Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10_25_04_ccCITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL - PRESENT: A Quorum was present. NOT PRESENT AT ROLL CALL: ABSENT: PRESIDING: Alderman Newman Alderman Jean -Baptiste Alderman Wynne Aldermen Kent, Moran, and Rainey Mayor Lorraine H. Morton Mayor Pro Tem Rainey October 25, 2004 Alderman Bernstein Alderman Tisdahl Alderman Feldman The OFFICIAL REGULAR MEETING of the City Council was called to order by Alderman Feldman Monday, October 25, 2004, at 6:20 p.m. in the Aldermanic Library. Alderman Newman moved that Council convene into Closed Session for the purpose of discussing matters related to personnel, real estate, litigation and closed session minutes pursuant to 5ILCS Section 120/2 (c) (5), (6), (11) and (21). Seconded by Alderman Tisdahl. (5) The purchase or lease of real property for the use of the public body, including meetings held for the purpose of discussing whether a particular parcel should be acquired. (6) The setting of a price for sale or lease of property owned by the public body. (11) Litigation, when an action against, affecting or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before a court or administrative tribunal, or when the public body finds that an action is probable or imminent, in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and entered into the minutes of the closed meeting. (21) Discussion of minutes of meetings lawfully closed under this Act, whether for purposes of approval by the body of the minutes or semi-annual review of the minutes as mandated by Section 2.06. Roll call. Voting aye — Newman, Jean -Baptiste, Wynne, Bernstein, Tisdahl, Feldman. Voting nay — none. Motion carried &Z At 7:45 p.m. Alderman Rainey moved that the Council reconvene into open session and recess. Seconded by Alderman Moran. Motion carried unanimouslv. At 9:13 p.m. City Clerk Mary Morris announced that in the absence of Mayor Morton, nominations for the election of a Mayor Pro Tem were in order and, in accordance with Council Rule 14.7, Alderman Rainey was next on the list of aldermen by seniority who has not served as Mayor Pro Tem. Alderman Feldman nominated Alderman Rainey. Seconded by Alderman Moran. Motion carried unanimouslv. Mayor pro tem Rainey welcomed all to the meeting noting the long agenda. Special Presentation to City of artwork by Richard Halstead Facilities Management Director Max Rubin introduced Richard Halstead, resident portrait artist. Mr. Halstead said the painting they were unveiling was the third of four paintings that are archetypal figures representing the City's emergency services and their dedicated workers. All four painting will hang in the hallway outside the Council Chamber. The two paintings there represent firefighters and forestry workers. This one is of a paramedic and the fourth will represent police. He has learned while doing these paintings that these workers put an extraordinary emphasis on teamwork. A fire captain reminded him there is no "I" in team. The model who posed did not want to because she would be singled out from the rest of the paramedics. This tradition of downplaying the individual in these departments has made his job easier because they shared an interest in making these figures archetypes so they represent all professionals. He selected a woman as the focal point to maintain a natural and proper perspective in terms of gender and also because he wanted to use a woman's image symbolically. The paramedic's role requires the quick action of a well -trained expert and a special hands-on sensitivity and compassion for people in immediate need of care. He tried to paint an image that is comforting October 25, 2004 and reassuring and felt he could convey that best by using woman. He thanked all who helped with this project, citizens through their representatives on Council who continue to make available affordable artists studios at Noyes Cultural Arts Center, Mayor Morton, Max Rubin, Donna Stuckert, Gene Grabowski and all the dedicated professionals involved in emergency services who have contributed time and consultation (even though they don't want their names mentioned). He will not forget them. Mayor pro tern Rainey recalled meeting the young woman the night she came to the Civil Service Commission before she was hired as a firefighter/paramedic. Alderman Feldman, in the Mayor's absence, expressed the deep appreciation of the Mayor, Council and citizens to Mr. Halstead for his generosity and involvement with the City. He noted that artists, by their work, contribute to the richness of our lives. Mr. Halstead does that and his generosity reminds all of the deep debt and obligation, love and respect they feel for those who put their lives and energy on the line when they go out. Mr. Halstead has given them an opportunity to salute these people and to those passing through these halls a value the City shares with Mr. Halstead, which is an admiration and respect for those he paints so beautifully. ANNOUNCEMENTS: Parks/Forestry & Recreation Director Doug Gaynor announced that again this year the Illinois Arts Council has given the City grants in the amount of $20,700 and $14,100 for different programs. State Senator Jeff Schoenberg will present the grants to the City on November 5, 1:00 p.m. at Northlight Theater. Public Works Director David Jennings announced that leaf collection is underway. He asked that leaves be collected in brown paper bags. Due to Illinois EPA regulations, leaves cannot be collected in plastic bags. It is against the law to rake or blow leaves into the street. Gasoline powered leaf blowers can be used until December 1 but only to collect leaves for the property owner. Leaves may also be put in yard waste carts. During leaf collection season, bundled limbs and brush are picked up once a month, not weekly. If residents don't want the City to pick up their leaves there is yard waste drop-off at the Recycling Center on Oakton, which continues through the first week of December and is open Friday 12:00 noon — 7:00 p.m., Saturday and Sunday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Composting leaves on one's property is the most environmentally friendly method of leaf disposal. Interim City Manager Judith Aiello announced that the last two Saturdays for the Farmers' Market were approaching. This Saturday children are invited to wear Halloween costumes to the market from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and can decorate pumpkins, receive treats and have pumpkins to take home. November 6 is the last Farmers' Market. Mayor Morton proclaimed Connections for the Homeless Week, October 24-31, 2004 Mayor pro tern Rainey read the proclamation into the record. WHEREAS, Connections for the Homeless has compassionately and effectively created opportunities for change for those affected by poverty, hunger and homelessness since October 31, 1984; and WHEREAS, Homelessness creates numerous barriers to accessing essential services, such as affordable healthcare, housing and education: and WHEREAS, Connections for the Homeless continues to be a valuable community resource for homeless individuals and families as well as to other service providers and municipal agencies; and WHEREAS, Connections for the Homeless is part of a broad community response to reduce and prevent homelessness in northeast Cook County: NOW, THEREFORE, I, Lorraine H. Morton, Mayor of the City of Evanston, do hereby proclaim the week of October 24 through 31, 2004 to be "CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS WEEK" in Evanston and recognize that the prevention and reduction of homelessness continues to be a complex challenge and is a serious problem for many individuals and families in Evanston: WITNESS my hand and corporate seal of Evanston, Illinois this 23`d day of October, 2004 Lorraine H. Morton October 25, 2004 City Clerk Mary Morris reminded people who will be out of Cook County on Election Day, serving as an election judge outside their precinct or disabled that they may vote absentee in -person in the City Clerk's office through Monday, November 1. Times are weekdays 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and Saturday, October 30, 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. Applications for voting absentee by mail are available in the City Clerk's office. Call to obtain one or download an application from the Cook County Clerk's election website www.voterinfonet.com. Ms. Morris announced that packets for municipal candidates in the April 5, 2005 Consolidated Election would be available Wednesday, October 27 in the City Clerk's office Presentation: Status of McCormick Blvd. Reconstruction Project Public Works Director David Jennings stated he was asked to bring a presentation on this project to the City Council The presentation reviewed recent funding developments and the project's schedule which has shifted since the last meeting. He presented the need for and history of the project; described the approved design; the history of public involvement with the project and the impact of the project on the trees. The City learned that funding is tied to a federal authorization bill which has been extended, and anticipate that will happen before May 2005 and there will be sufficient