HomeMy WebLinkAboutORDINANCES-2011-068-O-11Effective Date: August 24, 2011
7/28/2011
68-0-11
AN ORDINANCE
Amending Title 8, Chapter 27 of the City Code,
"Solid Waste Transfer Station Fee"
WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 6 of the Illinois Constitution sets forth the
powers of home rule units of government; and
WHEREAS, the City of Evanston is a home rule unit of government; and
WHEREAS, the powers of a home rule unit such as the City are to be
construed liberally pursuant to Article VII, Section 6(m) of the Illinois Constitution; and
WHEREAS, the City has the authority to adopt ordinances and to
promulgate rules and regulations that pertain to its government and affairs and that
0 protect the public health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; and
WHEREAS, a multinational conglomeration headquartered in France,
Veolia Environnement ("Veolia"), owns and operates a Solid Waste Transfer Station
("SWTS") for profit within the City of Evanston. The SWTS accepts waste generated by
private entities within the City and those in adjacent communities, which is collected by
private scavengers and solid waste collectors for profit; and
WHEREAS, Veolia operates, maintains, and seeks to expand the
operations of the SWTS in order to increase its profits; and
WHEREAS, as documented in its 2010 annual financial report, Veolia's
worldwide operations generated over 34 billion Euros in revenue, which adjusted to U.S.
• dollars comes out to approximately $50 billion in revenue in 2010 (currency
68-0-11
conversion as of July 28, 2011). Excerpts of the annual report are attached hereto as 0
Exhibit 1; and
WHEREAS, Veolia's subsidiary which operates the SWTS in Evanston
has 84,740 employees located in 33 countries worldwide; and
WHEREAS, Veolia's worldwide revenues in the waste collection sector
increased 6.7% in 2010, for a total of 9,312 billion Euros (approximately $13.2 billion);
and
WHEREAS, the annual report highlights the fact that in 2010 the revenue
margins in the waste collection sector improved despite increased pressure on prices;
and
WHEREAS, Veolia's North American revenues increased 6% in 2010;
and
WHEREAS, Veolia's annual report highlighted the significant revenue 0
streams coming in via the Cook/Lake County market, specifically, the $12 million annual
waste collection contract recently executed with the City of Highland Park; and
WHEREAS, the City of Batavia, Illinois currently charges Veolia two
dollars and twenty-eight cents ($2.28) per ton of solid waste delivered to the SWTS in
its jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the City of Plano charges the operator of a SWTS in its
jurisdiction two dollars and seventy-five cents ($2.75) per ton of solid waste delivered to
said SWTS; and
WHEREAS, the $2.00 per ton fee assessed by the City to Veolia is
reasonable and comparable to the those similarly situated communities' fees; and •
—2—
68-0-11
•1 WHEREAS, one of the private solid waste collectors utilizing the SWTS,
Groot, confirmed on December 21, 2010, that Veolia imposed a 1% increase on all of its
commercial franchise accounts, which was applicable to Groot, said increase which
took effect on January 1, 2011; and
WHEREAS, in its pursuit of profit, Veolia elected to pass on the costs of
the Solid Waste Station Transfer Fee to said commercial franchise accounts; and
WHEREAS, Article XI, Section I of the Illinois Constitution mandates that it
is the public policy of the State and the duty of each person to provide and maintain a
healthful environment for the benefit of this and future generations; and
WHEREAS, from time to time, the operations of the SWTS cause
environmental damage which adversely impacts the public health and welfare, and that
in order to alleviate the burden on the City's enforcement departments, and to assure
public participation in the task of protecting the environment, governmental remedies
and programs directed to the operations of the SWTS must be provided; and
WHEREAS, in addition to the City's existing laws and regulations
concerning transportation and storage of solid waste, there is a need for additional
regulations that prevent possible damage to the environment and harm to the public
health, safety and welfare of the people of the City resulting from the operations of the
SWTS; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to supplement and strengthen existing
regulations regarding all solid waste operations in the City; and
WHEREAS, excessive quantities of refuse and inefficient and improper
• methods of refuse disposal result in scenic blight, cause serious hazards to public
—3—
68-0-11
health and safety, create public nuisances, divert land from more productive uses, •
depress the value of nearby property, offend the senses, and otherwise interfere with
the City's community life and development; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to 415 ILCS 5/2(a)(iv), it is the obligation of the
State Government to manage its own activities so as to minimize environmental
damage and to encourage and assist local governments to adopt environmental
regulations; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to standard condition 5c of its Construction and
Development Permit from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ("IEPA") and
special condition 17 of its December 2010 IEPA-issued Supplemental Permit for
Operating Plan Modification, Veolia is required to meet and secure all necessary zoning
approvals from the City in the use of said permits; and •
WHEREAS, the Illinois Constitution authorizes home rule units to adopt
and enforce zoning restrictions, as explained in the case of Zeitz v. Village of Glenview,
304 III.App.3d 586; and
WHEREAS, the enforcement and application of all permitted zoning
regulations applicable to the Veolia SWTS costs the City of Evanston, and its residents,
money and time in terms of staff resources expended in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/11-60-8, the City of Evanston is
empowered with broad authority to define, prevent and abate nuisances, and to
otherwise make, enact, and enforce all needful rules, regulations, and ordinances which
may be conducive to the preservation of the public health, comfort, and convenience,
•
-4-
68-0-11
0 such power which extends to charging the owner and all users of the SWTS a
reasonable charge for the use of that station; and
WHEREAS, enforcement of proper regulations directed to controlling the
presence of vectors such as rats and other vermin, the existence of which are
attributable to the operations of the SWTS, and which cost City staff time and resources
in remediating, should permit the legitimate recovery of the costs of such enforcement;
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/11-42-9, the City of Evanston may
prohibit any offensive or unwholesome business or establishment within the municipality
and within the distance of one (1) mile beyond the municipal limits; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/11-80-10, the City of Evanston may
regulate and prevent the depositing of ashes, offal, dirt, garbage, or any other offensive
matter in and to prevent injury to streets, alleys, or other municipal property; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to 65 ILCS 5/11-42-10, the City of Evanston may
compel the owner of any unwholesome or nauseous house or place, to cleanse, abate,
or remove the same, and to regulate the location thereof; and
WHEREAS, the City Health Department expended, and continues to
expend, enormous amounts of staff time on the SWTS station issues (approximating at
least 1,070 hours as of July 28, 2011). A full-time staff member was hired on November
26, 2010 who is exclusively devoted to dealing with citizen complaints regarding the
SWTS operations and monitoring the SWTS' operations in connection thereto; and
WHEREAS, in July 2011 alone, no fewer than four (4) citations have been
• issued to Veolia for violations of City Code Subsection 8-4-1-(A), which stem from the
M-2
68-0-11
noxious odors that emanate from the operation of the SWTS, requiring approximately
fifty (50) hours' worth of City staff time for the investigation and prosecution thereof.
