Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 2000Draft- Not Approved Evanston Environment Board Thursday December 7, 2000 7:30 PM Board Members Present: Board Members Absent: Staff Members Present: Others Present: Gladys Bryer Judy Freitag Bob Gemmel! Mardi Klevs Sharon Lieberman Gwen Burton Poole Lucy Elam Judy Freeman David Jones Irwin Levinson David Schreier Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Dan Kert Len C. (?) Ms. Klevs introduced Mr. Kert and Mr. C who have experience in sustainable design. The Board welcomed their attendance and comments. November meeting minutes The Board approved the minutes of the November 2000 board meeting. The Board approved the motion. Board Review Ms. Bryer thanked both Ms. Lieberman and Ms. Freitag for their eight years of service to the Evanston Environment Board. Both Ms. Freitag and Ms. Lieberman have been strong, active, contributing members of the Board and their expertise and enthusiasm will be missed. Ms. Bryer asked both Ms. Lieberman and Ms. Freitag to review with the Board highlights of their service in order for newer Board members to leam what areas the Board has previously investigated. Ms. Lieberman indicated the areas of greatest achievement for her have been: 1. Integrated Pest Management; a 1999 law now requires schools to use IPM 2. The development of an IPM policy for the Parks/Forestry Division 3. The Gypsy Moth public education and tree trimming education program and public hearing were two of the most effective initiatives of the Board 4. The largest failure: getting the City of Evanston to participate in a green purchasing program Ms. Lieberman prepared, prior to the meeting, several documents that will be helpful in looking back at the Boards issues and accomplishments. These will be distributed in the January 2001 packets. Ms. Lieberman noted that it has been difficult to convince the City of Evanston to be an environmental leader in their policies. Ms. Freitag reviewed her experience for the Board. 1. Two household hazardous waste collection days were fun for the Board, provided an opportunity for education and service responsibly discarding hazardous material. 2. The Partners for Clean Air award given to the City of Evanston for the plan and implementation of reduced emissions on Ozone Action Days is an achievement the City of Evanston can be proud of. Primary participation was through the Parks/Forestry Department. 3. The most effective Board initiatives were issues that came from citizens and those referred from City Council including gypsy moth, leaf blovrer ordinance, and tree trimming. 4. No real failures: timing was probably not right on the green purchasing initiative. Ms. Freitag reviewed the last Partners for Clean Air report. This year only four days were over ninety degrees and only 2 days exceeded 125 ppm. Partners for Clean Air has an excellent web site. Two monitoring sites are near here: the Evanston water plant and the MWRD plant at Touhy. Cars contribute most to the formation of ozone. Mr. Gemmell highlighted his experience. 1. The project worked on most was the leaf blower ordinance. The real goal was to reduce noise, and leaf blower noise is only part of the total issue. 2. An additional noise threat is posed by boating on the north shore channel; work could be added in this area. 3. Household hazardous waste collection was highly successful involving the Board, staff, and citizens in a collective effort. If continued more publicity is needed. In general the Board has responded to pet projects versus focusing on a broad view of concerns. Requests from the City Council provide a focus and sometimes a broader perspective that a more personal agenda. The Board has r' limited authority. The extent of advocacy sometimes should be tempered as other regulatory bodies have jurisdiction over particular issues. Ms. Lutz noted that the Environment Board has been quite active and committed to research and policy. 1. The hazardous materials spill -drill (where the Environment Board served as monitors and participants) and the household hazardous waste collections have both provided service to longer -range issues. 2. It has been several years since the City Council has referred an issue to the Environment Board; co-operation with the Council on issues has resulted in the most effective initiatives and results. Ms. Bryer thanked members for their insights into the past workings of the Environment Board. The February meeting will be devoted to a discussion of a strategic plan for the Environment Board. Ms. Bryer reviewed the ordinance that created the Environment Board. She highlighted several issues that should be part of the future plant: transportation, sustainability, development, and air pollution. Several members noted that the Board could be most effective when working with City Council and staff. The City has to listen, they do not have to agree, but do have to listen. The City Council can be the best advocate for the Environment Board. Future Meetings The Board agreed to continue meeting the third Thursday of the month. The Board would like to have the meetings at the Ecology Center. Next Meeting The next meeting of the Evanston Environment Board will be Thursday, January 18, 2001, at 7:30 PM at the Evanston Ecology Center, 2024 McCormick Boulevard. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz Ecology Center Coordinator Draft- Not Approved Evanston Environment Board Thursday, November 16, 2000 7:30 PM Board Members Present: Board Members Absent: Staff Members Present: Others Present: Gladys Bryer Judy Freeman Bob Gemmell David Jones Mardi Klevs Irwin Levinson Sharon Lieberman Gwen Burton Poole Lucy Elam Judy Freitag David Schreier Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Hans Detweiler, Environmental Law and Policy Center The Board welcomed new board member Irwin Levinson. Introductions were made. October meeting minutes Mr. Jones moved, seconded by Ms. Bryer to approve the minutes of the October 2000 board meeting. The Board approved the motion. Energy Policy The Board welcomed Hans Detweiler from the Environmental Law and Policy Center (ELPC). Mr. Detweiler explained that he is a policy advocate for the ELPC. Mr. Detweiler explained that global warming is a crucial environmental issue that has to be addressed now. He sees coal plant emissions as a source of atmospheric pollution. Illinois is the most nuclear reliant state in the nation and has no plan for nuclear waste. Two thirds of the Chicagoland area has nuclear generated electricity while the statewide half is provided through nuclear and half through coal. The six county area of northeastern Illinois is an ozone non - attainment area. These issues provide ELPC with a broad need to address energy issues and energy efficiency. Mr. Detweiler proposed 3 goals for the City of Evanston: 1. Do more to empowerleducate City of Evanston staff on energy issues 2. Institute a green purchase plan 3. Use the energy franchise agreement to model energy efficiency. Mr. Detweiler would like to present a platform dealing with these goals prior to the aldermanic/mayoral elections. Mr. Detweiler reviewed electricity basics including the delivery system as well as CO2 emissions by fuel type. Losses of power occur in the distribution system. ETHS has a combined heat and power system and generates electricity near to the source being supplied with power; waste heat from power generation goes into usable heat. Mr. Detweiler views two solutions to energy situation: combined heat and power, and wind energy. Evanston is a wind intermittent area making wind farms impractical, although the purchase of power generated by wind from other sources is an option. Chicago and 45 other municipalities (mostly SWANCC members) have joined together to purchase power; 80 megawatts, or 20%, of which must come from renewable sources. Chicago's Commission on the Environment is committed to making Chicago a center of clean energy and help prime the market place for energy efficiency. The Chicago franchise agreement provides for $1.2 billion in distribution upgrades within the City of Chicago. $100 million dollars over the next 4 years will be administered by the Chicago's Energy Department to promote clean air. An additional $12 million will be administered by ComEd for solar power projects in Chicago. The