funding to start the project in 2006. The project removes 29 trees. Why each tree was being removed was explained. More than 90% of the American elms will remain. Alderman Feldman requested that the Marina project be considered first due to the large number of people who showed up for that item. No objections were raised. HUMAN SERVICES: Termination of the Marina Proiect - Consideration of a recommendation from the Human Services Committee to terminate the investigation of the marina project and direction of staff to initiate discussion with the Chicago Park District and the City of Chicago regarding their plans for the Chicago Shoreline. Alderman Tisdahl moved termination of the Marina Project and to discuss with the City of Chicago plans regarding the Chicago shoreline. Seconded by Alderman Wynne. Alderman Moran suggested that the City could potentially gain a great benefit by continuing to study the possibility of siting a marina east of Calvary Cemetery. Many concerns were expressed about adverse environmental impacts of this marina if constructed. Many of those concerns have been addressed in the Phase 1 report from the Army Corps of Engineers on several levels. Citizen concerns about traffic impact have been shown, through statistical analysis and expert opinion, to be exaggerated and fear of a great impact won't be realized when a more technical analysis is conducted. If continued, the next phase would be to examine the issues and environmental issues raised. He suggested an examination of those issues with answers provided by a Phase 2 report would provide them all with the ability, not to act on emotion, but on hard fact and experts can give answers to various concerns raised. The concerns are all good ones. He advocated for answers to those concerns. He said the other part of the motion is to somehow engage the City of Chicago and the Chicago Park District about the contemplated lakefront expansion project. He understood that in the near future the park district plans to go out for a feasibility analysis. He thought it would be good for Evanston to join Chicago in that examination. He does not know what Evanston will do when it contacts Chicago. He suggested it be done in a collaborative fashion to study a project that has immense potential for Evanston and Chicago — an amazing engineering project that would extend the City's park system and lakefront in a spectacular way. As part of the Chicago Park District's feasibility study, he did not understand why Evanston would not agree to be a partner in that examination by continuing with the Phase 2 feasibility study with the Army Corps and look at both projects to see how the two could be joined and provide a tremendous improvement. Concerns have been raised about hurting Evanston's lakefront by citing a marina opposite the cemetery. He said it is a October 25, 2004 great luxury that Evanston has a portion of the lakefront that could be developed that would not remove any parkland, a beach or any access point to the lake as it exists now. The fact that this is adjacent to the cemetery means it is removed from the immediate residential area. He suggested a marina should be looked at as an extension of the lakefront. In a way it would be leveraging a great asset. Marinas are not noisy and can be operated responsibility. He considers them to be beautiful, as do many, and a marina does not disrespect the lake and allows another way to enjoy it. He said Evanston runs many recreation programs that are used by many people, while other programs are used by few people. Regardless of the numbers, it is believed people will enjoy those programs. Some of the discourse on this has not been kind to the constituency that would use this facility. There was a lot of rhetoric that this facility would only be used by rich people. A facility that "they" might like but "I" don't like, therefore it should not be done. He thought people who took this tack, if they knew the boating community as he does, would be surprised to learn that not everybody who owns a boat is a multi -millionaire. Many people who enjoy the water are not rich because they place such a great value on water recreation on a boat. In some instances, people invest a high percentage of their assets because they find it to be a beautiful, relaxing, wonderful activity. The City has been committed to boating for a long time, so this is not a radical concept. One could argue that to proceed with this study, is not to decide they will have a marina, but to find answers to various concerns that have been raised. Once they have those answers, they can make an intelligent choice on how Evanston should proceed. Based upon those considerations, he asked Council to think about joining Chicago and the Chicago Park District in their study of lakefront usage and to continue to work on whether this is a feasible facility or whether it could be joined with an expanded lakefront to make one more opportunity to recreate in Evanston. Mayor pro tem Rainey pointed out that staff is directed to initiate discussions and no doors are closed. Alderman Wynne said the next phase to continue this multi -phase process would cost the City $300-400,000, or the equivalent of two park renovations. Total cost provided by the Army Corps of Engineers was $21 million and termed "speculative." All analysis on whether the debt service could be accounted for is based upon speculative numbers. When they look at the response by Evanston residents, it does not justify spending one dollar more, much less $300-400,000 to explore this further. Some of her environmental concerns were unanswered. She said use of City money to continue this would be wasteful and irresponsible and noted the City has many other recreational uses. It can be argued that Evanston provides uses only a few use, but don't provide uses so that a few people can take such an enormous amount of money. Residents have clearly indicated they don't want a marina at this site. For aesthetic and practical reasons, she did not think they should pursue this with more staff and citizens' time. She said it was crucial that the City talk with the City of Chicago about plans to extend the lakefront, which includes Lake Shore Drive and the reason many are concerned about what will happen to the southern end of the City. When Lake Shore Drive ends at Rogers Park, what happens to southeast Evanston? That is why it is important to look at Mayor Daley's plans and figure out the City's position. Some may want to move to the 6th Ward if that happens. She said Council should act immediately to end discussion of this. Alderman Feldman said whether they should collaborate with the City of Chicago was not consistent with the phase. He recalled Roger's Park residents were frightened that their beaches would be eliminated. The constant reference to this project of Mayor Daley does not validate it. It may be a huge engineering project but that does not mean it is needed or wanted. It does not mean it would be good for the people of Chicago. Evanston and Chicago have not talked about whether that money should be spent for parks within the City and not on the lakefront. He said there are sections of the outer drive that have huge tracts of empty parkland. He saw tremendous opposition to the marina. They have to be aware of Chicago's plan and not join them, but be defensive. If Lake Shore Drive were to end at Howard Street, what would that mean to Sheridan Road? What would that mean to Evanston neighborhoods? He wanted to see how far along Chicago's plans are and if they have any idea of their neighbor to the north. Evanston does not have the money for this project. If they had the money they could think of many ways to spend it that would meet the needs of many more residents who are underserved. He urged Council to end this. Alderman Newman recalled when Council originally decided to look at the marina, they had been told that federal funds would pay for 80-90%. That sounded attractive because if the federal government paid 90% of construction, the City would end up with potential revenues after the debt service was paid off. In the long run it would be a money generator for the City. Subsequently, they found that the federal government would not pay 90%. Now Alderman Moran has put October 25, 2004 out that the money is there, which is not true. Members of Congresswoman Schakowsky's staff indicated they could not come up with another $100,000. Ultimately, what would happen was that residents would pick up a huge debt for 309 boat owners. The marina would be a priority over such things as the Robert Crown Center, which would cost $8-20 million to cure its problems and is a higher priority than having real estate tax dollars fund a marina. When they put that together with strong community opposition, all five aldermen on the Human Services Committee concluded this was not the way to go. He said the 6th Ward is opposed to any form of development currently. They want to lower zoning requirements on Central Street. The idea of wanting to develop a marina from a part of the City that wants no development made no sense to him. He thought the same standards should be used throughout the City. For the 309 boat owners who would benefit, he saw no clear way to go forward with this