City staff tasked with the prosecution and adjudication of the citation included the City
Corporation Counsel, the Administrative Adjudication Division, as well as other City
departments; and
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2011, the SWTS was adjudged guilty of violating
City Code Section 8-4-1(A) due to the fact that an unwholesome odor of rotten garbage
was emanating from the SWTS on June 14, 2011, and thereby befouling the
neighborhood; and
WHEREAS, from May 16, 2011 to July 28, 2011, 54 complaints were
registered with the City's 311 Center, complaining of the noxious nuisances caused by
the SWTS' operations. The Service Request Report evidencing the complaints is
attached as Exhibit 2 to this Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, these complaints received from residents were regarding
odor, litter, speeding trucks, and noise, all of which are nuisances under the Illinois
Compiled Statutes and the City Code; and
WHEREAS, as depicted in the pictures taken by City staff, attached
hereto as Exhibit 3, on July 18, the nuisances present at the SWTS were of like kind
and volume present on a daily basis at the SWTS, such nuisances which the City
Council is fully aware of; and
WHEREAS, charging a fee for the benefit of the City will at least partially
offset, but not come close to recapturing, the enormous financial burdens imposed upon
the City as a result of the operation of the SWTS including, but not limited to, is
—6—
68-0-11
• responding to citizen complaints, regulating and abating associated nuisances, and
repairing and maintaining adversely affected infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, in the case of City of Chicago v. Krisjon Construction Co.,
246 III.App.3d 950, the Illinois Appellate Court held that home rule units of government
have the constitutional authority to regulate solid waste dump sites; and
WHEREAS, in the case of Village of Carpentersville v. Pollution Control
Board, 135 111.2d 463, the Illinois Supreme Court held that the State Environmental
Protection Act did not pre-empt the authority of either home rule or non -home rule units
of government, to regulate liquid hazardous waste incinerators; and
WHEREAS, in the cases of City of Chicago v. Pollution Control Board
(1974), 59 111.2d 484, and Cook County v. John Sexton Contractors Co., 75 111.2d 494,
the Illinois Supreme Court held that the State Environmental Protection Act did not pre-
empt t the authority of home rule units of government to regulate landfills; and
WHEREAS, the City, as a home rule unit of government, has the authority
to regulate solid waste dumps, liquid hazardous waste incinerators, landfills and, by
extension, the directly analogous operations of the SWTS; and
WHEREAS, in 2010 and 2011, the Evanston City Council held numerous
public hearings, pursuant to proper notice, to consider the impacts upon the City
infrastructure, public health, and resources resultant from the activities generated by the
SWTS, received information from City staff, received exhaustive input from City
residents, convened numerous neighborhood and Ward meetings, and carefully and
exhaustively deliberated regarding the setting of a reasonable user fee; and
—7—
68-0-11
WHEREAS, in 2010 and 2011, City staff and the City Council engaged •
Veolia in a dialog regarding the operations of the SWTS, such that any argument that
the fee mandated by this Ordinance is being arbitrarily assessed, is not well -taken; and
WHEREAS, if the user fee is not established, the City's enforcement
agencies will continue to be overly burdened in addressing and abating nuisances
attributable to the SWTS, and Evanston residents will be severely impacted and suffer
from deleterious health and environmental effects; and
WHEREAS, the City of Evanston must be allowed to impose a reasonable
fee to partially defray its costs related to aforesaid impacts; and
WHEREAS, the City of Evanston has the right to classify businesses and
their customers based upon reasonable classifications such as the cost of service,
impacts upon city infrastructure, impacts upon City staff and residents, the purpose for
which the service is received, the quantity or the amount received, the different
character of the service furnished, the time of its use, or any other matter that presents
a substantial difference as a ground of distinction; and
WHEREAS, the City of Evanston's police power is not limited to the
regulation of such things that may already become nuisances, but extends to the
regulation of those things that may become nuisances; and
WHEREAS, in the case of PrimeCo Personal Communications, LP v.
Illinois Commerce Commission, 2000 WL 34016430 (citing Diginet, Inc. v. Western
Union ATS, Inc., 958 F.2d 1388), the Circuit Court of Cook County found that it is within
a municipality's lawful regulatory power to impose user fees based on reasonable
estimates of the costs imposed by the user(s); and
•
MI-M
68-0-11
• WHEREAS, the City Council considered and adopted the Solid Waste
Station Transfer Fee pursuant to its home rule, zoning, regulatory, and police powers,
and, following its deliberations, set a user fee that is rationally related to legitimate
government purposes; and
WHEREAS, it is well -settled law in Illinois that the legislative judgment of
the City Council must be considered presumptively valid, see Glenview State Bank v.
Village of Deerfield, 213 III.App.3d 747; and
WHEREAS, the fee set forth herein is fair and equal to all similarly
situated parties and that the City is entitled to partially recover its reasonably estimated
costs through the collection of this fee; and
WHEREAS, a worldwide corporation such as Veolia with approximately
$50 billion in 2010 revenues has the means and ability to pay the reasonably
• established $2.00/ton waste transfer fee;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF EVANSTON, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION 1: That the foregoing recitals are found as fact and
incorporated herein by reference.
SECTION 2: That Title 8, Chapter 27 of the City Code is hereby deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following, titled "Solid Waste Station Transfer Fee":
8-27-1: TITLE:
This Chapter shall be referred to as the Solid Waste Transfer Station Fee.