State of Illinois wants to promote the use of photovoltaics (PV). On approved projects 60% of the installation costs using PV will be covered; however, at this point in time PV is expensive. Capital costs for PV are required up front. The systems are good for 30 years. High profile PV projects will be installed at museums, schools, and O'Hare. A PV factory on the west side of Chicago will produce about 100 jobs. Solar thermal, panels that capture the sun's energy for heat, trap radiant heat. Evanston has 14 solar thermal homes. In negotiating Evanston's franchise agreement, Mr. Detweiler suggested that Evanston may not be able to get $100 million but we should be able to get some money that could be spent on energy efficiency projects. Mr. Detweiler noted that lots of energy efficient savings are out there to be used by very little is being used. If the City of Evanston had a staff person pursuing these savings the City could attract money. The Board entered into a discussion regarding the Energy Commission. Mr. Detweiler will draft a letter with his ideas, which the Board could review and modify. The Board thanked Mr. Detweiler for his presentation. Board vacancies Ms. Klevs will send a packet to ETHS to notify teachers of the Board's work and promote participation in the Environment Board. Committee Reports Sustainable Practices EPA Working Committee Tree Committee Leaf Blower Ordinance Transportation No report No report No report Ms. Poole will produce a report for the Board Mr. Gernmell will compile a report Ms. Lutz will send additional police reports Ms. Bryer reported on her trip to Kenosha to check out the trolleys. She noted that Robert Teska is doing a study paid for by the City of Evanston, Evmark, and downtown businesses on downtown transportation. 650 transit riders and 450 parkers were surveyed. Ideas for increased bicycle use are also being investigated. The study wiil look at transportation issues in Evanston. Several Board members asked if the viaducts were incorporated in the study as improvements in their appearance would be beneficial. Code Issues Ms. Bryer reported on her investigations with the City of Evanston on codes. City of Evanston is using old BOCA codes and is not using any green building codes. Ms. Bryer had collected information on codes, which several Board members will review and report back to the Board. 3 Solid Waste Management Ms. Freeman thanked the Board for their response on the balel7ll Issue. The U. S. Supreme Court expects a decision earty spring. Lobbying can be done anytime until a decision is rendered or the case withdrawn. Board Chairman The Board discussed electing a new chairman of the Environment Board. Ms. Freeman nominated Ms. Bryer, seconded by Mr. Jones. There were no further nominations. The Board elected Ms. Bryer as the new chairman of the Environment Board. Next Meeting The next meeting of the Evanston Environment Board will be Thursday, December 7, 2000 at 7:30 PM at the Evanston Ecology Center, 2024 McCormick Boulevard. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz Ecology Center Coordinator 4 X Draft- Not Approved r1-. Evanston Environment Board Thursday, October 19, 2000 . 7:30 PM Board Members Present Gladys Bryer Bob Gemmell - : - David Jones Mardi Klevs Sharon Lieberman Gwen Burton Poole Board Me'im irs'Absent: Lucy Elam Judy Freeman Judy Freitag David Schreier x Staff Members Present; Linda Lutz, Eulogy Center Coordinator Others Present Hans Detweiler, Environmental Law and Policy Center Karen Lewis, Environmental Law and Policy Center r +' The Board opened the meeting with discussion on the Bartlett balefill lawsuit that will be heard before the U. S. Supreme Court. Hans Detweiler from the Environmental Law and Policy Center summarized the case for the Board. $25 million has been invested in the SWANC Bartlett balefill project. Land was purchased in Bartlett to develop a balefill operation for the communities that comprise SWANCC. The land is a former gravel pit that lay undeveloped for a number of years. SWANCC developed plans to implement the project and was denied permits by the Army Corps of Engineers to proceed with the project. Mr. Detweiler expressed the opinion that the City of Evanston is rather apathetic on this issue. it was know that the case was going to the Supreme Court this summer. Both sides appear not to want a settlement because it will be viewed as weakness in the case by both sides. At the SWANCC board meeting October I SWANCC was asked to negotiate a settlement that would avoid a challenge to environmental laws. Mr. Detweiler`- � , ; -- has asked for a financially fair settlement going through government affairs and has contacted several legislators including Dennis Hastert, and Jan Schakowsky - I Bartlett Balefill The Board discussed the balefill and the upcoming Supreme Court hearing. Concerns of the Board ranged from jurisdictional and environmental issues to financial interests of SVJANCC. There was debate on the environmental implications and how the case could affect the clean air and water acts. At the end of discussion the Board endorsed the following statement which Ms. Lutz will send to the mayor and city council tomorrow. What began as a local proposal to build a landfill near the Village of Bartlett has now become a case before the U. S. Supreme Court that threatens to severely weaken the Clean Water Act. Key protections provided by our environmental laws are at risk of being swept away by Supreme Court debate over the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. The 23 suburbs comprising the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County appealed a decision denying them a permit because their proposed landfill would be built on ponds that provide habitat for migratory birds and Great Blue Heron nests. Legal experts fear the Supreme Court will use this case to declare large parts of the Clean Water Act and other environmental laws unconstitutional_ The Evanston Environment Board urges the City of Evanston's leadership to act within SWANCC to actively seek a reasonable financial settlement before the case is heard by the U. S. Supreme Court on October 31, 2000. Next Meeting The next meeting of the Evanston Environment Board will be Thursday, November 16, 2000 at 7:30 PM in room 3650 of the Evanston Civic Center. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz Ecology Center Coordinator looking to for a settlement of the case before the case is heard by thesbp`reme Court. Mr. Detweiler suggested that if the Environment Board wanted to act on this matter it is necessary to act quickly. The City Council will meet in executive session to discuss the matter on Monday October 23"'. The Board thanked Mr. Detweiler for speaking to the balefill issue. Green Architecture Karen Lewis of the Environmental Law and Policy Center focuses on green architecture. She explained that the ELPC is a non-profit organization with a large staff of lawyers. Ms. Lewis specializes in working with businesses to held them be "green" and use elements of green design. Green design is the design; ` construction and operation of buildings that are environmentally responsible, profitable, and healthy places to live and work. Ms. Lewis highlighted energy efficiency, importance of green architecture, and described the eco-friendly office, which can be achieved at low or comparable costs. Energy is only one part of green design but it is the largest most costly component. Ms. Lewis gave the Board a handout on green design, which will be sent out to all members unable to attend the meeting. Energy Mr. Detweiler agreed to come to the November meeting to speak on energy policy and the current City franchise agreement. Included in his presentation will be global warming, electricity costs, and the energy franchise agreement. The Board thanked both Ms. Lewis and Mr. Detweiler for their thoughtful, information presentations. September Meeting Minutes Ms. Bryer moved, seconded by Mr. Jones, to accept the minutes of the September meeting with the following correction: Page 2 under transportation should read "marketing pieces and schedule cards_{ for the CTA and Pace. The Board approved the minutes of the September meeting. Board Chairman Ms. Lieberman reminded the Board that a new chairman needs to be elected. The Board will nominate and