioning compressor. Preliminary and Final A. Alterson presented the variation application by Ms. Lisa Holton to permit an air-conditioning compressor to remain In its current location (four feet, ten and one-half Inches from the property line where ten feet is required) at 2327 Brown Avenue. A. Alterson stated the side of the house on which the air-conditioning compressor is located is adjacent to a 20-foot wide alley, making the distance to the closest neighboring dwelling unit approximately 25 feet. C. Smith motioned to grant preliminary and final site plan and appearance review approval. L. Black seconded. Committee approved the motion (9-0) to grant Prellminary and final_s(te Plan and appearance review approval. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ?A -S #441o# lim Marc Steven Mylott, Zoning Planner SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 11, 1997 Page 6 of 6 6-13 97 Date SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 18, 1997 Room 2404 Members Present: A. Alterson, L. Black, P. D'Agostino, D. Jennings, A. Berkowsky (for K. Kelly), D. Marino, M. Mylott, C. Smith, J. Tonkinson. Members Absent: Design Professional Absent: Other Staff Present: Commencement J. Afello, J. Glus, J. Wolinski. H. Friedman. C. Ruiz, R. Schur, G, Wonders. C. Smith determined a quorum existed and began the meeting at 3:05 p.m. Approval of Summary of Findings J. Tonkinson motioned to approve the Summary of Findings of June 11, 1997. C. Smith seconded. Committee aooroyed the motion (7-0) to approve the -Summary of Findings gf June 11, 1997. SPAARC 94-0106 2201 Oakton Street Proposed Petsmart in the Home Depot shopping center. Preliminary Mr. Carl Frontera of Petsmart presented a site plan and elevations for the proposed Petsmart at 2201 Oakton Street. Mr, Jim Peter of Petsmart and Mr. Irving Muldowney of Greenberg Farrow Architecture were available for questions. A. Alterson stated that the Zoning Division has discovered that the subdivision and development of this property is to be regulated by the 1960 Zoning Ordinance. A. Alterson stated that the proposal has no zoning problems, according to the Zoning Officer. C. Smith stated this proposal received concept approval from the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee on May 7, 1997. C. Smith read the Summary of Findings from May 7, 1997, pertaining to SPAARC 97-0018. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 18, 1997 Page 1 of 8 C. Frontera stated that he has been advised that Hartrey Avenue Is off limits. D. Marino responded yes, and Mike Folio of Home Depot agreed to that stipulation as evidenced by the locked gate. D. Marino stated he can see no change In the City's position that Hartrey Avenue is off limits. C. Frontera stated the issue is the position of the loading dock; currently, it Is positioned for access to Hartrey Avenue. D. Marino stated that, given the projection of four to five trucks per week, access via the ring road should not be a problem. D. Marino stated that, if the Hartrey Avenue access was opened, the City could not limit the traffic to Petsmart only, creating a definite problem. C. Frontera stated that, in response to the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee request to include more windows, he cannot provide more than previously indicated because (1) the west side of the store is reserved for the aquatics department, and this livestock cannot be exposed to changes In temperature and sunlight; and (2) the east side of the store is reserved for dog -grooming and health services. C. Smith stated that she found this arrangement ironic given the historical arrangement of pet stores, placing livestock in the windows to serve an advertising function. C. Frontera responded that Petsmart's livestock is primarily fish and birds; their principal goods are pet supplies. L. Black stated that this location is not pedestrian oriented. D. Jennings agreed. C. Smith responded that the predominant mode of travel will be by car; however, some pedestrian traffic will be generated from shoppers in the complex, and the pedestrian should not be excluded. C. Frontera presented the design and materials of the building, including: 1. Split -faced block to 10 feet in height. 2. Smooth -faced block painted blue for the next three feet above the split -faced block. This "band" wraps around the sides of the building for approximately 32 feet. 3. Masonry on the remainder of the principal portion of the building. 4. A 15-foot projecting EFIS stucco sign board, containing the words "Petsmart". C. Smith stated this project should be an opportunity to build something significant, not simply cover it up with landscaping. C. Ruiz stated he feels strongly against the "cookie -cutter big boxes" that developers feel Evanston must accept; such a project goes against the community's goals of quality design. D. Marino stated that he would like to ensure that the remaining outlot to the east is seeded and construction debris is removed, because the City is not sure if or when it will be developed. C. Smith stated the signage cannot exceed a height of 15 feet 6 inches. A. Alterson asked about the fences at the rear of the property. C Frontera responded these fences screened trash and palette storage. A. Alterson stated that people leaving Home Depot will be viewing this enclosure; it would not seem very inviting. A Alterson stated that maybe the west side of the building is equally important as the east side of the building. C Smith stated that C. Frontera should consider both sides of the building as important and she doubted if simply extending the blue band would accomplish the necessary objectives. C. Smith stated a more appropriate approach would be to consider the building as a corner building. A. Alterson agreed and stated the building needs some unifying elements within the shopping center. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE June 18, 1997 Page 2 of 8