8-27-2: PURPOSE AND INTENT:
• The purpose of this Chapter is to promote the public health, safety, and welfare of the
residents of the City of Evanston by requiring a fee for the use of a Solid Waste Transfer
68-0-11
Station. Said fee shall serve to defray the City's reasonably estimated costs incurred due
to the operation of any such Solid Waste Transfer Station. Said costs include, but are not
limited to, regulatory inspections, nuisance abatement measures, remediation of
environmental damage, and the maintenance, repair, and replacement of adversely
affected infrastructure.
8-27-3: DEFINITIONS:
As used in this Chapter, the following terms are defined as follows:
SCAVENGER SERVICE: any person engaged in the removal of solid waste. The
foregoing shall not apply to waste collected by, or on behalf of, the City of Evanston.
SOLID WASTE TRANSFER STATION: a privately -owned site or facility that accepts
waste for sorting and/or consolidation, and further transfer to a waste disposal,
treatment, or handling facility.
8-27-4: PAYMENT OF FEE AND QUARTERLY REPORT REQUIRED:
(A) Any Scavenger Service that owns and operates a Solid Waste Transfer Station
shall be assessed a fee of two dollars ($2.00) per ton, or any fraction thereof, of
solid waste delivered to said Solid Waste Transfer Station.
(B) The fee shall be paid to the City of Evanston each calendar quarter within forty-
five (45) days after the end of the previous calendar quarter. •
(C) Any Scavenger Service that owns and operates a Solid Waste Transfer Station
shall provide, to the Director of Public Works of the City of Evanston, a quarterly
report documenting the quantity of all solid waste delivered to the Solid Waste
Transfer Station and shall identify the Scavenger Service(s) that delivered said
waste. Said report shall be submitted to the City of Evanston each calendar
quarter within forty-five (45) days after the end of the previous calendar quarter.
8-27-5: PENALTY:
(A) If a Scavenger Service that owns and operates a Solid Waste Transfer Station
fails to pay the fee within the time frame specified in Section 4 this Chapter, it
shall be fined a mandatory fine of seven hundred fifty dollars ($750.00). Each
day that the fee remains unpaid after it is due shall be a separate and continuing
offense.
(B) The City may refuse to permit any Scavenger Service that owns and operates a
Solid Waste Transfer Station to continue operation thereof if said Scavenger
Service fails to pay all outstanding fees it owes the City for any two (2)
consecutive calendar quarters.
(C) If a Scavenger Service that owns and operates a Solid Waste Transfer Station •
fails to provide the quarterly report within the time frame specified in Section 4 of
10-
68-0-11
• this Chapter, it shall be fined a mandatory fine of fifty dollars ($50.00). Each day
that the report is not submitted after it is due shall be a separate and continuing
offense.
8-27-6: TERMS LIBERALLY CONSTRUED:
The terms and provisions of this Chapter shall be liberally construed so as to effectuate
the purposes set forth in Section 2 of this Chapter. Each and every recital and
legislative finding regarding this Chapter is to be construed and interpreted severally.
SECTION 3: That if any provision of this ordinance or application thereof
to any person or circumstance is ruled unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such
invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this ordinance that can be
given effect without the invalid application or provision, and each invalid provision or
invalid application of this ordinance is severable.
SECTION 4: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict
herewith are hereby repealed, and, specifically, Ordinance 82-0-10 is repealed in its
• entirety.
•
SECTION 5: That this Ordinance 68-0-11 shall be in full force and
effective as of December 17, 2010, nunc pro tunc.
SECTION 6: That the findings and recitals contained herein are declared
to be prima facie evidence of the law of the City and shall be received in evidence as
provided by the Illinois Compiled Statutes and the courts of the State of Illinois.
—11—
68-0-11
Introduced: 2011
Adopted:A d.1 j,� , 2011
_1
Attest:
Ro ey Gre�, City Clerk
Approved:
2011
Eli2oeth B. Tisdahl, Mayor
Approved as to form:
W. Grant Farrar, Corporation Counsel
•
•
is
-12-
68-0-11
0
•
Exhibits 1, 2 & 3
—13—
REGISTRATION
DOCUMENT 2010
Annual financial report
Q VEOIIA
ENVIRONNEMENT
U
0
n
LJ
• This is a free translation into English of Veolia Environnement's document de reference (the "registration
document"), filed by Veolia Environnement with the French Regulatory Authority (Autorite des marches
financiers (AMF)) on March 30, 2011 under number D.11-0200, and is provided solely for the convenience
of English-speaking readers. This document does not include the annexes to the French version of the
registration document.
•
Veolia Environnement's Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed with the US Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 18, 2011, contains substantially all of the information set forth in this registration
document and certain additional information not included herein.
VEOLIA
E IV�VI RO[V NE n/l�E NT
Pursuant to article 28 of European Regulation n° 809/2004, the following
information is incorporated by reference in this registration document: (i) the
consolidated financial statements and the corporate financial statements for
the 2009 fiscal year and the corresponding statutory auditor's report,
included in chapter 20, paragraphs 20.1 and 20.2, respectively, of Veolia
Environnement's reference document for the 2009 fiscal year, filed with the
French Regulatory Authority (AMF) financiers on March 30, 2010 under
number D.10-0190, and (ii) the consolidated financial statements and the
corporate financial statements for the 2008 fiscal year and the corresponding
statutory auditor's report, included in chapter 20, paragraphs 20.1 and 20.2,
respectively, of Veolia Environnement's reference document for the 2008
fiscal year, filed with the French Regulatory Authority (AMF) on March 30,
2009 under number D.09-0166.
This registration document was filed with the French Regulatory Authority (AMF) on March 30, 2011,
pursuant to Article 212-13 of its general regulations. This registration document may be used in connection
with a financial transaction if supplemented by a note d'operation approved by the French Regulatory
Authority (AMF). This document has been prepared by the issuer under the liability of the signatories.