elect a new chairman at the November. The new chairman will begin presiding in December. Draft- Not Approved Evanston Environment Board Thursday, September 21, 2000 7:30 PM Board Members Present: Tim Andruss Gladys Bryer Judy Freeman Mardi Klevs Sharon Lieberman Board Members Absent: Leroy Davis Lucy Elam Judy Freitag Bob Gemmell David Jones Gwendolyn Burton Poole David Schreier Staff Members Present: Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Ms. Lieberman welcomed the Board back from the August break. Mr. Andruss announced that he would be moving to Washington State and this meeting would be his last meeting. Ms. Lieberman thanked Mr. Andruss for his',' service on the Board and wished him well in his move. July 2000 Minutes The Board approved the minutes of the July 20, 2000 meeting. The Board approved the following addition to the minutes of July 20, 2000: Mr. Marino said the most important thing the Board should be working on for the future regarding the Comprehensive General Plan is access to transportation and addressing urban sprawl. Sustainable Practices Ms. Lieberman told the Board that she had sent a letter to each principal in the school district notifying them of the new IPM laws. Superintendent Hardy Murphy from District #65 replied with his thanks to the Board and said that the school district did know about the recent legislation. There was no response from District #202. Ms. Lieberman will send the same letter to all three executives on the PTA Council. k: Gypsy Moth The Board reviewed the new brochure designed by Martha Logan, public information specialist for the Parks/Forestry and Recreation Department. The Board approved the copy and there will be brochures for members to distribute at the next meeting. Ms. Lutz will send copies to the 3 libraries and all the community centers. Ms. Lutz will also send copies to Theresa O'Neil at District' #65 for the building and grounds personnel. EPA Working Group The Board discussed issues of energy efficiency and green buildings. Ms. Klevs reported on a lecture series on green architecture that is sponsored by the Environmental Law and Policy Center. Perhaps this type of information could be incorporated into a green ordinance for City of Evanston. Ms. Bryer expressed interest in having a public discussion on energy issues including energy efficiency, green architecture, the franchise agreement, and energy issues in the local building code. Ms. Klevs suggested inviting Karen Lewis who may be able to discuss how to write ordinances. Ms. Freeman suggested Hans Detwiler from the Environmental Law and Policy Center who could speak on alternative energy. Ms. Klevs and Ms. Freeman will invite both Ms. Lewis and Mr. Detwiler to come to the October meeting of the Environment Board to give half hour presentations. Ms. Lutz will invite Energy Commission members. Tree Committee No report. Leaf Blower Ordinance No report. Transportation Ms. Bryer reported to the Board that two people from the CTA were at ETHS during registration passing out marketing pieces to the students. Both the CTA and PACE have bus schedules going to and from ETHS. Ms. Bryer observed that the CTA scheduling is much better organized now. Ms. Bryer said ridership is still low. She is looking for ETHS groups to promote student ridership, perhaps from an environmental angle. Ms. Bryer attended the Plan Commission's sub -committee meeting on transportation. Three main issues were discussed: 1. Developing a strategy to work with downtown businesses to promote public transportation 2. Development of a Transit Benefit Program where employers encourager: employees to take public transportation 3. Development of a local trolley system for Evanston; trolleys are fun to ride and could be used in the downtown area, possibly Central Street and shopping districts. Ms. Bryer will be going to Kenosha, Wisconsin with Sharon Feigon, Chairman of,- the transportation sub -committee, to view their 1 V2 mile trolley system. Ms. Bryer will take pictures for the Board to review. Code Issues Ms. Lieberman reported to the Board that she had received a letter from Jay Larson regarding the BOCA code bnd energy efficient standards. Additionally Carolyn Smith, the Assistant Director of Community Development, told Ms. Lieberman that Evanston has never adopted energy efficient standards. The BOCA codes are international codes. New codes, according to Ms. Smith, need a thorough review that should be done by a structural engineer. The City of Evanston does not have a structural engineer on staff. Ms. Smith said green aspects can be inserted into codes but all contractors can not pay for the additional costs. Larger projects generally have a structural engineer and can evaluate green adaptations. Green codes would require additional fees. Ms. Smith indicated that this a technical area but is something the Board could work on. The Board thought perhaps at the October meeting Ms. Lewis could give some guidance regarding green codes and ordinances. Solid Waste Management Ms. Freeman gave the Board a brief background on the Bartlett balefill issue. SWANCC (the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County), of which Evanston is a member, purchased an area in Bartlett IL for a balefill. The Army Corps of Engineers did not grant a permit for the balefill to be developed based on environmental issues related to small pond habitats that contain populations of wetland fauna. The Federal Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case, which is SWANCC vs. the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Implications of the case include federal regulation of environmental issues particularly on "isolated wetlands' that have no connection to interstate waters. Ms. Freeman will investigate further for the Board. Evanston's representative to SWANCC is Alderman Ed Moran. One course of action would be to encourage the City of Evanston to negotiate in good faith with SWANCC to come to a reasonable solutions that doesn't undermine the Clean Air and Clean Water Ads. 40; Board Chairman -. Ms. Lieberman noted that in January 2001 her 8 years of service on the Board ends. The Board should decide on a new chairman prior to the end of her term. Next Meeting The next meeting of the Evanston Environment Board will be Thursday, October 19, 2000 at 7:30 PM in room 3650 of the Evanston Civic Center—, Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz Ecology Center Coordinator 4 Draft- Not Approved Evanston Environment Board Thursday, July 20, 20D0 7:30 PM Boar! Members Present: Board Members Absent Staff Members Present Judy Freitag Gladys Bryer Judy Freeman David Jones Mardi Klevs Sharon Lieberman Gwendolyn Burton Poole David Schreier Tim Andruss Leroy Davis Lucy Elam Judy Freitag Bob Gemmell Ellen Fierer, Ecology Center Dennis Marino, Community Development Jay Larson, Planner New board member David Jones was introduced to the Board City of Evanston: Comprehensive General Plan Ms. Klevs opened discussion on the issue of environmentally friendly growth with in the cdiy. Mr. Marino noted that the plan approved by City Council in three particular chapters (12, 13, 16) was influenced by suggestions from the Environment Board. The Planning Division has a staff of 9 people whose responsibilities include putting together the plan as well as helping with the implementation of the plan. The Comprehensive General Plan represents a serious policy document used in many settings. The Board raised several issues: 1. Open space and zoning laws that govern it 2. Use of native plants in landscaping 3. Promotion of energy efficiency r *�e 4. Traffic and transportation issues 5. Facilitation of bike and pedestrian traffic 6. Education of building managers on non -toxic products and IPM 7. Recycling Education Mr. Marino suggested that the Board work with Mr. D'Agostino on landscaping issues. Some energy efficient processes are being utilized at the Robert Cro%%m Center. Mr. Marino thought Nicor and ComEd are doing a good job circulating information and providing incentives for energy efficiency. The Board asked about the permit process for construction and if the City encouraged environmental concessions. Mr. Marino replied that that was really a Counc:! issue. Mr. Marino thought the biggest issue was getting quality design. He noted developers are driven