project without having residents be responsible for this debt, putting this ahead of other projects with a higher priority and in 20-30 years the City would make some money. The political support of Congresswoman Schakowsky is not there. There is a lot of opposition to this in Rogers Park. It should have them re -think how they use staff time. They started and got some answers. Evanston has a boat launch at Church Street and some in the 1s` Ward would like the marina because they could get rid of the boat launch. He stated it was not in the best interests of the City to go forward with the project. The City cannot afford it and hang a sword over a neighborhood that does not deserve it. If somebody told them they would get $10-20 million from the federal government, they could re -think this. Voice vote. Motion carried. CITIZEN COMMENT: Cameron Davis, 220 S. State St., Chicago, said Council's vote was important to the Lake Michigan Federation and Citizens for Lakefront Preservation. These organizations are for water quality, habitat, good planning and a lakefront that is forever open, clear and free in Evanston, as it is supposed to be in Chicago. He knows there is interest in moving forward to look at what Evanston's lakefront will look like in the future. They asked the Mayor to support Illinois joining the federal Coastal Management Program. Illinois is only one of 35 eligible states that is not taking advantage of that program, which results in the loss of $2 million a year that could go to the parks and recreation divisions for lakefront planning. He provided letters from the mayors of Highland Park and Chicago supporting the program. Don Michelin, 1823 Hartrey Ave., Haven Middle School principal for 29 years, said McCormick Blvd. has always been difficult to cross. They have had some near misses and several citizens have spoken with him about students they almost hit. Last year a student was hit but recovered. At that time, Alderman Tisdahl and the police came to the school to discuss how they could improve safety for the children. It came down to funds. Whatever they proposed cost too much money. At Haven they became pro -active and worked with the students. At the end of the day students who live in the 5`h Ward go down Green Bay Rd. and over the bridge, which is the only way for many of them. The problem is most acute in the morning and when school lets out. People still complain about kids who run across the street and nearly get hit. He urged them not to wait until one of their children is killed or paralyzed before they do something. He hoped City Council would look at the safety issue for their children, because that is what the priority should be. Junad Rizki, 2784 Sheridan Rd., asked if the Traffic Engineering Division, District 65 and others really looked at the safety issue for children at Haven. He did not think the City had looked at the big picture. He asked how they would get funds to pay for the elm tree injections; where salary increases for aldermen and others will come from? He had not read the Compensation Committee report, but felt it missed something crucial. He views health insurance as compensation, not as a benefit. Therefore some aldermen do not get the same salary as others. He understood the City does not withhold tax from these medical benefits. He believed that aldermen should be paid a flat salary with no health insurance benefits. He asked who would pay somebody $10,000 in salary, then give $15,000 in health insurance benefits? Nobody. Council members are part time and the salary increase should be no more than 34% a year as Evanston employees get. Mimi Peterson, 748 Wesley Ave., said for the hours put in, elected officials are due all of their compensation. She noted that the T21 funding for the McCormick project is not available for the project. TREE members recommend reconsideration of issues that are driving the project. The urgency of purchasing the right of way from MWRD has been removed. Now there is time for staff to come back with a plan to do this project that is mindful of the desires of taxpaying residents who have clearly said removal of 41 trees is too many to lose. Accident analysis information (which is old) provided to her by staff proves the intersections don't meet the state criteria for high accident locations. A report from 1999-2001 shows each intersection to be far below the high accident location of 66 accidents. During a three-year period there were four accidents at McCormick/Grant, one at Dodge/McCormick, 28 at Bridge/McCormick and 41 at October 25, 2004 Green Bay/McCormick. She suggested they do a traffic study when the funding will apply in 2006. She said it was one thing to say the project is being done for the money and another thing to say they cannot get the money unless the road is a three lane cross section. There are capital needs — what is not okay is to say they moved certain trees into the saved column without doing any work, any re -engineering, without taking steps that trees in the saved column will be saved. In two weeks time no effort has been made by staff to come up with a new plan. TREE urged Council to wait and not move forward until they have a new, acceptable plan. The idea that the tree at Bridge/McCormick is so sick that it should be removed offended her. Virginia Mann, 3004 Normandy Pl., heard staff talk about 29 trees being removed and a month ago when they first heard about this project 50 some trees were to be removed. TREE is extremely concerned about the number of trees that will be lost. Staff has done nothing significant to change the number of trees that will be lost except to be reactive. Instead of removing the trees that will die, they now say they will let them live and see if they survive. If they die they won't be replaced because they are not part of the plan. TREE found this disturbing. Four of the trees that will removed are at the south end of McCormick and form a canopy that says "welcome to Evanston." They make it clear that one has left the barren stretch of McCormick in Chicago and Skokie. It distinctively shows the difference in the character of Evanston and why people pay more taxes and want to protect their community. She asked them to pause and ask themselves how this road can be rebuilt without tree loss. Is there a safer way to protect children instead of increasing traffic on Prairie, which will happen if that is made a thoroughfare from Central to McCormick. A pedestrian bridge might make more sense. What is the minimum width the road can be? She does not understand why they need to widen the road to make it one lane less. She recommended they start from "ground zero" and do this right. A tremendous concern at TREE is they were told these trees are not in good condition and they asked why these trees are not being attended to? Why can't they have a beautiful two-lane drive through McCormick as was originally intended? William Hanev, 1861 Sheridan Rd., said that he represented about 200 residents on the southeast side of NU campus at the International Studies College, Fine Arts Residential College, CRC for Communications and 1835 Hinman dormitory. The issue started several weeks ago when a student was crossing Sheridan/Hinman and was clipped by a car, flipped over and landed on her backpack on the windshield and then turned onto the pavement. The windshield was knocked out. Because she landed on her backpack she sustained no injury except torn ligaments in her leg. This is grave because these students have to cross this street everyday to get to a dining hall. The crosswalk where the student crossed was deteriorated so only white lines make it recognizable. There is one crosswalk sign that is clouded by the many signs at that bend. They bring this to the table to let Council know that students are at risk when they cross. They are not sure how to take care of this, but asked for a re -pavement plan. This area is scheduled to be repaved in 2005. They need a clear sign/light to show a crosswalk is there. Alma Woods, 1437 Noyes St., drives the Evanston section of McCormick twice a day; does not dispute that that the road needs replacement. Regarding safety of school children, it seemed reconfiguring the McCormick/Prairie/Grant intersection and adding a right turn lane at Green Bay Road/McCormick is enormously expensive and overkill in dollars and tree loss. The addition of a crossing guard at Grant/Prairie/McCormick, Bridge/McCormick and one judiciously placed sidewalk along McCormick, plus education of the school age children followed by sanctions for those who continue to jaywalk, would be considerably less costly and disruptive. Traffic signals at Green Bay Road/McCormick could be re -programmed to provide a safe traffic pattern including walk light timing with "no turn on red" during specific hours. This could eliminate the need to pave over yet more land, sacrifice trees and probably a portion of the Kingsley School gardens. She was unable to understand why the roadway would be widened, yet result in reduction of the driving lanes by 50%. She concluded that the City has an hidden agenda, which is, take the money, complete the project, then after a suitable time when the roadway is owned outright by the City, revert to the four -lane traffic configuration. The