Main acquisitions and divestitures in 2010
The main acquisition and divestitures during the year include: is
• in France, following the Memorandum of Understanding signed with Lyonnaise des Eaux (LDE) on
December 19, 2008, an agreement concerning the redistribution of the subsidiaries held jointly by
LDE and Veolia Eau — Compagnie G6ndrale des Eaux came into effect on March 2010 and resulted
in:
• the sale to LDE of Socidtd des Eaux du Nord, Socidtd Nancdienne des Eaux, Socidtd des Eaux de
Versailles et de Saint Cloud, Socidtd Martiniquaise des Eaux, Socidtd Guyanaise des Eaux,
Socidtd St6phanoise des Eaux, SERAM and Socidtd Provengale des Eaux,
• the acquisition by Veolia Eau - Compagnie Gdndrale des Eaux of additional interests in Socidtd
des Eaux d'Arles, Socidtd des Eaux de Marseille and certain of its subsidiaries and in particular
Socidtd Industrielle du Littoral Mdditerranden and Bronzo Environnement. Veolia Eau -
Compagnie Gdndrale des Eaux now holds more than 97% of the share capital of these
companies;
in Europe, the acquisition in November 2010 of certain United Utilities Group businesses, including:
• a 77.1% shareholding, via Veolia Voda, in Sofiyska Voda, which operates water supply and
treatment services for the city of Sofia in Bulgaria,
• a 33.2% shareholding, via Veolia Voda, in Aqua SA, which operates water supply and treatment
services for the city of Biesko Biala in southern Poland,
• a portfolio of construction and management contracts for water treatment plants in the United
Kingdom.
again in Europe, the acquisition of a 9.52% shareholding by the company International Finance •
Corporation (IFC) in Veolia Voda, reducing Veolia Eau — Compagnie Gdndrale des Eaux's
shareholding in Veolia Voda to 75.2%, the divestiture in December 2010 to Rabobank and Evides of
a portion (29%) of our shareholding in Delfluent B.V, the company operating the Hague BOT
contract, reducing our shareholding in this company to 11% and the buyout by Veolia Water
Systems of the remaining 25% minority interests in SIBA Spa increasing our shareholding in
Siciliacque (in Sicily) and Sorical (in Calabre) to 74.7% and 46.5%, respectively.
Following the creation, acquisition or consolidation of sixty-four companies in 2010 and the liquidation,
divestiture or transfer of thirty-seven companies, the Water Division (excluding Proactiva) is comprised of
755 companies as of December 31, 2010 compared to 728 in 2009.
6.1.3.2 Environmental Services
Veolia Environnement, through its subsidiary Veolia Propretd, is the number one reference in its sector('),
where it is involved in waste collection, recycling and processing and handles waste in all forms and at all
stages of the waste cycle. Veolia Propretd manages liquid and solid waste, non -hazardous and hazardous
waste (with the exception of nuclear waste) from collection to recovery, on behalf of both public authorities
and industrial customers.
As of December 31, 2010, Veolia Propretd employed 84,740 people(2) around the world, in approximately 33
countries.
•
(1) Sources: internal studies and Eurostat
(2) Employees managed as of December 31, 2010, including 6,567 Proactiva employees allocated to its environmental services business.
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2010 - VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT — 43
•
•
•
Veolia Propret6 is a partner of over 750,000 industrial and service -sector customers(3) and serves more than
75 million residents on behalf of public authorities.
As of December 31, 2010, Veolia Propretd managed approximately 817 waste processing units.
The term of Veolia Propretd contracts usually depends on the nature of services provided, applicable local
regulations and the level of industrial investment required. Collection contracts usually range from one to
five years, while waste processing contracts can range from one year (for services provided on sites
belonging to Veolia Propretd), to thirty years (for services involving the financing, construction, installation
and operation of new waste processing infrastructures).
The following table shows the consolidated revenue (revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS) and
operating income of the Environmental Services Division, after elimination of inter -company transactions.
Environmental Services*
(£ million)
Revenue
2009 Change
2010 re -presented" 2010/2009
9,312.2 8,731.5 6.7 %
Operating income 610.4 449.4 35.8 %
* Including Veolia Environnement's share in the results of the environmental services activities ofProactiva, Veolia Environnement's joint
venture with FCC.
** In accordance with IFRS 5, Non -current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the Income Statements of the Waste -to -Energy entities
in the Environmental Services Division (primarily divested in the second half of 2009, and at the beginning of 2010 for the Dade entity) and of
Veolia Mi jo (in the course of divestiture) are grouped together in a separate line, Net income from discontinued operations.
Overview of Environmental Services
Veolia Propretd furnishes waste management and logistical services, which include waste collection, waste
processing, cleaning of public spaces, maintenance of production equipment, treatment of polluted soil, and
management of waste discharge at industrial sites.
Downstream, Veolia Propretd conducts basic or more complex waste processing operations in order to
eliminate pollutants and transform waste into a resource. Thus, Veolia Propretd:
• sorts and processes waste in order to create new raw materials, otherwise referred to as recycling or
material recovery;
• transforms organic material into compost to be returned to the soil, otherwise referred to as
composting or agronomic recovery;
• processes waste in the least damaging way possible, through landfill sites or incineration;
• produces electricity or heat using waste in landfill sites or incineration, otherwise referred to as
waste -to -energy recovery.
The services referred to above fall into three major business sectors: environmental services and logistics for
public sectors and industrial companies, sorting and recycling of materials and waste recovery, and
processing through composting, incineration and landfilling.
(3) The commercial figures appearing in Chapter 6.1.3.2 (in terms of customers, number of residents served tonnage, etc.) do not include
Proactiva, unless otherwise indicated.
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2010- VEOLIA ENVERONNEMENT-44
Key factors
The key factors that may influence the activities of Veolia Propretd are of a technical, contractual and •
economic nature. They mainly concern the following success factors:
• A presence at all points of the waste value chain, from pre -collection through to processing and
recovery, in an appropriate range of geographical areas at different stages of maturity, enabling the
identification and control of innovative, tailored solutions for proposal to customers and setting the
Company apart from the competition in the market;
• The management of risks relating to the protection of the environment and the safety of individuals
and installations (see Section 4.2.3 above);
• The quality of employee management in sectors which are often labor-intensive (limiting
absenteeism and industrial action, developing skills and training);
• The ability to innovate using new technologies (processing, rolling stock) and processes (sorting -
recycling), founded on an effective technology, regulatory and competition watch system;
• Operating efficiency (purchases, sales, logistics, maintenance management) enabling the
optimization of unit costs and the utilization rate of equipment, while ensuring the high level of
quality required for products and services delivered;
Investment management in certain capital -intensive activities (selectivity, risk analysis, installation
size);
• The quality of contractual management for long-term contracts (major clauses, price review
formulae, guarantees and deposits, etc.) (see Section 4.1.2.2 above);
• Management of economic and financial risks: volumes fluctuation, volatility of raw material prices •
(fuel, materials sold such as paper and metals), customer risk, foreign exchange and interest rate risk
(see Section 4.2.3.2 above).