by the immediate bottom line. Developers would have to be approached directly regarding environmental concerns. Mr. Marino noted that priority has been upgraded for bike paths. Enhancing pedestrian traffic is part of the plan, and it an important issue for the Plan Commission. Busing is a different issue. Cost of inner city travel is expensive $1.50 and bus waits can be half an hour. Mr. Marino thought it would be hard to get the rate decreased and thought the transit agencies would not be responsive. The Board suggested the use of trolleys such as Northwestern does, maybe a similar thing can be done in the City. Mr. Marino suggested that the Board could work with Max Rubin regarding building cleaning which is contracted out. He thought IPM would be too difficult to implement because it is too hard to change the internal culture. IPM is law in schools. Mr. Marino noted that recycling education is not part of the Plan. Even though Chicago has made recycling a law, recycling is only encouraged here. The most frequent citation is over flow of dumpsters. Long term solid waste issues are dealt with through SWANC through Streets and Sanitation. Internally Mr. Marino thought there is not enough staff for enforcement on recycling issues and litter control. Some of this can be done with zoning through Arthur Alterson and Mark Mylott. Ms. Bryer addressed public transportation saying ridership is up and indicated that access to transportation can reduce housing costs. Mr. Marino indicated that the bus service issue is important. Biking needs to be encouraged more noting that 43% of residents work in Evanston. t Mr. Larson thought employers could be encouraged to use the transit check" program. The Board thanked Mr. Marino and Mr. Larson for their attendance. - The Board will use the next meeting to decide what issues to focus on. Ms. Lieberman suggested that the Board could worts to change the local BOCA_ code. Ms. Freeman will help with this issue. Ms. Bryer suggested recycling should be required for housing du3t has more tfi�jj 4 units. Trees Ms. Lieberman reviewed an article on tree shortages and how wade spread the shortages are. Information will be in the next packet. Ms. Poole and Mr. Schreier will regroup their efforts on the tree committee focusing on what the Board thinks should happen. The Board could make recommendations, facilitate, and issue a report. Perhaps a tree commission could be implemented. GypsyMoth The gypsy moth is back. A brochure should be ready for distribution at the September meeting for everyone to distribute. Perhaps the City Highlights can publicize information on the gypsy moth. Information can also be placed on Evanston cable. Transportation Ms. Bryer reported that the CTA bus route at ETHS is running at better times. PACE is harder to work with, the routes are firmly set. Ms. Bryer met earlier today with Mr. Larson on the organization of a transportation system committee. Ms. Bryer asked whether the Board would want her to be the liaison behveen the Board and the transportation committee. The Board agreed to Ms. Bryer as a liaison. EPA Working Group Reports from Northwestern are encouraging. John Burge of the engineering department will be upgrading internal equipment with an eye to energy efficiency. Ozone Action Days Ms. Freitag reported that there were exceedence in Illinois. 14 ozone action day in 1999 and no Next Meeting Ms. Freitag moved, seconded by Mr. Jones to cancel the August 2000 meeting. The Board approved the motion. _ A I June Minutes... . . . _ .. . The minutes were approved with the following corrections: Page 2, 4t' paragraph, strike the first sentence. Page 2, 6u' paragraph, last sentence, change to public transportation or energy efficiency and other issues could be highlighted. Next Meeting The next meeting of the Evanston Environment Board will be Thursday, September 21, 2000 at 7:30 PM in room 3650 of the Evanston Civic Center. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz . Ecology Center Coordinator j .. 4 Draft- Not Approved Evanston Environment Board Thursday, June 18, 2000 7:30 PM Board Members Present: Board Members Absent: Staff Members Present: Tim Andruss Gladys Bryer Bob Gemmell Judy Freeman Mardi Klevs Sharon Lieberman Judy Freitag Leroy Davis Lucy Elam Gwendolyn Burton Poole David Schreier Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator May Minutes Mr. Gemmell moved, seconded by Ms. Bryer, to approve the minutes of the May 18, 2000 meeting. The Board approved the motion, Leaf Blower Enforcement Mr. Gemmell reviewed with the Board 2 years worth of data on leaf blower enforcement. Mr. Gemmell added the categories of., 1. Not using blower on arrival 2. Unfounded The police reports use these categories in some of the reports. Beat 71 in southwest Evanston had the most calls. Violation of the leaf blower ordinance receives an "S" citation, which means that the ticket does not require a court appearance and is processed through administrative adjudication. There has been no response from Human Services yet. The Board will continue to monitor the enforcement process. Mr. Gemmell noted that even with the ordinance in place, one of the most objectionable issues is that violations occur every day. Frequently large commercial operations are flagrant violators. The Board discussed the recollection that the Police Department sent out a letter to "violators" informing them of the leaf blower ordinance. Mr. Gemmell will follow up and see if this practice is still being done. Sustainable Practices Ms. Lieberman provided articles on "Dursban' and regulations regarding diesel emissions, which will be included in the next packet. Transportation Ms. Bryer reported on the initiatives that she has been involved in regarding public transportation. Bus schedules have adjusted to fit with the current dismissal time from the High School; this has not been the case previously. Several other CTA and PACE routes are being investigated for adjustment that may lead to increased ridership and convenience. Ms. Bryer continues to work on public transportation through the Inter -religious sustainability project. Ms. Bryer added that Evanston is not a bicycle friendly community. Riding on sidewalks can be difficult (due to construction) or banned. Streets are narrow and frequently have lots of potholes. Comprehensive General Plan The board discussed the Comprehensive General Plan and noted that it seems like a wish list. Several questions include who looks at this plan, and is there any enforcement of environmental issues. Ms. Klevs will summarize the issues in preparation for the July meeting which will include staff members from the planning division that work with the Comprehensive General Plan. The Board agreed that picking a few issues to work with from the General Plan might be more effective than multiple topics. The Environment Board may be able to combine efforts with the Plan Commission on items of mutual interest. Several issues such as air quality, or energy efficiency could be highlighted. Next Meeting The next meeting of the Evanston Environment Board will be Thursday, July 20, 2000 at 7:30 PM in room 3650 of the Evanston Civic Center. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz Ecology Center Coordinator ]c Draft- Not Approved `= � " - Evanston Environment Board" Thursday, May 18, 2000 7:30 PM Board Members Present! Gtadys Bryer Judy Freitag Bob Gemmell Sharon Lieberman Gwendolyn Burton Poole David Schreier =Ire Board Members Absent: :: Tim Andruss Leroy Davis -Lucy Elam. ::ri.aiJiuhA .A „ c,r, :f.,; Judy Freeman i Ss. J Mardi Klevs -.. Staff Members Present: Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator, Others Present: Evelyn Raden, Trustee North Shore Mosquito Abatement District • George Xamplas, Ecologist North Shore t:r irlr,r! ,t Mosquito Abatement District -j ij Ms. Lieberman thanked Ms. Raden for meeting with the Board to discuss_ the working'of the North Shore Mosquito Abatement District (District). Ms. - Lieberman noted that as summer approaches the Board and the Ecology Center receive lots of questions regarding spraying of adult mosquitoes. She stated the Board is interested in learning more about the District's work. Ms. Raden introduced George Xamplas who is the ecologist for the District. Ms. Xamplas explained that the District is 80 square miles bordering Devon to the south, Lake Cook to the north, Lake to the East, and Milwaukee Avenue to the west. The District carries out a plan of Integrated Pest Management with 5 steps: Surveillance, breeding source reduction, larvacide, adulticide, and education. 