loss of so many trees cannot be easily re -configured. A great deal of time, effort and money has been expended on this project and she urged Council to delay all further expenditures, including land purchases and/or swaps, at a time when the City is struggling financially. This land is not in danger of being redeveloped. She asked the City to revisit the entire project and actively solicit and use citizen input when funding becomes available. Jan Atwell, 2750 Hurd St., represented The League of Women Voters of Evanston, read a statement to Council that proposed an open meeting with the final candidates for City Manager. Council was asked to consider suggestions for a public meeting with the final two candidates: (1) The meeting should be well publicized; (2) a list of selection process criteria and each candidate's resume should be distributed to participants; (3) Citizens should be provided with an October 25, 2004 opportunity to interact with the candidates, one at a time (not together), even if this lengthens the time of the meeting; (4) consider the use of a facilitator, perhaps someone from the search team and (5) allow the audience to complete an evaluation sheet for each candidate at the close of the meeting; collect and deliver these evaluations to the Mayor and Council as an advisory summary. Alderman Rainey explained the public meeting with city manager candidates would be November 14 in the afternoon. Paul Holdred2e, 2122 Forestview Rd., said safe pedestrian crossing was critical for roadway improvement on McCormick as with many streets that need correcting. He suggested the plan was inappropriate for what they envision for Evanston. He thought the Prairie Avenue intersection without such large changes to the landscape and the right turn onto Green Bay could be eliminated and reduce the project's scale and tree loss. He also was concerned that the changes would encourage diversion to the side streets as was seen in Wilmette after Green Bay Rd. was changed from four -lanes to two -lanes. He thought they could improve roadway and traffic safety while fighting a culture of bigger roads and less environmental concern. He suggested they continue to work for alternative solutions to the problem and reduce the scale of the plan changes with a vision to free resources for roadway improvement across the City, preserving valuable green space and Evanston's majestic tree heritage and not submit their society to pavement and cars. Since funding has been delayed and there is significant citizen disapproval of the project, he asked Council to decline appropriating funds for the right of way purchase and send it back for reconsideration, reduction and further review by the community. Jane Grover, 2703 Prairie Ave., said she is a nature lover and to lose one tree was one too many. She was grateful to Virginia Mann and Mimi Peterson for all their work and their group. She is a parent of two children who attend Kingsley School. She thought all could agree that the McCormick/Grant/Prairie intersection is unsafe. The problem of pedestrian safety there has a solution, except that the most feasible and reasonable reconfiguration will require sacrifice of some trees. She had this debate with her ten -year -old son, who opposed her view. She suggested they were at a point where they have met the obligation to protect as many trees as possible. Now it is time to consider students at Haven and Kingsley schools, the runners and walkers who use the Arboretum and residents of the 5 h and 7th wards. This cannot be an all or nothing proposition where the project is shelved for the sake of trees. This is not only a good policy debate but a teaching opportunity. She suggested to Ms. Peterson several weeks ago, that if the trees must be sacrificed for student safety, then help the students comprehend this loss. Include in their curriculum lessons about Evanston's elm trees, introduce them to those trees that must removed so they can cross the street safely. She hoped that lesson could be brought to Kingsley students. In the long term, they want pedestrian protection at these busy, fast intersections, but also want to encourage another generation of tree lovers. Sharon Eckersall, 846 Dodge Ave., Township Assessor, addressed the proposal for compensation for the township assessor; stated that currently the proposed increase is small and leaves a wider gap in compensation among 30 township assessors in Cook County. Currently, she is the lowest paid assessor and the gap is widening. The two elected township officials receive no health insurance benefits. She proposed that the two elected township officials have the option of having health care benefits as do aldermen/trustees. David Simmons, 1904 Lincoln St., drew attention to the highly questionable right turn aspects of the Green Bay/Prairie realignment of the McCormick project. He was disturbed that this would result in the loss of another 12 trees and by Mr. Jennings' creative use of photographs that evening. This was billed as a safety improvement but he has not seen compelling evidence that this will improve safety for school children and would potentially increase the risk for pedestrians. In April 1999, Mr. Jennings implemented a traffic flow plan on Prairie Avenue during school drop-off and pick-up times to reduce congestion and improved safety. He thought that plan was sound but impatient drivers are the biggest threat to safety of children. They routinely ignore "no right turn" signs, "do not enter" signs, "no thru traffic" signs in alleys, "stop" signs and crossing guard's instructions. This behavior increases with the onset of inclement weather. He failed to understand how changing Prairie/Grant would improve the situation. There will still be crossing guards who will be ignored and children should not jaywalk. Currently when traveling north on McCornuck/Green Bay, there is a sign "no turn on red when pedestrians are present." He suggested it be "no turn on red." Southbound on McCormick there is no sign whatsoever regarding a right turn. He suggested that one be added. He said the inclusion of a "right turn only" lane will encourage drivers to make that turn against instruction of crossing guards. He felt the biggest improvement that could be made to improve safety is enforcement. Have police rigorously enforce signs and issue tickets to violators. Eliminate the realignment of the road and save 12 more trees, protect pedestrians with October 25, 2004 substantive measures and save taxpayers' dollars for more worthwhile projects. Brian Utlev, 2152 Brown Ave., said his street intersects with McCormick and remained concerned about trees; commended Mr. Jennings for saving more trees. He was impressed that their input was heard and had some effect. He continued to be concerned that not all was being done to preserve the tree canopy. He was concerned that the number of replantings would be reduced because the number of trees being removed was reduced. He recommended they not reduce the number of replacement trees in anticipation of the sick trees that will die. He asked Council not to approve authorization to buy the right of way until that is included in the plan. Delores A. Holmes. 1715 McDaniel Ave., urged them to consider the safety of children going to Kingsley and Haven schools. Before retirement she interacted with many of those children who live in the 5t' Ward. Crossing there is dangerous. She drives it weekly. Kids have tunnel vision. She thought it wonderful to reconfigure the road. Like most Evanstonians she loves trees and grass, but loves children more. She asked Council to consider safety of the children. CONSENT AGENDA (Any item marked with an Asterisk*) Alderman Feldman moved Council approval of the Consent Agenda with these exceptions: authority to purchase right- of-way from MWRD for McCormick Blvd. reconstruction project; Ordinance 96-0-04 - Increase in Class C Liquor Licenses; Appeal of SPARC denial of facility antenna at 1235 Hartrey Ave.; Ordinance 108-0-04 - Modifications to the BOCA National Fire Prevention Code; Ordinance 102-0-04 - Increasing Compensation of the Aldermen; Ordinance 103- 0-04 — Increasing Compensation of the Mayor; Ordinance 104-0-04 - Increasing Compensation of City Clerk; Ordinance 105-0-04 - Increasing Compensation of the Township Supervisor; Ordinance 106-0-04 - Increasing Compensation of the Township Assessor. Seconded by Alderman Moran. Roll call. Voting aye — Newman, Jean - Baptiste, Wynne, Bernstein, Kent, Moran, Tisdahl, Rainey, Feldman. Voting nay — none. Motion carried (9-0). * ITEMS APPROVED ON CONSENT AGENDA MINUTES: * Approval of Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of October 11, 2004 and the Special City Council Meeting of October 2, 2004. * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL (9-0) ADMINISTRATION & PUBLIC WORKS: *Approval, as recommended, of the City of Evanston payroll for the period through October 21, 2004 and City of Evanston bills for the period ending October 26, 2004 authorized and charged to the proper accounts: City of Evanston payroll (through 10/21/04) $2,080,584.83 City of Evanston bills (through 10/26/04) $4,115,138.14 * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL (9-0) * Approval of the lowest responsible and responsive