Environmental Services and Logistics for Public Sectors and Industrial Companies
Maintenance of Public Spaces and Urban Cleaning
Each day, Veolia Propretd provides urban cleaning services in many cities throughout the world, including
London, Paris, Alexandria, Singapore and Dresden. Veolia Propretd also provides mechanized street
cleaning and building facade treatment services.
Cleaning and Maintenance of Industrial Sites
Veolia Propretd provides cleaning services at the sites of its industrial and service sector customers,
including cleaning of offices and maintenance of production lines.
In the industrial sector, cleaning services are extended to food -processing plants, and heavy industry and
hightech sites, where Veolia Propretd offers specialized cleaning services (high pressure or extreme high
pressure cleaning). Veolia Propretd also offers cryogenic cleaning, and reservoir cleaning services at
refineries and petrochemical sites. Finally, Veolia Propretd has developed emergency services to treat site
contamination in the event of an accident or other incident.
•
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2010 - VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT - 45
Liquid Waste management
• Through its specialized subsidiary SARP, Veolia Propretd provides liquid waste management services that
consist primarily of pumping and transporting sewer network liquids and oil residues to treatment centers.
Veolia Propretd has developed liquid waste management procedures that emphasize environmental
protection, such as on -site collection and the recycling and reuse of water during the processing of liquid
waste. Used oil, which is hazardous for the environment, is collected before processing and re -refining by a
Veolia Environment Services subsidiary specializing in the management of hazardous waste.
Soil Decontamination
Land redevelopment and the expansion of residential and business areas may lead to the use of sites where
the soil has been polluted through prior use. Veolia Propretd has specific techniques for treating difficult
sites, which include treating polluted soil and rehabilitating temporarily inactive industrial areas, cleaning
accidental spills and bringing active industrial sites into compliance with applicable environmental
regulations.
Collection
In 2010, more than 75 million people around the world benefited from Veolia Propretd's waste collection
services. Veolia Propretd collects household waste through door-to-door pickup or through pickup at
designated drop-off sites, and collects commercial and non -hazardous industrial waste. It maintains the
cleanliness of green areas and carries away "green" waste and also collects hazardous waste on behalf of its
service sector and industrial customers, including hospital waste, laboratory waste and oil residue (ships, gas
stations and drilling platforms) and diffused hazardous waste.
Veolia Propretd also offers related services to its service sector and industrial customers, such as preliminary
studies of future waste collection needs and waste tracking after collection.
• Transfer and Regrouping of Materials
•
Waste of the same type is transported either to transfer stations in order to be carried in large capacity trucks,
or to grouping centers where it is separated by type and then sorted before being sent to the appropriate
processing center.
Hazardous waste is usually transported to specialized physico-chemical processing centers, recycling units,
special industrial waste incineration units or landfill sites designed to receive inert hazardous waste.
Sorting and Recycling of Materials
Veolia Propret6 processes waste with a view to reintroducing such waste into the industrial production cycle.
Veolia Propret6's recycling activities generally involve the selective collection of paper, cardboard, glass,
plastic, wood and metal that customers either separate into different containers or mix with other recyclable
materials.
Veolia Propretd recovers solid waste received at its 329 sorting and recycling centers. These specialized
centers separate the different components of complex waste, such as electric and electronic products and
fluorescent lamps. Veolia Propretd works upstream in partnership with industrial customers and with the
Group's research center to develop new recycling activities. Recycled material is sold or distributed to
intermediaries or directly to industrial customers.
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2010 - VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT - 46
Waste Recovery and Treatment through Composting, Incineration and Landfilling •
Veolia Propretd has a wide range of treatment centers, comprising sorting and recycling centers, composting
units, hazardous waste treatment centers, incineration units and landfill sites.
Composting and Recovery of Organic Material from Fermentable Waste
Veolia Propretd and Veolia Eau work together to recover sludge from wastewater treatment plants. At its 127
composting units, Veolia Propretd processes urban and industrial sludge, part of which is then reintroduced
into the agricultural cycle through land spreading, with a related tracking service.
Incineration and Waste -to -Energy Recovery
Veolia Propretd operates 64 waste -to -energy recovery and incineration plants, which process non -hazardous
solid waste (mainly urban waste).
Energy is generated from the heat created by incinerating waste at these plants. Veolia Propretd uses this
energy to supply urban heating networks or sells it to electricity providers.
Landfilling and Waste -to -Energy Recovery
In 2010, Veolia Propretd had 137 non -hazardous waste landfill sites. Veolia Propretd has developed the
expertise to process waste through methods that reduce emissions of liquid and gas pollutants. In addition, 92
landfill sites have recovery systems to transform biogas emissions into alternative energies.
Processing of Hazardous Waste
In 2010, Veolia Propretd had 24 incineration units for specialized industrial waste, 64 processing units using
physico-chemical and stabilization methods, 15 class 1 landfill sites and 34 specialized recycling centers.
The principal methods used for processing industrial hazardous waste are incineration (for organic liquid is
waste, salt -water and sludge), solvent recycling, waste stabilization followed by processing at specially -
designed landfill sites, and physico-chemical processing of inorganic liquid waste.
Through its specialized subsidiaries, SARP Industries and VES Technical Solutions (in the United States),
Veolia Propretd has a worldwide network of experts, which has helped it become a world leader in the
processing, recycling and recovery of hazardous waste.
Description of activities in 2010
In 2010, at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates, the Environmental Services Division reported a
6.9% increase in revenue on 2009, driven by the rise in the price of recycled materials sold (particularly
paper/cardboard and metals), which had dropped sharply in 2008/2009. Waste volumes collected and
processed on behalf of companies recovered on 2009, although only moderately. Thanks to adaptation
measures taken in 2009 and efficiency actions implemented in 2010, margins improved despite increased
pressure on prices.