1. Surveillance involves driving around before the mosquito season,_ amending maps, looking for standing water (any site that will hold water for 3 — 4- days or more) areas to document I X 2. Breeding Source Reduction Areas of standing water;arecieared,;sj ,j};. especially if a ditch, so that if possible the water will start flowing again. This is done primarily in forest preserve district areas. 3. Larvicide This is the easiest stage to eliminate mosquitoes. A microbiall larvicide Bacillus sphaericus, is sprayed on mosquito breeding habitats. Methoprene, is an insect growth regulator that prevents the normal .., maturation of insect larvae. When methoprene is applied as briquette, pellet it is called altoside. Sprays generally disrupt the surface tension of the water and larva can't absorb oxygen. Sprays last approximately 14 days. BTI (Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis) is a new formulation that is less toxic, and metabolizes quickly. It can cause allergic reactions such as throat irritation or can trigger an asthma attack. , E 4. Adulticide An adulticide spray is used when the adult mosquito population is high. Use of spray is dependent on trapping results. Evanston have 3 permanent traps and 18 summer traps. Traps attract females. The District keeps a list of people who want to be noted of spraying and/or request their property not be sprayed. The sprayers are turned off as the unit passes the person's property. Turning off sprayers.,. frequently during spraying cuts down on the effectiveness of the spray. In 1998 spraying was cut down 40% over the previous 3 years, and in 1999 spraying was decreased 35% over the 4-year average. Last year only 3 map sections of Evanston were sprayed based on trapping results There are 400 permanent flood sites in Evanston; this includes birdbaths, catch basins, etc. The District did 163 sweeps of Evanston covering all 12 maps of the City. Sweeps focus on catch basins, standing water in arks/forest reserves, stopped . p , p Aped up gutters. On cusp of water can breed 500 mosquitoes. In urban areas containers make great breeding grounds. The Culex species, is responsible for 3 strains of encephalitis. This;, species is found in north Evanston; It is an urban mosquito that - proliferates in small areas of standing water. - Trap counts are sent to the IL Department of Public Health and the DNR survey. - Mosquito patterns are dependent on temperature, water level, and rain. r Adulticides are temperature effective generally lasting for 2 days. : 4 5. Education The District focuses its education program on helping people create hostile environments for mosquitoes. This includes removing receptacles for standing water, keeping gutters clean, wear long sleeve = shirts and pants at prime mosquito feeding times such as dusk. Repellent containing DEET is the most effective: do not use with children. If there is a high concentration of DEFT, apply to clothing not skin.' - Fill'in = low areas that collect water. Use gutter deflectors. The.District's budget is S600.000. The Board thanked Ms. Raden and Mr: ' Xamplas for their informative presentation. Minutes: March 2000, April 2000 Ms. Freitag moved, seconded by Mr. Gemmell to approve the minutes of thel March 2000 and the April 2000 meetings of the Environment Board. The -Board approved the motion. Comprehensive General Plan) ' Ms. Lieberman noted that Ms. Klevs had drafted a statement on the comprehensive general plan. She asked each Board member to review and have comments for the June meeting when the statement will be finaffzed. Ms. - Lutz will send out the statement with Ms. Lieberman's comments. ` EPA Working Group - Ongoing dialog. Continuing to interest Northwestern in the Energy Star program. Partners for Clean Air The Board discussed ozone chemistry and the effect of the lake on ozone levels.9 ; Ozone is high in Evanston; some of the highest levels are out in the lake. It follows that areas along the fake are also high. There are 2 sample sites in = _ Evanston; one is a water site. Ms. Freitag will find out how the levels are determined: by average of sample site. Partners for Clean Air has a web site that could be linked to the Ecology Center site (Ladd arboretum.org). - The City of Evanston has been nominated for an award. Ms: Freitag and MS.- =" Elam will offer the annual training for the Parks/Forestry Division on Ozone Action Day. Sustainable Practices Committee Ms. Lieberman reported that she sent letters to both school Districts regardiri'g110 "� the new pesticide laws. The Board also discussed the EPA's decision on diesel- =� A fuel, coal-fired power plants, and scrubbers. Tree Committee 0 Mr. Schreier and Ms. Poole reported that they had met with Charles Smiih, Chairman of the Ladd Arboretum Committee and met with the Ladd Arboretum Committee/Evanston Environmental Association. Mr. Smith talked enthusiastically about a tree plan and working cooperatively with the Environment Board. Several issues came up: 1. Both Boards should get to know each other better and possibly come to a _7 consensus to see if a joint committee is needed. 2. Determine the roles of each Board; the Environment Board with the policy end, and the Evanston Environmental Association as the implementer.-,=r, 3. Boards could meet for a joint meeting to talk trees, tree issues, and =' strategy. The Board discussed issues and how to structure the conversation. From the Environment Board's perspective the issues area: z:.�,rr,-, = ,.. f�=►7F�� �� 1. Tree maintenance, pruning cycle 2. Increase in tree planting 3. Increased surface area being paved 4. Donation of funds for parkway tree by individuals 5. Tree keeper program, education r, 10V1 (, 3 6. Create interest through public relations and marketing 7. Tree Commission idea: determine purpose The Board agreed that the tAC/EEA and the Environment Board would meet on Sunday, June 25, 2000 at the Ecology Center. The Boards can wresUe with ideas of what can be done jointly to make things happen. The goal of the Environment Board is to focus on the issue, pursue and see - where it leads. The Board discussed the vacant position of the Parks/Forestry arborist. Ms.'.. Bryer will draft a letter to encourage the timely hiring for the position. The letter will be sent to the City Manager and the Director of Parks/Forestry and Recreation. Mr. Gemmell moved, seconded by Ms. Freitag to forward a letter. encouraging the expeditious hiring of an arborist. The Board approved the motion. Air Quality Ms. Bryer told the Board that she is on a sub -committee for public transportation' through the Inter -religious sustainability group. Some of the Issues they are - looking at involve the public bus schedule at ETHS and CTA bus service. Dismissal times and bus times vary and is one reason the sub -committee thinks 4 4k kids are not taking the bus. Ms. Bryer will let the committee know that she is also a member of the Evanston Environment Board. Next Meeting The next meeting of the Evanston Environment Board will be Thursday, June 95, 2000 at 7:30 PM in room 3650 of the Evanston Civic Center. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz Ecology Center Coordinator 5 Draft- Not Approved Evanston Environment Board Tuesday, April 18, 2000 7:30 PM Board Members Present: Board Members Absent: Staff Members Present: Tim Andruss Judy Freeman Bob Gemmelt Mardi Klevs Sharon Lieberman Gladys Bryer Judy Freitag Leroy Davis Lucy Elam Gwendolyn Burton Poole David Schreier Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator A quorum of the Board was not present. The Board held a reception for two former Board members and their families, Dan Hartnett and Matt TerMolen. Both Mr. Hartnett and Mr. TerMolen served on the Environment Board for 8 years. Ms. Lieberman highlighted their accomplishments and thanked them for their long and fruitful service to the Evanston Community. March Board Minutes The minutes of the March 2000 Board meeting will be held for review and discussed at the May meeting. Leaf Blower Report Mr. Gemmell discussed the Board's response to the Human Services Committee regarding leaf blower issues. The Board approved the report, which will be forwarded to the Human Services Committee. New Pesticide Laws Ms. Lieberman requested permission from the Board to send a letter to the Evanston Review and the Roundtable regarding the new pesticide laws. The Board approved Ms. Lieberman's request. Additional letters will be sent to School Districts #103 and #202. EPA Working Group No report Mosquito Abatement Ms. Lieberman reported to the Board that Evanston resident Evelyn Raden is on the Board of the Mosquito Abatement District. As the Environment Board receives inquires and comments about mosquito spraying, Ms. Lieberman suggested that Ms. Raden be invited to a Board meeting to talk about the District and their policies. The Board asked Ms. Lieberman to invite Ms. Raden to speak at the May Board meeting. Comprehensive General Plan The Board agreed that Dennis Marino should be invited to the June meeting to discuss the Comprehensive General Plan. The Board is interested in enforcement and implementation of the environmental concerns listed in the Plan. Ms. Klevs will draft a statement for the Board that will either be delivered at the public meeting or distributed to the Board and Planning Division staff responsible for the Plan. Potential Tree Commission The Board discussed the issues of a potential tree commission for the City of Evanston. The Board noted that City staff liked the idea. Ms. Klevs will contact Mr. D'Agostino indicating the Board's support through e-mail. The Board noted that Ms. Poole and Mr. Schreier constitute the Board's sub -committee on trees. Next Meeting The next meeting of the Evanston Environment Board will be Thursday, May 18, 2000 at 7:30 PM in room 3650 of the Evanston Civic Center. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz Ecology Center Coordinator 2 Draft- Not Approved Evanston Environment Board Thursday, March 16, 2000 7:30 PM Board Members Present: Board Members Absent: Staff Members Present: Others Present: Judy Freitag Bob Gemmell Sharon Lieberman Gwendolyn Burton Poole David Schreier Tom Andruss Leroy Davis Lucy Elam Mardi Klevs Paul D'Agostino, Superintendent Parks/Forestry Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Gladys Bryer Judy Freeman Mimi Peterson February Board Minutes The minutes of the February 17, 2000 Board meeting were approved with the following corrections: Page 2: a. addition `A University program or another Evanston agency might be interested in assisting in the development of an annual plan (to get the City more resources). b. Change; from $1 of $5 to $1 or $5 Page 3: a. First paragraph add: Water is the only Evanston based utility bill. b. additional ideas expressed: • Ladd Arboretum Committee is a possible citizen board • Possible for local Evanston fund for tree replacement to fund tree replacement privately with tax deductible benefit Page 4: a. Clarify: Mr. Crum signed up for the pilot program as a private citizen Board Introductions The Board made introductions. The Mayor has introduced both Gladys Bryer and Judy Freeman as prospective Environment Board members to City Council. V Discussion concerning Evanston's trees Paul D'Agostino, superintendent of Parks/Forestry, welcomed questions from the Board. Mr. Schreier requested clarification on expenses for tree trimming. Mr_ D'Agostino said the City Council originally allotted 5250,000 a year to help get the Parks/Forestry Division on a 6-year trimming cycle (the current cycle is approximately 12 years). 518,000 is available as partial funding for an inventory and assessment of current City parkway and public trees. Mr. D'Agostino clarified that private elm tree insurance is based on the size of the tree. In 1999 the contractor and City crews trimmed 6,000 trees. Eight full time people are assigned to tree trimming. The arborist's salary is divided in the budget elements between tree planting, Dutch Elm disease, and parkway trees. Mr. D'Agostino explained that each element has different employees salaries assigned to it. 8 employees tree trimming and parkway trees 8 employees Dutch Elm disease 2 employees tree planting Mr. D'Agostino discussed the Forestry Division Management Plan. It will be helpful in developing priorities. One goal is to have the ratio of tree removals equal planted trees. Currently the City is losing trees at a ratio of two lost trees to one tree replanted. The City has funded the tree -trimming program at S175.000 for the fiscal year 2000-01 and at $250,000 for the budget year 2001-02. The goal is to keep part of the allocation so the City can plant more trees than it takes down. Long range planning includes a nursery where the City can grow its own trees. This year 250 trees will be planted. The exact number will depend on the cost of the tree; some new species are more expensive and the City is changing the types of trees they plant to plan for diversity and include native species. Mr. D'Agostino requested funding for 450 trees and was granted only enough for 250 trees. Generally 160 are lost due to hazards and 240 due to Dutch Elm disease. Last year was unusual; 465 trees were lost plus an additional 242 removed due to Dutch Elm disease. There are 28,000 parkway trees and 10,000 trees in City parks. When trees are replaced the new tree has a diameter of 2 112 to 3 inches. Should a resident want a larger size on their parkway, the resident can make up the difference in cost. The Board suggested that if people knew that they could pay for a larger size tree, many people would pay the cost. 2 Mr. D'Agostino said popular trees included maples, lindens, and ashes. The City of Evanston has a lot of these trees and will not be planting more until the ratios are lower. He suggested that no one species should represent more than 10% of the tree population. Some slower growing trees cost more. Trees that will be planted are native oaks, beeches, hornbeams, gingkoes and Kentucky coffee trees. This year Forestry rechecked all the trees slated for removal and 98% were confirmed for removal. As a result of the trimming program, there should be a reduction in the number of trees lost due to storm damage. Removal of hazardous branches depends on where the tree is located, the condition of the tree, and what the branch would `hit" if it failed. Mr. Schreier suggested that since it takes so long to replace the trees that a program could be started to increase the number of trees planted each year. Mr. D'Agostino welcomed the idea. Discussion included issues such as setting up a private fund to purchase parkway trees, a tax deduction for citizens, using a 501(c)(3) (such as the Evanston Environmental Association) to accept the donations or a direct donation to the City, using a private contractor to plant and guarantee the trees, etc. Currently a 4-inch tree would cost between $350 and $400 dollars to purchase and plant. On the current schedule a parkway tree might not be replaced until 2004 depending on the location; the department tries to plant evenly throughout 6 work areas. Mr. Schreier and Ms. Poole will research ideas on private funding of parkway trees. Regarding donations people might have more confidence giving to a not -for -profit instead of the City. The not -for -profit would have to be able to follow through and deal with the process expediently. Tree replacements should take no longer than a month after the donation has been paid. The Parks/Forestry division would have to maintain some kind of oversight. The Environment Board will work on developing private funding plans for parkway trees. Currently some Evanston garden clubs donate parkway trees. Mr. D'Agostino thinks that the City Council will keep funding the tree maintenance program. Once the program is under control, Mr. D'Agostino thinks additional money can be secured for tree planting. His planting goal is to have a tree every 30 — 35 feet along the parkways. Mr. D'Agostino noted that Mayor Daley's tree keeping program has cornered the market on trees and it is more difficult to find nurseries that have the trees the City needs in the quantities required. The City has not looked into growing its own trees due to lack of space (a general nursery has 10,000 trees). The City will be developing a small nursery across from the Ecology Center housing 6 foot trees that will be grown