bid for a contract award for professional services at Lovelace Park to Wolff Clements & Associates, Ltd. in the amount of $73,756. (Funded in 2004-05 CIP.) * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL (9-0) * Approval of the lowest responsible and responsive bid for a contract award for Plat of Topography Services for the LADD Arboretum to Gewalt Hamilton Associates, Inc. in the amount of $11,600. (Funded in 2004-05 CIP.) APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL (9-0). * Approval of the lowest responsible and responsive bid for a contract award for the purchase of trees for fall planting to Suburban Tree Consortium (STC) and Beeson's McHenry County Nursery in the amount of $76,972.50. (Funded in CDBG, 2004-05 Parks/Forestry Budget, General Contingency and CIP.) * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL (9-0) October 25, 2004 * Approval of contract for Janitorial Services in the amount of $200,100 from Total Building Services, Inc. (Funded in the 2004-05 General Budget.) * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL (9-0) ■ ■ ■ * Resolution 67-R-04 - Authorizine the Citv Manager to sign the Joint Aereement for the Evanston On -Street Bike Network Phase I/Phase II - Consideration of Resolution 67-R-04, which authorizes the City Manager to sign a joint agreement for the Evanston On -Street Bike Network Phase I/Phase II engineering services agreement for Federal participation. * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL (9-0) PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: * Ordinance 107-0-04 - Special Use (Tvpe 2 Restaurant) at 1168 Dodge Ave. - Consideration of a recommendation from the ZBA in ZBA 04-38-SU (R) to grant a Special Use for a Type 2 Restaurant, Domino's Pizza, at 1168 Dodge. * MARKED INTRODUCED —CONSENT AGENDA and referred back to committee. * Ordinance 101-0-04 - Special Use (Tvpe 2 Restaurant) for 1611 Sherman Ave. - Consideration of a recommendation from the ZBA in ZBA 04-35-SU ( R) introduced October 11, 2004, to grant a Special Use for a Type 2 Restaurant, Cold Stone Creamery, at 1611 Sherman Ave. * ADOPTED - CONSENT AGENDA MOTION AND ROLL CALL (9-0) APPOINTMENTS: Mayor Morton asked the following reappointments be introduced: Tamara Lee Heller Taxicab Advisory Board 319 Dempster St. * INTRODUCED — CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Morton asked the following re -appointments be confirmed: Gloria Bernard 1206 Dewey Ave. For term ending October 30, 2007 Martin P. Norkett 2430 Ridgeway Ave. For term ending October 30, 2007 * APPROVED - CONSENT AGENDA Commission on Aging Economic Development Committee REPORT OF THE STANDING COMMITTEES ADMINISTRATION & PUBLIC WORKS: Alderman Jean -Baptiste moved approval of authority to purchase right-of-way from the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District (MWRD) for the McCormick Blvd. reconstruction project. Seconded by Alderman Feldman. Alderman Kent listened to speakers; wanted children to be safe. A number of speakers noted this project won't guarantee safety of children attending Haven and Kingsley schools. He saw no rush to do this; suggested there was more they could do to make it a win -win situation. 10 October 25, 2004 Alderman Newman said he had voted to hold this over and wanted people who learned about this project late to have the opportunity to interact with staff on the trees. He appreciated greatly advocacy for the trees; did not agree that staff had not made a good -faith effort to try to make this project for the community. There are competing interests and staff has worked on this for some years. He thought staff has done a highly professional job. He believed they tried to save some trees. People can question their integrity, motives or whether they are trying to create a backdoor plan. He believed staff works hard on behalf of the City; has known the public works director for a long time and has a lot of respect for him. He has done a good job on this project and has listened to as many people as he could. He wanted two weeks to go by and take another look. He realized they won't get funding until 2006. Staff has done an incredible amount of work here and is doing the best they can. He wishes no trees were coming down. He hoped they continued to work with the community to salvage as much as they can. This has been a great Evanston process. At every point of the process meetings were held. People were heard, though not everybody agreed on what should happen on McCormick. He drives regularly on McCormick and can attest that when it rains the road is a flood zone. This project corrects that. He urged them to move forward and hoped staff continued to meet with those interested in this project. He appreciated all who have made efforts. He was convinced by the presentation that evening that staff had done an outstanding job of bringing this job to fruition and getting the City $4 million. Alderwoman Tisdahl agreed with Alderman Newman and said this was as close to a win -win they could get. She thanked all who called or emailed her about the trees and thanked staff who did a terrific job of preserving trees and planning to plant trees as well as protecting the property tax by getting $4 million and having the federal/state government plant the trees. This project will improve the road, increase safety for children and preserve the property tax and supported the project for those reasons. Roll call. Voting aye — Newman, Jean -Baptiste, Wynne, Bernstein, Moran, Tisdahl, Rainey, Feldman. Voting nay — Kent. Motion carried (8-1). Ordinance 96-0-04 - Increase in Class C Liquor Licenses - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 96- 0-04, introduced September 27, 2004, which amends Section 3-5-6(C) increasing the number of Class C liquor licenses by one from 20 to 21, with the opening of New Orleans Grill, 1601 Simpson St. Alderman Jean -Baptiste moved approval. Seconded by Alderman Moran. Alderman Kent framed the issue. He described Charles Murray, who was present, as an experienced and professional restaurateur. His difficulty is that Mr. Murray's restaurant is sited among three churches, in the vicinity of a fourth and near the Fleetwood-Jourdain Community Center. He stated this section of the 5th Ward has fought to keep liquor out. He examined the transcript of the Liquor Commission meeting on September 16 and had questions. He thought it would be a successful business. He asked what a small service bar is? Mr. Murray, proprietor of New Orleans Grill, explained the service bar is the area where waitresses pick up drinks. People don't sit there. It is also used to get soft drinks and coffee. Mr. Murray explained the grill is not zoned for a bar. People must have a complete meal to be served an alcoholic beverage. On Sundays they will close around 4:00 p.m. so little or no alcohol will be served because they will serve a Sunday brunch. Though alcohol is not limited to beer/wine, he feels that is mostly what they will serve. Alderman Kent asked him if he objected to limiting alcohol to beer and wine? Mr. Murray did not want to limit to beer/wine because there are some New Orleans style drinks that go with their style of food and did not want to limit because of the holidays. They will have a drink menu, but mostly project the sale of beer/wine. Alderman Kent noted he would close at 9:00 p.m. weekdays and 10:30 p.m. weekends. Mr. Murray said that was his plan; the dining hour is really over at 9:00 p.m. He wants to limit his hours to 9-10:00 p.m. and anticipates a family -oriented crowd. There are many meetings at the church that end at 8- 9:00 p.m. and he spoke with Reverend Curry about having meals after meetings on weekdays. Alderman Kent asked what time he would begin serving liquor on Sunday and noted the church services begin at 11:00 a.m. Mr. Murray said he would be willing not to sell alcoholic beverages on Sundays, if it would make churches feel better. He has attended church services at all those churches since he has lived here his entire life. He looked to develop a positive relationship with the churches and did not want to do anything to make them feel uncomfortable. Alderman Kent suggested that they meet with the ministers, tell them what he is trying to do and how he fits into that section of the community. He recalled establishments that were closed down due to loitering and drunkenness. They 11 October 25, 2004 understand that much of that was due to bad management. Mr. Murray said his restaurant is modeled after the former Fannie's, which occupied the site he is moving into, and was the second establishment to get a liquor license in Evanston. There were no problems. He started working there when he was 13. He did not foresee a problem because troublemakers would not want to pay $3.50 or $4 for a bottle of beer. Riffraff could be eliminated by pricing. On loitering, it is how people are dealt with. He has been where they are and he would tell them that he is trying to run a business and would like their cooperation not to loiter. He would show respect to them and get respect in return. Fannie's was open to everybody in the community. The restaurant and cars nearby were never broken into. Mr. Murray will have a conversation with ministers; has worked on this project for almost