In France, revenue increased 7% (at constant consolidation scope). In addition to the positive impact of the
rise in material prices, growth was driven by an increase in non -hazardous waste volumes incinerated and
placed in landfills (thanks in particular to the policy of insourcing tonnage collected) and hazardous waste
volumes processed. The contract renewal rate remained highly satisfactory, particularly with public
authorities, while major contact wins were also recorded (collection services in Dijon and Mulhouse,
incineration services in Beauvais, methanization in Angers and Pays de Caux). Finally, moderate price
increases were achieved in a context of higher inflation (increase in fuel prices in particular). •
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2010 - VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT - 47
In the United Kingdom, revenue increased 5.9% (at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates).
• Growth was primarily driven by the construction of installations under PFI (Private Finance Initiative)
contracts, the full -year impact of the Merseyside contract and the increase in the price of recycled materials.
This increase was achieved despite a difficult first six months due to the poor economic climate in the UK,
resulting in a drop in non -hazardous waste volumes collected and placed in landfill before stabilizing in the
second half of the year.
In Germany, revenue increased 9.8% (at constant consolidation scope), mainly due to the rise in the price of
recycled materials (primarily paper/cardboard) and the increase in non -hazardous industrial waste volumes
collected.
Revenue rose 4.2% in the rest of Europe (at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates). Growth was
driven by the increase in the price of recycled materials and a moderate recovery in waste volumes collected
and processed.
In North America, revenue increased 6% (at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates). This rise
benefited in particular from a recovery in non -hazardous waste landfill volumes, mainly tied to one-off
projects and a marked upturn in the industrial services and hazardous waste sectors.
The rest of the world reported a rise in revenue of 9.5% (at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates),
primarily driven by growth in industrial services in Australia and the processing of hazardous waste in
China.
•
•
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2010- VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT-48
Major Contracts in 2010
The following table shows the major contracts signed in
2010 with either public
authorities or industrial or
•
service sector companies'):
Estimated
Public authority or
Month of
cumulative
company and location signature of
New contract or
revenue
thereof
contract
renewal Contract term
(in euros)
Services provided
France
SYMOVE waste disposal
June
New
23 years*
347 million
Contract to design, build, finance
authority for the Oise
and operate a multi -process
recovery center for household
Department
and similar waste
Pays de Caux Waste
September
New
23 years*
110 million
Contract to design, build, finance
Disposal Authority
and operate a household waste
processing plant and two non-
hazardous waste landfill sites
South East Seine -et -blame
June
New
10 years
47 million
Operation of the Montereau
Household Waste Disposal
waste -to -energy center
Authority
Angers Loire Conurbation
April
New
6 years
44 million
Operation of the Biopole
household waste recovery center
Greater Dijon Conurbation
August
New
5 years
44 million
Collection of household waste
and equivalent
Flandre Morinie Authority
June
New
8 years
40 million
Operation of the Flamoval waste -
to -energy center
City of Mandelieu-la-
June
Renewal
7 years
17 million
Collection of household waste
Napoule
and equivalent
Europe (excl. France)
Staffordshire County
July
New
25 years
approx.
Integrated comprehensive waste
•
Council
1 billion
management contract
(United Kingdom)
City of Westminster
September
Renewal
7 years
302 million
Recycling and waste
(United Kingdom)
(+ 7 years
(excl. option)
management contract
option)
Medway Council
June
Renewal
7 years
91 million
Waste collection and recycling
(United Kingdom)
and town cleaning services
Medway Council
June
Renewal
25 years
150 million
Landfill disposal of residual
(United Kingdom)
waste
Abfallwirtschaftsgesellschaft
October
Renewal
6 years
30 million
Collection of household waste
Nordfriesland mbH
and equivalent
(Germany)
North America
City of Sanibel (Florida)
May
New
5 years
9 million
Collection of household waste
and equivalent
City of Highland Park
July
Renewal
5 years
9 million
Collection of household waste
(Chicago)
and equivalent
* including an operating period of 20
years.
is
(1) Revenues expected under the contracts won in 2010 have been converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of December 31, 2010 and
represent the portion due to Veolia Propretd under such contracts. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in
earlier Group press releases.
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2010- VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT-49
Replacement costs
• Replacement costs totaled-£364.0 million in 2010, compared to-£360.9 million in 2009.
As of January 1, 2010 pursuant to the amendment to IAS 7, replacement costs are no longer eliminated from
operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses. They are deducted from adjusted
operating cash flow and reduce the amount of maintenance -related investments presented in the Statement of
change in net fmancial debt. This amendment does not impact net financial debt, net income or equity.
9.2.2 Revenue
9.2.2.1 Overview
h r Year ended
rYeer;ended December.�' December 31, 2009 Foreign
31; 2010.' ;;; re -presented (') % Change Internal External exchange
(E,inllioiij ;"; i'';. ;' (£ million) 2010/2009 growth growth impact
33,951.8 2.5% 1.3% -1.5% 2.7%
(') A reconciliation of 2009 published and re presented consolidated revenue may be found in the Appendix
For the year ended December 31, 2010 Veolia Environnement consolidated revenue was £34,786.6 million,
an increase of 2.5% compared to re -presented revenue of £33,951.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2009. At constant consolidation scope and exchange rates, consolidated revenue increased 1.3% during the
same period.
• Revenue in the fourth quarter of 2010 showed a significant increase, with +7.9% growth marking a clear
inflexion after +4.9% growth in the third quarter, +1.5% growth in the second quarter and -4.3% revenue
decline in the first quarter of 2010.
•
This improvement was also observed at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates: +4.7% in 4Q 2010,
after +2.7% in 3Q 2010, +0.9% in 2Q 2010 and -3.3% in 1Q 2010, confirming a return to positive organic
growth.
This evolution in revenue growth is explained principally by the progressive improvement of the global
economic environment, the increase and maintenance of recycled raw material prices, and energy prices, a
positive climate effect both within and outside of France, as well as the benefits of successful commercial
development.
On the other hand, 2010 full year Group revenue was negatively impacted by the non -renewal of certain
significant contracts in 2009, notably in the Transportation division (-£637 million impact compared to
2009), as well as the completion of certain large construction contracts outside of France (Marafiq, Fujairah,
Ras Laffan) in the Water division (-£311 million impact compared to 2009).