to 2 % inch diameters; this will take most varieties 2 — 4 years. The memorial tree program in the Ladd Arboretum is run through the Packs division. Generally costs are $300 - 5500 a tree. Over 400 memorial trees have been planted in the last 30 years. Ms. Poole commented that she is concerned about the number of trees that need trimming in residential areas. Contractors can be hired to trim parkway trees but they must get a permit from the City of Evanston. The Parks Division is reluctant to issue permits to citizens to do trimming of parkway trees. Citizens can help Parkway trees through difficult times. In periods of antmapated drought, citizens could help out by watering their parkway trees. Mr. D'Agostino commented that a Tree Commission would be a useful vehicle to promote public education about the community's trees, tree care, and awareness of Evanston's tree resources. A suggestion was made that an already e.dsting committee, the Ladd Arboretum Committee, might take on this responsibility. The Board thanked Mr. D'Agostino for coming and discussing tree issues and concerns. Leaf Blower Ordinance The Board discussed the leaf blower ordinance. Ms. Lieberman highlighted several issues such as: Seasonal ban Possible exemption for the City of Evanston Licensing lawncare services Enforcement Quality of life issues Mr. D'Agostino noted that the City could buy non -backpack style blowers (he has 4 for park maintenance). These push blowers have a different pitch but are just as loud. He noted that when tree trimming is done there is a huge mess, and it does take a long time to clean up the site. The City exemption would be difficult. Electric hand blowers are not banned. One way around the ordinance is to use a generator that powers electric hand blowers. Violations of the leaf blower ordinance now go through adjudication at the Civic Center. Increased enforcement of the leaf blower ordinance might be achieved if a larger responsibility were placed on the homeowner. This would require education. Citations might be left at the homeowners if the homeowner is not at home. The Board may way to work with the problem solving team from the Police Department to figure out effective enforcement. Publicizing the ordinance is also 4 important. Licensing of lawn care services would be helpful in making businesses aware of the ordinance. A periodic crack down such as was done iin the fall, helped with compliance. Mr. Gemmell was authorized by the Board to develop a draft report on the ordinance that will go back to the Human Services Committee. The Board will review at the April meeting. Board Vacancies Both Ms. Bryer and Ms. Freeman have been introduced to the City Council as potential board members. Their appointments are slated for approval at the nerd City Council meeting. Ms. Lieberman reported that Ms. Ruble was moving to Madison Wisconsin and has resigned from the Board. Next Meeting Due to the pass over holiday the April Board meeting is being changed to Tuesday, April 18t'. The Board will meet at 7:00 PM for a reception for past Environment Board members Dan Hartnett and Matt Ter Molen. The next meeting of the Evanston Environment Board will be Tuesday, April 18, 2000 at 7:30 PM in the Recreation Division conference room (on the first floor) of the Evanston Civic Center. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz Ecology Center Coordinator 5 Draft- Not Approved Evanston Environment Board Thursday, February 17, 2000 7:30 PM Board Members Present: Board Members Absent: Staff Members Present: Tim Andruss Bob Gemmell Mardi Klevs Sharon Lieberman Gwendolyn Burton Poole Lynn Ruble David Schreier Leroy Davis Judy Freitag Lucy Elam Tom Fischl Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Others Present: Stephanie Hoops, Medill Journalism School Debbie Hillman Mimi Peterson Guests and Board members were introduced. Tree activist, Mimi Peterson, presented her history of association with local trees and the Parks/Forestry Division of the City. In 1996 a tree on her parkway developed "slime flux." Upon contacting the Parks/Forestry Division Ms. Peterson learned that the limited budget of the division did not allow for maintenance for disease control. As Ms. Peterson investigated the budget for tree maintenance and lobbied for more funds to be allocated to tree maintenance. Reviewing the number of trees planted vs. the number of trees removed dating back to 1984, Ms. Peterson noted that more trees are removed than are planted; currently the approximate number of trees in arrears is 1,000. Regarding American Elm trees, Ms. Peterson said that the lack of maintenance has further spread disease and losses in greater numbers than in previous years. In addition she sees the City removing trees unnecessarily suggesting that the trees present a hazard. Tree trimming money is being used for tree removal. Additionally Ms. Peterson suggested that the City is working without a plan. Under the current tree -trimming contract, Ms. Peterson suggests that the City is wasting its money as the current tree service is doing a poor job. Ms. Peterson invited Dr. Tom Green, an arborist and urban forester to evaluate the work. Dr. Green verbally indicated to Ms. Peterson that 10% of the 3,000 trees were nbt trimmed up to standards. Ms. Peterson noted that the goal of the contract tree trimming over a 3-year period is to reduce the tree trimming cycle to 6 years, which can then be handled by the current Fore_�ry division. Ms. Peterson had asked Dr. Green to review the tree trimming because she was not satisfied with the current contractor (Winkler) and had no confidence in the City Forestry Division. She noted that Doug Gaynor, director of Parks/Forestry and Recreation, considered 1 % of the contracted trees were problematic. Ms. Peterson agreed to make Dr. Green's report available to the Board. Referring back to an ideal plan for tree removal. Ms. Peterson suggested that 5 — 10 days after a tree has been removed the stump should be ground. One to two days later soil and seed should be added to the stump site. In the fall or spring a new tree should be planted on the site. Ms. Peterson's concerns include; • Having knowledgeable and adequate staff • Lack of oversight by the Forestry staff on the current tree trimming contract • Need for a tree plan • Consideration of establishing a citizen tree commission • Tree planting ratio to equal tree removals • Reduction in number of days to 30 for stump removal • Tree policy should address maintenance • Budget tightening has really mean a loss of service regarding trees • What is the plan to rectify poorly trimmed trees • Tree maintenance, Dutch Elm disease, and tree planting, although separate in the City of Evanston budget need to be tied together with a tree plan The Board suggested that the City of Evanston does not have enough resources to do all that Ms. Peterson is suggesting. The Parks/Forestry division does not have enough time to see the big picture, i.e. a plan; they are too busy putting out "fires." Using volunteers to work with grant app5cations and help get relief as well as using the local office of the United States Forest Service would both be ways to aid the Forestry division. Concentration on figuring out how to get the City more resources, such as grants, may produce the long-term results desired. An additional suggestion involved a voluntary program where citizens can round up their water bills to the nearest $1 of $5 to fund a tree commission. In Evanston, the water bill may not be the appropriate bill to round up as this bill has gone up tremendously in the last few years. Another possibility, is formation ota not -for -profit organization with a mission of tree maintenance and support. The Board also commented that a plan needs to go beyond current personnel and changing administrations. Treekeepers programs as administered by Opesn Lands would be helpful in educating citizens regarding trees. The Board noted that current trees have been inventoried and computerized. Another issue that could complicate the trimming and maintenance regarding trees in the unionization of Forestry workers; union work rules may have to be changed. Regarding the formation of a Tree Commission, the Board thought it was a good idea that citizens have a place to go with tree questions and issues that can be dealt