three years. In that time he has been to community meetings and the churches. If he knew he needed to speak to every minister in the past two weeks he would have done it, but nobody told him that. He thought he followed the proper procedure. Alderman Kent agreed but said when somebody comes into the community, and wants to fit in and be accepted, there is always some neighborly work and conversation that is needed. That has not existed with a large part of development there. Alderman Kent said he needed to reach out to other community members who don't remember a successful establishment there. One concern Alderman Kent had was that Mr. Murray would no longer be the owner. Mayor pro tem Rainey noted the liquor license would expire if the business was sold and a new license would be issued. Alderman Kent asked that the liquor license be reviewed at the year's end. Mr. Murray pointed out that the last establishment there had no liquor license. Alderman Kent said the troublemakers could make it difficult for Murray and for those who come after him. Alderman Kent thought there needed to be more communication between Mr. Murray and the ministers. Alderman Kent has confidence in the establishment he will run. He would vote against the license, not against Mr. Murray and his establishment, but because he thinks there needs to be more work done to create a successful venture for Mr. Murray and the community. He was not downing the restaurant and wanted to see more communication. He was not telling Council to vote no and wanted to see Mr. Murray there. He asked Mr. Murray to be aware of some of the things they have been through there. Alderman Kent thought it good that he was situated in an MUE area. Mayor pro tem Rainey asked Alderman Kent if he was going to facilitate a meeting with the three ministers. Alderman Kent had already spoke to Mr. Murray about that. Mr. Murray said he was at Council two weeks ago when this was held. During that time he was told that if he contacted Alderman Kent, he could find out what his issues were. He called Alderman Kent every day and his voice mail was full. He called the city manager and tried to contact the Mayor. These are things he could have done already in the three years. Right now he is trying to get open for the holidays. It will take another three weeks to get the state license and he cannot talk to distributors until he has a state license. He hoped for consideration of the time and effort he has put in. Mayor pro tem Rainey said this will be a Type 1 restaurant with tablecloths and glassware. Alderman Feldman asked Alderman Kent if he anticipated any issues? He understood Mr. Murray had already talked with the clergy. If that is the case, did he (Kent) want to be present? Alderman Kent sounded as though he had a lot of trust in Mr. Murray and respected him. If that was true and he is already involved with the clergy what was the issue? Alderman Kent said he read that Mr. Murray had spoken to one minister of the four churches. That minister had concerns about liquor. He thought Mr. Murray would be successful and it seemed to him there was a lack of communication. Alderman Newman moved that this license be for beer/wine only. No second. Mayor pro tem Rainey said this was not the place to change a license because Mr. Murray had been through the hearings and procedures to obtain this license. It seemed to her reusing the famous Fannie's would be the place to begin. She noted there are liquor establishments in downtown Evanston that should not have a license. This man seems to be responsible compared to some of the bad acts at Grove/Sherman. She said they could defeat this and send it back to the Liquor Commission, but this was not the place to change this man's business plan. Alderman Jean -Baptiste asked if Alderman Kent would vote yes if Mr. Murray had spoken to all the ministers. He recalled Alderman Kent's concerns when Hecky Powell's City Hall was serving alcohol illegally and Archie Simmons had the 1623 Club going way back and it was BYOB. He did not want to hold Mr. Murray to a different standard. He said they have a hard time managing what happens downtown. They try to influence establishment owners to do the right thing and ask the Police Department to have a presence to maintain order. If they trust Mr. Murray, the Liquor 12 October 25, 2004 Commission looks at a person's background, so they have to ask, what is the problem here? Everybody needs to come under the same standard. If they are saying that section of town cannot have liquor, then that needs to be debated so that everybody is clear on the facts. He noted that Mr. Murray said he would not serve liquor on Sunday, but if it is a holiday, it seemed they should not hold him to such a different standard so that any slippage becomes a major problem. He would leave open the possibility of serving liquor on a holiday even if it falls on Sunday. He supported granting the license. First Assistant Corporation Counsel Herb Hill explained about putting a condition on a liquor license. This license is for a particular category with particular standards. There is no ability to limit the license category within that Class C standard. They cannot impose upon him that he cannot serve alcoholic beverages on Sunday, and if so, they have created a different class of license, which the City's liquor ordinance does not provide for currently. He is entitled to all the benefits of the class of liquor license he applied for. If he agrees to do something on a certain day, that is not enforceable. The Liquor Commissioner can take no action against him or the establishment for acting in violation of that statement. It has to be for the category and class as proposed and limits set forth within it. If Council wished to create a different class it has the ability to do it, but cannot do a piecemeal action that evening. Alderman Bernstein supported granting this license. By asking him not to sell liquor on Sunday they were removing one of his appendages. The restaurant business is difficult. They need to have a lot of business; profits are in the sale of alcohol so that is why it is important to have a liquor license. To the extent the problems exist of loitering or people are threatening within the establishment he won't have business and few people will go there. He thought it would be self policing. They have spoken often about the reticence of the Liquor Commissioner to take action on violations. A liquor license is a privilege not a right and to the extent that people violate that trust, it is incumbent on them, through the Liquor Commissioner, to take action. He thought Mr. Murray understood. He is a good cook and will have to be a good manager. He will have to manage the locale around his restaurant to get patrons from all over the City. To the extent he can ingratiate himself with all the ministers who are in his base, it in his interest to reach out to those churches. Alderman Newman wanted to know the standard. He noted the Noyes Street Cafe has a beer/wine license. He did not know the standards, because sometimes the license is beer/wine and sometimes all alcohol beverages. He thought that in residential areas they went for a beer/wine license. Mayor pro tem Rainey said the reason an establishment is awarded a beer/wine license is because that is what they applied for. Mr. Murray did not apply for a beer/wine license. If she had been the Liquor Commissioner, she would have tried to talk him into getting a beer/wine license first — a test run, then after six months or a year, have him come in and issue a license for hard liquor. Alderman Newman said that would be good but she was surmising what was taking place. He did not know that was happening because communication on this was poor. He suggested they put the word out that they can apply for a different license. Alderman Newman was glad Mr. Murray was going in at this location. Interim City Manager Judith Aiello explained that the process to obtain a liquor license starts in the Office of Management & Budget with Director Pat Casey. A prospective restaurant owner comes in and meets with Mr. Casey. They discuss the various licenses, cost and the establishment owner decides what license to apply for. It is the applicant's decision about the kind of license they will need to have a successful business. After that application is completed it goes to the Liquor Commission. Restaurants outside of downtown can obtain a full liquor license, such as Jacky's Bistro and Oceanique, which are full -service restaurants. Roll call. Voting aye — Newman, Jean -Baptiste, Wynne, Bernstein, Moran, Tisdahl, Rainey, Feldman. Voting nay — Kent. Motion carried (8-1). PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: Anneal of the Site Plan & Annearance Review Committee - 1235 Hartrev Ave. - Consideration of an appeal by Sprint PCS of a denial by the SPAARC for a telecommunication antenna facility at 1235 Hartrey Ave. Alderman Wynne reported that this item was held in committee. Ordinance 108-0-04 - Amendment to Section 4-5-2 of the Evanston Citv Code with Modifications 13 October 25, 2004 to Section F-502 and F-503 of the BOCA National Fire Prevention Code - Consideration of Ordinance 108-0-04, which amends Section 4-5-2 of the City Code regarding Life