In total, the decline in revenue resulting from net divestments completed in 2009 and 2010 amounted to
-£495.6 million (4.5% versus full year 2009) and is composed of.-£150.7 million in the Water division,
-£312.4 million in the Environmental Services division (principally Veolia Propretd Nettoyage et
Multiservices or VPNM), -£26.5 million in the Energy Services division and -£6.0 million in the
Transportation division.
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2010 - VEOLIA ENVn20NNEMENT —108
The share of revenue generated outside France for 2010 was E20,748.8 million, which is 59.6% of total
revenue compared to 59.5% for full year 2009 on a re -presented basis. •
The positive effect of the evolution of average exchange rates during 2010 was E911.8 million, reflecting
essentially the appreciation compared to the euro of the Australian dollar for E194.6 million, the U.S. dollar
for E154.0 million, the U.K. pound sterling for E82.9 million, Central European currencies for E97.4 million,
Northern European currencies (Norway and Sweden) for E75.6 million.
9.2.2.2 Revenue by business
Year ended
l.r
Year cnd'ed,'
December 31, 2009
% Change
(E million)
December 31:2010'
re -presented
2010/2009
Water
12,127.9,.
12,318.3
-1.5%
Environmental Services
' %;312:2',':
8,731.5
6.7%
Energy Services
il!/:'; -.:, ° 7;581t8;
7,041.3
7.7%
Transportation
'.; ` 1 ;':;, 5;764.7 *
5,860.7
-1.6%
Revenue
s34;786.6
33,951.8
2.5%
Revenue at 2009 exchange rates
" °<'' ".:33,874.8'
33,951.8
-0.2%
Water
Year ended
Year ended December 31, 2009 Foreign
Deceiii6er,31, 2010.; ' re -presented % Change Internal External exchange
(E'inillion)"'.--':'. (Emillion) 2010/2009 growth growth impact •
12;127.9 12,318.3 -1.5% -2.9% -1.2% 2.6%
The revenue decline in the Water division is due essentially to the decline in Works activities given the end
of three large construction contracts (Marafiq, Fujairah, Ras Laffan). Excluding construction works, 2010
division revenue improved +0.5% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates.
• In France, revenue at constant consolidation scope declined 0.9% due to a slowdown in Works
activities, as well as a 1% decline in volumes of water sold compared to 2009 and the end of the
contract with the city of Paris.
Outside France, excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, revenue increased 2.4%
(+1.8% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates). In Europe, growth was 4.1% at constant
consolidation scope and exchange rates, driven by Germany, the United Kingdom and Eastern
Europe. Revenue in Asia increased 3.9% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates due to
the ramp -up of certain contracts in Central China and new contracts in Southern China. In the Pacific
zone, revenue declined by 10.7% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates, reflecting the
completion of the construction of the Sydney, Australia desalination plant.
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2010 - VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT —109
• Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies achieved 162,147.5 million in revenue, down 16.8%
• compared to 2009 at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates. The decline in VWST revenue
reflects the completion of certain large "Design and Build" contracts outside of France. Excluding
the impact of the end of the three large construction contracts in Fujairah, Marafiq and Ras Laffan,
Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies revenue would have declined 0.5% compared to 2009.
In addition, the division benefited from a recovery in industrial solutions activities, as well as
"Design and Build" activities for industrial clients during the second half of 2010, notably during the
fourth quarter. Finally, the backlog for VWST activities is slightly higher at the end of 2010
compared to the end of 2009, with an acceleration of business wins during the last quarter of 2010.
• Net divestments in the Water division in 2009 and 2010, had an impact on revenue of -1.2% (-E150.7
million for the full year 2010 compared to 2009).
•
Environmental services
Year ended
Year; ended December 31, 2009 Foreign
.December 31 2010 " re -presented % Change Internal External exchange
(E million) 2010/2009 growth growth impact
9;312J2 8,731.5 6.7% 6.9% -3.6% 3.4%
The positive movement in recycled raw materials prices (notably in France and Germany), the good
progression of certain activities in the United States, and the ramp -up and growth of integrated contracts in
the United Kingdom contributed to 6.9% organic revenue growth in the Environmental Services division in
2010. In addition, after a volume effect that was still marginally negative during the first quarter, the three
remaining quarters of 2010 confirmed signs of volume recovery within certain division activities in many
countries. Compared to the first three quarters of 2010, the fourth quarter of 2010 benefited from a less
favorable base effect as the sector recovery commenced in the fourth quarter of 2009.
• In France, revenue increased 7.0% at constant consolidation scope (-1.2% at current consolidation
scope due to the divestment of Veolia Propret6 Nettoyage and Multi -Services in 2009) due
principally to higher recycled raw material prices (paper/cardboard and metal). Volumes on a global
basis were stable in 2010, despite strong commercial discipline maintained at contract renewals, due
to a partial improvement in activity.
Outside France, revenue grew 11.9% (+6.9% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates).
Revenue in Germany increased 9.8% at constant consolidation scope, and benefited from higher
paper and cardboard prices, and since the third quarter, a rebound in activity in the commercial and
industrial segment. Revenue in the United Kingdom increased 5.9% at constant consolidation scope
and exchange rates due to the continued ramp and growth of integrated contracts and despite the
continuing difficult economic environment which negatively impacted other division activities. In
North America, 6.0% growth at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates was driven by the
recovery of industrial services activities and special waste, and reinforced by one-time projects in
solid waste. In Asia -Pacific, 10.7% revenue growth at constant consolidation scope and exchange
rates benefited from the ramp and growth of our activities in China, notably in the treatment of
special waste, as well as strength in industrial services activities in Australia.
• Net divestments in the Environmental Services division in 2009 and 2010, notably the activities of
Veolia Propret6 Nettoyage and Multi -Services in France in August 2009, had an impact on revenue
of -3.6% (-E312.4 million for the full year 2010 compared to 2009).
REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2010 - VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT — 110
Veolia - Service Request Report 6,
Run Date: 7/28/20113:07:10 PM
Veolia
ints
01iolLul
0 1611:
Ashley McIlwee W005940-
5/31/2011
6/1/2011
Completed
Cindy Levitt
053111
cIl
6 1,1201 lo
C d'
t
%,':Leslib;NIo
Nordum
strum
str
Ashley McIlwee W005952-
6/1/2011
6/1/2011
Completed
Patrick Conway
060111
2011,
Coin
Cib,
060111,'
Ashley McIlwee W005972-
6/1/2011
611/2011
Completed
Mrs Katherine Halley
060111
A'
s ey MdlWee".'M
6�A.3
/20ft''
6/13,
.,to Competed,;:
mr) et6 �, �� " ,
".. - ,
"r ;k
T6masz- a) a
.2,
64"
6
Christina W006888-
6/14/2011
7/19/2011
Completed
Brandi Pitts
Ferguson 061411
C IT) p etb
M ir' Sa"":;
IT) Davis
fi:'''
,.6617'
Ashley McIlwee W007693-
6/23/2011
6/23/2011
Completed
Mr. Sam Davis
062311
As W�y
CqmIeted
P...... 4,
Mheavis"
070711
Total: 11
Veolia Complaints - Litter
MIJI 6y„ M dlw&''� W008 105 '6- /2' 8/16 1"1"
C"* 'I" "i'd - : Mr�.- Saft Davis
Ashley McIlwee
W010567-
7/26/2011
7/27/2011
Completed
Kim Parnelfo
072611
Veolia Complaints - Odor
651611,1��::
IUM
Ashley McIlwee W004974-
511712011
5/17/2011
Completed
Cindy Levitt
051711
Ashle
CoMpf Odd
Cin y LeVi
Carl Caneva W007072-
6/16/2011
6/28/2011
Completed
Mrs Katherine Halley
061611
Ash Mcl wed: W007 Ib7L
I
COMD ete
Cina'*! tt evii
P.wv-a'r.b'
wbbLm Page 1 of 3
Veolia - Service Request Report Run Date: 7/28/20113:07:10 PM
40eolia Complaints - Odor
Ashley McIlwee
W007188-
6/17/2011
6/20/2011
Completed
Megan Baxa
061711
ti,
•
-CKhilla-
6
Ashley McIlwee
W007433-
6/21/2011
6/21/2011
Completed
Ike Dickson
062111
ey. M cI we6,�� W0078577
, "!/", I
6 2�1
1
Comiplet4d
FreqNordstromt J: J`
Ashley McIlwee
W008103-
6/28/2011
6/28/2011
Completed
Mrs Katherine Halley
062811
Ashley McIlwee'-:
W bj(Ji!28-'
I
Com i
se
Ashley McIlwee
W008561-
7/5/2011
7/5/2011
Completed
Cindy Levitt
070511
Ashiey�
J/5/ bii
Comb ete d
N John 11eiribikeb&
Ashley McIlwee
W008594-
7/5/2011
7/5/2011
Completed
Harry Nickel (311)
070511
Ashley McIlwee
W008596
;7/5%2011'
7/5/2011
Completed
Caktsuttbh.-'
Ashley McIlwee
W008598-
7/5/2011
7/5/2011
Completed
Muffy Mcauley
070511
07
7/
7j
COMbed
D
M u
Ashley McIlwee
W008742-
7/7/2011
7/7/2011
Completed
John Dyer
070711
Ashley McIlwee.PP87577
7/7/2011,Completed
Cindy Levitt
070711,
Ashley McIlwee
W009287-
7/12/2011
7/12/2011
Completed
Megan Baxa
071211
Ashle.McIlwee
e
_MK.piii Halley �n
0,
13+11
Ashley McIlwee
W009429-
7/13/2011
7/13/2011
Completed
Megan Baxa
071311
Ashley McIlwee
W8 b6666 - .
01
Compf eted,
Ike: Dickson j
071511
r.
Ashley McIlwee
W009847-
7/19/2011
In Progress
Megan Baxa
071911
As,lee.
6j;:
Chrislbeee§
071
Ashley McIlwee
W010339-
7/25/2011
7/25/2011
Completed
Cindy Levitt
072511
AshjeV. Md'666'�,
010-
W 5667
0
7252 11
7/262.011-
Comlete'
p
es i Nordstrom'
07'25ii
Ashley McIlwee
W010385-
7/25/2011
7/26/2011
Completed
William Stuart
072511
AAshleyMdWe6'
W6103877
52011,
72 11
1 ted
B Meqan axa
*Ashley
072511
. 1
McIlwee
WO 10404-
7/25/2011
7/ 26/ 2011
Completed
Chris Tirres
072511
Page 2 of 3
Veolia - Service Request Report
Run Date: 7/28/2011 3:07:10 PM
Cindy *,,,
Chris Tirres
Janice Fleckmari'
1,
Veolia Complaints - Odor
Ashley McIlwee';;W010907-° 7%25/2011� 7/26/2011 Completed „ x Chris:Tirres
072511,"
Ashley McIlwee W010435- 7/25/2011 7/26/2011 Completed Tina Galberath
072511
Astiley,McIlwee` ;W010494=
" .7/26/2011;,
7/26/2011
Completed
Ashley McIlwee W010497-
7/26/2011
7/26/2011
Completed
072611
Ashley.McIlwee:: 1N010519=,
7/26/20.11,;,
;`; 7/26%201i'r•.Completed:
07261;1
Total: 35
Veolia Complaints
Trucks
Ashley, McIlwee? W005480= 5/24/2011 ' S/26/2011'f ,
Completed
Ben Gaihes. '
052411:'
Ashley McIlwee W007195-
6/17/2011
6/20/2011
Completed
Mr. Sam Davis
061711
:,. .
Ashle 'McIlwee; W007200;;
Y..:.:
6/17/2011
6/20%2011-°
tompletedc
Mr: ;Sam Davis
.
061711
Ashley McIlwee W007240-
6/18/2011
6/20/2011
Completed
Mr. Sam Davis
061811
As a McIlwee hl y ';V0"0+4.>
20
''C
20 201-1
omet
r. Sam Davis
062011`
Ashley McIlwee W007776-
6/24/2011
6/24/2011
Completed
Mr. Sam Davis
062411
Total: 6
•
•
p-9 W-f.ca hyr:
we'b07A Page 3 of 3
0