with in a professional forum. Ms. Lieberman noted that the Environment Board has worked closely with the Parks/Forestry Division over the last few years and has developed a good working relationship with the Division and Superintendent, Paul D'Agostino. In general, the Board agreed that the new tree policy is a good, positive effort. Board members would like an opportunity to review the proposed plan in more detail. Ms. Lutz will e-mail the minutes to Board members to comment on the tree plan and the related issues discussed. The Board will be compiling information and sending it to Mr. D'Agostino. Initially the Board expressed these ideas: • The proposed tree planting plan is a big improvement over the previous 1950- 60's plan • Encouraged tree replacement to equal tree removal • Maintenance issues that coincide with trees should be addressed in the tree plan • Despite the lack of funds, the number of trees planted should be increased (based on the numbers presented by Ms. Peterson) • Emphasis on planting native trees; perhaps more oaks, other non-invasive tree species • More education is needed for homeowners such as watering their parkway trees during drought/dry seasons • Include information and processes regarding the gypsy moth and the Asian long horned beetle in the tree plan as well as in public information The Board would like to ask Mr. D'Agostino to come to the March meeting. Board members can review notes and suggestions from each other (Ms. Lutz will compile and distribute prior to the meeting) prior to the meeting. Ms. Lieberman noted that Ms. Poole is the Board's tree chairman. Leaf Blower Ordinance Mr. Gemmell briefly noted that the memo from City staff to the Human Services Committee had several suggested recommendations that undermined the leaf blower ordinance. The Board agreed that they did not have enough time to review the leaf blower documentation this evening and would take up the issue at the March 16ih meeting. The Board will be responding to the Human Services Committee and incorporating some of the suggestions that were discussed at the Human Services Committee meeting. Sustainable Practices Ms. Lieberman discussed a request from the Safer Pest Control Project for the Board to become an ally by supporting the implementation of the of the Integrated Pesticide Management laws passed at the end of 1999. These laws require schools to adopt IPM policies including 48-hour notification if spraying is to occur on school grounds. Ms. Lieberman asked and received the Board's permission to forward the IPM materials to the local schools. Ms. Klevs reported on the EPA working group committee, which met with Roger Crum, Joel Wells, Northwestern representatives, USEPA, and the US Department of Energy. Ms. Klevs and Ms. Lieberman attended for the Board. Northwestern is already doing a lot of energy efficiency practices. Northwestern did agree to participate in the Energy Star program and will be a pilot for the university model. Ms. Klevs also discussed a pilot project for Energy efficient fuel cells. Roger Crum signed up for the program and indicated that he would like to be kept informed on energy efficient technology. Ms. Klevs also said District 202 is much farther ahead on energy efficient practice than anticipated. They will most likely qualify for energy star recognition. Next Meeting The next meeting of the Evanston Environment Board will be Thursday, March 16, 2000 at 7:30 PM in room 3650 of the Evanston Civic Center. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz Ecology Center Coordinator A Draft- Not Approved Evanston Environment Board Thursday, January 20, 2000 7:30 PM Board Members Present Board Members Absent Staff Members Present: Others Present: Tim Andruss Bob Gemmell Judy Freitag Mardi 10evs Sharon Lieberman Gwendolyn Burton Poole David Schreier Leroy Davis Lucy Elam Tom Fisch[ Lynn Ruble Linda Lutz, Ecology Center Coordinator Fred Wittenberg November meeting notes The Board approved the notes from the November 1999 meeting. A quorum was not present. Idling Motors Ms. Lieberman reviewed the requests Alderman Feldman had made to the Board regarding idling motors. The Board noted that a similar query had resulted in a memorandum on the subject in 1996. The Board agreed that this response should be sent to Alderman Feldman. Ms. Lutz will send the information and a cover letter to Alderman Feldman. Ms. Lieberman also added that she had reported a truck, idling unnecessarily, to the Water Department. Richard Figurelli, superintendent of the water division, responded that he would send a memo to the division reminding truck operators that vehicles should not be left idling. Sustainable Practices Ms. Klevs reported that the working group from the USEPA would be meeting with Roger Crum, representatives of Northwestern, and a Department of Energy .. _ representative on February 4t' at 4:00 PM. The Department of Energy programs and resources are an opportunity for Northwestern to save money through energy efficiency. Mr. Wittenberg asked if the City of Evanston has to comply with the clean air act Ms. Klevs assured him that the City of Evanston does have to comply. Tree Watch Ms. Lieberman discussed the history of the tree issues that the Board has been involved with stemming from a clean sweep through the areas adjacent to the Skokie Swift tracks in south Evanston. This committee is currently without a chairperson. Ms. Klevs asked about the street tree plan recalling that the current plan was ; developed in the 1960's and aesthetic, as well as, biological considerations have changed. Ms. Klevs noted that the practice of same block/same tree, is not necessarily a good practice in light of new diseases and insects that are creating enormous new challenges. Focusing on trees native to the area could be included in the plan. Issues, such as planting low growing trees under power lines, should also be incorporated. Current policies on replacement of parkway trees in addition to tree diversity should be addressed. Ms. Lutz will request a current tree policy and forward it to Ms. Poole to review and make recommendations to the Board. Leaf Blower Ordinance Mr. Gemmell reviewed new charts incorporating additional citations. Several changes were suggested including date changes and uniformity in chart categories. The text of the report was unchanged from the December draft with the exception of deleting the sentence that says the Ecology Center will provide_ record keeping of the leaf blower violation reports. The leaf blower ordinance brochure deleting the language regarding receiving a warning for the first offense. The Board approved the leaf blower annual report as written. Ms. Lutz will forward the report to the Human Services Committee, which will meet on Monday, January 31, 2000 at the Evanston Civic Center. Comprehensive General Plan The Board briefly discussed the enforcement of the Comprehensive General Plan. Ms. Lutz will confirm that Dennis Marino and the new City planner will attend the next board meeting. Lawn mower buy-back program Ms. Freitag reviewed the lawn mower buy-back program sponsored by Home Depot and Black and Decker. The program is basically a one -day effort with volunteers to take in old mowers, empty out the gasoline, and stack mowers for pick up by scrap dealers. Participants are given coupons toward the purchase of a new (more efficient) mower. The Board agreed that it would be a great project that they would be happy to sponsor. It would be similar to the household hazardous waste collection days. End of Terms Ms. Lieberman volunteered to write letters for Dan Hartnett and Matt TerMolen who completed 8 years on the Environment Board in December. Chairman Elections The Board discussed election of a new chairperson. Traditionally the Environment Board chair is elected at the December meeting and takes over in January to serve the calendar year. Ms. Freitag moved, seconded by Mr. Gemmell to nominate Ms. Lieberman as chair of the Environment Board. There were no other nominations and Ms. Lieberman was elected unanimously as chairman of the Environment Board for the year 2000. Next Meeting The next meeting of the Ladd Arboretum Committee will be Thursday, February 17, 2000 at 7:30 PM in room 3650 of the Evanston Civic Center. Respectfully submitted, Linda Lutz Ecology Center Coordinator