Safety/Sprinkler Retrofit. Alderman Wynne asked that Ordinance 108-0-04 be marked introduced and referred back to the committee. OTHER COMMITTEES: Ordinance 102-0-04 - Increasine Compensation of Aldermen - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 102-0-04, introduced October 11, 2004, which amends the salary levels of the Aldermen. Alderman Newman moved that Ordinance 102-0-04 be removed from the agenda. Seconded by Alderman Feldman. Alderman Newman appreciated the time the Compensation Committee put in and had raised objections to the composition of that committee. He felt that Council members work hard and are more than adequately compensated. There has been a tremendous increase in health insurance costs over the past few years, which has given Council members significant increases in benefits by not having to pay the increased cost of the health insurance premium every year. Since 2000 the cost of health insurance has gone up 78% for the PPO family plan. Next year the cost of health insurance for that family plan will be $1,500, which amounts to $18,000 annually and not subject to taxation. Then there is $10,000 in salary. The best idea was to leave salaries alone and have aldermen pay a higher percentage of the cost of the health insurance premium. He did not choose that route because many members work hard and there is no reason to reduce the amount of compensation. He did not believe giving a significant increase to aldermen was the way to go. The City has significant expenses in hiring a new city manager. He thought that no one could argue that aldermen, with the benefits they receive, are not adequately compensated and that this was the wrong time to increase salaries. He thought the Compensation Committee recommendation was off because they were substantially decreasing the compensation to Council members. He suggested this be removed from the agenda. People make choices as to whether they want to have this job. Those with health insurance get an increase annually. Alderman Feldman said in 2000, the cost of PPO family coverage was $720 monthly; in 2001 it jumped to $899. In 2002 it went up to $1,060; in 2003 it went to $1,113 and in 2004 to $1,285. The difference between $720 and $1,285 monthly was a dramatic difference in salary, which is untaxed. That was enough and in 2005 insurance premiums will go up another 20%. Nobody gets those kind of raises, outside of some CEOs. This is not a salary that will support a family and was never intended to, but the health benefits provide health care for a family so aldermen get a raise annually that is much above the cost of living. Alderman Moran expressed concern about people running for Council in the future. They have seen a lot of uncontested elections. People would do a good job, if they had proper incentive to run for office and serve if elected. People have a perception that this work takes much effort and time. He did not know whether a raise to $15,000 would be an incentive for people to run for Council, but hoped it would. He hoped they would find other ways to encourage people to participate in this process. Everybody on Council works hard which takes an immense effort. He did not think whether somebody got $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000 that it would be adequate compensation for the hours and effort put into the job. Compensation was not adequate to sustain a family. But if a higher salary would allow somebody a reason to participate, he thought it would be worthwhile. Mayor Morton made a proposal several weeks ago that called for aldermanic salaries to go from $10,000 to $15,000 and raise the contribution for health insurance coverage by significant percentages. He thought they were about two -three times the monthly contributions and a good compromise, which recognized large increases in cost and acknowledged that each person eligible could make a significant contribution from their salary than what they had previously contributed. Mayor pro tem Rainey stated when they talk about total compensation for aldermen, they speak about two products aldermen can avail themselves of. Humana HMO and a PPO. Those who are compensated for family coverage through the Humana plan receive $5,400 less than four aldermen who receive the PPO coverage and two aldermen who receive no coverage, so there is a difference in compensation currently. If they are going to withdraw all the proposals before them to save money, she suggested that if aldermen agree to go with the lesser package, this year alone they would save taxpayers $20,000. She thought that right since there is a discrepancy between the amounts of premium paid on behalf of aldermen. That flies in the face of everything they were talking about. Why should some aldermen get a package of 14 October 25, 2004 $5,400 more than others? If they withdraw this recommendation, people who have the lower cost coverage could switch to the higher cost coverage. Some aldermen cost the City more than others if they talk about not being fully compensated. Alderman Wynne said it was important to note the difference between the HMO and PPO family plans paid monthly by aldermen is less than $5. For $37.50 aldermen can be in the PPO plan and pay $31 monthly in the HMO plan. She agreed that it important that there be compensation, but they don't serve for the $10,000 or the health insurance. She thought there should be recognition for how hard aldermen work and $10,000 was appropriate. Although they are called part-time officials, none really serve part time, they are on duty all the time. For that reason she thought it appropriate aldermen have health insurance. She said there may be a time in the future when none of the aldermen will opt into the City's health insurance plan. She pointed out this is a benefit that may be invoked. It gives people the flexibility to take the coverage if they feel it is appropriate. She looked at the percentage aldermen pay of their $10,000 for health insurance coverage. An aldermen who takes the most expensive PPO family plan, pays 4.5% of $10,000. Among non -union employees whose salaries go to $46,000, pay $85 month for family coverage, 2.5% of the cost of the insurance premium. She thought they were in line with what employees pay. As they move up the pay scale, employees pay increasingly smaller percentages of their salaries for health insurance premiums. She thought the compensation package was appropriate for the job they do; that they should hold onto as many of their dollars as possible as they will have to pay a new city manager the market rate, which they did not do for the past eight years. She supported Alderman Newman's motion. Alderman Jean -Baptiste said when he ran for office he did not know how much aldermen were paid. When he argued over compensation two weeks ago, it was against diminishing the value that they and the Mayor bring to these offices. He was not arguing for increased compensation for himself. Those who feel they are getting too much now should throw it back. He saw this as Alderman Moran did and the value of what they do is measured to some extent by compensation. They need to give greater value to what they do, which is to provide leadership to the City and make sacrifices. There may be others who want this and others who may not have the alternatives that some have to supplement what they receive or cover their obligations. If they start from personal status they make a mistake in determining value. Their status may be that they don't need it. He thought it fair to adopt one of the proposals that was made for a small increase of $600 and maintain the status quo on the health insurance benefit and move forward. It was symbolic. As the cost of living goes up, there should be some consideration to the aldermen for the work they do. He was against the motion. Alderman Bernstein noted they were not voting for their salaries but for the Council that would be seated in 2005. Those who run and win would benefit. He favored the motion. What Alderman Jean -Baptiste brought up was important. Symbolism is what they should be talking about. Compensation means value for services. None of them is compensated adequately for what they put in. Nobody takes this job for compensation but as an extension of public service because they have a passion for the City. No amount of money would change that. He recalled the last Council raised their salaries by $3,500, which was justified because there had not been an increase for eight years. Since being on Council he has had a greater need for health insurance and glad for buying it. Last time no one mentioned the disparities among health insurance policies. During the six years he served as Township Assessor, he purchased health insurance under the City's health insurance plan. He was paid $3,000 as assessor, which was symbolic for service to the community. People don't do this for the money. He thought they were paid sufficiently. Alderman Newman called the question. Alderman Feldman did not oppose and no objections were raised. Roll call. Voting aye — Newman, Wynne, Bernstein, Kent, Feldman. Voting nay — Jean -Baptiste, Moran, Tisdahl, Rainey, Motion carried (5-4). Ordinance 103-0-04 - Increasing Compensation of the Mavor - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 103-0-04, which amends the salary level of the Mayor. Alderman Newman moved that Ordinance 103-0-04 be removed from the agenda. Seconded by Alderman Feldman. Alderman Feldman spoke about how they could get more people to run for office; thought it had nothing to do with salary. Those who look to this office would not run for it unless they could earn a living. The problem is that they cannot 15 October 25, 2004 earn a living and put in the time this office requires. He has attended the National Leagues of Cities and met thousands of mayors and aldermen who work for nothing and do it because they love it and want to help their community. The measure of the value of aldermanic office has nothing to do with money. Roll call. Voting aye — Newman, Wynne, Bernstein, Kent, Feldman. Voting nay — Jean -Baptiste, Moran, Tisdahl, Rainey, Motion carried (5-4). Ordinance 104-0-04 - Increasing Compensation of Citv Clerk - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 104-0-04, introduced October 11, 2004, which amends the salary level of the City Clerk. Alderman Newman moved to increase the City Clerk's salary from $45,000 to $49,000. Seconded by Alderman Feldman. Roll call. Voting aye — Newman, Jean -Baptiste, Wynne, Bernstein, Kent, Moran, Tisdahl, Rainey, Feldman. Voting nay — none. Motion carried (9-0). Ordinance 105-0-04 - Increasing Compensation of the Township Supervisor - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 105-0-04, introduced October 11, 2004, which amends the salary level of the Township Supervisor. Alderman Newman moved that Ordinance 105-0-04 be removed from the agenda. Seconded by Alderman Rainey. Roll call. Voting aye — Newman, Wynne, Bernstein, Rainey, Feldman. Voting nay — Jean -Baptiste, Kent, Moran, Tisdahl. Motion carried (5-4). Ordinance 106-0-04 - Increasine Compensation of the Township Assessor - Consideration of proposed Ordinance 106-0-04, introduced October 11, 2004, which amends the salary of the Township Assessor. Alderman Newman moved that Ordinance 106-0-04 be removed from the agenda. Seconded by Alderman Feldman. Roll call. Voting aye — Newman, Wynne, Bernstein, Kent, Moran, Rainey, Feldman. Voting nay — Jean -Baptiste, Tisdahl. Motion carried (7-2). CALL OF THE WARDS: Vt Ward. Alderman Newman noted a meeting of the Plan Commission November 3 at 7:00 p.m. to consider a new zoning district in the area west of Sherman, south of Noyes and north of Emerson to control the expansion of multi- family housing that is targeted for the student population. He reported a long-time leader in the 1st Ward was distressed because Steve Sims bought the house next to hers. Steve Sims is buying up properties in the university area. He currently owns 809 Foster, 1116 Foster, 909 Hamlin, 2013 Maple, and 2014 Noyes. The long-time leader/neighbor realized that her property would be devalued. The reason is because Mr. Sims runs nuisance houses. No longer will a family live next to her but a potential "animal" house because that is the kind of establishment he runs. He buys up properties, moves families out and moves students in. He takes advantage of the rental market in Evanston. Mr. Sims knows he has a problem and has been cited twice by police for having a nuisance house at 1116 Foster and at 909 Hamlin. The 909 Hamlin is property across the street from the woman who had football players try to knock down her door last year. Mr. Sims keeps on buying property and has the right to do that. Thursday Mr. Sims and his attorney, Steve Engelman, will meet with the police chief to figure out why he was cited. He has hired an attorney to help him figure out how to beat the City ordinances. The person in his neighborhood who now has the horror of knowing Sims owns property next to her will be relying on the City to try and maintain the quality of her neighborhood. He said they will stand up for homeowners who have lived here a long time who have the right to dignity as anyone else. He could not imagine anybody wanting this man to own property on the street they live on. It means endless noise, garbage and beer bottles on the front lawn and seriously diminished family life. This man has to be stopped. He said they needed to find a way for Mr. Sims (non-resident) and his partner Solomon to be stopped so they 16 October 25, 2004 cannot destroy blocks. It does not matter who he hires, they will fight Sims. He has a responsibility to run decent houses, not "animal" houses. Now this neighbor will move. Last year somebody had a citywide party for NU students on this block on a weeknight. He did not think it was civil to help somebody devalue somebody else's property. He would rather have a three story building next to him than an "animal" house next door. He invited all to go by 809 Foster and look for a front lawn. There is none. He referred this situation to the P&D Committee. He said they will fight to maintain decent housing for families just as people want on Euclid, Isabella, Sherman and other streets. They will not let a guy charge students $700-800 a month and not rent to families. The police chief will stand up for Evanston residents and they need to be with him. 2°d Ward. Alderman Jean -Baptiste urged 2nd Ward residents to vote on November 2. Find registered voters and bring them to the polls. 3'd Ward. Alderman Wynne urged all to have a happy Halloween. Turn on lights and welcome kids. She noted that Illinois has not joined the federal coastal zone management plan. It takes a number of steps through the governor to do it. Potentially this will bring $2 million to Illinois a year. She made a reference to the Cit_v Manager's Office to prepare a letter to the governor and a resolution to support that effort. Alderman Wynne announced that the Rules Committee meeting on November 1 was cancelled. 4th Ward. Alderman Bernstein announced that those in the 4 b Ward, 5t" Precinct who voted at Park School now vote at Washington School. He called this the most important election of his lifetime and urged people to exercise their franchise to vote. He congratulated No Burn Evanston and thanked Evanston Hospital for closing down its incinerator. Through the help of Governor Blagovich, potential roadblocks were removed and they were able to close. He thanked Richard Halstead for his paintings and urged people to come to the Civic Center to see them. He congratulated Will Sunblad, Reverend Bob Thompson, Connections for the Homeless and the Lake Street Church. He noted they do wonderful work and thanked them for their contributions. Alderman Bernstein made a reference to the Human Services Committee to re -invite NU to have a dialogue about the prospect of having NU create an approved housing list for its student bodv. Doing that would take the pressure off the City's limited enforcement capacity. It would preclude "animal houses" from happening. 5thWard. No report. 6th Ward. Alderman Moran announced two Plan Commission meetings relating to redevelopment on Central Street. The next evening the commission would meet and have on its agenda "build to lot line" as a requirement in certain zoning districts, which has led to some unfavorable outcomes. The Plan Commission is considering eliminating that. On November 3 at 7:00 p.m. the Plan Commission will address potential changes to B2 districts that run along Central St. He thanked Evanston Hospital for making a significant effort to close its incinerator by October 15. He thanked David Jennings, Sat Nagar and Paul D'Agostino for their significant work on the McCormick project to further reduce the number of trees lost; thanked them for being steadfast in balancing the various interests of the City in doing a public works project like this one. It was not easy to do when there is a vocal and well intentioned group of people who are focused on an issue that is important to everybody. He thanked Larry Suffredin, Cook County Commissioner, who has written a letter to state officials in support of the City Council's vote against establishing The Georgian as a landmark. He invited other representatives to join Mr. Suffredin in that support. He made a reference to the P&D Committee to consider getting rid of all billboards. 7th Ward. Alderman Tisdahl announced the November 1 Human Services Committee meeting was cancelled. 17 October 25, 2004 81h Ward. Alderman Rainey thanked Alderman Tisdahl who brought the issue of the incinerator to Council and made them deal with it. They owe her a debt of gratitude. Alderman Rainey expressed condolences to St. Francis Hospital employees who were traumatized by the discovery of an infant in the laundry facilities. She thanked Chief Berkowsky and all firefighters who have done such yeoman work on recent fires on Oakton and Brummel streets. These fires were caused by adolescents playing with matches. She urged parents to get rid of matches. Alderman Rainey announced the Preservation Commission would meet November 11 to continue discussion of the Oakton National Historic District, an exciting project. 91h Ward. No report. There being no further business to come before Council, Mayor pro tem Rainey adjourned the meeting at 1:00 a.m. Mary P. Morris, City Clerk A videotape recording of this meetine has been made Dart of the Dermanent record and is available in the Citv Clerk's office.